Exhibit 2
                                  Pennsylvania
                            Public Utility Commission
NEWS RELEASE
DATE:    June 4, 1998
                  R-00974009 (OSA-237)

         PUC Approves Penelec Restructuring Plan in Non-Binding Poll

         The Public Utility  Commission (PUC) today approved by a 4-0 vote, in a
non-binding  poll, the  restructuring  plan for  Pennsylvania  Electric  Company
(Penelec). Penelec is a subsidiary of GPU, Inc.

         A final vote is scheduled for June 25.

         Today's action, coupled with the previous PUC decisions on PECO Energy,
Duquesne  Light  Company,  West Penn Power  Company  and PP&L  creates  the most
competitive electric market in the U.S.

         New PUC Commissioner Aaron Wilson Jr. did not participate in today's
voting.

         Under the plan approved today,  Penelec will provide customers who shop
for  their  electricity  a system  average  shopping  credit  of 3.73  cents per
kilowatt-hour  beginning in January  1999.  Shopping  credits will vary from one
rate class to another and will increase over time to match anticipated increases
in the  market  price of  generation.  Assuming  the market  price in  Penelec's
service  territory is 3 cents,  the Penelec plan will enable customers to reduce
bills in 1999 by about 10 percent.

         The plan  allows  Penelec  to  collect  approximately  $858  million in
stranded costs over eight years, starting in January 1999, through a competitive
transition charge. In it's restructuring plan, Penelec had requested recovery of
$1.322 billion in stranded costs.  Stranded costs are those costs incurred under
a regulated  market which may not be  recoverable in a competitive  market.  The
Electricity  Generation  Customer  Choice  and  Competition  Act of 1996  allows
utilities  to  collect  stranded  costs  that  the  PUC  finds  to be  just  and
reasonable.

         The PUC directed that one-third of Penelec's  customers will be able to
buy power from the  supplier of their choice on Jan. 1, 1999,  another  third on
Jan. 2, 1999,  and the remainder on Jan. 2, 2000. In a recent  separate  action,
the PUC  directed  that  open  enrollment  begin  July 1,  1998,  for  customers
throughout the Commonwealth to choose their electric generation supplier.

         Starting in 1999,  Penelec will unbundle its rates to reflect  separate
prices  for the  generation  charge,  the  competitive  transition  charge,  and
transmission  and  distribution  charges.  While  generation  will  be  open  to
competition,  Penelec will  continue to provide  transmission  and  distribution
services to its customers at PUC-regulated rates.
                                   --MORE--



         Today's action also significantly expands Penelec's funding of both the
Low Income Usage Reduction Program and its universal service program.

         Penelec filed its initial  restructuring   plan  on  June  2,   1997.
Administrative  Law Judge  Allison K. Turner held public input  hearings in Erie
and Johnstown and held seven technical  hearings in Harrisburg.  Turner issued a
recommended  decision  on May 7,  1998.  Reading-based  Penelec  serves  575,000
customers in 32 northern and central Pennsylvania counties.



Eric Levis
Press Secretary
717/787-5722


(86)





GPU Restructuring
Kevin F. Cadden - Manager of Communications - 787-5722
Penelec and Met-Ed Rate Cuts


Rate Cuts for Shopping Customers - System Average
If the Generation Market Price is 3 cents/kwh rising at 3%,
rate cuts for shopping customers will be:


                                     Penelec             Met-Ed
                                     -------             ------
                  1999                10.02%              9.82%
                  2000                10.30%             10.09%
                  2001                10.50%             10.26%
                  2002                10.62%             10.37%
                  2003                10.66%             10.44%
                  2004                10.61%             10.42%
                  2005                10.48%             10.31%
                  2006                10.28%             10.11%
                  2007                20.29%              9.82%
                  2008                18.73%              9.35%
                  2009                17.12%              8.81%





                                  Pennsylvania
                            Public Utility Commission

NEWS RELEASE

DATE:    June 4, 1998
         R-00974008 (OSA-236)

         PUC Approves Met-Ed Restructuring Plan in Non-Binding Poll

         The Public Utility  Commission (PUC) today approved by a 4-0 vote, in a
non-binding  poll,  the  restructuring  plan  for  Metropolitan  Edison  Company
(Met-Ed). Met-Ed is a subsidiary of GPU, Inc.

         A final vote is scheduled for June 25.

         Today's action, coupled with the previous PUC decisions on PECO Energy,
Duquesne  Light  Company,  West Penn Power  Company  and PP&L  creates  the most
competitive electric market in the U.S.

         New PUC Commissioner Aaron Wilson Jr. did not participate in today's 
voting.

         Under the plan approved today,  Met-Ed will provide  customers who shop
for their  electricity  a system  average  shopping  credit  of 3.757  cents per
kilowatt-hour  beginning in January  1999.  Shopping  credits will vary from one
rate class to another and will increase over time to match anticipated increases
in the  market  price of  generation.  Assuming  the  market  price  in  eastern
Pennsylvania is 3 cents,  the Met-Ed plan will enable  customers to reduce bills
in 1999 by about 10 percent.

         The plan allows  Met-Ed to collect $975 million in stranded  costs over
11 years, starting in January 1999, through a competitive  transition charge. In
it's  restructuring  plan,  Met-Ed had requested  recovery of $1.475  billion in
stranded costs. Stranded costs are those costs incurred under a regulated market
which may not be recoverable in a competitive market. The Electricity Generation
Customer Choice and Competition Act of 1996 allows utilities to collect stranded
costs that the PUC finds to be just and reasonable.

         The PUC directed that one-third of Met-Ed customers will be able to buy
power from the supplier of their choice on Jan. 1, 1999,  another  third on Jan.
2, 1999, and the remainder on Jan. 2, 2000. In a recent separate action, the PUC
directed that open enrollment  begin July 1, 1998, for customers  throughout the
Commonwealth to choose their electric generation supplier.

         Starting in 1999,  Met-Ed will  unbundle its rates to reflect  separate
prices  for the  generation  charge,  the  competitive  transition  charge,  and
transmission  and  distribution  charges.  While  generation  will  be  open  to
competition,  Met-Ed will  continue  to provide  transmission  and  distribution
services to its customers at PUC-regulated rates.
                                    --MORE--





         Today's action also significantly  expands Met-Ed's funding of both the
Low Income Usage Reduction Program and its universal service program.

         Met-Ed  filed  its  initial   restructuring   plan  on  June  2,  1997.
Administrative  Law Judge  Allison K.  Turner held five  public  input  hearings
throughout the company's service territory and held seven technical  hearings in
Harrisburg. Turner issued a recommended decision on May 6, 1998.

         The Reading-based Met-Ed serves 470,381 customers in all or portions of
14 eastern and southcentral counties.



Eric Levis
Press Secretary
717/787-5722


(87)





GPU Restructuring
Kevin F. Cadden - Manager of Communications - 787-5722
Penelec and Met-Ed Rate Cuts


Rate Cuts for Shopping Customers - System Average
If the Generation Market Price is 3 cents/kwh rising at 3%,
rate cuts for shopping customers will be:


                                      Penelec           Met-Ed
                                      -------           ------
                  1999                10.02%            9.82%
                  2000                10.30%           10.09%
                  2001                10.50%           10.26%
                  2002                10.62%           10.37%
                  2003                10.66%           10.44%
                  2004                10.61%           10.42%
                  2005                10.48%           10.31%
                  2006                10.28%           10.11%
                  2007                20.29%            9.82%
                  2008                18.73%            9.35%
                  2009                17.12%            8.81%