UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
________________________________
F O R M 10 - Q
--------------
(Mark One)
|X| Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003
--------------------------------------------
|_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number 1-10702
Terex Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 34-1531521
(State of Incorporation) (IRS Employer Identification No.)
500 Post Road East, Suite 320, Westport, Connecticut 06880
(Address of principal executive offices)
(203) 222-7170
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days.
YES X NO
----- -----
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b -2).
YES X NO
----- -----
Number of outstanding shares of common stock: 48.3 million as of August 11,
2003.
The Exhibit Index begins on page 55.
INDEX
TEREX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
GENERAL
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Terex Corporation ("Terex" or the
"Company") includes financial information with respect to the following
subsidiaries of the Company (all of which are wholly-owned) which are guarantors
(the "Guarantors") of the Company's $300 million principal amount of 10-3/8%
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 (the "10-3/8% Notes"), $200 million principal
amount of 8-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (the "8-7/8% Notes") and
$200 million principal amount of 9-1/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 (the
"9-1/4% Notes"). See Note P to the Company's June 30, 2003 Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report.
State or other I.R.S.
jurisdiction of employer
incorporation identification
Guarantor or organization number
--------- ----------------- --------------
Amida Industries, Inc. South Carolina 57-0531390
Benford America, Inc. Delaware 76-0522879
BL-Pegson USA, Inc. Connecticut 31-1629830
Cedarapids, Inc. Iowa 42-0332910
CMI Dakota Company South Dakota 46-0440642
CMI Terex Corporation Oklahoma 73-0519810
CMIOIL Corporation Oklahoma 73-1125438
Coleman Engineering, Inc. Tennessee 62-0949893
EarthKing, Inc. Delaware 06-1572433
Finlay Hydrascreen USA, Inc. New Jersey 22-2776883
Fuchs Terex, Inc. Delaware 06-1570294
Genie Access Services, Inc. Washington 91-2073567
Genie China, Inc. Washington 91-1973009
Genie Financial Services, Inc. Washington 91-1712115
Genie Holdings, Inc. Washington 91-1666966
Genie Industries, Inc. Washington 91-0815489
Genie International, Inc. Washington 91-1975116
Genie Manufacturing, Inc. Washington 91-1499412
GFS Commercial LLC Washington n/a
GFS National, Inc. Washington 91-1959375
Go Credit Corporation Washington 91-1563427
Koehring Cranes, Inc. Delaware 06-1423888
Lease Servicing & Funding Corp. Washington 91-1808180
O & K Orenstein & Koppel, Inc. Delaware 58-2084520
Payhauler Corp. Illinois 36-3195008
Powerscreen Holdings USA Inc. Delaware 61-1265609
Powerscreen International LLC Delaware 61-1340898
Powerscreen North America Inc. Delaware 61-1340891
Powerscreen USA, LLC Kentucky 31-1515625
PPM Cranes, Inc. Delaware 39-1611683
Product Support, Inc. Oklahoma 73-1488926
Royer Industries, Inc. Pennsylvania 24-0708630
Schaeff, Inc. Iowa 42-1097891
Standard Havens, Inc. Delaware 43-0913249
Standard Havens Products, Inc. Delaware 43-1435208
Telelect Southeast Distribution, Inc. Tennessee 02-0560744
Terex Advance Mixer, Inc. Delaware 06-1444818
Terex Bartell, Inc. Delaware 34-1325948
Terex Cranes, Inc. Delaware 06-1513089
Terex Financial Services, Inc. Delaware 45-0497096
Terex Mining Equipment, Inc. Delaware 06-1503634
Terex Utilities, Inc. Delaware 04-3711918
Terex Utilities South, Inc. Delaware 74-3075523
Terex-RO Corporation Kansas 44-0565380
Terex-Telelect, Inc. Delaware 41-1603748
The American Crane Corporation North Carolina 56-1570091
Utility Equipment, Inc. Oregon 93-0557703
1
Page No.
--------
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
---------------------
Item 1 Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-------------------------------------------
TEREX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations --
Three months and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002............................................3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet - June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002..............................4
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows --
Three months and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002............................................5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements -- June 30, 2003...................................6
Item 2 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.....................32
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk................................................51
Item 4 Controls and Procedures...................................................................................51
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
-----------------
Item 1 Legal Proceedings.........................................................................................51
Item 2 Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds.................................................................52
Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities...........................................................................52
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.......................................................52
Item 5 Other Information.........................................................................................52
Item 6 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K..........................................................................53
SIGNATURES...........................................................................................................54
- ----------
EXHIBIT INDEX........................................................................................................55
- -------------
2
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
-----------------------------
ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
---------------------------------------------------
TEREX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
(in millions, except per share data)
For the Three Months For the Six Months
Ended June 30, Ended June 30,
--------------------------- -----------------------------
2003 2002 2003 2002
------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Net sales.......................................................$ 1,007.4 $ 653.2 $ 1,886.7 $ 1,199.6
Cost of goods sold.............................................. 895.3 536.6 1,649.7 993.4
------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Gross profit................................................ 112.1 116.6 237.0 206.2
Selling, general and administrative expenses.................... (92.8) (69.4) (177.6) (126.1)
Goodwill impairment............................................. (51.3) --- (51.3) ---
------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Income (loss) from operations............................. (32.0) 47.2 8.1 80.1
Other income (expense):
Interest income............................................ 2.0 1.9 3.6 2.7
Interest expense........................................... (26.3) (22.1) (51.8) (43.8)
Loss on retirement of debt................................. (1.9) --- (1.9) ---
Other income (expense) - net............................... (3.0) (10.6) (2.7) (12.0)
------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income
taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle................................................. (61.2) 16.4 (44.7) 27.0
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes....................... 11.5 (5.3) 6.8 (8.7)
------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Income (loss) from continuing operations and before
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle....... (49.7) 11.1 (37.9) 18.3
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of income
tax benefit (expense)of $(0.2), $2.8, $(0.4) and $3.3,
respectively)................................................ 0.6 (5.9) 1.3 (6.9)
------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle..................................................... (49.1) 5.2 (36.6) 11.4
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (net of
income tax expense of $1.0 in 2002)........................... --- --- --- (113.4)
------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Net income (loss)...............................................$ (49.1) $ 5.2 $ (36.6) $ (102.0)
============= ============= ============= ==============
Per common share:
Basic:
Income (loss) from continuing operations..................$ (1.03) $ 0.26 $ (0.79) $ 0.45
Income (loss) from discontinued operations................ 0.01 (0.14) 0.03 (0.17)
------------- ------------- -------------- --------------
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle..................................... (1.02) 0.12 (0.76) 0.28
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle....... --- --- --- (2.80)
------------- ------------- -------------- --------------
Net income (loss).......................................$ (1.02) $ 0.12 $ (0.76) $ (2.52)
============= ============= ============== ==============
Diluted:
Income (loss) from continuing operations..................$ (1.03) $ 0.26 $ (0.79) $ 0.44
Income (loss) from discontinued operations................ 0.01 (0.14) 0.03 (0.16)
------------- ------------- -------------- --------------
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in (1.02) 0.12 (0.76) 0.28
accounting principle.....................................
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle....... --- --- --- (2.76)
------------- ------------- -------------- --------------
Net income (loss).......................................$ (1.02) $ 0.12 $ (0.76) $ (2.48)
============= ============= ============== ==============
Weighted average number of shares outstanding in per share calculation:
Basic................................................... 48.2 42.7 48.0 40.4
Diluted................................................. 48.2 43.6 48.0 41.2
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
TEREX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(unaudited)
(in millions, except par value)
June 30, December 31,
2003 2002
---------------- -----------------
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents........................................................ $ 420.4 $ 352.2
Trade receivables (net of allowance of $24.6 at June 30, 2003
and $19.6 at December 31, 2002)................................................ 561.1 578.6
Inventories...................................................................... 955.2 1,106.3
Other current assets............................................................. 237.3 184.0
----------------- -----------------
Total current assets......................................................... 2,174.0 2,221.1
Long-term assets
Property, plant and equipment.................................................... 313.9 309.4
Goodwill......................................................................... 601.1 622.9
Deferred taxes................................................................... 156.9 153.5
Other assets..................................................................... 324.8 318.8
----------------- -----------------
Total assets.......................................................................... $ 3,570.7 $ 3,625.7
================= =================
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt.............................. $ 69.7 $ 74.1
Trade accounts payable........................................................... 577.6 542.9
Accrued compensation and benefits................................................ 84.1 74.0
Accrued warranties and product liability......................................... 81.0 86.0
Other current liabilities........................................................ 281.2 329.2
----------------- -----------------
Total current liabilities.................................................... 1,093.6 1,106.2
Non-current liabilities
Long-term debt, less current portion............................................. 1,397.0 1,487.1
Other............................................................................ 301.1 263.2
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity
Common stock, $.01 par value - authorized 150.0 shares; issued 49.4 and 48.6
shares at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.................... 0.5 0.5
Additional paid-in capital....................................................... 785.2 772.7
Retained earnings................................................................ 30.8 67.4
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).................................... (19.7) (53.6)
Less cost of shares of common stock in treasury - 1.2 shares at June 30, 2003
and December 31, 2002.......................................................... (17.8) (17.8)
----------------- -----------------
Total stockholders' equity................................................... 779.0 769.2
----------------- -----------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity............................................ $ 3,570.7 $ 3,625.7
================= =================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
TEREX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(in millions)
For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
-----------------------------
2003 2002
-------------- -------------
Operating Activities
Net loss...................................................................... $ (36.6) $ (102.0)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
Depreciation............................................................. 27.5 15.7
Amortization............................................................. 5.9 2.8
Impairment charges and asset write downs................................. 72.5 140.8
Loss on retirement of debt............................................... 1.4 ---
Gain on sale of fixed assets............................................. (2.9) ---
Changes in operating assets and liabilities (net of effects of
acquisitions):
Trade receivables...................................................... 3.4 (90.0)
Inventories............................................................ 82.8 (14.2)
Trade accounts payable................................................. 42.0 79.9
Other, net............................................................. (11.6) (24.4)
-------------- -------------
Net cash provided by operating activities........................... 184.4 8.6
-------------- -------------
Investing Activities
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired............................... (8.7) (89.5)
Capital expenditures.......................................................... (14.1) (10.1)
Proceeds from sale of assets.................................................. 3.5 2.6
-------------- -------------
Net cash used in investing activities............................... (19.3) (97.0)
-------------- -------------
Financing Activities
Principal borrowings (repayments) of long-term debt........................... (53.0) 0.7
Net borrowings (repayments) under revolving line of credit agreements......... (36.5) 0.2
Issuance of common stock...................................................... --- 113.3
Payment of premium on early retirement of debt................................ (2.2) ---
Other......................................................................... (16.4) (0.4)
-------------- -------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities................. (108.1) 113.8
-------------- -------------
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents..................... 11.2 5.1
-------------- -------------
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents........................................ 68.2 30.5
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period................................. 352.2 250.4
-------------- -------------
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period....................................... $ 420.4 $ 280.9
============== =============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
TEREX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2003
(unaudited)
(dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise noted, except per share amounts)
NOTE A -- BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Basis of Presentation. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements of Terex Corporation and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2003
and for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America for interim financial information and the instructions
to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include
all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America to be included in full year financial
statements. The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December
31, 2002 has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet as of that
date.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Terex
Corporation and its majority owned subsidiaries ("Terex" or the "Company"). All
material intercompany balances, transactions and profits have been eliminated.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair
statement have been made. Except as otherwise disclosed, all such adjustments
consist only of those of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the
three months and six months ended June 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2003. For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2002.
Cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 include $27.8
and $4.5, respectively, which was not immediately available for use. These
consist primarily of cash balances held in escrow to secure various obligations
of the Company.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current
period presentation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets," was issued in October 2001. SFAS No. 144 became effective for the
Company on January 1, 2002 and provides new guidance on the recognition of
impairment losses on long-lived assets to be held and used or to be disposed of
and also broadens the definition of what constitutes a discontinued operation
and how the results of a discontinued operation are to be measured and
presented. The adoption of the standard has not materially changed the methods
used by the Company to determine impairment losses on long-lived assets, but may
result in additional items being reported as discontinued operations in the
future. See Note B - "Discontinued Operations" for information on discontinued
operations. Refer to Note F - "Restructuring and Other Charges" for information
on the recognition of impairment losses.
SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections as of April 2002," was issued in May
2002. SFAS No. 145 became effective for certain leasing transactions occurring
after May 15, 2002 and became effective for the Company on January 1, 2003 with
respect to reporting gains and losses from extinguishments of debt. The adoption
of SFAS No. 145 will result in the Company reporting most gains and losses from
extinguishments of debt as a component of income or loss from continuing
operations before income taxes and extraordinary items; there will be no effect
on the Company's net income or loss. Prior period amounts will be reclassified.
On June 30, 2003, the Company redeemed $50.0 aggregate principal amount of its
8-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008. In connection with this redemption
the Company recognized a loss of $1.9 before income taxes. The loss was
comprised of the payment of an early redemption premium ($2.2), the write off of
unamortized original issuance discount ($1.6) and the write off of unamortized
debt acquisition costs ($0.2), which were partially offset by the recognition of
deferred gains related to previously closed fair value interest rate swaps on
this debt ($2.1).
SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities," was issued in June 2002. SFAS No. 146 became effective for exit or
disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. Under SFAS No.
146, a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity is
recognized when the liability is incurred. Under previous accounting principles,
a liability for an exit cost would be recognized at the date of an entity's
commitment to an exit plan. Adoption of SFAS No. 146 has been applied
6
prospectively and has not had a material effect on the Company's consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued
FASB Interpretation No. ("FIN") 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others, an interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Nos. 5,
57, and 107 and rescission of FIN 34." FIN 45 extends the disclosures to be made
by a guarantor about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has
issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the
inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of its obligations
under certain guarantees. The disclosure provisions of FIN 45 were effective for
financial statements for periods ending after December 15, 2002. The provisions
for initial recognition and measurement of guarantees are effective on a
prospective basis for guarantees that are issued or modified after December 31,
2002. The application of FIN 45 has not had a material impact on the Company's
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
During January 2003 the FASB issued FIN 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities" which is effective for the Company on July 1, 2003 for any existing
entities and to any variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. A
variable interest entity ("VIE") is a corporation, partnership, trust or other
legal entity that does not have equity investors with voting rights or has
equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the
entity to support its own activities. This interpretation requires a company to
consolidate a VIE when the company has a majority of the risk of loss from the
VIE's activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the entity's residual
returns or both. The Company does not expect the adoption of FIN 46 to have a
material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
In January 2003, the Emerging Issues Task Force (the "EITF") released EITF
00-21, "Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables." EITF
00-21 clarifies the timing and recognition of revenue from certain transactions
that include the delivery and performance of multiple products or services. EITF
00-21 is effective for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods
beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company does not expect the adoption of EITF
00-21 to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position
or results of operation.
During April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." This statement amends and
clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments and
hedging activities, resulting primarily from decisions reached by the FASB
Derivatives Implementation Group subsequent to the original issuance of SFAS No.
133. This statement is generally effective prospectively for contracts and
hedging relationships entered into after June 30, 2003. The Company does not
expect the adoption of SFAS No. 149 to have a material impact on the Company's
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
On May 15, 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity." This statement
establishes standards for classifying and measuring as liabilities certain
financial instruments that embody obligations of the issuer and have
characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 must be applied
immediately to instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and to
all other instruments that exist as of the beginning of the first interim
financial reporting period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company does not
expect the adoption of SFAS No. 150 to have a material impact on the Company's
consolidated financial position or results of operation.
Accrued Warranties. The Company records accruals for potential warranty claims
based on the Company's claim experience. The Company's products are typically
sold with a standard warranty covering defects that arise during a fixed period
of time. Each business provides a warranty specific to the products it offers.
The specific warranty offered by a business is a function of customer
expectations and competitive forces. The length of warranty is generally a fixed
period of time, a fixed number of operating hours, or both.
A liability for estimated warranty claims is accrued at the time of sale. The
liability is established using a historical warranty claim experience for each
product sold. The historical claim experience may be adjusted for known design
improvements or for the impact of unusual product quality issues. Warranty
reserves are reviewed quarterly to ensure that critical assumptions are updated
for known events that may impact the potential warranty liability.
7
The following table summarizes the changes in the aggregate product warranty
liability:
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2003
-------------------
Balance at beginning of period.........................$ 59.1
Accruals for warranties issued during the period........ 30.3
Changes in estimates.................................... 0.5
Settlements during the period........................... (36.0)
Foreign exchange effect................................. 2.0
-------------------
Balance at end of period...............................$ 55.9
===================
Stock-Based Compensation. At June 30, 2003, the Company has stock-based employee
compensation plans. The Company accounts for those plans under the recognition
and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees," and related interpretations. No employee compensation cost is
reflected in net income for the granting of employee stock options, as all
options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market
value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The following table
illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and earnings per share if the
Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," to stock-based employee compensation.
For the Three Months Ended For the Six Months
June 30, Ended June 30,
---------------------------- ------------------------------
2003 2002 2003 2002
------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------
Reported net income (loss)............................... $ (49.1) $ 5.2 $ (36.6) $ (102.0)
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based methods for all
awards, net of related income tax effects............... (1.0) (0.9) (2.1) (1.6)
------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------
Pro forma net income (loss).............................. $ (50.1) $ 4.3 $ (38.7) $ (103.6)
============= ============== ============== ===============
Per common share:
Basic:
Reported net income (loss)........................... $ (1.02) $ 0.12 $ (0.76) $ (2.52)
============= ============== ============== ===============
Pro forma net income (loss).......................... $ (1.04) $ 0.10 $ (0.81) $ (2.56)
============= ============== ============== ===============
Diluted:
Reported net income (loss)........................... $ (1.02) $ 0.12 $ (0.76) $ (2.48)
============= ============== ============== ===============
Pro forma net income (loss).......................... $ (1.04) $ 0.10 $ (0.81) $ (2.51)
============= ============== ============== ===============
8
The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions:
For the Three Months For the Six Months
Ended June 30, Ended June 30,
----------------------------- ------------------------------
2003 2002 2003 2002
-------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------
Dividend yields......................................... 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Expected volatility..................................... 52.16% 51.24% 52.16% 51.24%
Risk-free interest rates................................ 4.59% 5.42% 4.59% 5.42%
Expected life (in years)................................ 10.0 10.0 9.7 9.9
Aggregate fair value of options granted................. $ 0.1 $ 5.3 $ 4.6 $ 7.9
Weighted average fair value at date of grant for
options granted........................................ $ 12.22 $ 15.53 $ 7.61 $ 15.26
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the
fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly
subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because
the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly
different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective
input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's
opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single
measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.
In December 2002, SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation -
Transition and Disclosure as amendment of FASB Statement No. 123," was issued.
SFAS No. 148, which became effective for fiscal years ended after December 15,
2002, provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the
fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In
addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123. The
adoption of SFAS No. 148 has not had, and will not have, a material impact on
the Company's financial statements, since the Company expects to continue to
follow the method in APB Opinion No. 25.
NOTE B -- DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The Company has entered into a non-binding agreement in principle to sell its
surface mining truck design and manufacturing business to Caterpillar Inc.
("Caterpillar"). In addition to the sale of the mining truck business, the
non-binding agreement also contemplates the sale of the Company's mining truck
and shovel product support businesses to Caterpillar dealers. The Company will
retain its mining shovel manufacturing business located in Dortmund, Germany and
intends to purchase the intellectual property rights for certain models of
Caterpillar hydraulic excavating mining shovels. The Company expects the
transaction to close by the end of 2003. As a result, the Company has classified
its mining truck business as a business held for sale. The Company has restated
all periods presented to reclassify the results of the business held for sale as
a discontinued operation in accordance with SFAS No. 144. The effect of the
discontinued operation on revenue and income from operations for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 is as follows:
For the Three Months For the Six Months
Ended June 30, Ended June 30,
---------------------- ------------------------
2003 2002 2003 2002
---------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Net sales.......................$ 41.4 $ 37.0 $ 89.8 $ 72.6
Income (loss) from operations...$ 1.0 $ (8.6) $ 2.2 $ (10.0)
NOTE C -- ACQUISITIONS
On February 14, 2003, the Company completed the acquisition of Commercial Body
Corporation ("Commercial Body"). Commercial Body, headquartered in San Antonio,
Texas with locations in various states, distributes, assembles, rents and
provides service of products for the utility, telecommunications and municipal
markets. In connection with the acquisition, the Company issued approximately
600 thousand shares of Common Stock and paid $4.5 cash, subject to adjustment.
9
One of such adjustments may require the Company to pay cash or issue additional
shares of Common Stock (at the Company's option) if, on the second anniversary
of the Commercial Body acquisition, the Common Stock is not trading on the New
York Stock Exchange at a price at least 50% higher than it was at the time of
the acquisition, up to a maximum number of shares of Common Stock having a value
of $3.4. At the time of Terex's acquisition of Commercial Body, Commercial Body
had a 50% equity interest in Combatel Distribution, Inc. ("Combatel"). The
remaining 50% of Combatel was owned by Terex and prior to the acquisition had
been accounted for under the equity method of accounting. During the second
quarter of 2003, Commercial Body and Combatel merged to form Terex Utilities
South, Inc. ("Utilities South"). Utilities South is included in the Terex
Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other segment.
The operating results of Commercial Body and Combatel are included in the
Company's consolidated results of operations since February 14, 2003 (date of
acquisition).
The Company is in the process of completing certain valuations, appraisals and
actuarial and other studies for purposes of determining the respective fair
values of tangible and intangible assets used in the allocation of purchase
consideration for the acquisitions of Commercial Body and Combatel. The Company
does not anticipate that the final results of these valuations will have a
material impact on its financial position, operations or cash flows. The Company
may revise its preliminary allocations as additional information is obtained.
The Company is in the process of evaluating various alternatives to integrate
the activities of Commercial Body and Combatel into the Company, including
alternatives to exit or consolidate certain facilities and/or activities and
restructure certain functions and reduce the related headcount. These
alternatives could impact the acquired businesses or existing businesses, and
the Company intends to finalize its plans by December 31, 2003. The Company does
not believe that these restructuring activities by themselves will have an
adverse impact on the Company's ability to meet customer requirements for the
Company's products.
On September 18, 2002, the Company completed the acquisition of Genie Holdings,
Inc. and its affiliates ("Genie"), a global manufacturer of aerial work
platforms (the "Genie Acquisition"). The Company initiated the Genie Acquisition
as an opportunity to diversify its product offering with the addition of a
complete line of aerial work platforms with a strong global brand and
significant market share. The Genie Acquisition was also intended to provide
operational and marketing synergies and cost savings, such as allowing the Genie
product line to expand the reach of its distribution through the Company's
existing sales base, particularly in Europe. Genie is included in the Terex
Aerial Work Platforms segment.
The following pro forma summary presents the consolidated results of operations
as though the Company completed the Genie Acquisition as of the beginning of the
respective period, after giving effect to certain adjustments for interest
expense, amortization of debt issuance costs and other expenses related to the
transaction:
Pro Forma Pro Forma
for the for the
Three Months Six Months
Ended Ended
June 30, 2002 June 30, 2002
--------------- --------------
Net sales.........................................$ 784.3 $ 1,474.6
Income from operations............................$ 46.6 $ 84.4
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle.......................................$ 3.4 $ 9.1
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle, per share:
Basic.........................................$ 0.07 $ 0.21
Diluted.......................................$ 0.07 $ 0.21
The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of what the actual
results of operations of the Company would have been for the period indicated,
nor does it purport to represent the results of operations for future periods.
NOTE D - ACCOUNTING CHANGE - BUSINESS COMBINATIONS AND GOODWILL
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 141
"Business Combinations" and SFAS No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets."
SFAS No. 141, effective July 1, 2001, addresses financial accounting and
reporting for business combinations and requires all business combinations be
accounted for using the purchase method. One requirement of SFAS No. 141 is that
previously recorded negative goodwill be eliminated. Accordingly, the Company
recorded a cumulative effect of an accounting change of $17.8, $10.7, net of
income tax, related to the write-off of negative goodwill at January 1, 2002
from the acquisition of Fermec Manufacturing Limited in December 2000.
10
SFAS No. 142 addresses financial accounting for acquired goodwill and other
intangible assets and how such assets should be accounted for in financial
statements upon their acquisition and after they have been initially recognized
in the financial statements. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, goodwill related
to acquisitions completed after June 30, 2001 was not amortized in 2001 or 2002
and, effective January 1, 2002, goodwill related to acquisitions completed prior
to July 1, 2001 is no longer being amortized. Under this standard, goodwill and
indefinite life intangible assets are to be reviewed at least annually for
impairment and written down only in the period in which the recorded value of
such assets exceed their fair value.
Under the transitional provisions of SFAS No. 142, the Company identified its
reporting units and performed impairment tests on the net goodwill and other
intangible assets associated with each of the reporting units, using a valuation
date of January 1, 2002. The SFAS No. 142 impairment test is a two-step process.
First, it requires comparison of the book value of net assets to the fair value
of the related reporting units. If the fair value is determined to be less than
book value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of impairment. In
the second step, the implied fair value of goodwill is estimated as the fair
value of the reporting unit used in the first step less the fair values of all
other tangible and intangible assets of the reporting unit. If the carrying
amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair market value, an impairment loss is
recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
Consistent with the approach required under SFAS No. 142, the Company estimated
the fair value of each of its ten reporting units existing as of January 1,
2002. Fair value was determined using a projection of undiscounted cash flow for
each reporting unit. Undiscounted cash flow was calculated using projected after
tax operating earnings, adding back depreciation and amortization, deducting
projected capital expenditures and also including the net change in working
capital employed. The assumptions were based on the Company's 2002 operating
plan. The present value of the undiscounted cash flows were calculated using the
Company's weighted cost of capital. The Company used an explicit five-year
projection of cash flow along with a terminal value based on the fifth year's
projected cash flow. The Company created these models. The total fair value of
the Company, as determined above, as of January 1, 2002, was approximately equal
to the market value of the Company at the same date, as determined by the market
value of the Company's equity and debt.
Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company performed the test described in SFAS
No. 142 for all units where the Company's carrying amount for such unit was
below the fair value of that unit as calculated by the method described above.
SFAS No. 142 defines how a company determines the implied fair value of
goodwill.
The carrying value of the Terex Mining reporting unit, a component of the Terex
Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other segment, exceeded the present
value of the cash flow expected to be generated by that reporting unit. Future
cash flow expectations had been reduced due to the continued weakness in mineral
commodity prices which are a major determinant of the overall demand for mining
equipment. The Company calculated the fair market value of the Terex Mining
reporting unit's fixed assets and intangible assets. Given the specialized
nature of this calculation, the Company employed a third party to assist in the
determination of the fair value of intangible assets at the Terex Mining
reporting unit. The appraiser helped determine the value for the Terex Mining
unit's intangible assets, which included trade names, customer relationships,
backlog and technology, as defined in SFAS No. 141. An income-based approach was
used to determine the market value of these intangible assets. A market
comparable approach was used to determine appropriate royalty rates. In
addition, the fair value of the Terex Mining unit's plant, property and
equipment was calculated using a cost approach. The Company provided guidance to
the appraiser related to assumptions and methodologies used in the valuation and
took responsibility for determining the goodwill impairment charge. The results
of this valuation work were used in the determination of the implied value of
the Terex Mining unit's goodwill as of January 1, 2002, which resulted in a
goodwill impairment of $105.7 ($105.7, net of income taxes).
The Light Construction reporting unit, a component of the Terex Mining,
Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other segment, also was determined to have a
carrying value in excess of its projected discounted cash flow. The market for
the unit's products, primarily light towers, has been negatively impacted by the
consolidation of distribution outlets for the unit's products, which has reduced
demand for these products, and the increasing preference of end users of the
unit's products to rent, rather than purchase, equipment. The analysis resulted
in a goodwill impairment of $26.2 ($18.1, net of income taxes) upon adoption of
SFAS No. 142.
The EarthKing reporting unit, a component of the Terex Mining, Roadbuilding,
Utility Products and Other segment, was also determined to have a carrying value
in excess of its projected discounted cash flow. EarthKing was created to
provide web based procurement services and complimentary products and services.
Several businesses in which EarthKing invested were unsuccessful in gaining
customer acceptance and were generating revenue at levels insufficient to
warrant anticipated growth, which substantially reduced its value. A goodwill
impairment of $0.3 ($0.3, net of income taxes) was recorded upon adoption of
SFAS No. 142.
11
The Company did not require the assistance of a third party when determining the
goodwill impairment associated with the Light Construction and EarthKing
reporting units, whose carrying amount exceeded their fair value, as it was
evident that the fair value of net tangible assets at these units was greater
than the estimated fair value of the reporting units, and that 100% of the
related goodwill was impaired.
The adjustment from the adoption of SFAS No. 142, an impairment loss of $132.2
($124.1, net of income taxes) was recorded as a cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle adjustment as of January 1, 2002. The Company performed its
last annual review of the carrying value of its goodwill, as required by SFAS
No. 142, as of October 1, 2002. Subsequent impairment tests will be performed
effective October 1 of each year and more frequently as circumstances warrant.
Business performance during the first six months of 2003 in the Roadbuilding
reporting unit has not met the expectations of the Company that were used when
goodwill was last reviewed for impairment as of October 1, 2002. To date,
funding for road projects have remained at historically low levels, as federal
and state budgets have been negatively impacted by a weak economy and the war in
Iraq. In response to the revised business outlook, management initiated several
changes to address the expected market conditions, including a change in
business management, discontinuance of several non-core products, work force
furloughs and reductions, and an inventory write-down based on anticipated lower
sales volume. Based on the continued weakness in the Roadbuilding reporting
unit, the Company initiated a review of the long-term outlook for the
Roadbuilding reporting unit. The revised outlook for the Roadbuilding reporting
unit assumes that funding levels for domestic road projects will not improve
significantly in the short term. In addition, the outlook assumes that the
Company will continue to reduce working capital invested in the reporting unit
to better match revenue expectations.
Based on this review during the second quarter of 2003, the Company determined
the fair value of the Roadbuilding reporting unit in accordance with the SFAS
No. 142 approach used during the initial review. The SFAS No. 142 approach uses
the present value of the cash flow expected to be generated by the reporting
unit. The cash flow was determined based on the expected revenues, after tax
profits, working capital levels and capital expenditures for the Roadbuilding
reporting unit. The present value was calculated by discounting the cash flow by
the Company's weighted average cost of capital. The Company, with the assistance
of a third-party, also reviewed the market value of the Roadbuilding reporting
unit's tangible and intangible assets. These values were included in the
determination of the carrying value of the Roadbuilding reporting unit.
Based on the revised fair value of the Roadbuilding reporting unit, a goodwill
impairment of $51.3 was recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2003.
A portion of the goodwill impairment ($23.8) is non-deductible for income tax
purposes.
On April 1, 2003 the Company changed the composition of its reporting units and
segments when it moved the North American operations of its telehandlers
business from the Terex Construction segment to the Terex Aerial Work Platforms
segment due to a change in the way the Company's operating decision makers view
the business. The goodwill balance at December 31, 2002 has been reclassified
within the two segments to reflect this change in the Company's reportable
segments.
An analysis of changes in the Company's goodwill by business segment is as
follows:
Terex Mining,
Roadbuilding, Terex
Utility Aerial
Terex Terex Products and Work
Construction Cranes Other segment Platforms Total
-------------- ----------- ---------------- ------------ ----------
Balance at December 31, 2002.. $ 307.3 $ 90.3 $ 177.5 $ 47.8 $ 622.9
Acquisitions.................. --- 3.2 8.1 6.2 17.5
Impairment.................... --- --- (51.3) --- (51.3)
Foreign exchange effect....... 11.2 0.8 --- --- 12.0
-------------- ----------- ---------------- ------------ ----------
Balance at June 30, 2003...... $ 318.5 $ 94.3 $ 134.3 $ 54.0 $ 601.1
============== =========== ================ ============ ==========
The goodwill recognized for the acquisitions of Commercial Body, Combatel, Demag
Mobile Cranes GmbH & Co. KG and its affiliates ("Demag") and Genie as of June
30, 2003 is not final, as the Company has not yet completed its valuation of
their respective tangible and intangible assets.
12
NOTE E -- DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
There are two types of derivatives that the Company enters into: hedges of fair
value exposures and hedges of cash flow exposures. Fair value exposures relate
to recognized assets or liabilities and firm commitments, while cash flow
exposures relate to the variability of future cash flows associated with
recognized assets or liabilities or forecasted transactions.
The Company operates internationally, with manufacturing and sales facilities in
various locations around the world, and utilizes certain financial instruments
to manage its foreign currency, interest rate and fair value exposures. To
qualify a derivative as a hedge at inception and throughout the hedge period,
the Company formally documents the nature and relationships between the hedging
instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objectives,
strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions and method of
assessing hedge effectiveness. Additionally, for hedges of forecasted
transactions, the significant characteristics and expected terms of a forecasted
transaction must be specifically identified, and it must be probable that each
forecasted transaction will occur. If it were deemed probable that the
forecasted transaction will not occur, the gain or loss would be recognized in
earnings currently. Financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must
maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and
the item being hedged, both at inception and throughout the hedged period. The
Company does not engage in trading or other speculative use of financial
instruments.
The Company uses forward contracts and options to mitigate its exposure to
changes in foreign currency exchange rates on third-party and intercompany
forecasted transactions. The primary currencies to which the Company is exposed
include the Euro, British Pound and Australian Dollar. When using options as a
hedging instrument, the Company excludes the time value from the assessment of
effectiveness. The effective portion of unrealized gains and losses associated
with forward contracts and the intrinsic value of option contracts are deferred
as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until the
underlying hedged transactions are reported on the Company's consolidated
statement of operations. The Company uses interest rate swaps to mitigate its
exposure to changes in interest rates related to existing issuances of variable
rate debt and to fair value changes of fixed rate debt. Primary exposure
includes movements in the London Interbank Offer Rate ("LIBOR").
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as fair value
hedges are recognized in earnings as offsets to the changes in fair value of
exposures being hedged. The change in fair value of derivatives that are
designated as cash flow hedges are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) and are recognized in earnings as the hedged transactions occur.
Any ineffectiveness is recognized in earnings immediately.
The Company records hedging activity related to debt instruments in interest
expense and hedging activity related to foreign currency and lease obligations
in operating profit.
The Company entered into interest rate swap agreements that effectively
converted variable rate interest payments into fixed rate interest payments. At
June 30, 2003, the Company had $100.0 notional amount of such interest rate swap
agreements outstanding, all of which mature in 2009. The fair market value of
these swaps at June 30, 2003 was a loss of $5.1, which is recorded in other
non-current liabilities. These swap agreements have been designated as, and are
effective as, cash flow hedges of outstanding debt instruments. During the three
months and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded the
change in fair value to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and
reclassified to earnings a portion of the deferred loss from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) as the hedged transactions occurred and were
recognized in earnings.
The Company has entered into a series of interest rate swap agreements that
converted fixed rated interest payments into variable rate interest payments. At
June 30, 2003, the Company had $154.0 notional amount of such interest rate swap
agreements outstanding, all of which mature in 2006 through 2008. The fair
market value of these swaps at June 30, 2003 was a gain of $10.2, which is
recorded in other non-current assets. These swap agreements have been designated
as, and are effective as, fair value hedges of outstanding debt instruments.
During March 2003 and December 2002, the Company exited interest rate swap
agreements in the notional amount of $275.0 with maturities from 2008 through
2011 that converted fixed rate interest payments into variable rate interest
payments. The Company received $13.4 upon exiting these swap agreements. These
gains are being amortized over the original maturity and, combined with the
market value of the swap agreements held at June 30, 2003, are offset by a $20.8
addition in the carrying value of the long-term obligations being hedged.
The Company is also a party to currency exchange forward contracts to manage its
exposure to changing currency exchange rates that mature within one year. At
June 30, 2003, the Company had $125.0 of notional amount of currency exchange
forward contracts outstanding, all of which mature on or before March 1, 2004.
The fair market value of these swaps at June 30, 2003 was a gain of $3.1. At
June 30, 2003, $47.4 notional amount of these swap agreements have been
designated as, and are effective as, cash flow hedges of specifically identified
assets and liabilities.
13
During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Company
recorded the change in fair value to accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) and reclassified to earnings a portion of the deferred loss from
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as the hedged transactions
occurred and were recognized in earnings.
At June 30, 2003, the fair value of all derivative instruments has been recorded
in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as a net asset of $6.5, net of
income taxes.
Counterparties to interest rate derivative contracts and currency exchange
forward contracts are major financial institutions with credit ratings of
investment grade or better and no collateral is required. There are no
significant risk concentrations. Management believes the risk of incurring
losses on derivative contracts related to credit risk is remote and any losses
would be immaterial.
Unrealized net gains (losses) included in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) are
as follows:
Three Months Six Months
Ended Ended
June 30, June 30,
------------------- --------------------
2003 2002 2003 2002
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at beginning of period.....$ 0.8 $ (0.9) $ 2.1 $ (0.8)
Additional gains (losses).......... (7.9) 0.2 (8.0) ---
Amounts reclassified to earnings... 3.3 1.3 2.1 1.4
-------- ---------- -------- ---------
Balance at end of period...........$ (3.8) $ 0.6 $ (3.8) $ 0.6
======== ========== ======== =========
NOTE F -- RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES
The Company continually evaluates its cost structure to ensure that it is
appropriately positioned to respond to changing market conditions. During 2003
and 2002, the Company experienced declines in several markets. In addition, the
Company's recent acquisitions have created product, production and selling and
administrative overlap with existing businesses. In response to changing market
demand and to optimize the impact of recently acquired businesses, the Company
has initiated the restructuring programs described below. For further
information on restructuring programs initiated prior to 2002, refer to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
There have been no material changes relative to the initial plans established by
the Company for the restructuring activities discussed below. The Company does
not believe that these restructuring activities by themselves will have an
adverse impact on the Company's ability to meet customer requirements for the
Company's products.
2003 Programs
In the first quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a charge of $0.7 related to
restructuring at its CMI Terex facility in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Due to the
continued poor performance in the Roadbuilding business, the Company reduced
employment by approximately 146 employees at its CMI Terex facility. As of June
30, 2003, all of the employees had ceased employment with the Company. The
program was substantially complete at June 30, 2003. CMI Terex is included in
the Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other segment.
Also in the first quarter of 2003, the Company recorded charges of $0.3 for
restructuring at its Terex-RO facility in Olathe, Kansas. As a result of weak
demand in the Company's North American crane business, the Terex-RO facility is
being closed and the production performed at that facility will be consolidated
into the Company's hydraulic crane production facility in Waverly, Iowa. The
program will reduce employment by approximately 50 employees and is expected to
be completed by September 30, 2003. As of June 30, 2003, 26 Terex-RO employees
had ceased employment with the Company. Booms for the Terex-RO product are
already made in the Waverly facility; accordingly, no production problems are
anticipated in connection with this consolidation. Terex-RO is included in the
Terex Cranes Segment.
The Company recorded a charge of $1.5 in the first quarter of 2003 for the exit
of all activities at its EarthKing e-commerce subsidiary. The $1.5 charge is for
non-cash closure costs and has been recorded in cost of sales. EarthKing is
included in the Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other segment.
The program is expected to be completed by September 30, 2003. Additionally,
during the first quarter of 2003, the Company wrote down certain investments it
held in technology businesses related to its EarthKing subsidiary. These
investments were no longer economically viable, as these businesses were
unsuccessful in gaining customer acceptance and were generating revenue at
levels insufficient to warrant anticipated growth, and resulted in a write-down
of $0.8. This write-down was reported in "Other income (expense) - net."
14
During the second quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a severance charge of
$3.1 for future cash expenditures related to restructuring at its Terex Peiner
tower crane manufacturing facility in Trier, Germany. This charge is a result of
the Company's decision to consolidate its German tower crane manufacturing into
its Demag facilities in an effort to lower fixed overhead and improve
manufacturing efficiencies and profitability. As a result of the restructuring,
the Company has accrued for a headcount reduction of 65 employees. As of June
30, 2003, one of the employees had ceased employment with the Company. The
program is expected to be completed by April 30, 2004. Terex Peiner is included
in the Terex Cranes Segment. During the three months ended June 30, 2003, $2.6
and $0.5 were recorded in cost of sales and selling, general and administrative
expenses, respectively. The Terex Peiner closing is expected to reduce annual
operating costs by $3.4 once the program is fully implemented.
The Company also recorded a restructuring charge in the second quarter of 2003
of $1.9 for future cash expenditures related to the closure of its Powerscreen
facility in Kilbeggan, Ireland. The $1.9 is comprised of $1.0 of severance
charges and $0.9 of accruable exit costs. This charge is a result of the
Company's decision to consolidate its European Powerscreen business at its
facility in Dungannon, Northern Ireland. This consolidation will lower the
Company's cost structure for this business and better utilize manufacturing
capacity. As a result of the restructuring, the Company has accrued for a
headcount reduction of 121 employees at the Kilbeggan facility. As of June 30,
2003, none of the employees had ceased employment with the Company. The program
is expected to be completed by December 31, 2003. The Powerscreen Kilbeggan
facility is included in the Terex Construction Segment. During the three months
ended June 30, 2003, $1.8 and $0.1 were recorded in cost of sales and selling,
general and administrative expenses, respectively. The Kilbeggan facility
closing is expected to generate annual cost savings of approximately $3.
In addition, during the second quarter of 2003, the Company recorded
restructuring charges of $4.7 in the Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility
Products and Other Segment. These restructuring charges are the result of
continued poor performance in the Roadbuilding business and the Company's
efforts to streamline operations and improve profitability. The $4.7
restructuring charge is comprised of the following components:
o A $2.8 charge related to exiting the bio-grind recycling
business, with $2.5 recorded in cost of sales and $0.3 recorded
in selling, general and administrative expenses.
o A charge of $1.8 related to the exiting of the screening and
shredder-mixer business operated at its Durand, Michigan
facility, with $1.7 recorded in cost of sales and $0.1 recorded
in selling, general and administrative expenses.
o A $0.1 charge was recorded in selling, general and
administrative expenses related to the headcount reduction of 17
employees at the Company's Cedarapids facility.
All of the 2003 projects are expected to reduce annual operating costs by
approximately $15 in the aggregate when fully implemented.
2002 Programs
During 2002, the Company initiated a series of restructuring projects that
related to productivity and business rationalization.
In the first quarter of 2002, the Company recorded a charge of $1.2 in
connection with the closure and subsequent relocation of the Cedarapids hot mix
asphalt plant facility to the Company's CMI Terex facility in Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma. The consolidation of duplicative CMI Terex and Cedarapids production
facilities and support functions was intended to lower the Company's operating
costs. Approximately $0.7 of this charge related to severance costs which have
been paid, with the remainder related to non-cash closure costs. Approximately
92 employees were terminated in connection with this action. This restructuring
was complete as of September 30, 2002.
In the second quarter of 2002, the Company announced that its surface mining
truck production facility in Tulsa, Oklahoma would be closed and the production
activities outsourced to a third party supplier. The Company recorded a charge
of $4.2 related to the Tulsa closure. The closure was in response to continued
weakness in demand for the Company's mining trucks. Demand for mining trucks is
closely related to commodity prices, which have been declining in real terms
over recent years. Approximately $1.0 of this charge related to severance and
other employee related charges, while $2.2 of this charge relates to inventory
deemed uneconomical to relocate to other distribution facilities. The remaining
$1.0 of the cost accrued related to the Tulsa building closure costs and
occupancy costs expected to be incurred after production is ended. Approximately
93 positions have been eliminated as a result of this action. The transfer of
production activities to a third party was completed prior to December 31, 2002
and the Company is currently marketing the Tulsa property for sale. As disclosed
in Note B - "Discontinued Operations," the Company has entered into a
non-binding agreement in principle to sell its surface mining truck design and
manufacturing business to Caterpillar.
15
The Company also recorded a charge of $0.9 in the second quarter of 2002 in
connection with a reduction to the Cedarapids workforce in response to adverse
market conditions and resulting decreased demand for Cedarapids products. The
charge recorded in connection with this reduction to the Cedarapids workforce is
for employee severance costs. Approximately 42 employees have been terminated as
a result of this action. The Cedarapids restructuring was complete as of
December 31, 2002.
In the third quarter of 2002, the Company announced restructuring charges of
$3.5 in connection with the consolidation of facilities in the Light
Construction group and staff reductions at its CMI Terex Roadbuilding operation
and in the Terex Cranes segment. The restructuring charges at the Light
Construction group were $2.6, of which $0.2 was for severance in relation to the
elimination of approximately 71 positions. The remaining $2.4 was for costs
associated with the termination of leases and the write-down of inventory.
Demand for the Light Construction group's products has been negatively impacted
by the consolidation of distribution outlets for the unit's products and a
change in end user preference from direct ownership of the unit's products to
rental of such equipment. These changes have made it uneconomical to maintain
numerous separate production facilities. The restructuring charges at CMI Terex
were $0.7 for severance in connection with the elimination of approximately 146
positions. CMI Terex's roadbuilding business has faced slow market conditions
and reduced demand, due in large part to delays in government funding for
roadbuilding projects, resulting in a need for staff reductions. Additionally,
the Terex Cranes segment recorded restructuring charges of $0.2 for severance in
connection with the elimination of approximately 35 positions at three of its
North American facilities due to reduced demand for the products manufactured at
these facilities. These restructurings were completed by December 31, 2002.
Projects initiated in the fourth quarter of 2002 related to productivity and
business rationalization include the following:
o The closure of the Company's pressurized vessel container business. This
business, located in Clones, Ireland, provides pressurized containers to
the transportation industry. The business, acquired as part of the
Powerscreen acquisition in 1999, is part of the Company's Construction
segment and is not core to the Company's overall strategy. The Company
recorded a charge of $5.4, of which $1.2 was for severance, $2.5 for the
write down of inventory, and $1.2 for facility closing costs. The
remaining $0.5 relates to the repayment of a local government work
grant. The business has faced declining demand over the past few years
and, as it is not integral to the Construction business. This
restructuring program reduced headcount by 137 positions and was
completed as of June 30, 2003.
o The consolidation of several Terex Construction segment facilities in
the United Kingdom. The Company is in the process of consolidating
several compact equipment production facilities into a single location
in Coventry, England. The Company will move the production of
mini-dumpers, rollers, soil compactors and loader backhoes into the new
facility. The Company recorded a charge of $7.2, of which $6.1 was for
severance and $1.1 was for the costs associated with exiting the
facilities. The consolidation will reduce total employment by
approximately 269 and is expected to be completed by the end of 2003. As
of June 30, 2003, 162 employees had ceased employment with the Company.
o The exit of certain heavy equipment businesses related to mining
products. During the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company conducted a
review of its rental equipment businesses in both its Mining unit and
Construction segment. The Company's review indicated that it was not
economical to continue its mining equipment rental business due to the
high cost of moving mining equipment between customers and given the
continued weak demand for mining products. In addition, the Company
decided to rationalize its large scraper offering in its Mining segment
given the weak demand for related mining products. The Company recorded
a charge of $6.9 associated with the write down of inventory. The
Company expects to complete this process by December 31, 2003.
o The exit of certain non-core tower cranes produced by the Terex Cranes
segment under the Peiner brand in Germany. The European tower crane
business has been negatively impacted by reduced demand from large
rental customers who are undergoing financial difficulties. This has
resulted in reduced demand and deterioration in margins recognized in
the tower crane business. The Company conducted a review of its offering
of tower cranes produced under the Peiner brand and eliminated certain
models that overlap with models produced at Gru Comedil S.r.l., the
Company's tower crane facility in Italy. The Company recorded a charge
of $3.9, of which $1.0 was for severance and $2.9 for inventory
write-downs on discontinued product lines. The program will reduce
employment by 47 and is expected to be completed by December 31, 2003.
As of June 30, 2003, 47 employees had ceased employment with the
Company.
o The elimination of the Standard Havens portable hot mix asphalt product.
The Company performed marketing and engineering analysis that indicated
that the Standard Havens product line did not meet current customer
expectations. As a result, the Company opted to discontinue the Standard
Havens portable hot mix asphalt product. The Company recorded a charge
of $1.8 to write-down the discontinued inventory. The program was
completed prior to December 31, 2002. The Standard Havens product line
was part of the Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other
segment.
16
o The severance costs incurred in re-aligning the Company's management
structure. The Company eliminated an executive position and recorded a
charge of $1.5. The Company paid $0.4 prior to December 31, 2002 and
expects to pay remaining severance by December 31, 2003.
o The elimination of the rotating telehandler product in North America by
the Terex Construction segment. It was determined that the product,
although popular in Europe as a multi-purpose machine, was not gaining
customer acceptance in North America. The Company recorded a charge of
$0.7 to write-down the rotating telehandler inventory in North America.
The program was completed prior to December 31, 2002.
During the three months ended March 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003, the Company
recorded additional charges of $0.6 and $0, respectively, relating to programs
begun in 2002. These period charges primarily related to facility closure costs
and were consistent with the initial restructuring plans established by the
Company.
These 2002 programs are expected to reduce operating costs by approximately $27
in the aggregate when fully implemented in 2004.
The following table sets forth the components and status of the restructuring
charges recorded in 2003 and 2002 that related to productivity and business
rationalization:
Employee
Termination Asset Facility
Costs Disposals Exit Costs Other Total
--------------- ------------ ------------- --------------- --------------
Accrued restructuring charges
at December 31, 2002.......... $ 9.7 $ --- $ 2.4 $ 1.4 $ 13.5
Restructuring charges........... 5.1 6.2 0.4 1.1 12.8
Cash expenditures............... (5.3) (1.0) (0.3) (0.7) (7.3)
Non-cash write-offs............. --- (5.2) (0.1) --- (5.3)
--------------- ------------ ------------- -------------- --------------
Accrued restructuring charges
at June 30, 2003.............. $ 9.5 $ --- $ 2.4 $ 1.8 $ 13.7
=============== ============ ============= =============== ==============
In aggregate, the restructuring charges described above incurred during the six
months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 were included in cost of goods sold ($11.4
and $1.5) and selling, general and administrative expenses ($1.4 and $0.6),
respectively.
Demag and Genie Acquisition Related Projects
During 2002, the Company also initiated a series of restructuring projects aimed
at addressing product, channel and production overlap created by the acquisition
of Demag and Genie in 2002.
Projects initiated in the Terex Cranes segment in the fourth quarter of 2002
related to the acquisition of Demag consist of:
o The elimination of certain PPM branded 3, 4 and 5 axle cranes produced
at the Company's Montceau, France facility. The Company determined that
the products produced under the PPM brand were similar to products
produced by Demag and has opted to eliminate these PPM models in favor
of the similar Demag products, which the Company believes have superior
capabilities. As a result, employment levels in Montceau were reduced.
As of June 30, 2003, 102 employees had ceased employment with the
Company. In addition, the Company also recognized a loss in value on the
affected PPM branded cranes inventory in France and Spain. The Company
recorded a charge of $15.3, of which $5.4 was for severance, $9.6 was
associated with the write down of inventory and $0.3 was for claims
related to exiting the sales function of the discontinued products. This
program was completed during the second quarter of 2003.
o The closure of the Company's existing crane distribution center in
Germany. Prior to the acquisition of Demag, the Company distributed
mobile cranes under the PPM brand from a facility in Dortmund, Germany.
The acquisition of Demag provided an opportunity to consolidate
distribution and reduce the overall cost to serve customers in Germany.
The Company recorded a charge of $2.5, of which $0.7 was for severance,
$1.2 was for inventory write-downs, and $0.6 for lease termination
costs. Eleven employees were terminated as a result of these actions. As
of June 30, 2003, all of the employees had ceased employment with the
Company. The Company expects this program to be completed by December
31, 2003.
o The rationalization of certain crawler crane products sold under the
American Crane brand in the United States. The acquisition of Demag
created an overlap with certain large crawler cranes produced in the
17
Company's Wilmington, North Carolina facility. Certain cranes produced
in the North Carolina facility will be rated for reduced lifting
capacity and marketed to a different class of user. This change in
marketing strategy, triggered by the acquisition of Demag, negatively
impacted inventory values. The Company recorded a charge of $3.2
associated with the write down of inventory. The Company expects to
complete the sale of such inventory by December 31, 2003.
o In addition, the acquisition of Demag created an overlap of small,
mobile cranes marketed for use in urban work places. As a result, the
Company opted to cease production of this style of crane, produced under
license from another company, and replace them with cranes produced by
Demag. As a result of this decision, a charge of $1.8 was recorded to
terminate the license agreement.
Projects initiated in the Terex Cranes segment in the fourth quarter of 2002
related to the acquisition of Genie consist of:
o The elimination of Terex branded aerial work platforms. The Company
determined that the acquisition of Genie created product and
distribution overlap with its existing Terex branded aerial work
platforms businesses in the United States and Europe. After a review of
products produced by the Company and Genie, the Company decided to
discontinue the Terex branded products. As a result, the Company reduced
the carrying values of the affected inventories to recognize the loss in
value created by the decision to discontinue these models of aerial work
platforms. As a result of this decision, a charge of $1.9 was recorded
to write down inventory.
The following table sets forth the components and status of the restructuring
charges recorded in the fourth quarter of 2002 that relate to addressing
product, channel and production overlaps created by the acquisition of the Demag
and Genie businesses:
Employee
Termination Asset Facility
Costs Disposals Exit Costs Other Total
--------------- ------------ ------------- --------------- --------------
Accrued restructuring charges at
December 31, 2002...............$ 5.1 $ --- $ 0.6 $ 0.3 $ 6.0
Restructuring charges............. --- --- --- --- ---
Cash expenditures................. (2.7) --- --- --- (2.7)
Non-cash write-offs............... --- --- --- --- ---
-------------- ------------ ------------- --------------- --------------
Accrued restructuring charges at
June 30, 2003..................$ 2.4 $ --- $ 0.6 $ 0.3 $ 3.3
=============== ============ ============= =============== ==============
These programs related to the Demag and Genie acquisitions are expected to
reduce annual operating costs by approximately $8 in the aggregate in 2004.
NOTE G -- INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following:
June 30, December 31,
2003 2002
----------------- ----------------
Finished equipment....................... $ 354.3 $ 437.2
Replacement parts........................ 194.5 225.0
Work-in-process.......................... 222.6 225.5
Raw materials and supplies............... 183.8 218.6
---------------- ----------------
Inventories.............................. $ 955.2 $ 1,106.3
================ ================
18
NOTE H -- PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following:
June 30, December 31,
2003 2002
----------------- -----------------
Property.............................. $ 44.3 $ 43.0
Plant................................. 189.6 173.4
Equipment............................. 204.1 197.6
----------------- -----------------
438.0 414.0
Less: Accumulated depreciation....... (124.1) (104.6)
----------------- -----------------
Net property, plant and equipment..... $ 313.9 $ 309.4
================= =================
NOTE I -- INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE
In April 2001, Genie entered into a joint venture arrangement with a European
financial institution whereby Genie maintains a forty-nine percent (49%)
ownership interest in the joint venture, Genie Financial Solutions Holding B.V.
("GFSH B.V."). Prior to the Company's acquisition of Genie, Genie had
contributed $5.3 in cash in exchange for its ownership interest in GFSH B.V.
During January 2003, Genie contributed an additional $0.8 in cash to GFSH B.V.
The Company applies the equity method of accounting for its investment in GFSH
B.V., as the Company does not control the operations of GFSH B.V.
GFSH B.V. was established to facilitate the financing of Genie's products sold
in Europe. As of June 30, 2003, the joint venture's total assets were $122.0 and
consisted primarily of financing receivables and lease related equipment; total
liabilities were $107.8 and consisted primarily of debt payable to the fifty-one
percent (51%) joint venture partner. The Company provided guarantees related to
potential losses arising from shortfalls in the residual values of financed
equipment or credit defaults by the joint venture's customers. As of June 30,
2003 the maximum exposure to loss under these guarantees is approximately $7.
Additionally, the Company is required to maintain a capital account balance in
GFSH B.V., pursuant to the terms of the joint venture, which could result in the
reimbursement to GFSH B.V. by the Company of losses to the extent of the
Company's ownership percentage.
As defined by FIN 46, GFSH B.V. is a variable interest entity. For entities
created prior to February 1, 2003, FIN 46 requires the application of its
provisions effective July 1, 2003. Based on the legal and operating structure of
GFSH B.V., it is reasonably possible that the Company will be required to
consolidate the results of GFSH B.V. in future financial statements. However,
the Company also is currently evaluating possible changes to the operating
structure of GFSH B.V. that would result in GFSH B.V. continuing to be accounted
for under the equity method.
NOTE J -- EQUIPMENT SUBJECT TO OPERATING LEASES
Operating leases arise from the leasing of the Company's products to customers.
Initial noncancellable lease terms typically range up to 60 months. The cost of
equipment subject to operating leases was approximately $160 at June 30, 2003.
The equipment is depreciated on the straight-line basis over the shorter of the
estimated useful life or the estimated amortization period of any borrowings
secured by the asset to its estimated salvage value.
NOTE K -- NET INVESTMENT IN SALES-TYPE LEASES
The Company leases new and used products manufactured and sold by the Company to
domestic and foreign distributors, end users and rental companies. The Company
provides specialized financing alternatives that include sales-type leases,
operating leases, conditional sales contracts, and short-term rental agreements.
At the time a sales-type lease is consummated, the Company records the gross
finance receivable, unearned finance income and the estimated residual value of
the leased equipment. Unearned finance income represents the excess of the gross
minimum lease payments receivable plus the estimated residual value over the
fair value of the equipment. Residual values represent the estimate of the
values of the equipment at the end of the lease contracts and are initially
recorded based on industry data and management's estimates. Realization of the
residual values is dependent on the Company's future ability to market the
equipment under then prevailing market conditions. Management reviews residual
values periodically to determine that recorded amounts are appropriate. Unearned
finance income is recognized as financing income using the interest method over
the term of the transaction. The allowance for future losses is established
through charges to the provision for credit losses.
19
Prior to its acquisition by the Company on September 18, 2002, Genie had a
number of domestic agreements with financial institutions to provide financing
of new and eligible products to distributors and rental companies. Under these
programs, Genie originated leases with distributors and rental companies and the
resulting lease receivables were either sold to a financial institution with
limited recourse to Genie or used as collateral for borrowings. The aggregate
unpaid sales-type lease payments previously transferred was $43.3 at June 30,
2003. Under these agreements, the Company's recourse obligation is limited to
credit losses up to the first 5%, in any given year, of the remaining discounted
rental payments due, subject to certain minimum and maximum recourse liability
amounts. The Company's maximum credit recourse exposure was $15.0 at June 30,
2003, representing a contingent liability under the limited recourse provisions.
During 2003, 2002 and 2001, domestically and globally, Genie entered into a
number of arrangements with financial institutions to provide financing of new
and eligible Genie products to distributors and rental companies. Under these
programs, Genie originates leases or leasing opportunities with distributors and
rental companies. If Genie originates the lease with a distributor or rental
company, the financial institution will purchase the equipment and take
assignment of the lease contract from Genie. If Genie originates a lease
opportunity, the financial institution will purchase the equipment from Genie
and execute a lease contract directly with the distributor or rental company. In
some instances, the Company retains certain credit and/or residual recourse in
these transactions. The Company's maximum exposure, representing a contingent
liability, under these transactions reflects a $45.0 credit risk and a $34.2
residual risk at June 30, 2003.
The Company's contingent liabilities previously referred to have not taken into
account various mitigating factors. These factors include the staggered timing
of maturity of lease transactions, resale value of the underlying equipment,
lessee return penalties and annual loss caps on credit loss pools. Further, the
credit risk contingent liability assumes that the individual leases were to all
default at the same time and that the repossessed equipment has no market value.
NOTE L-- EARNINGS PER SHARE
Three Months Ended June 30,
(in millions, except per share data)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per-Share Per-Share
Income Shares Amount Income Shares Amount
----------- ----------- ------------ ---------- ---------- -----------
Basic earnings per share
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle............. $ (49.7) 48.2 $ (1.03) $ 11.1 42.7 $ 0.26
Effect of dilutive securities
Stock Options............................... --- --- --- 0.9
Contingently issuable shares for
acquisitions............................. --- --- --- ---
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle - diluted................. $ (49.7) 48.2 $ (1.03) $ 11.1 43.6 $ 0.26
=========== =========== =========== ========== ========== ==========
20
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions, except per share data)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per-Share Per-Share
Income Shares Amount Income Shares Amount
----------- ----------- ------------ ---------- ---------- -----------
Basic earnings per share
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle......... $ (37.9) 48.0 $ (0.79) $ 18.3 40.4 $ 0.45
Effect of dilutive securities
Stock Options........................... --- --- --- 0.8
Contingently issuable shares for
acquisitions......................... --- --- --- ---
----------- ----------- --------- ----------
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle - diluted............. $ (37.9) 48.0 $ (0.79) $ 18.3 41.2 $ 0.44
============ =========== ============ ========== ========== ===========
Had the Company recognized income (versus a loss) from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in the three months
and six months ended June 30, 2003, incremental shares attributable to the
assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and the effect of Common Stock to
be issued at June 30, 2003 for the Company's contingent obligation to make
additional payments for the acquisition of Genie would have increased diluted
shares outstanding by 0.8 million and 0.5 million shares in the three months and
0.7 million and 0.6 million shares in the six months ended June 30, 2003,
respectively.
Options to purchase 1,017 thousand, 367 thousand, 1,593 and 530 thousand shares
of Common Stock during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2003 and
2002, respectively, were outstanding but were not included in the computation of
diluted shares. These options were excluded because the exercise price of these
options was greater than the average market price of the Common Stock during
such periods and, therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive. As discussed in
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
and in Note C - "Acquisitions", the Company has a contingent obligation to make
additional payments in cash or Common Stock based on provisions of certain
acquisition agreements. The Company's policy and past practice has been
generally to settle such obligations in cash. Accordingly, contingently issuable
Common Stock under these arrangements totaling 226 thousand, 72 thousand, 499
thousand and 73 thousand shares for the three months and six months ended June
30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, are not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share.
NOTE M -- STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Total non-shareowner changes in equity (comprehensive income) include all
changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by,
and distributions to, shareowners. The specific components include: net income,
deferred gains and losses resulting from foreign currency translation, minimum
pension liability adjustments, deferred gains and losses resulting from
derivative hedging transactions and deferred gains and losses resulting from
debt and equity securities classified as available for sale. Total
non-shareowner changes in equity were as follows.
For the For the
Three Months Six Months
Ended June 30, Ended June 30,
------------------- -------------------
2003 2002 2003 2002
--------- --------- ---------- --------
Net income (loss).................... $ (49.1) $ 5.2 $ (36.6) $(102.0)
Other comprehensive income:
Translation adjustment.......... 29.7 59.5 39.8 53.6
Derivative hedging adjustment... (4.6) 1.5 (5.9) 1.4
--------- --------- ---------- --------
Comprehensive income (loss).......... $ (24.0) $ 66.2 $ (2.7) $ (47.0)
========= ========= ========== ========
As disclosed in "Note C - Acquisitions", the Company also issued approximately
0.6 million shares of its Common Stock during the three months ended March 31,
2003 in connection with the acquisition of Commercial Body.
21
NOTE N -- LITIGATION AND CONTINGENCIES
In the Company's lines of business numerous suits have been filed alleging
damages for accidents that have arisen in the normal course of operations
involving the Company's products. The Company is self-insured, up to certain
limits, for these product liability exposures, as well as for certain exposures
related to general, workers' compensation and automobile liability. Insurance
coverage is obtained for catastrophic losses as well as those risks required to
be insured by law or contract. The Company has recorded and maintains an
estimated liability in the amount of management's estimate of the Company's
aggregate exposure for such self-insured risks. For self-insured risks, the
Company determines its exposure based on probable loss estimations, which
requires such losses to be both probable and the amount or range of possible
loss to be estimable.
The Company is involved in various other legal proceedings which have arisen in
the normal course of its operations. The Company has recorded provisions for
estimated losses in circumstances where a loss is probable and the amount or
range of possible amounts of the loss is estimable.
The Company's outstanding letters of credit totaled $94.7 at June 30, 2003. The
letters of credit generally serve as collateral for certain liabilities included
in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Certain of the letters of credit
serve as collateral guaranteeing the Company's performance under contracts.
The Company has a letter of credit outstanding covering losses related to a
former subsidiary's worker compensation obligations. The Company has recorded
liabilities for these contingent obligations representing management's estimate
of the potential losses which the Company might incur.
On March 11, 2002, an action was commenced in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division by Ursula Ungaro-Benages
and Ursula Ungaro-Benages as Attorney-in-fact for Peter C. Ungaro, M.D., in
which the plaintiffs alleged that ownership of O&K Orenstein & Koppel AG ("O&K
AG") was illegally taken from the plaintiffs' ancestors by German industry
during the Nazi era. The plaintiffs alleged that the Company was liable for
conversion and unjust enrichment as the result of its purchase of the shares of
the mining shovel subsidiary O&K Mining GmbH from O&K AG, and were claiming
restitution of a 25% interest in O&K Mining GmbH and monetary damages. On June
12, 2002, the United States Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest
in the action that expressed the foreign policy interests of the United States
in dismissal of the case. At the request of the Company, on October 8, 2002, the
Federal Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation ordered that the action be
transferred to the District of New Jersey and assigned the case to the Honorable
William G. Bassler for inclusion in the coordinated or consolidated pretrial
proceedings established in that court. On April 21, 2003 the plaintiffs
voluntarily dismissed the action against the Company.
In the third quarter of 2002, the Company obtained a favorable court judgment on
appeal as the defendant in a patent infringement case brought against the Terex
Construction segment's Powerscreen business. This favorable court judgment
reversed a lower court decision for which the Company had previously recorded a
liability. During the first quarter of 2003, amounts previously paid for the
litigation were returned to the Company. As a result, the Company recorded $2.4
of income in "Other income (expense) - net" in the Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Operations during the first quarter of 2003.
Credit Guarantees
Customers of the Company from time to time may fund the acquisition of the
Company's equipment through third-party finance companies. In certain instances,
the Company may provide a credit guarantee to the finance company, by which the
Company agrees to make payments to the finance company should the customer
default. The maximum liability of the Company is limited to the remaining
payments due to the finance company at the time of default. In the event of
customer default, the Company is generally able to dispose of the equipment with
the Company realizing the benefits of any net proceeds in excess of the
remaining payments due to the finance company.
As of June 30, 2003, the Company's maximum exposure to such credit guarantees is
$311.1. The terms of these guarantees coincide with the financing arranged by
the customer and generally does not exceed five years. Given the Company's
position as the original equipment manufacturer and its knowledge of end
markets, the Company, when called upon to fulfill a guarantee, generally has
been able to liquidate the financed equipment at a minimal loss, if any, to the
Company.
Residual Value and Buyback Guarantees
The Company, through its Genie subsidiary, issues residual value guarantees
under sales-type leases. A residual value guarantee involves a guarantee that a
piece of equipment will have a minimum fair market value at a future point in
22
time. As described in Note K - "Net Investment in Sales-Type Leases," the
Company's maximum exposure related to residual value guarantees under sales-type
leases is $34.2 at June 30, 2003. The Company is able to mitigate the risk
associated with these guarantees because the maturity of these guarantees is
staggered, which limits the amount of used equipment entering the marketplace at
any time.
The Company from time to time guarantees that it will buy equipment from its
customers in the future at a stated price if certain conditions are met by the
customer. Such guarantees are referred to as buyback guarantees. These
conditions pertain to the functionality and state of repair of the machine. As
of June 30, 2003, the Company's maximum exposure to buyback guarantees is $34.3.
The Company is able to mitigate the risk of these guarantees by staggering the
timing of the buybacks and through leveraging its access to the used equipment
markets provided by the Company's original equipment manufacturer status.
NOTE O -- BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
As a result of the Company's contemplated sale of its surface mining truck
design and manufacturing business, the Company has combined its remaining mining
businesses (namely its mining shovel business) into the renamed Terex Mining,
Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other segment. See Note B - "Discontinued
Operations."
Terex is a diversified global manufacturer of a broad range of equipment for the
construction, infrastructure and surface mining industries. From July 1, 2001
through June 30, 2002, the Company operated in three business segments: (i)
Terex Americas; (ii) Terex Europe; and (iii) Terex Mining. From July 1, 2002
through September 18, 2002, the Company operated in four business segments: (i)
Terex Construction; (ii) Terex Cranes; (iii) Terex Roadbuilding, Utility
Products and Other; and (iv) Terex Mining, and upon the acquisition of Genie on
September 18, 2002, the Company added the Terex Aerial Work Platforms segment.
The Company now operates in four business segments: (i) Terex Construction; (ii)
Terex Cranes; (iii) Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other; and
(iv) Terex Aerial Work Platforms. All prior periods have been restated to
reflect results based on these four business segments.
The Terex Construction segment designs, manufactures and markets three primary
categories of equipment and their related components and replacement parts:
heavy construction equipment (including off-highway trucks and scrapers),
compact equipment (including loader backhoes, compaction equipment, mini and
midi excavators, loading machines, site dumpers, telehandlers and wheel
loaders); and mobile crushing and screening equipment (including jaw crushers,
cone crushers, washing screens and trommels). Terex Construction products are
currently marketed principally under the following brand names: Atlas Terex,
Finlay, Fuchs Terex, Pegson, Powerscreen, Terex Benford, Terex Fermec, Terex
Schaeff, Terex and TerexLift. These products are primarily used by construction,
logging, mining, industrial and government customers in construction and
infrastructure projects and supplying coal, minerals, sand and gravel.
The Terex Cranes segment designs, manufactures and markets mobile telescopic
cranes, tower cranes, lattice boom crawler cranes, truck mounted cranes (boom
trucks) and telescopic container stackers, as well as their related replacements
parts and components. Currently, Terex Cranes products are marketed principally
under the following brand names: American, Atlas, Atlas Terex, Bendini, Comedil,
Demag, Franna, Lorain, P&H, Peiner, PPM, RO-Stinger and Terex. These products
are used primarily for construction, repair and maintenance of infrastructure,
building and manufacturing facilities.
The Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other segment designs,
manufactures and markets crushing and screening equipment (including crushers,
impactors, screens and feeders), asphalt and concrete equipment (including
pavers, plants, mixers, reclaimers, stabilizers and profilers), utility
equipment (including digger derricks, aerial devices and cable placers),
hydraulic mining shovels, light construction equipment (including light towers,
trowels, power buggies, generators and arrow boards) and construction trailers,
as well as related components and replacement parts. These products are
currently marketed principally under the following brand names: Amida, Bartell,
Bid-Well, Canica, Cedarapids, Cedarapids/Standard Havens, CMI Johnson Ross, CMI
Terex, CMI-Cifali, Coleman Engineering, Grayhound, Hi-Ranger, Jaques, Load King,
Morrison, O&K, Re-Tech, Royer, Simplicity, Terex, Terex Advance Mixer, Terex
Power, Terex Recycling and Terex Telelect. These products are used primarily by
government, utility, mining and construction customers to build roads, maintain
utility lines, excavate mineral deposits and trim trees. Terex also owns much of
the North American distribution channel for the utility products group,
including the distributors Utility Equipment, Telelect Southeast and Utilities
South (formerly Commercial Body and Combatel). These operations distribute and
install the Company's utility aerial devices as well as other products that
service the utility industry.
The Terex Aerial Work Platforms segment was formed upon the completion of
Terex's acquisition of Genie and its affiliates on September 18, 2002. The Terex
Aerial Work Platforms segment designs, manufactures and markets aerial work
platform equipment and telehandlers. Products include material lifts, portable
aerial work platforms, trailer mounted booms, articulated booms, stick booms,
scissor lifts, telehandlers, related components and replacement parts, and other
23
products. Terex Aerial Work Platforms products currently are marketed
principally under the Genie and Terex Handlers brand names. These products are
used primarily by customers in the construction and building maintenance
industries to lift people and/or equipment as required to build and/or maintain
large physical assets and structures.
On April 1, 2003 the Company changed the composition of its segments when it
moved the North American operations of its telehandlers business from the Terex
Construction segment to the Terex Aerial Work Platforms segment due to a change
in the way the Company's operating decision makers view the business. The
results by segment have been reclassified within the two segments to reflect
this change in the Company's segments.
The results of businesses acquired during 2003 and 2002 are included from the
dates of their respective acquisitions.
Included in Eliminations/Corporate are the eliminations among the four segments,
as well as general and corporate items for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2003 and 2002. Business segment information is presented below:
For the Three Months For the Six Months
Ended June 30, Ended June 30,
------------------------------ ---------------------------------
2003 2002 2003 2002
-------------- --------------- ---------------- ----------------
Sales
Terex Construction................................. $ 382.7 $ 337.7 $ 700.9 $ 594.2
Terex Cranes....................................... 273.0 136.4 510.9 271.5
Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and
Other .......................................... 202.9 193.9 392.6 356.2
Terex Aerial Work Platforms........................ 167.8 9.3 315.0 17.1
Eliminations/Corporate............................. (19.0) (24.1) (32.7) (39.4)
-------------- --------------- ---------------- ----------------
Total............................................ $ 1,007.4 $ 653.2 $ 1,886.7 $ 1,199.6
============== =============== ================ ================
Income (Loss) from Operations
Terex Construction................................. $ 19.0 $ 28.9 $ 33.2 $ 44.2
Terex Cranes....................................... 1.5 12.3 8.3 19.6
Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and
Other........................................... (74.3) 8.1 (69.5) 19.5
Terex Aerial Work Platforms........................ 21.4 0.2 37.2 0.4
Eliminations/Corporate............................. 0.4 (2.3) (1.1) (3.6)
-------------- --------------- --------------- ----------------
Total............................................ $ (32.0) $ 47.2 $ 8.1 $ 80.1
============== =============== =============== ================
June 30, December 31,
2003 2002
--------------- -------------
Identifiable Assets
Terex Construction............................. $ 1,538.0 $ 1,326.6
Terex Cranes................................... 953.3 937.9
Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products
and Other................................... 962.2 933.1
Terex Aerial Work Platforms.................... 447.0 469.9
Corporate...................................... 2,340.4 1,895.8
Eliminations................................... (2,670.2) (1,937.6)
--------------- -------------
Total........................................ $ 3,570.7 $ 3,625.7
=============== =============
NOTE P -- CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On March 29, 2001, the Company sold and issued $300 aggregate principal amount
of 10-3/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 (the "10-3/8% Notes"). On December
17, 2001, the Company sold and issued $200 aggregate principal amount of 9-1/4%
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 (the "9-1/4% Notes"). On March 31, 1998 and
March 9, 1999, the Company issued and sold $150 and $100 aggregate principal
amount, respectively, of 8-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (the "8-7/8%
Notes"). As of June 30, 2003, the 10-3/8% Notes, the 9-1/4% Notes and the 8-7/8%
Notes were each jointly and severally guaranteed by the following wholly-owned
subsidiaries of the Company (the "Wholly-owned Guarantors"): Terex Cranes, Inc.,
Koehring Cranes, Inc., Terex-Telelect, Inc., Terex-RO Corporation, Payhauler
Corp., PPM Cranes, Inc., O & K Orenstein & Koppel, Inc., The American Crane
Corporation, Amida Industries, Inc., Cedarapids, Inc., Standard Havens, Inc.,
Standard Havens Products, Inc., BL-Pegson USA, Inc., Benford America, Inc.,
24
Coleman Engineering, Inc., EarthKing, Inc., Finlay Hydrascreen USA, Inc.,
Powerscreen Holdings USA Inc., Powerscreen International LLC, Powerscreen North
America Inc., Powerscreen USA, LLC, Royer Industries, Inc., Terex Bartell, Inc.,
Terex Mining Equipment, Inc., CMI Terex Corporation, CMI Dakota Company, CMIOIL
Corporation, Product Support, Inc., Schaeff, Inc., Fuchs Terex, Inc., Telelect
Southeast Distribution, Inc., Utility Equipment, Inc., Terex Advance Mixer,
Inc., Terex Utilities, Inc., Genie Holdings, Inc., Genie Access Services, Inc.,
Genie Industries, Inc., Genie Financial Services, Inc., GFS National, Inc.,
Genie Manufacturing, Inc., Genie China, Inc., Genie International, Inc., Lease
Servicing & Funding Corp., GFS Commercial LLC, Go Credit Corporation, Terex
Utilities South, Inc., and Terex Financial Services, Inc. Prior to December
2002, PPM Cranes, Inc. was 92.4% owned by Terex. In December 2002, the Company
acquired the remaining minority interest in the equity of PPM Cranes, Inc. The
2003 results include PPM Cranes, Inc. with the Wholly-owned Guarantors; for
2002, PPM Cranes, Inc. is provided under a separate column. All of the
guarantees are full and unconditional.
No subsidiaries of the Company except the Wholly-owned Guarantors have provided
a guarantee of the 10-3/8% Notes, the 8-7/8% Notes and the 9-1/4% Notes.
The following summarized condensed consolidating financial information for the
Company segregates the financial information of Terex Corporation, the
Wholly-owned Guarantors, PPM Cranes, Inc. (for 2002) and the Non-guarantor
Subsidiaries. The results of businesses acquired during 2003 and 2002 are
included from the dates of their respective acquisitions.
Terex Corporation consists of parent company operations. Subsidiaries of the
parent company are reported on the equity basis.
Wholly-owned Guarantors combine the operations of the Wholly-owned Guarantor
subsidiaries. Subsidiaries of Wholly-owned Guarantors that are not themselves
guarantors are reported on the equity basis.
PPM Cranes, Inc. consists of the operations of PPM Cranes, Inc. Its subsidiary
is reported on an equity basis.
Non-guarantor Subsidiaries combine the operations of subsidiaries which have not
provided a guarantee of the obligations of Terex Corporation under the 10-3/8%
Notes, the 9-1/4% Notes and the 8-7/8% Notes.
Debt and goodwill allocated to subsidiaries is presented on an accounting
"push-down" basis.
25
TEREX CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003
(in millions)
Wholly- Non-
Terex owned guarantor Intercompany
Corporation Guarantors Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Net sales............................... $ 52.4 $ 365.3 $ 644.1 $ (54.4) $ 1,007.4
Cost of goods sold.................... 45.7 343.6 560.4 (54.4) 895.3
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Gross profit............................ 6.7 21.7 83.7 --- 112.1
Selling, general & administrative
expenses.............................. (6.5) (32.1) (54.2) --- (92.8)
Goodwill impairment................... --- (51.3) --- --- (51.3)
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Income (loss) from operations........... 0.2 (61.7) 29.5 --- (32.0)
Interest income....................... 0.2 2.2 (0.4) --- 2.0
Interest expense...................... (7.8) (7.2) (11.3) --- (26.3)
Income (loss) from equity investees... (53.3) --- --- 53.3 ---
Loss on retirement of debt............ (1.9) --- --- --- (1.9)
Other income (expense) - net.......... (1.7) (0.1) (1.2) --- (3.0)
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes and cumulative
effect of change in accounting
principle............................. (64.3) (66.8) 16.6 53.3 (61.2)
Benefit from (provision for) income
taxes................................. 15.7 (0.4) (3.8) --- 11.5
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Income (loss) from continuing operations
and before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle........ (48.6) (67.2) 12.8 53.3 (49.7)
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations............................ (0.5) --- 1.1 --- 0.6
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Income (loss) before cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle..... (49.1) (67.2) 13.9 53.3 (49.1)
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle.................. --- --- --- --- ---
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Net income (loss)....................... $ (49.1) $ (67.2) $ 13.9 $ 53.3 $ (49.1)
============= ============= ============= ============== =============
TEREX CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002
(in millions)
Wholly- Non-
Terex owned PPM guarantor Intercompany
Corporation Guarantors Cranes, Inc. Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Net sales............................... $ 37.0 $ 220.7 $ 5.1 $ 469.2 $ (78.8) $ 653.2
Cost of goods sold.................... 28.7 204.0 4.8 377.1 (78.0) 536.6
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Gross profit............................ 8.3 16.7 0.3 92.1 (0.8) 116.6
Selling, general & administrative
expenses............................. (3.1) (21.1) (0.4) (44.8) --- (69.4)
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Income (loss) from operations........... 5.2 (4.4) (0.1) 47.3 (0.8) 47.2
Interest income....................... 1.0 --- --- 0.9 --- 1.9
Interest expense...................... (1.8) (6.2) (0.7) (13.4) --- (22.1)
Income (loss) from equity investees... 32.6 --- --- --- (32.6) ---
Other income (expense) - net.......... (20.1) 11.8 --- (2.3) --- (10.6)
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes and cumulative
effect of change in accounting
principle............................. 16.9 1.2 (0.8) 32.5 (33.4) 16.4
Provision for income taxes.............. (3.9) (0.1) --- (1.3) --- (5.3)
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Income (loss) from continuing operations
and before cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle............... 13.0 1.1 (0.8) 31.2 (33.4) 11.1
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations............................ (7.8) --- --- 1.9 --- (5.9)
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Income (loss) before cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle..... 5.2 1.1 (0.8) 33.1 (33.4) 5.2
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle.................. --- --- --- --- --- ---
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Net income (loss)....................... $ 5.2 $ 1.1 $ (0.8) $ 33.1 $ (33.4) $ 5.2
============= ============= ============= ============= ============= =============
26
TEREX CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003
(in millions)
Wholly- Non-
Terex owned guarantor Intercompany
Corporation Guarantors Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Net sales............................... $ 92.6 $ 707.4 $ 1,188.1 $ (101.4) $ 1,886.7
Cost of goods sold.................... 83.4 640.1 1,027.6 (101.4) 1,649.7
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Gross profit............................ 9.2 67.3 160.5 --- 237.0
Selling, general & administrative
expenses.............................. (9.7) (62.5) (105.4) --- (177.6)
Goodwill impairment.................. --- (51.3) --- --- (51.3)
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Income (loss) from operations........... (0.5) (46.5) 55.1 --- 8.1
Interest income....................... 0.5 2.4 0.7 --- 3.6
Interest expense...................... (14.6) (13.7) (23.5) --- (51.8)
Income (loss) from equity investees... (35.0) --- --- 35.0 ---
Loss on retirement of debt............ (1.9) --- --- --- (1.9)
Other income (expense) - net.......... (3.5) (0.9) 1.7 --- (2.7)
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes and cumulative
effect of change in accounting
principle............................. (55.0) (58.7) 34.0 35.0 (44.7)
Benefit from (provision for) income
taxes.................................. 20.7 (3.6) (10.3) --- 6.8
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Income (loss) from continuing operations
and before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle......... (34.3) (62.3) 23.7 35.0 (37.9)
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations............................ (2.3) --- 3.6 --- 1.3
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Income (loss) before cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle..... (36.6) (62.3) 27.3 35.0 (36.6)
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle ................. --- --- --- --- ---
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Net income (loss)....................... $ (36.6) $ (62.3) $ 27.3 $ 35.0 (36.6)
============= ============= ============= ============== =============
TEREX CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002
(in millions)
Wholly- Non-
Terex owned PPM guarantor Intercompany
Corporation Guarantors Cranes, Inc. Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Net sales............................... $ 74.4 $ 434.4 $ 11.0 $ 827.4 $ (147.6) $ 1,199.6
Cost of goods sold................... 63.8 387.7 10.3 679.2 (147.6) 993.4
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Gross profit............................ 10.6 46.7 0.7 148.2 --- 206.2
Selling, general & administrative
expenses.......................... (7.0) (39.6) (0.8) (78.7) --- (126.1)
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Income (loss) from operations........... 3.6 7.1 (0.1) 69.5 --- 80.1
Interest income...................... 1.3 --- --- 1.4 --- 2.7
Interest expense..................... (12.3) (8.5) (1.4) (21.6) --- (43.8)
Income (loss) from equity investees.. (58.2) --- --- --- 58.2 ---
Other income (expense) - net......... (20.8) 11.6 --- (2.8) --- (12.0)
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes and cumulative
effect of change in accounting
principle............................ (86.4) 10.2 (1.5) 46.5 58.2 27.0
Benefit from (provision for) income (5.5) (0.1) --- (3.1) --- (8.7)
taxes................................
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle.... (91.9) 10.1 (1.5) 43.4 58.2 18.3
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations........................... (10.1) --- --- 3.2 --- (6.9)
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Income (loss) before cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle.... (102.0) 10.1 (1.5) 46.6 58.2 11.4
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle ................ --- (18.4) --- (95.0) --- (113.4)
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Net income (loss)....................... $ (102.0) $ (8.3) $ (1.5) $ (48.4) $ 58.2 $ (102.0)
============= ============= ============= ============= ============= =============
27
TEREX CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 2003
(in millions)
Wholly- Non-
Terex Owned Guarantor Intercompany
Corporation Guarantors Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents.......... $ 127.1 $ 7.2 $ 286.1 $ --- $ 420.4
Trade receivables - net............ 22.0 178.7 360.4 --- 561.1
Intercompany receivables........... 19.9 16.7 40.5 (77.1) ---
Net inventories.................... 64.3 282.0 588.4 20.5 955.2
Other current assets............... 70.4 41.2 125.7 --- 237.3
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Total current assets............. 303.7 525.8 1,401.1 (56.6) 2,174.0
Property, plant & equipment - net.... 8.7 117.1 188.1 --- 313.9
Investment in and advances to
(from) subsidiaries.............. 782.5 (367.8) (364.2) (50.5) ---
Goodwill - net....................... (9.7) 247.7 363.1 --- 601.1
Other assets - net................... 129.3 163.9 188.5 --- 481.7
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Total assets............................ $ 1,214.5 $ 686.7 $ 1,776.6 $ (107.1) $ 3,570.7
============= ============= ============= ============= ==============
Liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)
Current liabilities
Notes payable and current portion
of long-term debt................ $ 0.4 $ 38.2 $ 31.1 $ --- $ 69.7
Trade accounts payable............. 32.1 137.7 407.8 --- 577.6
Intercompany payables.............. 28.1 22.4 26.6 (77.1) ---
Accruals and other current
liabilities...................... 35.7 97.8 312.8 --- 446.3
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Total current liabilities........ 96.3 296.1 778.3 (77.1) 1,093.6
Long-term debt less current portion.. 282.6 374.3 740.1 --- 1,397.0
Other long-term liabilities.......... 56.6 49.7 194.8 --- 301.1
Stockholders' equity (deficit)....... 779.0 (33.4) 63.4 (30.0) 779.0
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Total liabilities and stockholders'
equity (deficit)..................... $ 1,214.5 $ 686.7 $ 1,776.6 $ (107.1) $ 3,570.7
============= ============= ============= ============= ==============
28
TEREX CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 2002
(in millions)
Wholly- Non-
Terex Owned Guarantor Intercompany
Corporation Guarantors Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents.......... $ 134.0 $ 6.2 $ 212.0 $ --- $ 352.2
Trade receivables - net............ 45.7 189.8 343.1 --- 578.6
Intercompany receivables........... 13.4 6.7 14.4 (34.5) ---
Net inventories.................... 101.1 324.9 645.6 34.7 1,106.3
Other current assets............... 41.1 54.6 88.3 --- 184.0
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Total current assets............. 335.3 582.2 1,303.4 0.2 2,221.1
Property, plant & equipment - net.... 7.4 128.0 174.0 --- 309.4
Investment in and advances to (from)
subsidiaries....................... 818.0 (520.9) (237.2) (59.9) ---
Goodwill - net....................... (9.8) 284.7 348.0 --- 622.9
Other assets - net................... 140.0 144.7 187.6 --- 472.3
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Total assets............................ $ 1,290.9 $ 618.7 $ 1,775.8 $ (59.7) $ 3,625.7
============= ============= ============= ============= =============
Liabilities and stockholders' equity
(deficit)
Current liabilities
Notes payable and current portion
of long-term debt................ $ 0.4 $ 40.7 $ 33.0 $ --- $ 74.1
Trade accounts payable............. 39.2 149.3 354.4 --- 542.9
Intercompany payables.............. 23.4 (127.8) 138.9 (34.5) ---
Accruals and other current
liabilities...................... 68.0 98.5 322.7 --- 489.2
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Total current liabilities........ 131.0 160.7 849.0 (34.5) 1,106.2
Long-term debt less current portion.. 335.7 386.4 765.0 --- 1,487.1
Other long-term liabilities.......... 55.0 42.7 165.5 --- 263.2
Stockholders' equity (deficit)....... 769.2 28.9 (3.7) (25.2) 769.2
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Total liabilities and stockholders'
equity (deficit)..................... $ 1,290.9 $ 618.7 $ 1,775.8 $ (59.7) $ 3,625.7
============= ============= ============= ============= =============
29
TEREX CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003
(in millions)
Wholly- Non-
Terex owned guarantor Intercompany
Corporation Guarantors Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- ---------------
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities................. $ 47.5 $ 17.0 $ 119.9 $ --- $ 184.4
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- ---------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of business, net of cash
acquired............................. --- (8.7) --- --- (8.7)
Capital expenditures.................. (0.7) (2.8) (10.6) --- (14.1)
Proceeds from sale of assets.......... --- 1.6 1.9 --- 3.5
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- ---------------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities............... (0.7) (9.9) (8.7) --- (19.3)
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- ---------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Principal borrowings (repayments) of
long-term debt....................... (51.5) (0.5) (1.0) --- (53.0)
Net borrowings (repayments) under
revolving line of credit agreements.. --- (2.0) (34.5) --- (36.5)
Payment of premium on early retirement
of debt.............................. (2.2) --- --- (2.2)
Other................................. --- (3.6) (12.8) --- (16.4)
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- ---------------
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities............... (53.7) (6.1) (48.3) --- (108.1)
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- ---------------
Effect of exchange rates on cash and
cash equivalents...................... --- --- 11.2 --- 11.2
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- ---------------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash
equivalents........................... (6.9) 1.0 74.1 --- 68.2
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of
period................................ 134.0 6.2 212.0 --- 352.2
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- ---------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 127.1 $ 7.2 $ 286.1 $ --- $ 420.4
============= ============= ============= ============== ===============
30
TEREX CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002
(in millions)
Terex Wholly-owned PPM Non-guarantor Intercompany
Corporation Guarantors Cranes, Inc. Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
------------- ------------ ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities................. $ (137.4) $ (0.7) $ --- $ 146.7 $ --- $ 8.6
------------- ------------ ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Investing activities
Acquisition of businesses, net of
cash acquired...................... (7.3) --- --- (82.2) --- (89.5)
Capital expenditures................. --- (2.8) --- (7.3) --- (10.1)
Proceeds from sale of assets......... --- 2.3 --- 0.3 --- 2.6
------------- ------------ ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities........... (7.3) (0.5) --- (89.2) --- (97.0)
------------- ------------ ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Financing activities
Issuance of common stock ............ 113.3 --- --- --- --- 113.3
Proceeds from issuance of long-term
debt, net of issuance costs....... --- --- --- --- --- ---
Principal borrowings (repayments) of
long-term debt.................... --- --- --- 0.7 --- 0.7
Net borrowings (repayments) under
revolving line of credit agreements --- (1.1) --- 1.3 --- 0.2
Other................................ --- --- --- (0.4) --- (0.4)
------------- ------------ ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities............ 113.3 (1.1) --- 1.6 --- 113.8
------------- ------------ ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Effect of exchange rates on cash and
cash equivalents..................... --- --- --- 5.1 --- 5.1
------------- ------------ ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents.......................... (31.4) (2.3) --- 64.2 --- 30.5
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of
period............................... 144.2 3.9 0.1 102.2 --- 250.4
------------- ------------ ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Cash and cash equivalents,
end of period........................ $ 112.8 $ 1.6 $ 0.1 $ 166.4 $ --- $ 280.9
============= ============ ============= ============== ============== ==============
31
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
-------------------------------------------------------------------
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
-------------------------
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Terex is a diversified global manufacturer of a broad range of equipment for the
construction, infrastructure and mining industries. The Company operated in five
business segments through the first six months of 2003. These segments were: (i)
Terex Construction; (ii) Terex Cranes; (iii) Terex Roadbuilding, Utility
Products, and Other; (iv) Terex Aerial Work Platforms; and (v) Terex Mining.
On July 1, 2003, the Company announced that it had entered into a non-binding
agreement in principle to sell its surface mining truck design and manufacturing
business to Caterpillar Inc. ("Caterpillar"). In addition to the sale of the
mining truck business, the non-binding agreement also contemplates the sale of
the Company's mining truck and shovel product support businesses to Caterpillar
dealers. The Company will retain the mining shovel manufacturing business
located in Dortmund, Germany and intends to purchase the intellectual property
rights for certain models of Caterpillar hydraulic excavator mining shovels. As
a result, the Company has classified its mining truck business as a business
held for sale and stopped depreciating the assets on June 1, 2003. The Company
has restated all periods presented to reclassify the results of the business
held for sale as a discontinued operation in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144. The Company's results are now
presented in four segments: (i) Terex Construction; (ii) Terex Cranes; (iii)
Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other; and (iv) Terex Aerial
Work Platforms. The results of the mining shovel business retained by the
Company are included in the Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and
Other segment for all periods presented.
The Terex Construction segment designs, manufactures and markets three primary
categories of equipment and their related components and replacement parts:
heavy construction equipment (including off-highway trucks and scrapers),
compact equipment (including loader backhoes, compaction equipment, mini and
midi excavators, loading machines, site dumpers, telehandlers and wheel
loaders); and mobile crushing and screening equipment (including jaw crushers,
cone crushers, washing screens and trommels). Terex Construction products are
currently marketed principally under the following brand names: Atlas Terex,
Finlay, Fuchs Terex, Pegson, Powerscreen, Terex Benford, Terex Fermec, Terex
Schaeff, Terex and TerexLift. These products are primarily used by construction,
logging, mining, industrial and government customers in construction and
infrastructure projects and supplying coal, minerals, sand and gravel. Effective
April 1, 2003, the Terex Aerial Work Platforms segment assumed responsibility
for the manufacturing, sales and service of the Company's telehandler business
in North America. The Company's telehandler business in North America was
previously within the Terex Construction segment. This change was made to better
service the large national account customers who purchase telehandlers in the
United States. The results of the Terex Construction segment have been restated
to reflect this change for all periods presented.
The Terex Cranes segment designs, manufactures and markets mobile telescopic
cranes, tower cranes, lattice boom crawler cranes, truck mounted cranes (boom
trucks) and telescopic container stackers, as well as their related replacements
parts and components. Currently, Terex Cranes products are marketed principally
under the following brand names: American, Atlas, Atlas Terex, Bendini, Comedil,
Demag, Franna, Lorain, P&H, Peiner, PPM, RO-Stinger and Terex. These products
are used primarily for construction, repair and maintenance of infrastructure,
building and manufacturing facilities. The Company acquired Demag Mobile Cranes
GmbH and Co. KG and its affiliates ("Demag") on August 30, 2002. The results of
Demag are included in the Terex Cranes segment since its date of acquisition.
The Company also has an interest in Crane and Machinery, Inc. ("Crane &
Machinery"). During 2002, the Company acquired from an unaffiliated financial
institution outstanding loans owed by Crane & Machinery to that institution, and
Crane & Machinery remains obligated to make payments to the Company pursuant to
the terms of such loans. The combination of the Company's interest in Crane &
Machinery and the rights of the Company under the loans to Crane & Machinery
provide a basis for consolidation of Crane & Machinery's results with those of
the Company. Accordingly, the results of Crane & Machinery are included in the
results of the Terex Cranes segment since December 1, 2002.
The Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other segment designs,
manufactures and markets crushing and screening equipment (including crushers,
impactors, screens and feeders), asphalt and concrete equipment (including
pavers, plants, mixers, reclaimers, stabilizers and profilers), utility
equipment (including digger derricks, aerial devices and cable placers),
hydraulic mining shovels, light construction equipment (including light towers,
trowels, power buggies, generators and arrow boards) and construction trailers,
as well as related components and replacement parts. These products are
currently marketed principally under the following brand names: Amida, Bartell,
Bid-Well, Canica, Cedarapids, Cedarapids/Standard Havens, CMI Johnson Ross, CMI
Terex, CMI-Cifali, Coleman Engineering, Grayhound, Hi-Ranger, Jaques, Load King,
32
Morrison, O&K, Re-Tech, Royer, Simplicity, Terex, Terex Advance Mixer, Terex
Power, Terex Recycling and Terex Telelect. These products are used primarily by
government, utility, mining and construction customers to build roads, maintain
utility lines, excavate mineral deposits and trim trees. Terex also owns much of
the North American distribution channel for the utility products group,
including the distributors Utility Equipment Co., Inc. ("Utility Equipment"),
Telelect Southeast Distribution, Inc. ("Telelect Southeast"), Commercial Body
Corporation ("Commercial Body") and Combatel Distribution, Inc. ("Combatel").
These operations distribute and install the Company's utility aerial devices as
well as other products that service the utility industry. The Company acquired
Utility Equipment on January 15, 2002, Telelect Southeast on March 26, 2002,
certain assets and liabilities of Terex Advance Mixer, Inc. ("Advance Mixer") on
April 11, 2002 and Commercial Body, including the remaining 50% of Combatel, on
February 14, 2003. The results of Utility Equipment, Telelect Southeast, Advance
Mixer, Commercial Body and Combatel are included in the results of the Terex
Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other segment from their respective
dates of acquisition. As mentioned earlier, this segment now includes the
results of the Company's hydraulic mining shovel business. The results of the
Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other segment have been
restated to reflect this change for all periods presented.
The Terex Aerial Work Platforms segment was formed upon the completion of
Terex's acquisition of Genie Holdings, Inc. and its affiliates ("Genie") on
September 18, 2002. The Terex Aerial Work Platforms segment designs,
manufactures and markets aerial work platform equipment and telehandlers.
Products include material lifts, portable aerial work platforms, trailer mounted
booms, articulated booms, stick booms, scissor lifts, telehandlers and related
components and replacement parts, and other products. Terex Aerial Work
Platforms products currently are marketed principally under the Genie and Terex
Handlers brand names. These products are used primarily by customers in the
construction and building maintenance industries to lift people and/or equipment
as required to build and/or maintain large physical assets and structures. As
mentioned above, this segment now includes the results of the Company's North
American telehandler business. The results of the Terex Aerial Work Platforms
segment have been restated to reflect this change for all periods presented.
Included in Eliminations/Corporate are the eliminations among the four segments,
as well as general and corporate items.
Restructuring
- -------------
The Company has initiated numerous restructuring programs since 2001. These
programs were initiated in response to a slowing economy, to reduce duplicative
operating facilities, including those arising from the Company's acquisitions,
and to respond to specific market conditions. Restructuring programs were
initiated within the Company's Terex Construction, Terex Cranes, and Terex
Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other segments. The Company's
programs have been designed to minimize the impact of any program on future
operating results and the Company's liquidity. To date, these restructuring
programs have not negatively impacted operating results or the Company's
liquidity. These initiatives are expected to generate a reduction in ongoing
labor and factory overhead expense as well as to reduce overall material costs
by leveraging the purchasing power of the consolidated facilities. For example,
cost savings from projects initiated during 2002 and 2003 are expected to
generate annual savings of approximately $50 million per year by 2004. See Note
F - "Restructuring and Other Charges" in the Company's Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information on the Company's restructuring
programs, including the reasons, timing and costs associated with each such
program.
33
Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 Compared with the Three Months Ended June 30,
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002
- ----
The table below is a comparison of net sales, gross profit, selling, general and
administrative expenses, and income from operations, by segment, for the three
months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.
Three Months Ended
June 30,
--------------------- Increase
2003 2002 (Decrease)
---------- ---------- ----------
(amounts in millions)
NET SALES
Terex Construction...........................$ 382.7 $ 337.7 $ 45.0
Terex Cranes................................. 273.0 136.4 136.6
Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility
Products and Other......................... 202.9 193.9 9.0
Terex Aerial Work Platforms.................. 167.8 9.3 158.5
Eliminations/Corporate....................... (19.0) (24.1) 5.1
---------- ---------- ----------
Total......................................$ 1,007.4 $ 653.2 $ 354.2
========== ========== ==========
GROSS PROFIT
Terex Construction...........................$ 53.3 $ 61.1 $ (7.8)
Terex Cranes................................. 21.8 21.7 0.1
Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility
Products and Other......................... 1.5 32.9 (31.4)
Terex Aerial Work Platforms.................. 35.4 0.8 34.6
Eliminations/Corporate....................... 0.1 0.1 ---
---------- ---------- ----------
Total......................................$ 112.1 $ 116.6 $ (4.5)
========== ========== ==========
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Terex Construction...........................$ 34.3 $ 32.2 $ 2.1
Terex Cranes................................. 20.3 9.4 10.9
Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility
Products and Other......................... 24.5 24.8 (0.3)
Terex Aerial Work Platforms.................. 14.0 0.6 13.4
Eliminations/Corporate....................... (0.3) 2.4 (2.7)
---------- ---------- ----------
Total......................................$ 92.8 $ 69.4 $ 23.4
========== ========== ==========
GOODWILL IMPAIRMENT
Terex Construction...........................$ --- $ --- $ ---
Terex Cranes................................. --- --- ---
Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility
Products and Other......................... 51.3 --- 51.3
Terex Aerial Work Platforms.................. --- --- ---
Eliminations/Corporate....................... --- --- ---
---------- ---------- ----------
Total......................................$ 51.3 $ --- $ 51.3
========== ========== ==========
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS
Terex Construction...........................$ 19.0 $ 28.9 $ (9.9)
Terex Cranes................................. 1.5 12.3 (10.8)
Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility
Products and Other......................... (74.3) 8.1 (82.4)
Terex Aerial Work Platforms.................. 21.4 0.2 21.2
Eliminations/Corporate....................... 0.4 (2.3) 2.7
---------- ---------- ----------
Total......................................$ (32.0) $ 47.2 $ (79.2)
========== ========== ==========
34
Terex Consolidated
Total sales for the three months ended June 30, 2003 were $1,007.4 million, an
increase of $354.2 million when compared to the same period in 2002. The Demag,
Genie, Commercial Body and Crane & Machinery acquisitions increased sales by
$342.4 million in the second quarter of 2003 when compared to the comparable
period in 2002. Total sales in the Terex Construction segment increased when
compared to the second quarter of 2002, primarily as a result of gains in the
Euro and British Pound relative to the U.S. dollar. Total sales in the North
American cranes business fell significantly in the second quarter of 2003 when
compared to the comparable period in 2002 and offset the improvements in the
Terex Construction segment. Sales in the North American cranes segment have
declined due to lower construction demand and economic difficulties experienced
by many of the Company's large rental customers.
Gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2003 was $112.1 million, a
decrease of $4.5 million when compared to the same period in 2002. The Demag,
Genie, Commercial Body and Crane & Machinery acquisitions increased gross profit
by $53.0 million when compared to the second quarter of 2002. Included in the
gross profit for the second quarter of 2003 is a charge of $38.0 million. The
charge relates primarily to inventory write-downs in the Roadbuilding businesses
as a result of significantly reduced demand for its products ($28.6 million),
the closure of a production facility in the Terex Cranes segment ($6.6 million),
the closure of a production facility in the Terex Construction segment ($1.8
million) and other costs ($1.0 million). Gross profit in the North American
crane business fell significantly in the second quarter of 2003 when compared to
the same period in 2002, due to the impact of lower demand on volumes and
selling margins. Gross profit in the Terex Construction segment declined in the
second quarter of 2003 relative to the same period in 2002, primarily due to
unfavorable results in the articulated dump truck business. Gross profit in the
Roadbuilding businesses declined as a result of lower demand for the product and
reduced selling margins as a result of increased competition.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30,
2003 totaled $92.8 million, an increase of $23.4 million when compared to the
same period in 2002. The acquisitions of Demag, Genie, Commercial Body and Crane
& Machinery increased selling, general and administrative expense by $25.5
million in the second quarter of 2003. Included in the selling, general and
administrative expense for the second quarter of 2003 is a charge of $2.3
million. This charge is related to the closure of a facility in the Terex Cranes
segment as well as cost related to product line rationalization in the
Roadbuilding businesses.
Income (loss) from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2003 was a
loss of $32.0 million, a decrease of $79.2 million when compared to the same
period in 2002. The acquisitions of Demag, Genie, Commercial Body and Crane &
Machinery increased income from operations by $27.5 million when compared to the
comparable period in 2002. A goodwill impairment charge of $51.3 million was
recorded in the Roadbuilding business in the second quarter of 2003.
Additionally, a charge of $40.3 million is included in income from operations in
the second quarter of 2003 for facility closure costs and the costs to bring
inventory levels in line with demand in the Roadbuilding businesses. Income from
operations in the second quarter of 2003 was negatively impacted by performance
in the North American crane business, the articulated truck business and the
Roadbuilding businesses.
Terex Construction
Sales in the Terex Construction segment increased by $45.0 to $382.7 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2003 from $337.7 million for the comparable 2002
period. The increase is due primarily to the relative increase in the Euro
exchange rate versus the U.S. Dollar. Sales of crushing and screening products
increased for the three months ended June 30, 2003 when compared to the same
period in 2002 due to the continuing shift of customer preferences towards
mobile crushing and screening products and away from stationary products.
Gross profit in the Terex Construction segment decreased by $7.8 million or
12.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2003 from the comparable 2002 period.
Gross margin in 2003 includes a charge of $1.8 million related to closing a
Powerscreen facility located in Kilbeggan, Ireland. The Kilbeggan operations
will be consolidated into Powerscreen's Dungannon, Northern Ireland facility and
will allow the business to reduce underutilized factory capacity. Annual savings
of approximately $3 million are expected from the closure, primarily through a
reduction in employment of 121 employees. Gross profit declined in the
articulated truck business and in the construction equipment rental business
located in the United Kingdom.
Selling, general and administrative expense in the Terex Construction segment
increased by $2.1 million to $34.3 million during the three months ended June
30, 2003 when compared to the same period in 2002. The increase is due to the
impact of foreign exchange, as the majority of the Terex Construction segment
businesses incur costs in Euro and British Pounds, and an increase in the
35
allowance for doubtful accounts receivable during the quarter ended June 30,
2003. Also included in selling, general and administrative expense in the second
quarter of 2003 is a $0.1 million charge related to the closure of Powerscreen's
facility in Kilbeggan, Ireland.
Operating profit in the Terex Construction segment fell by $9.9 million to $19.0
million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 when compared to the same
period in 2002. A restructuring charge of $1.9 million is included in the second
quarter 2003 operating profit results for costs related to the closure of
Powerscreen's facility in Kilbeggan, Ireland. Lower operating margins in both
the articulated dump truck business as well as the United Kingdom based
construction equipment rental business, as well as the increase in the reserve
for doubtful accounts, accounted for the majority of the remaining decline in
operating profit.
Terex Cranes
Total sales for the Terex Cranes segment increased by $136.6 million and totaled
$273.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 as compared to $136.4
million for the same period in 2002. Sales from Demag, acquired on August 30,
2002, and Crane & Machinery, consolidated since December 1, 2002, totaled $165.7
million. Sales of mobile cranes in North America decreased significantly
relative to 2002. Demand for mobile cranes has been negatively impacted by weak
construction activity and overcapacity in the rental markets.
Gross profit for the Terex Cranes segment increased by $0.1 million to $21.8
million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 as compared to $21.7 million
for the same period in 2002. Gross profit earned by Demag and Crane & Machinery
totaled $18.1 million in the second quarter 2003. Included in gross profit for
the second quarter of 2003 is a charge of $6.6 related to the closure of the
Peiner tower crane product facility in Trier, Germany. The facility will be
consolidated into Demag's production facility and certain non-core product lines
will be exited with the goal of reducing product cost to respond to an
increasingly competitive market for tower cranes in Europe. Gross profit in the
North American crane business fell in the second quarter of 2003 when compared
to the same period in 2002. The decline in gross profit is related primarily to
the drop in volume while the remainder is due to lower prices realized on the
sale of both new machines and replacement parts.
Selling, general and administrative expense in the Terex Cranes segment
increased by $10.9 million to $20.3 million in the first quarter of 2003 when
compared to the same period in 2002. Selling, general and administrative expense
from the Demag and Crane & Machinery businesses totaled $10.8 million, which
largely accounts for the increase over the prior year period. Also included in
selling, general and administrative expense in the second quarter of 2003 is a
$0.5 million charge related to the closure of the Peiner facility.
Operating profit for the Terex Cranes segment fell by $10.8 million to $1.5
million in the three months ended June 30, 2003 when compared to $12.3 million
for the same period in 2002. Demag and Crane & Machinery contributed $7.3
million of operating profit in the second quarter of 2003. Included in operating
profit for the second quarter 2003 is a $7.1 million charge related to the
closure of the Peiner tower crane facility. The North American crane business
generated an operating loss in the second quarter of 2003 as a result of lower
sales levels and selling margins when compared to the same period in 2002.
Demand for mobile cranes in North America remains weak due to reduced
construction demand.
Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other
Sales in the Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other segment
increased by $9.0 million to $202.9 million for the three months ended June 30,
2003 from $193.9 for the comparable 2002 period. Sales from Commercial Body
(acquired February 14, 2003) totaled $14.0 million during the second quarter of
2003. Sales of concrete paving products declined by approximately one-quarter
when compared to the second quarter of 2002. Demand for roadbuilding products in
general has been weak over the past twelve months as improvements in state and
federal funding for road construction have yet to materialize. Sales of Advance
Mixer's front discharge cement mixers doubled in the second quarter of 2003 when
compared to the same period in 2002. Advance Mixer was acquired on April 11,
2002 and its results in the second quarter of 2002 did not benefit from the full
impact of the Company's business integration activities.
Gross profit in the Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other
segment declined by $31.4 million to $1.5 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2003 compared to $32.9 million for the comparable period in 2002. Sales
levels in the segment's Roadbuilding businesses have declined significantly over
the past 24 months as funding for road building and repair projects has remained
weak. As a result of this decline, and in light of increasing state and federal
government budget deficits, the Company revised downward the projected sales
levels for the Roadbuilding business unit. In response to the depressed market
36
conditions, the Company reviewed its projected inventory requirements at its
Roadbuilding businesses and also reviewed the long-term profitability of several
niche product categories at these businesses. As a result of this review, the
Company recorded a charge of $28.6 million in the second quarter of 2003,
primarily to reduce inventory to reflect forecasted demand and to exit certain
economically unviable niche product lines. In addition to these inventory
related costs, gross profit in the Roadbuilding businesses declined as lower
selling prices were realized in a more competitive market place. During the
second quarter of 2002, the Company recorded a charge of $8.2 million to reduce
the carrying value of the long-term assets in the Light Construction business
($7.9 million) and to reduce the workforce in the Cedarapids business ($0.3
million).
Selling, general and administrative expense in the Terex Mining, Roadbuilding,
Utility Products and Other segment decreased by $0.3 million to $24.5 million in
the three months ended June 30, 2003 when compared to the same period in 2002.
The acquisition of Commercial Body and Combatel increased selling, general and
administrative expense by $1.3 million. Also included in second quarter 2003
selling, general and administrative costs is a $1.7 million charge related
primarily to the product line exits in the Roadbuilding businesses described
above. During the second quarter of 2002, the Company recorded a charge of $0.6
million related to a reduction in force at its Cedarapids business.
During the second quarter of 2003, the Company determined that the business
performance during the first six months of 2003 in the Roadbuilding reporting
unit would not meet the Company's 2003 performance expectations that were used
when goodwill was last reviewed for impairment as of October 1, 2002. To date,
funding for road projects have remained at historically low levels as federal
and state budgets have been negatively impacted by a weak economy and the war in
Iraq. In response to the revised business outlook, management initiated several
changes to address the expected market conditions, including a change in
business management, discontinuance of several non-core products, work force
furloughs and reductions, and an inventory write-down based on anticipated lower
sales volume. Based on the continued weakness in the reporting unit, the Company
initiated a review of the long-term outlook for the reporting unit. The revised
outlook for the reporting unit assumes that funding levels for domestic road
projects will not improve significantly in the short term. In addition, the
outlook assumes that the Company will continue to reduce working capital
invested in the reporting unit to better match revenue expectations.
Based on this review, the Company determined the fair value of the Roadbuilding
reporting unit using the present value of the cash flow expected to be generated
by the reporting unit. The cash flow was determined based on the expected
revenues, after tax profits, working capital levels and capital expenditures for
the reporting unit. The present value was calculated by discounting the cash
flow by the Company's weighted average cost of capital. The Company, with the
assistance of a third-party, also reviewed the market value of the Roadbuilding
reporting unit's tangible and intangible assets. These values were included in
the determination of the carrying value of the Roadbuilding reporting unit.
Based on the revised fair value of the reporting unit, a goodwill impairment of
$51.3 million was recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2003.
Operating profit in the Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other
segment for the three months ended June 30, 2003 was a loss of $74.3 million, a
reduction of $82.4 million from the same period in 2002. During the three months
ended June 30, 2003, the Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other
Segment recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $51.3 million for its
Roadbuilding reporting unit. Additionally, a total charge of $29.8 million was
recorded in the second quarter of 2003 to bring inventory levels in line with
significantly reduced demand expectations and to exit certain niche product
lines. The charges consist primarily of inventory write-downs.
Terex Aerial Work Platforms
Sales in the Terex Aerial Work Platforms segment totaled $167.8 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2003, an increase of $158.5 million from the
comparable period in 2002. The addition of Genie, acquired on September 18,
2002, is the primary reason for the increase. Results for the three months ended
June 30, 2002 represent the performance of the North American telehandler
business only.
Gross profit in the Terex Aerial Work Platforms segment totaled $35.4 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2003, an increase of $34.6 million from the
comparable period in 2002. The acquisition of Genie accounted for $33.7 million
of the increase in gross profit from 2002. Included in Genie's gross profit of
$33.7 million is a non-recurring reduction of gross profit of $0.1 million
related to the effects of the required fair-value accounting of Genie. The fair
value adjustments relate to acquired inventory. No fair value adjustment remains
in inventory as of June 30, 2003.
37
Selling, general and administrative expense in the Terex Aerial Work Platforms
segment totaled $14.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2003, an
increase of $13.4 million from the comparable period in 2002. The acquisition of
Genie accounted for the increase from 2002.
Operating profit for the Terex Aerial Work Platforms segment totaled $21.4
million, an increase of $21.2 million from the second quarter of 2002. The
majority of the increase is due to the acquisition of Genie.
Net Interest Expense
During the three months ended June 30, 2003, the Company's net interest expense
increased $4.1 million to $24.3 million from $20.2 million for the prior year
period. The increase was due to the overall increase in bank debt used to
finance acquisitions in 2002.
Other Income (Expense) - Net
Other income (expense) - net for the three months ended June 30, 2003 was
expense of $3.0 million as compared to an expense of $10.6 million for the prior
year period. During the three months ended June 30, 2003, the Company recorded
an expense of $1.1 million to reduce the carrying cost of its investment in SDC
International Inc. ("SDC") to zero. This write-down reflects the current market
value of SDC's stock. During the second quarter of 2002, the Company recorded a
charge of $15.0 million to write-down the carrying value of certain investments
in its Terex Cranes segment and EarthKing business.
Loss on Retirement of Debt
On June 30, 2003, the Company redeemed $50.0 million aggregate principle amount
of its 8-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008. In connection with this
redemption the Company recognized a loss of $1.9. The loss was comprised of the
payment of an early redemption premium ($2.2 million), the write off of
unamortized original issuance discount ($1.6 million) and the write off of
unamortized debt acquisition costs ($0.2 million), which were partially offset
by the recognition of deferred gains related to previously closed fair value
interest rate swaps on this debt ($2.1 million).
Income Taxes
During the three months ended June 30, 2003, the Company recognized a benefit
from income taxes of $11.5 million on a loss from continuing operations before
income taxes of $49.7 million, an effective rate of 23%, as compared to income
tax expense of $5.3 million on income from continuing operations of $16.4
million, an effective rate of 32%, in the prior year period. These effective tax
rates differ from previous periods primarily due to a goodwill impairment charge
that is non-deductible for income tax purposes and a change in the source of
earnings among various jurisdictions with different tax rates.
Discontinued Operations
On July 1, 2003, the Company announced that it had entered into a non-binding
agreement in principle to sell its surface mining truck design and manufacturing
business to Caterpillar. In addition to the sale of the mining truck business,
the non-binding agreement also contemplates the sale of the Company's mining
truck and shovel product support businesses to Caterpillar dealers. The Company
will retain the mining shovel manufacturing business located in Dortmund,
Germany and intends to purchase the intellectual property rights for certain
models of Caterpillar hydraulic excavating mining shovels. As a result, the
Company has classified its mining truck business as a business held for sale.
The Company has restated all periods presented to reclassify the results of the
business held for sale as a discontinued operation in accordance with SFAS No.
144.
Income from discontinued operations for the three months ended June 30, 2003
totaled $0.6 million, net of tax. During the three months ended June 30, 2002,
income from discontinued operations was a loss of $5.9 million, net of tax. The
increase in income from discontinued operations is due primarily to a 12%
increase in sales as well as lower costs incurred in 2003 due to the closure of
the Tulsa, Oklahoma mining truck facility. During the second quarter of 2002,
the Company recorded a charge of $2.9 million, net of tax, for the closure of
the Tulsa, Oklahoma mining truck production facility.
38
Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 Compared with the Six Months Ended June 30, 2002
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The table below is a comparison of net sales, gross profit, selling, general and
administrative expenses, and income from operations, by segment, for the six
months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.
Six Months Ended
June 30,
---------------------- Increase
2003 2002 (Decrease)
----------- ---------- ----------
(amounts in millions)
NET SALES
Terex Construction..........................$ 700.9 $ 594.2 $ 106.7
Terex Cranes................................ 510.9 271.5 239.4
Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility
Products and Other........................ 392.6 356.2 36.4
Terex Aerial Work Platforms................. 315.0 17.1 297.9
Eliminations/Corporate...................... (32.7) (39.4) 6.7
----------- ---------- ----------
Total.....................................$ 1,886.7 $ 1,199.6 $ 687.1
=========== ========== ==========
GROSS PROFIT
Terex Construction..........................$ 95.0 $ 100.3 $ (5.3)
Terex Cranes................................ 49.0 38.5 10.5
Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility
Products and Other........................ 28.3 65.6 (37.3)
Terex Aerial Work Platforms................. 64.9 1.6 63.3
Eliminations/Corporate...................... (0.2) 0.2 (0.4)
----------- ---------- ----------
Total.....................................$ 237.0 $ 206.2 $ 30.8
=========== ========== ==========
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Terex Construction..........................$ 61.8 $ 56.1 $ 5.7
Terex Cranes................................ 40.7 18.9 21.8
Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility
Products and Other........................ 46.5 46.1 0.4
Terex Aerial Work Platforms................. 27.7 1.2 26.5
Eliminations/Corporate...................... 0.9 3.8 (2.9)
----------- ---------- ----------
Total.....................................$ 177.6 $ 126.1 $ 51.5
=========== ========== ==========
GOODWILL IMPAIRMENT
Terex Construction..........................$ --- $ --- $ ---
Terex Cranes................................ --- --- ---
Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility
Products and Other........................ 51.3 --- 51.3
Terex Aerial Work Platforms................. --- --- ---
Eliminations/Corporate...................... --- --- ---
----------- ---------- ----------
Total.....................................$ 51.3 $ --- $ 51.3
=========== ========== ==========
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS
Terex Construction..........................$ 33.2 $ 44.2 $ (11.0)
Terex Cranes................................ 8.3 19.6 (11.3)
Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility
Products and Other........................ (69.5) 19.5 (89.0)
Terex Aerial Work Platforms................. 37.2 0.4 36.8
Eliminations/Corporate...................... (1.1) (3.6) 2.5
----------- ---------- ----------
Total.....................................$ 8.1 $ 80.1 $ (72.0)
=========== ========== ==========
39
Terex Consolidated
Total sales for the six months ended June 30, 2003 were $1,886.7 million, an
increase of $687.1 million when compared to the same period in 2002. The
acquisitions of Demag, Genie, Commercial Body and Crane & Machinery added $638.4
million of sales when compared to the first six months of 2002. Sales in the
Terex Construction segment increased by $106.7 million when compared to the
first half of 2002, primarily due to the increase in value of the Euro and
British Pound compared to the U.S. dollar. Sales in the Terex Cranes segment
fell relative to the first half of 2002 primarily as a result of reduced demand
for mobile cranes in the North American market.
Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2003 was $237.0 million, an
increase of $30.8 million when compared to the same period in 2002. The
acquisitions of Demag, Genie, Commercial Body and Crane & Machinery added $100.3
million of gross profit when compared to the first six months of 2002. During
the first six months of 2003, the Company recorded charges totaling $43.5
million. These costs relate primarily to inventory write-downs to reflect
significant reductions in market demand for roadbuilding products ($28.6
million), facility closures ($10.8 million), inventory valuation adjustments at
the recently acquired Demag and Genie businesses ($2.9 million) and other costs
($1.2 million). During the first six months of 2002, the Company recorded
charges totaling $9.4 million relating primarily to a reduction in carrying
value of long-term assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144 ($7.9 million). Gross
profit declined relative to the first six months of 2002 in the Terex Cranes
segment as a result of continued weak demand for mobile cranes in North America.
Gross profit also declined relative to the first six months of 2002 in the
Roadbuilding businesses as a result of the reduced demand for the segment's
products and increased competition.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30,
2003 totaled $177.6 million, an increase of $51.5 million when compared to the
same period in 2002. The acquisitions of Demag, Genie, Commercial Body and Crane
& Machinery added $51.0 million of selling, general and administrative expense
when compared to the first six months of 2002.
Income (loss) from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2003 totaled
$8.1 million, a reduction of $72.0 million when compared to the same period in
2002. This reduction in operating income is due primarily to the impact of the
goodwill impairment charge of $51.3 million recorded in the Roadbuilding
reporting unit in the six months ended June 30, 2003. The acquisitions of Demag,
Genie, Commercial Body and Crane & Machinery added $49.3 million of income from
operations when compared to the first six months of 2002.
Terex Construction
Sales in the Terex Construction segment increased to $700.9 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2003 from $594.2 million for the comparable 2002 period.
Sales in the segment increased primarily as a result of the increase in value of
the Euro and British Pound relative to the U.S. dollar in the first half of 2003
when compared to the first half of 2002.
Gross profit in the Terex Construction segment fell by $5.3 million from the
comparable 2002 period and totaled $95.0 million for the six months ended June
30, 2003. Gross profit in the first six months of 2003 included charges of $2.1
million primarily related to the closure of the Powerscreen facility in
Kilbeggan, Ireland announced during the second quarter of 2003. Gross profits
declined in the articulated dump truck business during the first six months of
2003 as compared to the first six months of 2002.
Selling, general and administrative expense in the Terex Construction segment
increased by $5.7 million to $61.8 million during the six months ended June 30,
2003 when compared to the same period in 2002. The increase was due primarily to
the impact of foreign exchange, as the majority of the Terex Construction
segment businesses incur costs in Euro and British Pounds. Additionally, the
Terex Construction segment increased its allowance for doubtful accounts
receivable during the six months ended June 30, 2003.
Operating profit in the Terex Construction segment fell by $11.0 million to
$33.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 when compared to the same
period in 2002. The primary reasons for the decrease in operating profit were
the decline in the gross profit on articulated trucks and the construction
equipment rental business located in the United Kingdom, the impact of foreign
exchange rates and costs to close the Kilbeggan facility.
Terex Cranes
Total sales for the Terex Cranes segment increased by $239.4 million and totaled
$510.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 as compared to the same
period in 2002. Sales of Demag, acquired on August 30, 2002, and Crane &
40
Machinery totaled $314.0 million in the first six months of 2003. Sales of
mobile cranes in North America decreased significantly in the first six months
of 2003 relative to 2002. Demand for mobile cranes continues to be negatively
impacted by weak construction activity and overcapacity in the rental markets.
Gross profit for the Terex Cranes segment increased by $10.5 million to $49.0
million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 as compared to the same period in
2002. Gross profit in 2003 included charges of $9.3 million. These charges
relate to fair-value adjustments to inventory required under purchase accounting
($2.1 million) and the closure of the Peiner tower crane production facility in
Trier, Germany ($6.6 million) and the Terex-RO production facility in Olathe,
Kansas ($0.3 million). Gross profit from Demag and Crane & Machinery totaled
$35.8 million. Gross profit declined significantly in the North American
business as a result of lower sales and lower selling margins from competitive
pressures.
Selling, general and administrative expense in the Terex Cranes segment
increased by $21.8 million to $40.7 million for the six months ended June 30,
2003 when compared to the same period in 2002. Selling, general and
administrative expense from the Demag and Crane & Machinery businesses totaled
$22.5 million, which largely accounts for the increase over the prior year
period.
Operating profit for the Terex Cranes segment fell by $11.3 million to $8.3
million in the six months ended June 30, 2003 when compared to the same period
in 2002. Demag and Crane & Machinery accounted for increased operating profit of
$13.3 million during the first six months of 2003. The North American crane
businesses generated a small operating loss during the first six months of 2003
as a result of significant decrease in demand. This compares unfavorably to the
operating profit generated by the North American crane businesses in the first
six months of 2002.
Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other
Sales in the Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other segment
increased by $36.4 million to $392.6 million for the six months ended June 30,
2003 when compared to the comparable 2002 period. Sales from Advance Mixer
(acquired April 11, 2002) and Commercial Body (acquired February 14, 2003)
totaled $61.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $9.2
million for the comparable period in 2002. Sales declined in the Roadbuilding
businesses at Cedarapids and CMI when compared to the first six months of 2002.
Demand remains weak for these products as increasing federal and state budget
deficits have reduced expected funding for roadbuilding projects.
Gross profit in the Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other
segment declined by $37.3 million to $28.3 million for the six months ended June
30, 2003 compared to the comparable period in 2002. Gross profit from Advance
Mixer and Commercial Body totaled $5.7 million for the six months ended June 30,
2003 compared to $1.1 million for the comparable period in 2002. During the
first six months of 2003, the Company recorded charges totaling $31.3 million,
primarily to reduce inventory levels to reflect reduced demand expectations and
to exit certain economically unviable niche product lines in the Roadbuilding
businesses. Also included in the $31.3 million total was a charge of $1.5
million recorded in the first quarter of 2003 for costs incurred in exiting the
Company's EarthKing internet based businesses. During the first six months of
2002, the Company recorded charges totaling $9.4 million relating primarily to
the closure of the Standard Havens hot mix asphalt plant ($1.2 million) and a
long-term asset impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144 recorded in the Light
Construction business ($7.9 million). In addition to these inventory related
costs, gross profit in the Roadbuilding businesses declined as lower selling
prices were realized in a more competitive market place.
Selling, general and administrative expense in the Terex Mining, Roadbuilding,
Utility Products and Other segment increased by $0.4 million to $46.5 million in
the six months ending June 30, 2003 when compared to the same period in 2002.
During the second quarter of 2003, the Company determined that the business
performance during the first six months of 2003 in the Roadbuilding reporting
unit would not meet the Company's 2003 performance expectations that were used
when goodwill was last reviewed for impairment as of October 1, 2002. To date,
funding for road projects have remained at historically low levels as federal
and state budgets have been negatively impacted by a weak economy and the war in
Iraq. In response to the revised business outlook, management initiated several
changes to address the expected market conditions, including a change in
business management, discontinuance of several non-core products, work force
furloughs and reductions, and an inventory write-down based on anticipated lower
sales volume. Based on the continued weakness in the reporting unit, the Company
initiated a review of the long-term outlook for the reporting unit. The revised
outlook for the reporting unit assumes that funding levels for domestic road
projects will not improve significantly in the short term. In addition, the
outlook assumes that the Company will continue to reduce working capital
invested in the reporting unit to better match revenue expectations.
41
Based on this review, the Company determined the fair value of the Roadbuilding
reporting unit using the present value of the cash flow expected to be generated
by the reporting unit. The cash flow was determined based on the expected
revenues, after tax profits, working capital levels and capital expenditures for
the reporting unit. The present value was calculated by discounting the cash
flow by the Company's weighted average cost of capital. The Company, with the
assistance of a third-party, also reviewed the market value of the Roadbuilding
reporting unit's tangible and intangible assets. These values were included in
the determination of the carrying value of the Roadbuilding reporting unit.
Based on the revised fair value of the reporting unit, a goodwill impairment of
$51.3 million was recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2003.
Operating profit in the Terex Mining, Roadbuilding, Utility Products and Other
segment for the six months ended June 30, 2003 was a loss of $69.5 million, a
reduction of $89.0 million from the same period in 2002. This reduction in
operating income is due primarily to the impact of the goodwill impairment
charge of $51.3 million recorded in the Roadbuilding reporting unit in the six
months ended June 30, 2003. Operating profit from Advance Mixer and Commercial
Body totaled $2.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to
$0.9 million for the comparable period in 2002. Total charges recorded in the
first half of 2003 relating primarily to product line exits and inventory
write-downs totaled $33.3 million. Total charges recorded in the first half of
2002 relating primarily to facility closures and long-term asset impairment
totaled $10.0 million.
Terex Aerial Work Platforms
Sales in the Terex Aerial Work Platform segment totaled $315.0 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2003, an increase of $297.9 million from the
comparable period in 2002. The increase in sales is due primarily to the
acquisition of Genie. Results for the six months ended June 30, 2002 represent
the performance of the North American telehandler business only.
Gross profit in the Terex Aerial Work Platform segment totaled $64.9 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2003, an increase of $63.3 million from the
comparable period in 2002. The acquisition of Genie increased gross profit by
$62.7 million when compared to the first six months of 2002. Included in gross
profit is a non-recurring reduction of gross profit of $0.8 million related to
the effects of the required fair-value accounting of Genie. The fair value
adjustments relate to acquired inventory. As of June 30, 2003, there was no
remaining fair value adjustment in inventory. Gross profit in the telehandler
business increased as a result of higher sales volume and improved margins.
Selling, general and administrative expense in the Terex Aerial Work Platforms
segment totaled $27.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003, an increase
of $26.5 million from the comparable period in 2002. The increase is due
primarily to the acquisition of Genie.
Operating profit for the six months ended June 30, 2003 in the Terex Aerial Work
Platforms segment increased by $36.8 million to $37.2 million when compared to
the same period in 2002. The acquisition of Genie increased operating earnings
by $36.3 million in the first half of 2003 when compared to the comparable
period in 2002. Operating earnings in the telehandler business increased as a
result of higher volumes and improved gross margins.
Net Interest Expense
During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company's net interest expense
increased $7.1 million to $48.2 million from $41.1 million for the prior year
period. The increase was due to the overall increase in bank debt used to
finance acquisitions in 2002.
Other Income (Expense) - Net
Other income (expense) - net for the six months ended June 30, 2003 was an
expense of $2.7 million as compared to an expense of $12.0 million for the prior
year period. During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company recorded
income of $2.4 million related to a favorable court judgment on appeal as the
defendant in a patent infringement case. This was partially offset by an expense
of $1.1 million to reduce the carrying cost of its investment in SDC to zero.
This write-down reflects the current market value of SDC's stock. During the six
months ended June 30, 2002, the Company recorded a charge of $15.0 million to
write-down the carrying value of certain investments in its Terex Cranes segment
and EarthKing business.
42
Loss on Retirement of Debt
On June 30, 2003, the Company redeemed $50.0 million aggregate principle amount
of its 8-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008. In connection with this
redemption the Company recognized a loss of $1.9. The loss was comprised of the
payment of an early redemption premium ($2.2 million), the write off of
unamortized original issuance discount ($1.6 million) and the write off of
unamortized debt acquisition costs ($0.2 million), which were partially offset
by the recognition of deferred gains related to fair value interest rate swaps
previously closed on this debt ($2.1 million).
Income Taxes
During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company recognized a benefit from
income taxes of $6.8 million on a loss from continuing operations before income
taxes of $44.7 million, an effective rate of 15%, as compared to income tax
expense of $8.7 million on income from continuing operations before income taxes
of $27.0 million, an effective rate of 32%, in the prior year period. A
significant portion of the goodwill impairment charge is not deductible for
income taxes and results in a change to the effective tax rate. These effective
tax rates differ from previous periods primarily due to a goodwill impairment
charge that is non-deductible for income tax purposes and a change in the source
of earnings among various jurisdictions with different tax rates.
Discontinued Operations
On July 1, 2003, the Company announced that it had entered into a non-binding
agreement in principle to sell its surface mining truck design and manufacturing
business to Caterpillar. In addition to the sale of the mining truck business,
the non-binding agreement also contemplates the sale of the Company's mining
truck and shovel product support businesses to Caterpillar dealers. The Company
will retain the mining shovel manufacturing business located in Dortmund,
Germany and intends to purchase the intellectual property rights for certain
models of Caterpillar hydraulic excavating mining shovels. As a result, the
Company has classified its mining truck business as a business held for sale.
The Company has restated all periods presented to reclassify the results of the
business held for sale as a discontinued operation in accordance with SFAS No.
144.
Income from discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2003
totaled $1.3 million, net of tax. During the six months ended June 30, 2002,
income from discontinued operations was a loss of $6.9 million, net of tax. The
increase in income from discontinued operations is due primarily to a 24%
increase in sales as well as lower costs incurred in 2003 due to the closure of
the Tulsa, Oklahoma mining truck facility. During the second quarter of 2002,
the Company recorded a charge of $2.9 million, net of tax, for the closure of
the Tulsa, Oklahoma mining truck production facility.
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
In accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations,"
and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," the Company recorded a
charge for the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $113.4
million in the six months ended June 30, 2002. See "Critical Accounting
Policies," below, for additional information on these charges. This charge
represents the write-off of $132.2 million of goodwill ($124.1 million, net of
income taxes) principally in the Mining Group (Terex Mining, Roadbuilding,
Utility Products and Other segment) ($105.7 million, or $105.7 million, net of
income taxes), and the Light Construction Group (Terex Mining, Roadbuilding,
Utility Products and Other segment) ($26.2 million, or $18.1 million, net of
income taxes). This charge was partially offset by a one-time gain ($17.8
million, $10.7 million net of income taxes) recognized on January 1, 2002 in the
Fermec Manufacturing Limited ("Fermec") business. The purchase price paid by the
Company to acquire Fermec was less than the net assets acquired in the
transaction. Prior to January 1, 2002, the difference was recorded as a deferred
credit in goodwill. As required by SFAS No. 141, this credit balance was
recognized as a cumulative effect adjustment on January 1, 2002.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Changes in the estimates and assumptions used by management could have
significant impact on the Company's financial results. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
The Company believes that the following are among its most significant
accounting polices which are important in determining the reporting of
transactions and events and which utilize estimates about the effect of matters
that are inherently uncertain and therefore are based on management judgment.
43
Please refer to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 for a complete listing of the Company's accounting policies.
Inventories - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. In
valuing inventory, management is required to make assumptions regarding the
level of reserves required to value potentially obsolete or over-valued items at
the lower of cost or market. The valuation of used equipment taken in trade from
customers requires the Company to use the best information available to
determine the value of the equipment to potential customers. This value is
subject to change based on numerous conditions. Inventory reserves are
established taking into account age, frequency of use, or sale, and in the case
of repair parts, the installed base of machines. While calculations are made
involving these factors, significant management judgment regarding expectations
for future events is involved. Future events which could significantly influence
management's judgment and related estimates include general economic conditions
in markets where the Company's products are sold, new equipment price
fluctuations, competitive actions including the introduction of new products and
technological advances, as well as new products and design changes introduced by
the Company. At June 30, 2003, reserves for excess and obsolete inventory
totaled $46.4 million.
Accounts Receivable - Management is required to make judgments relative to the
Company's ability to collect accounts receivable from the Company's customers.
Valuation of receivables includes evaluating customer payment histories,
customer leverage, availability of third party financing, political and exchange
risks and other factors. Many of these factors, including the assessment of a
customer's ability to pay, are influenced by economic and market factors which
cannot be predicted with certainty. At June 30, 2003, reserves for potentially
uncollectible accounts receivable totaled $24.6 million.
Guarantees - The Company has issued guarantees of customer financing to purchase
equipment as of June 30, 2003. The Company must assess the probability of losses
or non-performance in ways similar to the evaluation of accounts receivable,
including consideration of a customer's payment history, leverage, availability
of third party finance, political and exchange risks and other factors. Many of
these factors, including the assessment of a customer's ability to pay, are
influenced by economic and market factors that cannot be predicted with
certainty. To date, losses related to guarantees have been negligible.
Customers of the Company from time to time may fund the acquisition of the
Company's equipment through third-party finance companies. In certain instances,
the Company may provide a credit guarantee to the finance company, by which the
Company agrees to make payments to the finance company should the customer
default. The maximum liability of the Company is limited to the remaining
payments due to the finance company at the time of default. In the event of
customer default, the Company is generally able to dispose of the equipment with
the Company realizing the benefits of any net proceeds in excess of the
remaining payments due to the finance company.
As of June 30, 2003, the Company's maximum exposure to such credit guarantees is
$311.1 million. The terms of these guarantees coincide with the financing
arranged by the customer and generally does not exceed five years. Given the
Company's position as the original equipment manufacturer and its knowledge of
end markets, the Company, when called upon to fulfill a guarantee, generally has
been able to liquidate the financed equipment at a minimal loss, if any, to the
Company.
The Company, through its Genie subsidiary, issues residual value guarantees
under sales-type leases. A residual value guarantee involves a guarantee that a
piece of equipment will have a minimum fair market value at a future point in
time. As described in Note K - "Net Investment in Sales-Type Leases" in the
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company's maximum
exposure related to residual value guarantees at June 30, 2003 is $34.2 million.
The Company is able to mitigate the risk associated with these guarantees
because the maturity of the guarantees is staggered, which limits the amount of
used equipment entering the marketplace at any one time.
The Company from time to time guarantees that it will buy equipment from its
customers in the future at a stated price if certain conditions are met by the
customer. Such guarantees are referred to as buyback guarantees. These
conditions generally pertain to the functionality and state of repair of the
machine. As of June 30, 2003, the Company's maximum exposure pursuant to buyback
guarantees is $34.3 million. The Company is able to mitigate the risk of these
guarantees by staggering the timing of the buybacks and through leveraging its
access to the used equipment markets provided by the Company's original
equipment manufacturer status.
The Company recognizes a loss under a guarantee when the Company's obligation to
make payment under the guarantee is probable and the amount of the loss can be
estimated. A loss would be recognized if the Company's payment obligation under
the guarantee exceeds the value the Company can expect to recover to offset such
payment, primarily through the sale of the equipment underlying the guarantee.
44
Revenue Recognition -- Revenue and costs are generally recorded when products
are shipped and invoiced to either independently owned and operated dealers or
to customers. Certain new units may be invoiced prior to the time customers take
physical possession. Revenue is recognized in such cases only when the customer
has a fixed commitment to purchase the units, the units have been completed,
tested and made available to the customer for pickup or delivery, and the
customer has requested that the Company hold the units for pickup or delivery at
a time specified by the customer. In such cases, the units are invoiced under
the Company's customary billing terms, title to the units and risks of ownership
pass to the customer upon invoicing, the units are segregated from the Company's
inventory and identified as belonging to the customer and the Company has no
further obligations under the order.
Revenue generated in the United States is recognized when title and risk of loss
pass from the Company to its customers which occurs upon shipment when terms are
FOB shipping point (which is customary for the Company) and upon delivery when
terms are FOB destination. The Company also has a policy requiring it to meet
certain criteria in order to recognize revenue, including satisfaction of the
following requirements:
a) Persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists;
b) The price to the buyer is fixed or determinable;
c) Collectibility is reasonably assured; and
d) The Company has no significant obligations for future
performance.
In the United States, the Company has the ability to enter into a security
agreement and receive a security interest in the product by filing an
appropriate Uniform Commercial Code ("UCC") financing statement. However, a
significant portion of the Company's revenue is generated outside of the United
States. In many countries outside of the United States, as a matter of statutory
law, a seller retains title to a product until payment is made. The laws do not
provide for a seller's retention of a security interest in goods in the same
manner as established in the UCC. In these countries, the Company retains title
to goods delivered to a customer until the customer makes payment so that the
Company can recover the goods in the event of customer default on payment. In
these circumstances, where the Company only retains title to secure its recovery
in the event of customer default, the Company also has a policy which requires
it to meet certain criteria in order to recognize revenue, including
satisfaction of the following requirements:
a) Persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists;
b) Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;
c) The price to the buyer is fixed or determinable;
d) Collectibility is reasonably assured;
e) The Company has no significant obligations for future
performance; and
f) The Company is not entitled to direct the disposition of the
goods, cannot rescind the transaction, cannot prohibit the
customer from moving, selling, or otherwise using the goods in
the ordinary course of business and has no other rights of
holding title that rest with a titleholder of property that is
subject to a lien under the UCC.
In circumstances where the sales transaction requires acceptance by the customer
for items such as testing on site, installation, trial period or performance
criteria, revenue is not recognized unless the following criteria have been met:
a) Persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists;
b) Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;
c) The price to the buyer is fixed or determinable;
d) Collectibility is reasonably assured; and
e) The customer has given their acceptance, the time period for
acceptance has elapsed or the Company has otherwise objectively
demonstrated that the criteria specified in the acceptance
provisions have been satisfied.
In addition to performance commitments, the Company analyzes factors such as the
reason for the purchase to determine if revenue should be recognized. This
analysis is done before the product is shipped and includes the evaluation of
factors that may affect the conclusion related to the revenue recognition
criteria as follows:
a) Persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists;
b) Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;
c) The price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and
d) Collectibility is reasonably assured.
45
Goodwill & Acquired Intangible Assets - Goodwill represents the difference
between the total purchase price paid in the acquisition of a business and the
fair value of the assets, both tangible and intangible, and liabilities acquired
by the Company. Acquired intangible assets generally include trade names,
technology and customer relationships and are amortized over their estimated
useful lives. The Company is required annually to review the value of its
recorded goodwill and intangible assets to determine if either is potentially
impaired. The initial recognition of intangible assets, as well as the annual
review of the carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets, requires that
the Company develop estimates of future business performance. These estimates
are used to derive expected cash flow and include assumptions regarding future
sales levels, the impact of cost reduction programs, and the level of working
capital needed to support a given business. The Company relies on data developed
by business segment management as well as macroeconomic data in making these
calculations. The estimate also includes a determination of the Company's
weighted average cost of capital. The cost of capital is based on assumptions
about interest rates as well as a risk-adjusted rate of return required by the
Company's equity investors. Changes in these estimates can impact the present
value of the expected cash flow that is used in determining the fair value of
acquired intangible assets as well as the overall expected value of a given
business.
Impairment of Long Lived Assets - The Company's policy is to assess its ability
to realize on its long lived assets and to evaluate such assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
such assets (or group of assets) may not be recoverable. Impairment is
determined to exist if the estimated future undiscounted cash flows is less than
its carrying value. Future cash flow projections include assumptions regarding
future sales levels, the impact of cost reduction programs, and the level of
working capital needed to support each business. The Company relies on data
developed by business segment management as well as macroeconomic data in making
these calculations. There are no assurances that future cash flow assumptions
will be achieved. The amount of any impairment then recognized would be
calculated as the difference between estimated fair value and the carrying value
of the asset.
Accrued Warranties - The Company records accruals for potential warranty claims
based on the Company's prior claim experience. Warranty costs are accrued at the
time revenue is recognized. However, adjustments to the initial warranty accrual
are recorded if actual claim experience indicates that adjustments are
necessary. These warranty costs are based upon management's assessment of past
claims and current experience. However, actual claims could be higher or lower
than amounts estimated, as the amount and value of warranty claims are subject
to variation as a result of many factors that cannot be predicted with
certainty, including the performance of new products, models and technology,
changes in weather conditions for product operation, different uses for products
and other similar factors.
Accrued Product Liability - The Company records accruals for potential product
liability claims based on the Company's prior claim experience. Accruals for
product liability claims are valued based upon the Company's prior claims'
experience, including consideration of the jurisdiction, circumstances of the
accident, type of loss or injury, identity of plaintiff, other potential
responsible parties, analysis of outside counsel, analysis of internal product
liability counsel and the experience of the Company's director of product
safety. The Company provides self-insurance accruals for estimated product
liability experience on known claims. Actual product liability costs could be
different due to a number of variables such as the decisions of juries or
judges.
Pension Benefits - Pension benefits represent financial obligations that will be
ultimately settled in the future with employees who meet eligibility
requirements. Because of the uncertainties involved in estimating the timing and
amount of future payments, significant estimates are required to calculate
pension expense and liabilities related to the Company's plans. The Company
utilizes the services of several independent actuaries, whose models are used to
facilitate these calculations.
Several key assumptions are used in actuarial models to calculate pension
expense and liability amounts recorded in the financial statements. Management
believes the three most significant variables in the models are expected
long-term rate of return on plan assets, the discount rate, and the expected
rate of compensation increase. The actuarial models also use assumptions for
various other factors including employee turnover, retirement age and mortality.
The Company's management believes the assumptions used in the actuarial
calculations are reasonable and are within accepted practices in each of the
respective geographic locations in which the Company operates.
The expected long-term rates of return on pension plan assets were 8.00% for
U.S. plans and 2.0% to 7.0% for international plans at June 30, 2003. These
rates are determined annually by management based on a weighted average of
current and historical market trends, historical portfolio performance and the
portfolio mix of investments.
The discount rates for pension plan liabilities were 6.75% for U. S. plans and
5.75% to 6.0% for international plans at June 30, 2003. These rates are used to
calculate the present value of plan liabilities and are determined annually by
management based on market yields for high-quality fixed income investments on
the measurement date.
46
The expected rates of compensation increase for the Company's pension plans were
5.0% for U.S. plans and 3.75% to 4.25% for international plans at June 30, 2003.
These estimated annual compensation increases are determined by management every
year and are based on historical trends and market indices.
Income Taxes - At June 30, 2003 the Company had deferred tax assets of $202.9
million, net of valuation allowances. The benefit from income taxes was $6.8
million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The Company estimates income
taxes based on diverse and complex regulations that exist in various
jurisdictions where it conducts business. Deferred income tax assets and
liabilities represent tax benefits or obligations that arise from temporary
timing differences due to differing treatment of certain items for accounting
and income tax purposes. The Company evaluates deferred tax assets each period
to ensure that estimated future taxable income will be sufficient in character
(e.g., capital gain versus ordinary income treatment), amount and timing to
result in their recovery. To the extent that the Company estimates recovery is
not likely, then the Company establishes a valuation allowance to reduce the
assets to their realizable value. Considerable judgments are required in
establishing deferred tax valuation allowances and in assessing possible
exposures related to tax matters. Tax returns are subject to audit and local
taxing authorities could challenge tax positions. The Company's practice is to
review tax-filing positions by jurisdiction and to record provisions for
probable tax assessments, including interest and penalties, if applicable. The
Company believes it records and/or discloses such potential tax liabilities as
appropriate and has reasonably estimated its income tax liabilities and
recoverable tax assets.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Net cash of $184.4 million was provided by operating activities during the six
months ended June 30, 2003. Reduced working capital needs provided approximately
$128 million of cash. The Company defines working capital as the sum of accounts
receivable and inventory less accounts payable. Net cash used in investing
activities was $19.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2003,
primarily related to the acquisition of Commercial Body and capital
expenditures. Net cash used in financing activities was $108.1 million during
the six months ended June 30, 2003, which included $52.3 million for the
redemption of $50 million principal amount of 8-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes.
In addition, the Company had $212.2 million available for borrowing under its
revolving credit facilities at June 30, 2003. Therefore, total liquidity
available to the Company at June 30, 2003 was approximately $632.6 million.
Acquisitions and new product development have been important components of the
Company's growth strategy. Although the Company may make additional acquisitions
in the future, particularly those that would complement the Company's existing
operations, the Company is currently focused on completing the integration of
its recent acquisitions.
Debt reduction and an improved capital structure are major focal points for the
Company. The Company regularly reviews its alternatives to improve its capital
structure and to reduce debt service through debt refinancings, debt repurchases
and redemptions, issuances of equity, asset sales, including strategic
dispositions of business units, or any combination thereof. On June 30, 2003,
the Company redeemed $50 million of its 8-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due
2008. On April 23, 2002, the Company issued approximately 5.3 million shares of
its common stock in a public offering with net proceeds to the Company of $113.3
million for use for debt reduction and general corporate purposes. On July 3,
2002, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit facility with its
bank lending group. The revised agreement provides for $375 million of term debt
maturing in June 2009 and a revolving credit facility of $300 million that is
available through June 2007. The facility also included provisions for an
additional $250 million of term borrowing by the Company on terms similar to the
current term loan debt under the facility. On September 13, 2002, the Company
consummated an incremental term loan borrowing of $210 million maturing in
December 2009 under this facility to acquire Genie, to refinance some of Genie's
debt and for other general corporate purposes. In addition to providing the
Company with additional funds, the revised credit agreement also amended certain
covenants and other provisions to allow the Company greater flexibility. This
added flexibility included changes to increase the Company's ability to make
acquisitions, participate in joint ventures and take other corporate actions.
Adjustments were also made to financial covenant ratios, including the Company's
consolidated total leverage ratio, consolidated interest coverage ratio and
consolidated senior leverage ratio, that permit the Company to maintain
additional debt for a longer period of time.
Additionally, in January 2002, March 2002, September 2002 and February 2003, the
Company issued approximately 0.5 million shares, 0.3 million shares, 3.2 million
shares and 0.6 million shares of its common stock in connection with the
acquisition of Utility Equipment, Telelect Southeast, Genie and Commercial Body,
respectively. The Company also sold approximately 1.3 million shares of its
common stock for $17.3045 per share, or approximately $23 million in total, to
certain former shareholders of Schaeff in January 2002. In each instance, the
number of shares of common stock issued was determined based on the average
price of the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange for a specified time
period prior to the date of issuance.
47
The Company's businesses are working capital intensive and require funding for
purchases of production and replacement parts inventories, capital expenditures
for repair, replacement and upgrading of existing facilities, as well as trade
financing for receivables from customers and dealers. The Company has
significant debt service requirements, including semi-annual interest payments
on its senior subordinated notes and monthly interest payments on its bank
credit facilities. Other than default under the terms of the Company's debt
instruments, there are no other events that would accelerate the repayment of
the Company's debt. In the event of default, these borrowings could become
payable on demand.
Management believes that cash generated from operations, together with the
Company's bank credit facilities and cash on hand, provides the Company with
adequate liquidity to meet the Company's operating and debt service
requirements.
The Company's main sources of funding are cash generated from operations and
access to the Company's bank credit facilities, as well as the Company's ability
to access the capital markets. Additionally, the Company sells customer accounts
receivable, substantially all of which are insured, to third party institutions
to accelerate the collection of cash.
Cash generated from operations is directly tied to the Company's sales. A
decrease in sales will have a negative impact on the Company's ability to derive
liquidity from its operations. Sales are subject to decline for a number of
reasons, including economic conditions, weather, competition and foreign
currency fluctuations. A significant portion of sales are financed by third
party finance companies in reliance on the credit worthiness of the Company's
customers and the estimated residual value of its equipment. Deterioration in
the credit quality of the Company's customers or the estimated residual value of
its equipment could negatively impact the ability of such customers to obtain
the resources needed to make purchases from the Company and could have a
material adverse impact on results of operations or financial condition of the
Company. The recent economic climate has had a negative effect on cash generated
from operations, as consumer confidence remains fragile, many of the Company's
customers have delayed purchasing decisions and the availability of third party
financing has become more limited.
The Company's ability to borrow under its existing bank credit facilities is
subject to the Company's ability to comply with a number of covenants. The
Company's bank credit facilities include covenants that require the Company to
meet certain financial tests, including a pro forma consolidated leverage ratio
test, a consolidated interest ratio test, a consolidated fixed charge ratio
test, a pro forma consolidated senior secured debt leverage ratio test and a
capital expenditures test. These covenants require quarterly compliance and
become more restrictive periodically. Maintaining compliance with these ratios
depends on the future performance of the Company and the achievement of cost
savings and earning levels anticipated in acquisitions. The Company is currently
in compliance with its financial covenants under its bank credit facilities. The
Company's ability to remain compliant with its covenants in the future is
dependent on its ability to maintain its earnings, including its ability to
generate cash flow from working capital reductions, realize cost savings at
recently acquired units, realize the benefit of its restructuring programs and
maintain an appropriate level of operating profits. The interest rates charged
are subject to adjustment based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio.
The weighted average interest rate on the outstanding portion of the revolving
credit component of the Company's bank credit facility was 4.07% at June 30,
2003.
The Company's ability to access the capital markets to raise funds, through the
sale of equity or debt securities, is subject to various factors, some specific
to the Company and some impacted by general economic and/or financial market
conditions. These include results of operations, projected operating results for
future periods and debt to equity leverage.
At June 30, 2003, the Company had outstanding letters of credit that totaled
$94.7 million and had issued $311.1 million in guarantees of customer financing
to purchase equipment, $34.2 million in residual value guarantees and $34.3
million in buyback guarantees.
In April 2001, Genie entered into a joint venture arrangement with a European
financial institution whereby Genie maintains a forty-nine percent (49%)
ownership interest in the joint venture, Genie Financial Solutions Holding B.V.
("GFSH B.V."). Prior to the Company's acquisition of Genie, Genie had
contributed $5.3 million in cash in exchange for its ownership interest in GFSH
B.V. During January 2003, Genie contributed an additional $0.8 million in cash
to GFSH B.V. The Company applies the equity method of accounting for its
investment in GFSH B.V., as the Company does not control the operations of GFSH
B.V. As disclosed in Note I - "Investment in Joint Venture," in the Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, FIN 46 may require the Company to
consolidate the results of GFSH B.V. effective July 1, 2003. The Company does
not expect that this consolidation will have a material impact on the Company's
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
GFSH B.V. was established to facilitate the financing of Genie's products sold
in Europe. As of June 30, 2003, the joint venture's total assets were $122.0
48
million and consisted primarily of financing receivables and lease related
equipment; total liabilities were $107.8 million and consisted primarily of debt
payable to the fifty-one percent (51%) joint venture partner. The Company
provided guarantees related to potential losses arising from shortfalls in the
residual values of financed equipment or credit defaults by the joint venture's
customers. As of June 30, 2003, the maximum exposure to loss under these
guarantees is approximately $7 million. Additionally, the Company is required to
maintain a capital account balance in GFSH B.V., pursuant to the terms of the
joint venture, which could result in the reimbursement to GFSH B.V. by the
Company of losses to the extent of the Company's ownership percentage.
CONTINGENCIES AND UNCERTAINTIES
Foreign Currencies and Interest Rate Risk
The Company's products are sold in over 100 countries around the world and,
accordingly, revenues of the Company are generated in foreign currencies, while
the costs associated with those revenues are only partly incurred in the same
currencies. The major foreign currencies, among others, in which the Company
does business, are the Euro, the British Pound, the Australian Dollar and the
South African Rand. The Company may, from time to time, hedge specifically
identified committed cash flows in foreign currencies using forward currency
sale or purchase contracts. At June 30, 2003, the Company had foreign exchange
contracts with a notional value of $125.0 million.
The Company manages exposure to fluctuating interest rates with interest
protection arrangements. Certain of the Company's obligations, including
indebtedness under the Company's bank credit facility, bear interest at floating
rates, and as a result an increase in interest rates could adversely affect,
among other things, the results of operations of the Company. The Company has
entered into interest protection arrangements with respect to approximately $100
million of the principal amount of its indebtedness under its bank credit
facility, fixing interest at 6.51% for the period from July 1, 2004 through June
30, 2009.
Certain of the Company's obligations, including its senior subordinated notes,
bear interest at a fixed interest rate. The Company has entered into interest
rate agreements to convert these fixed rates to floating rates with respect to
approximately $75 million of the principal amount of its indebtedness under its
8-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes and approximately $79 million of operating
leases. The floating rates are based on a spread of 3.69% to 4.50% over LIBOR.
At June 30, 2003, the floating rates ranged between 4.81% and 5.82%.
Other
The Company is subject to a number of contingencies and uncertainties including,
without limitation, product liability claims, self-insurance obligations, tax
examinations and guarantees. Many of the exposures are unasserted or proceedings
are at a preliminary stage, and it is not presently possible to estimate the
amount or timing of any cost to the Company. However, the Company does not
believe that these contingencies and uncertainties will, in the aggregate, have
a material adverse effect on the Company. When it is probable that a loss has
been incurred and possible to make reasonable estimates of the Company's
liability with respect to such matters, a provision is recorded for the amount
of such estimate or for the minimum amount of a range of estimates when it is
not possible to estimate the amount within the range that is most likely to
occur.
The Company generates hazardous and non-hazardous wastes in the normal course of
its manufacturing operations. As a result, Terex is subject to a wide range of
federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations. These laws
and regulations govern actions that may have adverse environmental effects, such
as discharges to air and water, and also require compliance with certain
practices when handling and disposing of hazardous and non-hazardous wastes.
These laws and regulations also impose liability for the costs of, and damages
resulting from, cleaning up sites, past spills, disposals and other releases of
hazardous substances, should any of such events occur. No such incidents have
occurred which required the Company to pay material amounts to comply with such
laws and regulations. Compliance with such laws and regulations has required,
and will continue to require, the Company to make expenditures. The Company does
not expect that these expenditures will have a material adverse effect on its
business or profitability.
On March 11, 2002, an action was commenced in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division by Ursula Ungaro-Benages
and Ursula Ungaro-Benages as Attorney-in-fact for Peter C. Ungaro, M.D., in
which the plaintiffs alleged that ownership of O&K Orenstein & Koppel AG ("O&K
AG") was illegally taken from the plaintiffs' ancestors by German industry
during the Nazi era. The plaintiffs alleged that the Company was liable for
conversion and unjust enrichment as the result of its purchase of the shares of
the mining shovel subsidiary O&K Mining GmbH from O&K AG, and were claiming
restitution of a 25% interest in O&K Mining GmbH and monetary damages. On June
12, 2002, the United States Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest
in the action that expressed the foreign policy interests of the United States
in dismissal of the case. At the request of the Company, on October 8, 2002, the
Federal Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation ordered that the action be
49
transferred to the District of New Jersey and assigned the case to the Honorable
William G. Bassler for inclusion in the coordinated or consolidated pretrial
proceedings established in that court. On April 21, 2003 the plaintiffs
voluntarily dismissed the action against the Company.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections as of April 2002," was issued in May
2002. SFAS No. 145 became effective for certain leasing transactions occurring
after May 15, 2002 and became effective for the Company on January 1, 2003 with
respect to reporting gains and losses from extinguishments of debt. The adoption
of SFAS No. 145 will result in the Company reporting most gains and losses from
extinguishments of debt as a component of income or loss from continuing
operations before income taxes and extraordinary items; there will be no effect
on the Company's net income or loss. Prior period amounts will be reclassified.
SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities," was issued in June 2002. SFAS No. 146 became effective for exit or
disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. Under SFAS No.
146, a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity is
recognized when the liability is incurred. Under previous accounting principles,
a liability for an exit cost would be recognized at the date of an entity's
commitment to an exit plan. Adoption of SFAS No. 146 has been applied
prospectively and has not had a material effect on the Company's consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (the "FASB") issued
FASB Interpretation No. ("FIN") 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others, an interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Nos. 5,
57, and 107 and rescission of FIN 34." FIN 45 extends the disclosures to be made
by a guarantor about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has
issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the
inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of its obligations
under certain guarantees. The disclosure provisions of FIN 45 were effective for
financial statements for periods ending after December 15, 2002. The provisions
for initial recognition and measurement of guarantees are effective on a
prospective basis for guarantees that are issued or modified after December 31,
2002. The application of FIN 45 has not had a material impact on the Company's
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In December 2002, SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation -
Transition and Disclosure as amendment of FASB Statement No. 123," was issued.
SFAS No. 148, which became effective for fiscal years ended after December 15,
2002, provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the
fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In
addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123. The
adoption of SFAS No. 148 has not had, and will not have, a material impact on
the Company's financial statements, since the Company will continue to follow
the method in APB Opinion No. 25.
During January 2003 the FASB issued FIN 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities" which is effective for the Company on July 1, 2003 for any existing
entities and to any variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. A
variable interest entity ("VIE") is a corporation, partnership, trust or other
legal entity that does not have equity investors with voting rights or has
equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the
entity to support its own activities. This interpretation requires a company to
consolidate a VIE when the company has a majority of the risk of loss from the
VIE's activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the entity's residual
returns or both. The Company does not expect the adoption of FIN 46 to have a
material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
In January 2003, the Emerging Issues Task Force (the "EITF") released EITF
00-21, "Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables." EITF
00-21 clarifies the timing and recognition of revenue from certain transactions
that include the delivery and performance of multiple products or services. EITF
00-21 is effective for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods
beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company does not expect the adoption of EITF
00-21 to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position
or results of operations.
During April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." This statement amends and
clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments and
hedging activities, resulting primarily from decisions reached by the FASB
Derivatives Implementation Group subsequent to the original issuance of SFAS No.
133. This statement is generally effective prospectively for contracts and
hedging relationships entered into after June 30, 2003. The Company does not
expect the adoption of SFAS No. 149 to have a material impact on the Company's
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
On May 15, 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity." This statement
establishes standards for classifying and measuring as liabilities certain
financial instruments that embody obligations of the issuer and have
characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 must be applied
50
immediately to instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and to
all other instruments that exist as of the beginning of the first interim
financial reporting period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company does not
expect the adoption of SFAS No. 150 to have a material impact on the Company's
financial position or results of operation.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Company is exposed to certain market risks which exist as part of its
ongoing business operations and the Company uses derivative financial
instruments, where appropriate, to manage these risks. The Company, as a matter
of policy, does not engage in trading or speculative transactions. For further
information on accounting policies related to derivative financial instruments,
refer to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2002.
Foreign Exchange Risk
The Company is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency cash flows related to
third party purchases and sales, intercompany product shipments and intercompany
loans. The Company is also exposed to fluctuations in the value of foreign
currency investments in subsidiaries and cash flows related to repatriation of
these investments. Additionally, the Company is exposed to volatility in the
translation of foreign currency earnings to U.S. Dollars. Primary exposures
include the U.S. Dollars versus functional currencies of the Company's major
markets which include the Euro, the British Pound and the Australian Dollar. The
Company assesses foreign currency risk based on transactional cash flows and
identifies naturally offsetting positions and purchases hedging instruments to
protect anticipated exposures. At June 30, 2003, the Company had foreign
currency contracts with a notional value of $125.0 million. The fair market
value of these arrangements, which represents the cost to settle these
contracts, was an asset of approximately $3.1 million at June 30, 2003.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company is exposed to interest rate volatility with regard to future
issuances of fixed rate debt and existing issuances of variable rate debt.
Primary exposure includes movements in the LIBOR. At June 30, 2003,
approximately 50% of the Company's debt was floating rate debt and the weighted
average interest rate for all debt was approximately 6.3%.
At June 30, 2003, the Company had approximately $154 million of interest rate
swaps that converted fixed rates to floating rates. The floating rates ranged
between 4.81% and 5.82% at June 30, 2003. The fair market value of these
arrangements, which represent the cost to settle these contracts, was an asset
of approximately $10.2 million.
At June 30, 2003, the Company performed a sensitivity analysis for the Company's
derivatives and other financial instruments that have interest rate risk. The
Company calculated the pretax earnings effect on its interest sensitive
instruments. Based on this sensitivity analysis, the Company has determined that
an increase of 10% in the Company's weighted average interest rates at June 30,
2003 would have increased interest expense by approximately $2 million in the
six months ended June 30, 2003.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
-------------------------------
The Company carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2003,
pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
"Exchange Act"), under the supervision and with the participation of the
Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
Based on that evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that as of June 30, 2003, the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in the Company's reports filed or submitted pursuant to the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the appropriate time
periods.
There have been no significant changes to the Company's internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the
date of the Company's evaluation.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
------------------
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
-----------------
The Company is involved in certain claims and litigation arising in the ordinary
course of business, which are not considered material to the financial
operations or cash flow of the Company. For information concerning litigation
51
and other contingencies see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations -- Contingencies and Uncertainties."
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
-----------------------------------------
On April 29, 2003, the Company issued 42,805 shares of its Common Stock that
were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"). These shares were issued to the former stockholder of Utility
Equipment as part of the acquisition of all of the outstanding capital stock of
such company by a subsidiary of the Company. This issuance was made pursuant to
an exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act,
as such issuance did not involve a "public offering" pursuant to the Securities
Act given the limited number and scope of persons to whom the securities were
issued.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
-------------------------------
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
---------------------------------------------------
At the annual meeting of stockholders held May 22, 2003, Terex stockholders
holding a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the close of
business on March 28, 2003 voted to approve each of the two proposals included
in the Company's proxy statement as follows:
Affirmative Negative Abstentions Unvoted
----------------- ------------------ ----------------- -----------------
Proposal 1: To elect eight directors to hold
office for one year or until their
successors are duly elected and qualified:
Ronald M. DeFeo 41,615,239 339,151 --- ---
G. Chris Andersen 41,692,696 261,694 --- ---
Don DeFosset 41,692,665 261,725 --- ---
William H. Fike 41,692,626 261,764 --- ---
Dr. Donald P. Jacobs 41,691,626 262,764 --- ---
David A. Sachs 41,692,536 261,854 --- ---
J. C. Watts, Jr. 41,691,130 263,260 --- ---
Helge H. Wehmeier 41,691,379 263,011 --- ---
Proposal 2: To ratify the selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent
accountants of the Company for 2003: 41,669,971 263,292 21,127 ---
Item 5. Other Information
-----------------
Not applicable.
Forward-Looking Information
- ---------------------------
Certain information in this Quarterly Report includes forward-looking statements
regarding future events or the future financial performance of the Company that
involve certain contingencies and uncertainties, including those discussed above
in the section entitled "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations -- Contingencies and Uncertainties." In
addition, when included in this Quarterly Report or in documents incorporated
herein by reference, the words "may," "expects," "intends," "anticipates,"
"plans," "projects," "estimates" and the negatives thereof and analogous or
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
However, the absence of these words does not mean that the statement is not
forward-looking. The Company has based these forward-looking statements on
current expectations and projections about future events. These statements are
not guarantees of future performance. Such statements are inherently subject to
a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those reflected in such forward-looking statements. Such risks
and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company's control, include,
among others: the Company's business is highly cyclical and weak general
economic conditions may affect the sales of its products and its financial
52
results; the sensitivity of construction, infrastructure and mining activity to
interest rates and government spending; the ability to successfully integrate
acquired businesses; the retention of key management personnel; the Company's
businesses are very competitive and may be affected by pricing, product
initiatives and other actions taken by competitors; the effects of changes in
laws and regulations; the Company's business is international in nature and is
subject to changes in exchange rates between currencies, as well as
international politics; the ability of suppliers to timely supply the Company
parts and components at competitive prices; the financial condition of suppliers
and customers, and their continued access to capital; the Company's ability to
timely manufacture and deliver products to customers; the Company's substantial
amount of debt and its need to comply with restrictive covenants contained in
the Company's debt agreements; compliance with applicable environmental laws and
regulations; and other factors. Actual events or the actual future results of
the Company may differ materially from any forward looking statement due to
these and other risks, uncertainties and significant factors. The
forward-looking statements contained herein speak only as of the date of this
Quarterly Report and the forward-looking statements contained in documents
incorporated herein by reference speak only as of the date of the respective
documents. The Company expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to
release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement
contained or incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report to reflect any
change in the Company's expectations with regard thereto or any change in
events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
--------------------------------
(a) The exhibits set forth on the accompanying Exhibit Index
have been filed as part of this Form 10-Q.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
During the quarter ended June 30, 2003, the Company
filed or furnished the following Current Reports
on Form 8-K:
- A report on Form 8-K was filed on April 8, 2003
announcing a conference call to be held on April
24, 2003 to review the Company's financial
results for the quarter ended March 31, 2003.
- A report on Form 8-K was furnished on April 23,
2003 providing a press release that announced
and reviewed the Company's financial results for
its quarter ended March 31, 2003.
- A report on Form 8-K was filed on May 29, 2003
announcing the Company's redemption of $50
million in principal amount of its 8-7/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2008.
53
SIGNATURES
----------
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
TEREX CORPORATION
-----------------
(Registrant)
Date: August 13, 2003 /s/ Phillip C. Widman
Phillip C. Widman
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date: August 13, 2003 /s/ Mark T. Cohen
Mark T. Cohen
Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
54
EXHIBIT INDEX
3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Terex Corporation (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form S-1 Registration Statement of
Terex Corporation, Registration No. 33-52297).
3.2 Certificate of Elimination with respect to the Series B Preferred Stock
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1998 of Terex Corporation, Commission File No.
1-10702).
3.3 Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Terex
Corporation dated September 5, 1998 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.3 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 of
Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
3.4 Amended and Restated Bylaws of Terex Corporation (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1998 of Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
4.1 Indenture dated as of March 31, 1998 among Terex Corporation, the
Guarantors named therein and United States Trust Company of New York, as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of Amendment No. 1 to
the Form S-4 Registration Statement of Terex Corporation, Registration
No. 333-53561).
4.2 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 23, 1998, between
Terex Corporation and United States Trust Company of New York, as
Trustee (to Indenture dated as of March 31, 1998) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1999 of Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
4.3 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 1, 1999, between Terex
Corporation and United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee (to
Indenture dated as of March 31, 1998) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.5 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 of
Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
4.4 Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 29, 1999, between Terex
Corporation and United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee (to
Indenture dated as of March 31, 1998) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.6 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 of
Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
4.5 Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 26, 1999, between
Terex Corporation and United States Trust Company of New York, as
Trustee (to Indenture dated as of March 31, 1998) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1999 of Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
4.6 Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 29, 2001, between Terex
Corporation and United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee (to
Indenture dated as of March 31, 1998) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.6 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001 of
Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
4.7 Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2001, between Terex
Corporation and United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee (to
Indenture dated as of March 31, 1998) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.7 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 of
Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
4.8 Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 30, 2002, between
Terex Corporation and Bank of New York (as successor to United States
Trust Company of New York), as Trustee (to Indenture dated as of March
31, 1998) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002 of Terex Corporation, Commission File
No. 1-10702).
4.9 Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 31, 2003, between Terex
Corporation and Bank of New York (as successor to United States Trust
Company of New York), as Trustee (to Indenture dated as of March 31,
1998) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2003 of Terex Corporation, Commission File No.
1-10702).
4.10 Indenture dated as of March 9, 1999 among Terex Corporation, the
Guarantors named therein and United States Trust Company of New York, as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1998 of Terex Corporation, Commission File
No. 1-10702).
4.11 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 1, 1999, between Terex
Corporation and United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee (to
Indenture dated as of March 9, 1999) (incorporated by reference to
55
Exhibit 4.8 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 of
Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
4.12 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 30, 1999, between Terex
Corporation and United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee (to
Indenture dated as of March 9, 1999) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.9 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 of
Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
4.13 Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 26, 1999, between Terex
Corporation and United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee (to
Indenture dated as of March 9, 1999) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.11 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999
of Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
4.14 Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 29, 2001, between Terex
Corporation and United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee (to
Indenture dated as of March 9, 1999) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.11 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001 of
Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
4.15 Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2001, between Terex
Corporation and United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee (to
Indenture dated as of March 9, 1999) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.13 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001
of Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
4.16 Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 30, 2002, between
Terex Corporation and Bank of New York (as successor to United States
Trust Company of New York), as Trustee (to Indenture dated March 9,
1999) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to the Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002 of Terex Corporation, Commission File
No. 1-10702).
4.17 Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 31, 2003, between
Terex Corporation and Bank of New York (as successor to United States
Trust Company of New York), as Trustee (to Indenture dated as of March
9, 1999) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to the Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2003 of Terex Corporation, Commission File
No. 1-10702).
4.18 Indenture, dated as of March 29, 2001, between Terex Corporation and
United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2001 of Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
4.19 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2001, between Terex
Corporation and United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee (to
Indenture dated as of March 29, 2001) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.15 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001
of Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
4.20 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 30, 2002, between
Terex Corporation and Bank of New York (as successor trustee to United
States Trust Company of New York), as Trustee (to Indenture dated as of
March 29, 2001). (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.18 to the Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 of Terex Corporation,
Commission File No. 1-10702).
4.21 Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 31, 2003, between Terex
Corporation and Bank of New York (as successor to United States Trust
Company of New York), as Trustee (to Indenture dated as of March 29,
2001) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.21 to the Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2003 of Terex Corporation, Commission File
No. 1-10702).
4.22 Indenture, dated as of December 17, 2001, between Terex Corporation, the
Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York, as Trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to Form S-4 Registration
Statement of Terex Corporation, Registration No. 333-75700).
4.23 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 30, 2002, between
Terex Corporation and Bank of New York (as successor trustee to United
States Trust Company of New York), as Trustee (to Indenture dated as of
December 17, 2001) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.20 to the
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 of Terex Corporation,
Commission File No. 1-10702).
4.24 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 31, 2003, between Terex
Corporation and Bank of New York (as successor to United States Trust
Company of New York), as Trustee (to Indenture dated as of December 17,
2001) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.24 to the Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2003 of Terex Corporation, Commission File
No. 1-10702).
56
10.1 Terex Corporation Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form S-8 Registration Statement of
Terex Corporation, Registration No. 33-21483).
10.2 1994 Terex Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1994 of Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
10.3 Terex Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1994 of Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
10.4 1996 Terex Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form S-8 Registration Statement of Terex
Corporation, Registration No. 333-03983).
10.5 Amendment No. 1 to 1996 Terex Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1999 of Terex Corporation, Commission File No.
1-10702).
10.6 Amendment No. 2 to 1996 Terex Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1999 of Terex Corporation, Commission File No.
1-10702).
10.7 Terex Corporation 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2000 of Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
10.8 Terex Corporation 2000 Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2002 of Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
10.9 Terex Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective
October 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 of Terex Corporation,
Commission File No. 1-10702).
10.10 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 3, 2002, among
Terex Corporation, certain of its Subsidiaries, the Lenders named
therein, and Credit Suisse First Boston, as Administrative Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2002 of Terex Corporation, Commission File No.
1-10702).
10.11 Incremental Term Loan Assumption Agreement, dated as of September 13,
2002, relating to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of
July 3, 2002, among Terex Corporation, certain of its subsidiaries, the
lenders party thereto and Credit Suisse First Boston, as administrative
agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 of the Form 8-K Current
Report, Commission File No. 1-10702, dated September 13, 2002 and filed
with the Commission on September 20, 2002).
10.12 Guarantee Agreement dated as of March 6, 1998 of Terex Corporation and
Credit Suisse First Boston, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1998 of Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
10.13 Guarantee Agreement dated as of March 6, 1998 of Terex Corporation, each
of the subsidiaries of Terex Corporation listed therein and Credit
Suisse First Boston, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 of
Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
10.14 Security Agreement dated as of March 6, 1998 of Terex Corporation, each
of the subsidiaries of Terex Corporation listed therein and Credit
Suisse First Boston, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.16 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 of
Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
10.15 Pledge Agreement dated as of March 6, 1998 of Terex Corporation, each of
the subsidiaries of Terex Corporation listed therein and Credit Suisse
First Boston, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.17 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 of Terex
Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
10.16 Form Mortgage, Leasehold Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents,
Security Agreement and Financing entered into by Terex Corporation and
certain of the subsidiaries of Terex Corporation, as Mortgagor, and
Credit Suisse First Boston, as Mortgagee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.18 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 of
Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
10.17 Underwriting Agreement, dated as of December 5, 2001, between Terex
Corporation and Salomon Smith Barney Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 1 of the Form 8-K Current Report, Commission File No. 1-10702,
dated December 5, 2001 and filed with the Commission on December 6,
2001).
10.18 Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2001, among Terex
Corporation and the Purchasers, as defined therein (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.32 to Form S-4 Registration Statement of Terex
Corporation, Registration No. 333-75700).
57
10.19 Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2001, among
Terex Corporation and the Initial Purchasers, as defined therein
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to Form S-4 Registration
Statement of Terex Corporation, Registration No. 333-75700).
10.20 Agreement on the Sale and Purchase of Shares of the Schaeff Group of
Companies, dated as of November 26, 2001, among Terex Corporation, its
wholly-owned subsidiary and the parties named therein (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K Current Report, Commission
File No. 1-10702, dated December 28, 2001 and filed with the Commission
on January 15, 2002).
10.21 Stock Purchase Agreement Concerning the Acquisition of Terex Common
Stock, dated as of November 26, 2001, among Terex Corporation, its
wholly-owned subsidiary and the parties named therein (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 8-K Current Report, Commission
File No. 1-10702, dated December 28, 2001 and filed with the Commission
on January 15, 2002).
10.22 Underwriting Agreement, dated as of April 18, 2002 between Terex
Corporation and Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 1.1 of the Form 8-K Current Report, Commission File
No. 1-10702, dated April 18, 2002 and filed with the Commission on April
18, 2002).
10.23 Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated May 16, 2002, among Terex
Corporation, Terex Germany GmbH & Co. KG and Demag Mobile Cranes GmbH
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 of the Form 8-K Current Report,
Commission File No. 1-10702, dated May 16, 2002 and filed with the
Commission on May 17, 2002).
10.24 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated July 19, 2002, among Terex
Corporation, Magic Acquisition Corp., Genie Holdings, Inc., Robert
Wilkerson, S. Ward Bushnell, F. Roger Brown, Wilkerson Limited
Partnership, Bushnell Limited Partnership and R. Brown Limited
Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 of the Form 8-K
Current Report, Commission File No. 1-10702, dated July 19, 2002 and
filed with the Commission on July 22, 2002).
10.25 First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September
18, 2002, by and among Terex Corporation, Magic Acquisition Corp., Genie
Holdings, Inc. and Robert Wilkerson, S. Ward Bushnell and F. Roger Brown
and certain limited partnerships (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1
of the Form 8-K Current Report, Commission File No. 1-10702, dated
September 13, 2002 and filed with the Commission on September 20, 2002).
10.26 Contract of Employment, dated as of September 1, 1999, between Terex
Corporation and Filip Filipov (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.29 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 of Terex
Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
10.27 Supplement to Contract of Employment, dated as of April 1, 2000, between
Terex Corporation and Filip Filipov (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.37 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000
of Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
10.28 Second Amended and Restated Employment and Compensation Agreement, dated
as of January 1, 2002, between Terex Corporation and Ronald M. DeFeo
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2001 of Terex Corporation, Commission File No.
1-10702).
10.29 Amended and Restated Promissory Note, dated October 26, 2001, by Ronald
M. DeFeo in favor of Terex Corporation (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.32 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 of
Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
10.30 Pledge and Assignment Agreement dated as of March 2, 2000 between Ronald
M. DeFeo and Terex Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.33 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 of Terex
Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
10.31 Form of Amended and Restated Change in Control and Severance Agreement
dated as of April 1, 2002 between Terex Corporation and certain
executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 of Terex Corporation,
Commission File No. 1-10702).
10.32 Form of Change in Control and Severance Agreement between Terex
Corporation and certain executive officers (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.35 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 of
Terex Corporation, Commission File No. 1-10702).
12 Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. *
31.1 Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).*
31.2 Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).*
58
32 Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes -Oxley Act of 2002. *
* Exhibit filed with this document.
59