COMMUNICATION INTELLIGENCE CORPORATION
                         275 Shoreline Drive, Suite 500
                        Redwood Shores, California 94065

                                   -----------

                    NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
                                   -----------

                                  June 21, 2004
                                   -----------

To the Stockholders of Communication Intelligence Corporation:

     NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual
Meeting") of Communication Intelligence Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"),  will be held at the Hotel Sofitel,  223 Twin Dolphin Drive, Redwood
Shores,  California  94065, on June 21, 2004, at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time, for the
following purposes, all as more fully described in the attached Proxy Statement:

1.   To elect five directors to serve until their respective successors are duly
     elected and qualified.

2.   To ratify the  appointment of Stonefield  Josephson,  Inc. as the Company's
     independent accountants for the year ending December 31, 2004.

3.   To  transact  such other  business as may  properly  come before the Annual
     Meeting.

     The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on April 28, 2004 as
the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and
to vote on the matters  proposed at, the Annual Meeting and any  adjournments or
postponements thereof.

                             YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

         EVEN IF YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN PERSON, PLEASE
COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE PROXY IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED SO THAT YOUR
SHARES MAY BE VOTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING. IF YOU EXECUTE A PROXY, YOU STILL MAY
ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTE IN PERSON.

Redwood Shores, California       By Order of the Board of Directors
May 21, 2004


                                 Guido DiGregorio
                                 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer






                     COMMUNICATION INTELLIGENCE CORPORATION
                         275 Shoreline Drive, Suite 500
                        Redwood Shores, California 94065

                                  -------------

                                 PROXY STATEMENT
                                  -------------

                         ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
                                  -------------

                                  INTRODUCTION

     This Proxy  Statement  and the  accompanying  proxy is being  furnished  to
stockholders of Communication  Intelligence Corporation,  a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"),  in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of
Directors for the Company's  Annual  Meeting of  Stockholders  to be held at the
Hotel Sofitel, 223 Twin Dolphin Drive, Redwood Shores, California 94065, on June
21,  2004,  at  1:00  p.m.  Pacific  Time,  and  any  and  all  adjournments  or
postponements thereof (the "Annual Meeting").

     At the  Annual  Meeting,  stockholders  of the  Company  as of the close of
business on April 28,  2004 (the  "Record  Date") will be asked to consider  and
vote upon the following: (i) the election of five directors to serve until their
respective  successors  are duly elected and  qualified  (Proposal  1); (ii) the
ratification of the appointment of Stonefield  Josephson,  Inc. as the Company's
independent accountants for the year ending December 31, 2004 (Proposal 2). This
Proxy  Statement  and  the  accompanying  proxy,  together  with a  copy  of the
Company's Annual Report to Stockholders,  are first being mailed or delivered to
stockholders of the Company on or about May 21, 2004.

     Representatives of Stonefield Josephson, Inc. are expected to be present at
the Annual Meeting and will be given the opportunity to address the stockholders
if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

     WHETHER  OR NOT YOU  ATTEND THE  ANNUAL  MEETING,  YOUR VOTE IS  IMPORTANT.
ACCORDINGLY,  YOU ARE ASKED TO SIGN AND  RETURN  THE  PROXY,  REGARDLESS  OF THE
NUMBER OF SHARES YOU OWN.  SHARES CAN BE VOTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING ONLY IF THE
HOLDER IS REPRESENTED BY PROXY OR IS PRESENT.

                                VOTING SECURITIES

     We have designated April 28, 2004 as the record date for determining  those
stockholders  who are  entitled  to notice  of,  and to vote at,  this  meeting.
Accordingly,  only  holders of record of shares of Common  Stock at the close of
business  on such  date are  entitled  to  notice  of and to vote at the  Annual
Meeting.  At the close of business on the record date, there were  approximately
980 beneficial owners of the 100,516,848 outstanding shares of our common stock,
par value  $0.01 per share.  Each  stockholder  is entitled to one vote for each
share of our common stock held by that  stockholder  as of the record date. If a
choice as to the matters  coming before the Annual Meeting has been specified by
a stockholder "for," "against" or "abstain" on the proxy, which is duly returned
and properly  executed,  the shares will be voted  accordingly.  If no choice is
specified  on the  returned  proxy,  the  shares  will be  voted in favor of the
approval of the proposals  described in the Notice of Annual Meeting and in this
proxy  statement.  The presence in person or by proxy of a majority of the total
number of  outstanding  shares of Common  Stock  entitled  to vote at the Annual
Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting.

     Proxies marked as abstaining  will be treated as present for the purpose of
determining  whether there is a quorum for the Annual  Meeting,  but will not be
counted as voting on any matter as to which  abstinence is  indicated.  Thus, an
abstaining  vote in the election of  directors  will have no legal effect on the
outcome as directors  are elected by a plurality;  however,  an abstention as to
any other  matter will have the same legal effect as a vote against such matter.
Brokers  "non-votes"  (i.e.,  the  submission  of a proxy by a broker or nominee
specifically  indicating  the  lack of  discretionary  authority  to vote on the
matter) will not be treated as present for purposes of determining whether there
is a quorum for the Annual Meeting unless the broker is given discretion to vote
on at least one matter on the agenda.

                                       1




     A stockholder  executing a proxy pursuant to this  solicitation  may revoke
his or her proxy at any time prior to its use by:

o    delivery to the Secretary of the Company a signed notice of revocation or a
     later-dated, signed proxy; or

o    attending the meeting and voting in person.

     In order to be effective,  all  revocations or later-filed  proxies must be
delivered  to the  Company at the address  listed  above not later than June 21,
2004, 1:00 p.m., local time.

     Attendance at the meeting does not in itself constitute the revocation of a
proxy. In addition,  if your shares are held in the name of your broker, bank or
other nominee, you must obtain a proxy,  executed in your favor, from the holder
of record to be able to vote in person at the meeting.

     Approval of Proposal 1 to elect five  directors  requires  the  affirmative
vote  of  holders  representing  a  plurality  of the  shares  of  common  stock
represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting.  Approval of Proposal 2
to ratify  the  appointment  of  Stonefield  Josephson,  Inc.  as the  Company's
independent  accountants  for the year ending  December  31, 2004  requires  the
affirmative  vote of holders  representing  a  majority  of the shares of common
stock represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting.

     Each  enclosed  proxy gives  discretionary  authority to the persons  named
therein with respect to any amendments or modifications of the Company proposals
and any other matters that may be properly  proposed at the Annual Meeting.  The
shares represented by all valid non-revoked proxies returned in time to be voted
at the Annual Meeting will be voted in accordance with the  instructions  marked
therein. EXECUTED BUT UNMARKED PROXIES WILL BE VOTED (i) FOR THE ELECTION OF THE
DIRECTORS NAMED IN THE PROXY AND (ii) FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF
STONEFIELD JOSEPHSON,  INC. AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER
31, 2004. As of the date hereof,  the Company is not aware of any such amendment
or  modification  or other  matter to be  presented  for  action  at the  Annual
Meeting.  However, if any other matter properly comes before the Annual Meeting,
the proxies solicited hereby will be exercised in accordance with the reasonable
judgment of the proxyholders named therein.

         SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

     The following table sets forth information as of May 12, 2004, with respect
to the beneficial  ownership of (i) any person known to be the beneficial  owner
of more than 5% of any  class of voting  securities  of the  Company,  (ii) each
director  and  director  nominee  of the  Company,  (iii)  each  of the  current
executive  officers of the Company  named in the Summary  Compensation  Table of
this Proxy Statement  under the heading  "Executive  Compensation"  and (iv) all
directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.

                                                          Common Stock
                                                   -----------------------------
      Name of Beneficial Owner                         Number        Percent
                                                      of Shares      of Class

   Guido DiGregorio (1)........................       1,915,909          1.86%
   C. B. Sung (2)..............................       1,228,241          1.19%
   Louis P. Panetta (3)........................         153,125          *
   Michael Farese (4)..........................         100,000          *
   Welch, David E. (5).........................          50,000          *
   Francis V. Dane (6).........................         282,790          *
   All directors and executive officers
   as a group (6 persons)......................       3,730,065          3.63%
- -----------

*    Less than 1%.

(1)  The number of shares of common stock represents 1,915,909 shares of a total
     of 1,950,000 shares,  which are issuable upon the exercise of stock options
     granted to Mr.  DiGregorio  in January  1999 and  February  2002,  that are
     exercisable  within 60 days of May 12, 2004.  The  business  address of Mr.
     DiGregorio is 275 Shoreline Drive,  Suite 500,  Redwood Shores,  California
     94065. See "Executive Compensation; Option Grants in 2002."

                                       2


(2)  The number of shares of common stock includes (a) 1,033,682  shares held by
     the Sung Family Trust of which Mr. Sung is a trustee, (b) 3,369 shares held
     by the  Sung-Kwok  Foundation  of which Mr. Sung is the  Chairman,  and (c)
     191,190  shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options
     which are  exercisable  within  60 days of May 12,  2004.  Mr.  Sung may be
     deemed to beneficially own the shares held by the Sung Family Trust and the
     Sung-Kwok  Foundation.  The business  address of Mr. Sung is, UNISON Group,
     1001 Bayhill  Dr., 2nd Floor,  San Bruno,  California  94066.  See "Certain
     Relationships and Related Transactions."

(3)  The number of shares of common stock  represents  153,125 shares,  issuable
     upon the  exercise of options  granted on October 30,  2000,  May 11, 2001,
     June 18,  2001,  June 24,  2002 and June 23,  2003,  which are  exercisable
     within 60 days of May 12, 2004. Mr.  Panetta's  business address is 827 Via
     Mirada, Monterey,  California 93940. See "Certain Relationships and Related
     Transactions."

(4)  The number of shares of common stock  represents  100,000  shares  issuable
     upon the exercise of stock  options  granted to Mr.  Farese in February and
     June 2002 and June 23, 2003, that are exercisable within 60 days of May 12,
     2004.  The business  address of Mr. Farese is 401 River Oaks  Parkway,  San
     Jose, CA 95134. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."

(5)  The number of shares of common stock represent  50,000 shares issuable upon
     the exercise of stock  options  granted to Mr. Welch on March 11, 2004 that
     are exercisable within 60 days of May 12, 2004. The business address of Mr.
     Welch  is 1729  East  Otero  Avenue,  Littleton,  CO  80122.  See  "Certain
     Relationships and Related Transactions."


(6)  The number of shares of common stock  represents (a) 212 shares held by Mr.
     Dane  and (b)  282,578  shares  of a total of  343,943  shares,  which  are
     issuable upon the exercise of stock options  granted to Mr. Dane in January
     1999,  February 2002, and May 2003 that are  exercisable  within 60 days of
     May 12, 2004.  The  business  address of Mr. Dane is 275  Shoreline  Drive,
     Suite 500, Redwood Shores,  California 94065. See "Executive  Compensation;
     Option Grants in 2002."

             SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

     Section  16(a) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as amended  (the
"Exchange Act"), requires the Company's officers,  directors and persons who own
more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company's  equity  securities
to file certain reports with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "SEC")
regarding  ownership of, and  transactions in, the Company's  securities.  These
officers,  directors and  stockholders are also required by SEC rules to furnish
the Company  with copies of all Section  16(a)  reports  that are filed with the
SEC.  Based  solely on a review of copies of such forms  received by the Company
and  written  representations  received by the Company  from  certain  reporting
persons,  the Company  believes  that for the year ended  December  31, 2003 all
Section 16(a) reports required to be filed by the Company's  executive officers,
directors and 10% stockholders were filed on a timely basis.

                                   PROPOSAL 1
                              ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

     The Bylaws of the Company provide that the Board of Directors shall consist
of such number of directors,  with a minimum of three, as the Board of Directors
may determine from time to time.  Currently,  the Board has determined  that the
authorized  number of directors  is five (5). The five persons  listed below are
the nominees for election as  directors  at the Annual  Meeting.  Each  director
elected at this  Meeting  will serve for one (1) year or until his  successor is
duly   elected   and   qualified   or  his  earlier   resignation,   removal  or
disqualification.

     Unless otherwise  instructed,  the  proxyholders  named in the accompanying
proxy  will vote the shares  represented  by  proxies  received  by them for the
election of the five  nominees to the Board of  Directors  named  below.  In the
event  that any  nominee  of the  Company  is unable or  declines  to serve as a
director  at the time of the Annual  Meeting,  the shares  will be voted for the
election  of any  nominee  designated  by the present  Board of  Directors.  The
Company is not aware of any nominee who will be unable or will  decline to serve
as a director.

                                       3




Director Nominees

         The following table sets forth certain information concerning the
nominees:

                                                      Year First Elected
Name                               Age                   or Appointed

Guido D. DiGregorio.........        65                       1997
Michael Farese..............        57                       2002
Louis P. Panetta............        54                       2000
C. B. Sung..................        79                       1986
David E. Welch..............        57                       2004

     The business experience of each of the director nominees for at least the
past five years includes the following:

     Guido D.  DiGregorio  was elected  Chairman of the Board in February  2002,
Chief  Executive  Officer in June 1999 and  President  in  November  1997.  From
November 1997 to June 1999, he was also the Company's Chief  Operating  Officer.
He was a partner in DH Partners,  Inc. (a management  consultant firm) from 1996
to 1997. Prior to that Mr.  DiGregorio was recruited by a number of companies to
reverse trends of financial losses,  serving as President and CEO of each of the
following companies:  Display  Technologies,  Inc. (a manufacturer of video data
monitors)  from  1994  to  1996,  Superior  Engineering  Corp.  (a  producer  of
factory-built  gas fireplaces) from 1991 to 1993,  Proxim,  Inc.  (wireless data
communications)  from 1989 to 1991,  Maxitron Corp. (a  manufacturer of computer
products)  from 1986 to 1989 and Exide  Electronics  (producer of computer power
conditioning  products) from 1983 to 1986. From 1966 to 1983, Mr. DiGregorio was
employed by General  Electric  in various  management  positions,  rising to the
position of General Manager of an industrial automation business.

     Michael  Farese was elected a director of the Company in February 2002. Mr.
Farese  has  over  thirty  years  of  broad  based  telecommunications  industry
experience including an extensive background in cellular and wireless subscriber
equipment.  He has been the  President  & CEO of WJ  Communications,  a  Silicon
Valley-based  manufacturer of innovative broadband  communications  products for
current and next generation wireless  communications networks from March 2002 to
present.  Prior to joining WJ  Communications,  Mr.  Farese was President & CEO,
Tropian  Inc.  from 1999 to 2002.  Prior to that he numerous  senior  management
positions including Vice President & General  Manager-Global  Personal Networks,
Motorola,  Vice President & General  Manager-American  Business Group, Ericsson,
Vice President,  Product Planning & Strategy, Nokia, Executive Director-Business
Systems, ITT and Division Manger-Networks Business Systems, AT&T.

     Louis P.  Panetta was  elected a director  of the Company in October  2000.
From  November 2001 to September  2003 Mr.  Panetta was a member of the Board of
Directors  of Active Link.  Mr.  Panetta was Vice  President  of  Marketing  and
Investor Relations with Mobility Concepts, Inc. (a wireless Systems Integrator),
a subsidiary of Active Link Communications from February 2001 to April 2003. Mr.
Panetta  was  President  and  Chief   Operating   Officer  of   PortableLife.com
(e-commerce products provider) from September 1999 to October 2000 and President
and Chief  Executive  Officer of Fujitsu  Personal  Systems (a  manufacturer  of
computer  hardware) from December 1992 to September 1999. From 1995 to 1999, Mr.
Panetta served on the Board of Directors of Fujitsu Personal Systems.

     C.B. Sung was elected a director of the Company in 1986.  Mr. Sung has been
the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Unison Group, Inc. (a multi-national
corporation   involved  in  manufacturing,   computer   systems,   international
investment and trade) since 1986 and Unison Pacific  Corporation  since 1979. He
also  serves  on the  Board  of  Directors  of  several  private  companies  and
non-profit organizations.

     David E. Welch was  elected a director  in March 2004 and will serve as the
financial expert on the Audit Committee.  Mr. Welch is the principal of David E.
Welch Consulting,  a financial  consulting firm, from July 2002 to present.  Mr.
Welch has also been Vice  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer  of  American
Millennium  Corporation,  Inc., a provider of satellite based asset tracking and
reporting  equipment,  from April 2004 to present.  Mr. Welch was Vice President
and Chief  Financial  Officer of Active Link  Communications,  a manufacturer of
telecommunications equipment, from 1999 to 2002. Mr. Welch has held positions as
Director of Management  Information  Systems and Chief information  Officer with
Micromedex,  Inc and Language  Management  International from 1995 through 1998.
Mr.  Welch is a member of the Board of  Directors  of Advanced  Neutraceuticals,
Inc.

                                       4


Board of Director Meetings and Committees

     The  Company's  affairs are  managed  under the  direction  of the Board of
Directors.  Members of the Board receive  information  concerning  the Company's
affairs  through oral and written  reports by  management,  Board and  committee
meetings and other means.  The  Company's  directors  generally  attend Board of
Directors meetings, committee meetings and informal meetings with management and
others,  participate in telephone  conversations  and have other  communications
with management and others regarding the Company's affairs.

     Directors of the Company serve until their  successors are duly elected and
qualified or until their earlier resignation, removal or disqualification. There
are no family  relationships  between  the  Company's  directors  and  executive
officers.  For certain relationships between the Company and its directors,  see
"Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."

Board Committees

     The Company's  Board of Directors  has four  committees as set forth below.
The members of each committee are appointed by the Board of Directors.

     Audit  Committee.  The  Audit  Committee  generally  reviews  the scope and
results of the audit by the  Company's  independent  auditors,  the  independent
auditors' letter to the Board of Directors  concerning the  effectiveness of the
Company's internal financial and accounting controls and the Board of Directors'
response  to that  letter,  if  deemed  necessary,  and  reviews  the  Company's
procedures for establishing and monitoring  internal  accounting  controls.  The
members of the Audit Committee are Michael Farese,  Louis P. Panetta, C. B. Sung
and David E. Welch. Mr. Welch serves as the Audit Committee's  financial expert.
Each member of the Audit  Committee is independent  as defined under  applicable
SEC rules and  regulations.  The Audit  Committee  conducted two meetings in the
year ended December 31, 2003 and all members attended the meeting except for Mr.
Welch who was not a board member at that time. The Audit Committee  oversees the
annual and quarterly financial reporting process, confirms management's proposal
for the independent auditors, discuses with the auditors their independence from
management  and reviews the scope of the annual audit.  The Board has adopted an
Audit Committee  Charter, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as
Appendix A.

     Finance  Committee.  The  Finance  Committee  develops  strategies  for the
financing and  development  of the Company and monitors and  evaluates  progress
toward established objectives.  The members of the Finance Committee are Michael
Farese, Louis P. Panetta and C. B. Sung.

     Compensation  Committee.   The  Compensation  Committee  generally  reviews
compensation   matters  with  respect  to   executive   and  senior   management
arrangements  and administers  the Company's stock option plans.  The members of
the Compensation  Committee are Michael Farese, Louis P. Panetta and C. B. Sung.
The  Board has  adopted a  Compensation  Committee  Charter,  a copy of which is
attached to this proxy statement as Appendix B.

     Nominating  Committee.  In May 2004,  the Company  established a Nominating
Committee.  The Nominating  Committee is responsible  for considering and making
recommendations  to the Board  concerning the  appropriate  size,  functions and
needs of the Board. The members of the Nominating  Committee are Michael Farese,
Louis P.  Panetta,  C. B. Sung and  David E.  Welch.  The  Board  has  adopted a
Nominating  Committee  Charter,  a copy of  which  is  attached  to  this  proxy
statement as Appendix C.

Board and Committee Meetings

     During  2003,  the Board of Directors  held three formal  meetings and also
acted by unanimous  written  consent on eleven  occasions.  The Committees  held
meetings jointly with the formal Board meetings. For the year ended December 31,
2003, each incumbent director  participated in all of the formal meetings of the
Board and each Committee on which he served.

Director Compensation

     For their services as directors of the Company, all non-employee  directors
receive  a fee of  $1,000  for each  Board of  Directors  meeting  attended  and
directors are reimbursed for all reasonable  out-of-pocket  expenses incurred in
connection with attending such meetings.  Directors are also eligible to receive
stock options.  In June 2003, Michael Farese,  Louis Panetta and C. B. Sung were
each granted immediately  exercisable  non-qualified  options to purchase 25,000
shares of common stock at an exercise  price of $0.30,  which options  expire on
June 23, 2010. The Company retains a declining balance  repurchase option on the
shares underlying these options for one year from the date of grant.

                                       5


Communications to the Board

     The Board of Directors welcomes and encourages  stockholders to share their
thoughts  regarding  the Company.  Towards that end, the Board of Directors  has
adopted a policy whereby all communications should first be directed to Investor
Relations.  Investor Relations will then, for other than routine communications,
distribute  a copy  of the  communication  to the  Chairman  of the  Board,  the
Chairman of the Audit Committee and the Company's Chief Legal Officer.  Based on
the input and  decision of these  persons,  along with the entire board if it is
deemed necessary,  the Company will respond to the communications.  Stockholders
should not communicate with individual directors unless requested to do so.

Required Affirmative Vote

     APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 1 TO ELECT FIVE  DIRECTORS  REQUIRES  THE  AFFIRMATIVE
VOTE OF A  PLURALITY  OF THE  SHARES  REPRESENTED  IN  PERSON OR BY PROXY AT THE
ANNUAL  MEETING.  THE BOARD  RECOMMENDS THAT  STOCKHOLDERS  VOTE FOR EACH OF THE
NOMINEES NAMED HEREIN.  THE FIVE NOMINEES RECEIVING THE MOST VOTES, EVEN IF LESS
THAN A MAJORITY, WILL BE ELECTED TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

                                   PROPOSAL 2
                     APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     In December,  1999, the Company retained Stonefield Josephson,  Inc. as its
independent  auditors.  Prior to the  retention of Stonefield  Josephson,  Inc.,
neither  the  Company  nor any person on its behalf  consulted  with  Stonefield
Josephson,  Inc.  regarding  the  application  of  accounting  principles to any
transaction  or the  types of  audit  opinion  that  might  be  rendered  on the
Company's financial statements.

     The  aggregate  fees  billed  for   professional   services  by  Stonefield
Josephson,  Inc. in 2003 were approximately  $356,000, and in 2002 were $220,000
for the following services:

     Audit  Fees:  Stonefield  Josephson,  Inc.'s  fees in  connection  with its
     quarterly reviews and year end audits for 2003 were approximately $221,000,
     and were $148,000 in 2002, which  represented  approximately 62% and 68% of
     the aggregate fees billed by Stonefield  Josephson,  Inc. in 2003 and 2002,
     respectively.

     Audit-Related  Fees.  Stonefield  Josephson,  Inc.  did not bill us for any
     assurance and related work in fiscal year 2003 or 2002.

     Tax Fees.  Stonefield  Josephson,  Inc.  fees in  connection  with the 2002
     federal  and  state  tax   returns,   which  were  billed  in  2003,   were
     approximately  $3,000,  or 1% of the aggregate fees billed for professional
     services by Stonefield Josephson,  Inc. in 2003. Stonefield Josephson, Inc.
     fees in connection with the 2001 federal and state tax returns,  which were
     billed in 2002,  were  approximately  $7,000,  or 3% of the aggregate  fees
     billed for professional services by Stonefield Josephson, Inc. in 2002.

     Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees: There were no
     fees incurred in fiscal year 2001 or 2002 for financial information systems
     design and implementation services.

     All other Fees:  Stonefield  Josephson,  Inc's fees for all other  services
     provided in 2003  totaled  approximately  $131,000 or 37% of the  aggregate
     fees billed by Stonefield Josephson,  Inc. in 2003 and related primarily to
     preparation  of  the  Registration   statement  on  Form  S-1.   Stonefield
     Josephson,  Inc's  fees for all other  services  provided  in 2002  totaled
     approximately  $65,000 or 29% of the  aggregate  fees billed by  Stonefield
     Josephson,  Inc in 2002 and related  primarily to  preparation  of the 2002
     proxy statement, and a Registration statement on Form S-1.

     Pre-Approval  Policies.  It is the policy of the  Company not to enter into
     any  agreement  for  Stonefield  Josephson,  Inc. to provide any  non-audit
     services to us unless (a) the agreement is approved in advance by the Audit
     Committee or (b) (i) the aggregate  amount of all such  non-audit  services
     constitutes  no  more  than 5% of the  total  amount  we pay to  Stonefield
     Josephson, Inc. during the fiscal year in which such services are rendered,
     (ii) such  services  were not  recognized  by the  Company as  constituting
     non-audit  services at the time of the engagement of the non-audit services
     and (iii) such services are promptly  brought to the attention of the Audit
     Committee  and prior to the  completion  of the audit were  approved by the
     Audit  Committee or by one or more members of the Audit  Committee  who are
     members of the Board of Directors to whom authority to grant such approvals
     has been  delegated by the Audit  Committee.  The Audit  Committee will not

                                       6


     approve any  agreement  in advance for  non-audit  services  unless (x) the
     procedures  and policies are detailed in advance as to such  services,  (y)
     the Audit Committee is informed of such services prior to commencement  and
     (z) such policies and procedures do not constitute  delegation of the Audit
     Committee's  responsibilities  to management under the Securities  Exchange
     Act of 1934, as amended.

     The Audit  Committee  has  considered  whether the  provision  of non-audit
services has impaired the  independence  of Stonefield  Josephson,  Inc. and has
concluded that Stonefield  Josephson,  Inc. is independent  under applicable SEC
and Nasdaq rules and regulations.

     In 2004, upon recommendation of the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors
appointed Stonefield Josephson, Inc. as its independent accountants for the year
ending December 31, 2004.  Stockholders  are being asked to ratify the retention
of Stonefield  Josephson,  Inc. as independent  accountants  for the year ending
December 31, 2004. Representatives of Stonefield Josephson, Inc. are expected to
be present  at the  Annual  Meeting  and will be given the  opportunity  to make
statements  if they so desire and will be  available  to respond to  appropriate
questions.

Required Affirmative Vote

     Ratification  of the  appointment  of  Stonefield  Josephson,  Inc.  as the
Company's independent accountants for the year ending December 31, 2004 requires
the  affirmative  vote of a majority of the Shares  represented  in person or by
proxy at the Annual Meeting.

     THE  BOARD  OF  DIRECTORS   RECOMMENDS  THAT   STOCKHOLDERS  VOTE  FOR  THE
RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF STONEFIELD  JOSEPHSON,  INC. AS THE COMPANY'S
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2004.

                               EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

     The following  table sets forth,  as of April 28, 2004, the name and age of
each  executive  officer of the Company,  and all  positions  and offices of the
Company presently held by each of them.


         Name                      Age      Positions Currently Held

     Guido D. DiGregorio            65   Chairman of the Board,
                                         Chief Executive Officer and President,
     Francis V. Dane                52   Chief Legal Officer,
                                         Secretary and Chief Financial Officer

     The business  experience of each of the executive officers for at least the
past five years includes the following:

     Guido D. DiGregorio - see above.

     Francis V. Dane was appointed the Company's  Secretary in February of 2002,
its Chief Financial  Officer in October 2001, its Human  Resources  Executive in
September 1998 and he assumed the position of Chief Legal Officer in December of
1997.  From 1991 to 1997 he  served as a Vice  President  and  Secretary  of the
Company,  and from 1988 to 1992 as its Chief  Financial  Officer and  Treasurer.
Since  July of 2000,  Mr.  Dane has also been the  Secretary  and  Treasurer  of
Genyous,  Inc. a  biotechnology  venture  capital and incubation  company.  From
October  2000 to April  2004,  Mr.  Dane  served as a director  of  Perceptronix
Medical,  Inc. and SpetraVu  Medial Inc.,  two  companies  focused on developing
improved  methods for the early  detection of cancer.  From October 2000 to June
2003, Mr. Dane was a director of CPC Cancer  Prevention  Centers Inc., a company
that is  developing a  comprehensive  cancer  prevention  program based upon the
detection of early stage, non-invasive cancer. Prior to this Mr. Dane spent over
a decade  with  PricewaterhouseCoopers,  his last  position  was that of  Senior
Manager,  Entrepreneurial  Services Division.  Mr. Dane is a member of the State
Bar  of  California  and  has  earned  a CPA  certificate  from  the  states  of
Connecticut and California.

                             EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

     The following table sets forth  compensation  awarded to, earned by or paid
to the Company's President,  regardless of the amount of compensation,  and each
executive  officer of the Company  serving as of  December  31, 2003 whose total
annual salary and bonus for 2003  exceeded  $100,000  (collectively,  the "Named
Executive Officers").

                                       7

                           Summary Compensation Table

                                                                      Long-Term
                                      Annual Compensation           Compensation
                                                                     Securities
                                                     Other Annual    Underlying
Name and Principal Position    Year      Salary      Compensation     Options
- ---------------------------    ----      ------      ------------     -------
Guido DiGregorio.............  2003   $   206,250(1)       -                 -
 Chairman, President and       2002   $   213,500(1)       -           250,000
                               2001   $   180,000          -                 -
 Chief Executive Officer

Francis V. Dane..............  2003   $   128,500          -           100,000
 Chief Legal Officer,          2002   $   110,083          -           100,000
  Secretary and                2001   $    20,000(2)       -                 -
  Chief Financial Officer
- -----------

(1)  Mr.  DiGregorio's  salary was increased in February  2002 to $250,000.  Mr.
     DiGregorio has deferred  approximately  $70,000 in salary  payments to ease
     cash flow  requirements.  Mr.  DiGregorio  may  resume  payment of his full
     salary at any time, and payment of deferred  amounts may be demanded by Mr.
     DiGregorio at any time after December 31, 2003.

(2) Mr. Dane was named as an executive officer as of October 1, 2001.

                              Option Grants in 2003

     On May 7, 2003 Mr. Dane was granted  options to purchase  100,000 shares of
the Company's common stock, at an exercise price of $0.33 per share. Twenty five
percent of the options granted vested immediately and the balance of the options
vest pro rata quarterly over three years.

          Aggregate Option Exercises in 2003 and Year-End Option Values

     The following  table sets forth certain  information  concerning  the Named
Executive  Officers with respect to the exercise of options in 2003,  the number
of shares covered by exercisable and unexercisable stock options at December 31,
2003 and the aggregate  value of exercisable  and  unexercisable  "in-the-money"
options at December 31, 2003.


                                                                  Value of
                                       Number of Securities      Unexercised
                                      Underlying Unexercised     In-The-Money
                     Shares              Options at Fiscal        Options at
                    Acquired                Year-End          Fiscal Year-End(1)
                       On       Value     Exercisable(E)/       Exercisable(E)/
Name                Exercise   Realized  Unexercisable(U)      Unexercisable(U)

Guido DiGregorio..      -        $ -      1,881,818(E)          $      - (E)(1)
                                             68,182(U)                 - (U)(1)
Francis V. Dane...      -        $ -        255,306(E)          $  1,500 (E)(1)
                                             88,637(U)              2,500(U)(1)


- -----------
(1)  The value of unexercised  in-the-money  options was determined by using the
     difference between the closing sale price of the common stock on the Nasdaq
     Over the Counter  Market as of December  31, 2003  ($0.37) and the exercise
     price of such options.

1999 Stock Option Plan

     The  Company's  1999  Plan  provides  for  the  granting  to the  Company's
directors and employees of non-transferable  incentive stock options ("Incentive
Options")  within the meaning of Section  422 of the  Internal  Revenue  Code of
1986, as amended (the "Code"), and non-transferable  non-statutory stock options

                                       8


("Non-Qualified  Options").  A total of  4,000,000  shares of  common  stock are
authorized  for issuance  under the 1999 Plan. As of April 28, 2004,  options to
purchase an  aggregate  2,067,445  shares of common stock were  outstanding  and
1,864,758 shares remain available for future grants.  Unless terminated  sooner,
the 1999 Plan will terminate in June 2009.

     The 1999 Plan may be  administered by the Board of Directors or a committee
of the Board.  The Board or such  committee  has the  authority to determine the
terms of the options  granted,  including the exercise  price,  number of shares
subject  to  each  option,   vesting  provisions,   if  any,  and  the  form  of
consideration  payable upon exercise.  The exercise  price of Incentive  Options
must be the fair market  value of the common  stock valued at the date of grant,
and the exercise price of Non-Qualified Options must be at least 85% of the fair
market  value of the common stock  valued at the date of grant.  The  expiration
date of Options is  determined  by the Board or a  committee  of the Board,  but
Options  cannot  expire later than ten years from the date of grant,  and in the
case of Incentive Options granted to 10% stockholders,  cannot expire later than
five years from the date of grant.  Options have  typically been granted with an
expiration date seven years after the date of grant.

     If an employee to whom an award has been  granted  under the 1999 Plan dies
while  providing  services to the  Company,  retires  from  employment  with the
Company after attaining his retirement  date, or terminates  employment with the
Company as a result of permanent and total  disability,  the  restrictions  then
applicable  to such award shall  continue as if the employee had not  terminated
employment and such award shall  thereafter be exercisable,  in whole or in part
by the person to whom it was granted (or by his duly appointed,  qualified,  and
acting  personal  representative,  his estate,  or by a person who  acquired the
right to exercise such option by bequest or  inheritance  from the grantee),  in
the manner set forth in the award, at any time within the remaining term of such
award. Except as provided in the preceding  paragraph,  generally if a person to
whom an option has been granted  under the 1999 Plan ceases to be an employee of
the Company,  such option shall  continue to be  exercisable  to the same extent
that it was exercisable on the last day on which such person was an employee for
a period of 90 days  thereafter,  or for such longer period as may be determined
by the Board or a committee,  of the Board whereupon such option shall terminate
and shall not thereafter be exercisable.

     The Board has the authority to amend or terminate  the 1999 Plan,  provided
that such  action  does not impair the rights of any  optionee  under any option
previously granted under the 1999 Plan, without the consent of such optionee.

1994 Stock Option Plan

     The  Company's  1994 Stock Option Plan (the "1994  Plan")  provides for the
granting to the Company's  directors  and  employees of Incentive  Stock Options
within the  meaning of Section  422 of the  Internal  Revenue  Code of 1986,  as
amended and Non-Qualified  Options.  A total of 6,000,000 shares of common stock
are authorized  for issuance under the 1994 Plan. As of April 28, 2004,  options
to purchase an aggregate  1,003,025  shares of common stock were outstanding and
680,515 shares remain available for future grants. Unless terminated sooner, the
1994 Plan will terminate in November 2004.

     The 1994 Plan may be  administered by the Board of Directors or a committee
of the Board.  The Board or such  committee  of the Board has the  authority  to
determine the terms of the options granted, including the exercise price, number
of shares subject to each option,  vesting  provisions,  if any, and the form of
consideration  payable upon exercise.  The exercise  price of Incentive  Options
must be the fair market  value of the common  stock valued at the date of grant,
and the exercise price on Non-Qualified Options must be at least 85% of the fair
market  value of the common stock  valued at the date of grant.  The  expiration
date of Options is determined by the Board or such  committee of the Board,  but
Options  cannot  expire later than ten years from the date of grant,  and in the
case of Incentive Options granted to 10% stockholders,  cannot expire later than
five years from the date of grant.  Options have  typically been granted with an
expiration date seven years after the date of grant.

     If an employee to whom an award has been granted under the 1994 Option Plan
dies while providing  services to the Company,  retires from employment with the
Company after attaining his retirement  date, or terminates  employment with the
Company as a result of permanent and total  disability,  the  restrictions  then
applicable  to such award shall  continue as if the employee had not  terminated
employment and such award shall  thereafter be exercisable,  in whole or in part
by the person to whom it was granted (or by his duly appointed,  qualified,  and
acting  personal  representative,  his estate,  or by a person who  acquired the
right to exercise such option by bequest or  inheritance  from the grantee),  in
the manner set forth in the award, at any time within the remaining term of such
award. Except as provided in the preceding  paragraph,  generally if a person to
whom an option has been granted  under the 1994 Plan ceases to be an employee of
the Company,  such option shall  continue to be  exercisable  to the same extent
that it was exercisable on the last day on which such person was an employee for
a period of 30 days  thereafter,  or for such longer period as may be determined
by the Board or a committee of the Board,  whereupon such option shall terminate
and shall not thereafter be exercisable.

                                       9



     The Board has the authority to amend or terminate  the 1994 Plan,  provided
that such  action  does not impair the rights of any  optionee  under any option
previously granted under the 1994 Plan, without the consent of such optionee.

                          COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

     Under rules  established  by the Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the
"SEC"),  the Company is  required to provide  certain  data and  information  in
regard  to  the  compensation  and  benefits  provided  to the  Company's  Chief
Executive Officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers.
In fulfillment of this requirement,  the Compensation Committee has prepared the
following report for inclusion in this Proxy Statement.

     Compensation  Philosophy  and  Objectives.   The  Committees'  compensation
philosophy is based upon the belief that the success of the Company results from
the coordinated efforts of all employees working as a team to achieve objectives
of  providing  superior  products and services to the  Company's  customers  and
maximizing the Company's value for the benefit of its stockholders.

     The  Company's  compensation  programs are designed to attract,  retain and
reward personnel whose individual and team performance contributes significantly
to the short and long-term  objectives of the Company.  The Company's  executive
compensation programs are guided by the following principles,  which may also be
considered in making compensation decisions for employees:

o    To ensure  competitiveness,  the Company  monitors  industry  standards and
     considers this information when it makes compensation decisions; and

o    The compensation of executive officers is affected by individual,  team and
     overall  Company  performance.  Overall  Company  performance is based upon
     achievement of strategic and operating goals. Such factors include revenues
     generated, technology validations, timely product introductions,  capturing
     market  share and  preservation  of and  increases  in  stockholder  value.
     Individual  and team  performance  is  considered  to the extent of whether
     departmental  goals are achieved within the time and budget  constraints of
     Company operating plans. Additionally,  individual performance is measured,
     in part,  against the extent to which an  individual  executive  officer is
     able to foster team spirit and loyalty and minimize employee turnover.

     Methods  of  Compensation.  The key  elements  of the  Company's  executive
compensation program consist primarily of base salary and stock options.

     The base  salaries  of the  Company's  executive  officers  for  2004  were
established  as part of an annual  compensation  review cycle.  In  establishing
those salaries, the Compensation Committee considered information about salaries
paid by companies of comparable  size in our industry , individual  performance,
position and internal comparability  considerations.  While all of these factors
were considered,  the Compensation  Committee did not assign specific weights to
any of these  factors.  Base  salary for the  Company's  executive  officers  is
generally  determined by performance,  the combined base salary and annual bonus
for  competitive  positions  in the  industry  and  general  market and  Company
conditions. Currently, the Company does not have an annual bonus plan.

     The  Committees  believe  that  the use of  stock  options  as a  means  of
compensation provide an incentive for executives and aligns their interests with
those of the  stockholders.  All employees are eligible to receive stock options
under  the  Company's  stock  option  plans.  The  long-term,  performance-based
compensation  of executive  officers  takes the form of option  awards under the
Company's stock option plans, which are designed to align a significant  portion
of the executive  compensation  program with  long-term  shareholder  interests.
These  plans  permit the  granting  of several  different  types of  stock-based
awards.  The  Compensation  Committee  believes that  equity-based  compensation
ensures that the Company's  executive  officers  have a continuing  stake in the
long-term  success of the Company.  All options granted by the Company have been
granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company's Common
Stock  on the  date of grant  and,  accordingly,  will  only  have  value if the
Company's  stock price  increases.  In  granting  options  under the plans,  the
Compensation   Committee   generally   takes  into  account   each   executive's
responsibilities, relative position in the Company, past grants, and approximate
grants to individuals in similar  positions for companies of comparable  size in
the software industry.

     President and Chief Executive Officer's Compensation. Mr. Guido DiGregorio,
the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
was appointed to the  Presidency by the Board of Directors in November  1997, to
the office of Chief  Executive in June 1999 and to the  Chairmanship in February
2002.  The Company does not  currently  have an  employment  agreement  with Mr.
DiGregorio.  Mr. DiGregorio currently receives an annual salary of $250,000. Mr.
DiGregorio  has  deferred  a portion of his  salary  payments  to ease cash flow
requirements.  Mr.  DiGregorio may resume payment of his full salary at any time

                                       10


and payment of deferred  amounts may be demanded by Mr.  DiGregorio  at any time
after December 31, 2003.

                     Compensation Committee Interlocks and
                Insider Participation In Compensation Decisions

     During the fiscal  year ended  December  31,  2003,  there were no employee
directors on the Compensation Committee and no interlocks.  On May 13, 2004, the
Board of Directors adopted a Compensation  Committee charter, a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit A.

                                                   The Compensation Committee
                                                   Of the Board of Directors

                                                          Michael Farese
                                                          Louis P. Panetta
                                                          C. B. Sung

                             AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

     General. Under the Company's Audit Committee Charter ("Charter"), a copy of
which is  attached  hereto  as  Exhibit  A, the  general  purpose  of the  Audit
Committee is to assist the Board of  Directors in the exercise of its  fiduciary
responsibility of providing oversight of the Company's financial  statements and
the financial reporting  processes,  internal accounting and financial controls,
the annual independent audit of the Company's  financial  statements,  and other
aspects of the  financial  management  of the  Company.  The Audit  Committee is
appointed  by the Board of  Directors  and is to be  comprised of at least three
directors, each of whom shall be independent,  as such term is defined under the
listing  standards of the Nasdaq Stock  Market.  All  committee  members must be
financially  literate,  or shall become financially literate within a reasonable
period of time after  appointment  to the  Committee.  All of the members of the
Company's  Audit  Committee  are  independent  and Mr. Welch is the  committee's
financial expert as such term is defined in applicable regulations and rules.

     Responsibilities  and Duties.  The Company's  management is responsible for
preparing the Company's  financial  statements and the independent  auditors are
responsible   for  auditing  those  financial   statements.   The  Committee  is
responsible  for  overseeing  the conduct of these  activities  by the Company's
management  and the  independent  auditors.  The  financial  management  and the
independent  auditors of the Company have more time, knowledge and more detailed
information on the Company than do Committee members.  Consequently, in carrying
out its oversight responsibilities, the Committee does not provide any expert or
special assurance as to the Company's  financial  statements or any professional
certification as to the independent auditors' work.

     The specific duties of the Audit Committee include the following:

1.   Select,  retain,  and, when  appropriate,  terminate the  engagement of the
     independent auditor and set the independent auditors' compensation;

2.   Pre-approve  all  permitted  non-audit  services  to be  performed  by  the
     independent   auditors  and  establish  policies  and  procedures  for  the
     engagement  of the  independent  auditors  to provide  permitted  non-audit
     services;

3.   Periodically  discuss  and  review  with  the  independent  auditors  their
     independence  from  management and the Company and the matters  included in
     the written  disclosures  required  by the  Independence  Standards  Board,
     including  whether the provision by the  independent  auditors of permitted
     non-audit  services is compatible with independence and obtain and review a
     report from the independent  auditors describing all relationships  between
     the independent auditors and the Company;

4.   Receive and review: (a) a report by the independent auditors describing the
     independent auditors' internal quality-control  procedures and any material
     issues raised by the most recent internal  quality-control  review, or peer
     review, of the independent  auditors, or by any inquiry or investigation by
     governmental or professional authorities,  within the preceding five years,
     respecting one or more independent  audits carried out by the firm, and any
     steps taken to deal with any such issues;  and (b) other  required  reports
     from the independent auditors;

5.   Meet with management and the independent  auditors prior to commencement of
     the annual audits to review and discuss the planned scope and objectives of
     the audit;


                                       11


6.   Meet with the independent  auditors,  with and without management  present,
     after  completion  of the annual audit to review and discuss the results of
     the  examinations of the independent  auditors and appropriate  analyses of
     the financial statements;

7.   Review  the  recommendations  of the  independent  auditors  for  improving
     internal accounting controls and management's responses thereto;

8.   Review and discuss (a) the reports of the  independent  auditors,  with and
     without  management  present,  as to the state of the  Company's  financial
     reporting systems and procedures,  the adequacy of internal  accounting and
     financial  controls,  the  integrity  and  competency  of the financial and
     accounting staff, disclosure controls and procedures,  other aspects of the
     financial  management of the Company and (b) current  accounting trends and
     developments,  and (c) take such  action  with  respect  thereto  as may be
     deemed appropriate;

9.   Review the interim financial statements with management and the independent
     auditors  prior to the filing of the  Company's  Quarterly  Reports on Form
     10-Q and discuss the results of the quarterly reviews and any other matters
     required to be communicated  to the Committee by the  independent  auditors
     under generally accepted auditing standards;

10.  Review  and  discuss  with  management  and the  independent  auditors  the
     financial  statements to be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form
     10-K (or the annual  report to  stockholders  if  distributed  prior to the
     filing of Form 10-K),  including the judgment of the  independent  auditors
     about the quality, not just acceptability,  of accounting  principles,  the
     reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of the disclosures
     in the financial statements;

11.  Recommend to the Board of  Directors,  based upon the  Committee's  review,
     whether the financial statements should be included in the annual report on
     Form 10-K;

12.  Review press releases, as well as Company policies with respect to earnings
     press releases,  financial  information and earnings  guidance  provided to
     analysts and rating  agencies  and review such  releases,  information  and
     guidance for compliance with regulations governing the use of non-Generally
     Accepted  Accounting  Principles  financial measures and related disclosure
     requirements;

13.  Discuss  Company   policies  with  respect  to  risk  assessment  and  risk
     management,  and  review  contingent  liabilities  and  risks  that  may be
     material to the Company and major  legislative and regulatory  developments
     that could  materially  impact the  Company's  contingent  liabilities  and
     risks;

14.  Review (a) the status of compliance  with laws,  regulations,  and internal
     procedures,  including,  without  limitation,  the  Company's  policies  on
     ethical  business  practices;  and (b) the  scope  and  status  of  systems
     designed to promote Company compliance with laws,  regulations and internal
     procedures,  through receiving  reports from management,  legal counsel and
     third  parties as determined by the Committee and report on the same to the
     Board of Directors;

15.  Establish procedures for the confidential and anonymous receipt,  retention
     and treatment of complaints  regarding the Company's  accounting,  internal
     controls,  auditing  matters  and  compliance  with the  Company's  ethical
     business policies;

16.  Establish  policies for the hiring of employees and former employees of the
     independent auditor;

17.  Prepare a report of the Committee  each year for inclusion in the Company's
     proxy statement in accordance with SEC rules;

18.  Review and assess the adequacy of this Charter  annually  with the Board of
     Directors as a whole and report to the Board of Directors  any  significant
     matters as they occur during the year; and

19.  Conduct  such  other  duties  and  undertake  such  other  tasks  as may be
     appropriate  to  the  overall  purposes  for  the  Committee  and as may be
     assigned from time to time by the Board of Directors  consistent  with such
     purposes.

     Specific Audit Committee Actions Related to Review of the Company's Audited
Financial  Statements.  In discharging its duties,  the Audit  Committee,  among
other actions,  has (i) reviewed and discussed the audited financial  statements

                                       12


to be included in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the twelve months
ended  December 31, 2003 with  management,  (ii)  discussed  with the  Company's
independent   auditors   the  matters   required  to  be  discussed  by  SAS  61
(Codification  of  Statements  on  Auditing  Standard,  AU380)  related  to such
financial statements, (iii) received the written disclosures and the letter from
the Company's independent  accountants required by Independence  Standards Board
Standard  No. 1  (Independence  Standards  Board  Standard  No. 1,  Independence
Discussions  with  Audit  Committees)  and has  discussed  with the  independent
accountant the independent accountant's  independence,  (iv) the Audit Committee
has considered  whether the provision of service  represented under the headings
on "Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees" and "All Other
Fees"  as set  forth in the  table of fees on page  eleven  is  compatible  with
maintaining  Stonefield  Josephson,  Inc.'s independence,  and (v) based on such
reviews and  discussions,  the Audit  Committee has  recommended to the Board of
Directors  that the audited  financial  statements  be included in the company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003.

                                                   The Audit Committee
                                                Of the Board of Directors

                                                     Michael Farese
                                                     Louis P. Panetta
                                                     C. B. Sung
                                                     David E. Welch


                                       13


                                PERFORMANCE GRAPH

     The Securities and Exchange  Commission  requires the Company to include in
this Proxy Statement a graph comparing the Company's cumulative five-year return
on its  common  stock with a  broad-based  stock  index and either a  nationally
recognized industry index or an index of peer companies selected by the Company.
This performance  graph compares the cumulative  five-year returns on the common
stock with the Nasdaq Computer and Data  Processing  Index and the Nasdaq Index.
Since March 14, 2003 the  Company's  common  stock has been traded on the Nasdaq
OTC Bulletin Board.




                                [OBJECT OMITTED]





                          Total Return To Stockholders
                      (Includes reinvestment of dividends)


                                              ANNUAL RETURN PERCENTAGE
                                                    Years Ending

Company / Index                        Dec99    Dec00    Dec01   Dec02    Dec03
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMUNICATION INTELLIGENCE CORP      1000.00   -87.50   -37.94  -45.31     5.71
NASDAQ U.S & FOREIGN INDEX             86.44   -39.57   -21.09  -31.19    50.84
NASDAQ COMPUTER & DATA PROCESSING     119.99   -53.97   -19.47  -31.04    31.74



                                                         NDEXED RETURNS
                                  Base                    Years Ending
                                 Period
Company / Index                   Dec98     Dec99   Dec00   Dec01  Dec02   Dec03
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMUNICATION INTELLIGENCE CORP    100    1100.00  137.50   85.33  46.67   49.33
NASDAQ U.S & FOREIGN INDEX         100     186.44  112.66   88.89  61.17   92.26
NASDAQ COMPUTER & DATA PROCESSING  100     219.99  101.25   81.54  56.23   74.08


                                       14


                 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

     On June 23, 2003, the Board of Directors  granted  immediately  exercisable
non-qualified stock options to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock to each of
Mr. Farese, Mr. Panetta and Mr. Sung at an exercise price of $0.30 per share and
an expiration  date of June 23, 2010.  The Company  retains a declining  balance
repurchase  option on the shares  underlying  the  options for one year from the
date of grant.

                          PROPOSALS OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     A  stockholder  proposal  requested to be presented at the  Company's  next
Annual Meeting of Stockholders  must be received by the Company at its principal
executive offices,  275 Shoreline Drive,  Suite 500, Redwood Shores,  California
94065,  no later than January 20, 2005.  The Board of Directors  will review any
stockholder  proposal received in accordance herewith and will determine whether
such  proposal is  appropriate  and satisfies the  applicable  requirements  for
inclusion  in the  Company's  proxy  statement  for its next  Annual  Meeting of
Stockholders.

                             SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

     The Company will bear the cost of the Annual  Meeting and the  solicitation
of proxies related thereto, including the costs relating to printing and mailing
the proxy materials.  The Company has retained American Stock Transfer and Trust
Co., the Company's  transfer agent, to assist the Company in the solicitation of
proxies.  Directors,  officers and employees of the Company may make  additional
solicitations in person or by telephone in respect to the Meeting.

                                  OTHER MATTERS

     The Board of Directors  knows of no other matter that may be presented  for
action at the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matter properly comes before
the Annual  Meeting,  the persons named as proxies will vote in accordance  with
their judgment in respect to any such matter.

     Copies of the Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-K, its Quarterly  Reports
on Form 10-Q, including any amendments thereto, and the notice of annual meeting
of  stockholders,  proxy  statement  and  proxies,  are  available  upon written
request,  without cost, from the Company's  principal  executive  offices at 275
Shoreline  Drive,  Suite  500,  Redwood  Shores,  California  94065  (Attention:
Corporate Secretary), Telephone (650) 802-7888.

     Stockholders  are urged to  complete,  sign,  date and return the  enclosed
proxy  promptly  in the  envelope  provided,  regardless  of whether or not they
expect to attend the Annual Meeting. The prompt return of such proxy will assist
the Company in preparing for the Annual  Meeting.  Your  cooperation  is greatly
appreciated.

                             ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

     A copy of the Company's  Annual Report to Shareholders  for the fiscal year
ended  December  31,  2003  accompanies  this Proxy  statement.  The  Company is
required  to file an  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K for its  fiscal  year  ended
December 31, 2003 with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "SEC").  The
SEC maintains a web site, www.sec.gov,  that contains reports, proxy statements,
and certain other information filed  electronically by the Company with the SEC.
Shareholders  may obtain,  free of charge, a copy of the Form 10-K by writing to
Communication Intelligence Corporation, Attn: Corporate Secretary, 275 Shoreline
Drive,  Suite 500, Redwood Shores, CA, 94065, or visiting the Company's web site
at www.cic.com.


                       BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS


                                 Guido DiGregorio
                                 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

May 21, 2004

                                       15



                                                                     APPENDIX A


                     Communication Intelligence Corporation


                AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER


I. PURPOSE

     The  primary  function  of the Audit  Committee  is to assist  the Board of
Directors in fulfilling its oversight  responsibilities by reviewing the quality
and integrity of the Corporation's  financial reports; the Corporation's systems
of internal  controls  regarding  finance and accounting;  and the Corporation's
auditing,  accounting and financial  reporting  processes  generally.  The Audit
Committee's primary duties and responsibilities are to:

a)   Serve as an independent  and objective  party to monitor the  Corporation's
     financial reporting process and internal control systems.

b)   Review and  appraise  the audit  efforts of the  Corporation's  independent
     accountants (auditors) and internal accountants.

c)   Provide an open avenue of communication among the independent  accountants,
     financial and senior management and the Board of Directors.

     The Audit  Committee  will  primarily  fulfill  these  responsibilities  by
carrying out the  responsibilities  and duties enumerated in Section III of this
Charter.  While the Committee has the  responsibilities  and duties set forth in
this Charter,  it is not the Committee's duty (1) to plan or conduct audits, (2)
to  determine  that the  Corporation's  financial  statements  are  complete and
accurate and in accordance with GAAP,  which remains the  responsibility  of the
Corporation's  management  and  independent  accountants,   or  (3)  to  conduct
investigations,  resolve  disagreements,  if  any,  between  management  and the
independent accountants or to assure compliance with laws and regulations.

II.      COMPOSITION

     The Audit Committee shall be comprised of three or more directors.  Subject
to the next paragraph, each of the members of the Committee shall be independent
directors,  free from any  relationship  that, in the opinion of the Board,  may
interfere  with the exercise of his or her  independent  judgment as a member of
the Committee or independence  from management and the Corporation.  All members
of the  Committee  shall be  financially  literate  (or must become  financially
literate within a reasonable period of time after his or her  appointment),  and
at least one member of the Committee shall have accounting or related  financial
management expertise.

     Notwithstanding  the previous paragraph,  one non-independent  director can
serve on the Audit Committee  provided that the Board determines it to be in the
best interests of the Corporation and its shareholders.  The Board must disclose
the reasons for determining the necessity of the non-independent director in its
next proxy statement.  Current employees or officers,  or their immediate family
members may not serve on the Audit Committee under this exemption.

III. RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES

     To fulfill its responsibilities and duties, the Audit Committee shall:

A.   Review Financial Reports

1.   Review and discuss the Corporation's  audited financial statements with the
     Corporation's management.

2.   Review  with  management  and  the  independent   accountants  the  interim
     financial  statements  prior to  filing  the 10-Q  and  publicly  releasing
     quarterly  earnings.  The Chair of the  Committee  may represent the entire
     Committee for purposes of this review.


                                       16



B.   Independent Accountants

     1.   Review and  recommend  to the Board of  Directors  the  engagement  of
          independent accountants, including approval of their fee and the scope
          and timing of their audit of the Corporation's financial statements.

     2.   Review, with the independent  accountants,  the accountants' report on
          the Corporation's financial statements.

     3.   Evaluate  the  performance  of  the  independent  accountants;   where
          appropriate   recommend  that  the  Board  of  Directors  replace  the
          independent  accountants  and approve any  proposed  discharge  of the
          independent accountants.

     4.   On an annual basis,  obtain from the Corporation's  independent public
          accountants written disclosure  delineating all relationships  between
          such accountants and the Corporation and its affiliates, including the
          written  disclosure  and letter  required  by  Independence  Standards
          Board,   Standard   No.  1   ("Independent   Discussions   with  Audit
          Committees"), as it may be modified or supplemented.

     5.   From time to time, as appropriate,  actively engage the  Corporation's
          independent  public  accountants  in a  dialogue  with  respect to any
          disclosed  relationships  or services that may impact the  objectivity
          and  independence  of such  accountants  and recommend to the Board of
          Directors  appropriate  action in response  to the  outside  auditors'
          report to satisfy itself of the auditors' independence.

     6.   Inform  the   independent   accountants   that  they  are   ultimately
          accountable  to the Board of  Directors  and the Audit  Committee,  as
          representatives of the stockholders.

     7.   Periodically  discuss  with the  independent  accountants,  out of the
          presence of management:

               a)   the  Corporation's   internal   controls,   including  their
                    recommendations,   if   any,   for   improvements   in   the
                    Corporation's  internal  controls and the  implementation of
                    such recommendations;

               b)   the  fullness and  accuracy of the  Corporation's  financial
                    statements; and;

               c)   certain other matters  required to be discussed by Statement
                    on Accounting  Standards No. 61  ("Communication  with Audit
                    Committees")1,  as it may be modified,  and information that
                    would be required to be disclosed by GAAS.


C.   Reviewing and Improving Processes

          1.   Review,  with  the  independent  accountants  and  the  Company's
               management,  policies  and  procedures  with  respect to internal
               auditing and financial and accounting controls.

          2.   As part of its job to foster open  communication,  the  Committee
               should meet at least annually with the  Corporation's  management
               and the independent accountants in separate executive sessions to
               discuss any matters  that the  Committee  or each of these groups
               believe should be discussed confidentially.

1 SAS 61 requires independent auditors to communicate certain matters related to
the conduct of an audit to those who have  responsibility  for  oversight of the
financial reporting process, specifically the audit committee. Among the matters
to be  communicated  to the audit committee are: (1) methods used to account for
significant unusual  transactions;  (2) the effect of authoritative  guidance or
consensus;  (3) the  process  used by  management  in  formulating  particularly
sensitive  accounting  estimates  and the  basis for the  auditor's  conclusions
regarding the  reasonableness  of those estimates;  and (4)  disagreements  with
management  over  the  application  of  accounting  principles,  the  basis  for
management's  accounting  estimates,   and  the  disclosures  in  the  financial
statements.


                                       17



          3.   In  consultation  with the  independent  accountants,  review the
               integrity and quality of the organization's  financial  reporting
               processes,  both  internal  and  external,  and  the  independent
               accountant's   perception  of  the  Corporation's  financial  and
               accounting personnel.

          4.   Consider the independent accountants' judgments about the quality
               and appropriateness of the Corporation's accounting principles as
               applied  and  significant   judgments   affecting  its  financial
               reporting.

          5.   Review any  significant  disagreement  among  management  and the
               independent accountants in connection with the preparation of the
               financial statements.

          6.   Review with the independent accountants and management the extent
               to which  changes or  improvements  in  financial  or  accounting
               practices,  as  approved  by  the  Audit  Committee,   have  been
               implemented.

          7.   Consider and recommend to the Board of Directors, if appropriate,
               major changes to the Corporation's financial reporting,  auditing
               and  accounting  principles  and  practices  as  suggested by the
               independent accountants or management.

D.   Other

     1.   State in the  Audit  Committee's  Report in the  Corporation's  Annual
          Proxy Statement whether,  based on the review and discussions referred
          to in items A.1.,  B.4.,  B.5.  and B.7.  above,  the Audit  Committee
          recommended  to the  Board of  Directors  that the  audited  financial
          statements be included in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
          for the last fiscal year.

     2.   Review  and,  if  appropriate,   recommend  updates  of  this  Charter
          annually.

     3.   Perform  any  other  activities  consistent  with  this  Charter,  the
          Corporation's  By-laws and  applicable  law, as the  Committee  or the
          Board deems necessary or appropriate.


                                       18


                                                                     APPENDIX B

                     Communication Intelligence Corporation
                       The Compensation Committee Charter

                               -------------------

Status
         The Compensation Committee is a committee of the Board of Directors.

Membership

     The Compensation  Committee shall consist of three or more directors all of
whom  in the  judgment  of the  Board  of  Directors  shall  be  independent  in
accordance with the listing  requirements of the principal market or exchange on
which the Company's  shares are traded and if no such standards are  prescribed,
then in accordance with  applicable  rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange  Commission.  In  addition,  a person  may  serve  on the  Compensation
Committee  only if the  Board of  Directors  determines  that he or she (i) is a
"Non-employee Director" for purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934,  as amended,  and (ii)  satisfies the  requirements  of an "outside
director" for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Purpose

     The  purposes  of the  Compensation  Committee  are  (i) to  discharge  the
responsibilities  of the Board of  Directors  relating  to  compensation  of the
Company's  CEO and other  executives,  and (ii) to produce  an annual  report on
executive  compensation  for inclusion in the Company's  annual proxy  statement
that  complies with the rules and  regulations  of the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission.  Except as otherwise  required by applicable  laws,  regulations  or
listing standards,  all major decisions are considered by the Board of Directors
as a whole.

Duties and Responsibilities

     The Compensation  Committee is directly responsible for establishing annual
and long-term  performance goals and objectives for our elected  officers.  This
responsibility includes:
1.   evaluating the  performance of the CEO and other elected  officers in light
     of the approved performance goals and objectives;
2.   setting the  compensation of the CEO and other elected  officers based upon
     the  evaluation  of the  performance  of the  CEO  and  the  other  elected
     officers, respectively;
3.   making  recommendations  to the  Board of  Directors  with  respect  to new
     cash-based  incentive  compensation  plans  and  equity-based  compensation
     plans; and
4.   administering the Company's stock option plans.

     In determining the long-term  incentive  component of the Company's CEO and
other  elected  officers,  the  Compensation  Committee  may  consider:  (i) the
Company's  performance and relative  shareholder  return; and, (ii) the value of
similar  incentive  awards to chief executive  officers and elected  officers at
comparable  companies and (iii) the total  compensation  required to attract and
retain equally qualified executives.
..
     The  Compensation   Committee  may,  in  its  sole  discretion,   employ  a
compensation  consultant to assist in the evaluation of the  compensation of the
Company's CEO or other elected officers.  The Compensation  Committee shall have
the sole authority to approve the fees and other retention terms with respect to
such  a  compensation  consultant.  The  Compensation  Committee  also  has  the
authority as necessary and  appropriate,  to consult with other outside advisors
to assist in its duties to the Company.

Meetings

     The  Compensation  Committee shall meet at least annually and at such other
times as it deems necessary to fulfill its responsibilities.

                                       19



                                                                     APPENDIX C

                     Communication Intelligence Corporation

                        The Nominating Committee Charter
                                  ------------


Status
         The Nominating Committee is a committee of the Board of Directors.

Membership

     The  Nominating  Committee  shall  consist of directors  all of whom in the
judgment of the Board of Directors  shall be independent in accordance  with the
listing  requirements of the principal market or exchange on which the Company's
shares are traded and if no such  standards are  prescribed,  then in accordance
with applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Responsibilities

     The  Nominating   Committee  is  responsible  for  considering  and  making
recommendations  to the Board  concerning the  appropriate  size,  functions and
needs of the Board. The Nominating Committee may, at its sole discretion, engage
director  search firms and has the sole  authority to approve the fees and other
retention  terms with respect to any such firms.  The Nominating  Committee also
has the  authority,  as  necessary  and  appropriate,  to consult  with  outside
advisors to assist in their duties to the Company. This responsibility includes:

o    developing and recommending to the Board the criteria for Board membership.
     Criteria  should  include,  among other  things,  integrity,  independence,
     diversity  of  experience,  leadership  and the ability to  exercise  sound
     judgment;
o    considering,  recommending and recruiting  candidates to fill new positions
     on the Board;
o    reviewing candidates recommended by shareholders;
o    conducting the appropriate and necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and
     qualifications  of possible  candidates;  and o  recommending  the Director
     nominees for approval by the Board and the shareholders.

The Committee's additional functions are:
o    to consider  questions of possible  conflicts of interest of Board  members
     and of the Company's senior executives;
o    to monitor and  recommend  the  functions of the various  committees of the
     Board;
o    to recommend members of the committees;
o    to advise on changes in Board compensation;
o    to make recommendations on the structure of Board meetings;
o    to recommend matters for consideration by the Board;
o    to  consider  matters  of  corporate  governance  and to  review,  at least
     annually, the Company's nominating principles; and
o    to consider, and review periodically,  the Company's director qualification
     standards.


                                       20