UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ...................... FORM 10-Q ...................... (Mark One) [ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Quarterly Period Ended September 29, 2006 [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 0-19306 ...................... EXCEL TECHNOLOGY, INC. Delaware 11-2780242 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation of organization) Identification No.) 41 Research Way, East Setauket, New York 11733 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (631) 784-6175 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [X] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X] The number of shares outstanding of registrant's common stock, par value $.001 on November 7, 2006 was 12,067,196. CONTENTS PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Page Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements: ................................. Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 29, 2006 (unaudited) and December 31, 2005 3 Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) for the Three Months Ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005 4 Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) for the Nine Months Ended September 29, 2006 and September 30,2005 5 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Nine Months Ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005 6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) 7 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial ................................................. Condition and Results of Operations 12 ................................... Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 18 .......................................................... Item 4. Controls and Procedures 19 ....................... PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings 19 ................. Item 1A. Risk Factors 19 ............ Item 2. Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 20 .......................................................... Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 20 ............................... Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security-Holders 20 ................................................... Item 5. Other Information 20 ................. Item 6. Exhibits 20 Exhibits - (11) Computation of net income per share 23 (31) Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 24 (32) Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 26 PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements: .................................. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands, except per share amounts) September 29, 2006 Dec. 31, 2005 .................. ............. (Unaudited) Assets ....... Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 9,774 $ 16,303 Investments 49,150 34,000 Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $614 and $810 in 2006 and 2005, respectively 26,044 22,879 Inventories 36,497 30,269 Deferred income taxes 1,661 1,660 Other current assets 1,194 1,353 ........ ......... Total current assets 124,320 106,464 ........ ......... Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $12,927 and $11,090 in 2006 and 2005, respectively 25,158 25,983 Other assets 416 158 Goodwill 31,726 31,433 ........ ......... Total assets $181,620 $164,038 ........ ......... ........ ......... Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity Current liabilities: ..................... Accounts payable $ 6,950 $ 4,829 Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 9,013 5,882 Income taxes payable 436 1,097 ........ ......... Total current liabilities 16,399 11,808 ........ ......... Accrued deferred compensation 1,375 0 Deferred income taxes 3,478 3,492 Minority interest in subsidiary 89 48 Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock, par value $.001 per share: 2,000 shares authorized, none issued 0 0 Common stock, par value $.001 per share: 20,000 shares authorized, 12,067 and 12,055 shares issued and outstanding in 2006 and 2005, respectively 12 12 Additional paid-in capital 49,957 49,621 Retained earnings 107,928 97,583 Accumulated other comprehensive income 2,382 1,474 ........ ......... Total stockholders' equity 160,279 148,690 ........ ......... Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $181,620 $ 164,038 ........ ......... ........ ......... See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited and in thousands, except income per share amounts) Three Months Ended ............................ September 29, September 30, 2006 2005 ............. ............. Net sales and services $ 40,299 $ 37,842 Cost of sales and services 22,350 19,803 ......... .......... Gross profit 17,949 18,039 Operating expenses: Selling and marketing 4,611 5,027 General and administrative 3,724 3,536 Research and development 3,527 3,757 Merger related and deferred compensation expenses 2,875 0 ......... .......... Total operating expenses 14,737 12,320 ......... .......... Income from operations 3,212 5,719 Non-operating income (expense): Interest income 755 337 Minority interest in net income of subsidiary (28) (34) Merger expenses (210) 0 Foreign currency losses and other income (expense), net (15) (58) ......... .......... Income before provision for income taxes 3,714 5,964 Provision for income taxes 1,226 1,610 ......... .......... Net income $ 2,488 $ 4,354 ......... .......... ......... .......... Basic income per common share $0.21 $0.36 ..... ..... ..... ..... Weighted average common shares outstanding 12,066 12,054 ......... .......... ......... .......... Diluted income per common share $0.20 $0.36 ..... ..... ..... ..... Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding 12,522 12,259 ......... .......... ......... .......... See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited and in thousands, except income per share amounts) Nine Months Ended ........................... September 29, September 30, 2006 2005 ......... .......... Net sales and services $ 116,154 $ 101,352 Cost of sales and services 62,890 53,068 ......... .......... Gross profit 53,264 48,284 Operating expenses: Selling and marketing 14,352 14,094 General and administrative 9,689 9,496 Research and development 10,807 10,848 Merger related and deferred compensation expenses 2,875 0 ......... .......... Total operating expenses 37,723 34,438 ......... .......... Income from operations 15,541 13,846 Non-operating income (expense): Interest income 1,772 794 Minority interest in net income of subsidiary (41) (34) Merger expenses (2,194) 0 Foreign currency gains and other income, net 269 103 ......... .......... Income before provision for income taxes 15,347 14,709 Provision for income taxes 5,002 3,853 ......... .......... Net income $ 10,345 $ 10,856 ......... .......... ......... .......... Basic income per common share $0.86 $0.90 ..... ..... ..... ..... Weighted average common shares outstanding 12,064 12,053 ......... .......... ......... .......... Diluted income per common share $0.83 $0.89 ..... ..... ..... ..... Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding 12,505 12,243 ......... .......... ......... .......... See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited and in thousands) Nine Months Ended ........................... September 29, September 30, 2006 2005 ......... .......... Operating activities: Net income $ 10,345 $ 10,856 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Minority interest in net income of subsidiary 41 34 Depreciation and amortization 1,971 2,122 Stock compensation expense 95 0 Tax benefit from employee stock option exercises 0 2 Excess income tax benefit from employee stock options (37) 7 Gain on sale of equipment (116) 0 Provision for bad debts 54 42 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable (2,792) (5,746) Inventories (5,726) (3,766) Other current assets 176 95 Other assets (576) 182 Accounts payable 2,030 306 Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 3,835 1,173 ......... ......... Net cash provided by operating activities 9,300 5,307 ......... ......... Investing activities: Purchases of investments, net of redemptions (15,150) (6,575) Purchases of property, plant and equipment (1,290) (1,508) Proceeds from the sale of equipment 291 0 ......... ......... Net cash used in investing activities (16,149) (8,083) ......... ......... Financing activities: Proceeds from exercise of common stock options 204 11 Excess income tax benefit from employee stock options 37 0 ......... ......... Net cash provided by financing activities 241 11 ......... ......... Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents 79 (97) ......... ......... Net decrease in cash and equivalents (6,529) (2,862) Cash and equivalents, beginning of period 16,303 11,329 ......... ......... Cash and equivalents, end of period $ 9,774 $ 8,467 ......... ......... ......... ......... Supplemental cash flow information: .................................... Cash paid for: Interest $ 0 $ 0 Income taxes $ 5,625 $ 3,327 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) A. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ................................. Excel Technology, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") manufactures and markets laser systems and electro-optical components primarily for industrial and scientific applications. The consolidated balance sheet as of September 29, 2006, and the consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005 and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005 have been prepared by the Company and are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which included only normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company at September 29, 2006 and for all periods presented. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported in those financial statements. These judgments can be subjective and complex, and consequently actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. For information concerning the Company's significant accounting policies, reference is made to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. While the Company believes that the disclosures presented are adequate to make the information contained herein not misleading, it is suggested that these statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Form 10-K. Results of operations for the period ended September 29, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full year. The Company's quarterly closing dates end on the Friday prior and closest to or on the last day of each calendar quarter. The Company's fiscal year always ends on December 31st. B. MERGER ...... On February 20, 2006, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with Coherent, Inc. ("Parent"), and Spider Acquisition Merger Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Coherent, Inc. ("Merger Sub"). Under the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub was to be merged with and into the Company (the "Merger"), the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub would cease and the Company would have continued as the surviving corporation and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger, each issued and outstanding share of common stock of the Company issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time, other than common stock held by any stockholders who are entitled to and properly exercise appraisal rights under Delaware law, would have been automatically converted into the right to receive $30.00 in cash per share. The Merger was conditioned upon, among other things, the adoption of the Merger Agreement by the stockholders of the Company pursuant to applicable law, the termination or expiration of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, and obtaining material foreign antitrust approvals reasonably determined by Coherent to be required. On April 4, 2006, the stockholders of the Company voted to adopt the Merger Agreement providing for the acquisition of the Company by Coherent. The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice as well as the German Federal Cartel Office had requested additional information and documentary material in connection with their review of the proposed merger. On May 9, 2006, Coherent, Inc. received U.S. antitrust approval to acquire the Company. On July 10, 2006, the German Federal Cartel Office stated that it had decided to extend its investigation into the acquisition of the Company by Coherent, and on October 25, 2006 issued a prohibition order on the merger. On November 1, 2006, the Merger Agreement between the Company and Coherent was terminated. The foregoing description of the Merger Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Merger Agreement, which was filed as Exhibit 2.1 on a Current Report on Form 8-K on February 21, 2006. In connection with the merger, the Company incurred $210 thousand and $2.2 million in merger related expenses, which consist primarily of legal and other professional fees and have been included in the consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2006, respectively. The amount for the nine months ended September 29, 2006 included $200 thousand for the law firm of one director of the Company for reimbursement of expenses by the director's law firm in connection with the merger. In addition, the employment agreements of certain key executives include a change in control clause that provide for payments aggregating $6.1 million. These change in control payments have not been recorded as a liability in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 29, 2006, as such payments were contingent upon consummation of the merger, which has been terminated. In the third quarter of 2006, as a result of effectively addressing all merger-related matters while the announced merger was pending for eight months and as payment in lieu of options that, but for the proposed merger, would have been granted towards the end of 2005, an executive of the Company was awarded $1.5 million of compensation, of which the payment of $1.0 million is subject to the attainment of specified Company performance criteria. Such compensation, along with $1.4 million of deferred executive compensation awarded for prior services during the third quarter of 2006 (under a deferred compensation plan approved by the Board of Directors), is included in operating expenses in the consolidated statements of income. C. ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION ....................................... The Company currently has two stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully below. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation related to those plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB No. 25"), and related Interpretations, as permitted by Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS No. 123"). As such, prior to January 1, 2006, no stock-based employee compensation expense was recognized in net income, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the fair market values of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS No. 123 (R)"), using the modified prospective transition method. Under that transition method, compensation expense recognized for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2006 includes compensation expense for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value determined in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123. The fair value of the options was determined at the date of grant using the Black- Scholes option pricing model and is being amortized to expense over the options' vesting periods. There were no option or other share-based award grants subsequent to January 1, 2006 through September 29, 2006. Results for prior periods have not been restated. The following table illustrates the stock based compensation expense recorded in the statement of income for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2006 and the impact of adopting SFAS No. 123(R) effective January 1, 2006 on the Company's income before provision for income taxes, net income and income per share (In thousands, except per share data). Three months ended Nine months ended September 29, 2006 September 29, 2006 Stock option compensation expense $ 18 $ 95 Impact on income before provision for taxes $ 18 $ 95 Impact on net income $ 18 $ 95 Impact on basic income per common share $ 0.00 $ 0.01 Impact on diluted income per common share $ 0.00 $ 0.01 Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company reported excess tax benefits from employee stock option exercises as operating cash flows in its consolidated statement of cash flows. In accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), the Company now reports excess tax benefits as financing cash inflows. The actual income tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from stock option exercises for the three months ended September 29, 2006 was $12 thousand. There were no stock option exercises during the three months ended September 30, 2005. As such, there were no income tax benefits realized for that period. The actual income tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from stock option exercises for the nine months ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005 was $37 thousand and $2 thousand, respectively. There was no tax benefit recognized related to the total compensation expense for share- based payment arrangements for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005, as all the related options were incentive stock options and the tax benefit associated with disqualified incentive stock options is recognized by the Company only after such incentive stock options are exercised and disqualified. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and income per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to options granted under the Company's stock plans prior to adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006. No pro forma disclosure has been made for periods subsequent to January 1, 2006, as all stock-based compensation has been recognized in net income. For purposes of this pro forma disclosure and compensation expense recorded in the Company's consolidated financial statements, the value of the options is estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model and amortized to expense over the options' vesting periods. Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 September 30, 2005 In thousands, except (In thousands, except per share data) per share data) Net income, as reported $4,354 $10,856 Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects (8) (2,936) ...... ....... Proforma net income $4,346 $ 7,920 ...... ....... ...... ....... Net income per share: Basic - as reported $0.36 $0.90 ..... ..... Basic - proforma $0.36 $0.66 ..... ..... Diluted - as reported $0.36 $0.89 ..... ..... Diluted - proforma $0.35 $0.65 ..... ..... Stock-based employee compensation expense under the fair value method for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, includes $3.6 million, which represents the entire fair value of 440 thousand options granted to employees and directors in February 2005, all of which had an exercise price equal to or greater than the market value of the common stock on the date of the grant, as those options were vested as of the date of the grant. No options were granted during the nine months ended September 29, 2006 or during the three months ended September 30, 2005. The following weighted average assumptions were used in determining the fair value of stock options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2005: Average fair value of stock-based compensation awards granted $ 8.20 Valuation assumptions: Expected dividend yield 0.0% Expected volatility 41.0% Expected life (years) 3.9 Risk-free interest rate 3.6% The Company has placed exclusive reliance on historical volatility in its estimate of expected volatility. The Company used a sequential period of historical data equal to the expected term (or expected life) of the options using a simple average calculation based upon the daily closing prices during the aforementioned period. The expected life (years) represents the period of time for which the options granted are expected to be outstanding. This estimate was derived from historical share option exercise experience, which management believes provides the best estimate of the expected term. The following paragraphs describe each of the Company's stock option plans: In 2004, the Company adopted a stock option plan (the "2004 Plan") which provides for the granting of incentive stock options and non- incentive stock options to certain key employees, including officers and directors of the Company and consultants to purchase an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of common stock at prices and terms determined by the Board of Directors. The option price per share of incentive stock options must be at least 100% of the market value of the stock on the date of the grant, except in the case of shareholders owning more than 10% of the outstanding shares of common stock, the option price must be at least 110% of the market value on the date of the grant, and for non- incentive stock options such price may be less than 100% of the market value of the stock on the date of grant. Options granted under the 2004 Plan, which terminates on February 23, 2014, may be exercisable for a period up to ten years. Through September 29, 2006, all options granted to employees under the 2004 Plan have exercise prices equal to the market value of the stock on the date of grant, vest immediately, and expire ten years from the date of grant. In 1998, the Company adopted a stock option plan (the "1998 Plan") which provides for the granting of incentive stock options and non- incentive stock options to certain key employees, including officers and directors, and consultants to purchase an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of common stock at prices and terms determined by the Board of Directors. The option price per share of incentive stock options must be at least 100% of the market value of the stock on the date of the grant, except in the case of shareholders owning more than 10% of the outstanding shares of common stock, the option price must be at least 110% of the market value on the date of the grant, and for non-incentive stock options such price may be less than 100% of the market value of the stock on the date of grant. Options granted under the 1998 Plan, which terminates on April 8, 2008, may be exercisable for a period up to ten years. Through September 29, 2006, all options granted to employees under the 1998 Plan have exercise prices equal to the market value of the stock on the date of grant, vest ratably over three or five years, and expire either five or ten years from the date of grant. Effective November 1, 2006, the Board of Directors approved a stock option / stock issuance plan (the "2006 Plan"), which is subject to shareholder approval and provides an aggregate of up to 750,000 shares of common stock, which may be directly issued to eligible participants, granted as incentive stock options to employees of the Company or granted as non-statutory stock options to employees, including officers and directors of the Company, as well as to certain advisors and consultants. Shares of common stock issued under the 2006 Plan may, in the discretion of the Company's Compensation Committee ("the Committee"), be fully and immediately vested upon issuance or may vest in one or more installments over the participant's period of service or upon attainment of specified performance objectives. The exercise price for the common stock underlying the options is determined by the Committee, but in no event shall it be less than 100% of the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date the option is granted (110% in the case of incentive stock options granted to optionees who own more than 10% of the voting power of all classes of stock of the Company). No option granted under the 2006 Plan may be exercised after the expiration of the option, which may not, in any case, exceed ten years from the date of grant (five years in the case of incentive options granted to persons who own more than 10% of the voting power of all classes of the stock of the Company). Options granted under the 2006 Plan are exercisable on such basis as determined by the Committee. No options or common stock will be issued under the 2006 Plan until shareholder approval is received by the Company. The following table summarizes stock option activity of the Company during the nine months ended September 29, 2006: Weighted Average Aggregate Weighted Remaining Intrinsic Shares Average Contractual Value (in thousands) Exercise Price Term (in years) (in thousands) ............................................................... Outstanding at December 31, 2005 1,441 $ 20.38 Granted 0 $ 0 Exercised (12) $ 17.19 Cancelled 0 $ 0 .............. Outstanding at September 29, 2006 1,429 $ 20.41 5.87 $ 13,735 .............. .............. Options expected to vest at September 29, 2006 16 $ 19.14 6.31 $ 166 Exercisable at September 29, 2006 1,413 $ 20.42 5.86 $ 13,569 The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company's closing common stock price on the last trading day of the third quarter of 2006 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on September 29, 2006. This amount changes based on the fair market value of the Company's common stock. Total intrinsic value of options exercised for the three months ended September 29, 2006 was $35 thousand. There were no stock option exercises during the three months ended September 30, 2005. Total intrinsic value of options exercised for the nine months ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005 was $106 thousand and $6 thousand, respectively. As of September 29, 2006, there was $89 thousand of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.3 years. When an option is exercised, the Company issues new shares of common stock. D. INVENTORIES ........... Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost, on a first-in, first out basis, or market value. Inventories consist of the following (in thousands): September 29, 2006 December 31, 2005 .................. ................. Raw Materials $ 18,910 $ 16,474 Work-in-Process 11,052 8,158 Finished Goods 4,961 4,246 Consigned Inventory 1,574 1,391 ......... ......... $ 36,497 $ 30,269 E. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME .................... Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and foreign currency translation adjustments, amounting in the aggregate to $2.2 million and $4.5 million for the three months ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively and $11.3 million and $8.6 million for the nine months ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively. F. ACCRUED WARRANTY COSTS ...................... Quarterly, the Company analyzes its warranty liability for reasonableness based upon a five-year history of warranty costs incurred, the nature of the products shipped subject to warranty and anticipated warranty trends. Changes in the warranty liability during the nine-month period ended September 29, 2006 were as follows (In thousands): Balance at December 31, 2005 $ 720 Provisions for warranties during the nine-month period ended September 29, 2006 652 Costs of warranty obligations during the nine- month period ended September 29, 2006 (603) ...... Balance at September 29, 2006 $ 769 ...... ...... G. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES ............................. The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to various claims, which have arisen in the normal course of business. The impact of the final resolution of these matters on the Company's results of operations in a particular reporting period is not known. Management is of the opinion, however, that the ultimate outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company's financial condition or liquidity. On October 17, 2006, the Company entered into a lease agreement for a building in Cambridge, MA. The term of the operating lease is for 10 years and the cost is $5.7 million over the life of the lease. H. GOODWILL ........ The change in the goodwill balance during the nine months ended September 29, 2006 is attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates used to translate the goodwill contained in the financial statements of foreign subsidiaries. I. SUBSEQUENT EVENT ................ On November 7, 2006, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a stock buy-back plan. The buy-back plan authorizes the repurchase of up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock, or 16.6% of the shares of common stock outstanding as of November 7, 2006. The shares may be repurchased from time to time in open market transactions or privately negotiated transactions at the Company's discretion, including the quantity, timing and price thereof. Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition ........................................................... and Results of Operations ......................... Overview ......... The Company designs, manufactures and markets a variety of photonics-based solutions consisting of laser systems and electro-optical components primarily for industrial and scientific applications. The Company's current range of products include laser marking and engraving systems, laser micro-machining systems, CO2 lasers, optical scanners, high power solid state CW and Q-switched lasers, ultrafast lasers, high energy solid state pulsed lasers, precision optical components and light and color measurement instruments. The laser and electro-optical industry is subject to intense competition and rapid technological developments. Our strength and success is dependent upon us developing and delivering successful, timely and cost effective solutions to our customers. The Company believes, for it to maintain its performance, it must continue to increase its operational efficiencies, improve and refine its existing products, expand its product offerings and develop new applications for its technology. The Company's strategy has been to grow internally and through acquisitions of complementary businesses. Historically, the Company has successfully integrated acquired companies. Merger ....... On February 20, 2006, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with Coherent, Inc. ("Parent"), and Spider Acquisition Merger Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Coherent, Inc. ("Merger Sub"). Under the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub was to be merged with and into the Company (the "Merger"), the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub would cease and the Company would have continued as the surviving corporation and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger, each issued and outstanding share of common stock of the Company issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time, other than common stock held by any stockholders who are entitled to and properly exercise appraisal rights under Delaware law, would have been automatically converted into the right to receive $30.00 in cash per share. The Merger was conditioned upon, among other things, the adoption of the Merger Agreement by the stockholders of the Company pursuant to applicable law, the termination or expiration of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, and obtaining material foreign antitrust approvals reasonably determined by Coherent to be required. On April 4, 2006, the stockholders of the Company voted to adopt the Merger Agreement providing for the acquisition of the Company by Coherent. The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice as well as the German Federal Cartel Office had requested additional information and documentary material in connection with their review of the proposed merger. On May 9, 2006, Coherent, Inc. received U.S. antitrust approval to acquire the Company. On July 10, 2006, the German Federal Cartel Office stated that it had decided to extend its investigation into the acquisition of the Company by Coherent, and on October 25, 2006 issued a prohibition order on the merger. On November 1, 2006, the Merger Agreement between the Company and Coherent was terminated. The foregoing description of the Merger Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Merger Agreement, which was filed as Exhibit 2.1 on a Current Report on Form 8-K on February 21, 2006. In connection with the merger, the Company incurred $210 thousand and $2.2 million in merger related expenses, which consist primarily of legal and other professional fees and have been included in the accompanying consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2006, respectively. The amount for the nine months ended September 29, 2006 included $200 thousand for the law firm of one director of the Company for reimbursement of expenses by the director's law firm in connection with the merger. In addition, the employment agreements of certain key executives include a change in control clause that provide for payments aggregating $6.1 million. These change in control payments have not been recorded as a liability in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 29, 2006, as such payments were contingent upon consummation of the merger, which has been terminated. In the third quarter of 2006, as a result of effectively addressing all merger-related matters while the announced merger was pending for eight months and as payment in lieu of options that, but for the proposed merger, would have been granted towards the end of 2005, an executive of the Company was awarded $1.5 million of compensation, of which the payment of $1.0 million is subject to the attainment of specified Company performance criteria. Such compensation, along with $1.4 million of deferred executive compensation awarded for prior services during the third quarter of 2006 (under a deferred compensation plan approved by the Board of Directors), is included in operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Results of Operations ...................... Net sales and services for the quarter ended September 29, 2006 increased $2.5 million or 6.5% to $40.3 million from $37.8 million for the quarter ended September 30 2005. For the nine months ended September 29, 2006, net sales and services were $116.2 million, an increase of $14.8 million or 14.6% from $101.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The increases for the quarter and the nine months in comparison are attributable to increased CO2 laser, scanner, marking systems and high energy solid state pulsed laser sales. Gross margins decreased to 44.5% for the three months ended September 29, 2006 from 47.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2005. For the nine months ended September 29, 2006, gross margins decreased to 45.9% from 47.6% in the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The decreases are primarily due to the product mix where gross margins vary from product to product. Gross margins vary from direct sales to distributor sales, which result in no variable selling expenses, and also among the more than 250 Company product configurations. Selling and marketing expenses decreased to $4.6 million in the quarter ended September 29, 2006 from $5.0 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2005. The decrease of $416 thousand or 8.3% is primarily attributable to lower variable costs and fixed cost reductions in 2006 partially due to turnover related to the pending merger, which was terminated in November 2006, compared to higher levels of sales and marketing staff in 2005. For the nine months ended September 29, 2006, selling and marketing expenses were $14.4 million as compared to $14.1 million for the same period in 2005. The increase of $258 thousand or 1.8% is primarily attributable to increased variable costs such as commissions associated with the increased sales volume. Selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of sales decreased to 11.4% for the quarter ended September 29, 2006 from 13.3% for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. Selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of sales decreased to 12.4% for the nine months ended September 29, 2006 from 13.9% for the comparable period in the prior year. The decreases as a percentage of sales are essentially attributable to fixed costs being absorbed by higher sales volume. General and administrative expenses increased $188 thousand or 5.3% from $3.5 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2005 to $3.7 million in the quarter ended September 29, 2006. For the nine months ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005, general and administrative expenses were $9.7 million and $9.5 million, respectively, an increase of $193 thousand or 2.0%. The increases are primarily attributable to higher bonus expense as a result of higher operating income. Research and development costs decreased $230 thousand or 6.1% to $3.5 million from $3.8 million for the quarters ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively. For both the nine months ended September 29, 2006 and 2005 research and development costs were $10.8 million. The cost of research activities for most of our products was consistent for the two periods in comparison. Research and development costs decreased as a percentage of sales due to increased sales volume, as our research and development expenditures primarily consist of fixed costs. Merger related and deferred compensation expenses for the quarter ended September 29, 2006 of $2.9 million consisted primarily of $1.4 million of deferred executive compensation, $1.0 million of compensation in lieu of option grants, and $500 thousand of bonus expense. Interest income increased $418 thousand to $755 thousand in the quarter ended September 29, 2006 from $337 thousand in the same period of 2005 and $978 thousand to $1.8 million in the nine months ended September 29, 2006 from $794 thousand in the same period of 2005. The increases are primarily due to higher average investable cash balances and higher interest rates during each 2006 period. Merger expenses of $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 29, 2006 were primarily for professional fees related to the Merger Agreement with Coherent, Inc. more fully described above. Foreign currency losses and other income was $15 thousand for the quarter ended September 29, 2006 as compared to $58 thousand for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, which included foreign currency transaction losses of $20 thousand and $70 thousand, respectively. Foreign currency gains and other income was $269 thousand for the nine months ended September 29, 2006 as compared to $103 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. This is primarily attributable to the recording of $212 thousand and $71 thousand of foreign currency transaction gains in 2006 and 2005, respectively, principally at Excel Europe and Japan for the settlement of payables due in U.S. dollars for the purchase of inventories from the Company's U.S. subsidiaries, as a result of the decline in the value of the U.S. dollar against the Euro and Japanese Yen. The provision for income taxes decreased $384 thousand or 23.9% from $1.6 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2005 to $1.2 million for the current quarter ended September 29, 2006. For the nine months ended September 29, 2006 the provision for income taxes was $5.0 million, an increase of $1.1 million or 29.8% from $3.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The decrease for the quarter ended September 29, 2006 was primarily due to lower pre-tax income for the quarter as a result of merger related expenses in that period. The increase for the nine months ended September 29, 2006 is primarily attributable to higher year to date pre-tax income combined with higher effective tax rates. The effective tax rate was 33.0% for the quarter ended September 29, 2006 and 32.6% for the nine months ended September 29, 2006 compared to 26.4% for the year ended December 31, 2005. In 2006, due to the non- deductibility of certain merger related costs, the suspension of the R&D credit and investing in taxable versus non-taxable instruments, the Company's effective tax rate increased approximately 5%. The lower rate in 2005 was primarily due to the settlement of an income tax contingency for less than the amount previously accrued. Liquidity and Capital Resources ................................ Cash Flow Overview Cash, cash equivalents and investments increased $8.6 million during the nine months ended September 29, 2006 to $58.9 million. The increase was primarily due to the net cash provided by operating activities of $9.3 million, proceeds from the sale of equipment of $291 thousand and proceeds from the exercise of common stock options of $204 thousand partially offset by net cash used for capital expenditures of $1.3 million. The Company also experienced a favorable foreign exchange effect on cash and cash equivalents of $79 thousand in 2006. As of September 29, 2006 the Company had no bank debt. At September 29, 2006, the Company had working capital of $107.9 million, including cash, cash equivalents and auction rate notes of $58.9 million, compared to working capital of $94.7 million, including cash, cash equivalents and auction rate notes of $50.3 million, at December 31, 2005. The working capital increased by $13.2 million and cash, cash equivalents and investments increased by $8.6 million during the nine months ended September 29, 2006. Net cash provided by operating activities was $9.3 million for the nine months ended September 29, 2006 and $5.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, which were primarily attributable to net income plus depreciation and amortization expenses, offset partially by net changes in working capital items. Depreciation and amortization for the nine months ended September 29, 2006 was $2.0 million. Accounts receivable at September 29, 2006 of $26.0 million increased $3.2 million from December 31, 2005 primarily due to the increase in sales in 2006 coupled with the timing of the shipments in the third quarter of 2006 compared to the fourth quarter of 2005. Inventory at September 29, 2006 of $36.5 million increased $6.2 million from December 31, 2005 primarily due to increased projected sales volume for the fourth quarter of 2006 compared to the first quarter of 2006 as well as the introduction of new products. Net cash used in investing activities of $16.1 million was primarily attributable to the purchase of short-term auction rate notes for $15.2 million and equipment for $1.3 million offset partially by the proceeds from the sale of equipment of $291 thousand for the nine months ended September 29, 2006. Net cash used in investing activities of $8.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was due primarily to the purchase of short-term auction rate notes for $6.6 million and equipment for $1.5 million. Net cash provided by financing activities was $241 thousand and $11 thousand for the nine months ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively resulting primarily from the proceeds received upon the exercise of employee stock options. As of September 29, 2006, the Company has no lines of credit. The Company intends to continue to invest in product development, plant and equipment and marketing in support of its growth strategy. These investments aid in retaining and acquiring new customers, expanding the Company's current product offerings and further developing its operating infrastructure. The Company believes that current cash, cash equivalents and investments will be sufficient to meet these anticipated cash needs for at least the next twelve months. However, any projections of future cash needs and cash flows are subject to substantial uncertainty. If current cash, cash equivalents and investments and those that may be generated from operations are insufficient to satisfy the Company's liquidity requirements, the Company may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities or secure lines of credit. The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities could result in additional dilution to the Company's stockholders. In addition, the Company will, from time to time, consider the acquisition of, or investment in, complementary businesses, products, services and technologies, which might impact the Company's liquidity requirements or cause the Company to issue additional equity or debt securities. There can be no assurance that financing will be available, on terms that are acceptable to the Company or at all. Inflation .......... In the opinion of management, inflation has not had a material effect on the operations of the Company. Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncement ......................................... Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS No. 123 (R)"), using the modified prospective transition method. Under that transition method, compensation expense recognized for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2006 includes compensation expense for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value determined in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123. The fair value of the options was determined at the date of grant using the Black- Scholes option pricing model and is being amortized to expense over the options' vesting periods. There were no option or other share-based award grants subsequent to January 1, 2006 through September 29, 2006. Results for prior periods have not been restated. The following table illustrates the stock based compensation expense recorded in the statement of income for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2006 and the impact of adopting SFAS No. 123(R) effective January 1, 2006 on the Company's income before provision for income taxes, net income and income per share (In thousands, except per share data). Three months ended Nine months ended September 29, 2006 September 29, 2006 Stock option compensation expense $ 18 $ 95 Impact on income before provision for taxes $ 18 $ 95 Impact on net income $ 18 $ 95 Impact on basic income per common share $ 0.00 $ 0.01 Impact on diluted income per common share $ 0.00 $ 0.01 The Company receives a tax deduction from certain stock option exercises during the period the options are exercised, generally for the excess of the price at which the underlying stock is sold over the exercise price of the options. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company reported excess tax benefits from employee stock option exercises as operating cash flows in its consolidated statement of cash flows. In accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), the Company now reports excess tax benefits as financing cash inflows. The actual income tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from stock option exercises for the three months ended September 29, 2006 was $12 thousand. There were no stock option exercises during the three months ended September 30, 2005. As such, there were no income tax benefits realized for that period. The actual income tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from stock option exercises for the nine months ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005 was $37 thousand and $2 thousand, respectively. There was no tax benefit recognized related to the total compensation expense for share-based payment arrangements for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005, as all the related options were incentive stock options and the tax benefit associated with disqualified incentive stock options is recognized by the Company only after such incentive stock options are exercised and disqualified. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements .......................................... In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, "Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments." This Statement amends SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" and SFAS No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities" and provides for simplified accounting for certain hybrid financial instruments by permitting fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation and by eliminating a restriction on the passive derivative instruments that a qualifying special-purpose entity (SPE) may hold. This Statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. Management has evaluated the new statement and has determined that it does not have a material affect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, "Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets" ("SFAS 156"), which requires all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value. SFAS 156 permits, but does not require, the subsequent measurement of servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value. Adoption is required as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. Management has evaluated the new statement and has determined that it does not have a material affect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In March 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") issued EITF Issue 06-3, "How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross verses Net Presentation)." A consensus was reached that entities may adopt a policy of presenting sales taxes and other similar taxes in the income statement on either a gross or net basis. If taxes are significant, an entity should disclose its policy of presenting taxes and the amounts of taxes. The guidance is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company presents sales net of sales taxes. This Issue will not impact the method for recording these sales taxes in the Company's consolidated financial statements. In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. ("FIN") 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of SFAS No. 109," which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Any change in the net assets or liabilities recognized as a result of adopting the provisions of FIN 48 would be recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Management is evaluating the impact the adoption of FIN 48 will have on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" ("SFAS 157"), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the related disclosure requirements. Adoption is required as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Management is evaluating the impact the adoption of this statement will have on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, "Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)" ("SFAS 158"). SFAS 158 requires that employers recognize on a prospective basis the funded status of their defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans on their consolidated balance sheet and recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost. SFAS No. 158 also requires additional disclosures in the notes to financial statements. SFAS No. 158 is effective as of the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. Management concluded that this statement will not impact the Company's consolidated financial statements, as the Company has no defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position AUG AIR-1, "Accounting for Planned Major Maintenance Activities" which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. This position statement eliminates the accrue-in-advance method of accounting for planned major maintenance activities. Management does not believe that the adoption of this position will have a material affect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In September 2006, the Staff of the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, "Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements." SAB No. 108 provides guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of determining whether the current year's financial statements are materially misstated. SAB No. 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. Management does not expect the adoption of SAB No. 108 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. Forward-Looking Statements ........................... The information set forth in this Report (and other reports issued by the Company and its officers from time to time) contain certain statements concerning the Company's future results, future performance, intentions, objectives, plans and expectations that are or may be deemed to be "forward-looking statements". Such statements are made in reliance upon safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties, including those risks and uncertainties discussed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2005. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive, and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond the Company's control. Although the Company believes that its assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, the Company cannot assure you that the results discussed or implied in such forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in such forward-looking statements, the inclusion of such statements should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the Company's objectives and plans will be achieved. Words such as "believes," "anticipates," "expects," "intends," "may," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise any of these forward-looking statements. Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk .......................................................... Market Risk ............ The principal market risks (i.e. the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices) to which the Company is exposed are interest rates on demand deposits with banks and money market funds and foreign currency exchange rates, generating translation and transaction gains and losses. Interest Rates ............... The Company manages its cash and investment portfolios considering investment opportunities and risks, tax consequences and overall financing strategies. The Company's investment portfolios consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and investments, with carrying amounts approximating market value. Assuming September 29, 2006 cash and investment levels, a one-point change in interest rates would have an approximate $589 thousand impact on the annual interest income of the Company. Foreign Currency Exchange Rates ................................ Operating in international markets involves exposure to movements in currency exchange rates that are volatile at times. The economic impact of currency exchange rate movements on the Company is complex because such changes are often linked to variability in real growth, inflation, interest rates, governmental actions and other factors. These changes, if material, could cause the Company to adjust its financing and operating strategies. Consequently, isolating the effect of changes in currency does not incorporate these other important economic factors. The Company's net sales and services to foreign customers represent a large percentage of total net sales and services. The Company expects net sales and services to foreign customers will continue to represent a large percentage of its total net sales and services. The Company generally has not engaged in foreign currency hedging transactions. The aggregate foreign exchange gains included in determining consolidated results of operations were $212 thousand and $71 thousand in the nine months ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively. Changes in the Euro and Yen have the largest impact on the Company's operating profits. The Company estimates that a 10% change in foreign exchange rates would not materially impact reported operating profits. Item 4. Controls and Procedures ....................... Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Company's CEO and CFO concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company's periodic SEC filings. There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the quarterly period ended September 29, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting. PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings ................. The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to various claims, which have arisen in the normal course of business. The impact of the final resolution of these matters on the Company's results of operations in a particular reporting period is not known. Management is of the opinion, however, that the ultimate outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company's financial condition or liquidity. Item 1A. Risk Factors ............ A description of the risk factors associated with our business is contained in Item 1A, "Risk Factors," of our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 16, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference. There have been no material changes in the risk factors associated with our business. These cautionary statements are to be used as a reference in connection with any forward-looking statements. The factors, risks and uncertainties identified in these cautionary statements are in addition to those contained in any other cautionary statements, written or oral, which may be made or otherwise addressed in connection with a forward-looking statement or contained in any of our subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds ........................................................... None. Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities ............................... None. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security-Holders ................................................... None. Item 5. Other Information ................. None. Item 6. Exhibits ........ Exhibits - See accompanying Index to Exhibits included after the signature page of this report for a list of the exhibits filed or furnished with this report. SIGNATURES ........... PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED. DATED: November 8, 2006 EXCEL TECHNOLOGY, INC. By: /s/ Alice Varisano ................................ Alice Varisano, Chief Financial Officer By: /s/ J. Donald Hill ................................. J. Donald Hill, Chairman of the Board By: /s/ Antoine Dominic ................................. Antoine Dominic, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer INDEX TO EXHIBITS ................. Exhibit No. Description 11 Computation of Net Income Per Share 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. EXHIBIT 11 COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE (In thousands, except per share data)(Unaudited) BASIC DILUTED Three Months Ended Three Months Ended .................. .................. Sept 29, Sept 30, Sept 29, Sept 30, 2006 2005 2006 2005 ........ ........ ........ ........ Net income $ 2,488 $ 4,354 $ 2,488 $ 4,354 ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ Weighted average common shares outstanding 12,066 12,054 12,066 12,054 Weighted average common share equivalents outstanding: Stock options 0 0 456 205 ........ ........ ........ ........ Weighted average common shares and common share equivalents outstanding 12,066 12,054 12,522 12,259 ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ Net income per share $ 0.21 $ 0.36 $ 0.20 $ 0.36 ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ Nine Months Ended Nine Months Ended .................. .................. Sept 29, Sept 30, Sept 29, Sept 30, 2006 2005 2006 2005 ........ ........ ........ ........ Net income $ 10,345 $ 10,856 $ 10,345 $ 10,856 ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ Weighted average common shares outstanding 12,064 12,053 12,064 12,053 Weighted average common share equivalents outstanding: Stock options 0 0 441 190 ........ ........ ........ ........ Weighted average common shares and common share equivalents outstanding 12,064 12,053 12,505 12,243 ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ Net income per share $ 0.86 $ 0.90 $ 0.83 $ 0.89 ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ For the three and nine months ended September 29, 2006, there were 125 thousand and 135 thousand, respectively, stock options outstanding that are antidulutive and are not included in the above income per share calculations. For both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, there were 215 thousand stock options outstanding that are antidilutive and are not included in the above income per share calculations. EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Antoine Dominic, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Excel Technology, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Dated: November 8, 2006 By: /s/ Antoine Dominic ................................. Antoine Dominic, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Operating Officer EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION I, Alice Varisano, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Excel Technology, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Dated: November 8, 2006 By: /s/ Alice Varisano ....................... Alice Varisano, Chief Financial Officer EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT I, Antoine Dominic, Chief Executive Officer of Excel Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge,: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 29, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15. U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: November 8, 2006 /s/ Antoine Dominic ............................ Antoine Dominic, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Operating Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT I, Alice Varisano, Chief Financial Officer of Excel Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge,: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 29, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15. U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: November 8, 2006 /s/ Alice Varisano ............................. Alice Varisano, Chief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.