UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q/A
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended JUNE 30, 2001
------------------
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to .
--------
Commission File No. 0-19135
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts 04-3090151
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
88 Broad Street, Boston, MA 02110
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (617) 854-5800
-------------------
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
-----
EXPLANATORY NOTE
After American Income Partners V-D Limited Partnership ("the Partnership") filed
its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K (the "2000 10-K")
for the year ended December 31, 2000 and its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2001 (the "June 30, 2001 Form 10-Q") with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Partnership determined that the accounting
treatment for the loan receivable from Echelon Residential Holdings LLC
("Echelon Residential Holdings") required revision, as explained below.
As reported in the 2000 10-K and the June 30, 2001 Form 10-Q, on March 8, 2000,
the Partnership and 10 affiliated partnerships (the ''Exchange Partnerships'')
collectively loaned $32 million to Echelon Residential Holdings, a newly formed
real estate company. The Partnership's loan to Echelon Residential Holdings is
$2,730,000. Echelon Residential Holdings, through a wholly owned subsidiary
(Echelon Residential LLC), used the loan proceeds to acquire various real estate
assets from Echelon International Corporation, an unrelated Florida-based real
estate company. The loan has a term of 30 months, maturing on September 8, 2002
and an annual interest rate of 14% for the first 24 months and 18% for the final
six months. Interest accrues and compounds monthly and is payable at maturity.
In connection with the transaction, Echelon Residential Holdings has pledged a
security interest in all of its right, title and interest in and to its
membership interests in Echelon Residential LLC to the Exchange Partnerships as
collateral.
The loan receivable was previously accounted for and reported in accordance with
the guidance for Acquisition, Development and Construction Arrangements ("ADC
arrangements") in the Partnership's financial statements as of and for each of
the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The loan
was presented as an investment in a real estate venture and was presented net of
the Partnership's share of losses in Echelon Residential Holdings. The
Partnership was allocated its proportionate share of the unconsolidated real
estate venture's net loss, excluding the interest expense on the loan, based on
the balance of its loan receivable in relation to the real estate venture's
total equity and notes payable, including the ADC arrangements. For the three
and six month periods ended June 30, 2001 and June 30, 2000, the Partnership's
share of losses in Echelon Residential Holdings was $62,855 and $118,882, and
$14,831 and $17,502, respectively, and was reflected on the Statement of
Operations as ''Partnership's share of unconsolidated real estate venture's
loss''.
Subsequent to the issuance of the 2000 Form 10-K and the June 30, 2001 Form
10-Q, the Partnership determined that the loan receivable should be accounted
for consistent with its legal form and the Partnership should recognize the
interest income, as calculated per the contractual terms of the loan agreement
to the extent such interest income was evaluated as likely to be collected. The
loan receivable and related interest should be evaluated for impairment under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114 "Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan".
Accordingly, the Partnership reversed the proportionate share of losses in
Echelon Residential Holdings of $62,855 and $118,882, respectively, previously
recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and $14,831 and
$17,502, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2000. The
Partnership also recognized interest income of $108,515 during the six months
ended June 30, 2001 and $98,668 and $124,148, during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2000, respectively.
In addition, during the second quarter of 2001, the General Partner determined
that recoverability of the loan receivable had been impaired and at June 30,
2001 recorded an impairment of $238,875, reflecting the General Partner's
current assessment of the amount of loss that is likely to be incurred by the
Partnership. In addition to the write-down recorded at June 30, 2001, the
Partnership reserved all accrued interest of $443,080 recorded on the loan
receivable through March 31, 2001 and has ceased accruing interest on its loan
receivable from Echelon Residential Holdings, effective April 1, 2001.
These adjustments resulted in a net decrease in earnings for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 of $619,100 and $454,558, respectively, or $1.22 and
$0.90, per limited partnership unit. The adjustments resulted in a net increase
to earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2000 of $113,499 and
$141,650, respectively, or $0.22 and $0.28, per limited partnership unit.
As a result, the accompanying financial statements for each of the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and June 30, 2000 and the Partnership's Statement of
Financial Position as of December 31, 2000 have been restated from the amounts
previously reported.
A summary of the significant effects of the restatement is as follows:
As of and for the Three Months Ended
June 30, 2001
As
Previously As
Reported Restated
------------ -----------
Statement of Operations
Income
Lease revenue $ 33,156 $ 33,156
Interest income 13,478 13,478
Gain on sale of equipment 7,500 7,500
------------ -----------
Total income 54,134 54,134
------------ -----------
Expenses
Depreciation 14,569 14,569
Equipment management fees - affiliate 1,083 1,083
Operating expenses - affiliate 108,623 108,623
Write-down of impaired loan and interest receivable - 681,955
Partnership's share of unconsolidated
real estate venture's loss 62,855 -
------------ -----------
Total expenses 187,130 806,230
Net loss $ (132,996) $ (752,096)
============ ===========
Net loss per limited partnership unit $ (0.26) $ (1.49)
============ ===========
Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets $ 3,611,952 $3,699,176
============ ===========
Total liabilities $ 235,504 $ 235,504
Partners' capital (deficit)
General Partner (363,231) (358,870)
Limited Partnership Interests 3,739,679 3,822,542
------------ -----------
Total partners' capital $ 3,376,448 $3,463,672
============ ===========
As of and for the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2001
As
Previously As
Statement of Operations Reported Restated
------------ -----------
Income
Lease revenue $ 68,019 $ 68,019
Interest income 25,741 25,741
Interest income - loan receivable - 108,515
Gain on sale of equipment 7,500 7,500
------------ -----------
Total income 101,260 209,775
------------ -----------
Expenses
Depreciation 29,138 29,138
Equipment management fees - affiliate 2,251 2,251
Operating expenses - affiliate 186,887 186,887
Write-down of impaired loan and interest receivable - 681,955
Partnership's share of unconsolidated
real estate venture's loss 118,882 -
------------ -----------
Total expenses 337,158 900,231
------------ -----------
Net loss $ (235,898) $ (690,456)
============ ===========
Net loss per limited partnership unit $ (0.47) $ (1.37)
============ ===========
Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets $ 3,611,952 $3,699,176
============ ===========
Total liabilities $ 235,504 $ 235,504
Partners' capital (deficit)
General Partner (363,231) (358,870)
Limited Partnership Interests 3,739,679 3,822,542
------------ -----------
Total partners' capital $ 3,376,448 $3,463,672
============ ===========
As of and for the Three Months Ended
June 30, 2000
As
Previously As
Reported Restated
------------ -----------
Statement of Operations
Income
Lease revenue $ 51,772 $ 51,772
Interest income 18,000 18,000
Interest income - loan receivable - 98,668
Interest income - affiliate - -
Gain on sale of equipment 3,700 3,700
------------ -----------
Total income 73,472 172,140
------------ -----------
Expenses
Depreciation 16,141 16,141
Equipment management fees - affiliate 1,953 1,953
Operating expenses - affiliate 37,197 37,197
Partnership's share of unconsolidated
real estate venture's loss 14,831 -
------------ -----------
Total expenses 70,122 55,291
Net income $ 3,350 $ 116,849
============ ===========
Net income per limited partnership unit $ 0.01 $ 0.23
============ ===========
Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets $ 4,024,411 $4,166,061
============ ===========
Total liabilities $ 201,865 $ 201,865
Partners' capital (deficit)
General Partner (340,926) (333,844)
Limited Partnership Interests 4,163,472 4,298,040
------------ -----------
Total partners' capital $ 3,822,546 $3,964,196
============ ===========
As of and for the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2000
As
Previously As
Statement of Operations Reported Restated
------------ -----------
Income
Lease revenue $ 102,837 $ 102,837
Interest income 62,660 62,660
Interest income - loan receivable - 124,148
Gain on sale of equipment 3,700 3,700
------------ -----------
Total income 169,197 293,345
------------ -----------
Expenses
Depreciation 32,282 32,282
Equipment management fees - affiliate 3,870 3,870
Operating expenses - affiliate 73,384 73,384
Partnership's share of unconsolidated
real estate venture's loss 17,502 -
------------ -----------
Total expenses 127,308 109,536
------------ -----------
Net income $ 42,159 $ 183,809
============ ===========
Net income per limited partnership unit $ 0.08 $ 0.36
============ ===========
Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets $ 4,024,411 $4,166,061
============ ===========
Total liabilities $ 201,865 $ 201,865
Partners' capital (deficit)
General Partner (340,926) (333,844)
Limited Partnership Interests 4,163,472 4,298,040
------------ -----------
Total partners' capital $ 3,822,546 $3,964,196
============ ===========
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FORM 10-Q/A
INDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: Page
----
Item 1. Financial Statements (Restated):
Statement of Financial Position
at June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000 3
Statement of Operations
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 4
Statement of Cash Flows
for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 5
Notes to the Financial Statements 6
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations 11
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 15
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION:
Item 1 - 6 16
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
JUNE 30, 2001 AND DECEMBER 31, 2000
(UNAUDITED)
June 30, December 31,
. 2001 2000
. Restated Restated
ASSETS (See Note 1) (See Note 1)
------------- --------------
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,141,051 $ 1,226,359
Rents receivable - 10,731
Accounts receivable - affiliate 18,566 12,809
Prepaid expenses 6,563 -
Interest receivable - loan, net of allowance of $443,080
at June 30, 2001 - 334,565
Loan receivable, net of allowance of $238,875
at June 30, 2001 2,491,125 2,730,000
Equipment at cost, net of accumulated depreciation
of $974,382 and $1,003,736 at June 30, 2001
and December 31, 2000, respectively 41,871 71,009
------------- --------------
Total assets $ 3,699,176 $ 4,385,473
============= ==============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Accrued liabilities $ 204,338 $ 216,360
Accrued liabilities - affiliate 31,166 14,985
------------- --------------
Total liabilities 235,504 231,345
------------- --------------
Partners' capital (deficit):
General Partner (358,870) (324,347)
Limited Partnership Interests
(480,227 Units; initial purchase price of $25 each) 3,822,542 4,478,475
------------- --------------
Total partners' capital 3,463,672 4,154,128
------------- --------------
Total liabilities and partners' capital $ 3,699,176 $ 4,385,473
============= ==============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001 AND 2000
(UNAUDITED)
. For the three months ended For the nine months ended
. September 30, September 30,
. 2001 2000 2001 2000
. Restated Restated Restated Restated
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
INCOME (See Note 1) (See Note 1) (See Note 1) (See Note 1)
Lease revenue $ 33,156 $ 51,772 $ 68,019 $ 102,837
Interest income 13,478 18,000 25,741 62,660
Interest income - loan - 98,668 108,515 124,148
Gain on sale of equipment 7,500 3,700 7,500 3,700
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Total income 54,134 172,140 209,775 293,345
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
EXPENSES
Depreciation 14,569 16,141 29,138 32,282
Equipment management fees - affiliate 1,083 1,953 2,251 3,870
Operating expenses - affiliate 108,623 37,197 186,887 73,384
Write-down of impaired loan and interest receivable 681,955 - 681,955 -
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Total expenses 806,230 55,291 900,231 109,536
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Net income (loss) $ (752,096) $ 116,849 $ (690,456) $ 183,809
============= ============= ============= =============
Net income (loss) per limited partnership unit $ (1.49) $ 0.23 $ (1.37) $ 0.36
============= ============= ============= =============
Cash distributions declared
per limited partnership unit $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
============= ============= ============= =============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001 AND 2000
(UNAUDITED)
. 2001 2000
. Restated Restated
------------- -------------
. (See Note 1) (See Note 1)
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss) $ (690,456) $ 183,809
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation 29,138 32,282
Gain on sale of equipment (7,500) (3,700)
Write-down of impaired loan and interest receivable 681,955 -
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Rents receivable 10,731 -
Accounts receivable - affiliate (5,757) 30,155
Prepaid expenses (6,563) -
Interest receivable - loan (108,515) (124,148)
Accrued liabilities (12,022) (29,843)
Accrued liabilities - affiliate 16,181 (941)
------------- -------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (92,808) 87,614
------------- -------------
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from equipment sales 7,500 3,700
Issuance of loan receivable - (2,730,000)
------------- -------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 7,500 (2,726,300)
------------- -------------
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Distributions paid - (56,869)
------------- -------------
Net cash used in financing activities - (56,869)
------------- -------------
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (85,308) (2,695,555)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 1,226,359 3,878,824
------------- -------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 1,141,051 $ 1,183,269
============= =============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
------
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2000
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 - RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
- --------------------------------------------------
After American Income Partners V-D Limited Partnership ("the Partnership") filed
its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K (the "2000 10-K")
for the year ended December 31, 2000 and its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2001 (the "June 30, 2001 Form 10-Q") with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Partnership determined that the accounting
treatment for the loan receivable from Echelon Residential Holdings LLC
("Echelon Residential Holdings") required revision, as explained below.
As reported in the 2000 10-K and the June 30, 2001 Form 10-Q, on March 8, 2000,
the Partnership and 10 affiliated partnerships (the ''Exchange Partnerships'')
collectively loaned $32 million to Echelon Residential Holdings, a newly formed
real estate company. The Partnership's loan to Echelon Residential Holdings is
$2,730,000. Echelon Residential Holdings, through a wholly owned subsidiary
(Echelon Residential LLC), used the loan proceeds to acquire various real estate
assets from Echelon International Corporation, an unrelated Florida-based real
estate company. The loan has a term of 30 months, maturing on September 8, 2002
and an annual interest rate of 14% for the first 24 months and 18% for the final
six months. Interest accrues and compounds monthly and is payable at maturity.
In connection with the transaction, Echelon Residential Holdings has pledged a
security interest in all of its right, title and interest in and to its
membership interests in Echelon Residential LLC to the Exchange Partnerships as
collateral.
The loan receivable was previously accounted for and reported in accordance with
the guidance for Acquisition, Development and Construction Arrangements ("ADC
arrangements") in the Partnership's financial statements as of and for each of
the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The loan
was presented as an investment in a real estate venture and was presented net of
the Partnership's share of losses in Echelon Residential Holdings. The
Partnership was allocated its proportionate share of the unconsolidated real
estate venture's net loss, excluding the interest expense on the loan, based on
the balance of its loan receivable in relation to the real estate venture's
total equity and notes payable, including the ADC arrangements. For the three
and six month periods ended June 30, 2001 and June 30, 2000, the Partnership's
share of losses in Echelon Residential Holdings was $62,855 and $118,882, and
$14,831 and $17,502, respectively, and was reflected on the Statement of
Operations as ''Partnership's share of unconsolidated real estate venture's
loss''.
Subsequent to the issuance of the 2000 Form 10-K and the June 30, 2001 Form
10-Q, the Partnership determined that the loan receivable should be accounted
for consistent with its legal form and the Partnership should recognize the
interest income, as calculated per the contractual terms of the loan agreement
to the extent such interest income was evaluated as likely to be collected. The
loan receivable and related interest should be evaluated for impairment under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114 "Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan".
Accordingly, the Partnership reversed the proportionate share of losses in
Echelon Residential Holdings of $62,855 and $118,882, respectively, previously
recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and $14,831 and
$17,502, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2000. The
Partnership also recognized interest income of $108,515 during the six months
ended June 30, 2001 and $98,668 and $124,148, during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2000, respectively.
In addition, during the second quarter of 2001, the General Partner determined
that recoverability of the loan receivable had been impaired and at June 30,
2001 recorded an impairment of $238,875, reflecting the General Partner's
current assessment of the amount of loss that is likely to be incurred by the
Partnership. In addition to the write-down recorded at June 30, 2001, the
Partnership reserved all accrued interest of $443,080 recorded on the loan
receivable through March 31, 2001 and has ceased accruing interest on its loan
receivable from Echelon Residential Holdings, effective April 1, 2001.
These adjustments resulted in a net decrease in earnings for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 of $619,100 and $454,558, respectively, or $1.22 and
$0.90, per limited partnership unit. The adjustments resulted in a net increase
to earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2000 of $113,499 and
$141,650, respectively, or $0.22 and $0.28, per limited partnership unit. As a
result, the accompanying financial statements for each of the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and June 30, 2000 and the Partnership's Statement of
Financial Position as of December 31, 2000 have been restated from the amounts
previously reported.
NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION
- -----------------------------------
The financial statements, as restated, presented herein are prepared in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
for interim financial reporting and the instructions for preparing Form 10-Q
under Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission and
are unaudited. As such, these financial statements do not include all
information and footnote disclosures required under accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements and,
accordingly, the accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the footnotes presented in the Partnership's 2000 Annual Report. Except as
disclosed herein, there has been no material change to the information presented
in the footnotes to the 2000 Annual Report on Amendment No. 2 Form 10-K/A.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal and
recurring adjustments) considered necessary to present fairly the financial
position at June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000 and results of operations for
the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 have been made and
are reflected. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2001 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.
NOTE 3 - CASH
- ----------------
At June 30, 2001, the Partnership had $1,041,403 invested in federal agency
discount notes, repurchase agreements secured by U.S. Treasury Bills or
interests in U.S. Government securities, or other highly liquid overnight
investments.
NOTE 4 - REVENUE RECOGNITION
- --------------------------------
Rents are payable to the Partnership monthly or quarterly and no significant
amounts are calculated on factors other than the passage of time. The leases
are accounted for as operating leases and are noncancellable. Rents received
prior to their due dates are deferred. In certain instances, the Partnership
may enter renewal or re-lease agreements which expire beyond the Partnership's
anticipated dissolution date. This circumstance is not expected to prevent the
orderly wind-up of the Partnership's business activities as the General Partner
and EFG would seek to sell the then-remaining equipment assets either to the
lessee or to a third party, taking into consideration the amount of future
noncancellable rental payments associated with the attendant lease agreements.
See also Note 8 regarding the Class Action Lawsuit. Future minimum rents of
$31,750 are due as follows:
For the year ending June 30, 2002 $16,280
2003 14,280
2004 1,190
-------
. Total $31,750
=======
NOTE 5 - EQUIPMENT
- ---------------------
The following is a summary of equipment owned by the Partnership at June 30,
2001. Remaining Lease Term (Months), as used below, represents the number of
months remaining from June 30, 2001 under contracted lease terms and is
presented as a range when more than one lease agreement is contained in the
stated equipment category. A Remaining Lease Term equal to zero reflects
equipment either held for sale or re-lease or being leased on a month-to-month
basis. In the opinion of EFG, the acquisition cost of the equipment did not
exceed its fair market value.
Remaining
Lease
Term Equipment
Equipment Type (Months) at Cost
- ------------------------------------------- ---------- -----------
Trailers/intermodal containers 0-1 $ 323,542
Materials handling 0-6 267,667
Research and test 0 105,805
Manufacturing 25 95,460
Communications 0 80,063
Motor vehicles 25 64,367
Tractors and heavy duty trucks 25 46,921
Construction and mining 0 31,282
Computers and peripherals 0 1,146
-----------
Total equipment cost . 1,016,253
Accumulated depreciation . (974,382)
-----------
Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation . $ 41,871
===========
At June 30, 2001, the Partnership's equipment portfolio included equipment
having a proportionate original cost of $106,000, representing approximately 10%
of total equipment cost.
The summary above includes fully depreciated equipment held for re-lease or sale
with an original cost of approximately $106,000. The General Partner is
actively seeking the sale or re-lease of all equipment not on lease.
NOTE 6 - LOAN RECEIVABLE
- ----------------------------
On March 8, 2000, the Partnership and 10 affiliated partnerships (the ''Exchange
Partnerships'') collectively loaned $32 million to Echelon Residential Holdings,
a newly formed real estate company. Echelon Residential Holdings is owned by
several investors, including James A. Coyne, Executive Vice President of EFG.
In addition, certain affiliates of the General Partner made loans to Echelon
Residential Holdings in their individual capacities.
The Partnership's original loan was $2,730,000. Echelon Residential Holdings,
through a wholly-owned subsidiary (Echelon Residential LLC), used the loan
proceeds to acquire various real estate assets from Echelon International
Corporation, an unrelated Florida-based real estate company. The loan has a term
of 30 months, maturing on September 8, 2002, and an annual interest rate of 14%
for the first 24 months and 18% for the final six months.
Interest accrues and compounds monthly and is payable at maturity. In connection
with the transaction, Echelon Residential Holdings has pledged a security
interest in all of its right, title and interest in and to its membership
interests in Echelon Residential LLC to the Exchange Partnerships as collateral.
The summarized financial information for Echelon Residential Holdings as of and
for the periods ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively, is as follows:
(Unaudited)
As of and for the periods ended
June 30,
2001 2000
------------ ------------
Total assets $79,159,776 $54,704,360
Total liabilities $85,455,528 $48,386,270
Minority interest $ 1,782,982 $ 2,527,750
Total equity (deficit) $(8,078,734) $ 3,790,340
Total revenues $ 1,705,679 $ 905,751
Total expenses, minority interest
and equity in loss of unconsolidated
joint venture $ 5,924,774 $ 2,593,700
Net loss $(4,219,095) $(1,687,949)
During the second quarter of 2001, the General Partner determined that
recoverability of the loan receivable had been impaired and at June 30, 2001
recorded an impairment of $238,875, reflecting the General Partner's current
assessment of the amount of loss that is likely to be incurred by the
Partnership. In addition to the write-down recorded at June 30, 2001, the
Partnership reserved all accrued interest of $443,080 recorded on the loan
receivable through March 31, 2001 and has ceased accruing interest on its loan
receivable from Echelon Residential Holdings, effective April 1, 2001.
The write-down was precipitated principally by a slowing U.S. economy and its
effects on the real estate development industry. The economic outlook for the
properties that existed when the loan was funded has deteriorated and inhibited
the ability of Echelon Residential Holdings' management to secure low-cost
sources of development capital, including but not limited to joint-venture or
equity partners. In response to these developments and lower risk tolerances in
the credit markets, the management of Echelon Residential Holdings decided in
the second quarter of 2001 to concentrate its prospective development activities
within the southeastern United States and, therefore, to dispose of development
sites located elsewhere. In May 2001, Echelon Residential Holdings closed its
Texas-based development office; and since the beginning of 2001, the company has
sold three of nine properties (two in July 2001 and one in October 2001). As of
November 2001, one additional property is under contract to be sold, subject to
due diligence that remains pending. As a result of these developments, the
General Partner does not believe that Echelon Residential Holdings will realize
the profit levels originally believed to be achievable from either selling these
properties as a group or developing all of them as multi-family residential
communities.
NOTE 7 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
- ----------------------------------------
All operating expenses incurred by the Partnership are paid by EFG on behalf of
the Partnership and EFG is reimbursed at its actual cost for such expenditures.
Fees and other costs incurred during the six month periods ended June 30, 2001
and 2000, which were paid or accrued by the Partnership to EFG or its
Affiliates, are as follows:
2001 2000
-------- -------
Equipment management fees $ 2,251 $ 3,870
Administrative charges 38,430 34,527
Reimbursable operating expenses
due to third parties 148,457 38,857
-------- -------
Total $189,138 $77,254
======== =======
All rents and proceeds from the sale of equipment are paid directly to EFG. EFG
temporarily deposits collected funds in a separate interest-bearing escrow
account prior to remittance to the Partnership. At June 30, 2001, the
Partnership was owed $18,566 by EFG for such funds and the interest thereon.
These funds were remitted to the Partnership in July 2001.
The discussion of the loan to Echelon Residential Holdings in Note 6 above is
incorporated herein by reference.
NOTE 8 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
- ------------------------------
As described more fully in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
Amendment No. 2 for the year ended December 31, 2000, the Partnership is a
Nominal Defendant in a Class Action Lawsuit, the outcome of which could
significantly alter the nature of the Partnership's organization and its future
business operations.
On March 12, 2001, after a status conference and hearing, the Court issued an
order that required the parties, no later than May 15, 2001, to advise the Court
on (a) whether the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") had completed its
review of the solicitation statement and related materials submitted to the SEC
in connection with the proposed settlement, and (b) whether the parties
requested the Court to schedule a hearing for final approval of the proposed
settlement or were withdrawing the proposed settlement from judicial
consideration and resuming the litigation of the Plaintiffs' claims.
On May 11, 2001, the general partners of the partnerships that are nominal
defendants in the Class Action Lawsuit received a letter dated May 10, 2001 from
the Associate Director and Chief Counsel of the Division of Investment
Management of the SEC informing the general partners that the staff of the
Division believes that American Income Partners V-A Limited Partnership,
American Income Partners V-B Limited Partnership, American Income Partners V-C
Limited Partnership, American Income Partners V-D Limited Partnership, American
Income Fund I-A, American Income Fund I-B, American Income Fund I-E and AIRFUND
II International Limited Partnership (the "Designated Partnerships") are
investment companies as defined in Section 3(a)(1)(c) of the Investment Company
Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). The SEC staff noted that Section 7 of
the 1940 Act makes it unlawful for an unregistered investment company to offer
or sell or purchase any security or engage in any business in interstate
commerce. Accordingly, Section 7 would prohibit any partnership that is an
unregistered investment company from engaging in any business in interstate
commerce, except transactions that are merely incidental to its dissolution.
The letter also stated that the Division is considering enforcement action with
respect to this matter. Noting that the parties to the Class Action Lawsuit
were scheduled to appear before the court in the near future to consider a
proposed settlement, and that the SEC staff's views, as expressed in the letter,
are relevant to the specific matters that will be considered by the court at the
hearing, the SEC staff submitted the letter to the court for its consideration.
On May 15, 2001, Defendants' Counsel filed with the court Defendants' Status
Report pursuant to the court's March 12, 2001 Order. Defendants reported that,
notwithstanding the parties' best efforts, the staff of the SEC has not
completed its review of the solicitation statement in connection with the
proposed settlement of the Class Action Lawsuit. Nonetheless, the Defendants
stated their belief that the parties should continue to pursue the court's final
approval of the proposed settlement. In this regard, the Defendants also have
maintained, on the advice of special 1940 Act counsel that, even if the 1940 Act
applies to the Designated Partnerships, the 1940 Act does not prohibit going
forward with the proposed settlement, as that transaction is merely incidental
to a dissolution of the Partnerships and therefore is not subject to the
prohibitions of Section 7 of the 1940 Act.
The Defendants also referred to the SEC staff's letter of May 10, 2001 asserting
that certain of the partnerships are investment companies and special 1940 Act
counsel's submissions to the SEC staff setting forth the reasons why the 1940
Act does not apply to the Designated Partnerships, noting that counsel had
informed the staff of the Division of Investment Management that, based upon
counsel's understanding of the surrounding circumstances and after an in-depth
analysis of the applicable law, counsel is willing to issue an opinion of the
firm that none of the partnerships is an investment company under the 1940 Act.
The Defendants stated their belief that the proposed settlement is still viable
and in the best interests of the parties and that final approval should be
pursued. The Defendants advised the court that they believe that if the court
were to address the issue of whether or not the 1940 Act applies to the
partnerships and the proposed consolidation, it could remove the major obstacle
to the settlement being finally consummated. The Defendants also requested that
the court schedule a hearing to address on a preliminary basis the objection to
the proposed settlement raised in the staff's May 10, 2001 letter.
Plaintiffs' Counsel also submitted a Plaintiffs' Status Report to the court on
May 15, 2001 in which they reported that the SEC review has not been concluded
and that they notified the Defendants that they would not agree to continue to
stay the further prosecution of the litigation in favor of the settlement and
that they intend to seek court approval to immediately resume active prosecution
of the claims of the Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs' Counsel stated in the Report that
the "[p]laintiffs continue to believe that the settlement is in the best
interests of the Operating Partnership Sub-class. However, since the SEC has
yet to complete its review of the proxy, the Plaintiffs do not believe that the
litigation should continue to be stayed so that the SEC may continue its
regulatory review for an indefinite period of time." Plaintiffs requested a
pre-trial conference to schedule filing of Plaintiffs' motion for class
certification on or before May 29, 2001 and resumption of merits discovery and
discovery related to the class certification motion.
Subsequently, after a status conference on May 31 2001, the court issued an
order on June 4, 2001 setting a trial date of March 4, 2002, referred the case
to mediation and referred discovery to a magistrate judge. The Defendant's and
Plaintiff's Counsel have continued to negotiate toward a settlement and have
reached agreement as to its principal business terms. As part of the
settlement, EFG has agreed to buy the loans made by the Exchange Partnerships to
Echelon Residential Holdings for an aggregate of $32 million plus interest at
7.5% per annum, if they are not repaid prior to or at their scheduled maturity
date. Upon completion of a stipulation of settlement, the parties will submit
the settlement to the court for approval.
There can be no assurance that a settlement of the sub-class involving the
Exchange Partnerships will receive final Court approval and be effected.
However, in the absence of a final settlement approved by the Court, the
Defendants intend to defend vigorously against the claims asserted in the Class
Action Lawsuit. Neither the General Partner nor its affiliates can predict with
any degree of certainty the cost of continuing litigation to the Partnership or
the ultimate outcome.
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FORM 10-Q/A
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
of Operations.
- ---------------
Certain statements in this quarterly report of American Income Partners V-D
Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") that are not historical fact constitute
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are subject to a variety of risks and
uncertainties. There are a number of factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made
herein. These factors include, but are not limited to, the outcome of the Class
Action Lawsuit described in Note 8 to the accompanying financial statements, the
remarketing of the Partnership's equipment and the performance of the
Partnership's non-equipment assets.
The Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act") places restrictions on the
capital structure and business activities of companies registered thereunder.
The Partnership has active business operations in the financial services
industry, including equipment leasing and the loan to Echelon Residential
Holdings LLC ("Echelon Residential Holdings"). The Partnership does not intend
to engage in investment activities in a manner or to an extent that would
require the Partnership to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act.
However, it is possible that the Partnership may unintentionally engage in an
activity or activities that may be construed to fall within the scope of the
1940 Act. The General Partner is engaged in discussions with the staff of the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") regarding whether or not the
Partnership may be an inadvertent investment company as a consequence of the
above-referenced loan. If the Partnership were determined to be an unregistered
investment company, its business would be adversely affected. The 1940 Act,
among other things, prohibits an unregistered investment company from offering
securities for sale or engaging in any business in interstate commerce and,
consequently, leases and contracts entered into by partnerships that are
unregistered investment companies may be voidable. The General Partner has
consulted counsel and believes that the Partnership is not an investment
company. The General Partner has determined to take action to avoid the
Partnership being deemed an investment company by disposing or acquiring certain
assets that it might not otherwise dispose or acquire.
On May 11, 2001, the general partners of the partnerships that are nominal
defendants in the Class Action Lawsuit received a letter dated May 10, 2001 from
the Associate Director and Chief Counsel of the Division of Investment
Management of the SEC informing the general partners that the staff of the
Division believes that American Income Partners V-A Limited Partnership,
American Income Partners V-B Limited Partnership, American Income Partners V-C
Limited Partnership, American Income Partners V-D Limited Partnership, American
Income Fund I-A, American Income Fund I-B, American Income Fund I-E and AIRFUND
II International Limited Partnership (the "Designated Partnerships") are
investment companies as defined in Section 3(a)(1)(c) of the 1940 Act. The
letter also stated that the Division is considering enforcement action with
respect to this matter. Noting that the parties to the Class Action Lawsuit
were scheduled to appear before the court in the near future to consider a
proposed settlement, and that the SEC staff's views, as expressed in the letter,
are relevant to the specific matters that will be considered by the court at the
hearing, the SEC staff submitted the letter to the court for its consideration.
On May 15, 2001, Defendants' Counsel filed with the court Defendants' Status
Report pursuant to the court's March 12, 2001 Order. Defendants reported that,
notwithstanding the parties' best efforts, the staff of the SEC has not
completed its review of the solicitation statement in connection with the
proposed settlement of the Class Action Lawsuit. Nonetheless, the Defendants
stated their belief that the parties should continue to pursue the court's final
approval of the proposed settlement. In this regard, the Defendants also have
maintained, on the advice of special 1940 Act counsel that, even if the 1940 Act
applies to the Designated Partnerships, the 1940 Act does not prohibit going
forward with the proposed settlement, as that transaction is merely incidental
to a dissolution of the Partnerships and therefore is not subject to the
prohibitions of Section 7 of the 1940 Act.
The Defendants also referred to the SEC staff's letter of May 10, 2001 asserting
that certain of the partnerships are investment companies and special 1940 Act
counsel's submissions to the SEC staff setting forth the reasons why the 1940
Act does not apply to the Designated Partnerships, noting that counsel had
informed the staff of the Division of Investment Management that, based upon
counsel's understanding of the surrounding circumstances and after an in-depth
analysis of the applicable law, counsel is willing to issue an opinion of the
firm that none of the partnerships is an investment company under the 1940 Act.
The Defendants stated their belief that the proposed settlement is still viable
and in the best interests of the parties and that final approval should be
pursued. The Defendants advised the court that they believe that if the court
were to address the issue of whether or not the 1940 Act applies to the
partnerships and the proposed consolidation, it could remove the major obstacle
to the settlement being finally consummated. The Defendants also requested that
the court schedule a hearing to address on a preliminary basis the objection to
the proposed settlement raised in the staff's May 10, 2001 letter.
Plaintiffs' Counsel also submitted a Plaintiffs' Status Report to the court on
May 15, 2001 in which they reported that the SEC review has not been concluded
and that they notified the Defendants that they would not agree to continue to
stay the further prosecution of the litigation in favor of the settlement and
that they intend to seek court approval to immediately resume active prosecution
of the claims of the Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs' Counsel stated in the Report that
the "[p]laintiffs continue to believe that the settlement is in the best
interests of the Operating Partnership Sub-class. However, since the SEC has
yet to complete its review of the proxy, the Plaintiffs do not believe that the
litigation should continue to be stayed so that the SEC may continue its
regulatory review for an indefinite period of time." Plaintiffs requested a
pre-trial conference to schedule filing of Plaintiffs' motion for class
certification on or before May 29, 2001 and resumption of merits discovery and
discovery related to the class certification motion.
Subsequently, after a status conference on May 31 2001, the court issued an
order on June 4, 2001 setting a trial date of March 4, 2002, referred the case
to mediation and referred discovery to a magistrate judge. The Defendant's and
Plaintiff's Counsel have continued to negotiate toward a settlement and have
reached agreement as to its principal business terms. As part of the
settlement, EFG has agreed to buy the loans made by the Exchange Partnerships to
Echelon Residential Holdings for an aggregate of $32 million plus interest at
7.5% per annum, if they are not repaid prior to or at their scheduled maturity
date. Upon completion of a stipulation of settlement, the parties will submit
the settlement to the court for approval.
There can be no assurance that a settlement of the sub-class involving the
Exchange Partnerships will receive final Court approval and be effected.
However, in the absence of a final settlement approved by the Court, the
Defendants intend to defend vigorously against the claims asserted in the Class
Action Lawsuit. Neither the General Partner nor its affiliates can predict with
any degree of certainty the cost of continuing litigation to the Partnership or
the ultimate outcome.
The loan receivable from Echelon Residential Holdings was previously accounted
for and reported in accordance with the guidance for Acquisition, Development
and Construction Arrangements ("ADC arrangements") in the Partnership's
financial statements as of and for each of the three and six months ended June
30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The loan was presented as an investment in a
real estate venture and was presented net of the Partnership's share of losses
in Echelon Residential Holdings. The Partnership was allocated its proportionate
share of the unconsolidated real estate venture's net loss, excluding the
interest expense on the loan, based on the balance of its loan receivable in
relation to the real estate venture's total equity and notes payable, including
the ADC arrangements.
Subsequent to the issuance of the 2000 Form 10-K and the June 30, 2001 Form
10-Q, the Partnership determined that the loan receivable should be accounted
for consistent with its legal form and the Partnership should recognize the
interest income, as calculated per the contractual terms of the loan agreement
to the extent such interest income was evaluated as likely to be collected. The
loan receivable and related interest should be evaluated for impairment under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114 "Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan".
Accordingly, the Partnership reversed the proportionate share of losses in
Echelon Residential Holdings of $62,855 and $118,882, respectively, previously
recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and $14,831 and
$17,502, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2000. The
Partnership also recognized interest income of $108,515 during the six months
ended June 30, 2001 and $98,668 and $124,148, during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2000, respectively.
In addition, during the second quarter of 2001, the General Partner determined
that recoverability of the loan receivable had been impaired and at June 30,
2001 recorded an impairment of $238,875, reflecting the General Partner's
current assessment of the amount of loss that is likely to be incurred by the
Partnership. In addition to the write-down recorded at June 30, 2001, the
Partnership reserved all accrued interest of $443,080 recorded on the loan
receivable through March 31, 2001 and has ceased accruing interest on its loan
receivable from Echelon Residential Holdings, effective April 1, 2001.
The write-down was precipitated principally by a slowing U.S. economy and its
effects on the real estate development industry. The economic outlook for the
properties that existed when the loan was funded has deteriorated and inhibited
the ability of Echelon Residential Holdings' management to secure low-cost
sources of development capital, including but not limited to joint-venture or
equity partners. In response to these developments and lower risk tolerances in
the credit markets, the management of Echelon Residential Holdings decided in
the second quarter of 2001 to concentrate its prospective development activities
within the southeastern United States and, therefore, to dispose of development
sites located elsewhere. In May 2001, Echelon Residential Holdings closed its
Texas-based development office; and since the beginning of 2001, the company has
sold three of nine properties (two in July 2001 and one in October 2001). As of
November 2001, one additional property is under contract to be sold, subject to
due diligence that remains pending. As a result of these developments, the
General Partner does not believe that Echelon Residential Holdings will realize
the profit levels originally believed to be achievable from either selling these
properties as a group or developing all of them as multi-family residential
communities.
These adjustments resulted in a net decrease in earnings for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 of $619,100 and $454,558, respectively, or $1.22 and
$0.90, per limited partnership unit. The adjustments resulted in a net increase
to earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2000 of $113,499 and
$141,650, respectively, or $0.22 and $0.28, per limited partnership unit. As a
result, the accompanying financial statements for each of the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and June 30, 2000 and the Partnership's Statement of
Financial Position as of December 31, 2000 have been restated from the amounts
previously reported.
Three and six months ended June 30, 2001 compared to the three and six months
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ended June 30, 2000
- ----------------------
The Partnership was organized in 1990 as a direct-participation equipment
leasing program to acquire a diversified portfolio of capital equipment subject
to lease agreements with third parties. Presently, the Partnership is a Nominal
Defendant in a Class Action Lawsuit, the outcome of which could significantly
alter the nature of the Partnership's organization and its future business
operations. (See Note 8 to the financial statements.) Pursuant to the Amended
and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership ("the Restated
Agreement, as amended"), the Partnership is scheduled to be dissolved by
December 31, 2001. However, the General Partner does not expect that the
partnership will be dissolved until such time that the Class Action Lawsuit is
settled or adjudicated.
Results of Operations
- -----------------------
For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2001, the Partnership
recognized lease revenue of $33,156 and $68,019, respectively, compared to
$51,772 and $102,837, respectively, for the same periods in 2000. The decrease
in lease revenue from 2000 to 2001 resulted primarily from lease term
expirations and equipment sales. In the future, lease revenue will continue to
decline due to lease term expirations and the sale of equipment.
The Partnership's equipment portfolio includes certain assets in which the
Partnership holds a proportionate ownership interest. In such cases, the
remaining interests are owned by an affiliated equipment leasing program
sponsored by Equis Financial Group Limited Partnership ("EFG"). Proportionate
equipment ownership enabled the Partnership to further diversify its equipment
portfolio at inception by participating in the ownership of selected assets,
thereby reducing the general levels of risk, which could have resulted from a
concentration in any single equipment type, industry or lessee. The Partnership
and each affiliate individually report, in proportion to their respective
ownership interests, their respective shares of assets, liabilities, revenues,
and expenses associated with the equipment.
Interest income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2001 was
$13,478 and $134,256, respectively, compared to $116,668 and $186,808,
respectively, for the same periods in 2000. Interest income is typically
generated from temporary investment of rental receipts and equipment sale
proceeds in short-term instruments and interest on the loan receivable from
Echelon Residential Holdings. The amount of future interest income is expected
to fluctuate as a result of changing interest rates and the amount of cash
available for investment, among other factors.
The loan receivable from Echelon Residential Holdings was previously accounted
for and reported in accordance with the guidance for Acquisition, Development
and Construction Arrangements ("ADC arrangements") in the Partnership's
financial statements as of and for the year December 31, 2000. The loan was
presented as an investment in a real estate venture and was presented net of the
Partnership's share of losses in Echelon Residential Holdings. The Partnership
was allocated its proportionate share of the unconsolidated real estate
venture's net loss, excluding the interest expense on the loan, based on the
balance of its loan receivable in relation to the real estate venture's total
equity and notes payable, including the ADC arrangements.
Subsequent to the issuance of the 2000 Form 10-K and the June 30, 2001 Form
10-Q, the Partnership determined that the loan receivable should be accounted
for consistent with its legal form and the Partnership should recognize the
interest income, as calculated per the contractual terms of the loan agreement
to the extent such interest income was evaluated as likely to be collected. The
loan receivable and related interest should be evaluated for impairment under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114 "Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan".
Accordingly, the Partnership reversed the proportionate share of losses in
Echelon Residential Holdings of $62,855 and $118,882, respectively, previously
recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and $14,831 and
$17,502, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2000. The
Partnership also recognized interest income of $108,515 during the six months
ended June 30, 2001 and $98,668 and $124,148, during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2000, respectively.
In addition, during the second quarter of 2001, the General Partner determined
that recoverability of the loan receivable had been impaired and at June 30,
2001 recorded an impairment of $238,875, reflecting the General Partner's
current assessment of the amount of loss that is likely to be incurred by the
Partnership. In addition to the write-down recorded at June 30, 2001, the
Partnership reserved all accrued interest of $443,080 recorded on the loan
receivable through March 31, 2001 and has ceased accruing interest on its loan
receivable from Echelon Residential Holdings, effective April 1, 2001. The
total impairment of $681,955 is recorded as a write-down of impaired loan and
interest receivable in the accompanying Statement of Operations for the nine
months ended September 30, 2001.
The write-down was precipitated principally by a slowing U.S. economy and its
effects on the real estate development industry. The economic outlook for the
properties that existed when the loan was funded has deteriorated and inhibited
the ability of Echelon Residential Holdings' management to secure low-cost
sources of development capital, including but not limited to joint-venture or
equity partners. In response to these developments and lower risk tolerances in
the credit markets, the management of Echelon Residential Holdings decided in
the second quarter of 2001 to concentrate its prospective development activities
within the southeastern United States and, therefore, to dispose of development
sites located elsewhere. In May 2001, Echelon Residential Holdings closed its
Texas-based development office; and since the beginning of 2001, the company has
sold three of nine properties (two in July 2001 and one in October 2001). As of
November 2001, one additional property is under contract to be sold, subject to
due diligence that remains pending. As a result of these developments, the
General Partner does not believe that Echelon Residential Holdings will realize
the profit levels originally believed to be achievable from either selling these
properties as a group or developing all of them as multi-family residential
communities.
These adjustments resulted in a net decrease in earnings for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 of $619,100 and $454,558, respectively, or $1.22 and
$0.90, per limited partnership unit. The adjustments resulted in a net increase
to earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2000 of $113,499 and
$141,650, respectively, or $0.22 and $0.28, per limited partnership unit. As a
result, the accompanying financial statements for each of the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and June 30, 2000 and the Partnership's Statement of
Financial Position as of December 31, 2000 have been restated from the amounts
previously reported.
During the three months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, the Partnership sold fully
depreciated equipment to existing lessees and third parties resulting in net
gains of $7,500 and $3,700, respectively. There were no equipment sales during
either of the three months ended March 31, 2001 and 2000. It cannot be
determined whether future sales of equipment will result in a net gain or a net
loss to the Partnership, as such transactions will be dependent upon the
condition and type of equipment being sold and its marketability at the time of
sale. In addition, the amount of gain or loss reported for financial statement
purposes is partly a function of the amount of accumulated depreciation
associated with the equipment being sold.
The ultimate realization of residual value for any type of equipment is
dependent upon many factors, including EFG's ability to sell and re-lease
equipment. Changing market conditions, industry trends, technological advances,
and many other events can converge to enhance or detract from asset values at
any given time. EFG attempts to monitor these changes in order to identify
opportunities which may be advantageous to the Partnership and which will
maximize total cash returns for each asset.
The total economic value realized upon final disposition of each asset is
comprised of all primary lease term revenue generated from that asset, together
with its residual value. The latter consists of cash proceeds realized upon the
asset's sale in addition to all other cash receipts obtained from renting the
asset on a re-lease, renewal or month-to-month basis. The Partnership
classifies such residual rental payments as lease revenue. Consequently, the
amount of gain or loss reported in the financial statements is not necessarily
indicative of the total residual value the Partnership achieved from leasing the
equipment.
Depreciation expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2001 was
$14,569 and $29,138, respectively, compared to $16,140 and $32,282,
respectively, for the same periods in 2000. For financial reporting purposes,
to the extent that an asset is held on primary lease term, the Partnership
depreciates the difference between (i) the cost of the asset and (ii) the
estimated residual value of the asset on a straight-line basis over such term.
For purposes of this policy, estimated residual values represent estimates of
equipment values at the date of primary lease expiration. To the extent that
equipment is held beyond its primary lease term, the Partnership continues to
depreciate the remaining net book value of the asset on a straight-line basis
over the asset's remaining economic life.
Management fees were $1,083 and $2,251, respectively, for the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2001 and $1,953 and $3,870, respectively for the
same periods of 2000. Management fees are based on 5% of gross lease revenue
generated by operating leases and 2% of gross lease revenue generated by full
payout leases.
Operating expense were $108,623 and $186,887, respectively, for the three and
six month periods ended June 30, 2001 compared to $37,198 and $73,384,
respectively, for the same periods in 2000. In 2001, operating expenses
included approximately $59,000 related to the Class Action Lawsuit discussed in
Note 8 to the financial statements herein. Operating expenses consist
principally of administrative charges, professional service costs, such as audit
and other legal fees, as well as printing, distribution and remarketing
expenses. In certain cases, equipment storage or repairs and maintenance costs
may be incurred in connection with equipment being remarketed.
Liquidity and Capital Resources and Discussion of Cash Flows
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
The Partnership by its nature is a limited life entity. The Partnership's
principal operating activities derive from asset rental transactions.
Accordingly, the Partnership's principal source of cash from operations is
generally provided by the collection of periodic rents. These cash inflows are
used to pay management fees and operating costs. Operating activities generated
net cash outflows of $92,808 during the six months ended June 30, 2001 and net
cash inflows of $87,614 during the six months ended June 30, 2000. The loan to
Echelon Residential Holdings and accrued interest thereon are due in full at
maturity on September 8, 2002. Future renewal, re-lease and equipment sale
activities will cause a decline in the Partnership's lease revenues and
corresponding sources of operating cash. Overall, expenses associated with
rental activities, such as management fees, and net cash flow from operating
activities will also decline as the Partnership experiences a higher frequency
of remarketing events.
Cash realized from asset disposal transactions is reported under investing
activities on the accompanying Statement of Cash Flows. During the six months
ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, the Partnership realized equipment sale proceeds
of $7,500 and $3,700, respectively. Future inflows of cash from asset disposals
will vary in timing and amount and will be influenced by many factors including,
but not limited to, the frequency and timing of lease expirations, the type of
equipment being sold, its condition and age, and future market conditions.
At June 30, 2001, the Partnership had aggregate future minimum lease payments of
$31,750 from contractual lease agreements (see Note 4 to the financial
statements). At the expiration of the individual lease terms underlying the
Partnership's future minimum lease payments, the Partnership will sell the
equipment or enter re-lease or renewal agreements when considered advantageous
by the General Partner and EFG. Such future remarketing activities will result
in the realization of additional cash inflows in the form of equipment sale
proceeds or rents from renewals and re-leases, the timing and extent of which
cannot be predicted with certainty. This is because the timing and extent of
remarketing events often is dependent upon the needs and interests of the
existing lessees. Some lessees may choose to renew their lease contracts, while
others may elect to return the equipment. In the latter instances, the
equipment could be re-leased to another lessee or sold to a third party.
In connection with a preliminary settlement agreement for the Class Action
Lawsuit described in Note 8 to the accompanying financial statements, the court
permitted the Partnership to invest in any new investment, including but not
limited to new equipment or other business activities, subject to certain
limitations. On March 8, 2000, the Partnership loaned $2,730,000 to a newly
formed real estate company, Echelon Residential Holdings, to finance the
acquisition of real estate assets by that company. Echelon Residential
Holdings, through a wholly owned subsidiary ("Echelon Residential LLC"), used
the loan proceeds, along with the loan proceeds from similar loans by ten
affiliated partnerships, representing $32 million in the aggregate, to acquire
various real estate assets from Echelon International Corporation, an
independent Florida-based real estate company. Echelon Residential Holding's
interest in Echelon Residential LLC is pledged pursuant to a pledge agreement to
the partnerships as collateral for the loans. The loan has a term of 30 months,
maturing on September 8, 2002, and an annual interest rate of 14% for the first
24 months and 18% for the final six months. Interest accrues and compounds
monthly and is payable at maturity.
The loan made by the Partnership to Echelon Residential Holdings is, and will
continue to be, subject to various risks, including the risk of default by
Echelon Residential Holdings, which could require the Partnership to foreclose
under the pledge agreement on its interests in Echelon Residential LLC. The
ability of Echelon Residential Holdings to make loan payments and the amount the
Partnership may realize after a default would be dependent upon the risks
generally associated with the real estate lending business including, without
limitation, the existence of senior financing or other liens on the properties,
general or local economic conditions, property values, the sale of properties,
interest rates, real estate taxes, other operating expenses, the supply and
demand for properties involved, zoning and environmental laws and regulations,
rent control laws and other governmental rules. A default by Echelon
Residential Holdings could have a material adverse effect on the future cash
flow and operating results of the Partnership.
During the second quarter of 2001, the General Partner determined that
recoverability of the loan receivable had been impaired and at June 30, 2001
recorded an impairment of $238,875, reflecting the General Partner's current
assessment of the amount of loss that is likely to be incurred by the
Partnership. In addition to the write-down recorded at June 30, 2001, the
Partnership reserved all accrued interest of $443,080 recorded on the loan
receivable through March 31, 2001 and has ceased accruing interest on its loan
receivable from Echelon Residential Holdings, effective April 1, 2001.
The write-down was precipitated principally by a slowing U.S. economy and its
effects on the real estate development industry. The economic outlook for the
properties that existed when the loan was funded has deteriorated and inhibited
the ability of Echelon Residential Holdings' management to secure low-cost
sources of development capital, including but not limited to joint-venture or
equity partners. In response to these developments and lower risk tolerances in
the credit markets, the management of Echelon Residential Holdings decided in
the second quarter of 2001 to concentrate its prospective development activities
within the southeastern United States and, therefore, to dispose of development
sites located elsewhere. In May 2001, Echelon Residential Holdings closed its
Texas-based development office; and since the beginning of 2001, the company has
sold three of nine properties (two in July 2001 and one in October 2001). As of
November 2001, one additional property is under contract to be sold, subject to
due diligence that remains pending. As a result of these developments, the
General Partner does not believe that Echelon Residential Holdings will realize
the profit levels originally believed to be achievable from either selling these
properties as a group or developing all of them as multi-family residential
communities.
The Restated Agreement, as amended, prohibits the Partnership from making loans
to the General Partner or its affiliates. Since the acquisition of the several
parcels of real estate from the owner had to occur prior to the admission of
certain independent third parties as equity owners, Echelon Residential Holdings
and its wholly owned subsidiary, Echelon Residential LLC, were formed in
anticipation of their admission. The General Partner agreed to an officer of
the Manager serving as the initial equity holder of Echelon Residential Holdings
and as an unpaid manager of Echelon Residential Holdings. The officer made a
$185,465 equity investment in Echelon Residential Holdings. His return on his
equity investment is restricted to the same rate of return as the partnerships
realize on their loans. There is a risk that the court may object to the
general partner's action in structuring the loan in this way since the officer
may be deemed an affiliate and the loans in violation of the prohibition against
loans to affiliates and the court's statement in its order permitting New
Investments that all other provisions of the Partnership Agreements governing
the investment objectives and policies of the Partnership shall remain in full
force and effect. The court may require the partnerships to restructure or
divest the loan.
There are no formal restrictions under the Restated Agreement, as amended, that
materially limit the Partnership's ability to pay cash distributions, except
that the General Partner may suspend or limit cash distributions to ensure that
the Partnership maintains sufficient working capital reserves to cover, among
other things, operating costs and potential expenditures, such as refurbishment
costs to remarket equipment upon lease expiration. In addition to the need for
funds in connection with the Class Action Lawsuit, liquidity is especially
important as the Partnership matures and sells equipment, because the remaining
equipment base consists of fewer revenue-producing assets that are available to
cover prospective cash disbursements. Insufficient liquidity could inhibit the
Partnership's ability to sustain its operations or maximize the realization of
proceeds from remarketing its remaining assets.
Cash distributions to the General Partner and Recognized Owners had been
declared and generally paid within fifteen days following the end of each
calendar quarter. The payment of such distributions is reported under financing
activities on the accompanying Statement of Cash Flows. No cash distributions
were declared for either of the six month periods ended June 30, 2001 or 2000.
In any given year, it is possible that Recognized Owners will be allocated
taxable income in excess of distributed cash. This discrepancy between tax
obligations and cash distributions may or may not continue in the future, and
cash may or may not be available for distribution to the Recognized Owners
adequate to cover any tax obligation.
Cash distributions when paid to the Recognized Owners generally consist of both
a return of and a return on capital. Cash distributions do not represent and
are not indicative of yield on investment. Actual yield on investment cannot be
determined with any certainty until conclusion of the Partnership and will be
dependent upon the collection of all future contracted rents, the generation of
renewal and/or re-lease rents, the residual value realized for each asset at its
disposal date and the performance of the Partnership's non-equipment assets.
The Partnership's capital account balances for federal income tax and for
financial reporting purposes are different primarily due to differing treatments
of income and expense items for income tax purposes in comparison to financial
reporting purposes (generally referred to as permanent or timing differences;
see Note 7 to the financial statements presented in the Partnership's 2000
Annual Report). For instance, selling commissions and organization and offering
costs pertaining to syndication of the Partnership's limited partnership units
are not deductible for federal income tax purposes, but are recorded as a
reduction of partners' capital for financial reporting purposes. Therefore,
such differences are permanent differences between capital accounts for
financial reporting and federal income tax purposes. Other differences between
the bases of capital accounts for federal income tax and financial reporting
purposes occur due to timing differences. Such items consist of the cumulative
difference between income or loss for tax purposes and financial statement
income or loss. The principal component of the cumulative difference between
financial statement income or loss and tax income or loss results from different
depreciation policies for book and tax purposes.
For financial reporting purposes, the General Partner has accumulated a capital
deficit at June 30, 2001. This is the result of aggregate cash distributions to
the General Partner being in excess of its capital contribution of $1,000 and
its allocation of financial statement net income or loss. Ultimately, the
existence of a capital deficit for the General Partner for financial reporting
purposes is not indicative of any further capital obligations to the Partnership
by the General Partner. The Restated Agreement, as amended, requires that upon
the dissolution of the Partnership, the General Partner will be required to
contribute to the Partnership an amount equal to any negative balance, which may
exist in the General Partner's tax capital account. At December 31, 2000, the
General Partner had a positive tax capital account balance.
The outcome of the Class Action Lawsuit described in Note 8 to the accompanying
financial statements, will be the principal factor in determining the future of
the Partnership's operations. Commencing with the first quarter of 2000, the
General Partner suspended the payment of quarterly cash distributions pending
final resolution of the Class Action Lawsuit. Accordingly, future cash
distributions are not expected to be paid until the Class Action Lawsuit is
settled or adjudicated.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Partnership's financial statements include financial instruments that are
exposed to interest rate risks.
The Partnership's loan to Echelon Residential Holdings matures on September 8,
2002 and earns interest at a fixed annual rate of 14% for the first 24 months
and a fixed annual rate of 18% for the last 6 months of the loan, with interest
due at maturity. The effect of interest rate fluctuations on the Partnership
for the six months ended June 30, 2001 was not material.
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FORM 10-Q/A
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
. Response:
. Refer to Note 8 to the financial statements herein.
Item 2. Changes in Securities
. Response: None
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
. Response: None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
. Response: None
Item 5. Other Information
. Response: None
Item 6(a). Exhibits
. Response: None
Item 6(b). Reports on Form 8-K
. Response: None
SIGNATURE PAGE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By: AFG Leasing IV Incorporated, a Massachusetts
corporation and the General Partner of
the Registrant.
By: /s/ Michael J. Butterfield
-----------------------------
Michael J. Butterfield
Treasurer of AFG Leasing IV Incorporated
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: November 13, 2001
-------------------