UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (MARK ONE) [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ___ TO ___ COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-17139 GENUS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) CALIFORNIA 94-279080 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 1139 KARLSTAD DRIVE, SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA 94089 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) (408) 747-7120 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) NOT APPLICABLE (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No -- Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: Common shares outstanding at August 10, 2000: 19,060,848 ---------------- PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS GENUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) THREE MONTHS ENDED IX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, JUNE 30, -------- -------- 2000 1999 2000 1999 -------- ------- ------- -------- Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,356 $ 7,966 $24,633 $13,918 Costs and expenses: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,906 4,495 13,718 8,099 Research and development . . . . . . . . . . 1,968 1,341 3,728 2,544 Selling, general and administrative. . . . . 2,423 2,017 5,193 3,882 -------- ------- ------- -------- Income (loss) from operations . . . . . . . . 1,059 113 1,994 (607) Other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . (4) 66 282 175 -------- ------- ------- -------- Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . 1,055 179 2,276 (432) Provision for income taxes. . . . . . . . . . 100 0 350 0 -------- ------- ------- -------- Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 955 $ 179 $ 1,926 $ (432) ======== ======= ======= ======== Net income (loss) per share - basic . . . . . $ 0.05 $ 0.01 $ 0.10 $ (0.02) ======== ======= ======= ======== Net income (loss) per share - diluted . . . . $ 0.05 $ 0.01 $ 0.09 $ (0.02) ======== ======= ======= ======== Shares used in per share calculation-basic. . 18,839 18,117 18,704 17,991 ======== ======= ======= ======== Shares used in per share calculation-diluted. 20,579 18,624 20,604 17,991 ======== ======= ======= ======== <FN> The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. GENUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA) JUNE 30, 2000 DECEMBER 31, 1999 ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents. . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10,359 $ 6,739 Accounts receivable (net allowance for doubtful accounts of $241 in 2000 and $241 in 1999. . . 6,377 7,629 Inventories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,255 7,266 Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,179 883 --------------- ------------------- Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,170 22,517 Property and equipment, net. . . . . . . . . . . 6,938 4,894 Other assets, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358 333 --------------- ------------------- Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 34,466 $ 27,744 =============== =================== LIABILITIES Current liabilities: Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,475 $ 4,146 Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,335 4,220 Total current liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . 11,810 8,366 --------------- ------------------- Contingencies (see notes) SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Preferred stock, no par value: Authorized 1,982,000 shares; Issued and outstanding, none . . . . . . . . . 0 0 Common stock, no par value: Authorized 50,000,000 shares; Issued and outstanding 19,053,513 shares at June 30, 2000 and 18,469,000 shares at December 31, 1999. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102,374 101,042 Accumulated deficit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (77,946) (79,872) Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . (1,772) (1,792) --------------- ------------------- Total shareholders' equity . . . . . . . . . . 22,656 19,378 --------------- ------------------- $ 34,466 $ 27,744 =============== =================== <FN> The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. GENUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED) (IN THOUSANDS) SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, ------------------ 2000 1999 --------- -------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net income (loss). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,926 $ (432) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization. . . . . . . . . . . . . 756 831 Stock compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 0 Changes in assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,252 3,068 Inventories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,989) 976 Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (321) (19) Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,329 344 Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 (1050) Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities. 5,343 3,718 -------- -------- Cash flows from investing activities: Acquisition of property and equipment. . . . . . . . . . (2,800) (515) -------- -------- Net cash used in investing activities. . . . . . . . (2,800) (515) -------- -------- Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from issuance of common stock . . . . . . . . . 993 108 Proceeds from short-term bank borrowings . . . . . . . . 4,000 0 Payments of short-term bank borrowings . . . . . . . . . (4,000) (4,000) Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 0 -------- -------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities. 1,057 (3,892) -------- -------- Effect of exchange rate changes on cash . . . . . . . . . 20 (39) -------- -------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents. . . 3,620 (728) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period. . . . . . 6,739 8,125 -------- -------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of period. . . . . . . . . $ 10,359 $ 7,397 ======== ======== <FN> The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. GENUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) Basis of Presentation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with SEC requirements for interim financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The information furnished reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year. Net Income (Loss) Per Share. Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders, adjusted for convertible preferred dividends and after-tax interest expense on convertible debt, if any, by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and potential common shares (when dilutive). Net Income (Loss) Per Share A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share is as follows (in thousands, except per share data): THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, JUNE 30, ------------------- ---------------- 2000 1999 2000 1999 ------------------- ------- ------- Numerator-basic: Net income (loss) available to common shareholders $ 955 $ 179 $ 1,926 $ (432) Denominator-basic: Weighted average common stock outstanding. . . . . 18,839 18,117 18,704 17,991 ======== ======== ======= ======== Basic net income (loss) per share . . . . . . . . . $ 0.05 $ 0.01 $ 0.10 $ (0.02) ======== ======== ======= ======== Numerator-diluted: Net income (loss) available to common shareholders $ 955 $ 179 $ 1,926 $ (432) Denominator-diluted: Weighted average common stock outstanding. . . . . 18,839 18,117 18,704 17,991 Effect of dilutive securities: stock options . . . 1,548 507 1,672 0 Effect of dilutive securities: warrants. . . . . . 192 0 228 0 -------- -------- ------- -------- 20,579 18,624 20,604 17,991 ======== ======== ======= ======== Diluted net income (loss) per share . . . . . . . . $ 0.05 $ 0.01 $ 0.09 $ (0.02) GENUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) Anti-dilutive stock options to purchase approximately 446,821 shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share for the six months ended June 30, 2000, because the exercise price of the options exceeded the average fair market value of the stock for the six months ended June 30, 2000. Stock options to purchase approximately 2,284,690 shares of common stock were outstanding during the three months ended June 30, 1999 but were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share because the Company had a net loss for the three months ended June 30, 1999. Warrants to purchase 400,000 shares of common stock were outstanding during the three months ended June 30, 1999 but were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share because the Company had a net loss for the six months ended June 30, 1999. Statement of Cash Flow Information (amounts in thousands): SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, -------- 2000 1999 ----- ----- Supplemental cash flow information: Cash paid during the period for: Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 64 $ 2 Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . 152 0 Line of Credit. In November 1999, the Company entered into a $10 million revolving line of credit with Venture Bank. Amounts available under the line are based on 80% of eligible accounts receivable, and borrowings under the line of credit are secured by all corporate assets and bear interest at prime plus 0.25%. The line of credit expires in November 2001. The line of credit contains covenants that require the Company to maintain a minimum quick ratio and a maximum debt to tangible net equity ratio. In addition, the line requires the Company to have annual profitability beginning in 2000 and a maximum quarterly loss of $1 million with no two consecutive quarterly losses. Additionally, the Company is prohibited from distributing dividends. The amount available to borrow at June 30, 2000 was $3.3 million at a rate of 9.75%. There is no current outstanding balance against this line of credit. INVENTORIES Inventories comprise the following (in thousands): JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, 2000 1999 ------ ------ Raw materials and purchased parts $7,486 $5,439 Work in process . . . . . . . . . 1,692 1,055 Finished goods. . . . . . . . . . 77 772 ------ ------ $9,255 $7,266 ====== ====== GENUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) ACCRUED EXPENSES Accrued expenses comprise the following (in thousands): JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, 2000 1999 ------ ------ System installation and warranty. . . . $1,155 $ 817 Accrued commissions and incentives. . . 449 364 Accrued compensation and related items. 536 872 Federal, state and foreign income taxes 863 622 Customer deposits . . . . . . . . . . . 0 420 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,332 1,125 ------ ------ $4,335 $4,220 ====== ====== LEGAL PROCEEDINGS The Company has been named as a defendant in a claim involving an automobile accident by a former employee of the Company, which resulted in the death of an individual. General, punitive, and exemplary damages are being sought by the plaintiffs. The Company believes it is not at fault in this matter, and has appointed legal council to defend the claim. While the outcome of this matter is not presently determinable, management does not believe that resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130 (SFAS 130), "Reporting Comprehensive Income" establishes rules for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components. The following are the components of comprehensive income (loss) (in thousands): THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, JUNE 30, -------- -------- 2000 1999 2000 1999 ------ ------ ------ ------ Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 955 $ 179 $1,926 $(432) Foreign currency translation adjustments. (1) (58) 20 (39) ------ ------ ------ ------ Comprehensive income (loss). . . . . . . $ 954 $ 121 $1,946 $(471) ====== ====== ====== ====== The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, are as follows (in thousands): JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, 2000 1999 -------- -------- Cumulative translation adjustments $(1,772) $(1,792) ======== ======== GENUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) STOCK OPTION PLAN In May 2000, the Company adopted the 2000 Stock Option Plan which replaced the 1991 Incentive Stock Option Plan and resulted in an overall increase of 800,000 shares available for issuance to 4,803,006. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN In May 2000, the Company amended its employee stock purchase plan to increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance thereunder by 300,000 shares from 2,350,000 to 2,650,000. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS 133), SFAS 133 established a new model for accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. In July 1999, the Financial Accounting Standards Boards issued SFAS No. 137, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities--Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133" (SFAS 137). SFAS 137 deferred the effective date of SFAS 133 until the first quarter beginning after June 15, 2000. The impact of SFAS 133 on the consolidated financial statements has not yet been determined. In December 1999, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 101, "Revenue Recognition." The SEC staff addresses several issues in SAB No. 101, including the timing for recognizing revenue derived from selling arrangements that involve contractual customer acceptance provisions and installation of the product occurs after shipment and transfer of title. Our existing revenue recognition policy is to recognize revenue at the time the customer takes title to the product, generally at the time of shipment, because we have, in the past, routinely met our installation obligations and obtained customer acceptance. Applying the requirements of SAB No. 101 to our present selling arrangements for the sale of semiconductor production equipment may require a change in our accounting policy for revenue recognition and the deferral of the recognition of revenue from such equipment sales until installation is complete and accepted by the customer. The effect of such a change, if any, must be recognized as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting no later than the quarter ending December 31, 2000. We believe the effects on liquidity, cash flow and financial position will not be material. At the current time, it is not possible to determine the effect this change may have on our results of operations. However, should the Company be required to record a cumulative effect of a change in accounting, it will result in a charge to net income (loss). We are also considering potential changes to our standard contracts for equipment sales that could mitigate the potential impact of SAB No. 101 on a going forward basis. In March 2000, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Interpretation No. 44 ("FIN 44") Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25. FIN 44 clarifies the application of Opinion 25 for (a) the definition of employee for purposes of applying Opinion 25, (b) the criteria for determining whether a plan qualifies as a noncompensatory plan, (c) the accounting consequence of various modifications to the terms of a previously fixed stock option or award, and (d) the accounting for an exchange of stock compensation awards in a business combination. FIN 44 is effective July 1, 2000, but certain conclusions cover specific events that occur after either December 15, 1998, or January 12, 2000. The adoption of certain provisions prior to July 1, 2000 did not have a material effect. The Company does not expect adoption of the remaining provisions to have a material effect on the financial position or results of operations. ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Statements in this report which express "belief", anticipation" or "expectation" as well as other statements which are not historical fact are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or anticipated results, including those set forth under "Risk Factors" in this "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and elsewhere in or incorporated by reference into this report. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company's Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in this report. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS NET SALES. Net sales for the three and six months ending June 30, 2000 were $12.4 million and $24.6 million, representing an increase of 55% and 77% over the net sales of $8 million and $13.9 million for the corresponding periods in 1999. System shipments in the second quarter consisted of our mainstream tungsten silicide products to Samsung Electronics, Ltd. in Korea. Year to date shipments included an ALD system to a new customer, Infineon Technologies AG, and tungsten silicide systems to Samsung Electronics, Ltd. Additionally, Samsung completed a program to upgrade their entire installed base of Lynx2 systems in Korea to the current generation high productivity process chamber. The increase in sales levels in 2000 over 1999 reflects an overall strengthening in the semiconductor equipment market COST OF GOODS SOLD. Cost of goods sold for the three and six months ending June 30, 2000 was $6.9 million and $13.7 million, compared to $4.5 million and $8.1 million for the same periods in 1999. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales for the three and six months ending June 30, 2000 was 44.1% and 44.3%, compared with 43.5% and 41.8% in 1999. Gross margin percentage remained relatively flat despite higher sales volumes due to increases in operations and service overhead costs, as we increase our infrastructure to support the worldwide sales growth we have experienced over the past 12 months. Our gross profits have historically been affected by variations in average selling prices, configuration differences, changes in the mix of product sales, unit shipment levels, the level of foreign sales and competitive pricing pressures. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Research and development expenses for the quarter ending June 30, 2000 were $2.0 million, representing 16% of net sales, compared with $1.3 million or 17% of net sales for the same period in 1999. R&D spending for the first six months of 2000 was $3.7 million, or 15% of sales, compared with $2.5 million, or 18% in 1999. These increases are primarily related to investment in our Atomic Layer Deposition technology programs, specifically the development of new films to address advanced dielectric and barrier applications for sub .15 micron applications. We are also working with customers on applications for ALD other than in semiconductors, such as magnetic disk drives and telecommunications. We expect our research and development spending levels to continue to increase throughout 2000. SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $2.4 million for the second quarter of 2000, compared with $2.0 million for the second quarter of 1999. Year to date SG&A expenses were $5.2 million, compared to $3.9 million during the first half of 1999. Although actual spending increased in 2000, there was a decrease as a percentage of sales in both the three and six month periods of 2000 over the corresponding 1999 periods. Higher spending in 2000 is primarily due to the increase in business levels over the past 12 months, and include higher sales commissions, profit sharing accruals, travel costs, and additional resources to sales, marketing, and information technology. OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET. Other expenses for the second quarter of 2000 were $4,000, compared to other income of $66,000 for the same period in 1999. Interest expense associated with the short term borrowing offset interest income received during the quarter. Year to date other income was $282,000, compared to $175,000 in 1999, due primarily to interest income received during the first quarter of 2000 from Samsung. The remainder of other income consists of interest income from short term interest bearing deposits and foreign currency exchange gains due to the strengthening of the Korean won against the U.S. dollar. PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES. Income taxes for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2000 were $100,000 and $350,000, compared to none in the same 1999 periods. Income taxes are related to the profit generated from our South Korean subsidiary. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES At June 30, 2000, our cash and cash equivalents were $10.4 million, an increase of $3.6 million from cash and cash equivalents of $6.7 million held as of December 31, 1999. During the second quarter of 2000, we collected a total of $19 million, including the amount due on six systems. Three of these systems shipped early in the second quarter of 2000, and were collected prior to the end of June. Cash provided by operating activities totaled $5.3 million for the six months ending June 30, 2000, and consisted of net income of $1.9 million and increases in accounts payable of $3.3 million, accounts receivable of $1.3 million, depreciation and amortization of $756,000, stock compensation of $275,000, and accrued expenses of $115,000. Partially offsetting this was increases in inventory of $2.0 million and other current assets of $321,000. The accounts payable increase was primarily due to increased levels of inventory purchasing activity to support production requirements in the second and third quarter, and the acquisition of capital equipment for use in our applications and R&D labs. Inventories increased due to the early timing of shipments during the third quarter of 2000, requiring material to be in stock and on the production floor in June. Financing activities provided cash of $1.1 million for the six months ending June 30, 2000, from the issuance of common stock from our incentive stock option plan and our employee stock purchase plan. We made capital expenditures of $2.8 million for the six months ending June 30, 2000. These expenditures principally related to the acquisition and upgrading of machinery and equipment for our research and development and applications laboratories, and personal computer related equipment. We anticipate spending an additional $3 million in capital expenditures during the remainder of 2000. We currently anticipate that additional capital expenditures will be funded through existing working capital or lease financing. Our primary source of funds at June 30, 2000 consisted of $10.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, and $6.4 million of accounts receivable, most of which we expect to collect during the third quarter of 2000. In November 1999, we entered into a $10 million revolving line of credit with Venture Bank. Amounts available under the line are based on 80% of eligible accounts receivable, and borrowings under the line are secured by all corporate assets and bear interest at prime plus 0.25%. The line of credit expires in November 2001. The line of credit contains covenants that require us to maintain a minimum quick ratio and a maximum debt to tangible net equity ratio. In addition, the line of credit requires us to have annual profitability beginning in 2000 and a maximum quarterly loss of $1 million with no two consecutive quarterly losses. Additionally, we are prohibited from distributing dividends. The amount available to borrow at June 30, 2000 was $3.3 million at a rate of 9.75%. There are no outstanding borrowings. We believe that our existing working capital, as well as the $10 million Venture Bank line of credit, will be sufficient to satisfy our cash needs for the next 12 months. There can be no assurance that any required additional funding, if needed, will be available on terms attractive to us, which could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any additional equity financing may be dilutive to shareholders, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS 133), SFAS 133 established a new model for accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. In July 1999, the Financial Accounting Standards Boards issued SFAS No. 137, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities--Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133" (SFAS 137). SFAS 137 deferred the effective date of SFAS 133 until the first quarter beginning after June 15, 2000. The impact of SFAS 133 on the consolidated financial statements has not yet been determined. In December 1999, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 101, "Revenue Recognition." The SEC staff addresses several issues in SAB No. 101, including the timing for recognizing revenue derived from selling arrangements that involve contractual customer acceptance provisions and installation of the product occurs after shipment and transfer of title. Our existing revenue recognition policy is to recognize revenue at the time the customer takes title to the product, generally at the time of shipment, because we have, in the past, routinely met our installation obligations and obtained customer acceptance. Applying the requirements of SAB No. 101 to our present selling arrangements for the sale of semiconductor production equipment may require a change in our accounting policy for revenue recognition and the deferral of the recognition of revenue from such equipment sales until installation is complete and accepted by the customer. The effect of such a change, if any, must be recognized as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting no later than the quarter ending December 31, 2000. We believe the effects on liquidity, cash flow and financial position will not be material. At the current time, it is not possible to determine the effect this change may have on our results of operations. However, should the Company be required to record a cumulative effect of a change in accounting, it will result in a charge to net income (loss). We are also considering potential changes to our standard contracts for equipment sales that could mitigate the potential impact of SAB No. 101 on a going forward basis. In March 2000, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Interpretation No. 44 ("FIN 44") Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25. FIN 44 clarifies the application of Opinion 25 for (a) the definition of employee for purposes of applying Opinion 25, (b) the criteria for determining whether a plan qualifies as a noncompensatory plan, (c) the accounting consequence of various modifications to the terms of a previously fixed stock option or award, and (d) the accounting for an exchange of stock compensation awards in a business combination. FIN 44 is effective July 1, 2000, but certain conclusions cover specific events that occur after either December 15, 1998, or January 12, 2000. FIN 44 is effective July 1, 2000, but certain conclusions cover specific events that occur after either December 15, 1998, or January 12, 2000. The adoption of certain provisions prior to July 1, 2000 did not have a material effect. The Company does not expect adoption of the remaining provisions to have a material effect on the financial position or results of operations. Risk Factors Certain sections of Management's Discussion and Analysis contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of the factors set forth above in Management's Discussion and Analysis and this Risk Factors section. The discussion of these factors is incorporated by this reference as if said discussion was fully set forth in Management's Discussion and Analysis. WE HAVE EXPERIENCED LOSSES OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS AND WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ACHIEVE OR SUSTAIN PROFITABILITY We have experienced losses of $1.6 million, $29.5 million, and $19.3 million for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. While we recorded a profit of $1.9 million during the six months ending June 30, 2000, we may not be able to attain or sustain consistent future revenue growth on a quarterly or annual basis, or achieve and maintain consistent profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. As a result, our business could be materially harmed. SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF OUR NET SALES COME FROM A SMALL NUMBER OF LARGE CUSTOMERS Historically, we have relied on a small number of customers for a substantial portion of our net sales. For example, Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. and Micron Technology, Inc. accounted of 84% and 11% of our net sales in 1999 respectively. During the first six months of 2000, Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. and Infineon Technologies AG. accounted for 86% and 11% of our net sales. In addition, Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., and Micron Technology, Inc. represented 92% of accounts receivable at December 31, 1999. Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. and Infineon Technologies AG accounted for 86% of accounts receivable at June 30, 2000. The semiconductor manufacturing industry generally consists of a limited number of larger companies. We consequently expect that a significant portion of our future product sales will be concentrated within a limited number of customers. None of our customers has entered into a long-term agreement with us requiring them to purchase our products. In addition, sales to these customers may decrease in the future when they complete their current semiconductor equipment purchasing requirements. If any of our customers were to encounter financial difficulties or become unable to continue to do business with us at or near current levels, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected. Customers may delay or cancel orders or may stop doing business with us for a number of reasons including: - - customer departures from historical buying patterns; - - general market conditions; - - economic conditions; or - - competitive conditions in the semiconductor industry or in the industries that manufacture products utilizing integrated circuits. OUR QUARTERLY FINANCIAL RESULTS FLUCTUATE SIGNIFICANTLY AND MAY FALL SHORT OF ANTICIPATED LEVELS, WHICH COULD CAUSE OUR STOCK PRICE TO DECLINE Our net sales and operating results may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. We derive our revenue primarily from the sale of a relatively small number of high-priced systems, many of which may be ordered and shipped during the same quarter. Our results of operations for a particular quarter could be materially adversely affected if anticipated orders, for even a small number of systems, were not received in time to enable shipment during the quarter, anticipated shipments were delayed or canceled by one or more customers or shipments were delayed due to manufacturing difficulties. At our current revenue level, each sale, or failure to make a sale, could have a material effect on us. Our lengthy sales cycle, coupled with our customers' competing capital budget considerations, make the timing of customer orders uneven and difficult to predict. In addition, our backlog at the beginning of a quarter typically does not include all orders required to achieve our sales objectives for that quarter. As a result, our net sales and operating results for a quarter depend on us shipping orders as scheduled during that quarter as well as obtaining new orders for systems to be shipped in that same quarter. Any delay in scheduled shipments or in shipments from new orders would materially and adversely affect our operating results for that quarter, which could cause our stock price to decline. In December 1999, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101. SAB 101 summarizes certain of the SEC staff's views in applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue recognition in financial statements. Prior to SAB 101, we generally recognized revenue upon shipment of a system. Applying the requirements of SAB 101 to the present selling arrangements we use for the sale of semiconductor production equipment may require a change in our accounting policy for revenue recognition and deferral of the recognition of revenue from such equipment sales until installation is complete and accepted by the customer. The effect of such a change, if any, must be recognized as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting no later than the quarter ending December 31, 2000. Although SAB 101 applies to every company within our industry, there is a risk that our stock price may be materially and adversely impacted by SAB 101 if we are required to transition from recognizing revenue at shipment, to customer acceptance of a system. Since it is possible that there may be a shift in revenue recognition from the time of shipment to the time of acceptance by the customer, certain revenue that we would have recognized in the first and second quarters of 2000 upon shipment of products may not be recognized until the products are accepted. We cannot assure you as to the timing of such acceptances. Any material delay in receipt of acceptances may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. WE ARE HIGHLY DEPENDENT ON OUR INTERNATIONAL SALES, PARTICULARLY SALES IN ASIAN COUNTRIES, AND FACE RISKS BEYOND OUR CONTROL OR INFLUENCE Export sales accounted for approximately 86%, 56% and 74% of our total net sales in 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively, and accounted for 97% of our total net sales during the six months ending June 30, 2000. Net sales to our South Korean-based customers accounted for approximately 84%, 30% and 50% of total net sales, respectively, during the same year-end periods, and accounted for 85% of our total net sales during the six months ending June 30, 2000. We anticipate that international sales, including sales to South Korea, will continue to account for a significant portion of our net sales. As a result, a significant portion of our net sales will be subject to certain risks, including: - - unexpected changes in law or regulatory requirements; - - exchange rate volatility; - - tariffs and other barriers; - - political and economic instability; - - difficulties in accounts receivable collection; - - extended payment terms; - - difficulties in managing distributors or representatives; - - difficulties in staffing our subsidiaries; - - difficulties in managing foreign subsidiary operations; and - - potentially adverse tax consequences. Our foreign sales are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars and we do not engage in hedging transactions. As a result, our foreign sales are subject to the risks associated with unexpected changes in exchange rates, which could affect the price of our products. In the past, turmoil in the Asian financial markets resulted in dramatic currency devaluations, stock market declines, restriction of available credit and general financial weakness. For example, prices fell dramatically in 1998 as some integrated circuit manufacturers sold DRAMs at less than cost in order to generate cash. Currency devaluations make dollar-denominated goods, such as ours, more expensive for international customers. In addition, difficult economic conditions may limit capital spending by our customers. These circumstances may also affect the ability of our customers to meet their payment obligations, resulting in the cancellations or deferrals of existing orders and the limitation of additional orders. As a result of any or all these factors, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially harmed. OUR SALES REFLECT THE CYCLICALITY OF THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY, WHICH COULD CAUSE OUR OPERATING RESULTS TO FLUCTUATE SIGNIFICANTLY AND COULD CAUSE US TO FAIL TO ACHIEVE ANTICIPATED SALES Our business depends upon the capital expenditures of semiconductor manufacturers, which in turn depend on the current and anticipated market demand for integrated circuits and products utilizing integrated circuits. The semiconductor industry is cyclical and experiences periodic downturns both of which reduce the semiconductor industry's demand for semiconductor manufacturing capital equipment. Semiconductor industry downturns have significantly decreased our revenues, operating margins and results of operations in the past. There is a risk that our revenues and operating results will be materially harmed by any future downturn in the semiconductor industry. OUR FUTURE GROWTH IS DEPENDENT ON ACCEPTANCE OF NEW THIN FILMS AND MARKET ACCEPTANCE OF OUR SYSTEMS RELATING TO THOSE THIN FILMS We believe that our future growth will depend in large part upon the acceptance of our new thin films. As a result, we expect to continue to invest in research and development in these new thin films and the systems that use these films. There can be no assurance that the market will accept our new products or that we will be able to develop and introduce new products or enhancements to our existing products and processes in a timely manner to satisfy customer needs or achieve market acceptance. The failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we must manage product transitions successfully, as introductions of new products could harm sales of existing products. We derive our revenue primarily from the sale of our tungsten silicide CVD systems. We estimate that the life cycle for these systems is three-to-five years. There is a risk that future technologies, processes or product developments may render our product offerings obsolete and we may not be able to develop and introduce new products or enhancements to our existing products in a timely manner. WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO CONTINUE TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPETE IN THE HIGHLY COMPETITIVE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY AGAINST COMPETITORS WITH GREATER RESOURCES The semiconductor manufacturing capital equipment industry is highly competitive. We face substantial competition throughout the world. We believe that to remain competitive, we will require significant financial resources in order to develop new products, offer a broader range of products, establish and maintain customer service centers and invest in research and development. Many of our existing and potential competitors have substantially greater financial resources, more extensive engineering, manufacturing, marketing, customer service capabilities and greater name recognition. We expect our competitors to continue to improve the design and performance of their current products and processes and to introduce new products and processes with improved price and performance characteristics. If our competitors enter into strategic relationships with leading semiconductor manufacturers covering thin film products similar to those sold by us, it would materially adversely affect our ability to sell our products to such manufacturers. In addition, to expand our sales we must often replace the systems of our competitors or sell new systems to customers of our competitors. Our competitors may develop new or enhanced competitive products that will offer price or performance features that are superior to our systems. Our competitors may also be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, or to devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their product lines. We may not be able to maintain or expand our sales if competition increases and we are not able to respond effectively. WE MAY NOT ACHIEVE ANTICIPATED REVENUE GROWTH IF WE ARE NOT SELECTED AS VENDOR OF CHOICE FOR NEW OR EXPANDED FABRICATION FACILITIES AND IF OUR SYSTEMS AND PRODUCTS DO NOT ACHIEVE BROADER MARKET ACCEPTANCE Because semiconductor manufacturers must make a substantial investment to install and integrate capital equipment into a semiconductor fabrication facility, these manufacturers will tend to choose semiconductor equipment manufacturers based on established relationships, product compatibility and proven financial performance. Once a semiconductor manufacturer selects a particular vendor's capital equipment, the manufacturer generally relies for a significant period of time upon equipment from this vendor of choice for the specific production line application. In addition, the semiconductor manufacturer frequently will attempt to consolidate its other capital equipment requirements with the same vendor. Accordingly, we may face narrow windows of opportunity to be selected as the "vendor of choice" by potential new customers. It may be difficult for us to sell to a particular customer for a significant period of time once that customer selects a competitor's product, and we may not be successful in obtaining broader acceptance of our systems and technology. If we are not able to achieve broader market acceptance of our systems and technology, we may be unable to grow our business and our operating results and financial condition will be materially adversely affected. OUR LENGTHY SALES CYCLE INCREASES OUR COSTS AND REDUCES THE PREDICTABILITY OF OUR REVENUE Sales of our systems depend upon the decision of a prospective customer to increase manufacturing capacity. That decision typically involves a significant capital commitment by our customers. Accordingly, the purchase of our systems typically involves time-consuming internal procedures associated with the evaluation, testing, implementation and introduction of new technologies into our customers' manufacturing facilities. For many potential customers, an evaluation as to whether new semiconductor manufacturing equipment is needed typically occurs infrequently. Following an evaluation by the customer as to whether our systems meet its qualification criteria, we have experienced in the past and expect to experience in the future delays in finalizing system sales while the customer evaluates and receives approval for the purchase of our systems and constructs a new facility or expands an existing facility. Due to these factors, our systems typically have a lengthy sales cycle during which we may expend substantial funds and management effort. The time between our first contact with a customer and the customer placing its first order typically lasts from nine to twelve months and is often even longer. This lengthy sales cycle makes it difficult to accurately forecast future sales and may cause our quarterly and annual revenue and operating results to fluctuate significantly from period to period. If anticipated sales from a particular customer are not realized in a particular period due to this lengthy sales cycle, our operating results may be adversely affected. WE ARE DEPENDENT ON OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND RISK LOSS OF A VALUABLE ASSET, REDUCED MARKET SHARE AND LITIGATION EXPENSE IF WE CANNOT ADEQUATELY PROTECT IT Our success depends in part on our proprietary technology. There can be no assurance that we will be able to protect our technology or that competitors will not be able to develop similar technology independently. We currently have a number of United States and foreign patents and patent applications. There can be no assurance that any patents issued to us will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that the rights granted thereunder will provide us with competitive advantages. From time to time, we have received notices from third parties alleging infringement of such parties' patent rights by our products. In such cases, it is our policy to defend against the claims or negotiate licenses on commercially reasonable terms where appropriate. However, no assurance can be given that we will be able to negotiate necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, or that any litigation resulting from such claims would not have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. WE ARE DEPENDENT UPON KEY PERSONNEL WHO ARE EMPLOYED AT WILL, WHO WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO REPLACE AND WHOSE LOSS WOULD IMPEDE OUR DEVELOPMENT AND SALES We are highly dependent on key personnel to manage our business, and their knowledge of business, management skills and technical expertise would be difficult to replace. Our success depends upon the efforts and abilities of Dr. William W.R. Elder, our chairman and chief executive officer, Dr. Thomas E. Seidel, our chief technology officer, and other key managerial and technical employees who would be difficult to replace. The loss of Dr. Elder or Dr. Seidel or other key employees could limit or delay our ability to develop new products and adapt existing products to our customers' evolving requirements and would also result in lost sales and diversion of management resources. None of our executive officers are bound by a written employment agreement, and the relationships with our officers are at will. Because of competition for additional qualified personnel, we may not be able to recruit or retain necessary personnel, which could impede development or sales of our products. Our growth depends on our ability to attract and retain qualified, experienced employees. There is substantial competition for experienced engineering, technical, financial, sales and marketing personnel in our industry. In particular, we must attract and retain highly skilled design and process engineers. Competition for such personnel is intense, particularly in the San Francisco Bay Area where we are based. If we are unable to retain our existing key personnel, or attract and retain additional qualified personnel, we may from time to time experience inadequate levels of staffing to develop and market our products and perform services for our customers. As a result, our growth could be limited due to our lack of capacity to develop and market our products to customers, or fail to meet delivery commitments or experience deterioration in service levels or decreased customer satisfaction. OUR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS COULD RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL LIABILITY TO US We are subject to a variety of federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations relating to the protection of health and the environment. These include laws, rules and regulations governing the use, storage, discharge, release, treatment and disposal of hazardous chemicals during and after manufacturing, research and development and sales demonstrations. If we fail to comply with present or future regulations, we could be subject to substantial liability for clean up efforts, property damage, personal injury and fines or suspension or cessation of our operations. Restrictions on our ability to expand or continue to operate our present locations could be imposed upon us or we could be required to acquire costly remediation equipment or incur other significant expenses. WE DEPEND UPON A LIMITED NUMBER OF SUPPLIERS FOR MANY COMPONENTS AND SUBASSEMBLIES, AND SUPPLY SHORTAGES OR THE LOSS OF THESE SUPPLIERS COULD RESULT IN INCREASED COST OR DELAYS IN MANUFACTURE AND SALE OF OUR PRODUCTS Certain of the components and sub-assemblies included in our products are obtained from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Disruption or termination of these sources could have an adverse effect on our operations. We believe that alternative sources could be obtained and qualified to supply these products, if necessary. Nevertheless, a prolonged inability to obtain certain components could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. WE DEPEND UPON SIX DISTRIBUTORSHIPS FOR THE SALE OF OUR PRODUCTS AND ANY DISRUPTION IN THESE RELATIONSHIPS WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT US We currently sell and support our thin film products through direct sales and customer support organizations in the U.S., Europe, South Korea and Japan and through six independent sales representatives and distributors in the U.S., Europe, South Korea, Taiwan, China and Malaysia. We do not have any long-term contracts with our sales representatives and distributors. Any disruption or termination of our existing distributor relationships could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. WE ARE ESTABLISHING A DIRECT SALES ORGANIZATION IN JAPAN WHICH COULD RESULT IN LOST SALES OR INCREASED RISKS TO OUR BUSINESS IN JAPAN As part of our original strategy for penetrating the Japanese market, we established a distribution relationship with Innotech Corp. In 1998, we shifted our strategy in Japan to a direct sales model. We have terminated our distribution relationship with Innotech and are establishing our own direct sales force in Japan. Although we intend to continue to invest significant resources in Japan, including the hiring of additional personnel to support our direct sales effort, we may not be able to maintain or increase our sales to the Japanese semiconductor industry. We may miss sales opportunities or lose competitive sales as we transition to this direct sales model, and our existing Japanese customers and potential customers may be unwilling to purchase our systems from us directly. THE PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK HAS FLUCTUATED IN THE PAST AND MAY CONTINUE TO FLUCTUATE SIGNIFICANTLY IN THE FUTURE, WHICH MAY LEAD TO LOSSES BY INVESTORS OR TO SECURITIES LITIGATION Our common stock has experienced substantial price volatility, particularly as a result of quarter-to-quarter variations in our, our competitors or our customers actual or anticipated financial results, our competitors or our customers announcements of technological innovations, revenue recognition policies, changes in earnings estimates by securities analysts and other events or factors. Also, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations which have affected the market price of many technology companies, in particular, and which have often been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market fluctuations, as well as general economic and political conditions in the United States and the countries in which we do business, may adversely effect the market price of our common stock. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against a company following periods of volatility in the company's stock price. This type of litigation, if filed against us, could result in substantial costs and divert our management's attention and resources. YEAR 2000 COMPLICATIONS MAY DISRUPT OUR OPERATIONS BECAUSE, WHILE OUR UPGRADED INTERNAL SYSTEMS ARE OPERATIONAL AND THE COST OF UPGRADES WAS NOT MATERIAL, WE RELY ON EXTERNAL SYSTEMS THAT MAY NOT BE ADEQUATELY UPGRADED FOR YEAR 2000 The date fields coded in many software products and computer systems need to be able to distinguish 21st century dates from 20th century dates, including leap year calculations. The failure to be able to accurately distinguish these dates is commonly known as the year 2000 problem. While we have yet to experience year 2000 problems, the computer software programs and operating systems used in our internal operations, including our financial, product development, order management and manufacturing systems, could experience errors or interruptions due to the year 2000 problem. For example, a significant failure of our computer integrated manufacturing systems, which monitor and control factory equipment, could disrupt manufacturing operations and cause a delay in completion and shipping of products. In addition, it is possible that our suppliers' and service providers' failure to adequately address the year 2000 problem could have an adverse effect on their operations, which, in turn, could have an adverse impact on us. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Some of the information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in the documents that are incorporated by reference, including the risk factors, contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In many cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "predicts," "potential," or "continue," or the negative of these terms and other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including the risks faced by us described above and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We believe it is important to communicate our expectations to our shareholders. However, there may be events in the future that we are not able to predict accurately or over which we have no control. The risk factors listed above, as well as any cautionary language in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK We face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. These exposures may change over time as our business practices evolve and could seriously harm our financial results. All of our international sales, except spare parts and service sales made by our subsidiary in South Korea, are currently denominated in U.S. dollars. All spare parts and service sales made by the South Korean subsidiary are won denominated. An increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our products more expensive and, therefore, reduce the demand for our products. Reduced demand for our products could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. At any time, fluctuations in interest rates could affect interest earnings on our cash, cash equivalents or increase any interest expense owed on the line of credit facility. We believe that the effect, if any, of reasonably possible near term changes in interest rates on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows would not be material. Currently, we do not hedge these interest rates exposures. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS The Company's Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 31, 2000 in Santa Clara, California. Proxies for the meeting were solicited pursuant to Regulation 14A. At the Company's Annual Meeting, the shareholders approved the following resolutions: (1) Election of the following persons as directors. Director In Favor Withheld -------- --------- -------- William W.R. Elder 16,125,447 303,526 Todd S. Myhre 16,123,560 305,413 G. Frederick Forsyth 16,192,995 235,978 Mario M. Rosati 16,188,595 240,378 Robert J. Richardson 16,190,195 238,778 George D. Wells 16,196,195 232,778 (2) To approve the adoption of the Genus, Inc. 2000 stock option plan which will replace the 1991 Incentive Stock Option Plan and result in an overall increase of 800,000 shares available for issue. For: 3,710,314 Against: 2,148,825 Abstain: 65,021 Broker Non-Vote: 12,846,204 (3) Amendment to the 1989 Employee Stock Purchase Plan increasing the number of shares reserved for issuance thereunder by 300,000 additional shares. For: 5,599,843 Against: 259,524 Abstain: 64,793 Broker Non-Vote: 12,846,204 (4) Ratification and appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent accountants. For: 14,957,567 Against: 649,922 Abstain: 821,585 Broker Non-Vote: 2,341,290 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) Exhibits The Exhibits listed on the accompanying "Index to Exhibits" are filed as part hereof, or incorporated by reference into, the report. (b) Report on Form 8-K The Company was not required to file a Form 8-K during the second quarter of 2000. GENUS, INC. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. Date: August 10, 2000 GENUS, INC. /s/ William W.R. Elder ---------------------------------- William W.R. Elder, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman /s/ Kenneth Schwanda ----------------------------------- Kenneth Schwanda Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer) GENUS, INC. INDEX TO EXHIBITS EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION - ----------- ----------- 27.1 Financial Data Schedule