Exhibit 5.1
                                                                     -----------






                                            June 3, 2002



Textron Financial Corporation
40 Westminster Street
Providence, RI  02903

Re:  Registration Statement on Form S-3
     Rule 424(b) Prospectus Supplement

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We have  examined  the  Prospectus  Supplement  dated May 29, 2002 (the
"Prospectus  Supplement")  filed by Textron  Financial  Corporation,  a Delaware
corporation  (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on May
31, 2002 in connection with the issuance and sale by the Company of $600,000,000
aggregate principal amount of the Company's 5 7/8% Notes due 2007 (the "Notes").

         We have served as special counsel to the Company and, as such, assisted
in the  preparation of the Prospectus  Supplement.  In connection with rendering
this opinion, we have examined the following documents and records:

                (i)   a copy of the Prospectus Supplement;

                (iii) a copy of the  Registration  Statement as in effect on the
        date hereof, File No. 333-72676 (the "Registration Statement");

                (iv)  a copy of the Base  Prospectus  as in  effect  on the date
        hereof (together with the Prospectus Supplement, the "Prospectus");

                (v)   an executed copy of the Indenture, dated as of December 9,
        1999   between  the  Company  and   SunTrust   Bank,   as  trustee  (the
        "Indenture");

                (vi)  a specimen copy of the Notes;

                (vii) a copy of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
        Company  certified  by the  Secretary of State of the State of Delaware;
        and

                (viii) an executed copy of the Underwriting Agreement, dated May
        29, 2002,  which  incorporates  in its  entirety  the document  entitled
        Textron Financial Corporation Underwriting Agreement Standard Provisions
        dated December 2, 1999,  between the underwriters  named therein and the
        Company (the "Underwriting Agreement".

         We have also examined such corporate  records,  certificates  and other
documents,  and reviewed such  questions of law, as we have deemed  necessary or
appropriate in order to deliver the opinions contained herein.

         We have assumed (i) that all signatures on documents examined by us are
genuine;  (ii) that the  Company is duly  organized  and  validly  existing as a
corporation in good standing under the laws of its state of organization;  (iii)
the due  authorization,  execution and delivery of the Indenture,  the Notes and
the Underwriting Agreement by each party thereto (other than the Company);  (iv)
that the Underwriting  Agreement  constitutes a valid and binding  obligation of
each party thereto  enforceable against such party in accordance with its terms;
(v) the completeness and authenticity of all documents and records  submitted to
us as originals;  (vi) the conformity to original documents of all documents and
records submitted to us as certified,  conformed or photostatic  copies, and the
authenticity  of the  originals  of  such  copies;  (vii)  the  validity  of all
applicable  statutes,  ordinances,  rules and regulations;  and (viii) the legal
competence of all natural  persons  executing the  Indenture,  the Notes and the
Underwriting Agreement and the other documents contemplated thereby.

         The opinions hereinafter expressed are qualified to the extent that (i)
the  enforceability  of any right or remedy may be subject to or affected by any
bankruptcy,  reorganization,  insolvency,  avoidance,  equitable  subordination,
fraudulent  conveyance,  arrangement,   moratorium,  marshaling  or  other  laws
relating to or affecting the rights of creditors generally, whether the issue of
enforceability  is  considered  in a  proceeding  in equity or at law;  (ii) the
availability  of equitable  remedies may be limited by equitable  principles  of
general applicability;  or (iii) enforceability of any right or remedy under the
Indenture  or the Notes may be  limited  by (x)  requirements  that a claim with
respect  to any  Notes  denominated  other  than in U.S.  dollars  (or a foreign
currency or currency unit  judgment in respect of such claim) be converted  into
U.S. dollars at a rate of exchange  prevailing on a date determined  pursuant to
applicable  law or (y)  governmental  authority to limit,  delay or prohibit the
making of payments outside the United States.

         We are  qualified  to practice  law in the State of New York and do not
purport to express any opinion herein  concerning any law other than the laws of
the State of New York, the General  Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and
the federal law of the United States. Insofar as our opinion pertains to matters
of the laws of any  jurisdiction  other  than the laws of the State of New York,
the General  Corporation  Law of the State of Delaware or the federal law of the
United  States,  we have assumed,  with your  permission,  that the laws of such
other states are identical in all material  respects to the laws of the State of
New York, and have made no independent examination of such laws.

         Based upon such examination, it is our opinion that the Notes have been
duly  authorized  by  the  Company  and  will  be  legally  issued  and  binding
obligations of the Company  enforceable  against the Company in accordance  with
their terms.

         We  consent to the use of this  opinion as an exhibit to the  Company's
Current  Report on Form 8-K and to the  reference to our firm in the  Prospectus
Supplement.  In giving this consent,  we do not thereby admit that we are within
the  category  of persons  whose  consent  is  required  under  Section 7 of the
Securities  Act of  1933,  as  amended,  or the  rules  and  regulations  of the
Commission promulgated thereunder.

                                                 Very truly yours,


                                                 /s/ Edwards & Angell, LLP
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Edwards & Angell, LLP