U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
________________
FORM 10-QSB
________________
x QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
¨ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-29807
________________
ENTROPIN, INC.
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
________________
DELAWARE | 68-0510827 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (IRS employer Identification No.) |
13314 Lost Key Place, Bradenton, FL. 43202
(Address of principal executive offices)
(941) 388-9512
(Issuer’s telephone number)
Former Address
45926 Oasis Street, Indio, CA 92201
Former Telephone Number
(760) 775-8333
________________
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
As of August 9, 2005, 30,645,341 shares of the issuer’s Common Stock, $.0001 par value per share, were outstanding.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format Yes ¨ No x
INDEX
PART I. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |
| | |
Item 1. | Financial Statements | |
| | |
| Balance Sheets - December 31, 2004 and June 30, 2005 (unaudited) | 2 |
| | |
| Statements of Operations - For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2005 (unaudited) | 3 |
| | |
| Statements of Operations - For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2005 (and for the Period from August 27, 1984 (Inception) through June 30, 2005 (unaudited) | 4 |
| | |
| Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity - For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 (unaudited) | 5 |
| | |
| Statements of Cash Flows - For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2005 and for the Period from August 27, 1984 (Inception) through June 30, 2005 (unaudited) | 6 |
| | |
| Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) | 8 |
| | |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 11 |
| | |
Item 3. | Controls and Procedures | 16 |
| | |
PART II. | OTHER INFORMATION | |
| | |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 17 |
| | |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 17 |
| | |
Item 3. | Defaults upon Senior Securities | 17 |
| | |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 17 |
| | |
Item 5. | Other Information | 17 |
| | |
Item 6. | Exhibits | 18 |
| | |
| Signatures | 19 |
ENTROPIN, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2004 and June 30, 2005
| | December 31, 2004 | | June 30, 2005 | |
| | | | (Unaudited) | |
ASSETS | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 444,611 | | $ | 185,705 | |
Short-term investments | | | 1,273,000 | | | - | |
Total current assets | | | 1,717,611 | | | 185,705 | |
| | | | | | | |
Patent costs, less accumulated amortization of $252,143 (2004) and $280,861 (2005) | | | 674,102 | | | 695,572 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 1,906 | | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 2,393,619 | | $ | 881,277 | |
| | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 46,823 | | $ | 10,000 | |
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6) | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | | | |
Series A’ redeemable preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 3,210,487 shares authorized, issued and outstanding; liquidation preference of $3,210,487 | | | 3,210,487 | | | 3,210,487 | |
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 30,645,341 shares issued and outstanding | | | 3,065 | | | 3,065 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 34,819,422 | | | 34,819,422 | |
Deficit accumulated during the development stage | | | (35,686,178 | ) | | (37,161,697 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 2,346,796 | | | 871,277 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 2,393,619 | | $ | 881,277 | |
| | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
ENTROPIN, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2005
(Unaudited)
| | 2004 | | 2005 | |
Costs and expenses: | | | | | |
Research and development | | $ | 42,875 | | $ | 74,941 | |
General and administrative | | | 875,515 | | | 933,538 | |
| | | | | | | |
Operating loss | | | (918,390 | ) | | (1,008,479 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 3,425 | | | 4,085 | |
Interest expense | | | — | | | — | |
Other Expense | | | — | | | (931 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Total other income (expense), net | | | 3,425 | | | 3,154 | |
| | | | | | | |
Net loss | | | (914,965 | ) | | (1,005,325 | ) |
Dividends applicable to Series B preferred stockholders | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | |
Net loss applicable to common stockholders | | $ | (914,965 | ) | $ | (1,005,325 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted net loss per common share | | $ | (.03 | ) | $ | (.03 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | | | 30,659,000 | | | 30,645,000 | |
| | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
ENTROPIN, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2005
and for the Period from August 27, 1984 (Inception) Through June 30, 2005
(Unaudited)
| | 2004 | | 2005 | | Inception through June 30, 2005 | |
Costs and expenses: | | | | | | | |
Research and development | | $ | 352,453 | | $ | 131,006 | | $ | 16,043,819 | |
General and administrative | | | 1,712,053 | | | 1,364,344 | | | 21,189,084 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Operating loss | | | (2,064,506 | ) | | (1,495,350 | ) | | (37,232,903 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 5,387 | | | 20,762 | | | 1,529,258 | |
Interest expense | | | — | | | — | | | (242,811 | ) |
Other Expense | | | — | | | (931 | ) | | (127,241 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total other income (expense), net | | | 5,387 | | | 19,831 | | | 1,159,206 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | | (2,059,119 | ) | | (1,475,519 | ) | | (36,073,697 | ) |
Dividends applicable to Series B preferred stockholders | | | — | | | — | | | (1,103,184 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss applicable to common stockholders | | $ | (2,059,119 | ) | $ | (1,475,519 | ) | $ | (37,176,881 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted net loss per common share | | $ | (.08 | ) | $ | (.05 | ) | $ | (4.71 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | | | 24,487,000 | | | 30,645,000 | | | 7,898,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
ENTROPIN, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
(Unaudited)
| | Series A’ redeemable preferred stock | | Common stock | | Additional paid-in capital | | Deficit accumulated during the development stage | | Total stockholders’ equity | |
| | Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount | |
Balance, January 1, 2005 | | | 3,210,487 | | $ | 3,210,487 | | | 30,645,341 | | $ | 3,065 | | $ | 34,819,422 | | $ | (35,686,178 | ) | $ | 2,346,796 | |
Net loss for the period | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,475,519 | ) | | (1,475,519 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, June 30, 2005 | | | 3,210,487 | | $ | 3,210,487 | | | 30,645,341 | | $ | 3,065 | | $ | 34,819,422 | | $ | (37,161,697 | ) | $ | 871,277 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
ENTROPIN, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2005
and for the Period from August 27, 1984 (Inception) Through June 30, 2005
(Unaudited)
| | 2004 | | 2005 | | Inception through June 30, 2005 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (2,059,119 | ) | $ | (1,475,519 | ) | $ | (36,073,697 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 26,538 | | | 30,624 | | | 352,584 | |
Series B preferred stock redemption conversion incentive | | | — | | | — | | | 126,309 | |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | — | | | — | | | 1,837 | |
Services received in exchange for stock, stock options and warrants | | | 527,281 | | | — | | | 10,642,845 | |
Services received in exchange for compensation agreements | | | — | | | — | | | 2,231,678 | |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable | | | 23,619 | | | (36,823 | ) | | 217,697 | |
Other | | | — | | | — | | | 58,610 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in operating activities | | | (1,481,681 | ) | | (1,481,718 | ) | | (22,442,137 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Maturities (purchase) of short-term investments, net | | | (2,455,000 | ) | | 1,273,000 | | | — | |
Patent costs | | | (183,706 | ) | | (50,188 | ) | | (976,433 | ) |
Purchase of property and equipment | | | — | | | — | | | (130,515 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | | (2,638,706 | ) | | 1,222,812 | | | (1,106,948 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants | | | 3,489,893 | | | — | | | 21,732,261 | |
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock | | | — | | | — | | | 1,142,750 | |
Proceeds from stockholder loans | | | — | | | — | | | 809,679 | |
Proceeds from shares issued pursuant to recapitalization | | | — | | | — | | | 220,100 | |
Proceeds from stockholder advances | | | — | | | — | | | 98,873 | |
Repayments of stockholder advances | | | — | | | — | | | (98,873 | ) |
Repurchase of common stock | | | (40,000 | ) | | — | | | (40,000 | ) |
Payment for cancellation of common stock warrant | | | — | | | — | | | (330,000 | ) |
Proceeds from convertible notes payable | | | — | | | — | | | 200,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | 3,454,893 | | | — | | | 23,734,790 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | (665,494 | ) | | (258,906 | ) | | 185,705 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 1,032,343 | | | 444,611 | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 366,849 | | $ | 185,705 | | $ | 185,705 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(Continued on following page)
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
ENTROPIN, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2005
and for the Period from August 27, 1984 (Inception) Through June 30, 2005
(Unaudited)
(Continued from preceding page)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
| | 2004 | | 2005 | | Inception through June 30, 2005 | |
Cash paid for interest during the period | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 242,811 | |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
During the period from August 27, 1984 (inception) through June 30, 2005, the Company issued 3,210,487 shares of Series A preferred stock in exchange for an aggregate $1,710,487 of notes payable to stockholders plus accrued interest and a $1,500,000 compensation agreement.
During the period from August 27, 1984 (inception) through June 30, 2005, the Company converted promissory notes payable with outstanding principal and interest balances totaling $201,660 into 100,831 shares of common stock.
During the period from August 27, 1984 (inception) through June 30, 2005, the Company issued 94,850 shares of common stock at $5.00 per share as payment of accrued dividends on Series B preferred stock.
During the period from August 27, 1984 (inception) through June 30, 2005, the Company issued 1,337,333 shares of common stock totaling $1,336,609, for conversion of shares of Series B preferred stock.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
ENTROPIN, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The accompanying financial statements of Entropin, Inc. have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and Item 310(b) of Regulation S-B. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted under such rules and regulations. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the financial statements reflect all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. For further information, refer to the financial statements and notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2005, and subsequently amended on April 29, 2005.
1. Organization and summary of significant accounting policies
Organization and basis of presentation:
Entropin, Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, was organized as a California corporation in August 1984. The Company is a pharmaceutical research and development company focused on the development of its proprietary compound, ENT-103, as a pain therapy. Activities from inception include research and development, seeking the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, approval for its proprietary compounds, including its current drug candidate, ENT-103, as well as fund raising.
As of June 30, 2005, the Company had total current assets of $185,705. The Company’s financial statements have been presented on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company is in the development stage and has been primarily involved in research and development activities. This has resulted in significant operating losses and an accumulated deficit at June 30, 2005 of $37,161,697. Management anticipates additional operating losses for the foreseeable future. These factors, among others, indicate that the Company will be unable to continue as a going concern unless it can immediately obtain significant additional funds to support its operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability of recorded asset amounts that may be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. In the absence of positive cash flows from operations which the Company expects will not be possible for several years, if at all, the Company is and will remain highly dependent on its ability to secure additional funding through the issuance of debt or equity instruments, corporate partnering or merger/acquisition arrangements. As the Company was unable to raise sufficient additional funds on a timely basis, it was forced to cease its operations prior to the end of the second quarter of 2005.
The Company does not have capital sufficient to meet the Company’s cash needs, including the cost of compliance with the continuing reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company will have to seek loans or equity placements to cover such cash needs. Lack of existing capital may be a sufficient impediment to prevent the Company from accomplishing the goal of successfully executing a new business strategy. The Company will need to raise additional funds to conduct its business activities in the next twelve months.
At this time the Company has no commitments to provide funds. Accordingly, there can be no assurances that any additional funds will be available to the Company to allow it to cover its expenses as they are incurred.
Because the Company has not yet completed product development, obtained regulatory approval, or verified the market acceptance and demand for any products it may develop, its activities have been accounted for as those of a “development stage enterprise” as set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 7, “Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises”.
Use of estimates:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
ENTROPIN, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Income taxes:
The Company provides for income taxes utilizing the asset and liability approach under which deferred income taxes are recognized based upon currently enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the taxes are expected to become payable. A valuation allowance is established for deferred income tax assets when their realization is not reasonably assured.
Property and equipment:
Office furniture and equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation commences as items are placed in service and is computed using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of three years.
Leasehold improvements are recorded at cost and amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of their estimated useful life or the related lease term.
Research and development costs:
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Patents:
The Company believes that patents and other proprietary rights are important to its business. It is the Company’s policy to file patent applications to protect its technology, inventions and improvements to inventions that are considered important to the development of its business. Patent costs are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of 16 years. Amortization expense related to amortizable patents was $24,452 and $28,718 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2005, respectively, and $280,861 from inception through June 30, 2005.
Impairment of long-lived assets:
The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets or intangibles may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Cash equivalents and short-term investments:
The Company considers cash equivalents to include only highly liquid securities with an original maturity of three months or less. Investments with an original maturity of more than three months are considered short-term investments and have been classified by management as held-to-maturity. At December 31, 2004, the Company’s short-term investments consisted entirely of certificates of deposit carried at amortized cost with average remaining maturity period of 71 days. The Company had no short-term investments at June 30, 2005.
Concentrations of credit risk:
The Company invests its excess cash principally in certificates of deposit. The Company has established guidelines relative to diversification and maturities that maintain safety and liquidity. These guidelines are periodically reviewed and modified to take advantage of trends in yields and interest rates. The Company has not experienced any losses on its cash equivalents or short-term investments.
Stock-based compensation:
The Company follows the fair value method of accounting for employee stock-based compensation provided for in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. Compensation cost for stock option grants is measured as the fair value of the options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Amounts recorded for options granted to non-employees are determined in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 and EITF 96-18 based on the fair value of the consideration or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measured.
ENTROPIN, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Fair value of financial instruments:
The carrying amounts of cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and accounts payable are considered to be representative of their respective fair values because of their short-term nature.
Loss per share:
Net loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Basic and diluted net loss per common share amounts are equivalent for the periods presented as the inclusion of common stock equivalents in the number of shares used for the diluted computation would be anti-dilutive. Dividends on preferred stock, consisting of 10% cumulative dividends and deemed dividends related to the beneficial conversion feature and mandatory redemption accretion of Series B preferred stock, are added to net loss for the purpose of determining net loss and net loss per share amounts applicable to common stockholders.
Segment reporting:
The Company currently operates in a single segment. In addition, financial results are prepared and reviewed by management as a single operating segment. The Company continually evaluates its operating activities and the method utilized by management to evaluate such activities and will report on a segment basis when appropriate to do so.
2. Litigation
The Company is currently a named defendant in three securities lawsuits. The first lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California (hereinafter, the “State Action”). The second lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (hereinafter, the “Federal Action”). The third lawsuit was filed in the District Court for the City and County of Denver, Colorado (hereinafter, the “Colorado Action”). The allegations in each of the three actions-—e.g., the State Action, the Federal Action and the Colorado Action, are virtually identical. Essentially, the Company is accused of making false and misleading statements regarding the clinical development of its developmental drug Esterom®.
The Superior Court formally dismissed the State Action and entered judgment in favor of the Company and its two directors on August 13, 2004. The plaintiffs, however, filed a notice of appeal on August 24, 2004. The plaintiffs in the State Action have filed their opening appellate brief and the Company has filed its response. The plaintiffs’ reply brief is due on August 11, 2005.
In the Federal Action, our summary judgment motion was denied on April 11, 2005. The parties appeared before the court for a status conference on May 23, 2005, at which time the court established mandatory mediation procedures, a discovery schedule and set a trial date of June 20, 2006. Deposition discovery has commenced and is ongoing.
On June 1, 2005, the Company removed the Colorado Action from state court to federal court based upon the recently passed Class Action Fairness Act. After accepting jurisdiction, the federal court issued an order to show cause why the case should not be transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California so that it may be consolidated with the Federal Action. The parties submitted their responses to the order to show cause on July 15, 2005. In its response, the Company supported a transfer to the Central District of California; however, a co-defendant in the Colorado Action is a Colorado corporation and has filed a brief in opposition to the transfer. The Company is awaiting the court’s ruling.
The Company believes that it has strong defenses in each of the pending actions. However, there is no guarantee that it will be successful in defending against the plaintiffs’ claims. The existence of the lawsuits, irrespective of the merits, makes it more difficult for the Company to raise the additional funds needed to support its continued operations. As of the date of this report, the Company is not party to any other material legal proceedings.
Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements and notes thereto included in Part I - Item 1 of this report, and the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as amended.
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other portions of this Form 10-QSB contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are subject to the Safe Harbor provisions created by that statute. In some cases, you can identify the forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,”“will,”“should,”“could,”“expects,”“plans,”“anticipates,”“believes,”“estimates,”“predicts,”“potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Our business and results of operations are subject to various risks and uncertainties as disclosed under the caption “Factors That May Affect Our Future Results and the Trading Price of Our Common Stock” in this Form 10-QSB. These risks and uncertainties include our need and ability to raise significant additional capital; our history of significant operating losses; our ability to successfully complete formulation, development and preclinical studies for our sole drug candidate, ENT-103; the time, cost and uncertainty of obtaining regulatory approvals; and our ability to successfully commercialize products. The actual results that we achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements due to these risks and uncertainties and we undertake no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.
We were incorporated in California in 1984 as Entropin, Inc., or old Entropin, and in 1998 completed a merger with and into Vanden Capital Group, Inc. pursuant to which all of the issued and outstanding common shares of old Entropin were converted into a majority of Vanden’s common stock. Vanden subsequently changed its name to Entropin, Inc. For accounting purposes, the acquisition was treated as a recapitalization of old Entropin based upon historical cost, with old Entropin as the acquirer. In conjunction with the merger, Entropin, Inc. became a Colorado corporation. In June 2002, we changed our state of incorporation from Colorado to Delaware.
From our inception in August 1984, we have devoted our resources primarily to funding our research and development efforts and conducting clinical trials with our products. We have been unprofitable since inception and have had no revenue from the sale of products, and do not expect revenue for the foreseeable future until we have received FDA approval for one of the proprietary compounds we were attempting to develop. As of June 30, 2005, our accumulated deficit was approximately $37.2 million.
We have an immediate need to raise additional funds to continue our operations. As of June 30, 2005, we had total current assets of $185,705. Our available funds are not sufficient to allow us to pursue any further development of our proprietary drug candidate, ENT-103, including the preclinical work necessary to prepare and file an Investigational New Drug (IND) application with the FDA or to commence human clinical trials for ENT-103. As we were unable to immediately obtain significant additional funds to support our operations, we were forced to cease our operations prior to the end of the second quarter of 2005.
We do not have capital sufficient to meet our cash needs, including the cost of compliance with the continuing reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We will have to seek loans or equity placements to cover such cash needs. Lack of existing capital may be sufficient impediment to prevent us from accomplishing the goal of successfully executing a new business strategy. We will need to raise additional funds to conduct its business activities in the next twelve months.
At this time, we have no commitments to provide funds. Accordingly, there can be no assurances that any additional funds will be available to us to allow us to cover our expenses as they are incurred.
Going Concern:
Our independent auditors have added an explanatory paragraph in connection with the December 31, 2004 financial statements, which states that our Company is in the development stage and has incurred an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2004 of $35,686,178. At June 30, 2005, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $32,161,697. These conditions give rise to substantial doubt about our Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company is dependant on its ability to secure additional funding through the issuance of debt or equity instruments, corporate partnering or merger/acquisition arrangements. The Company ceased its business operations in the second quarter of 2005.
Research and Development
Prior to our current focus on ENT-103, we completed four preclinical animal studies, Phase I, Phase II and Phase II/III human clinical trials for our first product, known as Esterom solution. In January 2002, we reported that our researchers at Harvard Medical School had identified the active ingredient in Esterom solution, which we named ENT-102. Results of our initial preclinical studies revealed that ENT-102 effectively blocks nerve impulse conduction and when injected into animals may have long-lasting properties to reduce and manage pain.
Based on these findings and the results of our Phase II/III clinical study with Esterom solution, we decided to forego further development of Esterom solution and pursue development of ENT-102. In January 2003, we announced the discovery of a new chemical entity, ENT-103, a simplified derivative of ENT-102. ENT-103 is a single chemical compound that exists as a single molecular species. In contrast, ENT-102 is a single chemical compound comprised of a mixture of four chemical species. Due to the demonstrated pain reduction equivalency of ENT-103 and ENT-102 in preclinical studies, and the advantages of pursuing regulatory approval with a single molecule versus a mixture of four molecules, we decided to focus on the development of ENT-103 as a therapy for treatment of acute pain.
Our current resources are not sufficient to complete the required preclinical testing nor to begin or complete a Phase I clinical trial for ENT-103. Assuming that we can raise funds to support our operations and our clinical trials are successful and we do not experience unexpected delays, we estimate that it will take at least an additional four to five years to complete the preclinical and clinical development and testing of ENT-103 so that it can be commercialized. Any significant delays in our preclinical development, clinical trials or regulatory approval will affect our ability to generate revenue and may harm our ability to continue to raise the capital needed to complete the commercialization of ENT-103. We estimate that an additional $45 million will be required to complete development and FDA approval of ENT-103. These expenditures primarily represent research, clinical trials and general and administrative costs. As of June 30, 2005, we have spent a total of approximately $37.1million developing ENT-103 and its predecessor products, ENT-102 and Esterom solution.
Plan of Operation
We have an immediate need to raise additional funds to continue our operations. Our available funds are not sufficient to allow us to pursue any further development of our proprietary drug candidate, ENT-103, including the preclinical work necessary to prepare and file an Investigational New Drug (IND) application with the FDA or to commence human clinical trials for ENT-103. We are actively seeking additional funding through potential merger/acquisition transactions coupled with public or private sales of our equity or debt securities. We also intend to seek additional funding from corporate partnerships or licensing arrangements or through public or private sales of our equity or debt securities. Any such transactions may require us to relinquish rights to some of our technologies or products, and will be dilutive to our existing stockholders. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to complete any such transaction or secure additional funds on a timely basis, or at all, and we cannot assure that such transaction will be on reasonable terms. As we were unable to obtain the significant additional funds to support our operations, we had to cease our operations prior to the end of the second quarter of 2005.
We do not have capital sufficient to meet our cash needs, including the cost of compliance with the continuing reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We will have to seek loans or equity placements to cover such cash needs. Lack of existing capital may be sufficient impediment to prevent us from accomplishing the goal of successfully executing a new business strategy. We will need to raise additional funds to conduct its business activities in the next twelve months.
At this time, we have no commitments to provide funds. Accordingly, there can be no assurances that any additional funds will be available to us to allow us to cover our expenses as they are incurred.
Results of Operations
Three months ended June 30, 2005, compared to three months ended June 30, 2004.
The net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was approximately $1 million, or $0.03 per share on approximately 30.6 million weighted average shares outstanding. In comparison, the net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2004 was approximately $915,000 , or $0.03 per share on approximately 30.6 million weighted average shares outstanding.
Total research and development expenses were approximately $75,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to approximately $43,000 for the same period in 2004, an increase of $32,000 or 74%.
Total general and administrative expenses were approximately $1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to approximately $.9 million for the same period in 2004, an increase of $100,000 or 11%. Approximately $375,000 of the general and administrative expense incurred during the three months ended June 30, 2004 reflected charges to non-cash compensation for the fair value of stock options and warrants issued for services. No such non-cash charges were incurred during the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Interest income during the three months ended June 30, 2005 was approximately $4,000 as compared to approximately $3,400 during the same period in 2004, an increase of $600 or 18%. This increase in interest income reflects higher average balances for cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments during the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to six months ended June 30, 2004.
The net loss for the first six months of 2005 was approximately $1.5 million, or $0.05 per share on approximately 30.6 million weighted average shares outstanding. In comparison, the net loss for the first six months of 2004 was approximately $2.1 million, or $0.08 per share on approximately 24.5 million weighted average shares outstanding.
Total research and development expenses were approximately $131,000 during the first six months of 2005, as compared to approximately $352,000 for the first six months of 2004, a decrease of $221,000 or 63%. The decrease in research and development expenses during the first six months of 2005 compared with the same period during 2004 reflects the fact that preclinical research was restricted during the first six months of 2005 due to cash constraints.
Total general and administrative expenses were approximately $1.3 million for the first six months of 2005, as compared to approximately $1.7 million for the first six months of 2004, a decrease of $.4 million or 24%. Approximately $527,000 of the general and administrative expense incurred during the first six months of 2004 reflected charges to non-cash compensation for the fair value of stock options and warrants issued for services. No such non-cash charges were incurred during the first six months of 2005.
Interest income during the first six months of 2005 was approximately $20,800 as compared to approximately $5,400 during the first six months of 2004, an increase of $15,400 or 285%. This increase in interest income reflects higher average balances for cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments during the first six months of 2005.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2005, we had total current assets of approximately $185,700. Our financial statements have been presented on a going concern basis. We have an immediate need to raise additional funds to continue our operations. There can be no assurance that such additional capital will be available on a timely basis or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. As we were unable to obtain the significant additional funds to support our operations, we had to cease our operations prior to the end of the second quarter of 2005.
We are in the development stage and have been primarily involved in research and development activities. This has resulted in significant operating losses and an accumulated deficit at June 30, 2005 of approximately $37.2 million. Our management anticipates additional operating losses for the foreseeable future. These factors, among others, indicate that we will be unable to continue as a going concern unless it can immediately obtain significant additional funds to support its operations. We have financed our operations since inception primarily through the net proceeds generated from the sale of our common and preferred stock, and through loans and advances from stockholders that were subsequently converted into equity securities. From inception through June 30, 2005, we have received net cash proceeds from financing activities aggregating approximately $23.7 million. As of June 30, 2005, our working capital was approximately $185,700.
Our liquidity and capital needs relate primarily to working capital, research and development of ENT-103, and other general corporate requirements. We have not received any cash from operations since inception.
Net cash used in operating activities was approximately $1.5 million during the first six months of 2005, compared with approximately $2 million during the first six months of 2004. The cash used in operations was primarily related to conducting preclinical research studies and maintaining our administrative infrastructure.
Critical Accounting Policies
We routinely grant stock options to compensate officers, directors and employees for their services. This practice allows us to conserve our cash resources for our drug development program. We have adopted the fair value accounting provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. Under these provisions, stock based compensation is measured based on the fair value of the options granted using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Amounts recorded for options granted to non-employees are determined in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 and EITF 96-18 based on the fair value of the consideration or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measured.
Factors That May Affect Our Future Results and the Trading Price of Our Common Stock
An investment in shares of our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the following information about these risks, together with other information contained in this report and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission before you decide to buy our stock. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and prospects would likely suffer. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our operations.
Going Concern:
Our independent auditors have added an explanatory paragraph in connection with the December 31, 2004 financial statements, which states that our Company is in the development stage and has incurred an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2004 of $35,686,178. At June 30, 2005, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $32,161,697. These conditions give rise to substantial doubt about our Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company is dependant on its ability to secure additional funding through the issuance of debt or equity instruments, corporate partnering or merger/acquisition arrangements. The Company ceased its business operations in the second quarter of 2005.
We need to raise additional funds immediately to support our operations. If we are unable to raise these funds, we will be forced to cease our operations.
We have an immediate need to raise additional funds to continue our operations. As of June 30, 2005, we had total current assets of $185,705. Our financial statements have been presented on a going concern basis. Our available funds are not sufficient to allow us to begin any further development of our proprietary drug candidate, ENT-103, including the preclinical work necessary to prepare and file an Investigational New Drug (IND) application with the FDA or to commence human clinical trials for ENT-103. We ceased our business operations in the second quarter of 2005. We are actively seeking additional funding through potential merger/acquisition transactions coupled with public or private sales of our equity or debt securities. We also intend to seek additional funding from corporate partnerships or licensing arrangements or through public or private sales of our equity or debt securities. Any such transactions may require us to relinquish rights to some of our technologies or products, and will be dilutive to our existing stockholders. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to complete any such transaction or secure additional funds on a timely basis, or at all, and we cannot assure that such transaction will be on reasonable terms. As we were unable to obtain significant additional funds to support our operations, we had to cease our operations prior to the end of the second quarter of 2005.
We do not have capital sufficient to meet our cash needs, including the cost of compliance with the continuing reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We will have to seek loans or equity placements to cover such cash needs. Lack of existing capital may be sufficient impediment to prevent us from accomplishing the goal of successfully executing a new business strategy. We will need to raise additional funds to conduct its business activities in the next twelve months.
At this time, we have no commitments to provide funds. Accordingly, there can be no assurances that any additional funds will be available to us to allow us to cover our expenses as they are incurred.
We have a history of losses and we may never achieve or maintain profitability.
To date we have experienced significant operating losses in funding the research, development and testing of our previous drug candidate, Esterom solution, and our subsequent and current drug candidates, ENT-102 and ENT-103. We expect to continue to incur substantial operating losses during our research, development and preclinical testing of ENT-103. From our inception through June 30, 2005, we have incurred cumulative net losses applicable to common stockholders of $37.2 million. We will not be able to pursue generating revenues from sales of ENT-103 unless it is approved by the FDA for marketing. FDA approval will take several years, if ENT-103 is approved at all, and we may never achieve profitable operations.
The securities lawsuits filed against the Company and two of its directors are diverting the Company’s resources and attention, and if the Company is required to continue to defend against these lawsuits, its business and financial condition will continue to be harmed.
We are currently a named defendant in three securities lawsuits. The first lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California (hereinafter, the “State Action”). The second lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (hereinafter, the “Federal Action”). The third lawsuit was filed in the District Court for the City and County of Denver, Colorado (hereinafter, the “Colorado Action”). The allegations in each of the three actions-—e.g., the State Action, the Federal Action and the Colorado Action, are virtually identical. Essentially, we are accused of making false and misleading statements regarding the clinical development of its developmental drug Esterom®.
The Superior Court formally dismissed the State Action and entered judgment in favor of the Company and its two directors on August 13, 2004. The plaintiffs, however, filed a notice of appeal on August 24, 2004. The plaintiffs in the State Action have filed their opening appellate brief and the Company has filed its response. The plaintiffs’ reply brief is due on August 11, 2005.
In the Federal Action, our summary judgment motion was denied on April 11, 2005. The parties appeared before the court for a status conference on May 23, 2005, at which time the court established mandatory mediation procedures, a discovery schedule and set a trial date of June 20, 2006. Deposition discovery has commenced and is ongoing.
On June 1, 2005, the Company removed the Colorado Action from state court to federal court based upon the recently passed Class Action Fairness Act. After accepting jurisdiction, the federal court issued an order to show cause why the case should not be transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California so that it may be consolidated with the Federal Action. The parties submitted their responses to the order to show cause on July 15, 2005. In its response, the Company supported a transfer to the Central District of California; however, a co-defendant in the Colorado Action is a Colorado corporation and has filed a brief in opposition to the transfer. We are awaiting the court’s ruling.
We may not be successful in defending against the plaintiffs’ claims in these cases. The existence of the lawsuits, irrespective of the merits, makes it more difficult for us to raise the additional funds needed to support its continued operations. As of the date of this report, we are not party to any other material legal proceedings.
We have appointed two new Board members and our other Board directors and executive employees have resigned
On May 13, 2005, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Mr. Jeffrey Ploen and Mr. David Norris to the Board.
Following these appointments, Drs. Higgins D. Bailey, Randall L. Carpenter and Thomas G. Tachovsky and Messrs. David M. Chapman, Joseph R. Ianelli, Paul V. Maier and Bruce R. Manning resigned from the Board, with each resignation to be effective immediately following the Board Meeting held on May 13, 2005.
We lost the services of our only two full-time executive employees, Thomas Tachovsky and Patricia Kriss, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively. Dr. Carpenter served on the Company’s Sceintific Committee. Dr. Tachovsky served on the Company’s Executive and Scientific Committees.
The existing trading market for our securities is limited, which affects the price and liquidity of our securities.
On June 26, 2003, our common stock was delisted from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market and now trades on the OTC Bulletin Board. Securities trading on the OTC Bulletin Board typically suffer from lower liquidity, which may lead to depressed trading prices, greater price volatility and difficultly in buying or selling shares, particularly in large quantities. Currently, there is a limited trading market for our common stock and we cannot predict when, if ever, a fully developed public market for the common stock will occur. If a developed public trading market for the common stock does develop at a future time, there are no assurances that it will be sustained for any period of time. Any sales of shares by stockholders in substantial amounts in the public market could adversely affect the prevailing market price and could impair our future ability to raise capital through the sale of equity securities.
In addition, the SEC has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” to be any listed, trading equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share. These requirements may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to sell our common stock and may affect the ability of purchasers in this offering to sell our securities in the secondary market.
We may sell additional shares of capital stock in the future, which could dilute your investment.
Our Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation on August 31, 2004, to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 50,000,000 shares to 200,000,000 shares. Our stockholders approved the proposal to increase the number authorized shares of common stock at a special meeting held on November 19, 2004. The approval of this proposal by the Company’s stockholders provides the Board of Directors with a significant number of additional shares of common stock to issue in fund raising activities and for other corporate purposes. Our Certificate of Incorporation also provides for the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The issuance of these additional shares of common stock and/or preferred stock will have a dilutive effect on the equity and voting power of the existing holders of our common stock. It may also adversely affect the market price of our common stock. As of June 30, 2005, there were 30,645,341 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and 3,210,487 shares of Series A’ preferred stock.
The price of common stock has fluctuated greatly over the past several years and we expect this volatility to continue.
The market prices and trading volumes for the securities of development stage companies in general, and for our securities in particular, have historically been highly volatile and have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations may or may not be related to our operating performance, and the announcement of developments regarding our products, regulatory approval status, competition, government regulation or other matters that are material to our business or prospects may cause significant swings in our stock prices.
Item 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(A) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide a reasonable level of assurance of achieving the Company’s disclosure control objectives. The Company’s Principal Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer has concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are, in fact, effective at this reasonable assurance level as of the period covered. In addition, the Company reviewed its internal controls, and there have been no significant changes in its internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those controls subsequent to the date of their last evaluation or from the end of the reporting period to the date of this Form 10-QSB.
(B) Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
In connection with the evaluation of the Company’s internal controls during the Company’s second fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005, the Company’s Principal Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer has determined that there are no changes to the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are currently a named defendant in three securities lawsuits. The first lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California (hereinafter, the “State Action”). The second lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (hereinafter, the “Federal Action”). The third lawsuit was filed in the District Court for the City and County of Denver, Colorado (hereinafter, the “Colorado Action”). The allegations in each of the three actions-—e.g., the State Action, the Federal Action and the Colorado Action, are virtually identical. Essentially, we are accused of making false and misleading statements regarding the clinical development of its developmental drug Esterom®.
The Superior Court formally dismissed the State Action and entered judgment in favor of the Company and its two directors on August 13, 2004. The plaintiffs, however, filed a notice of appeal on August 24, 2004. The plaintiffs in the State Action have filed their opening appellate brief and the Company has filed its response. The plaintiffs’ reply brief is due on August 11, 2005.
In the Federal Action, our summary judgment motion was denied on April 11, 2005. The parties appeared before the court for a status conference on May 23, 2005, at which time the court established mandatory mediation procedures, a discovery schedule and set a trial date of June 20, 2006. Deposition discovery has commenced and is ongoing.
On June 1, 2005, the Company removed the Colorado Action from state court to federal court based upon the recently passed Class Action Fairness Act. After accepting jurisdiction, the federal court issued an order to show cause why the case should not be transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California so that it may be consolidated with the Federal Action. The parties submitted their responses to the order to show cause on July 15, 2005. In its response, the Company supported a transfer to the Central District of California; however, a co-defendant in the Colorado Action is a Colorado corporation and has filed a brief in opposition to the transfer. We are awaiting the court’s ruling.
We may not be successful in defending against the plaintiffs’ claims in these cases. The existence of the lawsuits, irrespective of the merits, makes it more difficult for us to raise the additional funds needed to support its continued operations. As of the date of this report, we are not party to any other material legal proceedings.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There have been no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits
Exhibit Number | Description |
| |
2.1 | Agreement of Plan of Merger, dated May 2, 2002, by and between Entropin, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and Entropin, Inc., a Colorado corporation (1) |
| |
3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation of Entropin, Inc., a Delaware corporation (2) |
| |
3.2 | Bylaws of Entropin, Inc., a Delaware corporation (2) |
| |
3.3 | Certificate of Designations of Series A’ Preferred Stock of Entropin, Inc. (3) |
| |
3.4 | Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation (4) |
| |
4.1 | Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant (5) |
| |
4.2 | Warrant for Common Stock issued to Navidec Financial Services, Inc. (6) |
| |
10.1 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated December 9, 1997 between Vanden Capital Group, Inc. and Entropin, Inc. (7) |
| |
10.2 | Lease Agreement, dated February 1, 1998, between the Registrant and Thomas T. Anderson (8) |
| |
10.3 | 1998 Compensatory Stock Plan (9) |
| |
10.4 | Employment Agreement, dated December 1, 1999, between Entropin, Inc. and Thomas Tachovsky. (10) |
| |
10.5 | Amended and Restated Investment Banking Agreement, dated December 11, 2003, between Entropin, Inc. and InvestLinc Securities, LLC. (10) |
| |
10.6 | Form of Indemnification Agreement for the officers and directors (11) |
| |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
| |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
| |
32.1 | Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
___________
(1) Incorporated by reference to the like numbered exhibit filed with the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB on August 14, 2002.
(2) Incorporated by reference from the like numbered exhibits as filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on June 26, 2002.
(3) Incorporated by reference from the like numbered exhibit as filed with the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-KSB/A on April 30, 2003.
(4) Incorporated by reference from Exhibit A filed with the Registrant’s Proxy Statement on October 1, 2004.
(5) Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2/A, No. 333-11308, on March 15, 2000.
(6) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit as filed with the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-KSB on March 30, 2004.
(7) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as amended, on January 15, 1998.
(8) Incorporated by reference from the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, on April 15, 1998, as amended.
(9) Incorporated by reference from exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 on December 30, 1998.
(10) Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2/A, No. 333-110159, on December 17, 2003.
(11) Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 as filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 17, 2004.
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Company caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| ENTROPIN, INC., a Delaware corporation |
| |
Date: August 9, 2005 | By: /s/ David Norris |
| David Norris |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| |
Date: August 9, 2005 | |
| David Norris |
| Chief Financial Officer |