SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 For the quarter ended September 30, 1998 Commission File Number 33-24180 AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. ---------------------------------------------------- (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Hawaii 36-3109397 (State of organization) (IRS Employer Identification No.) For the quarter ended September 30, 1998 Commission File Number 33-24180-01 AMFAC/JMB FINANCE, INC. ------------------------------------------------------ (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Illinois 36-3611183 (State of organization) (IRS Employer Identification No.) 900 N. Michigan Ave., Chicago, IL 60611 (Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code 312-440-4800 See Table of Additional Registrants Below. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [ ] As of November 12, 1998, all of Amfac/JMB Hawaii L.L.C.'s membership interest is solely owned by Northbrook Corporation, an Illinois corporation, and not traded on a public market. As of November 12, 1998, Amfac/JMB Finance, Inc. had 1,000 shares of Common Stock outstanding. All such Common Stock is owned by its respective parent and not traded on a public market. ADDITIONAL REGISTRANTS (1) Address, including, zip code, and Exact name of State or other telephone number, registrant as jurisdiction of IRS Employer including area code of specified in incorporation Identificationregistrant's principal its Charter or organization Number executive offices - ------------- --------------- ---------------------------------------- Amfac Land Hawaii 99-0185633 900 North Michigan Avenue Company, Chicago, Illinois 60611 Limited. 312/440-4800 Amfac Property Hawaii 99-0150751 900 North Michigan Avenue Development Chicago, Illinois 60611 Corp. 312/440-4800 Amfac Hawaii 99-0202331 900 North Michigan Avenue Property Chicago, Illinois 60611 Investment 312/440-4800 Corp. H. Hackfeld Hawaii 99-0037425 900 North Michigan Avenue & Co., Ltd. Chicago, Illinois 60611 312/440-4800 Kaanapali Hawaii 99-0176334 900 North Michigan Avenue Estate Chicago, Illinois 60611 Coffee, Inc. 312/440-4800 Kaanapali Hawaii 99-0185634 900 North Michigan Avenue Water Chicago, Illinois 60611 Corporation 312/440-4800 Kekaha Sugar Hawaii 99-0044650 900 North Michigan Avenue Company, Chicago, Illinois 60611 Limited 312/440-4800 The Lihue Hawaii 99-0046535 900 North Michigan Avenue Plantation Chicago, Illinois 60611 Company, 312/440-4800 Limited Oahu Sugar Hawaii 99-0105277 900 North Michigan Avenue Company, Chicago, Illinois 60611 Limited 312/440-4800 Pioneer Mill Hawaii 99-0105278 900 North Michigan Avenue Company, Chicago, Illinois 60611 Limited 312/440-4800 Puna Sugar Hawaii 99-0051215 900 North Michigan Avenue Company, Chicago, Illinois 60611 Limited 312/440-4800 Waiahole Hawaii 99-0144307 900 North Michigan Avenue Irrigation Chicago, Illinois 60611 Company, 312/440-4800 Limited Waikele Golf Hawaii 99-0304744 900 North Michigan Avenue Club, Inc. Chicago, Illinois 60611 312/440-4800 1) The Additional Registrants listed are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the registrant and are guarantors of the registrant's Certificate of Land Appreciation Notes due 2008. TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. . . 26 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K . . . . . . . . . 42 PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Consolidated Balance Sheets September 30, 1998 and December 31, 1997 (Dollars in Thousands) (Unaudited) SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31, 1998 1997 ------------- ----------- A S S E T S - ----------- Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 21,073 9,115 Receivables-net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,519 6,743 Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,251 61,469 Prepaid expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,316 2,648 -------- -------- Total current assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99,159 79,975 -------- -------- Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 46,496 -------- -------- Property, plant and equipment: Land and land improvements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301,087 262,233 Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64,407 63,497 Construction in progress. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,502 1,035 -------- -------- 366,996 326,765 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization. . . . . . . . . . . . 43,176 38,726 -------- -------- 323,820 288,039 -------- -------- Deferred expenses, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,106 11,872 Other assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37,509 37,863 -------- -------- $471,634 464,245 ======== ======== AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Consolidated Balance Sheets - Continued September 30, 1998 and December 31, 1997 (Dollars in Thousands) (Unaudited) SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31, 1998 1997 ------------ ----------- L I A B I L I T I E S - --------------------- Current liabilities: Accounts payable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,977 6,289 Accrued expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,831 9,213 Current portion of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,166 11,243 Current portion of deferred income taxes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,067 4,325 Amounts due to affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,867 10,719 -------- -------- Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,908 41,789 -------- -------- Amounts due to affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161,392 125,290 Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51,735 54,375 Long-term debt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100,903 94,312 Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,807 34,525 Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72,073 84,151 Certificate of Land Appreciation Notes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220,692 220,692 -------- -------- Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 686,510 655,134 -------- -------- Commitments and contingencies (notes 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8) S T O C K H O L D E R 'S E Q U I T Y (D E F I C I T ) - --------------------------------------------------------- Common stock, no par value; authorized, issued and outstanding 1,000 shares. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 Additional paid-in capital. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,384 14,384 Retained earnings (deficit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (229,261) (205,274) -------- -------- Total stockholder's equity (deficit). . . . . . . . . . . . . . (214,876) (190,889) -------- -------- $471,634 464,245 ======== ======== <FN> The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Consolidated Statements of Operations Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 1998 and 1997 (Dollars in Thousands) (Unaudited) THREE MONTHS ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30 SEPTEMBER 30 -------------------------- -------------------------- 1998 1997 1998 1997 ----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Revenue: Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 19,572 17,508 22,999 25,774 Property. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,775 13,880 48,672 33,462 -------- -------- -------- -------- 35,347 31,388 71,671 59,236 -------- -------- -------- -------- Cost of sales: Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,506 18,530 23,847 25,948 Property. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,957 12,117 44,050 28,330 -------- -------- -------- -------- 35,463 30,647 67,897 54,278 Operating expenses: Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . 2,518 2,754 7,791 9,332 Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . 1,632 1,523 4,898 4,572 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total costs and expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,613 34,924 80,586 68,182 Operating loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4,266) (3,536) (8,915) (8,946) -------- -------- -------- -------- Non-operating income (expenses): Amortization of deferred costs. . . . . . . . . (323) (301) (951) (1,022) Interest expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (8,576) (7,431) (24,790) (21,438) Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 206 333 286 -------- -------- -------- -------- (8,752) (7,526) (25,408) (22,174) -------- -------- -------- -------- Loss before taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (13,018) (11,062) (34,323) (31,120) -------- -------- -------- -------- Income tax benefit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,053 4,202 14,101 11,893 -------- -------- -------- -------- Net loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (7,965) (6,860) (20,222) (19,227) ======== ======== ======== ======== <FN> The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Nine Months Ended September 30, 1998 and 1997 (Dollars in Thousands) (Unaudited) 1998 1997 --------- --------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(20,222) (19,227) Items not requiring (providing) cash: Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,898 4,572 Amortization of deferred costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 1,022 Equity in earnings of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 10 Income tax benefit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (14,101) (11,893) Deferred interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 650 790 Interest on advances from affiliates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,275 8,629 Changes in: Receivables - net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (16,776) (6,825) Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,469 21,998 Prepaid expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 332 841 Accounts payable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 688 511 Accrued expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (382) (1,853) Amounts due to affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,148 1,589 Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2,821) (3,540) -------- -------- Net cash used in operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3,816) (3,376) -------- -------- Cash flows from investing activities: Property additions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (15,101) (1,945) Property sales, disposals and retirements - net . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 29 Investments in joint ventures and partnerships. . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- (359) Other assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (371) (4,513) Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2,187) (583) -------- -------- Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (17,567) (7,371) -------- -------- AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Continued Nine Months Ended September 30, 1998 and 1997 (Dollars in Thousands) (Unaudited) 1998 1997 --------- --------- Cash flows from financing activities: Deferred expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- (244) Net (repayments) proceeds of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,514 4,188 Net amounts due to affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,827 16,628 -------- -------- Net cash provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,341 20,572 -------- -------- Net increase in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,958 9,825 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year. . . . . . . . . . . . 9,115 8,736 -------- -------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of period. . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 21,073 18,561 ======== ======== Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid for interest (net of amount capitalized). . . . . . . . . . . . $ 15,512 14,229 ======== ======== Schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities: Transfer of property actively held for sale to real estate inventories and accrued costs relating to real estate sales . . . . . $ 21,251 6,894 ======== ======== <FN> The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 1998 and 1997 (Dollars in Thousands) Readers of this quarterly report should refer to the Company's audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, which are included in the Company's 1997 Annual Report, as certain footnote disclosures which would substantially duplicate those contained in such audited financial statements have been omitted from this report. (1) BASIS OF ACCOUNTING Amfac/JMB Hawaii, L.L.C. (the "Company") is a Hawaii limited liability company. The Company is wholly-owned by Northbrook Corporation ("Northbrook"). The primary business activities of the Company are land development and sales, golf course management and agriculture. The Company owns approximately 36,000 acres of land located on the islands of Oahu, Maui, Kauai and Hawaii in the State of Hawaii. All of this land is held by the Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries. In addition to its owned lands, the Company leases approximately 55,000 acres of land used primarily in conjunction with its agricultural operations. The Company's operations are subject to significant government regulation. The Company is the successor to Amfac/JMB Hawaii, Inc. ("A/J Hawaii"). On March 3, 1998, A/J Hawaii was merged (the "Merger") with and into the Company pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated February 27, 1998 by and between A/J Hawaii and the Company (which was then named Amfac/JMB Mergerco, L.L.C.). The Merger was consummated to change the Company's form of entity from a corporation to a limited liability company. The Company was a nominally capitalized limited liability company which was formed on December 24, 1997, solely for the purpose of effecting the Merger. The Company succeeded to all the assets and liabilities of A/J Hawaii in accordance with the Hawaii Business Corporation Act and the Hawaii Uniform Limited Liability Company Act. In addition, A/J Hawaii, the Company, The First National Bank of Chicago (the "Trustee") and various guarantors entered into a Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 1, 1998, pursuant to which the Company expressly assumed all obligations of A/J Hawaii under the Indenture dated as of March 14, 1989, as amended (the "Indenture") by and among A/J Hawaii, the Trustee and the guarantors named therein and the Certificates of Land Appreciation Notes due 2008 Class A (the "Class A COLAs") and the Certificates of Land Appreciation Notes Class B (the "Class B COLAs" and, collectively, with the Class A COLAs the "COLAs"). The Merger did not require the consent of the holders of the COLAs under the terms of the Indenture. The Company has succeeded to A/J Hawaii's reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Unless otherwise indicated, references to the Company prior to March 3, 1998 shall mean A/J Hawaii and A/J Hawaii's subsidiaries. The Company has two primary business segments. The agriculture segment ("Agriculture") is responsible for the Company's activities related to the cultivation and processing of sugar cane and other agricultural products. The real estate segment ("Property") is responsible for development and sales activities related to the Company's owned land, all of which is in the State of Hawaii, and the management and operation of the Company's golf course facilities. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued (Dollars in Thousands) The Company's policy is to consider all amounts held with original maturities of three months or less in U.S. Government obligations, certificates of deposit and money market funds (approximately $18,526 and $5,400 at September 30, 1998 and December 31, 1997, respectively) as cash equivalents, which approximates market. These amounts include $2,415 and $2,067 at September 30, 1998 and December 31, 1997, respectively, which were restricted primarily to fund debt service on long-term debt related to the acquisition of power generation equipment (see note 4). As part of the Company's agriculture operations, the Company enters into commodities futures contracts and options in sugar as deemed appropriate to reduce the risk of future price fluctuations in sugar. The sugar futures contracts obligate the Company to make or receive a payment equal to the net change in value of the contracts at its maturity. The sugar option contracts permit, but do not require, the Company to purchase specified numbers of futures contracts at specified prices until the expiration dates of the contracts. The sugar futures and options contracts are designated as hedges of the Company's firm sales commitments, are short-term in nature to correspond to the commitment period, and are effective in hedging the Company's exposure to changes in sugar prices during that cycle. Investments in certain partnerships and joint ventures, if any, over which the Company exercises significant influence are accounted for by the equity method. To the extent the Company engages in such activities as a general partner, the Company is contingently liable for the obligations of its partnership and joint venture investments. Project costs associated with the acquisition, development and construction of real estate projects are capitalized and classified as construction in progress. Such capitalized costs are not in excess of the project's estimated fair value, as reviewed periodically or as considered necessary. Land actively held for sale and any related development costs transferred from construction in progress are reported as inventories in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are stated at the lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell. For financial reporting purposes, the Company uses the effective interest rate method and accrued interest on the Certificate of Land Appreciation Notes due 2008 ("COLAs") at 4% per annum, which is the "Mandatory Base Interest" (see note 3). Interest is capitalized to qualifying assets (principally real estate under development) during the period that such assets are undergoing activities necessary to prepare them for their intended use. Such capitalized interest is charged to cost of sales as revenue from the real estate development is recognized. Interest costs of $538 and $1,235 have been capitalized for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Net interest received (paid) on contracts that qualify as hedges is recognized over the life of the contract as an adjustment to interest income (expense) of the hedged financial instrument. AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued (Dollars in Thousands) The Company and its subsidiaries report their taxes as part of the consolidated tax return of the Company's parent, Northbrook. The Company and its subsidiaries have entered into a tax indemnification agreement with Northbrook that indemnifies the Company and its subsidiaries for responsibility for all past, present and future federal and state income tax liabilities (other than income taxes which are directly attributable to cancellation of indebtedness income caused by the repurchase or redemption of securities as provided for in or contemplated by the Repurchase Agreement). Current and deferred taxes have been allocated to the Company as if the Company were a separate taxpayer in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109-Accounting for Income Taxes. However, to the extent the tax indemnification agreement does not require the Company to actually pay income taxes, current taxes payable or receivable have been reflected as deemed contributions or distributions, respectively, to additional paid-in capital or distributions to retained earnings (deficit) in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain amounts in the 1997 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 1998 presentation. YEAR 2000 The year 2000 issue is the result of computer programs being written using two digits rather than four to define a year. Consequently, any computer programs that have time-sensitive software may recognize a date using "00" as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. This could result in a system failure or miscalculations causing disruptions of operations including, among other things, a temporary inability to process transactions or engage in other normal business activities. The Company is reviewing its computer systems for year 2000 compliancy. The Company has completed an internal assessment of its information system technology and currently does not anticipate any hardware upgrade; however, it had determined a need to upgrade portions of the Company's software so that its computer systems would function properly with respect to dates in the year 2000 and thereafter. The Company has completed an internal review of its accounting, human resources and payroll applications which are supported by approximately six different major software vendors. Except for the golf course and water company division, the Company has received software upgrades for the financial, human resources and payroll applications and expects to complete testing and implementation of the new software upgrades by the end of 1998. The Company has not incurred and does not expect to incur any costs with respect to the testing and implementation of the software upgrades. The AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued (Dollars in Thousands) accounting systems at the golf courses and the water company are not yet year 2000 compliant. The Company currently expects new accounting system software to be tested and implemented by the end of June 1999 at a cost of approximately $60 to $80. However, in the event the Company's system reveals that, contrary to software vendors claims, the system upgrades or new software are not year 2000 compliant, the Company believes it has the ability to make the necessary changes through the use of third party consultants as well as the utilization of internal resources. The Company does not have an estimate of the length of time which could potentially be required to make these changes, nor an estimate of the costs involved to make such changes. The Company's agriculture operations are testing and reviewing its operational systems at certain of its plantations. At those locations where a review has not been performed and/or completed, reviews are expected to be completed by the end of the first quarter of 1999. The agriculture operations have also begun identifying and contacting key third party vendors with whom these operations have a material relationship to determine their year 2000 readiness and expect to have completed contacting its key vendors by the end of 1998. If these vendors are not year 2000 compliant or are unsuccessful in their efforts to become year 2000 compliant, a disruption in service and supplies may result in the inability of the Company to process and deliver its agricultural products to market. The subsequent loss in revenues might have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Company. The Company's Property operations (which includes the development and sales activities of the Company's land and the Company's golf course operations as well as the Company's water operations) are anticipated to begin testing and review of their operational systems in the fourth quarter of 1998. Reviews are expected to be completed by the second quarter of 1999. It is intended that key third party vendors with whom these operations have a material relationship will be contacted by the second quarter of 1999 to determine their year 2000 readiness. If these vendors are not year 2000 compliant or are unsuccessful in their efforts to become year 2000 compliant, a disruption in service and/or supplies may disrupt the Company's conduct of its real estate activities, golf course operations and/or its water deliveries. A resulting loss in revenues might have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Company. The Company's transfer agent has been upgrading its computer systems so that its computer systems will function properly with respect to dates in the years 2000 and thereafter. The Company's transfer agent anticipates testing its computer systems in primarily the fourth quarter of 1998. The Company has no contingency plans in place in the event that the Company's transfer agent systems upgrades are not year 2000 compliant. The Company is in the preliminary stages of making an assessment of its non-information technology systems (such as its telephone, sprinkler and alarm systems). Efforts will be made to contact the appropriate third party vendors to determine their year 2000 compliancy. This assessment is expected to be completed by the end of June 1999. The Company does not have an estimate of the cost, if any, that may be required to make its non- information systems year 2000 compliant. In addition, the Company will be contacting the various banks, insurance companies and state regulatory agencies with whom the Company has material relationships to determine their year 2000 readiness. The Company will make efforts to receive responses from these entities by June 1999. AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued (Dollars in Thousands) If the steps taken by the Company and its vendors to be year 2000 compliant are not successful, the Company could experience various operational difficulties. These could include, among other things, an inability to process transactions to the correct accounting period, difficulties in posting general ledger interfaces, an inability to process computer-generated checks, bank transactions posted to the wrong periods, and the failure of scheduling applications which are date sensitive. The Company currently has no contingency plans in place in the event it does not complete all phases of the year 2000 compliance program. The Company plans to continue to monitor the on-going results of the review and testing phases as well as the status of completion to determine whether such a plan is necessary. The foregoing discussion of year 2000 issues and the Company's responses thereto is based upon information presently known and certain assumptions and estimates (including those relating to costs and timing of remediation) currently made by the Company, as well as statements and representations made to the Company by its third party vendors. There are various risks that assumptions and estimates made by the Company will not prove to be correct, that delays in testing or remediation may occur and/or that significant additional remediation efforts may be required. In addition, the Company is also relying on the efforts and statements and representations of third parties, in particular its third party software vendors. Accordingly, the information concerning the year 2000 issues and the Company's responses thereto, including the nature, extent, timing and cost of the Company's remediation efforts, are subject to change and such changes could be material. In addition, there is no assurance that the software applications and packages currently believed to be year 2000 compliant will prove to be so after testing. (2) AMOUNTS DUE TO AFFILIATES - FINANCING The approximately $15,097 of remaining acquisition-related financing owed to affiliates had a maturity date of June 1, 1998 and bore interest at a rate per annum based upon the prime interest rate (8.5% at September 30, 1998), plus 1%. On June 1, 1995, the Company borrowed $52,000 from Northbrook to redeem Class A COLAs pursuant to the Redemption Offer (see note 3). The Company has also borrowed approximately $18,746 and $9,814 during 1996 and 1995, respectively, to fund COLA Mandatory Base Interest payments and other operational needs. The loans from Northbrook were payable interest only, matured on June 1, 1998 and carried an interest rate per annum equal to the prime interest rate plus 2%. In February 1997 the above noted affiliate loans, along with certain other amounts due Northbrook, were converted into a new $104,759 ten-year note payable. The new note is payable interest only and accrues interest at the prime rate plus 2%. The Company borrowed an additional $16,628 during 1997 and $24,828 during the nine months ended September 30, 1998 to fund COLA Mandatory Base Interest payments and other operational needs from a subsidiary of Northbrook under a separate note which is payable interest only and accrues at the prime rate plus 2%. The total amount due Northbrook and its subsidiary as of September 30, 1998 was $161,392, which includes accrued interest of $2,056. Pursuant to the Indenture relating to the COLAs, the amounts borrowed from Northbrook are considered "Senior Indebtedness" to the COLAs. AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued (Dollars in Thousands) (3) CERTIFICATE OF LAND APPRECIATION NOTES The COLAs are unsecured debt obligations of the Company. Interest on the COLAs is payable semi-annually on February 28 and August 31 of each year. The COLAs mature on December 31, 2008, and bear interest after the Final Issuance Date (August 31, 1989) at a rate of 10% per annum ("Base Interest") of the outstanding principal balance of the COLAs on a cumulative, non-compounded basis, of which 6% per annum is contingent ("Contingent Base Interest") and payable only to the extent of Net Cash Flow (Net Cash Flow for any period is generally an amount equal to 90% of the Company's net cash revenues, proceeds and receipts after payment of cash expenditures, including the Qualified Allowance (as defined) other than federal and state income taxes and after the establishment by the Company of reserves) or Maturity Market Value (as defined below). The Company has not generated a sufficient level of Net Cash Flow to pay Contingent Base Interest on the COLAs from 1990 through the current date. Approximately $109,717 of the $117,341 cumulative deficiency of Contingent Base Interest related to the period from August 31, 1989 (Final Issuance Date) through September 30, 1998 has not been accrued in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as the Company believes that it is not probable at this time that a sufficient level of Net Cash Flow will be generated in the future or that there will be sufficient Maturity Market Value (as defined below) as of December 31, 2008 (the COLA maturity date) to pay such unaccrued Contingent Base Interest. The following table is a summary of Mandatory Base Interest and Contingent Base Interest for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and the year ended December 31, 1997: 1998 1997 -------- -------- Mandatory Base Interest paid. . . . . $ 8,828 8,828 Contingent Base Interest paid . . . . -- -- Cumulative deficiency of Contingent Base Interest at end of period. . . $117,341 107,411 Net Cash Flow was $0 for 1997 and is expected to be $0 for 1998. In each calendar year, principal reductions may be made from remaining Net Cash Flow, if any, in excess of all current and unpaid deferred Contingent Base Interest and will be made at the election of the Company (subject to certain restrictions). The COLAs will bear additional contingent interest in any year, after any principal reduction, equal to 55% of remaining Net Cash Flow. Upon maturity, holders of COLAs will be entitled to receive the remaining outstanding principal balance of the COLAs plus unpaid Mandatory Base Interest (4%) plus additional interest equal to the unpaid Contingent Base Interest, to the extent of the Maturity Market Value (Maturity Market Value generally means 90% of the excess of the Fair Market Value (as defined) of the Company's assets at maturity over its liabilities (including Qualified Allowance, but only to the extent earned and payable from Net Cash Flow generated through maturity) at maturity, which liabilities have been incurred in connection with its operations), plus 55% of the remaining Maturity Market Value. On March 14, 1989, Amfac/JMB Finance, Inc. ("AJF"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Northbrook, and the Company entered into an agreement (the "Repurchase Agreement") concerning AJF's obligations to repurchase, on June 1, 1995 and 1999, the COLAs upon request of the holders thereof. The COLAs were issued in two units consisting of one Class A and one Class B COLA. As specified in the Repurchase Agreement, the repurchase of the Class A COLAs may have been requested by the holders of such COLAs on June 1, 1995 at a price equal to the original principal amount of such COLAs ($.5) minus all payments of principal and interest allocated to such AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued (Dollars in Thousands) COLAs. The cumulative interest paid per Class A COLA through June 1, 1995 was $.135. The repurchase of the Class B COLAs may be requested of AJF by the holders of such COLAs on June 1, 1999 at a price equal to 125% of the original principal amount of such COLAs ($.5) minus all payments of principal and interest allocated to such COLAs. Northbrook Corporation, the parent of the Company, is currently working to generate sufficient funds to meet the maximum potential repurchase obligation. Although there can be no assurance that these efforts will be successfully completed, the Company is hopeful that the funds necessary to meet the repurchase obligations will be raised. Failure to meet the repurchase obligations could lead to a claim against AJF and, in turn, Northbrook. As of September 30, 1998, the cumulative interest paid per Class A and Class B COLA was approximately $.205 and $.205, respectively. On March 14, 1989, Northbrook entered into a keep-well agreement with AJF, whereby it agreed to contribute sufficient capital or make loans to AJF to enable AJF to meet its COLA repurchase obligations described above. Notwithstanding AJF's repurchase obligations, the Company may elect to redeem any COLAs requested to be repurchased at the specified price. On March 15, 1995, pursuant to the indenture that governs the terms of the COLAs (the "Indenture"), the Company elected to offer to redeem (the "Redemption Offer") all Class A COLAs from the registered holders at the same price as would be required of Finance under the Repurchase Agreement, thereby eliminating Finance's obligation to satisfy the Class A COLA repurchase options requested by such holders as of June 1, 1995. Pursuant to the Redemption Offer, and in accordance with the terms of the Indenture, the Company was therefore obligated to purchase any and all Class A COLAs submitted pursuant to the Redemption Offer at a price of $.365 per Class A COLA. In conjunction with the Company's Redemption Offer, the Company made a tender offer (the "Tender Offer") to purchase up to approximately $68,000 principal value of the Class B COLAs at a price of $.220 per Class B COLA from COLA holders electing to have their Class A COLAs repurchased. Approximately 229,000 Class A COLAs were submitted for repurchase pursuant to the Redemption Offer and approximately 99,000 Class B COLAs were submitted for repurchase pursuant to the Tender Offer, requiring an aggregate payment by the Company of approximately $105,450 on June 1, 1995. The Company used its available cash to purchase Class B COLAs pursuant to the Tender Offer and borrowed $52,000 from Northbrook to purchase Class A COLAs pursuant to the Redemption Offer. As of September 30, 1998, the Company had approximately 156,000 Class A COLAs and approximately 286,000 Class B COLAs outstanding, with a principal balance of approximately $78,000 and $143,000, respectively. As a result of the COLA repurchases in 1995, the Company retired approximately $164,045 in face value of COLA debt and recognized a financial statement gain in 1995 of approximately $32,544 (net of income taxes of $20,807, the write-off of deferred financing costs of $10,015, the write-off of accrued Contingent Base Interest of $5,667 and expenses of $894). Such gain was treated as cancellation of indebtedness income for tax purposes and, accordingly, the income taxes related to the Class A Redemption Offer (approximately $9,106) were not indemnified by the tax agreement with Northbrook (see note 1). AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued (Dollars in Thousands) On January 30, 1998, Amfac Finance Limited Partnership ("Amfac Finance"), an Illinois limited partnership and an affiliate of the Company extended a Tender Offer to Purchase (the "Class B Tender Offer") up to approximately $65,421 Principal amount of Separately Certificated Class B COLAs ("Separate Class B COLAs") for cash at a unit price of $.375 to be paid by Amfac Finance on each Separate Class B COLA on or about March 24, 1998. The maximum cash to be paid under the Class B Tender Offer was approximately $49,066 (130,842 Separate Class B COLAs at a unit price of $.375 for each separate Class B COLA). Approximately 62,857 Separate Class B COLAs were submitted to Amfac Finance for repurchase pursuant to the Class B Tender Offer requiring an aggregate payment by Amfac Finance of approximately $23,571 on March 31, 1998. The Class B Tender Offer did not reduce the outstanding indebtedness of the Company. The Separate Class B COLAs purchased by Amfac Finance pursuant to Class B Tender Offer remain outstanding pursuant to the terms of the Indenture that governs the terms of the COLAs (the "Indenture"). Except as provided in the last sentence of this paragraph, Amfac Finance will be entitled to the same rights and benefits of any other holder of Separate Class B COLAs, including having the ability to have AJF to repurchase on June 1, 1999, the Separate Class B COLAs that it owns. Amfac Finance has not yet determined whether it will require AJF to so repurchase the Separate Class B COLAs which it will own on such date. Since Amfac Finance is an affiliate of the Company, Amfac Finance will not be able to participate in determining whether the holders of the required principal amount of debt under the Indenture have concurred in any direction, waiver or consent under the terms of the Indenture. As a result of the Class B Tender Offer, the Company recognized $7,850 of taxable gain in accordance with income tax regulations for certain transactions with affiliates. Such gain is treated as cancellation of indebtedness income for income tax purposes only, and accordingly, the income taxes related to the Class B Tender Offer (approximately $3,062) will be indemnified by Northbrook through the tax agreement (note 1). On October 23, 1998, Amfac Finance extended a Tender Offer to Purchase (the "Tender Offer") up to approximately $22,500 Principal amount of Jointly Certified Class A and B COLAs (together "COLA Units") for cash at a unit price of $.460 to be paid by Amfac Finance on each COLA Unit on or about December 23, 1998. The maximum cash to be paid under the Tender Offer is approximately $10,350 (22,500 COLA Units at a unit price of $.460 for each COLA Unit). (The Tender Offer will not reduce the outstanding indebtedness of the Company.) The COLA Units purchased by Amfac Finance pursuant to Tender Offer will remain outstanding pursuant to the terms of the Indenture. Except as provided in the last sentence of this paragraph, Amfac Finance will be entitled to the same rights and benefits of any holder of COLA Units, including having the ability to have AJF to repurchase on June 1, 1999, the COLA Units that it owns. Amfac Finance has not yet determined whether it will require AJF to so repurchase the COLA Units which it will own on such date. Since Amfac Finance is an affiliate of the Company, Amfac Finance will not be able to participate in determining whether holders of the required principal amount of debt under the Indenture have concurred in any direction, waiver or consent under the terms of the Indenture. The terms of the Indenture relating to the COLAs place certain restrictions on the Company's declaration and payment of dividends. Such restrictions generally relate to the source, timing and amounts that may be declared and/or paid. The COLAs also impose certain restrictions on, among other things, the creation of additional indebtedness for certain purposes, the Company's ability to consolidate or merge with or into other entities, and the Company's transactions with affiliates. AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued (Dollars in Thousands) (4) LONG-TERM DEBT In June 1991, the Company obtained a five-year $66,000 nonrecourse loan from the Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii ("ERS"). The loan is secured by a first mortgage on the two Kaanapali Golf Courses, and is considered "Senior Indebtedness" (as defined in the Indenture relating to the COLAs). The loan bore interest at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (i) the base interest rate announced by the Bank of Hawaii on the first of July for each year or (ii) ten percent per annum through September 30, 1993 and nine percent per annum thereafter. The annual interest payments were in excess of the cash flow generated by the Kaanapali Golf Courses. In April 1996, the Company reached an agreement to amend the loan with the ERS, extending the maturity date for five years. In exchange for the loan extension, the ERS received the right to participate in the "Net Disposition Proceeds" (as defined) related to the sale or refinancing of the golf courses or at the maturity of the loan. The ERS share of the Net Disposition Proceeds increases from 30% through September 30, 1997, to 40% for the period from July 1, 1997 to June 30, 1999 and to 50% thereafter. The loan amendment effectively adjusted the interest rate as of January 1, 1995 to 9.5% until June 30, 1996. After June 30, 1996, the loan bears interest at a rate per annum equal to 8.73%. The loan amendment requires the Company to pay interest at the rate of 7% for the period from January 1, 1995 to June 30, 1996, 7.5% from July 1, 1996 to June 30, 1997, 7.75% from July 1, 1997 to June 30, 1998 and 8.5% thereafter ("Minimum Interest"). The Company made payments through September 30, 1998 and 1997 totaling $3,825 and $3,699, respectively, which represents the Minimum Interest due. Accrued Minimum Interest as of September 30, 1998 was $1,414. The scheduled Minimum Interest payments are paid quarterly on the principal balance of the $66,000 loan. The difference between the accrued interest expense and the Minimum Interest payment accrues interest and is payable on an annual basis from excess cash flow, if any, generated from the Kaanapali Golf Courses. The accrued interest payable from excess cash flow was $6,988 as of September 30, 1998. Although the outstanding loan balance remains nonrecourse, certain payments and obligations, such as the Minimum Interest payments and the ERS's share of appreciation, if any, are recourse to the Company. However, the Company's obligations to make future Minimum Interest payments and to pay the ERS a share of appreciation would be terminated if the Company tendered an executed deed to the golf course property to the ERS in accordance with the terms of the amendment. In January 1993, The Lihue Plantation Company, Limited ("Lihue") obtained a ten-year $13,250 loan used to fund the acquisition of Lihue's power generation equipment. The $13,250 loan, constituting "Senior Indebtedness" under the COLAs' Indenture, consists of two ten-year amortizing term loans of $10,000 and $3,250, respectively, payable in forty consecutive installments commencing July 1, 1993 in the principal amount of $250 and $81, respectively (plus interest). The remaining balance of the $3,250 loan was fully repaid in January 1997. The $10,000 loan has an outstanding balance of $3,862 as of September 30, 1998 and bears interest at a rate equal to prime rate (8.5% at September 30, 1998) plus three and one half percent. Lihue has purchased an interest rate agreement which protects against fluctuations in interest rates and effectively caps the prime rate at eight percent for the first seven years of the loan agreement. The loan is secured by the Lihue power generation equipment, sugar inventories and receivables, certain other assets and real property of the Company and has limited recourse to the Company and certain other subsidiaries. AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued (Dollars in Thousands) In October 1993, Waikele Golf Club, Inc. ("WGCI"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that owns and operates the Waikele Golf Course, obtained a five year $20,000 loan facility from two lenders. The loan consisted of two $10,000 amortizing loans. Each loan bore interest only for the first two years and interest and principal payments based upon an assumed 20 year amortization period for the remaining three years. The loans bore interest at prime plus 1/2% and LIBOR (5.660% at September 30, 1998) plus 3%, respectively. In February 1997, WGCI entered into an amended and restated loan agreement with the Bank of Hawaii, whereby the outstanding principal amount of the loan was increased to $25,000, the maturity date was extended to February 2007, the interest rate was changed to LIBOR plus 2% until the fifth anniversary and LIBOR plus 2.5% thereafter and principal is to be repaid based on a 30-year amortization schedule. The loan is secured by WGCI's assets (the golf course and related improvements and equipment), is guaranteed by the Company, and is considered "Senior Indebtedness" (as defined in the Indenture relating to the COLAs). As of September 30, 1998, the outstanding principal balance was $24,607, with scheduled remaining annual principal maturities of $60 in 1998, $248 in 1999 through 2006 and the balance of $22,563 in 2007. In December 1996, Amfac Property Development Corp. ("APDC"), a wholly- owned subsidiary of the Company, obtained a $10,000 loan facility from a Hawaii bank. The loan is secured by a mortgage on property under development at the mill-site of Oahu Sugar (the sugar plantation was closed in 1995), and is considered "Senior Indebtedness" (as defined in the Indenture relating to the COLAs). The loan bears interest at the bank's base rate (8.5% at September 30, 1998) plus .5% and matures on December 1, 1998. In November 1998, APDC sold certain mill-site property which served as collateral for the $10,000 City Bank loan for an approximate sales price of $7,690 in cash plus 2% of the gross sales price of subsequent parcel sales of all or any portion of the property by the purchaser. The bank required $6,000 of the sales proceeds as a principal reduction on the loan in order to release the collateral. APDC received a one-year extension on the $4,000 remaining balance of the loan which is secured by another parcel at the mill-site. The extended loan bears interest at the bank's base rate (8.5% at September 30, 1998) plus 1.25% and matures on December 1, 1999. In September 1998, Amfac Property Investment Corporation. ("APIC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, purchased Tobishima Pacific, Inc.'s ("TPI") 50% ownership interest in the 96-acre beachfront parcel commonly referred to as Kaananpali North Beach for $12,000. APIC paid $2,400 in cash and signed a note for $9,600. The note is secured by a mortgage on the property in favor of TPI and is considered "Senior Indebtedness" (as defined in the Indenture relating to the COLAs). The note is payable in five annual installments in the principal amount of $1,920 beginning in September 1999. The note bears interest of 8.5% and is payable quarterly beginning in December 1998. AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued (Dollars in Thousands) (5) SEGMENT INFORMATION Agriculture and Property comprise separate industry segments of the Company. Operating Income-Other consists primarily of unallocated overhead expenses and Total Assets-Other consists primarily of cash and deferred expenses. Total assets at the balance sheet dates and capital expenditures, operating income (loss) and depreciation and amortization during the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and 1997 are set forth below by each industry segment: September 30, December 31, 1998 1997 ------------ ------------ Total Assets: Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . $202,964 222,693 Property. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240,220 222,745 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,450 18,807 -------- -------- $471,634 464,245 ======== ======== Nine Months Ended September 30, ------------------------ 1998 1997 -------- -------- Capital Expenditures: Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,519 1,474 Property. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,582 458 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- 13 -------- -------- $ 15,101 1,945 ======== ======== Operating income (loss): Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (4,603) (3,562) Property. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2,302) (2,237) Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2,010) (3,147) -------- -------- $ (8,915) (8,946) ======== ======== Depreciation and amortization: Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,320 2,953 Property. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,574 1,574 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 45 -------- -------- $ 4,898 4,572 ======== ======== AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued (Dollars in Thousands) (6) TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES With respect to any calendar year, JMB Realty Corporation ("JMB"), an affiliate of the Company, or its affiliates may receive a Qualified Allowance in an amount equal to: (i) approximately $6,200 during each of the calendar years 1989 through 1993, and (ii) thereafter, 1-1/2% per annum of the Fair Market Value (as defined) of the gross assets of the Company and its subsidiaries (other than cash and cash equivalents and Excluded Assets (as defined)) for providing certain advisory services for the Company. The aforementioned advisory services, which are provided pursuant to a 30-year Services Agreement entered into between the Company, certain of its subsidiaries and JMB in November 1988, include making recommendations in the following areas: (i) the construction and development of real property; (ii) land use and zoning changes; (iii) the timing and pricing of properties to be sold; (iv) the timing, type and amount of financing to be incurred; (v) the agricultural business; and, (vi) the uses (agricultural, residential, recreational or commercial) for the land. However, the Qualified Allowance shall be earned and paid for each year prior to maturity of the COLAs only if the Company generates sufficient Net Cash Flow to pay Base Interest to the holders of the COLAs for such year of an amount equal to 8% of the average outstanding principal balance of the COLAs for such year; any portion of the Qualified Allowance not paid for any year shall cumulate without interest and JMB or its affiliates shall be paid such amount with respect to any succeeding year, after the payment of all Contingent Base Interest for such year, to the extent of 100% of remaining Net Cash Flow until an amount equal to 20% of the Base Interest with respect to such year has been paid, and thereafter, to the extent of the product of (a) remaining Net Cash Flow, multiplied by (b) a fraction, the numerator of which is the cumulative deficiency as of the end of such year in the Qualified Allowance and the denominator of which is the sum of the cumulative deficiencies as of the end of such year in the Qualified Allowance and Base Interest. A Qualified Allowance for 1989 of approximately $6,200 was paid on February 28, 1990. Approximately $64,489 of Qualified Allowance related to the period from January 1, 1991 through December 31, 1997 has not been earned and paid, and is payable only from future Net Cash Flow. Accordingly, because the Company does not believe it is probable at this time that a sufficient level of Net Cash Flow will be generated in the future to pay Qualified Allowance, the Company has not accrued for any Qualified Allowance in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. JMB has informed the Company that no incremental costs or expenses have been incurred relating to the provision of these advisory services. The Company believes that using an incremental cost methodology is reasonable. The following table is a summary of the Qualified Allowance for the year ended December 31, 1997: 1997 -------- Qualified Allowance calculated. . . . . $ 10,082 Qualified Allowance paid. . . . . . . . -- Cumulative deficiency of Qualified Allowance at end of year . . . . . . . $ 64,489 The Qualified Allowance for 1998, which will not be calculated until the year is completed, is not expected to be paid. Net Cash Flow was $0 for 1997 and is expected to be $0 for 1998. AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued (Dollars in Thousands) After the maturity date of the COLAs, JMB will continue to provide advisory services pursuant to the Services Agreement, the Qualified Allowance for such years will continue to be 1-1/2% per annum of the Fair Market Value of the gross assets of the Company and its subsidiaries and the Qualified Allowance will continue to be payable from the Company's Net Cash Flow. Upon the termination of the Services Agreement, if there has not been sufficient Net Cash Flow to pay the cumulative deficiency in the Qualified Allowance, if any, such amount would not be due or payable to JMB. The Company, its subsidiaries, and their joint ventures reimburse Northbrook, JMB and their affiliates for direct expenses incurred on their behalf, including salaries and salary-related expenses incurred in connection with the management of the Company's or its subsidiaries' and the joint ventures' operations. The total of such costs was approximately $495 for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and approximately $600 for the nine months ended September 30, 1997. As of September 30, 1998, the amount due Northbrook totaled $1,102 related to these costs. In addition, as of September 30, 1998, the current portion of amounts due to affiliates includes $9,106 of income tax payable related to the Class A COLA Redemption Offer (see note 3). Also, the Company pays a non- accountable reimbursement of approximately $30 per month to JMB or its affiliates in respect of general overhead expense, all of which was paid as of September 30, 1998. JMB Insurance Agency, Inc. earns insurance brokerage commissions in connection with providing the placement of insurance coverage for certain of the properties and operations of the Company. Such commissions are comparable to those available to the Company in similar dealings with unaffiliated third parties. The total of such commissions for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 was approximately $657 and approximately $605 for the nine months ended September 30, 1998, all of which was paid as of September 30, 1998. Northbrook and its affiliates allocate certain charges for services to the Company based upon the estimated level of services. Such charges totaled $658 and $733 for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and September 30, 1997, respectively. The affiliated charges for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 were offset by $6 of charges for services provided by the Company for Northbrook. As of September 30, 1998, on a net basis, the amount due Northbrook totaled approximately $1,616 related to these services. These services and costs are intended to reflect the Company's separate costs of doing business and are principally related to the inclusion of the Company's employees in the Northbrook pension plan, payment of severance and termination benefits and reimbursement for insurance claims paid on behalf of the Company. All amounts described above, deferred or currently payable, do not bear interest and are expected to be paid in future periods. In February 1997 the affiliate loans (see Note 2), along with certain other amounts due Northbrook, were converted into a new $104,759 ten-year note payable. The new note is payable interest only and accrues interest at the prime rate plus 2%. The Company borrowed an additional $16,628 during 1997 and $24,828 during the nine months ended September 30, 1998 to fund COLA Mandatory Base Interest payments and other operational needs from a subsidiary of Northbrook under a separate note which is payable interest only and accrues at the prime rate plus 2%. In October 1997, the Company AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued (Dollars in Thousands) repaid $7,000 of the amount due the affiliate. In connection with such affiliated loans, the Company incurred interest expense of approximately $8,629 for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and approximately $11,275 for the nine months ended September 30, 1998. The total amount due Northbrook and its subsidiary as of September 30, 1998 was $161,392, which includes accrued interest of $2,056. Pursuant to the Indenture relating to the COLAs, the amounts borrowed from Northbrook are considered "Senior Indebtedness" to the COLAs. (7) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS The Company participates in benefit plans covering substantially all of its employees, which provide benefits based primarily on length of service and compensation levels. These plans are administered by Northbrook in conjunction with other plans providing benefits to employees of Northbrook and its affiliates. (8) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES The Company is involved in various matters of litigation and other claims. Management, after consultation with legal counsel, is of the opinion that the Company's liability (if any), when ultimately determined, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position. The Company's Property segment had contractual commitments (related to project costs) of approximately $3,203 as of September 30, 1998. Additional development expenditures are dependent upon the Company's ability to obtain financing for such costs and on the timing and extent of property development and sales. As of September 30, 1998, certain portions of the Company's land not currently under development or used in sugar operations are mortgaged as security for approximately $6,235 of performance bonds related to property development. AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued (Dollars in Thousands) (9) INCOME TAXES Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company's deferred tax liabilities and assets as of December 31, 1997 are as follows: Deferred tax (assets): Postretirement benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (21,206) Interest accruals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3,021) Other accruals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3,274) --------- Total gross deferred tax assets . . . . (27,501) --------- Deferred tax liabilities: Accounts receivable, related to profit on sales of sugar. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,960 Inventories, principally due to sugar production costs, capitalized costs, capitalized interest and purchase accounting adjustments. . . . . . (1,422) Plant and equipment, principally due to depreciation and purchase accounting adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,759 Land and land improvements, principally due to purchase accounting adjustments. . . . . 84,004 Deferred gains, due to installment sales for income tax purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,456 Investments in unconsolidated entities, principally due to purchase accounting adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,220 --------- Total deferred tax liabilities. . . . . 115,977 --------- Net deferred tax liability. . . . . . . $ 88,476 ========= (10) ADJUSTMENTS In the opinion of the Company, all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation have been made to the accompanying figures as of September 30, 1998 and for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and 1997. AMFAC/JMB FINANCE, INC. Balance Sheets September 30, 1998 and December 31, 1997 (Dollars in thousands, except per share information) (Unaudited) A s s e t s ----------- September 30, December 31, 1998 1997 ------------- ------------ Cash. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1 1 ======== ======== L i a b i l i t y a n d S t o c k h o l d e r ' s E q u i t y ------------------------------------------------------------------- Repurchase obligation (note 2) Common stock, $1 par value; authorized, issued and outstanding - 1,000 shares. . . . $ 1 1 ========= ======== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these balance sheets. AMFAC/JMB FINANCE, INC. Notes to the Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (Dollars in Thousands) (1) ORGANIZATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICY Amfac/JMB Finance, Inc. ("AJF") was incorporated November 7, 1988 in the State of Illinois. AJF has had no financial operations. All of the outstanding shares of AJF are owned by Northbrook Corporation ("Northbrook"). (2) KEEP-WELL AGREEMENT On March 14, 1989, Northbrook entered into a keep-well agreement with AJF, whereby it agreed to contribute sufficient capital or make loans to AJF to enable AJF to meet the COLA repurchase obligations described below in note 3. On March 15, 1995, pursuant to the indenture that governs the terms of the COLAs (the "Indenture"), Amfac/JMB Hawaii, L.L.C. elected to exercise its right to redeem, and therefore was obligated to purchase, any and all Class A COLAs submitted pursuant to the June 1, 1995 Redemption Offer at a price of $.365 per Class A COLA. Pursuant to Amfac/JMB Hawaii, L.L.C.'s election to redeem the Class A COLAs for repurchase, Amfac/JMB Hawaii, L.L.C. assumed AJF's maximum amount of its liability from the June 1, 1995 COLA repurchase obligation of $140,425. (3) REPURCHASE OBLIGATION On March 14, 1989, AJF and a subsidiary of Northbrook (Amfac/JMB Hawaii, L.L.C.) entered into an agreement (the "Repurchase Agreement") concerning AJF's obligation (on June 1, 1995 and 1999) to repurchase, upon request of the holders thereof, the Certificate of Land Appreciation Notes due 2008 ("COLAs"), to be issued by Amfac/JMB Hawaii, L.L.C. in conjunction with the acquisition of Amfac/JMB Hawaii, L.L.C. A total aggregate principal amount of $384,737 of COLAs were issued during the offering, which terminated on August 31, 1989. The COLAs were issued in two units consisting of one Class A and one Class B COLA. As specified in the Repurchase Agreement, the repurchase of the Class A COLAs may have been requested of AJF by the holders of such COLAs on June 1, 1995 at a price equal to the original principal amount of such COLAs ($.500) minus all payments of principal and interest allocated to such COLAs. The cumulative interest paid per Class A COLA through June 1, 1995 was $.135. The repurchase of the Class B COLAs may be requested of AJF by the holders of such COLAs on June 1, 1999 at a price equal to 125% of the original principal amount of such COLAs ($.500) minus all payments of principal and interest allocated to such COLAs. Northbrook Corporation, the parent of the Company, is currently working to generate sufficient funds to meet the maximum potential repurchase obligation. Although there can be no assurance that these efforts will be successful, the Company is hopeful that the funds necessary to meet the repurchase obligations will be raised. Failure to meet the repurchase obligation could lead to a claim against Finance and, in turn, Northbrook. To date, the cumulative interest paid per Class A and Class B COLA is approximately $.205 and $.205, respectively. PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS General A significant portion of the Company's cash needs result from the nature of the real estate development business, which requires a substantial investment in preparing development plans, seeking land urbanization and other governmental approvals and completing infrastructure improvements prior to sale. Additionally, the Company's sugar operations incur a large cash deficit during the first half of the year ranging from $10 to $20 million. This seasonal cash need is due to the sugar plantation's operating costs being incurred fairly ratably during the year, while most of the revenues are received between May and December concurrent with raw sugar deliveries to C&H. In addition to seasonal cash needs, in many years cash flow from sugar operations has been negative requiring a net cash investment to fund the operating deficits and any capital costs. Other significant cash needs include overhead expenses, debt service and the obligation to repurchase Class B COLAs on June 1, 1999. The Company believes that additional borrowings from Northbrook Corporation ("Northbrook") will be necessary to meet its short-term and long-term liquidity needs. Northbrook has made such borrowings available to the Company in the past and intends to make such borrowings available, at least in the short-term. However, there is no assurance that Northbrook will have sufficient funds, or that Northbrook will continue to make such funds available to the Company. In recent years, the Company has funded its cash requirements primarily through the use of long-term financings, borrowings from Northbrook and revenues generated from the development and sale of its properties. Significant short-term cash requirements relate to the funding of agricultural deficits, interest expenses, costs to process the SMA permit for North Beach, development costs on Oahu and Maui and overhead expenses. At September 30, 1998, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $21.1 million. The Company intends to use its cash reserves, land sales proceeds and proceeds from new financings or joint venture arrangements to meet its short-term liquidity requirements. However, there can be no assurance that new financings can be obtained or property sales consummated. The Company's land holdings on Maui and Kauai are its primary sources of future land sale revenues. However, due to current market conditions, the difficulty in obtaining land use approvals and the high development costs of required infrastructure, the Company does not believe that it will be able to generate significant amounts of cash in the short-term from the development of these lands. As a result, the Company is marketing for sale certain unentitled agricultural and conservation parcels. The Company has placed a relatively large portion of its land holdings on the market to generate cash to finance the Company's operations, to meet debt service requirements and to raise cash should the holders exercise their right to sell back to the Company their Class B COLAs on June 1, 1999. The Company has approximately 2,000 acres on Kauai of land currently listed for sale. Additionally, the Company expects to list another 300 to 400 acres on Maui and another 400 to 500 acres on Kauai before year end. These lands consist primarily of unentitled, agricultural and conservation parcels. Significant interest has been expressed in many of these parcels and some are under contract for sale for aggregate sales prices exceeding $6 million. However, these contracts often have due diligence investigation periods which allow the purchasers to terminate the agreements. It is difficult to predict how successful the Company will be in selling these lands at acceptable prices. During the first nine months of 1998, the Company generated approximately $31.3 million of land sales of which $16 million came from the sale of the 6,700 acre Kealia parcel in June 1998. The Company has received $5.5 million in cash at closing from the sale of the Kealia parcel; the remaining $10.5 million is payable (pursuant to the terms of a first mortgage note) in three equal installments due in late 1998 and early 1999. The 740-acre Olowalu parcel on Maui closed in September 1998 for a sales price of $9.6 million, paid in cash at closing. The Company was able to lease back approximately 600 acres of the mauka ("towards the mountains") portion of Olowalu for its agricultural operations. While the Company is pursuing other bulk parcel sales, there can be no assurances that any such sales will be consummated. Additionally, the Company generated $3.8 million of land sales related to Kaanapali Golf Estates and $1.9 million primarily from the sale of unentitled agricultural and conservation land parcels on Kauai and Hawaii. During all of 1997, the Company generated approximately $21.2 million of land sales, of which $4.8 million came from land related to Kaanapali Golf Estates on Maui, $5.2 million from the four remaining oceanfront residential lots at Kai Ala Place on Maui and $7.4 million was from the sale of unentitled, agricultural and conservation land parcels on Kauai and the Big Island of Hawaii. The Company continues to implement certain cost savings measures and to defer certain development costs and capital expenditures for longer-term projects. The Company's Property segment expended approximately $10.1 million in project costs during 1997 and anticipates expending approximately $10.3 million in project costs during 1998. As of September 30, 1998, contractual commitments related to project costs totaled approximately $3.2 million. In early March 1997, the Company restructured its operations into the following six separate operating divisions: Sugar, Golf, Coffee, Water, Land Management and Real Estate Development. The Company also formed a corporate services division to provide accounting, MIS, human resources, tax and other administrative services for the six operating groups. The Company believes it will operate more effectively as several smaller entrepreneurial-minded divisions. Approximately four percent(4%) of the Company's total employees were released as part of the restructuring, which has resulted in annual payroll savings of approximately $1.1 million. The Company incurred termination costs of approximately $0.6 million related to the restructuring during the first quarter of 1997. At December 31, 1997, the Company and its subsidiaries employed 845 persons. In February 1998, the Company announced the relocation of the headquarters for its real estate development division from Honolulu to Kaanapali, Maui. Due to poor market conditions on Kauai and a shortage of land inventory on Oahu, the focus of the Company's land development operations is expected to be on Maui. In connection with the office re- location, four executives and one administrative person resigned their positions with the Company. These changes are expected to result in one- time termination and relocation costs of $.5 million during 1998. Annual recurring cost savings are expected to be approximately $.7 million from lower compensation, rent and other employee-related costs. The Company has recently hired a new president, a Maui resident, for the land development operations. The Company is currently organizing a local management team for the Maui development office which the Company believes will be more effective in coordinating its planning and entitlement efforts, and in dealing with and responding to community concerns. The sugar industry in Hawaii has experienced significant difficulties for a number of years. Growers in Hawaii have long struggled with high costs of production, which have led to the closure of many plantations, including Oahu Sugar Company. Transportation costs of raw sugar to the C&H refinery are also significant. Over the years, the Company has implemented numerous cost reduction and consolidation plans. After lengthy negotiations with the union, the union membership at the Kauai plantation ratified a two year contract which included a 10% reduction in wages for one year as well as other concessions. The union membership at Pioneer Mill ratified a three year contract which included a 9% reduction in wages for one year as well as other concessions. Although the concessions will have a meaningful, positive impact on current operations, they do not provide the type of structural changes necessary to provide for long-term profitability and a secure future for the Company's sugar operations. The Company is currently completing the 1998 harvest campaign. Decisions regarding the future of the Company's sugar operation will be made this fall during the Company's normal planning and budgeting process after taking into account the actual 1998 operating results and forecasts for the upcoming year. There can be no assurances that the Company will continue with sugar production in the future. Changes in the price of raw sugar impact the level of agricultural deficits, and as a result the annual cash needs of the Company. Although government legislation is currently in place (through 2002) that sets a target price range for raw sugar, it is possible that such legislation could be amended or repealed resulting in a reduction in the price of raw sugar. Such a reduction could cause the Company to evaluate the shutdown of its sugar plantations. Company management cannot accurately predict the actual cost of a potential shutdown as there are a significant number of factors that would impact the actual cost including the exact timing of the shutdown, potential environmental issues, the market and pricing for the sale of the plantation's field and mill equipment and employee termination costs which are subject to negotiation with the union. Other significant unknowns relate to the costs associated with terminating the power sale agreements with the local utility companies. If the Company's sugar production decreases, the Company's water needs will also decrease. Subject to significant regulatory restrictions, excess water may be used for other purposes and the Company is exploring alternative uses for such water. Waiahole Irrigation Company, Limited ("WIC") is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and owns and operates a water collection and transmission system commonly referred to as the "Waiahole Ditch" (a series of tunnels and ditches constructed in the early 1900's). The Waiahole Ditch has the capacity to transport approximately 27 million gallons of water per day from the windward part of Oahu to the central Oahu plain leeward of the Ko'olau mountain range. This water was used by the Company's Oahu Sugar operations from the early 1900s until 1995, when the plantation was closed. After the closure of Oahu Sugar, WIC negotiated a collective agreement with several farms and golf courses (the "Users") to deliver irrigation water to them for a fee. However, to consummate these agreements, water permits (the "Water Permits") were applied for from the State of Hawaii Water Commission (the "Water Commission"). The Water Commission issued a final decision in December 1997 relating to the Water Permits which allowed only about one-half of the capacity of the Waiahole Ditch to be transported through the system. The continued operation of the Waiahole Ditch and receipt of the delivery fees (from the agreement with the Users) were predicated upon an allocation (from the Water Commission) at or near the capacity of the Waiahole Ditch. When the lower allocation was received, WIC terminated the agreement with the Users. Currently, water is delivered to the Users on a month-to-month basis at the fees originally included in the agreement. After several months of discussions with prospective purchasers, the Company reached an agreement with the State of Hawaii pursuant to which the State will purchase the stock or substantially all of the assets of WIC for $8.5 million (which includes 450 acres of conservation land). The purchase was subject to state legislative approval which was obtained in May 1998. Closing remains conditional upon other factors. The purchase agreement has been further extended after an initial expiration on October 3, 1998. If the sale is not consummated, WIC will then decide whether to re-negotiate the fee for delivery of water through the system. Finally, if improvements cannot be made in either the pricing or volume of Waiahole Ditch water, WIC will consider reducing or terminating the operations of the Waiahole Ditch. Such a closure or limitation of the Waiahole Ditch would not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition or on its results of operations. The Company is currently negotiating with a potential buyer for the sale of its water utility business on West Maui, the Kaanapali Water Corporation. The Company has received a commitment of $1.5 million in federal funding under the Rural Economic Transition Assistance - Hawaii program. The Company has identified various new agricultural crops in which these "matching funds" are to be used by the Company. During the first nine months of 1998, cash increased by approximately $12 million from December 31, 1997. Net cash used in operating activities of $3.8 million and in investing activities of $17.6 million was primarily provided by $24.8 million of long-term financing proceeds from Northbrook and $9.6 million of additional debt related to the acquisition of Tobishima Pacific, Inc.'s (TPI's) 50% ownership interest in the 96 acre parcel at North Beach (as discussed below) partially offset by principal loan repayments on other long-term debt of approximately $1.1 million. During the first nine months of 1998, net cash flow used in operating activities was $3.8 million, as compared to net cash used in operating activities of $3.4 during the first nine months of 1997. The $.4 million increase in cash flow used in operating activities during the first nine months of 1998 as compared to the first nine months of 1997 was due primarily to a $10 million increase in receivables related to the sale of land parcels of Kealia of approximately $10.5 million offset in part by (i) the $8.5 million decrease in inventory primarily due to increased land sales for the first nine months of 1998 as compared to the first nine months of 1997 and (ii) a $1.5 decrease in cash used in operating activities for accrued expenses for the first nine months of 1998 compared to the first nine months of 1997. During the first nine months of 1998, net cash flow used in investing activities was $17.6 million as compared to $7.4 million during the first nine months of 1997. The $10.2 million increase in net cash used in investing activities was principally due to (i) an increase in property additions of $13.2 million primarily due to the acquisition of TPI's 50% ownership interest in North Beach (as discussed below) and (ii) a decrease of $4.1 million in other assets during the first nine months of 1998 primarily due to the reclassification of a note receivable recorded in connection with a prior year land sale from noncurrent to current. The note which is due in 1999, has an outstanding balance of approximately $1.1 million and is classified in current receivables at September 30, 1998. During the first nine months of 1998, net cash flow provided by financing activities increased to $33.3 million from $20.6 million during the first nine months of 1997. The $12.7 million increase is due primarily to (i) an increase in net advances by affiliates totaling $24.8 million during the first nine months of 1998 as compared to $16.6 million during the first nine months of 1997 (see Note 4) and (ii) $9.6 million of additional debt related to the acquisition of TPI's 50% ownership interest in the 96 acre parcel of North Beach compared to $5.0 million of additional long-term financing primarily related to the loan secured by the golf course owned by WGCI in the first nine months of 1997. These amounts were also partially offset by $1.1 million and $.8 million of principal loan repayment on long-term debt in the first nine months of 1998 and 1997, respectively. COLA RELATED OBLIGATIONS. AJF and the Company are parties to the Repurchase Agreement pursuant to which AJF is obligated to repurchase the Class B COLAs tendered by the holders thereof on June 1, 1999. Northbrook agreed pursuant to the Keep-Well Agreement to contribute sufficient capital or make loans to AJF to enable AJF to meet the COLA repurchase obligations, if any, described above. Notwithstanding AJF's repurchase obligations, the Company may elect to redeem any COLAs requested to be repurchased at the specified price. The Company and its parent, Northbrook, are currently working to generate sufficient funds to meet the maximum potential repurchase obligation. Although there can be no assurances that these efforts will be successful, the Company is hopeful that the funds necessary to meet the repurchase obligations will be raised. Failure to meet the repurchase obligations could lead to a claim against AJF and, in turn, Northbrook. The COLAs were issued in units consisting of one Class A COLA and one Class B COLA. The repurchase of the Class B COLAs on June 1, 1999 may be required of AJF by the holders of such COLAs at a price equal to 125% of the original principal amount of such COLAs ($500) minus all payments of principal and interest allocated to such COLAs. As of December 31, 1997, the Company had approximately 156,000 Class A COLAs units and approximately 286,000 Class B COLAs units outstanding, with a principal balance of approximately $78 million and $143 million, respectively. The Company estimates that assuming only 4% per annum interest payments ("Mandatory Base Interest") is paid that the redemption price for the Class B COLAs at June 1, 1999 would be approximately $410 per unit. Therefore, the maximum potential repurchase obligation would be $117.3 million. At March 31, 1998, the cumulative interest paid per Class A COLA unit and Class B COLA unit was approximately $205 and $205, respectively. On January 30, 1998, Amfac Finance Limited Partnership ("Amfac Finance"), an Illinois limited partnership and an affiliate of the Company extended a tender offer to purchase (the "Class B Tender Offer") up to $65.4 million principal amount of separately Certificated Class B COLAs ("Separate Class B COLAs") for cash at a unit price of $375 to be paid by Amfac Finance on each Separate Class B COLA on or about March 24, 1998. The maximum cash to be paid under the Class B Tender Offer is $49.0 million (130,842 Separate Class B COLAs at a unit price of $375 each). Approximately 62,857 Separate Class B COLAs were submitted to Amfac Finance for repurchase pursuant to the Class B Tender Offer requiring an aggregate payment by Amfac Finance of approximately $23.6 million on March 31, 1998. The Class B Tender Offer will not reduce the outstanding indebtedness of the Company. The Separate Class B COLAs to be purchased by Amfac Finance pursuant to the Class B Tender Offer will remain outstanding pursuant to the terms of the Indenture. Except as provided in the last sentence of this paragraph, Amfac Finance will be entitled to the same rights and benefits of any other holder of Class B COLAs, including having the right to have AJF repurchase on June 1, 1999, the separate Class B COLAs that it owns. Amfac Finance has not yet determined whether it will require AJF to repurchase its separate Class B COLAs. Because Amfac Finance is an affiliate of the Company, Amfac Finance will not be able to participate in determining whether the holders of the required principal amount of debt under the Indenture have concurred in any direction, waiver or consent under the terms of the Indenture. As a result of the Class B Tender Offer, the Company recognized $7.9 million of taxable gain in accordance with income tax regulations for certain transactions with affiliates. Such gain is treated as cancellation of indebtedness income for income tax purposes only, and accordingly, the income taxes related to the Class B Tender Offer (approximately $3.1 million) will be indemnified by Northbrook through the tax agreement (note 1). On October 23, 1998, Amfac Finance extended a Tender Offer to Purchase (the "Tender Offer") up to approximately $22.5 million Principal amount of Jointly Certified Class A and B COLAs (together "COLA Units") for cash at a unit price of $460 to be paid by Amfac Finance on each COLA Unit on or about December 23, 1998. The maximum cash to be paid under the Tender Offer is approximately $10.4 million (22,500 COLA Units at a unit price of $460 for each COLA Unit). (The Tender Offer will not reduce the outstanding indebtedness of the Company.) The COLA Units purchased by Amfac Finance pursuant to Tender Offer will remain outstanding pursuant to the terms of the Indenture that governs the terms of the COLAs (the "Indenture"). Except as provided in the last sentence of this paragraph, Amfac Finance will be entitled to the same rights and benefits of any holder of COLA Units, including having the ability to have AJF to repurchase on June 1, 1999, the COLA Units that it owns. Amfac Finance has not yet determined whether it will require AJF to so repurchase the COLA Units which it will own on such date. Since Amfac Finance is an affiliate of the Company, Amfac Finance will not be able to participate in determining whether holders of the required principal amount of debt under the Indenture have concurred in any direction, waiver or consent under the terms of the Indenture. Pursuant to the terms of the Indenture relating to the COLAs, the Company is required to maintain a Value Maintenance Ratio (defined in the Indenture) of 1.05 to 1.00. Such ratio is equal to the relationship of the Company's Net Asset Value to the sum of: (i) the outstanding principal amount of the COLAs, (ii) any unpaid Base Interest, and (iii) the outstanding principal balance of any Indebtedness incurred to redeem COLAs (the "COLA Obligation"). Net Asset value represents the excess of the Fair Market Value (as defined in the Indenture) of the gross assets of the Company over the liabilities of the Company other than the COLA obligations and certain other liabilities. The COLA Indenture requires the Company to obtain independent appraisals of the fair market value of the gross assets used to calculate the Value Maintenance Ratio as of December 31 in each even-numbered calendar year. The Company has received independent appraisals indicating that the appraised value of substantially all of its gross assets as of December 31, 1996, was approximately $653 million. Based upon the appraisals, the Company was able to meet the Value Maintenance Ratio as of December 31, 1996. As of December 31, 1997, the Fair Market Value of the gross assets of the Company was determined by Company management. It should be noted that pursuant to the Indenture the concept of Fair Market Value is intended to represent the value that an independent arm's-length purchaser, seeking to utilize such asset for its highest and best use would pay, taking into consideration the risks and benefits associated with such use or development, current restrictions on development (including zoning limitations, permitted densities, environmental restrictions, restrictive covenants, etc.) and the likelihood of changes to such restrictions; provided, however, that with respect to any Fair Market Value determination of all of the assets of the Company, such assets shall not be valued as if sold in bulk to a single purchaser. Although the Company believes the value of certain of its assets as of December 31, 1997, may be lower than their value one year earlier, the Company believes that the values were sufficient to be in compliance with the Value Maintenance Ratio. The Company is currently appraising the value of its gross assets and anticipates that such value may be lower than in previous years. Although the Company expects that the values will be sufficient to be in compliance with the Value Maintenance Ratio on December 31, 1998, there can be no assurance that such ratio will be met. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to sell its real estate assets for their aggregate appraised value. Because of the size and diversity of the real estate holdings of the Company and the uncertainty of the Hawaii real estate market, it is likely that it would take a considerable period of time for the Company to sell its assets. In recent years, the Company has sold some of its real estate for less than their appraised value to meet cash needs. In addition, the aggregate value of the Company's assets could be negatively affected by the recent financial difficulties in Southeast Asia and Japan. The Company uses the effective interest method and as such interest on the COLAs is accrued at the Mandatory Base Interest rate (4% per annum). The Company has not generated a sufficient level of Net Cash Flow to pay Contingent Base Interest (interest in excess of 4%) on the COLAs (see Note 3) from 1990 through 1997. Contingent Base Interest through 2008 is payable only to the extent of Net Cash Flow. Net Cash Flow for any period is generally an amount equal to 90% of the Company's net cash revenues, proceeds and receipts after payment of cash expenditures, excluding federal and state income taxes and after the establishment by the Company of reserves. At December 31, 2008, Contingent Base Interest may also be payable to the extent of Maturity Market Value. Maturity Market Value generally means 90% of the excess of the Fair Market Value of the Company's assets at maturity over its liabilities (including Qualified Allowance (described in the next paragraph), but only to the extent earned and payable from Net Cash Flow generated through maturity) at maturity. Approximately $109.7 million of the $117.3 million cumulative deficiency of Contingent Base Interest related to the period from August 31, 1989 (Final Issuance Date) through September 30, 1998 has not been accrued in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as the Company believes that it is not probable at this time that a sufficient level of Net Cash Flow will be generated in the future or that there will be sufficient Maturity Market Value as of December 31, 2008 (the COLA maturity date) to pay any such unaccrued Contingent Base Interest. The following table is a summary of Mandatory Base Interest and Contingent Base Interest for the nine months ended and the year ended December 31, 1997 (dollars are in millions): 1998 1997 -------- -------- Mandatory Base Interest paid. . . . . . . . . $ 8.8 8.8 Contingent Base Interest paid . . . . . . . . -- Cumulative deficiency of Contingent Base Interest at end of year. . . . . . . . $ 117.3 107.4 Net Cash Flow was $0 for 1997 is expected to be $0 for 1998. With respect to any calendar year, JMB or its affiliates may receive a Qualified Allowance in an amount equal to 1.5% per annum of the Fair Market Value of the gross assets of the Company (other than cash and cash equivalents and certain other types of assets as provided for in the Indenture) for providing certain advisory services to the Company. The aforementioned advisory services, which are provided pursuant to a 30-year Services Agreement entered into between the Company and JMB Realty Corporation ("JMB"), an affiliate of the Company, in November 1988, include making recommendations in the following areas: (i) the construction and development of real property; (ii) land use and zoning changes; (iii) the timing and pricing of properties to be sold; (iv) the timing, type and amount of financing to be incurred; (v) the agricultural business; and (vi) the uses (agricultural, residential, recreational or commercial) for the land. However, the Qualified Allowance shall be earned and paid for each year prior to maturity of the COLAs only if the Company generates sufficient Net Cash Flow to pay Mandatory and Contingent Base Interest for such year in an amount equal to 8% . Any portion of the Qualified Allowance not paid for any year shall cumulate without interest and JMB or its affiliates shall be paid such deferred amount in succeeding years, only after the payment of all Contingent Base Interest for such succeeding year and then, only to the extent that Net Cash Flow exceeds levels specified in the Indenture. A Qualified Allowance for 1989 of approximately $6.2 million was paid on February 28, 1990. Approximately $64.5 million of Qualified Allowance related to the period from January 1, 1990 through December 31, 1997 has not been earned and paid, and is payable only to the extent that future Net Cash Flow is sufficient. Accordingly, because the Company does not believe it is probable at this time that a sufficient level of Net Cash Flow will be generated in the future to pay the Qualified Allowance, the Company has not accrued for any Qualified Allowance payments in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. JMB has informed the Company that no incremental costs or expenses have been incurred relating to the provision of these advisory services. The Company believes that using an incremental cost methodology is reasonable. The following table is a summary of the Qualified Allowance for the year ended December 31, 1997 (dollars are in millions): 1997 -------- Qualified Allowance calculated. . . . . . . . $ 10.1 Qualified Allowance paid. . . . . . . . . . . -- Cumulative deficiency of Qualified Allowance at end of year. . . . . . . . . . $ 64.5 After the maturity date of the COLAs, JMB will continue to provide advisory services pursuant to the Services Agreement, the Qualified Allowance for such years will continue to be 1.5% per annum of the Fair Market Value of the gross assets of the Company and its subsidiaries and the Qualified Allowance will continue to be payable from the Company's Net Cash Flow. Upon the termination of the Services Agreement, if there has not been sufficient Net Cash Flow to pay the cumulative deficiency in the Qualified Allowance, if any, such amount would not be due or payable to JMB. Upon maturity, holders of COLAs will be entitled to receive the remaining outstanding principal balance of the COLAs plus unpaid Mandatory Base Interest plus additional interest equal to the unpaid Contingent Base Interest, to the extent of the Maturity Market Value (Maturity Market Value generally means 90% of the excess of the Fair Market Value (as defined) of the Company's assets at maturity over its liabilities (including Qualified Allowance, but only to the extent earned and payable from Net Cash Flow generated through maturity) at maturity, which liabilities have been incurred in connection with its operations), plus 55% of the remaining Maturity Market Value. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS GENERAL: The Company and its subsidiaries report its taxes as a part of the consolidated tax return for Northbrook. The Company and its subsidiaries have entered into a tax indemnification agreement with Northbrook, which indemnifies the Company and its subsidiaries for responsibility for all past, present and future federal and state income tax liabilities (other than income taxes which are directly attributable to cancellation of indebtedness income caused by the repurchase or redemption of securities as provided for in or contemplated by the Repurchase Agreement). Current and deferred taxes have been allocated to the Company as if the Company were a separate taxpayer in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109 - Accounting for Income Taxes. However, to the extent the tax indemnification agreement does not require the Company to actually pay income taxes, current taxes payable or receivable (excluding income taxes which are directly attributable to cancellation of indebtedness income caused by the repurchase or redemption of securities as provided for in or contemplated by the Repurchase Agreement) have been reflected as deemed contributions to additional paid-in capital or distributions from retained earnings (deficit) in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. As such, the deferred income tax liabilities reflected on the Company's consolidated balance sheet are not expected to result in cash payments by the Company. YEAR 2000 The year 2000 issue is the result of computer programs being written using two digits rather than four to define a year. Consequently, any computer programs that have time-sensitive software may recognize a date using "00" as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. This could result in a system failure or miscalculations causing disruptions of operations including, among other things, a temporary inability to process transactions or engage in other normal business activities. The Company is reviewing its computer systems for year 2000 compliancy. The Company has completed an internal assessment of its information system technology and currently does not anticipate any hardware upgrade; however, it had determined a need to upgrade portions of the Company's software so that its computer systems would function properly with respect to dates in the year 2000 and thereafter. The Company has completed an internal review of its accounting, human resources and payroll applications which are supported by approximately six different major software vendors. Except for the golf course and water company division, the Company has received software upgrades for the financial, human resources and payroll applications and expects to complete testing and implementation of the new software upgrades by the end of 1998. The Company has not incurred and does not expect to incur any costs with respect to the testing and implementation of the software upgrades. The accounting systems at the golf courses and the water company are not yet year 2000 compliant. The Company currently expects new accounting system software to be tested and implemented by the end of June 1999 at a cost of approximately $60,000 to $80,000. However, in the event the Company's system reveals that, contrary to software vendors claims, the system upgrades or new software are not year 2000 compliant, the Company believes it has the ability to make the necessary changes through the use of third party consultants as well as the utilization of internal resources. The Company does not have an estimate of the length of time which could potentially be required to make these changes, nor an estimate of the costs involved to make such changes. The Company's agriculture operations are testing and reviewing its operational systems at certain of its plantations. At those locations where a review has not been performed and/or completed, reviews are expected to be completed by the end of the first quarter of 1999. The agriculture operations have also begun identifying and contacting key third party vendors with whom these operations have a material relationship to determine their year 2000 readiness and expect to have completed contacting its key vendors by the end of 1998. If these vendors are not year 2000 compliant or are unsuccessful in their efforts to become year 2000 compliant, a disruption in service and supplies may result in the inability of the Company to process and deliver its agricultural products to market. The subsequent loss in revenues may have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Company. The Company's Property operations (which includes the development and sales activities of the Company's land and the Company's golf course operations as well as the Company's water operations) are anticipated to begin testing and review of their operational systems in the fourth quarter of 1998. Reviews are expected to be completed by the second quarter of 1999. It is intended that key third party vendors with whom these operations have a material relationship will be contacted by the second quarter of 1999 to determine their year 2000 readiness. If these vendors are not year 2000 compliant or are unsuccessful in their efforts to become year 2000 compliant, a disruption in service and/or supplies may disrupt the Company's conduct of its real estate activities, golf course operations and/or its water deliveries. A resulting loss in revenues might have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Company. The Company's transfer agent has been upgrading its computer systems so that its computer systems will function properly with respect to dates in the years 2000 and thereafter. The Company's transfer agent anticipates testing its computer systems in primarily the fourth quarter of 1998. The Company has no contingency plans in place in the event that the Company's transfer agent systems upgrades are not year 2000 compliant. The Company is in the preliminary stages of making an assessment of its non-information technology systems (such as its telephone, sprinkler and alarm systems). Efforts will be made to contact the appropriate third party vendors to determine their year 2000 compliancy. This assessment is expected to be completed by the end of June 1999. The Company does not have an estimate of the cost, if any, that may be required to make its non- information systems year 2000 compliant. In addition, the Company will be contacting the various banks, insurance companies and state regulatory agencies with whom the Company has material relationships to determine their year 2000 readiness. The Company will make efforts to receive responses from these entities by June 1999. If the steps taken by the Company and its vendors to be year 2000 compliant are not successful, the Company could experience various operational difficulties. These could include, among other things, an inability to process transactions to the correct accounting period, difficulties in posting general ledger interfaces, an inability to process computer-generated checks, bank transactions posted to the wrong periods, and the failure of scheduling applications which are date sensitive. The Company currently has no contingency plans in place in the event it does not complete all phases of the year 2000 compliance program. The Company plans to continue to monitor the on-going results of the review and testing phases as well as the status of completion to determine whether such a plan is necessary. The foregoing discussion of year 2000 issues and the Company's responses thereto is based upon information presently known and certain assumptions and estimates (including those relating to costs and timing of remediation) currently made by the Company, as well as statements and representations made to the Company by its third party vendors. There are various risks that assumptions and estimates made by the Company will not prove to be correct, that delays in testing or remediation may occur and/or that significant additional remediation efforts may be required. In addition, the Company is also relying on the efforts and statements and representations of third parties, in particular its third party software vendors. Accordingly, the information concerning the year 2000 issues and the Company's responses thereto, including the nature, extent, timing and cost of the Company's remediation efforts, are subject to change and such changes could be material. In addition, there is no assurance that the software applications and packages currently believed to be year 2000 compliant will prove to be so after testing. Selling, general and administrative costs deceased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 1998 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 1997 due primarily to payroll savings associated with the Company's restructuring in early 1997. Interest expense increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 1998 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 1997 due to additional affiliated financing. AGRICULTURE SEGMENT: The Company's Agriculture segment is responsible for activities related to the cultivation, processing and sale of sugar cane and coffee. Agriculture's revenues are primarily derived from the Company's sale of its raw sugar. Reference is made to the "Liquidity and Capital Resources" section of "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for a discussion of potential uncertainties regarding the price of raw sugar and the continuation of the Company's sugar cane operations. The Company's sugar plantations sell all their raw sugar production to the Hawaiian Sugar and Transportation Company ("HSTC"), which is an agricultural cooperative owned by the major Hawaii producers of raw sugar (including the Company). Pursuant to a long term supply contract, HSTC is required to sell, and the California and Hawaiian Sugar Company ("C&H") is required to purchase, all raw sugar produced by the HSTC's cooperative members. HSTC remits to its cooperative members the remaining proceeds from its sugar sales after storage, delivery and administrative costs. The Company recognizes revenues and related cost of sales upon delivery of its raw sugar by HSTC to C&H. As part of the Company's agriculture operations, the Company enters into commodities futures contracts and options in raw sugar as deemed appropriate to reduce the risk of future price fluctuations. These futures contracts and options are accounted for as hedges and, accordingly, gains and losses are deferred and recognized in cost of sales as part of the production cost. During the first nine months of 1998, agriculture revenues were $23.0 million as compared to $25.8 million in the first nine months of 1997. Agricultural revenues and cost of sales increased for the three months ended September 30, 1998 as compared to the three months September 30, 1997 while agricultural revenues and costs of sales decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 1997 due primarily to the timing of sugar production and related sales as a result of the delay of the sugar harvest season attributable to the timing of the sugar union negotiations and contract ratification. The delay in the sugar harvest resulted in a higher level of sugar sales for the three months ended September 30, 1998 as compared to the same three month period in 1997 while the decrease in sugar sales for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 as compared to the same period for 1997 was due to the decrease in tons produced. For the nine months ended September 30, 1998, the Company sold approximately 57,905 tons of sugar, a 14.7% decrease over the same period in 1997. The average price of sugar sold for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 of approximately $358 represents a .3% decrease over the average price for the nine months ended September 30, 1997. The Company harvested approximately 6,980 and 9,201 acres for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 1998, the Company sold approximately 50,052 tons of sugar, a 7.3% increase over the same period in 1997. The average price of sugar sold for the three months ended September 30, 1998 of approximately $358 represents a .5% decrease over the average price for the three months ended September 30, 1997. The Company harvested approximately 5,316 and 5,424 acres for the three months ended September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The operating loss of $4.6 million in the first nine months of 1998 as compared to the $3.7 million in the first nine months of 1997 was due primarily to higher cost of sales per ton of approximately 2%. PROPERTY SEGMENT: The Company's Property segment is responsible for land planning and development activities; obtaining land use, zoning and other governmental approvals; selling or financing developed and undeveloped land parcels; and the management and operation of the Company's golf course facilities. Revenues increased to $48.7 million during the first nine months of 1998 from $33.5 million during the first nine months of 1997. Property revenues include revenues from land sales of approximately $31.3 million and $16.3 million for the first nine months of 1998 and 1997, respectively, and revenues from the operations of the three golf courses owned by the Company of approximately $11.2 million and $11.8 million for the first nine months of 1998 and 1997. Land sales included revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 of approximately $16 million from the sale of the 6,700 area Kealia parcel on Kauai, $9.6 million from the sale of the 740- acre Olowalu parcel on Maui, $3.8 million of land sales related to Kaanapali Golf Estates and $1.9 million primarily from the sale of unentitled agricultural and conservation land parcels on Kauai and Hawaii. The Company has received $5.5 million of the $16 million Kealia parcel sales proceeds and the remaining $10.5 million is payable (pursuant to the terms of a first mortgage note) in three equal installments due in late 1998 and early 1999. During the first nine months of 1998, property cost of sales were $44.1 million as compared to $28.3 million in the first nine months of 1997. The $15.8 million increase in costs was due primarily to an increase in sales volume associated with land parcels sold (as discussed above). Property sales and cost of sales increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 1998 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 1997 due to higher sales volume. Operating income deteriorated slightly primarily due to slightly lower margins realized on property sold during 1998 offset in part by lower general and administrative expenses. (a) Maui In general, the development of the Company's land on Maui is expected to be long-term in nature. As Maui is less populated than Oahu and more dependent on the resort/tourism industry, much of the Company's land is intended for resort and resort-related uses. Due to overall economic conditions and trends in tourism, demand for these land uses has been weak. The Company's homesite inventory on Maui, which is targeted to the second home buyer, has experienced slower sales activity over the past five years than originally expected. The Company's competitors on Maui have also experienced slow sales activity. The Company is continuing to evaluate its plans and the timing of development of its land holdings in light of the current weak market demand and the capital resources needed for future development. The Company has determined that the focus of its development efforts should be on its Kaanapali/Honokowai land holdings (approximately 3,200 acres) on Maui. Although additional governmental approvals are required for most of these lands, approximately 900 acres of the Company's Kaanapali/Honokowai land holdings already have some form of entitlements. Due to the strong market appeal of the Kaanapali Beach Resort, the Company believes its development efforts are best concentrated in this area where it has certain development approvals already secured. The Company's Kahoma and Launiupoko properties (in total approximately 8,000 acres) are considered to be better suited in the near term for agricultural uses and possibly for lower density, more rural developments. To generate cash, the Company has decided to sell certain portions of these land holdings as unentitled parcels, and may consider selling additional portions of these lands based upon market conditions and the cash needs of the Company. The Company expects to list another 300 to 400 acres on Maui before the end of this year. KAANAPALI GOLF ESTATES. The Company is marketing Kaanapali Golf Estates ("KGE"), a residential community that is part of the Kaanapali Beach Resort on West Maui. KGE is divided into several parcels and is approved for 340 homesites of which the Company through individual and bulk sales has sold approximately 90 homesites. In May 1997, the Company obtained final subdivision approval for a 32-lot subdivision of one such parcel, referred to as "Parcel 17B". The Company commenced on-site construction of the subdivision improvements for Parcel 17B in August 1997 and completed these improvements in March 1998 at a cost of approximately $1.7 million. During 1997, the Company generated approximately $2.8 million from the sale of 18 lots at Parcel 17B and approximately $2.0 million from the sale of the remaining 6 lots in a nearby parcel referred to as Parcel 14. For the nine months ended September 30, 1998, the Company generated $2.0 million from the sale of twelve lots at Parcel 17B. One additional lot was sold in October 1998 and there is currently one lot available. In May 1998, the Company sold Parcel 18, an 18-lot subdivision in KGE, in bulk for $1.8 million. KAI ALA PLACE. In 1995, the Company subdivided an oceanfront parcel commonly known as Kai Ala Place into six single family homesites of approximately one acre each. Two of the lots were sold in 1995 generating sales proceeds of approximately $4.1 million. The remaining four lots were sold in 1997 as a package to a local developer for a "package" price of $5.2 million. NORTH BEACH. The Company has received the final county approval needed to develop the Kaanapali Ocean Resort ("KOR"), the Company's 280 unit time share project. The Company has completed the purchase of Tobishima Pacific, Inc.'s ("TPI") 50% ownership interest in the 96-acre beachfront parcel commonly referred to as Kaanapali North Beach. The Company and TPI were unable to agree on key operating decisions related to the development KOR and the future development plan for the entire North Beach property. To break the deadlock on these issues, the Company exercised a buy/sell option with a $12 million stated price and TPI elected to sell its interest. The Company financed 80% of the purchase price for TPI's interest in North Beach and signed a note and first mortgage in favor of TPI for $9.6 million. The note is payable in five equal, annual principal installments beginning in September 1999 and with interest at 8.5% is payable quarterly beginning in December 1998. To obtain final approval for the planned development of the 280-unit KOR, the Company filed an application for a special management area use permit with the County of Maui ("SMA Permit") in March 1997. The Maui Planning Commission held hearings in mid-October 1998 on the Company's SMA Permit application and final action by the Commission was taken on or about October 27, 1998, granting the Company the necessary approvals to proceed with KOR. Although this project may provide substantial long-term benefits, the Company does not expect significant net cash flow over the next few years from this project. In connection with the SMA Permit for KOR, the Company signed a settlement agreement with certain Maui citizens who were opposing the project in "contested case hearings". Additionally, several opposing citizens who did not enter into the settlement agreement signed letters agreeing to withdraw from the contested case hearings. The Company submitted the settlement agreement to the Maui Planning Commission in October 1998, which assisted the Company in getting a favorable vote from the Commission on the project. Key provisions of the settlement agreement include a new 10-acre public recreational area on North Beach, a maximum limit of 1,950 units density on North Beach (versus the existing 3,200 units) and a requirement to implement certain drainage improvements associated with the development of the Company's remaining Kaanapali lands. Concurrent with construction of KOR, the Company plans to begin construction of improvements for a 13-acre public park at Wainee, Maui. The park land and improvements will be donated by the Company to the County of Maui. In February 1997, the Company formed a limited partnership with an affiliate of an experienced time-share development and management company. Kaanapali Ownership Resorts L.P., the new limited partnership, is owned 85% by affiliates of the Company and 15% by Kaanapali Partners Limited Partnership, an affiliate of the owners of The Ridge Tahoe resort in Nevada. Construction plans for KOR are expected to be finalized late this year, and construction is expected to start in early spring 1999. The Company is working with various lenders to obtain construction and other financing for KOR. Sales of time share intervals are scheduled to begin during the summer of 1999. In September 1997, the Company and Tobishima entered into an agreement with Maui County providing the County with the option to purchase 33 acres at North Beach (separate from the Site) for $15 million. In connection with receiving the SMA permit for KOR, the Company agreed to extend the option for a period of six to twelve months and to provide alternative park sites for the County's consideration. Specifically, the County could decide to purchase a smaller portion of the original 33 acre option site for the original per acre purchase price. Alternatively, the County could decide to purchase 17 acres located directly to the south of the original option site again for the original per acre purchase price. The Company will work directly with the new County administration and council on this option. NORTH BEACH MAUKA. The Company has plans for an additional 18-hole golf course, condominiums, commercial/retail and residential uses. The Company also plans to evaluate adding a significant time-share component to the development plans for this 318-acre parcel. Currently, the Company has Community Plan approvals and R-3 zoning (residential, minimum 10,000 square foot lots) for North Beach Mauka. State urbanization is required, along with final zoning and subdivision. PUUKOLII VILLAGE. The Company has regulatory approval to develop a project known as "Puukolii Village", on approximately 249 acres which is also located near Kaanapali Beach Resort. A significant portion of this project will be affordable housing. Development of most of Puukolii Village cannot commence until after completion of the planned Lahaina/Kaanapali bypass highway. The proposed development of Puukolii Village is anticipated to satisfy the Company's affordable housing requirements in connection with its Kaanapali/Honokowai land use entitlements. For the portion of Puukolii Village that is not dependent upon completion of the Lahaina/Kaanapali bypass highway, the Company has unsuccessfully attempted to sell several residential parcels to home builders and multi-family residential developers. Until such time that an acceptable agreement can be reached with a housing developer, limited funds will be expended on infrastructure (including an access road) for Puukolii Village. In connection with certain of the Company's land use approvals on Maui, the Company has agreed to provide employee and affordable housing and to participate in the funding of the design and construction of the planned Lahaina/Kaanapali bypass highway. The Company has entered into an agreement with the State of Hawaii Department of Transportation covering the Company's participation in the design and construction of the bypass highway. In conjunction with state urbanization of the Company's Kaanapali Golf Estates project, the Company committed to spend up to $3.5 million, (of which approximately $.8 million has been spent as of June 30, 1998) toward the design of the highway. Due to lengthy delays by the State in the planned start date for the bypass highway, the Company recently funded approximately $1.0 million for the engineering and design of the widening (from 2 to 4 lanes) of the existing highway through the Kaanapali Beach Resort. The Company believes this $1.0 million can be credited against the $3.5 million commitment discussed above. The Company's remaining commitment of another $6.7 million for the construction of the bypass highway is subject to the Company obtaining future entitlements on Maui and the actual construction of the bypass highway. The development and construction of the bypass highway is expected to be a long-term project that will not be completed until the year 2004 or later. (b) Oahu In 1997, the Company began developing the 64 acres of fee simple land it owns at the Oahu Sugar mill-site. The Company has received county zoning for a light industrial subdivision on a 37-acre portion of the property, which excludes property containing the actual sugar mill and adjacent buildings. In connection with the development of this property, the Company has received state land use urbanization for the entire 64-acre site. In November 1998, the Company sold certain mill-site property which served as collateral for the $10 million City Bank loan for an approximate sales price of $7.7 million in cash plus 2% of the gross sales price of subsequent parcel sales of all or any portion of the property by the purchaser. The bank required $6 million of the sales proceeds as a principal reduction on the loan in order to release the collateral. The purchaser assumed responsibility for completion of the infrastructure requirements for this portion of the mill-site development project. The Company received a one-year extension on the $4 million remaining balance of the loan which is secured by another parcel at the mill-site. The extended loan bears interest at the bank's base rate (8.5% at September 30, 1998) plus 1.25% and matures on December 1, 1999. The Company is currently negotiating contracts for other bulk land sales at this development. The infrastructure for mill-site development was expected to cost approximately $5.9 million, of which $4.0 million has been spent through September 30, 1998. The Company does not anticipate completing additional infrastructure. The Waikele Golf Course has experienced a significant drop in play from eastbound tour groups which has depressed rounds, average rate, and as a result, net operating income. The Company has developed and implemented a marketing plan to return the golf course to its previous levels of profitability. It is difficult, however, to predict how effective these efforts will be. (c) Kauai The Company owns approximately 21,200 acres of land on the island of Kauai, the vast majority of which is classified and zoned by the State of Hawaii and the County of Kauai, respectively, as agricultural and conservation lands. There are two large contiguous parcels which comprise the bulk of these Kauai land holdings: Kapaa and Lihue/Hanamaulu. Each of the parcels is located along the eastern shore of Kauai. Large portions of the agricultural lands are currently used for sugar cane cultivation, and portions of the conservation lands are utilized by the Company's sugar plantations to collect, store and transmit irrigation water from mountainous areas to the sugar cane fields. The Company has state urbanization and county zoning for a 552 acre master-planned community known as the Lihue/Hanamaulu Town Expansion, which includes approximately 1,800 affordable and market rate residential units, commercial and industrial facilities and a number of community and other public uses. The Company does not plan to pursue subdivision and building permits for this project until the real estate market on Kauai improves. Once construction commences, the project could span 20 years. The Company has decided to sell large portions of its Kauai land holdings which includes primarily 2,000 acres in Kapaa. The Company has certain additional lands also listed for sale; however, many of these are smaller remnant parcels. The Company may consider selling additional portions of these lands based upon market conditions and the cash needs of the Company. The Company expects to list another 400 to 500 acres on Kauai before the end of this year. (d) Hawaii The Company owns approximately 700 acres of land on the island of Hawaii of which almost all are classified by the State of Hawaii and zoned by the County of Hawaii as agricultural lands. These lands are located on the eastern (windward) side of the island, primarily in the Keaau and Pahoa districts, south of the town of Hilo. PART II. OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS The Company is not involved in any material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business. The Company and/or certain of its affiliates have been named as defendants in several pending lawsuits. While it is impossible to predict the outcome of the litigation that is now pending (or threatened) and for which the potential liability is not covered by insurance, the Company is of the opinion that the ultimate liability from any of the litigation will not materially adversely affect the Company's results of operations or its financial condition. ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) The following documents are included as an exhibits to this report. Exhibit No. Exhibit - ------- -------- 4.1 Indenture, including the form of COLAs, among Amfac/JMB Hawaii, Inc., its subsidiaries as Guarantors and Continental Bank National Association, as Trustee (dated as of March 14, 1989). (2) 4.2 Amendment dated as of January 17, 1990 to the Indenture relating to the COLAs. (2) 4.3 $28,097,832 Promissory Note from Amfac, Inc. to Amfac/JMB Hawaii, Inc. Extended and Reissued Effective December 31, 1993. (3) 4.4 The five year $66,000,000 loan with the Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii to Amfac/JMB Hawaii, Inc. as of June 25, 1991. (4) 4.5 $15,000,000 Credit Agreement dated March 31, 1993 among AMFAC/JMB Hawaii, Inc. and Continental Bank N.A (5). 4.6 $10,000,000 loan agreement between Waikele Golf Club, Inc. and ORIX USA Corporation. $10,000,000 loan agreement between Waikele Golf Club, Inc. and Bank of Hawaii. (6) 4.7 $52,000,000 Promissory Note to Northbrook Corporation from Amfac/JMB Hawaii, Inc., effective May 31, 1995. (7) 4.8 Agreement for delivery and sale of raw sugar between Hawaii Sugar Transportation Corporation, as seller, and C&H, as Buyer, dated June 4, 1993. (8) 4.9 Standard Sugar Marketing Contracts between Hawaiian Sugar Transportation Company and Hawaii Sugar Growers dated June 4, 1993. (9) 4.10 Amendment to the $66,000,000 loan with the Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii to Amfac/JMB Hawaii, Inc. as of April 18, 1996. (9) 4.11 Amended and Restated $52,000,000 Promissory Note to Northbrook Corporation from Amfac/JMB Hawaii, Inc. extended and reissued effective June 1, 1996. (10) 4.12 Amended and Restated $28,087,832 Promissory Note from Amfac, Inc. to Amfac/JMB Hawaii, Inc. extended and reissued effective June 1, 1996. (10) 4.13 $10,000,000 loan agreement between Amfac Property Development Corp. and City Bank at December 18, 1996. (11) 4.14 Amended and Restated $25,000,000 loan agreement with the Bank of Hawaii dated February 4, 1997. (12) 4.15 Limited Partnership Agreement for Kaanapali Ownership Resorts, L.P. dated February 1, 1997 for development of time-share resort on Kaanapali. (11) 4.16 Second Supplement to the Indenture dated as of March 1, 1998. (13) 4.17 $104,759,324 promissory Note between Northbrook Corporation and Amfac Land Company, Ltd. dated January 1, 1998. (13) 4.18 Revolving Credit Note between Fred Harvey Transportation Company, Inc. and Amfac Land Company, Ltd., dated January 1, 1998. (13) 10.1 Escrow Deposit Agreement. (1) 10.2 General Lease S-4222, dated January 1, 1969, by and between the State of Hawaii and Kekaha Sugar Company, Limited. (1) 10.3 Grove Farm Haiku Lease, dated January 25, 1974 by and between Grove Farm Company, Incorporated and The Lihue Plantation Company, Limited. (1) 10.4 General Lease S-4412, dated October 31, 1974, by and between the State of Hawaii and the Lihue Plantation Company, Limited. (1) 10.5 General Lease S-4576, dated March 15, 1978, by and between the State of Hawaii and The Lihue Plantation Company, Limited. (1) 10.6 General Lease S-3821, dated July 8, 1964, by and between the State of Hawaii and East Kauai Water Company, Ltd. (1) 10.7 Amended and Restated Power Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 15, 1992, by and between The Lihue Plantation Company, Limited and Citizens Utilities Company. (1) 10.8 U.S. Navy Waipio Peninsula Agricultural Lease, dated May 26, 1964, between The United States of America (as represented by the U.S. Navy) and Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. (1) 10.9 Amendment to the Robinson Estate Hoaeae Lease, dated May 15, 1967, by and between various Robinsons, heirs of Robinsons, Trustees and Executors, etc. and Oahu Sugar Company, Limited amending and restating the previous lease. (1) 10.10 Amendment to the Campbell Estate Lease, dated April 16, 1970, between Trustees under the Will and of the Estate of James Campbell, Deceased, and Oahu Sugar Company, Limited amending and restating the previous lease. (1) 10.11 Bishop Estate Lease No. 24,878, dated June 17, 1977, by and between the Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop and Pioneer Mill Company, Limited. (1) 10.12 General Lease S-4229, dated February 25, 1969, by and between the State of Hawaii, by its Board of Land and Natural Resources and Pioneer Mill Company, Limited. (1) 10.13 Honokohau Water License, dated December 22, 1980, between Maui Pineapple Company Ltd. and Pioneer Mill Company, Limited. (1) 10.14 Water Licensing Agreement, dated September 22, 1980, by and between Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. and Amfac, Inc. (1) 10.15 Joint Venture Agreement, dated as of March 19, 1986, by and between Amfac Property Development Corp. and Tobishima Properties of Hawaii, Inc. (1) 10.16 Development Agreement, dated March 19, 1986, by and between Kaanapali North Beach Joint Venture and Amfac Property Investment Corp. and Tobishima Pacific, Inc. (1) 10.19 Keep-Well Agreement between Northbrook Corporation and Amfac/JMB Finance, Inc. (2) 10.20 Repurchase Agreement, dated March 14, 1989, by and between Amfac/JMB Hawaii, Inc. and Amfac/JMB Finance, Inc. (2) 10.21 Amfac Hawaii Tax Agreement, dated November 21, 1988 between Amfac/JMB Hawaii, Inc., and Amfac Property Development Corp.; Amfac Property Investment Corp.; Amfac Sugar and Agribusiness, Inc.; Kaanapali Water Corporation; Amfac Agribusiness, Inc.; Kekaha Sugar Company, Limited; The Lihue Plantation Company, Limited; Oahu Sugar Company, Limited; Pioneer Mill Company, Limited; Puna Sugar Company, Limited; H. Hackfeld & Co., Ltd.; and Waiahole Irrigation Company, Limited. (2) 10.22 Amfac-Amfac Hawaii Tax Agreement, dated February 21, 1989 between Amfac, Inc. and Amfac/JMB Hawaii, Inc. (2) 10.23 Services Agreement, dated November 18, 1988, between Amfac/JMB Hawaii, Inc., and Amfac Property Development Corp.; Amfac Property Investment Corp.; Amfac Sugar and Agribusiness, Inc.; Kaanapali Water Corporation; Amfac Agribusiness, Inc.; Kekaha Sugar Company, Limited; The Lihue Plantation Company, Limited; Oahu Sugar Company, Limited; Pioneer Mill Company, Limited; Puna Sugar Company, Limited; H. Hackfeld & Co., Ltd.; and Waiahole Irrigation Company, Limited and JMB Realty Corporation. (2) 10.24. Amended buy-sell notice dated August 27, 1998 from APIC are filed herewith. 10.25. Assignment and assumption agreement dated September 30, 1998, executed by TPI and APIC are filed herewith. 10.26. Purchase money promissory note secured by mortgage dated September 30, 1998, executed by APIC are filed herewith. 19.0 $35,700,000 agreement for sale of C&H and certain other C&H assets, to A&B Hawaii, Inc. in June 1993. (7) 22.1 Subsidiaries of Amfac/JMB Hawaii, Inc. (1) 99.1 A copy of pages 19, 41-45 and 51 of the Prospectus of the Company dated December 5, 1988 (relating to SEC Registration Statement on Form S-1 (as amended) File No. 33-24180) and hereby incorporated by reference. (2) Pursuant to Item 6.01 (b)(4) of Regulation SK, the registrant hereby undertakes to provide the Commission upon its request a copy of any agreement with respect to long-term indebtedness of the registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries that does not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. (1) Previously filed as exhibits to the Company's Registration Statement of Form S-1 (as amended) under the Securities Act of 1933 (File No. 33-24180) and hereby incorporated by reference. (2) Previously filed as exhibits to the Company's Form 10-K report under the Securities Act of 1934 (File No. 33-24180) filed on March 27, 1989 and hereby incorporated by reference. (3) Previously filed as exhibits to the Company's Form 10-K report under the Securities Act of 1934 (File No. 33-24180) filed on March 27, 1991 and hereby incorporated by reference. (4) Previously filed as exhibits to the Company's Form 10-Q report under the Securities Act of 1934 (File No. 33-24180) filed on August 13, 1991 and hereby incorporated by reference. (5) Previously filed as exhibit to the Company's Form 10-Q report under the Securities Act of 1934 (File No. 33-24180) filed on May 14, 1993 and hereby incorporated by reference. (6) Previously filed as exhibit to the Company's Form 10-Q report under the Securities Act of 1934 (File No. 33-24180) filed on November 11, 1993 and hereby incorporated by reference. (7) Previously filed as exhibits to the Company's Form 10-K report under the Securities Act of 1934 (File No. 33-24180) filed on March 27, 1994 and hereby incorporated by reference. (8) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Form 10-Q report under the Securities Act of 1934 (File No. 33-24180) filed May 12, 1995 and hereby incorporated by reference. (9) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Form 10-Q report under the Securities Act of 1934 (File No. 33-24180) filed May 13, 1996 and hereby incorporated by reference. (10) Previously filed as exhibit to the Company's Form 10-Q report under the Securities Act of 1934 (File No. 33-24180) filed on August 13, 1996 and hereby incorporated by reference. (11) Previously filed as exhibit to the Company's Form 10-K report under the Securities Act of 1934 (File No. 33-24180) filed March 21, 1997 and hereby incorporated by reference. (12) Previously filed as exhibit to the Company's Form 10-Q report under the Securities Act of 1934 (File No. 33-24180) filed May 15, 1996 and hereby incorporated by reference. (13) Previously filed as exhibit to the Company's Form 8-K report under the Securities Act of 1934 (File No. 33-24180) filed March 3, 1998 and hereby incorporated by reference. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- By: Edward J. Kroll Vice President Date: November 12, 1998 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person in the capacity and on the date indicated. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- Edward J. Kroll Principal Accounting Officer Date: November 12, 1998 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. AMFAC/JMB FINANCE, INC. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- By: Edward J. Kroll Vice President Date: November 12, 1998 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person in the capacity and on the date indicated. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- Edward J. Kroll Principal Accounting Officer Date: November 12, 1998 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. AMFAC LAND COMPANY, LIMITED /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- By: Edward J. Kroll Vice President Date: November 12, 1998 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person in the capacity and on the date indicated. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- Edward J. Kroll Principal Accounting Officer Date: August 12, 1998 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. AMFAC PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CORP. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- By: Edward J. Kroll Vice President Date: November 12, 1998 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person in the capacity and on the date indicated. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- Edward J. Kroll Principal Accounting Officer Date: August 12, 1998 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. AMFAC PROPERTY INVESTMENT CORP. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- By: Edward J. Kroll Vice President Date: November 12, 1998 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person in the capacity and on the date indicated. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- Edward J. Kroll Principal Accounting Officer Date: November 12, 1998 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. H. HACKFIELD & CO., LTD. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- By: Edward J. Kroll Vice President Date: November 12, 1998 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person in the capacity and on the date indicated. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- Edward J. Kroll Principal Accounting Officer Date: November 12, 1998 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. KAANAPALI ESTATES COFFEE, INC. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- By: Edward J. Kroll Vice President Date: November 12, 1998 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person in the capacity and on the date indicated. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- Edward J. Kroll Principal Accounting Officer Date: November 12, 1998 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. KAANAPALI WATER CORPORATION /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- By: Edward J. Kroll Vice President Date: November 12, 1998 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person in the capacity and on the date indicated. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- Edward J. Kroll Principal Accounting Officer Date: November 12, 1998 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. KEKAHA SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- By: Edward J. Kroll Vice President Date: November 12, 1998 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person in the capacity and on the date indicated. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- Edward J. Kroll Principal Accounting Officer Date: November 12, 1998 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. THE LIHUE PLANTATION COMPANY, LIMITED /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- By: Edward J. Kroll Vice President Date: November 12, 1998 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person in the capacity and on the date indicated. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- Edward J. Kroll Principal Accounting Officer Date: November 12, 1998 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. OAHU SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- By: Edward J. Kroll Vice President Date: November 12, 1998 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person in the capacity and on the date indicated. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- Edward J. Kroll Principal Accounting Officer Date: August 12, 1998 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. PIONEER MILL COMPANY, LIMITED /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- By: Edward J. Kroll Vice President Date: November 12, 1998 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person in the capacity and on the date indicated. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- Edward J. Kroll Principal Accounting Officer Date: November 12, 1998 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. PUNA SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- By: Edward J. Kroll Vice President Date: November 12, 1998 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person in the capacity and on the date indicated. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- Edward J. Kroll Principal Accounting Officer Date: November 12, 1998 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. WAIAHOLE IRRIGATION COMPANY, LIMITED /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- By: Edward J. Kroll Vice President Date: November 12, 1998 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person in the capacity and on the date indicated. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- Edward J. Kroll Principal Accounting Officer Date: November 12, 1998 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. WAIKELE GOLF CLUB, INC. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- By: Edward J. Kroll Vice President Date: November 12, 1998 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person in the capacity and on the date indicated. /s/ EDWARD J. KROLL ------------------- Edward J. Kroll Principal Accounting Officer Date: November 12, 1998