As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2009
Registration File No. 333-133153
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM S-1
POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 5
TO
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
ING USA ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
IOWA
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
6355
(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)
41-0991508
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
ING
1475 Dunwoody Drive
West Chester, PA 19380-1478
(610) 425-3400
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)
John S. (Scott) Kreighbaum, Esq.
ING
1475 Dunwoody Drive
West Chester, PA 19380-1478
(610) 425-3404
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:
As soon as practical after the effective date of the Registration Statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box | x |
| |
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering | o |
| |
If this Form is post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering | o |
| |
If this Form is post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering | o |
PART I
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company
Deferred Modified Guaranteed Annuity Prospectus
ING SmartDesign Multi-Rate Index Annuity
May 1, 2009
This prospectus describes ING SmartDesign Multi-Rate Index Annuity, a group and individual deferred modified guaranteed annuity contract (the “Contract”) offered by ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (“ING USA” the “Company,” “we,” or “our”). The Contract is available in connection with certain retirement plans that qualify for special federal income tax treatment (“qualified Contracts”), as well as those that do not qualify for such treatment (“non-qualified Contracts”). We currently do not offer this Contract for sale to new purchasers.
The Contract provides a means for you to allocate your single premium payment to one or more Accounts available under the Contract. Available Accounts include the:
· Interest Account, which provides contract value based on the daily crediting of interest at a rate that yields an annual specified Guaranteed Interest Rate;
· Term Indexed Account, which provides contract value based on the crediting at the end of the Term of an interest rate that reflects certain changes in a market index (“Index”) specified in the Contract (currently, The Standard and Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Price Index (the “S&P 500®”)) during the Term; and
· Annual Indexed Account, which provides contract value based on the annual crediting of an interest rate that reflects certain changes in an Index (currently, the S&P 500®) during that contract year.
We generally offer several Terms for each Account. You may allocate your premium payment to more than one Account, but you must select the same Term across all Accounts. Your contract value will vary to reflect interest credited under the Interest Account (on a daily basis) and the Annual Indexed Account (on an annual basis). Your contract value will not vary to reflect interest under the Term Indexed Account prior to the end of the Term. The interest earned on your money, as well as your principal, is guaranteed as long as you hold them until the expiration of the applicable Term. Contract values surrendered, withdrawn, or applied to an annuity option prior to that time are subject to a Market Value Adjustment, the operation of which may result in upward or downward adjustments in values, and may be subject to a surrender charge. You bear the risk that you may receive less than your principal if we take a Market Value Adjustment. You have the right to return a Contract within 10 days after you receive it for a refund of the adjusted contract value (which may be more or less than the premium payment you paid) or, if required by your state, the original amount of your premium payment. Longer free look periods apply in some states and in certain situations. Your free look rights depend on the laws of the state in which you purchase the Contract.
This prospectus provides information that you should know before investing and should be kept for future reference.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has not approved or disapproved these securities or passed upon the adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. An investment in this contract is not a bank deposit and is not insured or guaranteed by any bank or by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency.
We pay compensation to broker/dealers whose registered representatives sell the Contract. See “Other Contract Provisions — Selling the Contract,” for further information about the amount of compensation we pay.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Page |
INDEX OF SPECIAL TERMS | 1 |
SUMMARY: CHARGES | 2 |
SUMMARY: THE CONTRACT’S ACCOUNTS AND RISK FACTORS | 2 |
ING USA ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY | 4 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 5 |
THE ANNUITY CONTRACT | 5 |
THE INTEREST ACCOUNT | 7 |
THE TERM INDEXED ACCOUNT | 8 |
THE ANNUAL INDEXED ACCOUNT | 10 |
MARKET VALUE ADJUSTMENT | 12 |
CONTRACT PROVISIONS | 13 |
WITHDRAWALS | 15 |
DEATH BENEFIT | 17 |
CHARGES | 19 |
THE ANNUITY OPTIONS | 20 |
OTHER CONTRACT PROVISIONS | 23 |
OTHER INFORMATION | 26 |
FEDERAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS | 27 |
APPENDIX A — Term Indexed Account Examples | A1 |
APPENDIX B — Annual Indexed Account Examples | B1 |
APPENDIX C — Market Value Adjustment Examples | C1 |
APPENDIX D — Surrender Charge for Excess Withdrawals Examples | D1 |
INDEX OF SPECIAL TERMS
The following special terms are used throughout this prospectus. Refer to the page(s) listed for an explanation of each term:
Special Term | | Page |
Annual Indexed Account | | 10 |
Annuitant | | 13 |
Annuity Start Date | | 13 |
Cash Surrender Value | | 14 |
Contract Date | | 13 |
Contract Owner | | 13 |
Contract Value | | 14 |
Contract Year | | 13 |
Free Withdrawal Amount | | 20 |
Guaranteed Interest Rates | | 7 |
Index | | Cover |
Index Growth | | 9 |
Index Return | | 10 |
Interest Account | | 7 |
Market Value Adjustment | | 12 |
Minimum Guaranteed Account Value | | 9 |
Monthiversary | | 9 |
Participation Rates | | 8 |
Renewal Terms | | 8 |
Selecting a Term | | 7 |
Surrender Charge | | 19 |
Term Indexed Account | | 8 |
The following terms as used in this prospectus have the same or substituted meanings as the corresponding terms currently used in the Contract:
Term Used in This Prospectus | | Corresponding Term Used in the Contract |
Annuity Start Date | | Annuity Commencement Date |
Contract Owner | | Owner or Certificate Owner |
Contract Value | | Accumulation Value |
Free Look Period | | Right to Examine Period |
Withdrawals | | Partial Withdrawals |
1
SUMMARY: CHARGES
Contract Owner Transaction Expenses*
Surrender Charge:
Complete Years Elapsed | | 0 | | 1 | | 2 | | 3 | | 4 | | 5 | | 6 | | 7 | | 8+ |
Since Start of Term | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Surrender Charge | | 8% | | 7% | | 6% | | 5% | | 4% | | 3% | | 2% | | 1% | | 0% |
* A Market Value Adjustment may apply to certain transactions. This may increase or decrease your contract value and/or your surrender amount. In addition, if you withdraw money from your Contract, die, or begin receiving annuity payments, we may deduct a premium tax charge of 0% to 3.5% to pay to your state.
SUMMARY: THE CONTRACT’S ACCOUNTS AND RISK FACTORS
The Contract provides a means for you to allocate premium payments and contract value to one or more Accounts available under the Contract. The available Accounts include the:
· Interest Account, which provides contract value based on the daily crediting of interest at a rate that yields an annual specified Guaranteed Interest Rate — for more information, see “The Interest Account” beginning on page 7;
· Term Indexed Account, which provides contract value based on the crediting at the end of the Term of an interest rate that reflects certain changes in an Index specified in the Contract (currently, the S&P 500®(1)) during the Term — for more information, see “The Term Indexed Account” beginning on page 8; and
· Annual Indexed Account, which provides contract value based on the annual crediting of an interest rate that reflects certain changes in an Index (currently, the S&P 500®) during that contract year — for more information, see “The Annual Indexed Account” beginning on page 10.
Not all Accounts may be available in all States. Which account is right for you depends on your investment time horizon, need for liquidity and risk tolerance. The Contract and its accounts are not designed to be a short-term investment.
(1) The Contract is not sponsored, endorsed, sold, or promoted by Standard & Poor’s, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (S&P). S&P makes no representation or warrant, express or implied, to the owners of the Contract or any member of the public regarding the advisability of investing in securities generally or in the Contract particularly or the ability of the S&P 500 Index to track general stock market performance. S&P’s only relationship to the Licensee is the licensing of certain trademarks and trade names of the S&P and of the S&P 500 Index which is determined, composed, and calculated by S&P without regard to the Licensee or the Contract. S&P has no obligation to take the needs of the Licensee or the owners of the Contract into consideration in determining, composing, or calculating the S&P 500 Index. S&P is not responsible for and has not participated in the determination of the prices and amount of the Contract or the timing of the issuance or sale of the Contract or in the determination or calculation of the equation by which the Contract is to be converted into cash. S&P has no obligation or liability in connection with the administration, marketing, or trading of the Contract.
S&P does not guarantee the accuracy and/or the completeness of the S&P Index or any data included therein and S&P shall have no liability for any errors, omissions, or interruptions therein. S&P makes no warranty, express or implied, as to results to be obtained by licensee, owners of the Contract, or any other person or entity from the use of the S&P 500 Index or any data included therein. S&P makes no express or implied warranties, and expressly disclaims all warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use with respect to the S&P 500 Index or any data included therein. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall S&P have any liability for any special, punitive, indirect, or consequential damages (including lost profits), even if notified of the possibility of such damages.
2
Liquidity Risk — An Interest Account allocation maintained for the duration of the applicable Term is guaranteed in full by the Company. Indexed Account allocations maintained for the duration of the applicable Term are guaranteed not be to be less than the Minimum Guaranteed Account Value, which equals 90% of first contract year premium payments (contract value upon renewal), credited with an interest rate we declare (currently, 0%). However, withdrawals and surrenders from an Account before the end of its Term are subject to a Market Value Adjustment, which may be positive or negative, and may be subject to a surrender charge. Because the Contract provides only limited liquidity during a Term through the free withdrawal provision, it is not suitable for short-term investment.
Investment Risk for the Interest Account — The investment risk and return characteristics for the Interest Account are similar to those of a zero coupon bond or certificate of deposit; an Interest Account, if maintained until the end of its Term, provides a fixed rate of return over a stated period. Principal and credited interest are guaranteed by the Company and are available without surrender charge or Market Value Adjustment during the 30-day period prior to the end of each Term. If Interest Account Value is withdrawn prematurely, or before the 30-day period, then the effect of the surrender charge and Market Value Adjustment may result in a loss of principal.
Investment Risk for the Indexed Accounts — The investment risk and return characteristics for an Indexed Account are expected to fall in between those typical of fixed annuities and those typical of equity mutual funds or variable annuities. A fixed annuity guarantees principal, and provides for no participation in equity or other markets. A variable annuity does not guarantee principal, and provides for 100% participation in equity or other markets. Long-term returns under the Indexed Accounts may be higher than those offered by a typical fixed annuity, but growth will be more volatile than under a fixed annuity as the Index fluctuates. The principal guarantee under the Contract may make an Indexed Account more suitable than direct equity investment for risk-averse Owners. However, expected long-term returns of Indexed Accounts will be lower than those for equity mutual funds or variable annuities. Furthermore, amounts withdrawn from an Indexed Account will not share in any Index Returns for the current period (i.e., the Term for the Term Indexed Account and the current contract year for the Annual Indexed Account).
Loss of Principal Risk — Withdrawals of Account Value outside of the 30-day period prior to the end of a Term that are in excess of the Contract’s free withdrawal amount may be subject to a surrender charge and Market Value Adjustment. A Market Value Adjustment may be positive, negative or result in no change. Because amounts withdrawn from the Term Indexed Account prior to the end of the Term and from the Annual Indexed Account prior to the end of a contract year do not participate in any Index Returns for that period, you should generally take withdrawals from the Interest Account. You bear the risk of loss that you may receive less than your principal after a surrender charge deduction and if we apply a Market Value Adjustment.
Investments
Amounts applied to the Accounts will be allocated to a nonunitized separate account established under Iowa law. A nonunitized separate account is a separate account in which the contract holder does not participate in the performance of the assets through unit values or any other interest. Contract holders do not receive a unit value of ownership of assets accounted for in this separate account. Interests under the Contract are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, but the Accounts are not registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The risk of investment gain or loss with the assets maintained in the nonunitized separate account is borne entirely by the Company. All Company obligations due to allocations to the nonunitized separate account are contractual guarantees of the Company and are accounted for in the separate account. All of the general assets of the Company are available to meet its contractual guarantees. Income, gains and losses of the separate account are credited to or charged against the separate account without regard to other income, gains or losses of the Company.
As part of its overall investment strategy, the Company intends to maintain assets in the separate account that reflect its obligations to Contract Owners that have made allocations to the Interest Account and Indexed Accounts. Accordingly, it is anticipated that assets relating to the Interest Account will likely consist of fixed income investments, and that assets relating to the Indexed Accounts will likely consist of fixed income investments, as well as call options or other hedging instruments that relate to movements in the Index.
3
We are not obligated to invest the assets attributable to the Contract according to any particular strategy, except as required by Iowa and other state insurance laws. Contract Owners do not participate in the investment performance of the assets of the separate account, and the Guaranteed Interest Rates, Index Returns, and any other benefits provided by the Company are not determined by the performance of the nonunitized separate account.
ING USA ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (“ING USA”) is an Iowa stock life insurance company, which was originally incorporated in Minnesota on January 2, 1973. ING USA is a wholly owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc. (“Lion Connecticut”), which in turn is a wholly owned subsidiary of ING Groep N.V. (“ING”), a global financial services holding company based in The Netherlands. ING USA is authorized to sell insurance and annuities in all states, except New York, and the District of Columbia. Although we are a subsidiary of ING, ING is not responsible for the obligations under the Contract. The obligations under the Contract are solely the responsibility of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company.
Lion Connecticut is the holding company for ING USA, Directed Services LLC, the distributor of the Contracts, and other interests.
Our principal office is located at 1475 Dunwoody Drive, West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380.
Regulatory Matters
As with many financial services companies, the Company and its affiliates have received informal and formal requests for information from various state and federal governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations in connection with inquiries and investigations of the products and practices of the financial services industry. In each case, the Company and its affiliates have been and are providing full cooperation.
Insurance and Retirement Plan Products and Other Regulatory Matters. Federal and state regulators, and self-regulatory agencies are conducting broad inquiries and investigations involving the insurance and retirement industries. These initiatives currently focus on, among other things, compensation, revenue sharing, and other sales incentives; potential conflicts of interest; sales and marketing practices (including sales to seniors); specific product types (including group annuities and indexed annuities); and disclosure. The Company and certain of its U.S. affiliates have received formal and informal requests in connection with such investigations, and have cooperated and are cooperating fully with each request for information. Some of these matters could result in regulatory action involving the Company. These initiatives also may result in new legislation and regulation that could significantly affect the financial services industry, including businesses in which the Company is engaged. In light of these and other developments, U.S. affiliates of ING, including the Company, periodically review whether modifications to their business practices are appropriate.
Investment Product Regulatory Issues. Since 2002, there has been increased governmental and regulatory activity relating to mutual funds and variable insurance products. This activity has primarily focused on inappropriate trading of fund shares; directed brokerage; compensation; sales practices, suitability, and supervision; arrangements with service providers; pricing; compliance and controls; adequacy of disclosure; and document retention.
In addition to responding to governmental and regulatory requests on fund trading issues, ING management, on its own initiative, conducted, through special counsel and a national accounting firm, an extensive internal review of mutual fund trading in ING insurance, retirement, and mutual fund products. The goal of this review was to identify any instances of inappropriate trading in those products by third parties or by ING investment professionals and other ING personnel.
4
The internal review identified several isolated arrangements allowing third parties to engage in frequent trading of mutual funds within the variable insurance and mutual fund products of ING, and identified other circumstances where frequent trading occurred despite measures taken by ING intended to combat market timing. Each of the arrangements has been terminated and disclosed to regulators, to the independent trustees of ING Funds (U.S.) and in Company reports previously filed with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Action has been or may be taken by regulators with respect to the Company or certain affiliates before investigations relating to fund trading are completed. The potential outcome of such action is difficult to predict but could subject the Company or certain affiliates to adverse consequences, including, but not limited to, settlement payments, penalties, and other financial liability. It is not currently anticipated, however, that the actual outcome of any such action will have a material adverse effect on ING or ING’s U.S.-based operations, including the Company.
ING has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the ING Funds from all damages resulting from wrongful conduct by ING or its employees or from ING’s internal investigation, any investigations conducted by any governmental or self-regulatory agencies, litigation or other formal proceedings, including any proceedings by the SEC. Management reported to the ING Funds Board that ING management believes that the total amount of any indemnification obligations will not be material to ING or ING’s U.S.-based operations, including the Company.
Product Regulation. Our products are subject to a complex and extensive array of state and federal tax, securities and insurance laws, and regulations, which are administered and enforced by a number of governmental and self-regulatory authorities. Specifically, U.S. federal income tax law imposes requirements relating to nonqualified annuity product design, administration, and investments that are conditions for beneficial tax treatment of such products under the Internal Revenue Code. (See “Federal Tax Considerations” for further discussion of some of these requirements.) Failure to administer certain nonqualified contract features (for example, contractual annuity start dates in nonqualified annuities) could affect such beneficial tax treatment. In addition, state and federal securities and insurance laws impose requirements relating to insurance and annuity product design, offering and distribution, and administration. Failure to meet any of these complex tax, securities, or insurance requirements could subject the Company to administrative penalties, unanticipated remediation, or other claims and costs.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The audited financial statements of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company are included in this prospectus.
THE ANNUITY CONTRACT
Purchase and Availability of the Contract
The Contract is designed for people seeking long-term tax-deferred accumulation of assets, generally for retirement or other long-term purposes. The tax-deferred feature is more attractive to people in high federal and state tax brackets. You should not buy this Contract: (i) if you are looking for a short-term investment; (ii) if you cannot risk getting back less money than you put in; or (iii) if your assets are in a plan which provides for tax-deferral and you see no other reason to purchase this Contract. When considering an investment in the Contract, you should consult with your investment professional about your financial goals, investment time horizon and risk tolerance.
Replacing an existing insurance contract with this Contract may not be beneficial to you. Before purchasing the Contract, determine whether your existing contract will be subject to any fees or penalties upon surrender. Also, compare the fees, charges, coverage provisions and limitations, if any, of your existing contract with those of the Contract described in this prospectus.
5
We will issue a Contract only if both the annuitant and the contract owner are not older than age 80. The single premium payment must be $5,000 or more ($1,500 for qualified Contracts). Under certain circumstances, we may waive the minimum premium payment requirement. We may also change the minimum initial premium requirement for certain group or sponsored arrangements. Any premium payment that would cause the contract value to exceed $1,000,000 requires our prior approval.
IRAs and other qualified plans already have the tax-deferral feature found in this Contract. For an additional cost, the Contract provides other benefits including death benefits and the ability to receive a lifetime income. You should not purchase a qualified Contract unless you want these other features and benefits, taking into account their costs. See “Charges” in this prospectus.
Premium Payments
Although this is a single premium contract, in certain situations involving transfers and exchanges identified on the application, we may permit additional premium payments to be made in the first contract year. We will issue a new Contract, however, for any subsequent premium payments received more than 60 days after the contract date that are greater than the required minimum single premium payment.
Premium payments received in the first contract year will be treated the same as the initial payment for purposes of the ending date of the Term and duration of the surrender charge. The Market Value Adjustment, however, would vary based on the date the premium payment was received. For the Indexed Accounts, the starting Index values are based on the date the premium payment was received; ending Index value would be the same for all premium payments. The Minimum Guaranteed Account Value is based on the date the premium payment was received.
Crediting of Premium Payment
We will process your premium payment within 2 business days after receipt, if the application and all information necessary for processing the Contract are complete. In certain states we also accept premium payments by wire order. Wire transmittals must be accompanied by sufficient electronically transmitted data. We may retain your premium payment for up to 5 business days while attempting to complete an incomplete application. If the application cannot be completed within this period, we will inform you of the reasons for the delay. We will also return the premium payment immediately unless you direct us to hold the premium payment until the application is completed.
If your premium payment was transmitted by wire order from your broker-dealer, we will follow one of the following two procedures after we receive and accept the wire order and investment instructions. The procedure we follow depends on state availability and the procedures of your broker-dealer.
(1) If either your state or broker-dealer does not permit us to issue a Contract without an application, we reserve the right to rescind the Contract if we do not receive and accept a properly completed application or enrollment form within 5 days of the premium payment. If we do not receive the application or form within 5 days of the premium payment, we will refund the contract value plus any charges we deducted, and the Contract will be voided. Some states require that we return the premium paid, in which case we will comply.
(2) If your state and broker-dealer allow us to issue a Contract without an application, we will issue and mail the Contract to you or your representative, together with an Application Acknowledgement Statement for your execution. Until our Customer Service Center receives the executed Application Acknowledgement Statement, neither you nor the broker-dealer may execute any financial transactions on your Contract unless they are requested in writing by you. We may require additional information before complying with your request (e.g., signature guarantee).
We may also refuse to accept certain forms of premium payments or loan repayments, if applicable, (traveler’s checks, for example) or restrict the amount of certain forms of premium payments or loan repayments. In addition, we may require information as to why a particular form of payment was used (third party checks, for example) and the source of the funds of such payment in order to determine whether or not we will accept it. Use of an unacceptable form of payment may result in us returning your premium payment and not issuing the contract.
6
Allocation of Premium Payments
At issue, you determine the percentage of the single premium payment to be allocated to each Account. The amount allocated to each Account becomes the beginning Account Value for each Account.
Selecting a Term
For the Interest Account and the Term Indexed Account, a Term is the period of time that a rate of interest (whether fixed or indexed) is guaranteed to be credited to your contract value. Currently, Terms of five, seven and ten years are available. Each Term ends on its maturity date, which is the last day of the last contract year in the Term. Please note that for the Annual Indexed Account, the Term that you select determines the Participation Rate and Cap, each of which will reset each year at renewal rates, subject to a minimum guarantee.
You may select the duration of your initial Term from among the durations offered by us. We may at any time decrease or increase the number of Terms offered. You must select the same Term for all Accounts to which you allocate premium payments.
Unless you elect to surrender your Contract, a subsequent Term will automatically begin at the end of a Term. We may not offer the same Terms for renewal as for initial periods. If offered at the time of your renewal, each subsequent Term will be of the same duration as the previous Term unless you elect in writing, on any day within the 30-day period prior to the end of the current Term, a Term of a different duration from among those offered by us at that time. Within 45 days prior to the end of a Term, we will send you a notice of the Terms that are available, along with certain information about your Account Values. Because Term Indexed Account Value does not participate in Index Returns if withdrawn or annuitized prior to the end of a Term, you may only select the Interest Account or the Annual Indexed Account if you are less than 5 years from your annuity start date on a renewal date.
Transfers Among the Accounts
During a 30-day period prior to the end of each Term, you have the option of withdrawing some or all of the contract value without surrender charge or Market Value Adjustment. You may also elect to transfer contract value among the Accounts. We determine the beginning Account Value for the renewal Terms by adding and subtracting specified transfers from the ending Account Value from the prior Term. If you do not make any transfers of Account Value, the beginning Account Value for the renewal Term will equal the ending Account Value from the prior Term.
THE INTEREST ACCOUNT
General
In the Interest Account, your premium payment (less withdrawals) will earn interest at the initial Guaranteed Interest Rate, which is an annual effective rate of interest guaranteed for the duration of the Term.
Your Interest Account Value is the sum of your premium payment or contract value allocated to the Interest Account and the interest credited as adjusted for any withdrawals (including any Market Value Adjustment or surrender charge applied to such withdrawal). Your Interest Account Value will be credited with the Guaranteed Interest Rate in effect for the Term you selected when we receive and accept your premium. We will credit interest daily at a rate that yields the quoted Guaranteed Interest Rate. We may credit bonus interest in the first contract year.
Guaranteed Interest Rates
The Guaranteed Interest Rate to be credited to your contract value is guaranteed as long as you do not take your money out until the 30-day period prior to the end of the applicable Term. We do not have a specific formula for establishing the Guaranteed Interest Rates for the different Terms. We determine Guaranteed Interest Rates at our sole discretion. To find out the current Guaranteed Interest Rate for a Term you are interested in, please contact our Customer Service Center or your registered representative. The determination may be influenced by the interest rates on fixed income investments in which we may invest the amounts we receive under the Contracts. You will have no direct or indirect interest in these investments. We will also consider other factors in determining the Guaranteed Interest Rates, including regulatory and tax requirements, sales commissions and administrative
7
expenses borne by us, amount or allocation of premium payments, general economic trends and competitive factors. We cannot predict the level of future interest rates. The Interest Account does not have a minimum Guaranteed Interest Rate.
We may from time to time at our discretion offer interest rate specials for new premiums that are higher than the current base interest rate. Renewal rates for such rate specials will be based on the base interest rate and not on the special rates initially declared.
Renewal Terms
The Renewal Interest Rate for a Term will be the same as the initial Guaranteed Interest Rate for the same Term then available for a new Contract. The Interest Account Value at the beginning of any renewal Term will be equal to the Interest Account Value at the end of the Term just ending. This value, less withdrawals made after the beginning of the subsequent Term, will earn interest compounded annually at the Renewal Interest Rate. If offered at the time of your renewal, each subsequent Term will be of the same duration as the previous Term unless you elect in writing, on any day within the 30-day period prior to the end of the current Term, a Term of a different duration from among those offered by us at that time.
Withdrawals
During the accumulation phase, you may withdraw a portion of your contract value. If you do not specify otherwise, withdrawals will be taken first from the Interest Account, then from the Annual Indexed Account, and finally from the Term Indexed Account. Unless made during the 30-day period prior to the end of the Term, a withdrawal may be subject to a Market Value Adjustment and, in some cases, a surrender charge (see “Charges”). Be aware that withdrawals may have federal income tax consequences, including a 10% penalty tax.
Interest Account Cash Surrender Value
At any time, the Interest Account Cash Surrender Value equals the Interest Account Value, plus/minus the Market Value Adjustment, less any applicable surrender charges.
THE TERM INDEXED ACCOUNT
General
In the Term Indexed Account, your premium payment (less withdrawals) will earn interest credited as a percentage of the growth, if any, in the S&P 500® Index (the “Index Return”). The S&P 500® Index can, of course, increase or decrease daily; however, the Term Indexed Account Value will remain constant during a Term. Index Return (if any) is determined and credited to the Term Indexed Account Value at the end of the Term. The Index Return equals the Index Growth of the S&P 500® over the Term multiplied by a Participation Rate. If you surrender, withdraw, or annuitize your investment before the end of the Term, the amounts withdrawn or paid will not participate in any Index Returns. Death benefit proceeds, however, will participate in Index Returns up to the most recent contract anniversary. (See “Death Benefit” for additional information.) We guarantee a Minimum Guaranteed Account Value at maturity of the Term Indexed Account.
Term Indexed Account Values are not determined by, and do not reflect, the investment performance of the separate account, and do not correspond directly to increases or decreases in the Index.
Participation Rates
Participation Rates vary depending on the duration of the Term. Participation Rates for the initial Term depend upon rates in effect as of the date the premium was received. The Participation Rate is guaranteed for the duration of the Term. At the end of the Term, you may renew for another Term. There is no minimum Participation Rate; however, we guarantee a Minimum Guaranteed Account Value at maturity of the Term Indexed Account. See “Minimum Guaranteed Account Value” below. The Term Indexed Account is also not subject to a stated maximum return (or cap), unlike the Annual Indexed Account. Participation Rates for renewal Terms may be different, but Participation Rates for renewal Terms will be the same as the Participation Rates in effect for the same Terms then available on new Contracts as of the renewal date.
8
Index Return
At the end of the Term, we determine the Index Return, which is the amount we will credit on your Account Value. The Index Return equals one plus the Index Growth at the end of the Term multiplied by the applicable Participation Rate. Prior to the end of each Term, the Term Indexed Account Value equals the beginning Term Indexed Account Value less gross withdrawals. At the end of each Term, the Term Indexed Account Value equals the greater of: (a) beginning Term Indexed Account Value less gross withdrawals multiplied by the Index Return, or (b) the Guaranteed Minimum Account Value. In the initial Term, Index Returns are calculated individually for each premium payment received.
As an example, assume that the Index Growth over a 5-year Term is 75% and the Participation Rate is 80%. The amount credited at the end of the Term would be 75% times 80%, or 60% of the beginning Term Indexed Account Value less gross withdrawals (withdrawals plus applicable surrender charges and MVA’s).
Index Growth
Index Growth is calculated over the duration of the Term as:
Greater of: | 0 or | ( | EOP-BOP BOP | ) | | |
Where:
BOP = S&P 500® Index value at the beginning of the Term (based on Index value as of date premium is received for initial Terms, or the renewal date for renewal Terms);
EOP = S&P 500® Index value at the end of the Term, calculated as an average of 12 monthly S&P 500® Index values on each monthiversary in the final contract year of the Term.
One-month anniversary (“monthiversary”) dates fall on the same date each month as the contract date. If there is no corresponding date in the month, the monthiversary date will be the last date of such month. If the monthiversary date falls on a weekend or holiday, we will use the Index value as of the subsequent business day. In the initial Term, each premium payment will have its own BOP Index value corresponding to the date the premium payment was received, and a common EOP value. In renewal Terms, the BOP and EOP Index values will be the same for all contract value allocated.
For examples that illustrate how the Term Indexed Account works, see Appendix A.
Minimum Guaranteed Account Value
We guarantee that the Term Indexed Account Value at the end of a Term will not be less than the Minimum Guaranteed Account Value. For the first Term, the Minimum Guaranteed Account Value equals 90% of the first contract year premium payments with interest at a rate we declare (currently, 0%), less net withdrawals. In renewal Terms, the Minimum Guaranteed Account Value equals 90% of Account Value at the end of the prior Term with interest at a rate we declare (currently, 0%), net of transfers, less net withdrawals.
Renewal Terms
The Term Indexed Account Value at the beginning of any renewal Term will be equal to the Term Indexed Account Value at the end of the Term just ending net of transfers. This value, less withdrawals made after the beginning of the subsequent Term, will earn the Index Return determined at the end of the renewal Term. If you are fewer than 5 years from your annuity start date at renewal, you may not select the Term Indexed Account.
Withdrawals
During the accumulation phase, you may withdraw a portion of your contract value. If you do not specify otherwise, withdrawals will be taken first from the Interest Account, then from the Annual Indexed Account, and finally from the Term Indexed Account. Unless made during the 30-day period prior to the end of the Term, a withdrawal may be subject to a Market Value Adjustment and, in some cases, a surrender charge (see “Charges”). In addition, amounts withdrawn from the Term Indexed Account prior to the end of the Term do not participate in
9
any Index Returns. Be aware that withdrawals may have federal income tax consequences, including a 10% penalty tax.
Term Indexed Account Cash Surrender Value
At any time, the Term Indexed Account Cash Surrender Value equals the greater of:
(a) Term Indexed Account Value, plus/minus the Market Value Adjustment, less surrender charges; and
(b) Minimum Guaranteed Account Value, plus/minus the Market Value Adjustment.
THE ANNUAL INDEXED ACCOUNT
General
In the Annual Indexed Account, your premium payment (less withdrawals) will earn annual interest credited as a percentage of the growth, if any, in the S&P 500® Index (the “Index Return”). The S&P 500® Index can, of course, increase or decrease daily; however, the Annual Indexed Account Value will remain constant during a contract year. Index Return (if any) is determined and credited to the Annual Indexed Account Value at the end of each contract year throughout the Term. Annual Index Returns equal the Index Growth of the S&P 500® at the end of the contract year multiplied by a Participation Rate, subject to a stated maximum return (the “Cap”). If you surrender, withdraw, or annuitize your investment or die before the end of the contract year, the amounts withdrawn or paid will not participate in any Index Returns for the contract year in which the withdrawal or death occurs. We guarantee a Minimum Guaranteed Account Value for the Annual Indexed Account at the end of the Term.
Annual Indexed Account Values are not determined by, and do not reflect, the investment performance of the separate account, and do not correspond directly to increases or decreases in the Index.
Participation Rates and Caps
Participation Rates and Caps vary depending on the duration of the Term. Participation Rates and Caps for the initial Term depend upon rates in effect as of the date the premium was received. Participation Rates and Caps also vary throughout the Term, reset each year at rates that may be different from rates for initial Terms on new Contracts. However, we guarantee that the Participation Rate will never be less than 50%, and the Cap will never be less than 8%. Participation Rates and Caps for renewal Terms are the same as the Participation Rates and Caps in effect for the same Terms then available on new Contracts as of the renewal date.
Index Return
At the end of each contract year, we determine the Index Return, which is the amount we will credit on your Account Value. The Index Return equals one plus the lesser of the Index Growth at the end of the contract year multiplied by the applicable Participation Rate or the stated Cap. Prior to the end of each contract year, the Annual Indexed Account Value equals the Annual Indexed Account Value at the beginning of the contract year less gross withdrawals. At the end of each contract year, the Annual Indexed Account Value equals the Annual Indexed Account Value at the beginning of the contract year, less gross withdrawals, multiplied by the Index Return. At the end of the Term, if the Guaranteed Minimum Account Value is greater than the Annual Indexed Account Value, then your Annual Indexed Account Value will be reset to equal the Guaranteed Minimum Account Value. In the first contract year, Index Returns are calculated individually for each premium payment received.
As an example, assume that the current Participation Rate for the Term is 75%, the current year’s Index Return is 15%, and the applicable Cap is 10%. The amount credited at the end of the year would be 10% of the Annual Indexed Account Value at the beginning of the year, which is the lesser of the Index Return multiplied by the Participation Rate (15% * 75% = 11.25%) and the Cap of 10%.
10
Index Growth
Index Growth is calculated on an annual basis as:
Greater of: | 0 or | ( | EOP-BOP BOP | ) | | |
Where:
BOP = S&P 500® Index value at the beginning of the Term (based on Index value as of the date a premium payment is received in the first contract year for the initial Term, and the contract anniversary for all other contract years and renewal Terms);
EOP = S&P 500® Index value at the end of each contract year, calculated as an average of 12 monthly S&P 500® Index values on each monthiversary in the contract year.
One-month anniversary dates (“monthiversary”) fall on the same date each month as the contract date. If there is no corresponding date in the month, the monthiversary date will be the last date of such month. If the monthiversary date falls on a weekend or holiday, we will use the Index value as of the subsequent business day. In the first contract year of the initial Term, each premium will have its own BOP Index value corresponding to the date the premium payment was received, and a common EOP value. In subsequent years and renewal Terms, the BOP and EOP Index values will be the same for all contract value allocated.
For examples that illustrate how the Annual Indexed Account works, see Appendix B.
Minimum Guaranteed Account Value
We guarantee that the Annual Indexed Account Value at the end of a Term will not be less than the Minimum Guaranteed Account Value. For the first Term, the Minimum Guaranteed Account Value equals 90% of the first contract year premium payments with interest at a rate we declare (currently, 0%), less net withdrawals. In renewal Terms, the Minimum Guaranteed Account Value equals 90% of Account Value at the end of the prior Term with interest at a rate we declare (currently, 0%), net of transfers, less net withdrawals.
Renewal Terms
The Annual Indexed Account Value at the beginning of any renewal Term will be equal to the Annual Indexed Account Value at the end of the Term just ending net of transfers. This value, less withdrawals made after the beginning of the subsequent Term, will earn the Index Return determined at the end of the first contract year of the renewal term.
Withdrawals
During the accumulation phase, you may withdraw a portion of your contract value. If you do not specify otherwise, withdrawals will be taken first from the Interest Account, then from the Annual Indexed Account, and finally from the Term Indexed Account. Unless made during the 30-day period prior to the end of the Term, a withdrawal may be subject to a Market Value Adjustment and, in some cases, a surrender charge (see “Charges”). In addition, amounts withdrawn from the Annual Indexed Account prior to the end of a contract year do not participate in any Index Returns for that contract year. Be aware that withdrawals may have federal income tax consequences, including a 10% penalty tax.
Annual Indexed Account Cash Surrender Value
At any time, the Annual Indexed Account Cash Surrender Value equals the greater of the:
(a) Annual Indexed Account Value, plus/minus the Market Value Adjustment, less surrender charges; and
(b) Minimum Guaranteed Account Value, plus/minus the Market Value Adjustment.
11
MARKET VALUE ADJUSTMENT
A Market Value Adjustment may decrease, increase, or have no effect on your contract value. We will apply a Market Value Adjustment to amounts in excess of the free withdrawal amount:
· whenever you withdraw money (unless made within the 30-day period prior to the end of the applicable Term), and
· on the annuity start date if a Guaranteed Period does not end on or within 30 days of the annuity start date.
We do not apply a Market Value Adjustment on death benefit proceeds. The Market Value Adjustment resets at the start of each Term. The Market Value Adjustment will be applied before the deduction of any applicable surrender charges or premium tax charges.
We determine the Market Value Adjustment by multiplying the amount you withdraw or apply to an income plan by the following factor:
where:
“I” is the MVA Rate (as defined below), determined at the time the premium payment is received for the initial Term, and the beginning of the Term for renewal Terms;
“J” is the MVA Rate, determined at the time of surrender or withdrawal for a security with time to maturity equal to the number of years (fractional years rounded up to the next full year) remaining in the Term from the date of surrender or withdrawal; and
“N” is the number of days from the date of surrender or withdrawal to the end of the current Term.
* For Contracts issued in Florida, the factor is [(1+I)/(1+J+.0025)]N/365-1.
The MVA Rate is the average of the Ask Yields for U.S. Treasury Strips as quoted by a national quoting service for a period equal to an applicable Term. The average currently is based on the period starting from the 22nd day of the calendar month two months prior to the month of the MVA Rate determination and ending the 21st day of the calendar month immediately before the month of determination. We currently calculate the MVA Rate once each calendar month but have the right to calculate it more frequently. The MVA Rate will always be based on a period of at least 28 days. If the Ask Yields are no longer available, we will determine the MVA Rate by using a suitable and approved, if required, replacement method.
A Market Value Adjustment may be positive, negative, or result in no change. You bear the risk that you may receive less than your principal if we apply a Market Value Adjustment. In general, if interest rates are rising, you bear the risk that any Market Value Adjustment will likely be negative and reduce your contract value. On the other hand, if interest rates are falling, it is more likely that you will receive a positive Market Value Adjustment that increases your contract value. In the event of a full surrender or annuitization, we will add or subtract any Market Value Adjustment from the amount surrendered or annuitized. In the event of a partial withdrawal or annuitization, we will add or subtract any Market Value Adjustment from the remaining contract value in order to provide the amount requested. If a negative Market Value Adjustment exceeds your contract value, we will consider your request to be a full surrender or annuitization.
For examples that illustrate how the Market Value Adjustment works, see Appendix C.
12
CONTRACT PROVISIONS
Contract Date and Contract Year
The date the Contract became effective is the contract date. Each 12-month period following the contract date is a contract year.
Annuity Start Date
The annuity start date is the date you start receiving annuity payments under your Contract. The Contract, like all deferred annuity contracts, has two phases: the accumulation phase and the income phase. The accumulation phase is the period between the contract date and the annuity start date. The income phase begins when you start receiving regular annuity payments from your Contract on the annuity start date.
Contract Owner
You are the contract owner. You are also the annuitant unless another annuitant is named in the application. You have the rights and options described in the Contract. One or more persons may own the Contract.
The death benefit becomes payable when you die. In the case of a sole contract owner who dies before the income phase begins, we will pay the beneficiary the death benefit then due. The sole contract owner’s estate will be the beneficiary if no beneficiary has been designated or the beneficiary has predeceased the contract owner. In the case of a joint owner of the Contract dying before the income phase begins, we will designate the surviving contract owner as the beneficiary. This will override any previous beneficiary designation.
Joint Owners
For non-qualified Contracts only, joint owners may be named in a written request before the Contract is in effect. Joint owners may independently exercise transfers and other transactions allowed under the Contract. All other rights of ownership must be exercised by both owners. Joint owners own equal shares of any benefits accruing or payments made to them. All rights of a joint owner end at death of that owner if the other joint owner survives. The entire interest of the deceased joint owner in the Contract will pass to the surviving joint owner.
Annuitant
The annuitant is the person designated by you to be the measuring life in determining annuity payments. The annuitant’s age determines when the income phase must begin and the amount of the annuity payments to be paid. You are the annuitant unless you choose to name another person. The annuitant may not be changed after the Contract is in effect.
The contract owner will receive the annuity benefits of the Contract if the annuitant is living on the annuity start date. If the annuitant dies before the annuity start date, and a contingent annuitant has been named, the contingent annuitant becomes the annuitant (unless the contract owner is not an individual, in which case the death benefit becomes payable).
If there is no contingent annuitant when the annuitant dies before the annuity start date, the contract owner will become the annuitant. In the event of joint owners, the youngest will be the contingent annuitant. The contract owner may designate a new annuitant within 60 days of the death of the annuitant.
If there is no contingent annuitant when the annuitant dies before the annuity start date and the contract owner is not an individual, we will pay the designated beneficiary the death benefit then due. If a beneficiary has not been designated, or if there is no designated beneficiary living, the contract owner will be the beneficiary. If the annuitant was the sole contract owner and there is no beneficiary designation, the annuitant’s estate will be the beneficiary.
Regardless of whether a death benefit is payable, if the annuitant dies and any contract owner is not an individual, distribution rules under federal tax law will apply. You should consult your tax advisor for more information if the contract owner is not an individual.
13
Beneficiary
The beneficiary is named by you in a written request. The beneficiary is the person who receives any death benefit proceeds. The beneficiary may become the successor contract owner if the contract owner who is a spouse dies before the annuity start date. We pay death benefits to the primary beneficiary (unless there are joint owners, in which case death proceeds are payable to the surviving owner(s)).
If the beneficiary dies before the annuitant or the contract owner, the death benefit proceeds are paid to the contingent beneficiary, if any. If there is no surviving beneficiary, we pay the death benefit proceeds to the contract owner’s estate.
One or more persons may be a beneficiary or contingent beneficiary. In the case of more than one beneficiary, we will assume any death benefit proceeds are to be paid in equal shares to the surviving beneficiaries unless you indicate otherwise in writing.
Change of Contract Owner or Beneficiary
During the annuitant’s lifetime, you may transfer ownership of a non-qualified Contract. You may also change the beneficiary. All requests for changes must be in writing and submitted to our Customer Service Center in good order. Please date your requests. The change will be effective as of the day we receive the request. The change will not affect any payment made or action taken by us before recording the change.
A change of owners may have tax consequences.
You have the right to change beneficiaries during the annuitant’s lifetime unless you have designated an irrevocable beneficiary. You may also restrict a beneficiary’s right to elect an annuity option or receive a lump sum payment. If so, such rights or options will not be available to the beneficiary. In the event of a death claim, we will honor the form of payment of the death benefit specified by the beneficiary to the extent permitted under Section 72(s) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Tax Code”). When an irrevocable beneficiary has been designated, you and the irrevocable beneficiary may have to act together to exercise some of the rights and options under the Contract. In the event of joint owners, all must agree to change a beneficiary.
Administrative Procedures
We may accept a request for Contract service in writing, by telephone, or other approved electronic means, subject to our administrative procedures, which vary depending on the type of service requested and may include proper completion of certain forms, providing appropriate identifying information, and/or other administrative requirements. Please be advised that the risk of a fraudulent transaction is increased with telephonic or electronic instructions (for example, a facsimile withdrawal request form), even if appropriate identifying information is provided.
Contract Value
We determine your contract value on a daily basis beginning on the contract date. Your contract value is the sum of the Account Values. If you surrender your Contract during the 30-day period prior to the end of the Term, you will receive the contract value.
Cash Surrender Value
The cash surrender value is the amount you receive when you surrender the Contract, other than during the 30-day period prior to the end of a Term. The cash surrender value will fluctuate daily based on the interest credited to the contract value and any Market Value Adjustment. The cash surrender value equals the sum of the Interest Account Cash Surrender Value, the Term Indexed Account Cash Surrender Value, and the Annual Indexed Account Cash Surrender Value. We do not guarantee any minimum cash surrender value. Any charge for premium taxes will be deducted from cash surrender value.
Surrendering to Receive the Cash Surrender Value
You may surrender the Contract at any time while the annuitant is living and before the annuity start date. A surrender will be effective on the date your written request and the Contract are received at our Customer Service Center. We will determine and pay the cash surrender value after receipt of all paperwork required in order for us to process your surrender. Once paid, all benefits under the Contract will be terminated. You may receive the cash
14
surrender value in a single sum payment or apply it under one or more annuity options. We will usually pay the cash surrender value within 7 days.
Consult your tax advisor regarding the tax consequences associated with surrendering your Contract. A surrender made before you reach age 59½ may result in a 10% tax penalty. See “Federal Tax Considerations” for more details.
Other Important Provisions
See “Withdrawals,” “Death Benefit,” “Charges,” “The Annuity Options” and “Other Contract Provisions” in this prospectus for information on other important provisions in your Contract.
WITHDRAWALS
Any time during the accumulation phase and before the death of the owner, you may withdraw all or part of your money. Keep in mind that the minimum withdrawal is $100, and your contract value after the withdrawal must equal or exceed $1,000 or we will treat the withdrawal request as a request to surrender the Contract. We deduct a surrender charge and impose a Market Value Adjustment if you surrender your Contract or withdraw an amount exceeding the free withdrawal amount. No surrender charge or Market Value Adjustment applies to withdrawals taken within the 30-day period prior to the end of a Term.
You may specify from which Account you want a withdrawal to be deducted. Because amounts withdrawn from the Term Indexed Account prior to the end of the Term and from the Annual Indexed Account prior to the end of a contract year do not participate in any Index Returns for that period, you should generally take withdrawals from the Interest Account. Accordingly, unless you instruct us otherwise, we will take withdrawals first from the Interest Account, then from the Annual Indexed Account, and finally from the Term Indexed Account, to the extent possible.
In the first contract year, the free withdrawal amount is limited to systematic interest withdrawals from the Interest Account. After the first contract year, the free withdrawal amount equals 10% of your contract value as of the close of business on the day we receive the withdrawal request at our Customer Service Center. For example, if the Account Value for each Account was $10,000 and the total contract value was $30,000 as if the close of business on the day we receive the withdrawal request at our Customer Service Center, then the free withdrawal amount for the contract year would be $3,000 (10% of $30,000), all of which would be deducted from the Interest Account unless otherwise instructed. If required minimum distributions on qualified Contracts are greater than the free withdrawal amount, we will waive any applicable surrender charges, but will apply a Market Value Adjustment.
If more than the free withdrawal amount is withdrawn, a surrender charge and Market Value Adjustment, if applicable, will be applied to the amount in excess of the free withdrawal amount. The surrender charge varies by the length of the Term selected, beginning with 8% during contract year 1 and reducing by 1% per contract year to the end of the Term. No surrender charge is imposed upon a surrender made during the 30-day period prior to the end of a Term. The surrender charge period resets at the beginning of each Term. It is charged against the contract value and is based on the amount of the withdrawal.
We will apply a Market Value Adjustment to any withdrawal in excess of the free withdrawal amount taken prior to the 30-day period prior to the end of a Term. We will determine the contract value as of the close of business on the day we receive your withdrawal request at our Customer Service Center. The contract value may be more or less than the premium payment made. Definitive guidance on the proper federal tax treatment of the Market Value Adjustment has not been issued. You may want to discuss the potential tax consequences of a Market Value Adjustment with your tax adviser.
Upon surrender, surrender charges and a Market Value Adjustment will be applied retroactively with respect to any free withdrawal amount previously withdrawn within the same contract year as the surrender.
15
We offer the following withdrawal options:
Regular Withdrawals
After the free look period, you may make regular withdrawals. Each withdrawal must be a minimum of $100. We will apply a surrender charge and Market Value Adjustment to any regular withdrawal in excess of the free withdrawal amount that is taken prior to the 30-day period prior to the end of a Term. Unless otherwise instructed, we will take all withdrawals from the Interest Account until exhausted.
Systematic Withdrawals
You may choose to receive automatic systematic withdrawal payments. Systematic withdrawals are limited to interest earnings in the Interest Account during the prior month, quarter, or year, depending on the frequency you chose. Systematic withdrawals are not subject to a Market Value Adjustment, unless you have added the Fixed Dollar Systematic Withdrawal Feature discussed below and the payments exceed the free withdrawal amount. Systematic withdrawals under the Fixed Dollar Systematic Withdrawal Feature are available only in connection with Section 72(q) or 72(t) of the Tax Code.
Systematic withdrawals may be taken monthly, quarterly, or annually. You decide when you would like systematic payments to start as long as they start at least 28 days after your contract date. You also select the date on which the systematic withdrawals will be made, but this date cannot be later than the 28th day of the month. If you have elected to receive systematic withdrawals but have not chosen a date, we will make the withdrawals on the same calendar day of each month as your contract date. If your contract date is after the 28th day of the month, your systematic withdrawal will be made on the first day of each month.
Each systematic withdrawal amount must be a minimum of $100. The amount of your systematic withdrawal can either be (1) a fixed dollar amount, or (2) an amount based on a percentage of the interest earned and not previously withdrawn or contract value, but in either case is limited to : (a) during the first contract year, interest earnings in the Interest Account; (b) after the first contract year, up to 10% of your contract value as of the close of business on the day the withdrawal is processed at our Customer Service Center. If your systematic withdrawal is a fixed dollar amount and the amount to be withdrawn would exceed the applicable free withdrawal amount on any withdrawal date, we will automatically reduce the amount withdrawn so that it equals such free withdrawal amount. Thus, your fixed dollar systematic withdrawals will never exceed the free withdrawal amount. If you want fixed dollar systematic withdrawals to exceed the free withdrawal amount and are willing to incur associated surrender charges, consider the Fixed Dollar Systematic Withdrawal Feature which you may add to your regular systematic withdrawal program.
You may change the amount or percentage of your systematic withdrawal once each contract year or cancel this option at any time by sending satisfactory notice to our Customer Service Center at least 7 days before the next scheduled withdrawal date. The systematic withdrawal option may commence in a contract year where a regular withdrawal has been taken but you may not change the amount or percentage of your withdrawals in any contract year during which you have previously taken a regular withdrawal. You may not elect the systematic withdrawal option if you are taking IRA withdrawals.
Fixed Dollar Systematic Withdrawal Feature
You may add the Fixed Dollar Systematic Withdrawal Feature to your regular fixed dollar systematic withdrawal program. This feature allows you to receive a systematic withdrawal in a fixed dollar amount regardless of any surrender charges or Market Value Adjustments. Systematic withdrawals under the Fixed Dollar Systematic Withdrawal Feature are available only in connection with Section 72(q) or 72(t) of the Tax Code. You choose the amount of the fixed dollar systematic withdrawals. We will take fixed dollar systematic withdrawals first from the Interest Account, unless otherwise instructed.
We will assess a surrender charge and Market Value Adjustment on the withdrawal date if the withdrawal exceeds the free withdrawal amount on the withdrawal date. We will apply the surrender charge and any Market Value Adjustment directly to your contract value (rather than to the systematic withdrawal) so that the amount of each systematic withdrawal remains fixed.
16
Fixed dollar systematic withdrawals which are intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 72(q) or 72(t) of the Tax Code may exceed the free withdrawal amount. Such withdrawals are subject to surrender charges and Market Value Adjustment when they exceed the applicable free withdrawal amount.
IRA Withdrawals
If you have a non-Roth IRA Contract and will be at least age 70½ during the current calendar year, you may elect to have distributions made to you to satisfy requirements imposed by Federal tax law. IRA withdrawals provide payout of amounts required to be distributed by the Internal Revenue Service rules governing mandatory distributions under qualified plans. We will send you a notice before your distributions commence. You may elect to take IRA withdrawals at that time, or at a later date. You may not elect IRA withdrawals and participate in systematic withdrawals at the same time. If you do not elect to take IRA withdrawals, and distributions are required by Federal tax law, distributions adequate to satisfy the requirements imposed by Federal tax law may be made. Thus, if you are participating in systematic withdrawals, distributions under that option must be adequate to satisfy the mandatory distribution rules imposed by federal tax law.
You may choose to receive IRA withdrawals on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis. Under this option, you may elect payments to start as early as 28 days after the contract date. You select the day of the month when the withdrawals will be made, but it cannot be later than the 28th day of the month. If no date is selected, we will make the withdrawals on the same calendar day of the month as the contract date.
You may request that we calculate for you the amount that is required to be withdrawn from your Contract each year based on the information you give us and various choices you make. For information regarding the calculation and choices you have to make, see the Statement of Additional Information. Or, we will accept your written instructions regarding the calculated amount required to be withdrawn from your Contract each year. We will make these withdrawals first from the Interest Account, then from the Annual Indexed Account, and finally from the Term Indexed Account unless otherwise instructed. The minimum dollar amount you can withdraw is $100. When we determine the required IRA withdrawal amount for a taxable year based on the frequency you select, if that amount is less than $100, we will pay $100. At any time where the IRA withdrawal amount is greater than the contract value, we will cancel the Contract and send you the amount of the cash surrender value.
You may change the payment frequency of your IRA withdrawals once each contract year or cancel this option at any time by sending us satisfactory notice to our Customer Service Center at least 7 days before the next scheduled withdrawal date.
An IRA withdrawal in excess of the amount allowed under systematic withdrawals will be subject to a Market Value Adjustment.
Consult your tax adviser regarding the tax consequences associated with taking withdrawals. You are responsible for determining that withdrawals comply with applicable law. A withdrawal made before the taxpayer reaches age 59½ may result in a 10% penalty tax. See “Federal Tax Considerations” for more details.
DEATH BENEFIT
Death Benefit during the Accumulation Phase
During the accumulation phase, a death benefit is payable when either the contract owner or the first of joint owners dies (or the annuitant dies when a contract owner is not an individual). Assuming you are the contract owner, your beneficiary will receive a death benefit unless the beneficiary is your surviving spouse and elects to continue the Contract. The death benefit value is calculated at the close of the business day on which we receive written notice and due proof of death, as well as any required paperwork, at our Customer Service Center (“claim date”). The death benefit is equal to the sum of the following:
· Interest Account Value on the date of death, plus
· Annual Indexed Account Value on the date of death, plus
17
· Greater of (a) Minimum Guaranteed Account Value for the Term Indexed Account and (b) Term Indexed Account Value at the beginning of the Term, less withdrawals, multiplied by the Index Return calculated using S&P Index value as of the prior contract anniversary as the end of period value (without any averaging).
Proceeds could be reduced by a charge for premium taxes owed. Neither Indexed Account participates in any Index Returns for the current period (i.e. Term for Term Indexed Account and current contract year for Annual Indexed Account).
If your beneficiary elects to delay receipt of the death benefit until a date after the time of death, the amount of the benefit payable in the future may be affected. The death benefit value will not continue to accrue at the guaranteed interest period rate, but will be credited with the rate being offered under new contracts at such time. Please note if you elect a guarantee period of more than five years, the distribution may be subject to a Market Value Adjustment. The proceeds may be received in a single sum or applied to any of the annuity options, or, if available, paid over the beneficiary’s lifetime. A beneficiary’s right to elect an income phase payment may have been restricted by the contract owner. If so, such rights or options will not be available to the beneficiary.
If we do not receive a request to apply the death benefit proceeds to an annuity option, we will make a single sum distribution. Unless you elect otherwise, the distribution will be made into an interest bearing account, backed by our general account, that is accessed by the beneficiary through a checkbook feature. The beneficiary may access death benefit proceeds at any time without penalty. We will generally distribute death benefit proceeds within 7 days after the claim date. For information on required distributions under federal income tax laws, you should see “Required Distributions upon Contract Owner’s Death.”
Death Benefit During the Income Phase
If any contract owner or the annuitant dies after the annuity start date, we will pay the beneficiary any certain benefit remaining under the annuity in effect at the time.
Required Distributions Upon Contract Owner’s Death
We will not allow any payment of benefits provided under a non-qualified Contract which does not satisfy the requirements of Section 72(s) of the Tax Code.
If any owner of a non-qualified contract dies before the annuity start date, the death benefit payable to the beneficiary will be distributed as follows: (a) the death benefit must be completely distributed within 5 years of the contract owner’s date of death; or (b) the beneficiary may elect, within the 1-year period after the contract owner’s date of death, to receive the death benefit in the form of an annuity from us, provided that (i) such annuity is distributed in substantially equal installments over the life of such beneficiary or over a period not extending beyond the life expectancy of such beneficiary; and (ii) such distributions begin not later than 1 year after the contract owner’s date of death.
Notwithstanding (a) and (b) above, if the sole contract owner’s beneficiary is the deceased owner’s surviving spouse, then such spouse may elect to continue the Contract under the same terms as before the contract owner’s death. Upon receipt of such election from the spouse at our Customer Service Center: (1) all rights of the spouse as contract owner’s beneficiary under the Contract in effect prior to such election will cease; (2) the spouse will become the owner of the Contract and will also be treated as the contingent annuitant, if none has been named and only if the deceased owner was the annuitant; and (3) all rights and privileges granted by the Contract or allowed by ING USA will belong to the spouse as contract owner of the Contract. This election will be deemed to have been made by the spouse if such spouse makes a premium payment to the Contract or fails to make a timely election as described in this paragraph. If the owner’s beneficiary is a non-spouse, the distribution provisions described in subparagraphs (a) and (b) above, will apply even if the annuitant and/or contingent annuitant are alive at the time of the contract owner’s death.
18
Subject to availability, and our then current rules, a spousal or non-spousal beneficiary may elect to receive death benefits as payments over the life expectancy of the beneficiary (“stretch”). “Stretch” payments will be subject to the same limitations as systematic withdrawals, and non-qualified “stretch” payments will be reported on the same basis as other systematic withdrawals.
At subsequent surrender, any surrender charge applicable to premiums paid prior to the date we receive due proof of death of the contract owner will be waived. If the spouse elects to continue the Contract, the surrender charge period will reset at the beginning of each subsequent Term. Otherwise, the surrender charge period will not reset.
If we do not receive an election from a non-spouse owner’s beneficiary within the 1-year period after the contract owner’s date of death, then we will pay the death benefit to the owner’s beneficiary in a cash payment within five years from date of death. We will determine the death benefit as of the date we receive proof of death. We will make payment of the proceeds on or before the end of the 5-year period starting on the owner’s date of death. Such cash payment will be in full settlement of all our liability under the Contract.
If a contract owner dies after the annuity start date, we will continue to distribute any benefit payable at least as rapidly as under the annuity option then in effect. All of the contract owner’s rights granted under the Contract or allowed by us will pass to the contract owner’s beneficiary.
If a Contract has joint owners we will consider the date of death of the first joint owner as the death of the contract owner and the surviving joint owner will become the beneficiary of the Contract. If any contract owner is not an individual, the death of an annuitant shall be treated as the death of the owner.
CHARGES
We deduct the Contract charges described below to cover our costs and expenses, services provided, and risks assumed under the Contracts. We incur certain costs and expenses for distributing and administering the Contracts, including compensation and expenses paid in connection with sales of the Contracts, for paying the benefits payable under the Contracts and for bearing various risks associated with the Contracts. The amount of a Contract charge will not always correspond to the actual costs associated with the charge. For example, the surrender charge collected may not fully cover all of the distribution expenses incurred by us with the service or benefits provided. In the event there are any profits from fees and charges deducted under the Contract, we may use such profits to finance the distribution of Contracts.
Charges Deducted from the Contract Value
We deduct the following charges from your contract value:
Surrender Charge. No sales charge is deducted from the single premium payment at the time that it is paid. However, we will deduct a contingent deferred sales charge (a “surrender charge”) if you surrender your Contract or if you take a withdrawal in excess of the free withdrawal amount during a Term. The surrender charge is charged against the contract value and is based on the amount of the withdrawal. This charge is intended to cover sales expenses that we have incurred. We may in the future reduce or waive the surrender charge in certain situations and will never charge more than the maximum surrender charges. The percentage deducted at the time of surrender or excess withdrawal depends on the number of complete years that have elapsed since the beginning of the Term.
The surrender charge varies by the length of the Term selected, beginning with 8% during contract year 1 and reducing by 1% per year to the earlier of the end of the Term or the 8th contract year. No surrender charge is imposed upon a surrender made during the 30-day period prior to the end of a Term.
The surrender charge period resets at the beginning of each Term. Upon withdrawal, it is charged against the remaining contract value after you have received the amount requested for withdrawal, and is based on the amount of the withdrawal including the amount deducted for the surrender charge. Upon surrender, a surrender charge, as well as a Market Value Adjustment, will be applied retroactively with respect to any free withdrawal amount
19
previously withdrawn within the same contract year as the surrender. The following table shows the schedule of the surrender charge that will apply.
Complete Years Elapsed | | 0 | | 1 | | 2 | | 3 | | 4 | | 5 | | 6 | | 7 | | 8+ |
Since Start of Term | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Surrender Charge | | 8% | | 7% | | 6% | | 5% | | 4% | | 3% | | 2% | | 1% | | 0% |
For examples that illustrate how the surrender charge works, see Appendix D.
Waiver of Surrender Charge for Extended Medical Care. We will waive the surrender charge in most states in the following events: (i) you begin receiving qualified extended medical care on or after the first contract anniversary for at least 45 days during a 60-day period and your request for the surrender or withdrawal, together with all required documentation is received at our Customer Service Center during the term of your care or within 90 days after the last day of your care; or (ii) you are first diagnosed by a qualifying medical professional, on or after the first contract anniversary, as having a qualifying terminal illness. We do not waive the Market Value Adjustment in these circumstances. Amounts withdrawn from the Indexed Accounts will not share in Index Returns for the current period (i.e., the Term for the Term Indexed Account and the current contract year for the Annual Indexed Account). We have the right to require an examination by a physician of our choice. If we require such an examination, we will pay for it. You are required to send us satisfactory written proof of illness. See your Contract for more information. The waiver of surrender charge may not be available in all states.
Free Withdrawal Amount. No surrender charge or Market Value Adjustment applies to withdrawals made during the 30-day period prior to the end of a Term. In the first contract year, the free withdrawal amount is limited to systematic interest withdrawals from the Interest Account. After the first contract year, the free withdrawal amount equals 10% of your contract value as of the close of business on the day we receive the withdrawal request at our Customer Service Center.
Surrender Charge for Excess Withdrawals. We will deduct a surrender charge for excess withdrawals. We consider a withdrawal to be an “excess withdrawal” when the amount you withdraw in any contract year exceeds the free withdrawal amount. Where you are receiving systematic withdrawals, any combination of regular withdrawals taken and any systematic withdrawals expected to be received in a contract year will be included in determining the amount of the excess withdrawal. Such a withdrawal will be considered a partial surrender of the Contract and we will impose a surrender charge and any associated premium tax. Any excess withdrawal taken other than during the 30-day period prior to the end of a Term will trigger a Market Value Adjustment.
For examples that illustrate how the surrender charge works, see Appendix D. For a discussion of the Market Value Adjustment, see “Market Value Adjustment.”
Premium Taxes. We may make a charge for state and local premium taxes depending on your state of residence. The tax can range from 0% to 3.5% of the contract value. We have the right to change this amount to conform with changes in the law or if you change your state of residence.
We deduct the premium tax from your contract value on the annuity start date. However, some jurisdictions impose a premium tax at the time that premiums are paid, regardless of when the annuity payments begin. In those states we may defer collection of the premium taxes from your contract value and deduct it when you surrender the Contract, when you take an excess withdrawal, or on the annuity start date.
THE ANNUITY OPTIONS
Annuitization of Your Contract
If the annuitant and contract owner are living on the annuity start date, we will begin making payments to the contract owner under an income plan. We will make these payments under the annuity option chosen. You may change your annuity option by making a written request to us at least 30 days before the annuity start date. The
20
amount of the payments will be determined by applying the annuitization value on the annuity start date in accordance with the annuity option you chose. The annuitization value equals the greater of:
(a) Contract value plus/minus the Market Value Adjustment (unless the annuity start date falls within the 30-day period prior to the end of a Term), or
(b) The Minimum Guaranteed Account Values for the Indexed Accounts plus the contract value for the Interest Account plus/minus the Market Value Adjustment (unless the annuity start date falls within the 30-day period prior to the end of a Term).
If you annuitize prior to the end of the current contract year, amounts allocated to the Annual Indexed Account will not participate in any Index Returns for that period. Because Term Indexed Account Value does not participate in Index Returns if annuitized prior to the end of a Term, we will not allow you to allocate contract value to the Term Indexed Account if you are less than 5 years from your annuity start date on a renewal date.
You may also elect an annuity option on surrender of the Contract for its cash surrender value or you may choose one or more annuity options for the payment of death benefit proceeds while it is in effect and before the annuity start date. If, at the time of the contract owner’s death or the annuitant’s death (if the contract owner is not an individual), no option has been chosen for paying death benefit proceeds, the beneficiary may choose an annuity option within 60 days. In such a case, the payments will be based on the life expectancy of the beneficiary rather than the life of the annuitant. A beneficiary’s right to elect an annuity option or lump sum payment may have been restricted by the contract owner. If so, such rights or options will not be available to the beneficiary. In all events, payments of death benefit proceeds must comply with the distribution requirements of applicable federal tax law.
The minimum monthly annuity income payment that we will make is $20. We may require that a single sum payment be made if the contract value is less than $2,000 or if the calculated monthly annuity income payment is less than $20.
For each annuity option we will issue a separate written agreement putting the annuity option into effect. Before we pay any annuity benefits, we require the return of your Contract. If your Contract has been lost, we will require that you complete and return the applicable lost Contract form. Various factors will affect the level of annuity benefits, such as the annuity option chosen and the applicable payment rate used.
Our current annuity options provide only for fixed payments. Fixed annuity payments are regular payments, the amount of which is fixed and guaranteed by us. Some fixed annuity options provide fixed payments either for a specified period of time or for the life of the annuitant. The amount of life income payments will depend on the form and duration of payments you chose, the age of the annuitant or beneficiary (and gender, where appropriate under applicable law), the total contract value applied, and the applicable payment rate.
Our approval is needed for any option where:
(1) The person named to receive payment is other than the contract owner or beneficiary;
(2) The person named is not a natural person, such as a corporation; or
(3) Any income payment would be less than the minimum annuity income payment allowed.
Selecting the Annuity Start Date
You select the annuity start date, which is the date on which the annuity payments commence. The annuity start date must be at least 1 year from the contract date but before the month immediately following the annuitant’s 90th birthday, or 10 years from the contract date, if later. If, on the annuity start date, a surrender charge remains, the elected annuity option must include a period certain of at least 5 years.
If you do not select an annuity start date, it will automatically begin in the month following the annuitant’s 90th birthday, or 10 years from the contract date, if later.
21
If the annuity start date occurs when the annuitant is at an advanced age, such as after age 85, it is possible that the Contract will not be considered an annuity for federal tax purposes. See “Federal Tax Considerations.” For a Contract purchased in connection with a qualified plan, other than a Roth IRA, distributions must commence not later than April 1st of the calendar year following the calendar year in which you attain age 70½ or, in some cases, retire. Distributions may be made through annuitization or withdrawals. You should consult your tax adviser for tax advice.
Frequency of Annuity Payments
You choose the frequency of the annuity payments. They may be monthly, quarterly, semi-annually, or annually. If we do not receive written notice from you, we will make the payments monthly. There may be certain restrictions on minimum payments that we will allow.
The Annuity Options
We offer the 3 annuity options shown below. Payments under Options 1, 2, and 3 are fixed. The contract value can be applied to any other annuitization plan that we choose to offer on the annuity start date. Annuity payments under other available options may be fixed and/or variable.
Option 1. Income for a Fixed Period. Under this option, we make monthly payments in equal installments for a fixed number of years based on the contract value on the annuity start date. We guarantee that each monthly payment will be at least the amount stated in your Contract. If you prefer, you may request that payments be made in annual, semi-annual, or quarterly installments. We will provide you with illustrations if you ask for them. If the cash surrender value or contract value is applied under this option, a 10% penalty tax may apply to the taxable portion of each income payment until the contract owner reaches age 59½.
Option 2. Income for Life with a Period Certain. Payment is made for the life of the annuitant in equal monthly installments and guaranteed for at least a period certain such as 10 or 20 years. Other periods certain may be available to you on request. You may choose a refund period instead. Under this arrangement, income is guaranteed until payments equal the amount applied. If the person named lives beyond the guaranteed period, payments continue until his or her death. We guarantee that each payment will be at least the amount specified in the Contract corresponding to the person’s age on his or her last birthday before the annuity start date. Amounts for ages not shown in the Contract are available if you ask for them.
Option 3. Joint Life Income. This option is available when there are 2 persons named to determine annuity payments. At least one of the persons named must be either the contract owner or beneficiary of the Contract. We guarantee monthly payments will be made as long as at least one of the named persons is living. There is no minimum number of payments. Monthly payment amounts are available if you ask for them.
The contract value can be applied to any other annuitization plan that we choose to offer on the annuity start date. Annuity payments under other available options may be fixed and/or variable. If variable and subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940, it will comply with requirements of such Act.
Payment When Named Person Dies
When the person named to receive payment dies, we will pay any amounts still due as provided in the annuity agreement between you and ING USA. The amounts we will pay are determined as follows:
(1) For Option 1, or any remaining guaranteed payments under Option 2, we will continue payments. Under Options 1 and 2, the discounted values of the remaining guaranteed payments may be paid in a single sum. This means we deduct the amount of the interest each remaining guaranteed payment would have earned had it not been paid out early. The discount interest rate is never less than 3% for Option 1 and for Option 2 per year. We will, however, base the discount interest rate on the interest rate used to calculate the payments for Options 1 and 2 if such payments were not based on the tables in the Contract.
(2) For Option 3, no amounts are payable after both named persons have died.
For other available options, the annuity option agreement will state the amount we will pay, if any.
22
OTHER CONTRACT PROVISIONS
Reports to Contract Owners
We will send you an annual report within 31 days after the end of each contract year. The report will show the contract value, cash surrender value, and the death benefit as of the end of the contract year. The report will also show the amounts deducted from or added to the contract value since the last report. You have 30 days to notify our Customer Service Center of any errors or discrepancies contained in the report or in any confirmation notices. We will also send you any other reports, notices or documents we are required by law to furnish to you.
Suspension of Payments
The Company reserves the right to delay payment for up to 6 months.
In Case of Errors in Your Application
If an age or sex given in the application or enrollment form is misstated, the amounts payable or benefits provided by the Contract shall be those that the premium payment would have bought at the correct age or sex.
Assigning the Contract as Collateral
You may assign a non-qualified Contract as collateral security for a loan but you should understand that your rights and any beneficiary’s rights may be subject to the terms of the assignment. An assignment may have federal tax consequences. You must give us satisfactory written notice at our Customer Service Center in order to make or release an assignment. We are not responsible for the validity of any assignment.
Contract Changes — Applicable Tax Law
We have the right to make changes in the Contract to continue to qualify the Contract as an annuity under applicable federal tax law. You will be given advance notice of such changes.
Free Look
You may cancel your Contract within your 10-day free look period. We deem the free look period to expire 15 days after we mail the Contract to you. Some states may require a longer free look period. To cancel, you need to send your Contract to our Customer Service Center or to the agent from whom you purchased it. We will refund the contract value. For purposes of the refund during the free look period, (i) we adjust your contract value for any Market Value Adjustment, and (ii) then we include a refund of any charges deducted from your contract value. The Market Value Adjustment during the free look period is determined as described on page 12, but without adding .005 in the denominator of the formula. Because of the potential positive or negative effect of the Market Value Adjustment, the contract value returned may be greater or less than the premium payment you paid. Some states require us to return to you the amount of the paid premium (rather than the adjusted contract value) in which case you will not be subject to investment risk during the free look period. Your free look rights depend on the laws of the state in which you purchase the Contract. Your Contract is void as of the day we receive your Contract and cancellation request. We determine your contract value at the close of business on the day we receive your written request.
Special Arrangements
We may reduce or waive any Contract, rider, or benefit fees or charges for certain group or sponsored arrangements, under special programs, and for certain employees, agents, and related persons of our parent corporation and its affiliates. We reduce or waive these items based on expected economies, and the variations are based on differences in costs or services.
Selling the Contract
Our affiliate, Directed Services LLC, 1475 Dunwoody Drive, West Chester, PA 19380 is the principal underwriter and distributor of the Contract as well as for other ING USA contracts. Directed Services LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, is registered with the SEC as a broker/dealer under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”).
23
Directed Services LLC does not retain any commissions or compensation paid to it by ING USA for Contract sales. Directed Services LLC enters into selling agreements with affiliated and unaffiliated broker/dealers to sell the Contracts through their registered representatives who are licensed to sell securities and variable insurance products (“selling firms”). Selling firms are also registered with the SEC and are FINRA member firms.
The following is a list of broker/dealers that are affiliated with the Company:
· | Bancnorth Investment Group, Inc. | · | ING Funds Distributor, LLC |
· | Directed Services LLC | · | ING Investment Advisors, LLC |
· | Financial Network Investment Corporation | · | ING Investment Management Services LLC |
· | Guaranty Brokerage Services, Inc. | · | Multi-Financial Securities Corporation |
· | ING America Equities, Inc. | · | PrimeVest Financial Services, Inc. |
· | ING Financial Advisers, LLC | · | ShareBuilder Securities Corporation |
· | ING Financial Markets LLC | · | Systematized Benefits Administrators, Inc. |
· | ING Financial Partners, Inc. | | |
Directed Services LLC pays selling firms compensation for the promotion and sale of the Contracts. Registered representatives of the selling firms who solicit sales of the Contracts typically receive a portion of the compensation paid by Directed Services LLC to the selling firm in the form of commissions or other compensation, depending on the agreement between the selling firm and the registered representative. This compensation, as well as other incentives or payments, is not paid directly by contract owners or the Separate Account. We intend to recoup this compensation and other sales expenses paid to selling firms through fees and charges imposed under the Contracts.
Directed Services LLC pays selling firms for Contract sales according to one or more schedules. This compensation is generally based on a percentage of premium payments, and may vary based on amount or allocation of premium payments. Selling firms may receive commissions of up to 6.50% of premium payments. In addition, selling firms may receive ongoing annual compensation of up to 1.00% of all, or a portion, of values of Contracts sold through the firm. Individual representatives may receive all or a portion of compensation paid to their selling firm, depending on their firm’s practices. Commissions and annual compensation, when combined, could exceed 6.50% of total premium payments.
Directed Services LLC has special compensation arrangements with certain selling firms based on those firms’ aggregate or anticipated sales of the Contracts or other criteria. These special compensation arrangements will not be offered to all selling firms, and the terms of such arrangements may differ among selling firms based on various factors. Any such compensation payable to a selling firm will not result in any additional direct charge to you by us.
In addition to the direct cash compensation for sales of Contracts described above, Directed Services LLC may also pay selling firms additional compensation or reimbursement of expenses for their efforts in selling the Contracts to you and other customers. These amounts may include:
· Marketing/distribution allowances which may be based on the percentages of premium received, the aggregate commissions paid and/or the aggregate assets held in relation to certain types of designated insurance products issued by the Company and/or its affiliates during the year;
· Loans or advances of commissions in anticipation of future receipt of premiums (a form of lending to agents/registered representatives). These loans may have advantageous terms such as reduction or elimination of the interest charged on the loan and/or forgiveness of the principal amount of the loan, which terms may be conditioned on fixed insurance product sales;
· Education and training allowances to facilitate our attendance at certain educational and training meetings to provide information and training about our products. We also hold training programs from time to time at our expense;
24
· Sponsorship payments or reimbursements for broker/dealers to use in sales contests and/or meetings for their agents/registered representatives who sell our products. We do not hold contests based solely on the sales of this product;
· Certain overrides and other benefits that may include cash compensation based on the amount of earned commissions, agent/representative recruiting or other activities that promote the sale of policies; and
· Additional cash or noncash compensation and reimbursements permissible under existing law. This may include, but is not limited to, cash incentives, merchandise, trips, occasional entertainment, meals and tickets to sporting events, client appreciation events, business and educational enhancement items, payment for travel expenses (including meals and lodging) to pre-approved training and education seminars, and payment for advertising and sales campaigns.
We may pay commissions, dealer concessions, wholesaling fees, overrides, bonuses, other allowances and benefits and the costs of all other incentives or training programs from our resources, which include the fees and charges imposed under the Contract.
The following is a list of the top 25 selling firms that, during 2008, received the most compensation, in the aggregate, from us in connection with the sale of registered annuity contracts issued by us, ranked by total dollars received:
1. | ING Financial Partners, Inc. | 14. | Wells Fargo Investments, LLC |
2. | Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. | 15. | Multi-Financial Securities Corporation |
3. | LPL Financial Corporation | 16. | Banc of America Investment Services Inc. |
4. | ING Financial Partners, Inc. - CAREER | 17. | ING Financial Advisers, LLC |
5. | Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated | 18. | Securities America, Inc. |
6. | Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. | 19. | National Planning Corporation |
7. | Wachovia Securities, LLC - Bank | 20. | Financial Network Investment Corporation |
8. | Chase Investment Services Corporation | 21. | Royal Alliance Associates, Inc. |
9. | UBS Financial Services, Inc. | 22. | Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. |
10. | A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. | 23. | MML Investors Services, Inc. |
11. | Wachovia Securities, LLC | 24. | Park Avenue Securities, LLC. |
12. | Woodbury Financial Services Inc. | 25. | Securian Financial Services Inc. |
13. | PrimeVest Financial Services, Inc. | | |
Directed Services LLC may also compensate wholesalers/distributors, and their sales management personnel, for Contract sales within the wholesale/distribution channel. This compensation may be based on a percentage of premium payments and/or a percentage of Contract values. Directed Services LLC may, at its discretion, pay additional cash compensation to wholesalers/distributors for sales by certain broker-dealers or “focus firms.”
We do not pay any additional compensation on the sale or exercise of any of the Contract’s optional benefit riders offered in this prospectus.
This is a general discussion of the types and levels of compensation paid by us for sale of our variable annuity contracts. It is important for you to know that the payment of volume- or sales-based compensation to a selling firm or registered representative may provide that registered representative a financial incentive to promote our contracts over those of another company, and may also provide a financial incentive to promote one of our contracts over another.
25
OTHER INFORMATION
State Regulation
We are regulated by the Insurance Department of the State of Iowa. We are also subject to the insurance laws and regulations of all jurisdictions where we do business. The Contract offered by this prospectus has been approved where required by those jurisdictions. We are required to submit annual statements of our operations, including financial statements, to the Insurance Departments of the various jurisdictions in which we do business to determine solvency and compliance with state insurance laws and regulations.
December 31, 2008 Statutory Capital and Surplus of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company
The Company’s primary regulator, the State of Iowa Insurance Division (the “Division”), recognizes as capital and surplus those amounts determined in conformity with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Division. Statutory capital and surplus of the Company was $1,872.7 million and $2,552.6 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 respectively. As permitted by statutory accounting practices, statutory surplus as of December 31, 2008 includes the impact of a $835.0 million capital contribution received by the Company from its immediate parent company, Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc. on February 24, 2009. In addition, as approved by the Division, statutory surplus as of December 31, 2008 reflects the acceptance as of December 31, 2008 of a $883.0 million receivable from ING America Insurance Holdings, Inc. (“ING AIH”) payable to Security Life of Denver International Limited (“SLDI”) into the reinsurance trust established by SLDI for the benefit of the Company. SLDI is the reinsurer of certain reserves associated with variable annuity contracts underwritten by the Company. The reinsurance trust receivable was funded by a portion of a cash capital contribution of $1,216.0 million made by ING AIH to SLDI on April 22, 2009. ING AIH is the indirect parent company of the Company and the immediate parent company of SLDI, and SLDI is an affiliate of the Company.
Legal Proceedings
ING USA is involved in threatened or pending lawsuits/arbitrations arising from the normal conduct of business. Due to the climate in insurance and business litigation/arbitrations, suits against the company sometimes include claims for substantial compensatory, consequential, or punitive damages and other types of relief. Moreover, certain claims are asserted as class actions, purporting to represent a group of similarly situated individuals. While it is not possible to forecast the outcome of such lawsuits/arbitrations, in light of existing insurance, reinsurance, and established reserves, it is the opinion of management that the disposition of such lawsuits/arbitrations will not have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s operations or financial position.
Directed Services LLC, the principal underwriter and distributor of the contract, is a party to threatened or pending lawsuits/arbitration that generally arise from the normal conduct of business. Some of these suits may seek class action status and sometimes include claims for substantial compensatory, consequential or punitive damages and other types of relief. Directed Services LLC is not involved in any legal proceeding which, in the opinion of management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on its ability to distribute the contract.
Legal Matters
The Company’s organization and authority, and the contract’s legality and validity, have been passed on by the Company’s legal department.
Experts
The financial statements of the Company appearing in the Company’s Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008 (including schedules appearing therein), have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their reports thereon included therein, and are included and incorporated herein by reference. Such financial statements are included and incorporated herein by reference in reliance upon such reports given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
Further Information
This prospectus does not contain all of the information contained in the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. Portions of the registration statement have been omitted from this prospectus as allowed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). You may obtain the omitted information from the offices of the SEC, as described below. We are required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to file periodic reports and other
26
information with the SEC. You may inspect or copy information concerning the Company at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at:
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street NE, Room 1580
Washington, DC 20549
You may also obtain copies of these materials at prescribed rates from the Public Reference Room of the above office. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at either 1-800-SEC-0330 or 1-202-942-8090. You may also find more information about the Company at www.ing.com.
A copy of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, accompanies this prospectus. We refer to Form 10-K for a description of the Company and its business, including financial statements. We intend to send contract holders annual account statements and other such legally required reports. We do not anticipate such reports will include periodic financial statements or information concerning the Company.
You can find this prospectus and other information the Company files electronically with the SEC on the SEC’s web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference
The Company’s latest annual report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC and in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 134 must accompany this prospectus. Form 10-K contains additional information about the Company including certified financial statements for the latest fiscal year. We were not required to file any other reports pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act since the end of the fiscal year covered by that Form 10-K.
We will provide a free copy of these documents upon the written or oral request of anyone who has received this prospectus. We will not include exhibits to those documents unless they are specifically incorporated by reference into the document. Direct requests to:
ING
Customer Service Center
P.O. Box 9271
Des Moines, Iowa 50306-9271
1-800-366-0066
Inquiries
You may contact us directly by writing or calling us at the address or phone number shown above.
FEDERAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS
Introduction
This section discusses our understanding of current federal income tax laws affecting the contract. Federal income tax treatment of the contract is complex and sometimes uncertain. You should keep the following in mind when reading it:
Your tax position (or the tax position of the designated beneficiary, as applicable) determines federal taxation of amounts held or paid out under the contract;
Tax laws change. It is possible that a change in the future could affect contracts issued in the past;
This section addresses some but not all applicable federal income tax rules and does not discuss federal estate and gift tax implications, state and local taxes, or any other tax provisions; and
We do not make any guarantee about the tax treatment of the contract or transactions involving the contract.
We do not intend this information to be tax advice. For advice about the effect of federal income taxes or any other
27
taxes on amounts held or paid out under the contract, consult a tax adviser. For more comprehensive information, contact the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
Types of Contracts: Non-Qualified or Qualified
The Contract may be purchased on a non-tax-qualified basis (non-qualified contracts) or purchased on a tax-qualified basis (qualified contracts).
Non-qualified contracts are purchased with after tax contributions and are not related to retirement plans that receive special income tax treatment under the Tax Code.
Qualified Contracts are designed for use by individuals whose premium payments are comprised solely of proceeds from and/or contributions under retirement plans that are intended to qualify for special income tax treatment under Sections 401, 408 or 408A, and some provisions of 403 and 457 of the Tax Code.
Effective January 1, 2009, except in the case of a rollover contribution as permitted under the Tax Code or as a result of an intra-plan exchange or plan-to-plan transfer described under the Final Regulations, contributions to a section 403(b) tax sheltered annuity contract may only be made by the Employer sponsoring the Plan under which the assets in your contract are covered subject to the applicable Treasury Regulations and only if the Company, in its sole discretion, agrees to be an approved provider.
Taxation of Non-Qualified Contracts
Contributions
You may not deduct the amount of your contributions to a non-qualified contract.
Taxation of Gains Prior to Distribution
Tax Code Section 72 governs taxation of annuities in general. We believe that if you are a natural person you will generally not be taxed on increases in the value of a non-qualified Contract until a distribution occurs or until annuity payments begin. This assumes that the Contract will qualify as an annuity contract for federal income tax purposes. For these purposes, the agreement to assign or pledge any portion of the contract value generally will be treated as a distribution. In order to be eligible to receive deferral of taxation, the following requirements must be satisfied:
Required Distributions. In order to be treated as an annuity contract for federal income tax purposes, the Tax Code requires any non-qualified Contract to contain certain provisions specifying how your interest in the Contract will be distributed in the event of your death. The non-qualified Contracts contain provisions that are intended to comply with these Tax Code requirements, although no regulations interpreting these requirements have yet been issued. When such requirements are clarified by regulation or otherwise, we intend to review such distribution provisions and modify them if necessary to assure that they comply with the applicable requirements.
Non-Natural Holders of a Non-Qualified Contract. If you are not a natural person, a non-qualified contract generally is not treated as an annuity for income tax purposes and the income on the contract for the taxable year is currently taxable as ordinary income. Income on the contract is any increase in the contract value over the “investment in the contract” (generally, the premiums or other consideration you paid for the contract less any nontaxable withdrawals) during the taxable year. There are some exceptions to this rule and a non-natural person should consult with its tax adviser prior to purchasing the Contract. When the contract owner is not a natural person, a change in the annuitant is treated as the death of the contract owner.
Delayed Annuity Starting Date. If the Contract’s annuity starting date occurs (or is scheduled to occur) at a time when the annuitant has reached an advanced age (e.g., after age 85), it is possible that the Contract would not be treated as an annuity for federal income tax purposes. In that event, the income and gains under the Contract could be currently includible in your income.
28
Taxation of Distributions
General. When a withdrawal from a non-qualified Contract occurs, the amount received will be treated as ordinary income subject to tax up to an amount equal to the excess (if any) of the contract value (unreduced by the amount of any surrender charge) immediately before the distribution over the contract owner’s investment in the contract at that time. Investment in the contract is generally equal to the amount of all contributions to the contract, plus amounts previously included in your gross income as the result of certain loans, assignments or gifts, less the aggregate amount of non-taxable distributions previously made.
In the case of a surrender under a non-qualified Contract, the amount received generally will be taxable only to the extent it exceeds the contract owner’s investment in the contract (cost basis).
10% Penalty Tax. A distribution from a non-qualified Contract may be subject to a federal tax penalty equal to 10% of the amount treated as income. In general, however, there is no penalty on distributions:
made on or after the taxpayer reaches age 59½;
made on or after the death of a contract owner (the annuitant if the contract owner is a non-natural person);
attributable to the taxpayer’s becoming disabled as defined in the Tax Code;
made as part of a series of substantially equal periodic payments (at least annually) over your life or life expectancy or the joint lives or joint life expectancies of you and your designated beneficiary; or
the distribution is allocable to investment in the contract before August 14, 1982.
The 10% penalty does not apply to distributions from an immediate annuity as defined in the Tax Code. Other exceptions may be applicable under certain circumstances and special rules may be applicable in connection with the exceptions enumerated above. A tax adviser should be consulted with regard to exceptions from the penalty tax.
Tax-Free Exchanges. Section 1035 of the Tax Code permits the exchange of a life insurance, endowment or annuity contract for an annuity contract on a tax-free basis. In such instance, the “investment in the contract” in the old contract will carry over to the new contract. You should consult with your tax advisor regarding procedures for making Section 1035 exchanges.
If your Contract is purchased through a tax-free exchange of a life insurance, endowment or annuity contract that was purchased prior to August 14, 1982, then any distributions other than annuity payments will be treated, for tax purposes, as coming:
First, from any remaining “investment in the contract” made prior to August 14, 1982 and exchanged into the Contract;
Next, from any “income on the contract” attributable to the investment made prior to August 14, 1982;
Then, from any remaining “income on the contract;” and
Lastly, from any remaining “investment in the contract.”
The IRS has concluded that in certain instances, the partial exchange of a portion of one annuity contract for another contract will be tax-free. Pursuant to IRS guidance, receipt of withdrawals, surrenders or annuity payments (annuitizations) from either the original contract or the new contract during the 12 month period following the partial exchange may retroactively negate the partial exchange. If the partial exchange is retroactively negated, the partial surrender of the original contract will be treated as a withdrawal, taxable as ordinary income to the extent of gain in the original contract and, if the partial exchange occurred prior to you reaching age 59½, may be subject to an additional 10% tax penalty. A taxable event may be avoided if requirements identified as a qualifying event are satisfied. We are not responsible for the manner in which any other insurance company, for tax reporting purposes, or the IRS, with respect to the ultimate tax treatment, recognizes or reports a partial exchange. We strongly advise you to discuss any proposed 1035 exchange or subsequent distribution within 12 months with your tax advisor prior to proceeding with the transaction.
Taxation of Annuity Payments. Although tax consequences may vary depending on the payment option elected under an annuity contract, a portion of each annuity payment is generally not taxed and the remainder is
29
taxed as ordinary income. The non-taxable portion of an annuity payment is generally determined in a manner that is designed to allow you to recover your investment in the contract ratably on a tax-free basis over the expected stream of annuity payments, as determined when annuity payments start. Once your investment in the contract has been fully recovered, however, the full amount of each subsequent annuity payment is subject to tax as ordinary income.
The tax treatment of partial annuitizations is unclear. We currently treat any partial annuitizations as withdrawals rather than as annuity payments. Please consult your tax adviser before electing a partial annuitization.
Death Benefits. Amounts may be distributed from a Contract because of your death or the death of the annuitant. Generally, such amounts are includible in the income of the recipient as follows: (i) if distributed in a lump sum, they are taxed in the same manner as a surrender of the Contract, or (ii) if distributed under a payment option, they are taxed in the same way as annuity payments. Special rules may apply to amounts distributed after a Beneficiary has elected to maintain Contract value and receive payments.
Different distribution requirements apply if your death occurs:
After you begin receiving annuity payments under the Contract; or
Before you begin receiving such distributions.
If your death occurs after you begin receiving annuity payments, distributions must be made at least as rapidly as under the method in effect at the time of your death.
If your death occurs before you begin receiving annuity payments, your entire balance must be distributed within five years after the date of your death. For example, if you died on September 1, 2008, your entire balance must be distributed by August 31, 2013. However, if distributions begin within one year of your death, then payments may be made over one of the following timeframes:
Over the life of the designated beneficiary; or
Over a period not extending beyond the life expectancy of the designated beneficiary.
If the designated beneficiary is your spouse, the contract may be continued with the surviving spouse as the new contract owner. If the contract owner is a non-natural person and the primary annuitant dies, the same rules apply on the death of the primary annuitant as outlined above for the death of a contract owner.
The Contract offers a death benefit that may exceed the greater of the premium payments and the contract value. Certain charges are imposed with respect to the death benefit. It is possible that these charges (or some portion thereof) could be treated for federal tax purposes as a distribution from the Contract.
Assignments and Other Transfers. A transfer, pledge or assignment of ownership of a non-qualified contract, the selection of certain annuity dates, or the designation of an annuitant or payee other than an owner may result in certain tax consequences to you that are not discussed herein. The assignment, pledge or agreement to assign or pledge any portion of the contract value generally will be treated as a distribution. Anyone contemplating any such transfer, pledge, assignment, or designation or exchange, should consult a tax adviser regarding the potential tax effects of such a transaction.
Immediate Annuities. Under Section 72 of the Tax Code, an immediate annuity means an annuity (1) which is purchased with a single premium, (2) with annuity payments starting within one year from the date of purchase, and (3) which provides a series of substantially equal periodic payments made annually or more frequently. While this Contract is not designed as an immediate annuity, treatment as an immediate annuity would have significance with respect to exceptions from the 10% early withdrawal penalty, to contracts owned by non-natural persons, and for certain exchanges.
30
Multiple Contracts. Tax laws require that all non-qualified deferred annuity contracts that are issued by a company or its affiliates to the same contract owner during any calendar year be treated as one annuity contract for purposes of determining the amount includible in gross income under Tax Code Section 72(e). In addition, the Treasury Department has specific authority to issue regulations that prevent the avoidance of Tax Code Section 72(e) through the serial purchase of annuity contracts or otherwise.
Withholding. We will withhold and remit to the IRS a part of the taxable portion of each distribution made under a Contract unless the distributee notifies us at or before the time of the distribution that he or she elects not to have any amounts withheld. Withholding is mandatory, however, if the distributee fails to provide a valid taxpayer identification number or if we are notified by the IRS that the taxpayer identification number we have on file is incorrect. The withholding rates applicable to the taxable portion of periodic annuity payments are the same as the withholding rates generally applicable to payments of wages. In addition, a 10% withholding rate applies to the taxable portion of non-periodic payments. Regardless of whether you elect to have federal income tax withheld, you are still liable for payment of federal income tax on the taxable portion of the payment.
Certain states have indicated that state income tax withholding will also apply to payments from the contracts made to residents. Generally, an election out of federal withholding will also be considered an election out of state withholding. In some states, you may elect out of state withholding, even if federal withholding applies. If you need more information concerning a particular state or any required forms, please contact our Customer Service Center.
If you or your designated beneficiary is a non-resident alien, then any withholding is governed by Tax Code Section 1441 based on the individual’s citizenship, the country of domicile and treaty status, and we may require additional documentation prior to processing any requested transaction.
Taxation of Qualified Contracts
General
The Contracts are primarily designed for use with IRAs under Tax Code Sections 401, 408 or 408A, and some provisions of 403 and 457 (We refer to all of these as “qualified plans”). The tax rules applicable to participants in these qualified plans vary according to the type of plan and the terms and conditions of the plan itself. The ultimate effect of federal income taxes on the amounts held under a Contract, or on annuity payments, depends on the type of retirement plan and your tax status. Special favorable tax treatment may be available for certain types of contributions and distributions. In addition, certain requirements must be satisfied in purchasing a qualified contract with proceeds from a tax-qualified plan in order to continue receiving favorable tax treatment.
Adverse tax consequences may result from: contributions in excess of specified limits; distributions before age 59½ (subject to certain exceptions); distributions that do not conform to specified commencement and minimum distribution rules; and in other specified circumstances. Some qualified plans may be subject to additional distribution or other requirements that are not incorporated into the Contract. No attempt is made to provide more than general information about the use of the Contracts with qualified plans. Contract owners, annuitants, and beneficiaries are cautioned that the rights of any person to any benefits under these qualified plans may be subject to the terms and conditions of the plans themselves, regardless of the terms and conditions of the Contract. The Company is not bound by the terms and conditions of such plans to the extent such terms contradict the Contract, unless we consent.
Contract owners and beneficiaries generally are responsible for determining that contributions, distributions and other transactions with respect to the contract comply with applicable law. Therefore, you should seek competent legal and tax advice regarding the suitability of a contract for your particular situation. The following discussion assumes that qualified contracts are purchased with proceeds from and/or contributions under retirement plans or programs that qualify for the intended special federal tax treatment.
Tax Deferral
Under the federal tax laws, earnings on amounts held in annuity contracts are generally not taxed until they are withdrawn. However, in the case of a qualified plan (as defined in this prospectus), an annuity contract is not necessary to obtain this favorable tax treatment and does not provide any tax benefits beyond the deferral already
31
available to the qualified plan itself. Annuities do provide other features and benefits (such as guaranteed living benefits and/or death benefits or the option of lifetime income phase options at established rates) that may be valuable to you. You should discuss your alternatives with your financial representative taking into account the additional fees and expenses you may incur in an annuity.
Section 401(a), 401(k), Roth 401(k), and 403(a) Plans. Sections 401(a), 401(k), and 403(a) of the Tax Code permit certain employers to establish various types of retirement plans for employees, and permits self-employed individuals to establish these plans for themselves and their employees. These retirement plans may permit the purchase of Contracts to accumulate retirement savings under the plans. Employers intending to use the Contract with such plans should seek competent legal advice.
The contracts may also be available as a Roth 401(k), as described in Tax Code Section 402A, and we may set up accounts for you under the Contract for Roth 401(k) contributions (“Roth 401(k) accounts”). Tax Code Section 402A allows employees of certain private employers to contribute after-tax salary contributions to a Roth 401(k), which provides for tax-free distributions, subject to certain restrictions.
Individual Retirement Annuities. Section 408 of the Tax Code permits eligible individuals to contribute to an individual retirement program known as an Individual Retirement Annuity (“IRA”). IRAs are subject to limits on the amounts that can be contributed, the deductible amount of the contribution, the persons who may be eligible, and the time when distributions commence. Contributions to IRAs must be made in cash or as a rollover or a transfer from another eligible plan. Also, distributions from IRAs, individual retirement accounts, and other types of retirement plans may be “rolled over” on a tax-deferred basis into an IRA. If you make a tax-free rollover of a distribution from an IRA you may not make another tax-free rollover from the IRA within a 1-year period. Sales of the contract for use with IRAs may be subject to special requirements of the IRS.
The IRS has not reviewed the contracts described in this prospectus for qualification as IRAs and has not addressed, in a ruling of general applicability, whether the contract’s death benefit provisions comply with IRS qualification requirements.
Roth IRAs. Section 408A of the Tax Code permits certain eligible individuals to contribute to a Roth IRA. Contributions to a Roth IRA are subject to limits on the amount of contributions and the persons who may be eligible to contribute, are not deductible, and must be made in cash or as a rollover or transfer from another Roth IRA or other IRA. Certain qualifying individuals may convert an IRA, SEP, or a SIMPLE to a Roth IRA. Such rollovers and conversions are subject to tax, and other special rules may apply. If you make a tax-free rollover of a distribution from a Roth IRA to another Roth IRA, you may not make another tax-free rollover from the Roth IRA within a 1-year period. A 10% penalty may apply to amounts attributable to a conversion to a Roth IRA if the amounts are distributed during the five taxable years beginning with the year in which the conversion was made.
Sales of a contract for use with a Roth IRA may be subject to special requirements of the IRS. The IRS has not reviewed the contracts described in this prospectus for qualification as IRAs and has not addressed, in a ruling of general applicability, whether the contract’s death benefit provisions comply with IRS qualification requirements.
Section 403(b) Tax-Sheltered Annuities. The contracts are no longer available for purchase as Tax Code section 403(b) tax-sheltered annuities. Existing contracts issued as Tax Code section 403(b) tax-sheltered annuities will continue to be maintained as such under the applicable rules and regulations.
The Treasury Department has issued regulations which generally take effect on January 1, 2009. Existing contracts will be modified as necessary to comply with these regulations where allowed, or where required by law in order to maintain their status as section 403(b) tax-sheltered annuities. The final regulations include: (a) the ability to terminate a 403(b) plan, which would entitle a participant to a distribution; (b) the revocation of IRS Revenue Ruling 90-24, and the resulting increase in restrictions on a participant’s right to transfer his or her 403(b) accounts; and (3) the imposition of withdrawal restrictions on non-salary reduction contribution amounts, as well as other changes.
Contributions
In order to be excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes, total annual contributions to
32
certain qualified plans are limited by the Tax Code. You should consult with your tax adviser in connection with contributions to a qualified contract.
Distributions — General
Certain tax rules apply to distributions from the Contract. A distribution is any amount taken from a Contract including withdrawals, annuity payments, rollovers, exchanges and death benefit proceeds. We report the taxable portion of all distributions to the IRS.
Section 401(a), 401(k) and 403(a) Plans. Distributions from these plans are taxed as received unless one of the following is true:
The distribution is an eligible rollover distribution and is rolled over to another plan eligible to receive rollovers or to a traditional IRA in accordance with the Tax Code;
You made after-tax contributions to the plan. In this case, depending upon the type of distribution, the amount will be taxed according to the rules detailed in the Tax Code; or
The distribution is a qualified health insurance premium of a retired safety officer as defined in the Pension Protection Act of 2006.
A payment is an eligible rollover distribution unless it is:
part of a series of substantially equal periodic payments (at least one per year) made over the life expectancy of the participant or the joint life expectancy of the participant and his designated beneficiary or for a specified period of 10 years or more;
a required minimum distribution under Tax Code Section 401(a)(9);
a hardship withdrawal;
otherwise excludable from income; or
Not recognized under applicable regulations as eligible for rollover.
The Tax Code imposes a 10% penalty tax on the taxable portion of any distribution from a Contract used with a 401(a), 401(k) or 403(a) plan unless certain exceptions, including one or more of the following, have occurred:
You have attained age 59½;
You have become disabled, as defined in the Tax Code;
You have died and the distribution is to your beneficiary;
You have separated from service with the sponsor at or after age 55;
The distribution amount is rolled over into another eligible retirement plan or to an IRA in accordance with the terms of the Tax Code;
You have separated from service with the plan sponsor and the distribution amount is made in substantially equal periodic payments (at least annually) over your life or the life expectancy or the joint lives or joint life expectancies of you and your designated beneficiary;
The distribution is made due to an IRS levy upon your plan;
The withdrawal amount is paid to an alternate payee under a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO); or
The distribution is a qualified reservist distribution as defined under the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (401(k) plans only).
In addition, the 10% penalty tax does not apply to the amount of a distribution equal to unreimbursed medical expenses incurred by you during the taxable year that qualify for deduction as specified in the Tax Code. The Tax Code may provide other exceptions or impose other penalties in other circumstances.
Individual Retirement Annuities. All distributions from an IRA are taxed as received unless either one of the following is true:
The distribution is rolled over to another IRA or to a plan eligible to receive rollovers as permitted under the Tax Code; or
You made after-tax contributions to the IRA. In this case, the distribution will be taxed according to rules
33
detailed in the Tax Code.
The Tax Code imposes a 10% penalty tax on the taxable portion of any distribution from an IRA unless certain exceptions, including one or more of the following, have occurred:
You have attained age 59½;
You have become disabled, as defined in the Tax Code;
You have died and the distribution is to your beneficiary;
The distribution amount is rolled over into another eligible retirement plan or to an IRA in accordance with the terms of the Tax Code;
The distribution is made due to an IRS levy upon your plan;
The withdrawal amount is paid to an alternate payee under a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO); or
The distribution is a qualified reservist distribution as defined under the Pension Protection Act of 2006.
In addition, the 10% penalty tax does not apply to a distribution made from an IRA to pay for health insurance premiums for certain unemployed individuals, a qualified first-time home purchase, or for higher education expenses.
Roth IRAs. A qualified distribution from a Roth IRA is not taxed when it is received. A qualified distribution is a distribution:
Made after the five-taxable year period beginning with the first taxable year for which a contribution was made to a Roth IRA of the owner; and
Made after you attain age 59½, die, become disabled as defined in the Tax Code, or for a qualified first-time home purchase.
If a distribution is not qualified, generally it will be taxable to the extent of the accumulated earnings. A partial distribution will first be treated as a return of contributions which is not taxable and then as taxable accumulated earnings.
The Tax Code imposes a 10% penalty tax on the taxable portion of any distribution from a Roth IRA that is not a qualified distribution unless certain exceptions have occurred. In general, the exceptions for an IRA listed above also apply to a distribution from a Roth IRA that is not a qualified distribution or a rollover to a Roth IRA that is not a qualified rollover contribution. The 10% penalty tax is also waived on a distribution made from a Roth IRA to pay for health insurance premiums for certain unemployed individuals, used for a qualified first-time home purchase, or for higher education expenses.
403(b) Plans. Distributions from your contract are subject to the requirements of Code Section 403(b), the Treasury Regulations, and, if applicable, the Plan under which the assets in your contract are covered. In accordance with Code Section 403(b) and the Treasury Regulations, we have no responsibility or obligation to make any distribution (including distributions due to loans, annuity payouts, qualified domestic relations orders, hardship withdrawals and systematic distributions options) from your contract until we have received instructions or information from your Employer and/or its designee or, if permitted under Code Section 403(b) and the Treasury Regulations, you in a form acceptable to us and necessary for us to administer your contract in accordance with Code Section 403(b) the Treasury Regulations, and, if applicable, the Plan.
All distributions from these plans are taxed as received unless one of the following is true:
The distribution is an eligible rollover distribution and is rolled over to another plan eligible to receive rollovers or to a traditional IRA in accordance with the Tax Code;
You made after-tax contributions to the plan. In this case, depending upon the type of distribution, the amount will be taxed according to the rules detailed in the Tax Code; or
The distribution is a qualified health insurance premium of a retired public safety officer as defined in the Pension Protection Act of 2006.
34
A payment is an eligible rollover distribution unless it is:
Part of a series of substantially equal periodic payments (at least one per year) made over the life expectancy of the participant or the joint life expectancy of the participant and his designated beneficiary or for a specified period of 10 years or more;
A required minimum distribution under Tax Code section 401(a)(9);
A hardship withdrawal;
Otherwise excludable from income; or
Not recognized under applicable regulations as eligible for rollover.
The Tax Code imposes a 10% penalty tax on the taxable portion of any distribution from a contract used with a 403(b) plan, unless certain exceptions have occurred. In general, the exceptions for an IRA listed above also apply to a distribution from a 403(b) plan, plus in the event you have separated from service with the sponsor at or after age 55, or you have separated from service with the plan sponsor and the distribution amount is made in substantially equal periodic payments (at least annually) over your life or the life expectancy or the joint lives or joint life expectancies of you and your designated beneficiary. In addition, the 10% penalty tax does not apply to the amount of a distribution equal to unreimbursed medical expenses incurred by you during the taxable year that qualify for deduction as specified in the Tax Code. The Tax Code may provide other exceptions or impose other penalty taxes in other circumstances.
Distribution of amounts restricted under Tax Code section 403(b)(11) may only occur upon your death, attainment of age 59½, severance from employment, disability or financial hardship. Such distributions remain subject to other applicable restrictions under the Tax Code and the regulations.
Special Hurricane-Related Relief. The Katrina Emergency Tax Relief Act and the Gulf Opportunity Zone Act provide tax relief to victims of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma. The relief includes a waiver of the 10% penalty tax on qualified hurricane distributions from eligible retirement plans. In addition, the 20% mandatory withholding rules do not apply to these distributions and the tax may be spread out ratably over a three-year period. A recipient of a qualified hurricane distribution may also elect to re-contribute all or a portion of the distribution to an eligible retirement plan within three (3) years of receipt without tax consequences. Other relief may also apply. You should consult a competent tax adviser for further information.
Lifetime Required Minimum Distributions (Sections 401(a), 401(k), Roth 401(k), 403(a), 403(b) and IRAs only).
To avoid certain tax penalties, you and any designated beneficiary must also meet the minimum distribution requirements imposed by the Tax Code. These rules may dictate the following:
Start date for distributions;
The time period in which all amounts in your account(s) must be distributed; and
Distribution amounts.
Start Date and Time Period. Generally, you must begin receiving distributions by April 1 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which you attain age 70½. We must pay out distributions from the contract over a period not extending beyond one of the following time periods:
Over your life or the joint lives of you and your designated beneficiary; or
Over a period not greater than your life expectancy or the joint life expectancies of you and your designated beneficiary.
Distribution Amounts. The amount of each required distribution must be calculated in accordance with Tax Code Section 401(a)(9). The entire interest in the account includes the amount of any outstanding rollover, transfer, recharacterization, if applicable, and the actuarial present value of other benefits provided under the account, such as guaranteed death benefits.
50% Excise Tax. If you fail to receive the minimum required distribution for any tax year, a 50%
35
excise tax may be imposed on the required amount that was not distributed.
Lifetime Required Minimum Distributions are not applicable to Roth IRAs during your lifetime. Further information regarding required minimum distributions may be found in your contract.
Required Distributions Upon Death (Sections 401(a), 401(k), Roth 401(k), 403(a), 403(b), IRAs and Roth IRAs Only). Different distribution requirements apply after your death, depending upon if you have been receiving required minimum distributions. Further information regarding required distributions upon death may be found in your contract.
If your death occurs on or after you begin receiving minimum distributions under the contract, distributions generally must be made at least as rapidly as under the method in effect at the time of your death. Tax Code Section 401(a)(9) provides specific rules for calculating the required minimum distributions after your death.
If your death occurs before you begin receiving minimum distributions under the contract, your entire balance must be distributed by December 31 of the calendar year containing the fifth anniversary of the date of your death. For example, if you died on September 1, 2006, your entire balance must be distributed to the designated beneficiary by December 31, 2011. However, if distributions begin by December 31 of the calendar year following the calendar year of your death, and you have named a designated beneficiary, then payments may be made over either of the following time frames:
Over the life of the designated beneficiary; or
Over a period not extending beyond the life expectancy of the designated beneficiary.
Start Dates for Spousal Beneficiaries. If the designated beneficiary is your spouse, distributions must begin on or before the later of the following:
December 31 of the calendar year following the calendar year of your death; or
December 31 of the calendar year in which you would have attained age 70½.
No designated beneficiary. If there is no designated beneficiary, the entire interest generally must be distributed by the end of the calendar containing the fifth anniversary of the contract owner’s death.
Special Rule for IRA Spousal Beneficiaries (IRAs and Roth IRAs Only). In lieu of taking a distribution under these rules, if the sole designated beneficiary is the contract owner’s surviving spouse, the spousal beneficiary may elect to treat the contract as his or her own IRA and defer taking a distribution until his or her own start date. The surviving spouse is deemed to have made such an election if the surviving spouse makes a rollover to or from the contract or fails to take a distribution within the required time period.
Withholding
Any taxable distributions under the contract are generally subject to withholding. Federal income tax liability rates vary according to the type of distribution and the recipient’s tax status.
401(a), 401(k), Roth 401(k), 403(a) and 403(b). Generally, distributions from these plans are subject to mandatory 20% federal income tax withholding. However, mandatory withholding will not be required if you elect a direct rollover of the distributions to an eligible retirement plan or in the case of certain distributions described in the Tax Code.
IRAs and Roth IRAs. Generally, you or, if applicable, a designated beneficiary may elect not to have tax withheld from distributions.
Non-resident Aliens. If you or your designated beneficiary is a non-resident alien, then any withholding is governed by Tax Code section 1441 based on the individual’s citizenship, the country of domicile and treaty status, and we may require additional documentation prior to processing any requested distribution.
36
Assignment and Other Transfers
IRAS and Roth IRAs. The Tax Code does not allow a transfer or assignment of your rights under these contracts except in limited circumstances. Adverse tax consequences may result if you assign or transfer your interest in the contract to persons other than your spouse incident to a divorce. Anyone contemplating such an assignment or transfer should contact a qualified tax adviser regarding the potential tax effects of such a transaction.
Section 403(b) Plans. Adverse tax consequences to the plan and/or to you may result if your beneficial interest in the contract is assigned or transferred to persons other than:
A plan participant as a means to provide benefit payments;
An alternate payee under a qualified domestic relations order in accordance with Tax Code section 414(p); or
The Company as collateral for a loan.
Possible Changes in Taxation
Although the likelihood of legislative change and tax reform is uncertain, there is always the possibility that the tax treatment of the Contracts could change by legislation or other means. It is also possible that any change could be retroactive (that is, effective before the date of the change). You should consult a tax adviser with respect to legislative developments and their effect on the Contract.
Taxation of Company
We are taxed as a life insurance company under the Tax Code.
37
APPENDIX A
Term Indexed Account Examples
Example #1: End of Term S&P 500 Index Values — Issue Day = 1 to 28
The End of Term S&P 500 Index Value is calculated as an average of the 12 monthly S&P 500 index values in the final year of the term. The dates of the monthly values are the monthiversary dates in the final Contract year. For Contracts issued on the 1st through 28th day of the month, the monthly values are based on the day of the month corresponding to the issue day in the final Contract year. If the monthiversary date falls on a weekend or holiday, the index value from the next business day is used.
Assume a Contract is issued 1/1/1994 for a 7-year term. The index values for the final Contract year will correspond to the following dates:
Monthiversary Date | | Day of Week | | Date of Index Rate |
2/1/2000 | | Tuesday | | 2/1/2000 |
3/1/2000 | | Wednesday | | 3/1/2000 |
4/1/2000 | | Saturday | | 4/3/2000 |
5/1/2000 | | Monday | | 5/1/2000 |
6/1/2000 | | Thursday | | 6/1/2000 |
7/1/2000 | | Saturday | | 7/3/2000 |
8/1/2000 | | Tuesday | | 8/1/2000 |
9/1/2000 | | Friday | | 9/1/2000 |
10/1/2000 | | Sunday | | 10/2/2000 |
11/1/2000 | | Wednesday | | 11/1/2000 |
12/1/2000 | | Friday | | 12/1/2000 |
1/1/2001 | | Monday (Holiday) | | 1/2/2001 |
Example #2: End of Term S&P 500 Index Values — Issue Day = 29 to 31
The End of Term S&P 500 Index Value is calculated as an average of the 12 monthly S&P 500 index values in the final year of the term. The dates of the monthly values are the monthiversary dates in the final Contract year. For Contracts issued on the 29th through 31st day of the month, the monthly values in the final Contract year are based on the day of the month corresponding to the issue day. For months that are shorter than the issue month, the monthiversary date is the last day of such month. If the monthiversary date falls on a weekend or holiday, the index value from the next business day is used.
A1
Assume a Contract is issued 1/31/1994 for a 7-year term. The index values for the final Contract year will correspond to the following dates:
Monthiversary Date | | Day of Week | | Date of Index Rate |
2/29/2000 | | Tuesday | | 2/29/2000 |
3/31/2000 | | Friday | | 3/31/2000 |
4/30/2000 | | Sunday | | 5/1/2000 |
5/31/2000 | | Wednesday | | 5/31/2000 |
6/30/2000 | | Friday | | 6/30/2000 |
7/31/2000 | | Monday | | 7/31/2000 |
8/31/2000 | | Thursday | | 8/31/2000 |
9/30/2000 | | Saturday | | 10/2/2000 |
10/31/2000 | | Tuesday | | 10/31/2000 |
11/30/2000 | | Thursday | | 11/30/2000 |
12/31/2000 | | Sunday | | 1/2/2000 |
1/31/2001 | | Wednesday | | 1/31/2001 |
Example #3: Fund Account Value ¾ Example of Positive S&P 500 Growth
Assume $100,000 single premium investment in Fund #2 with an index period of 7 years, an issue date of 01/01/1994, and a participation rate of 75%.
Fund Account Value during the Index Term
The Term Indexed Fund Account Value during the term equals the beginning of term account value less gross withdrawals. In this example, from 01/01/1994 through 12/31/2000 the Fund Account Value is equal to $100,000.
Calculate the Fund Account Value at the end of the Index Term
The following table contains the closing S&P 500 Index Values applicable to this Contract:
Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index |
1/1/1994 | | 465.44 | | | | | | | | |
2/1/2000 | | 1409.28 | | 3/1/2000 | | 1379.19 | | 4/1/2000 | | 1505.97 |
5/1/2000 | | 1468.25 | | 6/1/2000 | | 1448.81 | | 7/1/2000 | | 1469.54 |
8/1/2000 | | 1438.10 | | 9/1/2000 | | 1520.77 | | 10/1/2000 | | 1436.23 |
11/1/2000 | | 1421.22 | | 12/1/2000 | | 1315.23 | | 1/1/2001 | | 1283.27 |
1. Beginning of Term S&P 500 index value = 465.44
2. End of Term S&P 500 index value = Average of 12 monthly S&P 500 index values in the final year of the term = (1409.28 + 1379.19 + 1505.97 + 1468.25 + 1448.81 + 1469.54 + 1438.10 +1520.77 + 1436.23 + 1421.22 + 1315.23 + 1283.27) / 12 = 17095.86 / 12 = 1424.66
3. Index Growth = (End of Term S&P 500 Index Value – Beginning of Term S&P 500 Index Value) / Beginning of Term S&P 500 Index Value = (1424.66 – 465.44) / 465.44 = 2.0609
A2
4. Index Return = 1 + Maximum [(Index Growth * Participation Rate), 0] = 1 + (2.0609 * 75%) = 1 + 1.5457 = 2.5457
5. Fund Account Value = (Beginning of Term Fund Value – Gross Withdrawals) * Index Return = ($100,000 - $0) * (2.5457) = $254,570.
Example #4: Fund Account Value ¾ Example of Negative S&P 500 Growth
Assume $100,000 single premium investment in the Term Indexed Account with an index period of 7 years, an issue date of 01/01/1973, and a participation rate of 75%.
Fund Account Value during the Index Term
The Fund Account Value during the term equals the beginning of term account value less gross withdrawals. In this example, from 01/01/1973 through 12/31/1979 the Fund Account Value is equal to $100,000.
Calculate the Fund Account Value at the end of the Index Term
The following table contains the closing S&P 500 Index Values applicable to this Contract:
Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index |
1/1/1973 | | 119.10 | | | | | | | | |
2/1/1979 | | 99.96 | | 3/1/1979 | | 96.90 | | 4/1/1979 | | 100.90 |
5/1/1979 | | 101.68 | | 6/1/1979 | | 99.17 | | 7/1/1979 | | 101.99 |
8/1/1979 | | 104.17 | | 9/1/1979 | | 107.44 | | 10/1/1979 | | 108.56 |
11/1/1979 | | 102.57 | | 12/1/1979 | | 105.83 | | 1/1/1980 | | 105.76 |
1. Beginning of Term S&P 500 index value = 119.10
2. End of Term S&P 500 index value = Average of 12 monthly S&P 500 index values in the final year of the term = (99.96 + 96.90 + 100.90 + 101.68 + 99.17 + 101.99 + 104.17 +107.44 + 108.56 + 102.57 + 105.83 + 105.76) / 12 = 1234.93 / 12 = 102.91
3. Index Growth = (End of Term S&P 500 Index Value – Beginning of Term S&P 500 Index Value) / Beginning of Term S&P 500 Index Value = (102.91 – 119.15) / 119.10 = -0.1359
4. Index Return = 1 + Maximum [(Index Growth * Participation Rate), 0] = 1 + Maximum [(-0.1359 * 75%), 0} = 1 + 0 = 1
5. Fund Account Value = (Beginning of Term Fund Value – Gross Withdrawals) * Index Return = ($100,000 - $0) * 1 = $100,000.
Example #5: Fund Account Value ¾ Example of Multiple Premiums
Assume $50,000 of premium investment in the Term Indexed Fund with an index period of 7 years, an issue date of 01/01/1994, and a participation rate of 75%. The premiums are received in two payments: $30,000 is received on the issue date, 1/1/1994; the final premium of $20,000 is received on 2/15/1994.
Fund Account Value during the Index Term
The Fund Account Value during the term equals the beginning of term account value less gross withdrawals. In this example, from 01/01/1994 through 02/15/1994 the Term Index Fund Account Value is equal to $30,000. When the second premium is paid on 02/15/1994, the Term Index Fund Account Value increases to $50,000 ($30,000 + $20,000). The term index fund value remains at $50,000 (assuming no withdrawals) until the end of the Index Term, 12/31/2000.
A3
Calculate the Fund Account Value at the end of the Index Term
In the initial index term, each premium payment will have its own BOP Index value corresponding to the date the premium payment was received, and a common EOP Index value based on the initial premium. In renewal Index Terms, the BOP and EOP Index values will be the same for all contract value allocated to the Term Index Fund.
The following tables contain the closing S&P 500 Index Values applicable to this Contract:
Beginning of Period Index Values
Date | | S&P 500 Index |
1/1/1994 | | 465.44 |
2/15/1994 | | 472.52 |
End of Period Monthiversary Index Values
Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Date | | S&P 500 Index |
2/1/2000 | | 1409.28 | | 3/1/2000 | | 1379.19 | | 4/1/2000 | | 1505.97 |
5/1/2000 | | 1468.25 | | 6/1/2000 | | 1448.81 | | 7/1/2000 | | 1469.54 |
8/1/2000 | | 1438.10 | | 9/1/2000 | | 1520.77 | | 10/1/2000 | | 1436.23 |
11/1/2000 | | 1421.22 | | 12/1/2000 | | 1315.23 | | 1/1/2001 | | 1283.27 |
Premium #1
1. Beginning of Term S&P 500 index value = 465.44
2. End of Term S&P 500 index value = Average of 12 monthly S&P 500 index values in the final year of the term = (1409.28 + 1379.19 + 1505.97 + 1468.25 + 1448.81 + 1469.54 + 1438.10 +1520.77 + 1436.23 + 1421.22 + 1315.23 + 1283.27) / 12 = 17095.86 / 12 = 1424.66
3. Index Growth = (End of Term S&P 500 Index Value – Beginning of Term S&P 500 Index Value) / Beginning of Term S&P 500 Index Value = (1424.66 – 465.44) / 465.44 = 2.0609
4. Index Return = 1 + Maximum [(Index Growth * Participation Rate), 0] = 1 + (2.0150 * 75%) = 1 + 1.5113 = 2.5457
5. Fund Account Value = (Beginning of Term Fund Value – Gross Withdrawals) * Index Return = ($30,000 - $0) * (2.5457) = $76,371.
Premium #2
1. Beginning of Term S&P 500 index value for premium #2 = 472.52
2. End of Term S&P 500 index value = Average of 12 monthly S&P 500 index values in the final year of the term = (1409.28 + 1379.19 + 1505.97 + 1468.25 + 1448.81 + 1469.54 + 1438.10 +1520.77 + 1436.23 + 1421.22 + 1315.23 + 1283.27) / 12 = 17095.86 / 12 = 1424.66
3. Index Growth for Premium #2 = (End of Term S&P 500 Index Value – Beginning of Term S&P 500 Index Value) / Beginning of Term S&P 500 Index Value = (1424.66 – 472.52) / 472.52 = 2.0150
A4
4. Index Return = 1 + Maximum [(Index Growth * Participation Rate), 0] = 1 + (2.0569 * 75%) = 1 + 1.5427 = 2.5113
5. Fund Account Value = (Beginning of Term Fund Value – Gross Withdrawals) * Index Return = ($20,000 - $0) * (2.5113) = $50,226.
Total End of Term Fund Account Value
1. End of Term Fund Account Value = Premium #1 End of Term Fund Account Value + Premium #2 End of Term Fund Account Value = $76,371 + $50,226 = $126,597.
A5
APPENDIX B
Annual Indexed Account Examples
Example #1: Fund Account Value ¾ Example of S&P 500 Growth
Assume $100,000 single premium investment in the Annual Indexed Account with an index term of 7 years, and an issue date of 01/01/1999. On 01/01/1999, the participation rate is 75%, and the cap is 15%. On renewal on 01/01/2000, the participation rate is 80% and the cap is 10%.
Fund Account Value during the First Contract Year
The Annual Indexed Fund Account Value prior to the end of each Contract year equals the beginning of Contract year account value less gross withdrawals. In this example, from 01/01/1999 through 12/31/1999 the Fund Account Value is equal to $100,000.
Calculate the Fund Account Value at the end of the First Contract Year
The following table contains the closing S&P 500 Index Values applicable to the first Contract year:
Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index |
1/1/1999 | | 1228.10 | | | | | | | | |
2/1/1999 | | 1273.00 | | 3/1/1999 | | 1236.16 | | 4/1/1999 | | 1293.72 |
5/1/1999 | | 1354.63 | | 6/1/1999 | | 1294.26 | | 7/1/1999 | | 1380.96 |
8/1/1999 | | 1328.05 | | 9/1/1999 | | 1331.07 | | 10/1/1999 | | 1282.81 |
11/1/1999 | | 1354.12 | | 12/1/1999 | | 1397.72 | | 1/1/2000 | | 1455.22 |
1. Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 index value = 1228.10
2. End of Contract Year S&P 500 index value = Average of 12 monthly S&P 500 index values in the Contract year = (1273.00 + 1236.16 + 1293.72 + 1354.63 + 1294.26 + 1380.96 + 1328.05 + 1331.07 + 1282.81 + 1354.12 + 1397.72 + 1455.22) / 12 = 15981.72 / 12 = 1331.81
3. Index Growth = Maximum [(End of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value – Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value) / Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value, 0] = (1331.81 – 1228.10) / 1228.10 = 0.0844
4. Index Return = 1 + Minimum [(Index Growth * Participation Rate), Cap] = 1 + Minimum [(0.0844 * 75%), 0.15] = 1 + 0.0633 = 1.0633
5. Fund Account Value = (Beginning of Contract Year Fund Value – Gross Withdrawals) * Index Return = ($100,000 - $0) * (1.0633) = $106,330.
B1
Fund Account Value during the Second Contract Year
The Annual Indexed Fund Account Value prior to the end of each Contract year equals the beginning of Contract year account value less gross withdrawals. In this example, from 01/01/2000 through 12/31/2000 the Fund Account Value is equal to $106,330.
Calculate the Fund Account Value at the end of the Second Contract Year
The following table contains the closing S&P 500 Index Values applicable to the second Contract year:
Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index |
1/1/2000 | | 1455.22 | | | | | | | | |
2/1/2000 | | 1409.28 | | 3/1/2000 | | 1379.19 | | 4/1/2000 | | 1505.97 |
5/1/2000 | | 1468.25 | | 6/1/2000 | | 1448.81 | | 7/1/2000 | | 1469.54 |
8/1/2000 | | 1438.10 | | 9/1/2000 | | 1520.77 | | 10/1/2000 | | 1436.23 |
11/1/2000 | | 1421.22 | | 12/1/2000 | | 1315.23 | | 1/1/2001 | | 1283.27 |
1. Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 index value = 1455.22
2. End of Contract Year S&P 500 index value = Average of 12 monthly S&P 500 index values in the Contract year = (1409.28 + 1379.19 + 1505.97 + 1468.25 + 1448.81 + 1469.54 + 1438.10 +1520.77 + 1436.23 + 1421.22 + 1315.23 + 1283.27) / 12 = 17095.86 / 12 = 1424.66
3. Index Growth = Maximum [(End of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value – Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value) / Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value, 0] = Maximum [(1424.66 – 1455.22) / 1455.22, 0] = Maximum [-0.0210, 0] = 0
4. Index Return = 1 + Minimum [(Index Growth * Participation Rate), Cap] = 1 + Minimum [(0 * 80%), 0.10] = 1 + 0 = 1
5. Fund Account Value at end of Second Contract Year = (Beginning of Contract Year Fund Value – Gross Withdrawals) * Index Return = ($106,330 - $0) * (1.0) = $106,330.
Example #2: Fund Account Value ¾ Example of S&P 500 Growth that Exceeds Cap
Assume $100,000 single premium investment in the Annual Indexed Account with an index term of 7 years, and an issue date of 01/01/1997. On 01/01/1997, the participation rate is 80%, and the cap is 15%. On renewal on 01/01/1998, the participation rate is 75% and the cap is 12%.
Fund Account Value during the First Contract Year
The Annual Indexed Fund Account Value prior to the end of each Contract year equals the beginning of Contract year account value less gross withdrawals. In this example, from 01/01/1997 through 12/31/1997 the Fund Account Value is equal to $100,000.
Calculate the Fund Account Value at the end of the First Contract Year
The following table contains the closing S&P 500 Index Values applicable to the first Contract year:
Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index |
1/1/1997 | | 737.01 | | | | | | | | |
2/1/1997 | | 786.73 | | 3/1/1997 | | 795.31 | | 4/1/1997 | | 759.64 |
5/1/1997 | | 798.53 | | 6/1/1997 | | 846.36 | | 7/1/1997 | | 891.03 |
8/1/1997 | | 947.14 | | 9/1/1997 | | 927.58 | | 10/1/1997 | | 955.41 |
11/1/1997 | | 938.99 | | 12/1/1997 | | 974.77 | | 1/1/1998 | | 975.04 |
B2
1. Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 index value = 737.01
2. End of Contract Year S&P 500 index value = Average of 12 monthly S&P 500 index values in the Contract year = (786.73 + 795.31 + 759.64 + 798.53 + 846.36 + 891.03 + 947.14 + 927.58 + 955.41 + 938.99 + 974.77 + 975.04) / 12 = 10596.53 / 12 = 883.04
3. Index Growth = Maximum [(End of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value – Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value) / Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value, 0] = (883.04 – 737.01) / 737.01 = 0.1981
4. Index Return = 1 + Minimum [(Index Growth * Participation Rate), Cap] = 1 + Minimum [(0.1981* 80%), 0.15] = 1 + Minimum [0.1585, 0.15] = 1.15
5. Fund Account Value = (Beginning of Contract Year Fund Value – Gross Withdrawals) * Index Return = ($100,000 - $0) * (1.15) = $115,000.
Fund Account Value during the Second Contract Year
The Annual Indexed Fund Account Value prior to the end of each Contract year equals the beginning of Contract year account value less gross withdrawals. In this example, from 01/01/1998 through 12/31/1998 the Fund Account Value is equal to $115,000.
Calculate the Fund Account Value at the end of the Second Contract Year
The following table contains the closing S&P 500 Index Values applicable to the second Contract year:
Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index |
1/1/1998 | | 975.04 | | | | | | | | |
2/1/1998 | | 1001.27 | | 3/1/1998 | | 1047.70 | | 4/1/1998 | | 1108.15 |
5/1/1998 | | 1121.00 | | 6/1/1998 | | 1090.98 | | 7/1/1998 | | 1148.56 |
8/1/1998 | | 1112.44 | | 9/1/1998 | | 994.26 | | 10/1/1998 | | 986.39 |
11/1/1998 | | 1111.60 | | 12/1/1998 | | 1175.28 | | 1/1/1999 | | 1228.10 |
1. Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 index value = 975.04
2. End of Contract Year S&P 500 index value = Average of 12 monthly S&P 500 index values in the Contract year = (1001.27 + 1047.70 + 1108.15 + 1121.00 + 1090.98 + 1148.56 + 1112.44 + 994.26 + 986.39 + 1111.60 + 1175.28 + 1228.10) / 12 = 13125.73 / 12 = 1093.81
3. Index Growth = Maximum [(End of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value – Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value) / Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value, 0] = Maximum [(1093.81 – 975.04) / 975.04, 0] = Maximum [0.1218, 0] = 0.1218
4. Index Return = 1 + Minimum [(Index Growth * Participation Rate), Cap] = 1 + Minimum [(0.1218 * 75%), 0.12] = 1 + Minimum [0.0914, 0.12] = 1.0914
5. Fund Account Value at end of Second Contract Year = (Beginning of Contract Year Fund Value – Gross Withdrawals) * Index Return = ($115,000 - $0) * (1.0914) = $125,511.
Example #3: Fund Account Value ¾ Example of Multiple Premiums
Assume $50,000 of premium investment in the Annual Indexed Account with an index period of 7 years, and an issue date of 01/01/1999. On 01/01/1999, the participation rate is 75%, and the cap is 15%. On renewal on 01/01/2000, the participation rate is 80% and the cap is 10%. The premiums are received in two payments: $30,000 is received on the issue date, 1/1/1999; the final premium of $20,000 is received on 2/15/1999.
B3
Fund Account Value during the First Contract Year
The Annual Indexed Fund Account Value during the first Contract year equals the beginning of term account value less gross withdrawals. In this example, from 01/01/1999 through 02/15/1999 the Annual Indexed Fund Account Value is equal to $30,000. When the second premium is paid on 02/15/1999, the Annual Indexed Fund Account Value increases to $50,000 ($30,000 + $20,000). The annual indexed fund value remains at $50,000 (assuming no withdrawals) until the end of the first Contract year, 12/31/1999.
Calculate the Fund Account Value at the end of the First Contract Year
In the first Contract year, each premium payment will have its own BOP Index value corresponding to the date the premium payment was received, and a common EOP Index value based on the date of the initial premium. In subsequent Contract years, the BOP and EOP Index values will be the same for all contract value allocated to the Annual Indexed Fund.
The following tables contain the closing S&P 500 Index Values applicable to this Contract:
Beginning of Period Index Values
Date | | S&P 500 Index |
1/1/1999 | | 1228.10 |
2/15/1999 | | 1241.87 |
End of Period Monthiversary Index Values
Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Date | | S&P 500 Index |
2/1/1999 | | 1273.00 | | 3/1/1999 | | 1236.16 | | 4/1/1999 | | 1293.72 |
5/1/1999 | | 1354.63 | | 6/1/1999 | | 1294.26 | | 7/1/1999 | | 1380.96 |
8/1/1999 | | 1328.05 | | 9/1/1999 | | 1331.07 | | 10/1/1999 | | 1282.81 |
11/1/1999 | | 1354.12 | | 12/1/1999 | | 1397.72 | | 1/1/2000 | | 1455.22 |
Premium #1
1. Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 index value = 1228.10
2. End of Contract Year S&P 500 index value = Average of 12 monthly S&P 500 index values in the Contract year = (1273.00 + 1236.16 + 1293.72 + 1354.63 + 1294.26 + 1380.96 + 1328.05 + 1331.07 + 1282.81 + 1354.12 + 1397.72 + 1455.22) / 12 = 15981.72 / 12 = 1331.81
3. Index Growth = Maximum [(End of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value – Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value) / Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value, 0] = (1331.81 – 1228.10) / 1228.10 = 0.0844
4. Index Return = 1 + Minimum [(Index Growth * Participation Rate), Cap] = 1 + Minimum [(0.0844 * 75%), 0.15] = 1 + 0.0633 = 1.0633
5. Fund Account Value = (Beginning of Contract Year Fund Value – Gross Withdrawals) * Index Return = ($30,000 - $0) * (1.0633) = $31,899.
B4
Premium #2
1. Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 index value = 1241.87
2. End of Contract Year S&P 500 index value = Average of 12 monthly S&P 500 index values in the Contract year = (1273.00 + 1236.16 + 1293.72 + 1354.63 + 1294.26 + 1380.96 + 1328.05 + 1331.07 + 1282.81 + 1354.12 + 1397.72 + 1455.22) / 12 = 15981.72 / 12 = 1331.81
3. Index Growth = Maximum [(End of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value – Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value) / Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value, 0] = (1331.81 – 1241.87) / 1241.87 = 0.0724
4. Index Return = 1 + Minimum [(Index Growth * Participation Rate), Cap] = 1 + Minimum [(0.0724 * 75%), 0.15] = 1 + 0.0543 = 1.0543
5. Fund Account Value = (Beginning of Contract Year Fund Value – Gross Withdrawals) * Index Return = ($20,000 - $0) * (1.0543) = $21,086.
Total End of First Contract Year Fund Account Value
End of Contract Year Annual Indexed Fund Account Value = Premium #1 End of Contract Year Annual Indexed Fund Account Value + Premium #2 End of Contract Year Annual Indexed Fund Account Value = $31,899 + $21,086 = $52,985.
Fund Account Value during the Second Contract Year
The Fund Account Value prior to the end of each Contract year equals the beginning of Contract year account value less gross withdrawals. In this example, from 01/01/2000 through 12/31/2000 the Fund Account Value is equal to $52,985.
Calculate the Fund Account Value at the end of the Second Contract Year
The following table contains the closing S&P 500 Index Values applicable to the second Contract year:
Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index | | Monthiversary Date | | S&P 500 Index |
1/1/2000 | | 1455.22 | | | | | | | | |
2/1/2000 | | 1409.28 | | 3/1/2000 | | 1379.19 | | 4/1/2000 | | 1505.97 |
5/1/2000 | | 1468.25 | | 6/1/2000 | | 1448.81 | | 7/1/2000 | | 1469.54 |
8/1/2000 | | 1438.10 | | 9/1/2000 | | 1520.77 | | 10/1/2000 | | 1436.23 |
11/1/2000 | | 1421.22 | | 12/1/2000 | | 1315.23 | | 1/1/2001 | | 1283.27 |
1. Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 index value = 1455.22
2. End of Contract Year S&P 500 index value = Average of 12 monthly S&P 500 index values in the Contract year = (1409.28 + 1379.19 + 1505.97 + 1468.25 + 1448.81 + 1469.54 + 1438.10 +1520.77 + 1436.23 + 1421.22 + 1315.23 + 1283.27) / 12 = 17095.86 / 12 = 1424.66
3. Index Growth = Maximum [(End of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value – Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value) / Beginning of Contract Year S&P 500 Index Value, 0] = Maximum [(1424.66 – 1455.22) / 1455.22, 0] = Maximum [-0.0210, 0] = 0
4. Index Return = 1 + Minimum [(Index Growth * Participation Rate), Cap] = 1 + Minimum [(0 * 80%), 0.10] = 1 + 0 = 1
5. Fund Account Value at end of Second Contract Year = (Beginning of Contract Year Fund Value – Gross Withdrawals) * Index Return = ($52,985 - $0) * (1.0) = $52,985.
B5
APPENDIX C
Market Value Adjustment Examples
Example #1: Full Surrender ¾ Example of a Negative Market Value Adjustment
Assume $100,000 single premium with a term of 10 years, an initial ask yield for 10 year U.S. Treasury Strips (“I”) of 7%; that a full surrender is requested 3 years into the term; that the Account Value on the date of surrender is $115,000 that the then ask yield for remaining 7 year period U.S. Treasury Strips (“J”) is 8%.
Calculate the Market Value Adjustment
1. N = 2,555 ( 365 x 7 )
2. Market Value Adjustment = $115,000 x | [( | 1.07 1.0850 | ) 2,555/365 | -1 | ] | = -$10,678 |
Therefore, the amount paid to you on full surrender ignoring any surrender charge is $104,322
($115,000 - $10,678).
Example #2: Full Surrender ¾ Example of a Positive Market Value Adjustment
Assume $100,000 single premium with a term of 10 years, an initial ask yield for 10 year U.S. Treasury Strips (“I”) of 7%; that a full surrender is requested 3 years into the term; that the Account Value on the date of surrender is $115,000 that the then ask yield for remaining 7 year period U.S. Treasury Strips (“J”) is 6%.
Calculate the Market Value Adjustment
1. N = 2,555 ( 365 x 7 )
2. Market Value Adjustment = $115,000 x | [( | 1.07 1.0650 | ) 2,555/365 | -1 | ] | = $3,833 |
Therefore, the amount paid to you on full surrender ignoring any surrender charge is $118,833
($115,000 + $3,833).
Example #3: Withdrawal ¾ Example of a Negative Market Value Adjustment
Assume $200,000 was allocated to an account with a selected term of 10 years, an initial ask yield for 10 year U.S. Treasury Strips (“I”) of 7%; that a withdrawal of $128,000 requested 3 years into the guaranteed interest period; that the Account Value on the date of surrender is $250,000; that the then ask yield for remaining 7 year period U.S. Treasury Strips (“J’) is 8%; and that no prior transfers or withdrawals affecting this account have been made.
First calculate the amount that must be withdrawn from the Fixed Interest Allocation to provide the amount requested.
1. N = 2,555 ( 365 x 7 )
2. Amount that must be withdrawn = | [ | $128,000 / | ( | 1.07 1.0850 | ) 2,555/365 | ] | = $141,102 |
Then calculate the Market Value Adjustment on that amount.
3. Market Value Adjustment = $141,102 x | [( | 1.07 1.0850 | ) 2,555/365 | -1 | ] | = -$13,102 |
C1
Therefore, the amount of the withdrawal paid to you ignoring any surrender charge is $128,000, as requested. The account value will be reduced by the amount of the withdrawal, $128,000, and by the Market Value Adjustment of -$13,102, for a total reduction in the account value of $141,102.
Example #4: Withdrawal ¾ Example of a Positive Market Value Adjustment
Assume $200,000 was allocated to an account with a selected term of 10 years, and the initial ask yield for 10 year U.S. Treasury Strips (“I”) of 7%. Also assume that a withdrawal of $128,000 is requested 3 years into the guaranteed interest period; that the Account Value on the date of surrender is $250,000; that the then ask yield for remaining 7 year period U.S. Treasury Strips (“J’) is 6%; and that no prior transfers or withdrawals affecting this account have been made.
First calculate the amount that must be withdrawn from the Fixed Interest Allocation to provide the amount requested.
1. N = 2,555 ( 365 x 7 )
2. Amount that must be withdrawn = | [ | $128,000 / | ( | 1.07 1.0650 | ) 2,555/365 | ] | = $123,871 |
Then calculate the Market Value Adjustment on that amount.
3. Market Value Adjustment = $123,871 x | [( | 1.07 1.0650 | ) 2,555/365 | -1 | ] | = $4,129 |
Therefore, the amount of the withdrawal paid to you ignoring any surrender charge is $128,000, as requested. The account value will be reduced by the amount of the withdrawal, $128,000, but increased by the Market Value Adjustment of $4,129, for a total reduction in the account value of $123,871.
C2
APPENDIX D
Surrender Charge for Excess Withdrawals Examples
Example #1: Surrender Charges ¾ Partial Withdrawal in Excess of Free Withdrawal Amount
The following assumes you made an initial single premium payment of $100,000. It also assumes a withdrawal at the beginning of the fifth contract year of 25% of the contract value. Assume the contract value at the time of the withdrawal is $130,000.00.
In this example, $13,000.00 (10% of the contract value at withdrawal) is the maximum amount that you may withdraw without a surrender charge. The total amount requested is $32,500.00 ($130,000.00 x .25). Therefore, $19,500.00 ($32,500.00 – $13,000.00) is considered an excess withdrawal and would be subject to a surrender charge of $812.50 ($19,500 x (1/(1-0.04) – 1)) which would be deducted from the remaining contract value. After the withdrawal, the contract value would be $96,687.50.
This example does not take into account any Market Value Adjustment or deduction of any premium taxes.
Example #2: Surrender Charges ¾ Withdrawal of Free Withdrawal Amount Followed by Full Surrender 6 Months Later
The following assumes you made an initial single premium payment of $100,000 and that the contract value at the beginning of the fifth contract year was $130,000.00. It also assumes a free withdrawal at the beginning of the fifth contract year of $13,000.00 (10% of the contract value), followed by a full surrender six months later.
The maximum free withdrawal amount that you may withdraw without a surrender charge is $13,000.00 (10% of the contract value). After the free withdrawal at the beginning of the fifth contract year, the contract value is $117,000.00 ($130,000.00 - $13,000.00).
Assume that 6 months later, the contract is surrendered. Assume also that the contract value has grown to $118,000.00. On full surrender, surrender charges are applied to all amounts withdrawn in that contract year. The cash surrender value is calculated as follows:
1. The amount previously withdrawn without a charge in that contract year is added back to the contract value to determine the surrender charge.
2. The surrender charge is $5,240 [.04 x {$118,000 + $13,000}].
3. The cash surrender value equals the contract value minus the surrender charge or
$112,760 ($118,000 - $5,240).
This example does not take into account any Market Value Adjustment or deduction of any premium taxes.
D1
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company is a stock company domiciled in Iowa.
SD Multi-Rate Index | | 05/01/2009 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75a2d/75a2d560ec5d678512cc7ce80efeda9cf2adba6a" alt=""
| | | | ING | | | | | |
|
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
| | | WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 | | | | |
| | | FORM 10-K | | | | | |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2008 | | | | | | | |
Commission File Number:333-133154, 333-133076, 333-151031, 333-133153, 333-133155, 333-133152 |
|
ING USA ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| | (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) | | | | |
| | Iowa | | | | 41-0991508 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| 1475 Dunwoody Drive | | | | 19380-1478 | |
| West Chester, Pennsylvania | | | | (Zip Code) | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | | | | | | |
| | | | (610) 425-3400 | | | | | |
| | (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) | | | | |
| | Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report | | | |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: | | | | | | | |
Title: 4.50% Secured Medium Term Notes due 2010 of ING USA Global Funding Trust I | | | | | |
Name of exchange on which registered: New York Stock Exchange | | | | | | |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None | | | | | | | |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes | x | No | £ |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes | £No | x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during |
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past |
days. YesxNo£ | | | | | | | | |
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not |
contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this form 10-K or |
amendment to this Form 10-K. YesxNo£ | | | | | | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See |
definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): |
Large accelerated filer | £Accelerated filer | £Non-accelerated filerx | | Smaller reporting company£ |
| | | | (Do not check if a smaller | | | | |
| | | | reporting company) | | | | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). | Yes | £Nox | | |
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates: N/A | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS: | | | |
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 250,000 shares of Common Stock, $10 |
value, as of March 24, 2009, are authorized, issued, and outstanding, all of which were directly owned by Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc. | |
NOTE: WHEREAS ING USA ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTION I(1)(a) AND |
OF FORM 10-K, THIS FORM IS BEING FILED WITH THE REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT PURSUANT TO GENERAL INSTRUCTION I(2). |
1
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Annual Report on Form 10-K |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008 |
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| | PAGE |
PART I | | |
|
Item 1. | Business** | 3 |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 15 |
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | 28 |
Item 2. | Properties** | 28 |
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | 28 |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders* | 28 |
|
PART II | | |
|
Item 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters | |
| and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 29 |
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data*** | 30 |
Item 7. | Management’s Narrative Analysis of the Results of Operations and | |
| Financial Condition** | 31 |
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 82 |
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 87 |
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and | |
| Financial Disclosure | 156 |
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | 156 |
Item 9B. | Other Information | 157 |
|
PART III | | |
|
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance* | 158 |
Item 11. | Executive Compensation* | 158 |
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management | |
| and Related Stockholder Matters* | 158 |
Item 13. | Certain Relationships, Related Transactions, and Director Independence* | 158 |
|
Item 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services | 159 |
|
PART IV | | |
|
Item 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules | 161 |
|
| Index to Financial Statement Schedules | 162 |
| Signatures | 166 |
| Exhibits Index | 167 |
* | Item omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2) of Form 10-K, except as to Part III, Item 10 with respect to compliance with Sections 406 and 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
** | Item prepared in accordance with General Instruction I(2) of Form 10-K. |
*** | Although item may be omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2) of Form 10-K, the Company has provided certain disclosure under this item. |
2
| |
Item 1. | Business |
| (Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Organization of Business
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (“ING USA” or the “Company,” as appropriate) is a stock life insurance company domiciled in the State of Iowa and provides financial products and services in the United States. ING USA is authorized to conduct its insurance business in all states, except New York, and in the District of Columbia.
ING USA is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc. (“Lion” or “Parent”), which is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of ING Groep N.V. (“ING”). ING is a global financial services holding company based in The Netherlands, with American Depository Shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ING”.
Description of Business
ING’s U.S.-based operations offer a broad range of life insurance, annuity, mutual fund, employee benefit, defined contribution, guaranteed investment, and funding agreement contracts. For the year ended December 31, 2008, ING’s U.S.-based operations were ranked sixth in sales of variable annuities according to data published by Morningstar, Inc. and sixteenth in sales of fixed annuities, excluding structured settlements, according to data published by LIMRA International Inc. (“LIMRA”). The Company serves as one of the primary vehicles through which ING’s U.S.-based operations write variable and fixed annuity business. According to LIMRA’s fourth quarter 2008 sales report on Stable Value and Funding Agreement products, ING’s U.S.-based operations were ranked third in market share for funding agreement contracts, and seventh for traditional general account guaranteed investment contracts, in terms o f total assets.
The Company offers various insurance products, including immediate and deferred variable and fixed annuities. The Company’s annuity products are distributed by national wirehouses, regional securities firms, independent broker-dealers, banks, life insurance companies with captive agency sales forces, independent insurance agents, independent marketing organizations, and affiliated broker-dealers. The Company’s primary annuity customers are individual consumers.
The Company also offers guaranteed investment contracts and funding agreements (collectively referred to as “GICs”), sold primarily to institutional investors and corporate benefit plans. These products are marketed by home office personnel or through specialty insurance brokers.
3
See “Reserves” for a discussion of the Company’s reserves by product type.
The Company has one operating segment, which offers the products described below.
Products and Services
Products offered by the Company include immediate and deferred variable and fixed annuities, designed to address customer needs for tax-advantaged savings, retirement needs, and wealth-protection concerns, and GICs.
Variable Annuities: The variable annuities offered by the Company are savings vehicles in which contractowner deposits are recorded and primarily maintained in separate accounts established by the Company and registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as a unit investment trust. Unlike fixed annuities, variable annuity contractowners bear the risk of investment gains and losses associated with the selected investment allocation. The Company, however, offers certain guaranteed death and living benefits (described below) under which it bears specific risks associated with these products.
Separate account assets and liabilities generally represent funds maintained to meet specific investment objectives of contractowners. In general, investment income and investment gains and losses accrue directly to the separate accounts. The assets of each account are legally segregated and are not subject to claims that arise out of any other business of the Company.
Separate account assets supporting variable options under variable annuity contracts are invested, as designated by the contractowner or participant under a contract, in shares of mutual funds managed by affiliates of the Company or in other selected mutual funds not managed by affiliates of the Company. Variable annuity deposits are allocated to various subaccounts established within the separate account. Each subaccount represents a different investment option into which the contractowner may allocate deposits. The account value of a variable annuity contract is equal to the aggregate value of the subaccounts selected by the contractowner, including the value allocated to any fixed account, less fees and expenses. The Company offers investment options for its variable annuities covering a wide range of investment styles, including large, mid, and small cap equity funds, as well as fixed income alternatives. Many of the variable ann uity contracts issued by the Company are combination contracts, offering both variable and fixed options under which some or all of the deposits may be allocated by the contractowner to a fixed account.
The Company’s major source of income from variable annuities is the base contract mortality, expense, and guaranteed death and living benefit rider fees charged to the contractowner, less the costs of administering the product and providing for the guaranteed death and living benefits.
4
The Company’s variable annuities offer one or more of the following guaranteed death and living benefits:
Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefits(“GMDBs”):
§ | Standard - Guarantees that, upon death, the death benefit will be no less than the premiums paid by the contractowner, adjusted for any contract withdrawals. |
§ | Ratchet - Guarantees that, upon death, the death benefit will be no less than the greater of (1) Standard or (2) the maximum contract anniversary (or quarterly) value of the variable annuity, adjusted for contract withdrawals. |
§ | Rollup (7.0% or 5.5% Solution) - Guarantees that, upon death, the death benefit will be no less than the aggregate premiums paid by the contractowner accruing interest at 7.0% or 5.5% per annum, adjusted for contract withdrawals, which may be subject to a maximum cap on the rolled up amount. (The Company has discontinued this option for new sales.) |
§ | Combo (Max 7) - Guarantees that, upon death, the death benefit will be no less than the greater of (1) Ratchet or (2) Rollup. |
For contracts issued prior to January 1, 2000, most contracts with enhanced death benefit guarantees were reinsured to third party reinsurers to mitigate the risk produced by such guaranteed death benefits. For contracts issued after December 31, 1999, the Company instituted an equity hedging program in lieu of reinsurance. The equity hedging program is based on the Company entering into derivative positions to offset exposures to guaranteed minimum death benefits due to adverse changes in the equity markets.
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the guaranteed value of these death benefits in excess of account values was estimated to be $16.6 billion and $2.7 billion, respectively, before reinsurance. The increase was primarily driven by the decrease in account values due to unfavorable equity market performance in 2008.
At December 31, 2008, the guaranteed value of minimum guaranteed death benefits in excess of account values, net of reinsurance, was estimated to be $15.0 billion, of which $10.7 billion was projected to be covered by the Company’s equity hedging program. At December 31, 2007, the guaranteed value of minimum guaranteed death benefits in excess of account values, net of reinsurance, was estimated to be $1.8 billion, of which $537.6 was projected to be covered by the Company’s equity hedging program. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded a liability of $565.4 and $209.4, respectively, net of reinsurance, representing the estimated net present value of the Company’s future obligation for guaranteed minimum death benefits in excess of account values. The liability increased mainly due to the accumulation of fees used to fund the reserve during 2008 and higher future projected benefi ts in excess of account values.
5
Guaranteed Living Benefits: |
§ | Guaranteed Minimum Income Benefit (“GMIB”) - Guarantees a minimum income payout, exercisable each contract anniversary on or after a specified date, in most cases the 10th rider anniversary. |
§ | Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit (“GMWB”) - Guarantees lifetime annual withdrawals, after certain ages are reached, of a percentage of premiums paid. The percentage may vary by age at first withdrawal and depending on the base annuity contract. For certain (more recent) versions, there are annual step- up (for up to 10 years) and quarterly ratchet features that may increase the amount to which the percentage is applied for the annual withdrawal amount calculation. Other versions have a quarterly ratchet feature only. A joint life- time withdrawal benefit option is available to include coverage for spouses. |
| Most versions of the withdrawal benefit have reset and/or step-up features that may increase the guaranteed withdrawal amount in certain conditions. Earlier versions of the withdrawal benefit guarantee that annual withdrawals of up to 7.0% of eligible premiums may be made until eligible premiums previously paid by the contractowner are returned, regardless of account value performance. Asset allocation requirements apply at all times where withdrawals are guaranteed for life. |
§ | Guaranteed Minimum Accumulation Benefit (“GMAB”) - Guarantees that the account value will be at least 100% of the eligible premiums paid by the contractowner after 10 years, net of any contract withdrawals (GMAB 10). In the past, the Company offered an alternative design that guaranteed the account value to be at least 200% of the eligible premiums paid by contractowners after 20 years (GMAB 20). The Company has discontinued both of these options fornew sales. |
| |
Effective June 30, 2008, the Company reinsured most of its living benefit guarantees to an affiliated reinsurer to mitigate the risk produced by such benefits. This reinsurance agreement covers all of the GMIBs, as well as the GMWBs with lifetime guarantees (“the “Reinsured living benefits”). The GMABs and the GMWBs without lifetime guarantees (the “Non-reinsured living benefits”) are not covered by this reinsurance.
Prior to June 30, 2008, the Company utilized an equity hedging program to mitigate risks associated with all living benefits. The non-reinsured living benefits are still covered by the Company’s equity hedging program.
For the reinsured living benefits, as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the guaranteed value of these benefits in excess of account values was estimated to be $12.0 billion and $397.5, respectively, before reinsurance. The increase was primarily driven by the decrease in the account values of contractowners due to unfavorable equity market performance in 2008. After reinsurance, the guaranteed values in excess of account value were $0 and $397.5 for December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company recorded a liability, net of reinsurance, representing the estimated net present value of its future obligations for these benefits of $0 and $138.0 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
6
For the non-reinsured living benefits, as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the guaranteed value of these benefits in excess of account values was $310.0 and $109.0, respectively. The Company recorded a liability representing the estimated net present value of its future obligations for these benefits of $153.0 and $11.3 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Equity Hedging Program: In order to hedge equity risk associated with non-reinsured GMDBs and guaranteed living benefits, the Company enters into futures positions on various public market equity indices chosen to closely replicate contractowner variable fund returns. The Company uses market consistent valuation techniques to establish its derivative positions and to rebalance the derivative positions in response to market fluctuations. One aspect of the hedging program is designed to offset changes related to equity experience in the liability and to pay excess claims not covered by the contractowner account value. In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company began a new tactical hedging program designed to mitigate the impact of equity market movements on future fee income for its variable annuity business. The Company also administers a hedging program t hat mitigates both equity risk and equity volatility risk associated with its Principal Guard GMWB product issued in 2005 and beyond. This hedge strategy primarily involves entering into put options. The derivatives under the equity hedging programs do not qualify for hedge accounting under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”).
Other risks posed by market conditions, such as interest rate risk and the majority of the Company’s equity volatility risk, and risks posed by contractowner experience, such as surrender and mortality experience deviations, are not explicitly mitigated by this program. In addition, certain funds, where there is no replicating market index and where hedging is not appropriate, as well as certain enhanced death benefits, are excluded from the program.
For those risks addressed by the equity hedging program, the Company is exposed to the risk that the market indices will not adequately replicate actual contractowner variable fund growth. Any differences between actual results and the market indices result in income volatility.
Fixed Annuities: The fixed annuities offered by the Company are general account products and include single premium immediate, multi-year guaranteed, annual reset, and fixed indexed (“FIA”) annuities. Under fixed annuity contracts, the principal amount is guaranteed, and, for a specified time period, the Company credits interest to the contractowner accounts at a fixed interest rate, or, for an FIA, the greater of a fixed interest rate or a return based upon performance of the Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 index and participation rates set by the Company. For accounting purposes, the equity return component of an FIA is considered an embedded derivative. See further discussion under “Reserves” below. The Company bears the investment risk on fixed annuities, because, while the Company credits contractowner account s with a stated interest rate, the Company cannot be certain the investment income earned on the general account assets will exceed that rate.
7
S&P 500 call options are purchased and written to hedge equity risk associated with FIA contracts. During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company began using futures contracts to hedge certain FIA contracts. The FIA hedging program is limited to currently accruing liabilities resulting from participation rates that have already been set, and measured using capital market valuation techniques. Future equity returns, which may be reflected in FIA credited rates beyond the current policy term, are not hedged. The derivatives under the FIA hedging program do not qualify for hedge accounting under US GAAP.
The Company’s major source of income from fixed annuities is the spread between the investment income earned on the underlying general account assets and the interest rate credited to contractowner accounts.
Guaranteed Investments Contracts and Funding Agreements: The Company is also a provider of GICs issued to the stable value market and other institutional customers. The Company may issue GICs to one or more special purpose entities, including the ING USA Global Funding Trusts, which concurrently sell notes to institutional or retail investors in order to fund the purchase of GICs. The Company profits from the sale of GICs by earning income in excess of the amount credited to the customer accounts, less the cost of administering the product. The Company bears the investment risk because, while the Company credits customer accounts with an interest rate based on a predetermined index, plus a spread or a fixed rate, the Company cannot be certain the investment income earned on the general account investments, less expenses will exceed that rate.
Other Insurance Products: Historically, the Company provided interest-sensitive, traditional life insurance, and health insurance products. All health insurance has been ceded to other insurers and new policies are no longer written. The Company ceased the issuance of life insurance policies in 2001, and all life insurance business is currently in run-off. A certain portion of the assets held in the general account are dedicated to funding this block of business.
Strategy, Method of Distribution, and Principal Markets
The Company believes longer life expectancies, an aging population, and growing concern over the stability and availability of the Social Security system have made retirement planning a priority for many Americans. The target market for the Company’s annuity products is primarily individuals, while the target market for GICs is primarily institutional investors and corporate benefit plans.
The principal distribution channels of the Company’s variable and fixed annuities include national wirehouses, regional securities firms, independent broker-dealers, banks, life insurance companies with captive agency sales forces, independent insurance agents, independent marketing organizations, and affiliated broker-dealers. GICs are distributed primarily through direct sales by home office personnel or through specialty insurance brokers.
8
The Company markets its variable annuities primarily on the underlying guarantee features, positioning the product line as a risk management tool for clients and advisors. Indexed annuities are marketed primarily based on underlying guarantee features coupled with consumer-friendly product designs offering the potential for equity market upside. The Company also offers fixed annuities offering a guaranteed interest rate or annuity payment suitable for clients seeking a stable return.
The Company also utilizes sales inducements as part of its distribution strategy for annuities. Sales inducements represent benefits paid to contractowners for a specified period, which are incremental to the amounts the Company credits on similar contracts and are higher than the contract’s expected ongoing crediting rates for periods after the inducement.
The Company is not dependent upon any single customer, and no single customer accounted for 10.0% or more of the Company’s revenue in 2008. The only distributor that produced 5.0% or more of 2008 annuity sales was the ING Advisors Network (a group of broker-dealers affiliated with the Company), which produced approximately 12.2% of annuity sales.
Assets Under Management
A substantial portion of the Company’s fees, or other charges and margins, are based on general and separate account assets under management (“AUM”). General account AUM represents assets in which the Company bears the investment risk, while separate account AUM represents assets in which the contractowners bear the investment risk. AUM is principally affected by net deposits (i.e., annuity premiums and GIC deposits, less surrenders), investment performance (i.e., interest credited to contractowner accounts for fixed options or market performance for variable options), and contractowner retention. The general and separate account AUM was as follows at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
| | | |
| December 31, | |
| 2008 | | 2007 |
Variable annuities | $ 35,112.3 | $ 45,525.9 |
Fixed annuities | 17,284.2 | | 17,167.4 |
GICs | 6,233.2 | | 6,976.1 |
Other insurance products | 1,255.1 | | 1,300.9 |
Total | $ 59,884.8 | $ 70,970.3 |
Competition
The competitive annuity market remains intense and is dominated by a number of large, highly-rated insurance companies. Increasing competition within the retirement savings business from traditional insurance carriers, as well as banks and mutual fund companies, offers consumers many choices. The Company’s annuity products compete in the annuity market principally on the basis of investment performance, product design, brand recognition, financial strength ratings, distribution capabilities, levels of charges and credited rates, reputation, and customer service.
9
The Company competes in the GIC market primarily on the basis of its capital markets, product structuring, and risk management expertise, as well as its brand recognition and financial strength ratings. Other competitors in this market include other life insurance companies, as well as banks and other financial institutions.
Reserves
The Company establishes and carries actuarially-determined reserves that are calculated to meet its future obligations. Generally, reserves are calculated using mortality and withdrawal rate assumptions based on relevant Company experience and are periodically reviewed against both industry standards and experience. Changes in, or deviations from, the assumptions used can significantly affect the Company’s reserve levels and related future operations.
Future policy benefits and claims reserves include reserves for deferred annuities and immediate annuities with and without life contingent payouts, universal and traditional life insurance contracts, and GICs.
Reserves for deferred annuity investment contracts and immediate annuities without life contingent payouts are equal to cumulative deposits, less charges and withdrawals, plus credited interest thereon. Deferred annuity crediting rates and reserve interest rates varied by product up to 10.0% for 2008 and 2007, and 7.8% for 2006.
Reserves for individual immediate annuities with life contingent payout benefits are computed on the basis of assumed interest discount rate, mortality, and expenses, including a margin for adverse deviations. Such assumptions generally vary by annuity plan type, year of issue, and policy duration. For 2008, 2007, and 2006, immediate annuity reserve interest discount rates varied up to 8.0%.
Reserves for FIAs are computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) No. 97, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Long-Duration Contracts and for Realized Gains and Losses from the Sale of Investments” (“FAS 97”), FAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS 133”), and FAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS 157”). Accordingly, the aggregate initial liability is equal to the deposit received, plus a bonus, if applicable, and is split into a host component and an embedded derivative component. Thereafter, the host liability accumulates at a set interest rate, and the embedded derivative liability is recognized at fair value, with the change in fair value recorded in the Statements of Operations.
Reserves for universal life products are equal to cumulative deposits, less withdrawals and charges, plus credited interest thereon. Reserves for traditional life insurance contracts represent the present value of future benefits to be paid to or on behalf of contractowners and related expenses, less the present value of future net premiums.
10
Under Statement of Position (“SOP”) 03-1, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts for Separate Accounts” (“SOP 03-1”), the Company calculates additional liabilities (“SOP 03-1 reserves”) for certain variable annuity guaranteed benefits and for universal life products with certain patterns of cost of insurance charges and certain other fees. The SOP 03-1 reserve for such products recognizes the portion of contract assessments received in early years used to compensate the insurer for services provided in later years.
The Company calculates a benefit ratio for each block of business subject to SOP 03-1, and calculates an SOP 03-1 reserve by accumulating amounts equal to the benefit ratio multiplied by the assessments for each period, reduced by excess benefits during the period. The SOP 03-1 reserve is accumulated at interest rates using rates consistent with the deferred policy acquisition costs model for the period. The calculated reserve includes a provision for universal life contracts with patterns of cost of insurance charges that produce expected gains from the insurance benefit function followed by losses from that function in later years.
GMABs and GMWBs without life contingent payouts are considered to be derivatives under FAS 133. The additional reserves for these guarantees are recognized at fair value through the Statements of Operations.
Reserves for GICs are calculated using the amount deposited with the Company, less withdrawals, plus interest accrued to the ending valuation date. Interest on these contracts is accrued by a predetermined index, plus a spread or a fixed rate, established at the issue date of the contract.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company’s life and annuity insurance reserves (general and separate account) and deposit-type funds were comprised of each type of the following products:
| | | | |
| 2008 | | 2007 | |
| Reserves | % of Total | Reserves | % of Total |
Variable annuity | $ 36,680.1 | 55.0% | $ 45,941.2 | 60.5% |
Fixed annuity | 18,976.0 | 28.5% | 19,233.4 | 25.3% |
GICs | 9,401.4 | 14.1% | 9,415.1 | 12.4% |
Other insurance products | 1,604.0 | 2.4% | 1,349.7 | 1.8% |
Total | $ 66,661.5 | 100.0% | $ 75,939.4 | 100.0% |
Reinsurance Arrangements
The Company utilizes indemnity reinsurance agreements to reduce its exposure to large losses from its annuity and life insurance businesses. Reinsurance permits recovery of a portion of losses from reinsurers, although it does not discharge the Company’s primary liability as the direct insurer of the risks. Reinsurance treaties are structured as yearly renewable term, coinsurance, or modified coinsurance. The Company bases its selection of a reinsurer on the financial strength of the reinsurer.
11
The Company currently has a significant concentration of ceded reinsurance with its affiliate, Security Life of Denver Insurance Company (“Security Life”). At December 31, 2008, the Company has reinsurance primarily related to GICs, fixed annuities, and universal life policies with Security Life.
One of the main risks reinsured by the Company is the GMDBs on its variable annuity policies issued prior to January 1, 2000. For contracts issued after December 31, 1999, the Company hedges its exposure due to these products. Other reinsurance contracts coinsure life, accident and health, and annuity businesses. The Company continually monitors and evaluates the financial strength and credit ratings of its reinsurers. Only those reinsurance recoverable balances deemed probable of recovery are reflected as assets on the Company’s Balance Sheets.
Effective June 30, 2008, ING USA entered into an automatic reinsurance agreement with its affiliate, Security Life of Denver International Limited (“SLDI”). Under the terms of the agreement, ING USA ceded to SLDI 100% of the benefits guaranteed under specific variable annuity guaranteed living benefit riders attached to certain variable annuity contracts issued by ING USA on or after January 1, 2000.
The Company also currently reinsures risks ceded by its affiliate, ReliaStar Life Insurance Company (“ReliaStar”), on life insurance policies through bulk reinsurance agreements, a coinsurance funds withheld agreement, and a quota share retrocession agreement.
See “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Reinsurance Agreements” in Management’s Narrative Analysis of the Results of Operations and Financial Condition for further discussion on the Company’s reinsurance arrangements.
Investment Overview and Strategy
The Company’s investment strategy focuses on diversification by asset class. The Company seeks to achieve economic diversification, while reducing overall credit risk and liquidity risks. In addition, the Company seeks to mitigate the impact of cash flow variability from embedded options within certain investment products, such as prepayment options and interest rate options embedded in collateralized mortgage obligations and call options embedded in corporate bonds. The investment management function is centralized under ING Investment Management LLC, an affiliate of the Company, pursuant to an investment advisory agreement. Separate portfolios are established for groups of products with similar liability characteristics within the Company.
The Company’s general account invests primarily in fixed maturity investments, including publicly issued bonds (including government bonds), privately placed notes and bonds, mortgage-backed securities, and asset-backed securities. The primary investment strategy is to optimize the risk-adjusted return through superior asset selection predicated on a developed relative value approach, credit research and monitoring, superior management of interest rate risk, and active exploration into new investment product opportunities. Investments are purchased when market returns, adjusted for risk and expenses, are sufficient to profitably support growth of the liability block of business. In addition, assets and liabilities are analyzed and reported
12
for internal management purposes on an option-adjusted basis. The level of required capital of given transactions is a primary factor in determining relative value among different investment and liability alternatives, within the scope of each product type’s objective. An active review of existing holdings identifies specific assets that could be effectively traded in order to enhance the risk-adjusted returns of the portfolio, while minimizing adverse tax and accounting impacts. The Company strives to maintain a portfolio weighted average asset quality rating of A, based on S&P ratings classifications. The weighted average excludes mortgage loans, but includes mortgage-backed securities, which are reported with bonds.
The Company uses derivatives for hedging purposes to reduce the Company’s exposure to cash flow variability of assets and liabilities, interest rate risk, credit risk, and market risk. In addition, the Company uses credit default swaps to reduce the credit loss exposure with respect to certain assets that the Company owns, or to assume credit exposure on certain assets that the Company does not own. These credit default swaps are similar in credit risk to bonds of the named issuer, and allow the Company to gain access to a broader, more diversified pool of credit risks. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources - Derivatives” in Management’s Narrative Analysis of the Results of Operations and Financial Condition for further discussion of the Company’s use of derivatives.
Ratings
On January 27, 2009, S&P reaffirmed its AA (Very Strong) counterparty credit and financial strength rating of ING’s primary U.S. insurance operating companies (“ING U.S.”), including the Company. S&P also, on that date, reaffirmed it’s A-1+ short-term counterparty credit rating on the Company. S&P currently maintains a negative outlook for the Company. In February 2009, S&P announced that it will conduct new reviews of the ratings of European global multi-line insurers to assess their ability to “maintain financial strength through a period of heightened stress.” Upon completion of its review, S&P announced on March 31, 2009, that it had downgraded ING U.S., including the Company, to AA- from AA and reaffirmed a negative outlook for the Company.
On October 21, 2008, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) placed the Aa3 insurance financial strength rating of ING U.S. under review for possible downgrade. On January 28, 2009, Moody’s downgraded the insurance financial ratings of ING U.S., including the Company, to A1 from Aa3 and removed its outlook from Negative to Stable. Moody’s also, on that date, affirmed the short-term financial strength rating of Prime-1 (P-1) for the Company.
On June 18, 2008, A.M. Best Company, Inc. (“A.M. Best”) reaffirmed the financial strength rating of A+ (Superior) of ING U.S., including the Company, with a stable outlook. A.M. Best assigned an issuer credit rating of aa- to ING USA at that time.
On January 28, 2009, Fitch Ratings Ltd. (“Fitch”) downgraded its ratings for ING U.S. from AA to AA- and kept its outlook at Negative.
The downgrades by Fitch and Moody’s reflect a broader view of how the financial services industry is being challenged by the current economic environment. In response to weakening global markets, the rating agencies have been continuously
13
reevaluating their ratings of banks and insurance companies around the world. Over the past several months, the rating agencies have adjusted their outlook of the financial services industry overall downward, while reviewing the individual ratings they give to specific entities.
Regulation
The Company’s operations are subject to comprehensive regulation throughout the United States. The laws of the various jurisdictions establish supervisory agencies, including the state insurance departments, with broad authority to grant licenses to transact business and regulate many aspects of the products and services offered by the Company, as well as solvency and reserve adequacy. Many agencies also regulate the investment activities of insurance companies on the basis of quality, diversification, and other quantitative criteria. The Company’s operations and accounts are subject to examination at regular intervals by certain of these regulators.
ING USA is subject to the insurance laws of the state in which it is organized and of the other jurisdictions in which it transacts business. The primary regulator of the Company’s insurance operations is the Division of Insurance for the State of Iowa. Among other matters, these agencies may regulate trade practices, agent licensing, policy forms, underwriting and claims practices, minimum interest rate to be credited to fixed annuity contractowner accounts, and the maximum interest rates that can be charged on policy loans.
The SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), the self-regulatory organization which succeeded to the regulatory functions of the National Association of Securities Dealers and the New York Stock Exchange, and, to a lesser extent, the states, regulate sales and investment management activities and operations of the Company. Generally, the Company’s variable annuity products and certain of its fixed annuities are registered as securities with the SEC. Regulations of the SEC, Department of Labor (“DOL”), and Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) also impact certain of the Company’s annuity, life insurance, and other investment products. These products may involve separate accounts and mutual funds registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Insurance Holding Company Laws
A number of states regulate affiliated groups that include insurers such as the Company under holding company statutes. These laws, among other things, place certain restrictions on investments in, or transactions with, affiliates and may require pre-approval of the payment of certain dividends by the Company to its Parent.
Insurance Company Guaranty Fund Assessments
Insurance companies are assessed the costs of funding the insolvencies of other insurance companies by the various state guaranty associations, generally based on the amount of premiums companies collect in that state.
14
The Company accrues the cost of future guaranty fund assessments based on estimates of insurance company insolvencies provided by the National Organization of Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Associations and the amount of premiums written in each state. The Company has estimated this liability to be $10.5 and $11.6 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company has also recorded an asset of $3.7 and $4.6 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, for future credits to premium taxes for assessments already paid.
For information regarding certain other potential regulatory changes relating to the Company’s businesses, see Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Employees and Other Shared Services
The Company had 1,325 employees as of December 31, 2008, primarily focused on managing new business processing, product distribution, marketing, customer service, and product management for the Company and certain of its affiliates, as well as providing product development, actuarial, and finance services to the Company and certain of its affiliates. The Company also utilizes services provided by ING North America Insurance Corporation and other affiliates. These services include underwriting, risk management, human resources, investment management, information technology, legal and compliance services, as well as other new business processing, product distribution, marketing, customer service, product management, actuarial, and finance related services. The affiliated companies are reimbursed for the Company’s use of various services and facilities under a variety of intercompany agreements.
In addition to the normal risks of business, the Company is subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including those which are described below.
The current financial crisis has reached unprecedented levels of market volatility and has adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations
Markets in the United States and elsewhere have experienced extreme volatility and disruption for more than twelve months, due largely to the stresses affecting the global financial systems, which accelerated significantly in the second half of 2008. The United States has entered a severe recession that is likely to persist throughout and even beyond 2009, despite past and future expected governmental intervention in the world’s major economies. These circumstances have exerted significant downward pressure on prices of equity securities and virtually all other asset classes and have resulted in substantially increased market volatility, severely constrained credit and capital markets, particularly for financial institutions, and an overall loss of investor confidence. Economic conditions have continued to deteriorate in early 2009. These market conditions have affected and may continue to affect the Company’s results of op erations and investment portfolio since the Company is exposed to significant financial and capital markets risk, including changes in interest rates, credit spreads and equity prices.
15
The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to the market price and cash flow variability associated with changes in interest rates. Changes in interest rates may be caused by either changes in the underlying risk-free rates or changes in the credit spreads required for various levels of risk within the market. A rise in interest rates or widening of credit spreads will increase the net unrealized loss position of the Company’s investment portfolio and, if long-term interest rates rise dramatically within a six to twelve month time period, certain contractowners may surrender their contracts, requiring the Company to liquidate assets in an unrealized loss position. Due to the long-term nature of the liabilities associated with certain of the Company’s products, sustained declines in long term interest rates may subject the Company to reinvestment risks, increased hedging costs, and increased costs of guaranteed benefits. As interest rates decline, borrowers may prepay or redeem mortgages and other investments with embedded call options. This may force the Company to reinvest the proceeds at lower interest rates. In other situations, declines in interest rates or changes in credit spreads may result in reducing the duration of certain liabilities, creating asset liability duration mismatches and possibly lower spread income due to minimum interest rate guarantees on certain liabilities.
This market environment has also reduced the liquidity of institutional investors, which has limited their ability to purchase guaranteed investment contracts and funding agreements (collectively “GICs”). These adverse market conditions may constrain the Company’s ability to issue or renew GICs in the near term and may increase the interest costs associated with new contracts.
With the continued widening of credit spreads, the net unrealized loss position of the Company’s investment portfolio increased $1.8 billion in 2008, and has also contributed to the increase in other-than-temporary impairments and trading losses. If issuer credit spreads continue to widen or increase significantly over an extended period of time, it would likely exacerbate these effects, resulting in greater and additional other-than-temporary impairments. In addition, a reduction in market liquidity has made it difficult to value certain of the Company’s securities as trading has become less frequent. As such, valuations may include assumptions or estimates that may be more susceptible to significant changes which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.
Another important primary exposure to equity risk relates to the potential for lower earnings associated with variable annuities where fee income is earned based upon the fair value of the assets under management. During the course of 2008, the declines in equity markets have negatively impacted assets under management. As a result, fee income earned on the value of those assets under management has been negatively impacted. A decline in the equity markets also caused an increase in both hedging costs and costs of guaranteed benefits.
In addition, certain of the Company’s products offer guaranteed benefits which increase the potential benefit exposure should equity markets decline. Due to declines in equity markets during 2008, the liability for these guaranteed benefits has increased and the Company’s statutory capital position has decreased. While the Company uses reinsurance in combination with derivative instruments to minimize the risk associated with these guaranteed benefits, the Company is liable for the guaranteed benefits in the event that reinsurers or derivative counterparties are unable
16
or unwilling to pay, and are subject to the risk that other management procedures prove ineffective or that unanticipated policyholder behavior, combined with sustained adverse market events, produces economic losses beyond the scope of the risk management techniques employed, which individually or collectively may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Continuing adverse financial market conditions may significantly affect the Company’s ability to meet liquidity needs, access to capital and cost of capital
Adverse capital market conditions may affect the availability and cost of borrowed funds, including commercial paper, thereby ultimately impacting profitability and ability to support or grow the businesses. The Company’s capital position declined in 2008 relative to 2007, and the Company expects continued pressure in 2009. Further significant declines in the Company’s capital position could impair the ability to support the business, to absorb continuing operating losses and liabilities under customer contracts and to preserve overall competitiveness. The Company has taken a number of steps to preserve capital and mitigate risk. These initiatives include entering into reinsurance arrangements, modifying product features, adjusting hedging activities, mitigating risks in the Company’s investment portfolio, and reducing the expense base. Taken as a whole, these actions may not be effective, especially if the global econ omy experiences further shocks. Even if effective, certain measures may have unintended consequences. For example, adjusting the hedging program may better protect statutory surplus, but may also result in greater earnings volatility, additional costs or other charges or adversely affect the ability to compete.
While the Company has various sources of liquidity available, sustained adverse market conditions could impact the cost and availability of these borrowing sources, including utilization of letters of credit through offshore reinsurance agreements. The Company may not be able to raise sufficient cash as and when required if the financial markets remain in turmoil, and any cash raised may be on unfavorable terms. Any sales of securities or other assets may be completed on unfavorable terms or cause the Company to incur losses. The Company would lose the potential for market upside on those assets in a market recovery. Without sufficient liquidity, the Company could be forced to curtail certain operations, and the business could suffer.
The amount of statutory capital that the Company must hold to maintain its financial strength and credit ratings can vary significantly from time to time and is sensitive to a number of factors outside of the Company’s control
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) has established regulations that provide minimum capitalization requirements based on risk-based capital (“RBC”) formulas for insurance companies. The RBC formula for life insurance companies establishes capital requirements relating to insurance, business, asset and interest rate risks, including equity, interest rate and expense recovery risks associated with variable annuities and group annuities that contain death benefits or certain living benefits.
17
In any particular year, statutory surplus amounts and RBC ratios may increase or decrease depending on a variety of factors – the amount of statutory income or losses generated by the Company (which itself is sensitive to equity market and credit market conditions), the amount of additional capital the Company must hold to support business growth, changes in equity market levels, the value and credit ratings of certain fixed-income securities in its investment portfolio, the value of certain derivative instruments that do not receive hedge accounting, changes in interest rates, as well as changes to the NAIC RBC formulas. Most of these factors are outside of the Company’s control. The Company’s financial strength and credit ratings are significantly influenced by its statutory surplus amounts and RBC. In addition, rating agencies may implement changes to internal models that have the effect of increasing or decreasing the amount of statutory capital the Company must hold in order to maintain its current ratings. In addition, in extreme scenarios of equity market declines or sustained periods of low interest rates, the amount of additional statutory reserves that the Company is required to hold for variable annuity guarantees increases at a greater than linear rate. This reduces the statutory surplus used in calculating the Company’s RBC ratios. On January 28, 2009, the Company’s financial strength ratings were downgraded by two rating agencies. See Item 1. Business. To the extent that the Company’s statutory capital resources are deemed to be insufficient to maintain a particular rating by one or more rating agencies, the Company may seek to raise additional capital. Alternatively, if the Company were unable to raise additional capital in such a scenario, the Company’s financial strength and credit ratings might be further downgraded by one or more rating agencies.
The Company has experienced ratings downgrades recently and may experience additional future downgrades in the Company’s ratings, which may negatively affect profitability and financial condition
Ratings are an important factor in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies. On January 28, 2009, Moody’s downgraded the financial strength rating of ING U.S., including the Company, to “A1” from “Aa3”. On the same day, Fitch downgraded the financial strength rating of ING U.S., including the Company, to “AA-” from “AA”. On March 31, 2009, S&P downgraded the financial strength rating of ING U.S., including the Company, to “AA-” from “AA.” See “Ratings” in Item 1. Business.
A downgrade, or the potential for a downgrade, of any of the Company’s ratings may lead to lower margins and fee income as follows:
§ | Increase in contract surrenders and withdrawals; |
§ | Termination of relationships with broker-dealers, banks, agents, wholesalers, and other distributors of products and services; |
§ | Reduction of new annuity contract and GIC sales or renewals; and |
§ | Ratings triggers under Collateral Support Annexes of derivatives contracts, which would require the Company to post additional collateral. |
The Company cannot predict what actions rating organizations may take, or what actions it may be required to take in response to the actions of rating organizations, which could adversely affect the Company. Rating organizations assign ratings based upon several factors, including the following:
18
§ | Statutory capital; |
§ | Risk of investment portfolio; |
§ | Economic trends affecting the financial services industry; |
§ | Changes in models and formulas used by rating organizations to assess the financial strength of a rated company; |
§ | Strength of the Company’s management team; |
§ | Enterprise risk management; and |
§ | Other circumstances outside the rated company’s control. |
In view of the difficulties experienced recently by many financial institutions, including insurance companies, it is possible that rating organizations will heighten the level of scrutiny that they apply to such institutions, will increase the frequency and scope of their credit reviews, will request additional information from the companies that they rate, and may adjust upward the capital and other requirements employed in the rating organization models for maintenance of certain ratings levels. It is possible that the outcome of such reviews of the Company will have additional adverse ratings consequences, which could have a material adverse effect on results of operations and financial condition.
Regulatory initiatives intended to alleviate the current financial crisis that have been adopted may not be effective and, in any event, may be accompanied by other initiatives, including new capital requirements or other regulations, that could materially affect the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and liquidity
In response to the financial crisis affecting the banking system and financial markets, the U.S federal government has passed new legislation in an effort to stabilize the financial markets, including the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. The Company cannot predict with any certainty the effect these actions or any other legislative initiatives will have on the financial markets or on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. This legislation and other proposals or actions may also have other consequences, including material effects on interest rates, which could materially affect the Company’s investments, results of operations and liquidity in ways that are not predictable. The failure to effectively implement this legislation and related proposals or actions could also result in material adverse effects, notably inc reased constraints on the liquidity available in the banking system and financial markets and increased pressure on stock prices, any of which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. In the event of future material deterioration in business conditions, the Company may need to raise additional capital or consider other transactions to manage its capital position or liquidity.
In addition, the Company is subject to extensive laws and regulations that are administered and/or enforced by a number of different governmental authorities and non-governmental self-regulatory bodies, including state insurance regulators, state securities administrators, the NAIC, the SEC, FINRA, Financial Accounting Standards Board, and state attorneys general. In light of the current financial crisis, some of these authorities are or may in the future consider enhanced or new requirements intended to prevent future crises or otherwise assure the stability of
19
institutions under their supervision. These authorities may also seek to exercise their supervisory or enforcement authority in new or more robust ways. All of these possibilities, if they occurred, could affect the way the Company conducts its business and manages capital, and may require the Company to satisfy increased capital requirements, any of which in turn could materially affect the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. Section 382 of the United States Internal Revenue Code contains a so-called loss limitation rule, the general purpose of which is to prevent trafficking in tax losses (i.e., it is an anti-abuse rule). The rule is triggered when the ownership of a company changes by more than 50% (measured by value) on a cumulative basis in any three year period. If triggered, restrictions may be imposed on the future use of realized tax losses as well as certain losses that are built into th e assets of the company at the time of the ownership change and that are realized within the next five years. The issuance of EUR 10 billion of securities by ING to the Dutch State on November 12, 2008, brought ING’s (cumulative) change of ownership as per that date to approximately 42%. As a result, future increases in capital or other changes of ownership may adversely affect the net result or equity of ING, unless relief from the loss limitation rules is obtained, which may or may not be possible.
The valuation of many of the Company’s financial instruments include methodologies, estimations and assumptions that are subject to differing interpretations and could result in changes to investment valuations that may materially adversely affect results of operations and financial condition
The following financial instruments are carried at fair value in the Company’s financial statements: fixed maturities, equity securities, freestanding and embedded derivatives, and separate account assets. The Company has categorized these securities into a three-level hierarchy, based on the priority of the inputs to the respective valuation technique. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). In many situations, inputs used to measure the fair value of an asset or liability position may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In these situations, the Company will determine the level in which the fair value falls based upon the lowest level input that is significant to the determination of the fair value.
The determination of fair values are made at a specific point in time, based on available market information and judgments about financial instruments, including estimates of the timing and amounts of expected future cash flows and the credit standing of the issuer or counterparty. The use of different methodologies and assumptions may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
During periods of market disruption such as the Company is currently experiencing, including periods of rapidly changing credit spreads or illiquidity, it has been and will likely continue to be difficult to value certain of the Company’s securities, such as Alt-A or subprime mortgage-backed securities, if trading becomes less frequent and/or market data becomes less observable. There may be certain asset classes that were in active markets with significant observable data that become illiquid due to the current financial environment. In such cases, more securities may fall to Level 3 and thus require more subjectivity and management judgment. As such, valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are less observable or require greater estimation
20
thereby resulting in values which may differ materially from the value at which the investments may be ultimately sold. Further, rapidly changing and unprecedented credit and equity market conditions could materially impact the valuation of securities as reported within the financial statements and the period-to-period changes in value could vary significantly. Decreases in value could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. During the third quarter of 2008, the Company determined that the market for Alt-A and subprime mortgage-backed securities was inactive and, as such, classified those assets as Level 3. As of December 31, 2008, 7.8%, 78.1% and 14.1% of the Company’s available-for-sale securities were considered to be Level 1, 2 and 3, respectively.
If assumptions used in estimating future gross profits differ from actual experience, the Company may be required to accelerate the amortization of Deferred Acquisition Costs (“DAC”), which could have a material adverse effect on results of operations and financial condition
The Company defers acquisition costs associated with the sales of its variable annuity products. These costs are amortized over the expected life of the contracts in proportion to the present value of estimated gross profits. The projection of estimated gross profits requires the use of certain assumptions, principally related to separate account fund returns, surrender and lapse rates, interest margin, mortality, future impairments, costs of guaranteed benefits, and hedging costs. Estimating future gross profits is a complex process requiring considerable judgment and the forecasting of events well into the future. If assumptions regarding policyholder behavior, hedging costs or costs to employ other risk mitigating techniques prove to be inaccurate or if significant or sustained equity market declines persist, the Company could be required to accelerate the amortization of DAC which would result in a charge to earnings. Such adjust ments could have a material adverse effect on results of operations and financial condition.
If the Company’s business does not perform well, the Company may be required to establish an additional valuation allowance against the deferred income tax asset, which could have a material adverse effect on results of operations and financial condition
Deferred income tax represents the tax effect of the differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are assessed periodically by management to determine if they are realizable. Factors in management’s determination include the performance of the business, including the ability to generate capital gains from a variety of sources and tax planning strategies. If based on available information, it is more likely than not that the deferred income tax asset will not be realized, then a valuation allowance must be established with a corresponding charge to earnings. As of December 31, 2008, the Company’s valuation allowance was $408.9. However, based on facts and circumstances identified in the future, the valuation allowance may not be sufficient. Charges to increase the valuation allowance could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial position.
21
Reinsurance subjects the Company to the credit risk of reinsurers and may not be adequate to protect against losses arising from ceded reinsurance
The collectibility of reinsurance recoverables is subject to uncertainty arising from a number of factors, including whether the insured losses meet the qualifying conditions of the reinsurance contract, whether reinsurers, or their affiliates, have the financial capacity and willingness to make payments under the terms of the reinsurance treaty or contract, and the degree to which the Company’s reinsurance balances are secured by trust agreements or letters of credit. The Company’s inability to collect a material recovery from a reinsurer could have a material adverse effect on profitability and financial condition.
Offshore reinsurance subjects the Company to the risk that the reinsurer is unable to provide letters of credit
The Company’s credit for reinsurance taken under affiliated offshore reinsurance agreements is subject to uncertainty arising from the offshore reinsurer’s ability to provide letters of credit from lending banks under adverse market conditions. In addition, the cost of letters of credit has become very expensive in the current economic environment. Because of this, the Company is taking various steps to develop alternative sources for reinsurance collateral. To address the potential exposure, the Company is considering alternatives, including, but not limited to, reverse repurchase agreements, a Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (“FHLB”) advance agreement, additional letters of credit, and securitization of life insurance reserves or structured financing. If these steps are unsuccessful, the Company would be unable to obtain full reserve credit to the extent that the reserves exceed the letter of credit. Loss o f reserve credit or the recapture of the reinsurance would result in a decrease in the capitalization of the Company.
The inability of counterparties to meet their financial obligations could have an adverse effect on the Company's results of operations.
Third-parties that owe the Company money, securities or other assets many not pay or perform under their obligations. These parties include issuers of securities held by the Company, customers, trading counterparties, counterparties under swaps, credit default and other derivative contracts, clearing agents, exchanges and other financial intermediaries. Defaults by one of more of these parties on their obligations to the Company due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, economic downturns, operational failure or even rumors about potential defaults by one of more of these parties could have an adverse effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Changes in underwriting and actual experience could materially affect profitability
The Company prices its products based on long-term assumptions regarding investment returns, mortality, morbidity, persistency, costs of guaranteed benefits, hedging costs and operating costs. Management establishes target returns for each product based upon these factors and the average amount of regulatory and rating agency capital that the Company must hold to support in-force contracts. The
22
Company monitors and manages pricing and sales mix to achieve target returns. Profitability from a new business emerges over a period of years, depending on the nature and life of the product, and is subject to variability, either positive or negative, as actual results may differ from pricing assumptions.
The Company’s profitability depends on the following:
§ | Adequacy of investment margins; |
§ | Management of market and credit risks associated with investments; |
§ | Ability to maintain premiums and contract charges at a level adequate to cover mortality and morbidity benefits and contract administration expenses; |
§ | Availability and cost of hedging; |
§ | Adequacy of contract charges on variable contracts to cover the cost of product features; |
§ | Availability and pricing of letters of credit associated with offshore reinsurance agreements; |
§ | Persistency of policies to ensure recovery of acquisition expenses; and |
§ | Management of operating costs and expenses within anticipated pricing allowances. |
Changes in reserve estimates may reduce profitability
The Company establishes reserves based upon estimates of how much the Company will pay for future benefits and claims. The Company calculates reserves based on many assumptions and estimates including future investment yields, mortality, morbidity, policy terminations, and expenses. The assumptions and estimates used in connection with the reserve estimation process are inherently uncertain. The Company periodically reviews the adequacy of reserves. The Company cannot, however, determine with precision the amounts that the Company will pay for, or the timing of payment of, actual benefits and claims or whether the assets supporting the policy liabilities will grow to the level assumed prior to payment of benefits or claims. If actual experience differs significantly from assumptions or estimates, reserves may not be adequate. As a result, the Company would incur a charge to earnings in the quarter in which the reserves are increased.
A loss of key product distribution relationships could materially affect sales
The Company distributes certain products under agreements with other members of the financial services industry that are not affiliated with the Company. Termination of one or more of these agreements due to, for example, a loss of confidence or a change in control of one of the distributors, could reduce sales.
Competition could negatively affect the ability to maintain or increase profitability
The insurance industry is intensely competitive. The Company competes based on factors including the following:
§ | Name recognition and reputation; |
§ | Service; |
§ | Investment performance; |
23
§ | Product features; |
§ | Price; |
§ | Perceived financial strength; and |
§ | Claims paying and credit ratings. |
The Company’s competitors include insurers, broker-dealers, financial advisors, asset managers, and other financial institutions, which may, for example, have greater market share, offer a broader range of products, or have higher claims-paying or credit ratings than the Company.
In recent years, there has been substantial consolidation among companies in the financial services industry resulting in increased competition from large, well-capitalized financial services firms. Current economic turmoil may accelerate consolidation activity. Many of these firms also have been able to increase their distribution systems through mergers or contractual arrangements. Furthermore, larger competitors may lower operating costs and have an ability to absorb greater risk, while maintaining financial strength ratings, allowing them to price products more competitively. While the Company cannot predict the future level of consolidation, the Company expects consolidation to continue and perhaps accelerate in the future, increasing competitive pressure.
Changes in federal income tax law or interpretations of existing tax law could affect profitability and financial condition by making some products less attractive to contractowners and increasing tax costs of contractowners or the Company
Annuity products that the Company sells currently benefit from one or more forms of tax favored status under current federal tax law. The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 and the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 significantly lowered individual tax rates and reduced the benefits of deferral on the build-up of value of annuities. Many of these provisions expire in 2010. It is likely that looming federal deficits will spawn numerous revenue raising proposals, including those directed at the life insurance industry and its products. Over the years, the life insurance industry has contended with proposals either to limit, or repeal, the continued tax deferral afforded to the “inside build-up” associated with life insurance and annuity products. While countering any such revenue proposal is a top industry priority, if such a proposal should be made, the Company cannot predict its sco pe, effect or likelihood of outcome.
Additionally, the Company is subject to federal corporation income tax, and benefits from certain federal tax provisions, including but not limited to, dividends received deductions, various tax credits, and insurance reserve deductions. There is risk that changes to federal tax law or in IRS interpretation of existing tax law may be enacted or adopted, and could result in materially higher corporate taxes than would be incurred under existing tax law or interpretation and adversely impact profitability.
24
Litigation may adversely affect profitability and financial condition
The Company is, and may be in the future, subject to legal actions in the ordinary course of insurance, investment management, and other business operations. These legal actions may include proceedings relating to aspects of businesses and operations that are specific to the Company and proceedings that are typical of the businesses in which the Company operates. Some of these proceedings may be brought on behalf of a class. Plaintiffs may seek large or indeterminate amounts of damage, including compensatory, liquidated, treble, and/or punitive damages. Given the large or indeterminate amounts sometimes sought, and the inherent unpredictability of litigation, it is possible that an adverse outcome could, from time to time, have an adverse effect on the Company’s reputation, results of operations, or cash flows, in particular quarterly or annual periods.
Changes in regulation in the United States and recent regulatory investigations may reduce profitability
The Company’s insurance and securities business is subject to comprehensive state and federal regulation and supervision throughout the United States. The primary purpose of state regulation is to protect contractowners, and not necessarily to protect creditors and investors. State insurance and securities regulators, state attorneys general, the NAIC, the SEC, FINRA, the DOL and the IRS continually reexamine existing laws and regulations and may impose changes in the future. Changes in legislation and administrative policies, or new interpretations of existing laws, in areas such as employee benefit plan regulation, financial services regulation, and federal taxation, could lessen the competitive advantages of certain of the Company’s products, result in the surrender of existing contracts and policies, increase costs, reduce new product sales, or result in higher taxes affecting the Company, thus reducing the Company’ ;s profitability.
Since 2002, the insurance industry has become the focus of increased regulatory scrutiny as various state and federal governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations conduct inquiries and investigations into the products and practices of the financial services industries. These initiatives currently focus on areas such as:
§ | Inappropriate trading of fund shares; |
§ | Revenue sharing and directed brokerage; |
§ | Sales and marketing practices (including sales to seniors); |
§ | Suitability; |
§ | Arrangements with service providers; |
§ | Pricing; |
§ | Product cost and fees; |
§ | Compensation and sales incentives; |
§ | Potential conflicts of interest; |
§ | Specific product types, including group annuities and indexed annuities; and |
§ | Adequacy of disclosure. |
25
In some cases, this regulatory scrutiny has led to new proposed legislation and regulation that could significantly affect the financial services industry, including businesses in which the Company is engaged, or has resulted in regulatory penalties, and litigation. At this time, the Company does not believe that any of this regulatory scrutiny will have a material adverse affect on it. The Company cannot, however, guarantee that new laws, regulations, and other regulatory action aimed at the business practices under scrutiny would not adversely affect its business. The adoption of new laws and regulations, enforcement actions, or litigation, whether or not involving the Company, could influence the manner in which the Company distributes its products, result in negative coverage of the industry by the media, cause significant harm to the Company’s reputation, and adversely impact profitability.
The Company’s products are subject to extensive regulation and failure to meet any of the complex product requirements may reduce profitability
The Company’s insurance and annuity products are subject to a complex and extensive array of state and federal tax, securities and insurance laws, and regulations, which are administered and enforced by a number of different governmental and self-regulatory authorities, including state insurance regulators, state securities administrators, the SEC, the FINRA, the DOL, and the IRS.
For example, U.S. federal income tax law imposes requirements relating to insurance and annuity product design, administration, and investments that are conditions for beneficial tax treatment of such products under the Internal Revenue Code. Failure to administer certain contract features (for example, contractual annuity start dates in nonqualified annuities) could affect such beneficial tax treatment. Additionally, state and federal securities and insurance laws impose requirements relating to insurance and annuity product design, offering and distribution, and administration. Failure to meet any of these complex tax, securities, or insurance requirements could subject the Company to administrative penalties imposed by a particular governmental or self-regulatory authority, unanticipated costs associated with remedying such failure or other claims, harm to the Company's reputation, interruption of the Company's operations, or adverse ly impact profitability.
A failure of the Company’s operating systems or a compromise of security with respect to operating systems or portable electronic devices could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition
The Company is highly dependent on automated systems to record and process Company and contractowner transactions. The Company may experience a failure of its operating systems or a compromise of security due to technical system flaws, clerical or record-keeping errors, or tampering or manipulation of those systems by employees or unauthorized third parties. Information security risks also exist with respect to the use of portable electronic devices, such as laptops, which are particularly vulnerable to loss and theft. The Company may also be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond its control (for example, natural disasters, acts of terrorism, epidemics, computer viruses, and electrical/telecommunications outages). All of these risks are also applicable where the Company relies on outside vendors to provide services to it
26
and its contractowners. Operating system failures or disruptions or the compromise of security with respect to operating systems or portable electronic devices could subject the Company to regulatory sanctions, or other claims, harm the Company’s reputation, interrupt the Company’s operations, and adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations, or financial condition.
The occurrence of natural or man-made disasters may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition
The Company is exposed to various risks arising from natural disasters, including hurricanes, global warming, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, and pandemic disease, caused by a virus such as H5N1 (the “Avian flu” virus), as well as man-made disasters, including acts of terrorism and military actions, which may adversely affect assets under management, results of operations and financial condition, as follows:
§ | Losses in the Company’s investment portfolio due to significant volatility in global financial markets or the failure of counterparties to perform. |
§ | Changes in the rate of mortality lapses and surrenders of existing policies/contracts, as well as sales of new policies/contracts. |
§ | Reduced collectibility of reinsurance. |
§ | Disruption of the Company’s normal business operations due to catastrophic property damage, loss of life, or disruption of public and private infrastructure, including communications and financial services. |
While the Company has a business continuation and crisis management plan, there can be no assurance that the Company’s plan and insurance coverages would be effective in mitigating any negative effects on operations or profitability in the event of a disaster.
The occurrence of unidentified or unanticipated risks could negatively affect the Company’s business or result in losses
The Company has developed risk management policies and procedures and expects to continue to do so in the future. Nonetheless, the Company's policies and procedures to identify, monitor, and manage risks may not be fully effective, particularly during extremely turbulent times. Many of the Company's methods of managing risk and exposures are based upon observed historical market behavior or statistics based on historical models. As a result, these methods may not predict future exposures, which could be significantly greater than historical measures indicate. Other risk management methods depend on the evaluation of information regarding markets, clients, catastrophe occurrence, or other matters, that is publicly available or otherwise accessible to the Company. This information may not always be accurate, complete, up-to-date, or properly evaluated. Management of operational, legal, and regulatory risks requires, among other things, policies and procedures to record and verify large numbers of transactions and events. These policies and procedures may not be fully effective.
27
| Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments |
Item 2. Properties
The Company’s principal office is located at 1475 Dunwoody Drive, West Chester, Pennsylvania, 19380-1478. The Company’s annuity operations and customer service center are located at 909 Locust Street, Des Moines, Iowa 50309, and the guaranteed investment contract business activities are located at 1290 Broadway, Denver, Colorado 80203-2122. All Company office space is leased or subleased by the Company or its other affiliates. The Company pays substantially all expenses associated with its leased and subleased office properties. Affiliates within ING’s U.S. operations provide the Company with various management, finance, investment management, and other administrative services, primarily from facilities located at 5780 Powers Ferry Road, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30327-4390, and One Orange Way, Windsor, Connecticut 06095-4774. The affiliated companies are reimbursed for the Company’s use of these services and facilit ies under a variety of intercompany agreements.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in threatened or pending lawsuits/arbitrations arising from the normal conduct of business. Due to the climate in insurance and business litigation/arbitrations, suits against the Company sometimes include claims for substantial compensatory, consequential, or punitive damages, and other types of relief. Moreover, certain claims are asserted as class actions, purporting to represent a group of similarly situated individuals. While it is not possible to forecast the outcome of such lawsuits/arbitrations, in light of existing insurance, reinsurance, and established reserves, it is the opinion of management that the disposition of such lawsuits/arbitrations will not have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s operations or financial position.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10-K.
28
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated)
There is no public trading market for the common stock of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (“ING USA” or the “Company”, as appropriate). All of the Company’s outstanding common stock is owned by its parent, Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc. (“Lion” or “Parent”), a Connecticut holding and management company. All of the outstanding common stock of Lion is owned by ING America Insurance Holdings, Inc. (“ING AIH”), whose ultimate parent is ING Groep N.V.
The Company’s ability to pay dividends to its Parent is subject to the prior approval of the Iowa Division of Insurance for payment of any dividend, which, when combined with other dividends paid within the preceding twelve months, exceeds the greater of (1) ten percent (10.0%) of the Company’s statutory surplus at the prior year end or (2) the Company’s prior year statutory net gain from operations.
During 2008, the Company paid its Parent a cash return of capital distribution in the amount of $900.0. During 2007, the Company did not pay any dividends or return of capital distributions on its common stock to its Parent. During 2006, the Company paid $170.0 in a return of capital distribution to its Parent.
During 2008, the Company received a $1.1 billion capital contribution from its Parent. During 2007, the Company received $150.0 in capital contributions from its Parent. During 2006, the Company did not receive any capital contributions from its Parent.
On November 12, 2008, ING issued to The State of the Netherlands (the “Dutch State”) non-voting Tier 1 securities for a total consideration of Euro 10 billion. On February 24, 2009, $2.2 billion was contributed to the direct and indirect insurance company subsidiaries of ING AIH, of which $835.0 was contributed to the Company. The contribution was comprised of the proceeds from the investment by the Dutch State and the redistribution of currently existing capital within ING.
29
| |
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data |
| (Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
|
ING USA ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
3-YEAR SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
The following selected financial data has been derived from the financial statements. The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Narrative Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition” and the financial statements and notes thereto, which can be found under Part II, Item 7. and Item 8. contained herein.
| | | |
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
OPERATING RESULTS | | | |
Net investment income | $ 1,438.0 | $ 1,346.4 | $ 1,156.4 |
Fee income | 1,152.4 | 1,198.9 | 939.2 |
Premiums | 19.1 | 19.6 | 20.5 |
Net realized capital losses | (1,481.7) | (391.2) | (90.4) |
Total revenue | 1,128.0 | 2,173.8 | 2,025.7 |
Interest credited and other benefits to | | | |
contractowners | 1,716.0 | 1,312.0 | 1,169.7 |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition | | | |
costs and value of business acquired | 680.5 | 408.1 | 293.0 |
Net (loss) income | (1,381.2) | 129.0 | 212.2 |
|
FINANCIAL POSITION | | | |
Total investments | $ 23,267.1 | $ 27,881.2 | $ 22,586.3 |
Assets held in separate accounts | 34,090.8 | 44,477.8 | 37,928.3 |
Total assets | 69,817.5 | 81,276.2 | 69,677.6 |
Future policy benefits and claims reserves | 32,570.7 | 31,461.6 | 26,696.4 |
Notes to affiliates | 435.0 | 435.0 | 435.0 |
Liabilities related to separate accounts | 34,090.8 | 44,477.8 | 37,928.3 |
Total shareholder's equity | 767.5 | 3,119.0 | 2,989.1 |
|
ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT | | | |
Variable annuities | $ 35,112.3 | $ 45,525.9 | $ 38,801.6 |
Fixed annuities | 17,284.2 | 17,167.4 | 17,084.1 |
Guaranteed investment contracts | | | |
and funding agreements | 6,233.2 | 6,976.1 | 2,353.9 |
Other insurance products | 1,255.1 | 1,300.9 | 1,316.0 |
Total assets under management | $ 59,884.8 | $ 70,970.3 | $ 59,555.6 |
30
| |
Item 7. | Management’s Narrative Analysis of the Results of Operations and Financial |
| Condition |
| (Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Overview
The following narrative analysis presents a review of the results of operations of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (“ING USA” or the “Company,” as appropriate) for each of the three years ended 2008, 2007 and 2006, and financial condition as of December 31, 2008 and 2007. This item should be read in its entirety and in conjunction with the selected financial data, financial statements and related notes, and other supplemental data, which can be found under Part II, Item 6. and Item 8. contained herein.
Forward-Looking Information/Risk Factors
In connection with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company cautions readers regarding certain forward-looking statements contained in this report and in any other statements made by, or on behalf of, the Company, whether or not in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Forward-looking statements are statements not based on historical information and which relate to future operations, strategies, financial results, or other developments. Statements using verbs such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” or words of similar import, generally involve forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, forward-looking statements include statements that represent the Company’s beliefs concerning future levels of sales and redemptions of the Company’s products, investment spreads and yiel ds, or the earnings and profitability of the Company’s activities.
Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, economic, and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the Company’s control and many of which are subject to change. These uncertainties and contingencies could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, the Company. Whether or not actual results differ materially from forward-looking statements may depend on numerous foreseeable and unforeseeable developments, including, but not limited to the following:
(1) | The current financial crisis has reached unprecedented levels of market volatility and has adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations; |
(2) | Continuing adverse financial market conditions may significantly affect the Company’s ability to meet liquidity needs, access to capital and cost of capital; |
(3) | The amount of statutory capital that the Company must hold to maintain its financial strength and credit ratings can vary significantly from time to time and is sensitive to a number of factors outside of the Company’s control; |
31
| |
(4) | The Company has experienced ratings downgrades recently and may |
| experience additional future downgrades in the Company’s ratings, which |
| may negatively affect profitability and financial condition; |
(5) | Regulatory initiatives intended to alleviate the current financial crisis that |
| have been adopted may not be effective and, in any event, may be |
| accompanied by other initiatives, including new capital requirements or other |
| regulations, that could materially affect the Company’s results of operations, |
| financial condition and liquidity; |
(6) | The valuation of many of the Company’s financial instruments include |
| methodologies, estimations and assumptions that are subject to differing |
| interpretations and could result in changes to investment valuations that may |
| materially adversely affect results of operations and financial condition; |
(7) | If assumptions used in estimating future gross profits differ from actual |
| experience, the Company may be required to accelerate the amortization of |
| Deferred Acquisition Costs (“DAC”), which could have a material adverse |
| effect on results of operations and financial condition; |
(8) | If the Company’s business does not perform well, the Company may be |
| required to establish an additional valuation allowance against the deferred |
| income tax asset, which could have a material adverse effect on results of |
| operations and financial condition; |
(9) | Reinsurance subjects the Company to the credit risk of reinsurers and may not |
| be adequate to protect against losses arising from ceded reinsurance; |
(10) | Offshore reinsurance subjects the Company to the risk that the reinsurer is |
| unable to provide letters of credit; |
(11) | The inability of counterparties to meet their financial obligations could have |
| an adverse effect on the Company's results of operations; |
(12) | Changes in underwriting and actual experience could materially affect |
| profitability; |
(13) | Changes in reserve estimates may reduce profitability; |
(14) | A loss of key product distribution relationships could materially affect sales; |
(15) | Competition could negatively affect the ability to maintain or increase |
| profitability; |
(16) | Changes in federal income tax law or interpretations of existing tax law could |
| affect profitability and financial condition by making some products less |
| attractive to contractowners and increasing tax costs of contractowners or the |
| Company; |
(17) | Litigation may adversely affect profitability and financial condition; |
(18) | Changes in regulation in the United States and recent regulatory investigations |
| may reduce profitability; |
(19) | The Company’s products are subject to extensive regulation and failure to |
| meet any of the complex product requirements may reduce profitability; |
(20) | A failure of the Company’s operating systems or a compromise of security |
| with respect to operating systems or portable electronic devices could |
| adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition; |
(21) | The occurrence of natural or man-made disasters may adversely affect the |
| Company’s results of operations and financial condition; and |
(22) | The occurrence of unidentified or unanticipated risks could negatively affect |
| the Company’s business or result in losses. |
32
Investors are also directed to consider the risks and uncertainties discussed in Item 1A, 7., and 7A contained herein, as well as in other documents filed by the Company with the SEC. Except as may be required by the federal securities laws, the Company disclaims any obligation to update forward-looking information.
Basis of Presentation
The Company is a stock life insurance company domiciled in the State of Iowa and provides financial products and services in the United States. ING USA is authorized to conduct its insurance business in all states, except New York, and in the District of Columbia.
ING USA is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc. (“Lion” or “Parent”), which is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of ING Groep N.V. (“ING”). ING is a global financial services holding company based in The Netherlands, with American Depository Shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ING”.
The Company has one operating segment.
Critical Accounting Policies
General
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the use of estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying financial statements and related footnotes. These estimates and assumptions are evaluated on an on-going basis based on historical developments, market conditions, industry trends, and other information that is reasonable under the circumstances. There can be no assurance that actual results will conform to estimates and assumptions, and that reported results of operations will not be materially adversely affected by the need to make future accounting adjustments to reflect changes in these estimates and assumptions from time to time.
The Company has identified the following estimates as critical in that they involve a higher degree of judgment and are subject to a significant degree of variability: reserves, income taxes, valuation of investments and other-than-temporary impairments, valuation of derivative instruments, and amortization of DAC and value of business acquired (“VOBA”). In developing these estimates, management makes subjective and complex judgments that are inherently uncertain and subject to material changes as facts and circumstances develop. Although variability is inherent in these estimates, management believes the amounts provided are appropriate based upon the facts available upon compilation of the financial statements.
33
Reserves
The Company establishes and carries actuarially-determined reserves that are calculated to meet its future obligations. Generally, reserves are calculated using mortality and withdrawal rate assumptions based on relevant Company experience and are periodically reviewed against both industry standards and experience. Changes in, or deviations from, the assumptions used can significantly affect the Company’s reserve levels and related future operations.
Future policy benefits and claims reserves include reserves for deferred annuities and immediate annuities with and without life contingent payouts, universal and traditional life insurance contracts, and guaranteed investment contracts and funding agreements, collectively referred to as GICs.
Reserves for deferred annuity investment contracts and immediate annuities without life contingent payouts are equal to cumulative deposits, less charges and withdrawals, plus credited interest thereon. Deferred annuity crediting rates and reserve interest rates varied by product up to 10.0% for 2008 and 2007, and 7.8% for 2006.
Reserves for individual immediate annuities with life contingent payout benefits are computed on the basis of assumed interest discount rate, mortality, and expenses, including a margin for adverse deviations. Such assumptions generally vary by annuity plan type, year of issue, and policy duration. For 2008, 2007, and 2006, immediate annuity reserve interest discount rates varied up to 8.0%.
Reserves for fixed indexed annuities (“FIAs”) are computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) No. 97, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Long-Duration Contracts and for Realized Gains and Losses from the Sale of Investments” (“FAS 97”), FAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS 133”), and FAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS 157”). Accordingly, the aggregate initial liability is equal to the deposit received, plus a bonus, if applicable, and is split into a host component and an embedded derivative component. Thereafter, the host liability accumulates at a set interest rate, and the embedded derivative liability is recognized at fair value, with the change in fair value recorded in the Statements of Operations.
Reserves for universal life products are equal to cumulative deposits, less withdrawals and charges, plus credited interest thereon. Reserves for traditional life insurance contracts represent the present value of future benefits to be paid to or on behalf of contractowners and related expenses, less the present value of future net premiums.
Under Statement of Position (“SOP”) 03-1, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts for Separate Accounts” (“SOP 03-1”), the Company calculates additional liabilities (“SOP 03-1 reserves”) for certain variable annuity guaranteed benefits and for universal life products with certain patterns of cost of insurance charges and certain other fees. The SOP 03-1 reserve recognized for such products is in addition to the liability
34
previously held and recognizes the portion of contract assessments received in early years used to compensate the insurer for services provided in later years.
The Company calculates a benefit ratio for each block of business subject to SOP 03-1, and calculates an SOP 03-1 reserve by accumulating amounts equal to the benefit ratio multiplied by the assessments for each period, reduced by excess benefits during the period. The SOP 03-1 reserve is accumulated at interest rates using rates consistent with the DAC model for the period. The calculated reserve includes a provision for universal life contracts with patterns of cost of insurance charges that produce expected gains from the insurance benefit function followed by losses from that function in later years.
Guaranteed Minimum Accumulation Benefits (“GMABs”) and Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefits (“GMWBs”) without life contingent payouts are considered to be derivatives under FAS 133. The additional reserves for these guarantees are recognized at fair value through the Statements of Operations.
Reserves for GICs are calculated using the amount deposited with the Company, less withdrawals, plus interest accrued to the ending valuation date. Interest on these contracts is accrued by a predetermined index, plus a spread or a fixed rate, established at the issue date of the contract.
Income Taxes
Management uses certain assumptions and estimates in determining the income taxes payable or refundable for the current year, the deferred income tax liabilities and assets for items recognized differently in its financial statements from amounts shown on its income tax returns, and the federal income tax expense. Determining these amounts requires analysis and interpretation of current tax laws and regulations, including the loss limitation rules associated with change in control. Management exercises considerable judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting income tax liabilities and assets. These judgments and estimates are reevaluated on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change.
Valuation of Investments and Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
All of the Company’s fixed maturities and equity securities are currently designated as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value and unrealized capital gains (losses) on these securities are recorded directly in Shareholder’s equity, after adjustment for related changes in DAC, VOBA, and deferred income taxes. The Company’s valuation methods for investments did not change with the adoption of FAS 157.
The fair values for the actively traded marketable fixed maturities are determined based upon the quoted market prices or dealer quotes. The fair values for marketable bonds without an active market are obtained through several commercial pricing services, which provide the estimated fair values. These services incorporate a variety of market observable information in their valuation techniques, including benchmark yields, broker-dealer quotes, credit quality, issuer spreads, bids, offers and other reference data. Valuations obtained from third party commercial pricing
35
services are non-binding and are validated monthly through comparisons to internal pricing models, back testing to recent trades, and monitoring of trading volumes.
Fair values of privately placed bonds are determined using a matrix-based pricing model. The model considers the current level of risk-free interest rates, current corporate spreads, the credit quality of the issuer, and cash flow characteristics of the security. Also considered are factors such as the net worth of the borrower, the value of collateral, the capital structure of the borrower, the presence of guarantees, and the Company’s evaluation of the borrower’s ability to compete in their relevant market. Using this data, the model generates estimated market values which the Company considers reflective of the fair value of each privately placed bond.
The fair values for certain collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMO-Bs”) are determined by taking the average of broker quotes when more than one broker quote is provided. A few of the CMO-Bs are priced by the originating broker due to the complexity and unique characteristics of the asset.
The fair values for actively traded equity securities are based on quoted market prices.
Mortgage loans on real estate are reported at amortized cost, less impairment write-downs. If the value of any mortgage loan is determined to be impaired (i.e., when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement), the carrying value of the mortgage loan is reduced to either the present value of expected cash flows from the loan, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or fair value of the collateral. If the loan is in foreclosure, the carrying value is reduced to the fair value of the underlying collateral, net of estimated costs to obtain and sell. The carrying value of the impaired loans is reduced by establishing a permanent write-down recorded in Net realized capital gains (losses).
The fair value of policy loans is equal to the carrying, or cash surrender, value of the loans. Policy loans are fully collateralized by the account value of the associated insurance contracts.
The fair values for short-term investments are based on quoted market prices.
See “Valuation of Derivative Instruments” for a discussion of the techniques used to determine fair values of derivatives.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, unrelated willing parties. As such, the estimated fair value of a financial instrument may differ significantly from the amount that could be realized if the security was sold immediately.
The Company’s accounting policy requires that a decline in the value of an investment below its amortized cost basis be assessed to determine if the decline is other-than-temporary. If so, the investment is deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, and a charge is recorded in Net realized capital gains (losses) equal to the difference between fair value and the amortized cost basis of the investment. The fair value of the other-than-temporarily impaired investment becomes its new cost basis.
36
The evaluation of other-than-temporary impairments included in the Company’s general account is a quantitative and qualitative process, which is subject to risks and uncertainties, and is intended to determine whether declines in the fair value of investments should be recognized in current period earnings. The risks and uncertainties include the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost, the issuer’s financial condition and near-term prospects, future economic conditions and market forecasts, and the Company’s intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery in fair value.
In addition, the Company invests in structured securities that meet the criteria of Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 99-20, “Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets” (“EITF 99-20”). Under EITF 99-20, a further determination of the required impairment is based on the analysis discussed in the preceding paragraph, as well as credit risk and the possibility of significant prepayment risk that restricts the Company’s ability to recover the investment. An impairment is recognized if the fair value of the security is less than amortized cost and there has been an adverse change in cash flow since the last remeasurement date.
Valuation of Derivative Instruments
Derivative instruments are reported at fair value primarily using the Company’s derivative accounting system. The system uses key financial data, such as yield curves, exchange rates, Standard and Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 Index prices, and London Inter Bank Offered Rates (“LIBOR”), which are obtained from third party sources and uploaded into the system. For those derivatives that are unable to be valued by the accounting system, the Company typically utilizes values established by third party brokers.
The Company records liabilities, which can be either positive or negative, for annuity contracts containing guaranteed riders for GMABs and GMWBs without life contingencies in accordance with FAS 133. The guarantee is treated as an embedded derivative and is required to be reported separately from the host variable annuity contract. The fair value of the obligation is calculated based on actuarial and capital market assumptions related to the projected cash flows, including benefits and related contract charges, over the anticipated life of the related contracts. The cash flow estimates are produced by using stochastic techniques under a variety of market return scenarios and other best estimate assumptions.
The Company also records for its FIA contracts an embedded derivative liability for interest payments to contractholders above the minimum guaranteed interest rate, in accordance with FAS 133. The guarantee is treated as an embedded derivative and is required to be reported separately from the host contract. The fair value of the obligation is calculated based on actuarial and capital market assumptions related to the projected cash flows, including benefits and related contract charges, over the anticipated life of the related contracts. The cash flow estimates are produced by best estimate assumptions.
37
Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Value of Business Acquired
DAC represents policy acquisition costs that have been capitalized and are subject to amortization. Such costs consist principally of certain commissions, underwriting, contract issuance, and certain agency expenses, related to the production of new and renewal business.
VOBA represents the outstanding value of in force business capitalized in purchase accounting when the Company was acquired and is subject to amortization. The value is based on the present value of estimated profits embedded in the Company’s contracts.
FAS 97 applies to universal life and investment-type products, such as fixed and variable deferred annuities. Under FAS 97, DAC and VOBA are amortized, with interest, over the life of the related contracts in relation to the present value of estimated future gross profits from investment, mortality, and expense margins, plus surrender charges. DAC related to GICs, however, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the contract.
Contractowners may periodically exchange one contract for another, or make modifications to an existing contract. These transactions are identified as internal replacements and are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Position 05-1, “Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection with Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts” (“SOP 05-1”).
Internal replacements that are determined to result in substantially unchanged contracts are accounted for as continuations of the replaced contracts. Any costs associated with the issuance of the new contracts are considered maintenance costs and expensed as incurred. Unamortized DAC and VOBA related to the replaced contracts continue to be deferred and amortized in connection with the new contracts, as follows:
§ | For deferred annuities, the estimated future gross profits of the new contracts are treated as revisions to the estimated future gross profits of the replaced contracts in the determination of amortization. |
§ | As of January 1, 2007, internal replacements that are determined to result in contracts that are substantially changed are accounted for as extinguishments of the replaced contracts, and any unamortized DAC and VOBA related to the replaced contracts are written off to Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired in the Statements of Operations. |
Changes in assumptions can have a significant impact on DAC and VOBA balances and amortization rates. Several assumptions are considered significant in the estimation of future gross profits associated with variable universal life and variable deferred annuity products. One of the most significant assumptions involved in the estimation of future gross profits is the assumed return associated with the variable account performance. The overall return on the variable account is dependent on multiple factors, including the relative mix of the underlying sub-accounts among bond funds and equity funds, as well as equity sector weightings. Other significant assumptions include estimated future hedging and guaranteed benefit costs, surrender and lapse rates, estimated interest spread, and estimated mortality.
38
Due to the relative size and sensitivity to minor changes in underlying assumptions of DAC and VOBA balances, the Company performs quarterly and annual analyses of DAC and VOBA for the annuity and life businesses, respectively. The DAC and VOBA balances are also evaluated for recoverability.
At each evaluation date, actual historical gross profits are reflected, and estimated future gross profits and related assumptions are evaluated for continued reasonableness. Any adjustment in estimated future gross profits requires that the amortization rate be revised (“unlocking”) retroactively to the date of the policy or contract issuance. The cumulative unlocking adjustment is recognized as a component of current period amortization. In general, sustained increases in investment, mortality, and expense margins, and thus estimated future profits, lower the rate of amortization. However, sustained decreases in investment, mortality, and expense margins, and thus estimated future gross profits, increase the rate of amortization.
For interest rate and equity sensitivity and related effects on DAC and VOBA, see Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Results of Operations
Overview
Products offered by the Company include immediate and deferred variable and fixed annuities, designed to address individual customer needs for tax-advantaged savings, retirement needs, and wealth-protection concerns, and GICs, sold primarily to institutional investors and corporate benefit plans.
The Company derives its revenue mainly from (a) fee income generated on variable assets under management (“AUM”), (b) investment income earned on fixed AUM, and (c) certain other management fees. Fee income is primarily generated from separate account assets supporting variable options under variable annuity contract investments, as designated by contractowners. Investment income from fixed AUM is mainly generated from annuity products with fixed investment options and GIC deposits. The Company’s expenses primarily consist of (a) interest credited and other benefits to contractowners, (b) amortization of DAC and VOBA, (c) expenses related to the selling and servicing of the various products offered by the Company, and (d) other general business expenses.
Economic Analysis
The current economic environment presents challenges for the Company and the insurance industry. The Company’s sales and financial results continue to be affected by economic trends.
Equity market performance affects the Company, as fee revenue from variable AUM is generally affected by equity market performance. The poor equity market performance in 2008 unfavorably impacted variable AUM during 2008, and also increased the Company’s net amount at risk for variable annuity guaranteed benefits, which resulted in an increase in projected hedging and benefit costs.
39
The changing market interest rate environment during 2008, in combination with the slow economic growth resulted in a substantial increase in unrealized losses in 2008, as compared to the same period for 2007.
Year ended December 31, 2008 compared to year ended December 31, 2007
The Company’s results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008, and changes therein, reflected higher realized capital losses and higher net amortization of DAC and VOBA driven by unfavorable market conditions, as well as higher interest credited and other benefits to contractowners. These losses were partially offset by the impact of the adoption of FAS 157 as well as an increase in net investment income.
| | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, | $ Increase | % Increase |
| 2008 | 2007 | (Decrease) | (Decrease) |
Revenues: | | | | |
Net investment income | $ 1,438.0 | $ 1,346.4 | $ 91.6 | 6.8% |
Fee income | 1,152.4 | 1,198.9 | (46.5) | (3.9)% |
Premiums | 19.1 | 19.6 | (0.5) | (2.6)% |
Net realized capital losses | (1,481.7) | (391.2) | (1,090.5) | NM |
Other income | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 100.0% |
Total revenue | 1,128.0 | 2,173.8 | (1,045.8) | (48.1)% |
Benefits and expenses: | | | | |
Interest credited and other | | | | |
benefits to contractowners | 1,716.0 | 1,312.0 | 404.0 | 30.8% |
Operating expenses | 291.7 | 269.6 | 22.1 | 8.2% |
Net amortization of deferred policy | | | | |
acquisition costs and value | | | | |
of business acquired | 680.5 | 408.1 | 272.4 | 66.7% |
Interest expense | 30.5 | 32.5 | (2.0) | (6.2)% |
Other expense | 35.7 | 24.2 | 11.5 | 47.5% |
Total benefits and expenses | 2,754.4 | 2,046.4 | 708.0 | 34.6% |
(Loss) income before income taxes | (1,626.4) | 127.4 | (1,753.8) | NM |
Income tax (benefit) expense | (245.2) | (1.6) | (243.6) | NM |
Net (loss) income | $ (1,381.2) | $ 129.0 | $ (1,510.2) | NM |
Effective tax rate | 15.1% | (1.3)% | | |
| NM - Not meaningful.
Revenues |
Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008, was mainly impacted by increases in Net realized capital losses. The year end losses were partially offset by an increase in Net investment income.
Net realized capital lossesincreased for the year ended December 31, 2008, primarily due to higher losses on fixed maturities as a result of other-than-temporary impairments driven by the widening of credit spreads. In addition, derivative realized losses increased for the year ended December 31, 2008, driven by interest rate swaps due to lower LIBOR rates and by losses on call options due to the drop in equity markets. These losses were partially offset by gains on futures held in short positions, which were also a result of poor equity market performance.
40
Benefits and Expenses
Total benefits and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008, increased primarily due to higher Interest credited and other benefits to contractowners, Net amortization of DAC and VOBA and Other expense.
Interest credited and other benefits to contractownersincreased for the year ended December 31, 2008, primarily driven by an increase in reserves for variable annuity guarantees, primarily due to the decline in equity market performance. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in reserves on fixed indexed annuities also driven by the decline in equity market performance.
TheNet amortization of DAC and VOBAincreased for the year ended December 31, 2008, reflecting lower estimated future gross profits mainly as a result of lower fee income and higher hedging and benefit costs, which were driven by the decline in equity market performance and lower risk-free interest rates.
Other expenseincreased for the year ended December 31, 2008, due to the amortization of deferred losses on the variable annuity guaranteed living benefits reinsurance agreement.
Income Taxes
Income tax (benefit) expenseincreased for the year ended December 31, 2008 primarily due to higher losses before taxes relative to the deduction allowed for dividends received, partially offset by the tax valuation allowance related to realized capital losses.
Year ended December 31, 2007 compared to year ended December 31, 2006
The Company’s results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007, and changes therein, reflected positive product experience as a result of increased AUM, primarily driven by higher sales of GICs and variable annuity products during 2007, and a higher block of business in force. This positive product experience, however, was more than offset by higher realized capital losses, interest credited and other benefits to contractowners, and net amortization of DAC and VOBA.
41
| | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, | $ Increase | % Increase |
| 2007 | 2006 | (Decrease) | (Decrease) |
Revenues: | | | | |
Net investment income | $ 1,346.4 | $ 1,156.4 | $ 190.0 | 16.4% |
Fee income | 1,198.9 | 939.2 | 259.7 | 27.7% |
Premiums | 19.6 | 20.5 | (0.9) | (4.4)% |
Net realized capital losses | (391.2) | (90.4) | (300.8) | NM |
Other income | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | NM |
Total revenue | 2,173.8 | 2,025.7 | 148.1 | 7.3% |
Benefits and expenses: | | | | |
Interest credited and other | | | | |
benefits to contractowners | 1,312.0 | 1,169.7 | 142.3 | 12.2% |
Operating expenses | 269.6 | 228.0 | 41.6 | 18.2% |
Net amortization of deferred policy | | | | |
acquisition costs and value | | | | |
of business acquired | 408.1 | 293.0 | 115.1 | 39.3% |
Interest expense | 32.5 | 30.3 | 2.2 | 7.3% |
Other expense | 24.2 | 28.1 | (3.9) | (13.9)% |
Total benefits and expenses | 2,046.4 | 1,749.1 | 297.3 | 17.0% |
Income before income taxes | 127.4 | 276.6 | (149.2) | (53.9)% |
Income tax (benefit) expense | (1.6) | 64.4 | (66.0) | (102.5)% |
Net income | $ 129.0 | $ 212.2 | $ (83.2) | (39.2)% |
Effective tax rate | (1.3)% | 23.3% | | |
| NM - Not meaningful.
Revenues |
Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2007, increased mainly due to increases in Fee income and Net investment income, partially offset by increases in Net realized capital losses.
The increase inFee incomefor the year ended December 31, 2007, reflects an increase in average variable AUM, primarily driven by higher sales of variable annuities and a higher block of business in force.
Net investment incomefor the year ended December 31, 2007, increased as the result of an increase in assets supporting fixed AUM and surplus, which reflects a larger block of GICs, and fixed indexed annuities in force. In addition, the Company experienced higher yields in 2007.
Net realized capital lossesincreased for the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily due to higher losses on derivatives and fixed maturities. The changes in derivatives were primarily driven by interest rate swaps and call options, partially offset by lower losses on futures as a result of lower equity market performance. The losses on fixed maturities for the year ended December 31, 2007, were due to other-than-temporary impairments driven by the slow economic environment and widening of credit spreads in 2007.
42
Benefits and Expenses
Total benefits and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007, increased mainly due to higher Interest credited and other benefits to contractowners, Net amortization of DAC and VOBA, and Operating expenses.
Interest credited and other benefitsto contractowners increased for the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily driven by (a) the increase in reserves on variable annuities, driven by unfavorable equity market performance in 2007 compared to 2006, and (b) the increase in interest credited on GICs, mainly attributable to higher average fixed AUM. The increases were partially offset by a lower increase in reserves on fixed annuities due to unfavorable equity market performance in 2007.
Operating expensesincreased for the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily due to higher non-deferred asset-based commissions and marketing expenses, as well as the continued growth of the business.
TheNet amortization of DAC and VOBAincreased for the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily due to refinements of the DAC model during the fourth quarter of 2007, partially offset by favorable mutual fund and mortality and persistency unlocking.
Income Taxes
Income tax (benefit) expensedecreased for the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily due to lower Income before taxes relative to the deduction allowed for dividends received.
Financial Condition
Investments
Investment Strategy
The Company’s investment strategy focuses on diversification by asset class. The Company seeks to achieve economic diversification, while reducing overall credit risk and liquidity risks. In addition, the Company seeks to mitigate the impact of cash flow variability from embedded options within certain investment products, such as prepayment options and interest rate options embedded in collateralized mortgage obligations and call options embedded in corporate bonds. The investment management function is centralized under ING Investment Management LLC, an affiliate, pursuant to an investment advisory agreement. Separate portfolios are established for groups of products with similar liability characteristics within the Company.
The Company’s general account invests primarily in fixed maturity investments, including publicly issued bonds (including government bonds), privately placed notes and bonds, mortgage-backed securities, and asset-backed securities. The primary investment strategy is to optimize the risk-adjusted return through superior asset selection predicated on a developed relative value approach, credit research and
43
monitoring, superior management of interest rate risk, and active exploration into new investment product opportunities. Investments are purchased when market returns, adjusted for risk and expenses, are sufficient to profitably support growth of the liability block of business. In addition, assets and liabilities are analyzed and reported for internal management purposes on an option-adjusted basis. The level of required capital of given transactions is a primary factor in determining relative value among different investment and liability alternatives, within the scope of each product type’s objective. An active review of existing holdings identifies specific assets that could be effectively traded in order to enhance the risk-adjusted returns of the portfolio, while minimizing adverse tax and accounting impacts. The Company strives to maintain a portfolio weighted average asset quality rating of A, based on Standard and Poor 6;s (“S&P”) ratings classifications. The weighted average excludes mortgage loans, but includes mortgage-backed securities, which are reported with bonds.
The Company uses derivatives for hedging purposes to reduce the Company’s exposure to cash flow variability of assets and liabilities, interest rate risk, credit risk, and market risk. In addition, the Company uses credit default swaps to reduce the credit loss exposure with respect to certain assets that the Company owns, or to assume credit exposure on certain assets that the Company does not own. These credit default swaps are similar in credit risk to bonds of the named issuer, and allow the Company to gain access to a broader, more diversified pool of credit risks. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Derivatives” for further discussion of the Company’s use of derivatives.
Portfolio Composition
The following table presents the investment portfolio at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
| 2008 | | 2007 | |
| Carrying | | Carrying | |
| Value | % | Value | % |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, | | | | |
including securities pledged | $ 18,136.2 | 77.9% | $ 22,776.0 | 81.7% |
Equity securities, available-for-sale | 253.9 | 1.1% | 211.1 | 0.8% |
Short-term investments | 111.7 | 0.5% | 188.0 | 0.7% |
Mortgage loans on real estate | 3,923.3 | 16.9% | 3,701.7 | 13.3% |
Policy loans | 144.4 | 0.6% | 155.8 | 0.5% |
Other investments | 697.6 | 3.0% | 848.6 | 3.0% |
Total investments | $ 23,267.1 | 100.0% | $ 27,881.2 | 100.0% |
44
Fixed Maturities
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, were as follows as of December 31, 2008.
| | Gross | Gross | |
| | Unrealized | Unrealized | |
| Amortized | Capital | Capital | Fair |
| Cost | Gains | Losses | Value |
Fixed maturities: | | | | |
U.S. Treasuries | $ 1,109.3 | $ 74.2 | $ 0.3 | $ 1,183.2 |
U.S. government agencies and authorities | 267.3 | 20.8 | 0.8 | 287.3 |
State, municipalities, and political subdivisions | 48.2 | 0.3 | 9.1 | 39.4 |
|
U.S. corporate securities: | | | | |
Public utilities | 1,452.2 | 5.6 | 133.1 | 1,324.7 |
Other corporate securities | 5,570.9 | 68.5 | 634.1 | 5,005.3 |
Total U.S. corporate securities | 7,023.1 | 74.1 | 767.2 | 6,330.0 |
|
Foreign securities(1): | | | | |
Government | 426.7 | 3.3 | 65.4 | 364.6 |
Other | 3,145.5 | 11.4 | 411.0 | 2,745.9 |
Total foreign securities | 3,572.2 | 14.7 | 476.4 | 3,110.5 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 4,264.0 | 122.4 | 803.0 | 3,583.4 |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 3,585.9 | - | 1,028.0 | 2,557.9 |
Other asset-backed securities | 1,500.2 | 9.2 | 464.9 | 1,044.5 |
Total fixed maturities, including securities pledged | 21,370.2 | 315.7 | 3,549.7 | 18,136.2 |
Less: securities pledged | 976.7 | 46.4 | 29.9 | 993.2 |
Total fixed maturities | $ 20,393.5 | $ 269.3 | $ 3,519.8 | $ 17,143.0 |
(1)Primarily U.S. dollar denominated. | | | | |
45
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, were as follows as of December 31, 2007.
| | Gross | Gross | |
| | Unrealized | Unrealized | |
| Amortized | Capital | Capital | Fair |
| Cost | Gains | Losses | Value |
Fixed maturities: | | | | |
U.S. Treasuries | $ 18.4 | $ 1.0 | $ - | $ 19.4 |
U.S. government agencies and authorities | 86.1 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 86.8 |
State, municipalities, and political subdivisions | 49.7 | - | 2.5 | 47.2 |
|
U.S. corporate securities: | | | | |
Public utilities | 1,417.5 | 22.8 | 13.4 | 1,426.9 |
Other corporate securities | 6,742.7 | 81.1 | 67.0 | 6,756.8 |
Total U.S. corporate securities | 8,160.2 | 103.9 | 80.4 | 8,183.7 |
|
Foreign securities(1): | | | | |
Government | 525.2 | 14.9 | 7.1 | 533.0 |
Other | 3,280.6 | 40.5 | 59.4 | 3,261.7 |
Total foreign securities | 3,805.8 | 55.4 | 66.5 | 3,794.7 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 4,988.4 | 53.3 | 85.8 | 4,955.9 |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 3,842.2 | 37.6 | 36.4 | 3,843.4 |
Other asset-backed securities | 1,947.5 | 5.7 | 108.3 | 1,844.9 |
|
Total fixed maturities, including securities pledged | 22,898.3 | 257.9 | 380.2 | 22,776.0 |
Less: securities pledged | 953.3 | 6.1 | 16.8 | 942.6 |
Total fixed maturities | $ 21,945.0 | $ 251.8 | $ 363.4 | $ 21,833.4 |
(1)Primarily U.S. dollar denominated.
It is management’s objective that the portfolio of fixed maturities be of high quality and be well diversified by market sector. The fixed maturities in the Company’s portfolio are generally rated by external rating agencies and, if not externally rated, are rated by the Company on a basis believed to be similar to that used by the rating agencies. The average quality rating of the Company's fixed maturities portfolio was AA- at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Ratings are calculated using a rating hierarchy that considers S&P, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), and internal ratings.
46
Total fixed maturities by quality rating category, including securities pledged to creditors, were as follows at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
| 2008 | | 2007 | |
| Fair | % of | Fair | % of |
| Value | Total | Value | Total |
AAA | $ 8,010.5 | 44.2% | $ 10,023.0 | 43.9% |
AA | 917.9 | 5.1% | 1,743.6 | 7.7% |
A | 3,452.1 | 19.0% | 4,112.4 | 18.1% |
BBB | 4,966.6 | 27.4% | 5,945.3 | 26.1% |
BB | 532.2 | 2.9% | 676.0 | 3.0% |
B and below | 256.9 | 1.4% | 275.7 | 1.2% |
Total | $ 18,136.2 | 100.0% | $ 22,776.0 | 100.0% |
95.7% and 95.8% of the fixed maturities were invested in securities rated BBB and above (Investment Grade) at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. From December 31, 2008 through February 28, 2009, the percentage of the Company’s investment grade fixed maturities decreased from 95.7% to 94.9%, while the below investment grade fixed maturities increased from 4.3% to 5.1%.
Fixed maturities rated BB and below (Below Investment Grade) may have speculative characteristics, and changes in economic conditions or other circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the issuer to make principal and interest payments than is the case with higher rated fixed maturities.
Total fixed maturities, including securities pledged to creditors, by market sector were as follows at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
| 2008 | | 2007 | |
| Fair | % of | Fair | % of |
| Value | Total | Value | Total |
U.S. Treasuries | $ 1,183.2 | 6.5% | $ 19.4 | 0.1% |
U.S. government agencies and authorities | 287.3 | 1.6% | 86.8 | 0.4% |
U.S. corporate, states, and municipalities | 6,369.4 | 35.1% | 8,230.9 | 36.0% |
Foreign | 3,110.5 | 17.1% | 3,794.7 | 16.7% |
Residential mortgage-backed | 3,583.4 | 19.8% | 4,955.9 | 21.8% |
Commercial mortgage-backed | 2,557.9 | 14.1% | 3,843.4 | 16.9% |
Other asset-backed | 1,044.5 | 5.8% | 1,844.9 | 8.1% |
Total | $ 18,136.2 | 100.0% | $ 22,776.0 | 100.0% |
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturities as of December 31, 2008, are shown below by contractual maturity. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities as securities may be restructured, called, or prepaid.
47
| Amortized | Fair |
| Cost | Value |
Due to mature: | | |
One year or less | $ 463.4 | $ 458.5 |
After one year through five years | 5,534.1 | 5,120.1 |
After five years through ten years | 3,347.5 | 2,993.1 |
After ten years | 2,675.1 | 2,378.7 |
Mortgage-backed securities | 7,849.9 | 6,141.3 |
Other asset-backed securities | 1,500.2 | 1,044.5 |
Less: securities pledged | 976.7 | 993.2 |
Fixed maturities, excluding securities pledged | $ 20,393.5 | $ 17,143.0 |
The Company had investments with five issuers, other than obligations of the U.S. government and government agencies, with a carrying value in excess of 10.0% of the Company’s Shareholder’s equity at December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2007, the Company did not have any investments in a single issuer, other than obligations of the U.S. government and government agencies, with a carrying value in excess of 10.0% of the Company’s Shareholder’s equity.
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, fixed maturities with fair values of $22.3 billion and $11.2, respectively, were on deposit as required by regulatory authorities. The increase was due to unrestricted deposits of securities made to the State of Iowa.
The Company invests in various categories of collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) that are subject to different degrees of risk from changes in interest rates and, for CMOs that are not agency-backed, defaults. The principal risks inherent in holding CMOs are prepayment and extension risks related to dramatic decreases and increases in interest rates resulting in the prepayment of principal from the underlying mortgages, either earlier or later than originally anticipated. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, approximately 12.1% and 7.5%, respectively, of the Company’s CMO holdings were invested in those types of CMOs which are subject to more prepayment and extension risk than traditional CMOs, such as interest-only or principal-only strips.
The Company is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (“FHLB”) and is required to maintain a collateral deposit that backs funding agreements issued to the FHLB. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had $2,995.2 and $2,898.7, respectively, in non-putable funding agreements, including accrued interest, issued to the FHLB. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, assets with a market value of approximately $3,341.1 and $3,270.1, respectively, collateralized the funding agreements issued to the FHLB. Assets pledged to the FHLB are included in Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, on the Balance Sheets.
In conjunction with the January 2009 agreement with the Dutch State regarding the transfer of 80% of the Company's Alt-A residential mortgage backed securities (“Alt-A RMBS”), which included $375.1 in Alt-A RMBS pledged to the FHLB, the Company substituted the Alt-A RMBS assets pledged to the FHLB with other fixed maturities. By February 17, 2009, the Company recalled these Alt-A securities in order to implement the transaction with the Dutch State and reduced the funding agreements pro rata.
48
Subprime and Alt-A Mortgage Exposure
Since the third quarter of 2007, credit markets have become more turbulent amid concerns about subprime and Alt-A mortgages and collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”). This in turn has resulted in a general widening of credit spreads, reduced price transparency, reduced liquidity, increased rating agency downgrades and increased volatility across certain markets.
The Company does not originate or purchase subprime or Alt-A whole-loan mortgages. The Company does have exposure to Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (“RMBS”) and asset-backed securities (“ABS”). Subprime lending is the origination of loans to customers with weaker credit profiles. The Company defines Alt-A Loans to include residential mortgage loans to customers who have strong credit profiles but lack some element(s), such as documentation to substantiate income. Commencing in the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company expanded its definition of Alt-A loans to include residential mortgage loans to borrowers that would otherwise be classified as prime but whose loan structure provides repayment options to the borrower that increase the risk of default. Further, during the fourth quarter of 2007, the industry coalesced around classifying any securities backed by residential mortgage collateral not clearly ident ifiable as prime or subprime into the Alt-A category, and the Company is following that lead. The following summarizes the Company’s exposure to subprime and Alt-A mortgages as of December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Trading activity for the Company’s RMBS, particularly subprime and Alt-A RMBS, has been declining during 2008 as a result of the dislocation of the credit markets. During 2008, the Company continued to obtain pricing information from commercial pricing services and brokers. However, the pricing for subprime and Alt-A RMBS did not represent regularly occurring market transactions since the trading activity declined significantly in the second half of 2008. As a result, the Company concluded in the second half of 2008 that the market for subprime and Alt-A RMBS was inactive. The Company did not change its valuation procedures as a result of determining that the market was inactive.
The Company’s exposure to subprime mortgages was primarily in the form of ABS structures collateralized by subprime residential mortgages, and the majority of these holdings were included in other asset-backed securities in the fixed maturities by market sector table above. As of December 31, 2008, the fair value and gross unrealized losses related to the Company’s exposure to subprime mortgages were $520.2 and $312.3, respectively, representing 2.9% of total fixed maturities. As of December 31, 2007, the fair value and gross unrealized losses related to the Company’s exposure to subprime mortgages were $879.3 and $86.4, respectively, representing 3.9% of total fixed maturities.
49
The following tables summarize the Company’s exposure to subprime mortgage-backed holdings by credit quality and vintage year as of December 31, 2008 and 2007:
| | 2008 | | | | | 2007 | |
% of Total | | | | | % of Total | | |
Subprime | | | | | Subprime | | |
Mortgage-backed | | | | Mortgage-backed | | |
Securities | | Vintage | | | Securities | Vintage | |
AAA | 57.8% | 2007 | 35.9% | | AAA | 60.7% | 2007 | 28.0% |
AA | 27.0% | 2006 | 9.6% | | AA | 28.8% | 2006 | 11.5% |
A | 7.5% | 2005 and prior | 54.5% | | A | 9.9% | 2005 and prior | 60.5% |
BBB | 2.5% | | 100.0% | | BBB | 0.6% | | 100.0% |
BB and below | 5.2% | | | | | 100.0% | | |
| 100.0% | | | | | | | |
The Company’s exposure to Alt-A mortgages was included in residential mortgage-backed securities in the fixed maturities by market sector table above. As of December 31, 2008, the fair value and gross unrealized losses aggregated to $846.0 and $513.8, respectively, representing 4.7% of total fixed maturities. As of December 31, 2007, the fair value and gross unrealized losses related to the Company’s exposure to Alt-A mortgages were $1.9 billion and $69.9, respectively, representing 8.3% of total fixed maturities.
The following tables summarize the Company’s exposure to Alt-A mortgage-backed holdings by credit quality and vintage year as of December 31, 2008 and 2007:
| | 2008 | | | | | 2007 | |
% of Total Alt-A | | | | % of Total Alt-A | | |
RMBS | | Vintage | | | | RMBS | Vintage | |
AAA | 80.7% | 2007 | 29.8% | | AAA | 99.9% | 2007 | 36.2% |
AA | 2.1% | 2006 | 20.6% | | AA | 0.1% | 2006 | 24.0% |
A | 3.4% | 2005 and prior | 49.6% | | | 100.0% | 2005 and prior | 39.8% |
BBB | 2.6% | | 100.0% | | | | | 100.0% |
BB and below | 11.2% | | | | | | | |
| 100.0% | | | | | | | |
Transfer of Alt-A RMBS Participation Interest
On January 26, 2009, ING announced it reached an agreement, for itself and on behalf of certain ING affiliates including the Company, with the Dutch State on an Illiquid Assets Back-up Facility (the “Back-up Facility”) covering 80% of ING’s Alt-A residential mortgage-backed securities (“Alt-A RMBS”). Under the terms of the Back-up Facility, a full credit risk transfer to the Dutch State will be realized on 80% of ING’s Alt-A RMBS owned by ING Bank, FSB and ING affiliates within ING Insurance Americas with a book value of $36.0 billion portfolio, including book value of $1.4 billion of the Alt-A RMBS portfolio owned by the Company (with respect to the Company’s portfolio, the “Designated Securities Portfolio”) (the “ING-Dutch State Transaction”). As a result of the risk transfer, the Dutch State will participate in 80% of any results of the ING Alt-A RMBS portfolio. The risk transfer to the Dutch
50
State will take place at a discount of approximately 10% of par value. In addition, under the Back-up Facility, other fees will be paid both by the Company and the Dutch State. Each ING company participating in the ING-Dutch State Transaction, including the Company will remain the legal owner of 100% of its Alt-A RMBS portfolio and will remain exposed to 20% of any results on the portfolio. Subject to documentation and regulatory approvals, the ING-Dutch State Transaction is expected to close by the end of March 2009, with the affiliate participation conveyance and risk transfer to the Dutch State described in the succeeding paragraph to take effect as of January 26, 2009.
In order to implement that portion of the ING-Dutch State Transaction related to the Company’s Designated Securities Portfolio, the Company will enter into a participation agreement with its affiliates, ING Support Holding B.V. (“ING Support Holding”) and ING pursuant to which the Company will convey to ING Support Holding an 80% participation interest in its Designated Securities Portfolio and pay a periodic transaction fee, and will receive, as consideration for the participation, an assignment by ING Support Holding of its right to receive payments from the Dutch State under the Illiquid Assets Back-Up Facility related to the Company’s Designated Securities Portfolio among, ING, ING Support Holding and the Dutch State (the “Company Back-Up Facility”). Under the Company Back-Up Facility, the Dutch State will be obligated to pay certain periodic fees and make certain periodic payments with respect to th e Company’s Designated Securities Portfolio, and ING Support Holding will be obligated to pay a periodic guarantee fee and make periodic payments to the Dutch State equal to the distributions it receives with respect to the 80% participation interest in the Company’s Designated Securities Portfolio.
In a second transaction, known as the Step 1 Cash Transfer, a portion of the Company’s Alt-A RMBS which has a book value of $27.9 will be sold for cash to an affiliate, Lion II Custom Investments LLC (“Lion II”). Immediately thereafter, Lion II will sell to ING Direct Bancorp the purchased securities (the “Step 2 Cash Transfer”). Contemporaneous with the Step 2 Cash Transfer, ING Direct Bancorp will include such purchased securities as part of its Alt-A RMBS portfolio sale to the Dutch State. Subject to documentation and regulatory approval, the Step 1 Cash Transfer is expected to close by the end of March 2009 contemporaneous with the closing of the ING-Dutch State Transaction.
Since the Company had the intent to sell a portion of its Alt-A RMBS through the 80% participation interest in its Designated Securities Portfolio or as part of the Step 1 Cash Transfer as of December 31, 2008, the Company recognized $56.9 in other-than-temporary impairments with respect to the 80% participation interest in its Designated Securities Portfolio that it expects to convey as part of the ING-Dutch State Transaction and the Step 1 Cash Transfer. The Company expects to reduce the unrealized loss balance in Accumulated other comprehensive loss included in Shareholder’s equity by approximately $400.0 and recognize a gain in the estimated range of $110.0 to $130.0 upon the closing of the ING-Dutch State Transaction and the Step 1 Cash Transfer.
51
Commercial Mortgage-backed and Other Asset-backed Securities
While the delinquency rates on commercial mortgages have been stable in recent years, commercial real estate rents and property values have recently become more volatile. In addition, there are growing concerns with consumer loans as a result of the current economic environment, which includes lower family income and higher unemployment rates.
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the fair value of the Company’s Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) totaled $2.5 billion and $3.8 billion, and Other ABS, excluding subprime exposure, totaled $526.3 and $984.1, respectively. CMBS investments represent pools of commercial mortgages that are broadly diversified across property types and geographical areas.
As of December 31, 2008, the other ABS was also broadly diversified both by type and issuer with credit card receivables, collateralized loan obligations, and automobile receivables comprising 45.0%, 29.3%, and 10.2%, respectively, of total other ABS, excluding subprime exposure. As of December 31, 2007, the other ABS was broadly diversified both by type and issuer with credit card receivables, collateralized loan obligations, and automobile receivables comprising 41.3%, 29.7%, and 14.3%, respectively, of total other ABS, excluding subprime exposure.
The following tables summarize the Company’s exposure to CMBS holdings by credit quality and vintage year as of December 31, 2008 and 2007:
| | 2008 | | | | | 2007 | |
% of Total CMBS | Vintage | | | % of Total CMBS | Vintage | |
AAA | 98.0% | 2008 | 0.3% | | AAA | 95.1% | 2007 | 39.4% |
AA | 0.9% | 2007 | 29.1% | | AA | 2.5% | 2006 | 13.2% |
A | 0.5% | 2006 | 27.7% | | A | 1.2% | 2005 and prior | 47.4% |
BBB | 0.5% | 2005 and prior | 42.9% | | BBB | 1.0% | | 100.0% |
BB and below | 0.1% | | 100.0% | | BB and below | 0.2% | | |
| 100.0% | | | | | 100.0% | | |
The following tables summarize the Company’s exposure to Other ABS holdings, excluding subprime exposure, by credit quality and vintage year as of December 31, 2008 and 2007:
| | 2008 | | | | | 2007 | |
% of Total Other ABS | Vintage | | | % of Total Other ABS | Vintage | |
AAA | 56.6% | 2008 | 1.5% | | AAA | 59.3% | 2007 | 30.5% |
AA | 18.0% | 2007 | 20.6% | | AA | 5.9% | 2006 | 11.8% |
A | 7.3% | 2006 | 18.7% | | A | 10.1% | 2005 and prior | 57.7% |
BBB | 15.2% | 2005 and prior | 59.2% | | BBB | 24.5% | | 100.0% |
BB and below | 2.9% | | 100.0% | | BB and below | 0.2% | | |
| 100.0% | | | | | 100.0% | | |
52
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
Mortgage loans on real estate, primarily commercial mortgage loans, totaled $3,923.3 and $3,701.7 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These loans are reported at amortized cost, less impairment write-downs. If the value of any mortgage loan is determined to be impaired (i.e., when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect on all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement), the carrying value of the mortgage loan is reduced to either the present value of expected cash flows from the loan, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or fair value of the collateral. If the loan is in foreclosure, the carrying value is reduced to the fair value of the underlying collateral, net of estimated costs to obtain and sell. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had no allowance for mortgage loan credit losses. The properties collateralizing mortgage loans are geographical ly dispersed throughout the United States, with the largest concentration of 25.1% and 24.5% of properties in California at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Unrealized Capital Losses
Fixed maturities, including securities pledged to creditors, comprise 77.9% and 81.7% of the Company’s total investment portfolio at December 31, 2008 an 2007, respectively. Unrealized capital losses related to fixed maturities are analyzed in detail in the following tables.
Unrealized capital losses in fixed maturities, including securities pledged to creditors, for Investment Grade (“IG”) and Below Investment Grade (“BIG”) securities by duration were as follows at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2008 | | | | | 2007 | | |
| | % of IG | | | % of IG | | % of IG | | | % of IG |
| IG | and BIG | | BIG | and BIG | IG | and BIG | | BIG | and BIG |
Less than six months | | | | | | | | | | |
below amortized cost | $ 645.7 | 18.2% | $ 115.6 | 3.3% | $ 106.1 | 27.9% | $ 5.0 | 1.3% |
More than six months | | | | | | | | | | |
and less than twelve | | | | | | | | | | |
months below | | | | | | | | | | |
amortized cost | 828.3 | 23.3% | | 85.7 | 2.4% | 171.3 | 45.1% | | 12.7 | 3.3% |
More than twelve months | | | | | | | | | | |
below amortized cost | 1,776.4 | 50.0% | | 98.0 | 2.8% | 81.6 | 21.5% | | 3.5 | 0.9% |
Total unrealized capital losses | $ 3,250.4 | 91.5% | $ 299.3 | 8.5% | $ 359.0 | 94.5% | $ 21.2 | 5.5% |
Unrealized losses in fixed maturities at December 31, 2008 and 2007, were primarily related to the effects of interest rate movement or changes in credit spreads on mortgage and other asset-backed securities. Mortgage and other asset-backed securities include U.S. government-backed securities, principal protected securities, and structured securities, which did not have an adverse change in cash flows. The following tables summarize the unrealized capital losses by duration and reason, along with the fair value of fixed maturities, including securities pledged to creditors, in unrealized capital loss positions at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
53
| Less than | More than | | |
| Six Months | Six Months and | More than | Total |
| Below | less than Twelve | Twelve Months | Unrealized |
| Amortized | Months Below | Below | Capital |
2008 | Cost | Amortized Cost | Amortized Cost | Losses |
Interest rate or spread widening | $ 198.7 | $ 538.4 | $ 516.7 | $ 1,253.8 |
Mortgage and other asset-backed | | | | |
securities | 562.6 | 375.6 | 1,357.7 | 2,295.9 |
Total unrealized capital losses | $ 761.3 | $ 914.0 | $ 1,874.4 | $ 3,549.7 |
Fair value | $ 4,350.9 | $ 4,522.0 | $ 4,551.9 | $ 13,424.8 |
|
2007 | | | | |
Interest rate or spread widening | $ 37.8 | $ 49.2 | $ 62.7 | $ 149.7 |
Mortgage and other asset-backed | | | | |
securities | 73.3 | 134.8 | 22.4 | 230.5 |
Total unrealized capital losses | $ 111.1 | $ 184.0 | $ 85.1 | $ 380.2 |
Fair value | $ 5,322.0 | $ 3,248.4 | $ 3,300.6 | $ 11,871.0 |
Unrealized capital losses in fixed maturities, including securities pledged to creditors, by market sector and duration were as follows at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
| | More than | | |
| Less than | Six Months | More than | |
| Six Months | and less than | Twelve Months | Total |
| Below | Twelve Months | Below | Unrealized |
| Amortized | Below | Amortized | Capital |
2008 | Cost | Amortized Cost | Cost | Losses |
U.S. Treasuries | $ 0.3 | $ - | $ - | $ 0.3 |
U.S. government agencies and authorities | 0.3 | 0.5 | - | 0.8 |
U.S. corporate, state, and municipalities | 139.3 | 337.2 | 299.8 | 776.3 |
Foreign | 58.8 | 200.7 | 216.9 | 476.4 |
Residential mortgage-backed | 307.3 | 75.5 | 420.2 | 803.0 |
Commercial mortgage-backed | 113.6 | 262.2 | 652.2 | 1,028.0 |
Other asset-backed | 141.7 | 37.9 | 285.3 | 464.9 |
Total unrealized capital losses | $ 761.3 | $ 914.0 | $ 1,874.4 | $ 3,549.7 |
2007 | | | | |
U.S. government agencies and authorities | $ - | $ - | $ 0.3 | $ 0.3 |
U.S. corporate, state, and municipalities | 16.6 | 31.4 | 34.9 | 82.9 |
Foreign | 21.2 | 17.8 | 27.5 | 66.5 |
Residential mortgage-backed | 51.1 | 29.3 | 5.4 | 85.8 |
Commercial mortgage-backed | 3.8 | 27.0 | 5.6 | 36.4 |
Other asset-backed | 18.4 | 78.5 | 11.4 | 108.3 |
Total unrealized capital losses | $ 111.1 | $ 184.0 | $ 85.1 | $ 380.2 |
Of the unrealized losses aged more than twelve months, the average market value of the related fixed maturities was 75.7% of the average book value as of December 31, 2008. In addition, this category includes 1,499 securities, which have an average quality rating of AA-. No other-than-temporary impairment loss was considered necessary for these fixed maturities as of December 31, 2008.
54
Unrealized capital losses in fixed maturities, including securities pledged to creditors, for instances in which fair value declined below amortized cost by greater than or less than 20% were as follows for December 31, 2008 and 2007.
| | | | | | |
| Amortized Cost | Unrealized Capital Loss | Number of Securities |
| < 20% | > 20% | < 20% | > 20% | < 20% | > 20% |
2008 | | | | | | |
Less than six months below | | | | | | |
amortized cost | $ 3,491.8 | $ 1,620.4 | $ 189.8 | $ 571.5 | 1,289 | 580 |
More than six months and | | | | | | |
less than twelve months | | | | | | |
below amortized cost | 3,210.2 | 2,225.8 | 260.5 | 653.5 | 963 | 899 |
More than twelve months | | | | | | |
below amortized cost | 1,857.6 | 4,568.7 | 162.2 | 1,712.2 | 425 | 1,074 |
Total | $ 8,559.6 | $ 8,414.9 | $ 612.5 | $ 2,937.2 | 2,677 | 2,553 |
2007 | | | | | | |
Less than six months below | | | | | | |
amortized cost | $ 5,406.8 | $ 26.3 | $ 105.6 | $ 5.5 | 1,131 | 6 |
More than six months and | | | | | | |
less than twelve months | | | | | | |
below amortized cost | 3,282.4 | 150.0 | 147.0 | 37.0 | 1,289 | 76 |
More than twelve months | | | | | | |
below amortized cost | 3,365.0 | 20.7 | 79.1 | 6.0 | 727 | 27 |
Total | $ 12,054.2 | $ 197.0 | $ 331.7 | $ 48.5 | 3,147 | 109 |
Unrealized capital losses in fixed maturities, including securities pledged to creditors, by market sector for instances in which fair value decline below amortized cost by greater than or less than 20% were as follows for December 31, 2008 and 2007.
| | | | | | |
| Amortized Cost | Unrealized Capital Loss | Number of Securities |
| < 20% | > 20% | < 20% | > 20% | < 20% | > 20% |
2008 | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasuries | $ 254.3 | $ - | $ 0.3 | $ - | 16 | - |
U.S. government agencies | | | | | | |
and authorities | 11.5 | - | 0.8 | - | 25 | - |
U.S. corporate, state and | | | | | | |
municipalities | 3,955.9 | 1,689.6 | 288.1 | 488.2 | 1,336 | 1,073 |
Foreign | 2,000.1 | 1,135.3 | 134.0 | 342.4 | 875 | 827 |
Residential mortgage-backed | 1,193.3 | 1,686.5 | 76.0 | 727.0 | 201 | 189 |
Commercial mortgage-backed | 718.4 | 2,848.3 | 77.7 | 950.3 | 121 | 216 |
Other asset-backed | 426.1 | 1,055.2 | 35.6 | 429.3 | 103 | 248 |
Total | $ 8,559.6 | $ 8,414.9 | $ 612.5 | $ 2,937.2 | 2,677 | 2,553 |
55
| | | | | | |
2007 | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasuries | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | - | - |
U.S. government agencies | | | | | | |
and authorities | 23.6 | - | 0.3 | - | 2 | - |
U.S. corporate, state, and | | | | | | |
municipalities | 3,468.5 | 3.1 | 82.4 | 0.5 | 1,415 | 5 |
Foreign | 2,036.5 | 16.6 | 63.1 | 3.4 | 899 | 56 |
Residential mortgage-backed | 3,526.1 | 22.3 | 81.4 | 4.4 | 362 | 5 |
Commercial mortgage-backed | 1,507.6 | 7.0 | 35.1 | 1.3 | 171 | 2 |
Other asset-backed | 1,491.9 | 148.0 | 69.4 | 38.9 | 298 | 41 |
Total | $ 12,054.2 | $ 197.0 | $ 331.7 | $ 48.5 | 3,147 | 109 |
For 2008, unrealized capital losses on fixed maturities increased by $3.2 billion due to widening of credit spreads.
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company held 53 and 0 fixed maturities, respectively, with unrealized capital losses in excess of $10 million. The unrealized capital losses on these fixed maturities equaled $890.8, or 25.1% of the total unrealized capital losses, as of December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2007, there were no unrealized capital losses on these fixed maturities in excess of $10 million. No other-than-temporary impairment loss was considered necessary for these fixed maturities as of December 31, 2008. The fair value of the Company’s fixed maturities declined $483.4, before tax and DAC, from December 31, 2008 through February 28, 2009, due to further widening of credit spreads. This decline in fair value includes $258.3 related to the Company’s investments in CMBS.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
The Company analyzes the general account investments to determine whether there has been an other-than-temporary decline in fair value below amortized cost basis. Management considers the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost, the issuer’s financial condition and near-term prospects, future economic conditions and market forecasts, interest rate changes, and the Company’s intent to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery in fair value. If it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of an investment will not be collected, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred.
In addition, the Company invests in asset-backed securities. Determination of the required impairment is based on the analysis discussed in the preceding paragraph, as well as credit risk and the possibility of significant prepayment risk that restricts the Company’s ability to recover the investment. An impairment is recognized if the fair value of the security is less than book value and there has been an adverse change in cash flow since the last remeasurement date.
When a decline in fair value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the individual security is written down to fair value, and the loss is recorded in Net realized capital gains (losses).
56
The following table identifies the Company’s other-than-temporary impairments by type for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
| 2008 | | | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | No. of | | | No. of | | No. of |
| Impairment | Securities | Impairment | | Securities | Impairment | Securities |
U.S. Treasuries | $ - | - | $ - | * | 1 | $ 0.1 | 1 |
U.S. Corporate | 289.1 | 230 | 81.0 | | 173 | 15.8 | 63 |
Foreign | 229.4 | 108 | 25.7 | | 74 | 3.5 | 13 |
Residential mortgage-backed | 289.8 | 98 | 3.0 | | 24 | 12.7 | 68 |
Commercial mortgage-backed | 4.8 | 1 | - | | - | - | - |
Other asset-backed | 182.5 | 93 | 43.3 | | 91 | 1.2 | 2 |
Equity | 32.0 | 12 | - | | - | - | - |
Limited partnerships | 0.5 | 1 | 0.3 | | 1 | 0.5 | 2 |
Total | $ 1,028.1 | 543 | $ 153.3 | | 364 | $ 33.8 | 149 |
The above schedule includes $369.7, $31.0, and $11.5, in other-than-temporary write-downs for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively, related to the analysis of credit risk and the possibility of significant prepayment risk. The remaining $658.4, $122.3, and $22.3, in write-downs for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively, are related to investments that the Company does not have the intent to retain for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery in fair value. The following table summarizes these write-downs by type for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
| 2008 | | | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | No. of | | | No. of | | No. of |
| Impairment | Securities | Impairment | | Securities | Impairment | Securities |
U.S. Treasuries | $ - | - | $ - | * | 1 | $ 0.1 | 1 |
U.S. Corporate | 199.8 | 178 | 70.6 | | 161 | 15.8 | 63 |
Foreign | 146.5 | 87 | 21.4 | | 68 | 3.5 | 13 |
Residential mortgage-backed | 142.9 | 40 | 1.0 | | 5 | 1.7 | 4 |
Other asset-backed | 169.2 | 58 | 29.3 | | 84 | 1.2 | 2 |
Total | $ 658.4 | 363 | $ 122.3 | | 319 | $ 22.3 | 83 |
The Company may sell securities during the period in which fair value has declined below amortized cost for fixed maturities or cost for equity securities. In certain situations new factors, including changes in the business environment, can change the Company’s previous intent to continue holding a security.
Net Realized Capital Gains (Losses)
Net realized capital gains (losses) are comprised of the difference between the amortized cost of investments and proceeds from sale, and redemption, as well as losses incurred due to the other-than-temporary impairment of investments and changes in fair value of derivatives. The cost of the investments on disposal is determined based on specific identification of securities. Net realized capital gains (losses) on investments were as follows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
57
| 2008 | 2007 | | 2006 |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale | $ (975.9) | $ (100.3) | $ (43.8) |
Equity securities, available-for-sale | (52.9) | 0.5 | | 0.9 |
Derivatives | (447.5) | (291.0) | | (48.2) |
Other | (5.4) | (0.4) | | 0.7 |
Net realized capital losses | $ (1,481.7) | $ (391.2) | $ (90.4) |
After-tax net realized capital losses | $ (963.1) | $ (254.3) | $ (58.8) |
Net realized capital losses increased for the year ended December 31, 2008, primarily due to higher losses on fixed maturities as a result of other-than-temporary impairments driven by the widening of credit spreads. In addition, derivative realized losses increased for the year ended December 31, 2008, driven by interest rate swaps due to lower LIBOR rates and by losses on call options due to the drop in equity markets. These losses were partially offset by gains on futures held in short positions, which were also a result of poor equity market performance.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability of the Company to generate sufficient cash flows to meet the cash requirements of operating, investing, and financing activities.
Sources and Uses of Liquidity
The Company’s principal sources of liquidity are annuity product charges, GIC deposits, investment income, proceeds from the maturing and sale of investments, proceeds from debt issuance, reinsurance, and capital contributions. Primary uses of these funds are payments of commissions and operating expenses, interest and premium credits, payments under guaranteed death and living benefits, investment purchases, repayment of debt, and contract maturities, withdrawals, and surrenders.
The Company’s liquidity position is managed by maintaining adequate levels of liquid assets, such as cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments. Asset/liability management is integrated into many aspects of the Company’s operations, including investment decisions, product development, and determination of crediting rates. As part of the risk management process, different economic scenarios are modeled, including cash flow testing required for insurance regulatory purposes, to determine that existing assets are adequate to meet projected liability cash flows. Key variables in the modeling process include interest rates, anticipated contractowner behavior, and variable separate account performance. Contractowners bear the investment risk related to variable annuity products, subject to the minimum guaranteed death and living benefits included in these contracts.
The fixed account liabilities are supported by a general account portfolio, principally composed of fixed rate investments with matching duration characteristics that can generate predictable, steady rates of return. The portfolio management strategy for the fixed account considers the assets available-for-sale. This strategy enables the Company to respond to changes in market interest rates, prepayment risk, relative values of asset sectors and individual securities and loans, credit quality outlook, and other relevant factors. The objective of portfolio management is to maximize returns, taking into account interest rate and credit risk, as well as other risks. The
58
Company’s asset/liability management discipline includes strategies to minimize exposure to loss as interest rates and economic and market conditions change. In executing this strategy, the Company uses derivative instruments to manage these risks. The Company’s derivative counterparties are of high credit quality. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had net derivative liabilities with a fair value of $439.9.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Additional sources of liquidity include borrowing facilities to meet short-term cash requirements that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company maintains the following agreements:
§ | A reciprocal loan agreement with ING America Insurance Holdings, Inc. (“ING AIH”), an affiliate, whereby either party can borrow from the other up to 3.0% of the Company’s statutory admitted assets as of the prior December 31. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had no amounts due to or due from ING AIH under the reciprocal loan agreement. |
§ | A $50.0 uncommitted, perpetual revolving note facility with the Bank of New York. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had no amounts outstanding under the revolving note facility. |
§ | A $100.0 uncommitted line-of-credit agreement with PNC Bank. Borrowings are guaranteed by ING AIH, with maximum aggregate borrowings outstanding at anytime to ING AIH and its affiliates of $100.0. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had no amounts outstanding under the line-of-credit agreement. As of October 31, 2008, the Company had not formally renewed this line-of-credit, which subsequently expired on this date. |
§ | A $100.0 uncommitted line-of-credit agreement with Svenska Handelsbanken AB (Publ.), effective June 2, 2006. Borrowings are guaranteed by ING AIH, with maximum aggregate borrowings outstanding at any time to ING AIH and its affiliates of $100.0. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had no amounts outstanding under the line-of-credit agreement. Effective November 19, 2008, the Company discontinued this line-of-credit. |
Subsequent to December 31 2008, the ING Supervisory Board of Directors approved a liquidity facility for up to $2.0 billion to support the liquidity requirements in ING’s life insurance operations, including the Company. The exact usage of the facility, if any, has not yet been determined, as it will be utilized as an alternative source of liquidity.
Management believes that these sources of liquidity are adequate to meet the Company’s short-term cash obligations.
The Company is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (“FHLB”) and is required to maintain a collateral deposit that backs funding agreements issued to the FHLB. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had $2,995.2 and $2,898.7, respectively, in non-putable funding agreements, including accrued interest, issued to FHLB. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, assets with a market value of approximately $3,341.1 and $3,270.1, respectively, collateralized the funding agreements issued to the FHLB. Assets pledged to the FHLB are included in Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, on the Balance Sheets.
59
In conjunction with the agreement with the Dutch State on the Back-Up Facility as discussed further below under “Transfer of Alt-A RMBS Participation Interest”, approximately $375.1 of the Alt-A portfolio included in the participation agreement is pledged to the FHLB as of December 31, 2008. By February 17, 2009, the Company recalled these Alt-A securities in order to implement the transaction with the Dutch State and reduced the funding agreements pro rata.
Funding Agreements
On August 10, 2007, the Company issued an extendable funding agreement to its parent, Lion, upon receipt of a single deposit in the amount of $500.0. To fund the purchase of the funding agreement, Lion issued a promissory note to its indirect parent company, ING Verzekeringen N.V. ("ING V"), which has been guaranteed by Lion’s immediate parent, ING AIH.
Under the terms of the funding agreement, the Company will pay Lion interest quarterly at the credited interest rate until maturity, and on the maturity date, the Company will pay Lion the single deposit and any accrued and unpaid interest. The credited interest rate shall be the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), plus 0.05%, and shall be reset quarterly. The maturity date of the funding agreement shall be August 10, 2009, or such later date to which the maturity date may be extended; provided, however, that the maturity date may not be extended beyond August 10, 2012.
Capital Contributions and Distributions
During 2008, the Company paid its Parent a cash return of capital distribution in the amount of $900.0. During 2007, the Company did not pay any dividends or return of capital distributions on its common stock to its Parent. During 2006, the Company paid $170.0 in a return of capital distribution to its Parent.
During 2008, the Company received a $1.1 billion capital contribution from its Parent. During 2007, the Company received $150.0 in capital contributions from its Parent. During 2006, the Company did not receive any capital contributions from its Parent.
On November 12, 2008, ING issued to the Dutch State non-voting Tier 1 securities for a total consideration of Euro 10 billion. On February 24, 2009, $2.2 billion was contributed to direct and indirect insurance company subsidiaries of ING AIH, of which $835.0 was contributed to the Company. The contribution was comprised of the proceeds from the investment by the Dutch government and the redistribution of currently existing capital within ING.
Transfer of Alt-A RMBS Participation Interest
On January 26, 2009, ING announced it reached an agreement, for itself and on behalf of certain ING affiliates including the Company, with the Dutch State on an Illiquid Assets Back-up Facility covering 80% of ING’s Alt-A RMBS. Under the terms of the Back-up Facility, a full credit risk transfer to the Dutch State will be realized on 80% of ING’s Alt-A RMBS owned by ING Bank, FSB and ING affiliates
60
within ING Insurance Americas with a book value of $36.0 billion portfolio, including book value of $1.4 billion of the Alt-A RMBS portfolio owned by the Company. As a result of the risk transfer, the Dutch State will participate in 80% of any results of the ING Alt-A RMBS portfolio. The risk transfer to the Dutch State will take place at a discount of approximately 10% of par value. In addition, under the Back-up Facility, other fees will be paid both by the Company and the Dutch State. Each ING company participating in the ING-Dutch State Transaction, including the Company will remain the legal owner of 100% of its Alt-A RMBS portfolio and will remain exposed to 20% of any results on the portfolio. Subject to documentation and regulatory approvals, the ING-Dutch State Transaction is expected to close by the end of March 2009, with the affiliate participation conveyance and risk transfer to the Dutch State described in the s ucceeding paragraph to take effect as of January 26, 2009.
In order to implement that portion of the ING-Dutch State Transaction related to the Company’s Designated Securities Portfolio, the Company will enter into a participation agreement with its affiliates, ING Support Holding and ING pursuant to which the Company will convey to ING Support Holding an 80% participation interest in its Designated Securities Portfolio and pay a periodic transaction fee, and will receive, as consideration for the participation, an assignment by ING Support Holding of its right to receive payments from the Dutch State under the Illiquid Assets Back-Up Facility related to the Company’s Designated Securities Portfolio among, ING, ING Support Holding and the Dutch State. Under the Company BackUp Facility, the Dutch State will be obligated to pay certain periodic fees and make certain periodic payments with respect to the Company’s Designated Securities Portfolio, and ING Support Holding will be o bligated to pay a periodic guarantee fee and make periodic payments to the Dutch State equal to the distributions it receives with respect to the 80% participation interest in the Company’s Designated Securities Portfolio.
In a second transaction, known as the Step 1 Cash Transfer, a portion of the Company’s Alt-A RMBS which has a book value of $27.9 will be sold for cash to an affiliate, Lion II. Immediately thereafter, Lion II will sell to ING Direct Bancorp the purchased securities. Contemporaneous with the Step 2 Cash Transfer, ING Direct Bancorp will include such purchased securities as part of its Alt-A RMBS portfolio sale to the Dutch State. Subject to documentation and regulatory approval, the Step 1 Cash Transfer is expected to close by the end of March 2009 contemporaneous with the closing of the ING-Dutch State Transaction.
Since the Company had the intent to sell a portion of its Alt-A RMBS through the 80% participation interest in its Designated Securities Portfolio or as part of the Step 1 Cash Transfer as of December 31, 2008, the Company recognized $56.9 in other-than-temporary impairments with respect to the 80% participation interest in its Designated Securities Portfolio that it expects to convey as part of the ING-Dutch State Transaction and the Step 1 Cash Transfer. The Company expects to reduce the unrealized loss balance in Accumulated other comprehensive loss included in Shareholder’s equity by approximately $400.0 and recognize a gain in the estimated range of $110.0 to $130.0 upon the closing of the ING-Dutch State Transaction and the Step 1 Cash Transfer.
61
Cash Collateral
Under the terms of the Company’s Over-The-Counter Derivative International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. Agreements (“ISDA Agreements”), the Company may receive from, or deliver to, counterparties, collateral to assure that all terms of the ISDA Agreements will be met with regard to the Credit Support Annex (“CSA”). The terms of the CSA call for the Company to pay interest on any cash received equal to the Federal Funds rate. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company held $17.6 and $11.5 of cash collateral, respectively, which was included in Collateral held, including payables under securities loan agreement on the Balance Sheets and was reinvested in short-term investments.
Reinsurance Agreements
Facultative Coinsurance Agreement
The Company is a party to a Facultative Coinsurance Agreement with its affiliate, Security Life of Denver Insurance Company (“Security Life”) effective August 20, 1999. Under the terms of this agreement, the Company facultatively cedes to Security Life, from time to time, certain GICs on a 100% coinsurance basis. The value of GIC reserves ceded by the Company under this agreement was $2.5 billion and $2.3 billion at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company utilizes this reinsurance facility primarily for diversification and asset-liability management purposes in connection with this business, which is facilitated by the fact that Security Life is also a major GIC issuer. Senior management of the Company has established a current maximum of $4.0 billion for GIC reserves ceded under this agreement.
Guaranteed Living Benefit Reinsurance Agreement
Effective June 30, 2008, ING USA entered into an automatic reinsurance agreement with its affiliate, Security Life of Denver International Limited (“SLDI”). Under the terms of the agreement, ING USA ceded to SLDI 100% of the benefits guaranteed under specific variable annuity guaranteed living benefit riders (the “Covered Benefits”) attached to certain variable annuity contracts issued by ING USA on or after January 1, 2000 (the “Contracts”). ING USA paid SLDI initial consideration of $665.8. Thereafter, ING USA will pay (i) new business consideration equal to 1.62% of premiums received from contractholders on the Contracts and (ii) a base premium equal to the actual fees paid by contractholders for the Covered Benefits. Under the terms of the agreement, SLDI is required to provide ING USA security for ING USA’s full statutory reserve credit for reinsurance by providing a letter of credit to ING USA or establishing a trust for its benefit, or a combination of a letter of credit and assets in trust. SLDI has provided ING USA with letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $960.0, with $319.0 issued under a letter of credit facility with its affiliate, ING Bank N.V., while the remainder resides with three separate third party letter of credit facilities as of December 31, 2008. SLDI has also established a trust with The Bank of New York as trustee and ING USA as beneficiary in which SLDI assets totaling $655.2 have been deposited as of December 31, 2008. Since December 31, 2008, an additional $1,074.0 has been contributed to the trust. Given the current economic environment, the Company is taking steps to develop alternative sources of credit for reinsurance collateral.
62
At the inception of this reinsurance contract, the impact of the initial ceded premium of $665.8 was partially offset by ceded reserves of $273.6 and by an increase in DAC of $85.5. The net of these was established as a deferred loss of $306.7 and was reflected in Other Assets. The deferred loss is being amortized over the period of benefit.
At December 31, 2008, the value of reserves ceded by the Company under this agreement was $732.3, and the balance of the deferred loss, including both the initial deferred loss plus additional deferrals of 1.62% of premiums on new business, was $353.8.
Yearly Renewable Term Agreements
Effective December 1 and December 31, 2008, ING USA entered into two yearly renewable term reinsurance agreements with its affiliate, ReliaStar Life Insurance Company (“ReliaStar”), for an indefinite duration. Under the terms of the agreements, ING USA assumed 100% of ReliaStar’s mortality risk associated with the net amount at risk under specific life insurance policies, including:
§ | Individual life policies issued by ReliaStar and previously assumed by ReliaStar from ReliaStar Life Insurance Company of New York (“RLNY”), with policy dates prior to January 1, 2000, including certain term life, universal life, variable universal life, and whole life, insurance policies. |
§ | In force individual life policies issued by ReliaStar, where premiums are paid on the insured’s behalf through payroll deduction and which were marketed by employee benefit brokers. |
ING USA received initial consideration of $3.9 from ReliaStar. Thereafter, the Company will receive monthly premiums, net of benefit payments, based on premium rates set forth in the respective agreements. As such, there is no unearned reinsurance premium.
As of December 31, 2008, the value of the reserves assumed by the Company under these agreements was $5.0.
Coinsurance Funds Withheld Agreement
Effective December 31, 2008, ING USA entered into a coinsurance funds withheld agreement with ReliaStar for an indefinite duration. Under the terms of the agreement, ING USA assumed 100% quota share of ReliaStar’s net retained liability under certain Employee Benefits Group Annual Term policies, including disability waiver of premium.
The initial premium of $219.9 was equal to the aggregate reserve assumed by ING USA. Thereafter, premiums are equal to the total earned gross premiums collected by ReliaStar from policyholders. ReliaStar will retain all reinsurance premiums payable to ING USA as funds withheld, as security for ceded liabilities and against which ceded losses will be offset. Monthly, ING USA will receive or pay a net settlement. In addition, ING USA is required to provide ReliaStar full reserve credit for
63
reinsurance by providing a letter of credit, the cost of which will be partially reimbursed by ReliaStar.
As of December 31, 2008, the value of the reserves assumed by the Company under these agreements was $219.9.
Funds Withheld Agreement
Effective December 31, 2008, ING USA entered into a funds withheld agreement with ReliaStar for an indefinite duration. Under the terms of the agreements, ING USA assumed 100% quota share of ReliaStar’s net retained liability under assumed group life reinsurance in-force.
The initial premium of $60.0 was equal to the net Statutory reserve assumed by ING USA. Thereafter, premiums are equal to the total earned reinsurance premiums collected by ReliaStar, less a ceding commission. ReliaStar will retain all reinsurance premiums payable to ING USA as funds withheld, as security for ceded liabilities and against which ceded losses will be offset. Monthly, ING USA will receive or pay a net settlement. In addition, ING USA is required to provide ReliaStar reserve credit in the excess of the funds withheld for reinsurance by providing a cash deposit or letter of credit.
As of December 31, 2008, the value of the reserves assumed by the Company under these agreements was $60.0.
Separate Accounts
Separate account assets and liabilities generally represent funds maintained to meet specific investment objectives of contractowners who bear the investment risk, subject, in limited cases, to certain minimum guarantees. Investment income and investment gains and losses generally accrue directly to such contractowners. The assets of each account are legally segregated and are not subject to claims that arise out of any other business of the Company or its affiliates.
Separate account assets supporting variable options under variable annuity contracts are invested, as designated by the contractowner or participant (who bears the investment risk subject, in limited cases, to minimum guaranteed rates) under a contract, in shares of mutual funds that are managed by affiliates of the Company, or in other selected mutual funds not managed by affiliates of the Company.
Variable annuity deposits are allocated to various subaccounts established within the separate account. Each subaccount represents a different investment option into which the contractowner may allocate premiums. The account value of a variable annuity contract is equal to the aggregate value of the subaccounts selected by the contractowner (including the value allocated to any fixed account), less fees and expenses. The Company offers investment options for its variable annuity contracts covering a wide range of investment styles, including large, mid, and small cap equity funds, as well as fixed income alternatives. Therefore, unlike fixed annuities, under variable annuity contracts, contractowners bear the risk of investment gains and losses associated with the selected investment allocation. The Company, however, offers certain guaranteed death and living benefits (described below) under which it
64
bears specific risks associated with these benefits. Many of the variable annuity contracts issued by the Company are combination contracts offering both variable and fixed options under which some or all of the deposits may be allocated by the contractowner to a fixed account available under the contract.
The Company’s major source of income from variable annuities is the base contract mortality fees, expense fees, and guaranteed death and living benefit rider fees charged to the contractowner, less the cost of administering the product, as well as the cost of providing for the guaranteed death and living benefits.
Minimum Guarantees
Variable annuity contracts containing minimum guaranteed death and living benefits expose the Company to equity risk. A decrease in the equity markets may cause a decrease in the account values, thereby increasing the possibility that the Company may be required to pay amounts to contractowners due to guaranteed death and living benefits. An increase in the value of the equity markets may increase account values for these contracts, thereby decreasing the Company’s risk associated with guaranteed death and living benefits.
The Company’s variable annuities offer one or more of the following guaranteed death and living benefits:
Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefits (“GMDBs”):
§ | Standard - Guarantees that, upon death, the death benefit will be no less than the premiums paid by the contractowner, adjusted for any contract withdrawals. |
§ | Ratchet - Guarantees that, upon death, the death benefit will be no less than the greater of (1) Standard or (2) the maximum contract anniversary (or quarterly) value of the variable annuity, adjusted for contract withdrawals. |
§ | Rollup (7.0% or 5.5% Solution) - Guarantees that, upon death, the death benefit will be no less than the aggregate premiums paid by the contractowner accruing interest at 7.0% or 5.5% per annum, adjusted for contract withdrawals, which may be subject to a maximum cap on the rolled up amount. (The Company has discontinued this option for new sales.) |
§ | Combo (Max 7) - Guarantees that, upon death, the death benefit will be no less than the greater of (1) Ratchet or (2) Rollup. |
For contracts issued prior to January 1, 2000, most contracts with enhanced death benefit guarantees were reinsured to third party reinsurers to mitigate the risk produced by such guaranteed death benefits. For contracts issued after December 31, 1999, the Company instituted an equity hedging program in lieu of reinsurance. The equity hedging program is based on the Company entering into derivative positions to offset exposures to guaranteed minimum death benefits due to adverse changes in the equity markets.
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the guaranteed value of these death benefits in excess of account values was estimated to be $16.6 billion and $2.7 billion, respectively, before reinsurance. The increase was primarily driven by the decrease in account values due to unfavorable equity market performance in 2008.
65
At December 31, 2008, the guaranteed value of minimum guaranteed death benefits in excess of account values, net of reinsurance, was estimated to be $15.0 billion, of which $10.7 billion was projected to be covered by the Company’s equity hedging program. At December 31, 2007, the guaranteed value of minimum guaranteed death benefits in excess of account values, net of reinsurance, was estimated to be $1.8 billion, of which $537.6 was projected to be covered by the Company’s equity hedging program. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded a liability of $565.4 and $209.4, respectively, net of reinsurance, representing the estimated net present value of the Company’s future obligation for guaranteed minimum death benefits in excess of account values. The liability increased mainly due to the accumulation of fees used to fund the reserve during 2008 and higher future projected benefits in excess of account val ues.
Guaranteed Living Benefits:
§ | Guaranteed Minimum Income Benefit (“GMIB”) - Guarantees a minimum income payout, exercisable each contract anniversary on or after a specified date, in most cases the 10th rider anniversary. |
§ | Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit (“GMWB”) - Guarantees lifetime annual withdrawals, after certain ages are reached, of a percentage of premiums paid. The percentage may vary by age at first withdrawal and depending on the base annuity contract. For certain (more recent) versions, there are annual step- up (for up to 10 years) and quarterly ratchet features that may increase the amount to which the percentage is applied for the annual withdrawal amount calculation. Other versions have a quarterly ratchet feature only. A joint life- time withdrawal benefit option is available to include coverage for spouses. |
| Most versions of the withdrawal benefit have reset and/or step-up features that may increase the guaranteed withdrawal amount in certain conditions. Earlier versions of the withdrawal benefit guarantee that annual withdrawals of up to 7.0% of eligible premiums may be made until eligible premiums previously paid by the contractowner are returned, regardless of account value performance. Asset allocation requirements apply at all times where withdrawals are guaranteed for life. |
§ | Guaranteed Minimum Accumulation Benefit (“GMAB”) - Guarantees that the account value will be at least 100% of the eligible premiums paid by the contractowner after 10 years, net of any contract withdrawals (GMAB 10). In the past, the Company offered an alternative design that guaranteed the account value to be at least 200% of the eligible premiums paid by contractowners after 20 years (GMAB 20). The Company has discontinued both of these options fornew sales. |
| |
Effective June 30, 2008, the Company reinsured most of its living benefit guarantees to an affiliated reinsurer to mitigate the risk produced by such benefits. This reinsurance agreement covers all of the GMIBs, as well as the GMWBs with lifetime guarantees (“the “Reinsured living benefits”). The GMABs and the GMWBs without lifetime guarantees (the “Non-reinsured living benefits”) are not covered by this reinsurance.
66
Prior to June 30, 2008, the Company utilized an equity hedging program to mitigate risks associated with all living benefits. The non-reinsured living benefits are still covered by the Company’s equity hedging program.
For the reinsured living benefits, as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the guaranteed value of these benefits in excess of account values was estimated to be $12.0 billion and $397.5, respectively, before reinsurance. The increase was primarily driven by the decrease in the account values of contractowners due to unfavorable equity market performance in 2008. After reinsurance, the guaranteed values in excess of account value were $0 and $397.5 for December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company recorded a liability, net of reinsurance, representing the estimated net present value of its future obligations for these benefits of $0 and $138.0 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
For the non-reinsured living benefits, as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the guaranteed value of these benefits in excess of account values was $310.0 and $109.0, respectively. The Company recorded a liability representing the estimated net present value of its future obligations for these benefits of $153.0 and $11.3 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Equity Hedging Program: In order to hedge equity risk associated with non-reinsured GMDBs and guaranteed living benefits, the Company enters into futures positions or put options on various public market equity indices chosen to closely replicate contractowner variable fund returns. The Company uses market consistent valuation techniques to establish its derivative position and to rebalance the derivative positions in response to market fluctuations. One aspect of the hedging program is designed to offset changes related to equity experience in the liability and to pay excess claims not covered by the contractowner account value. In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company began a new tactical hedging program designed to mitigate the impact of equity market movements on future fee income for its variable annuity business. The Company also administers a hed ging program that mitigates both equity risk and equity volatility risk associated with its Principal Guard GMWB product issued in 2005 and beyond. This hedge strategy primarily involves entering into put options. The derivatives under the equity hedging programs do not qualify for hedge accounting under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”).
Other risks posed by market conditions, such as interest rate risk and the majority of the Company’s equity volatility risk, and risks posed by contractowner experience, such as surrender and mortality experience deviations, are not explicitly mitigated by this program. In addition, certain funds, where there is no replicating market index and where hedging is not appropriate, are excluded from the program.
For those risks addressed by the equity hedging program, the Company is exposed to the risk that the market indices will not adequately replicate actual contractowner variable fund growth. Any differences between actual results and the market indices result in income volatility.
67
In the first quarter of 2009, the Company has taken certain actions to reduce its exposure to market risks. These actions include revisions to variable annuity product features for new issues, as well as a program to hedge interest rates for new business to reduce the effect of interest rate changes on the projected cost of variable annuity guaranteed benefits. During 2009, the Company will be monitoring these initiatives and their impacts on earnings, capital, and liquidity, and will determine whether further actions are necessary.
Fixed Indexed Annuities
The crediting mechanism for FIAs exposes the Company to changes in the equity market (“S&P 500”). Under these contracts, the Company credits interest to the contractowner accounts at the greater of a fixed interest rate or a rate based upon performance of a specified equity index. The Company bears the investment risk as the Company credits contractowner accounts with a stated interest rate, but cannot be certain that the investment income earned on the general account assets will exceed that rate. For accounting purposes, the equity return component of the FIA is considered an embedded derivative. See Critical Accounting Policies “Reserves” for further discussion.
S&P 500 call options are purchased and written to hedge equity risk associated with the FIA contracts. During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company began using futures contracts to hedge certain FIA contracts. The FIA hedging program is limited to currently accruing liabilities resulting from participation rates, that have already been set, and measured using capital market valuation techniques. Future equity returns, which may be reflected in FIA credited rates beyond the current policy term, are not hedged. The derivatives under the FIA hedging program do not qualify for hedge accounting under US GAAP.
Derivatives
The Company’s use of derivatives is limited mainly to hedging purposes to reduce the Company’s exposure to cash flow variability of assets and liabilities, interest rate risk, credit risk, and market risk. Generally, derivatives are not accounted for using hedge accounting treatment under FAS 133, as the Company has not historically sought hedge accounting treatment.
The Company enters into interest rate, equity market, credit default, and currency contracts, including swaps, caps, floors, options and futures, to reduce and manage risks associated with changes in value, yield, price, cash flow, or exchange rates of assets or liabilities held or intended to be held, or to assume or reduce credit exposure associated with a referenced asset, index, or pool. The Company also utilizes options and futures on equity indices to reduce and manage risks associated with its annuity products. Open derivative contracts are reported as either Other investments or Other liabilities, as appropriate, on the Balance Sheets. Changes in the fair value of such derivatives are recorded in Net realized capital gains (losses) in the Statements of Operations.
68
The Company also has investments in certain fixed maturity instruments, and has issued certain retail annuity products, that contain embedded derivatives whose market value is at least partially determined by, among other things, levels of or changes in domestic and/or foreign interest rates (short- or long-term), exchange rates, prepayment rates, equity markets, or credit ratings/spreads.
Embedded derivatives within fixed maturity instruments are included in Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, on the Balance Sheets, and changes in fair value are recorded in Net realized capital gains (losses) in the Statements of Operations.
Embedded derivatives within retail annuity products are included in Future policy benefits and claims reserves on the Balance Sheets, and changes in the fair value are recorded in Interest credited and other benefits to contractowners in the Statements of Operations.
Deposits and Reinsurance Recoverable
The Company utilizes reinsurance agreements to reduce its exposure to large losses in most aspects of its insurance business. Such reinsurance permits recovery of a portion of losses from reinsurers, although it does not discharge the primary liability of the Company as direct insurer of the risks reinsured. The Company evaluates the financial strength of potential reinsurers and continually monitors the financial condition of reinsurers. Only those reinsurance recoverable balances deemed probable of recovery are reflected as assets on the Company’s Balance Sheets.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations
Through the normal course of investment operations, the Company commits to either purchase or sell securities, commercial mortgage loans, or money market instruments, at a specified future date and at a specified price or yield. The inability of counterparties to honor these commitments may result in either a higher or lower replacement cost. Also, there is likely to be a change in the value of the securities underlying the commitments.
At December 31, 2008, the Company had off-balance sheet commitments to purchase investments equal to their fair value of $421.4, $207.2 of which was with related parties. At December 31, 2007, the Company had off-balance sheet commitments to purchase investments equal to their fair value of $616.3, $156.5 of which was with related parties. During 2008 and 2007, $176.2 and $33.1, respectively, was funded to related parties under these commitments.
The Company has entered into various credit default swaps to assume credit exposure to certain assets that the Company does not own. Credit default swaps involve a transfer of credit risk from one party to another in exchange for periodic payments. These instruments are typically written for a maturity period of five years and contain no recourse provisions, which would enable the seller to recover from third parties. The Company’s collateral positions are tracked by the ISDA. To the extent cash collateral was received, it was included in the Collateral held, including payables under securities loan agreement on the Balance Sheets and was reinvested in short-term investments. The source of non-cash collateral posted was investment grade
69
bonds of the entity. Collateral held is used in accordance with the CSA to satisfy any obligations. In the event of a default on the underlying credit exposure, the Company will either receive an additional payment (purchased credit protection) or will be required to make an additional payment (sold credit protection) equal to the notional value of the swap contract. At December 31, 2008, the fair value of credit default swaps of $12.7 and $124.8 was included in Other investments and Other liabilities, respectively, on the Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2007, the fair value of credit default swaps of $8.5 and $30.6 was included in Other investments and Other liabilities, respectively, on the Balance Sheets. As of December 2008, the maximum potential future exposure to the Company on the sale of credit protection under credit default swaps was $143.3.
The Company owns a 3-year credit-linked note arrangement, whereby the Company agrees to reimburse the guaranteed party upon payment default of the referenced obligation. Upon such default, the Company will reimburse the guaranteed party for the loss under the reference obligation, and the Company receives that reference obligation in settlement. The Company can then seek recovery of any losses under the agreement by sale or collection of the received reference obligation. As of December 31, 2008, the maximum potential future exposure to the Company under the guarantee was $32.5.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company had certain contractual obligations due over a period of time as summarized in the following table.
| | | Payments Due by Period | | |
| | Less than | | | More than |
Contractual Obligations | Total | 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | 5 Years |
Long-term debt(1) | $ 1,153.7 | $ 27.5 | $ 56.3 | $ 56.4 | $ 1,013.5 |
Operating lease obligations(2) | 48.8 | 7.7 | 11.6 | 10.6 | 18.9 |
Purchase obligations(3) | 421.4 | 421.4 | - | - | - |
Reserves for insurance obligations(4) | 87,718.4 | 8,942.3 | 14,711.9 | 16,539.8 | 47,524.4 |
Pension obligations(5) | 22.4 | 1.9 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 11.8 |
Total | $ 89,364.7 | $ 9,400.8 | $ 14,784.0 | $ 16,611.3 | $ 48,568.6 |
(1) | Long-term debt, including interest, consists of the following: |
| § | A surplus note in the principal amount of $35.0, and the related interest payable with its affiliate, Security Life. As of December 31, 2008, the outstanding principal, interest rate, and maturity date, of the surplus note were $35.0, 7.98%, and December 7, 2029, respectively. |
| § | Surplus notes in the aggregate principal amount of $400.0 and the related interest payable, with its affiliates, ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company, ReliaStar and SLDI. As of December 31, 2008, the aggregate amount of outstanding principal, interest rate, and maturity date, of these surplus notes were $400.0, 6.26%, and December 29, 2034, respectively. |
(2) | Operating lease obligations relate to the rental of office space under various |
| non-cancelable | operating lease agreements, the longest term of which expires in |
| 2017, | and the anticipated fees from the abandonment and disposition of leased |
| property. | |
70
(3) | Purchase obligations consist primarily of outstanding commitments under limited partnerships that may occur any time within the term of the partnership. |
| The exact timing of funding these commitments, however, cannot be estimated. Therefore, the total amount of the commitments is included in the category “Less than 1 Year.” |
(4) | Reserves for insurance obligations consist of amounts required to meet the Company’s future obligations under its variable annuity, fixed annuity, GIC, and other insurance products. |
(5) | Pension obligations consist of actuarially-determined pension obligations, contribution matching obligations, and other supplemental retirement and insurance obligations, under various benefit plans. |
Repurchase Agreements
The Company engages in dollar repurchase agreements (“dollar rolls”) and repurchase agreements to increase its return on investments and improve liquidity. These transactions involve a sale of securities and an agreement to repurchase substantially the same securities as those sold. Company policies require a minimum of 95% of the fair value of securities pledged under dollar rolls and repurchase agreement transactions to be maintained as collateral. Cash collateral received is invested in fixed maturities, and the offsetting collateral liability is included in Borrowed money on the Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the carrying value of the securities pledged in dollar rolls and repurchase agreement transactions was $562.8 and $745.5, respectively. The carrying value of the securities pledged in dollar rolls and repurchase agreement transactions is included in Securities pledged on the Balance Sheets. The repurchase obligation related to dollar rolls and repurchase agreements totaled $482.2 and $711.9 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The repurchase obligation related to dollar rolls and repurchase agreements is included in Borrowed money on the Balance Sheets.
The Company also enters into reverse repurchase agreements. These transactions involve a purchase of securities and an agreement to sell substantially the same securities as those purchased. Company policies require a minimum of 102% of the fair value of securities pledged under reverse repurchase agreements to be pledged as collateral. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company did not have any securities pledged under reverse repurchase agreements. Reverse repurchase agreements are included in Cash and cash equivalents on the Balance Sheets.
The primary risk associated with short-term collateralized borrowings is that the counterparty will be unable to perform under the terms of the contract. The Company’s exposure is limited to the excess of the net replacement cost of the securities over the value of the short-term investments, an amount that was immaterial at December 31, 2008. The Company believes the counterparties to the dollar roll, repurchase, and reverse repurchase agreements are financially responsible and that the counterparty risk is minimal.
71
Securities Lending
The Company engages in securities lending whereby certain securities from its portfolio are loaned to other institutions for short periods of time. Initial collateral, primarily cash, is required at a rate of 102% of the market value of the loaned domestic securities. The collateral is deposited by the borrower with a lending agent, and retained and invested by the lending agent according to the Company’s guidelines to generate additional income. The market value of the loaned securities is monitored on a daily basis with additional collateral obtained or refunded as the market value of the loaned securities fluctuates. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the fair value of loaned securities was $125.4 and $123.1, respectively.
Statutory Capital and Risk-Based Capital
The Iowa Insurance Division (the “Division”) recognizes only statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the State of Iowa for determining and reporting the financial condition and results of operations of an insurance company and for determining its solvency under the Iowa Insurance Law. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners' (“NAIC”) Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual has been adopted as a component of prescribed or permitted practices by the State of Iowa.
The Commissioner of the Division has the right to permit other specific practices that deviate from prescribed practices. For 2008, the Company received a permitted practice regarding deferred income taxes, which expires on December 15, 2009. Specifically, the this permitted practice modifies the accounting for deferred income taxes prescribed by the NAIC by increasing the realization period for deferred tax assets from one year to three years and increasing the asset recognition limit from 10% to 15% of adjusted statutory capital and surplus. The benefits of this permitted practice may not be considered by the Company when determining surplus available for dividends. This permitted practice increased admitted assets and statutory surplus by $120.7 for the year ended December 31, 2008. This permitted practice had no impact on net income. The Company’s risk-based capital would not have triggered a regulatory event without the benefit of this permitted practice.
The Division also has the ability to ease certain reserving requirements at its discretion. Due to the reduction in liquidity and the availability of letters of credit confirming banks, the Department allowed the Company to accept unconfirmed letters of credit for reinsurance transactions. This allowed the Company to take the full reserve relief for reinsurance transactions with unconfirmed letters of credit. This reserve relief is available for the period from December 31, 2008 through July 1, 2009 and is not a permitted practice.
72
The NAIC risk-based capital requirements require insurance companies to calculate and report information under a risk-based capital formula. These requirements are intended to allow insurance regulators to monitor the capitalization of insurance companies based upon the type and mixture of risks inherent in a company’s operations. The formula includes components for asset risk, liability risk, interest rate exposure, and other factors. The Company has complied with the NAIC’s risk-based capital reporting requirements. Amounts reported indicate that, as of December 31, 2008, the Company has total adjusted capital above all required capital levels.
The sensitivity of the Company’s statutory reserves and surplus established for variable annuity contracts and guaranteed benefit riders to changes in the equity markets will vary depending on the magnitude of the decline. The sensitivity will be affected by the level of account values relative to the level of guaranteed amounts, product design and reinsurance. Statutory reserves for variable annuities depend upon the cumulative equity market impacts on the business in force and therefore result in non-linear relationships with respect to the level of equity market performance within any reporting period.
Risk-based capital is also affected by the product mix of the in force book of business (i.e., the amount of business without guarantees is not subject to the same level of reserves as the business with guarantees). Risk-based capital is an important factor in the determination of the credit and financial strength ratings of the Company. As a result of declines in the market value of the Company’s separate account assets during 2008, the reserves for variable annuity guaranteed benefits increased during the year. Although the Company reinsured a large block of its guaranteed living benefits to an affiliate during 2008, the statutory reserves for the non-reinsured guaranteed benefits increased by $1,445.3 during the year, which adversely impacted statutory surplus. Future declines in the market values of the Company’s separate account assets could cause future reductions in the Company’s surplus, which may also impa ct risk-based capital.
Further, the Company’s statutory credit for reinsurance taken under the affiliated offshore reinsurance agreement covering the Company’s guaranteed living benefits is subject to uncertainty arising from the offshore reinsurer’s ability to provide letters of credit from lending banks under adverse market conditions. The Company is taking various steps to develop alternative sources of credit for reinsurance collateral.
See also Item 7, “Liquidity and Capital Resources - Reinsurance Agreements and Minimum Guarantees”, contained herein.
Income Taxes
On September 25, 2007, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2007-61, which announced its intention to issue regulations with respect to certain computational aspects of the dividend received deduction (“DRD”) on separate account assets held in connection with variable annuity and life insurance contracts. Revenue Ruling 2007-61 suspended Revenue Ruling 2007-54 issued in August 2007 that purported to change accepted industry and IRS interpretations of the statutes governing these computational questions. Any regulations that the IRS ultimately proposes for issuance in this area will be subject to public notice and comment, at which time
73
insurance companies and other members of the public will have the opportunity to raise legal and practical questions about the content, scope and application of such regulations. As a result, the ultimate timing, substance, and effective date of any such regulations are unknown, but they could result in the elimination of some or all of the separate account DRD tax benefit that the Company receives. Management believes that such regulations will apply prospectively.
Income tax obligations include the allowance on uncertain tax benefits related to IRS tax audits and state tax exams that have not been completed. The current liability of $24.2 may be paid in less than one year, upon completion of such audits and exams. The timing of the payment of the remaining allowance of $43.5 cannot be reliably estimated.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
(See the Organization and Significant Accounting Policies footnote to the financial statements set forth in Part II, Item 8. herein, for further information.)
Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. FAS 157 does not expand the use of fair value to any new circumstances.
Under FAS 157, the FASB clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. In support of this principle, FAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop such assumptions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data. FAS 157 also requires separate disclosure of fair value measurements by level within the hierarchy and expanded disclosure of the effect on earnings for items measured using unobservable data.
FAS 157 was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2008. As a result of implementing FAS 157, the Company recognized $69.6, before tax, as an increase to Net income on the date of adoption related to the fair value measurements of investment contract guarantees. The impact of implementation was included in Interest credited and other benefits to contractowners on the Statements of Operations.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (“FSP FAS 157-3”), which provides clarifying guidance on the application of FAS 157 to financial assets in a market that is not active and was effective upon issuance. FSP FAS 157-3 had no effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows upon adoption, as its guidance is consistent with that applied by the Company upon adoption of FAS 157.
74
The Company recognized no other adjustments to its financial statements related to the adoption of FAS 157, and new disclosures are included in the Financial Instruments footnote set forth in Part II, Item 8. herein.
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“FAS 159”), which allows a company to make an irrevocable election, on specific election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recognized in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The election to measure an item at fair value may be determined on an instrument by instrument basis, with certain exceptions. If the fair value option is elected, any upfront costs and fees related to the item will be recognized in earnings as incurred. Items eligible for the fair value option include:
§ | Certain recognized financial assets and liabilities; |
§ | Rights and obligations under certain insurance contracts that are not financial instruments; |
§ | Host financial instruments resulting from the separation of an embedded nonfinancial derivative instrument from a nonfinancial hybrid instrument; and |
§ | Certain commitments. |
FAS 159 was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2008. In implementing FAS 159, the Company elected not to take the fair value option for any eligible assets or liabilities in existence on January 1, 2008, or in existence at the date of the financial statements set forth in Part II, Item 8. herein.
Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts
On April 30, 2007, the FASB issued a FSP on FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 39, “Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts” (“FSP FIN 39-1”), which permits a reporting entity to offset fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim or the obligation to return cash collateral against fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments under master netting arrangements. FSP FIN 39-1 had no effect on the financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows upon adoption by the Company on January 1, 2008, as it is the Company’s accounting policy not to offset such fair value amounts.
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), which creates a single model to address the accounting for the uncertainty in income tax positions recognized in a company’s financial statements. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement criteria that must be satisfied to recognize a financial statement benefit of tax positions taken, or expected to be taken, on an income tax return. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.
75
FIN 48 was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2007. As a result of implementing FIN 48, the Company recognized a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $1.7 as a reduction to January 1, 2007 Retained earnings (deficit).
Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection With Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts
In September 2005, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) issued Statement of Position (“SOP”) 05-1, “Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection with Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts” (“SOP 05-1”), which states that when an internal replacement transaction results in a substantially changed contract, the unamortized deferred acquisition costs, unearned revenue liabilities, and deferred sales inducement assets, related to the replaced contract should not be deferred in connection with the new contract. Contract modifications that meet various conditions defined by SOP 05-1 and result in a new contract that is substantially unchanged from the replaced contract, however, should be accounted for as a continuation of the replaced contract.
SOP 05-1 defines an internal replacement as a modification in product benefits, features, rights, or coverage, that occurs by the exchange of a contract for a new contract, by amendment, endorsement, or rider, to a contract, or by the election of a feature or coverage within a contract. SOP 05-1 applies to internal replacements made primarily to contracts defined by FAS No. 60, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises” (“FAS 60”), as short-duration and long-duration insurance contracts, and by FAS 97 as investment contracts.
SOP 05-1 was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2007, and is effective for internal replacements occurring on or after that date. As a result of implementing SOP 05-1, the Company recognized a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $4.8, before tax, or $3.1, net of $1.7 of income taxes, as a reduction to January 1, 2007 Retained earnings (deficit). In addition, the Company revised its accounting policy on the amortization of DAC and VOBA to include internal replacements.
Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees
In September 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 133-1 and FIN No. 45-4, “Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161” (“FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4”), which does the following:
§ | Amends FAS No. 133, requiring additional disclosures by sellers of credit derivatives; |
§ | Amends FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“FIN 45”), requiring additional disclosure about the current status of the payment/performance risk of a guarantee; and |
76
§ | Clarifies the effective date of FAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS 161”). |
FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 was adopted by the Company on December 31, 2008. In implementing FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4, the Company determined that its adoption had no financial statement impact. New disclosures are included in the Financial Instruments and Commitments and Contingent Liabilities footnotes to the financial statements set forth in Part II, Item 8. herein.
The clarification in the FSP of the effective date of FAS 161 is consistent with the guidance in FAS 161 and the Company’s disclosure provided herein.
Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities
In December, 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, “Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities” (“FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8”), which requires additional disclosures regarding a transferor’s continuing involvement with financial assets transferred in a securitization or asset-backed financing arrangement and an enterprise’s involvement with variable interest entities (“VIEs”) and qualifying special purpose entities (“QSPEs”).
FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 was adopted by the Company on December 31, 2008. In implementing FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, the Company determined that its adoption has no financial statement impact. The Company does not have any QSPEs or continuing involvement with financial assets transferred in a securitization or asset-backed financing arrangement.
Amendments to Impairment Guidance
In January 2009, the FASB issued FSP EITF 99-20-1, “Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99-20” (“FSP EITF 99-20-1”), which amends EITF 99-20, “Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets” (“EITF 99-20”). FSP EITF 99-20-1 requires that an other-than-temporary impairment on investments that meet the criteria of EITF 99-20 be recognized as a realized loss through earnings when it is probable there has been an adverse change in the holder’s estimated cash flow, consistent with the impairment model in FAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.”
FSP EITF 99-20-1 was adopted by the Company on December 31, 2008, prospectively. In implementing FSP EITF 99-20-1, the Company determined there was a minimal effect on financial position, results of operations, and cash flows, as the structured securities held by the Company were highly rated at issue.
77
New Accounting Pronouncements
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS 161, which requires enhanced disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements, including:
§ | How and why derivative instruments are used; |
§ | How derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FAS 133 and its related interpretations; and |
§ | How derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial statements. |
The provisions of FAS 161 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company is currently in the process of determining the impact of adoption of FAS 161 on its disclosures; however, as the pronouncement only pertains to additional disclosure, the Company has determined that the adoption of FAS 161 will have no financial statement impact. In addition, the Company’s derivatives are generally not accounted for using hedge accounting treatment under FAS 133, as the Company has not historically sought hedge accounting treatment.
Business Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“FAS 141R”), which replaces FAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” as issued in 2001. FAS 141R requires most identifiable assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interest, and goodwill, acquired in a business combination to be recorded at full fair value as of the acquisition date, even for acquisitions achieved in stages. In addition, the statement requires:
§ | Acquisition-related costs to be recognized separately and generally expensed; |
§ | Non-obligatory restructuring costs to be recognized separately when the liability is incurred; |
§ | Contractual contingencies acquired to be recorded at acquisition-date fair values; |
§ | A bargain purchase, which occurs when the fair value of net assets acquired exceeds the consideration transferred plus any non-controlling interest in the acquiree, to be recognized as a gain; and |
§ | The nature and financial effects of the business combination to be disclosed. |
FAS 141R also amends or eliminates various other authoritative literature.
The provisions of FAS 141R are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 for all business combinations occurring on or after that date. As such, this standard will impact any Company acquisitions that occur on or after January 1, 2009. Also, the Company will consider transition costs related to any acquisitions that may occur prior to January 1, 2009.
78
Equity Method Investment Accounting
In November 2008, the EITF reached consensus on EITF 08-6, “Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations” (“EITF 08-6”), which requires, among other provisions, that:
§ | Equity method investments be initially measured at cost; |
§ | Contingent consideration only be included in the initial measurement; |
§ | An investor recognize its share of any impairment charge recorded by the equity investee; and |
§ | An investor account for a share issuance by an equity investee as if the investor had sold a proportionate share of its investment; |
The provisions of EITF 08-6 are effective in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. As such, this standard will impact Company acquisitions or changes in ownership with regards to equity investments that occur on or after January 1, 2009. The Company is currently in the process of determining the impact of the other-than-temporary impairment provisions.
Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives
Legislative proposals, which have been or may again be considered by Congress, include changing the taxation on annuity benefits, changing the tax treatment of insurance products relative to other financial products, and changing life insurance company taxation. Some of these proposals, if enacted, could have a material adverse effect on life insurance, annuity, and other retirement savings product sales, while others could have a material beneficial effect. The SEC has a regulatory initiative underway to improve fee disclosure in financial products and has also adopted Regulation 151A, with an effective date of January 12, 2011. The new rule will have the effect of requiring the registration of fixed annuity products. The IRS and the Treasury have published final regulations, effective in 2009, that update and consolidate the rules applicable to 403(b) tax deferred annuity arrangements. As a result of these final regulations, the Co mpany is no longer offering new 403(b) contracts; however, 403(b) products will continue to be offered by the Company’s affiliates, including ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company.
Other Regulatory Matters
Regulatory Matters
As with many financial services companies, the Company and its affiliates have received informal and formal requests for information from various state and federal governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations in connection with inquiries and investigations of the products and practices of the financial services industry. In each case, the Company and its affiliates have been and are providing full cooperation.
79
Insurance and Retirement Plan Products and Other Regulatory Matters
Federal and state regulators, and self-regulatory agencies are conducting broad inquiries and investigations involving the insurance and retirement industries. These initiatives currently focus on, among other things, compensation, revenue sharing, and other sales incentives; potential conflicts of interest; sales and marketing practices (including sales to seniors); specific product types (including group annuities and indexed annuities); and disclosure. The Company and certain of its U.S. affiliates have received formal and informal requests in connection with such investigations, and have cooperated and are cooperating fully with each request for information. Some of these matters could result in regulatory action involving the Company. These initiatives also may result in new legislation and regulation that could significantly affect the financial services industry, including businesses in which the Company is engaged. In light o f these and other developments, U.S. affiliates of ING, including the Company, periodically review whether modifications to their business practices are appropriate.
Investment Product Regulatory Issues
Since 2002, there has been increased governmental and regulatory activity relating to mutual funds and variable insurance products. This activity has primarily focused on inappropriate trading of fund shares; directed brokerage; compensation; sales practices, suitability, and supervision; arrangements with service providers; pricing; compliance and controls; adequacy of disclosure; and document retention.
In addition to responding to governmental and regulatory requests on fund trading issues, ING management, on its own initiative, conducted, through special counsel and a national accounting firm, an extensive internal review of mutual fund trading in ING insurance, retirement, and mutual fund products. The goal of this review was to identify any instances of inappropriate trading in those products by third parties or by ING investment professionals and other ING personnel.
The internal review identified several isolated arrangements allowing third parties to engage in frequent trading of mutual funds within the variable insurance and mutual fund products of ING, and identified other circumstances where frequent trading occurred despite measures taken by ING intended to combat market timing. Each of the arrangements has been terminated and disclosed to regulators, to the independent trustees of ING Funds (U.S.), and in Company reports previously filed with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Action has been or may be taken by regulators with respect to the Company or certain affiliates before investigations relating to fund trading are completed. The potential outcome of such action is difficult to predict but could subject the Company or certain affiliates to adverse consequences, including, but not limited to, settlement payments, penalties, and other financial liability. It is not currently anticipated, however, that the actual outcome of any such action will have a material adverse effect on ING or ING’s U.S.-based operations, including the Company.
80
ING has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the ING Funds from all damages resulting from wrongful conduct by ING or its employees or from ING’s internal investigation, any investigations conducted by any governmental or self-regulatory agencies, litigation or other formal proceedings, including any proceedings by the SEC. Management reported to the ING Funds Board that ING management believes that the total amount of any indemnification obligations will not be material to ING or ING’s U.S.-based operations, including the Company.
For further discussion of the risks to the Company as a result of recent regulatory inquiries and possible changes in U.S. regulation, see Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors.
81
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated)
Asset/liability management is integrated into many aspects of the Company’s operations, including investment decisions, product development, and determination of crediting rates. As part of the risk management process, different economic scenarios are modeled, including cash flow testing required for insurance regulatory purposes, to determine that existing assets are adequate to meet projected liability cash flows. Key variables in the modeling process include interest rates, anticipated contractowner behavior, and variable separate account performance. Contractowners bear the investment risk related to variable annuity products, subject to the minimum guaranteed death and living benefits included in these contracts.
The fixed account liabilities are supported by a general account portfolio principally composed of fixed rate investments with matching duration characteristics that can generate predictable, steady rates of return. The portfolio management strategy for the fixed account considers the assets available-for-sale. This enables the Company to respond to changes in market interest rates, prepayment risk, relative values of asset sectors and individual securities and loans, credit quality outlook, and other relevant factors. The objective of portfolio management is to maximize returns, taking into account interest rate and credit risk, as well as other risks. The Company’s asset/liability management discipline includes strategies to minimize exposure to loss as interest rates and economic and market conditions change.
On the basis of these analyses, management believes there is currently no material solvency risk to the Company.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company defines interest rate risk as the risk of an economic loss due to adverse changes in interest rates. This risk arises from the Company’s primary activity of investing fixed annuity premiums and guaranteed investment contract deposits received in interest-sensitive assets and carrying these funds as interest-sensitive liabilities. The Company manages the interest rate risk in its general account investments relative to the interest rate risk in its liabilities. The current product portfolio also includes products where interest rate risks are entirely or partially passed on to the contractowner, thereby reducing the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements. The Company is also subject to interest rate risk on its variable annuity business, as a sustained decline in interest rates may subject the Company to higher cost of guaranteed benefits and increased hedging costs. Changes in interest rates can impact pr esent and future earnings, the levels of new sales, surrenders, or withdrawals.
The following schedule demonstrates the potential changes in the annual earnings from an instantaneous, parallel increase/decrease in interest rates of 1% on December 31, 2008. These changes to income could relate to future investment income, interest paid to contractowners, market-value adjustments, amortization of DAC and VOBA, sales levels, or any other net income item that would be affected by interest rate changes. The effect of interest rate changes is different by product. In addition, the Company has estimated the impact to December 31, 2008 Shareholder’s
82
equity from the same instantaneous change in interest rates. The effect on Shareholder’s equity includes the impact of interest rate fluctuations on income, unrealized capital gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, and DAC and VOBA adjustments for unrealized capital gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities.
Interest rate sensitivity and effect on Net income and Shareholder’s equity:
| | |
| | Effect on |
| | Shareholder's |
| Effect on Net | Equity as of |
| Income for | December 31, |
| 2008 | 2008 |
|
Increase of 1% | $ (2.9) | $ (18.8) |
Decrease of 1% | (29.4) | (12.1) |
The above analysis includes the following changes in DAC and VOBA related to an instantaneous, parallel increase/decrease in interest rates.
Interest rate sensitivity and effect on DAC and VOBA:
| | |
| Effect on | Effect on |
| Amortization of | DAC and VOBA |
| DAC and VOBA | Assets as of |
| for | December 31, |
| 2008 | 2008 |
|
Increase of 1% | $ 24.7 | $ 30.5 |
Decrease of 1% | (21.0) | (28.4) |
Equity Market Risk
The Company’s operations are significantly influenced by changes in the equity markets. The Company’s profitability depends largely on the amount of assets under management (“AUM”), which is primarily driven by the level of sales, equity market appreciation and depreciation, and the persistency of the in force block of business.
Prolonged and precipitous declines in the equity markets can have a significant impact on the Company’s operations. As a result, sales of variable products may decline and surrender activity may increase, as contractowner sentiment towards the equity market turns negative. Lower AUM will have a negative impact on the Company’s financial results, primarily due to lower fee income on variable annuities, as well as increased costs for guaranteed benefits and hedging. Furthermore, the Company may experience a reduction in profit margins if a significant portion of the assets held in the variable annuity separate account move to the general account and the Company is unable to earn an acceptable investment margin, particularly in light of the low interest rate environment and the presence of contractually guaranteed interest credited rates.
83
In addition, prolonged declines in the equity market may also decrease the Company’s expectations of future gross profits, which are utilized to determine the amount of DAC and VOBA to be amortized in a given financial statement period. A significant decrease in the Company’s estimated gross profits would require the Company to accelerate the amount of amortization of DAC and VOBA in a given period, potentially causing a material adverse deviation in the period’s Net income.
The following schedule demonstrates the potential changes in the annual earnings resulting from an instantaneous increase/decrease in equity markets of 10% on December 31, 2008. These changes to income could relate to future fee income, reserves for guaranteed benefit payments, hedging gains (losses), unrealized or realized capital gains (losses), amortization of DAC and VOBA, or any other net income item that would be affected by a substantial change to equity markets. In addition, the Company has estimated the impact to Shareholder’s equity as of December 31, 2008 from the same instantaneous change in equity markets. The effect on Shareholder’s equity include the impact of equity market fluctuations on income, unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities, and DAC and VOBA adjustments for unrealized capital gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities.
Equity sensitivity and effect on Net income and Shareholder’s equity
| | |
| | Effect on |
| | Shareholder's |
| Effect on Net | Equity as of |
| Income for | December 31, |
| 2008 | 2008 |
|
Increase of 10% | $ 164.6 | $ 163.3 |
Decrease of 10% | (142.2) | (142.2) |
The above analysis includes the following changes in DAC and VOBA related to an instantaneous increase/decrease in equity markets.
Equity sensitivity and effect on DAC and VOBA:
| | |
| Effect on | Effect on |
| Amortization of | DAC and VOBA |
| DAC and VOBA | Assets as of |
| for | December 31, |
| 2008 | 2008 |
|
Increase of 10% | $ 206.3 | $ 206.3 |
Decrease of 10% | (153.5) | (153.5) |
84
Hedging of Minimum Guarantees
The Company sells variable annuities that offer various guaranteed death and living benefits, including guaranteed minimum death benefits (“GMDBs”), guaranteed minimum income benefits (“GMIBs”), guaranteed minimum withdrawals benefits (“GMWBs”), and guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (“GMABs”). See Part II, Item 7., discussion of Minimum Guarantees under Liquidity and Capital Resources.
The liabilities associated with GMDBs, GMIBs, and GMWBs with life contingent payouts, are recorded in accordance with Statement of Position (“SOP”) 03-1, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts for Separate Accounts” (“SOP 03-1”). The liabilities associated with GMABs and GMWBs without life contingent payouts represent embedded derivative liabilities within variable annuities, which are required to be reported separately from the host variable annuity contract. These guarantees are carried at fair value in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS 133”) and FAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS 157”), and are reported in Future policy benefits and claims reserves in the Balance Sheets.
Both the liabilities recorded in accordance with SOP 03-1, and the liabilities carried at fair value in accordance with FAS 133, are calculated based on actuarial assumptions related to projected cash flows, including benefits and related contract charges, over the lives of the contracts, incorporating expectations concerning contractowner behavior. These liability assumptions, such as lapses, partial withdrawals, and mortality, are based on Company experience and are, where appropriate, consistent with those used for DAC and VOBA.
Declines in the equity market may increase the Company’s net exposure to the death and living benefit guarantees offered under these contracts. Such declines would cause a decrease in account values, and increase the possibility that the Company may be required to pay amounts related to these guarantees. The following schedule demonstrates the potential change in the 2008 reserve liabilities for minimum guarantees resulting from an instantaneous increase/decrease in equity markets of 10% on December 31, 2008.
| | | | |
| | Effect on Reserves | |
| GMDBs | GMIBs | GMABs | GMWBs |
|
Increase of 10% | $ (94.8) | $ - | $ (10.4) | $ (15.7) |
Decrease of 10% | 127.5 | - | 13.9 | 21.2 |
In order to hedge equity risk associated with guaranteed death and living benefits, the Company enters into futures positions on various public market indices chosen to closely replicate contractowner variable fund returns. The Company uses market consistent valuation techniques to establish its derivative positions and to rebalance the derivative positions in response to market fluctuation. One aspect of the hedging program is designed to offset changes related to equity experience in the liability and to pay excess claims not covered by the contractowner account value. The Company
85
also administers a hedging program that mitigates both equity risk and equity volatility risk associated with its Principal Guard GMWB product issued in 2005 and beyond. This hedge strategy primarily involves entering into put options.
Other risks posed by market conditions, such as interest rate risk and the majority of the Company’s equity volatility risk, and risks posed by contractowner experience, such as surrender and mortality experience deviations, are not explicitly mitigated by this program. In addition, certain funds, where there is no replicating market index and where hedging is not appropriate, as well as certain enhanced death benefits are excluded from the program.
For those risks addressed by the equity hedging program, the Company is exposed to the risk that the market indices will not adequately replicate actual contractowner variable fund growth. Any differences between actual results and the market indices result in income volatility.
Hedging of Indexed Annuity Guarantees
The crediting mechanism for fixed indexed annuities (“FIA”) exposes the Company to changes in the equity market (“S&P 500”). The Company mitigates this exposure by purchasing over-the-counter S&P 500 call options from broker-dealer derivative counterparties who generally have a minimum credit rating of Aa3 from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., and AA- from Standard & Poor’s. For each broker-dealer counterparty, the Company’s derivative exposure to that counterparty is aggregated with any fixed income exposure to the same counterparty, and is maintained within applicable state requirements and National Association of Insurance Commissioners insurance regulatory guidelines. During 2007, the Company began using futures contracts to hedge certain FIA contracts. The FIA hedging program is limited to currently accruing liabilities resulting from participation rates that have been determined using capital market valuation techniques. Future equity returns, which may be reflected in FIA credited rates beyond the current policy term, are not hedged.
The following schedule demonstrates the potential change in the 2008 FIA reserve liabilities resulting from instantaneous increase/decrease in equity markets of 10% on December 31, 2008.
| Effect on |
| Reserves |
|
Increase of 10% | $ (30.5) |
Decrease of 10% | 30.5 |
86
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | |
|
| Index to Financial Statements | |
| | Page |
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 88 |
| | |
| Financial Statements: | |
| | |
| Statements of Operations for the years ended | |
| December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 | 89 |
| | |
| Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 | 90 |
| | |
| Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity for the years ended | |
| December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 | 92 |
| | |
| Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended | |
| December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 | 93 |
| | |
| Notes to Financial Statements | 95 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related statements of operations, changes in shareholder’s equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits include consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, a nd evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Atlanta, Georgia March 26, 2009 |
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.)
Statements of Operations (In millions) |
| | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| 2008 | 2007 | | 2006 |
Revenue: | | | | |
Net investment income | $ 1,438.0 | $ 1,346.4 | $ 1,156.4 |
Fee income | 1,152.4 | 1,198.9 | | 939.2 |
Premiums | 19.1 | 19.6 | | 20.5 |
Net realized capital losses | (1,481.7) | (391.2) | | (90.4) |
Other income | 0.2 | 0.1 | | - |
Total revenue | 1,128.0 | 2,173.8 | | 2,025.7 |
Benefits and expenses: | | | | |
Interest credited and other benefits to contractowners | 1,716.0 | 1,312.0 | | 1,169.7 |
Operating expenses | 291.7 | 269.6 | | 228.0 |
Net amortization of deferred policy acquisition | | | | |
costs and value of business acquired | 680.5 | 408.1 | | 293.0 |
Interest expense | 30.5 | 32.5 | | 30.3 |
Other expense | 35.7 | 24.2 | | 28.1 |
Total benefits and expenses | 2,754.4 | 2,046.4 | | 1,749.1 |
(Loss) income before income taxes | (1,626.4) | 127.4 | | 276.6 |
Income tax (benefit) expense | (245.2) | (1.6) | | 64.4 |
Net (loss) income | $ (1,381.2) | $ 129.0 | $ 212.2 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
89
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.)
Balance Sheets (In millions, except share data) |
| | | |
| As of December 31, | |
| 2008 | | 2007 |
Assets | | | |
Investments: | | | |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, at fair value | | | |
(amortized cost of $20,393.5 at 2008 and $21,945.0 at 2007) | $ 17,143.0 | $ 21,833.4 |
Equity securities, available-for-sale, at fair value | | | |
(cost of $257.6 at 2008 and $216.6 at 2007) | 253.9 | | 211.1 |
Short-term investments | 111.7 | | 188.0 |
Mortgage loans on real estate | 3,923.3 | | 3,701.7 |
Policy loans | 144.4 | | 155.8 |
Limited partnerships/corporations | 332.9 | | 454.5 |
Other investments | 364.7 | | 394.1 |
Securities pledged (amortized cost of $976.7 at 2008 | | | |
and $953.3 at 2007) | 993.2 | | 942.6 |
Total investments | 23,267.1 | | 27,881.2 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 610.8 | | 204.4 |
Short-term investments under securities loan agreement | 130.4 | | 128.5 |
Accrued investment income | 214.5 | | 216.9 |
Receivable for securities sold | 9.1 | | 4.6 |
Premium receivable | 303.1 | | - |
Deposits and reinsurance recoverable from affiliate | 5,349.3 | | 4,616.1 |
Deferred policy acquisition costs | 4,205.5 | | 2,908.4 |
Value of business acquired | 195.1 | | 128.7 |
Sales inducements to contractowners | 624.3 | | 645.4 |
Due from affiliates | 14.5 | | 22.9 |
Current income tax recoverable | 321.1 | | - |
Other assets | 481.9 | | 41.3 |
Assets held in separate accounts | 34,090.8 | | 44,477.8 |
Total assets | $ 69,817.5 | $ 81,276.2 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
90
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.)
Balance Sheets (In millions, except share data) |
| | | |
| As of December 31, | |
| 2008 | | 2007 |
Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity | | | |
Future policy benefits and claims reserves | $ 32,570.7 | $ 31,461.6 |
Payables for securities purchased | 4.1 | | - |
Payables under securities loan agreement, including collateral held | 148.0 | | 140.0 |
Borrowed money | 483.1 | | 715.5 |
Notes to affiliates | 435.0 | | 435.0 |
Due to affiliates | 151.7 | | 95.6 |
Current income taxes | - | | 40.7 |
Deferred income taxes | 35.8 | | 184.5 |
Other liabilities | 1,130.8 | | 606.5 |
Liabilities related to separate accounts | 34,090.8 | | 44,477.8 |
Total liabilities | 69,050.0 | | 78,157.2 |
|
Shareholder's equity | | | |
Common stock (250,000 shares authorized, issued | | | |
and outstanding; $10 per share value) | 2.5 | | 2.5 |
Additional paid-in capital | 4,335.4 | | 4,132.7 |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,333.7) | | (160.7) |
Retained earnings (deficit) | (2,236.7) | | (855.5) |
Total shareholder's equity | 767.5 | | 3,119.0 |
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity | $ 69,817.5 | $ 81,276.2 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
91
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) Statements of Changes in Shareholder’s Equity
| | | Accumulated | | |
| | Additional | Other | Retained | Total |
| Common | Paid-In | Comprehensive | Earnings | Shareholder's |
| Stock | Capital | Income (Loss) | (Deficit) | Equity |
Balance at December 31, 2005 | $ 2.5 | $ 4,143.1 | $ (4.7) | $ (1,191.9) | $ 2,949.0 |
Comprehensive income: | | | | | |
Net income | - | - | - | 212.2 | 212.2 |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: | | | | | |
Change in net unrealized capital | | | | | |
gains (losses) on securities | | | | | |
($(10.7) pretax) | - | - | (7.3) | - | (7.3) |
Pension liability ($0.6 pretax) | - | - | 0.4 | - | 0.4 |
Other | - | - | 1.1 | - | 1.1 |
Total comprehensive income | | | | | 206.4 |
Cumulative effect of change of | | | | | |
accounting principle ($(2.4) pretax) | - | - | (1.6) | - | (1.6) |
Capital distribution paid | - | (170.0) | - | - | (170.0) |
Employee share-based payments | - | 4.1 | - | - | 4.1 |
Other | - | 1.2 | - | - | 1.2 |
Balance at December 31, 2006 | 2.5 | 3,978.4 | (12.1) | (979.7) | 2,989.1 |
Cumulative effect of change of | | | | | |
accounting principles | - | - | - | (4.8) | (4.8) |
Balance at January 1, 2007 | 2.5 | 3,978.4 | (12.1) | (984.5) | 2,984.3 |
Comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | |
Net income | - | - | - | 129.0 | 129.0 |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: | | | | | |
Change in net unrealized capital | | | | | |
gains (losses) on securities | | | | | |
($(158.7) pretax), including | | | | | |
valuation allowance of $(46.9) | - | - | (149.7) | - | (149.7) |
Pension liability ($3.4 pretax) | - | - | 2.2 | - | 2.2 |
Other | - | - | (1.1) | - | (1.1) |
Total comprehensive loss | | | | | (19.6) |
Capital contribution | - | 150.0 | - | - | 150.0 |
Employee share-based payments | - | 4.3 | - | - | 4.3 |
Balance at December 31, 2007 | 2.5 | 4,132.7 | (160.7) | (855.5) | 3,119.0 |
Comprehensive loss: | | | | | |
Net loss | - | - | - | (1,381.2) | (1,381.2) |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: | | | | | |
Change in net unrealized capital | | | | | |
gains (losses) on securities | | | | | |
($(1,831.4) pretax), including | | | | | |
valuation allowance of $17.1 | - | - | (1,173.3) | - | (1,173.3) |
Pension liability ($0.5 pretax) | - | - | 0.3 | - | 0.3 |
Total comprehensive loss | | | | | (2,554.2) |
Capital contribution from Parent | - | 1,100.0 | - | - | 1,100.0 |
Capital distribution to Parent | - | (900.0) | - | - | (900.0) |
Employee share-based payments | - | 2.7 | - | - | 2.7 |
Balance at December 31, 2008 | $ 2.5 | $ 4,335.4 | $ (1,333.7) | $ (2,236.7) | $ 767.5 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
92
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.)
Statements of Cash Flows (In millions) |
| | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| 2008 | 2007 | | 2006 |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | | | | |
Net (loss) income | $ (1,381.2) | $ 129.0 | $ 212.2 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to | | | | |
net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | |
Capitalization of deferred policy acquisition costs | | | | |
and sales inducements | (888.6) | (864.5) | | (831.9) |
Net amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, | | | | |
value of business acquired, and sales inducements | 910.2 | 528.3 | | 367.1 |
Net accretion/decretion of discount/premium | 74.7 | 52.2 | | 57.7 |
Future policy benefits, claims reserves, and | | | | |
interest credited | 2,156.8 | 1,368.5 | | 1,179.9 |
Provision for deferred income taxes | 509.6 | (69.0) | | 131.4 |
Net realized capital losses | 1,481.7 | 391.2 | | 90.4 |
Change in: | | | | |
Accrued investment income | 2.4 | (33.2) | | (8.7) |
Reinsurance recoverable (excluding GICs) | (827.0) | (132.4) | | (52.1) |
Other receivables and asset accruals | (389.9) | 2.5 | | (13.9) |
Other reinsurance asset | (353.8) | - | | - |
Due to/from affiliates | 64.5 | 56.0 | | (8.0) |
Income tax recoverable | (361.8) | - | | - |
Other payables and accruals | 17.9 | 42.9 | | (3.1) |
Employee share-based payments | 2.7 | 4.3 | | 4.1 |
Other, net | 163.8 | 2.2 | | 1.1 |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 1,182.0 | 1,478.0 | | 1,126.2 |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | | | | |
Proceeds from the sale, maturity, or redemption of: | | | | |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale | 7,478.8 | 10,631.8 | | 10,496.1 |
Equity securities, available-for-sale | 162.8 | 16.5 | | 15.8 |
Mortgage loans on real estate | 474.5 | 776.1 | | 523.7 |
Acquisition of: | | | | |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale | (7,002.2) | (15,767.5) | | (11,446.3) |
Equity securities, available-for-sale | (272.0) | (193.5) | | (25.4) |
Mortgage loans on real estate | (700.3) | (790.6) | | (444.4) |
Derivatives, net | (58.1) | 22.9 | | (198.1) |
Limited partnerships, net | 30.1 | (305.4) | | (69.9) |
Short-term investments, net | 77.2 | (53.8) | | (79.7) |
Collateral (paid) received | 6.2 | 11.5 | | - |
Other, net | 13.7 | 1.9 | | 4.7 |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 210.7 | (5,650.1) | | (1,223.5) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
93
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.)
Statements of Cash Flows (In millions) |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | | | |
Deposits received for investment contracts | $ 8,473.0 | $ 10,458.9 | $ 5,788.4 |
Maturities and withdrawals from investment contracts | (9,520.7) | (7,062.2) | (4,497.2) |
Reinsurance recoverable on investment contracts | 93.8 | 275.3 | (638.8) |
Notes to affiliates | - | - | 45.0 |
Short-term repayments | (232.4) | (54.1) | (36.7) |
Capital distribution to Parent | (900.0) | - | (170.0) |
Capital contribution from Parent | 1,100.0 | 150.0 | - |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (986.3) | 3,767.9 | 490.7 |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 406.4 | (404.2) | 393.4 |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 204.4 | 608.6 | 215.2 |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | $ 610.8 | $ 204.4 | $ 608.6 |
Supplemental cash flow information: | | | |
Income taxes (received) paid, net | $ (393.1) | $ 21.3 | $ (30.2) |
Interest paid | $ 50.5 | $ 67.1 | $ 66.2 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
94
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (“ING USA” or the “Company,” as appropriate) is a stock life insurance company domiciled in the State of Iowa and provides financial products and services in the United States. ING USA is authorized to conduct its insurance business in all states, except New York, and in the District of Columbia.
ING USA is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc. (“Lion” or “Parent”), which is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of ING Groep N.V. (“ING”). ING is a global financial services holding company based in The Netherlands, with American Depository Shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ING”.
Description of Business
The Company offers various insurance products, including immediate and deferred variable and fixed annuities. The Company’s annuity products are distributed by national wirehouses, regional securities firms, independent broker-dealers, banks, life insurance companies with captive agency sales forces, independent insurance agents, independent marketing organizations, and affiliated broker-dealers. The Company’s primary annuity customers are individual consumers.
The Company also offers guaranteed investment contracts and funding agreements (collectively referred to as “GICs”), sold primarily to institutional investors and corporate benefit plans. These products are marketed by home office personnel or through specialty insurance brokers.
The Company previously provided interest-sensitive, traditional life insurance, and health insurance. The Company no longer issues these products. The life insurance business is in runoff, and the Company has ceded to other insurers all health insurance.
The Company has one operating segment.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. FAS 157 does not expand the use of fair value to any new circumstances.
95
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Under FAS 157, the FASB clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. In support of this principle, FAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop such assumptions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data. FAS 157 also requires separate disclosure of fair value measurements by level within the hierarchy and expanded disclosure of the effect on earnings for items measured using unobservable data.
FAS 157 was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2008. As a result of implementing FAS 157, the Company recognized $69.6, before tax, as an increase to Net income on the date of adoption related to the fair value measurements of investment contract guarantees. The impact of implementation was included in Interest credited and other benefits to contractowners on the Statements of Operations.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (“FSP FAS 157-3”), which provides clarifying guidance on the application of FAS 157 to financial assets in a market that is not active and was effective upon issuance. FSP FAS 157-3 had no effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows upon adoption, as its guidance is consistent with that applied by the Company upon adoption of FAS 157.
The Company recognized no other adjustments to its financial statements related to the adoption of FAS 157, and new disclosures are included in the Financial Instruments footnote.
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“FAS 159”), which allows a company to make an irrevocable election, on specific election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recognized in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The election to measure an item at fair value may be determined on an instrument by instrument basis, with certain exceptions. If the fair value option is elected, any upfront costs and fees related to the item will be recognized in earnings as incurred. Items eligible for the fair value option include:
§ | Certain recognized financial assets and liabilities; |
§ | Rights and obligations under certain insurance contracts that are not financial instruments; |
§ | Host financial instruments resulting from the separation of an embedded nonfinancial derivative instrument from a nonfinancial hybrid instrument; and |
§ | Certain commitments. |
96
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
FAS 159 was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2008. In implementing FAS 159, the Company elected not to take the fair value option for any eligible assets or liabilities in existence on January 1, 2008, or in existence at the date of these financial statements.
Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts
On April 30, 2007, the FASB issued a FSP on FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 39, “Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts” (“FSP FIN 39-1”), which permits a reporting entity to offset fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim or the obligation to return cash collateral against fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments under master netting arrangements. FSP FIN 39-1 had no effect on the financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows upon adoption by the Company on January 1, 2008, as it is the Company’s accounting policy not to offset such fair value amounts.
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), which creates a single model to address the accounting for the uncertainty in income tax positions recognized in a company’s financial statements. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement criteria that must be satisfied to recognize a financial statement benefit of tax positions taken, or expected to be taken, on an income tax return. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.
FIN 48 was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2007. As a result of implementing FIN 48, the Company recognized a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $1.7 as a reduction to January 1, 2007 Retained earnings (deficit).
Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection With Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts
In September 2005, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) issued Statement of Position (“SOP”) 05-1, “Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection with Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts” (“SOP 05-1”), which states that when an internal replacement transaction results in a substantially changed contract, the unamortized deferred acquisition costs, unearned revenue liabilities, and deferred sales inducement assets, related to the replaced contract should not be deferred in connection with the new contract. Contract modifications that meet various conditions defined by SOP 05-1 and result in a new contract that is substantially unchanged from the replaced contract, however, should be accounted for as a continuation of the replaced contract.
97
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
SOP 05-1 defines an internal replacement as a modification in product benefits, features, rights, or coverage, that occurs by the exchange of a contract for a new contract, by amendment, endorsement, or rider, to a contract, or by the election of a feature or coverage within a contract. SOP 05-1 applies to internal replacements made primarily to contracts defined by FAS No. 60, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises” (“FAS 60”), as short-duration and long-duration insurance contracts, and by FAS No. 97, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Long-Duration Contracts and for Realized Gains and Losses from the Sale of Investments” (“FAS 97”), as investment contracts.
SOP 05-1 was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2007, and is effective for internal replacements occurring on or after that date. As a result of implementing SOP 05-1, the Company recognized a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $4.8, before tax, or $3.1, net of $1.7 of income taxes, as a reduction to January 1, 2007 Retained earnings (deficit). In addition, the Company revised its accounting policy on the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs (“DAC”) and value of business acquired (“VOBA”) to include internal replacements.
Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees
In September 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 133-1 and FIN No. 45-4, “Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161” (“FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4”), which does the following:
§ | Amends FAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS 133”), requiring additional disclosures by sellers of credit derivatives; |
§ | Amends FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“FIN 45”), requiring additional disclosure about the current status of the payment/performance risk of a guarantee; and |
§ | Clarifies the effective date of FAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS 161”). |
FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 was adopted by the Company on December 31, 2008. In implementing FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4, the Company determined that its adoption had no financial statement impact.
98
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
The clarification in the FSP of the effective date of FAS 161 is consistent with the guidance in FAS 161 and the Company’s disclosure provided herein.
Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities
In December, 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, “Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities” (“FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8”), which requires additional disclosures regarding a transferor’s continuing involvement with financial assets transferred in a securitization or asset-backed financing arrangement and an enterprise’s involvement with variable interest entities (“VIEs”) and qualifying special purpose entities (“QSPEs”).
FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 was adopted by the Company on December 31, 2008. In implementing FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, the Company determined that its adoption has no financial statement impact. The Company does not have any QSPEs or continuing involvement with financial assets transferred in a securitization or asset-backed financing arrangement.
Amendments to Impairment Guidance
In January 2009, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 99-20-1, “Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99-20” (“FSP EITF 99-20-1”), which amends EITF 99-20, “Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets” (“EITF 99-20”). FSP EITF 99-20-1 requires that an other-than-temporary impairment on investments that meet the criteria of EITF 99-20 be recognized as a realized loss through earnings when it is probable there has been an adverse change in the holder’s estimated cash flow, consistent with the impairment model in FAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.”
FSP EITF 99-20-1 was adopted by the Company on December 31, 2008, prospectively. In implementing FSP EITF 99-20-1, the Company determined there was a minimal effect on financial position, results of operations, and cash flows, as the structured securities held by the Company were highly rated at issue.
99
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
New Accounting Pronouncements
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS 161, which requires enhanced disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements, including:
§ | How and why derivative instruments are used; |
§ | How derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FAS 133 and its related interpretations; and |
§ | How derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial statements. |
The provisions of FAS 161 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company is currently in the process of determining the impact of adoption of FAS 161 on its disclosures; however, as the pronouncement only pertains to additional disclosure, the Company has determined that the adoption of FAS 161 will have no impact on income, financial position or cash flows. In addition, the Company’s derivatives are generally not accounted for using hedge accounting treatment under FAS 133, as the Company has not historically sought hedge accounting treatment.
Business Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“FAS 141R”), which replaces FAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” as issued in 2001. FAS 141R requires most identifiable assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interest, and goodwill, acquired in a business combination to be recorded at full fair value as of the acquisition date, even for acquisitions achieved in stages. In addition, the statement requires:
§ | Acquisition-related costs to be recognized separately and generally expensed; |
§ | Non-obligatory restructuring costs to be recognized separately when the liability is incurred; |
§ | Contractual contingencies acquired to be recorded at acquisition-date fair values; |
§ | A bargain purchase, which occurs when the fair value of net assets acquired exceeds the consideration transferred plus any non-controlling interest in the acquiree, to be recognized as a gain; and |
§ | The nature and financial effects of the business combination to be disclosed. |
FAS 141R also amends or eliminates various other authoritative literature.
100
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
The provisions of FAS 141R are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 for all business combinations occurring on or after that date. As such, this standard will impact any Company acquisitions that occur on or after January 1, 2009. Also, the Company will consider transition costs related to any acquisitions that may occur prior to January 1, 2009.
Equity Method Investment Accounting
In November 2008, the EITF reached consensus on EITF 08-6, “Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations” (“EITF 08-6”), which requires, among other provisions, that:
§ | Equity method investments be initially measured at cost; |
§ | Contingent consideration only be included in the initial measurement; |
§ | An investor recognize its share of any impairment charge recorded by the equity investee; and |
§ | An investor account for a share issuance by an equity investee as if the investor had sold a proportionate share of its investment; |
The provisions of EITF 08-6 are effective in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. As such, this standard will impact Company acquisitions or changes in ownership with regards to equity investments that occur on or after January 1, 2009. The Company is currently in the process of determining the impact of the other-than-temporary impairment provisions.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from reported results using those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year financial information to conform to the current year classifications. For 2007, the Company reclassified $250.0 from operating cash flows to financing cash flows in order to properly reflect all cash flows associated with the Company’s guaranteed investment contracts and associated facultative reinsurance.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, money market instruments, and other debt issues with a maturity of 90 days or less when purchased.
101
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Investments
All of the Company’s fixed maturities and equity securities are currently designated as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value and unrealized capital gains (losses) on these securities are recorded directly in Shareholder’s equity, after adjustment for related changes in DAC, VOBA, and deferred income taxes.
Other-Than-Temporary-Impairments
The Company analyzes the general account investments to determine whether there has been an other-than-temporary decline in fair value below the amortized cost basis. Management considers the length of the time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost, the issuer’s financial condition and near-term prospects, future economic conditions and market forecasts, and the Company’s intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery in fair value. If it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of a debt security will not be collected, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred.
In addition, the Company invests in structured securities that meet the criteria of the EITF 99-20. Under EITF 99-20, a further determination of the required impairment is based on credit risk and the possibility of significant prepayment risk that restricts the Company’s ability to recover the investment. An impairment is recognized if the fair value of the security is less than amortized cost and there has been an adverse change in cash flow since the remeasurement date.
When a decline in fair value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the individual security is written down to fair value, and the loss is recorded in Net realized capital gains (losses).
Purchases and Sales
Purchases and sales of fixed maturities and equity securities, excluding private placements, are recorded on the trade date. Purchases and sales of private placements and mortgage loans are recorded on the closing date.
Valuation
The fair values for the actively traded marketable fixed maturities are determined based upon the quoted market prices or dealer quotes. The fair values for marketable bonds without an active market are obtained through several commercial pricing services, which provide the estimated fair values. These services incorporate a variety of market observable information in their valuation techniques, including benchmark yields, broker-dealer quotes, credit quality, issuer spreads, bids, offers and other reference data. Valuations obtained from third party commercial pricing services are non-binding and are validated monthly through comparisons to internal pricing models, back testing to recent trades, and monitoring of trading volumes.
102
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Fair values of privately placed bonds are determined using a matrix-based pricing model. The model considers the current level of risk-free interest rates, current corporate spreads, the credit quality of the issuer, and cash flow characteristics of the security. Also considered are factors such as the net worth of the borrower, the value of collateral, the capital structure of the borrower, the presence of guarantees, and the Company’s evaluation of the borrower’s ability to compete in their relevant market. Using this data, the model generates estimated market values which the Company considers reflective of the fair value of each privately placed bond.
The fair values for certain collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMO-Bs”) are determined by taking the average of broker quotes when more than one broker quote is provided. A few of the CMO-Bs are priced by the originating broker due to the complexity and unique characteristics of the asset.
The fair values for actively traded equity securities are based on quoted market prices.
Mortgage loans on real estate are reported at amortized cost, less impairment write-downs. If the value of any mortgage loan is determined to be impaired (i.e., when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement), the carrying value of the mortgage loan is reduced to either the present value of expected cash flows from the loan, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or fair value of the collateral. If the loan is in foreclosure, the carrying value is reduced to the fair value of the underlying collateral, net of estimated costs to obtain and sell. The carrying value of the impaired loans is reduced by establishing a permanent write-down recorded in Net realized capital gains (losses).
The fair value of policy loans is equal to the carrying, or cash surrender, value of the loans. Policy loans are fully collateralized by the account value of the associated insurance contracts.
Short-term investments, consisting primarily of money market instruments and other fixed maturity issues purchased with an original maturity of 91 days to one year, are considered available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, which is based on quoted market prices.
Derivative instruments are reported at fair value primarily using the Company’s derivative accounting system. The system uses key financial data, such as yield curves, exchange rates, Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 Index prices, and London Inter Bank Offered Rates (“LIBOR”), which are obtained from third party sources and uploaded into the system. For those derivatives that are unable to be valued by the accounting system, the Company utilizes values established by third party brokers.
The Company records liabilities, which can be either positive or negative, for annuity contracts containing guaranteed riders for guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (“GMAB”) and guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (“GMWB”) without life contingencies in accordance with FAS 133. The guarantee is treated as an embedded derivative and is required to be reported separately from the host variable annuity contract. The fair value of the obligation is calculated based on actuarial and capital market assumptions related to the projected cash flows, including benefits and related contract charges, over the anticipated life of the related contracts.
103
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
The cash flow estimates are produced by using stochastic techniques under a variety of market return scenarios and other best estimate assumptions.
The Company also records for its fixed indexed annuities (“FIA”) contracts an embedded derivative liability for interest payments to contractholders above the minimum guaranteed interest rate, in accordance with FAS 133. The guarantee is treated as an embedded derivative and is required to be reported separately from the host contract. The fair value of the obligation is calculated based on actuarial and capital market assumptions related to the projected cash flows, including benefits and related contract charges, over the anticipated life of the related contracts. The cash flow estimates are produced by best estimate assumptions.
Repurchase Agreements
The Company engages in dollar repurchase agreements (“dollar rolls”) and repurchase agreements to increase the return on investments and improve liquidity. These transactions involve a sale of securities and an agreement to repurchase substantially the same securities as those sold. Company policies require a minimum of 95% of the fair value of securities pledged under dollar rolls and repurchase agreement transactions to be maintained as collateral. Cash collateral received is invested in fixed maturities, and the carrying value of the securities pledged in dollar rolls and repurchase agreement transactions is included in Securities pledged on the Balance Sheets. The repurchase obligation related to dollar rolls and repurchase agreements is included in Borrowed money on the Balance Sheets.
The Company also enters into reverse repurchase agreements. These transactions involve a purchase of securities and an agreement to sell substantially the same securities as those purchased. Company policies require a minimum of 102% of the fair value of securities pledged under reverse repurchase agreements to be pledged as collateral. Reverse repurchase agreements are included in Cash and cash equivalents on the Balance Sheets.
Securities Lending
The Company engages in securities lending whereby certain securities from its portfolio are loaned to other institutions for short periods of time. Initial collateral, primarily cash, is required at a rate of 102% of the market value of the loaned domestic securities. The collateral is deposited by the borrower with a lending agent, and retained and invested by the lending agent according to the Company’s guidelines to generate additional income. The market value of the loaned securities is monitored on a daily basis with additional collateral obtained or refunded as the market value of the loaned securities fluctuates.
Derivatives
The Company’s use of derivatives is limited mainly to hedging purposes to reduce the Company’s exposure to cash flow variability of assets and liabilities, interest rate risk, credit risk, and market risk. Generally, derivatives are not accounted for using hedge accounting treatment under FAS 133, as the Company has not historically sought hedge accounting treatment.
104
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
The Company enters into interest rate, equity market, credit default, and currency contracts, including swaps, caps, floors, options and futures, to reduce and manage risks associated with changes in value, yield, price, cash flow, or exchange rates of assets or liabilities held or intended to be held, or to assume or reduce credit exposure associated with a referenced asset, index, or pool. The Company also utilizes options and futures on equity indices to reduce and manage risks associated with its annuity products. Open derivative contracts are reported as either Other investments or Other liabilities, as appropriate, on the Balance Sheets. Changes in the fair value of such derivatives are recorded in Net realized capital gains (losses) in the Statements of Operations.
The Company also has investments in certain fixed maturity instruments, and has issued certain retail annuity products, that contain embedded derivatives whose market value is at least partially determined by, among other things, levels of or changes in domestic and/or foreign interest rates (short-term or long-term), exchange rates, prepayment rates, equity markets, or credit ratings/spreads.
Embedded derivatives within fixed maturity instruments are included in Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, on the Balance Sheets, and changes in fair value are recorded in Net realized capital gains (losses) in the Statements of Operations.
Embedded derivatives within retail annuity products are included in Future policy benefits and claims reserves on the Balance Sheets, and changes in the fair value are recorded in Interest credited and other benefits to contractowners in the Statements of Operations.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Value of Business Acquired
General
DAC represents policy acquisition costs that have been capitalized and are subject to amortization. Such costs consist principally of certain commissions, underwriting, contract issuance, and agency expenses, related to the production of new and renewal business.
VOBA represents the outstanding value of in force business capitalized in purchase accounting when the Company was acquired and is subject to amortization. The value is based on the present value of estimated profits embedded in the Company’s contracts.
FAS 97 applies to universal life and investment-type products, such as fixed and variable deferred annuities. Under FAS 97, DAC and VOBA are amortized, with interest, over the life of the related contracts in relation to the present value of estimated future gross profits from investment, mortality, and expense margins, plus surrender charges. DAC related to GICs, however, is amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the contract.
105
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Internal Replacements
Contractowners may periodically exchange one contract for another, or make modifications to an existing contract. Beginning January 1, 2007, these transactions are identified as internal replacements and are accounted for in accordance with SOP 05-1.
Internal replacements that are determined to result in substantially unchanged contracts are accounted for as continuations of the replaced contracts. Any costs associated with the issuance of the new contracts are considered maintenance costs and expensed as incurred. Unamortized DAC and VOBA related to the replaced contracts continue to be deferred and amortized in connection with the new contracts. For deferred annuities, the estimated future gross profits of the new contracts are treated as revisions to the estimated future gross profits of the replaced contracts in the determination of amortization.
Internal replacements that are determined to result in contracts that are substantially changed are accounted for as extinguishments of the replaced contracts, and any unamortized DAC and VOBA related to the replaced contracts are written off to Net amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired in the Statements of Operations.
Unlocking
Changes in assumptions can have a significant impact on DAC and VOBA balances and amortization rates. Several assumptions are considered significant in the estimation of future gross profits associated with variable universal life and variable deferred annuity products. One of the most significant assumptions involved in the estimation of future gross profits is the assumed return associated with the variable account performance. To reflect the volatility in the equity markets, this assumption involves a combination of near-term expectations and long-term assumptions regarding market performance. The overall return on the variable account is dependent on multiple factors, including the relative mix of the underlying sub-accounts among bond funds and equity funds, as well as equity sector weightings. Other significant assumptions include estimated future hedging and guaranteed benefit costs, surrender and lapse rates, estimated intere st spread, and estimated mortality.
Due to the relative size and sensitivity to minor changes in underlying assumptions of DAC and VOBA balances, the Company performs quarterly and annual analyses of DAC and VOBA for the annuity and life businesses, respectively. The DAC and VOBA balances are evaluated for recoverability.
At each evaluation date, actual historical gross profits are reflected, and estimated future gross profits and related assumptions are evaluated for continued reasonableness. Any adjustment in estimated profit requires that the amortization rate be revised (“unlocking”), retroactively to the date of the policy or contract issuance. The cumulative unlocking adjustment is recognized as a component of current period amortization. In general, sustained increases in investment, mortality, and expense margins, and thus estimated future profits, lower the rate of amortization. Sustained decreases in investment, mortality, and expense margins, and thus estimated future profits, however, increase the rate of amortization.
106
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Reserves
Future policy benefits and claims reserves include reserves for deferred annuities and immediate annuities with and without life contingent payouts, universal and traditional life insurance contracts, and GICs. Generally, reserves are calculated using mortality and withdrawal rate assumptions based on relevant Company experience and are periodically reviewed against both industry standards and experience.
Reserves for deferred annuity investment contracts and immediate annuities without life contingent payouts are equal to cumulative deposits, less charges and withdrawals, plus credited interest thereon. Deferred annuity crediting rates and reserve interest rates varied by product up to 10.0% for 2008 and 2007, and 7.8% for 2006.
Reserves for individual immediate annuities with life contingent payout benefits are computed on the basis of assumed interest discount rate, mortality, and expenses, including a margin for adverse deviations. Such assumptions generally vary by annuity plan type, year of issue, and policy duration. For 2008, 2007, and 2006, immediate annuity reserve interest discount rates varied up to 8.0%.
Reserves for FIAs are computed in accordance with FAS 97, FAS 133, and FAS 157. Accordingly, the aggregate initial liability is equal to the deposit received, plus a bonus, if applicable, and is split into a host component and an embedded derivative component. Thereafter, the host liability accumulates at a set interest rate, and the embedded derivative liability is recognized at fair value, with the change in fair value recorded in the Statements of Operations.
Reserves for universal life products are equal to cumulative deposits, less withdrawals and charges, plus credited interest thereon. Reserves for traditional life insurance contracts represent the present value of future benefits to be paid to or on behalf of contractowners and related expenses, less the present value of future net premiums.
Under Statement of Position 03-1, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts for Separate Accounts” (“SOP 03-1”), the Company calculates additional liabilities (“SOP 03-1 reserves”) for certain variable annuity guaranteed benefits and for universal life products with certain patterns of cost of insurance charges and certain other fees. The SOP 03-1 reserve recognized for such products is in addition to the liability previously held and recognizes the portion of contract assessments received in early years used to compensate the insurer for services provided in later years.
The Company calculates a benefit ratio for each block of business subject to SOP 03-1, and calculates an SOP 03-1 reserve by accumulating amounts equal to the benefit ratio multiplied by the assessments for each period, reduced by excess death benefits during the period. The SOP 03-1 reserve is accumulated at interest rates using rates consistent with the DAC model for the period. The calculated reserve includes a provision for universal life contracts with patterns of cost of insurance charges that produce expected gains from the insurance benefit function followed by losses from that function in later years.
107
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
GMABs and GMWBs without life contingent payouts are considered to be derivatives under FAS 133 and FAS 157. The additional reserves for these guarantees are recognized at fair value through the Statements of Operations.
Reserves for GICs are calculated using the amount deposited with the Company, less withdrawals, plus interest accrued to the ending valuation date. Interest on these contracts is accrued by a predetermined index, plus a spread or a fixed rate, established at the issue date of the contract.
Sales Inducements
Sales inducements represent benefits paid to contractowners for a specified period that are incremental to the amounts the Company credits on similar contracts and are higher than the contract’s expected ongoing crediting rates for periods after the inducement. Sales inducements are amortized as a component of Interest credited and other benefits to contractowners using methodologies and assumptions consistent with those used for amortization of DAC.
Revenue Recognition
For universal life and most annuity contracts, charges assessed against contractowner funds for the cost of insurance, surrender, expenses, and other fees are recorded as revenue as charges are assessed. Other amounts received for these contracts are reflected as deposits and are not recorded as premium or revenue. Related policy benefits are recorded in relation to the associated premiums or gross profit so that profits are recognized over the expected lives of the contracts.
Premiums on the Statements of Operations primarily represent amounts received under traditional life insurance policies.
For GICs, deposits made to the Company are not recorded as revenue in the Statements of Operations, but are recorded directly to Future policy benefits and claims reserves on the Balance Sheets.
Separate Accounts
Separate account assets and liabilities generally represent funds maintained to meet specific investment objectives of contractowners who bear the investment risk, subject, in limited cases, to certain minimum guarantees. Investment income and investment gains and losses generally accrue directly to such contractowners. The assets of each account are legally segregated and are not subject to claims that arise out of any other business of the Company or its affiliates.
Separate account assets supporting variable options under variable annuity contracts are invested, as designated by the contractowner or participant (who bears the investment risk subject, in limited cases, to minimum guaranteed rates) under a contract, in shares of mutual funds that are managed by the Company or its affiliates, or in other selected mutual funds not managed by the Company or its affiliates.
108
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Separate account assets and liabilities are carried at fair value and shown as separate captions in the Balance Sheets. Deposits, investment income, and net realized and unrealized capital gains (losses) of the separate accounts, however, are not reflected in the Statements of Operations (with the exception of realized and unrealized capital gains (losses) on the assets supporting the guaranteed interest option). The Statements of Cash Flows do not reflect investment activity of the separate accounts.
Assets and liabilities of separate account arrangements that do not meet the criteria in SOP 03-1 for separate presentation in the Balance Sheets (primarily guaranteed interest options), and revenue and expenses related to such arrangements, are consolidated in the financial statements with the general account. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, unrealized capital (losses) gains of $(249.2) and $21.1, respectively, after taxes, on assets supporting a guaranteed interest option are reflected in Shareholder’s equity.
Reinsurance
The Company utilizes reinsurance agreements to reduce its exposure to large losses in most aspects of its insurance business. Such reinsurance permits recovery of a portion of losses from reinsurers, although it does not discharge the primary liability of the Company as the direct insurer of the risks reinsured. The Company evaluates the financial strength of potential reinsurers and continually monitors the financial condition of reinsurers. Only those reinsurance recoverable balances deemed probable of recovery are reflected as assets on the Company’s Balance Sheets.
Participating Insurance
Participating business approximates 2.0% of the Company’s ordinary life insurance in force and 21.9% of life insurance premium income. The amount of dividends to be paid is determined annually by the Board of Directors. Amounts allocable to participating contractowners are based on published dividend projections or expected dividend scales. Dividends to participating policyholders of $13.7, $14.8, and $15.4, were incurred during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company is taxed at regular corporate rates after adjusting income reported for financial statement purposes for certain items. Deferred income tax expenses (benefits) result from changes during the year in cumulative temporary differences between the tax basis and book basis of assets and liabilities.
109
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
2. Investments
Fixed Maturities and Equity Securities |
Fixed maturities and equity securities, available-for-sale, were as follows as of December 31, 2008.
| | Gross | Gross | |
| | Unrealized | Unrealized | |
| Amortized | Capital | Capital | Fair |
| Cost | Gains | Losses | Value |
Fixed maturities: | | | | |
U.S. Treasuries | $ 1,109.3 | $ 74.2 | $ 0.3 | $ 1,183.2 |
U.S. government agencies and authorities | 267.3 | 20.8 | 0.8 | 287.3 |
State, municipalities, and political | | | | |
subdivisions | 48.2 | 0.3 | 9.1 | 39.4 |
U.S. corporate securities: | | | | |
Public utilities | 1,452.2 | 5.6 | 133.1 | 1,324.7 |
Other corporate securities | 5,570.9 | 68.5 | 634.1 | 5,005.3 |
Total U.S. corporate securities | 7,023.1 | 74.1 | 767.2 | 6,330.0 |
|
Foreign securities(1): | | | | |
Government | 426.7 | 3.3 | 65.4 | 364.6 |
Other | 3,145.5 | 11.4 | 411.0 | 2,745.9 |
Total foreign securities | 3,572.2 | 14.7 | 476.4 | 3,110.5 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 4,264.0 | 122.4 | 803.0 | 3,583.4 |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 3,585.9 | - | 1,028.0 | 2,557.9 |
Other asset-backed securities | 1,500.2 | 9.2 | 464.9 | 1,044.5 |
|
Total fixed maturities, including | | | | |
securities pledged | 21,370.2 | 315.7 | 3,549.7 | 18,136.2 |
Less: securities pledged | 976.7 | 46.4 | 29.9 | 993.2 |
Total fixed maturities | 20,393.5 | 269.3 | 3,519.8 | 17,143.0 |
Equity securities | 257.6 | 0.3 | 4.0 | 253.9 |
Total investments, available-for-sale | $ 20,651.1 | $ 269.6 | $ 3,523.8 | $ 17,396.9 |
| (1)Primarily U.S. dollar denominated. |
110
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Fixed maturities and equity securities, available-for-sale, were as follows as of December 31, |
2007. |
| | Gross | Gross | |
| | Unrealized | Unrealized | |
| Amortized | Capital | Capital | Fair |
| Cost | Gains | Losses | Value |
Fixed maturities: | | | | |
U.S. Treasuries | $ 18.4 | $ 1.0 | $ - | $ 19.4 |
U.S. government agencies and authorities | 86.1 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 86.8 |
State, municipalities, and political | | | | |
subdivisions | 49.7 | - | 2.5 | 47.2 |
|
U.S. corporate securities: | | | | |
Public utilities | 1,417.5 | 22.8 | 13.4 | 1,426.9 |
Other corporate securities | 6,742.7 | 81.1 | 67.0 | 6,756.8 |
Total U.S. corporate securities | 8,160.2 | 103.9 | 80.4 | 8,183.7 |
|
Foreign securities(1): | | | | |
Government | 525.2 | 14.9 | 7.1 | 533.0 |
Other | 3,280.6 | 40.5 | 59.4 | 3,261.7 |
Total foreign securities | 3,805.8 | 55.4 | 66.5 | 3,794.7 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 4,988.4 | 53.3 | 85.8 | 4,955.9 |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 3,842.2 | 37.6 | 36.4 | 3,843.4 |
Other asset-backed securities | 1,947.5 | 5.7 | 108.3 | 1,844.9 |
|
Total fixed maturities, including | | | | |
securities pledged | 22,898.3 | 257.9 | 380.2 | 22,776.0 |
Less: securities pledged | 953.3 | 6.1 | 16.8 | 942.6 |
Total fixed maturities | 21,945.0 | 251.8 | 363.4 | 21,833.4 |
Equity securities | 216.6 | 2.8 | 8.3 | 211.1 |
Total investments, available-for-sale | $ 22,161.6 | $ 254.6 | $ 371.7 | $ 22,044.5 |
(1)Primarily U.S. dollar denominated. |
|
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, net unrealized loss was $3,237.7 and $127.8, respectively, on |
total fixed maturities, including securities pledged to creditors, and equity securities. |
111
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturities as of December 31, 2008, are shown below by contractual maturity. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities as securities may be restructured, called, or prepaid.
| | |
| Amortized | Fair |
| Cost | Value |
Due to mature: | | |
One year or less | $ 463.4 | $ 458.5 |
After one year through five years | 5,534.1 | 5,120.1 |
After five years through ten years | 3,347.5 | 2,993.1 |
After ten years | 2,675.1 | 2,378.7 |
Mortgage-backed securities | 7,849.9 | 6,141.3 |
Other asset-backed securities | 1,500.2 | 1,044.5 |
Less: securities pledged | 976.7 | 993.2 |
Fixed maturities, excluding securities pledged | $ 20,393.5 | $ 17,143.0 |
The Company had investments with five issuers, other than obligations of the U.S. government and government agencies, with a carrying value in excess of 10.0% of the Company’s Shareholder’s equity at December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2007, the Company did not have any investments in a single issuer, other than obligations of the U.S. government and government agencies, with a carrying value in excess of 10.0% of the Company’s Shareholder’s equity.
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, fixed maturities with fair values of $22.3 billion and $11.2, respectively, were on deposit as required by regulatory authorities. The increase was due to unrestricted deposits of securities made to the State of Iowa.
The Company invests in various categories of collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) that are subject to different degrees of risk from changes in interest rates and, for CMOs that are not agency-backed, defaults. The principal risks inherent in holding CMOs are prepayment and extension risks related to dramatic decreases and increases in interest rates resulting in the prepayment of principal from the underlying mortgages, either earlier or later than originally anticipated. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, approximately 12.1% and 7.5%, respectively, of the Company’s CMO holdings were invested in those types of CMOs which are subject to more prepayment and extension risk than traditional CMOs, such as interest-only or principal-only strips.
The Company is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (“FHLB”) and is required to maintain a collateral deposit that backs funding agreements issued to the FHLB. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had $2,995.2 and $2,898.7, respectively, in non-putable funding agreements, including accrued interest, issued to the FHLB. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, assets with a market value of approximately $3,341.1 and $3,270.1, respectively, collateralized the funding agreements to the FHLB. Assets pledged to the FHLB are included in Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, in the Balance Sheets.
112
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
In conjunction with the January 2009 agreement with the Dutch State regarding the transfer of 80% of the Company's Alt-A residential mortgage backed securities (“Alt-A RMBS”), which included $375.1 in Alt-A RMBS pledged to the FHLB, the Company substituted the Alt-A RMBS assets pledged with other fixed maturities. By February 17, 2009, the Company recalled these Alt-A securities in order to implement the transaction with the Dutch State and reduced the funding agreements pro rata.
Transfer of Alt-A RMBS Participation Interest
On January 26, 2009, ING announced it reached an agreement, for itself and on behalf of certain ING affiliates including the Company, with the Dutch State on an Illiquid Assets Backup Facility (the “Back-up Facility”) covering 80% of ING’s Alt-A residential mortgage-backed securities (“Alt-A RMBS”). Under the terms of the Back-up Facility, a full credit risk transfer to the Dutch State will be realized on 80% of ING’s Alt-A RMBS owned by ING Bank, FSB and ING affiliates within ING Insurance Americas with a book value of $36.0 billion portfolio, including book value of $1.4 billion of the Alt-A RMBS portfolio owned by the Company (with respect to the Company’s portfolio, the “Designated Securities Portfolio”) (the “ING-Dutch State Transaction”). As a result of the risk transfer, the Dutch State will participate in 80% of any results of the ING Alt-A RMBS portfolio. The ris k transfer to the Dutch State will take place at a discount of approximately 10% of par value. In addition, under the Back-up Facility, other fees will be paid both by the Company and the Dutch State. Each ING company participating in the ING-Dutch State Transaction, including the Company will remain the legal owner of 100% of its Alt-A RMBS portfolio and will remain exposed to 20% of any results on the portfolio. Subject to documentation and regulatory approvals, the ING-Dutch State Transaction is expected to close by the end of March 2009, with the affiliate participation conveyance and risk transfer to the Dutch State described in the succeeding paragraph to take effect as of January 26, 2009.
In order to implement that portion of the ING-Dutch State Transaction related to the Company’s Designated Securities Portfolio, the Company will enter into a participation agreement with its affiliates, ING Support Holding B.V. (“ING Support Holding”) and ING pursuant to which the Company will convey to ING Support Holding an 80% participation interest in its Designated Securities Portfolio and pay a periodic transaction fee, and will receive, as consideration for the participation, an assignment by ING Support Holding of its right to receive payments from the Dutch State under the Illiquid Assets Back-Up Facility related to the Company’s Designated Securities Portfolio among, ING, ING Support Holding and the Dutch State (the “Company Back-Up Facility”). Under the Company Back-Up Facility, the Dutch State will be obligated to pay certain periodic fees and make certain periodic payments with respect to th e Company’s Designated Securities Portfolio, and ING Support Holding will be obligated to pay a periodic guarantee fee and make periodic payments to the Dutch State equal to the distributions it receives with respect to the 80% participation interest in the Company’s Designated Securities Portfolio.
113
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
In a second transaction, known as the Step 1 Cash Transfer, a portion of the Company’s Alt-A RMBS which has a book value of $27.9 will be sold for cash to an affiliate, Lion II Custom Investments LLC (“Lion II”). Immediately thereafter, Lion II will sell to ING Direct Bancorp the purchased securities (the “Step 2 Cash Transfer”). Contemporaneous with the Step 2 Cash Transfer, ING Direct Bancorp will include such purchased securities as part of its Alt-A RMBS portfolio sale to the Dutch State. Subject to documentation and regulatory approval, the Step 1 Cash Transfer is expected to close by the end of March 2009 contemporaneous with the closing of the ING-Dutch State Transaction.
Since the Company had the intent to sell a portion of its Alt-A RMBS through the 80% participation interest in its Designated Securities Portfolio or as part of the Step 1 Cash Transfer as of December 31, 2008, the Company recognized $56.9 in other-than-temporary impairments with respect to the 80% participation interest in its Designated Securities Portfolio that it expects to convey as part of the ING-Dutch State Transaction and the Step 1 Cash Transfer. The Company expects to reduce the unrealized loss balance in Accumulated other comprehensive loss included in Shareholder’s equity by approximately $400.0 and recognize a gain in the estimated range of $110.0 to $130.0 upon the closing of the ING-Dutch State Transaction and the Step 1 Cash Transfer.
Repurchase Agreements
The Company engages in dollar repurchase agreements (“dollar rolls”) and repurchase agreements to increase its return on investments and improve liquidity. These transactions involve a sale of securities and an agreement to repurchase substantially the same securities as those sold. Company policies require a minimum of 95% of the fair value of securities pledged under dollar rolls and repurchase agreement transactions to be maintained as collateral. Cash collateral received is invested in fixed maturities, and the offsetting collateral liability is included in Borrowed money on the Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the carrying value of the securities pledged in dollar rolls and repurchase agreement transactions was $562.8 and $745.5, respectively. The carrying value of the securities pledged in dollar rolls and repurchase agreement transactions is included in Securities pledged on the Balance Sheets. The repurchase obligation related to dollar rolls and repurchase agreements totaled $482.2 and $711.9 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The repurchase obligation related to dollar rolls and repurchase agreements is included in Borrowed money on the Balance Sheets.
The Company also enters into reverse repurchase agreements. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company did not have any securities in reverse repurchase agreements.
The primary risk associated with short-term collateralized borrowings is that the counterparty will be unable to perform under the terms of the contract. The Company’s exposure is limited to the excess of the net replacement cost of the securities over the value of the short-term investments, an amount that was immaterial at December 31, 2008 and 2007. The Company believes the counterparties to the dollar rolls, repurchase, and reverse repurchase agreements are financially responsible and that the counterparty risk is minimal.
114
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Securities Lending
The Company engages in securities lending whereby certain securities from its portfolio are loaned to other institutions for short periods of time. Initial collateral, primarily cash, is required at a rate of 102% of the market value of the loaned domestic securities. The collateral is deposited by the borrower with a lending agent, and retained and invested by the lending agent according to the Company’s guidelines to generate additional income. The market value of the loaned securities is monitored on a daily basis with additional collateral obtained or refunded as the market value of the loaned securities fluctuates. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the fair value of loaned securities was $125.4 and $123.1, respectively.
Unrealized Capital Losses
Unrealized capital losses in fixed maturities at December 31, 2008 and 2007, were primarily related to the effects of interest rate movement or changes in credit spreads on mortgage and other asset-backed securities. Mortgage and other asset-backed securities include U.S. government-backed securities, principal protected securities, and structured securities, which did not have an adverse change in cash flows. The following table summarizes the unrealized capital losses by duration and reason, along with the fair value of fixed maturities, including securities pledged to creditors, in unrealized capital loss positions at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
| Less than | More than | | |
| Six Months | Six Months and | More than | Total |
| Below | less than Twelve | Twelve Months | Unrealized |
| Amortized | Months Below | Below | Capital |
2008 | Cost | Amortized Cost | Amortized Cost | Losses |
Interest rate or spread widening | $ 198.7 | $ 538.4 | $ 516.7 | $ 1,253.8 |
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities | 562.6 | 375.6 | 1,357.7 | 2,295.9 |
Total unrealized capital losses | $ 761.3 | $ 914.0 | $ 1,874.4 | $ 3,549.7 |
Fair value | $ 4,350.9 | $ 4,522.0 | $ 4,551.9 | $ 13,424.8 |
|
2007 | | | | |
Interest rate or spread widening | $ 37.8 | $ 49.2 | $ 62.7 | $ 149.7 |
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities | 73.3 | 134.8 | 22.4 | 230.5 |
Total unrealized capital losses | $ 111.1 | $ 184.0 | $ 85.1 | $ 380.2 |
Fair value | $ 5,322.0 | $ 3,248.4 | $ 3,300.6 | $ 11,871.0 |
115
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Of the unrealized capital losses aged more than twelve months, the average market value of the related fixed maturities is 75.7% of the average book value. In addition, this category includes 1,499 securities, which have an average quality rating of AA-. No other-than-temporary impairment loss was considered necessary for these fixed maturities as of December 31, 2008. The fair value of the Company’s fixed maturities declined $483.4, before tax and DAC, from December 31, 2008 through February 28, 2009, due to further widening of credit spreads. This decline in fair value includes $258.3 related to the Company’s investments in commercial mortgage-backed securities.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
The following table identifies the Company’s other-than-temporary impairments by type for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | | No. of | | | No. of | | | No. of |
| Impairment | | Securities | Impairment | | Securities | Impairment | | Securities |
U.S. Treasuries | $ - | | - | $ - | * | 1 | $ 0.1 | | 1 |
U.S. Corporate | 289.1 | | 230 | 81.0 | | 173 | 15.8 | | 63 |
Foreign | 229.4 | | 108 | 25.7 | | 74 | 3.5 | | 13 |
Residential mortgage-backed | 289.8 | | 98 | 3.0 | | 24 | 12.7 | | 68 |
Commercial mortgage-backed | 4.8 | | 1 | - | | - | - | | - |
Other asset-backed | 182.5 | | 93 | 43.3 | | 91 | 1.2 | | 2 |
Equity | 32.0 | | 12 | - | | - | - | | - |
Limited partnerships | 0.5 | | 1 | 0.3 | | 1 | 0.5 | | 2 |
Total | $ 1,028.1 | | 543 | $ 153.3 | | 364 | $ 33.8 | | 149 |
*Less than $0.1.
The above schedule includes $369.7, $31.0, and $11.5, in other-than-temporary write-downs for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively, related to the analysis of credit risk and the possibility of significant prepayment risk. The remaining $658.4, $122.3, and $22.3, in write-downs for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively, are related to investments that the Company does not have the intent to retain for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery in fair value.
116
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
| The following table summarizes these write-downs by type for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006. |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | | No. of | | | No. of | | | No. of |
| Impairment | | Securities | Impairment | | Securities | Impairment | | Securities |
U.S. Treasuries | $ - | | - | $ - | * | 1 | $ 0.1 | | 1 |
U.S. Corporate | 199.8 | | 178 | 70.6 | | 161 | 15.8 | | 63 |
Foreign | 146.5 | | 87 | 21.4 | | 68 | 3.5 | | 13 |
Residential mortgage-backed | 142.9 | | 40 | 1.0 | | 5 | 1.7 | | 4 |
Other asset-backed | 169.2 | | 58 | 29.3 | | 84 | 1.2 | | 2 |
Total | $ 658.4 | | 363 | $ 122.3 | | 319 | $ 22.3 | | 83 |
* Less than $0.1.
The remaining fair value of fixed maturities with other-than-temporary impairments at December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, was $2,268.4, $2,353.8, and $437.4, respectively.
The Company may sell securities during the period in which fair value has declined below amortized cost for fixed maturities or cost for equity securities. In certain situations new factors, including changes in the business environment, can change the Company’s previous intent to continue holding a security.
Net Investment Income
Sources of Net investment income were as follows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale | $ 1,361.0 | $ 1,176.1 | $ 1,009.7 |
Equity securities, available-for-sale | (0.2) | 3.3 | 1.9 |
Mortgage loans on real estate | 223.6 | 233.1 | 225.3 |
Policy loans | 8.8 | 9.0 | 9.1 |
Short-term investments and cash equivalents | 4.5 | 6.7 | 5.5 |
Other | (53.3) | 35.1 | 13.9 |
Gross investment income | 1,544.4 | 1,463.3 | 1,265.4 |
Less: investment expenses | 106.4 | 116.9 | 109.0 |
Net investment income | $ 1,438.0 | $ 1,346.4 | $ 1,156.4 |
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had $21.2 and $60.3, respectively, of non-income producing investments in fixed maturities.
117
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Net Realized Capital Gains (Losses)
Net realized capital gains (losses) are comprised of the difference between the amortized cost of investments and proceeds from sale, and redemption, as well as losses incurred due to the other-than-temporary impairment of investments and changes in fair value of derivatives. The cost of the investment on disposal is determined based on specific identification of securities using the first-in, first-out method. Net realized capital gains (losses) on investments were as follows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale | $ (975.9) | $ (100.3) | $ (43.8) |
Equity securities, available-for-sale | (52.9) | 0.5 | | 0.9 |
Derivatives | (447.5) | (291.0) | | (48.2) |
Other | (5.4) | (0.4) | | 0.7 |
Net realized capital losses | $ (1,481.7) | $ (391.2) | $ (90.4) |
After-tax net realized capital losses | $ (963.1) | $ (254.3) | $ (58.8) |
Net realized capital lossesincreased for the year ended December 31, 2008, primarily due to higher losses on fixed maturities as a result of other-than-temporary impairments driven by the widening of credit spreads. In addition, derivative realized losses increased for the year ended December 31, 2008, driven by interest rate swaps due to lower LIBOR rates and by losses on call options due to the drop in equity markets. These losses were partially offset by gains on futures, which were also a result of poor equity market performance.
Proceeds from the sale of fixed maturities and equity securities, available-for-sale, and the related gross realized gains and losses were as follows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Proceeds on sales | $ 9,271.9 | $ 5,859.3 | $ 5,543.1 |
Gross gains | 100.2 | 41.1 | 64.5 |
Gross losses | 164.9 | 57.0 | 78.0 |
3. Financial Instruments
Fair Value Measurements |
FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value, and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements.
118
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Fair Value Hierarchy
The Company has categorized its financial instruments into a three level hierarchy based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the category level is based on the lowest priority level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the Balance Sheets are categorized as follows:
§ | Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market. |
§ | Level 2 - Quoted prices in markets that are not active or inputs that are observable either |
| directly | or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. |
| Level | 2 inputs include the following: |
| a) | Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; |
| b) | Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets; |
| c) | Inputs other than quoted market prices that are observable; and |
| d) | Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data through correlation or other means. |
§ | Level 3 - Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and |
| significant | to the overall fair value measurement. These valuations, whether derived |
| internally | or obtained from a third party, use critical assumptions that are not widely |
| available | to estimate market participant expectations in valuing the asset or liability. |
119
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
The following table presents the Company’s hierarchy for its assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2008.
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3(1) | Total |
Assets: | | | | |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, | | | | |
including securities pledged | $ 1,183.3 | $ 14,363.3 | $ 2,589.6 | $ 18,136.2 |
Equity securities, available-for-sale | 253.9 | - | - | 253.9 |
Other investments (primarily derivatives) | - | 164.1 | 176.2 | 340.3 |
Cash and cash equivalents, short-term | | | | |
investments, and short-term investments | | | | |
under securities loan agreement | 852.9 | - | - | 852.9 |
Assets held in separate accounts | 34,090.8 | - | - | 34,090.8 |
Total | $ 36,380.9 | $ 14,527.4 | $ 2,765.8 | $ 53,674.1 |
Liabilities: | | | | |
Investment contract guarantees: | | | | |
Fixed Indexed Annuities | - | - | 638.9 | 638.9 |
Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal and | | | | |
Accumulation Benefits | - | - | 153.0 | 153.0 |
Other liabilities (primarily derivatives) | - | 614.0 | 166.2 | 780.2 |
Total | $ - | $ 614.0 | $ 958.1 | $ 1,572.1 |
(1) | Level 3 net assets and liabilities accounted for 3.5% of total net assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Excluding separate accounts assets for which the policyholder bears the risk, the Level 3 net assets and liabilities in relation to total net assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis totaled 10.0%. |
Valuation of Financial Assets and Liabilities
The Company utilizes a number of valuation methodologies to determine the fair values of its financial assets and liabilities in conformity with the concepts of “exit price” and the fair value hierarchy as prescribed in FAS 157. Valuations are obtained from third party commercial pricing services, brokers and industry-standard, vendor-provided software that models the value based on market observable inputs. The valuations obtained from the brokers are non-binding. The valuations are reviewed and validated monthly through comparisons to internal pricing models, back testing to recent trades, and monitoring of trading volumes.
All valuation methods and assumptions are validated at least quarterly to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the fair values. There were no material changes to the valuation methods or assumptions used to determine fair values.
The following valuation methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of the following financial instruments:
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale: The fair values for the actively traded marketable bonds are determined based upon the quoted market prices or dealer quotes and are classified as Level 1 assets. The fair values for marketable bonds without an active market, excluding subprime and Alt-A mortgage-backed securities, are obtained through several commercial pricing services,
120
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
which provide the estimated fair values, and are classified as Level 2 assets. These services incorporate a variety of market observable information in their valuation techniques, including benchmark yields, broker-dealer quotes, credit quality, issuer spreads, bids, offers and other reference data. Valuations obtained from third party commercial pricing services are non-binding and are validated monthly through comparisons to internal pricing models, back testing to recent trades, and monitoring of trading volumes.
Fair values of privately placed bonds are determined using a matrix-based pricing model and are classified as Level 2 assets. The model considers the current level of risk-free interest rates, current corporate spreads, the credit quality of the issuer, and cash flow characteristics of the security. Also considered are factors such as the net worth of the borrower, the value of collateral, the capital structure of the borrower, the presence of guarantees, and the Company’s evaluation of the borrower’s ability to compete in their relevant market. Using this data, the model generates estimated market values which the Company considers reflective of the fair value of each privately placed bond.
The fair values for certain collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMO-Bs”) are determined by taking the average of broker quotes when more than one broker quote is provided. A few of the CMO-Bs are priced by the originating broker due to the complexity and unique characteristics of the asset. Due to the lack of corroborating evidence to support a higher level, these bonds are classified as Level 3 assets.
Trading activity for the Company’s Residential Mortgage-backed Securities (“RMBS”), particularly subprime and Alt-A mortgage-backed securities, has been declining during 2008 as a result of the dislocation of the credit markets. During 2008, the Company continued to obtain pricing information from commercial pricing services and brokers. However, the pricing for subprime and Alt-A mortgage-backed securities did not represent regularly occurring market transactions since the trading activity declined significantly in the second half of 2008. As a result, the Company concluded in the second half of 2008 that the market for subprime and Alt-A mortgage-backed securities was inactive. The Company did not change its valuation procedures, which are consistent with those used for Level 2 marketable bonds without an active market, as a result of determining that the market was inactive. However, the Company determined that the classification within the valuation hierarchy should be transferred to Level 3 due to market inactivity.
At December 31, 2008, the fixed maturities valued using unadjusted broker quotes totaled $10,482.3.
Equity securities, available-for-sale: Fair values of these securities are based upon quoted market price and are classified as Level 1 assets.
Cash and cash equivalents, Short-term investments, and Short-term investments under securities loan agreement: The carrying amounts for cash reflect the assets’ fair values. The fair values for cash equivalents and short-term investments are determined based on quoted market prices. These assets are classified as Level 1.
121
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Assets held in separate accounts: Assets held in separate accounts are reported at the quoted fair values of the underlying investments in the separate accounts. Mutual funds, short-term investments and cash are based upon a quoted market price and are classified as Level 1.
Other financial instruments reported as assets and liabilities: The carrying amounts for these financial instruments (primarily derivatives) reflect the fair value of the assets and liabilities. Derivatives are carried at fair value (on the Balance Sheets), which is determined using the Company’s derivative accounting system in conjunction with observable key financial data from third party sources or through values established by third party brokers. Counterparty credit risk is considered and incorporated in the Company’s valuation process through counterparty credit rating requirements and monitoring of overall exposure. It is the Company’s policy to deal only with investment grade counterparties with a credit rating of A- or better. The Company obtains a key input into the valuation model for puts, calls, and futures from one third party broker. Because the input is not received from multiple brokers, these fair values are not deemed to be calculated based on market observable inputs, and, therefore, these instruments are classified as Level 3. However, all other derivative instruments are valued based on market observable inputs and are classified as Level 2.
Investment contract guarantees: The Company records liabilities, which can be either positive or negative, for annuity contracts containing guaranteed riders for GMABs and GMWBs without life contingencies in accordance with FAS 133. The guarantee is treated as an embedded derivative and is required to be reported separately from the host variable annuity contract. The fair value of the obligation is calculated based on actuarial and capital market assumptions related to the projected cash flows, including benefits and related contract charges, over the anticipated life of the related contracts. The cash flow estimates are produced by using stochastic techniques under a variety of market return scenarios and other best estimate assumptions.
The Company also records for its FIA contracts an embedded derivative liability for interest payments to contractholders above the minimum guaranteed interest rate, in accordance with FAS 133. The guarantee is treated as an embedded derivative and is required to be reported separately from the host contract. The fair value of the obligation is calculated based on actuarial and capital market assumptions related to the projected cash flows, including benefits and related contract charges, over the anticipated life of the related contracts. The cash flow estimates are produced by best estimate assumptions.
Nonperformance risk for investment contract guarantees contains adjustments to the fair values of these contract liabilities related to the current credit standing of ING and the Company based on credit default swaps with similar term to maturity and priority of payment. The ING credit default swap spread is applied to the discount factors for FIAs and the risk-free rates for GMABs and GMWBs in the Company’s valuation models in order to incorporate credit risk into the fair values of these investment contract guarantees. As of December 31, 2008, the credit ratings of ING and the Company increased by approximately 185 basis points during the year, which resulted in substantial changes in the valuation of the reserves for all investment contract guarantees.
122
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
The following disclosures are made in accordance with the requirements of FAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FAS 107”). FAS 107 requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument.
FAS 107 excludes certain financial instruments, including insurance contracts, and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company.
The following valuation methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of the following financial instruments for purposes of FAS 107 disclosures:
Mortgage loans on real estate: The fair values for mortgage loans on real estate are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses and rates currently being offered in the marketplace for similar loans to borrowers with similar credit ratings. Loans with similar characteristics are aggregated for purposes of the calculations.
Policy loans: The fair value of policy loans is equal to the carrying, or cash surrender, value of the loans. Policy loans are fully collateralized by the account value of the associated insurance contracts.
Deposits from affiliates: Fair value is estimated based on the fair value of the liabilities for the account values of the underlying contracts, plus the fair value of the unamortized ceding allowance based on the present value of the projected release of the ceding allowance, discounted at risk-free rates, plus a credit spread.
Investment contract liabilities (included in Future policy benefits and claims reserves):
| With a fixed maturity: Fair value is estimated by discounting cash flows, including associated expenses for maintaining the contracts, at rates which are market risk-free rates augmented by credit spreads on current Company debt or AA insurance company debt. The augmentation is present to account for non-performance risk. A margin for non-financial risks associated with the contracts is also included.
Without a fixed maturity: Fair value is estimated as the mean present value of stochastically modeled cash flows associated with the contract liabilities relevant to both the contractholder and to the Company. Here, the stochastic valuation scenario set is consistent with current market parameters, and discount is taken using stochastically evolving short risk-free rates in the scenarios augmented by credit spreads on current Company debt. The augmentation in the discount is present to account for non-performance risk. Margins for non-financial risks associated with the contract liabilities are also included. |
123
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Notes to affiliates: Estimated fair value of the Company’s notes to affiliates is based upon |
discounted future cash flows using a discount rate approximating the current market value. |
|
The carrying values and estimated fair values of certain of the Company’s financial instruments |
were as follows at December 31, 2008 and 2007. |
| | 2008 | | | | 2007 | |
| Carrying | | Fair | | Carrying | | Fair |
| Value | | Value | | Value | | Value |
Assets: | | | | | | | |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, | | | | | | | |
including securities pledged | $ 18,136.2 | $ 18,136.2 | | $ 22,776.0 | $ 22,776.0 |
Equity securities, available-for-sale | 253.9 | | 253.9 | | 211.1 | | 211.1 |
Mortgage loans on real estate | 3,923.3 | | 3,803.3 | | 3,701.7 | | 3,739.4 |
Policy loans | 144.4 | | 144.4 | | 155.8 | | 155.8 |
Cash, cash equivalents, Short-term | | | | | | | |
investments, and Short-term | | | | | | | |
investments under securities | | | | | | | |
loan agreement | 852.9 | | 852.9 | | 520.9 | | 520.9 |
Other investments | 697.6 | | 706.5 | | 848.6 | | 857.3 |
Deposits from affiliates | 1,947.0 | | 2,025.7 | | 2,153.2 | | 2,192.0 |
Assets held in separate accounts | 34,090.8 | | 34,090.8 | | 44,477.8 | | 44,477.8 |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Investment contract liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Deferred annuities | 19,282.5 | | 18,986.2 | | 19,733.8 | | 18,150.4 |
Guaranteed investment contracts | | | | | | | |
and funding agreements | 6,868.9 | | 6,580.2 | | 9,415.1 | | 9,498.2 |
Supplementary contracts and | | | | | | | |
immediate annuities | 866.5 | | 883.9 | | 900.3 | | 900.3 |
Derivatives | 780.2 | | 780.2 | | 273.8 | | 273.8 |
Notes to affiliates | 435.0 | | 407.6 | | 435.0 | | 420.6 |
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on available market information and judgments about various financial instruments, such as estimates of timing and amounts of future cash flows. Such estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument, nor do they consider the tax impact of the realization of unrealized capital gains (losses). In many cases, the fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets, nor can the disclosed value be realized in immediate settlement of the instruments. In evaluating the Company’s management of interest rate, price, and liquidity risks, the fair values of all assets and liabilities should be taken into consideration, not only those presented above.
Level 3 Financial Instruments
The fair values of certain assets and liabilities are determined using prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement (i.e., Level 3 as defined by FAS 157). These valuations, whether derived internally or obtained from a third party, use critical assumptions that are not widely available to
124
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
| estimate market participant expectations in valuing the asset or liability. In light of the methodologies employed to obtain the fair values of financial assets and liabilities classified as Level 3, additional information is presented below, with particular attention addressed to changes in derivatives, FIAs, and GMWBs and GMABs due to their impacts on the Company’s results of operations.
The following table summarizes the changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 assets and liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2008. |
| Fixed maturities, | | | | | Investment | | |
| available-for-sale | | | | Contract Guarantees | |
| including | | | | | | GMWB/ | |
| securities pledged | | Derivatives | | FIA | | GMAB | |
Balance at January 1, 2008 | $ 1,396.3 | | $ 298.2 | | $ (925.6) | $ (2.7) | |
Capital gains (losses): | | | | | | | | |
Net realized capital gains (losses) | (7.5) | (1) | (76.2) | (3) | 328.4 | (4) | (141.5) | (4) |
Net unrealized capital | | | | | | | | |
gains (losses)(2) | 27.9 | | - | | - | | - | |
Total net realized and unrealized | | | | | | | | |
capital gains (losses) | 20.4 | | (76.2) | | 328.4 | | (141.5) | |
Purchases, sales, issuances, and | | | | | | | | |
settlements, net | (32.5) | | (105.1) | | (41.7) | | (8.8) | |
Transfer in (out) of Level 3 | 1,205.4 | | (106.9) | | - | | - | |
Balance at December 31, 2008 | $ 2,589.6 | | $ 10.0 | | $ (638.9) | $ (153.0) | |
(1) | This amount is included in Net realized capital gains (losses) on the Statements of Operations. |
(2) | The amounts in this line are included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the Balance Sheets. |
(3) | This amount is included in Net realized capital gains (losses) on the Statements of Operations and contains unrealized gains (losses) on Level 3 derivatives held at December 31, 2008. All gains and losses on Level 3 assets are classified as realized gains (losses) for the purpose of this disclosure because it is impracticable to track realized and unrealized gains (losses) separately by security. |
(4) | These amounts are included in Interest credited and other benefits to contractowners on the Statements of Operations. All gains and losses on Level 3 liabilities are classified as realized gains (losses) for the purpose of this disclosure because it is impracticable to track realized and unrealized gains (losses) separately on a contract-by-contract basis. |
For the year ended December 31, 2008, the decline in the fair values of the FIA reserves was partially offset by a decline in the value of Level 3 derivatives that hedge the FIA exposure and the increase in the reserves for GMWBs and GMABs. The gains on the FIA embedded derivatives and the losses on the GMWBs ad GMABs were primarily driven by unfavorable equity market performance and changes in interest rates during 2008. In addition, derivatives experienced losses related to unfavorable equity market performance, resulting in a decline in the fair values of these assets. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the net realized gains attributable to credit risk were $117.0. The net unrealized capital losses related to fixed maturities were driven by the widening of credit spreads.
125
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
| During 2008, the Company determined that the classification within the valuation hierarchy related to the subprime and Alt-A mortgage-backed securities within the RMBS portfolio should be changed due to market inactivity. This change is presented as transfers into Level 3 in the table above and discussed in more detail in the previous disclosure regarding RMBS.
Derivative Financial Instruments |
| | | | | |
| Notional Amount | | Fair Value | |
| 2008 | 2007 | | 2008 | 2007 |
Interest Rate Caps | | | | | |
Interest rate caps are used to manage the interest | | | | | |
rate risk in the Company’s fixed maturity portfolio. | | | | | |
Interest rate caps are purchased contracts that | | | | | |
provide the Company with an annuity in an | | | | | |
increasing interest rate environment. | 122.0 | 50.0 | | $ 0.1 | $ 0.1 |
|
Interest Rate Swaps | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps are used to manage the interest | | | | | |
rate risk in the Company’s fixed maturity portfolio, | | | | | |
as well as the Company’s liabilities. Interest rate | | | | | |
swaps represent contracts that require the exchange | | | | | |
of cash flows at regular interim periods, typically | | | | | |
monthly or quarterly. | 7,130.0 | 8,533.5 | | (434.0) | (138.2) |
|
Foreign Exchange Swaps | | | | | |
Foreign exchange swaps are used to reduce the risk | | | | | |
of a change in the value, yield, or cash flow with | | | | | |
respect to invested assets. Foreign exchange | | | | | |
swaps represent contracts that require the | | | | | |
exchange of foreign currency cash flows for | | | | | |
U.S. dollar cash flows at regular interim periods, | | | | | |
typically quarterly or semi-annually. | 287.3 | 288.3 | | (16.0) | (44.0) |
|
Credit Default Swaps | | | | | |
Credit default swaps are used to reduce the credit loss | | | | | |
exposure with respect to certain assets that the | | | | | |
Company owns, or to assume credit exposure on | | | | | |
certain assets that the Company does not own. | | | | | |
Payments are made to or received from the | | | | | |
counterparty at specified intervals and amounts | | | | | |
for the purchase or sale of credit protection. In the | | | | | |
event of a default on the underlying credit exposure, | | | | | |
the Company will either receive an additional | | | | | |
payment (purchased credit protection) or will be | | | | | |
required to make an additional payment (sold credit | | | | | |
protection) equal to the notional value of the swap contract. | 477.0 | 488.9 | | (112.1) | (22.1) |
126
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
| | | | | |
| Notional Amount | Fair Value | | |
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
Forwards | | | | | |
Forwards are acquired to hedge the Company's | | | | | |
inverse portfolio against movements in interest | | | | | |
rates, particularly mortgage rates. On the | | | | | |
settlement date, the Company will either receive | | | | | |
a payment (interest rate drops on owned forwards | | | | | |
or interest rate rises on purchased forwards) or | | | | | |
will be required to make a payment (interest rate | | | | | |
rises on owned forwards or interest rate drops | | | | | |
on purchased forwards). | 156.0 | - | $ 1.9 | $ - | |
| |
Swaptions | | | | | |
Swaptions are used to manage interest rate risk in | | | | | |
the Company’s collateralized mortgage obligations | | | | | |
portfolio. Swaptions are contracts that give the | | | | | |
Company the option to enter into an interest rate | | | | | |
swap at a specific future date. | 1,667.5 | 302.5 | 3.4 | - | ** |
| |
Futures | | | | | |
Futures contracts are used to hedge against a decrease | | | | | |
in certain equity indices. Such decrease may result | | | | | |
in a decrease in variable annuity account values, | | | | | |
which would increase the possibility of the Company | | | | | |
incurring an expense for guaranteed benefits in | | | | | |
excess of account values. A decrease in variable | | | | | |
annuity account values would also result in lower | | | | | |
fee income. A decrease in equity markets may also | | | | | |
negatively impact the Company's investment in | | | | | |
equity securities. The futures income would | | | | | |
serve to offset these effects. Futures contracts | | | | | |
are also used to hedge against an increase | | | | | |
in certain equity indices. Such increase may result | | | | | |
in increased payments to contract holders of fixed | | | | | |
indexed annuity contracts, and the futures income | | | | | |
would serve to offset this increased expense. The | | | | | |
underlying reserve liabilities are valued under | | | | | |
either SOP 03-1 or FAS 133 and FAS 157 (see | | | | | |
discussion under “Reserves” section) and the change | | | | | |
in reserve liability is recorded in Interest credited and | | | | | |
other benefits to contractowners. The gain or loss on | | | | | |
futures is recorded in Net realized capital gains (losses). | 2,593.9 | 1,584.6 | (35.2) | (6.4) | |
127
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
| | | | | |
| Notional Amount | | Fair Value | |
| 2008 | 2007 | | 2008 | 2007 |
Options | | | | | |
Call options are used to hedge against an increase | | | | | |
in the various equity indices. Such increase may | | | | | |
result in increased payments to contract holders | | | | | |
of fixed indexed annuity contracts, and the options | | | | | |
offset this increased expense. Put options are used | | | | | |
to hedge the liability associated with embedded | | | | | |
derivatives in certain variable annuity contracts. | | | | | |
Both the options and the embedded derivative | | | | | |
reserve are carried at fair value. The change in value | | | | | |
of the options are recorded in Net realized capital | | | | | |
gains (losses); the change in value of the embedded | | | | | |
derivative is recorded in Interest credited and | | | | | |
other benefits to contractowners. | 3,744.2 | 6,666.0 | | $ 152.0 | $ 303.5 |
|
Embedded Derivatives | | | | | |
The Company also has investments in certain fixed | | | | | |
maturity instruments, and has issued certain retail | | | | | |
annuity products, that contain embedded derivatives | | | | | |
whose market value is at least partially determined by, | | | | | |
among other things, levels of or changes in domestic | | | | | |
and/or foreign interest rates (short- or long-term), | | | | | |
exchange rates, prepayment rates, equity rates, or | | | | | |
credit ratings/spreads. | | | | | |
Within securities | N/A* | N/A* | | (96.3) | 33.8 |
Within retail annuity products | N/A* | N/A* | | 791.9 | 997.9 |
| * N/A - not applicable. **Less than $0.1.
Credit Default Swaps |
| The Company has entered into various credit default swaps to assume credit exposure to certain assets that the Company does not own. Credit default swaps involve a transfer of credit risk from one party to another in exchange for periodic payments. These instruments are typically written for a maturity period of five years and do not contain recourse provisions, which would enable the seller to recover from third parties. The Company’s collateral positions are tracked by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (“ISDA”). To the extent cash collateral was received, it was included in the Collateral held, including payables under securities loan agreement on the Balance Sheets and was reinvested in short-term investments. The source of non-cash collateral posted was investment grade bonds of the entity. Collateral held is used in accordance with the Credit Support Annex (“CSA”) to satisfy any obligations. In the event of a default on the underlying credit exposure, the Company will either receive an additional payment (purchased credit protection) or will be required to make an additional payment (sold credit protection) equal to the notional value of the swap contract. At December 31, 2008, the fair value of credit default swaps of $12.7 and $124.8 was included in Other investments and Other liabilities, respectively, on the Balance Sheets. At December 31, |
128
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
2007, the fair value of credit default swaps of $8.5 and $30.6 was included in Other investments and Other liabilities, respectively, on the Balance Sheets. As of December 2008, the maximum potential future exposure to the Company on the sale of credit protection under credit default swaps was $143.3.
Embedded Derivative in Credit-Linked Note
The Company owns a 3-year credit-linked note arrangement, whereby the Company agrees to reimburse the guaranteed party upon payment default of the referenced obligation. Upon such default, the Company will reimburse the guaranteed party for the loss under the reference obligation, and the Company receives that reference obligation in settlement. The Company can then seek recovery of any losses under the agreement by sale or collection of the received reference obligation. As of December 31, 2008, the maximum potential future exposure to the Company under the guarantee was $32.5.
Variable Interest Entities
The Company holds VIEs for investment purposes in the form of private placement securities, structured securities, securitization transactions, and limited partnerships. Consolidation of these investments in the Company’s financial statements is not required, as the Company is not the primary beneficiary for any of these VIEs. Rather, the VIEs are accounted for using the cost or equity method of accounting. Investments in limited partnerships are included in Limited partnerships/corporations on the Balance Sheets.
129
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
4. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Value of Business Acquired
Activity within DAC was as follows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006. |
| |
Balance at January 1, 2006 | $ 2,255.4 |
Deferrals of commissions and expenses | 681.9 |
Amortization: | |
Amortization | (421.7) |
Interest accrued at 5% to 6% | 138.1 |
Net amortization included in the Statements of Operations | (283.6) |
Change in unrealized capital gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities | 16.2 |
Balance at December 31, 2006 | 2,669.9 |
Deferrals of commissions and expenses | 729.1 |
Amortization: | |
Amortization | (592.0) |
Interest accrued at 5% to 6% | 162.2 |
Net amortization included in the Statements of Operations | (429.8) |
Change in unrealized capital gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities | (56.0) |
Implementation of SOP 05-1 | (4.8) |
Balance at December 31, 2007 | 2,908.4 |
Deferrals of commissions and expenses | 781.7 |
Amortization: | |
Amortization | (814.9) |
Interest accrued at 4% to 5% | 146.4 |
Net amortization included in the Statements of Operations | (668.5) |
Change in unrealized capital gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities | 1,098.2 |
Effect of variable annuity guaranteed living benefits reinsurance | 85.7 |
Balance at December 31, 2008 | $ 4,205.5 |
The estimated amount of DAC to be amortized, net of interest, is $491.9, $509.1, $491.9, $438.5, and $422.7, for the years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. Actual amortization incurred during these years may vary as assumptions are modified to incorporate actual results.
130
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Activity within VOBA was as follows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
Balance at January 1, 2006 | $ 122.1 |
Amortization: | |
Amortization | (15.0) |
Interest accrued at 4% to 5% | 5.6 |
Net amortization included in the Statements of Operations | (9.4) |
Change in unrealized capital gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities | (2.6) |
Balance at December 31, 2006 | 110.1 |
Amortization: | |
Amortization | 16.8 |
Interest accrued at 4% to 6% | 4.9 |
Net amortization included in the Statements of Operations | 21.7 |
Change in unrealized capital gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities | (3.1) |
Balance at December 31, 2007 | 128.7 |
Amortization: | |
Amortization | (18.7) |
Interest accrued at 3% to 5% | 6.7 |
Net amortization included in the Statements of Operations | (12.0) |
Change in unrealized capital gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities | 78.4 |
Balance at December 31, 2008 | $ 195.1 |
The estimated amount of VOBA to be amortized, net of interest, is $11.7, $12.1, $12.6, $11.6, and $10.9, for the years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013, respectively. Actual amortization incurred during these years may vary as assumptions are modified to incorporate actual results.
Analysis of DAC and VOBA - Annuity Products
The increase in Net amortization of DAC and VOBA in 2008 compared to 2007 was primarily due to unfavorable separate account performance during 2008 which caused a significant acceleration of variable annuity DAC amortization, as a result of lower projections of fee income. In addition, this unfavorable performance required the Company to adjust its future gross profit projections for variable annuity hedging costs and guaranteed benefit costs, which also increased amortization.
The increase in Net amortization of DAC and VOBA in 2007 compared to 2006 is due in part to a $67.0 change in estimate recorded during the fourth quarter of 2007. This change resulted from refinements of the DAC model, partially offset by favorable unlocking of mutual fund and mortality and persistency unlocking.
131
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
The Company revised and unlocked certain assumptions for its fixed and variable annuity products during 2008, 2007, and 2006. Unlocking adjustments and their acceleration (deceleration) impact on Amortization of DAC and VOBA were as follows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Impact of separate account growth and contractowner | | | |
withdrawal behavior different from assumptions | $ 491.8 | $ 1.3 | $ (42.6) |
Impact of current year gross profit variances | 227.2 | - | - |
Unlock of mortality, lapse, expense and mutual fund | | | |
sharing assumptions | (40.1) | (43.6) | (19.8) |
Impact of refinements of gross profit projections | 302.0 | 67.0 | - |
Total unlocking effect on Amortization of DAC and VOBA | $ 980.9 | $ 24.7 | $ (62.4) |
5. Dividend Restrictions and Shareholder’s Equity
The Company’s ability to pay dividends to its parent is subject to the prior approval of the State of Iowa Insurance Division (the “Division”) for payment of any dividend, which, when combined with other dividends paid within the preceding twelve months, exceeds the greater of (1) ten percent (10.0%) of the Company’s statutory surplus at the prior year end or (2) the Company’s prior year statutory net gain from operations.
During 2008, the Company paid its Parent a cash return of capital distribution in the amount of $900.0. During 2007, the Company did not pay any dividends or return of capital distributions on its common stock to its Parent. During 2006, the Company paid $170.0 in a return of capital distribution to its Parent.
During 2008, the Company received a $1.1 billion capital contribution from its Parent. During 2007, the Company received $150.0 in capital contributions from its Parent. During 2006, the Company did not receive any capital contributions from its Parent.
On November 12, 2008, ING issued to the Dutch State non-voting Tier 1 securities for a total consideration of Euro 10 billion. On February 24, 2009, $2.2 billion was contributed to direct and indirect insurance company subsidiaries of ING America Insurance Holdings, Inc. (“ING AIH”), of which $835.0 was contributed to the Company. The contribution was comprised of the proceeds from the investment by the Dutch government and the redistribution of currently existing capital within ING.
The Division recognizes as net income and capital and surplus those amounts determined in conformity with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Department, which differ in certain respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Statutory net income (loss) was $(831.4), $(40.1), and $(1.6), for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. Statutory capital and surplus was $1,872.7 and $2,552.6 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. As specifically permitted by
132
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
statutory accounting practices, statutory surplus as of December 31, 2008 includes the impact of the $835.0 capital contribution received on February 24, 2009.
During 2008, the Company received a permitted practice regarding deferred income taxes, which modified the accounting prescribed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners by increasing the realization period for deferred tax assets from one year to three years and increasing the asset recognition limit from 10% to 15% of adjusted statutory capital and surplus. This permitted practice increased admitted assets and statutory surplus by $120.7 for the year ended December 31, 2008. This permitted practice expires on December 15, 2009. The benefits of this permitted practice may not be considered by the Company when determining surplus available for dividends. This permitted practice had no impact on net income. The Company’s risk-based capital would not have triggered a regulatory event without the benefit of this permitted practice.
The Division also has the ability to ease certain reserving requirements at its discretion. Due to the reduction in liquidity and the availability of letters of credit confirming banks, the Department allowed the Company to accept unconfirmed letters of credit for reinsurance transactions. This allowed the Company to take the full reserve relief for reinsurance transactions with unconfirmed letters of credit. This reserve relief is available for the period from December 31, 2008 through July 1, 2009 and is not a permitted practice.
6. Additional Insurance Benefits and Minimum Guarantees
Under SOP 03-1, the Company calculates SOP 03-1 reserves for certain guaranteed benefits and for universal life products with certain patterns of cost of insurance charges and certain other fees.
The following assumptions and methodology were used to determine the guaranteed minimum death benefits (“GMDB”) SOP 03-1 reserve at December 31, 2008.
Area | Assumptions/Basis for Assumptions |
Data used | Based on 100 investment performance scenarios stratified based on |
| 10,000 random generated scenarios |
Mean investment performance | 8.125% |
Volatility | 18.0% |
Mortality | 1999 and prior issues – 75.0%, 75.0%, 75.0%, 80.0%, grading to 100% |
| from age 80 to 120, of the 90-95 ultimate mortality table for standard, |
| ratchet, rollup, and combination rollup and ratchet, respectively. |
| 2000 and later issues – 55.0%, 55.0%, 65.0%, 65.0%, grading to 100% |
| from age 80 to 120, of the 90-95 ultimate mortality table for standard, |
| ratchet, rollup, and combination rollup and ratchet, respectively. |
Lapse rates | Vary by contract type and duration; range between 1.0% and 40.0% |
Discount rates | 5.5%, based on the portfolio earned rate of the general account |
The assumptions used for calculating the additional guaranteed minimum income benefits (“GMIB”) and Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal for Life Benefit (LifePay and LifePay Plus)
133
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
liabilities at December 31, 2008, are consistent with those used for the calculating the additional GMDB liability. In addition, the calculation of the GMIB liability assumes dynamic surrenders and dynamic annuitization reflecting the extent to which the benefit, at the time of payment, has a positive value.
The separate account liabilities subject to SOP 03-1 for minimum guaranteed benefits, and the additional liabilities recognized related to minimum guarantees, by type, as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the paid and incurred amounts by type for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, were as follows:
| Guaranteed | Guaranteed | Guaranteed | | Guaranteed | |
| Minimum | Minimum | Minimum | | Withdrawal | |
| Death | Accumulation/ | Income | | For Life | |
| Benefit | Withdrawal Benefit | Benefit | | Benefit | |
| (GMDB) | (GMAB/GMWB) | (GMIB) | | (LP/LPP) | |
Separate account liability | | | | | | |
at December 31, 2008 | $ 34,090.8 | $ 1,470.2 | $ 12,701.6 | | $ 10,020.7 | |
Separate account liability | | | | | | |
at December 31, 2007 | $ 44,477.8 | $ 2,556.4 | $ 20,066.1 | | $ 5,900.0 | |
|
Additional liability balance: | | | | | | |
Balance at January 1, 2007 | $ 139.7 | $ (8.9) | $ 83.3 | | $ 1.7 | |
Incurred guaranteed benefits | 88.9 | 20.1 | 48.9 | | 4.2 | |
Paid guaranteed benefits | (19.2) | - | - | | - | |
Balance at December 31, 2007 | $ 209.4 | $ 11.2 | $ 132.2 | | $ 5.9 | |
Incurred guaranteed benefits | 509.4 | 141.8 | (132.2) | (1) | (5.9) | (1) |
Paid guaranteed benefits | (153.4) | - | - | | - | |
Balance at December 31, 2008 | $ 565.4 | $ 153.0 | $ - | | $ - | |
(1)Amounts represent full reinsurance of ceded reserves for GMIBs and LP/LPPs.
The net amount at risk, net of reinsurance, and the weighted average attained age of contractowners by type of minimum guaranteed benefit, were as follows as of December 31, 2008 and 2007.
| Guaranteed | Guaranteed | Guaranteed | Guaranteed |
| Minimum | Minimum | Minimum | Withdrawal |
| Death | Accumulation/ | Income | For Life |
| Benefit | Withdrawal Benefit | Benefit | Benefit |
2008 | (GMDB) | (GMAB/GMWB) | (GMIB) | (LP/LPP) |
Net amount at risk, net of reinsurance | $ 15,035.8 | $ 310.0 | $ - | $ - |
Weighted average attained age | 64 | 66 | - | - |
|
2007 | | | | |
Net amount at risk, net of reinsurance | $ 1,796.0 | $ 109.0 | $ 391.9 | $ 5.6 |
Weighted average attained age | 63 | 63 | 59 | 63 |
134
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
The aggregate fair value of equity securities, including mutual funds, supporting separate accounts with additional insurance benefits and minimum investment return guarantees as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $34.1 billion and $44.5 billion, respectively.
7. | Sales Inducements |
| During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company capitalized and amortized $106.9 and $229.7, respectively, of sales inducements. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company capitalized and amortized $135.4 and $120.2, respectively, of sales inducements. The unamortized balance of capitalized sales inducements, net of unrealized capital gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, was $624.3 and $645.4 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
8. | Income Taxes |
| The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return with ING AIH, an affiliate, and certain other subsidiaries of ING AIH. The Company is a party to a federal tax allocation agreement with ING AIH and its subsidiaries that are part of the group, whereby ING AIH charges its subsidiaries for federal taxes each subsidiary would have incurred were it not a member of the consolidated group and credits each subsidiary for losses at the statutory federal tax rate. |
Income tax expense (benefit) consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Current tax (benefit) expense: | | | |
Federal | $ (754.9) | $ 26.6 | $ (67.6) |
Total | (754.9) | 26.6 | (67.6) |
Deferred tax expense: | | | |
Operations and capital loss carryforwards | 14.6 | - | 151.0 |
Other federal deferred tax expense (benefit) | 495.1 | (28.2) | (19.0) |
Total deferred tax expense (benefit) | 509.7 | (28.2) | 132.0 |
Total income tax expense (benefit) | $ (245.2) | $ (1.6) | $ 64.4 |
135
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Income taxes were different from the amount computed by applying the federal income tax rate to income before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for the following reasons for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
(Loss) income before income taxes and cumulative | | | |
effect of change in accounting principle | $ (1,626.4) | $ 127.4 | $ 276.6 |
Tax rate | 35.0% | 35.0% | 35.0% |
Income tax (benefit) expense at federal statutory rate | $ (569.2) | $ 44.6 | $ 96.8 |
Tax effect of: | | | |
Meals and entertainment | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
Dividend received deduction | (48.9) | (49.5) | (42.9) |
Valuation allowance | 379.1 | - | - |
Other | (6.9) | 2.6 | 9.9 |
Income tax expense (benefit) | $ (245.2) | $ (1.6) | $ 64.4 |
Temporary Differences
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to Deferred tax assets and Deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2008 and 2007, are presented below.
| 2008 | 2007 |
Deferred tax assets: | | |
Operations and capital loss carryforwards | $ - | $ 14.6 |
Future policy benefits | 288.7 | 731.1 |
Goodwill | 3.7 | 5.1 |
Investments | 353.8 | 103.8 |
Employee compensation and benefits | 36.7 | 45.4 |
Unrealized losses on investments | 813.4 | 59.6 |
Other | 54.1 | 68.0 |
Total gross assets before valuation allowance | 1,550.4 | 1,027.6 |
Less: valuation allowance | (408.9) | (46.9) |
Assets, net of valuation allowance | 1,141.5 | 980.7 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities: | | |
Deferred policy acquisition cost | (1,137.9) | (1,120.3) |
Value of purchased insurance in force | (39.2) | (42.7) |
Other | (0.2) | (2.2) |
Total gross liabilities | (1,177.3) | (1,165.2) |
Net deferred income liability | $ (35.8) | $ (184.5) |
Net unrealized capital gains (losses) are presented as a component of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) in Shareholder’s Equity, net of deferred taxes.
136
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Valuation allowances are provided when it is considered unlikely that deferred tax assets will be realized. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had a tax valuation allowance of $374.0 and $0, respectively, related to realized capital losses, which is included in Net Income (Loss). The valuation allowance includes $81.4 related to impairments of securities designated in the ING-Dutch State Transaction, which was established pending uncertainties regarding the closing of the transaction. Additionally, at December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had a tax valuation allowance of $29.8 and $46.9, respectively, related to unrealized capital losses, which is included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). The Company also established a $5.1 tax valuation allowance against foreign tax credits, the benefit of which is uncertain.
Tax Sharing Agreement
The Company had a receivable from ING AIH of $321.1 and a payable to ING AIH of $40.7 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, for federal income taxes under the intercompany tax sharing agreement.
See Related Party Transactions footnote for more information.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
Reconciliations of the change in the unrecognized income tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
| 2008 | 2007 |
Balance at January 1 | $ 66.4 | $ 61.5 |
Additions for tax positions related to the current year | 7.8 | 6.9 |
Additions for tax positions related to prior years | 0.7 | - |
Reductions for tax positions related to prior years | (9.6) | (2.0) |
Reductions for settlements with taxing authorities | (0.4) | - |
Balance at December 31 | $ 64.9 | $ 66.4 |
The Company had $47.3 of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2008 that would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized.
Interest and Penalties
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in Current income taxes and Income tax expense on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statement of Operations, respectively. The Company had accrued interest of $4.4 as of December 31, 2008 and $4.7 as of December 31, 2007. The decrease in accrued interest during the year ended December 31, 2008 primarily relates to the settlement of the 2003 IRS audit.
137
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Tax Regulatory Matters
In the first quarter of 2008, the IRS finalized the audit of tax year 2003. The 2003 settlement did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position. The Company is currently under audit by the IRS for tax years 2002 and 2004 through 2008, and is expected that the examination of these years will be finalized within the next twelve months. Upon finalization of the IRS examination it is reasonably possible that the unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by up to $22.9. The timing of the payment of the remaining allowance of $42.0 cannot be reliably estimated.
On September 25, 2007, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2007-61, which announced its intention to issue regulations with respect to certain computational aspects of the dividend received deduction (“DRD”) on separate account assets held in connection with variable annuity and life insurance contracts. Revenue Ruling 2007-61 suspended Revenue Ruling 2007-54 issued in August 2007 that purported to change accepted industry and IRS interpretations of the statutes governing these computational questions. Any regulations that the IRS ultimately proposes for issuance in this area will be subject to public notice and comment, at which time insurance companies and other members of the public will have the opportunity to raise legal and practical questions about the content, scope and application of such regulations. As a result, the ultimate timing, substance, and effective date of any such regulations are unknown, but they could resul t in the elimination of some or all of the separate account DRD tax benefit that the Company receives.
Under prior law, life insurance companies were allowed to defer from taxation a portion of income. Prior to 2006, deferred income of $14.4 was accumulated in the Policyholder’s Surplus Account and would only become taxable under certain conditions, which management believed to be remote. In 2004, Congress passed the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, allowing certain tax-free distributions from the Policyholders’ Surplus Account during 2005 and 2006. During 2006, the Company made a return of capital distribution of $170.0, which eliminated the $14.4 balance in the Policyholders’ Surplus Account and, therefore, any potential tax on the accumulated balance.
9. Benefit Plans
Defined Benefit Plan |
ING North America Insurance Corporation (“ING North America”) sponsors the ING Americas Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”), effective as of December 31, 2001. Substantially all employees of ING North America and its affiliates (excluding certain employees) are eligible to participate, including the Company’s employees. However, effective January 1, 2009, the Retirement Plan was amended to provide that anyone hired or rehired by the Company on or after January 1, 2009, would not be eligible to participate in the Plan. The Retirement Plan was amended and restated effective July 1, 2008 related to the admission of employees from the acquisition of CitiStreet LLC (“CitiStreet”) by Lion, and ING North America filed a request for a determination letter on the qualified status of the Plan.
138
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
The Retirement Plan is a tax-qualified defined benefit plan, the benefits of which are guaranteed (within certain specified legal limits) by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”). As of January 1, 2002, each participant in the Retirement Plan (except for certain specified employees) earns a benefit under a final average compensation formula. Subsequent to December 31, 2001, ING North America is responsible for all Retirement Plan liabilities. The costs allocated to the Company for its employees’ participation in the Retirement Plan were $10.8, $13.0, and $17.1, for the years ended 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively, and are included in Operating expenses in the Statements of Operations.
Defined Contribution Plan
ING North America sponsors the ING Savings Plan and ESOP (the “Savings Plan”). Substantially all employees of ING North America and its affiliates (excluding certain employees) are eligible to participate, including the Company’s employees other than Company agents. The Savings Plan is a tax-qualified defined contribution retirement plan, which includes an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”) component. The Savings Plan was amended and restated effective July 1, 2008 related to the admission of employees from the acquisition of CitiStreet by Lion, and ING North America filed a request for a determination letter on the qualified status of the Plan. Savings Plan benefits are not guaranteed by the PBGC. The Savings Plan allows eligible participants to defer into the Savings Plan a specified percentage of eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis. ING North America matches such pre-tax contributions, up to a max imum of 6.0% of eligible compensation. Matching contributions are subject to a 4-year graded vesting schedule, although certain specified participants are subject to a 5-year graded vesting schedule. All contributions made to the Savings Plan are subject to certain limits imposed by applicable law. Pre-tax charges to operations of the Company for the Savings Plan were $5.6, $4.9, and $4.6, for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively, and are included in Operating expenses in the Statements of Operations.
Stock Option and Share Plans
ING sponsors the ING Group Long Term Equity Ownership Plan (“leo”), which provides employees of the Company who are selected by the ING Board of Directors to be granted options and/or performance shares. The terms applicable to an award under leo are set out in an award agreement which is signed by the participant when he or she accepts the award.
Options granted under leo are nonqualified options on ING shares in the form of American Depository Receipts (“ADRs”). Leo options have a ten (10) year term and vest three years from the grant date. Options awarded under leo may vest earlier in the event of the participant’s death, permanent disability or retirement. Retirement for purposes of leo means a participant terminates service after attaining age 55 and completing 5 years of service. Early vesting in all or a portion of a grant of options may also occur in the event the participant is terminated due to redundancy or business divestiture. Unvested options are generally subject to forfeiture when a participant voluntarily terminates employment or is terminated for cause (as defined in leo). Upon vesting, participants generally have up to seven years in which to exercise their vested options. A shorter exercise period applies in the event of termination due to re dundancy, business divestiture, voluntary termination or termination for cause. An option gives the
139
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
recipient the right to purchase an ING share in the form of ADRs at a price equal to the fair market value of one ING share on the date of grant. On exercise, participant’s have three options (i) retain the shares and remit a check for applicable taxes due on exercise, (ii) request the administrator to remit a cash payment for the value of the options being exercised, less applicable taxes, or (iii) retain some of the shares and have the administrator liquidate sufficient shares to satisfy the participant’s tax obligation. The share price is in Euros and converted to U.S. dollars, as determined by ING.
Awards of performance shares may also be made under leo. Performance shares are a contingent grant of ING stock and on vesting, the participant has the right to receive a cash amount equal to the closing price per ING share on the Euronext Amsterdam Stock Market on the vesting date times the number of vested Plan shares. Performance shares generally vest three years from the date of grant, with the amount payable based on ING’s share price on the vesting date. Payments made to participants on vesting are based on the performance targets established in connection with leo and payments can range from 0% to 200% of target. Performance is based on ING’s total shareholder return relative to a peer group as determined at the end of the vesting period. To vest, a participant must be actively employed on the vesting date, although vesting will continue to occur in the event of the participant’s death, disability or retirement. If a participant is terminated due to redundancy or business divestiture, vesting will occur but in only a portion of the award. Unvested shares are generally subject to forfeiture when an employee voluntarily terminates employment or is terminated for cause (as defined in leo). Upon vesting, participants have three options (i) retain the shares and remit a check for applicable taxes due on exercise, (ii) request the administrator to remit a cash payment for the value of the shares, less applicable taxes, or (iii) retain some of the shares and have the administrator liquidate sufficient shares to satisfy the participant’s tax obligation. The amount is converted from Euros to U.S. dollars based on the daily average exchange rate between the Euro and the U.S. dollar, as determined by ING.
The Company recognized compensation expense for the leo options and performance shares of $5.3, $4.7, and $7.4, for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
For leo, the Company recognized tax benefits of $0.7 in 2008, $2.5 in 2007, and minimal tax benefits in 2006.
Other Benefit Plans
In addition to providing retirement plan benefits, the Company, in conjunction with ING North America, provides certain supplemental retirement benefits to eligible employees and health care and life insurance benefits to retired employees and other eligible dependents. The supplemental retirement plan includes a non-qualified defined benefit pension plan and a non-qualified defined contribution plan, which means all benefits are payable from the general assets of the Company. The post-retirement health care plan is contributory, with retiree contribution levels adjusted annually. The life insurance plan provides a flat amount of noncontributory coverage and optional contributory coverage. The benefits charges allocated to the Company related to all of these plans for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, were $1.3, $0.6, and $1.3, respectively.
140
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
10. Related Party Transactions
Operating Agreements
The Company has certain agreements whereby it generates revenues and incurs expenses with affiliated entities. The agreements are as follows:
§Underwriting and distribution agreement with Directed Services LLC (“DSL”) (successor by merger to Directed Services, Inc.), an affiliated broker-dealer, whereby DSL serves as the principal underwriter for variable insurance products issued by the Company. DSL is authorized to enter into agreements with broker-dealers to distribute the Company’s variable products and appoint representatives of the broker-dealers as agents. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, commissions were incurred in the amounts of $603.8, $553.8, and $418.0, respectively. §Asset management agreement with ING Investment Management LLC (“IIM”), an affiliate, in which IIM provides asset management, administration, and accounting services for ING USA’s general account. The Company records a fee, which is paid quarterly, based on the value of the assets under management. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, expenses were incurred in the amounts of $85.9, $78.0, and $69.5, respectively. §Service agreement with DSL, in which the Company provides managerial and supervisory services to DSL and earns a fee that is calculated as a percentage of average assets in the Company’s variable separate accounts deposited in ING Investors Trust. On August 9, 2007, the Company and DSL entered into an amendment to the service agreement effective July 31, 2007, which modifies the method for calculating the compensation owed to the Company for its provision of managerial and supervisory services to DSL. As a result of this amendment, DSL pays the Company the total net revenue associated with the Company’s deposits in ING Investors Trust. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, revenue for these services was $139.2, $109.0, and $62.0, respectively. §Services agreements with ING North America, dated September 1, 2000 and January 1, 2001, respectively, for administrative, management, financial, information technology, and finance and treasury services. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, expenses were incurred in the amounts of $93.0, $96.6, and $95.4, respectively. §Services agreement between the Company and its U.S. insurance company affiliates dated January 1, 2001, amended effective January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2007, for administrative, management, professional, advisory, consulting, and other services. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, expenses related to the agreements were incurred in the amount of $21.6, $19.0, and $6.1, respectively. §Administrative Services Agreement between the Company, ReliaStar Life Insurance Company of New York (“RLNY”), an affiliate, and other U.S. insurance company affiliates dated March 1, 2003, amended effective August 1, 2004, in which the Company and affiliates provide services to RLNY. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, revenue related to the agreement was $6.5, $6.3, and $5.8, respectively. §ING Advisors Network, a group of broker-dealers affiliated with the Company, distributes the Company’s annuity products. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, ING Advisors Network sold new contracts of $1,411.3, $1,429.3, and $1,255.4, respectively. |
141
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
| §Services agreement between the Company, Security Life of Denver Insurance Company (“Security Life”), an affiliate, and IIM whereby IIM provides administrative, management, professional, advisory, consulting and other services to the Company and Security Life with respect to its Financial Products unit. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company incurred expenses of $8.9 and $1.3, respectively. |
Management and service contracts and all cost sharing arrangements with other affiliated companies are allocated in accordance with the Company’s expense and cost allocation methods.
Reinsurance Agreements
Automatic Reinsurance Agreement
Effective June 30, 2008, ING USA entered into an automatic reinsurance agreement with its affiliate, Security Life of Denver International Limited (“SLDI”). Under the terms of the agreement, ING USA ceded to SLDI 100% of the benefits guaranteed under specific variable annuity guaranteed living benefit riders (the “Covered Benefits”) attached to certain variable annuity contracts issued by ING USA on or after January 1, 2000 (the “Contracts”). ING USA paid SLDI initial consideration of $665.8. Thereafter, ING USA will pay (i) new business consideration equal to 1.62% of premiums received from contractholders on the Contracts and (ii) a base premium equal to the actual fees paid by contractholders for the Covered Benefits. Under the terms of the agreement, SLDI is required to provide ING USA security for ING USA’s full statutory reserve credit for reinsurance by providing a letter of credit to ING USA or establishing a trust for its benefit, or a combination of a letter of credit and assets in trust. SLDI has provided ING USA with letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $960.0, with $319.0 issued under a letter of credit facility with its affiliate, ING Bank N.V., while the remainder resides with three separate third party letter of credit facilities as of December 31, 2008. SLDI has also established a trust with The Bank of New York as trustee and ING USA as beneficiary in which SLDI assets totaling $655.2 have been deposited as of December 31, 2008. Since December 31, 2008, an additional $1,074.0 has been contributed to the trust.
At the inception of this reinsurance contract, the impact of the initial ceded premium of $665.8 was partially offset by ceded reserves of $273.6 and by an increase in DAC of $85.5. The net of these was established as a deferred loss of $306.7 and was reflected in Other Assets. The deferred loss is being amortized over the period of benefit.
At December 31, 2008, the value of reserves ceded by the Company under this agreement was $732.3, and the balance of the deferred loss, including both the initial deferred loss plus additional deferrals of 1.62% of premiums on new business, was $353.8.
Effective June 30, 2008, ING USA also entered into a services agreement with SLDI pursuant to which ING USA will provide certain actuarial risk modeling consulting services to SLDI with respect to hedge positions undertaken by SLDI in connection with the Covered Benefits reinsured by SLDI under the automatic reinsurance agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2008, revenue related to the agreement was $4.9.
142
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Coinsurance Agreements
Effective May 1, 2005, ING USA entered into a coinsurance agreement with its affiliate, Security Life. Under the terms of the agreement, Security Life assumed and accepted the responsibility for paying, when due, 100% of the liabilities arising under the multi-year guaranteed fixed annuity contracts issued by ING USA between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2003. In addition, ING USA assigned to Security Life all future premiums received by ING USA attributable to the ceded contracts.
Under the terms of the agreement, ING USA ceded $2.5 billion in account balances and transferred a ceding commission and $2.7 billion in assets to Security Life, resulting in a realized capital gain of $47.9 to the Company.
The coinsurance agreement is accounted for using the deposit method. As such, $2.7 billion of Deposit receivable from affiliate was established on the Balance Sheets. The receivable will be adjusted over the life of the agreement based on cash settlements and the experience of the contracts, as well as for amortization of the ceding commission. The Company incurred amortization expense of the negative ceding commission of $19.9, and $21.2 and $23.5 for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which is included in Other expenses in the Statements of Operations.
In addition, the Company entered into a 100% coinsurance agreement with Security Life dated January 1, 2000, covering certain universal life policies which had been issued and in force as of, as well as any such policies issued after, the effective date of the agreement. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the value of reserves ceded by the Company under this agreement was $17.2 and $16.6, respectively.
The Company is a party to a Facultative Coinsurance Agreement with its affiliate, Security Life, effective August 20, 1999. Under the terms of this agreement, the Company facultatively cedes to Security Life, from time to time, certain GICs on a 100% coinsurance basis. The value of GIC reserves ceded by the Company under this agreement was $2.5 billion and $2.3 billion at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Reinsurance Assumed
Yearly Renewable Term Agreements
Effective December 1 and December 31, 2008, respectively, ING USA entered into two yearly renewable term reinsurance agreements with its affiliate, ReliaStar Life Insurance Company (“ReliaStar”), for an indefinite duration. Under the terms of the agreements, ING USA assumed 100% of ReliaStar’s mortality risk associated with the net amount at risk under specific life insurance policies, including:
143
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
| §Individual life policies issued by ReliaStar and previously assumed by ReliaStar from ReliaStar Life Insurance Company of New York (“RLNY”), with policy dates prior to January 1, 2000, including certain term life, universal life, variable universal life, and whole life, insurance policies. §In force individual life policies issued by ReliaStar, where premiums are paid on the insured’s behalf through payroll deduction and which were marketed by employee benefit brokers. |
ING USA received initial consideration of $3.9 from ReliaStar. Thereafter, the Company will receive monthly premiums, net of benefit payments, based on premium rates set forth in the respective agreements. As such, there is no unearned reinsurance premium.
As of December 31, 2008, the value of the reserves assumed by the Company under these agreements was $5.0.
Coinsurance Funds Withheld Agreement
Effective December 31, 2008, ING USA entered into a coinsurance funds withheld agreement with ReliaStar for an indefinite duration. Under the terms of the agreement, ING USA assumed 100% quota share of ReliaStar’s net retained liability under certain Employee Benefits Group Annual Term policies, including disability waiver of premium.
The initial premium of $219.9 was equal to the aggregate reserve assumed by ING USA. Thereafter, premiums are equal to the total earned gross premiums collected by ReliaStar from policyholders. ReliaStar will retain all reinsurance premiums payable to ING USA as funds withheld, as security for ceded liabilities and against which ceded losses will be offset. Monthly, ING USA will receive or pay a net settlement. In addition, ING USA is required to provide ReliaStar full reserve credit for reinsurance by providing a letter of credit, the cost of which will be partially reimbursed by ReliaStar.
As of December 31, 2008, the value of the reserves assumed by the Company under this agreement was $219.9.
Funds Withheld Agreement
Effective December 31, 2008, ING USA entered into a funds withheld agreement with ReliaStar for an indefinite duration. Under the terms of the agreements, ING USA assumed 100% quota share of ReliaStar’s net retained liability under assumed group life reinsurance in-force.
144
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
The initial premium of $60.0 was equal to the net Statutory reserve assumed by ING USA. Thereafter, premiums are equal to the total earned reinsurance premiums collected by ReliaStar, less a ceding commission. ReliaStar will retain all reinsurance premiums payable to ING USA as funds withheld, as security for ceded liabilities and against which ceded losses will be offset. Monthly, ING USA will receive or pay a net settlement. In addition, ING USA is required to provide ReliaStar reserve credit in the excess of the funds withheld for reinsurance by providing a cash deposit or letter of credit.
As of December 31, 2008, the value of the reserves assumed by the Company under this agreement was $60.0.
Financing Agreements
The Company maintains a reciprocal loan agreement with ING AIH, an affiliate, to facilitate the handling of unanticipated short-term cash requirements that arise in the ordinary course of business. Under this agreement, which became effective in January 2004 and expires on January 14, 2014, either party can borrow from the other up to 3.0% of the Company's statutory admitted assets as of the preceding December 31. Interest on any ING USA borrowing is charged at the rate of ING AIH’s cost of funds for the interest period, plus 0.15%. Interest on any ING AIH borrowing is charged at a rate based on the prevailing interest rate of U.S. commercial paper available for purchase with a similar duration.
Under this agreement, the Company incurred interest expense of $1.3, $3.5, and $1.5, for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. The Company earned interest income of $2.8, $6.7, and $4.9, for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. Interest expense and income are included in Interest expense and Net investment income, respectively, on the Statements of Operations. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had no amounts outstanding with ING AIH under the reciprocal loan agreement.
Notes with Affiliates
The Company issued a 30-year surplus note in the principal amount of $35.0 on December 8, 1999, to its affiliate, Security Life, which matures on December 7, 2029. Interest is charged at an annual rate of 7.98%. Payment of the note and related accrued interest is subordinate to payments due to contractowners and claimant and beneficiary claims, as well as debts owed to all other classes of debtors, other than surplus note holders, of ING USA. Any payment of principal and/or interest made is subject to the prior approval of the Iowa Insurance Commissioner. Interest expense was $2.8, for each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
145
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
On December 29, 2004, the Company issued surplus notes in the aggregate principal amount of $400.0 (the “Notes”), scheduled to mature on December 29, 2034, to its affiliates, ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company, ReliaStar, and SLDI, in an offering that was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. The Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.26% per year. Any payment of principal and/or interest is subject to the prior approval of the Iowa Insurance Commissioner. Interest is scheduled to be paid semi-annually in arrears on June 29 and December 29 of each year, commencing on June 29, 2005. Interest expense was $25.4 for each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
Funding Agreement
On August 10, 2007, the Company issued an extendable funding agreement to its parent, Lion, upon receipt of a single deposit in the amount of $500.0. To fund the purchase of the funding agreement, Lion issued a promissory note to its indirect parent company, ING Verzekeringen N.V. ("ING V"), which has been guaranteed by Lion’s immediate parent, ING AIH.
Under the terms of the funding agreement, the Company will pay Lion interest quarterly at the credited interest rate until maturity, and on the maturity date, the Company will pay Lion the single deposit and any accrued and unpaid interest. The credited interest rate shall be the three-month LIBOR, plus 0.05%, and shall be reset quarterly. The maturity date of the funding agreement shall be August 10, 2009, or such later date to which the maturity date may be extended; provided, however, that the maturity date may not be extended beyond August 10, 2012.
Proprietary Alpha Fund
The ING Proprietary Alpha Fund, LLC (“PAF”) is a multi-strategy investment fund established in 2007 as a U.S. domiciled limited liability company managed by ING Alternative Asset Management LLC (“IAAM”), an affiliate. The investment strategies within PAF include both long and short exposures to various investments and utilize various fixed income, equity, and derivative financial instruments. In September 2007, ING USA invested $125.0 into PAF.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company recognized approximately $40.2 in losses related to financial instruments held by the PAF in the Lehman Liquidity Fund in response to the bankruptcy proceedings of Lehman Brothers, Inc. (“Lehman”).
ING Multi-Strategy Opportunity Fund
On September 30, 2008, the Company’s affiliate, Security Life of Denver Insurance Company, transferred 51.9% of its interest in the ING Multi-Strategy Opportunity Fund (the “Fund”) to the Company for a purchase price of $68.9. As of December 31, 2008, the Company has an investment in the various series of the ING Multi-Strategy Opportunity Fund Series LLC that total $66.8. This amount is included in Limited partnerships/corporations on the Balance Sheets.
146
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Tax Sharing Agreements
Effective January 1, 2005, the Company is a party to a federal tax allocation agreement with ING AIH and its subsidiaries that are part of the ING AIH consolidated group. Under the federal tax allocation agreement, ING AIH charges its subsidiaries for federal taxes each subsidiary would have incurred were it not a member of the consolidated group and credits each subsidiary for losses at the statutory federal tax rate.
The Company has entered into a state tax sharing agreement with ING AIH and each of the specific subsidiaries that are parties to the agreement. The state tax agreement applies to situations in which ING AIH and all or some of the subsidiaries join in the filing of a state or local franchise, income tax, or other tax return on a consolidated, combined, or unitary basis.
Derivatives
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had call options with a notional amount of $162.3 and $167.8, respectively, and market value of $8.6 and $42.6, respectively, with ING Bank, an affiliate. Each of these contracts was entered into as a result of a competitive bid, which included unaffiliated counterparties.
11. Financing Agreements
The Company maintains a $50.0 uncommitted, perpetual revolving note facility with the Bank of New York ("BONY"). Interest on any of the Company borrowing accrues at an annual rate equal to a rate quoted by BONY to the Company for the borrowing. Under this agreement, the Company did not incur any interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company incurred minimal interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had no amounts outstanding under the revolving note facility.
The Company also maintains a $100.0 uncommitted line-of-credit agreement with PNC Bank (“PNC”), effective December 19, 2005. Borrowings are guaranteed by ING AIH, with maximum aggregate borrowings outstanding at anytime to ING AIH and its affiliates of $100.0. Interest on any of the Company borrowing accrues at an annual rate equal to the rate quoted by PNC to the Company for the borrowing. Under this agreement, the Company did not incur any interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company incurred minimal interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had no amounts outstanding under the line-of-credit agreement. As of October 31, 2008, the Company had not formally renewed this line-of-credit, which subsequently expired on this date.
147
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
The Company maintains a $100.0 uncommitted line-of-credit agreement with Svenska Handelsbanken AB (Publ.) (“Svenska”), effective June 2, 2006. Borrowings are guaranteed by ING AIH, with maximum aggregate borrowings outstanding at anytime to ING AIH and its affiliates of $100.0. Interest on any of the Company’s borrowing accrues at an annual rate equal to the rate quoted by Svenska to the Company for the borrowing. Under this agreement, the Company incurred minimal interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had no amounts outstanding under the line-of-credit agreement. Effective November 19, 2008, the Company discontinued this line-of-credit.
Also see Financing Agreements in the Related Party Transactions footnote.
12. Reinsurance
At December 31, 2008, the Company had reinsurance treaties with 16 unaffiliated reinsurers covering a portion of the mortality risks and guaranteed death and living benefits under its annuity contracts. The Company, as cedant, also has reinsurance treaties with two affiliates, Security Life and SLDI, related to GICs, fixed annuities, and universal life insurance policies. The Company remains liable to the extent its reinsurers do not meet their obligations under the reinsurance agreements.
Reinsurance ceded in force for life mortality risks were $633.1 and $689.1 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Net receivables were comprised of the following at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
| 2008 | 2007 |
Claims recoverable from reinsurers | $ 24.6 | $ 12.0 |
Receivable for reinsurance premiums | 0.5 | 1.4 |
Reinsured amounts due to reinsurers | (33.8) | (36.2) |
Reinsurance reserves ceded | 3,384.8 | 2,452.1 |
Deposits | 1,947.0 | 2,153.2 |
Other | 26.2 | 33.6 |
Total | $ 5,349.3 | $ 4,616.1 |
Premiums and Interest credited and other benefits to contractowners were reduced by the following amounts for reinsurance ceded for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Deposits ceded under reinsurance | $ 1,632.0 | $ 1,309.1 | $ 1,144.3 |
Premiums ceded under reinsurance | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.5 |
Reinsurance recoveries | 1,212.6 | 1,723.2 | 657.6 |
Also see Reinsurance Agreements in the Related Party Transactions footnote.
148
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
13. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Leases |
The Company leases its office space and certain equipment under operating leases, the longest term of which expires in 2017.
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, rent expense for leases was $8.7, $7.9, and $8.3, respectively. The future net minimum payments under noncancelable leases for the years ended December 31, 2009 through 2013 are estimated to be $7.7, $6.3, $5.3, $5.3, and $5.3, respectively, and $18.9, thereafter. The Company pays substantially all expenses associated with its leased and subleased office properties. Expenses not paid directly by the Company are paid for by an affiliate and allocated back to the Company.
Commitments
Through the normal course of investment operations, the Company commits to either purchase or sell securities, commercial mortgage loans, or money market instruments, at a specified future date and at a specified price or yield. The inability of counterparties to honor these commitments may result in either a higher or lower replacement cost. Also, there is likely to be a change in the value of the securities underlying the commitments.
At December 31, 2008, the Company had off-balance sheet commitments to purchase investments equal to their fair value of $421.4, $207.2 of which was with related parties. At December 31, 2007, the Company had off-balance sheet commitments to purchase investments equal to their fair value of $616.3, $156.5 of which was with related parties. During 2008 and 2007, $176.2 and $33.1, respectively, was funded to related parties under these commitments.
Financial Guarantees
The Company owns a 3-year credit-linked note arrangement, whereby the Company will reimburse the guaranteed party upon payment default of the referenced obligation. Upon such default, the Company will reimburse the guaranteed party for the loss under the reference obligation, and the Company receives that reference obligation in settlement. The Company can seek recovery of any losses under the agreements by sale or collection of the received reference obligation. As of December 31, 2008, the maximum potential future exposure to the Company under the guarantee was $32.5.
149
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Cash Collateral
Under the terms of the Company’s Over-The-Counter Derivative ISDA Agreements (“ISDA Agreements”), the Company may receive from, or deliver to, counterparties, collateral to assure that all terms of the ISDA Agreements will be met with regard to the CSA. The terms of the CSA call for the Company to pay interest on any cash received equal to the Federal Funds rate. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company held $17.6 and $11.5, respectively, of cash collateral, which was included in Payables under securities loan agreement, including collateral held, on the Balance Sheets.
Litigation
The Company is involved in threatened or pending lawsuits/arbitrations arising from the normal conduct of business. Due to the climate in insurance and business litigation/arbitrations, suits against the Company sometimes include claims for substantial compensatory, consequential, or punitive damages, and other types of relief. Moreover, certain claims are asserted as class actions, purporting to represent a group of similarly situated individuals. While it is not possible to forecast the outcome of such lawsuits/arbitrations, in light of existing insurance, reinsurance, and established reserves, it is the opinion of management that the disposition of such lawsuits/arbitrations will not have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s operations or financial position.
Other Regulatory Matters
Regulatory Matters
As with many financial services companies, the Company and its affiliates have received informal and formal requests for information from various state and federal governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations in connection with inquiries and investigations of the products and practices of the financial services industry. In each case, the Company and its affiliates have been and are providing full cooperation.
Insurance and Retirement Plan Products and Other Regulatory Matters
Federal and state regulators, and self-regulatory agencies are conducting broad inquiries and investigations involving the insurance and retirement industries. These initiatives currently focus on, among other things, compensation, revenue sharing, and other sales incentives; potential conflicts of interest; sales and marketing practices (including sales to seniors); specific product types (including group annuities and indexed annuities); and disclosure. The Company and certain of its U.S. affiliates have received formal and informal requests in connection with such investigations, and have cooperated and are cooperating fully with each request for information. Some of these matters could result in regulatory action involving the Company. These initiatives also may result in new legislation and regulation that could significantly affect the financial services industry, including businesses in which the Company is engaged. In light o f these and other developments, U.S. affiliates of ING, including the Company, periodically review whether modifications to their business practices are appropriate.
150
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
Investment Product Regulatory Issues
Since 2002, there has been increased governmental and regulatory activity relating to mutual funds and variable insurance products. This activity has primarily focused on inappropriate trading of fund shares; directed brokerage; compensation; sales practices, suitability, and supervision; arrangements with service providers; pricing; compliance and controls; adequacy of disclosure; and document retention.
In addition to responding to governmental and regulatory requests on fund trading issues, ING management, on its own initiative, conducted, through special counsel and a national accounting firm, an extensive internal review of mutual fund trading in ING insurance, retirement, and mutual fund products. The goal of this review was to identify any instances of inappropriate trading in those products by third parties or by ING investment professionals and other ING personnel.
The internal review identified several isolated arrangements allowing third parties to engage in frequent trading of mutual funds within the variable insurance and mutual fund products of ING, and identified other circumstances where frequent trading occurred despite measures taken by ING intended to combat market timing. Each of the arrangements has been terminated and disclosed to regulators, to the independent trustees of ING Funds (U.S.) and in Company reports previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Action has been or may be taken by regulators with respect to the Company or certain affiliates before investigations relating to fund trading are completed. The potential outcome of such action is difficult to predict but could subject the Company or certain affiliates to adverse consequences, including, but not limited to, settlement payments, penalties, and other financial liability. It is not currently anticipated, however, that the actual outcome of any such action will have a material adverse effect on ING or ING’s U.S.-based operations, including the Company.
ING has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the ING Funds from all damages resulting from wrongful conduct by ING or its employees or from ING’s internal investigation, any investigations conducted by any governmental or self-regulatory agencies, litigation or other formal proceedings, including any proceedings by the SEC. Management reported to the ING Funds Board that ING management believes that the total amount of any indemnification obligations will not be material to ING or ING’s U.S.-based operations, including the Company.
14. Subsequent Events
Subsequent to December 31 2008, the ING Supervisory Board of Directors approved a liquidity facility for up to $2.0 billion to support the liquidity requirements in ING’s life insurance operations, including the Company. The exact usage of the facility, if any, has not yet been determined, as it will be utilized as an alternative source of liquidity.
151
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
15. Restructuring Charges
2008 Expense Reductions |
During the fourth quarter, the Company implemented an expense reduction program for the purpose of streamlining its overall operations. The restructuring charges related to this expense reduction initiative include severance and other employee benefits and lease abandonment costs, which are included in Operating Expenses on the Statements of Operations.
The following table illustrates the restructuring reserves and charges for the period ended December 31, 2008.
Restructuring reserve at inception | $ - | |
Restructuring charges: | | |
Employee severance and termination benefits | 3.3 | (1) |
Future rent on non-cancelable leases | 0.4 | (2) |
Total restructuring charges | 3.7 | |
Other charges | - | |
Intercompany charges and payments | (0.5) | (3) |
Payments applied against reserve | (0.7) | (4) |
Restructuring reserve at December 31, 2008 | $ 2.5 | |
(1) | Amounts represent charges to the Company for all severed employees that support the Company, including those within affiliates. |
(2) | Amounts represent intercompany expense allocations from ING AIH. The expenses were allocated to the Company based upon the department that used the space, and the cash settlement occurred in January 2009. |
(3) | Amounts represent payments to ING affiliates for severance incurred by another ING entity for employees that supported the Company. Payments were made through ING's intercompany cash settlement process. |
(4) | Amounts represent payments to employees of the Company, as well as reversals of severance reserves. |
The Company estimates the completion of these integration and restructuring activities by November 15, 2009.
2009 Expense and Staff Reductions
On January 12, 2009, ING announced expense and staff reductions across all U.S. operations, which resulted in the elimination of 114 current and open positions in the Company. Due to the staff reductions, curtailment of pension benefits shall occur during the first quarter of 2009, which will result in the recognition of a loss related to unrecognized prior service costs. The effect of the curtailment on the Company’s earnings is anticipated to be less than $0.1. The Company anticipates that the restructuring activities in regards to its operations will be complete by November 15, 2009, with total estimated costs to the Company equal to $6.7.
152
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
16. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Shareholder’s equity included the following components of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Net unrealized capital (losses) gains: | | | |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale | $ (3,234.0) | $ (122.3) | $ (28.9) |
Equity securities, available-for-sale | (3.7) | (5.5) | 1.5 |
DAC/VOBA adjustment on | | | |
available-for-sale securities | 1,139.7 | (36.9) | 21.1 |
Sales inducements adjustment on | | | |
available-for-sale securities | 102.2 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
Other investments | (6.2) | (6.4) | (6.6) |
Unrealized capital (losses) gains , before tax | (2,002.0) | (170.6) | (11.9) |
Deferred income tax asset (liability) | 700.7 | 59.7 | 3.8 |
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance | (29.8) | (46.9) | - |
Net unrealized capital (losses) gains | (1,331.1) | (157.8) | (8.1) |
Pension liability, net of tax | (2.6) | (2.9) | (5.1) |
Other | - | - | 1.1 |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | $ (1,333.7) | $ (160.7) | $ (12.1) |
Changes in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of DAC, VOBA, and tax (excluding the tax valuation allowance), related to changes in unrealized capital gains (losses) on securities, including securities pledged, were as follows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale | $ (3,111.7) | $ (93.4) | $ (22.0) |
Equity securities, available-for-sale | 1.8 | (7.0) | 0.4 |
DAC/VOBA adjustment on | | | |
available-for-sale securities | 1,176.6 | (58.0) | 13.6 |
Sales inducements adjustment on | | | |
available-for-sale securities | 101.7 | (0.5) | (1.5) |
Other investments | 0.2 | 0.2 | (1.2) |
Unrealized capital (losses) gains, before tax | (1,831.4) | (158.7) | (10.7) |
Deferred income tax asset (liability) | 641.0 | 55.9 | 3.4 |
Net change in unrealized capital (losses) gains | $ (1,190.4) | $ (102.8) | $ (7.3) |
153
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Notes to Financial Statements |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Net unrealized capital holding (losses) gains | | | |
arising during the year(1) | $ (1,877.2) | $ (210.5) | $ (49.5) |
Less: reclassification adjustment for (losses) gains | | | |
and other items included in Net (loss) income(2) | (686.8) | (107.7) | (42.2) |
Net change in unrealized capital (losses) | | | |
gains on securities | $ (1,190.4) | $ (102.8) | $ (7.3) |
(1) | Pretax unrealized capital holding gains (losses) arising during the year were $(2,888.0), $(324.9), and $(72.6), for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. |
(2) | Pretax reclassification adjustments for gains (losses) and other items included in Net (loss) income were $(1,056.6), $(166.2), and $(61.9), for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. |
154
QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED) |
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
2008 | First | Second | Third | Fourth |
|
Total revenue | $ 429.9 | $ 640.2 | $ 229.8 | $ (171.9) |
Income (loss) before income taxes | (113.3) | 137.6 | (465.5) | (1,185.2) |
Income tax expense (benefit) | (51.4) | 34.7 | (35.7) | (192.8) |
Net income (loss) | $ (61.9) | $ 102.9 | $ (429.8) | $ (992.4) |
|
2007 | First | Second | Third | Fourth |
|
Total revenue | $ 512.4 | $ 632.7 | $ 534.7 | $ 494.0 |
Income (loss) before income taxes | 96.6 | 138.1 | 37.1 | (144.4) |
Income tax expense (benefit) | 26.9 | 41.0 | (11.1) | (58.4) |
Net income (loss) | $ 69.7 | $ 97.1 | $ 48.2 | $ (86.0) |
155
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s current disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that material information relating to the Company required to be disclosed in the Company’s periodic SEC filings is made known to them in a timely manner.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) for the Company. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements of the Company in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
§ | pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; |
§ | provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Company’s management and directors; and |
§ | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
156
Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. In making its assessment, management has used the criteria set forth in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based upon its assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has not been any change in the internal controls over financial reporting of the Company that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect these internal controls.
Item 9B. Other Information |
157
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2) of Form 10-K, except with respect to compliance with Sections 406 and 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
a) | Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals |
| The Company has approved and adopted a Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals (which was filed as Exhibit 14 to the Company’s Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2004, File No. 033-87270), pursuant to the requirements of Section 406 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. Any waiver of the Code of Ethics will be disclosed by the Company by way of a Form 8-K filing. |
b) | Designation of Board Financial Expert |
| The Company has designated David A. Wheat, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, as its Board Financial Expert, pursuant to the requirements of Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Because the Company is not subject to the requirements of Exchange Act Rule 10A-3, it does not have any outside directors sitting on its board. |
Item 11. Executive Compensation |
Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2) of Form 10-K.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2) of Form 10-K.
Item 13. Certain Relationships, Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2) of Form 10-K.
158
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated)
In 2008 and 2007, Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”) served as the principal external auditing firm for ING, including ING USA. ING subsidiaries, including ING USA, are allocated Ernst & Young fees attributable to services rendered by Ernst & Young to each subsidiary. Ernst & Young fees allocated to the Company for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 are detailed below, along with a description of the services rendered by Ernst & Young to the Company.
| 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Audit fees | $ 2.2 | $ 3.2 | |
Audit-related fees | | 0.5 | | 0.2 | |
Tax fees | | - | * | - | * |
All other fees | | - | * | - | * |
| $ 2.7 | $ 3.4 | |
*Less than $0.1. | | | | | |
Audit Fees
Fees for audit services include fees associated with professional services rendered by the auditors for the audit of the annual financial statements of the Company and review of the Company’s interim financial statements.
Audit-related Fees
Audit-related fees were allocated to ING USA for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the financial statements and are not reported under the audit fee item above. These services consisted primarily of the audit of SEC product filings.
Tax Fees
There were minimal tax fees allocated to ING USA in 2008 and 2007. Tax fees allocated to ING USA were primarily for tax compliance and accounting for income taxes. These services consisted of tax compliance, including the review of tax disclosures and proper completion of tax forms, assistance with questions regarding tax audits, and tax planning and advisory services relating to common forms of domestic taxation (i.e., income tax and capital tax).
All Other Fees
There were minimal fees allocated to ING USA in 2008 and 2007 under the category “all other fees.” Other fees allocated to ING USA under this category typically include fees paid for products and services other than the audit fees, audit-related fees, and tax fees described above, and consist primarily of non-recurring support and advisory services.
159
Pre-approval Policies and Procedures
ING USA has adopted the pre-approval policies and procedures of ING. Audit, audit-related, and non-audit services provided to the Company by ING’s independent auditors are pre-approved by ING’s audit committee. Pursuant to ING’s pre-approval policies and procedures, the ING audit committee is required to pre-approve all services provided by ING’s independent auditors to ING and its affiliates, including the Company. The ING pre-approval policies and procedures distinguish five types of services: (1) audit services, (2) audit-related services, (3) tax services, (4) other services that are not audit, audit-related, tax, or prohibited services, and (5) prohibited services (as described in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act).
The ING pre-approval procedures consist of a general pre-approval procedure and a specific pre-approval procedure.
General Pre-approval Procedure
ING’s audit committee pre-approves audit, audit-related, tax, and other, services to be provided by ING’s external audit firms on an annual basis. The audit committee also sets the maximum annual amount for such pre-approved services. Throughout the year, ING’s audit committee receives from ING’s external audit firms an overview of all services provided, including related fees and supported by sufficiently detailed information. ING’s audit committee evaluates this overview periodically on a retrospective basis during the year. Additionally, ING’s Group Finance and Control monitors the amounts paid versus the pre-approved amounts throughout the year.
Specific Pre-approval Procedure
In addition to the general pre-approval procedure, each proposed independent auditor engagement that is expected to generate fees in excess of the pre-approved amounts, must be approved by the audit committee after recommendation of local management on a case-by-case basis.
In 2008 and 2007, 100% of each of the audit related services, tax services, and all other services were pre-approved by ING’s audit committee.
160
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) | The following documents are filed as part of this report: |
| 1. | Financial statements. See Item 8. on page 87. |
| 2. | Financial statement schedules. See Index to Financial Statement Schedules on page 162. |
| 3. | Exhibits. See Exhibit Index on page 167. |
161
| | |
Index to Financial Statement Schedules |
|
| | Page |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 163 |
| | |
I. | Summary of Investments - Other than Investments in Affiliates as of | |
| December 31, 2008 | 164 |
| | |
IV. | Reinsurance Information as of and for the years ended | |
| December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 | 165 |
| |
Schedules other than those listed above are omitted because they are not required or | |
not applicable. | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
We have audited the financial statements of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, and have issued our report thereon dated March 26, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in Item 15. These schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.
In our opinion, the financial statement schedules referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
Atlanta, Georgia March 26, 2009 |
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Schedule I |
Summary of Investments – Other than Investments in Affiliates |
As of December 31, 2008 |
(In millions) |
| | | Amount |
| | | Shown on |
Type of Investments | Cost | Value* | Balance Sheets |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale: | | | |
U.S. Treasuries | $ 1,109.3 | $ 1,183.2 | $ 1,183.2 |
U.S. government agencies and authorities | 267.3 | 287.3 | 287.3 |
State, municipalities, and political subdivisions | 48.2 | 39.4 | 39.4 |
Public utilities securities | 1,452.2 | 1,324.7 | 1,324.7 |
Other U.S. corporate securities | 5,570.9 | 5,005.3 | 5,005.3 |
Foreign securities(1) | 3,572.2 | 3,110.5 | 3,110.5 |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 4,264.0 | 3,583.4 | 3,583.4 |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 3,585.9 | 2,557.9 | 2,557.9 |
Other asset-backed securities | 1,500.2 | 1,044.5 | 1,044.5 |
Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale, including | | | |
securities pledged to creditors | $ 21,370.2 | $ 18,136.2 | $ 18,136.2 |
|
Equity securities, available-for-sale | $ 257.6 | $ 253.9 | $ 253.9 |
|
Mortgage loans on real estate | $ 3,923.3 | $ 3,803.3 | $ 3,923.3 |
Policy loans | 144.4 | 144.4 | 144.4 |
Other investments | 712.7 | 818.2 | 809.3 |
Total investments | $ 26,408.2 | $ 23,156.0 | $ 23,267.1 |
* | See Notes 2 and 3 of Notes to Financial Statements. |
(1) | The term "foreign" includes foreign governments, foreign political subdivisions, foreign public utilities, and all other bonds of foreign issuers. Substantially all of the Company's foreign securities are denominated in U.S. dollars. |
164
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.) |
Schedule IV |
Reinsurance Information |
As of and for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 |
(In millions) |
| | | | | Percentage |
| | | | | of Assumed |
| Gross | Ceded | Assumed | Net | to Net |
Year ended December 31, 2008 | | | | | |
Life insurance in force | $ 7,921.7 | $ 633.1 | $ 193,062.4 | $ 200,351.0 | 96.4% |
Premiums: | | | | | |
Life insurance | 21.1 | 2.0 | 291.3 | 310.4 | |
Accident and health insurance | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | - | |
Total premiums | $ 21.2 | $ 2.1 | $ 291.3 | $ 310.4 | |
|
Year ended December 31, 2007 | | | | | |
Life insurance in force | $ 8,351.5 | $ 689.1 | $ - | $ 7,662.4 | 0.0% |
Premiums: | | | | | |
Life insurance | 21.8 | 2.2 | - | 19.6 | |
Accident and health insurance | 0.2 | 0.2 | - | - | |
Total premiums | $ 22.0 | $ 2.4 | $ - | $ 19.6 | |
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 | | | | | |
Life insurance in force | $ 6,596.5 | $ 755.3 | $ - | $ 5,841.2 | 0.0% |
Premiums: | | | | | |
Life insurance | 22.8 | 2.3 | - | 20.5 | |
Accident and health insurance | 0.2 | 0.2 | - | - | |
Total premiums | $ 23.0 | $ 2.5 | $ - | $ 20.5 | |
165
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
March 24, 2009 | | ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
(Date) | | (Registrant) |
|
|
| By: /s/ | David A. Wheat |
| | David A. Wheat |
| | Executive Vice President and |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
| | (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on or before March 24, 2009.
| Signatures | | Title |
|
|
/s/ | David A. Wheat | | Director, Executive Vice President and |
| David A. Wheat | | Chief Financial Officer |
|
/s/ | Bridget M. Healy | | Director |
| Bridget M. Healy | | |
|
/s/ | Robert G. Leary | | Director |
| Robert G. Leary | | |
|
/s/ | Thomas J. McInerney | | Director and Chairman |
| Thomas J. McInerney | | |
|
/s/ | Catherine H. Smith | | Director |
| Catherine H. Smith | | |
|
/s/ | Valerie G. Brown | | President |
| Valerie G. Brown | | |
|
/s/ | Steven T. Pierson | | Senior Vice President and |
| Steven T. Pierson | | Chief Accounting Officer |
166
| |
| ING USA ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008 |
| Exhibit Index |
|
Exhibit Number | Description of Exhibit |
|
2.1 | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 25, 2003, by and between USG Annuity & Life |
| Company, United Life & Annuity Insurance Company, Equitable Life Insurance Company of |
| Iowa and Golden American Life Insurance Company, incorporated by reference in Exhibit 99-8 |
| in the Company’s Form 8K filed with the SEC on January 2, 2004 (File No. 333-87270). |
|
3.1 | Restated Articles of Incorporation Providing for the Redomestication of Golden American Life |
| Insurance Company dated July 2 and 3, 2003, effective January 1, 2004, incorporated by |
| reference to Company’s 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 29, 2004 (File No. 033-87270). |
|
3.2 | Amendment to Articles of Incorporation Providing for the Name Change of Golden American |
| Life Insurance Company dated November 20, 2003, effective January 1, 2004, incorporated by |
| reference to the Company’s 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 29, 2004 (File No. 033- |
| 87270). |
|
3.3 | Amendment to Articles of Incorporation Providing for the Change in Purpose and Powers of |
| ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company dated March 3 and 4, 2004, effective March |
| 11, 2004, incorporated by reference to the Company’s 10-Q, as filed with the SEC on May 17, |
| 2004 (File No. 033-87270). |
|
3.4 | Amended and Restated By-Laws of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company effective |
| January 1, 2005, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-Q, as filed with the SEC |
| on May 13, 2005 (File No. 033-87270). |
|
4.1 | Single Premium Deferred Modified Guaranteed Annuity Contract, Single Premium Deferred |
| modified Guaranteed Annuity Master Contract, and Single Premium Deferred Modified |
| Guaranteed Annuity Certificate - Incorporated herein by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment |
| No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 for Golden American Life Insurance Company as |
| filed with the SEC on February 8, 2002 (File No. 333-67660). |
|
4.2 | Single Premium Deferred Modified Guaranteed Annuity Master Contract and Single Premium |
| Deferred Modified guaranteed Annuity Certificate – Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective |
| Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 for Golden American Life Insurance |
| Company, as filed with the SEC on September 13, 2000 (File No. 333-40596). |
|
4.3 | Individual Retirement Annuity Rider; Roth Individual Retirement Annuity Rider; Simple |
| Retirement Account Rider; and 403(b) Rider - Incorporated herein by reference to Post- |
| Effective Amendment No. 34 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 for Golden American Life |
| Insurance Company Separate Account B, as filed with the SEC on April 15, 2003 (File No. |
| 033-23351). |
|
4.4 | 403(b) Rider - Incorporated herein by reference to Initial Registration Statement on Form S-2 |
| for Golden American Life Insurance Company, as filed with the SEC on April 15, 2003 (File |
| No. 333-104547). |
|
4.5 | Single Premium Deferred Equity Indexed Modified Guaranteed Annuity Contract; Single |
| Premium Deferred Modified Guaranteed Annuity Group Master Contract; and Single Premium |
| Deferred Equity Indexed Modified Guaranteed Annuity Certificate, - Incorporated herein by |
| reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-2 for ING |
| USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company, as filed with the SEC on August 13, 2004 (File No. |
| 333-116137). |
167
| |
4.6 | Interest in Fixed Account I under Variable Annuity Contracts - Incorporated herein by reference |
| to: Post-Effective Amendment No. 12 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 for Golden |
| American Life Insurance Company Separate Account B, as filed with the SEC on April 23, |
| 1999 (File Nos. 033-59261, 811-5626); Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective |
| Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 for Golden American life Insurance |
| Company, as filed with the SEC on April 23, 1999 (File Nos. 333-28769, 811-5626); and |
| Incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration statement on Form |
| N-4 for Golden American Life Insurance Company Separate Account B, as filed with the SEC |
| on June 24, 2000 (File Nos. 333-33914, 811-5626). |
|
4.7 | Interests in Fixed Account II under Variable Annuity Contracts - Incorporated herein by |
| reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 for |
| Separate Account B of Golden American Life Insurance Company as filed with the SEC on |
| October 2, 2000 (File No. 333-28679, 811-5626), Incorporated herein by reference to Post- |
| Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 for Separate Account B of |
| Golden American Life Insurance Company as filed with the SEC on February 26, 2001 (File |
| Nos. 333-30180, 811-5626), Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment |
| No. 5 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 for Separate Account B of Golden American Life |
| Insurance Company as filed with the SEC on April 23, 1999 (File Nos. 333-28755, 811-5626), |
| Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement |
| on Form N-4 for Separate Account B of Golden American Life Insurance Company as filed |
| with the SEC on April 23, 1999 (File Nos. 333-66757, 811-5626), Incorporated herein by |
| reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 for |
| Separate Account B of Golden American Life Insurance Company as filed with the SEC on |
| October 26, 2001 (File Nos. 333-63692, 811-5626), Incorporated herein by reference to Pre- |
| Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 for Separate Account B of |
| Golden American Life Insurance Company as filed with the SEC on December 11, 2001 (File |
| Nos. 333-70600, 811-5626), Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to |
| Registration Statement on Form N-4 for Golden American Life Insurance Company Separate |
| Account B, as filed with the SEC on April 16, 2003 (File Nos. 333-90516, 811-5626) and |
| Incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on |
| Form N-4 for Golden American Life Insurance Company Separate Account B, as filed with the |
| SEC on July 3, 2003 (File Nos. 333-101487, 811-5626). |
|
4.8 | Interest in the Guaranteed Account under Variable Annuity Contracts - Incorporated herein by |
| reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-2 for Golden |
| American Life Insurance Company, as filed with the SEC on June 29, 2001 (File No. 333- |
| 57212). |
|
10.1 | Service Agreement, dated as of January 1, 1994, as amended March 7, 1995, between Golden |
| American and Directed Services, Inc., incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(b) to a |
| Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on April 29, 1998 (File No. 333-51353). |
|
10.2 | Asset Management Agreement, dated January 20, 1998, between Golden American and ING |
| Investment Management LLC, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(f) to Golden |
| American’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 14, 1998 (File No. 033-87270). |
|
10.3 | Reciprocal Loan Agreement dated January 1, 2004, between ING USA Annuity and Life |
| Insurance Company and ING America Insurance Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference from |
| Exhibit 10.A(a) to ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the |
| SEC on or about May 17, 2004 (File No. 333-87270). |
|
10.4 | Surplus Note, dated December 8, 1999, between Golden American and First Columbine Life |
| Insurance Company, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(g) to Amendment No. 7 to a |
| Registration Statement for Golden American on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on or about |
| January 27, 2000 (File No. 333-28765). |
168
| |
10.5 | Services Agreement between Golden American and the affiliated companies listed in Exhibit B |
| to that Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2001, as amended effective January 1, 2002, |
| incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.A (k) to ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance |
| Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 29, 2004 (File No. 033-87270). |
|
10.6 | Services Agreement between Golden American and ING North America Insurance Corporation |
| effective January 1, 2001, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.A (g) to ING USA |
| Annuity and Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 29, 2004 (File |
| No. 033-87270). |
|
10.7 | Form of Shared Services Center Services Agreement by and among ING North America |
| Insurance Corporation (“Service Provider”) and Ameribest Life Insurance Company, a Georgia |
| corporation; Equitable Life Insurance Company of Iowa, an Iowa corporation; USG Annuity & |
| Life Company, an Oklahoma corporation; Golden American, a Delaware corporation; First |
| Columbine Life Insurance Company, a Colorado corporation; Life Insurance Company of |
| Georgia, a Georgia corporation; Southland Life Insurance Company, a Texas corporation; |
| Security Life of Denver Insurance Company, a Colorado corporation; Midwestern United Life |
| Insurance Company, an Indiana corporation; and United Life & Annuity Insurance Company, a |
| Texas corporation, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(r) to Pre-Effective Amendment |
| No. 1 to a Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed by Registrant with the SEC on or about |
| December 11, 2001 (File No. 333-70602). |
|
10.8 | Tax Sharing Agreement between Golden American, ING America Insurance Holdings, Inc. and |
| affiliated companies, effective January 1, 2001, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.A (j) |
| to ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March |
| 29, 2004 (File No. 033-87270). |
|
10.9 | Administrative Services Agreement between Golden American, ReliaStar Life Insurance |
| Company of New York and affiliated companies listed on Exhibit A to the Agreement, effective |
| March 1, 2003, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.A (m) to ING USA Annuity and Life |
| Insurance Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 29, 2004 (File No. 033-87270). |
|
10.10 | First Amendment to the Administrative Services Agreement between ING USA Annuity and |
| Life Insurance Company and its affiliates, effective as of August 1, 2004, incorporated by |
| reference from Exhibit 10.(i) to ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-K |
| filed with the SEC on March 18, 2005 (File No. 033-87270). |
|
10.11 | Amendments to Asset Management Agreement between Golden American and ING Investment |
| Management LLC, effective January 1, 2003, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.A (l) |
| to ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March |
| 29, 2004 (File No. 033-87270). |
|
10.12 | Third Amendment to the Asset Management Agreement, between Golden American and ING |
| Investment Management LLC, effective August 18, 2003, incorporated by reference from |
| Exhibit 10.A (n) to ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-K filed with the |
| SEC on March 29, 2004 (File No. 033-87270). |
|
10.13 | Lease Agreement, dated as of April 16, 1998, by and between Golden American and Dunwoody |
| Associates, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.A (o) to ING USA Annuity and Life |
| Insurance Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 29, 2004 (File No. 033-87270). |
|
10.14 | First Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated November 4, 1998, between Golden American |
| and Dunwoody Associates, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.A (p) to ING USA |
| Annuity and Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 29, 2004 (File |
| No. 033-87270). |
|
10.15 | Second Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated June 1, 2000, between Golden American and |
| Dunwoody Associates, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.A (q) to ING USA Annuity |
| and Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 29, 2004 (File No. |
| 033-87270). |
169
| |
10.16 | Services Agreement with ING Financial Advisers, LLC (“INGFA”), entered into June 1, 2002 |
| by Equitable Life Insurance Company of Iowa, as subsumed by ING USA pursuant to the |
| January 1, 2004 merger, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.(p) to ING USA Annuity |
| and Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2005 (File No. |
| 033-87270). |
|
10.17 | Surplus Note for $50,000,000 aggregate principal amount, dated December 29, 2004, issued by |
| ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company to its affiliate, Security Life of Denver |
| International Limited, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.(q) to ING USA Annuity and |
| Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2005 (File No. 033- |
| 87270). |
|
10.18 | Surplus Note for $175,000,000 aggregate principal amount, dated December 29, 2004, issued |
| by ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company to its affiliate, ING Life Insurance and |
| Annuity Company, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.(r) to ING USA Annuity and Life |
| Insurance Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2005 (File No. 033-87270). |
|
10.19 | Surplus Note for $175,000,000 aggregate principal amount, dated December 29, 2004, issued |
| by ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company to its affiliate, ReliaStar Life Insurance |
| Company, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.(s) to ING USA Annuity and Life |
| Insurance Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2005 (File No. 033-87270). |
|
10.20 | Lease Agreement dated August 31, 1995, between The Graham Group, Inc. and Equitable Life |
| Insurance Company of Iowa, as subsumed by ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company |
| pursuant to the January 1, 2004 merger, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.(t) to ING |
| USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2005 |
| (File No. 033-87270). |
|
10.21 | Joinder Number 2005-1 to Tax Sharing Agreement, dated January 20, 2006, between ING USA |
| Annuity and Life Insurance Company and ING America Insurance Holdings Inc., incorporated |
| by reference from Exhibit 10. to ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-Q |
| filed with the SEC on May 12, 2006 (File No. 001-32625). |
|
10.22 | Coinsurance Agreement, effective May 1, 2005, between ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance |
| Company and Security Life of Denver Insurance Company, incorporated by reference from |
| Exhibit 10. to ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC |
| on May 13, 2005 (File No. 033-87270). |
|
10.23 | Amendment Number 2006-1, dated as of September 11, 2006, to the Services Agreement |
| between ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company and ING North America Insurance |
| Company, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10. to ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance |
| Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 14, 2006 (File No. 001-32625). |
|
10.24 | Second Amendment, effective as of July 31, 2007, to Services Agreement, between Golden |
| American Life Insurance Company (nka ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company) & |
| Directed Services Inc. (nka Directed Services LLC), incorporated by reference from Exhibit |
| 10.3 to ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on |
| March 28, 2008 (File No. 001-32625). |
|
10.25 | Amendment Number 2007-1 to Reciprocal Loan Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2007, |
| between ING USA and ING America Insurance Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference from |
| Exhibit 10.4 to ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-K filed with the |
| SEC on March 28, 2008 (File No. 001-32625). |
|
10.26 | Amendment Number 2007-1 to Services Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2007, between |
| ING USA and the affiliated companies listed on Exhibit B to the Agreement, incorporated by |
| reference from Exhibit 10.5 to ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-K |
| filed with the SEC on March 28, 2008 (File No. 001-32625). |
170
| |
10.27 | ING USA Guaranteed Funding Agreement, effective August 10, 2007, issued by ING USA |
| Annuity and Life Insurance Company to Lion Connecticut Holdings, Inc., incorporated by |
| reference from Exhibit 10.2 to ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-Q |
| filed with the SEC on November 13, 2007 (File No. 001-32625). |
10.28+ | Amendment Number 2008-1 to Services Agreement, effective October 1, 2008, among ING |
| USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company and the affiliated companies listed on Exhibit B to |
| the Agreement. |
12.+ | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges, filed herewith. |
14. | ING Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 14 to |
| ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 29, |
| 2004 (File No. 033-87270). |
23.+ | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, filed herewith. |
31.1+ | Certificate of David A. Wheat pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2+ | Certificate of Valerie G. Brown pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1+ | Certificate of David A. Wheat pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2+ | Certificate of Valerie G. Brown pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
+Filed herewith. |
171
ING USA ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES RATIO |
| | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
|
| Earnings: | | | | | |
1. | Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative | | | | | |
| effect of changes in accounting principles | $ (1,626.4) | $ 127.4 | $ 276.6 | $ 224.1 | $ 173.6 |
|
| Fixed Charges: | | | | | |
2. | Interest expense | 30.5 | 32.5 | 30.3 | 29.6 | 5.1 |
3. | Interest factor on rental expense | 5.1 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 8.0 | 5.0 |
4. | Interest credited to contractowners | 1,024.1 | 1,067.0 | 980.8 | 946.5 | 903.6 |
5. | Net (undistributed) distributed income from | | | | | |
| equity investees | 90.9 | (11.7) | (1.7) | (1.6) | (1.8) |
6. | Total fixed charges (2 + 3 + 4 + 5) | 1,150.6 | 1,093.3 | 1,015.9 | 982.5 | 911.9 |
7. | Total fixed charges excluding interest | | | | | |
| credited to contractowners (6 - 4) | 126.5 | 26.3 | 35.1 | 36.0 | 8.3 |
8. | Earnings and fixed charges (1 + 6) | (475.8) | 1,220.7 | 1,292.5 | 1,206.6 | 1,085.5 |
9. | Earnings and fixed charges, excluding | | | | | |
| interest credited to contractowners (1 + 7) | (1,499.9) | 153.7 | 311.7 | 260.1 | 181.9 |
|
| Ratios: | | | | | |
10. | Earnings and fixed charges, to total fixed | | | | | |
| charges (8 / 6) | (0.4) | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
11. | Earnings and fixed charges, excluding interest | | | | | |
| credited to contractowners to total fixed | | | | | |
| charges (9 / 7) | (11.9) | 5.8 | 8.9 | 7.2 | 21.9 |
12. | Deficiency of earnings to fixed charges (6 - 8)* | $ 1,626.4 | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - |
*Represents additional earnings that would be necessary to result in a one to one ratio of earnings to fixed charges. NM - Not meaningful.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-123457) of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company and in the related Prospectus of our reports dated March 26, 2009, with respect to the financial statements and schedules of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Atlanta, Georgia March 26, 2009 |
| I, David A. Wheat, certify that: |
| | |
1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company; |
|
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit |
| to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under |
| which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this |
| report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash |
| flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|
4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining |
| disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and |
| internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) |
| for the registrant and have: |
|
| a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and |
| | procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to |
| | the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those |
| | entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
| b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over |
| | financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance |
| | regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for |
| | external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
| c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in |
| | this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of |
| | the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
| d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that |
| | occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in |
| | the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially |
| | affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of |
| internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the |
| registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
| a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control |
| | over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to |
| | record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
| b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a |
| | significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
Date: | March 24, 2009 |
| |
By: /s/ | David A. Wheat |
| David A. Wheat |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
I, Valerie G. Brown, certify that: |
| | |
1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company; |
|
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit |
| to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under |
| which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this |
| report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash |
| flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|
4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining |
| disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and |
| internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) |
| for the registrant and have: |
|
| a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and |
| | procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to |
| | the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those |
| | entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
| b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over |
| | financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance |
| | regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for |
| | external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
| c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in |
| | this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of |
| | the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
| d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that |
| | occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in |
| | the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially |
| | affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of |
| internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the |
| registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
| a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control |
| | over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to |
| | record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
| b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a |
| | significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
Date: | March 24, 2009 |
| |
By: /s/ | Valerie G. Brown |
| Valerie G. Brown |
| President |
| (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Officer) |
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
March 24, 2009 | | By: /s/ | David A. Wheat |
(Date) | | | David A. Wheat |
| | | Executive Vice President and |
| | | Chief Financial Officer |
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
March 24, 2009 | | By: /s/ | Valerie G. Brown |
(Date) | | | Valerie G. Brown |
| | | President |
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 13. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION
Not Applicable
ITEM 14. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (ING USA) shall indemnify (including therein the prepayment of expenses) any person who is or was a director, officer or employee, or who is or was serving at the request of ING USA as a director, officer or employee of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise for expenses (including attorney’s fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him with respect to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceedings against him by reason of the fact that he is or was such a director, officer or employee to the extent and in the manner permitted by law.
ING USA may also, to the extent permitted by law, indemnify any other person who is or was serving ING USA in any capacity. The Board of Directors shall have the power and authority to determine who may be indemnified under this paragraph and to what extent (not to exceed the extent provided in the above paragraph) any such person may be indemnified.
A corporation may procure indemnification insurance on behalf of an individual who is or was a director of the corporation. Consistent with the laws of the State of Iowa, ING America Insurance Holdings, Inc. maintains a Professional Liability and fidelity bond insurance policy issued by an international insurer. The policy covers ING America Insurance Holdings, Inc. and any company in which ING America Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a controlling financial interest of 50% or more. These policies include the principal underwriter, as well as, the depositor. Additionally, the parent company of ING America Insurance Holdings, Inc., ING Groep N.V., maintains excess umbrella coverage with limits in excess of €125,000,000. The policies provide for the following types of coverage: errors and omissions/professional liability, directors and officers, employment practices, fiduciary and fidelity.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant, as provided above or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification by the Depositor is against public policy, as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933, and therefore may be unenforceable. In the event that a claim of such indemnification (except insofar as it provides for the payment by the Depositor of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted against the Depositor by such director, officer or controlling person and the SEC is still of the same opinion, the Depositor or Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question of whether such indemnification by the Depositor is against public policy as expressed by the Securities Act of 1933 and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
ITEM 15. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
Not Applicable
ITEM 16. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) | | |
| 3(a) | Amendment to Articles of Incorporation Providing for the Name Change of Golden American Life Insurance Company, dated (11/21/03), incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to a Registration Statement on Form S-1 for ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 9, 2007 (File Nos. 333-133076). |
2
| 3(b) | Amendment to Articles of Incorporation Providing for the Change in Purpose and Powers of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company, dated (03/04/04), incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to a Registration Statement on Form S-1 for ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 9, 2007 (File Nos. 333-133076). |
| | |
| 3(c) | Amended and Restated By-Laws of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company, dated (12/15/04), incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to a Registration Statement on Form S-1 for ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 9, 2007 (File Nos. 333-133076). |
| | |
| 3(d) | Resolution of Board of Directors for Powers of Attorney, dated (04/23/99), incorporated herein by reference to Post Effective Amendment No. 5 to a Registration Statement on Form N-4 for Golden American Life Insurance Company Separate Account B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 1999 (File Nos. 333-28679, 811-05626). |
| | |
| 3(e) | Articles of Merger and Agreement and Plan of Merger of USGALC, ULAIC, ELICI into GALIC and renamed ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company, effective date (01/01/04), dated (06/25/03), incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 25 to a Registration Statement on Form N-4 for ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company Separate Account B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2004 (File Nos. 333-28679, 811-05626). |
| | |
| 4(a) | Single Premium Deferred Modified Guaranteed Annuity Contract, incorporated herein by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to a Registration Statement on Form S-1 for Golden American Life Insurance Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 2002 (File No. 333-67660). |
| | |
| 4(b) | Single Premium Deferred Modified Guaranteed Annuity Master Contract, incorporated herein by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to a Registration Statement on Form S-1 for Golden American Life Insurance Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 2002 (File No. 333-67660). |
| | |
| 4(c) | Single Premium Deferred Modified Guaranteed Annuity Certificate, incorporated herein by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to a Registration Statement on Form S-1 for Golden American Life Insurance Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 2002 (File No. 333-67660). |
| | |
| 4(d) | Single Premium Deferred Modified Guaranteed Annuity Application/Enrollment Form, incorporated herein by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to a Registration Statement on Form S-1 for Golden American Life Insurance Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 2002 (File No. 333-67660). |
| | |
| 4(e) | Individual Retirement Annuity Rider, incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 34 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 for Golden American Life Insurance Company Separate Account B filed on April 15, 2003 (File Nos. 033-23351, 811-05626). |
| | |
| 4(f) | Roth Individual Retirement Annuity Rider, incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 34 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 for Golden American Life Insurance Company Separate Account B filed on April 15, 2003 (File Nos. 033-23351, 811-05626). |
| | |
| 4(g) | Simple Retirement Account Rider, incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 34 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 for Golden American Life Insurance Company Separate Account B filed on April 15, 2003 (File Nos. 033-23351, 811-05626). |
3
| 4(h) | 403(b) Rider, incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 34 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 for Golden American Life Insurance Company Separate Account B filed on April 15, 2003 (File Nos. 033-23351, 811-05626). |
| | |
| 4(i) | Company Address and Name Change Endorsement, incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 25 to a Registration Statement on Form N-4 for ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company Separate Account B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2004 (File Nos. 333-28679, 811-05626). |
| | |
| 5 | Opinion of Counsel, attached. |
| | |
| 10 | Material contracts are listed under exhibit 10 in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (File Nos. 333-133076, 333-151031, 333-133154, 333-133155, 333-133153, 333-133152), as filed with the Commission on March 31, 2009. Each of the Exhibits so listed is incorporated by reference as indicated in the Form 10-K. |
| | |
| 21 | Subsidiaries of the Registrant, incorporated herein by reference to Item 28 in Post-Effective Amendment No. 26 to Registration Statement on Form N-6 for Select*Life Variable Account of ReliaStar Life Insurance Company (File No. 33-57244), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 7, 2009 |
| | |
| 23(a) | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, attached. |
| | |
| 23(b) | Consent of Counsel, incorporated in Item 5 of this Part II, together with the Opinion of Counsel. |
| | |
| 24 | Powers of Attorney, attached. |
| | |
| | Exhibits other than those listed above are omitted because they are not required or are not applicable. |
(b) | | |
| | ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 is incorporated in Part I within the Prospectus. |
ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS
(a) Rule 415 offerings. The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes as follows, pursuant to Item 512 of Regulation S-K:
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales of the registered securities are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:
| (i) | To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933; |
| (ii) | To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement; and |
| (iii) | To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material changes to such information in the registration statement. |
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
4
(5) That, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser:
(ii) Each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relaying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.
(6) That, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities:
The undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:
(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;
(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;
(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant: and
(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
(h) Request for Acceleration of Effective Date:
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
5
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registrant has duly caused this Amendment to the Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of West Chester, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, on this 1st day of May, 2009.
By: ING USA ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
(Registrant)
By: | | |
Valerie G. Brown* | |
President (Principal Executive Officer) | |
| |
| |
By: | /s/ John S. Kreighbaum | |
John S. (Scott) Kreighbaum as | |
Attorney-in-Fact | |
As required by the Securities Act of 1933, this Amendment to the Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities indicated on May 1, 2009.
SIGNATURE | | TITLE |
| | |
| | President |
| | (Principal Executive Officer) |
Valerie G. Brown* | | |
| | |
| | Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |
Steven T. Pierson* | | |
| | |
| | Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
David A. Wheat* | | |
| | |
| | Director |
Bridget M. Healy* | | |
| | |
| | Director |
Robert G. Leary* | | |
| | |
| | Director and Chairman |
Thomas J. McInerney* | | |
| | |
| | Director and Senior Vice President |
Catherine H. Smith* | | |
By: | /s/ John S. Kreighbaum | |
John S. (Scott) Kreighbaum as | |
Attorney-in-Fact | |
*Executed by John S. (Scott) Kreighbaum on behalf of those indicated pursuant to Powers of Attorney.
6