SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(AMENDMENT NO. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]
Check the appropriate box:
[_]CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14a-
6(e)(2))
[X] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[_] Definitive Proxy Statement
[_] Definitive Additional Materials
[_] Soliciting Material Pursuant to (S)240.14a-11(c) or (S)240.14a-12
THE GAP, INC.
- -----------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
- -----------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X]No fee required.
[_]Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5) Total fee paid:
[_]Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[_]Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3) Filing Party:
(4) Date Filed:
Notes:
Preliminary Copies
Gap Inc. logo
N O T I C E O F A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S H A R E H O L D E R S
May 4, 1999
To Our Shareholders:
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of The Gap, Inc. (the "Company") will
be held at the Town Hall of the Delancey Street Foundation, 600 The
Embarcadero, San Francisco, California, on Tuesday, May 4, 1999 at 1:30 p.m.,
for the following purposes:
1. To elect a Board of Directors;
2. To approve the Company's Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation to increase the Company's authorized number of shares of Common
Stock from 1,500,000,000 to 2,300,000,000;
3. To approve the Company's Executive Long-Term Cash Award
Performance Plan;
4. To ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as
independent auditors for the Company for the fiscal year ending on January 29,
2000; and
5. To attend to other business properly presented at the meeting.
These items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement
following this Notice.
You must be a shareholder of record at the close of business on March 12,
1999, to vote at the Annual Meeting. A complete list of shareholders entitled
to vote at this meeting will be available for inspection at our offices at One
Harrison Street, San Francisco, California. Whether or not you plan to attend
the Annual Meeting, please complete, date and sign the enclosed proxy card and
return it as promptly as possible in the enclosed envelope.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Anne B. Gust
Secretary
April 5, 1999
Preliminary Copies
THE GAP, INC.
ONE HARRISON STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105
PROXY STATEMENT
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of
proxies by the Board of Directors of The Gap, Inc. (the "Company") for use at
the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May 4, 1999 at
1:30 p.m. at the Town Hall of the Delancey Street Foundation, 600 The
Embarcadero, in San Francisco, and at any adjournment thereof. This statement
and the enclosed form of proxy were first sent to shareholders on or about
April 5, 1999.
THE PROXY
The persons named as proxyholders were selected by our Board of Directors
and are officers of the Company.
The proxyholders will vote all proxies, or record an abstention or
withholding, in accordance with the directions on the proxy. If no contrary
direction is given, the shares will be voted:
FOR the election of directors nominated by the Board of Directors;
FOR the approval of the proposal to amend the Company's Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the Company's authorized
number of shares of Common Stock from 1,500,000,000 to 2,300,000,000;
FOR the approval of the Company's Executive Long-Term Cash Award
Performance Plan; and
FOR the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as
independent auditors for the Company for the fiscal year ending January 29,
2000.
We will pay all expenses in connection with the solicitation of the
enclosed proxy, including the charges of brokerage houses and other custodians,
nominees or fiduciaries for forwarding documents to security owners. In
addition to solicitation by mail, certain of our officers, directors and
employees, who will receive no extra compensation for their services, or a
proxy solicitation firm retained by us, may solicit proxies by telephone, fax
or in person.
You may revoke your proxy at any time before its exercise. You may also
revoke your proxy by voting in person at the Annual Meeting.
VOTING SECURITIES AND VOTING RIGHTS
The only outstanding voting securities of the Company are its shares of
Common Stock, of which [571,973,354] shares were outstanding at the close of
business on March 12, 1999. Only shareholders of record at the close of
business on that date are entitled to vote at the meeting. Each shareholder is
entitled to one vote per share on each matter submitted to the meeting. All
share amounts in this Proxy Statement have been restated to reflect stock
splits.
The election inspector(s) appointed for the Annual Meeting will determine
whether or not a quorum is present and will tabulate votes cast by proxy or in
person at the Annual Meeting. The holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares of our Common Stock, present in person or by proxy, will constitute a
quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Election of
directors by shareholders will be determined by a plurality of the votes of the
shares present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote
on the election of directors. Approval of the proposal to amend the Company's
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation requires the affirmative vote
of a majority of the Company's outstanding Common Stock entitled to vote.
Approval of the proposal to approve the Company's Executive Long-Term Cash
Award Performance Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the
shares present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to
vote. Approval of the selection by the Board of Directors of Deloitte & Touche
LLP as independent auditors for the Company requires the affirmative vote of a
majority of the shares present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and
entitled to vote.
Abstentions are included in the determination of shares present for quorum
purposes. Because abstentions represent shares entitled to vote, the effect of
an abstention will be the same as a vote against a proposal. However,
abstentions will have no effect on the election of directors.
If you hold shares in "street name" through a broker or other nominee,
your broker or nominee may not be permitted to exercise voting discretion with
respect to certain matters to be acted upon. If you do not give your broker or
nominee specific instructions, your shares may not be voted on those matters
and will not be considered as present and entitled to vote with respect to
those matters. Shares represented by such "broker non-votes" will, however,
be counted in determining whether there is a quorum.
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Nominees for Election as Directors
Directors will be elected at the Annual Meeting to serve until the next
Annual Meeting and until their successors are elected. The Board of Directors
proposes to nominate the persons whose names are set forth below, all of whom
are current directors. In the absence of instructions to the contrary, shares
represented by the proxy will be voted for the election of all these nominees
to the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe
that any of these nominees will be unable to serve. However, if any nominee
should for any reason be unavailable to serve, the proxies will be voted for
the election of such other person to the office of director as the Board of
Directors may recommend in place of such nominee. Set forth below is certain
information concerning the nominees which is based on data furnished by them.
Name, Age, Principal Occupation Served as Director
During Past Five Years and Other Information since
Adrian D. P. Bellamy, 57 # * 1995
Chairman and Director of Airport Group International Holdings LLC,
an airport management company; Chairman of Gucci Group, NV, luxury
accessories and apparel manufacturer and retailer; Director of
Benckiser N.V., The Body Shop International, P.L.C. and its USA
subsidiary Blith-NA-Bodhaige, Inc., Paragon Trade Brands, Inc.,
Shaman Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of DFS Group Limited, specialty retailer,
1983-95.
Evan S. Dobelle, 53 * 1999
President of Trinity College, Hartford, CT, since 1995.
Chancellor of City College of San Francisco, 1990-95.
Millard S. Drexler, 54 1983
Chief Executive Officer of the Company since 1995, President of the
Company since 1987 and Chief Executive Officer of the Gap Division
since 1987. Chief Operating Officer of the Company, 1993-95; Chief
Executive Officer of Banana Republic, Inc., 1988-97. Director of
Restoration Hardware Inc.
Donald G. Fisher, 70 * + 1969
Chairman of the Company. Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
1969-95. Director of The Charles Schwab Corporation, AirTouch
Communications, Inc. and Cornerstone Properties Inc.
Doris F. Fisher, 67 + 1969
Merchandising consultant to the Company.
Robert J. Fisher, 44 ++ 1990
Executive Vice President of the Company since 1992. President, Gap
Division since 1997. Chief Operating Officer of the Company, 1992-93
and 1995-97; Chief Financial Officer of the Company, 1993-95.
Director of Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Glenda A. Hatchett, 47 * 1999
Chief Judge, Fulton County Juvenile Court, Atlanta, Georgia, since
1991.
John M. Lillie, 62 # * 1992
President, Sequoia Associates LLC, private investment firm, since
1998. Chairman, The Epic Team, bicycle and accessory products,
1996-98. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American President
Companies, Ltd., transportation company, 1992-95. Director of
Consolidated Freightways, Ltd, Circle International Group, Inc. and
Walker Interactive Systems, Inc.
Charles R. Schwab, 61 % * 1986
Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of The Charles Schwab
Corporation, discount securities brokerage, since 1997. Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of The Charles Schwab Corporation, 1986-
97. Director of Transamerica Corporation, AirTouch Communications,
Inc. and Siebel Systems, Inc.
Brooks Walker, Jr., 70 % * 1972
General Partner, Walker Investors, venture capital investment
partnership, since 1979. Director of Pope & Talbot, Inc.
Sergio S. Zyman, 53 % * 1997
President, Sergio Zyman & Company, consulting company, since 1998.
Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of The Coca-Cola
Company, 1993-98.
____________________
% Member of the Audit and Finance Committee.
# Member of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee.
* Member of the Corporate Governance Committee.
+ Donald G. Fisher and Doris F. Fisher are husband and wife.
++ Robert J. Fisher is the son of Donald G. and Doris F. Fisher.
Fewer nominees are named (eleven) than the number fixed by the Board
pursuant to the Company's Bylaws (twelve) because the Company has not yet
determined whether to fill that vacancy and, if so, who will be invited to join
the Board. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the
number of nominees named.
Information concerning executive officers of the Company who are not also
directors is set forth in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended January 30, 1999.
Information About the Board of Directors and Committees of the Board
The Board of Directors has three standing committees: the Audit and
Finance Committee and the Compensation and Stock Option Committee, both of
which are composed of directors who are not employees of the Company, and the
Corporate Governance Committee, which is made up of the non-employee directors
and one employee director.
The functions of the Audit and Finance Committee are (i) to recommend the
engagement of the Company's independent auditors and review with them the plan,
scope and results of their audit for each year, (ii) to review with the
Company's Consulting and Auditing Services department the plan, scope and
results of their operations, (iii) to consider and review other matters
relating to the financial and accounting affairs of the Company, and (iv) to
oversee the Company's Corporate Compliance Program. This committee is composed
exclusively of directors who are, in the opinion of the Board of Directors,
free from any relationship that will interfere with the exercise of independent
judgment as a committee member. The present members of the Audit and Finance
Committee are Messrs. Schwab, Walker (who is Chairman) and Zyman.
The functions of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee are to review
and approve salaries and other forms of compensation for all corporate and
divisional officers, to approve the guaranteeing or granting of loans to
certain corporate and divisional officers under the Company's Relocation Loan
Plan, to grant stock and options to purchase stock to selected employees under
the Company's stock plans, to make awards under the Company's annual and long-
term incentive plans to key employees, and to make recommendations to the Board
concerning the compensation of non-employee directors. This committee is
composed exclusively of directors who have not been eligible to receive stock
options or awards under the Company's stock plans (except for predetermined,
formula-based awards, as described below) for a period of at least one year
prior to membership on the committee. The present members of the Compensation
and Stock Option Committee are Messrs. Bellamy and Lillie (who is Chairman).
The functions of the Corporate Governance Committee are to make
recommendations to the Board on all matters concerning corporate governance and
directorship practices, including the qualifications of directors, the size and
function of the Board of Directors, the functions and duties of the committees
of the Board, the effectiveness and procedures of the Board, retirement
policies of non-employee directors, and succession planning for important
Company functions. The present members of the Corporate Governance Committee
are Messrs. Bellamy (who is Chairman), Dobelle, Donald Fisher, Lillie, Schwab,
Walker, and Zyman, and Ms. Hatchett.
During the last fiscal year, the Board of Directors held six meetings, the
Compensation and Stock Option Committee held three meetings, the Audit and
Finance Committee held two meetings and the Corporate Governance Committee held
one meeting. Each director attended at least 75% of the Board meetings and
committee meetings on which he or she served.
Compensation of Directors
We do not pay director fees to directors who are employees of the Company
or any affiliated company. Directors who are not employees of or consultants
to the Company ("non-employee directors") do not receive any form of direct
remuneration other than as described below. In addition, we reimburse travel
expenses to attend Board and committee meetings. All directors are eligible to
receive discounts on Company merchandise.
We pay each of our non-employee directors an annual retainer of $36,000
per year, payable quarterly, which is diminished by $2,500 for each Board
and/or Committee meeting day missed.
Under the Company's Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan, each
non-employee director may elect to forego receipt of his or her annual retainer
on a quarterly basis in exchange for an option to purchase 937 shares of our
Common Stock. Any such option will have an exercise price which is discounted
to reflect the amount of the foregone retainer, will be exercisable
immediately, and will have a maximum term of seven years. Shares issued under
the plan will come from treasury shares. Each non-employee director
participated in the plan in fiscal 1998.
Under the Company's 1996 Stock Option and Award Plan, non-employee
directors are eligible to receive stock options according to a pre-determined
formula, as follows: (i) each new non-employee director automatically receives
an option to purchase 15,000 shares at the then-current fair market value; and
(ii) each continuing non-employee director automatically receives an option to
purchase 3,750 shares at the then-current fair market value. All initial
options to new non-employee directors are granted on the date of appointment to
the Board. All continuing non-employee director options are granted on the
first business day after each annual meeting of shareholders. The options
normally become exercisable three years after the date of grant. In addition,
the Compensation and Stock Option Committee is authorized to grant
discretionary options to non-employee directors using treasury shares.
The Non-Employee Director Retirement Plan is an unfunded deferred
compensation plan which sets mandatory retirement from service on the Board at
age 72 and provides for annual benefits if a non-employee director has served
on the Board for five consecutive years and is still a director at age 72. The
annual benefit payable to an eligible retired director is equal to 75% of the
annual retainer fee in effect at the time of the director's retirement. The
duration of these annual payments equals the number of years that the director
served on the Board. If the director dies before the maximum payment period
expires, payments will continue for the life of his or her surviving spouse, or
until the end of the maximum payment period, whichever is sooner. In fiscal
1996, the Board of Directors elected to discontinue this plan for future
directors. Directors in office at January 27, 1997 are still eligible for plan
benefits, assuming they meet the requirements of the plan; however, the benefit
payable will be capped at the current level (i.e., 75% of $36,000).
In fiscal 1998, Doris Fisher received $24,001 for merchandising services
rendered in the course of her employment with the Company. As a Company
employee, Mrs. Fisher participates in all benefits which the Company makes
available to its employees generally, except for stock-based compensation and
bonus programs.
PROPOSAL NO. 2
APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE
AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
At the Annual Meeting we will submit to shareholders a proposal to
increase the number of shares of Common Stock the Company is authorized to
issue. The Board of Directors recommends adoption of the proposal.
The Company presently is authorized to issue 1,500,000,000 shares of
Common Stock. As of [January 30, 1999], approximately 665 million shares of
Common Stock were issued and approximately 572 million shares were outstanding
(net of approximately 93 million treasury shares). Of the remaining authorized
but unissued shares, approximately 89 million shares were reserved for issuance
under the Company's stock option and restricted stock plans. Based upon the
foregoing, we have approximately 746 million shares remaining available for
other purposes.
From time to time, the Company has issued additional shares of Common
Stock in payment of stock dividends or stock splits or for other purposes.
During fiscal 1998, the Company issued approximately 190.0 million shares in
connection with a three-for-two stock split in the form of a stock dividend.
Also during fiscal 1998, the Company issued approximately 4.8 million shares
upon exercise of employee stock options and 121,500 shares under the restricted
stock portion of the 1996 Stock Option and Award Plan. During fiscal 1997, the
Company also issued shares in connection with a three-for-two stock split in
the form of a stock dividend.
In January 1999, the Board approved a resolution amending Article Fifth of
the Company's Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation ("Certificate
of Incorporation") to increase the authorized number of shares of Common
Stock from 1,500,000,000 to 2,300,000,000. The pertinent provisions of the
amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation are set forth in Exhibit A to
this Proxy Statement. The affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding
shares of Common Stock is required to adopt the proposed amendment. The
amendment, if approved by shareholders, will take effect upon filing with the
Delaware Secretary of State, which is expected to occur on or about May 6,
1999.
The Board of Directors believes that it is in our best interests to
increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock which may be made
available for future stock dividends or splits, financing and acquisition
transactions, employee benefit plans and other general corporate purposes. If
the amendment is approved, the Company also will have greater flexibility in
the future to issue shares in excess of those presently authorized, without the
expense and delay of a special shareholders' meeting.
Except in connection with its stock option and restricted stock plans, the
Board of Directors currently has no immediate plans, understandings,
agreements, arrangements, or commitments for the issuance of additional shares
of Common Stock and no holder of Common Stock has any preemptive right with
respect to the Common Stock. Thus, should the Board of Directors elect to
issue additional shares of Common Stock, existing shareholders would not have
any preferential rights to purchase such shares. If the Board of Directors
deems it to be in the best interests of the Company and the shareholders to
issue additional shares of Common Stock in the future, the Board of Directors
generally would not seek further authorization by vote of the shareholders,
unless such authorization is otherwise required by applicable law or stock
exchange regulations.
The proposed amendment to increase the authorized number of shares of
Common Stock could, under certain circumstances, have an anti-takeover effect,
although this is not the intention of this proposal. For example, in the event
of a hostile attempt to take over control of the Company, it may be possible
for the Company to endeavor to impede the attempt by issuing shares of Common
Stock, thereby diluting the voting power of the other outstanding shares and
increasing the potential cost to acquire control of the Company. The amendment
therefore may have the effect of discouraging unsolicited takeover attempts.
By potentially discouraging initiation of any such unsolicited takeover
attempt, the proposed amendment may limit the opportunity for our shareholders
to dispose of their shares at the higher price generally available in takeover
attempts or that may be available under a merger proposal. However, the Board
of Directors is not aware of any attempt to take control of the Company and the
Board of Directors has not presented this proposal with the intent that it be
utilized as a type of anti-takeover device.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" THE
APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY'S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO
INCREASE THE AUTHORIZED NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK FROM 1,500,000,000 TO
2,300,000,000. Unless a contrary choice is specified, the proxyholders will
vote all proxies solicited by the Board of Directors FOR approval of the
amendment.
PROPOSAL NO. 3
APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY'S
EXECUTIVE LONG-TERM CASH AWARD PERFORMANCE PLAN
The Board of Directors has adopted an amended and restated Executive
Long-Term Cash Award Performance Plan (the "ELCAPP"), subject to stockholder
approval. Adoption of the amended and restated ELCAPP is subject to the
approval of a majority of the shares of the Company's Common Stock that are
present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Background and Reasons for Amendment
Under section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code ("Section 162(m)"),
the federal income tax deductibility of compensation paid to the Company's
Chief Executive Officer and to each of its next four most highly compensated
executive officers may be limited to the extent that it exceeds $1 million in
any one year. The Company can deduct compensation in excess of that amount if
it qualifies as "performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m). The
ELCAPP is intended to permit the Company to pay incentive compensation that
qualifies as performance-based compensation, thereby permitting the Company to
receive a federal income tax deduction for the payment of such incentive
compensation.
The Company originally adopted the ELCAPP in order to provide financial
incentives for the Company's eligible officers to meet and exceed the
Company's multi-year financial goals. The primary changes to the ELCAPP are
to (1) allow awards for performance cycles having a duration of at least three
to five fiscal years (rather than only three fiscal years), (2) add new
performance goals that the Committee may use in making awards, and (3) permit
the Committee to choose to defer the payment of ELCAPP awards for up to five
years after the date on which payment otherwise would have been made.
Description of the ELCAPP
The following paragraphs provide a summary of the principal features of
the ELCAPP (as amended and restated) and its operation. The ELCAPP is set
forth in its entirety as Exhibit B to this Proxy Statement. The following
summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to Exhibit B.
Purpose of the ELCAPP
The ELCAPP is intended to provide financial incentives for the Company's
eligible officers to meet and exceed the Company's multi-year financial goals.
Administration of the ELCAPP
The ELCAPP is administered by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee
of the Company's Board of Directors (the "Committee"). The members of the
Committee must qualify as "outside directors" under Section 162(m). Subject
to the terms of the ELCAPP, the Committee has the sole discretion to determine
the key employees who shall be granted awards, and the amounts, terms and
conditions of each award.
Eligibility to Receive Awards
Eligibility for the ELCAPP is determined in the discretion of the
Committee. In selecting participants for the ELCAPP, the Committee will
choose officers of the Company and its affiliates whose responsibilities
significantly influence Company results.
Awards and Performance Goals
Under the ELCAPP, the Committee will establish (1) a target award for
each participant, (2) the performance goals that must be achieved in order for
the participant to actually be paid an award, and (3) a formula for
calculating a participant's award, depending upon how actual performance
compares to the preestablished performance goals. Each participant's target
award will be expressed as a percentage of his or her base salary. A
participant's award will increase or decrease as actual performance increases
or decreases. The Committee also will determine the period for measuring
actual performance (the "performance cycle"). Each performance cycle will
last from three to five fiscal years. The Committee may set performance cycles
and performance goals that differ from participant to participant. For
example, the Committee may choose performance goals based on either a Company-
wide or divisional basis and/or a comparison of actual performance by the
Company or a division to actual performance by a group of competitors
determined in the discretion of the Committee.
There are a total of ten performance measures that may be used by the
Committee in setting the performance goals for any performance cycle.
Specifically, the performance goals applicable to any participant will provide
for a targeted level of achievement using one or more of the following
measures: capital control, comparable store sales, earnings, economic value
added, return on equity, return on invested capital, return on net assets,
sales volume, spread and total sales.
Capital control means adherence to the capital budget approved by the
Company's Board of Directors as part of the annual budgeting process.
Comparable store sales means the Company's or a division's net sales from
stores open more than one year. Earnings means either (1) operating income of
the Company or one of its divisions for a given performance cycle less certain
allocated expenses, or (2) income before taxes of the Company or one of its
divisions, determined in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles ("GAAP"). Economic value added means the Company's or a
division's net operating profit after tax for a specific performance cycle
less charges for use of capital assets. Return on equity means the Company's
or a division's average earnings for the performance cycle, expressed as a
percentage of the Company's or a division's average shareholders' equity over
the performance cycle, determined in accordance with GAAP. Return on invested
capital means the Company's or a division's net operating profit after tax (as
defined) divided by their respective average capital balances over the same
period of time. Return on net assets means the Company's or a division's
average earnings for the performance cycle, expressed as a percentage of the
Company's or a division's average assets for the performance cycle, determined
in accordance with GAAP. Sales volume means the average total sales volume
per store of the Company or one of its divisions for the performance cycle,
determined in accordance with GAAP. Spread means the difference between the
Company's or a divisions return on invested capital for a performance cycle
and the weighted average cost of capital. Total sales means the Company's or
a division's net sales for the performance cycle. At the beginning of each
performance cycle, the Committee may determine that one or more significant
elements may be excluded from the calculation of any performance goal.
Determination of Actual Awards
After the end of each performance cycle, the Committee will determine the
extent to which the performance goals applicable to each participant were
achieved or exceeded. The actual award (if any) for each participant will be
determined by applying the formula to the level of actual performance that was
achieved. No award is payable to a participant if the minimum performance
level specified by the Committee for the performance cycle is not achieved. In
any event, no participant may receive an award of more than $8 million for any
performance cycle.
The Committee retains discretion to eliminate or reduce the actual award
payable to any participant below that which otherwise would be payable under
the applicable formula. The Committee does not have discretion to increase the
award otherwise payable to any participant under the applicable formula.
Awards under the ELCAPP generally will be payable in cash on or about the
first April 1 following the end of the applicable performance cycle. However,
the Committee has discretion to declare that payment of all or part of an
award shall be deferred for a period not to exceed five years after the date
on which payment otherwise would have been made.
Pro Forma Benefits for the ELCAPP
Given that payments under the ELCAPP are determined by comparing actual
performance to the performance goals established by the Committee, it is not
possible to conclusively state the amount of benefits that will be paid under
the ELCAPP. In March 1999, the Committee established a performance cycle to
run for the three-fiscal year period beginning with the Company's 1999 fiscal
year. The performance goals for this performance cycle provide for a targeted
level of achievement for earnings and return on invested capital. The
following table sets forth the target awards that would be payable to the
persons named in the Summary Compensation Table and to all current executive
officers as a group, assuming that the performance goals established by the
Committee for the fiscal 1999 - 2001 performance cycle are exactly 100%
achieved, the participants' salaries remain constant, and the Committee chooses
not to reduce the award otherwise payable to any participant. There can be no
assurance that the preestablished performance goals actually will be achieved,
and therefore there can be no assurance that the target awards shown below
actually will be paid.
ELCAPP
Name and Position Dollar Value
Millard S. Drexler, President and Chief Executive Officer $2,050,000
Donald G. Fisher, Chairman (1) N/A
Robert J. Fisher, Executive Vice President and President, Gap $ 900,000
John B. Wilson, Chief Operating Officer $ 850,000
Charles K. Crovitz, Executive Vice President $ 255,000
All current executive officers as a group $4,669,100
All directors who are not current employees (2) N/A
All employees who are not current executive officers $15,764,000
(1) Donald Fisher does not participate in the Company's ELCAPP.
(2) The Company's non-employee directors are not eligible to participate
in the ELCAPP.
Amendment and Termination of the ELCAPP
The Board of Directors of the Company may amend or terminate the ELCAPP
at any time and for any reason, provided, however, that any amendment shall be
subject to shareholder approval if necessary to ensure the ELCAPP's
qualification under Section 162(m).
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" THE
APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY'S EXECUTIVE LONG-TERM CASH AWARD PERFORMANCE PLAN.
Unless a contrary choice is specified, the proxyholders will vote all proxies
solicited by the Board of Directors FOR approval of the plan.
PROPOSAL NO. 4
SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board of Directors has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent
auditors for the Company for the fiscal year ending January 29, 2000. Deloitte
& Touche LLP has acted as auditors for the Company since 1972. If shareholders
fail to approve the selection of such auditors, the Board of Directors will
reconsider the selection.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" THE
SELECTION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS.
Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the
Annual Meeting and available to make statements to, and respond to appropriate
questions of, shareholders.
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SHARES
The following table sets forth certain information as of [January 30,
1999], to indicate beneficial ownership of the Common Stock of the Company by
(i) each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5%
of the outstanding shares of the Company's Common Stock, (ii) each director and
nominee and each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table, and
(iii) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. Unless
otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership is direct and the person indicated
has sole voting and investment power.
Shares
Name of Beneficial Owner Beneficially Percent
Owned (1) of Class
Directors and Executive Officers
Adrian D. P. Bellamy 55,157 *
Charles K. Crovitz 167,858 (2) *
Evan S. Dobelle 0
Millard S. Drexler 8,811,075 (2)(3) 1.5%
Donald G. Fisher and (4) (4)
Doris F. Fisher 122,092,043 (4) 21.3%(4)
Robert J. Fisher 32,513,556 (2)(5) 5.7%
Glenda A. Hatchett 0
John M. Lillie 21,057 (6) *
Charles R. Schwab 54,193 (7) *
Brooks Walker, Jr. 331,907 (8) *
John B. Wilson 0
Sergio S. Zyman 8,963 (9) *
All directors and executive officers as a group
(15 persons) 164,558,963(10) 28.7%
Certain Other Beneficial Holders
John J. Fisher 33,661,074(11) 5.9%
* Indicates ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding shares of the
Company's Common Stock.
(1) Shares issuable upon exercise of options to acquire Common Stock that
are exercisable within 60 days after March 12, 1999 are treated as
beneficially owned as follows: Mr. Bellamy, 33,557; Mr. Crovitz, 97,650;
Mr. Drexler, 629,325; Mr. Robert Fisher, 810,900; Mr. Lillie, 6,557; Mr.
Schwab, 42,557; Mr. Walker, 42,557; Mr. Wilson, 0; Mr. Zyman, 8,807; and
all directors and executive officers as a group, 1,912,660.
(2) Includes shares as to which restrictions have not lapsed which were
granted under the Company's Management Incentive Restricted Stock Plan
and/or the 1996 Stock Option and Award Plan.
(3) Includes 187,500 shares held by the Peggy and Millard Drexler Family
Foundation of which Mr. Drexler disclaims beneficial ownership.
(4) Donald G. Fisher and Doris F. Fisher, who are husband and wife, are the
founders of the Company, directors, and, respectively, the Chairman of,
and a merchandising consultant to, the Company. Their address is the
same as that shown for the Company on the first page of this Proxy
Statement. In the table shown above, the 122,092,043 shares beneficially
owned by Donald G. Fisher and Doris F. Fisher are beneficially owned by
both of them. Of the shares shown, 111,016,123 shares are held as
community property. The remainder of the shares are held by the Fishers
as trustees for various foundations and trusts. Amounts shown include
378,819 shares held by the Donald and Doris Fisher Family Foundation
Trust, of which the Fishers constitute a minority of the trustees,
beneficial ownership of which is disclaimed, and exclude shares held
directly or indirectly by the Fishers' three adult sons, beneficial
ownership of which is disclaimed.
(5) Includes 1,005,750 shares held jointly by Robert Fisher and his spouse,
71,163 shares owned by his spouse, 12,353,119 shares held by Robert
Fisher as trustee for his nieces and nephews, and 2,359,236 shares held
by Robert Fisher as trustee for certain other trusts. Robert Fisher's
address is the same as that shown for the Company on the first page of
this Proxy Statement.
(6) Includes 14,500 shares held under the Lillie Family Living Trust, over
which Mr. Lillie and his wife share voting and investment power.
(7) Includes 2,250 shares owned by Mr. Schwab's spouse and 200 shares owned
by a trust for which Mr. Schwab is the trustee.
(8) Includes 135,000 shares owned by the Brooks Walker, Jr. Charitable
Remainder Trust, of which Mr. Walker is the trustee and over which he has
sole voting and investment power.
(9) Includes 156 shares held by Mr. Zyman's minor children.
(10) Reflects the information in the footnotes set forth above.
(11) Includes 16,893 shares owned by John Fisher's spouse, 12,353,119 shares
held by John Fisher as trustee for his nieces and nephews and 2,419,758
shares held by John Fisher as trustee for certain other trusts. John
Fisher's address is the same as that shown for the Company on the first
page of this Proxy Statement.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
As required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the
Company notes that Mr. Drexler reported on a Form 4 filed late one transaction
involving the gift of Common Stock in March 1994.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary of Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth for the periods presented compensation paid
to, earned by or awarded to the Chief Executive Officer and the four other most
highly compensated executive officers of the Company in the fiscal year ended
January 30, 1999. The footnotes to the table provide additional information
concerning the Company's compensation and benefit programs.
Summary Compensation Table
Long-Term
Annual Compensation Compensation Awards
Other Restricted Securities
Annual Stock Underlying All Other
Name and Fiscal Compensation Awards Options Compensation
Principal Position Year Salary($) Bonus($)(1) ($)(2) ($)(3) (#)(3) ($)(5)
Millard S. Drexler, 1998 $1,976,870 $5,335,000 $0 $0 3,601,500 $492,896
President and Chief 1997 1,882,928 1,615,000 $0 $0 180,000 244,712
Executive Officer 1996 1,746,989 1,350,000 $0 $0 180,000 141,404
Donald G. Fisher, 1998 532,655 539,500 0 N/A N/A 866,244
Chairman 1997 499,274 425,000 0 N/A N/A 492,278
1996 1,058,047 787,313 0 N/A N/A 278,105
Robert J. Fisher, 1998 890,771 2,114,500 0 0 151,500 705,650
Executive Vice 1997 848,548 650,250 0 0 150,000 269,791
President and 1996 840,940 637,500 0 0 150,000 93,227
President, Gap Division
John B. Wilson, 1998 721,926 1,537,074 462 0 301,500 10,443
Chief Operating 1997 626,794 531,250 156,030 0 600,000 8,800
Officer (6) 1996 188,098 1,006,750 11,812 597,581 555,000 0
Charles K. Crovitz, 1998 395,745 613,500 0 0 252,750 7,653
Executive Vice President
(1) Includes bonuses paid in 1998 under the Executive Long-Term Cash Award
Performance Plan ("ELCAPP") as follows: Mr. Drexler $2,875,000; Mr.
Donald Fisher $0; Mr. Robert Fisher $1,300,000; Mr. Wilson $803,674 and
Mr. Crovitz $308,400.
(2) While the named executive officers enjoy certain perquisites, for fiscal
years 1996, 1997 and 1998 these did not exceed the lesser of $50,000 or
10% of each executive officer's salary and bonus, except for perquisites
of Mr. Wilson in 1997. The amount listed for Mr. Wilson in 1998
represents tax gross-up payments in connection with the reimbursement of
relocation expenses. The amount listed for Mr. Wilson in 1997 includes,
among other things, amounts paid to Mr. Wilson in connection with his
relocation as follows: $42,308 for temporary housing, $41,856 for tax
gross-up payments in connection with the reimbursement for temporary
housing, and $43,562 for closing costs. The amount listed for Mr. Wilson
in 1996 represents tax gross-up payments in connection with the
reimbursement of relocation expenses.
(3) Donald Fisher does not participate in the Company's restricted stock
plan. As of the end of fiscal 1998, the aggregate restricted stock
holdings for the named executive officers consisted of 2,385,000 shares
worth $153,087,188 (based on the closing price of the Company's Common
Stock of $64.1875 on January 29, 1999), without giving effect to the
diminution of value attributable to the restrictions on such stock. Such
amount included $144,421,875 for Mr. Drexler (2,250,000 shares),
$7,221,094 for Robert Fisher (112,500 shares), and $1,444,219 for Mr.
Crovitz (22,500 shares). Dividends are paid on the restricted shares to
the extent payable on the Company's Common Stock generally. The
restricted stock award of 45,675 shares for Mr. Wilson in 1996 had a
vesting date of less than three years and was canceled in 1997 pursuant
to a prior arrangement with Mr. Wilson. No other shares granted to the
named executive officers vest in less than three years from the date of
grant.
(4) Donald Fisher does not participate in the Company's stock option plan.
Of the securities underlying options for Mr. Wilson in 1996, 14,385 were
canceled in 1997 pursuant to a prior arrangement with Mr. Wilson.
(5) These amounts include earnings over 120% of applicable federal long-
term rate in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules on
deferred compensation credited, but not paid or payable, during the
fiscal year under the Company's Executive Capital Accumulation Plan,
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and/or Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan as follows: Mr. Drexler, $486,184 for 1998, $238,520 for
1997, and $135,367 for 1996; Mr. Donald Fisher, $858,892 for 1998,
$486,109 for 1997, and $273,219 for 1996; Mr. Robert Fisher, $700,173 for
1998, $263,391 for 1997, and $86,742 for 1996; Mr. Wilson, $2,043 for
1998 and $477 for 1997; and Mr. Crovitz, $1,138 for 1998. All remaining
amounts shown represent the Company's contributions to the Company's
GapShare Plan.
(6) Mr. Wilson joined the Company in October 1996.
(7) Mr. Crovitz became an executive officer in September 1998.
Stock Options
The following tables set forth certain information regarding stock options
granted to, exercised by and held by the executive officers named in the
Summary Compensation Table. All stock option awards in the following tables
and elsewhere in this Proxy Statement have been adjusted to reflect stock
splits.
Option Grants In Last Fiscal Year
Individual Grants
Number of
Securities Percent of Total Market
Underlying Options Granted Exercise or Price on Grant Date
Options Granted to Employees in Base Price Grant Date Expiration Present
Name (#)(1)(2) Fiscal Year ($/Sh) ($/Sh)(3) Date (4) Value ($)(5)
Millard S. Drexler 1,125,000 6.0% $39.4063 $30.3125 3/31/08 $10,804,725
1,125,000 6.0% 36.3750 30.3125 3/31/08 11,754,450
1,350,000 7.1% 30.3125 30.3125 3/31/08 16,759,170
1,500 * 31.7083 31.7083 10/02/08 19,479
Donald G. Fisher N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Robert J. Fisher 150,000 .8% 30.3125 30.3125 3/31/08 1,540,140
1,500 * 31.7083 31.7083 10/02/08 16,111
John B. Wilson 300,000 1.6% 30.3125 30.3125 3/31/08 3,351,450
1,500 * 31.7083 31.7083 10/02/08 16,111
Charles K. Crovitz 101,250 .5% 30.3125 30.3125 3/31/08 1,131,114
150,000 .8% 38.9792 38.9792 9/09/08 2,377,905
1,500 * 31.7083 31.7083 3/31/08 16,111
* Less than 0.1%.
(1) The vesting schedule for options listed above is as follows:
Number of shares vesting on
anniversary of grant date in:
Shares Date of
Granted Grant 2001 2002 2003 2004
Millard S. Drexler 1,125,000 3/31/98 375,000 375,000 375,000
1,125,000 3/31/98 375,000 375,000 375,000
1,350,000 3/31/98 487,500 487,500 375,000
1,500 10/02/98 1,500
Robert S. Fisher 150,000 3/31/98 75,000 75,000
1,500 10/02/98 1,500
John B. Wilson 300,000 3/31/98 75,000 75,000 150,000
1,500 10/02/98 1,500
Charles K. Crovitz 101,250 3/31/98 28,125 28,125 45,000
150,000 9/09/98 30,000 30,000 45,000 45,000
1,500 10/02/98 1,500
(2) Under the terms of the Company's 1996 Stock Option and Award Plan, the
Compensation and Stock Option Committee retains discretion, subject to
plan limits, to modify the terms of outstanding stock options.
Donald Fisher does not participate in the Company's stock option plan.
(3) Average of high and low stock prices for the Company's Common Stock as
reported in NYSE - Composite Transactions for the date of grant.
(4) All options granted in fiscal 1998 were granted for a term of ten
years, subject to termination 90 days following termination of employment
in certain events.
(5) This column represents the present value of the options on the grant
date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model for the Common Stock,
utilizing the following assumptions: stock price volatility of 32%;
dividend yield of 0.37%; 4.29 to 6.08-year expected option terms; 5.65%
to 5.68% risk-free interest rate; and no adjustment for non-
transferability or forfeiture. The actual value, if any, that an
executive officer may realize will depend on the excess of the market
price over the exercise price on the date the option is exercised so that
there is no assurance that the value realized by an executive will be at
or near the value estimated by the Black-Scholes model, which is based on
arbitrary assumptions as to the variables of stock price volatility,
future dividend yield and interest rate. For an estimate of the impact
of all stock option grants on the Company's financial results using the
Black-Scholes valuation method, see note G to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in the Company's Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal
year ended January 30, 1999.
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year
and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
Number of Value of
Securities Underlying Unexercised
Unexercised In-the-Money
Shares Acquired Options at FY-End (#) Options at FY-End($)
Name on Exercise(#) Value Realized($) Exercisable/Unexercisable Exercisable/Unexercisable(1)
Millard S. Drexler 180,000 $4,828,750 494,325 13,141,500 $28,095,857 $631,396,688
Donald G. Fisher (2) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Robert J. Fisher 160,650 5,971,642 248,400 2,851,500 13,961,687 153,884,968
John B. Wilson 305,115 9,277,890 0 1,714,500 0 80,406,968
Charles K. Crovitz 0 0 70,650 405,750 3,959,540 15,222,375
____________________
(1) Represents the difference between the closing price of the Company's
Common Stock on January 29, 1999 ($64.1875) and the exercise price of the
options.
(2) Donald Fisher does not participate in the Company's stock option plan.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During the fiscal year 1998, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee
of the Board of Directors consisted of Messrs. Bellamy, Bowes and Lillie and
Ms. Fjeldstad, all of whom were non-employee directors. Ms. Fjeldstad did not
stand for election at the 1998 Annual Meeting and Mr. Bowes resigned from the
Board of Directors on August 31, 1998.
Report of Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation
The Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors is
responsible for reviewing and approving the Company's compensation policies and
the compensation paid to executive officers. The Committee currently is
comprised of the members named below, all of whom are non-employee directors.
Compensation Philosophy
The general philosophy of the Company's compensation program, which has
been reviewed and approved by the Committee, is to provide a competitive
advantage to the Company and rewards to the executives based both on the
Company's performance and on the individual's contribution to the Company.
Corporate and divisional performance are evaluated by reviewing the extent to
which financial and strategic goals are met, including such factors as
profitability and sales growth. These performance criteria are reviewed each
year to ensure that they are consistent with the Company's mission and
strategies. Officers are also given annual goals and their individual
performance is evaluated by reviewing progress against these objectives.
The Company's compensation policies are intended to motivate and reward
highly qualified executives for long-term strategic management and the
enhancement of shareholder value, to support a performance-oriented environment
that rewards achievement of specific internal Company and individual goals, and
to attract and retain executives whose abilities are critical to the long-term
success and competitiveness of the Company. The program is heavily oriented
toward incentive compensation tied to the annual and longer-term financial
performance of the Company and to the longer-term return realized by the
Company's shareholders.
There are three main components in the Company's executive compensation
program:
- Base Salary
- Annual Incentives
- Long-Term Incentives
Base Salary
Executive officers' salaries have been targeted above the average rates
paid by competitors to enable the Company to attract and retain highly skilled
executives. The Committee believes that the historical growth in the Company's
revenues, stores and profitability has made the Company a target for other
companies seeking employees and that, therefore, these rates are necessary to
retain key officers. The Committee reviews the performance of and approves
salaries for the Chief Executive Officer and the executive officers on an
annual basis, generally in the first quarter.
The Committee believes that the market for retailing executives, and thus
the relevant competitive data, includes a broader group of companies than that
shown in the stock price performance graph presented in this Proxy Statement
under the heading "Performance Graph." Thus, in reviewing the 1998 salaries
for executive officers, the Committee examined market data and salary increase
surveys for specialty retail, consumer/branded goods, and general industry
groups which were prepared by national consulting companies. Salaries were
adjusted based on actual individual job performance and/or changes in duties
and responsibilities.
Mr. Drexler's base salary for fiscal year 1998 was $2.05 million,
representing an increase of 8% over the prior year. In setting the Chief
Executive Officer's 1998 salary, the Committee considered the Company's 1997
results, future objectives and challenges, and Mr. Drexler's individual
performance and contributions. The Company's 1997 performance was judged by the
Committee to be above expectations and very good compared to
industry/competitor results. The Committee reviewed in detail Mr. Drexler's
achievement of his 1997 goals and his individual contributions to the Company.
The Committee concluded that he had achieved his 1997 goals and had provided a
leadership role in achieving the Company's three strategic priorities for
1997: growing earnings and improving the return on investments, developing
employees and strengthening the Brand. The Committee also considered Mr.
Drexler's decisive management of operational and strategic issues, his drive to
reinforce a culture of innovation and his ability and dedication to enhance the
long-term value of the Company for the shareholders. The Committee believes
that Mr. Drexler has continued to provide the leadership and vision that he has
provided throughout his 15-year tenure as a Company executive, during which, on
a compounded annual growth basis, the Company's net earnings increased by 30%,
net sales by 23% and market value by 48%. In making its salary decisions with
respect to Mr. Drexler, the Committee exercised its discretion and judgment
based on the above factors, and no specific formula was applied to determine
the weight of each factor.
Annual Incentive Bonus
Annual incentive bonuses for executive officers are intended to reflect
the Committee's belief that a significant portion of the annual compensation of
each executive officer should be contingent upon the performance of
the Company.
To carry out this philosophy, the Company has implemented a performance-
based Executive Management Incentive Cash Award Plan ("Executive MICAP"), in
which executive officers are measured solely on Company performance targets.
As a pay-for-performance plan, the Executive MICAP is intended to motivate and
reward executive officers by directly linking the amount of any cash bonus to
specific corporate and/or divisional financial goals. Specific measurements are
chosen each year among earnings, sales growth and volume, return on assets,
and/or return on equity; and threshold, target and maximum payout levels are
established to reflect the Company's objectives. These goals and the potential
bonuses are reviewed and approved by the Committee in the first quarter of
each fiscal year. Under the 1998 guidelines adopted by the Committee,
executive officers were eligible to receive between 12% and 120% of their
salary as a bonus, depending on actual earnings performance compared to target
earnings goals set for each division. Actual bonus amounts are calculated
within this range pursuant to a set formula which takes into account the extent
to which earnings goals were achieved and the grade level of the officer. No
bonus is paid if threshold goals are not met.
The Company's 1998 performance was judged by the Committee to be
significantly above expectations. The Company achieved record earnings and
surpassed its financial goals for the year. The Chief Executive Officer was
eligible to receive between 20% and 120% of his base salary as a bonus under
the 1998 guidelines adopted by the Committee. No bonus would have been paid to
Mr. Drexler if threshold goals were not met. Because the Company far exceeded
its goals and achieved superior results, the actual bonus received by Mr.
Drexler was 120% of his base pay.
The Committee believes that the Executive MICAP program provides an
excellent link between annual results and the incentives paid to executives.
Long-Term Incentives
Long-term incentives represent over half the total income opportunity for
executive officers. These incentives create a direct linkage between executive
rewards and increased shareholder value by delivering a significant portion of
total compensation opportunity through both stock options and through a cash
performance plan with three-year overlapping performance cycles. This
compensation program is designed to focus on Company performance.
The Committee believes that executive officers and other key employees
should have significant ownership of the Company's stock. Notably, all
executive officers as a group beneficially own approximately 28.6% of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock. In particular, Mr. Donald Fisher, the
Company's founder and Chairman, beneficially owns jointly with his wife Doris
Fisher approximately 21.3% of the outstanding shares.
Long-Term Performance Plan
In order to emphasize its compensation philosophy oriented to longer-term
results, the Company has an Executive Long-Term Cash Award Performance Plan
("ELCAPP"), in which officers are measured and compensated on Company and/or
business unit performance targets. A three-year performance cycle is
established each year, with participants receiving a cash payout if certain
minimum, target or maximum predetermined performance goals are achieved at the
end of the cycle. As a pay-for-performance plan, ELCAPP is intended to
motivate and reward officers by directly linking the amount of any cash bonus
to specific corporate and/or divisional long-term financial goals. Specific
measurements are chosen each year for each successive three-year cycle. The
type of measurements considered include earnings, return on equity, return on
net assets, return on invested capital, sales volume and total sales.
Threshold, target and maximum payout levels are established to reflect the
Company's objectives. These goals and the potential amounts of officer bonuses
are reviewed and approved by the Committee in the first quarter of each fiscal
year. Under the 1997, 1998 and 1999 guidelines adopted by the Committee,
officers will be eligible to receive between 15% and 150% of their three-year
average salary as a bonus, depending on actual performance compared to target
goals set for each division. Actual bonus amounts are calculated within this
range pursuant to a set formula which takes into account the extent to which
goals were achieved and the grade level of the officer. No bonus is paid if
threshold goals are not met.
ELCAPP was established in 1996, with the first cycle comprising fiscal
years 1996 - 1998. The Company's performance for the first cycle was judged by
the Committee to far exceed expectations, with financial results surpassing
financial goals for the three year cycle.
The Committee believes that the ELCAPP program provides an excellent link
between long-term results and financial incentives paid to executives. Because
of the Company's superior results, Mr. Drexler received a bonus of 150% of the
average of his salary over the three year cycle.
Stock Option and Award Plan
The Committee has the power to grant both stock options and restricted
stock under the Company's 1996 Stock Option and Award Plan. It has been the
Committee's practice to grant stock options to executive officers on an annual
basis, usually in the first quarter of each fiscal year. Generally, the
options vest in three years or more from date of grant and executives must be
employed by the Company at the time of vesting in order to exercise the
options. The Committee has discretion to grant discounted stock options and it
has done so when it felt it was necessary to attract and/or retain key
executives. The Committee believes that stock option grants provide an
incentive that focuses the executives' attention on managing the Company from
the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in the business. The
Company's stock options are tied to the future performance of the Company's
stock and will provide value to the recipient only when the price of the
Company's stock increases above the option grant price.
In order to determine the appropriate number of options to be granted to
its executive officers, in 1998 the Company considered competitive practices
for a wide array of companies in a large number of industries. The
calculations underlying these guidelines are based on the grant value of the
option (i.e., number of shares times the exercise price) in relation to the
employee's salary and performance level. With the exception of the Chief
Executive Officer's grants, the Company's actual 1998 option grants to
executive officers were in line with those ranges. The size of each grant was
based on a range of potential shares (high, medium, low) for each eligible
employee's level. Actual shares awarded were based on the score obtained by
eligible employees on their yearly individual performance evaluation.
In 1998, Mr. Drexler was granted options to purchase 3,601,500 shares.
These grants were intended to recognize exceptional performance. The price of
these shares is as follows: 1,351,500 at market value at the date of grant,
1,125,000 at a price which was 20% above the market value at the date of grant,
1,125,000 at a price which was 30% above the market value at the date of grant.
The "premium price" options are intended to reward Mr. Drexler only after
shareholders have been delivered growth in the stock price. The shares become
exercisable four, five, and six years from date of grant. This grant is
consistent with the Committee's philosophies of increasing shareholder value
and including at-risk compensation as a significant part of an executive's
overall compensation.
Impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code
The Committee has considered the potential impact of Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code on its compensation plans and has determined that it is
the Company's preference to qualify to the maximum extent possible its
executives' compensation for deductibility under applicable tax laws. The
Company's compensation plans have been designed to permit the Committee to
grant awards (other than restricted stock and discounted stock options) which
qualify for deductibility under Section 162(m).
In addition, to allow for full deductibility of base salaries, those named
executive officers whose base salaries exceed the $1,000,000 limit have in the
past deferred that portion of their compensation above the limit under the
Company's deferred compensation plans.
John M. Lillie (Chairman)
Adrian D. P. Bellamy
Performance Graph
The graph below compares the percentage changes in the Company's
cumulative total shareholder return* on its Common Stock for the five-year
period ended January 30, 1999, with the cumulative total return of the S&P 500
Index and the Dow Jones Retailers All Specialty Index.
[performance graph]
Total Return Analysis
1/28/94 1/28/95 2/3/96 2/1/97 1/31/98 1/30/99
The Gap, Inc. $ 100 $ 78 $ 115 $ 139 $ 285 $ 706
DJ Retailers All
Specialty Index $ 100 $ 101 $ 141 $ 176 $ 224 $ 290
S&P 500 $ 100 $ 104 $ 110 $ 131 $ 199 $ 346
____________________
* Total return assumes quarterly reinvestment of dividends.
Employment Contracts
In December 1998, the Company entered into an income continuation
agreement with John B. Wilson. Under the terms of the agreement, if the
Company decides to significantly decrease Mr. Wilson's level of
responsibilities, the Company will provide him with continued employment for
two years. Subject to certain exceptions, during the two-year period, Mr.
Wilson will continue to receive his latest base salary and will continue to
participate in other standard Company benefits, as well as certain Executive
MICAP and ELCAPP payouts. At the start of any such two-year period, 50% of the
options that vest during the two-year period will be decelerated to vest at the
end of the two-year period.
Other Reportable Transactions
The Company has an agreement with Fisher Development, Inc. ("FDI"), a
company which is wholly owned by Robert S. Fisher, the brother of Donald G.
Fisher, the Chairman and a principal shareholder of the Company. The
agreement, which is reviewed annually by the Audit and Finance Committee of the
Board of Directors, sets forth the terms under which FDI may act as general
contractor in connection with the Company's construction activities. During
the 1998 fiscal year, FDI supervised the construction of new store leasehold
improvements for ______ stores and certain headquarters facilities, expansions
of ____ stores, and remodels of existing stores and headquarters facilities.
The total cost of such construction was approximately $_____ million, including
profit and overhead costs of approximately $_____ million paid by the Company
to FDI relating to this construction.
Robert J. Fisher, an adult son of Donald G. and Doris F. Fisher, is
employed as Executive Vice President of the Company and President, Gap Division
of the Company. Robert J. Fisher is also a director of the Company.
Comparable transactions with the persons described above are expected to
continue during the current fiscal year.
William S. Fisher, an adult son of Donald G. and Doris F. Fisher, was
employed by the Company during the 1998 fiscal year. He was paid a salary and
bonus of $227,533 during the 1998 fiscal year; Company contributions to his
account under GapShare for fiscal 1998 amounted to $3,197. William S. Fisher
is no longer employed by the Company.
Pursuant to the Company's Relocation Loan Plan, on November 30, 1996, the
Company made a $550,000 loan to Mr. Wilson at the interest rate of 3% per year,
secured by a second deed of trust on his home and by the stock and options
granted to him under the Company's 1996 Stock Option and Award Plan. The loan
is payable in full on November 25, 2001, or earlier upon termination of
employment. Mr. Wilson is also required to apply 50% of any after-tax
(withholding) gain on the sale of stock acquired upon exercise of stock options
to decrease the amount of this loan. The Company waived this requirement for
two stock option exercises by Mr. Wilson: one in March 1998 for 80,115 shares
and another in November 1998 for 225,000 shares. Interest on the loan is
payable via bi-weekly payroll deductions. The amount outstanding on February
27, 1999 with respect to this loan was $550,000.
In January 1999, the Company made a $3,000,000 loan to Mr. Wilson at no
interest, secured by a third deed of trust on his home and by the stock options
granted to him under the Company's 1996 Stock Option and Award Plan. The loan
is payable in five equal annual installments beginning in January 2005, or
earlier upon termination of employment. The entire $3,000,000 was outstanding
on February 27, 1999.
OTHER BUSINESS
The Company's management is not aware of any other matters to come before
the meeting. If any matter not mentioned in this Proxy Statement is properly
brought before the meeting, the proxyholders will vote upon such matters in
accordance with their best judgment.
PROPOSALS OF SHAREHOLDERS
Proposals of shareholders intended to be presented at the Company's Annual
Meeting in 2000 must be received by the Company for inclusion in the Company's
Proxy Statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting on or before
December 6, 1999. Address proposals to the Company's Secretary at One Harrison
Street, San Francisco, California 94105.
In accordance with Rule 14a-4(c)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, management proxyholders intend to use their discretionary
voting authority with respect to any shareholder proposal raised at the
Company's Annual Meeting in 2000 as to which the proponent fails to notify the
Company on or before February 19, 2000 (45 days prior to the date on which this
Proxy Statement was first mailed to shareholders). Address notifications to
the Company's Secretary at One Harrison Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Anne B. Gust
Secretary
Exhibit A
AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
THE GAP, INC.
Section 1 of Article FIFTH of the Company's Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation shall be amended to read as follows:
FIFTH: Section 1. Classes and Number of Shares.
The total number of shares of all classes of stock which this corporation
shall have authority to issue is 2,390,000,000 shares. The classes and the
aggregate number of shares of stock of each class which this corporation shall
have authority to issue are as follows:
(i) 2,300,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.05 par value per share
(hereinafter the "Common Stock");
(ii) 60,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, $0.05 par value per
share (hereinafter the "Class B Stock"); and
(iii) 30,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, $0.05 par value per share,
with such rights, privileges, restrictions and preferences as the
Board of Directors may authorize from time to time (hereinafter the
"Preferred Stock").
Exhibit B
THE GAP, INC.
EXECUTIVE LONG-TERM CASH AWARD PERFORMANCE PLAN
(January 26, 1999 Restatement)
1. Purpose of the Plan
The purpose of the Executive Long-Term Cash Award Performance Plan is to
provide financial incentives for certain of the Company's officers to meet and
exceed the Company's multi-year financial goals. The Plan is intended to
qualify as "performance-based compensation" under Code Section 162(m).
2. Definitions
2.1 "Affiliated Company" means any company controlling, controlled
by or under common control with the Company.
2.2 "Award" means a cash award pursuant to the provisions of the
Plan.
2.3 "Capital Control" means adherence to the capital budget
approved by the Company's Board of Directors as part of the annual budgeting
process. Such budget shall be inclusive of the costs of new, enlarged, and
relocated stores, remodels, lease rights, divisional capital, and other
associated costs.
2.4 "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Reference to a specific section of the Code shall include such section, any
valid regulation promulgated thereunder, and any comparable provision of any
further legislation or regulation amending, supplementing or superseding such
section or regulation.
2.5 "Committee" means the Compensation and Stock Option Committee
of the Company's Board of Directors, or any other Committee appointed by the
Board pursuant to Section 3 of the Plan.
2.6 "Company" means The Gap, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
2.7 "Comparable Store Sales" means the Company's or a division's
net sales from stores open more than one year.
2.8 "Determination Date" means as to a Performance Cycle, the
latest date possible that will not jeopardize the Plan's qualification as
"performance-based compensation" under Code section 162(m).
2.9 "Earnings" means either (a) operating income of the Company or
one of its divisions for a given Performance Cycle less certain allocated
expenses (e.g., headquarters, distribution centers, etc.), or (b) income
before taxes of the Company or one of its divisions; determined in accordance
with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, provided that prior to the
Determination Date the Committee shall determine (1) whether Earnings will be
measured under clause (a) or (b), and (2) whether any significant adjustments
should be made to the calculation (e.g., exclusions for non-recurring items or
adjustments for costs not accounted for under Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, etc.).
2.10 "Economic Value Added" means the Company's or a division's
Net Operating Profit After Tax (NOPAT) for a specific performance period less
charges for use of capital assets (Capital Charges). NOPAT for a division
includes not only the revenues and directly controllable expenses, but also
could include shared costs for applicable Information Technology,
Distribution, and other Headquarters-related expenses, as determined by the
Committee (prior to the Determination Date). Capital Charges means the
Company's or a division's Average Capital Balances multiplied by the Weighted
Average Cost of Capital. Divisional Average Capital Balances include not only
directly controllable assets (Inventory, Property Plant and Equipment, Net
Lease Rights, and Capitalized Leases), but also can include shared assets for
applicable Information Technology, Distribution, and other Facilities capital,
as determined by the Committee (prior to the Determination Date). Total
Company Average Capital Balances includes all assets except cash, plus
capitalized leases less all non-interest bearing current liabilities.
2.11 "Fiscal Year" means the 1999 fiscal year of the Company and
each succeeding fiscal year of the Company.
2.12 "Officer" means an officer (whether or not a member of the
Company's Board of Directors) employed by the Company or any Affiliated
Company.
2.13 "Participant" means as to any Performance Cycle, an Officer
who has been selected by the Committee for participation in the Plan for such
Performance Cycle.
2.14 "Performance Cycle" means any fiscal period of not less than
three consecutive Fiscal Years nor more than five consecutive Fiscal Years, as
determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.
2.15 "Performance Goals" means the goal(s) (or combined goals(s))
determined by the Committee (in its sole discretion) to be applicable to a
Participant for a Performance Cycle. As determined by the Committee, the
Performance Goals applicable to each Participant shall provide for a targeted
level or levels of achievement using one or more of the following measures:
(a) Capital Control, (b) Comparable Store Sales; (c) Earnings; (d) Economic
Value Added, (d) Return on Equity; (e) Return on Invested Capital; (f) Return
on Net Assets; (g) Sales Volume; (h) Spread, and (i) Total Sales. As
determined in the discretion of the Committee, the Performance Goals for any
Performance Cycle may: (a) differ among Participants, (b) relate to
performance on a Company-wide or divisional basis, and/or (c) provide for a
comparison of actual performance by the Company or a division to actual
performance by a group of competitors determined in the discretion of the
Committee. For each Performance Cycle, the Performance Goals applicable to
each Participant shall be set forth in writing on or prior to the
Determination Date.
2.16 "Plan" means the Executive Long-Term Cash Award Performance
Plan, as set forth in this document and as hereafter amended from time to
time.
2.17 "Return on Equity" means the Company's or a division's
average Earnings for the Performance Cycle, expressed as a percentage of the
Company's or a division's average shareholders' equity over the Performance
Cycle, determined in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
2.18 "Return on Invested Capital" (or "ROIC") means the
Company's or a division's Net Operating Profit After Tax (NOPAT) divided by
their respective Average Capital Balances over the same period of time. For a
division, NOPAT includes not only the division-specific revenues and directly
controllable expenses, but also could include shared costs for applicable
Information Technology, Distribution, and other Headquarters-related expenses.
Prior to applying taxes, operating profits are adjusted for interest expense
on capitalized leases. Divisional Average Capital Balances is defined as an
average of both directly controlled assets (Inventory, Property Plant and
Equipment, Net Lease Rights and Capitalized Leases) as well as any applicable
shared assets for related Information Technology, Distribution, and
Headquarters facilities capital balances. For the Company, NOPAT includes all
after tax earnings items, including an adjustment for interest on capitalized
leases but excluding interest expense or income on debt and cash. Total
Company Average Capital includes all assets except cash, plus capitalized
leases less non-interest bearing current liabilities.
2.19 "Return on Net Assets" means the Company's or division's
average Earnings for the Performance Cycle, expressed as a percentage of the
Company's or a division's average assets for Performance Cycle, determined in
accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
2.20 "Sales Volume" means the average total sales volume per store
of the Company or one of its divisions for the Performance Cycle, determined
in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
2.21 "Spread" means the difference between the Company's or a
division's ROIC for a Performance Cycle and the Weighted Average Cost of
Capital. In practice, it can be used as an alternative method of calculating
Economic Value Added, by simply multiplying the calculated spread by the
Average Capital figures.
2.22 "Termination of Employment" means the time when the employee-
employer relationship between the Participant and the Company and its
Affiliated Companies is terminated for any reason, including, but not limited
to, a termination by resignation, discharge, death, permanent disability,
retirement, or the disaffiliation of an Affiliated Company, but excluding any
such termination where there is a simultaneous reemployment by either the
Company or one of its Affiliated Companies.
2.23 "Total Sales" means the Company's or a division's net sales
for the Performance Cycle.
2.24 "Weighted Average Cost of Capital" (or "WACC") means the
weighted average of the Company's cost of debt and cost of capital. The
weighting is determined by comparing the balance of the Company's debt
(acquired debt plus capitalized leases) to the balance of the Company's equity
based upon market value (rather than book value).
3. Administration of the Plan
3.1 The Plan shall be administered by the Committee, which shall
consist of no fewer than two members of the Company's Board of Directors, who
shall be appointed and serve at the pleasure of the Company's Board of
Directors. No member of the Company's Board of Directors who is not an
"outside director" under Code section 162(m) shall serve on the Committee.
3.2 Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have
exclusive authority to select the Participants, and to determine the target
Award levels, the times when Awards will be granted, and the Performance Goals
which must be achieved prior to payment of any Awards. For each Performance
Cycle, all actions by the Committee shall be taken by the Determination Date.
3.3 The Committee shall have all discretion and authority necessary
or appropriate to administer the Plan, including, but not limited to, the
power to interpret the Plan, to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and
regulations relating to it, and to make all other determinations necessary or
advisable in the administration of the Plan, and all such determinations shall
be final and binding upon all persons having and interest in the Plan.
3.4 A majority of the Committee shall constitute a quorum, and the
acts of a majority of the members present at a meeting at which the quorum is
present or any action taken without a meeting by a writing executed by a
majority of the Committee shall constitute the act of the Committee.
3.5 All expenses and liabilities incurred by the Committee in the
administration of the Plan shall be borne by the Company. The Committee may
employ attorneys, consultants, accountants, or other persons. The Committee,
the Company and its officers and directors shall be entitled to rely upon the
advice, opinion, or valuations of any such persons. No member of the
Committee shall be personally liable for any action, determination, or
interpretation taken or made with respect to the Plan, unless such action,
determination, or interpretation constitutes criminal misconduct, willful
negligence or demonstrates bad faith and all members of the Committee shall be
fully protected by the Company in respect to any such action, determination or
interpretation.
4. Eligibility and Participation
The Plan is designed for Officers whose responsibilities significantly
influence Company results. Participants shall be selected by the Committee
prior to or on the Determination Date. Participation in the Plan is on a
Performance Cycle basis and in the sole discretion of the Committee. Thus, an
Officer who is selected for participation in a given Performance Cycle is in
no way guaranteed to be selected for participation in any subsequent
Performance Cycle or Performance Cycles.
5. Determination of Awards
5.1 Prior to or on the Determination Date, the Committee, in its
sole discretion shall assign each Participant a target Award expressed as a
percentage of the Participant's average annual base salary during the
Performance Cycle.
5.2 On or prior to the Determination Date, the Committee, in its
sole discretion, shall establish a formula for purposes of determining the
actual Award (if any) payable to each Participant. Each formula shall: (a)
be in writing; (b) be based on a comparison of actual performance to the
Performance Goals; (c) provide for the payment of a Participant's target Award
if the Performance Goals for the Performance Cycle are achieved; and
(d) provide for an actual Award greater than or less than the Participant's
target Award, depending upon the extent to which actual performance exceeds or
falls below the Performance Goals.
5.3 After the end of the each Performance Cycle, the Committee shall
certify in writing the extent to which the Performance Goals applicable to
each Participant for the Performance Cycle were achieved or exceeded. The
actual Award for each Participant shall be determined by applying the formula
established pursuant to Section 5.2 of the Plan to the level of actual
performance that has been certified by the Committee. However, each
Participant's actual Award (if any) shall be subject to the maximum provided
in Section 6.
5.4 No Awards shall be paid to a Participant for a Performance Cycle
unless the minimum actual performance for the Performance Cycle specified by
the Committee pursuant to Section 5.2 of the Plan is achieved.
5.5 The Committee, in its sole discretion, may eliminate any
Participant's Award, or reduce it below that which otherwise would be payable
in accordance with the Plan.
6. Maximum Award Payable
For any Performance Cycle, the maximum Award payable to any Participant
under the Plan shall be $8,000,000.
7. Payment of Award
7.1 Except as provided in Section 7.2 of the Plan or as otherwise
determined by the Committee, payment of Awards (if any) for a Performance
Cycle will be made in cash or its equivalent on or about the first April 1
following the end of the Performance Cycle. If the Committee (in its
discretion) so determines, payment of all or part of an Award to one or more
Participants may be deferred for a period not to exceed five years after the
date when payment otherwise would have been made. Any such deferral shall be
subject to such rules and procedures as the Committee (in its discretion)
shall determine. For example (but not by way of limitation), the Committee
may determine that a deferred Award shall be forfeited unless the Participant
remains an Officer through the scheduled payment date.
7.2 Unless otherwise specifically determined by the Committee, a
participant actually will be entitled to payment of an Award only if the
Participant is an Officer on the date of payment (and except to the limited
extent provided in the following sentence). If, after the completion of a
Performance Cycle, a Participant incurs a Termination of Employment due to
death or permanent disability, the Participant still shall be entitled to the
payment of any Award for such Performance Cycle otherwise payable to the
Participant. In the event an Award is payable to a Participant subsequent to
the Participant's death, such payment shall be made to the Participant's
estate.
7.3 The Company shall withhold all applicable income and other taxes
from any Award payment to any Participant, including any federal, FICA, state
and local taxes.
7.4 Each Award shall be payable solely from the general assets of
the Company. Each Participant's right to payment of an Award (if any) shall
be solely as an unsecured general creditor of the Company.
8. Employment Rights
Nothing in the Plan shall confer upon any Participant the right to
continue in the employ of the Company or its Affiliated Companies or shall
interfere with or restrict in any way the rights of the Participant's employer
to discharge or change the terms of employment of any Participant at any time
for any reason whatsoever, with or without cause.
9. Effect on Other Plans
The adoption of the Plan shall not affect any other equity or other
compensation or incentive plan in effect for the Company or any Affiliated
Company, and the Plan shall not preclude the Company's Board of Directors from
establishing any other forms of incentive compensation for Officers.
10. Amendment or Termination of the Plan
The Board, in its sole discretion, may alter, amend, or terminate the
Plan or any part thereof at any time and for any reason; provided, however,
that to the extent required to ensure the Plan's qualification under Code
section 162(m) as "performance-based compensation", any such amendment shall
be subject to stockholder approval.
11. Effective Date
The Plan originally was effective as of January 23, 1996. This amended
and restated Plan is effective as of January 26, 1999, subject to the approval
of the Plan by a majority of the shares of the Common Stock of the Company
that are present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the 1999 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
THE GAP, INC.
Annual Meeting of Shareholders - May 4, 1999
Proxy Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors
The undersigned hereby appoints Donald G. Fisher, Warren R. Hashagen and Anne
B. Gust, or any of them, each with full power of substitution, as proxies to
vote, in accordance with the instructions set forth in this Proxy, all shares
of common stock of The Gap, Inc. which the undersigned is entitled to vote at
the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 4, 1999, and any
postponements and adjournments thereof. The proxies are authorized in their
discretion to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the
meeting.
IMPORTANT - This proxy must be signed and dated on the reverse side.
THE SHARES COVERED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
SPECIFICATIONS MADE ON THE REVERSE SIDE. IF NO CHOICES ARE INDICATED, THE
SHARES COVERED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL NOMINEES LISTED ON THE
REVERSE SIDE, FOR PROPOSAL 2, FOR PROPOSAL 3, FOR PROPOSAL 4 AND, WITH
RESPECT TO ANY OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES.
THE GAP, INC.
PLEASE MARK IN OVAL IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER USING DARK INK ONLY
1. Election of Directors, Nominees: FOR WITHHOLD FOR ALL
Adrian D. P. Bellamy, Evan S. Dobelle, ALL ALL (EXCEPT NOMINEES
Millard S. Drexler, Donald G. Fisher, WRITTEN BELOW)
Doris F. Fisher, Robert J. Fisher, [ ] [ ] [ ]
Glenda A. Hatchett, John M. Lillie,
Charles R. Schwab, Brooks Walker, Jr.,
Sergio S. Zyman
2. Approve the Amended and Restated Certificate FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
of Incorporation to increase the number of [ ] [ ] [ ]
authorized shares of Common Stock of
The Gap, Inc. from 1,500,000,000 to
2,300,000,000.
3. Approve the Executive Long-Term Cash Award FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
Performance Plan [ ] [ ] [ ]
4. Ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
as independent auditors. [ ] [ ] [ ]
Date: , 1999
(Signature)
(Signature)
NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each
sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or
guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in
full corporate name by President or other authorized officer. If a
partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.