Carolina Power & Light Company
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.   Except as described in Note 2 below, these interim financial
     statements are prepared in conformity with the accounting
     principles reflected in the financial statements included in
     the Company's 1993 Annual Report to Shareholders and the 1993
     Annual Report on Form 10-K. These are interim financial
     statements, and because of temperature variations between
     seasons of the year and the timing of outages of electric
     generating units, especially nuclear-fueled units, the amounts
     reported in the Statements of Income for periods of less than
     twelve months are not necessarily indicative of amounts
     expected for the year.
   
     Certain amounts for 1993 have been reclassified to conform to
     the 1994 presentation.

2.   In January 1994, the Company implemented Statement of Position
     (SOP) 93-6, "Employers' Accounting for Employee Stock
     Ownership Plans," on a prospective basis. This SOP requires
     the following changes in accounting for the Company's
     leveraged employee stock ownership plan (ESOP): 1) ESOP shares
     that have not been committed to be released to participants'
     accounts are no longer considered outstanding for the
     determination of earnings per common share; 2) dividends on
     unallocated ESOP shares are no longer recognized for financial
     statement purposes; 3) all tax benefits of ESOP dividends are
     now recorded to non-operating income tax expense, whereas
     previously a portion of the tax benefits was recorded directly
     to retained earnings; 4) interest income related to the
     qualified ESOP loan is no longer recognized; and 5) the
     difference between the acquisition and allocation prices of
     ESOP shares, which was previously recorded as other income,
     net, is now recorded directly to common stock. In addition,  
     ESOP loan transactions between the Company and the Stock
     Purchase-Savings Plan (SPSP) Trustee are no longer reflected
     in the Statements of Cash Flows.

     The implementation of SOP 93-6 resulted in an increase in
     earnings per common share of approximately $.01 for the six
     months ended June 30, 1994. 

     Selected pro forma statistics, which eliminate the significant
     capital structure-related impacts of the ESOP feature of the
     SPSP, are included in Financial Statistics.

3.   Contingencies existing as of the date of these statements are
     described below. No significant changes have occurred since
     December 31, 1993, with respect to the commitments discussed
     in Note 9 of the financial statements included in the
     Company's 1993 Annual Report to Shareholders.

     a) In the Company's retail jurisdictions, provisions for
     nuclear decommissioning costs are approved by the North  
     Carolina Utilities Commission and the South Carolina Public
     Service Commission and are based on site-specific estimates
     that included the costs for removal of all radioactive and
     other structures at the site. In the wholesale jurisdiction,
     the provisions for nuclear decommissioning cost are based on
     amounts agreed upon in applicable rate settlements.
     Accumulated decommissioning cost provisions, which are
     included in accumulated depreciation, were $240.5 million at
     June 30, 1994, and $201.1 million at June 30, 1993, and
     include amounts funded internally and amounts funded in an
     external decommissioning trust. Based on an assumed after-tax
     earnings rate of 8.5% and an assumed cost escalation rate of
     4%, provisions for nuclear decommissioning costs are currently
     adequate to provide for decommissioning of the Company's
     nuclear facilities.

     The Company's most recent site-specific estimates of
     decommissioning costs were developed in 1993 and are based  
     on prompt dismantlement decommissioning, which reflects the
     cost of removal of all radioactive and other structures  
     currently at the site. These estimates, in 1993 dollars, are
     $257.7 million for Robinson Unit No. 2, $284.3 million for  
     the Harris Plant, $235.4 million for Brunswick Unit No. 1 and
     $221.4 million for Brunswick Unit No. 2.  These estimates are
     subject to change based on a variety of factors including, but
     not limited to, inflation, changes in technology applicable to
     nuclear decommissioning, and changes in federal, state or
     local regulations. The cost estimates exclude the portion
     attributable to North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency,
     which holds an undivided ownership interest in certain of the
     Company's generating facilities.    

     b) There are several manufactured gas plant (MGP) sites to
     which the Company and certain entities that were later merged
     into the Company may have had some connection. In this regard,
     the Company is participating in the North Carolina MGP Group
     (Group), a group of entities alleged to be former owners or
     operators of MGP sites. The Group was formed in response to an
     initiative launched by the North Carolina Department of
     Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Division of Solid
     Waste Management (DSWM), to encourage the voluntary assessment
     and, where necessary, the remediation of MGP sites. The Group
     and DSWM have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding
     relative to the establishment of a uniform program and
     framework for addressing MGP sites for which DSWM has
     contended that members of the Group have potential
     responsibility. It is anticipated that the investigation and
     remediation of specific MGP sites will be addressed pursuant
     to one or more Administrative Orders on Consent between DSWM
     and individual potentially responsible parties. In addition,
     a current owner of property that was the site of one MGP site
     owned by Tidewater Power Company, which merged into the
     Company in 1952, and the Company have entered into an
     agreement to share the cost of investigation and remediation
     of this site. Due to the lack of information with respect to
     the operation of MGP sites and the uncertainty concerning
     questions of liability and potential environmental harm, the
     extent and cost of required remedial action, if any, and the
     extent to which liability may be asserted against the Company
     or against others are not currently determinable.  The Company
     cannot predict the outcome of these matters or the extent to
     which other former MGP sites may become the subject of
     inquiry.