EXHIBIT 18.1
                                  ------------

                                     ARTHUR
                                    ANDERSEN


                                                        Arthur Andersen LLP
                                                        Suite 1500
                                                        One Marine Midland Plaza
                                                        Rochester NY 14604-2494
                                                        716 399 2800


April 22, 1999

Canandaigua Brands, Inc.


Re:  Form 10-K Report for the year ended February 28, 1999

Gentlemen/Ladies:

This letter is written to meet the  requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a
letter from a  registrant's  independent  accountants  whenever there has been a
change in accounting principle or practice.

As of  February  28,  1999,  the Company  changed  from the  last-in,  first-out
("LIFO")  method  of  accounting  for  inventories  to the  first-in,  first-out
("FIFO")  method.  According to the  management of the Company,  this change was
made for the following  reasons:  (1) a better matching of revenues and expenses
of the Company's  products  sold, and therefore a better method of reporting the
Company's  results of  operations;  and (2) the FIFO method of  accounting  will
provide improved financial  comparability to other publicly-traded  companies in
the industry.

A complete  coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining
the  preferability  of  accounting   principles  among  acceptable   alternative
principles  has not been  established  by the  accounting  profession.  Thus, we
cannot  make an  objective  determination  of whether  the change in  accounting
described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. However, we have
reviewed the pertinent factors,  including those related to financial reporting,
in this particular case on a subjective  basis,  and our opinion stated below is
based on our determination made in this manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of accounting is to an
acceptable  alternative  method of  accounting,  which,  based upon the  reasons
stated for the change and our discussions with you, is also preferable under the
circumstances  in this  particular  case. In arriving at this  opinion,  we have
relied on the business judgment and business planning of your management.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP