UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-QSB
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
For the transition period from _________to _________
Commission file number 0-14578
HCW PENSION REAL ESTATE FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts 04-2825863
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
55 Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089
Greenville, South Carolina 29602
(Address of principal executive offices)
(864) 239-1000
(Issuer's telephone number)
Check whether the issuer (i) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No ___
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
HCW PENSION REAL ESTATE FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BALANCE SHEET
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except unit data)
June 30, 2005
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 431
Receivables and deposits 122
Other assets 121
Investment property:
Land $ 621
Buildings and related personal property 10,198
10,819
Less accumulated depreciation (7,583) 3,236
$ 3,910
Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
Accounts payable $ 4
Tenant security deposit liabilities 117
Accrued property taxes 373
Other liabilities 112
Mortgage note payable 4,860
Partners' Deficit
General partner $ (166)
Limited partners (15,693 units issued and
outstanding) (1,390) (1,556)
$ 3,910
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
HCW PENSION REAL ESTATE FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per unit data)
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2005 2004 2005 2004
Revenues:
Rental income $ 506 $ 482 $ 1,085 $ 1,059
Other income 46 39 71 59
Total revenues 552 521 1,156 1,118
Expenses:
Operating 173 169 307 292
General and administrative 44 50 85 106
Depreciation 113 121 227 245
Property taxes 62 64 125 130
Interest 99 103 200 206
Total expenses 491 507 944 979
Net income $ 61 $ 14 $ 212 $ 139
Net income allocated to
general partner (2%) $ 1 $ 1 $ 4 $ 3
Net income allocated to
limited partners (98%) 60 13 208 136
$ 61 $ 14 $ 212 $ 139
Net income per limited
partnership unit $ 3.82 $ 0.82 $ 13.25 $ 8.66
Distributions per limited
partnership unit $ 7.78 $ 8.73 $ 18.42 $ 17.14
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
HCW PENSION REAL ESTATE FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except unit data)
Limited
Partnership General Limited
Units Partner Partners Total
Original capital contributions 15,698 $ -- $15,698 $15,698
Partners' deficit at
December 31, 2004 15,693 $ (164) $(1,309) $(1,473)
Distributions paid to partners -- (6) (289) (295)
Net income for the six months
ended June 30, 2005 -- 4 208 212
Partners' deficit at
June 30, 2005 15,693 $ (166) $(1,390) $(1,556)
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
HCW PENSION REAL ESTATE FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2005 2004
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 212 $ 139
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation 227 245
Amortization of loan costs 2 2
Change in accounts:
Receivables and deposits (11) (1)
Other assets (2) (20)
Accounts payable 4 21
Tenant security deposit liabilities 5 (10)
Accrued property taxes 125 128
Other liabilities (107) (75)
Net cash provided by operating activities 455 429
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Property improvements and replacements (31) (34)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Distributions to partners (295) (275)
Payments on mortgage note payable (80) (73)
Net cash used in financing activities (375) (348)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 49 47
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 382 302
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 431 $ 349
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest $ 198 $ 204
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
HCW PENSION REAL ESTATE FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note A - Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited financial statements of HCW Pension Real Estate Fund
Limited Partnership (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and Item 310(b) of
Regulation S-B. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. The General Partner of the Partnership is HCW General
Partner Ltd., whose sole general partner is IH, Inc. (the "Managing General
Partner"). In the opinion of the Managing General Partner, all adjustments
(consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair
presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2005, are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005. For further
information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in
the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004. The General Partner and Managing General Partner are both
affiliates of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly
traded real estate investment trust.
Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties
The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Managing General Partner and
its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership
activities. The Partnership Agreement provides for (i) certain payments to
affiliates for services and (ii) reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by
affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.
Affiliates of the Managing General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from the
Partnership's sole property as compensation for providing property management
services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $58,000 and
$57,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, which is included in
operating expenses.
An affiliate of the Managing General Partner received reimbursement of asset
management fees amounting to approximately $32,000 and $50,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, which is included in general
and administrative expenses. The asset management fees are calculated based on a
percentage of tangible asset value of the Partnership as defined in the
Partnership Agreement. The percentage as stipulated in the Partnership Agreement
is 0.50% for 2005 and was 0.75% for 2004.
Affiliates of the Managing General Partner charged the Partnership reimbursement
of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $32,000 and
$34,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, which is
included in general and administrative expenses.
The Partnership insures its property up to certain limits through coverage
provided by AIMCO which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and
liabilities related to workers compensation, property casualty, general
liability and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its property above the
AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers
unaffiliated with the Managing General Partner. During the six months ended June
30, 2005 and 2004, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates
approximately $22,000 and $21,000 for insurance coverage and fees associated
with policy claims administration.
Note C - Contingencies
As previously disclosed, AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company, both
affiliates of the Managing General Partner, are defendants in a lawsuit alleging
that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") by failing to
pay maintenance workers overtime for all hours worked in excess of forty per
week. The complaint attempts to bring a collective action under the FLSA and
seeks to certify state subclasses in California, Maryland, and the District of
Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. and
NHP Management Company failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that
they were required to be "on-call." Additionally, the complaint alleges AIMCO
Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to comply with the FLSA in
compensating maintenance workers for time that they worked in excess of 40 hours
in a week. On June 23, 2005 the Court conditionally certified the collective
action on both the on-call and overtime issues. The Court ruling allows
plaintiffs to provide notice of the collective action to all non-exempt
maintenance workers from August 7, 2000 through the present. Those employees
will have the opportunity to opt-in to the collective action. Defendants have
asked the Court to reconsider its ruling or in the alternative certify the
ruling for appeal on that issue. After the notice goes out, defendants will have
the opportunity to move to decertify the collective action. The Court further
denied plaintiffs' Motion for Certification of the state subclass. Although the
outcome of any litigation is uncertain, AIMCO Properties, L.P. does not believe
that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on its
consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Similarly, the
Managing General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a
material adverse effect on the Partnership's financial condition or results of
operations.
The Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding litigation
matters involving it or its investment property that are not of a routine nature
arising in the ordinary course of business.
Environmental
Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to
liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain
hazardous substances present on a property. Such laws often impose liability
without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for,
the release or presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the
failure to manage or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect
occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance
affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and
remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or
penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of
hazardous substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs
for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also
impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous
substances through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who
arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is potentially
liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the
person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility.
In connection with the ownership, operation and management of its property, the
Partnership could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs
associated with its property.
Mold
The Partnership is aware of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily
properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the
presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments
or settlements. The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property
damage loss claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury
claims related to mold exposure. Affiliates of the Managing General Partner have
implemented a national policy and procedures to prevent or eliminate mold from
its properties and the Managing General Partner believes that these measures
will minimize the effects that mold could have on residents. To date, the
Partnership has not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to
claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions. Because the law regarding
mold is unsettled and subject to change the Managing General Partner can make no
assurance that liabilities resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold
will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's financial condition
or results of operations.
SEC Investigation
The Central Regional Office of the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "SEC") continues its formal investigation relating to certain
matters. Although the staff of the SEC is not limited in the areas that it may
investigate, AIMCO believes the areas of investigation have included AIMCO's
miscalculated monthly net rental income figures in third quarter 2003,
forecasted guidance, accounts payable, rent concessions, vendor rebates,
capitalization of payroll and certain other costs, tax credit transactions, and
tender offers for limited partnership interests. AIMCO is cooperating fully.
AIMCO is not able to predict when the investigation will be resolved. AIMCO does
not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on its
consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Similarly, the
Managing General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a
material adverse effect on the Partnership's financial condition or results of
operations.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION
The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a
variety of risks and factors including, without limitation: national and local
economic conditions; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the
Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment
in which the Registrant operates; financing risks, including the risk that cash
flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal
and interest; real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and
the general economic climate in local markets and competition for tenants in
such markets; litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting and
defending claims and any adverse outcomes, and possible environmental
liabilities. Readers should carefully review the Registrant's financial
statements and the notes thereto, as well as the risk factors described in the
documents the Registrant files from time to time with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
The Partnership's investment property consists of one apartment complex, Lewis
Park Apartments, located in Carbondale, Illinois. The average occupancy of the
property for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was 93% and 92%,
respectively.
The Partnership's financial results depend upon a number of factors including
the ability to attract and maintain tenants at the investment property, interest
rates on mortgage loans, costs incurred to operate the investment property,
general economic conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing business plan of
the Partnership, the Managing General Partner monitors the rental market
environment of its investment property to assess the feasibility of increasing
rents, maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and protecting the Partnership
from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the Managing General Partner
attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of inflation-related
increases in expenses by increasing rents and maintaining a high overall
occupancy level. However, the Managing General Partner may use rental
concessions and rental rate reductions to offset softening market conditions,
accordingly, there is no guarantee that the Managing General Partner will be
able to sustain such a plan. Further, a number of factors that are outside the
control of the Partnership, such as the local economic climate and weather can
adversely or positively affect the Partnership's financial results.
Results of Operations
The Partnership realized net income of approximately $212,000 for the six months
ended June 30, 2005 compared to net income of approximately $139,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2004. The Partnership realized net income of approximately
$61,000 for the three months ended June 20, 2005 compared to net income of
approximately $14,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The increase in
net income for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 is due to an
increase in total revenues and a decrease in total expenses.
Total revenues increased due to an increase in both rental and other income.
Rental income increased due to a slight increase in occupancy at Lewis Park
Apartments and an increase in the average rental rate. Other income increased
due to increases in cleaning and damage fees and administrative charges billed
to residents.
The decrease in total expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005
is due to a decrease in general and administrative and depreciation expenses
partially offset by an increase in operating expenses. Property tax and interest
expenses remained relatively constant for the comparable periods. Depreciation
expense decreased due to assets becoming fully depreciated during the past
twelve months. Operating expenses increased due to increases in salaries and
related benefits along with an increase in painting and grounds work at the
Partnership's investment property.
General and administrative expenses decreased due to a decrease in asset
management fees paid to an affiliate of the Managing General Partner as a result
of a decrease in the percentage used to calculate such fees. The asset
management fees are calculated based on a percentage of the tangible asset value
of the Partnership as defined in the Partnership Agreement. The percentage as
stipulated in the Partnership Agreement was 0.50% for 2005 and 0.75% for 2004.
In addition, costs associated with the quarterly and annual communications with
investors and regulatory agencies and the annual audit required by the
Partnership Agreement are also included in general and administrative expenses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2005, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately
$431,000 compared to approximately $349,000 at June 30, 2004. Cash and cash
equivalents increased approximately $49,000 from December 31, 2004. The increase
is due to approximately $455,000 of cash provided by operating activities which
was partially offset by approximately $375,000 and $31,000 of cash used in
financing and investing activities, respectively. Cash used in financing
activities consisted of distributions paid to the partners and, to a lesser
extent, principal payments made on the mortgage encumbering Lewis Park
Apartments. Cash used in investing activities consisted of property improvements
and replacements. The Partnership invests its working capital reserves in
interest bearing accounts.
The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future liquidity and capital
expenditure requirements is directly related to the level of capital
expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets
and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal, state,
and local legal and regulatory requirements. The Managing General Partner
monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance. For
example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests additional
compliance measures with regard to governance, disclosure, audit and other
areas. In light of these changes, the Partnership expects that it will incur
higher expenses related to compliance. Capital improvements planned for the
Partnership's property are detailed below.
During the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Partnership completed
approximately $31,000 of capital improvements at Lewis Park Apartments,
consisting primarily of stairwell, appliance, window and floor covering
replacements. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow. The
Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property.
While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and
replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2005.
Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property
as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.
The capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from
operations or from Partnership reserves. To the extent that such capital
improvements are completed, the Partnership's distributable cash flow, if any,
may be adversely affected at least in the short term.
The Partnership's assets are thought to be sufficient for any short-term needs
(exclusive of capital improvements) of the Partnership. The mortgage
indebtedness encumbering Lewis Park Apartments of approximately $4,860,000 is
amortized over 20 years with a maturity date of September 1, 2020, at which time
the loan is scheduled to be fully amortized.
The Partnership distributed the following amounts during the six months ended
June 30, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands, except per unit data):
Six Months Per Limited Six Months Per Limited
Ended Partnership Ended Partnership
June 30, 2005 Unit June 30, 2004 Unit
Operations $ 295 $18.42 $ 275 $17.14
Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated from
operations, the timing of debt maturity, property sale and/or refinancing. The
Partnership's cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis.
There can be no assurance that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds
from operations, after capital improvement expenditures, to permit additional
distributions to its partners during 2005 or subsequent periods.
Other
In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interest in the
Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 5,618 limited partnership units (the
"Units") in the Partnership representing 35.80% of the outstanding units as of
June 30, 2005. A number of these units were acquired pursuant to tender offers
made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates
will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and
units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either
through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership
Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take
action with respect to a variety of matters that are included, but not limited
to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to
remove the Managing General Partner. Although the Managing General Partner owes
fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Managing
General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As
a result, the duties of the Managing General Partner, as managing general
partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with
the duties of the Managing General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States, which require the Partnership to make
estimates and assumptions. The Partnership believes that of its significant
accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and
complexity.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Partnership's investment property is recorded at cost, less accumulated
depreciation, unless considered impaired. If events or circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of the property may be impaired, the Partnership will
make an assessment of its recoverability by estimating the undiscounted future
cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property. If the carrying amount
exceeds the aggregate future cash flows, the Partnership would recognize an
impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.
Real property investments are subject to varying degrees of risk. Several
factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of the
Partnership's investment property. These factors include, but are not limited
to, changes in the national, regional and local economic climate; local
conditions, such as an oversupply of multifamily properties; competition from
other available multifamily property owners and changes in market rental rates.
Any adverse changes in these factors could cause an impairment of the
Partnership's asset.
Revenue Recognition
The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or
in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area.
Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Partnership evaluates all
accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the
application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on
current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.
ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Partnership's management, with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has
evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership's disclosure controls and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end
of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal
executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the
end of such period, the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures are
effective.
(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes
in the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership's internal control
over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
As previously disclosed, AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company, both
affiliates of the Managing General Partner, are defendants in a lawsuit alleging
that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") by failing to
pay maintenance workers overtime for all hours worked in excess of forty per
week. The complaint attempts to bring a collective action under the FLSA and
seeks to certify state subclasses in California, Maryland, and the District of
Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. and
NHP Management Company failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that
they were required to be "on-call." Additionally, the complaint alleges AIMCO
Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to comply with the FLSA in
compensating maintenance workers for time that they worked in excess of 40 hours
in a week. On June 23, 2005 the Court conditionally certified the collective
action on both the on-call and overtime issues. The Court ruling allows
plaintiffs to provide notice of the collective action to all non-exempt
maintenance workers from August 7, 2000 through the present. Those employees
will have the opportunity to opt-in to the collective action. Defendants have
asked the Court to reconsider its ruling or in the alternative certify the
ruling for appeal on that issue. After the notice goes out, defendants will have
the opportunity to move to decertify the collective action. The Court further
denied plaintiffs' Motion for Certification of the state subclass. Although the
outcome of any litigation is uncertain, AIMCO Properties, L.P. does not believe
that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on its
consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Similarly, the
Managing General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a
material adverse effect on the Partnership's financial condition or results of
operations.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
See Exhibit Index.
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
HCW PENSION REAL ESTATE FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By: HCW General Partner, Ltd.,
General Partner
By: IH, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
By: /s/Martha L. Long
Martha L. Long
Senior Vice President
By: /s/Stephen B. Waters
Stephen B. Waters
Vice President
Date: August 12, 2005
HCW PENSION REAL ESTATE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
3 & 4 Limited Partnership Agreement (Incorporated by reference to
Registration Statement No. 2-91006 on Form S-11 filed by
Registrant).
10.4 Multifamily Note dated August 28, 2000, by and between the
Partnership and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation, a
California Corporation incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4 to the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the period ended September 30, 2000.
31.1 Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification of the equivalent of the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Martha L. Long, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of HCW Pension Real
Estate Fund Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small
business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and
5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 12, 2005
/s/Martha L. Long
Martha L. Long
Senior Vice President of IH, Inc.,
equivalent of the chief executive officer
of the Partnership
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of HCW Pension Real
Estate Fund Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small
business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and
5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 12, 2005
/s/Stephen B. Waters
Stephen B. Waters
Vice President of IH, Inc., equivalent of
the chief financial officer of the
Partnership
Exhibit 32.1
Certification of CEO and CFO
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of HCW Pension Real
Estate Fund Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the Chief
Executive Officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent
of the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Partnership.
/s/Martha L. Long
Name: Martha L. Long
Date: August 12, 2005
/s/Stephen B. Waters
Name: Stephen B. Waters
Date: August 12, 2005
This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.