[LETTERHEAD OF THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.]



Via EDGAR, U.S. Mail and Facsimile to (202) 772-9210
- ----------------------------------------------------

July 20, 2006

United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F Street, NE
Washington, D.C. 20549

Attention:    Ms. Angela Connell
              Senior Accountant
              Mail Stop 4561

Re:           The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
              Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended November 25, 2005
                ("2005 Form 10-K")
              File No. 001-14965

Dear Ms. Connell:

We are in receipt of the letter, dated June 29, 2006, to David A. Viniar, Chief
Financial Officer of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. from the staff of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "staff"), regarding our 2005 Form 10-K.
We appreciate the staff's careful review of our Form 10-K and its flexibility in
extending the time for our response. For your convenience, we have included the
staff's comments below and have keyed our responses accordingly.

In response to five of the staff's comments, we will incorporate new disclosures
in our third quarter 2006 Form 10-Q. We have either included or described these
proposed new disclosures in this letter (see comments 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7). Our
response to the remaining comments (see comments 1 and 2) also follow below.

Consolidated Statements of Earnings - page 102
- ----------------------------------------------

1.   We note that with the exception of your power generation activities, you do
     not separately present your costs and expenses applicable to services on
     your Statements of Earnings. We also note that you report revenues
     inclusive of interest income and interest expense and that you do not
     separately present operating and non-operating income and expenses. Please
     tell us:

     o    Whether you track costs related to each of your separately presented
          revenue line items;

     o    Your basis for characterizing interest income and interest expense as
          "revenues;" and

     o    Your basis for not separately presenting operating and non-operating
          income and expenses.

     Refer to Rule 5-01 and 5-03 of Regulation S-X.


                                       1



     Response:
     ---------

     For your convenience, we have repeated each of the staff's points below and
     have keyed our responses accordingly.

     o    Whether you track costs related to each of your separately presented
          revenue line items.

     We track operating expenses related to the following revenue line items:
     investment banking, trading and principal investments, and asset management
     and securities services. For these line items, we disclose (i) revenues,
     net of interest expense and cost of power generation, (ii) operating
     expenses and (iii) pre-tax earnings in the footnotes to our financial
     statements (see Note 16 on page 147 of the firm's 2005 Form 10-K).

     o    Your basis for characterizing interest income and interest expense as
          "revenues."

     We report interest income as part of "Total revenues" in accordance with
     the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Brokers and Dealers in Securities.
     We report total revenues, net of interest expense, because funding costs
     are integral to and a direct function of our revenue generating activities.
     We believe our revenues and related funding costs are inextricably linked,
     similar to cost of goods sold for a manufacturing concern. For that reason,
     we do not evaluate revenues excluding interest expenses in assessing the
     performance of our businesses.

     o    Your basis for not separately presenting operating and non-operating
          income and expenses.

     We note that Rule 5-03 of Regulation S-X requires separate presentation of
     non-operating income and expenses. Rule 5-03 does not explicitly provide a
     definition of non-operating (versus operating) income and expenses, but
     provides examples, including dividends, interest on securities and net
     profits on securities. We believe that the implicit principle in Rule 5-03
     is that operating revenues and expenses relate to an entity's ongoing major
     or central operations, whereas non-operating revenues and expenses relate
     to peripheral activities or incidental transactions. For example,
     dividends, interest and net profits on securities would most likely be
     non-operating items for an industrial company as they are typically part of
     peripheral activities.

     For a broker-dealer, however, dividends, interest and net profits on
     securities relate to ongoing major activities, which principally consist of
     purchasing, selling, borrowing and lending financial instruments.
     Consequently, we consider dividends, interest and net profits on securities
     to be part of our operating activities. Furthermore, in reviewing all of
     our activities, we believe that substantially all of our revenues and
     expenses relate to ongoing major or central operations.


Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies.  Revenue Recognition - Financial
Instruments - page 109
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

2.   We note your supplemental response dated February 1, 2006 regarding your
     application of the AICPA Broker Dealer Guide and your fair value accounting
     policy. In light of EITF deliberations we will defer further consideration
     of this issue until it has been determined whether this issue will be added
     to the EITF agenda. We may have comments at a future date.

     Response:
     ---------

     We acknowledge that the staff may have future comments regarding
     application of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Brokers and Dealers
     in Securities.


                                       2




Note 3: Financial Instruments - Derivative Activities - page 118
- ----------------------------------------------------------------

3.   You have disclosed throughout your filing that substantially all of your
     derivative transactions are entered into for trading purposes, to
     facilitate client transactions, to take proprietary positions or as a means
     of risk management. Given the significance of derivative activities to your
     overall business model and your various objectives for holding or issuing
     such instruments, please revise future filings to provide comprehensive
     disclosure that distinguishes among the following:

     o    Derivatives used for trading purposes (including exchange-traded and
          OTC derivatives);

     o    Derivatives designated as qualifying hedges in a fair value, cash flow
          or foreign currency hedging relationship;

     o    Derivatives used as economic hedges; and

     o    Any other financial instruments that meet the definition of a
          derivative (including other stand-alone derivatives and embedded
          derivatives requiring bifurcation).

     Response:
     ---------

     We separate our derivative financial instruments into those held for
     trading purposes (including "economic" hedges) and those designated as
     qualifying hedges under SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
     Instruments and Hedging Activities." We will include the following
     disclosure (illustrated using November 25, 2005 amounts) in our third
     quarter 2006 Form 10-Q and subsequent filings.

         The fair value of derivative financial instruments, computed in
         accordance with the firm's netting policy, is set forth below:

                                                           AS OF
                                               ----------------------------
                                                       NOVEMBER 2005
                                               ----------------------------
                                                ASSETS          LIABILITIES
                                                ------          -----------
                                                      (in millions)

          Forward settlement contracts.......  $ 13,921           $ 15,345
          Swap agreements....................    25,865             22,001
          Option contracts...................    18,746             20,483
                                               --------           --------
          Total .............................  $ 58,532           $ 57,829
                                               ========           ========

         Certain derivative instruments are accounted for as qualifying hedges
         under SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
         Hedging Activities." The fair value of these derivative instruments
         consisted of $2.10 billion in assets and $443 million in liabilities
         as of November 25, 2005.

         The firm also has embedded derivatives that have been bifurcated from
         related borrowings under SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
         Instruments and Hedging Activities." Such derivatives, which are
         classified in short-term and long-term borrowings, had a carrying
         value of $607 million (excluding the debt host contract) as of
         November 25, 2005. See Notes 4 and 5 for further information regarding
         the firm's borrowings.


                                       3





4.   Please revise future filings to clarify when you use the term "hedge"
     whether you are referring to an economic hedging relationship or a fair
     value, cash flow or foreign currency hedging relationship in which you have
     applied the hedge accounting guidance in SFAS No. 133.

     Response:
     ---------

     In our third quarter 2006 Form 10-Q and subsequent filings, we will clarify
     when we use the term "hedge" whether we are referring to (i) an economic
     hedging relationship or (ii) a fair value, cash flow or foreign currency
     hedging relationship in which we have applied the hedge accounting guidance
     in SFAS No. 133.


5.   In the last paragraph on page 118, you disclose that you apply fair value
     hedge accounting to derivative contracts that hedge the benchmark interest
     rate on fixed rate long-term borrowings and cash flow hedge accounting to
     derivative contracts that hedge changes in interest rates associated with
     floating rate long-term borrowings related to your power generation
     facilities. Please revise future filings to disclose the specific types of
     derivative instruments used in these hedging strategies and the methods
     used to both prospectively and retrospectively assess hedge effectiveness.

     Response:
     ---------

     In our third quarter 2006 Form 10-Q and subsequent filings, we will modify
     our disclosures to reference the specific types of derivative instruments
     used in our hedging strategies as well as the methods we use to both
     prospectively and retrospectively assess hedge effectiveness. We have
     included our modified disclosure below:

         The firm enters into derivative transactions to facilitate client
         transactions, to take proprietary positions and as a means of risk
         management. Risk exposures are managed through diversification, by
         controlling position sizes and by entering into offsetting positions.
         For example, the firm may manage the risk related to a portfolio of
         common stock by entering into an offsetting position in a related
         equity-index futures contract. Gains and losses on derivatives used for
         trading purposes are generally included in "Trading and principal
         investments" in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings.

         The firm applies hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for
         Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" to certain derivative
         contracts. The firm uses these derivatives to manage certain interest
         rate and currency exposures, including the firm's net investment in
         non-U.S. operations. The firm designates certain interest rate swap
         contracts as fair value hedges. These interest rate swap contracts
         hedge changes in the relevant benchmark interest rate (e.g., London
         Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)), effectively converting a substantial
         portion of the firm's long-term and certain short-term borrowings into
         floating rate obligations. In addition, the firm applies cash flow
         hedge accounting to foreign currency forward contracts that hedge
         currency exposure on certain forecasted transactions in its
         consolidated power generation facilities. See Note 2 for information
         regarding the firm's policy on foreign currency forward contracts used
         to hedge its net investment in non-U.S. operations.

         The firm applies long-haul hedge accounting to substantially all of its
         hedge accounting relationships and performs an ongoing assessment of
         the effectiveness of these transactions in achieving offsetting changes
         in fair value or offsetting cash flows attributable to the risk being
         hedged. The firm primarily utilizes scenario analyses to prospectively
         assess hedge effectiveness and the dollar-offset method, which involves
         comparing the change in the fair value of the hedging instrument with
         the change in the fair value of the hedged item, to retrospectively
         assess hedge effectiveness. For fair value hedges, gains or losses on
         derivative transactions as well as the hedged item are recognized in
         net revenues in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings. For


                                       4



         cash flow hedges, the effective portion of gains or losses on
         derivative transactions is reported as a component of "Other
         comprehensive income." Gains or losses related to hedge ineffectiveness
         for all hedges are included in net revenues. These gains or losses and
         the component of gains or losses on derivative transactions excluded
         from the assessment of hedge effectiveness (e.g., the effect of time
         value on fair value hedges of the firm's borrowings) were not material
         to the firm's results of operations.


Note 3: Financial Instruments - Securitization Activities - page 119
- --------------------------------------------------------------------

6.   Please revise future filings to provide each of the specific disclosures
     required by paragraphs 17(f) and 17(g) of SFAS 140 with respect to your
     securitization activities. Such disclosures should include, but are not
     limited to, the following:

     o    Describe the extent to which you maintain any continuing involvement
          with the transferred assets (i.e. servicing, recourse, restrictions on
          retained interests);

     o    Describe the types of retained interests that you hold;

     o    Describe your accounting policies and key assumptions used for both
          initially and subsequently measuring the fair value of retained
          interests; and

     o    Quantify the gain or loss from securitization activities for each
          period presented.

     Please note that the disclosures required by paragraphs 17(f) and 17(g)
     should be presented for each major asset type (for example, mortgage loans,
     credit card receivables, and automobile loans).

     Response:
     ---------

     For your convenience, we have repeated each of the staff's points below and
     have keyed our responses accordingly.

     o    Describe the extent to which you maintain any continuing involvement
          with the transferred assets (i.e. servicing, recourse, restrictions on
          retained interests).

     o    Describe the types of retained interests that you hold.

     The firm maintains a continuing involvement with transferred assets by (i)
     retaining interests in securitized assets, primarily in the form of senior
     or subordinated securities, including residual interests, and (ii) through
     servicing rights. The fair value of servicing rights held by the firm is
     not material to our financial statements or disclosures (the fair value was
     approximately $17 million as of November 25, 2005). We will include
     disclosure in our third quarter 2006 Form 10-Q and subsequent filings on
     the types of retained interests we hold and will disclose the fair value of
     servicing rights if that amount becomes material.

     o    Describe your accounting policies and key assumptions used for both
          initially and subsequently measuring the fair value of retained
          interests.

     The firm accounts for financial assets at fair value both initially and
     subsequent to securitization. The assumptions used in valuing retained
     interests at the time of securitization are consistent with those used in
     valuing the underlying assets prior to securitization. The methodologies
     applied in estimating fair value for these financial instruments are
     consistent with those used for other cash trading instruments, as described
     in "Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies - Revenue Recognition -
     Financial Instruments" (see page 109 of the firm's 2005 Form 10-K). The
     weighted average key economic assumptions used in measuring retained
     interests with reasonable, little or no price transparency at period end
     are presented in "Note 3: Financial Instruments - Securitization
     Activities,"


                                       5



     along with the sensitivity of the fair values of such instruments to
     changes in the key economic assumptions.

     o    Quantify the gain or loss from securitization activities for each
          period presented.

     Since the firm accounts for financial assets held prior to securitization
     at fair value, with related unrealized gains or losses recognized in
     net revenues, gains or losses on the sale of financial assets in
     securitizations are not material to our results of operations (the gains at
     the time of securitization were less than 0.5% of net revenues for the year
     ended November 25, 2005). We will disclose gains or losses from
     securitization activities in our third quarter 2006 Form 10-Q and
     subsequent filings if such amounts become material.

     o    Please note that the disclosures required by paragraphs 17(f) and
          17(g) should be presented for each major asset type (for example,
          mortgage loans, credit card receivables, and automobile loans).

     The majority of the firm's securitization proceeds involve residential
     mortgage-related assets (71% of total securitization proceeds for the year
     ended November 25, 2005). If any other asset type becomes material, we will
     disclose the securitization proceeds from that asset type in our subsequent
     filings.

     Retained interests in mortgage-backed securitizations represented the
     majority of the firm's retained interests as disclosed in the table of
     weighted average key economic assumptions in "Note 3: Financial Instruments
     - Securitization Activities" in our 2005 Form 10-K. Retained interests in
     corporate debt securitizations amounted to $1.28 billion of the $1.80
     billion disclosed in the Corporate Debt and Other category in the table. We
     will disclose retained interests in corporate debt securitizations as a
     separate category in our third quarter 2006 Form 10-Q and subsequent
     filings.



Note 3: Financial Instruments - Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) - page 121
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

7.   In light of the wide range of entities in which you hold a variable
     interest, please revise future filings to provide the disclosures required
     by paragraphs 23-26 of FIN 46R for each VIE in which you hold a significant
     variable interest. We note that paragraph 25 of FIN 46R permits aggregated
     disclosure for similar entities if separate reporting would not add
     material information. Accordingly, we believe that such entities should
     truly be similar in nature, purpose and type of activities in order to
     conclude that separate reporting would not provide material information to
     an investor. Where you believe aggregation in your proposed disclosure is
     appropriate, please tell us the nature, purpose and type of activities of
     the entities being aggregated and how you determined they were similar
     enough to justify such aggregation.

     Response:
     ---------

     In the table below, we have disaggregated the firm's interests in
     consolidated VIEs. We will include this table (illustrated using May 26,
     2006 amounts) in our third quarter 2006 Form 10-Q and subsequent filings:

         The following table sets forth the firm's total assets and maximum
         exposure to loss associated with its significant variable interests in
         consolidated VIEs where the firm does not hold a majority voting
         interest. The firm has aggregated consolidated VIEs based upon
         principal business activity, as reflected in the first column.


                                       6






                                                            AS OF MAY 2006
                                                    --------------------------------
                                                                         MAXIMUM
                                                      VIE ASSETS    EXPOSURE TO LOSS
                                                    --------------------------------
                                                            (in millions)
                                                                   
Investments in loans and real estate ............       $2,107           $  646
Municipal bonds .................................        1,903            1,903
Mortgage-backed and other asset-backed ..........          663              217
Asset repackagings and credit-linked notes ......          940              645
Investments in preferred stock ..................          442              245
Foreign exchange and commodities ................          726              368
Other ...........................................          155              288
                                                        ------           ------
Total ...........................................       $6,936           $4,312
                                                        ======           ======



                                      * * *

As requested in your letter, the Company hereby acknowledges that: the Company
is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the Form 10-K;
staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not
foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and
the Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding
initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of
the United States.

Please feel free to call me (212-902-5675) if you have any questions about the
foregoing, or if you would like to further discuss any of the matters raised in
this response letter.

Sincerely,



/s/ Sarah E. Smith
- -----------------------
Sarah E. Smith
Principal Accounting Officer

cc:  Margaret Fitzgerald
     (Securities and Exchange Commission)

     David A. Viniar, Chief Financial Officer
     (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.)


                                       7