1
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Year ended DECEMBER 31, 1996
----------------------------
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________ to __________
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-25418
CENTRAL COAST BANCORP
-------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 77-0367061
- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
301 Main Street, Salinas, California 93901
- ------------------------------------ -------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (408) 422-6642
---------------------
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: None
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
- ------------------- -----------------------------------------
Common Stock None
(no par value)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes __X__ No _____
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K [ ].
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant at February 28, 1997 was $65,163,000. As of February 28, 1997,
the registrant had 2,864,298 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The following documents are incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K:
Part III, Items 10 through 13 from registrant's definitive proxy statement for
the 1997 annual meeting of shareholders.
2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS.
Certain matters discussed or incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K including, but not limited to, matters described in Item 7
- - "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations," are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
projected. Changes to such risks and uncertainties, which could impact future
financial performance, include, among others, (1) competitive pressures in the
banking industry; (2) changes in the interest rate environment; (3) general
economic conditions, nationally, regionally and in operating market areas; (4)
changes in the regulatory environment; (5) changes in business conditions and
inflation; and (6) changes in securities markets. Therefore, the information
set forth therein should be carefully considered when evaluating the business
prospects of the Company and the Banks.
Central Coast Bancorp (the "Company") is a California corporation
organized in 1994 to act as the bank holding company of Bank of Salinas, a
state-chartered bank (the "Bank"), which has served individuals, merchants,
small and medium-sized businesses, professionals and agribusiness enterprises
located in and adjacent to Salinas, California since February 1, 1983.
On May 31, 1996, the Company aquired Cypress Coast Bank ("Cypress"),
whereby Cypress became a subsidiary of the Company and continues to operate
from its branches in Seaside and Marina, California. Under the terms of the
Agreement the shareholders of Cypress received 534,310 shares of common stock
of the Company in a tax-free exchange. At May 31, 1996, Cypress had unaudited
total assets of $46.9 million, including $29.8 million in loans and total
unaudited liabilities of $42.7 million, including $42.5 million in deposits.
The transaction has been accounted for as a pooling-of-interests. Subsequent
to the pooling, the name of Cypress Coast Bank was changed to Cypress Bank.
Cypress Bank is a state chartered bank engaged in the general
commercial banking business primarily serving businesses, professionals and
wage earners in the Seaside, Marina and adjoining communities.
Other than holding the shares of the subsidiary Banks, the Company
conducts no significant activities. Although it is authorized, with the prior
approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "Board of
Governors"), the Company's principal regulator, to engage in a variety of
activities which are deemed closely related to the business of banking.
2
3
The Banks operate through their headquarter offices located in Salinas
and Seaside, California and through their branch offices located in King City
and Marina, California. The Banks offer a full range of commercial banking
services, including the acceptance of demand, savings and time deposits, and
the making of commercial, real estate (including residential mortgage), Small
Business Administration, personal, home improvement, automobile and other
installment and term loans. They also offer travelers' checks, safe deposit
boxes, notary public, customer courier and other customary bank services. The
Bank of Salinas King City and Salinas Offices and the Cypress Bank Seaside and
Marina Offices are open from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday,
and 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Friday. The Bank of Salinas also operates a
limited service facility in a retirement home located in Salinas, California.
The facility is open from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on Wednesday of each week.
The Banks have automated teller machines (ATMs) located at the King City,
Marina and Seaside offices, the Monterey County Fairgrounds, the Soledad
Correctional Training Facility Credit Union, Salinas Valley Memorial Hospital
and Fort Hunter Liggett which is located in Jolon, California. The Banks are
insured under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and each depositor's account is
insured up to the legal limits thereon. The Banks are chartered (licensed) by
the California State Superintendent of Banks ("Superintendent") and have chosen
not to become a member of the Federal Reserve System. The Banks have no
subsidiaries.
In October 1996, the Bank of Salinas entered into a definitive
agreement to purchase certain assets and assume certain liabilities of the
Gonzales and Castroville branch offices of Wells Fargo Bank outstanding as of
the close of business on February 21, 1997. As a result of the transaction the
Bank will assume deposit liabilities, receive cash, and acquire tangible assets.
This transaction will result in intangible assets, representing the excess of
the liabilities assumed over the fair value of the tangible assets acquired.
The Banks also currently offer personal and business Visa credit
cards. The Banks have arranged with a correspondent institution to offer trust
services to the Banks' customers on request. The Banks operate an on-site
computer system which provides independent processing of the Banks' deposits,
loans and financial accounting.
The three areas in which the Banks have directed virtually all of
their lending activities are: (i) commercial loans; (ii) consumer loans; and
(iii) real estate loans (including residential construction and mortgage
loans). As of December 31, 1996, these three categories accounted for
approximately 46 percent, 4 percent and 50 percent, respectively, of the
Banks' loan portfolio.
The Banks' deposits are attracted primarily from individuals,
merchants, small and medium-sized businesses, professionals and agribusiness
enterprises. The
3
4
Banks' deposits are not received from a single depositor or group of affiliated
depositors the loss of any one of which would have a materially adverse effect
on the business of the Banks, nor is a material portion of the Banks' deposits
concentrated within a single industry or group of related industries.
As of December 31, 1996, the Banks served a total of 32 municipality
and governmental agency depositors totaling $28,412,000 in deposits. In
connection with the deposits of municipalities or other governmental agencies
or entities, the Banks are generally required to pledge securities to secure
such deposits, except for the first $100,000 of such deposits which are insured
by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC").
As of December 31, 1996, the Banks had total deposits of $338,663,000.
Of this total, $90,149,000 represented noninterest-bearing demand deposits,
$76,392,000 represented interest-bearing demand deposits, and $172,122,000
represented interest-bearing savings and time deposits.
The principal sources of the Banks' revenues are: (i) interest and
fees on loans; (ii) interest on Federal Funds sold (funds loaned on a
short-term basis to other banks) and short-term certificates of deposit at
other financial institutions; and (iii) interest on investments (principally
government securities). For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 these
sources comprised 76 percent, 17 percent, and 7 percent, respectively, of the
Banks' total interest income.
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
The common stock of the Company is subject to the registration
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the qualification
requirements of the California Corporate Securities Law of 1968, as amended.
The Banks' common stock, however, is exempt from such requirements. The
Company is also subject to the periodic reporting requirements of Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which include, but are not
limited to, annual, quarterly and other current reports with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
The Banks are licensed by the California State Superintendent of Banks
("Superintendent"), their deposits are insured by the FDIC, and they have
chosen not to become members of the Federal Reserve System. The Banks have no
subsidiaries. Consequently, the Banks are subject to the supervision of, and
are regularly examined by, the Superintendent and the FDIC. Such supervision
and regulation include comprehensive reviews of all major aspects of the Banks'
business and condition, including their capital ratios, allowance for possible
loan losses and other factors. However, no inference should be drawn that such
authorities have approved any such factors. The Company and the Banks are
required to file reports with the Superintendent, the FDIC and the Board of
4
5
Governors and provide such additional information as the Superintendent, FDIC
and the Board of Governors may require.
Effective July 1, 1997, all functions of the Superintendent will be
transferred to the Commissioner of Financial Institutions (the "Commissioner"),
a post newly created by the California legislature in 1996. The Commissioner
will be responsible to regulate and supervise, in addition to all California
state banks, California state savings and loan institutions previously
supervised by the California Savings and Loan Commissioner, and California
state credit unions and industrial loan companies previously supervised by the
California Commissioner of Corporations.
The Company is a bank holding company within the meaning of the Bank
Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the "Bank Holding Company Act"), and
is registered as such with, and subject to the supervision of, the Board of
Governors. The Company is required to obtain the approval of the Board of
Governors before it may acquire all or substantially all of the assets of any
bank, or ownership or control of the voting shares of any bank if, after giving
effect to such acquisition of shares, the Company would own or control more
than 5% of the voting shares of such bank. The Bank Holding Company Act
prohibits the Company from acquiring any voting shares of, or interest in, all
or substantially all of the assets of, a bank located outside the State of
California unless such an acquisition is specifically authorized by the laws of
the state in which such bank is located. Any such interstate acquisition is
also subject to the provisions of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and
Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 discussed below.
The Company, and any subsidiaries which it may acquire or organize,
are deemed to be "affiliates" of the Banks within the meaning of that term as
defined in the Federal Reserve Act. This means, for example, that there are
limitations (a) on loans by the Banks to affiliates, and (b) on investments by
the Banks in affiliates' stock as collateral for loans to any borrower. The
Company and its subsidiary are also subject to certain restrictions with
respect to engaging in the underwriting, public sale and distribution of
securities.
In addition, regulations of the Board of Governors promulgated under
the Federal Reserve Act require that reserves be maintained by the Banks in
conjunction with any liability of the Company under any obligation (promissory
note, acknowledgement of advance, banker's acceptance or similar obligation)
with a weighted average maturity of less than seven (7) years to the extent
that the proceeds of such obligations are used for the purpose of supplying
funds to the Banks for use in its banking business, or to maintain the
availability of such funds.
The Board of Governors and the FDIC have adopted risk-based capital
guidelines for evaluating the capital adequacy of bank holding companies and
banks. The guidelines are designed to make capital requirements sensitive to
5
6
differences in risk profiles among banking organizations, to take into account
off-balance sheet exposures and to aid in making the definition of bank capital
uniform internationally. Under the guidelines, the Company and the Banks are
required to maintain capital equal to at least 8.0% of its assets and
commitments to extend credit, weighted by risk, of which at least 4.0% must
consist primarily of common equity (including retained earnings) and the
remainder may consist of subordinated debt, cumulative preferred stock, or a
limited amount of loan loss reserves.
Assets, commitments to extend credit, and off-balance sheet items are
categorized according to risk and certain assets considered to present less
risk than others permit maintenance of capital at less than the 8% ratio. For
example, most home mortgage loans are placed in a 50% risk category and
therefore require maintenance of capital equal to 4% of such loans, while
commercial loans are placed in a 100% risk category and therefore require
maintenance of capital equal to 8% of such loans.
The guidelines establish two categories of qualifying capital: Tier 1
capital comprising core capital elements, and Tier 2 comprising supplementary
capital requirements. At least one-half of the required capital must be
maintained in the form of Tier 1 capital. Tier 1 capital includes common
shareholders' equity and qualifying perpetual preferred stock. However, no
more than 25% of the Company's total Tier 1 capital may consist of perpetual
preferred stock. The definition of Tier 1 capital for the Banks is the same,
except that perpetual preferred stock may be included only if it is
noncumulative. Tier 2 capital includes, among other items, limited life (and
in the case of banks, cumulative) preferred stock, mandatory convertible
securities, subordinated debt and a limited amount of reserve for credit
losses.
The Board of Governors and the FDIC also adopted minimum leverage
ratios for banking organizations as a supplement to the risk-weighted capital
guidelines. The leverage ratio is generally calculated using Tier 1 capital
(as defined under risk-based capital guidelines) divided by quarterly average
net total assets (excluding intangible assets and certain other adjustments).
The leverage ratio establishes a limit on the ability of banking organizations,
including the Company and the Banks, to increase assets and liabilities without
increasing capital proportionately.
The Board of Governors emphasized that the leverage ratio constitutes
a minimum requirement for well-run banking organizations having diversified
risk, including no undue interest rate risk exposure, excellent asset quality,
high liquidity, good earnings and a composite rating of 1 under the regulatory
rating system for banks and 1 under the regulatory rating system for bank
holding companies. Banking organizations experiencing or anticipating
significant growth, as well as those organizations which do not exhibit the
characteristics of a strong, well-run banking organization described above,
will be required to maintain minimum capital ranging generally from 100 to 200
basis points in excess of the
6
7
leverage ratio. The FDIC adopted a substantially similar leverage ratio for
state non-member banks which established (i) a 3 percent Tier 1 minimum capital
leverage ratio for highly-rated banks (those with a composite regulatory rating
of 1 and not experiencing or anticipating significant growth); and (ii) a 4
percent Tier 1 minimum capital leverage ratio for all other banks, as a
supplement to the risk-based capital guidelines.
At December 31, 1996, the Banks and the Company are in compliance with
the risk-based capital and leverage ratios described above. See Item 7 below
for a listing of the Company's risk-based capital ratios at December 31, 1996
and 1995.
The Company's ability to pay cash dividends is subject to restrictions
set forth in the California General Corporation Law. Funds for payment of any
cash dividends by the Company would be obtained from its investments as well as
dividends and/or management fees from the Banks. The payment of cash dividends
and/or management fees by the Banks is subject to restrictions set forth in the
California Financial Code, as well as restrictions established by the FDIC.
See Item 5 below for further information regarding the payment of cash
dividends by the Company and the Banks.
COMPETITION
At December 31, 1996, there were 36 branches of commercial and savings
banks in the cities of Salinas, King City, Marina, Seaside and the Monterey
Peninsula. Additionally, the Banks compete with savings and loan associations
and, to a lesser extent, credit unions, finance companies and other financial
service providers for deposit and loan customers.
Larger banks may have a competitive advantage because of higher
lending limits and major advertising and marketing campaigns. They also
perform services, such as trust services, international banking, discount
brokerage and insurance services which the Banks are not authorized or prepared
to offer currently. The Banks have made arrangements with their correspondent
banks and with others to provide such services for its customers. For
borrowers requiring loans in excess of the Banks' legal lending limits, the
Banks have offered, and intend to offer in the future, such loans on a
participating basis with their correspondent banks and with other independent
banks, retaining the portion of such loans which is within their lending
limits. As of December 31, 1996, the Banks' aggregate legal lending limits to
a single borrower and such borrower's related parties were $5,329,000 on an
unsecured basis and $8,882,000 on a fully secured basis based on regulatory
capital of $35,529,000.
Each Bank's business is concentrated in its service area, which
primarily encompass Monterey County, including the Salinas Valley area and to a
lesser extent, the contiguous areas of San Benito County, Southern Santa Cruz
County,
7
8
and Santa Clara County. The economy of the Bank of Salinas's service area is
primarily dependent upon the agricultural industry. Consequently, the Bank
competes with other financial institutions for deposits from and loans to
individuals and companies who are also dependent upon the agricultural
industry. The economy of Cypress Bank's service area is primarily dependent on
the tourist supported small business industry. Cypress Bank competes with
other financial institutions located in their own communities and in
surrounding communities.
Based upon data as of the most recent practicable date (June 30,
1996), there were 51 operating commercial and savings bank branches in Monterey
County with total deposits of $2,196,237,000. The Banks held a total of
$338,663,000 in deposits, representing approximately 15.4% of total commercial
and savings banks deposits in Monterey County as of June 30, 1996. Of the
Banks' competitors, three are independent banks headquartered in Monterey
County. The Banks also compete with savings and loans associations in Monterey
County.
In order to compete with the major financial institutions in their
primary service areas, the Banks use to the fullest extent possible the
flexibility which is accorded by their independent status. This includes an
emphasis on specialized services, local promotional activity, and personal
contacts by the Banks' officers, directors and employees. The Banks also seek
to provide special services and programs for individuals in their primary
service area who are employed in the agricultural, professional and business
fields, such as loans for equipment, furniture, tools of the trade or expansion
of practices or businesses. In the event there are customers whose loan
demands exceed the Banks' lending limits, the Banks seek to arrange for such
loans on a participation basis with other financial institutions. The Banks
also assist those customers requiring services not offered by the Banks to
obtain such services from correspondent banks.
Banking is a business which depends on interest rate differentials.
In general, the difference between the interest rate paid by the Banks to
obtain their deposits and their other borrowings and the interest rate received
by the Banks on loans extended to their customers and on securities held in the
Banks' portfolio comprise the major portion of the Banks' earnings.
Commercial banks compete with savings and loan associations, credit
unions, other financial institutions and other entities for funds. For
instance, yields on corporate and government debt securities and other
commercial paper affect the ability of commercial banks to attract and hold
deposits. Commercial banks also compete for loans with savings and loan
associations, credit unions, consumer finance companies, mortgage companies and
other lending institutions.
__________________________________
"Data Book Summary of Deposits in all FDIC Insured Commercial and Savings
Banks", June 30, 1996.
8
9
The interest rate differentials of the Banks, and therefore their
earnings, are affected not only by general economic conditions, both domestic
and foreign, but also by the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States
as set by statutes and as implemented by federal agencies, particularly the
Federal Reserve Board. This agency can and does implement national monetary
policy, such as seeking to curb inflation and combat recession, by its open
market operations in United States government securities, adjustments in the
amount of interest free reserves that banks and other financial institutions
are required to maintain, and adjustments to the discount rates applicable to
borrowing by banks from the Federal Reserve Board. These activities influence
the growth of bank loans, investments and deposits and also affect interest
rates charged on loans and paid on deposits. The nature and timing of any
future changes in monetary policies and their impact on the Banks are not
predictable.
On December 19, 1991, President Bush signed the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 ("FDICIA"). The FDICIA
substantially revises banking regulations, certain aspects of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Act and establishes a framework for determination of capital
adequacy of financial institutions, among other matters. Under the FDICIA,
financial institutions are placed into five capital adequacy categories as
follows: (1) well capitalized, (2) adequately capitalized, (3)
undercapitalized, (4) significantly undercapitalized, and (5) critically
undercapitalized. The FDICIA authorized the Board of Governors, the
Comptroller and FDIC to establish limits below which financial institutions
will be deemed critically undercapitalized, provided that such limits can not
be less than two percent (2%) of the ratio of tangible equity to total assets
or sixty-five percent (65%) of the minimum leverage ratio established by
regulation. Financial institutions classified as undercapitalized or below are
subject to limitations including restrictions related to (i) growth of assets,
(ii) payment of interest on subordinated indebtedness, (iii) capital
distributions, and (iv) payment of management fees to a parent holding company.
The FDICIA requires the Board of Governors and FDIC to initiate
corrective action regarding financial institutions which fail to meet minimum
capital requirements. Such action may result in orders to augment capital such
as through sale of voting stock, reduction in total assets, and restrictions
related to correspondent bank deposits. Critically undercapitalized financial
institutions may also be subject to appointment of a receiver or conservator
unless the financial institution submits an adequate capitalization plan.
In 1995 the FDIC, pursuant to Congressional mandate, reduced bank
deposit insurance assessment rates to a range from $0 to $0.27 per $100 of
deposits, dependent upon a bank's risk. The FDIC has continued these reduced
assessment rates through the first semiannual assessment period of 1997. Based
upon the above risk-based assessment rate schedule, the Banks' current capital
ratios, the Banks' current levels of deposits, and assuming no further change
in the assessment
9
10
rate applicable to the Banks during 1997, the Bank estimates that its annual
noninterest expense attributed to assessments will increase during 1997 by
approximately $ 45,000.
The Board of Governors and FDIC adopted regulations effective December
19, 1992, implementing a system of prompt corrective action pursuant to Section
38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and Section 131 of the FDICIA. The
regulations establish five capital categories with the following
characteristics: (1) "Well capitalized" - consisting of institutions with a
total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio of 6% or greater and a leverage ratio of 5% or greater, and the
institution is not subject to an order, written agreement, capital directive or
prompt corrective action directive; (2) "Adequately capitalized" - consisting
of institutions with a total risk-based capital ratio of 8% or greater, a Tier
1 risk-based capital ratio of 4% or greater and a leverage ratio of 4% or
greater, and the institution does not meet the definition of a "well
capitalized" institution; (3) "Undercapitalized" - consisting of institutions
with a total risk-based capital ratio less than 8%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio of less than 4%, or a leverage ratio of less than 4%; (4) "Significantly
undercapitalized" - consisting of institutions with a total risk-based capital
ratio of less than 6%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 3%, or a
leverage ratio of less than 3%; (5) "Critically undercapitalized" - consisting
of an institution with a ratio of tangible equity to total assets that is equal
to or less than 2%.
The regulations established procedures for classification of financial
institutions within the capital categories, filing and reviewing capital
restoration plans required under the regulations and procedures for issuance of
directives by the appropriate regulatory agency, among other matters. The
regulations impose restrictions upon all institutions to refrain from certain
actions which would cause an institution to be classified within any one of the
three "undercapitalized" categories, such as declaration of dividends or other
capital distributions or payment of management fees, if following the
distribution or payment the institution would be classified within one of the
"undercapitalized" categories. In addition, institutions which are classified
in one of the three "undercapitalized" categories are subject to certain
mandatory and discretionary supervisory actions. Mandatory supervisory actions
include (1) increased monitoring and review by the appropriate federal banking
agency; (2) implementation of a capital restoration plan; (3) total asset
growth restrictions; and (4) limitation upon acquisitions, branch expansion,
and new business activities without prior approval of the appropriate federal
banking agency. Discretionary supervisory actions may include (1) requirements
to augment capital; (2) restrictions upon affiliate transactions; (3)
restrictions upon deposit gathering activities and interest rates paid; (4)
replacement of senior executive officers and directors; (5) restrictions upon
activities of the institution and its affiliates; (6) requiring divestiture or
sale of the institution; and (7) any other supervisory action that the
appropriate federal banking agency determines is necessary to further the
purposes of the regulations. Further, the federal banking
10
11
agencies may not accept a capital restoration plan without determining, among
other things, that the plan is based on realistic assumptions and is likely to
succeed in restoring the depository institution's capital. In addition, for a
capital restoration plan to be acceptable, the depository institution's parent
holding company must guarantee that the institution will comply with such
capital restoration plan. The aggregate liability of the parent holding
company under the guaranty is limited to the lesser of (i) an amount equal to 5
percent of the depository institution's total assets at the time it became
undercapitalized, and (ii) the amount that is necessary (or would have been
necessary) to bring the institution into compliance with all capital standards
applicable with respect to such institution as of the time it fails to comply
with the plan. If a depository institution fails to submit an acceptable plan,
it is treated as if it were "significantly undercapitalized." FDICIA also
restricts the solicitation and acceptance of and interest rates payable on
brokered deposits by insured depository institutions that are not "well
capitalized." An "undercapitalized" institution is not allowed to solicit
deposits by offering rates of interest that are significantly higher than the
prevailing rates of interest on insured deposits in the particular
institution's normal market areas or in the market areas in which such deposits
would otherwise be accepted.
Any financial institution which is classified as "critically
undercapitalized" must be placed in conservatorship or receivership within 90
days of such determination unless it is also determined that some other course
of action would better serve the purposes of the regulations. Critically
undercapitalized institutions are also prohibited from making (but not
accruing) any payment of principal or interest on subordinated debt without the
prior approval of the FDIC and the FDIC must prohibit a critically
undercapitalized institution from taking certain other actions without its
prior approval, including (1) entering into any material transaction other than
in the usual course of business, including investment expansion, acquisition,
sale of assets or other similar actions; (2) extending credit for any highly
leveraged transaction; (3) amending articles or bylaws unless required to do so
to comply with any law, regulation or order; (4) making any material change in
accounting methods; (5) engaging in certain affiliate transactions; (6) paying
excessive compensation or bonuses; and (7) paying interest on new or renewed
liabilities at rates which would increase the weighted average costs of funds
beyond prevailing rates in the institution's normal market areas.
The capital ratio requirements for the "adequately capitalized"
category generally are the same as the existing minimum risk-based capital
ratios applicable to the Company and the Banks. It is not possible to predict
what effect the prompt corrective action regulation will have upon the Company
and the Banks or the banking industry taken as a whole in the foreseeable
future.
Under the FDICIA, the federal financial institution agencies have
adopted regulations which require institutions to establish and maintain
comprehensive written real estate policies which address certain lending
considerations, including
11
12
loan-to-value limits, loan administrative policies, portfolio diversification
standards, and documentation, approval and reporting requirements. FDICIA
further generally prohibits an insured state bank from engaging as a principal
in any activity that is impermissible for a national bank, absent FDIC
determination that the activity would not pose a significant risk to the Bank
Insurance Fund, and that the bank is, and will continue to be, within
applicable capital standards. Similar restrictions apply to subsidiaries of
insured state banks. The Company does not currently intend to engage in any
activities which would be restricted or prohibited under the FDICIA.
The federal banking agencies during 1996 issued a joint agency policy
statement regarding the management of interest-rate risk exposure (interest
rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates might adversely
affect a bank's financial condition) with the goal of ensuring that
institutions with high levels of interest-rate risk have sufficient capital to
cover their exposures. This policy statement reflected the agencies' decision
at that time not to promulgate a standardized measure and explicit capital
charge for interest rate risk, in the expectation that industry techniques for
measurement of such risk will evolve.
However, the Federal Financial Institution Examination Counsel
("FFIEC") on December 13, 1996, approved an updated Uniform Financial
Institutions Rating System ("UFIRS"). In addition to the five components
traditionally included in the so-called "CAMEL" rating system which has been
used by bank examiners for a number of years to classify and evaluate the
soundness of financial institutions (including capital adequacy, asset quality,
management, earnings and liquidity), UFIRS includes for all bank regulatory
examinations conducted on or after January 1, 1997, a new rating for a sixth
category identified as sensitivity to market risk. Ratings in this category
are intended to reflect the degree to which changes in interest rates, foreign
exchange rates, commodity prices or equity prices may adversely affect an
institution's earnings and capital. The rating system henceforth will be
identified as the "CAMELS" system.
The federal financial institution agencies have established safety and
soundness standards for insured financial institutions covering (1) internal
controls, information systems and internal audit systems; (2) loan
documentation; (3) credit underwriting; (4) interest rate exposure; (5) asset
growth; (6) compensation, fees and benefits; and (7) excessive compensation for
executive officers, directors or principal shareholders which could lead to
material financial loss. If an agency determines that an institution fails to
meet any standard, the agency may require the financial institution to submit
to the agency an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard. If
the agency requires submission of a compliance plan and the institution fails
to timely submit an acceptable plan or to implement an accepted plan, the
agency must require the institution to correct the deficiency. Under the final
rule, an institution must file a compliance plan within 30 days of a request to
do so from the institution's primary federal regulatory agency. The
12
13
agencies may elect to initiate enforcement action in certain cases rather than
rely on an existing plan particularly where failure to meet one or more of the
standards could threaten the safe and sound operation of the institution.
The Board of Governors issued final amendments to its risk-based
capital guidelines to be effective December 31, 1994, requiring that net
unrealized holding gains and losses on securities available for sale determined
in accordance with SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt
and Equity Securities," are not to be included in the Tier 1 capital component
consisting of common stockholders' equity. Net unrealized losses on marketable
equity securities (equity securities with a readily determinable fair value),
however, will continue to be deducted from Tier 1 capital. This rule has the
general effect of valuing available for sale securities at amortized cost
(based on historical cost) rather than at fair value (generally at market
value) for purposes of calculating the risk-based and leverage capital ratios.
On December 13, 1994, the Board of Governors issued amendments to its
risk-based capital guidelines regarding concentration of credit risk and risks
of non-traditional activities, which were effective January 17, 1995. As
amended, the risk-based capital guidelines identify concentrations of credit
risk and evaluate an institution's ability to manage such risks and the risk
posed by non-traditional activities as important factors in assessing an
institution's overall capital adequacy.
Since 1986, California has permitted California banks and bank holding
companies to be acquired by banking organizations based in other states on a
"reciprocal" basis (i.e., provided the other state's laws permit California
banking organizations to acquire banking organizations in that state on
substantially the same terms and conditions applicable to local banking
organizations). Some increase in merger and acquisition activity among
California and out-of-state banking organizations has occurred as a result of
this law, as well as increased competition for loans and deposits.
Since October 2, 1995, California law implementing certain provisions
of prior federal law has (1) permitted interstate merger transactions; (2)
prohibited interstate branching through the acquisition of a branch business
unit located in California without acquisition of the whole business unit of
the California bank; and (3) prohibited interstate branching through de novo
establishment of California branch offices. Initial entry into California by
an out-of-state institution must be accomplished by acquisition of or merger
with an existing whole bank which has been in existence for at least five
years.
Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA") regulations effective as of July 1,
1995 evaluate banks' lending to low and moderate income individuals and
businesses across a four-point scale from "outstanding" to "substantial
noncompliance," and are a factor in regulatory review of applications to merge,
establish new branches or
13
14
form bank holding companies. In addition, any bank rated in "substantial
noncompliance" with the CRA regulations may be subject to enforcement
proceedings.
The Banks have a current rating of "satisfactory" or better for CRA
compliance, and are scheduled for further examination for CRA compliance.
The United States Congress has periodically considered legislation
which could result in further deregulation of banks and other financial
institutions. Such legislation could result in further relaxation or
elimination of geographic restrictions on banks and bank holding companies and
increase the level of direct competition with other financial institutions,
including mutual funds, securities brokerage firms, investment banking firms
and other entities. The effect of such legislation on the Company and the
Banks cannot be determined at this time.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The headquarters office and centralized operations of the Company are
located at 301 Main Street, Salinas, California.
Bank of Salinas is headquartered at 301 Main Street, Salinas,
California, with branch offices located at 301 Main Street, Salinas, California
and 532 Broadway, King City, California.
Cypress Bank is headquartered at 1676 Fremont Boulevard in Seaside,
California, with branch offices located at 228 Reservation Road, Marina,
California and 1658 Fremont Boulevard, Seaside, California. The Marina office
is leased from a joint venture that includes affiliates of Cypress Bank. In
addition to the monthly rental expense, the Bank paid to the joint venture
$18,000 for a security deposit and $12,000 for the January 1994 and last three
months rent.
The headquarters and branch office locations of the Company and
subsidiary Banks are operated under facilities leases which expire in June 1997
through December 1999, with options to extend for two to fifteen years. These
include facilities leased from a shareholder and from directors at terms and
conditions which management believes are consistent with the market. Rental
rates are adjusted annually for changes in certain economic indices. The
annual minimum lease commitments are set forth in Footnote 7 of Item 8 -
"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" included in this report and
incorporated herein by reference. The forgoing description of the Lease
Agreements is qualified by reference to Exhibits listed in Part IV of this Form
10-K.
14
15
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are no material proceedings adverse to the Company or the Banks
to which any director, officer, affiliate of the Company or 5% shareholder of
the Company or the Banks, or any associate of any such director, officer,
affiliate or 5% shareholder of the Company or Banks are a party, and none of
the above persons has a material interest adverse to the Company or the Banks.
Neither the Company nor the Banks are a party to any pending legal or
administrative proceedings (other than ordinary routine litigation incidental
to the Company's or the Bank's business) and no such proceedings are known to
be contemplated.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the
fourth quarter of 1996.
15
16
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
(a) Market Information
There is limited trading in and no established public trading market
for the Company's common stock. The Company's common stock is not listed on
any exchange nor is it quoted by The Nasdaq Stock Market. Hoefer & Arnett,
Incorporated and Ryan Becker are registered as market makers in the Company's
stock. Dean Witter Reynolds, Smith Barney and Paine Webber also facilitate
trades in the Company's common stock. Based on information provided to the
Company from Dean Witter Reynolds and Smith Barney, the range of high and low
bids for the common stock for the two most recent fiscal years, restated to
reflect all stock dividends distributed by the Company and the 3-for-2
stock split declared in February, 1997, are presented below.
Calendar Year Low High
-------------- ----- ------
1996
First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $9.85 $10.61
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.30 11.51
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.50 12.67
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12.67 14.67
1995
First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $7.88 $8.63
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.49 9.70
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.70 9.70
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.55 10.00
The bid price for the Company's common stock was $15.17 as of February
28, 1997.
(b) Holders
As of February 28, 1997, there were approximately 1,285 holders of the
common stock of the Company. There are no other classes of common equity
outstanding.
(c) Dividends
The Company's shareholders are entitled to receive dividends when and
as declared by its Board of Directors, out of funds legally available therefor,
subject to
16
17
the restrictions set forth in the California General Corporation Law (the
"Corporation Law"). The Corporation Law provides that a corporation may make a
distribution to its shareholders if the corporation's retained earnings equal
at least the amount of the proposed distribution. The Corporation Law further
provides that, in the event that sufficient retained earnings are not available
for the proposed distribution, a corporation may nevertheless make a
distribution to its shareholders if it meets two conditions, which generally
stated are as follows: (1) the corporation's assets equal at least 1-1/4 times
its liabilities; and (2) the corporation's current assets equal at least its
current liabilities or, if the average of the corporation's earnings before
taxes on income and before interest expenses for the two preceding fiscal years
was less than the average of the corporation's interest expenses for such
fiscal years, then the corporation's current assets must equal at least 1-1/4
times its current liabilities. Funds for payment of any cash dividends by the
Company would be obtained from its investments as well as dividends and/or
management fees from the Banks.
The payment of cash dividends by the subsidiary Banks is subject to
restrictions set forth in the California Financial Code (the "Financial Code").
The Financial Code provides that a bank may not make a cash distribution to its
shareholders in excess of the lesser of (a) the bank's retained earnings; or
(b) the bank's net income for its last three fiscal years, less the amount of
any distributions made by the bank or by any majority-owned subsidiary of the
bank to the shareholders of the bank during such period. However, a bank may,
with the approval of the Superintendent, make a distribution to its
shareholders in an amount not exceeding the greater of (a) its retained
earnings; (b) its net income for its last fiscal year; or (c) its net income
for its current fiscal year. In the event that the Superintendent determines
that the shareholders' equity of a bank is inadequate or that the making of a
distribution by the bank would be unsafe or unsound, the Superintendent may
order the bank to refrain from making a proposed distribution.
The FDIC may also restrict the payment of dividends if such payment
would be deemed unsafe or unsound or if after the payment of such dividends,
the bank would be included in one of the "undercapitalized" categories for
capital adequacy purposes pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Improvement Act of 1991. Additionally, while the Board of Governors has no
general restriction with respect to the payment of cash dividends by an
adequately capitalized bank to its parent holding company, the Board of
Governors might, under certain circumstances, place restrictions on the ability
of a particular bank to pay dividends based upon peer group averages and the
performance and maturity of the particular bank, or object to management fees
on the basis that such fees cannot be supported by the value of the services
rendered or are not the result of an arm's length transaction.
Under these provisions and considering minimum regulatory capital
requirements, the amount available for distribution from the Banks to the
Company was approximately $10,484,000 as of December 31, 1996.
17
18
To date, the Company has not paid a cash dividend and presently does
not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The Company has
distributed a ten percent stock dividend in 1996 and 1994 and a twelve percent
stock dividend in 1995. Payment of dividends in the future will be determined
by the Board of Directors after consideration of various factors including the
profitability and capital adequacy of the Company and the Banks.
18
19
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents certain consolidated financial
information concerning the business of the Company and its subsidiary Banks.
This information should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial
Statements, the notes thereto, and Management's Discussion and Analysis
included in this report.
Years Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollar amounts in thousands,
except per share data) 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
OPERATING RESULTS
Total Interest Income $29,301 $26,964 $21,646 $18,492 $18,148
Total Interest Expense 9,859 10,008 7,071 6,198 6,976
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net Interest Income 19,442 16,956 14,575 12,294 11,172
Provision for Credit Losses 352 695 1,745 915 1,017
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net Interest Income After
Provision for Credit Losses 19,090 16,261 12,830 11,379 10,155
Other Income 1,456 1,302 1,315 1,384 1,051
Other Expenses 11,115 10,263 9,170 8,546 7,615
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Income before Income Taxes 9,431 7,300 4,975 4,217 3,591
Income Taxes 3,571 2,975 2,046 1,760 1,557
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
NET INCOME $5,860 $4,325 $2,929 $2,457 $2,034
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EARNINGS PER COMMON AND
COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE $1.24 $0.94 $0.65 $0.57 $0.47
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
CAPITAL -- YEAR-END BALANCES
Net Loans $235,992 $191,000 $179,266 $181,250 $167,690
Total Assets 376,832 357,236 310,362 269,820 241,380
Deposits 338,663 326,089 283,823 247,112 221,343
Shareholders' Equity 36,332 29,916 25,547 21,932 19,307
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
CAPITAL -- AVERAGE BALANCES
Net Loans $203,117 $173,065 $179,514 $169,829 $163,725
Total Assets 355,386 329,502 290,166 265,935 230,914
Deposits 319,110 300,291 265,512 234,228 205,304
Shareholders' Equity 33,228 27,684 23,691 20,670 18,138
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SELECTED FINANCIAL RATIOS
Rate of Return on:
Average Total Assets 1.65% 1.31% 1.01% 0.92% 0.88%
Average Shareholders Equity 17.64% 15.62% 12.36% 11.89% 11.22%
Ratio of Average Shareholders' Equity
to Total Average Assets 9.35% 8.40% 8.16% 7.77% 7.85%
19
20
(a) (1) Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and Equity; Interest Rates
and Interest Differential
Table I in Management's Discussion and Analysis included in this
report sets forth the Company's average balance sheets (based on daily averages)
and an analysis of interest rates and the interest rate differential for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996 and is hereby incorporated
by reference.
(2) Volume/Rate Analysis
Information as to the impact of changes in average rates and
average balances on interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities is
shown in the table below. The variances attributed to simultaneous balance and
rate changes have been reflected as rate variances.
VOLUME/RATE ANALYSIS
(in thousands) 1996 over 1995
Increase (decrease) due to change in: Net
Volume Rate Change
---------- ---------- ----------
Interest-earning assets:
Net Loans (1)/(2)/(3) $ 3,426 $ (809) $ 2,617
Investment securities 222 194 416
Federal funds sold & other (474) (222) (696)
---------- ---------- ----------
Total 3,174 (837) 2,337
---------- ---------- ----------
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits (90) (190) (280)
Savings deposits (392) (388) (780)
Time deposits 818 93 911
---------- ---------- ----------
Total 336 (485) (149)
---------- ---------- ----------
Interest differential $ 2,838 $ (352) 2,486
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands) 1995 over 1994
Increase (decrease) due to change in: Net
Volume Rate Change
---------- ---------- ----------
Interest-earning assets:
Net Loans (1)/(2) $ (645) $ 2,428 $ 1,783
Investment securities 1,037 965 2,002
Federal funds sold & other 791 742 1,533
---------- ---------- ----------
Total 1,183 4,135 5,318
---------- ---------- ----------
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits (289) (8) (297)
Savings deposits 1,500 866 2,366
Time deposits 147 721 868
---------- ---------- ----------
Total 1,358 1,579 2,937
---------- ---------- ----------
Interest differential $ (175) $ 2,556 $ 2,381
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The average balance of non-accruing loans is immaterial as a percentage of
total loans and, as such, has been included in net loans.
(2) Loan fees of $901,000, $769,000 and $916,000 for 1996, 1995 and 1994,
respectively, have been included in the interest income computation.
(3) Rate variance includes impact of interest income recognized from payments
received on nonaccrual loans of $619,000 in 1996.
20
21
(b) Investment Portfolio
(1) The book value of investment securities at December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994 is set forth in Table III of Management's
Discussion and Analysis included in this report and
incorporated herein by reference.
(2) The book value, maturities and weighted average yields of
investment securities as of December 31, 1996 are set forth in
Table III of Management's Discussion and Analysis included in
this report and incorporated herein by reference.
(3) There were no issuers of securities for which the book value
was greater than 10% of shareholders' equity other than U.S.
Government and U.S. Government Agencies and Corporations.
(c) Loan Portfolio
(1) The composition of the loan portfolio is summarized in Table
IV of Management's Discussion and Analysis included in this
report and is incorporated herein by reference.
(2) The following table sets forth the maturity distribution of
the loan portfolio at December 31, 1996:
One year
One year through Over
(in thousands) or less five years five years Total
--------- ------------ ------------ -------
Commercial,
Financial and
Agricultural $ 54,657,000 $33,464,000 $23,424,000 $111,545,000
Real estate -
construction 26,830,000 1,167,000 -- 27,997,000
Real estate -
other 45,688,000 27,972,000 19,581,000 93,241,000
Installment 3,860,000 4,264,000 106,000 8,230,000
-------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Total $131,035,000 $66,867,000 $43,111,000 $241,013,000
============== ============== ============== ==============
Loans shown above with maturities greater than one year
include $86,859,000 of floating interest rate loans and
$23,119,000 of fixed rate loans.
21
22
(3) Nonperforming Loans
The Company's current policy is to cease accruing interest
when a loan becomes 90 days past due as to principal or
interest, when the full timely collection of interest or
principal becomes uncertain or when a portion of the principal
balance has been charged off, unless the loan is well secured
and in the process of collection. When a loan is placed on
nonaccrual status, the accrued and uncollected interest
receivable is reversed and the loan is accounted for on the
cash or cost recovery method thereafter, until qualifying for
return to accrual status. Generally, a loan may be returned
to accrual status when all delinquent interest and principal
become current in accordance with the terms of the loan
agreement or when the loan is both well secured and in process
of collection.
For further discussion of nonperforming loans, refer to Risk
Elements section of Management Discussion Analysis in this
report.
22
23
(d) Summary of Loan Loss Experience
(1) An analysis of the allowance for loan losses follows:
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
(in thousands) 12/31/96 12/31/95 12/31/94 12/31/93 12/31/92
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Average Loans outstanding $ 207,556 $ 177,476 $ 182,812 $ 172,412 $ 165,933
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Allowance for possible credit
at beginning of period $ 4,446 $ 4,068 $ 2,840 $ 2,371 $ 2,166
Loans charged off:
Real estate (207) (52) (45) (46) (31)
Installment (22) (80) (125) (164) (296)
Commercial (391) (302) (413) (404) (556)
Recoveries of loans previously
charged off:
Real estate 11 - - - -
Installment 27 29 35 75 38
Commercial 156 88 31 93 33
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net loans charged off (426) (317) (517) (446) (812)
Additions to allowance charged to
operating expenses 352 695 1,745 915 1,017
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Allowance for possible loan
at end of period $ 4,372 $ 4,446 $ 4,068 $ 2,840 $ 2,371
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Ratio of net charge-offs to
loans outstanding 0.21% 0.18% 0.28% 0.26% 0.49%
Factors used in determination of the allowance for loan losses
are discussed in greater detail in the "Risk Elements" section
of Management's Discussion and Analysis included in this
report and are incorporated herein by reference.
(2) In evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses,
the Company attempts to allocate the allowance for loan losses
to specific categories of loans. Management believes that any
breakdown or allocation of the allowance for possible loan
losses into loan categories lends an appearance of exactness
which does not exist in that the allowance is utilized as a
single unallocated allowance available for all loans.
Further, management believes that the breakdown of historical
losses in the preceding table is a reasonable representation
of
23
24
management's expectation of potential losses in the next full
year of operation. However, the allowance for loan losses
should not be interpreted as an indication that charge-offs
will occur or as an indication of future charge-off trends.
(e) Deposits
(1) Table I in Management's Discussion and Analysis included in this
report sets forth the distribution of average deposits for the years
ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 and is incorporated herein by
reference.
(2) The maturities of time certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more at
December 31, 1996 are summarized as follows:
Year Ended
12/31/96
-----------
3 months or less . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,319,000
Over 3 months
Through 6 months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,402,000
Over 6 months
Through 12 months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,018,000
Over 12 months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,330,000
-----------
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $44,069,000
===========
3(f) Return on Equity and Assets
(1) The table at page 19 of this section sets forth the ratios of net
income to average assets and average shareholders' equity, and
average shareholders' equity to average assets. As the Company has
never paid a cash dividend, the dividend payout ratio is not
indicated.
24
25
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Certain matters discussed or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
projected. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to,
matters described in Item 7 - "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations." Therefore, the information set forth
therein should be carefully considered when evaluating the business prospects of
the Company and the Banks.
BUSINESS ORGANIZATION
Central Coast Bancorp (the "Company") a California corporation organized in
1994 acts as the holding company for Bank of Salinas and Cypress Bank (the
"Banks"), state-chartered banks, headquartered in Salinas and Seaside,
California, respectively. As of December 31, 1996, the Banks operated four
full-service branches and one limited-service branch in Monterey County,
California. Other than its investment in the Banks, the Company currently
conducts no other significant business activities, although it is authorized to
engage in a variety of activities which are deemed closely related to the
business of banking upon prior approval of the Board of Governors, the
Company's principal regulator.
The Banks offer a full range of commercial banking services, offering a diverse
range of traditional banking products and services to individuals, merchants,
small and medium-sized businesses, professionals and agribusiness enterprises
located in the Salinas Valley and the Monterey Peninsula.
On May 31, 1996, the Company completed the acquisition of Cypress Coast Bank
("Cypress"), whereby Cypress became a subsidiary of the Company and continues
to operate from its full-service offices in Seaside and Marina, California.
Under the terms of the acquisition agreement the shareholders of Cypress
received common stock of the Company in a tax-free exchange. At May 31, 1996,
Cypress had unaudited total assets of $46.9 million, including $29.8 million in
net loans and total unaudited liabilities of $42.7 million, including $42.5
million in deposits. The transaction has been accounted for as a
pooling-of-interests.
The following analysis is designed to enhance the reader's understanding of the
Company's financial condition and the results of its operations as reported in
the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report.
Reference should be made to those statements and the Selected Financial Data
presented elsewhere in this report for additional detailed information.
25
26
OVERVIEW
The Company earned net income of $5,860,000 for the year ended December 31,
1996, representing an increase of $1,535,000 or 35% over 1995 net income of
$4,325,000. Net income reported for 1995 represented an increase of $1,396,000
or 48% over 1994 net income of $2,929,000. On a per common and common
equivalent share basis, net income for 1996 was $1.24 compared to $.94 and $.65
per share for the preceding two years. The improvement in net income in 1996
and 1995 was primarily due to growth in net interest income and noninterest
income that outpaced increases in operating expenses. Net income in 1996 and
1995 also benefited from lower provisions for loan losses compared with 1995
and 1994, respectively. Each of these factors is discussed in more detail
later in this analysis.
Common shareholders' equity increased by $6,416,000 during 1996 to $36,332,000
at December 31, 1996, through the retention of earnings and as the result of
exercises of stock options and warrants and related tax benefits. In 1995 and
1994, common shareholders' equity increased by $4,369,000 and $3,615,000
primarily through retention of earnings. It is the objective of management to
maintain adequate capital for future growth through retention of earnings. The
Company has never declared a cash dividend, however, it distributed a ten
percent stock dividend during 1996 and twelve and ten percent stock dividends,
respectively, in each of the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994. Also, the
Company declared a 3-for-2 stock split in February 1997 (to be distributed
March 28, 1997 to shareholders of record as of March 14, 1997). Per share
earnings have been adjusted to reflect such stock split and stock dividends
and any dilutive effect of common stock equivalents (stock options and warrants
outstanding but not exercised) calculated using the treasury stock method.
EARNINGS SUMMARY
NET INTEREST INCOME - Net interest income refers to the difference between the
interest paid on deposits and borrowings, and the interest earned on loans and
investments. It is the primary component of the net earnings of a financial
institution. The primary factors to consider in analyzing net interest income
are the composition and volume of earning assets and interest bearing
liabilities, the amount of noninterest bearing liabilities and nonaccrual
loans, and changes in market interest rates.
Net interest income for 1996 was $19,442,000, or 6.0% of average earning
assets, representing an increase of $2,486,000 or 14.7% over $16,956,000 and
5.7% of average earning assets in 1995. Net interest income reported in 1995
represented an increase of $2,381,000 or 16.3% from $14,575,000 in 1994. The
increases in the net interest income in 1996 and 1995 primarily reflect
increases in average earning assets in each of those years.
26
27
Interest income for 1996 was $29,301,000 compared to $26,964,000 and
$21,646,000 for 1995 and 1994, respectively. The increase in interest income
in 1996 and 1995 is primarily due to growth in average earning assets. Average
earning assets were $325,203,000 in 1996 representing an increase of 8.6% over
$299,417,000 in 1995. In addition, interest income in 1996 included
approximately $600,000 of previously foregone interest collected on two loans
that had been on nonaccrual status. Average earning assets in 1995 represented
an increase of 13.4% over $264,003,000 in 1994. Loan yields averaged 11.0% in
1996 compared to 11.4% and 10.0% in 1995 and 1994, respectively. The trend in
loan yields generally corresponds to fluctuatiions in market interest rates
during 1996 and 1995. A majority of the Company's loan yields float with the
prime rate. The average prime rate was 8.27%, 8.82% and 7.13% in 1996, 1995
and 1994, respectively.
Interest expense was $9,859,000 in 1996 representing a slight decrease of
$149,000 or 1.5% from $10,008,000 in 1995. The decrease in interest expense
resulted from a decrease in the average rate paid on average interest-bearing
deposits which offset an increase in the volume of such deposits. Average
interest-bearing liabilities of $249,233,000 in 1996 represented 78.1% of total
deposits compared to $246,382,000 or 82.0% of total deposits in 1995. Interest
expense for 1995 increased $2,937,000 or 41.5% over $7,071,000 in 1994. The
increase in interest expense in 1995 was primarily due to growth in interest
bearing core deposits and an increase in rates paid on such deposits.
The following table sets forth average balance sheet information, interest
income and expense, average yields and rates, and net interest income and
margin for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994.
27
28
1996 1995 1994
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg Avg Avg Avg Avg Avg
Balance Interest Yield Balance Interest Yield Balance Interest Yield
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assets:
Interest Earnings:
Loans(1)(2) $203,117 $22,330 11.0% $173,065 $19,713 11.4% $179,514 $17,930 10.0%
Investment Securities 82,883 4,936 6.0% 78,980 4,520 5.7% 55,944 2,518 4.5%
Federal funds sold
& other 39,203 2,035 5.2% 47,372 2,731 5.8% 28,545 1,198 4.2%
-------- ------- -------- ------- -------- -------
Total Earning Assets 325,203 $29,301 9.0% 299,417 $26,964 9.0% 264,003 $21,646 8.2%
------- ------- -------
Cash & Due from banks 22,867 23,198 19,962
Bank premises & equipment 1,239 1,421 1,515
Other assets 6,077 5,466 4,686
-------- -------- --------
Total Assets $355,386 $329,502 $290,166
======== ======== ========
Liabilities &
Shareholders' Equity:
Interest bearing:
Demand deposits $ 75,295 $1,629 2.2% $ 79,065 $ 1,909 2.4% $ 91,103 $ 2,206 2.4%
Savings 102,819 4,303 4.2% 111,351 5,083 4.6% 71,886 2,717 3.8%
Time deposits 71,119 3,927 5.5% 55,966 3,016 5.4% 52,380 2,148 4.1%
-------- ------ -------- ------- -------- -------
Total Interest Bearing
Liabilities 249,233 $9,859 4.0% 246,382 $10,008 4.1% 215,369 $ 7,071 3.3%
------ ------- -------
Demand deposits 69,877 53,909 50,143
Other Liabilities 3,048 1,527 963
-------- -------- --------
Total Liabilities 322,158 301,818 266,475
Shareholders' Equity 33,228 27,684 23,691
-------- -------- --------
$355,386 $329,502 $290,166
======== ======== ========
Net Interest Income and
Margin (Net Yield)(3) $19,442 6.0% $16,956 5.7% $14,575 5.5%
======= === ======= === ======= ===
(1) Loan interest includes loan fees of $901,000, $769,000 and $916,000 in 1996,
1995 and 1994, respectively and interest recognized from payments received
on nonaccrual loans of $619,000 and $92,000 in 1996 and 1994, respectively.
(2) Average balances of loans include average allowance for loan losses of
$4,439,000, $4,411,000 and $3,298,000, and average deferred loan fees of
$613,000, $536,000 and $622,000 for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995
and 1994, respectively.
(3) Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest income by total
average earning assets.
OTHER INCOME - Other income growth is a key to improving overall profitability
in a deregulated competitive environment. Noninterest income provides stability
to the income stream and enhances overall profitability. Total noninterest
income was $1,456,000 for 1996, $1,302,000 for 1995 and $1,315,000 for 1994.
The Company's noninterest income is primarily derived from fees earned by the
Banks for deposit-related customer services. Income realized from service
charges on deposit accounts increased $59,000 or 8.7% to $735,000 in 1996 over
$676,000 in 1995. Service charge income for
28
29
1995 represented an increase of $41,000 or 6.5% over $635,000 recognized in
1994. The increase in income from fees and service charges was largely the
result of growth in the total number of interest bearing and noninterest
bearing demand deposit accounts.
The Company also earns income from the sale and servicing of SBA loans. Income
from the sale and servicing of such loans was $161,000 in 1996 representing an
increase of $6,000 or 3.9% over $155,000 recognized in 1995. Sale and
servicing income in 1995 increased $10,000 or 6.9% over $145,000 in 1994. The
increases in income from the sale and servicing of SBA loans in 1996 and 1995
were primarily due to increases in the volume of loans sold.
Fees earned on merchant credit card transactions decreased $30,000 or 16.6% to
$151,000 in 1996 from $181,000 in 1995. In 1995, merchant card fees represented
an increase of $38,000 or 26.6% over $143,000 in 1994. Fluctuations in
merchant card fees are primarily due to fluctuations in merchant retail sales
volumes.
Mortgage origination fees increased $15,000 or 16.9% to $104,000 for 1996 from
$89,000 in 1995. The increase in 1996 was due to an increase in the volume of
mortgage applications processed as a response to lower market interest rates.
In 1995, mortgage origination fees decreased $62,000 or 40.8% from $151,000 in
1994 due to a decline in the volume of mortgage applications.
OTHER EXPENSE - Noninterest expense reflects the costs of products and
services, systems, facilities and personnel for the Company. The major
components of other expense stated as a percentage of average earning assets
are as follows:
Table II Other Operating Expense to Average Earning Assets
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In thousands 1996 1995 1994
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Salaries and benefits 1.98% 1.81% 1.91%
Occupancy 0.22% 0.25% 0.27%
Furniture and equipment 0.26% 0.22% 0.26%
Professional fees 0.14% 0.22% 0.08%
Customer expenses 0.12% 0.07% 0.06%
Marketing 0.11% 0.09% 0.09%
Data processing 0.10% 0.09% 0.08%
Stationary and supplies 0.10% 0.08% 0.08%
Shareholder and director 0.09% 0.06% 0.06%
Insurance 0.05% 0.07% 0.07%
Dues and assessments 0.02% 0.16% 0.23%
Write-down of other real estate owned 0.00% 0.07% 0.00%
Other 0.23% 0.24% 0.28%
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 3.42% 3.43% 3.47%
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noninterest expense increased to $11,115,000 in the year ended December 31,
1996 over $10,263,000 and $9,170,000 for the same periods in 1995 and 1994.
29
30
As a percentage of average earning assets, noninterest expense decreased
slightly to 3.42% in 1996 compared to 3.43% in 1995. Noninterest expense as a
percentage of average earning assets for 1995 represented a decrease from 3.47%
in 1994.
Salaries and employee benefits expense for 1996 was $6,437,000, an increase of
18.8% over $5,419,000 in 1995, and represented approximately 1.98% of average
earning assets. Salaries and employee benefits in 1996 included approximately
$175,000 of nonrecurring charges for restructuring related to the acquisition
of Cypress and $250,000 for a salary continuation plan. The remaining increase
was due to increased headcount to accomodate growth and higher contributions to
the Company's profit sharing and employee retirement plans. Salaries and
employee benefits expense for 1995 represented an increase of $367,000 or 7.3%
over $5,052,000 in 1994. The increase in 1995 primarily reflects the impact of
increased headcount to accommodate growth in the Banks. As a percentage of
average earning assets, salaries and employee benefits expense was 1.81% in
1995 representing a decrease from 1.91% in 1994.
Occupancy expense decreased $18,000 or 2.4% to $728,000 in 1996 from $746,000
in 1995 and compares to an increase of $31,000 or 4.3% over $715,000 in 1994.
As a percentage of average earning assets, occupancy expense was .22%
representing a decrease from .25% in 1995 and .27% in 1994.
Furniture and equipment expenses of $837,000 in 1996 represented an increase of
$165,000 or 24.6% over $672,000 in 1996. The increase in 1996 was primarily
due to a one-time charge of approximately $192,000 from restructuring of
operations in connection with the acquisition of Cypress. Expense for 1995
represented a slight decrease of $21,000 or 3.0% from $693,000 in 1994. The
decrease in 1995 was primarily due to lower maintenance costs on equipment.
Furniture and equipment expenses represented .26%, .22% and .26% of average
earning assets in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
Other noninterest expenses were $3,113,000 in 1996 which represents a decrease
of $313,000 or 9.1% from 1995 expenses of $3,426,000. The decrease in 1996 is
primarily due to decreases in professional fees, deposit insurance premiums and
write-downs of other real estate owned. Other noninterest expenses for 1995
increased $716,000 or 26.4% over $2,710,000 in 1994. The increase in 1995 was
primarily related to professional fees incurred in connection with the
acquisition of Cypress and a write-down of other real estate owned to net
realizable value.
The Company's effective income tax rate was 37.9% for 1996 compared to 40.8%
for 1995 and 41.1% for 1994. Changes in the effective tax rate of the Company
are primarily due to changes in the valution allowance for the deferred tax
assets of Cypress and nondeductible costs related to the acquisition of Cypress
in 1996 and 1995 and organization of the holding company in 1994.
30
31
BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS
Total assets of Central Coast Bancorp at December 31, 1996 were $376,832,000
compared to $357,236,000 in 1995 and $310,362,000 in 1994, representing
increases of 5.5% and 15.1%, respectively. Based on average balances, total
assets of $355,386,000 in 1996 represent an increase of $25,884,000 or 7.9%
over $329,502,000 in 1995. Average total assets in 1995 represent an increase
of $39,366,000 or 13.6% over 1994.
EARNING ASSETS
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - The scheduled maturities and weighted average yields of
the Company's investment securities portfolio as of December 31, 1996, 1995 and
1994 are as follows:
Table III Maturity and Yields of Investment Securities
Weighted
Book Unrealized Unrealized Market Average
In thousands Value Gain Losses Value Yield
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1996
U.S. Treasury and
agency securities
Maturing within 1 year $29,358 $ 46 $ 9 $29,395 5.72%
Maturing after 1 year
but within 5 years 37,460 71 96 37,435 5.80%
Maturing after 10 years 1,027 1 44 984 6.06%
Corporate Debt Securities
Maturing within 1 year 3,028 - 11 3,017 5.28%
Other 4 - - 4 -
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals $70,877 $118 $ 160 $70,835 5.75%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1995
U.S. Treasury and
agency securities
Maturing within 1 year $32,415 $234 $ 6 $32,643 5.37%
Maturing after 1 year
but within 5 years 45,942 259 - 46,201 5.70%
Maturing after 10 years 1,282 - 17 1,265 7.50%
Other 4 - - 4 -
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals $79,643 $493 $ 23 $80,113 5.59%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1994
U.S. Treasury and
agency securities
Maturing within 1 year $44,809 $ - $ 557 $44,252 4.33%
Maturing after 1 year
but within 5 years 23,560 - 479 23,081 5.85%
Maturing after 10 years 1,122 - 29 1,093 5.84%
Other 4 - - 4 -
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals $69,495 $ - $1,065 $68,430 4.86%
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
31
32
Investment securities designated as held-to-maturity at December 31, 1996 were
carried at an amortized cost of $70,877,000. The estimated market value of the
held-to-maturity portfolio on that date was $70,831,000 reflecting a net
unrealized loss of $46,000 or .07% of amortized cost. The book value of
investment securities at the end of 1996 compared to $79,643,000 and
$69,495,000 at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively. Fluctuations in the
investment portfolio reflect funding needs for anticipated and actual levels of
loan demand. In 1996, the Company experienced growth in loan balances that
outpaced growth in deposits resulting in generally higher loan to deposit
ratios and lower liquidity as compared to 1995. Conversely, in 1995 investment
balances increased as growth in deposits outpaced growth in the loan portfolio.
It is the Banks' policy to invest primarily in U.S. Treasury and U.S.
Government Agency securities. Further, it is management's intent to reduce the
market valuation risk of the investment portfolio by generally limiting the
average life of portfolio maturities to 3 years or less.
There were no sales of investment securities in 1996, 1995 or 1994.
LOAN PORTFOLIO - The following table summarizes the composition of the loan
portfolio for the past five years as of December 31:
Table IV Analysis of Loans Outstanding by Type
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In thousands
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
Commercial $ 111,545 $ 85,823 $ 78,627 $ 73,083 $ 67,255
Installment 8,230 5,677 6,445 7,384 8,846
Real Estate:
Construction 27,997 24,852 24,076 30,159 30,817
Other 93,241 79,644 74,769 74,075 63,706
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Loans 241,013 195,996 183,917 184,701 170,624
Allowance for
Credit Losses (4,372) (4,446) (4,068) (2,840) (2,371)
Deferred Loan Fees (649) (550) (583) (611) (554)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 235,992 $ 191,000 $ 179,266 $ 181,250 $ 167,699
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average net loans in 1996 were $203,117,000 representing an increase of
$30,052,000 or 17.4% over 1995. Average net loans of $173,065,000 in 1995
represented a decrease of $6,449,000 or 3.6% from $179,514,000 in 1994.
Average net loans comprised 62.5% of average earning assets in 1996 compared to
57.8% and 68.0% in 1995 and 1994, respectively.
Net loans outstanding at December 31, 1996 were $235,992,000, which represented
an increase of $44,992,000 or 23.6% over $191,000,000 on the same date one year
earlier. The overall composition of loan balances at December 31, 1996
compared to 1995 reflected increases in virtually all major categories with the
strongest growth coming from commercial
32
33
loans. At December 31, 1995 net loans outstanding represented an increase of
$11,734,000 or 6.5% over $179,266,000 at December 31, 1994.
Commercial loans consist of credit lines for operating needs, loans for
equipment purchases and working capital, and various other business loan
products. At December 31, 1996, the Company had $111,545,000 in commercial
loans outstanding representing 46.3% of total gross loans compared to
$85,823,000 and 43.8% and $78,627,000 and 42.8% at December 31, 1995 and 1994,
respectively. Fluctuations in commercial loan balances in 1996 and 1995
primarily reflect cyclical changes in customer borrowing needs related to
changes in the agri-business sector of the local economy.
Installment loans include a range of traditional consumer loan products offered
by the Company such as home equity and personal lines of credit and loans to
finance purchases of autos, boats, recreational vehicles, mobile homes and
various other consumer items. At December 31, 1996, installment loans
outstanding were $8,230,000 representing 3.4% of total loans. This compares to
installment loans of $5,677,000 and $6,445,000 representing 2.9% and 3.5% at
December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
The Company's construction loan portfolio increased $3,145,000 or 12.7% to
$27,997,000 at December 31, 1996 from $24,852,000 at December 31, 1995. This
compares to an increase of $776,000 or 3.2% in 1995 from $24,076,000 at
December 31, 1994. Construction loans expressed as a percentage of total loans
were 11.6%, 12.7% and 13.1% at December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
The construction loans outstanding at December 31, 1996 are generally composed
of commitments to customers within the Company's service area for construction
of custom and semi- custom single family residences.
Other real estate loans consist primarily of loans to the Banks' depositors
secured by first trust deeds on commercial and residential properties typically
with short-term maturities and original loan to value ratios not exceeding 75%.
Other real estate loans increased $13,597,000 or 17.1% to $93,241,000 at
December 31, 1996 compared to $79,644,000 and $74,769,000 on December 31, 1995
and 1994, respectively. In general, except in the case of loans with SBA
guarantees, the Company does not make long-term mortgage loans; however, the
Company has informal arrangements in place with mortgage lenders to assist
customers in securing single-family mortgage financing.
RISK ELEMENTS - The Company assesses and manages credit risk on an ongoing
basis through stringent credit review and approval policies, extensive internal
monitoring and established formal lending policies. Additionally, the Company
contracts with an outside loan review consultant to periodically grade new
loans and to review the existing loan portfolio. Management believes its
ability to identify and assess risk and return characteristics of the Company's
loan portfolio is critical for profitability and growth. Management strives
to continue the historically low level of credit losses by continuing its
33
34
emphasis on credit quality in the loan approval process, active credit
administration and regular monitoring. With this in mind, management has
designed and implemented a comprehensive loan review and grading system that
functions to continually assess the credit risk inherent in the loan portfolio.
Ultimately, credit quality may be influenced by underlying trends in the
economic and business cycles. The Company's business is concentrated in
Monterey County, California whose economy is highly dependent on the
agricultural industry. As a result, the Company lends money to individuals and
companies dependent upon the agricultural industry. In addition, the Company
has significant extensions of credit and commitments to extend credit which
are secured by real estate, totalling approximately $143.5 million at December
31, 1996. The ultimate recovery of these loans is generally dependent on the
successful operation, sale or refinancing of the real estate. The Company
monitors the effects of current and expected market conditions and other
factors on the collectibility of real estate loans. When, in management's
judgement, these loans are impaired, appropriate provision for losses is
recorded. The more significant assumptions management considers involve
estimates of the following: lease, absorption and sale rates; real estate
values and rates of return; operating expenses; inflation; and sufficiency of
collateral independent of the real estate including, in limited instances,
personal guarantees.
In extending credit and commitments to borrowers, the Company generally
requires collateral and/or guarantees as security. The repayment of such loans
is expected to come from cash flow or from proceeds from the sale of selected
assets of the borrowers. The Company's requirement for collateral and/or
guarantees is determined on a case-by-case basis in connection with
management's evaluation of the credit-worthiness of the borrower. Collateral
held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and
equipment, income-producing properties, residences and other real property.
The Company secures its collateral by perfecting its interest in business
assets, obtaining deeds of trust, or outright possession among other means.
Credit losses from lending transactions related to real estate and agriculture
compare favorably with the Company's credit losses on its loan portfolio as a
whole.
In the period spanning the second half of 1993 and continuing through 1995,
California's economy began a gradual recovery from the recession that persisted
in first years of the decade. During 1993, real estate values firmed up
slightly as housing became more affordable due to the low levels of interest
rates, however, economic conditions in California continued to lag behind the
national trend toward recovery. During 1994 and 1995, economic conditions in
California continued to improve, however, the level of activity remained less
vigorous than the national trend. In the year ended 1996, California's
economic recovery gained momentum, growing at a rate that exceeded the national
average. Economic activity and job growth has been particularly strong in the
northern portion of the state. As a result, real estate values have firmed and
construction activity has increased. At December 31, 1996, construction loans
and other real estate secured loans comprised 11.6% and 38.7%, respectively, of
total loans outstanding.
34
35
Management believes that its lending policies and underwriting standards will
tend to minimize losses in an economic downturn, however, there is no assurance
that losses will not occur under such circumstances. The Banks' loan policies
and underwriting standards include, but are not limited to, the following: 1)
maintaining a thorough understanding of the Banks' service area and limiting
investments outside of this area, 2) maintaining a thorough understanding of
borrowers' knowledge and capacity in their field of expertise, 3) basing real
estate construction loan approval not only on salability of the project, but
also on the borrowers' capacity to support the project financially in the event
it does not sell within the original projected time period, and 4) maintaining
conforming and prudent loan to value and loan to cost ratios based on
independent outside appraisals and ongoing inspection and analysis by the
Banks' construction lending officers. In addition, the Banks strive to
diversify the risk inherent in the construction portfolio by avoiding
concentrations to individual borrowers and on any one project.
NONACCRUAL LOANS, LOANS PAST DUE 90 DAYS AND OREO - Management generally places
loans on nonaccrual status when they become 90 days past due, unless the loan
is well secured and in the process of collection. Loans are charged off when,
in the opinion of management, collection appears unlikely. The following Table
sets forth nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more for December 31:
Table V Non-Performing Loans
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In thousands 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Past due 90 days or more
and still accruing:
Real estate $ 59 $ 71 $ - $ 42 $ 335
Commercial 60 35 - - 151
Installment and other 90 - 6 - 1
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
209 106 6 42 487
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonaccrual:
Real estate 419 633 2,697 2,462 182
Commercial 184 194 99 454 129
Installment and other 1 24 33 43 64
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
604 851 2,829 2,959 375
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total nonperforming loans $ 813 $ 957 $ 2,835 $ 3,001 $ 862
====================================================================================================================
Interest due but excluded from interest income on nonaccrual loans was
approximately $50,000 in 1996, $166,000 in 1995 and $306,000 in 1994. In 1996
and 1994, interest income recognized from payments received on nonaccrual loans
was $619,000 and $92,000, respectively. In 1995, no payments received on
nonaccrual loans were included in interest income.
35
36
At December 31, 1996, the recorded investment in loans that are considered
impaired under SFAS No. 114 was $965,000 of which $541,000 are included as
nonaccrual loans above. Such impaired loans had a valuation allowance of
$446,000. The average recorded investment in impaired loans during 1996 was
$1,376,000. The Company recognized interest income on impaired loans of
$13,000.
There were no "troubled debt restructurings" as defined in SFAS No. 15 or loan
concentrations in excess of 10% of total loans not otherwise disclosed as a
category of loans as of December 31, 1996. Management is not aware of any
potential problem loans, which were accruing and current at December 31, 1996,
where serious doubt exists as to the ability of the borrower to comply with the
present repayment terms.
Other real estate owned was $348,000 and $506,000 at December 31, 1996 and
1995, respectively. At December 31, 1994, other real estate owned was
$318,000.
PROVISION AND ALLOWANCE FOR POSSIBLE CREDIT LOSSES - The provision for credit
losses is based upon management's evaluation of the adequacy of the existing
allowance for loans outstanding. This allowance is increased by provisions
charged to expense and reduced by loan charge-offs net of recoveries.
Management determines an appropriate provision based upon the interaction of
three primary factors: (1) the loan portfolio growth in the period, (2) a
comprehensive grading and review formula for total loans outstanding, and (3)
actual previous charge-offs.
The allowance for credit losses totaled $4,372,000 or 1.81% of total loans at
December 31, 1996 compared to $4,446,000 or 2.27% at December 31, 1995 and
$4,068,000 or 2.21% at December 31, 1994. The decrease in the allowance as a
percentage of total loans in 1996 is primarily due to the increase in loan
balances in a generally strong economic environment. Increases in the
allowance as a percentage of total loans in 1995 and 1994 were primarily a
response to adverse trends in the real estate market, the general condition of
the economy and higher net charge-offs experience. It is the policy of
management to maintain the allowance for credit losses at a level adequate for
known and future risks inherent in the loan portfolio. Based on information
currently available to analyze credit loss potential, including economic
factors, overall credit quality, historical delinquency and a history of actual
charge-offs, management believes that the credit loss provision and allowance
is prudent and adequate. However, no prediction of the ultimate level of loans
charged off in future years can be made with any certainty.
36
37
FUNDING SOURCES - Deposits accepted by its subsidiary banks represent the
Company's principal source of funds for investment. Deposits are primarily
core deposits in that they are demand, savings and time deposits under $100,000
generated from local businesses and individuals. These sources are considered
to be relatively more stable, long-term deposit relationships thereby enhancing
steady growth of the deposit base without major fluctuations in overall deposit
balances. At December 31, 1996, such accounts comprise 87.0% of all deposit
balances compared to 91.4% and 91.5% at December 31, 1995 and 1994. Table VI
presents the composition of the deposit mix at December 31:
Table VI Composition of Deposits
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In thousands 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Demand, non-interest $ 90,149 $ 68,541 $ 60,407 $ 47,822 $ 44,161
Demand, interest 76,392 74,079 70,911 87,588 68,579
Savings 89,650 121,050 100,484 62,188 54,369
Time 82,472 62,419 52,021 49,514 54,234
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $338,663 $326,089 $283,823 $247,112 $221,343
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The increase in 1996 year-end total deposits is attributable to increases in
noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing demand categories. Average total
deposits in 1996 of $319,110,000 represented an increase of $18,819,000 or 6.3%
over 1995 totals of $300,291,000 and reflects growth in noninterest-bearing
demand and time deposits which was partially offset by decreases in
interest-bearing demand and savings categories. Average noninterest bearing
demand deposits increased in 1996 to $69,877,000 from $53,909,000 in 1995
representing an increase of $15,968,000 or 29.6% as a result of the Company's
business development efforts which focuses on serving small and medium-size
businesses. Average time deposits were $71,119,000 in 1996 compared to
$55,966,000 in 1995 representing an increase of 15,153,000 or 27.1%. Growth
in time deposits was primarily due to migration of balances from savings and
interest-bearing demand accounts.
Average total deposits in 1995 represented an increase of $34,779,000 or 13.1%
over 1994 totals of $265,512,000 and primarily reflects growth in savings
balances. Changes in the composition of deposit funding in 1995 compared to
1994 reflected a shift away from time deposits toward the higher liquidity of
savings accounts as local economic activity increased. Average savings
balances of $111,351,000 represented an increase of $39,465,000 or 54.9% over
$71,886,000 in 1994.
LIQUIDITY AND INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY
LIQUIDITY - Liquidity management refers to the Company's ability to provide
funds on an ongoing basis to meet fluctuations in deposit levels as well as the
credit needs and requirements of its clients. Both assets and liabilities
contribute to the Company's liquidity position. Federal funds lines,
short-term investments and securities, and loan repayments contribute to
liquidity, along with deposit increases, while loan funding and deposit
withdrawals decrease liquidity. The Banks assess the likelihood of projected
funding
37
38
requirements by reviewing historical funding patterns, current and forecasted
economic conditions and individual client funding needs. Commitments to fund
loans and outstanding standby letters of credit at December 31, 1996, were
approximately $80,055,000 and $1,551,000, respectively. Such loans relate
primarily to revolving lines of credit and other commercial loans, and to real
estate construction loans.
The Company's sources of liquidity consist of its deposits with other banks,
overnight funds sold to correspondent banks, unpledged short-term, marketable
investments and loans held for sale. On December 31, 1996, consolidated liquid
assets totaled $85.1 million or 22.6% of total assets as compared to $121.4
million or 34.0% of total consolidated assets on December 31, 1995. In
addition to liquid assets, the subsidiary banks maintain lines of credit with
correspondent banks for up to $15,000,000 available on a short-term basis.
Informal agreements are also in place with various other banks to purchase
participations in loans, if necessary. The Company serves primarily a business
and professional customer base and, as such, its deposit base is susceptible to
economic fluctuations. Accordingly, management strives to maintain a balanced
position of liquid assets to volatile and cyclical deposits.
Liquidity is also affected by portfolio maturities and the effect of interest
rate fluctuations on the marketability of both assets and liabilities. In
addition, it has been the Banks' policy to restrict maturities in the
investment portfolio to not more than three years. The short-term nature of
the loan and investment portfolios, and loan agreements which generally require
monthly interest payments, provide the Banks with additional secondary sources
of liquidity. Another key liquidity ratio is the ratio of gross loans to total
deposits, which was 71.2% at December 31, 1996 and 60.1% at December 31, 1995.
INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY - Interest rate sensitivity is a measure of the
exposure to fluctuations in the Banks' future earnings caused by fluctuations
in interest rates. Such fluctuations result from the mismatch in repricing
characteristics of assets and liabilities at a specific point in time. This
mismatch, or interest rate sensitivity gap, represents the potential mismatch
in the change in the rate of accrual of interest revenue and interest expense
from a change in market interest rates. Mismatches in interest rate repricing
among assets and liabilities arise primarily from the interaction of various
customer businesses (i.e., types of loans versus the types of deposits
maintained) and from management's discretionary investment and funds gathering
activities. The Company attempts to manage its exposure to interest rate
sensitivity, but due to its size and direct competition from the major banks,
it must offer products which are competitive in the market place, even if less
than optimum with respect to its interest rate exposure.
The Company's natural position is asset-sensitive (based upon the significant
amount of variable rate loans and the repricing characteristics of its deposit
accounts). This natural position provides a hedge against rising interest
rates, but has a detrimental effect during times of interest rate decreases.
38
39
The following table quantifies the Company's interest rate exposure at December
31, 1996 based upon the known repricing dates of certain assets and liabilities
and the assumed repricing dates of others. This table displays a static view
of the Company's interest rate sensitivity position and does not consider the
dynamics of the balance sheet and interest rate movements.
Table VII Interest Rate Sensitivity
In thousands
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Over three
Assets and Liabilities Next day months and Over one
which Mature or and within within and within Over
Reprice Immediately three months one year five years five years Total
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest earning assets:
Federal funds sold $ 23,135 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 23,135
Purchased CD's - 700 299 - - 999
Investment securities 4 2,495 29,892 37,459 1,027 70,877
Loans, excluding
nonaccrual loans
and overdrafts 189,725 12,903 9,545 17,747 9,058 238,978
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 212,864 $ 16,098 $ 39,736 $ 55,206 $ 10,085 $ 333,989
==========================================================================================================================
Interest bearing
liabilities:
Interest bearing demand $ 76,392 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 76,392
Savings 89,650 - - - - 89,650
Time certificates - 21,255 43,081 18,136 - 82,472
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 166,042 $ 21,255 $ 43,081 $ 18,136 $ - $ 248,514
==========================================================================================================================
Interest rate
sensitivity gap $ 46,822 $ (5,857) $ (3,644) $ 37,070 $ 10,085
Cumulative interest
rate sensitivity gap $ 46,822 $ 40,965 $ 37,321 $ 74,391 $ 84,476
Ratios:
Interest rate
sensitibity gap 1.28 0.72 0.92 3.04
Cumulative interest
rate sensitivity gap 1.28 1.22 1.16 1.30 1.34
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is management's objective to maintain stability in the net interest margin
in times of fluctuating interest rates by maintaining an appropriate mix of
interest sensitive assets and liabilities. The Banks strive to achieve this
goal through the compostion and maturities of the investment portfolio and by
adjusting pricing of its interest bearing liabilities, however, as noted above,
the ability to manage its interest rate exposure may be constrained by
competitive pressures.
39
40
CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company's total shareholders' equity was $36,332,000 at December 31, 1996
compared to $29,916,000 as of December 31, 1995 and $25,547,000 as of December
31, 1994.
The Company and the Banks are subject to regulations issued by the Board of
Governors and the FDIC which require maintenance of a certain level of capital.
These regulations impose two capital standards: a risk-based capital standard
and a leverage capital standard.
Under the Board of Governor's risk-based capital guidelines, assets reported on
an institution's balance sheet and certain off-balance sheet items are assigned
to risk categories, each of which has an assigned risk weight. Capital ratios
are calculated by dividing the institution's qualifying capital by its
period-end risk-weighted assets. The guidelines establish two categories of
qualifying capital: Tier 1 Capital (defined to include common shareholders'
equity and noncumulative perpetual preferred stock) and Tier 2 capital defined
to include limited life (and in the case of banks, cumulative) preferred stock,
mandatory convertible securities, subordinated debt and a limited amount of
reserves for loan and lease losses. Each institution is required to maintain a
risk-based capital ratio (including Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital) of 8%, of which
at least half must be Tier 1 capital.
Under the Board of Governors' leverage capital standard an institution is
required to maintain a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to the sum of its
quarterly average total assets and quarterly average reserve for loan losses,
less intangibles not included in Tier 1 capital. Period-end assets may be used
in place of quarterly average total assets on a case-by-case basis. A minimum
leverage ratio of 3% is required for institutions which have been determined to
be in the highest of five categories used by regulators to rate financial
institutions and which are not experiencing or anticipating significant growth.
All other organizations are required to maintain leverage ratios of at least
100 to 200 basis points above the 3% minimum.
40
41
The table below presents the capital and leverage ratios of the Company as of:
December 31, 1996 December 31, 1995
RISK-BASED CAPITAL
RATIOS (Dollars in thousands) Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier I Capital $ 36,332 14.1% $ 29,916 13.8%
--------- -------- --------- --------
Total Capital $ 39,562 15.4% $ 32,655 15.0%
--------- -------- --------- --------
Total risk-adjusted assets $257,305 $217,433
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVERAGE RATIO
(dollars in thousands)
Tier I Capital to average total assets $ 36,332 10.1% $ 29,916 9.1%
--------- -------- --------- --------
Quarterly average total assets $358,027 $325,502
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 ("FDICIA")
substantially revises banking regulations and establishes a framework for
determination of capital adequacy of financial institutions. Under the FDICIA,
financial institutions are placed into one of five capital adequacy categories
as follows: (1) "well capitalized" consisting of institutions with a total
risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
of 6% or greater and a leverage ratio of 5% or greater, and the institution is
not subject to an order, written agreement, capital directive or prompt
corrective action directive; (2) "adequately capitalized" consisting of
institutions with a total risk-based capital ratio of 8% or greater, a Tier 1
risk-based capital ratio of 4% or greater and a leverage ratio of 4% or
greater, and the institution does not meet the definition of a "well
capitalized" institution; (3) "undercapitalized" consisting of institutions
with a total risk-based capital ratio less than 8%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio of less than 4%, or a leverage ratio of less than 4%; (4) "significantly
undercapitalized" consisting of institutions with a total risk-based capital
ratio of less than 6%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 3%, or a
leverage ratio of less than 3%; and, (5) "critically undercapitalized"
consisting of an institution with a ratio of tangible equity to total assets
that is equal to or less than 2%.
Financial institutions classified as undercapitalized or below are subject to
various limitations including, among other matters, certain supervisory actions
by bank regulatory authorities and restrictions related to (i) growth of
assets, (ii) payment of interest on subordinated indebtedness, (iii) payment of
dividends or other capital distributions, and (iv) payment of management fees
to a parent holding company. The FDICIA requires the bank regulatory
authorities to initiate corrective action regarding financial institutions
which fail to meet minimum capital requirements. Such action may, among other
matters, require that the financial institution augment capital and reduce
total assets. Critically undercapitalized financial institutions may also be
subject to appointment of a receiver or conservator unless the financial
institution submits an adequate capitalization plan.
41
42
INFLATION
The impact of inflation on a financial institution differs significantly from
that exerted on manufacturing, or other commercial concerns, primarily because
its assets and liabilities are largely monetary. In general, inflation
primarily affects the Company indirectly through its effect on market rates of
interest, and thus the ability of the Banks to attract loan customers.
Inflation affects the growth of total assets by increasing the level of loan
demand, and potentially adversely affects the Company's capital adequacy
because loan growth in inflationary periods can increase at rates higher than
the rate that capital grows through retention of earnings which the Company may
generate in the future. In addition to its effects on interest rates,
inflation directly affects the Company by increasing the Company's operating
expenses.
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In October, 1994, the FASB issued SFAS No. 119, "Disclosure about Derivative
Financial Instruments and Fair Value of Financial Instruments." which requires
disclosures about derivative financial instruments----futures, forward, swap,
and option contracts, and other financial instruments with similar
characteristics. It requires disclosures about amounts, nature, and terms of
certain derivative financial instruments. The Company has no derivative
financial instruments that would be subject to such disclosures.
In May 1995, the FASB issued SFAS No. 122, "Accounting for Mortgage Servicing
Rights" which requires that a mortgage banking enterprise recognize as separate
assets rights to service mortgage loans for others, however those servicing
rights are acquired. SFAS No. 122 also requires that a mortgage banking
enterprise assess its capitalized mortgage servicing rights for impairment
based on the fair value of those rights. As of December 31, 1996 the Company
has no servicing rights retained on mortgage loans.
In October, 1995, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation." which establishes accounting and disclosure requirements using a
fair value method of accounting for stock based employee compensation plans.
Under SFAS No. 123, the Company may either adopt the new fair value based
accounting method or continue the intrinsic value based method and provide
proforma disclosures of net income and earnings per share as if the accounting
provisions of SFAS No. 123 had been adopted. The provisions of SFAS 123 became
effective January 1, 1996. The Company has adopted only the disclosure
requirements of SFAS No. 123; therefore such adoption have had no effect on the
Company's consolidated net earnings or cash flows.
In June 1996, SFAS No. 125, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities" was issued. The Statement
establishes standards for when transfers of financial assets, including those
with continuing involvement by the transferor, should be considered a sale.
SFAS No. 125 also establishes standards for when
42
43
a liability shoud be considered extinguished. This statement is effective for
transfers of assets and extinguishments of liabilities after December 31, 1996.
In December 1996, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
reconsidered certain provisions of SFAS No. 125 and issued SFAS No. 127,
"Deferral of the Effective Date of Certain Provisions of FASB Statement No.
125" to defer for one year the effective date of implementation for
transactions related to repurchase agements, dollar-roll repurchase agreements,
securities lending and similar transactions. Earlier adoption or retroactive
application of this statement with respect to any of its provisions is not
permitted. Management believes that the effect of adoption on the Company's
financial statements will not be material.
43
44
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
------
Independent Auditors' Report 45
Consolidated Balance Sheets, December 31, 1996 and 1995 46
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 47
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 48
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the
years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 49
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 50-67
All schedules have been omitted since the required information is not present
in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule or because the
information required is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or
notes thereto.
44
45
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Central Coast Bancorp:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Central Coast
Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits. The consolidated financial statements give retroactive effect to the
merger of Central Coast Bancorp and Cypress Coast Bank, which has been accounted
for as a pooling of interests as described in Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements. We did not audit the balance sheet of Cypress Coast Bank
as of December 31, 1995, or the related statements of income, shareholders'
equity and cash flows of Cypress Coast Bank for the years ended December 31,
1995 and 1994, which statements reflect total assets of $43,702,000 as of
December 31, 1995, net interest income of $1,999,000 and $1,708,000 and net
income of $437,000 and $169,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994,
respectively. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has
been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts
included for Cypress Coast Bank for 1995 and 1994, is based solely on the report
of such other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits and the report of the other auditors provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of the other auditors, the
consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Central Coast Bancorp and
subsidiaries at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1996 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Salinas, California
February 11, 1997
(March 28, 1997 as to the stock split information in Note 1)
45
46
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Central Coast Bancorp and Subsidiaries
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1996 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks $ 37,522,000 $ 27,915,000
Federal funds sold 23,135,000 46,764,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cash and equivalents 60,657,000 74,679,000
Interest-bearing deposits in other
financial institutions 999,000 4,492,000
Held-to-maturity securities (market
value: 1996, $70,835,000; 1995, $80,113,000) 70,877,000 79,643,000
Loans held for sale 447,000 540,000
Loans:
Commercial 111,545,000 85,823,000
Real estate-construction 27,997,000 24,852,000
Real estate-other 93,241,000 79,644,000
Installment 8,230,000 5,677,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total loans 241,013,000 195,996,000
Allowance for credit losses (4,372,000) (4,446,000)
Deferred loan fees net (649,000) (550,000)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Loans 235,992,000 191,000,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Premises and equipment, net 1,140,000 1,333,000
Accrued interest receivable and other assets 6,720,000 5,549,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total assets $376,832,000 $357,236,000
====================================================================================
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Deposits:
Demand, noninterest bearing $ 90,149,000 $ 68,541,000
Demand, interest bearing 76,392,000 74,079,000
Savings 89,650,000 121,050,000
Time 82,472,000 62,419,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Deposits 338,663,000 326,089,000
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities 1,837,000 1,231,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total liabilities 340,500,000 327,320,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commitments and contingencies
(Notes 7 and 13)
Shareholders' Equity
Preferred stock-no par value; authorized
1,000,000 shares; no shares issued
Common stock - no par value, authorized 30,000,000
shares; issued and outstanding: 4,273,227 shares
in 1996 and 3,807,681 shares in 1995 30,856,000 25,860,000
Retained earnings 5,476,000 4,056,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shareholders' equity 36,332,000 29,916,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $376,832,000 $357,236,000
====================================================================================
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
46
47
Consolidated Statements of Income
Central Coast Bancorp and Subsidiaries
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Years Ended December 31, 1996 1995 1994
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTEREST INCOME
Loans (including fees) $ 22,330,000 $ 19,713,000 $ 17,930,000
Held-to-maturity securities:
Taxable 4,936,000 4,520,000 2,511,000
Tax exempt -- -- 7,000
Other 2,035,000 2,731,000 1,198,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total interest income 29,301,000 26,964,000 21,646,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest on deposits 9,859,000 9,998,000 7,071,000
Other -- 10,000 --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total interest expense 9,859,000 10,008,000 7,071,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET INTEREST INCOME 19,442,000 16,956,000 14,575,000
PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES (352,000) (695,000) (1,745,000)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER
PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES 19,090,000 16,261,000 12,830,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER INCOME
Service charges on deposits 735,000 676,000 635,000
Other 721,000 626,000 680,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total other income 1,456,000 1,302,000 1,315,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER EXPENSES
Salaries and benefits 6,437,000 5,419,000 5,052,000
Occupancy 728,000 746,000 715,000
Furniture and equipment 837,000 672,000 693,000
Other 3,113,000 3,426,000 2,710,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total other expenses 11,115,000 10,263,000 9,170,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 9,431,000 7,300,000 4,975,000
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES 3,571,000 2,975,000 2,046,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET INCOME $ 5,860,000 $ 4,325,000 $ 2,929,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET INCOME PER COMMON AND
COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE $ 1.24 $ 0.94 $ 0.65
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
47
48
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Central Coast Bancorp and Subsidiaries
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Years Ended December 31, 1996 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATIONS:
Net income $ 5,860,000 $ 4,325,000 $ 2,929,000
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Provision for credit losses 352,000 695,000 1,745,000
Depreciation 557,000 469,000 470,000
Amortization and accretion (42,000) (292,000) 149,000
Loss on sale of equipment 52,000 -- 3,000
Deferred income taxes (300,000) (168,000) (877,000)
Write down (gain on sale) of other real estate owned (87,000) 215,000 24,000
Increase in accrued interest receivable
and other assets (787,000) (184,000) (311,000)
Increase in accrued interest payable
and other liabilities 606,000 251,000 217,000
Increase (decrease) in deferred loan fees 99,000 (32,000) (29,000)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by operations 6,310,000 5,279,000 4,320,000
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Net (increase) decrease in interest-bearing
deposits in financial institutions 3,493,000 (1,693,000) 807,000
Purchase of investment securities (48,161,000) (72,972,000) (39,142,000)
Proceeds from maturities
of investment securities 56,969,000 63,117,000 20,050,000
Net change in loans held for sale 93,000 195,000 (558,000)
Net increase in loans (45,485,000) (12,962,000) (327,000)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned 287,000 163,000 254,000
Proceeds from sale of equipment 1,000 -- 2,000
Capital expenditures (417,000) (317,000) (690,000)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash used in investing activities (33,220,000) (24,469,000) (19,604,000)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in deposit accounts 12,574,000 42,265,000 36,711,000
Proceeds from sale of stock 319,000 32,000 639,000
Common stock repurchased (5,000) -- --
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 12,888,000 42,297,000 37,350,000
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents (14,022,000) 23,107,000 22,066,000
Cash and equivalents, beginning of year 74,679,000 51,572,000 29,506,000
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and equivalents, end of year $ 60,657,000 $ 74,679,000 $ 51,572,000
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
In 1996, 1995 and 1994 the Company obtained $42,000, $566,000 and $353,000 respectively of real estate
(OREO) in connection with foreclosures of delinquent loans. In 1996, 1995 and 1994 the Company received
$242,000, $12,000 and $46,000, respectively in tax benefits from the exercise of stock options, which
were recorded as increases to common stock.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid $ 9,852,000 $ 9,853,000 $ 6,939,000
Income taxes paid 4,063,000 3,219,000 3,081,000
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
48
49
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity
Central Coast Bancorp and Subsidiaries
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Years Ended December 31, Common Stock Retained
1996, 1995 & 1994 Shares Amount Earnings Total
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances, January 1, 1994 3,037,843 $ 19,523,000 $ 2,409,000 $ 21,932,000
10% stock dividend
(including fractional shares) 267,765 2,231,000 (2,231,000) -
Sale of stock less
offering costs 123,606 603,000 - 603,000
Stock options exercised 15,632 37,000 - 37,000
Tax benefit of stock options
exercised - 46,000 - 46,000
Net income - - 2,929,000 2,929,000
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances, December 31, 1994 3,444,846 22,440,000 3,107,000 25,547,000
12% stock dividend
(including fractional shares) 355,326 3,376,000 (3,376,000) -
Sale of stock less
offering costs 1,944 10,000 - 10,000
Stock options exercised 5,565 22,000 - 22,000
Tax benefit of stock options
exercised - 12,000 - 12,000
Net income - - 4,325,000 4,325,000
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances, December 31, 1995 3,807,681 25,860,000 4,056,000 29,916,000
10% stock dividend 380,768 4,440,000 (4,440,000) -
Stock repurchased (653) (5,000) - (5,000)
Stock options and
warrants exercised 85,431 319,000 - 319,000
Tax benefit of stock options
exercised - 242,000 - 242,000
Net income - - 5,860,000 5,860,000
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances, December 31, 1996 4,273,227 $ 30,856,000 $ 5,476,000 $ 36,332,000
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
49
50
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Central Coast Bancorp and Subsidiaries
Years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
NOTE 1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND OPERATIONS. The consolidated
financial statements include Central Coast Bancorp (the "Company") and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, Bank of Salinas and Cypress Bank (the "Banks"). All
material intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company and the Banks conform to
generally accepted accounting principles and prevailing practices within the
banking industry. In preparing such financial statements, management is required
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and revenues and expenses for
the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes in
the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for credit losses and
the carrying value of other real estate owned. Management uses information
provided by an independent loan review service in connection with the
determination of the allowance for loan losses.
Bank of Salinas operates two branches in the Salinas Valley and Cypress Bank
operates two branches on the Monterey Peninsula, serving small and medium sized
business customers, as well as individuals. The Banks focus on business loans
and deposit services to customers throughout Monterey and San Benito counties.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES are classified at the time of purchase into one of three
categories: held-to-maturity, trading or available-for-sale. Investment
securities classified as held-to-maturity are measured at amortized cost based
on the Company's positive intent and ability to hold such securities to
maturity. Trading securities are bought and held principally for the purpose of
selling them in the near term and are carried at market value with a
corresponding recognition of unrecognized holding gain or loss in the results of
operations. The remaining investment securities are classified as
available-for-sale and are measured at market value with a corresponding
recognition of the unrealized holding gain or loss (net of tax effect) as a
separate component of shareholders' equity until realized. Accretion of
discounts and amortization of premiums arising at acquisition are included in
income using methods approximating the effective interest method. Gains and
losses on sales of investments, if any, are determined on a specific
identification basis.
In 1996 and 1995, the Company's investment securities were classified as
held-to-maturity.
LOANS are stated at the principal amount outstanding, reduced by any charge-offs
or specific valuation allowance. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan
50
51
origination costs are deferred and the net amount is recognized using the
effective yield method, generally over the contractual life of the loan.
Interest income is accrued as earned. The accrual of interest on loans is
discontinued and any accrued and unpaid interest is reversed when principal or
interest is ninety days past due, when payment in full of principal or interest
is not expected or when a portion of the principal balance has been charged off.
Income on such loans is then recognized only to the extent that cash is received
and where the future collection of principal is probable. Senior management may
grant a waiver from nonaccrual status if a loan is well secured and in the
process of collection. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, the accrued
and unpaid interest receivable is reversed and the loan is accounted for on the
cash or cost recovery method thereafter, until qualifying for return to accrual
status. Generally, a loan may be returned to accrual status when all delinquent
interest and principal become current in accordance with the original terms of
the loan agreement or when the loan is both well secured and in process of
collection.
Loans held for sale are stated at the lower of cost or aggregate market value.
THE ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES is an amount that management believes will be
adequate to absorb losses inherent in existing loans and commitments to extend
credit, based on evaluations of collectibility and prior loss experience. The
allowance is established through a provision charged to expense. Loans are
charged against the allowance when management believes that the collectibility
of the principal is unlikely. In evaluating the adequacy of the reserve,
management considers numerous factors such as changes in the composition of the
portfolio, overall portfolio quality, loan concentrations, specific problem
loans, and current and anticipated local economic conditions that may affect the
borrowers' ability to pay.
A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable
that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on
the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's
effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan's observable
market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is
collateral-dependent.
Real estate and other assets acquired in satisfaction of indebtedness are
recorded at the lower of estimated fair market value net of anticipated selling
costs or the recorded loan amount, and any difference between this and the loan
amount is treated as a loan loss. Costs of maintaining other real estate owned,
subsequent write downs and gains or losses on the subsequent sale are reflected
in current earnings.
51
52
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation and amortization are computed on a straight-line
basis over the lesser of the lease terms or estimated useful lives of the
assets, which are generally 3 to 30 years.
STOCK COMPENSATION. In October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation", which is effective in 1996. In accordance with
the provisions of SFAS No. 123 the Company applies APB Opinion 25 and
related interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans and,
accordingly, does not recognize compensation cost. Note 11 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements contains a summary of the pro forma effects to reported net
income and earnings per share for 1996 and 1995 if the Company had elected
to recognize compensation cost based on the fair value of the options granted at
grant date as prescribed by SFAS No. 123.
INCOME TAXES are provided using the asset and liability method. Under this
method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences of differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities arise principally from differences in reporting
provisions for credit losses, net operating loss carryforwards, interest on
nonaccrual loans, depreciation, state franchise taxes and accruals related to
the salary continuation plan. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured
using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in
which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The
effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is
recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
NET INCOME PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE is calculated using the
weighted average shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of shares issuable
under the stock option plans and outstanding stock purchase warrants, adjusted
retroactively for stock dividends of 10% in January 1994, 12% in January 1995
and 10% in July 1996. The number of shares used to compute net income per common
and common equivalent share amounts were approximately 4,710,000, 4,590,000,
4,540,000 in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. The difference between primary
and fully-diluted earnings per share was not significant in any year.
STOCK SPLIT. On February 24, 1997 the Board of Directors declared a 3-for-2
stock split to be distributed on March 28, 1997, to shareholders as of record
as of March 14, 1997. All share and per share data including stock option and
warrant information have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.
RECLASSIFICATIONS. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform
to the financial statement presentation for the current year. The
reclassifications had no impact on results of operations or shareholders'
equity.
52
53
NOTE 2. ACQUISITION OF CYPRESS COAST BANK
On May 31, 1996, the Company acquired Cypress Coast Bank ("Cypress"). As a
result Cypress became a subsidiary of the Company and continues to operate from
its offices in Seaside and Marina. Cypress shareholders received 534,310 shares
of common stock of the Company in a tax-free exchange. At May 31, 1996, Cypress
had unaudited total assets of $46.9 million, including $29.8 million in net
loans and total unaudited liabilities of $42.7 million, including $42.5 million
in deposits. The transaction has been accounted for as a pooling-of-interests.
Included in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December
31, 1996 are the following results of the previously separate companies.
January 1, 1996 through May 31, 1996 June 1, 1996 through
------------------------------------ December 31, 1996
Central Coast Cypress Coast --------------------
(In thousands) Bancorp Bank Combined Total
------------- ------------- -------- -------
Net interest
income $ 7,390 $ 832 $10,868 $19,090
Net income 2,727 249 2,884 5,860
The following is a reconciliation of the results of operations previously
reported by Central Coast Bancorp for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994
with the combined amounts currently presented for those periods:
(In thousands)
Year Ended Central Coast
December 31, Bancorp Cypress Coast
1995 (as previously reported) Bank Total
- ---- ------------------------ ------------- -----
Net interest
income $ 14,957 $ 1,999 $ 16,956
Net income 3,888 437 4,325
Year Ended
December 31,
1994
- ----
Net interest
income $ 12,867 $ 1,708 $ 14,575
Net income 2,760 169 2,929
53
54
NOTE 3. PENDING BRANCH ACQUISITION. In October, the Bank of Salinas entered into
a definitive agreement to purchase certain assets and assume certain liabilities
of the Gonzales and Castroville branch offices of Wells Fargo Bank outstanding
as of the close of business on February 21, 1997 (including unaudited total
deposit liabilities of approximately $34 million). As a result of the
transaction the Bank will assume deposit liabilities, receive cash, and acquire
tangible assets. This transaction will result in intangible assets, representing
the excess of the liabilities assumed over the fair value of the tangible assets
acquired.
NOTE 4. CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS. The Company, through its bank subsidiaries, is
required to maintain reserves with the Federal Reserve Bank. Reserve
requirements are based on a percentage of deposits. At December 31, 1996 the
Company maintained reserves of approximately $4,252,000 in the form of vault
cash and balances at the Federal Reserve to satisfy regulatory requirements.
NOTE 5. SECURITIES. The scheduled maturities and weighted average yields of the
Company's held-to-maturity securities portfolio as of December 31, 1996 and 1995
are as follows:
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted
Carrying Unrealized Unrealized Market Average
In thousands Value Gain Losses Value Yield
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1996
U.S. Treasury and
agency securities
Maturing within 1 year $29,358 $ 46 $ 9 $29,395 5.72%
Maturing after 1 year
but within 5 years 37,460 71 96 37,435 5.80%
Maturing after 10 years 1,027 1 44 984 6.06%
Corporate Debt Securities
Maturing within 1 year 3,028 -- 11 3,017 5.28%
Other 4 -- -- 4 --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals $70,877 $ 118 $ 160 $70,835 5.75%
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1995
U.S. Treasury and
agency securities
Maturing within 1 year $32,415 $ 234 $ 6 $32,643 5.37%
Maturing after 1 year
but within 5 years 45,942 259 -- 46,201 5.70%
Maturing after 10 years 1,282 -- 17 1,265 7.50%
Other 4 -- -- 4 --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals $79,643 $ 493 $ 23 $80,113 5.59%
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
54
55
At December 31, 1996 and 1995, all securities were classified as
held-to-maturity and securities with a book value of $45,834,000 and $37,989,000
were pledged as collateral for deposits of public funds and other purposes as
required by law or contract.
There were no sales of securities in 1996, 1995 or 1994.
NOTE 6. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES. The Company's business is
concentrated in Monterey County, California whose economy is highly dependent on
the agricultural industry. As a result, the Company lends money to individuals
and companies dependent upon the agricultural industry. In addition, the Company
has significant extensions of credit and commitments to extend credit which are
secured by real estate, the ultimate recovery of which is generally dependent on
the successful operation, sale or refinancing of the real estate, totaling
approximately $143.5 million. The Company monitors the effects of current and
expected market conditions and other factors on the collectibility of real
estate loans. When, in management's judgment, these loans are impaired,
appropriate provision for losses is recorded. The more significant assumptions
management considers involve estimates of the following: lease, absorption and
sale rates; real estate values and rates of return; operating expenses;
inflation; and sufficiency of collateral independent of the real estate
including, in limited instances, personal guarantees.
In extending credit and commitments to borrowers, the Company generally requires
collateral and/or guarantees as security. The repayment of such loans is
expected to come from cash flow or from proceeds from the sale of selected
assets of the borrowers. The Company's requirement for collateral and/or
guarantees is determined on a case-by-case basis in connection with management's
evaluation of the credit worthiness of the borrower. Collateral held varies but
may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment,
income-producing properties, residences and other real property. The Company
secures its collateral by perfecting its interest in business assets, obtaining
deeds of trust, or outright possession among other means. Credit losses from
lending transactions related to real estate and agriculture compare favorably
with the Company's credit losses on its loan portfolio as a whole.
The activity in the allowance for credit losses is summarized as follows:
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In thousands 1996 1995 1994
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance, beginning of year $ 4,446 $ 4,068 $ 2,840
Provision charged to expense 352 695 1,745
Loans charged off (620) (434) (583)
Recoveries 194 117 66
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance, end of year $ 4,372 $ 4,446 $ 4,068
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
55
56
In determining the provision for estimated losses related to specific major
loans, management evaluates its allowance on an individual loan basis, including
an analysis of the credit worthiness, cash flows and financial status of the
borrower, and the condition and the estimated value of the collateral. Specific
valuation allowance for secured loans are determined by the excess of recorded
investment in the loan over the fair market value or net realizable value where
appropriate, of the collateral. In determining overall general valuation
allowances to be maintained and the loan loss allowance ratio, management
evaluates many factors including prevailing and forecasted economic conditions,
regular reviews of the quality of loans, industry experience, historical loss
experience, composition and geographic concentrations of the loan portfolio, the
borrowers' ability to repay and repayment performance and estimated collateral
values.
Management believes that the allowance for credit losses at December 31, 1996 is
prudent and warranted, based on information currently available. However, no
prediction of the ultimate level of loans charged off in future years can be
made with any certainty.
Nonperforming loans at December 31 are summarized below:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In thousands 1996 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing
Real estate $ 59 $ 71
Commercial 60 35
Installment and other 90 --
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
209 106
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonaccrual:
Real estate 419 633
Commercial 184 194
Installment and other 1 24
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
604 851
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $813 $957
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest due but excluded from interest income on nonaccrual loans was
approximately $50,000 in 1996, $166,000 in 1995 and $306,000 in 1994. In 1996
and 1994, interest income recognized from payments received on nonaccrual loans
was $619,000 and $92,000, respectively. In 1995, no payments received on
nonaccrual loans were included in interest income
At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the recorded investment in loans that are
considered impaired was $965,000 and $1,099,000 of which $541,000 and $189,000
are included as nonaccrual loans above. Such impaired loans had a valuation
allowance of $446,000 and $535,000. The average recorded investment in impaired
loans during 1996 and 1995 was $1,376,000 and $973,000, respectively. The
Company recognized
56
57
interest income on impaired loans of $13,000 and $103,000 in 1996 and 1995,
respectively.
Other real estate owned included in other assets was $348,000 and $506,000 (net
of a $185,000 and $215,000 valuation allowance) at December 31, 1996 and 1995,
respectively.
Note 7. Premises and equipment. Premises and equipment at December 31 are
summarized as follows:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In thousands 1996 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Furniture and equipment $ 3,450 $ 2,502
Leasehold improvement 1,079 1,842
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4,529 4,344
Accumulated depreciation and amortization (3,389) (3,011)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Premises and equipment, net 1,140 1,333
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Company's facilities leases expire in June 1997 through December 1999 with
options to extend for two to fifteen years. These include four facilities leased
from shareholders at terms and conditions which management believes are
consistent with the market. Rental rates are adjusted annually for changes in
certain economic indices. Rental expense was approximately $406,000, $397,000
and $401,000, including lease expense to shareholders of $174,000, $170,000 and
$168,000 in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. The minimum annual rental
commitments under these leases, including the remaining rental commitment under
the leases to shareholders, are as follows:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating
In thousands Leases
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 $ 390
1998 390
1999 301
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 1,081
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
57
58
NOTE 8. INCOME TAXES. The provision for income taxes is as follows:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In thousands 1996 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current:
Federal $ 2,830 $ 2,287 $ 2,136
State 1,041 856 787
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 3,871 3,143 2,923
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deferred:
Federal (289) (125) (647)
State (11) (43) (230)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (300) (168) (877)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 3,571 $ 2,975 $ 2,046
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A reconciliation of the Federal income tax rate to the effective tax rate is as
follows:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statutory Federal income tax rate 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
State income taxes (net of
Federal income tax benefit) 7.6% 7.8% 7.6%
Change in the valuation allowance
for deferred taxes (4.0%) (2.5%) (1.5%)
Other (0.7%) 0.5% 0.0%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective tax rate 37.9% 40.8% 41.1%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions
of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 1996 and
1995, respectively, are presented below:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In thousands 1996 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Provision for credit losses $ 1,699 $ 1,743
Net operating loss 187 306
State income taxes 152 117
Salary continuation plan 113 --
Excess serving rights 97 88
OREO valuation reserve 97 98
Accrual to cash adjustments (51) (106)
Interest on nonaccrual loans 25 191
Depreciation 16 20
Other 33 6
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal 2,368 2,463
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets -- (381)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net deferred tax asset $ 2,368 $ 2,082
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
58
59
NOTE 9. DETAIL OF OTHER EXPENSE. Other expense for the years ended December 31,
1996, 1995 and 1994 consists of the following:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In thousands 1996 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional fees 454 644 224
Customer expenses 379 213 168
Marketing 345 253 226
Data processing 330 261 215
Stationary and supplies 319 247 208
Shareholder and director 284 187 167
Insurance 176 215 175
Dues and assessments 65 487 619
Write down of other real estate owned -- 215 24
Other 761 704 684
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 3,113 3,426 2,710
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 10. STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS. During 1995 and 1994, warrants were issued in
connection with the sale of the Company's common stock at a rate of one warrant
for every share of stock purchased. The warrants are exercisable at $5.75 and
expire on June 30, 1999. During 1996, 21,932 warrants were exercised (none in
1995 and 1994) and at December 31, 1996, 116,173 warrants were outstanding.
NOTE 11. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS. The Company has two stock option plans under
which incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options may be granted to
certain key employees or directors to purchase authorized, but unissued, common
stock. Shares may be purchased at a price not less than the fair market value of
such stock on the date of grant. Options vest over various periods not in excess
of ten years from date of grant and expire not more than ten years from date of
grant.
Activity under the stock option plans adjusted for stock dividends is as
follows:
Weighted
Average
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares Price per share Price
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances, January 1, 1994 534,171 $1.95-6.49 $ 3.29
Exercised (19,297) 1.95 1.95
Expired (8,946) 6.49 6.49
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances, December 31, 1994 505,928 1.95-6.49 3.28
Granted (wt. avg. fair value $2.66 per share) 188,858 4.79-9.70 8.11
Exercised (6,122) 1.95-6.49 3.60
Canceled (34,428) 3.35-8.49 5.92
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances, December 31, 1995 654,236 1.95-9.70 4.54
Granted (wt. avg. fair value $4.00 per share) 321,000 11.06-14.33 14.20
Exercised (63,500) 1.95-6.49 3.07
Expired (18,075) 1.95-8.49 4.57
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances, December 31, 1996 893,661 1.95-14.33 7.78
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
59
60
Additional information regarding options outstanding as of December 31, 1996 is
as follows:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
------------------------------- -----------------------------
Weighted Average
Remaining Weighted Weighted
Range of Number Contractual Average Number Average
Exercise Prices Outstanding Life (years) Exercise Price Exercisable Exercise Price
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1.95-3.19 379,590 2.0 $ 3.12 267,054 $ 3.11
4.79-8.48 184,821 7.8 7.73 75,043 7.11
9.69-14.33 329,250 9.7 13.19 1,650 9.69
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1.95-14.33 893,661 6.1 $ 7.78 343,747 $ 4.02
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At December 31, 1996, 380,253 shares were available for additional grants.
401(K) SAVINGS PLAN
The Company has a 401(k) Savings Plan under which eligible employees may elect
to make tax deferred contributions from their annual salary, to a maximum
established annually by the IRS. The Company matches 20% of the employees'
contributions. The Company may make additional contributions to the plan at the
discretion of the Board of Directors. All employees meeting age and service
requirements are eligible to participate in the Plan. Company contributions vest
after 3 years of service. Company contributions during 1996, 1995 and 1994 which
are funded currently, totaled $46,000, $43,000 and $37,000, respectively.
SALARY CONTINUATION PLAN
In 1996 the Company established a salary continuation plan for five officers
which provides for retirement benefits upon reaching age 63. The Company accrues
such post-retirement benefits over the vesting periods (of five or ten years).
In the event of a change in control of the Company, the officers' benefits will
fully vest. The Company accrued $250,000 in 1996.
EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
Effective January 1, 1996, the Company established an employee stock ownership
plan. Under this plan, the Company intends to make contributions which will be
invested primarily in Company stock. All full time employees meeting the age and
service requirements are eligible to participate and will receive a share of
each company contribution either in proportion to their annual compensation
expense or in an equal amount for each eligible employee at the discretion of
the Company. Contributions vest to each employee based on their years of service
( three to seven years). Upon retirement, employees will receive the value of
the amounts which have been accumulated in their accounts in the form of Company
stock.
60
61
Contributions to the plan are at the discretion of the Company. Company
contributions during 1996 totaled $50,000.
ADDITIONAL STOCK PLAN INFORMATION
As discussed in Note 1, the Company continues to account for its stock-based
awards using the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles
Board No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and its related
interpretations. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized in the
financial statements for employee stock arrangements.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation", (SFAS 123) requires the disclosure of pro forma net income and
earnings per share had the Company adopted the fair value method as of the
beginning of fiscal 1995. Under SFAS 123, the fair value of stock-based awards
to employees is calculated through the use of option pricing models, even though
such models were developed to estimate the fair value of freely tradable, fully
transferable options without vesting restrictions, which significantly differ
from the Company's stock option awards. These models also require subjective
assumptions, including future stock price volatility and expected time to
exercise, which greatly affect the calculated values. The Company's calculations
were made using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
weighted average assumptions: expected life, four years following vesting;
average stock volatility of 12%; average risk free interest rate of 5.79%; and
no dividends during the expected term. The Company's calculations are based on a
multiple option valuation approach and forfeitures are recognized as they occur.
If the computed fair values of the 1995 and 1996 awards had been amortized to
expense over the vesting period of the awards, pro forma net income would have
been $4,203,000 ($0.93 per share) in 1995 and $5,348,000 ($1.14 per share) in
1996. However, the impact of outstanding non-vested stock options granted prior
to 1995 has been excluded from the pro forma calculation; accordingly, the 1995
and 1996 pro forma adjustments are not indicative of future period pro forma
adjustments, when the calculation will apply to all applicable stock options.
NOTE 12. DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS. The following
disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in
accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures About Fair Value
of Financial Instruments". The estimated fair value amounts have been determined
by using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.
However, considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop
the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented are not
necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market
exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation techniques
may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
61
62
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1996 December 31, 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying Estimated Carrying Estimated
In thousands Amount Fair Value Amount Fair Value
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents $ 60,657 $ 60,657 $ 74,679 $ 74,679
Interest-bearing deposits in other
financial institutions 999 999 4,492 4,496
Securities 70,877 70,835 79,643 80,113
Loans held for sale 447 483 540 585
Loans, net 235,992 236,060 191,000 191,166
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
Demand deposits 166,541 166,541 142,620 142,620
Time deposits 82,472 82,863 62,419 62,794
Savings 89,650 89,650 121,050 121,050
The following estimates and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of
the financial instruments.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair
value.
INTEREST-BEARING DEPOSITS IN OTHER FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND SECURITIES - Fair
values of interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions and
securities are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes. If a quoted
market price was not available, fair value was estimated using quoted market
prices for similar securities.
LOANS, NET - Fair values for certain commercial, construction, revolving
customer credit and other loans were estimated by discounting the future cash
flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with
similar credit ratings and similar maturities, adjusted for the allowance for
credit losses.
Certain adjustable rate loans have been valued at their carrying values, if no
significant changes in credit standing have occurred since origination and the
interest rate adjustment characteristics of the loan effectively adjust the
interest rate to maintain a market rate of return. For adjustable rate loans
which have had changes in credit quality, appropriate adjustments to the fair
value of the loans are made.
DEMAND DEPOSITS, TIME DEPOSITS AND SAVINGS - The fair value of
noninterest-bearing and adjustable rate deposits and savings is the amount
payable upon demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-rate
interest-bearing deposits with fixed maturity dates was estimated by discounting
the cash flows using rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining
maturities.
62
63
OFF-BALANCE SHEET INSTRUMENTS - The fair value of commitments to extend credit
is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements,
taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present
credit-worthiness of the counterparties. The fair values of standby and
commercial letters of credit are based on fees currently charged for similar
agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the
obligations with the counterparties. The fair values of such off-balance sheet
instruments were not significant at December 31, 1996 and 1995 and, therefore,
have not been included in the table above.
NOTE 13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES. In the normal course of business there
are various commitments outstanding to extend credit which are not reflected in
the financial statements, including loan commitments of approximately
$80,055,000 and standby letters of credit and financial guarantees of $1,551,000
at December 31, 1996. The Bank does not anticipate any losses as a result of
these transactions.
Approximately $16,068,000 of loan commitments outstanding at December 31, 1996
relate to construction loans and are expected to fund within the next twelve
months. The remainder relate primarily to revolving lines of credit or other
commercial loans. Many of these loan commitments are expected to expire without
being drawn upon. Therefore the total commitments do not necessarily represent
future cash requirements.
Stand-by letters of credit are commitments written by the Bank to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. These guarantees are issued
primarily relating to purchases of inventory by the Bank's commercial customers,
are typically short-term in nature and virtually all such commitments are
collateralized.
Most of the outstanding commitments to extend credit are at variable rates tied
to the Bank's reference rate of interest. The Company's exposure to credit loss
in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument
for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit issued is the
contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit
policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for
on-balance-sheet instruments. The Company controls the credit risk of the
off-balance sheet financial instruments through the normal credit approval and
monitoring process.
63
64
NOTE 14. RELATED PARTY LOANS. The Company makes loans to officers and directors
and their associates subject to loan committee approval and ratification by the
Board of Directors. These transactions are on substantially the same terms as
those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unaffiliated
parties and do not involve more than normal risk of collectibility. An analysis
of changes in related party loans for the year ended December 31, 1996 is as
follows:
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beginning balance Additions Repayments Ending balance
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$7,170,000 $10,948,000 $ 8,372,000 $ 9,746,000
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committed lines of credit, undisbursed loans and standby letters of credit to
directors and officers at December 31, 1996 were approximately $1,746,000.
NOTE 15. REGULATORY MATTERS. The Company is subject to various regulatory
capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet
minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly,
additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a
direct material effect on the Company's financial statements. Capital adequacy
guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action require
that the Company meet specific capital adequacy guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of the Company's assets, liabilities and certain
off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The
Company's capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative
judgments by the regulators about components, risk weighting and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy
require the Company to maintain minimum ratios of total and Tier 1 capital (as
defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and a minimum
leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined). Management
believes, as of December 31, 1996 that the Company meets all capital adequacy
requirements to which it is subject.
As of December 31, 1996 and 1995, the most recent notifications from the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the Banks as well capitalized under
the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well
capitalized the Banks must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based
and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or
events since that notification that management believes have changed the
institution's category.
64
65
The following table shows the Company's and the Banks' actual capital amounts
and ratios at December 31, as well as the minimum capital ratios to be
categorized as "well capitalized" under the regulatory framework:
To Be Categorized
Well Capitalized Under
For Capital Prompt Corrective
Actual Adequacy Purposes: Action Provisions:
------------------ ------------------ --------------------
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
------ ----- ------ ----- ------ -----
As of December 31, 1996:
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
COMPANY 39,562,000 15.4% 20,584,000 8.0% N/A
Bank of Salinas 34,134,000 15.1% 18,043,000 8.0% 22,554,000 10.0%
Cypress Bank 4,700,000 15.1% 2,493,000 8.0% 3,117,000 10.0%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
COMPANY 36,332,000 14.1% 10,292,000 4.0% N/A
Bank of Salinas 31,302,000 13.9% 9,021,000 4.0% 13,532,000 6.0%
Cypress Bank 4,309,000 13.8% 1,247,000 4.0% 1,870,000 6.0%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
COMPANY 36,332,000 10.1% 14,321,000 4.0% N/A
Bank of Salinas 31,302,000 10.1% 9,326,000 3.0% 15,543,000 5.0%
Cypress Bank 4,309,000 9.1% 1,887,000 4.0% 2,358,000 5.0%
As of December 31, 1995:
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
COMPANY 32,655,000 15.0% 17,395,000 8.0% N/A
Bank of Salinas 28,117,000 15.1% 14,852,000 8.0% 18,565,000 10.0%
Cypress Bank 4,327,000 13.6% 2,536,000 8.0% 3,170,000 10.0%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
COMPANY 29,916,000 13.8% 8,697,000 4.0% N/A
Bank of Salinas 25,776,000 13.9% 7,426,000 4.0% 11,139,000 6.0%
Cypress Bank 3,930,000 12.4% 1,268,000 4.0% 1,902,000 6.0%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
COMPANY 29,916,000 9.1% 13,180,000 4.0% N/A
Bank of Salinas 25,776,000 8.8% 11,662,000 4.0% 14,578,000 5.0%
Cypress Bank 3,930,000 10.4% 1,516,000 4.0% 1,895,000 5.0%
The ability of the Company to pay cash dividends in the future will largely
depend upon the cash dividends paid to it by its subsidiary Banks. Under State
and Federal law regulating banks, cash dividends declared by a Bank in any
calendar year generally may not exceed its undistributed net income for the
preceding three fiscal years, less distributions to the Company, or its retained
earnings. Under these provisions, and considering minimum regulatory capital
requirements, the amount available for distribution from the Banks to the
Company was approximately $10,484,000 as of December 31, 1996.
The Banks are subject to certain restrictions under the Federal Reserve Act,
including restrictions on the extension of credit to affiliates. In particular,
the Banks are prohibited from lending to the Company unless the loans are
secured by
65
66
specified types of collateral. Such secured loans and other advances
from the Banks are limited to 10% of Bank shareholders' equity, or a combined
maximum of $3,561,000 at December 31, 1996. No such advances were made during
1996 or 1995.
NOTE 16. CENTRAL COAST BANCORP (Parent Company Only)
The condensed financial statements of Central Coast Bancorp follow (in
thousands):
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1996 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assets:
Cash - interest bearing account with Bank $ 74 $ 315
Investment in Banks 35,611 29,706
Premises and equipment, net 68 --
Other assets 844 80
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total assets $36,597 $30,101
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity:
Liabilities $ 265 $ 185
Common stock 30,856 25,860
Retained earnings 5,476 4,056
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $36,597 $30,101
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONDENSED INCOME STATEMENTS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Years ended December 31, 1996 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management fees $ 840
Cash dividends received from the Banks 500 $ 600
Operating expenses 1,737 437 $ 91
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in
undistributed net income of Banks (397) 163 (91)
Provision (credit) for income taxes (352) (66) (38)
Equity in undistributed
net income of Banks 5,905 4,096 -
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) $5,860 $4,325 $(53)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
66
67
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Years ended December 31, 1996 1995 1994
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase (decrease) in cash:
Operations:
Net income (loss) $ 5,860 $ 4,325 $ (53)
Adjustments to reconcile net
income (loss) to net cash provided
by operations:
Equity in undistributed
net income of Banks (5,905) (4,096) -
Depreciation 1 - -
(Increase) decrease in other assets (522) (34) (46)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities 80 194 3
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided (used) by operations (486) 389 (96)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investing Activities -
Capital expenditures (69) - -
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financing Activities:
Short-term borrowings - (125) 125
Common stock issued - - 1
Common stock repurchased (5) - (1)
Stock options exercised 319 22 -
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities 314 (103) 125
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (241) 286 29
Cash balance beginning of year 315 29 -
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash, balance end of year $ 74 $ 315 $ 29
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
67
68
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
Not applicable.
68
69
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
The information required by Item 10 of Form 10-K is incorporated by
reference to the information contained in the Company's Proxy Statement for the
1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders which will be filed pursuant to Regulation
14A.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the
Company's directors, executive officers and ten percent or more shareholders of
the Company's equity securities, to file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes of ownership of
the Company's equity securities. Officers, directors and ten percent or more
shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies
of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To the Company's knowledge, based solely
on review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written
representations that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1996, except for Directors Souza and Glover, each of whom
failed to timely file one report on Form 3, all Section 16(a) filing
requirements applicable to its executive officers, directors and beneficial
owners of ten percent or more of the Company's equity securities appear to have
been met.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by Item 11 of Form 10-K is incorporated by
reference to the information contained in the Company's Proxy Statement for the
1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders which will be filed pursuant to Regulation
14A.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
The information required by Item 12 of Form 10-K is incorporated by
reference to the information contained in the Company's Proxy Statement for the
1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders which will be filed pursuant to Regulation
14A.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by Item 13 of Form 10-K is incorporated by
reference to the information contained in the Company's Proxy Statement for the
1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders which will be filed pursuant to Regulation
14A.
69
70
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM
8-K
(a)(1) Financial Statements. Listed and included in Part
II, Item 8.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules. Not applicable.
(3) Exhibits.
(2.1) Agreement and Plan of Reorganization
and Merger by and between Central
Coast Bancorp, CCB Merger Company
and Cypress Coast Bank dated as of
December 5, 1995, incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 99.1 to Form
8-K filed with the Commission on
December 7, 1995.
(3.1) Articles of Incorporation
incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 4.8 to Registration Statement
on Form S-8 No. 33-89948 filed with
the Commission on March 3, 1995.
(3.2) Bylaws incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 4.9 to Registration Statement
on Form S-8 No. 33-89948 filed with
the Commission on March 3, 1995.
(4.1) Specimen form of Central Coast
Bancorp stock certificate
incorporated by reference from the
Company's 1994 Annual Report on Form
10K.
(10.1) Lease agreement dated December 12,
1994, related to 301 Main Street,
Salinas, California incorporated by
reference from the Company's 1994
Annual Report on Form 10K.
(10.2) King City Branch Lease incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to
Registration Statement on Form S-4
No. 33-76972, filed with the
Commission on March 28, 1994.
(10.3) Amendment to King City Branch Lease
incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.4 to Registration
Statement on Form S-4 No. 33-76972,
filed with the Commission on March
28, 1994.
*(10.4) 1982 Stock Option Plan, as amended,
incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 4.2 to Registration
Statement on Form S-8 No. 33-89948,
filed with the Commission on
70
71
March 3, 1995.
*(10.5) Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option
Agreement under the 1982 Stock
Option Plan incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 4.6 to
Registration Statement on Form S-8
No. 33-89948, filed with the
Commission on March 3, 1995.
*(10.6) Form of Incentive Stock Option
Agreement under the 1982 Stock
Option Plan incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 4.7 to
Registration Statement on Form S-8
No. 33-89948, filed with the
Commission on March 3, 1995.
*(10.7) 1994 Stock Option Plan incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to
Registration Statement on Form S-8
No. 33-89948, filed with the
Commission on March 3, 1995.
*(10.8) Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option
Agreement under the 1994 Stock
Option Plan incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 4.3 to
Registration Statement on Form S-8
No. 33-89948, filed with Commission
on March 3, 1995.
*(10.9) Form of Incentive Stock Option
Agreement under the 1994 Stock
Option Plan incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 4.4 to
Registration Statement on Form S-8
No. 33-89948, filed with the
commission on March 3, 1995.
*(10.10) Form of Director Nonstatutory Stock
Option Agreement under the 1994
Stock Option Plan incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 4.5 to
Registration Statement on Form S-8
No. 33-89948, filed with the
commission on March 3, 1995.
*(10.11) Form of Bank of Salinas
Indemnification Agreement for
directors and executive officers
incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.9 to Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement on Form S-4
No. 33-76972, filed with the
commission on April 15, 1994.
*(10.12) 401(k) Pension and Profit Sharing
Plan Summary Plan Description
incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.8 to Registration
Statement on Form S-4 No. 33-76972,
71
72
filed with the Commission on March
28, 1994.
*(10.13) Specimen form of Employment
Agreement.
*(10.14) Specimen form of Executive Salary
Continuation Agreement
*(10.15) 1994 Stock Option Plan, as amended,
incorporated by reference from
Exhibit A to the Proxy statement
filed with the Commission on
September 3, 1996 in connection with
Central Coast Bancorp's 1996 Annual
Shareholders' Meeting held on
September 23, 1996.
(10.16) Specimen for of Indemnification
Agreement, incorporated by reference
from Exhibit D to the Proxy
statement filed with the Commission
on September 3, 1996 in connection
with Central Coast Bancorp's 1996
Annual Shareholders' Meeting held on
September 23, 1996.
(10.17) Purchase and Assumption Agreement
for the Aquisistion of Wells Fargo
Bank Branches
*(10.18) Employee Stock Ownership Plan and
Trust Agreement
(21.1) The Registrant's only subsidiaries
are its wholly-owned subsidiaries,
Bank of Salinas and Cypress Bank.
(23.1) Independent auditors' consent.
(27) Financial Data Schedule
*Denotes management contracts, compensatory plans or
arrangements.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K. - none
An Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, and Notice of
Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement for the Company's 1997 Annual Meeting will
be mailed to security holders subsequent to the date of filing this Report.
Copies of said materials will be furnished to the Commission in accordance with
the Commission's Rules and Regulations.
72
73
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CENTRAL COAST BANCORP
Date: March 24, 1997 By: /s/ Nick Ventimiglia
-------------------------------
Nick Ventimiglia, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: March 24, 1997 By: /s/ Thomas A. Sa
-------------------------------
Thomas A. Sa, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial
Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature Title Date
--------- ------- ----
/s/ Andrew E. Ausonio Director 3/24/97
- ----------------------------
(Andrew E. Ausonio)
/s/ C. Edward Boutonnet Director 3/24/97
- ----------------------------
(C. Edward Boutonnet)
Director 3/24/97
- ----------------------------
(Bradford G. Crandall)
Director 3/24/97
- ----------------------------
(Alfred P. Glover)
Director 3/24/97
- ----------------------------
(Richard C. Green)
/s/ Robert M. Mraule Director 3/24/97
- ----------------------------
(Robert M. Mraule)
/s/ Duncan L. McCarter Director 3/24/97
- ----------------------------
(Duncan L. McCarter)
Director 3/24/97
- ----------------------------
(Louis A. Souza)
Director 3/24/97
- ----------------------------
(Mose E. Thomas)
/s/ Nick Ventimiglia Chairman, President 3/24/97
- ---------------------------- and CEO
(Nick Ventimiglia)
73
74
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Sequential
Number Description Page Number
- ------ ----------- -----------
10.13 Specimen form of Employment Agreement 75
10.14 Specimen form of Executive Salary
Continuation Agreement 85
10.17 Purchase and Assumption Agreement for
the Aquisition of Wells Fargo Bank Branches 101
10.18 Employee Stock Ownership Plan and
Trust Agreement 162
23.1 Independent auditors' consent. 242
27 Financial Data Schedule
74