JAMES R. LEONE
                                Attorney at Law
                                  P.O. Box 755
                        New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170-0755

                                 3188 Oak Lane
                              Edgewater, FL 32132
                            Telephone (386) 478-1743
                               Fax (386) 478-1744
                             Mobile (407) 701-8550

                        E-mail:jrleoneattorney@yahoo.com

                                February 25, 2003

BY MAIL AND FAX TO (202) 942-9516 (OR 15+ PP. -9626 OR 7 OR 8)
- --------------------------------------------------------------

Phone (202) 942-1794
STEVEN J. HEARNE, Attorney Examiner
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street NW
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:  Alfa Utility Services, Inc.
     File No. 333-86984
     Withdrawal Of Form SB-2 Registration Statement


Dear Mr. Hearne:

           1. FORM SB-2 WITHDRAWAL; FEE NOT RETURNABLE. Alfa Utility Services,
Inc. has authorized me to submit this request for withdrawal of its pending Form
SB-2 Registration Statement pursuant to Rule 477. Alfa understands that the
filing fee will not be returned.

           2. REASONS FOR WITHDRAWAL. The reasons for this request include the
following: (A) Alfa now has a less urgent need for issuance of stock at this
time or in the near future either for financing or for acquisitions. This is
discussed in more detail near the end of this letter. (B) Absent that urgent
need, Ontario Power Contracting Limited, which became a subsidiary of the former
"blank check" shell company, Envirotech Mfg. Co., renamed as Alfa (the
registrant), has realized that it need not give up such a high percentage of
stock as it left with the original shareholders of the shell in order to obtain
the advantages of a shall. (C) A straight registration now can be pursued with
the time available, with closer to 100% of the stock benefits being available to





          Page 1 of Alfa Utility Services Inc. Withdrawal of Form SB-2







Ontario Power and its employees, suppliers, customers, etc., or a different
shell can be utilized, all because Ontario Power has the legal means to
"unwind" from the Alfa/Envirotech shell. (D) Ontario Power  has been offered two
other shell acquisition opportunities on more favorable terms for its  purposes,
one having cash and tax losses to help finance business expansion. Thus, Ontario
Power is withdrawing from the Alfa/EMC shell and will use one of the other
shells or its own holding company as a registrant for a replacement Form SB-2.
Accordingly, the SB-2 is being withdrawn.

           3. FORM 10-SB AMENDMENT. The Form 10-SB soon will be amended to
reflect (A) the removal/withdrawal of Ontario Power from the Alfa/EMC shell, (B)
the shell's absence of assets and future revenues, (C) a likely shareholder vote
on dissolution, and (D) a concluding report to shareholders and the Commission.

           4. REPLACEMENT FORM SB-2 WITH REPLACEMENT HOLDING COMPANY REGISTRANT.
As indicated above, for its long term plans, and so as not to lose the benefits
of the Registration process, Ontario Power intends to utilize another holding
company as a Form SB-2 registrant. It is intended to be either an existing
or newly created subsidiary or a soon to be acquired shell with more favorable
terms for Ontario Power's needs. (One available shell has both significant cash
and operating losses for tax refunds that could finance business expansion for
Ontario Power.)

           5. EXPEDITED/CURSORY AND "PLAIN ENGLISH" REVIEW.

               5A. EXPEDITED/CURSORY REVIEW ADVICE REQUESTED. We would
appreciate your advice as to whether the replacement SB-2 would be favorably
considered for expedited or cursory review as to most of its disclosures in view
of the fact that the management and operational information would be virtually
identical to the Alfa SB-2, and the now deferred marker seeding and future
financing/acquisition issuances would be substantially or almost entirely the
same. The main difference would be that the Selling Shareholders would be
replaced and a much smaller number of Ontario Power employees, customers and/or
suppliers, and/or their families would be substituted. It appears likely there
would be few if any sales at the present time, other than perhaps a 5% dribble
out under a replacement Stock Resale Form.

               5B. "PLAIN ENGLISH" AND OTHER COMMENTS RESPONSE REVIEW IS
EXPECTED TO BE QUICK AND EASY WITH REDLINED TEXT. We believe there will not be
any significant delay or difficulty due to your "Plain English" comment number
1, for the following reasons. The front and back cover, Summary, and Risk
Factors are relatively short and will receive the closest "Plain English"
attention. Originally we thought we simply could compare the SB-2 to the 10-SB.
Because the 10-SB had




          Page 2 of Alfa Utility Services Inc. Withdrawal of Form SB-2






been reviewed five (5) times and had passed muster, we thought we would only
need to correct the SB-2 material which is not common with the 10-SB, in order
to comply with the "clear writing" requirements. However, we have started to
examine the "Plain English/Clear Writing" material suggested in comment number 1
in your January 13, 2003 Comment Letter on the SB-2 Amendment filed December 9,
2002. We now understand that only Prospectuses are subject to these rules, and
thus the common portions might need some revision. We are dismayed at that
possible inconsistency in the disclosure requirements, but we will do what is
necessary to become fully compliant. Please advise us whether 10-SB material now
in the SB-2 also needs "Plain English/Clear Writing" revision. The redlining on
the new SB-2 will show exactly where we replace the offensive phrases and
legalese. Our responses to other old SB-2 comments that still apply, or to new
SB-2 comments, are not expected to require much Commission staff review effort
as to text or accounting.

               6. ONGOING PRELIMINARY FINANCING DISCUSSIONS. Also alluded to
above, Alfa/Ontario Power has been engaged in increasingly intense and
productive preliminary discussions with M.H. Meyerson & Co. (and one or more
other new financial advisors) who have made increasingly clear that it is
premature to issue Ontario Power/Alfa stock at this time for financing or
acquisitions. It is becoming increasingly likely that debt instruments can be
utilized, particularly for possible municipal facilities construction that may
be undertaken by Ontario Power (through contractors) for a somewhat related line
of business which it has intended to enter for some time (power co-generation).
Further, because of the favorable nature of the similar and closely related
business acquisitions which Alfa/Ontario Power has had under preliminary
discussion, it appears that debt financing also may be available to facilitate
those acquisitions, together with the use of Restricted Stock, which obviously
does not involve an urgent need for the current Form SB-2 Registration. Thus,
there clearly is a reduced need to stay tied to the less desirable Alfa/EMC
shell.

               7. CONCLUSION. Please advise us if you require any further
information at this time. Please also advise us as to the anticipated withdrawal
date for the SB-2. Thank you very much.






                                                              Yours Very Truly,


                                                              /s/ JAMES R. LEONE
                                                              ------------------
                                                              James R. Leone

ENCLOSURES
- ----------
None






          Page 3 of Alfa Utility Services Inc. Withdrawal of Form SB-2