UNITED STATES 	SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 	Washington, D.C. 20549 	FORM 10-Q 	 (Mark One) X 		Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the 		Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the period ended March 31, 2000 Transaction Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of 		the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transaction period from to Commission File Number 0-11204 USBANCORP, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Pennsylvania 25-1424278 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) incorporation or organization) Main & Franklin Streets, P.O. Box 430, Johnstown, PA 15907-0430 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code (814) 533-5300 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. X Yes 				 No Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. Class 	 Outstanding at May 1, 2000 Common Stock, par value $2.50 		 13,328,741 per share 1 	USBANCORP, INC. 	INDEX Page No. PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: Consolidated Balance Sheet - March 31, 2000, December 31, 1999, and March 31, 1999					 	 3 Consolidated Statement of Income - Three Months Ended March 31, 2000, and 1999							 	4 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity - Three Months Ended March 31, 2000, and 1999 	 6 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows - Three Months Ended March 31, 2000, and 1999 				 	7 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			 				 	8 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition 	and Results of Operations			 	 	 	22 Part II.	Other Information							 	35 2 	USBANCORP, INC. 	CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET 	(In thousands) 				 	 March 31 December 31 March 31 2000		 1999	 1999 	(Unaudited)	 	(Unaudited) ASSETS Cash and due from banks	 $ 42,657 	$ 54,676 	$ 37,806 Interest bearing deposits with banks	 230 	758 	 110 Investment securities: Available for sale 	1,066,183 	1,187,335 	689,944 Held to maturity (market value $497,839 on March 31, 1999)	 - 	- 	492,297 Loans held for sale 	17,704 	 21,753 	62,022 Loans 	1,089,583 	1,082,459 	1,024,960 Less: Unearned income 	7,577 	8,408 	4,880 Allowance for loan losses	 10,446 	 10,350 10,760 Net loans	 1,071,560 	1,063,701 	1,009,320 Premises and equipment 	18,802 	18,937 	18,346 Accrued income receivable 	16,149 	 16,650 	17,058 Mortgage servicing rights	 13,118 	13,510 	 16,127 Goodwill and core deposit intangibles	 24,863 	25,655 	 28,078 Bank owned life insurance 	37,726 	37,290 	 36,041 Other assets	 28,470 27,214 10,223 TOTAL ASSETS	 $ 2,337,462 	$ 2,467,479 	$ 2,417,372 LIABILITIES Non-interest bearing deposits 	$ 165,463 	$ 160,253 	$ 158,547 Interest bearing deposits	 1,071,775 	 1,070,688 	 1,097,612 Total deposits	 1,237,238 	 1,230,941 	 1,256,159 Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase 	58,605 	 16,369 	106,781 Other short-term borrowings 	213,826 	84,874 	96,267 Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank	 653,245 	 956,999 	 751,126 Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures	 34,500 	 34,500 	 34,500 Long-term debt	 6,400 7,100 8,684 Total borrowed funds	 966,576	 1,099,842 997,358 Other liabilities	 20,482 24,139 28,151 TOTAL LIABILITIES	 2,224,296 	 2,354,922 	 2,281,668 STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Preferred stock, no par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; there were no shares issued and outstanding for the periods presented	 - 	 - 	 - Common stock, par value $2.50 per share; 24,000,000 shares authorized; 17,419,660 shares issued and 13,328,741 outstanding on March 31, 2000; 17,390,496 shares issued and 13,309,577 outstanding on December 31, 1999; 17,377,460 shares issued and 13,331,541 outstanding on March 31, 1999 	43,549	 43,476 	43,444 Treasury stock at cost, 4,090,919 shares on March 31,2000; 4,080,919 shares on December 31, 1999; and 4,045,919 shares on March 31, 1999 	(65,824) 	(65,725)	 (65,155) Surplus	 65,838 	65,686 	65,648 Retained earnings 	104,905 	104,294 	94,895 Accumulated other comprehensive income	 (35,302)	 (35,174) (3,128) TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 	 113,166 112,557 135,704 	 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 	$ 2,337,462 	$ 2,467,479 	$ 2,417,372 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 3 	USBANCORP, INC. 	CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (In thousands, except per share data) Unaudited 	 Three Months Ended March 31 	 2000 1999 INTEREST INCOME Interest and fees on loans and loans held for sale: Taxable 	$ 21,677	 $ 20,938 Tax exempt 	 656 	 557 Deposits with banks 	33 	32 Investment securities: Available for sale 	19,106 	10,751 Held to maturity - 	 7,946 Total Interest Income 41,472	 40,224 INTEREST EXPENSE Deposits 	 10,838	 10,116 Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase 	 840	 1,204 Other short-term borrowings 	1,790	 1,589 Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank 11,823 	 10,329 Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures 	 740	 740 Long-term debt 82	 101 Total Interest Expense 	 26,113 	 24,079 NET INTEREST INCOME 15,359	 16,145 Provision for loan losses 249	 375 NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES 15,110	 15,770 NON-INTEREST INCOME Trust fees 	1,324	 1,228 Net realized (losses) gains on investment securities 	 (889)	 296 Net realized gains on loans held for sale 308	 1,347 Wholesale cash processing fees 	 120	 175 Service charges on deposit accounts 870	 853 Net mortgage servicing fees 	 190 	 138 Bank owned life insurance 	 437	 419 Other income 1,541	 1,728 Total Non-Interest Income 	 3,901 	 6,184 NON-INTEREST EXPENSE Salaries and employee benefits 	 8,184 	 7,983 Net occupancy expense 	 1,288	 1,186 Equipment expense 	1,154	 1,022 Professional fees 	 865	 700 Supplies, postage, and freight 	 663	 694 Miscellaneous taxes and insurance 	 516	 493 FDIC deposit insurance expense 	 62	 68 Amortization of goodwill and core deposit intangibles 	 792 	 712 Impairment charge (credit) for mortgage servicing rights 	(55) 	- Spin-off costs 	593	 - Other expense 	 2,935	 2,244 Total Non-Interest Expense 	 $ 16,997 	 $ 15,102 	CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 4 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE (In thousands, except per share data) Unaudited 	 Three Months Ended 	 March 31 	 	2000 1999 INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES $ 2,014	 $ 6,852 Provision (credit) for income taxes 	 (597)	 1,816 NET INCOME $ 2,611 	$ 5,036 PER COMMON SHARE DATA: Basic: Net income 	$ 0.20	 $ 0.37 Average shares outstanding 	13,318,966	13,445,841 Diluted: Net income 	$ 0.20 	$ 0.37 Average shares outstanding 13,330,006	13,604,163 Cash dividends declared $ 0.15 	$ 0.14 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 5 	USBANCORP, INC. 	CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 	(In thousands) 	Unaudited 	March 31, 2000	March 31, 1999 PREFERRED STOCK 	Balance at beginning of period	 $ - 	$ - 	Balance at end of period		 -	 - COMMON STOCK Balance at beginning of period	 43,476	 43,375 Stock options exercised		 73	 69 Balance at end of period		 43,549 	43,444 TREASURY STOCK Balance at beginning of period	 (65,725) 	(61,521) Treasury stock, at cost		 (99) 	 (3,634) Balance at end of period	 	(65,824) 	(65,155) CAPITAL SURPLUS 	Balance at beginning of period	 	65,686 		65,495 	Stock options exercised		 152		 153 	Balance at end of period	 	65,838	 	65,648 RETAINED EARNINGS 	Balance at beginning of period	 	104,294	 	91,737 	Net income	 	2,611 		5,036 	Cash dividends declared		 (2,000) 		(1,878) 	Balance at end of period	 	104,905 		94,895 ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 	Balance at beginning of period	 	(35,174) 		2,584 	Other comprehensive income 	 (loss), net of tax		 (128) 		(5,712) 	Balance at end of period	 	(35,302) 		(3,128) 	TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 	$ 113,166	 	$ 135,704 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 6 USBANCORP, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 	(In thousands) 	Unaudited 		Three Months Ended 		 March 31 2000 	1999 OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net income	 $ 2,611	$ 5,036 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Provision for loan losses 	 249 	 375 Depreciation and amortization expense 	724 	 628 Amortization expense of goodwill and core deposit intangibles 	792 	712 Amortization expense of mortgage servicing rights 	481 	770 Net amortization of investment securities 	 55 378 Net realized losses (gains) on investment securities	 889 	(296) Net realized gains on loans and loans held for sale 	(308) 	(1,347) Origination of mortgage loans held for sale 	(51,729	 (132,978) Sales of mortgage loans held for sale 	61,970 	140,851 Decrease in accrued income receivable	 501 	 92 Increase in accrued expense payable	 (2,062) (853) Net cash provided by operating activities	 14,173	 13,368 INVESTING ACTIVITIES Purchases of investment securities and other short-term investments - available for sale 	(39,696) 	(248,182) Purchases of investment securities and other short-term investments - held to maturity 	- 	(13,843) Proceeds from maturities of investment securities and other short-term investments - available for sale	 35,204 	26,592 Proceeds from maturities of investment securities and other short-term investments - held to maturity	 - 	28,856 Proceeds from sales of investment securities and other short-term investments - available for sale	 124,507 	184,830 Long-term loans originated 	 (53,899) 	 (78,976) Loans held for sale 	(17,704) 	(62,022) Principal collected on long-term loans 	67,218 	 126,069 Loans purchased or participated	 (10,000) (9,734) Loans sold or participated 	1,329 	- Net (increase) decrease in credit card receivable and other short-term loans	 (936) 	 2,016 Purchases of premises and equipment 	(711) (1,058) Sale/retirement of premises and equipment 	122 	 104 Net decrease in assets held in trust for collateralized mortgage obligation 	77 	270 Net increase in mortgage servicing rights	 (89)	 (700) Net increase in other assets	 (1,704) (10,434) Net cash provided (used) by investing activities	 103,718 	 (56,212) FINANCING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from sales of certificates of deposit	 158,558 	 101,032 Payments for maturing certificates of deposit	 (122,969) 	(35,947) Net (decrease) increase in demand and savings deposits	 (29,292) 	14,783 Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and other short-term borrowings 	171,188	 (27,604) Net principal paydowns of advances from Federal Home Loan Bank 	 (303,754)	 (1,265) 	Repayments of long-term debt 	 (700) 	(343) Common stock cash dividends paid	 (2,000) 	(811) Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debenture dividends paid	 (729) 	(729) Proceeds from dividend reinvestment, stock purchase plan, and stock options exercised 	225 	222 Purchases of treasury stock 	 (99) 	 (3,634) Net (decrease) increase in other liabilities	 (866) (3,884) Net cash (used) provided by financing activities	 (130,438) 41,820 NET DECREASE IN CASH EQUIVALENTS	 (12,547) 	 (1,024) CASH EQUIVALENTS AT JANUARY 1	 55,434 	 38,940 CASH EQUIVALENTS AT MARCH 31	 $ 42,887 	 $ 37,916 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 7 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of USBANCORP, Inc. (the "Company") and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, U.S. Bank ("U.S. Bank"), Three Rivers Bank and Trust Company ("Three Rivers Bank"), USBANCORP Trust and Financial Services Company ("Trust Company"), UBAN Associates, Inc., ("UBAN Associates") and United Bancorp Life Insurance Company ("United Life"). In addition, the Parent Company is an administrative group that provides support in such areas as audit, finance, investments, loan review, general services, loan policy, and marketing. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements. On April 1, 2000, the Company successfully completed the spin-off of its Pittsburgh based Three Rivers Bank subsidiary to its shareholders. 2. Basis of Preparation The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. In the opinion of management, all adjustments that are of a normal recurring nature and are considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. They are not, however, necessarily indicative of the results of consolidated operations for a full year. With respect to the unaudited consolidated financial information of the Company for the three month periods ended March 31, 2000, and 1999, Arthur Andersen LLP, independent public accountants, conducted reviews (based upon procedures established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants) and not audits, as set forth in their separate review report dated April 14, 2000, appearing herein. This report does not express an opinion on the interim unaudited consolidated financial information. Arthur Andersen LLP has not carried out any significant or additional audit tests beyond those which would have been necessary if its report had not been included. The December 31, 1999, numbers are derived from audited financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company's "Annual Report and Form 10-K" for the year ended December 31, 1999. 3. Earnings Per Common Share Basic earnings per share includes only the weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share includes the weighted average common shares outstanding and any dilutive common stock equivalent shares in the calculation. Treasury shares are treated as retired for earnings per share purposes. 8 4. Comprehensive Income In January 1998, the Company adopted SFAS #130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income," which established standards for reporting and displaying comprehensive income and its components in a financial statement. For the Company, comprehensive income includes net income and unrealized holding gains and losses from available for sale investment securities. The changes in other comprehensive income are reported net of income taxes, as follows (in millions): Three Months Ended 			 March 31,	 March 31, 	 2000 1999 Net income 	 $2,611 	 $5,036 Other comprehensive income, before tax: Unrealized holding gains(losses) on investment securities 1,071 (7,475) Less: reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net income 	 889 (296) Other comprehensive income(loss) before tax 	 (182)	 (7,771) Income tax expense(credit) related to items of other comprehensive income (54)	 (2,059) Other comprehensive income(loss), net of tax 	 (128)	 (5,712) Comprehensive income $ 2,483 $ (676) 5. Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows On a consolidated basis, cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits with banks, and federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell. For the Parent Company, cash equivalents also include short-term investments. The Company made $3,477,000 in income tax payments in the first three months of 2000 as compared to $4,930,000 for the first three months of 1999. Total interest expense paid amounted to $28,090,000 in 2000's first three months compared to $24,932,000 in the same 1999 period. 6. Investment Securities Securities classified as available for sale include securities which may be sold to effectively manage interest rate risk exposure, prepayment risk, and other factors (such as liquidity requirements). These available for sale securities are reported at fair value with unrealized aggregate appreciation/(depreciation) excluded from income and credited/(charged) to a separate component of shareholders' equity on a net of tax basis. The mark-to-market of the available for sale portfolio does inject more volatility in the book value of equity, but has no impact on regulatory capital. Realized gain or loss on securities sold was computed upon the adjusted cost of the specific securities sold. The book and market values of investment securities are summarized as follows (in thousands): 9 Investment securities available for sale: 			 March 31, 2000 	Gross 	Gross 	Book 	Unrealized	Unrealized	Market 	Value 	Gains 	Losses 	Value U.S. Treasury	 $ 15,836	$ - 	$ (139) 	$ 15,697 U.S. Agency 	43,704 	 - 	 (2,479) 	41,225 State and municipal 	 97,253 	 96	 (6,367) 	 90,982 U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities 	880,421 	157 	(44,658) 	835,920 Other securities(1) 83,505	 39	 (1,185)	 82,359 Total 	$1,120,719	$ 292 	$ (54,828) 	$1,066,183 (1)Other investment securities include corporate notes and bonds, asset-backed securities, and equity securities. Maintaining investment quality is a primary objective of the Company's investment policy which, subject to certain limited exceptions, prohibits the purchase of any investment security below a Moody's Investor's Service or Standard & Poor's rating of "A." At March 31, 2000, 97.2% of the portfolio was rated "AAA" compared to 97.6% at March 31, 1999. Approximately 1.7% of the portfolio was rated below "A" or unrated on March 31, 2000. 7.	Loans Held for Sale At March 31, 2000, $17,704,000 of newly originated fixed-rate residential mortgage loans were classified as "held for sale." It is management's intent to sell these residential mortgage loans during the next several months. The residential mortgage loans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market value. Net realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in "Net gains (losses) on loans held for sale"; unrealized net valuation adjustments (if any) are recorded in the same line item on the Consolidated Statement of Income. 8.	Loans The loan portfolio of the Company consists of the following (in thousands): March 31 December 31 March 31 	 2000 	 1999 	 1999 Commercial 	$171,969 	$152,042 	$150,644 Commercial loans secured by real estate 	400,051	 406,927	 352,800 Real estate - mortgage	 449,879	 452,507	 448,185 Consumer	 67,684	 70,983	 73,331 Loans	 1,089,583	 1,082,459	 1,024,960 Less: Unearned income	 7,577 8,408	 4,880 Loans, net of unearned income 	$1,082,006	 $1,074,051	 $1,020,080 Real estate-construction loans were not material at these presented dates and comprised 4.7% of total loans net of unearned income at March 31, 2000. The Company has no credit exposure to foreign countries or highly leveraged transactions. Additionally, the Company has no significant industry lending concentrations. 10 9.	Allowance for Loan Losses and Charge-Off Procedures As a financial institution which assumes lending and credit risks as a principal element of its business, the Company anticipates that credit losses will be experienced in the normal course of business. Accordingly, the Company consistently applies a comprehensive methodology and procedural discipline which is updated on a quarterly basis at the subsidiary bank level to determine both the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and the necessary provision for loan losses to be charged against earnings. This methodology includes: a detailed review of all criticized and impaired loans to determine if any specific reserve allocations are required on an individual loan basis. The specific reserve established for these criticized and impaired loans is based on careful analysis of the loan's performance, the related collateral value, cash flow considerations and the financial capability of any guarantor. the application of formula driven reserve allocations for all commercial and commercial real-estate loans are calculated by using a three year migration analysis of net losses incurred within each risk grade for the entire commercial loan portfolio. The difference between estimated and actual losses is reconciled through the dynamic nature of the migration analysis. the application of formula driven reserve allocations to installment and mortgage loans which are based upon historical charge-off experience for those loan types. The residential mortgage loan allocation is based upon the Company's five-year historical average of actual loan charge-offs experienced in that category. The same methodology is used to determine the allocation for consumer loans except the allocation is based upon an average of the most recent actual three-year historical charge-off experience for consumer loans. the application of formula driven reserve allocations to all outstanding loans and certain unfunded commitments is based upon review of historical losses and qualitative factors, which include but are not limited to, economic trends, delinquencies, concentrations of credit, trends in loan volume, experience and depth of management, examination and audit results, effects of any changes in lending policies and trends in policy exceptions. The maintenance of a general unallocated reserve to accommodate inherent risk in the Company's portfolio that is not identified through the Company's specific loan and portfolio segment reviews discussed above. Management recognizes that there may be events or economic factors that have occurred effecting specific borrowers or segments of borrowers that may not yet be fully reflected in the information that the Company uses for arriving at a specific loan or portfolio segment reserves. Therefore, the company and its Board of Directors believe a general unallocated reserve is needed to recognize the estimation risk associated with the specific and formula driven allowances. In conjunction with the establishment of the general unallocated reserve, the Company also looks at the total allowance for loan losses in relation to the size of the total loan portfolio, the level of non-performing assets and its coverage of these items as compared to peer banks. 11 After completion of this process, a formal meeting of the Loan Loss Reserve Committee is held to evaluate the adequacy of the reserve and establish the provision level for the next quarter. The Company believes that the procedural discipline, systematic methodology, and comprehensive documentation of this quarterly process is in full compliance with all regulatory requirements and provides appropriate support for accounting purposes. When it is determined that the prospects for recovery of the principal of a loan have significantly diminished, the loan is immediately charged against the allowance account; subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance account. In addition, non-accrual and large delinquent loans are reviewed monthly to determine potential losses. Consumer loans are considered losses when they are 90 days past due, except loans that are insured for credit loss. The Company's policy is to individually review, as circumstances warrant, each of its commercial and commercial mortgage loans to determine if a loan is impaired. At a minimum, credit reviews are mandatory for all commercial and commercial mortgage loans with balances in excess of $500,000 within an 12 month period. The Company has also identified two pools of small dollar value homogeneous loans which are evaluated collectively for impairment. These separate pools are for residential mortgage loans and consumer loans. Individual loans within these pools are reviewed and removed from the pool if factors such as significant delinquency in payments of 90 days or more, bankruptcy, or other negative economic concerns indicate impairment. An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses follows (in thousands, except ratios): Three Months Ended Year Ended 	 March 31, December 31, 	 2000 1999	 1999 Balance at beginning of period	 $ 10,350 	 $ 10,725 	 $ 10,725 Charge-offs: Commercial 	 171 	168 	 1,802 Real estate-mortgage 	 269 	 210	 625 Consumer 	 67 234 	 576 Total charge-offs 	 507 612 	 3,003 Recoveries: Commercial 	 37 	 125 	 295 Real estate-mortgage 	 271 	 102 	 199 Consumer 	 46	 45 234 Total recoveries 	 354 	 272 	 728 Net charge-offs 	 153 	 340 	2,275 Provision for loan losses 	 249 	 375 	 1,900 Balance at end of period 	 $ 10,446 	 $ 10,760 	 $ 10,350 As a percent of average loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income: Annualized net charge-offs 	 0.06% 	 0.13%	 0.21% Annualized provision for loan losses 	 0.09 	 0.14 	 0.18 Allowance as a percent of loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income at period end 0.95 	 0.99 	 0.94 Total classified loans 	 $22,716 	 $25,339 	 $24,049 12 (For additional information, refer to the "Provision for Loan Losses" and "Loan Quality" sections in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations on pages 26 and 28, respectively.) 10.	Components of Allowance for Loan Losses For impaired loans, the measurement of impairment may be based upon: 1) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate; 2) the observable market price of the impaired loan; or 3) the fair value of the collateral of a collateral dependent loan. The Company had loans totaling $2,491,000 and $1,690,000 being specifically identified as impaired and a corresponding allocation reserve of $500,000 and $969,000 at March 31, 2000, and March 31, 1999, respectively. The average outstanding balance for loans being specifically identified as impaired was $2,330,000 for the first three months of 2000 compared to $1,725,000 for the first three months of 1999. All of the impaired loans are collateral dependent, therefore the fair value of the collateral of the impaired loans is evaluated in measuring the impairment. There was no interest income recognized on impaired loans during the first three months of 2000 or 1999. The following table sets forth the allocation of the allowance for loan losses among various categories. This allocation is determined by using the consistent quarterly procedural discipline which was discussed above. This allocation, however, is not necessarily indicative of the specific amount or specific loan category in which future losses may ultimately occur (in thousands, except percentages): March 31, 2000 December 31, 1999 March 31, 1999 		 Percent of	 	Percent of	 	Percent of 	Loans in 		Loans in 		 Loans in 		 Each 		Each 	 	 Each 		 Category 		Category 	 	 Category 	Amount	to Loans 	Amount	to Loans 	Amount	 to Loans Commercial	 $ 1,829	15.6%	 $ 1,991	13.9%	 $ 1,870	13.9% Commercial loans secured by real estate	 3,226	36.4 	2,928	37.1 	2,098	32.6 Real Estate - mortgage	 829	42.5 	791	43.3 	991	47.2 Consumer	 665	 5.5 	631	 5.7 	620	 6.3 Allocation to general risk 	 3,897	 - 	 4,009 - 	 5,181	 - Total 	$10,446	100.0% 	$10,350	100.0% 	$10,760	100.0% Even though real estate-mortgage loans comprise approximately 43% of the Company's total loan portfolio, only $829,000 or 7.9% of the total allowance for loan losses is allocated against this loan category. The real estate-mortgage loan allocation is based upon the Company's five-year historical average of actual loan charge- offs experienced in that category and other qualitative factors. The disproportionately higher allocations for commercial loans and commercial loans secured by real estate reflect the increased credit risk associated with this type of lending, the Company's historical loss experienced in these categories, and other qualitative factors. 13 The Company has strengthened its allocations to the commercial segments of the loan portfolio over the past two quarters. Factors considered by the Company that led to increased allocations to the commercial segments of the portfolio included: the potential adverse effects of rising interest rates which began in the second half of 1999, continued growth of the commercial loan portfolio, the continued increase in concentration risk in single borrowers, and the overall growth in the average size associated with these credits. At March 31, 2000, management of the Company believes the allowance for loan losses was adequate to cover potential yet undetermined losses within the Company's loan portfolio. The Company's management is unable to determine in what loan category future charge-offs and recoveries may occur. (For a complete discussion concerning the operations of the "Allowance for Loan Losses" refer to Note 9.) 11.	Non-performing Assets Non-performing assets are comprised of (i) loans which are on a non-accrual basis, (ii) loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments some of which are insured for credit loss, and (iii) other real estate owned (real estate acquired through foreclosure and in-substance foreclosures). All loans, except for loans that are insured for credit loss, are placed on non-accrual status immediately upon becoming 90 days past due in either principal or interest. In addition, if circumstances warrant, the accrual of interest may be discontinued prior to 90 days. In all cases, payments received on non-accrual loans are credited to principal until full recovery of principal has been recognized; it is only after full recovery of principal that any additional payments received are recognized as interest income. The only exception to this policy is for residential mortgage loans wherein interest income is recognized on a cash basis as payments are received. The following table presents information concerning non- performing assets (in thousands, except percentages): March 31 December 31 March 31 		 2000		 1999 		 1999 Non-accrual loans		 $ 6,114 $ 4,928 		$ 5,840 Loans past due 90 days or more 		 85 		1,305 		 476 Other real estate owned		 6,403	 	 7,126 		 1,650 Total non-performing assets 		$ 12,602 		$ 13,359 		$ 7,966 Total non-performing assets as a percent of loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, and other real estate owned 	1.14%	 	1.21% 		 0.74% 14 The Company is unaware of any additional loans which are required to either be charged-off or added to the non-performing asset totals disclosed above. Other real estate owned is recorded at the lower of 1)fair value minus estimated costs to sell, or 2)carrying cost. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, (i) the gross interest income that would have been recorded if non- accrual loans had been current in accordance with their original terms and had been outstanding throughout the period or since origination if held for part of the period, (ii) the amount of interest income actually recorded on such loans, and (iii) the net reduction in interest income attributable to such loans (in thousands). 	Three Months Ended March 31 2000 	 1999 Interest income due in accordance with original terms	 $ 123	 $ 87 Interest income recorded	 (67) 	 (9) Net reduction in interest income	 $ 56	 $ 78 12. Off-Balance Sheet Hedge Instruments Policies The Company uses various interest rate contracts, such as interest rate swaps, caps and floors, to help manage interest rate and market valuation risk exposure, which is incurred in normal recurrent banking activities. These interest rate contracts function as hedges against specific assets or liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Unrealized gains or losses on these hedge transactions are deferred. It is the Company's policy not to terminate hedge transactions prior to their expiration date. For interest rate swaps, the interest differential to be paid or received is accrued by the Company and recognized as an adjustment to interest income or interest expense of the underlying assets or liabilities being hedged. Because only interest payments are exchanged, the cash requirement and exposure to credit risk are significantly less than the notional amount. Any premium or transaction fee incurred to purchase interest rate caps or floors is deferred and amortized to interest income or interest expense over the term of the contract. Unamortized premiums related to the purchase of caps and floors are included in "Other assets" on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. A summary of the off-balance sheet derivative transactions outstanding as of March 31, 2000, are as follows: 15 Borrowed Funds Hedges The Company has entered into several interest rate swaps to hedge short-term borrowings used to leverage the balance sheet. Specifically, FHLB advances which reprice between 30 days and two years are being used to fund fixed-rate agency mortgage-backed securities with durations ranging from three to five years. Under the swap agreements, the Company pays a fixed-rate of interest and receives a floating-rate which resets either monthly or quarterly. For the $120 million interest rate cap, the Company only receives payment from the counter party if the federal funds rate goes above the 5.00% strike rate. The following table summarizes the interest rate swap transactions which impacted the Company's first three months of 2000 performance: 		Fixed Floating	 Impact Notional	 Start	 Termination	Rate	 Rate	 Repricing	 On Interest 	Amount	 Date	 Date	 Paid	 Received	Frequency	 Expense $130,000,000	 10-25-99	10-25-00	 6.17%	 6.08% 	 Quarterly	 $ 26,493 	 90,000,000	10-25-99	10-25-01	 6.41	 6.08 	 Quarterly	 73,658 	 50,000,000	10-25-99	10-25-01	 6.42 6.08 	 Quarterly 	41,583 	 120,000,000	 5-01-99	 4-30-00	 5.00	 5.75 	 Monthly 	(209,067) 							 (67,333) The Company believes that its exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by any of the counterparties (which include Mellon Bank, PNC and First Union) in the interest rate swap agreements is remote. The Company monitors and controls all off- balance sheet derivative products with a comprehensive Board of Director approved hedging policy. This policy permits a total maximum notional amount outstanding of $500 million for interest rate swaps, and interest rate caps/floors. The Company had no interest rate floors outstanding at March 31, 2000, or March 31, 1999. 13. Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible Assets USBANCORP's balance sheet shows both tangible assets (such as loans, buildings, and investments) and intangible assets (such as goodwill). The Company now carries $12.1 million of goodwill and $12.8 million of core deposit intangible assets on its balance sheet. $10 million of this core deposit intangible was established in the first quarter of 1999 with the purchase of the First Western branches. A rollforward of the Company's intangible asset balances is as follows (in thousands): Balance at December 31, 1999	 		 	$ 25,655 Amortization expense				 (792) Balance at March 31, 2000		 	 	 $ 24,863 The Company is amortizing core deposit intangibles over periods ranging from five to ten years while goodwill is being amortized over a 15 year life. The straight-line method of amortization is being used for both of these categories of intangibles. It is important to note that this intangible amortization expense is not a future cash outflow. The following table reflects the future amortization expense of the intangible assets (in thousands): 16 Remaining 2000 		 $ 2,485 2001	 	 	 3,112 2002		 	 3,112 2003		 	 3,112 2004		 	 2,684 2005 and after	 	 10,358 14. Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings Total FHLB borrowings consist of the following at March 31, 2000, (in thousands, except percentages): 	 Type 		Maturing	 Amount	 Weighted 					 Average 					 Rate 	Open Repo Plus		 Overnight	 $ 183,650	 6.62% 	 Advances and		 2000	 405,000	 5.53 		wholesale 	 	 2001	 110,126	 6.17 	repurchase	 	 2002	 8,500	 7.06 	agreements 	 	 2003	 3,750	 6.61 			 2004 and after	 125,869	 5.99 Total Advances and		 	 653,245 	5.75 wholesale repurchase agreements Total FHLB Borrowings		 $836,895 	5.94% All of the above borrowings bear a fixed rate of interest, with the only exceptions being the Open Repo Plus advances whose rate can change daily. All FHLB stock along with an interest in unspecified mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, with an aggregate statutory value equal to the amount of the advances, have been pledged as collateral with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh to support these borrowings. 15. Capital The Company is subject to various capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company's assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgements by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. 17 Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company's financial statements. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum amounts and ratios(set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. Management believes that as of March 31, 2000, the Company meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject. As of March 31, 2000, and 1999, as well as, December 31, 1999, the Federal Reserve categorized the Company as "Well Capitalized" under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Company must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since notification that management believes have changed the Company's classification category. 		 	 To Be Well 		 Capitalized Under 		 For Capital Prompt Corrective As of March 31, 2000 Actual 		 Adequacy Purposes Action Provisions Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Total Capital (to Risk (In thousands, except ratios) Weighted Assets) Consolidated	 $ 167,736	14.09%	$ 95,245	 8.00%	$ 119,057	10.00% U.S. Bank	 90,829	14.10 	51,550	 8.00 	64,438	10.00 Three Rivers Bank	 73,597	13.58 	43,359	 8.00 	54,199	10.00 Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) Consolidated	 157,290	13.21 	 47,623	 4.00 	 71,434	 6.00 U.S. Bank	 85,508	13.27 	25,775	 4.00 	38,663	 6.00 Three Rivers Bank	 68,472	12.63 	21,680	 4.00 	32,519	 6.00 Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) Consolidated	 157,290	 6.57 	 95,802	 4.00 	 119,753	 5.00 U.S. Bank	 85,508	 6.54 	52,310	 4.00 	65,387	 5.00 Three Rivers Bank	 68,472	 6.34 	43,207	 4.00 	54,009	 5.00 16. Segment Results The financial performance of the Company is also monitored by an internal funds transfer pricing profitability measurement system which produces line of business results and key performance measures. The Company's major business units include community banking, mortgage banking, trust, and investment/parent. The reported results reflect the underlying economics of the business segments. Expenses for centrally provided services are allocated based upon the cost and estimated usage of those services. Capital has been allocated among the businesses on a risk-adjusted basis. The businesses are match-funded and interest rate risk is centrally managed and accounted for within the investment/parent business segment. The key performance measures the Company focuses on for each business segment are net income and risk-adjusted return on equity. 18 Community banking includes the deposit-gathering branch franchise along with lending to both individuals and businesses. Lending activities include commercial and commercial real-estate loans, residential mortgage loans and direct consumer loans. Mortgage banking includes the servicing of mortgage loans and the origination of residential mortgage loans through a wholesale broker network. The trust segment has two primary business divisions, institutional trust and personal trust. Institutional trust products and services include 401(k) plans, defined benefit and defined contribution employee benefit plans, individual retirement accounts, and collective investment funds for trade union pension funds. Personal trust products and services include personal portfolio investment management, estate planning and administration, custodial services and pre-need trusts. The investment/parent includes the net results of investment securities and borrowing activities, general corporate expenses not allocated to the business segments, interest expense on corporate debt, and centralized interest rate risk management. The contribution of the major business segments to the consolidated results for the first three months of 2000 and 1999 were as follows (in thousands, except ratios): March 31, 2000	 Community Banking	 Mortgage Banking	 Trust	 Investment/Parent	 Total Net Income	 $ 2,099	 $ (267)	 $ 205	$ 574	 $ 2,611 Risk adjusted return on equity	 11.7%	 (13.3)%	 30.0%	 6.9% 	 9.3% Total assets	 $1,073,960	 $44,068	 $1,814	 $1,217,620	 $2,337,462 March 31, 1999	 Community Banking	 Mortgage Banking	 Trust	 Investment/Parent	 Total Net Income	 $ 1,925	 $ 312	 $ 180	 $ 2,619	 $ 5,036 Risk adjusted return on equity	 9.9%	 15.0%	 23.2%	 21.1%	 14.4% Total assets	 $986,786	 $70,058	 $1,679	 $1,358,849	 $2,417,372 17. Tax-Free Spin-Off of Three Rivers Bancorp On April 1, 2000, the Company executed its Board approved tax- free spin-off of its Three Rivers Bank subsidiary. Shareholders received one share of the new Three Rivers Bancorp (NASDAQ: TRBC) common stock for every two shares of USBANCORP common stock that they owned. The distribution of the Three Rivers Bancorp shares did not change the number of USBANCORP common shares outstanding. Standard Mortgage Company (SMC), a mortgage banking company, previously a subsidiary of Three Rivers Bank, was internally spun- off from Three Rivers Bank to the Company prior to consummation of the Three Rivers Bank spin-off. The accompanying USBANCORP Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. The USBANCORP pro forma condensed consolidated income statements assumes that the dividend to shareholders occurred on January 1, 1999, and the pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet assumes that the dividend occurred on March 31, 2000. The pro forma condensed consolidated financial information is presented for informational purposes only and does not purport to reflect the results of operations or financial position of USBANCORP or Three Rivers Bancorp or the results of operations or financial position that would have occurred had USBANCORP or Three Rivers Bancorp been operated as a separate, independent company. The pro forma adjustments to the accompanying historical consolidated statements of income and the consolidated balance sheets are set forth below. 19 	Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income 	Three Rivers USBANCORP 	Bancorp		 USBANCORP Historical	Historical 		 Pro Forma 	 Period Ended	Period Ended		 Period Ended 	 March 31, 	March 31,	 	 March 31, 	2000	 2000	 Adjustment	 2000 		 (Unaudited in thousands, except per share data) Total interest income	 $ 41,472	 $ 18,100	 $ - $ 23,372 Total interest expense	 26,113	 11,011	 	 15,102 Net interest income	 15,359	 7,089		 8,270 Provision for loan losses	 249	 150		 99 Net interest income after Provision for loan losses	 15,110	 6,939		 8,171 Total non-interest income	 3,901	 623		 3,278 Total non-interest expense	 16,997	 6,589	 117(A) 	 10,525 Income before income taxes	 2,014	 973 	(117) 	924 Provision for income taxes	 (597) 	 (477) 	 (35)(B)	 (155) Net income	 $ 2,611	 $ 1,450	 $ (82) 	$ 1,079 Diluted earnings per share 	 $ 0.20	 -	 $(0.12) 	$ 0.08 Average shares outstanding 	13,330	 -	 - 	13,330 		Three Rivers 	USBANCORP	 Bancorp		 USBANCORP 	Historical	 Historical		 Pro Forma 	Year Ended	 Year Ended		 Year Ended 	December 31,December 31, 		December 31, 	1999	 1999	 Adjustment	1999 	 	(Unaudited in thousands, except per share data) Total interest income	 $ 165,188	 $ 70,816	 $ - 	$ 94,372 Total interest expense	 99,504	 41,082		 58,422 Net interest income	 65,684	 29,734		 35,950 Provision for loan losses	 1,900	 300		 1,600 Net interest income after Provision for loan losses	 63,784	 29,434		 34,350 Total non-interest income	 24,374	 5,653		 18,721 Total non-interest expense	 60,815	 21,027	 469(A) 	40,257 Income before income taxes	 27,343 	14,060	 (469) 	12,814 Provision for income taxes	 6,922	 4,090 	 (142)(B) 2,690 Net income	 $ 20,421	 $ 9,970	 $ (327) 	$ 10,124 Diluted earnings per share 	$ 1.52	 -	 $ (0.77) 	$ 0.75 Average shares outstanding	 13,451	 -	 - 	13,451 20 	Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet 		Three Rivers 	USBANCORP	 Bancorp		 USBANCORP 	Historical	 Historical		 Pro Forma 	Period Ended	Period Ended		 Period Ended 	March 31, 	March 31,	 	 March 31, 	2000	 2000	 Adjustment	 2000 		(Unaudited in thousands) ASSETS Cash and due from banks $ 42,887	$ 16,979	$ (82)(A)	$ 25,826 Investment securities 	1,066,183	 465,451	 	600,732 Loans	 1,089,264	 471,397		 617,867 Other assets	 139,128	 55,276	 10,159(C) 	94,011 Total Assets	 $ 2,337,462	$ 1,009,103	$ 10,077 	$ 1,338,436 LIABILITIES Deposits	 $ 1,237,238	$ 569,898	$ - 	$ 667,340 Total borrowed funds	 966,576	 375,351	 	591,225 Other liabilities	 20,482	 8,520	 	11,962 Total Liabilities	 2,224,296	 953,769	 	1,270,527 Total stockholders' equity 113,166	 55,334	 10,077(A),(C) 67,909 Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$ 2,337,462	$ 1,009,103 $ 10,077 	$ 1,338,436 Notes to unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements: (A) To record the additional incremental expenses USBANCORP expects to incur that were previously allocated to and paid by Three Rivers Bank. (B) To record the income tax impact of the above expenses at the Company's historical effective tax rate. (C) To record the distribution by Three Rivers Bank of all of the outstanding shares of the capital stock of Standard Mortgage Corporation (SMC) to USBANCORP, so that SMC will be a wholly owned subsidiary of USBANCORP. 21 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ("M.D.& A.") .....PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW..... The Company's net income for the first quarter of 2000 totaled $2.6 million or $0.20 per share on a diluted basis. These results include the consolidated results of Three Rivers Bank because the spin-off did not occur until April 1, 2000. The Company's return on equity (ROE) for the first quarter of 2000 averaged 9.26%. This represents a decrease from the $5.0 million or $0.37 per diluted share earned in the first quarter of 1999. The Company's ROE in the first quarter of 1999 averaged 14.49%. Factors that contributed to the lower earnings in the first quarter of 2000 included a higher level of non-interest expense, reduced non-interest income, and a lower level of net interest income. The higher non-interest expense resulted primarily from a $735,000 write-down of an other real estate owned property held at Three Rivers Bank and $593,000 in costs associated with the Three Rivers Bank spin-off. The lower non-interest income was due to a $889,000 loss realized on the sale of $125 million of investment securities as the Company used the proceeds from the sale to paydown short-term borrowings and delever its balance sheet. Additionally, a $1.0 million reduction in gains realized on mortgage loan sales also contributed to the reduced non-interest income. A 20 basis point reduction in the net interest margin caused net interest income to decline by $786,000. These negative items were partially offset by reduced income tax expense. During the first quarter of 2000, the Internal Revenue Service completed its examination of the Company's tax returns through the 1997 tax year. As a result of the successful conclusion of this examination, the Company was able to reduce its first quarter tax expense by approximately $900,000. The following table summarizes some of the Company's key performance indicators (in thousands, except per share and ratios): 		 Three Months Ended Three Months Ended March 31, 2000 March 31, 1999 Net income 	 $ 2,611 	$ 5,036 Diluted earnings per share 	 0.20 	 0.37 Cash earnings per share 0.25	 0.42 Return on average equity 	 9.26% 	 14.49% Return on average assets 	 0.43 	 0.85 Average diluted common shares outstanding 	 13,330 	 13,604 .....NET INTEREST INCOME AND MARGIN..... The Company's net interest income represents the amount by which interest income on earning assets exceeds interest paid on interest bearing liabilities. Net interest income is a primary source of the Company's earnings; it is affected by interest rate fluctuations as well as changes in the amount and mix of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. It is the Company's philosophy to strive to optimize net interest income performance in varying interest rate environments. The following table compares the Company's net interest income performance for the first quarter of 2000 to the first quarter of 1999 (in thousands, except percentages): 22 	 Three Months Ended March 31, 	 2000 	 1999 	 $ Change 	% Change Interest income	 $ 41,472 	$ 40,224 1,248 	 3.1 Interest expense	 26,113 	 24,079 2,034 	 8.4 Net interest income	 15,359 	16,145 	 (786) 	(4.9) Tax-equivalent adjustment	 657 773 (116) 	 (15.0) Net tax-equivalent interest income	 $ 16,016 	 $ 16,918 (902) 	(5.3) Net interest margin	 2.75% 	 2.95% 	(0.20)%	 N/M N/M - Not meaningful USBANCORP's net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis decreased by $902,000 or 5.3% due to the negative impact of a 20 basis point decline in the net interest margin to 2.75%. This drop in the net interest margin was caused by a 26 basis point increase in the cost of funds due to higher costs for both borrowings and deposits. This increase in the cost of funds more than offset the benefit of a four basis point increase in the earning asset yield due to a higher loan portfolio yield. ...COMPONENT CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME... Regarding the separate components of net interest income, the Company's total tax- equivalent interest income for the first quarter of 2000 increased by $1.1 million or 2.8% when compared to the same 1999 period. This increase was due to the previously mentioned four basis point increase in the earning asset yield and a higher level of earning assets. Total average earning assets were $40 million higher in the first quarter of 2000 due to an $18 million or 1.7% increase in total loans and a similar $19 million increase in investment securities. The Company was able to continue to achieve solid loan growth in the commercial and commercial mortgage loan categories which more than offset lower balances of residential mortgage loans due to the higher interest rate environment. This shift within the loan portfolio towards higher yielding commercial loans was a key factor contributing to the 12 basis point improvement in the total loan portfolio yield to 8.23%. The yield on total investment securities decreased by three basis points to 6.46% as slower prepayment speeds have extended the duration of the portfolio which has limited repricing opportunities in the higher interest rate environment experienced in the first quarter of 2000. The Company did sell approximately $125 million of investment securities in March of 2000 and used the proceeds from the sale to paydown short- term borrowings. While this balance sheet repositioning strategy had only limited impact on the average securities balances and investment portfolio yield in the first quarter of 2000, it helped reduce the Company's exposure to rising short-term interest rates in the future. 23 The Company's total interest expense for the first quarter of 2000 increased by $2.0 million or 8.4% when compared to the same 1999 quarter. This higher interest expense was due primarily to a 26 basis point increase in the cost of funds to 4.96% which caused interest expense to rise by $1.5 million. Interest rates, particularly short rates such as fed funds and 90 day libor, were 125 basis points higher in the first quarter of 2000 as compared to the first quarter of 1999. These higher interest rates contributed to a 35 basis point increase in the cost of borrowings to 5.88% and a 17 basis point increase in the cost of deposits to 4.07%. The remainder of the increase in interest expense was due to a $39 million increase in average interest bearing liabilities which was used to fund the earning asset growth. The growth in interest bearing liabilities included an $18 million increase in interest bearing deposits and a $21 million increase in borrowed funds. The Company expects to continue to experience net interest margin pressure in 2000 due to anticipated further interest rate increases which will negatively impact the cost of funds. It is recognized that interest rate risk does exist from the Company's use of borrowed funds to leverage the balance sheet. To neutralize a portion of this risk, the Company has executed a total of $390 million of off-balance sheet hedging transactions which help fix the variable funding costs associated with the use of short-term borrowings to fund earning assets. (See further discussion under Note 12.) Additionally, the maximum amount of leveraging the Company can perform is controlled by internal policy requirements to maintain a minimum asset leverage ratio of no less than 6.0% (see further discussion under Capital Resources) and to limit net interest income variability to ?7.5% and net income variability to ?15% over a twelve month period. (See further discussion under Interest Rate Sensitivity). The Company also has asset liability policy parameters which limit the maximum amount of total short-term borrowings and FHLB advances to 40% of total assets. At March 31, 2000, the Company was in compliance with each of these internal policy requirements. The table that follows provides an analysis of net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis setting forth (i) average assets, liabilities, and stockholders' equity, (ii) interest income earned on interest earning assets and interest expense paid on interest bearing liabilities, (iii) average yields earned on interest earning assets and average rates paid on interest bearing liabilities, (iv) USBANCORP's interest rate spread (the difference between the average yield earned on interest earning assets and the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities), and (v) USBANCORP's net interest margin (net interest income as a percentage of average total interest earning assets). For purposes of this table, loan balances include non-accrual loans and interest income on loans includes loan fees or amortization of such fees which have been deferred, as well as, interest recorded on non-accrual loans as cash is received. Additionally, a tax rate of approximately 35% is used to compute tax equivalent yields. 24 Three Months Ended March 31 (In thousands, except percentages) 	 	 2000 	 1999 		 Interest 			 Interest 	Average	 Income/ 	Yield/	 Average	 Income/ 	Yield/ 	Balance	 Expense 	Rate 	Balance 	 Expense 	 Rate Interest earning assets: Loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income	 $ 1,084,386 	$ 22,520	 8.23%	 $ 1,066,527 	$ 21,682	 8.11% Deposits with banks	 7,066 	33	 1.83 	 3,602 	 32	 3.51 Total investment securities	 1,209,988 	 19,576	 6.46 	 1,190,933 	 19,283	 6.49 Total interest earning assets/interest income	 2,301,440 	42,129 	7.30 	2,261,062 	 40,997	 7.26 Non-interest earning assets: Cash and due from banks	 37,318 			 35,757 Premises and equipment	 18,876 			 18,126 Other assets	 72,709 			103,074 Allowance for loan losses 	 (10,420)			 (10,829) TOTAL ASSETS	 $2,419,923 			 $2,407,190 Interest bearing liabilities: Interest bearing deposits: Interest bearing demand 	$ 90,686	 $ 212 0.94% 	 $ 93,750	 $ 230 	0.99% Savings	 163,498	 686 	1.69 	170,845	 662 	1.57 Money markets	 179,651	 1,804	 4.04 	 176,350	 1,439 	3.31 Other time	 635,968	 8,136 	5.15 	 611,209	 7,785 	5.17 Total interest bearing deposits	 1,069,803	 10,838 	4.07 	 1,052,154	 10,116 	3.90 Short term borrowings: Federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings	 181,664	 2,630 	5.73 	 228,829	 2,793 	4.91 Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank 	 822,331	 11,823 	5.78 	 751,655	 10,329 	5.57 Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures	 34,500	 740 8.58 	 34,500	 740 	8.58 Long-term debt	 6,697	 82 4.92 	 8,934	 101	 4.58 Total interest bearing liabilities/interest expense 	2,114,995	 26,113 	4.96 	 2,076,072	 24,079 	4.70 Non-interest bearing liabilities: Demand deposits	 167,278	 		165,010 Other liabilities	 24,187 			25,114 Stockholders' equity	 113,463			 140,994 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 	$2,419,923 			$2,407,190 Interest rate spread		 	2.34 			 2.57 Net interest income/ net interest margin 		16,016 	2.75% 		 16,918 	2.95% Tax-equivalent adjustment		 (657)	 		 (773) Net Interest Income		 $15,359 			 $16,145 25 ..PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES..... The Company's provision for loan losses for the first quarter of 2000 totaled $249,000 or 0.09% of average total loans. This provision level exceeded net-charge-offs for the quarter which amounted to $153,000 or 0.06% of average loans. Both the provision and net charge-offs in the first quarter of 2000 were lower than the prior year first quarter. The Company applies a consistent methodology and procedural discipline to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses at each subsidiary bank on a quarterly basis. (See further discussion in Note 9 and the Allowance for Loan Losses section of the MD&A.) At March 31, 2000, the allowance for loan losses totaled $10.4 million or 0.95% of total loans and 83% of total non-performing assets. The Company expects its provision level to at a minimum match and more likely exceed net-charge-offs through the remainder of 2000. This is due to the inherent risk in the loan portfolio resulting from increased holdings of commercial and commercial real estate loans. .....NON-INTEREST INCOME..... Non-interest income for the first quarter of 2000 totaled $3.9 million which represented a $2.3 million or 37% decrease when compared to the first quarter of 1999. This decrease was primarily due to the following items: an $889,000 loss realized on the sale of $125 million of investment securities in the first quarter of 2000. The Company used the proceeds from the sale to paydown short-term borrowings and delever its balance sheet. This balance sheet repositioning strategy helped reduce the Company's exposure to rising short-term interest rates. When compared to the $296,000 gain realized in the first quarter of 1999, this represents a net unfavorable change of $1.2 million. a $1 million decrease in gains realized on loans held for sale as a significant drop in mortgage refinancing activity has reduced both the volume and spread on loan sales into the secondary market in the first quarter of 2000. a $96,000 or 7.8% increase in trust fees to $1.3 million in the first quarter of 2000. This trust fee growth reflects increased assets under management due to the profitable expansion of the Company's trust operations. .....NON-INTEREST EXPENSE..... Non-interest expense for the first quarter of 2000 totaled $17.0 million which represented a $1.9 million or 12.5% increase when compared to the same 1999 quarter. This increase was primarily due to the following items: a $691,000 increase in other expense due entirely to a $735,000 write-down of an other real estate owned property held at Three Rivers Bank. The write-down of this non- performing commercial asset was needed to better reflect its anticipated net realizable value. the recognition of $593,000 in costs related to the spin-off of Three Rivers Bank. These costs related to severance and personnel matters, certain investor relations costs, and system and facility changes. The remaining costs associated with the spin-off should approximate $1.8 million pre-tax and will be expensed in the second quarter of 2000 in conjunction with the April 1st distribution date of the Three Rivers Bancorp stock to USBANCORP shareholders. 26 a $201,000 or 2.5% increase in salaries and employee benefits. Approximately $100,000 of this increase related to severance costs associated with a downsizing in the Company's mortgage banking subsidiary due to reduced loan production volumes. The remainder of the increase was caused by increased incentive compensation and higher medical insurance premiums. a $165,000 increase in professional fees due to higher legal fees and other professional fees. .....INCOME TAX EXPENSE..... The Company's recognized a net credit for income taxes of $597,000 in the first quarter of 2000. During the first quarter of 2000, the Internal Revenue Service completed its examination of the Company's tax returns through the 1997 tax year. As a result of the successful conclusion of this examination, the Company was able to reduce its first quarter income tax expense by $925,000 due to the reversal of a valuation allowance and accrued income taxes. Excluding this item, the Company's first quarter tax provision amounted to $328,000 or an effective rate of 16.3%. This represented a decline from the $1.8 million provision or 26.5% effective tax rate recognized in the first quarter of 1999 due to a reduced level of pre-tax income and a comparable level of tax-free income. Net deferred income taxes of $13.6 million have been provided as of March 31, 2000, on the differences between taxable income for financial and tax reporting purposes. .....NET OVERHEAD BURDEN..... The Company's efficiency ratio (non- interest expense divided by total revenue) increased significantly to 85.3% in the first quarter of 2000 due to the previously discussed unusually high non-interest expenses and reduced level of non-interest income. The Company estimates that on a core basis the efficiency ratio averaged approximately 74.8% which compared unfavorably to the 65.4% efficiency ratio reported in the first quarter of 1999. Factors contributing to the higher efficiency ratio included lower net interest income and reduced revenue from the mortgage banking operation. The amortization of intangible assets also creates a $3.1 million annual non-cash charge that negatively impacts the efficiency ratio. The efficiency ratio for the first quarter of 2000, stated on a cash basis excluding the intangible amortization, was 81.4% or approximately 4.0% lower than the reported efficiency ratio of 85.3%. .....BALANCE SHEET..... The Company's total consolidated assets were $2.337 billion at March 31, 2000, compared with $2.467 billion at December 31, 1999, which represents a decrease of $130 million or 5.3% due to deleveraging of the balance sheet. As previously mentioned, the Company sold $125 million of investment securities and used the proceeds to paydown short term borrowings. Total loans and loans held for sale increased by approximately $4 million due to continued growth in commercial loans which more than offset lower balances of residential mortgage and consumer loans. Cash balances dropped by $12 million as the Company maintained higher cash balances at December 31, 1999, in anticipation of potential deposit outflows due to Year 2000. No material deposit outflows materialized. Total deposits increased by $6.3 million since December 31, 1999, due to higher demand deposit account balances. The Company is actively trying to grow deposit balances to enhance liquidity and reduce its dependence on borrowings in 2000. Total borrowed funds decreased by $133 million since December 31, 1999, as the Company used the proceeds from security sales to paydown short-term borrowings with the Federal Home Loan Bank. Total equity was up 27 slightly from year-end due to growth in retained earnings. The negative balance in accumulated other comprehensive income resulting from the mark-to-market of the available for sale securities portfolio increased modestly from December 31,1999, and reduced total equity by $35.3 million at March 31, 2000. .....LOAN QUALITY.....The following table sets forth information concerning USBANCORP's loan delinquency and other non-performing assets (in thousands, except percentages): 	 March 31 December 31 	 March 31 2000 	 1999 	 1999 Total loan delinquency (past due 30 to 89 days)	 $ 10,928 	 $9,931 	$ 13,419 Total non-accrual loans	 6,114 	4,928 	5,840 Total non-performing assets*	 12,602 	13,359 	 7,966 Loan delinquency, as a percentage of total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income 	0.99% 	0.91% 	1.24% Non-accrual loans, as a percentage of total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income 	0.56 	0.45	 0.54 Non-performing assets, as a percentage of total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, and other real estate owned	 1.14 	1.21 	0.74 *Non-performing assets are comprised of (i) loans that are on a non-accrual basis, (ii) loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest and principal payments some of which are insured for credit loss, and (iii) other real estate owned. All loans, except for loans that are insured for credit loss, are placed on non-accrual status upon becoming 90 days past due in either principal or interest. Between December 31, 1999, and March 31, 2000, total loan delinquency increased by $1.0 million but the delinquency ratio remained below 1.0% of total loans. Total non-performing assets decreased by $757,000 since year-end 1999 due primarily to the previously discussed write-down of an other real estate owned property at Three Rivers Bank. The balance of this non-performing asset totaled $5.3 million at March 31, 2000. At all dates presented, the Company had no troubled debt restructurings which involve forgiving a portion of interest or principal on any loans or making loans at a rate materially less than that of market rates. .....ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES.....The following table sets forth changes in the allowance for loan losses and certain ratios for the periods ended (in thousands, except percentages): 	 March 31 December 31 March 31 	 2000 1999 1999 Allowance for loan losses	 $ 10,446 	$ 10,350 	$ 10,760 Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of each of the following: total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income 	0.95% 	0.94% 	0.99% total delinquent loans (past due 30 to 89 days) 	95.59 	 104.22 	 80.18 total non-accrual loans	 170.85 	210.02 	184.25 total non-performing assets	 82.89 	77.48 	135.07 28 Since December 31, 1999, the balance in the allowance for loan losses has increased by $96,000 due to the loan loss provision exceeding net charge-offs in the first quarter of 2000. The Company's allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2000, was 83% of non-performing assets and 171% of non-accrual loans. .....INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY..... Asset/liability management involves managing the risks associated with changing interest rates and the resulting impact on the Company's net interest income, net income and capital. The management and measurement of interest rate risk at USBANCORP is performed by using the following tools: 1) simulation modeling which analyzes the impact of interest rate changes on net interest income, net income and capital levels over specific future time periods. The simulation modeling forecasts earnings under a variety of scenarios that incorporate changes in the absolute level of interest rates, the shape of the yield curve, prepayments and changes in the volumes and rates of various loan and deposit categories. The simulation modeling also incorporates all off balance sheet hedging activity as well as assumptions about reinvestment and the repricing characteristics of certain assets and liabilities without stated contractual maturities; 2)static "GAP" analysis which analyzes the extent to which interest rate sensitive assets and interest rate sensitive liabilities are matched at specific points in time; and 3) market value of portfolio equity sensitivity analysis. The overall interest rate risk position and strategies are reviewed by senior management and Company's Board of Directors on an ongoing basis. The following table presents a summary of the Company's static GAP positions (in thousands, except for the GAP ratios): 		 March 31 December 31 March 31 2000 1999 	 	 1999 Six month cumulative GAP RSA........................	$ 551,256 	$ 574,913 	$ 654,486 RSL....................... (1,103,216) 	 (1,178,167) (910,144) Off-balance sheet 		 hedges...............	 270,000 	 270,000 - GAP.......................	 $ (281,960) 	$ (333,254) 	$ (255,658) GAP ratio..............	 0.66X 	 0.63X 0.72X GAP as a % of total 		 assets................	 (12.06)%	 (13.51)%	 (10.58)% One year cumulative GAP RSA...................... 	$ 769,595 	$ 788,634 	 $ 899,896 RSL......................	 (1,457,453) 	 (1,474,606) (1,076,088) 			Off-balance sheet hedges.............. 	 270,000 	 140,000 	 - GAP......................	 $ (417,858) 	$ (545,972) 	$ (176,192) GAP ratio.............. 	 0.65X 0.59X 0.84X GAP as a % of total assets............... 	(17.88)% 	 (22.13)%	 (7.29)% When March 31, 2000, is compared to December 31, 1999, both the Company's six month and one year cumulative GAP ratios became less negative due primarily to the deleverage strategy executed in the first 29 quarter which resulted in the paydown of $130 million of short-term borrowings. The securities sold in the first quarter had durations approximating 5 years. Management places primary emphasis on simulation modeling to manage and measure interest rate risk. The Company's asset liability management policy seeks to limit net interest income variability over the first twelve months of the forecast period to plus or minus 7.5% and net income variability to plus or minus 15.0% based upon varied economic rate forecasts which include interest rate movements of up to 200 basis points and alterations of the shape of the yield curve. Additionally, the Company also uses market value sensitivity measures to further evaluate the balance sheet exposure to changes in interest rates. Market value of portfolio equity sensitivity analysis captures the dynamic aspects of long-term interest rate risk across all time periods by incorporating the net present value of expected cash flows from the Company's assets and liabilities. The Company monitors the trends in market value of portfolio equity sensitivity analysis on a quarterly basis. The following table presents an analysis of the sensitivity inherent in the Company's net interest income, net income and market value of portfolio equity. The interest rate scenarios in the table compare the Company's base forecast or most likely rate scenario at March 31, 2000, to scenarios which reflect ramped increases and decreases in interest rates of 200 basis points along with performance in a stagnant rate scenario with interest rates held flat at the March 31, 2000, levels. The Company's most likely rate scenario is based upon published economic consensus estimates. Each rate scenario contains unique prepayment and repricing assumptions which are applied to the Company's expected balance sheet composition which was developed under the most likely interest rate scenario. Variability of 		Change In 	Interest Rate	 Net Interest 	Variability of	 Market Value of 	Scenario	 Income	 Net Income	 Portfolio Equity 	Base	 0%	 0%	 0% 	Flat	 2.0 	 6.2 	 10.5 	200bp increase	 (3.5) 	(11.1) 	(35.5) 	200bp decrease	 1.6 	8.7 	67.0 As indicated in the table, the maximum negative variability of USBANCORP's net interest income and net income over the next twelve month period was (3.5%) and (11.1%) respectively, under an upward rate shock forecast reflecting a 200 basis point increase in interest rates. The variability of market value of portfolio equity was (35.5%) under this interest rate scenario. The off-balance sheet borrowed funds hedge transactions also helped reduce the variability of forecasted net interest income, net income, and market value of portfolio equity in a rising interest rate environment. Finally, this sensitivity analysis is limited by the fact that it does not include all balance sheet repositioning actions the Company may take should severe movements in interest rates occur such as lengthening or shortening the duration of the securities portfolio or entering into additional off-balance sheet hedging transactions. These actions would likely reduce the variability of each of the factors identified in the above table but the cost associated with the repositioning would most likely negatively impact net income. .....LIQUIDITY...... Liquidity can be analyzed by utilizing the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Cash equivalents decreased by $12.5 million from December 31, 1999, to March 31, 2000, due primarily 30 to $130 million of net cash used by financing activities. This more than offset $14.2 million of net cash provided by operating activities and $104 million of net cash provided by investing activities. Within investing activities, cash proceeds from investment security maturities and sales exceeded purchases of new investment securities by $120 million. Cash advanced for new loan fundings and purchases totaled $82 million and was approximately $13 million greater than the cash received from loan principal payments. Within financing activities, deposits increased by $6.3 million while net short-term borrowings and Federal Home Loan Bank advances were paid down by $133 million. The Company used $2.0 million of cash to pay common dividends to shareholders and $729,000 of cash to service the dividend on the guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures. .....CAPITAL RESOURCES..... As presented in Note 15, each of the Company's regulatory capital ratios increased between December 31, 1999, and March 31, 2000, due to an increase in tangible equity and a decline in total assets. The Company targets an operating range of 6.0% to 6.50% for the asset leverage ratio because management and the Board of Directors believes that this level provides an optimal balance between regulatory capital requirements and shareholder value needs. Note that the impact of other comprehensive income(loss) is excluded from the regulatory capital ratios. Strategies the Company uses to manage its capital ratios include common dividend payments, treasury stock repurchases, and earning asset growth. Additionally, the Company will generate approximately $2.8 million of tangible capital in 2000 due to the amortization of intangible assets. Post spin-off, USBANCORP will first focus on providing a high common dividend as a key means to enhance shareholder value. Over the next six months, the Company does not envision resuming the treasury stock repurchase program and will continue to shrink the size of the balance sheet. The Company exceeds all regulatory capital ratios for each of the periods presented. Furthermore, each of the Company's subsidiary banks are considered "well capitalized" under all applicable FDIC regulations. It is the Company's intent to maintain the FDIC "well capitalized" classification for each of its subsidiaries to ensure the lowest deposit insurance premium. The Company's declared Common Stock cash dividend per share was $0.15 for the first quarter of 2000 which was a 7.1% increase over the $0.14 per share dividend for the same 1999 period. Post spin-off, USBANCORP anticipates paying a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. On an annualized basis assuming a $5.25 market price, this equates to a 6.9% dividend yield. The Company's Board of Directors believes that a better than peer common dividend is a key component of total shareholder return particularly for retail shareholders. .....TAX-FREE SPIN-OFF.... As discussed in Note 17, The Company successfully spun-off its Three Rivers Bank and Trust subsidiary on April 1, 2000. Upon completion of the spin-off, the resulting companies have the following corporate profiles based upon financial data as of March 31, 2000. The financial data assumes that one share of Three Rivers Bancorp was issued for every two shares of USBANCORP common stock outstanding. 31 Pro Forma Financial Information As of March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) USBANCORP 		Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc Total Assets	 			$1.3 billion		 	$1.0 billion Total Loans	 			$ 623 million	 		$ 476 million Total Investments		 	$ 601 million 			$ 465 million Total Deposits			 $ 667 million 			$ 570 million Total Equity 				$ 68.0 million		 	$ 45.2 million Allowance for Loan Losses 	$ 5.4 million	 		$ 5.0 million Non-performing Assets	 	$ 3.9 million 			$ 8.7 million Total Intangibles	 	 $ 22.1 million	 		$ 2.7 million Corporate Headquarters		 Johnstown			 Monroeville 1st Quarter 2000 Net Income	 $ 1,161,000			 $ 1,450,000 1st Quarter 2000 EPS		 $ 0.09	 			$ 0.22 1st Quarter Return on Equity	 6.89%				 12.75% Shares Outstanding			 13,329,000		 	6,665,000 Book Value per Share		 $ 5.10		 		$ 6.78 .....FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT..... This Form 10-Q contains various forward-looking statements and includes assumptions concerning the Company's beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations estimates, intentions, operations, future results, and prospects, including statements that include the words "may," "could," "should," "would," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "intend," "plan" or similar expressions. These forward- looking statements are based upon current expectations and are subject to risk and uncertainties. In connection with the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company provides the following cautionary statement identifying important factors (some of which are beyond the Company's control) which could cause the actual results or events to differ materially from those set forth in or implied by the forward- looking statements and related assumptions. 32 Such factors include the following: (i) risk resulting from the Distribution and the operation of Three Rivers Bank as a separate independent company, (ii) the effect of changing regional and national economic conditions; (iii) the effects of trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; (iv) significant changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds; (v) inflation, stock and bond market, and monetary fluctuations; (vi) credit risks of commercial, real estate, consumer, and other lending activities; (vii) changes in federal and state banking and financial services laws and regulations; (viii) the presence in the Company's market area of competitors with greater financial resources than the Company; (ix) the timely development of competitive new products and services by the Company and the acceptance of those products and services by customers and regulators (when required); (x) the willingness of customers to substitute competitors' products and services for those of the Company and vice versa; (xi) changes in consumer spending and savings habits; (xii) unanticipated regulatory or judicial proceedings; and (xiii) other external developments which could materially impact the Company's operational and financial performance. The foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive, and neither such list nor any forward-looking statement takes into account the impact that any future acquisition may have on the Company and on any such forward-looking statement. 33 SERVICE AREA MAP This page contains a service area map showing the Company's six county area. 34 Part II Other Information Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K (a) Exhibits 3.1	Articles of Incorporation, as amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit III to Registration Statement No. 2-79639 on Form S-14, Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3 to Registration Statement No. 33-685 on Form S-2, Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement No. 33-56604 on Form S-3, and Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994). 3.2	Bylaws, as amended and restated (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994). 10.1 Corporate separation and reorganization agreement among USBANCORP, Inc., Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc. and Three Rivers Bank and Trust Company, dated as of March 31, 2000, incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10 of Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc. 10.2 Tax separation agreement between USBANCORP, INc. and Three Rivers BAncorp, Inc., dated as of April 1, 2000, incoprorated herein by reference to exhibit 2.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of USBANCORP, Inc. filed on April 14, 2000. 15.1	Letter re: unaudited interim financial information 27.1	Financial Data Schedule (b) Reports on Form 8-K: There were no reports filed on Form 8-K for the period presented. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. 					USBANCORP, Inc. 					Registrant Date: May 12, 2000 				/s/Orlando B. Hanselman 					Orlando B. Hanselman 					 President and 					Chief Executive Officer Date: May 12, 2000 				/s/Jeffrey A. Stopko 					Jeffrey A. Stopko 					Senior Vice President and 					Chief Financial Officer 35 STATEMENT OF MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY April 12, 2000 To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of USBANCORP, Inc. Management of USBANCORP, Inc. and its subsidiaries have prepared the consolidated financial statements and other information in the Form 10-Q in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and are responsible for its accuracy. In meeting its responsibilities, management relies on internal accounting and related control systems, which include selection and training of qualified personnel, establishment and communication of accounting and administrative policies and procedures, appropriate segregation of responsibilities, and programs of internal audit. These systems are designed to provide reasonable assurance that financial records are reliable for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets, and that assets are safeguarded against unauthorized use or disposition. Such assurance cannot be absolute because of inherent limitations in any internal control system. Management also recognizes its responsibility to foster a climate in which Company affairs are conducted with the highest ethical standards. The Company's Code of Conduct, furnished to each employee and director, addresses the importance of open internal communications, potential conflicts of interest, compliance with applicable laws, including those related to financial disclosure, the confidentiality of propriety information, and other items. There is an ongoing program to assess compliance with these policies. The Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors consists solely of outside directors. The Audit Committee meets periodically with management and the independent accountants to discuss audit, financial reporting, and related matters. Arthur Andersen LLP and the Company's internal auditors have direct access to the Audit Committee. /s/Terry K. Dunkle		 			/s/Jeffrey A. Stopko Terry K. Dunkle						 Jeffrey A. Stopko Chairman, President &					 Senior Vice President & Chief Executive Officer					 Chief Financial Officer 36 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of USBANCORP, Inc. : We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of USBANCORP, Inc. (a Pennsylvania corporation) and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the three-month periods then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the consolidated balance sheet of USBANCORP, Inc. as of December 31, 1999, and, in our report dated January 23, 1998, except for the matter discussed in Note 23, as to which the date is January 30, 1998, we expressed an unqualified opinion on that statement. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1997, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the balance sheet from which it has been derived. /s/Arthur Andersen LLP ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, April 14, 2000 April 14, 2000 To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of USBANCORP, INC.: We are aware that USBANCORP, Inc. has incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Registration No. 33-56604); Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-53935); Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-55845); Form S-8 (Registration No. 33- 55207); and Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-55211) its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998, which includes our report dated April 16, 1998, covering the unaudited interim financial statement information contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), that report is not considered a part of the registration statements prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. Very truly yours, /s/Arthur Andersen LLP ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP