1


                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Filed by the registrant |X|
Filed by a party other than the registrant |_|


Check the appropriate box:
|_|   Preliminary proxy statement
|_|   Confidential,  for  Use  of the  Commission  only  (as  permitted  by Rule
      14a-6(e)(2))
|_|   Definitive proxy statement
|X|   Definitive additional materials
|_|   Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12


                               Lenox Bancorp, Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):
|X|   No fee required.
|_|   Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
             N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2)   Aggregate number of securities to which  transactions  applies:
             N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed  pursuant
      to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
      calculated and state how it was determined:
             N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
             N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5)   Total fee paid:
             N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|_|   Fee paid previously  with  preliminary  materials.
|_|   Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
      Rule 0-11 (a)(2) and identify the filing for which the  offsetting fee was
      paid  previously.  Identify the previous filing by registration  statement
      number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)   Amount Previously Paid:
             N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
             N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3)   Filing Party:
             N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4)   Date Filed:
             N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------




 2




                                   May 2, 2001




Dear Fellow Shareholder:

      By now you likely  received a letter from Lame  alleging we are leveling a
personal  attack against him. DO NOT BE FOOLED BY LAME! The question  before you
in this proxy  battle is who you should  choose as  directors of the Company and
what affect your choice will have on the financial  performance  and stock price
of the Company. We gave you information  regarding Lame's conduct affecting your
company that was pertinent to that question. Lame did not dispute the facts.

      We  acknowledge  the Company has had problems,  and we are working hard to
address those problems. Remember, Lame joined the Board in 1998 and has overseen
the problems  experienced  by the Company since 1998.  Also,  Lame presented you
with  specific  numbers  about  the  Company's   financial   condition   without
identifying   reasons  for  those  numbers.   We  believe  Lame's  actions  have
significantly  contributed  to the problems  experienced by the Company since he
joined the Board in 1998.

      1. As a Board member,  Lame urged Lenox Savings Bank to buy  approximately
$15.0  million in loans from his  brother-in-law's  mortgage  company,  Mortgage
House of America. Remember, when Lame was soliciting support for being appointed
to the Board in 1998, his written presentation to the Board stated he thought he
could  refer up to $9.0  million in loans  directly  to Lenox  Savings  Bank and
thought he could help raise deposits as well. Instead, Lame not only urged us to
to buy loans from  Mortgage  House of  America,  but to do so based on  interest
rates that other Board members questioned.

            o     LAME STONGLY  ADVOCATED  PROJECTIONS THAT INTEREST RATES WOULD
                  FALL FURTHER AS A REASON TO BUY LOANS FROM MORTGAGE  HOUSE. IN
                  FACT, INTEREST RATES ROSE RAPIDLY. THE ULTIMATE EFFECT OF LAME
                  URGING US TO DO BUSINESS WITH MORTGAGE HOUSE,  AND BEING WRONG
                  ABOUT  THE  DIRECTION   INTEREST   RATES  WOULD  TAKE,  WAS  A
                  SIGNIFICANT  DECREASE IN THE BANK'S NET INTEREST MARGIN, WHICH
                  NEGATIVELY IMPACTED EARNINGS.

      2. The significant decrease in stockholders'  equity, and in the liquidity
of the Company's stock cited by Lame primarily was due to the substantial  stock
repurchase program that Lame promoted and approved. The stock repurchase program
also  had the  effect  of  reducing  the  Company's  return  on  equity  because
interest-earning assets were used to fund the stock repurchases.




 3



Moreover,  Lame also sought to have some of his shares  purchased by the Company
following the completion of our repurchase program, which would have made Lame's
asserted negative aspects of the program even worse.

      3. Lame  identifies the  Supervisory  Agreement as a negative  factor.  In
fact, the Office of Thrift  Supervision  cited the uncertainty of who controlled
the Company caused by Lame's actions as the reason the Supervisory Agreement was
required, and specifically demanded Lame be a signatory to that Agreement.

      4. Lame  cites poor  earnings,  but fails to  acknowledge  his role in the
Company's  failure to be profitable  since he joined the Board.  It has cost the
Company a significant amount to fend off Lame's attacks and proposals,  which we
firmly  believe  would be  harmful  to the  Company  and  stockholders.  Had the
Company's  expenses  remained at 1998 levels,  we believe the Company could have
reported a profit in 1999 and 2000.  Most  recently,  Lame has  promised  to sue
because we chose to hire a proxy solicitor  because of the proxy fight initiated
by Lame.  However,  Lame has hired a proxy solicitor,  and has stated that if he
wins, he will have the Company reimburse his expenses. This will take money away
from the  Company  and  further  impair the ability of the Company to report net
income.

      5. Lame cites the failure of the Company to pay dividends to  shareholders
as a negative  issue.  As a Board  member,  Lame  insisted  that we stop  paying
dividends,  and has informed the Board that he is opposed to paying dividends in
the future, regardless of the Company's performance.

      We urge  you to take a look at what we have  been  doing  to  improve  the
performance  of the  Company's  primary  asset,  the Bank.  Notwithstanding  the
distractions  caused by Lame, we restructured  the Bank's portfolio to eliminate
the loans Lame urged us to purchase from Mortgage House, among other things. The
effect has been very  positive.  For the quarter ended March 31, 2001,  the Bank
reported  interest income  totaling $1.3 million and net income of $93,000.  The
Bank's net interest  margin is widening,  not shrinking.  We believe the Bank is
well positioned for the future.

                    LAME'S PROPOSED INVESTMENT IN THE COMPANY
                    -----------------------------------------

      Lame is trying to  persuade  you to vote for him and his nominee by citing
his proposal to make additional  investments in Company stock.  However, he does
not tell you what he is talking  about.  Is he  proposing  to buy stock from the
Company and have the Company sell stock to someone else? On what terms?  At what
cost?

      The book value of the Company's stock is currently greater than $16.00 per
share.  If Lame  arranges  for his  Company  stock  purchases  to be made at the
current market price of roughly  $10.00 per share,  what does that mean for you?
Last year Lame urged that the Company be sold.  If he  purchases  stock from the
Company  before  arranging  for  the  sale  of the  Company,  your  interest  as
shareholders could be substantially diluted.



 4




      We urge you to be cautious when considering  Lame's  proposals.  Remember,
Lame  claimed he had an interest  in helping the Company  when he sought a Board
seat in 1998.  Lame now is using  precisely  the same type of tactics he used to
get on the Board in the first place. We have heard for three years what Lame can
do for us. We have not seen any positive results.

      WE URGE YOU NOT TO VOTE FOR LAME.  DO NOTHING WITH THE LAME
GROUP WHITE PROXY.

      We are  committed  to  enhancing  shareholder  value in any way  possible,
including  through a merger or sale of the  Company.  The  Bank,  the  Company's
primary  asset,  is  currently  reporting a profit.  We believe that without the
distraction and expense of Lame, the Company can be profitable.

      SEND LAME A MESSAGE, VOTE FOR MANAGEMENT'S NOMINEES ON THE
GREEN PROXY CARD.

      YOUR  BOARD OF  DIRECTORS  URGES YOU TO  COMPLETE,  SIGN,  DATE AND RETURN
MANAGEMENT'S GREEN PROXY CARD, IN ITS POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE, VOTING "FOR" ALL OF
ITS NOMINEES.

      PLEASE DO NOT RETURN THE WHITE PROXY CARD TO THE LAME GROUP.

      IF ANY OF YOUR  SHARES  ARE  HELD IN THE NAME OF A BANK,  BROKER  OR OTHER
NOMINEE,  PLEASE CONTACT THE PARTY  RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACCOUNT AND DIRECT THEM
TO VOTE YOUR SHARES FOR YOUR COMPANY'S NOMINEES ON THE GREEN PROXY CARD.

                                    Sincerely,

                                    /s/ Henry E. Brown

                                    Henry E. Brown
                                    Chairman of the Board

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                             YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

1.    The Board of Directors  urges you to DISCARD the WHITE proxy card recently
      sent to you by the Lame  Group.  A "WITHHOLD  AUTHORITY"  vote on the Lame
      Group's White proxy card is not a vote for the Board's  nominees.  To vote
      FOR your Company's nominees you MUST execute a GREEN proxy card.
2.    If you voted on a White  proxy  card BUT WISH TO  SUPPORT  YOUR  COMPANY'S
      NOMINEES,  please sign, date and mail the enclosed GREEN proxy card in the
      postage-paid envelope provided as soon as possible.
3.    Remember-only your latest dated  proxy  will determine how your shares are
      to be voted at the meeting.


 5


4.    If any of your  shares  are  held in the name of a bank,  broker  or other
      nominee,  please contact the party  responsible for you account and direct
      them to vote your  shares for your  Company's  nominees on the GREEN proxy
      card.
5.    For assistance in voting your shares, or for further  information,  please
      contact Ginny Heitzman,  Chief Executive Officer of Lenox Bancorp at (513)
      531-8655, or our proxy solicitor:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IF YOU HAVE ANY  QUESTIONS,  NEED  ANOTHER  COPY OF OUR  APRIL  13,  2001  PROXY
STATEMENT  FOR THE ANNUAL  MEETING OR NEED  FURTHER  ASSISTANCE  IN VOTING  YOUR
SHARES, PLEASE CALL:

                    GEORGESON SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS INC.
                           17 STATE STREET, 10TH FLOOR
                NEW YORK, NY 10004 CALL TOLL FREE (800) 223-2064
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------