Exhibit 99.2

                                 B&G Foods, Inc.
               Q4 and Fiscal 2004 Earnings Conference Call Script
                                  March 2, 2005


Viavid Operator
Instructions/Introduction

David Wenner
Thank you.  Welcome  everyone  to the B&G Foods  fourth  quarter and fiscal 2004
conference call.

Everyone  on the call today can access  detailed  financial  information  on the
quarter  in  our  press   release,   which  is   available  on  our  website  at
www.bgfoods.com.

Before we begin our formal  remarks I need to remind  everyone  that part of our
discussion today may include forward looking statements.  The statements are not
guarantees of future  performance and therefore undue reliance should not be put
upon  them.  We refer all of you to our recent  filings  with the SEC for a more
detailed  discussion of the risks that could impact our future operating results
and  financial  condition.  We also will be making  reference on today's call to
certain non GAAP terms like EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA. A reconciliation to GAAP
terms is provided in today's press release and our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

I'd like to start the call by asking Bob Cantwell, our CFO, to discuss financial
results for the year.  After Bob's remarks I'll discuss  factors that influenced
the fourth quarter,  certain business highlights as well as some of the dynamics
we see going forward.

Bob Cantwell
Thank you, Dave.


First I will review the full year, then talk about the fourth quarter.

Net Sales

Net sales  increased $44.4 million or 13.5% to $372.8 million for the year ended
January 1, 2005,  compared to $328.4 million for the previous year.  Fiscal 2004
had one less week than fiscal 2003. Our  acquisition of Ortega in August of 2003
accounted for $44.2  million of the sales  increase  during  fiscal 2004.  Sales
increases  were driven by higher unit volume in our brands as follows:  Sales of
Trappey's  increased $1.7 million,  or 11.9%; Maple Grove Farms of Vermont sales
increased  $1.4  million,  or 2.9%;  Las Palmas grew by $0.7  million,  or 3.3%;
Polaner increased $0.6 million, or 1.6%; Underwood grew by $0.4 million, or





1.9%; and Emeril's brands increased $0.3 million, or 1.4%. Lower unit volume was
seen in our B&M Baked Bean brand, which decreased $2.2 million,  or 9.0%; in B&G
pickle and pepper brand,  which  decreased  $1.7 million or 3.8%, and in and our
Joan of Arc brand,  which  decreased by $0.9 million,  or 7.8%. All other brands
decreased, in the aggregate, $0.1 million or 0.2%.

Gross Profit

Gross profit  increased  $9.7  million or 9.6% to $111.9  million in fiscal 2004
from $102.2  million in fiscal  2003.  As a percentage  of net sales,  the gross
profit margin  decreased to 30.0% in fiscal 2004 from 31.1% in fiscal 2003. This
decrease was primarily due to higher costs of packaging and certain commodities,
including maple syrup, meat, chicken and beans.

Operating Expenses

Turning to the year's operating expenses,

Sales,  marketing and  distribution  expenses  increased $3.7 million or 9.5% to
$43.2 million for fiscal 2004,  compared to $39.5 million for fiscal 2003. These
expenses  expressed  as a percentage  of net sales  decreased to 11.6% in fiscal
2004 from  12.0% in fiscal  2003.  The  Ortega  acquisition  accounted  for $5.6
million of the increase in sales and  marketing  expenses  for fiscal 2004.  For
brands other than Ortega,  marketing  costs  decreased $0.9 million  relating to
reduced spending on consumer  marketing  programs during fiscal 2004 as compared
with 2003. All other sales, marketing and distribution expenses, which primarily
include incentive compensation, decreased $1.0 million during fiscal 2004.

General & administrative  expenses,  including  management fees,  decreased $1.5
million or 22.6% to $5.3  million in fiscal  2004  compared  to $6.8  million in
fiscal 2003.  Fiscal 2003 included a bad debt write-off of $0.6 million relating
to Fleming  Companies,  Inc.,  which  filed  Chapter 11 on April 1, 2003.  Other
decreases  in general  and  administrative  expenses  in 2004  compared  to 2003
included  incentive  compensation  of $0.8  million  and other  expenses of $0.1
million.

Operating Income

In the  fourth  quarter  of  2004,  the  Company  incurred  transaction  related
compensation  expenses of $9.9 million. As a result of these transaction related
compensation  expenses,  operating income decreased 4.2% to $53.6 million during
fiscal  2004 from $55.9  million in fiscal  2003.  Excluding  these  transaction
related expenses, operating income increased 13.5% to $63.4 million.





Interest Expense

Interest  expense,  net increased  $17.0 million to $48.2 million in fiscal 2004
from $31.2 million in fiscal 2003.  Interest  expense for fiscal 2004 included a
an expense of $13.9  million  relating to the:  write-off of deferred  financing
costs,  bond tender costs and payment of bond  discount in  connection  with our
initial public offering.  Interest expense in fiscal 2003 includes the write-off
of $1.8 million of deferred  financing costs in connection with the repayment of
our then existing term loan B. Excluding these charges,  the remaining  interest
expense increase in fiscal 2004 of $4.8 million related primarily to an increase
in average debt outstanding as a result of the August 2003 acquisition of Ortega
and an increase in interest rates under our term loan versus fiscal 2003.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

I'd like to take a moment  to  discuss  EBITDA  and  adjusted  EBITDA,  non-GAAP
financial  measures  that we have  reconciled  to net cash provided by operating
activities in our press release. Our EBITDA decreased to $60.3 million in fiscal
2004  compared to $61.9  million in fiscal  2003.  On an adjusted  basis,  which
excludes transaction  expenses,  our EBITDA was $70.2 million.  Again, I want to
emphasize  that we had one less week in fiscal  2004  compared  to last year and
while we  experienced a number of cost  increases in fiscal 2004, we did not see
the benefit of our price increases in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 and Dave
will speak to this shortly.

Fourth Quarter 2004
For the  fourth  quarter,  net  sales  decreased  4.8% to $96.4  million  in the
thirteen  weeks ended January 1, 2005 from $101.2  million in the fourteen weeks
ended January 3, 2004.  Gross profit decreased 18.6% to $26.5 million from $32.5
million in the comparable  period last year.  Operating income decreased to $3.9
million  from $17.4  million in the  comparable  period.  Excluding  transaction
related compensation expenses, operating income was $13.8 million for the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2004.  Adjusted EBITDA,  which takes into account $9.9 million
of transaction related compensation  expense,  decreased to $15.5 million in the
fourth  quarter of fiscal  2004 from $19.2  million in fourth  quarter of fiscal
2003.  The  decrease in adjusted  EBITDA is primarily  attributable  to one less
sales week,  material costs that increased  without the benefit of the announced
price  increases,  fuel  surcharges  and  under-absorption  of  overhead  due to
inventory reduction initiatives.


Capital Expenditures

Capital  Expenditures in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 were $1.3 million and
$6.6  million  for the full  year.  Most of our  capital  expenditures  were for
purchases of manufacturing and computer equipment. We continue to foresee modest
capital expenditure requirements in the future.




Balance Sheet

Moving onto the balance sheet,  we finished the year with $28.5 million of cash,
up from $8.0  million at the end of fiscal  2003.  At year end had a little over
$408 million in long-term debt and over $92 million in shareholders equity.

Future Cash Needs Include:

Expected cash taxes in fiscal 2005 are $0.

Planned capital spending is between $6.5 and $7.0 million.

Annual cash interest expense for fiscal 2005 is approximately $39.1 million.

With our new capital  structure in place, we made our first dividend  payment on
the class A common stock and interest payment on the senior  subordinated  notes
on January 31st to holders of record as of December 31st, 2004.

As our SEC filings indicate per the Company's  dividend policy, we intend to pay
quarterly  dividends of 21.2 cents per class A share of common stock through the
first four full quarterly  dividend payment periods following our initial public
offering,  which was completed in October 2004.  Please  remember that dividends
are not  mandatory  or  guaranteed  and our  dividend  policy can be modified or
revoked at any time.  In addition,  the actual  amount of dividends  distributed
under the policy and the  decision  to make  distributions  is  entirely  at the
discretion of our Board of Directors.  Further,  any dividends must be permitted
by applicable law and the terms of our  indebtedness.  The interest  payments on
the senior subordinated notes will be approximately 21.45 cents per quarter.

I will now turn the call back over to Dave for his remarks. Dave?


David Wenner

Thank you, Bob.



There are a lot of things to discuss on today's call,  but before I get into the
issues   facing  the   business,   I  would  like  to  point  out  some  of  our
accomplishments is 2004.




First,  the company  completed  its first full year of  ownership  of the Ortega
brand.  This helped a set a sales record for the year - reaching  $372.8 million
in net sales,  a $44.4 million  increase,  or plus 13.5%.  This was a major step
forward for B&G as a company,  and allowed us to increase our adjusted EBITDA to
$70.2 million.  It's important to point out that the EBITDA we are reporting for
the year is $60.3 million,  but adjusted for  transaction-related  expenses,  it
reached the $70.2 million number I just cited. The difference  between those two
numbers was  comprehended in the cash position of the business coming out of the
IPO transaction.


The   successful   completion  of  our  EIS  IPO  is  really  the  second  major
accomplishment  for the company.  This  provided  our sponsors  with a return on
their  investment  after nearly eight years of ownership  but more  importantly,
provided our employees  with a sense of the future of the company.  After nearly
20 years of ownership by financial sponsors, that is a welcome event.


When we look at the  fourth  quarter  and full  year  2004,  it's  important  to
remember  that 2004 had one less week of sales  than 2003,  and this  negatively
impacted  our year over year  revenue  comparison,  although  not as much as the
potential  impact,  which could have been just under 2%. We also did not realize
price  increases  in the  fourth  quarter as  quickly  as we  anticipated.  When
enacting  price  increases,  even though they are  announced  broadly,  they are
implemented on a  customer-by-customer  basis, and there is generally a lag from
the  announcement to actual  implementation.  Because of this, most of the price
increases  we  initiated  to  customers  for the fourth  quarter  weren't  fully
implemented until the start of 2005, which is later than we expected.


With one less week in the fourth quarter, or nearly 8% less sales time, combined
with the lack of a benefit from pricing that I just mentioned, net sales for the
quarter were $96.4 million, down $4.8 million or 4.7%.





In spite of that,  9 of the 16 brands we track were up in sales for the year and
the overall business, excluding Ortega because of the incomplete comparison, was
up slightly versus prior year.  Depending on your outlook on the business,  that
could be a positive  or a negative.  We think of it as a  positive,  since sales
grew 3% on a same-week basis. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter declined more than
sales,  however, for the reasons Bob cited in his overview.  Adjusted EBITDA was
down 19% or $3.6 million, to $15.5 million. The first factor, of course, was the
margin on the sales change,  which we calculate to be roughly $1.5  million.  As
I've said,  we saw little or no benefit from the price  increases  that had been
announced  previously,  and which we hoped would lift Q4 sales and EBITDA. Cost,
meanwhile, hit us with full effect in a number of ways. Oil spiked in the fourth
quarter,  causing  fuel  surcharges  much higher than we had seen earlier in the
year.  These  surcharges  added nearly $500,000 to our  distribution and utility
costs in the quarter.  Additionally we had referenced approximately $3.0 million
in  annualized  material and commodity  costs on earlier calls - that  increased
further in the quarter and in total impacted  cost-of-goods  approximately  $1.0
million.  Finally,  implicit in our plan to reduce  inventory was a reduction in
volume in the plants - aggravated by lower than expected  sales - which resulted
in under-absorption of overhead of approximately $600,000.

Other  expenses  within the company were well under control for the year and the
quarter.  Our G&A spending  declined  due to lower  management  bonus  accruals,
offset  by higher  public  company  costs.  Sales and  marketing  expenses  also
declined,  primarily  due to the cost of a 2003  marketing  program  behind  the
Emeril brand that we did not repeat in 2004.  Much of that spending was in Q4 in
2003 and,  although the program achieved the distribution  objectives we had for
it, it was judged to be an investment we would not repeat in 2004.


As we look  forward we have both  pluses and  minuses to deal with as a company.
Cost remains an issue - oil is spiking again, for instance,  and fuel surcharges
are going up after  backing  down early in the first  quarter of 2005.  While we
have made  progress  in some  areas - signing a contract  for glass that  should
yield  significant  savings this year, for instance - steel and other  packaging
costs may see further increases. Commodity costs have leveled in meat and beans,
and we anticipate  that beans at least will return to more normal levels by this
fall.  Meat -  primarily  ham in our case - is less  certain  because the export
market is still being affected by the specter of mad cow disease.  We anticipate
cost  increases on our co-packed Joan of Arc line and perhaps others to a lesser
degree, and have already announced price increases effective April 1st to offset
those  potential  increases.  And,  of course,  we face the steady  increase  in
benefit costs and new costs of operating as a public company.





None of that is to say we aren't being  proactive to offset  these  issues.  The
price  increases we announced  last year are fully  effective now, and have been
for much of the current quarter.  We have announced further price increases on a
number of our lines, including MGF maple syrup, MGF salad dressings, Joan of Arc
beans and Las Palmas products - all effective April 1st.


In addition, we continue to look for opportunities to improve the cost picture.


We have  announced the closing of the New Iberia,  Louisiana  plant,  planned to
take effect by July 1st.  Trappey  peppers and hot sauce,  and  Wright's  liquid
smoke  production  will move to our Hurlock,  Maryland  facility and Brer Rabbit
molasses to the  Roseland,  New Jersey  facility.  This shutdown will involve an
approximately  $600,000 cash charge for severance and other expenses, and modest
capex  expense that will be funded out of our normal annual capex budget of $6.5
million to relocate  equipment.  We expect the plant closing to yield annualized
costs savings of at least $1.0 million.  We are actively  working with the State
of Louisiana  and local  businesses  to place our  employees in new jobs once we
shut down.  There will also be a non-cash  write-down  on the  property of up to
$3.1 million in Q2 2005. There is already interest in the New Iberia property by
prospective purchasers, however, and any sale would reduce that number.


On the  brand  side,  we have  strengthened  a number  of  brands  that had been
problematic in prior years. Polaner sales were up in 2004 after several years of
decline.


We expect  the  sugar-free  line to  accelerate  that  growth  in 2005.  B&M has
stabilized;  the brand was down over $2.0  million in sales in 2004,  but was up
20% in Q4 due to our new pricing  strategy.  We anticipate  that B&G will have a
better year as well - the  Foodservice  business  that suffered for most of 2004
has been  doing  better  and  aggressive  retail  programs  are in place for key
holidays.





We are active on the new product front as well, introducing products in a number
of brands. We have launched new two SKU's in the Polaner sugar-free line and are
gaining distribution.  B&M has introduced a new flavor - Boston's Best - that is
rolling out in B&M's core markets for the summer  season.  Ortega has introduced
five new items - a hard and soft  taco  dinner  kit,  a chili  seasoning,  a hot
fire-roasted  diced chile product and,  completely unique for the brand, a salsa
and  cheese  dip bowl  product  and a nacho  cheese  dip  product.  All of these
products are being slotted into grocery  distribution;  the two cheese  products
are already in Wal-Mart  Supercenters.  There are other new items is the smaller
brands, such as new wine vinegars for Regina, but these are the major efforts to
drive top-line growth in the company.


Additionally,  we are  looking  at how we  allocate  our trade  and  promotional
dollars  in an  effort  to expand  our  slotting  efforts  in  support  of these
products. One source of those funds will be trade promotion dollars that are not
performing for us at retail. In that vein, we will transition a number of brands
to  pay-for-performance  trade spending this year.  Because of this, please note
that as we pull back on these  funds there will be a  temporary  dislocation  of
sales that we will have to manage,  especially  in Q1, but the net end result is
expected to be a lower trade expense that we can redeploy to new distribution.


Our M&A efforts are gaining  momentum,  having been restarted  after the IPO. We
have already passed on several potential  acquisitions because valuations became
too high,  but we are  actively  looking at a number of  possible  acquisitions.
While  there is nothing  imminent,  it is entirely  possible  that we will do an
acquisition in 2005 - most likely a smaller property rather than a larger one.


Our  company  remains  strong;  we ended 2004 with $28.5  million in cash on our
balance  sheet and made our first EIS dividend and interest  payments on January
31st of this  year.  As a result of the many  efforts  we are  making to counter
costs and  increase  sales in 2005 we believe  that fro  fiscal  2005 we will at
least maintain EBITDA at the 2004 level at the adjusted EBITDA of $70.2 million.
That  statement  is, of course,  based on all the normal  caveats  regarding our
assumptions, the risk factors in our S-1 filing and barring extraordinary events
in our business or outside our business. Having said that, I can assure you that
it remains  management's  absolute  priority to reach the $73.4  million  EBITDA
referenced  in the S-1 for  2005,  and we will be  working  diligently  to do so
throughout the year.


With that, I would like to open the call up for questions. Operator?