1
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14A-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission
Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12
Atmel Corporation
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5) Total fee paid:
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3) Filing Party:
(4) Date Filed:
2
[ATMEL LOGO]
ATMEL CORPORATION
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 2, 2001
2:00 PM
Dear Atmel Stockholders:
Our Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on Wednesday, May 2,
2001 at 2:00 p.m., local time, at our offices located at 2325 Orchard Parkway,
San Jose, California 95131, for the following purposes:
1. To elect six (6) directors to serve for the ensuing year and until
their successors are elected;
2. To approve the amendment of Atmel's Certificate of Incorporation to
increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from
500,000,000 to 1,600,000,000;
3. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P. as our
independent accountants for the year ending December 31, 2001; and
4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy
Statement accompanying this Notice.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 5, 2001
are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting and any adjournments or
postponements thereof.
All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting. However,
whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please complete, sign, date and
promptly return the accompanying proxy in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope.
You may revoke your proxy at any time prior to the meeting. If you decide to
attend the meeting and wish to change your proxy vote, you may do so
automatically by voting in person at the meeting.
FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Mark A. Bertelsen
Secretary
San Jose, California
March 21, 2001
3
ATMEL CORPORATION
PROXY STATEMENT
-------------------
INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING
GENERAL
These proxy materials are furnished in connection with the solicitation
of proxies by our Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to
be held on Wednesday, May 2, 2001, at 2:00 p.m., local time, or at any
adjournments or postponements thereof, for the purposes set forth herein and in
the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The meeting will be
held at our offices located at 2325 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, California 95131.
When proxies are properly executed, dated and returned, and not later revoked,
the shares they represent will be voted at the meeting in accordance with the
instructions of the stockholder. If no specific instructions are provided, the
shares will be voted as recommended by our Board of Directors. If any other
matters are properly presented for consideration at the meeting or any
adjournments or postponements thereof, the proxy holders will have discretion to
vote on these matters. We do not currently anticipate that any other matters
will be raised at the meeting.
These proxy materials and the Annual Report to Stockholders for the year
ended December 31, 2000, including financial statements, were first mailed on or
about March 21, 2001, to all stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting.
RECORD DATE AND VOTING SECURITIES
Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 5, 2001, are
entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting and any adjournment thereof. At
the record date, 463,632,131 shares of our common stock were issued and
outstanding, and no shares of our preferred stock were outstanding.
REVOCABILITY OF PROXIES
Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the
person giving it at any time before its use by delivering to us (Attention:
Investor Relations, 2325 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, California 95131) a later
dated written notice of revocation or duly executed proxy, in each case at or
before the taking of the vote at the annual meeting, or by attending the meeting
and voting in person.
EXPENSES OF SOLICITATION
We will bear the entire cost of proxy solicitation, including
preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of this proxy statement, the proxy,
and any additional materials furnished to stockholders. Copies of proxy
solicitation material will be furnished to brokerage houses, fiduciaries, and
custodians holding shares in their names which are beneficially owned by others
to forward to such beneficial owners. In addition, we may reimburse such persons
for their cost of forwarding the solicitation material to such beneficial
owners. Solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by one or more of
telephone, email, telegram, facsimile, or personal solicitation by our
directors, officers, or regular employees. No additional compensation will be
paid for such services. We may engage the services of a professional proxy
solicitation firm to aid in the solicitation of proxies from certain brokers,
bank nominees and other institutional owners. Our costs for such services, if
retained, will not be material.
QUORUM; REQUIRED VOTE; ABSTENTIONS AND BROKER NON-VOTES
A majority of the shares entitled to vote, present in person or
represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at the meeting. If a quorum is
present, in all matters other than the election of directors, the affirmative
vote of the majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy at the
meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter shall be required to approve
any matter presented at the meeting. Directors shall be elected by a plurality
of the votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy.
1
4
Shares that are voted "FOR," "AGAINST" or "ABSTAIN" are treated as being
present at the meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum and are also
treated as shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting ("Votes Cast").
While there is no definitive statutory or case law authority in Delaware
as to the proper treatment of abstentions, we believe that abstentions should be
counted for purposes of determining both (i) the presence or absence of a quorum
for the transaction of business and (ii) the total number of Votes Cast with
respect to a proposal (other than the election of directors). In the absence of
a controlling precedent to the contrary, we intend to treat abstentions in this
manner. Accordingly, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against a
proposal.
The Delaware Supreme Court held that, while broker non-votes should be
counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the
transaction of business, broker non-votes should not be counted for purposes of
determining the number of Votes Cast with respect to the particular proposal on
which the broker has expressly not voted. We intend to treat broker non-votes in
this manner. As a result, a broker non-vote will have the same effect as a vote
against a proposal which requires the vote of a majority of shares of
outstanding common stock to be approved, and will have no effect on the outcome
of the voting on a proposal which requires the vote of a majority of Votes Cast
to be approved.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS TO BE PRESENTED AT NEXT ANNUAL MEETING
Stockholders interested in submitting a proposal for inclusion in the
proxy materials for our 2002 annual meeting may do so by submitting such
proposal in writing to our offices located at 2325 Orchard Parkway, San Jose,
California 95131, Attn: Mike Ross, Vice President and General Counsel. To be
eligible for inclusion, stockholder proposals must be received by our Vice
President and General Counsel no later than November 21, 2001. If we are not
notified of a stockholder proposal by February 4, 2002, then the proxies held by
our management may provide the discretion to vote against such stockholder
proposal, even though such proposal is not discussed in the proxy statement. Our
bylaws also establish an advanced notice procedure with regard to certain
matters, including nominations of persons for election to the board of directors
and stockholder proposals not included in our proxy statement, to be brought
before an annual meeting of stockholders. Stockholder proposals, including the
nomination of a person for election to the board of directors, may not be
brought before the meeting unless, among other things: (1) the proposal contains
certain information specified in the bylaws, and (2) the proposal is received by
us not less than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year's
annual meeting. These requirements are separate from and in addition to the
SEC's requirements that a stockholder must meet in order to have a stockholder
proposal included in our proxy statement. A copy of the full text of these bylaw
provisions may be obtained by writing to our Vice President and General Counsel
at the address above.
2
5
PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
NOMINEES
A board of six (6) directors is to be elected at the meeting. Unless
otherwise instructed, the proxyholders will vote the proxies received by them
for the six (6) nominees named below, all of whom are presently our directors.
In the event that any such nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director
at the time of the meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee who shall
be designated by the present Board of Directors to fill the vacancy. In the
event that additional persons are nominated for election as directors, the proxy
holders intend to vote all proxies received by them in such a manner as will
ensure the election of as many of the nominees listed below as possible and, in
such event, the specific nominees to be voted for will be determined by the
proxy holders. We are not aware of any nominee who will be unable or will
decline to serve as a director. The term of office for each person elected as a
director will continue until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until
his successor has been elected and qualified.
The names of the nominees and certain information about them are set
forth below:
DIRECTOR
NAME OF NOMINEE AGE PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION SINCE
- --------------- --- -------------------- ---------
George Perlegos 52 President, Chief Executive Officer and 1984
Chairman of the Board, Atmel Corporation
Gust Perlegos 54 Executive Vice President, General Manager, 1985
Atmel Corporation
Tsung-Ching Wu 51 Executive Vice President, Technology, 1985
Atmel Corporation
Norm Hall 48 Managing Partner, Alliant Partners 1992
T. Peter Thomas 55 Managing Director, Institutional Venture 1987
Partners
Pierre Fougere 60 Chief Executive Officer, Fougere Conseil 2001
George Perlegos has served as President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board since our inception in 1984. George Perlegos holds degrees
in electrical engineering from San Jose State University (B.S.) and Stanford
University (M.S.). George Perlegos is a brother of Gust Perlegos.
Gust Perlegos has served as Vice President, General Manager and a
director since January 1985 and as Executive Vice President since January 1996.
Gust Perlegos holds degrees in electrical engineering from San Jose State
University (B.S.), Stanford University (M.S.) and Santa Clara University
(Ph.D.). Gust Perlegos is a brother of George Perlegos.
Tsung-Ching Wu has served as a director since January 1985, as Vice
President, Technology since January 1986 and as Executive Vice President since
January 1996. Mr. Wu holds degrees in electrical engineering from the National
Taiwan University (B.S.), the State University of New York at Stony Brook (M.S.)
and the University of Pennsylvania (Ph.D.).
Norm Hall has served as a director of Atmel since August 1992. He is
currently Managing Partner of Alliant Partners, an investment banking firm,
which position he has held since 1990. From 1988 to 1990, he worked for Berkeley
International Capital Corporation, a venture capital firm. Prior to 1988, Mr.
Hall worked at Intel Corporation. Mr. Hall also serves as a director of White
Electronic Designs, Inc..
T. Peter Thomas has served as a director of Atmel since December 1987.
Mr. Thomas is Managing Director of Institutional Venture Management. Mr. Thomas
has held this position since November 1985. Mr. Thomas also serves as a director
of @Road, Inc. and Transmeta Corporation.
Pierre Fougere has served as a director of Atmel since February 2001.
Mr. Fougere is currently Chief Executive Officer of Fougere Conseil and serves
as Chairman of Financiere Saint Florentin and Chairman of Matra Datavision Inc..
From 1986 to 1988, Mr. Fougere was Executive Vice President, Chairman, and Chief
Executive Officer of Matra Datavision (Software). Prior to 1986, he was
Executive Vice President, General Manager of the Components Division, Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of Matra Harris Semiconductor and Matra GCA.
3
6
BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
Our Board of Directors held a total of eleven (11) meetings during the
year 2000. The directors attended an average of 95% of the meetings of the Board
of Directors and meetings of the committees, if any, upon which such director
served. The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee and a Compensation
Committee. The Board of Directors has no nominating committee nor any committee
performing similar functions.
The Compensation Committee currently consists of directors Hall, Thomas,
and Fougere. The Compensation Committee held one meeting during 2000. This
Committee reviews and approves the our executive compensation policies,
including the salaries and target bonuses of our executive officers, and
administers our incentive stock plans.
The Audit Committee currently consists of directors Hall, Thomas, and
Fougere. The Audit Committee held two meetings during 2000. In addition, the
Committee met twice during 2000 with the outside auditors to review Atmel's
interim financial results. The duties of the Audit Committee are set forth in
our Audit Committee Charter attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Directors do not receive cash compensation for service on the Board of
Directors or any Committee thereof. Mr. Hall and Mr. Thomas each received an
option to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock on November 17, 2000.
VOTE REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The six nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative votes of
the shares entitled to be voted for them shall be elected as directors. Votes
withheld from any director and broker non-votes are counted as present for
purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction
of business, but have no legal affect under Delaware law and are not counted
toward a nominee's total and have no legal affect under Delaware law.
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS VOTING "FOR" THE NOMINEES
SET FORTH HEREIN.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
Our Audit Committee has (1) reviewed and discussed the audited financial
statements with management, (2) discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P.,
its independent accountants, the matters required to be discussed by the
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, and (3) received the written disclosures
and the letter from the independent accountants required by Independence
Standards Board Standard No. 1, and has discussed the accountants' independence
with the independent accountants. Based upon these discussions and reviews, the
Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements
be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2000 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Audit Committee is currently composed of the following three
directors, all of whom are independent directors as defined in Rule 4200(a)(14)
of the National Association of Securities Dealers listing standards:
Pierre Fougere
Norm Hall
T. Peter Thomas
AUDIT FEES
Audit fees billed to Atmel by PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P. for the
fiscal year 2000 audit and review of Forms 10-Q are estimated to total $935,435
of which an aggregate amount of $457,771 has been billed through December 31,
2000.
4
7
FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION FEES
Atmel has engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P. to provide advice for
designing and implementing financial information systems and was billed
$5,061,920 during the fiscal year which ended December 31, 2000.
ALL OTHER FEES
Fees billed to Atmel by PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P. during the fiscal
year 2000 for all other non-audit services rendered to Atmel totaled $3,156,310.
Our Audit Committee has considered whether and determined that the
provision of the non-audit services rendered to Atmel by PricewaterhouseCoopers
L.L.P. during Atmel's fiscal year 2000 was compatible with maintaining the
independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P..
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
The Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee. A copy
of the Audit Committee Charter is attached as Appendix A to this proxy
statement.
Respectfully submitted by the members of the Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors.
Pierre Fougere
Norm Hall
T. Peter Thomas
5
8
SECURITY OWNERSHIP
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to
beneficial ownership of our common stock as of December 31, 2000 by (i) each
person known by us to be a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding
common stock, (ii) our Chief Executive Officer and each of the four other most
highly compensated executive officers (collectively, the "Named Officers"),
(iii) each director and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group.
The information on beneficial ownership in the table and the footnotes hereto is
based upon our records and the most recent Schedule 13D or 13G filed by each
such person or entity and information supplied to us by such person or entity.
Except as otherwise indicated, each person has sole voting and investment power
with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned, subject to community
property laws where applicable, and can be reached by contacting our principal
executive offices, unless otherwise noted.
APPROXIMATE
COMMON STOCK PERCENT
BENEFICIAL OWNER BENEFICIALLY OWNED(1) BENEFICIALLY OWNED
- ---------------- --------------------- ------------------
George Perlegos (2) 33,286,636 7.14 %
Gust Perlegos (3) 14,950,615 3.21 %
Tsung-Ching Wu (4) 9,294,829 1.99 %
Mikes Sisois (5) 1,451,753 *
Donald Colvin (6) 232, 712 *
T. Peter Thomas (7) 90,567 *
Norm Hall (8) 73,334 *
All directors and executive officers as a group
(8 persons) (9) 60,715,508 12.74 %
- ------------------
* Less than one percent of the outstanding common stock.
(1) Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the
Securities Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment
power with respect to the securities. In computing the number of shares
beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person,
shares of Atmel common stock subject to options held by that person that
will be exercisable on or before March 1, 2001, are deemed outstanding. Such
shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the
percentage ownership of any other person.
(2) The address for George Perlegos is 2325 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, CA 95131.
(3) Includes 569,375 issuable under stock options exercisable within 60 days of
December 31, 2000.
(4) Includes 451,259 issuable under stock options exercisable within 60 days of
December 31, 2000.
(5) Includes 132,073 issuable under stock options exercisable within 60 days of
December 31, 2000.
(6) Includes 230,668 issuable under stock options exercisable within 60 days of
December 31, 2000.
(7) Includes 74,167 issuable under stock options exercisable within 60 days of
December 31, 2000.
(8) Includes 73,334 issuable under stock options exercisable within 60 days of
December 31, 2000.
(9) Includes 2,157,252 issuable under stock options exercisable within 60 days
of December 31, 2000.
6
9
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth all compensation received for services
rendered to Atmel in all capacities, for the three years ended December 31,
2000, by the Named Officers:
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG-TERM
COMPENSATION
AWARDS
ANNUAL COMPENSATION NUMBER OF SHARES
---------------------- UNDERLYING
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY ($) BONUS ($) OPTIONS (1)
- --------------------------- ---- ---------- --------- ----------------
George Perlegos 2000 349,854 175,183 --
President and Chief Executive Officer 1999 324,389 80,563 --
1998 311,905 22,952 --
Gust Perlegos 2000 305,108 152,778 --
Executive Vice President, General 1999 282,932 70,258 --
Manager 1998 272,155 20,027 --
Tsung-Ching Wu 2000 282,348 141,427 --
Executive Vice President, Technology 1999 257,140 64,136 --
1998 243,800 17,940 --
Donald Colvin (2) 2000 235,060 157,741 40,000
Vice President, Finance and 1999 214,968 53,388 120,000
Chief Financial Officer 1998 159,814 -- 272,000
Mikes Sisois 2000 212,914 106,594 --
Vice President of Planning and 1999 199,225 49,369 80,000
Information Systems 1998 192,920 14,196 --
- -----------------
(1) The shares have been retroactively adjusted to reflect two 2-for-1 stock
splits each in the form of a 100% stock dividend to stockholders of record
as of December 3, 1999 and August 11, 2000.
(2) Donald Colvin's compensation for 1998 was paid in French Francs, and is
presented in the table above in U.S. Dollars based on the exchange rate as
of December 31, 1999, which was 6.518 French Francs to 1.00 U.S. Dollar.
7
10
OPTION GRANTS
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to stock
options granted to each of the Named Officers during the year ended December 31,
2000. In accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
also shown below is the potential realizable value over the term of the option
(the period from the grant date to the expiration date) based on assumed rates
of stock appreciation of 5% and 10%, compounded annually. These amounts are
based on certain assumed rates of appreciation and do not represent our estimate
of future stock price. Actual gains, if any, on stock option exercises are
dependent on the future performance of the common stock.
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS
-------------------------------------------------------
% OF TOTAL POTENTIAL REALIZABLE
NUMBER OF OPTIONS VALUE AT ASSUMED ANNUAL
SHARES GRANTED TO RATES OF STOCK PRICE
UNDERLYING EMPLOYEES EXERCISE APPRECIATION FOR OPTION TERM
OPTIONS IN FISCAL PRICE PER EXPIRATION ----------------------------
NAME GRANTED YEAR SHARE DATE 5% 10%
- ---- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- -------- --------
George Perlegos -- -- -- -- -- --
Gust Perlegos -- -- -- -- -- --
Tsung-Ching Wu -- -- -- -- -- --
Donald Colvin 40,000 .92% $12.125 11/17/10 $305,014 $772,965
Mikes Sisois -- -- -- -- -- --
OPTION EXERCISES AND HOLDINGS
The following table provides information with respect to option
exercises in 2000 by the Named Officers and the value of such officers'
unexercised options at December 31, 2000.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
NUMBER OF SHARES UNDERLYING VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNEXERCISED OPTIONS AT IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS AT
SHARES FISCAL YEAR-END FISCAL YEAR-END (2)
ACQUIRED ON VALUE ---------------------------- ----------------------------
NAME EXERCISE REALIZED (1) EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
- ---- ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
George Perlegos -- -- -- -- -- --
Gust Perlegos -- -- 562,708 50,000 $4,497,680 $ 276,560
Tsung-Ching Wu -- -- 444,592 50,000 $3,250,080 $ 276,560
Donald Colvin 40,000 $ 875,624 201,334 190,666 $1,910,042 $ 948,445
Mikes Sisois 59,908 $1,167,470 128,740 50,000 $ 774,603 $ 285,935
- ------------------
(1) Market value of underlying securities on date of exercise, minus the
exercise price.
(2) Market value of unexercised options is based on the last reported sales
price of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market of $ 11.625 per
share on December 29, 2000 (the last trading day for fiscal 2000), minus the
exercise price.
8
11
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors generally reviews
and approves our executive compensation policies, including the base salary
levels and target incentives for our executive officers at the beginning of each
year, and approves the performance objectives of the officers in their areas of
responsibility. The Compensation Committee also administers our stock plans,
including our 1996 Stock Plan and our 1991 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. No
member of the Compensation Committee is a former or current officer or employee
of Atmel or any of its subsidiaries. Meetings of the Compensation Committee are
also attended by George Perlegos, our President and Chief Executive Officer, who
provides background and market information and makes recommendations to the
Compensation Committee on salary levels, officer performance objectives, and
corporate financial goals. However, Mr. Perlegos is not entitled to vote on any
actions taken by the Compensation Committee.
COMPENSATION POLICIES
Our policy is that a substantial portion of each officer's annual
compensation should be based upon our financial performance. The Compensation
Committee establishes the salary of each officer primarily by considering the
salaries of officers in similar positions with a number of comparably-sized
companies in the semiconductor industry (the "Benchmark Group"). Such group is
subject to change from year to year based on management's assessment of
comparability. In setting base compensation, we strive to achieve compensation
levels for each officer within 25% of the average salaries paid by the Benchmark
Group. The Compensation Committee further adjusts the salaries of our officers
based on our financial performance during the past year and on each officer's
performance against the objectives related to his area of responsibility, which
objectives were established at the beginning of the prior year. The base salary
increases for our executive officers in 2000 set forth in the Summary
Compensation Table reflect the analysis by management and the Compensation
Committee of the salary levels paid by members of Benchmark Group and our
performance in 2000.
Under our executive bonus plan, executive officers may receive a
substantial percentage of their base salary in bonus payments, based on our
quarterly financial performance compared to pre-tax income targets established
by the Board of Directors at the beginning of the year in connection with the
adoption of our operating plan.
The Compensation Committee considers granting stock options to executive
officers based upon a number of factors, including such officer's
responsibilities and relative position, any changes in such officer's
responsibility and position, such officer's equity interest in the form of stock
and options held by such individual, and the extent to which existing options
remain unvested. All options are granted at the current market price of our
common stock on the date of grant and options generally vest over four years.
COMPENSATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
The Compensation Committee uses the same factors and criteria described
above for compensation decisions regarding the Chief Executive Officer. In
particular, in 2000, Mr. Perlegos' compensation was well below the average
compensation of chief executive officers in the Benchmark Group. Mr. Perlegos'
bonus for 2000 was also determined under our executive bonus plan.
MEMBERS OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Pierre Fougere
Norm Hall
T. Peter Thomas
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
In 2000 the Compensation Committee consisted of directors Hall and
Thomas. During 2000, we paid Alliant Partners approximately $59,950, in
consideration for services rendered in advising us regarding financing, mergers
and acquisitions. Mr. Hall, a director of Atmel and a member of the Compensation
Committee, is Managing Partner of Alliant Partners.
9
12
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent
of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership on
Form 3 and changes in ownership on Form 4 or 5 with the Securities Exchange
Commission. Such officers, directors and 10% stockholders are also required by
the Securities and Exchange Commission rules to furnish us with copies of all
Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on our review of copies of such forms received, or written
representations from certain reporting persons that no filings were required for
such persons, we believe that, during the year ended December 31, 2000, all
Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our executive officers and
directors were complied with.
PROPOSAL TWO
INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES
Our Certificate of Incorporation currently authorizes the issuance of
500,000,000 shares of common stock. As of the record date, approximately
463,632,131 shares were issued and outstanding. There were 36,000,000 shares of
common stock reserved for issuance under our 1996 Stock Option Plan. Of this
amount, approximately 16,571,494 shares were subject to currently outstanding
options and an additional 15,342,534 shares were available for grant as of the
record date. An additional 6,675,000 shares are available for purchase under our
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Additionally, we have reserved and will be
obligated to issue 19,030,000 shares of common stock upon the conversion of the
Zero Coupon Convertible Subordinated Debenture Due 2018. A significant amount of
the increase in authorized shares approved at the 1999 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders was issued in two 2-for-1 stock splits, each of which was effected
in the form of a 100% stock dividend to stockholders of record, as of December
3, 1999 and August 11, 2000.
As a result of our prior convertible note financings and efforts to
provide equity incentives to our employees, officers and directors, we have
issued or reserved for issuance a significant amount of our authorized common
stock. The Board of Directors has determined that it is in our best interests
and that of our stockholders to amend the second sentence of Article Four of the
Company's Certificate of Incorporation (the "Amendment") to increase the number
of authorized shares of common stock of the Company from 500,000,000 to
1,600,000,000 shares, and hereby solicits the approval our stockholders of the
Amendment. If the stockholders approve the Amendment, the Board of Directors
currently intends to file an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation
reflecting the Amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware as
soon as practicable following such stockholder approval. If the Amendment is not
approved by the stockholders, Article Four of the existing Certificate of
Incorporation will continue in effect. The objective of the increase in the
authorized number of shares of common stock is to ensure that we have sufficient
shares available for future issuances. The Board of Directors believes that it
is prudent to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock to the
proposed levels in order to provide a reserve of shares available for issuance
to meet business needs as they arise. Though our Board of Directors has no
immediate plans to issue a significant number of additional shares of common
stock, such future business needs may include, without limitation, establishing
strategic relationships with corporate partners, providing equity incentives to
employees, officers or directors, funding future financings or acquisitions or
effecting stock splits by means of a stock dividend.
POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
All authorized but unissued shares of common stock will be available for
issuance from time to time for any proper purpose approved by the Board of
Directors (including issuances in connection with stock-based employee benefit
plans, future stock splits by means of a dividend and issuances to raise capital
or effect acquisitions). Other than authorizing sufficient shares to cover the
conversion of the Zero Coupon Convertible Debentures Due 2018, there are
currently no arrangements, agreements or understandings for the issuance or use
of the additional shares of authorized common stock. The Board of Directors does
not presently intend to seek further stockholder approval of any particular
issuance of shares unless such approval is required by law or the rules of the
National Association of Securities Dealers.
10
13
Our stockholders do not currently have any preemptive or similar rights
to subscribe for or purchase any additional shares of common stock that may be
issued in the future, and therefore, future issuances of common stock, may,
depending on the circumstances, have a dilutive effect on the earnings per
share, voting power and other interests of the existing stockholders.
VOTE REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares of our common stock will be required to approve this proposal.
Abstentions and broker non-vote will have the same effect as a vote against the
proposal.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THIS PROPOSAL AND
RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE PROPOSAL TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES
OF COMMON STOCK OF ATMEL FROM 500,000,000 TO 1,600,000,000.
PROPOSAL THREE
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
The Board of Directors has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P.,
independent accountants, to audit our consolidated financial statements for the
year ending December 31, 2001. PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P. has audited our
financial statements since the year ended 1985.
Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P. are expected to be
present at the meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they
so desire. The representatives are also expected to be available to respond to
appropriate questions from the stockholders.
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS L.L.P.
Stockholder ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers
L.L.P. as Atmel's independent public accountants is not required by Atmel's
Bylaws or other applicable legal requirement. However, our Board is submitting
the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P. to the stockholders for
ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to
ratify the selection, the Audit Committee and the Board will reconsider whether
or not to retain that firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Board at its
discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent accounting firm
at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the
best interests of Atmel and its stockholders.
VOTE REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares
represented and entitled to vote at the meeting will be required to ratify the
selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P. as Atmel's independent public
accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2001. Abstentions will be
counted toward the tabulation of votes cast on proposals presented to the
stockholders and will have the same effect as negative votes. Broker non-votes
are counted towards a quorum, but are not counted for any purpose in determining
whether this matter has been approved.
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS VOTING "FOR" RATIFICATION
OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS L.L.P. AS INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2001. IN THE EVENT OF A NEGATIVE VOTE ON SUCH
RATIFICATION, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL RECONSIDER ITS SELECTION.
11
14
OTHER MATTERS
We know of no other matters to be submitted to the meeting. If any other
matters properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement
thereof, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy
to vote the shares they represent as the Board of Directors may recommend.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Dated: March 21, 2001
12
15
APPENDIX A
ATMEL CORPORATION
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
PURPOSE
The primary purpose of the Audit Committee (the "Committee") is to assist the
Board of Directors (the "Board") in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee
management's conduct of the Company's financial reporting process, including
overviewing the financial reports and other financial information provided by
the Company to any governmental or regulatory body, the public or other users
thereof, the Company's systems of internal accounting and financial controls and
the annual independent audit of the Company's financial statements.
In discharging its oversight role, the Committee is empowered to investigate any
matter brought to its attention with full access to all books, records,
facilities and personnel of the Company and the power to retain outside counsel,
auditors or other experts for this purpose. The Board and the Committee are in
place to represent the Company's shareholders; accordingly, the outside auditor
is ultimately accountable to the Board and the Committee.
MEMBERSHIP
The Committee shall, by July 2001, be comprised of not less than three members
of the Board, and the Committee's composition will meet the requirements of the
Audit Committee Policy.
Accordingly, all of the members will be directors:
1. Who have no relationship to the Company that may interfere with the exercise
of their independence from management and the Company; and
2. Who are financially literate or who become financially literate within a
reasonable period of time after appointment to the Committee. In addition,
at least one member of the Committee will have accounting or related
financial management expertise.
KEY RESPONSIBILITIES
The Committee's job is one of oversight and it recognizes that the Company's
management is responsible for preparing the Company's financial statements and
that the outside auditors are responsible for auditing those financial
statements. Additionally, the Committee recognizes that financial management, as
well as the outside auditors, have more time, knowledge and more detailed
information on the Company than do Committee members; consequently, in carrying
out its oversight responsibilities, the Committee is not providing any expert or
special assurance as to the Company's financial statements or any professional
certification as to the outside auditors work.
The following functions shall be the common recurring activities of the
Committee in carrying out its oversight function. These functions are set forth
as a guide with the understanding that the Committee may diverge from this guide
as appropriate given the circumstances.
- The Committee shall review with management and the outside auditors
the audited financial statements to be included in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K and review and consider with the outside
auditors the matters required to be discussed by Statement of Auditing
Standards ("SAS") No. 61.
- As a whole, or through the Committee chair, the Committee shall review
with the outside auditors the Company's interim financial results to
be included in the Company's quarterly reports to be filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission and the matters required to be
discussed by SAS No. 6 1; this review will occur prior to the
Company's filing of the Form 10-Q.
- The Committee shall discuss with management and the outside auditors
the quality and adequacy of the Company's internal controls.
13
16
- The Committee shall:
1. request from the outside auditors annually, a formal written
statement delineating all relationships between the auditor
and the Company consistent with Independence Standards Board
Standard Number 1;
2. discuss with the outside auditors any such disclosed
relationships and their impact on the outside auditors'
independence; and
3. recommend that the Board take appropriate action to oversee
the independence of the outside auditor.
- The Committee, subject to any action that may be taken by the full
Board, shall have the ultimate authority and responsibility to select
(or nominate for shareholder approval), evaluate and, where
appropriate, replace the outside auditor.
14
17
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total
stockholder return, calculated on a dividend reinvested basis, for Atmel
Corporation, Technology - 500 and the S&P 500 Index. The graph assumes that $100
was invested in Atmel's common stock, Technology - 500 and the S&P 500 Index
from the date of December 31, 1995 through the 2000 year end. Historic stock
price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price
performance.
[PERFORMANCE GRAPH]
12/31/95 12/31/96 12/31/97 12/31/98 12/31/99 12/31/00
Atmel Corporation 100 148 83 68 264 208
S&P 500 Index 100 123 164 211 255 232
Technology - 500 100 142 179 309 542 325
15
18
ATMEL CORPORATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 2, 2001
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned stockholder of ATMEL CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation, hereby acknowledges receipt of the 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K,
and receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement,
each dated March 21, 2001, and hereby appoints George Perlegos and Mike Ross,
and each of them, proxies and attorneys-in-fact, with full power to each of
substitution, on behalf and in the name of the undersigned, to represent the
undersigned at the 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of ATMEL CORPORATION to
be held on May 2, 2001 at 2:00 p.m., local time, at Atmel Corporation, 2325
Orchard Parkway, San Jose, California 95131 and at any adjournments or
postponements thereof, and to vote all shares of Common Stock which the
undersigned would be entitled to vote if then and there personally present, on
the matters set forth on the reverse side.
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR IF NO CONTRARY DIRECTION IS
INDICATED WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSALS ON THE REVERSE SIDE HEREOF AND
FOR SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING AS SAID PROXIES
DEEM ADVISABLE.
CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ ] ___________________ PLAN TO ATTEND
ACCOUNT NUMBER THE MEETING
PLEASE MARK YOUR CHOICE LIKE [ ]
___________________ THIS ~ IN BLUE OR BLACK INK
COMMON
Proposal 1 - Election of directors
Nominees: George Perlegos, Gust Perlegos, Tsung-Ching Wu,
Norm Hall, T. Peter Thomas, and Pierre Fougere
FOR ALL WITHHOLD ALL
[ ] [ ] [ ] ________________________________________
FOR all nominees except as noted above.
Proposal 2- Proposal to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock
of Atmel Corporation to 1,600,000,000.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
Proposal 3 - Proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P.
as the independent accountants of Atmel Corporation for 2001.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
IN THEIR DISCRETION UPON SUCH OTHER MATTER OR MATTERS WHICH MAY PROPERLY COME
BEFORE THE MEETING AND ANY ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT THEREOF.
(This proxy should be marked, dated and signed by the stockholder(s) exactly as
such stockholder's name appears hereon and returned promptly in the enclosed
envelope. Persons signing in a fiduciary capacity should so indicate. If shares
are held by joint tenants or as community property, both should sign.)
Signature:
--------------------------
Date:
-------------------------------
Signature:
--------------------------
Date:
-------------------------------
[ ] Mark here for address change
and note at left.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------