EXHIBIT 99

            CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR"
           PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT

NVE Corporation is filing this Exhibit 99 to its Quarterly Report on Form 10-
QSB to avail itself of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-
QSB, future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, press releases
and in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive
officer, the words may, will, expect, anticipate, intend, believe, estimate,
should, or continue or the negatives of these terms or other variations on
these words or comparable terminology are intended to identify "forward-looking
statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. These types of statements and the facts or events to which they relate
express risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from historical financial condition, operating results, business
prospects or any other aspect of NVE, and those presently anticipated or
projected. We caution readers that the following important factors, among
others, could affect our financial condition, operating results, business
prospects or any other aspect of NVE, and could cause our actual results to
differ materially from that projected or estimated by us in the forward-looking
statements made by us or on our behalf. Although we have attempted to list
below the important factors which do or may affect our financial condition,
operating results, business prospects or any other aspect of NVE, other factors
may in the future prove to be more important. New factors emerge from time to
time and it is not possible for us to predict all of such factors. Similarly,
we cannot necessarily assess or quantify the impact of each such factor on the
business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may
cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-
looking statements.


RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

ALTHOUGH WE HAVE BEEN PROFITABLE RECENTLY, WE HAVE A HISTORY OF OPERATING
LOSSES AND COULD SUFFER FURTHER LOSSES IN THE FUTURE.
We had an accumulated deficit of $2,699,768 as of March 31, 2004. Although we
reported positive net income in fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003, prior to fiscal
2003 we had a history of losses. Additional expenditures could lead to
operating losses in fiscal 2005 and beyond. Shifting resources from government-
funded research contracts to company-funded research may increase our research
and development expenses. We expect selling, general and administrative
expenses to increase in fiscal 2005 if we rollout MRAM manufactured under our
technology agreement with Cypress Semiconductor Corporation. Expenditures
relating to MRAM license procurement and legal expenses relating to enforcing
our MRAM intellectual property may also increase.

WE RELY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS FOR A LARGE PERCENTAGE OF OUR REVENUES AND WE
WILL LOSE REVENUE IF WE LOSE THESE CONTRACTS.
During fiscal 2004 United States government contracts accounted for
approximately 54% of our revenues. Disqualification as a vendor to the United
States government for any reason or a material decrease in government funding
research would cause serious setbacks and would likely hamper both future
research and development activity, as well as related revenues.




FAILURE TO QUALIFY AS A SMALL BUSINESS UNDER FEDERAL REGULATIONS COULD MAKE US
INELIGIBLE FOR SOME GOVERNMENT-FUNDED RESEARCH GRANTS WHICH COULD HAVE A
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OUR REVENUE AND OUR ABILITY TO MAKE RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT PROGRESS.
Federal regulations place a number of criteria for a business to be eligible to
compete for Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) awards. Those criteria
include number of employees and ownership structure. While we believe we meet
the criteria, changes in our ownership beyond our control could cause us to
lose our eligibility to compete for SBIR awards, which in turn could have a
material adverse effect on our revenues profits, and research and development
efforts.

WE MAY LOSE REVENUE IF ANY OF OUR LARGE CUSTOMERS CANCEL, POSTPONE, OR REDUCE
THEIR PURCHASES.
We rely on several large customers for a large percentage of our commercial
revenues; these include Agilent Technologies, Inc., St. Jude Medical, Inc., the
United States Government, and certain distributors. Orders from these customers
can be cancelled, postponed, or reduced without cause or notice, and the loss
of any of these customers could have a significant impact on our commercial
revenues and our profitability.

WE FACE A DIFFICULT AND UNCERTAIN ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT IN OUR INDUSTRY WHICH
COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS.
The semiconductor and electronics industries in general have experienced a
significant economic downturn during recent years, and several experts are
predicting weak demand in the coming quarters. The poor economic environment
may have adversely affected the sales of many of our customers' products, thus
limiting our sales. Economic conditions may not improve in the near term or at
all. Any failure of the economic environment to improve or a future downturn
would likely have a material adverse impact on our business and revenues.

OUR REPUTATION COULD BE DAMAGED AND WE COULD LOSE REVENUE IF WE FAIL TO MEET
TECHNICAL CHALLENGES REQUIRED TO PRODUCE MARKETABLE PRODUCTS.
Our products use new technology and we are continually researching and
developing product designs and production processes. Our production processes
require control of magnetic and other parameters that are not required in
conventional semiconductor processes. If we are unable to develop stable
designs and production processes we may not be able to produce products that
meet our customers' requirements, which could cause damage to our reputation
and loss of revenues.

WE MAY LOSE BUSINESS AND REVENUE IF OUR CRITICAL PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT FAILS.
Our production process relies on certain critical pieces of equipment for
defining, depositing, and modifying the magnetic properties of very thin metal
films. Some of this equipment was designed or customized by us, and some may no
longer be in production. While we have back-ups for some of the equipment, an
in-house maintenance staff, some critical spare parts, and maintenance
agreements for certain pieces of equipment, we cannot be sure we could repair
or replace critical manufacturing equipment were it to fail.

OUR FAILURE TO MEET STRINGENT CUSTOMER TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS COULD RESULT IN
THE LOSS OF KEY CUSTOMERS AND POTENTIAL REDUCED SALES.
Some of our customers, including Agilent and St. Jude Medical, have stringent
technical requirements which require our products to pass certain test and
qualification criteria before they are accepted by such customers. Failure to
meet those criteria could result in the loss of current sales revenue,
customers and future sales.




IF WE ARE UNABLE TO DELIVER PRODUCTS WE FACE PENALTIES, INCLUDING LOSS OF
CERTAIN EXCLUSIVE MANUFACTURING RIGHTS.
Our Agilent supply agreement allows Agilent to gain rights to manufacture
couplers based on our technology if we are unable to deliver products on time.
The imposition of this penalty could have a material impact on future sales of
our products. Furthermore, on reaching certain sales goals, Agilent could gain
exclusive rights to distribute certain couplers based on our technology, which
could reduce our product sales and leave us partially or totally dependent on
Agilent for future coupler sales.

THE LOSS OF SUPPLY FROM ANY OF OUR KEY SINGLE-SOURCE WAFER SUPPLIERS COULD
IMPACT OUR ABILITY TO PRODUCE AND DELIVER PRODUCTS AND CAUSE LOSS OF REVENUE.
Critical suppliers include our suppliers of certain semiconductor wafers which
are incorporated in our products. These critical suppliers include Advanced
Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation of Shanghai (China), AMI Semiconductor,
Inc., Intersil Corporation, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation, and
Texas Instruments Inc. We maintain inventory of some critical wafers, but we
have not identified or qualified alternate suppliers for many of the wafers now
being obtained from single sources.

THE LOSS OF SUPPLY FROM ANY OF OUR SINGLE-SOURCE PACKAGING VENDORS COULD IMPACT
OUR ABILITY TO PRODUCE AND DELIVER PRODUCTS AND CAUSE LOSS OF REVENUE.
We are dependent on our packaging vendors including Circuit Electronics
Industries (Ayutthaya, Thailand) and NS Electronics Bangkok (Thailand), Ltd.
Some of our products use processes or tooling unique to a particular packaging
vendor, and it might be expensive, time-consuming, or impractical to convert to
another vendor in the event of a supply interruption. Supply interruptions
could seriously jeopardize our ability to provide products that are critical to
our business and operations which may cause us to lose revenue.

BECAUSE WE ARE SIGNIFICANTLY SMALLER THAN THE MAJORITY OF OUR COMPETITORS, WE
MAY LACK THE FINANCIAL RESOURCES NEEDED TO INCREASE OUR MARKET SHARE AND FUTURE
REVENUE.
Our known competitors and potential competitors include Advanced Micro Devices,
Inc., Agilent Technologies, Inc., Allegro Microsystems, Inc., NEC Corporation,
Analog Devices, Inc., Fujitsu Limited, Hewlett-Packard Company, IBM
Corporation, Infineon Technologies AG, Intel Corporation, NEC Corporation,
Ramtron International Corporation, Renesas Technology Corporation, Royal
Philips Electronics, Samsung Electronics, Ltd., Sony Corporation, Texas
Instruments Inc., Vishay Intertechnology, Xicor, Inc., and others. We believe
that our competition has increased in the past year as the technology matures.
This has meant more competitors and more severe pricing pressure. Furthermore,
our competitors are narrowing or eliminating performance advantages we may have
had. We expect these trends to continue, and our future competitiveness will
depend on our ability to develop new products and reduce our product costs.
Most of our competitors and potential competitors are established companies
that have significantly greater financial, technical, and marketing resources
than us. While we believe that our products have important competitive
advantages, our competitors may succeed in developing and marketing products
that perform better or are less expensive than ours, or that would render our
products and technology obsolete or noncompetitive.

OUR LICENSE AGREEMENTS INCLUDE REVENUE MINIMUMS AND ROYALTY LIMITS WHICH COULD
LIMIT THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF REVENUE WE CAN DERIVE UNDER THESE AGREEMENTS.
Our existing license agreements do not provide for us to receive royalties
until revenue minimums are met by licensees. In addition, some of these
agreements place limits on future royalty and license payments. These
provisions could substantially delay our potential revenues and profits from
these licensing arrangements and could limit the total amount of revenue that
we can derive under these license agreements. Such limits are common practice
in our industry, but they could limit our potential MRAM revenues and profits
even if our intellectual property is widely adopted.




OUR BUSINESS MAY SUFFER BECAUSE WE HAVE LIMITED INFLUENCE OVER THE RATE OF
ADOPTION OF OUR TECHNOLOGY, AND MRAM TECHNOLOGY MAY NOT BUILD INTO A LARGE OR
SIGNIFICANT MARKET.
A significant portion of our future revenues and profits is dependent on our
licensees and manufacturing partners introducing MRAM products. Production
difficulties, technical barriers, high production costs, poor market reception
or other problems, almost all of which are outside our control, could prevent
the deployment of MRAM or limit its market potential. In addition, our
licensees and manufacturing partners may have other priorities that detract
attention and resources from introduction of MRAM products using our
technology. Furthermore, competing technologies could prevent or supplant MRAM
from becoming an important memory technology.

OUR LICENSEES MAY NOT BE ABLE TO MAKE COMMERCIALLY VIABLE MRAMS, WHICH WOULD
LIMIT OUR REVENUE FROM MRAM AND LIKELY CAUSE OUR STOCK PRICE TO DECLINE.
MRAM is a new technology, and we are almost completely dependent on our
licensees to convert our intellectual property into commercially viable MRAM.
While our licensees have made prototypes and samples, several technical and
manufacturing issues must be resolved before commercially viable devices can be
produced, and these problems may never successfully be solved. Cypress has said
it expects to sample in calendar 2004, but has missed several schedule targets
for sample devices, and further delays could have a material impact on our
revenues from MRAM. In July 2004, Motorola, Inc. transferred its semiconductor
business to a majority owned subsidiary, Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
Freescale expects to be in production with standard MRAM products in 2005, but
any delays could have a material impact on our potential MRAM license revenues.

WE ARE HIGHLY DEPENDENT ON MOTOROLA OR FREESCALE TO COMBINE OUR MRAM TECHNOLOGY
WITH CONVENTIONAL SEMICONDUCTORS AND WE MAY LOSE POTENTIAL REVENUE IF MOTOROLA
OR FREESCALE ARE UNSUCCESSFUL.
Embedded MRAM, that is, MRAM combined with conventional semiconductors, is a
major market for MRAM and our primary potential source of royalties from
Motorola. We are highly dependent on the success of Motorola's majority owned
subsidiary, Freescale, embedding MRAM into cellphone and system integrated
circuits. Technical difficulties with embedding, production difficulties, high
production costs, or other problems, almost all of which are outside our
control, could limit our potential MRAM royalties under our license agreement
with Motorola.

WE ARE HIGHLY DEPENDENT ON CYPRESS FOR POTENTIAL SUPPLY OF MRAM DEVICES USING
THEIR DESIGNS AND MAY LOSE REVENUE IF WE NEED TO REPLACE CYPRESS AS A SUPPLIER.
Although we have rights to Cypress' MRAM designs, mask works, and other
intellectual property, it could be difficult for us to fabricate devices based
on those designs and intellectual property at a foundry other than Cypress.
This is because other potential foundries might not have the needed equipment,
and Cypress' designs are tailored for their factories. If Cypress is unable to
manufacture devices for us for any reason, it could be difficult for us to find
another manufacturer for their designs.

WE MUST PACKAGE AND TEST CYPRESS MRAM WAFERS TO MAKE SALABLE PRODUCTS, AND MAY
LOSE REVENUE IF WE ARE UNABLE TO PROCURE SUCH SERVICES.
Although Cypress is obligated under our agreement to provide us MRAM wafers, it
is not obligated to provide us packaged, tested devices. We may be able to
reach an agreement with Cypress to provide packaging and testing services, or
we may be able to procure such "back-end" services from a third party. Delays
or failure to procure such services could cause us to lose or delay potential
revenues from selling MRAM devices.




ONE OR MORE OF OUR LICENSEES COULD CANCEL THEIR MRAM DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS,
WHICH WOULD REDUCE OUR FUTURE REVENUE POTENTIAL.
Freescale and Cypress could cancel their MRAM development programs at any time
because of financial or other consideration. A cancellation of Freescale's MRAM
program would eliminate our opportunity to receive royalties from the sale of
devices under our agreement with Motorola. A cancellation of Cypress' MRAM
program would likely eliminate our opportunity to sell devices based on their
designs.

OUR FUTURE BUSINESS MAY SUFFER BECAUSE WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO CONSUMMATE
ADDITIONAL MRAM LICENSE AGREEMENTS.
Although there are potential licensees for our MRAM intellectual property in
addition to our current licensees and partners, we may never be able to
consummate additional license agreements. Potential licensees for our MRAM
intellectual property might not be interested unless and until the commercial
viability of the technology is demonstrated. Potential licensees could also use
their own or a third party's MRAM intellectual property rather than ours. In
addition, our existing agreements place restrictions on future license
agreements. Specifically, one of our agreements allows one of our licensees to
approve licenses with certain other potential licensees. Each of these
limitations could hinder our ability to consummate additional MRAM license
agreements.

WE WILL NOT RECEIVE ROYALTIES IF OUR LICENSEES DO NOT USE OUR INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY.
Our license agreements do not require our licensees to use our intellectual
property. Although we believe, based on their public disclosures, that the
devices that Motorola, Inc. and Cypress Semiconductor Corporation have
demonstrated would use our intellectual property at least to some extent, our
licensees could circumvent or find alternatives to all or some of our
technology, and our license agreements require royalty payments only if our
licensees use our intellectual property in their devices. It is possible that
our licensees might make MRAM devices without using our technology or
infringing on our patents, and we would not receive royalties on such devices.

WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ENFORCE OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OR OUR
TECHNOLOGY MAY PROVE TO INFRINGE UPON PATENTS OR RIGHTS OWNED BY OTHERS WHICH
MAY PREVENT THE FUTURE SALE OF OUR PRODUCTS OR INCREASE THE COST OF SUCH SALES.
We protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property by seeking
patents, trademarks, and copyrights, and by maintaining trade secrets through
entering into confidentiality agreements with employees, suppliers, customers,
and prospective customers depending on the circumstances. We hold patents or
are the licensee of others owning patented technology covering certain aspects
of our sensor, coupler, and MRAM technology. These patent rights may be
challenged, rendered unenforceable, invalidated or circumvented. In addition,
rights granted under the patents or under licensing agreements may not provide
a competitive advantage to us. At least several potential MRAM competitors have
described designs that we believe would infringe on our patents if such designs
were to be commercialized. Efforts to legally enforce patent rights can involve
substantial expense which we may not be able to afford and in any case may not
be successful. Further, others may independently develop similar, superior, or
parallel technologies to any technology developed by us, or our technology may
prove to infringe upon patents or rights owned by others. Thus the patents held
by or licensed to us may not afford us any meaningful competitive advantage.
Also, our confidentiality agreements may not provide meaningful protection of
our proprietary information. Our inability to maintain our proprietary rights
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.




OUR FUTURE BUSINESS MAY SUFFER IF WE ARE UNABLE TO ENFORCE OUR INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY RIGHTS WITH EXISTING LICENSEES.
Our success in enforcing our intellectual property rights may be dependent on
our ability to enforce our contract rights under existing license agreements.
Our existing licensees could claim without merit that they do not use our
intellectual property or claim that one or more of our patents are invalid. In
2000 we were forced to resort to litigation to enforce our intellectual
property rights with Motorola, and we plan to continue to vigorously defend our
intellectual property rights.  Our limited capital resources could put us at a
disadvantage if we take legal action to enforce our intellectual property
rights.

WE MAY NEED TO NEGOTIATE A NEW MRAM LICENSING AGREEMENT WITH FREESCALE
SEMICONDUCTOR AND THE OUTCOME OF SUCH NEGOTIATIONS IS UNCERTAIN.
We believe that our Patent License Option Agreement with Motorola will
terminate December 31, 2005 or on the date Motorola ceases manufacturing MRAM
Products whichever is later. We believe Motorola is manufacturing MRAM products
through its majority owned subsidiary, Freescale. However, we have been
notified that Motorola intends to distribute its remaining ownership interest
in Freescale to its common stockholders. In its filings with the SEC, Freescale
Semiconductor, Inc. has said it has been advised by Motorola that Motorola
anticipates that the distribution will occur by the end of 2004. If Freescale
loses its license through Motorola from NVE through ceasing to be controlled by
Motorola, or if the Patent License Option Agreement is terminated through a
cessation of manufacturing of MRAM Products by Motorola, we would be free to
negotiate a new license agreement with Freescale. There can be no assurance,
however, that agreement will be reached with Freescale, or that any such
agreement with Freescale would be on more favorable terms to NVE than the
present agreement with Motorola, or that NVE would receive any value under the
existing Patent License Option Agreement or any value under any such further
agreement with Freescale.

MOTOROLA MAY NOT DISTRIBUTE ITS CONTROLLING INTEREST IN FREESCALE, IN WHICH
CASE OUR AGREEMENT WITH MOTOROLA WOULD CONTINUE TO APPLY TO FREESCALE AND WE
WOULD NOT HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO NEGOTIATE A MORE FAVORABLE LICENSING
AGREEMENT WITH FREESCALE.
Completion of Motorola's distribution of its remaining ownership interest in
Freescale is contingent upon a variety of conditions, and may not occur by the
contemplated time or may not occur at all. If Motorola does not distribute its
controlling interest in Freescale, our patent license option agreement with
Motorola might continue to apply to Freescale in which case we would not have
the opportunity to negotiate a more favorable license agreement with Freescale.
The limitations of our agreement with Motorola may continue to apply at least
until other termination provisions are met. Limitations of our agreement with
Motorola include revenue minimums and royalty limits which could limit our
royalties from Freescale's sales of MRAM products.

OUR BUSINESS SUCCESS MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED IF WE ARE UNABLE TO ATTRACT AND
RETAIN HIGHLY-QUALIFIED MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL EMPLOYEES.
We have no employment agreements with any of our management other than our
Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Baker, and have no key-person insurance covering
employees. Competition for highly-qualified management and technical personnel
is generally intense and we may not be able to attract and retain the personnel
necessary for the development and operation of our business. The loss of the
services of key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations. Our Chief Technology Officer,
Dr. Daughton, may decide to retire at any time in the next several years, and
we may not be able to replace his technical or contract development expertise.




RISKS RELATED TO BUYING OUR STOCK

OUR STOCK HAS BEEN MORE VOLATILE THAN OTHER TECHNOLOGY SECTOR STOCKS.
The market price of our common stock has experienced significant fluctuations
and may continue to fluctuate in the future. We believe these fluctuations have
been greater on a percentage basis than other technology sector stocks.

OUR STOCK MAY BE SUBJECT TO VOLATILITY BECAUSE IT IS NOT LISTED ON A NATIONAL
MARKET.
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market, which has less daily
trading volume on average than the average trading market for companies quoted
on the NASDAQ National Market or the New York Stock Exchange. A public trading
market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness
depends on the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of our
common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the individual
decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which we
have no control.

THE PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY SIGNIFICANT PRICE
FLUCTUATIONS DUE TO A NUMBER OF FACTORS, MANY OF WHICH ARE BEYOND OUR CONTROL.
The market price of the common stock may be significantly affected by many
factors, including:

     * technological innovations by us, our licensees, or our competitors;

     * the announcement of new products, product enhancements, contracts, or
       license agreements by us, our licensees, or our competitors;

     * changes in requirements or demands for our products;

     * changes in prices of our or our competitors' products and services;

     * quarterly variations in our operating results;

     * changes in our revenue and revenue growth rates;

     * changes in revenue estimates, earnings estimates, or market projections
       by market analysts, speculation in the press or analyst community;

     * short selling and covering of short positions in our stock; and

     * general market conditions or market conditions specific to particular
       industries.

The stock prices for many companies in the technology sector have experienced
wide fluctuations that often have been unrelated to their operating
performance. Such fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our
common stock.