AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON APRIL 10, 2000
REGISTRATION NO. 333-30762
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------------
AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
------------------------------
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 4899 95-4542908
(State or other jurisdiction of (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Classification Code Number) Identification Number)
1901 MAIN STREET, 2ND FLOOR
SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90405
(310) 382-3300
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrant's principal executive offices)
JONATHAN GANS
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT
1901 MAIN STREET, 2ND FLOOR
SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90405
(310) 382-3300
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,
of agent for service)
------------------------------
COPIES TO:
CYNTHIA M. DUNNETT, ESQ. KENNETH R. LAMB, ESQ.
Riordan & McKinzie LISA A. FONTENOT, ESQ.
300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2900 MEG L. FITZPATRICK, ESQ.
Los Angeles, California 90071 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
(213) 629-4824 1 Montgomery Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
(415) 393-8200
------------------------------
APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC:
AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE AFTER THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT BECOMES EFFECTIVE.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on
a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of
1933, check the following box. / /
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and
list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. / /
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. / /
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. / /
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434,
please check the following box. / /
------------------------------
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
PROPOSED MAXIMUM PROPOSED MAXIMUM
TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF AMOUNT TO OFFERING PRICE AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF
SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED BE REGISTERED PER SHARE OFFERING PRICE(1) REGISTRATION FEE(2)
Common Stock, $.001 par value.......... 7,475,000 $12.00 $89,700,000 $23,681
(1) Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee.
(2) Calculated pursuant to Rule 457(a). $22,770 of this amount was previously
paid with the filing of this Registration Statement of Form S-1 on February
18, 2000. Accordingly, a registration fee of $911 is being paid herewith.
--------------------------
THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR
DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL
FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION
STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNTIL THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(A),
MAY DETERMINE.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. These securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary
prospectus is not an offer to sell nor does it seek an offer to buy these
securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION. DATED APRIL 10, 2000.
PROSPECTUS
6,500,000 Shares
[LOGO]
Common Stock
This is an initial public offering of shares of common stock of InterPacket
Networks, Inc. All of the 6,500,000 shares of common stock are being sold by us.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock.
The initial public offering price per share is estimated to be between $10.00
and $12.00. We have applied to have the common stock approved for quotation on
the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol IPKT.
-------------------
Per Share Total
--------- -----------
Initial public offering price............................... $ $
Underwriting discounts and commissions...................... $ $
Proceeds to InterPacket Networks, Inc., before expenses..... $ $
InterPacket has granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to
an additional 975,000 shares of common stock to cover over-allotments.
-------------------
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. See "Risk
Factors" beginning on page 4.
-----------------
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other regulatory body
has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus
is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
CHASE H&Q LEHMAN BROTHERS
CIBC WORLD MARKETS
, 2000
[INSIDE FRONT COVER]
[MAP AND DIAGRAM OF CONTENT DISTRIBUTION VIA SATELLITE]
[INSIDE COVER GATEFOLD]
[MAP OF THE WORLD WITH SATELLITE COVERAGE AND
COUNTRIES WHERE WE HAVE CUSTOMERS]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
--------
Prospectus Summary.......................................... 1
Risk Factors................................................ 4
Forward-Looking Statements.................................. 15
Use of Proceeds............................................. 16
Dividend Policy............................................. 16
Capitalization.............................................. 17
Dilution.................................................... 18
Selected Consolidated Financial Information................. 19
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations................................. 20
Business.................................................... 28
Management.................................................. 43
Certain Transactions........................................ 52
Principal Stockholders...................................... 56
Description of Capital Stock................................ 58
Shares Eligible for Future Sale............................. 60
Underwriting................................................ 62
Legal Matters............................................... 64
Experts..................................................... 64
Additional Information...................................... 64
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. F-1
i
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
YOU SHOULD READ THE ENTIRE PROSPECTUS, INCLUDING "RISK FACTORS" AND THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION.
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC.
OVERVIEW
We operate a satellite-based, high performance Internet network that
delivers Internet services to international Internet service providers, or ISPs,
and other businesses in more than 90 countries. Our proprietary network design
integrates the broadcast capabilities of satellites with Internet networking
technologies to offer our customers an expandable, or scalable, solution to the
constraints of the public Internet infrastructure. Our global network's open
technical architecture enables us to provide multiple categories of Internet
services, including global high bandwidth, or broadband, connectivity to the
Internet backbone, enhanced Internet services, such as Internet telephony, and
Internet content distribution, such as newsfeeds and streaming media. From
December 31, 1998 to December 31, 1999, we increased the number of our customers
from 69 to 343, and as of March 27, 2000 we had over 500 customers worldwide.
Strain on the worldwide Internet infrastructure is increasing, especially
outside the U.S., as the number of Internet users grows and as their bandwidth
needs expand. International Data Corporation estimates that the number of active
Internet users worldwide will grow from approximately 261 million in 1999, of
which approximately 59% resided outside of the U.S., to approximately
623 million by the end of 2003, of which approximately 68% will reside outside
of the U.S. Despite an anticipated expansion in the number of Internet users
worldwide, advances in the global telecommunications infrastructure and the
public Internet have failed to keep pace with user demand. When connecting to
and navigating the Internet, international ISPs and their subscribers suffer
numerous problems caused by limited access to the Internet backbone, poor
telecommunications infrastructure and low bandwidth availability. These
difficulties are likely to increase as demand grows for rich Internet content,
such as streaming audio and video.
THE INTERPACKET SOLUTION
Our satellite-based Internet network overlays the public Internet around the
world and offers solutions to the limitations of the current global Internet
infrastructure. Our network currently incorporates nine geostationary
satellites, uplinked from six strategically located earth-based satellite
transmission stations, or teleports, and allows for the rapid delivery of
Internet connectivity services worldwide. ESPRESSO and ESPRESSO BIZKIT, our
branded satellite-based Internet connectivity services, supplement or bypass
local and international telecommunications connections, enabling our ISP
customers to deliver a more reliable, higher quality of Internet service to
their subscribers. Our enhanced Internet services, including ESPRESSO VOICE, our
Internet telephony service, are complementary to the broadband access we provide
to our international ISP customers and create additional revenue opportunities.
The broadcast capabilities of our satellite network create an efficient,
reliable means for Internet content distributors to transmit bandwidth-intensive
forms of rich, Web-based content simultaneously to multiple locations, known as
multicasting, around the world. We currently broadcast ESPRESSO NEWS, our
aggregated newsfeed, and we recently entered into agreements with iBEAM
Broadcasting Corporation and RealNetworks, Inc., leading Internet broadcast
networks, to deliver streaming content around the world.
Our satellite-based Internet network and services feature:
- Scalable, proprietary and global network design
- High quality, branded service
- Rapid provisioning
- Enhanced Internet services
- Multicasting content delivery
- Customer-focused network management and support
1
OUR STRATEGY
Our goal is to become the leading provider of global satellite Internet
connectivity and services by building the world's largest, premier quality and
cost-efficient satellite-based Internet network. We also intend to capitalize on
our proprietary network design, our network's broadcast capabilities and the
global reach of our satellite coverage to offer content delivery to Internet
content distributors. To achieve this goal we intend to:
- Increase our global customer base
- Capitalize on our early entrant status
- Broaden our Internet service offerings
- Provide turnkey solutions to the emerging Internet content industry
- Expand our network infrastructure
- Develop our strategic and business relationships
-------------------
Our headquarters are located at 1901 Main Street, 2nd Floor, Santa Monica,
CA 90405, and our telephone number is (310) 382-3300.
-------------------
THE OFFERING
Common stock offered by InterPacket Networks,
Inc........................................ 6,500,000 shares
Common stock to be outstanding after the
offering................................... 40,400,333 shares
Use of proceeds.............................. Primarily to acquire satellite and fiber
optic capacity, increase sales and marketing
personnel and activities, increase working
capital and for other general corporate
purposes.
Proposed Nasdaq National Market symbol....... IPKT
The number of shares outstanding is based on shares outstanding as of
March 27, 2000. This number reflects the conversion of our 3,000,000 shares of
preferred stock into common stock upon completion of the offering and takes into
account our 2.2 for 1 stock split but excludes 6,963,163 shares of common stock
issuable upon exercise of options outstanding, at a weighted average exercise
price of $2.50, and 3,854,941 shares of common stock reserved for future option
grants under our stock option plans.
2
SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
Please see Note 2 of notes to our consolidated financial statements
appearing at the end of this prospectus for an explanation of the determination
of the number of shares used in computing per share data. The Actual column
reflects balance sheet data on a historical basis, without any adjustments to
reflect subsequent events or anticipated events and gives effect to our 2.2 for
1 stock split. The Pro Forma column reflects the issuance of 6,600,000 shares of
common stock upon conversion of our outstanding preferred stock on completion of
the offering. The Pro Forma As Adjusted column reflects the issuance of
6,600,000 shares upon this conversion and the receipt of the estimated proceeds
from our sale of 6,500,000 shares of common stock at an assumed initial public
offering price of $11 per share, after deducting the underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. In 1998, 64% of our
total revenue and in 1999, 20% of our total revenue was derived from the sale of
traditional telecom services to one company, STAR Telecommunications, Inc. We do
not expect to generate any meaningful revenues in 2000 from traditional telecom
services.
Due to the costs associated with the development and expansion of our
network and the Internet services we now offer, we experienced net losses of
approximately $1.3 million in 1998 and $10.9 million in 1999. As of December 31,
1999 we had a deficit of $12.1 million.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
-------- -------- --------
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Revenue:
Network services.......................................... $ 583 $ 4,115 $ 10,789
Traditional telecom services.............................. 1,176 7,295 2,685
------ ------- --------
Total revenue........................................... 1,759 11,410 13,474
Income (loss) from operations............................... 158 (1,416) (10,057)
------ ------- --------
Net income (loss)........................................... $ 89 $(1,328) $(10,890)
====== ======= ========
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share............ $ 0.01 $ (0.07) $ (0.48)
====== ======= ========
Weighted average number of common shares (basic and
diluted).................................................. 15,950 18,506 22,862
====== ======= ========
Pro forma basic and diluted loss per common share
(unaudited)............................................... $ (0.46)
========
Weighted average number of common shares used to compute pro
forma loss per common share (unaudited)................... 23,767
========
DECEMBER 31, 1999
--------------------------------
PRO FORMA
AS
ACTUAL PRO FORMA ADJUSTED
-------- --------- ---------
(UNAUDITED)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash........................................................ $15,948 $15,948 $81,443
Total assets................................................ 64,291 64,291 129,786
Capital leases of satellite transponders, net of current
portion................................................... 38,669 38,669 38,669
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock...................... 14,824 -- --
Deficit..................................................... (12,126) (12,126) (12,126)
Stockholders' equity........................................ 2,392 17,216 82,711
Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus
- reflects our 2.2 for 1 stock split which will occur prior to the
completion of this offering;
- reflects the conversion of our preferred stock into common stock upon
completion of the offering; and
- assumes that the underwriters' over-allotment option is not exercised.
3
RISK FACTORS
YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING FACTORS AND OTHER INFORMATION IN
THIS PROSPECTUS BEFORE DECIDING TO INVEST IN SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK. THE
RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES DISCUSSED BELOW, WHILE COMPRISING THE RISKS WE CURRENTLY
BELIEVE TO BE MATERIAL, MAY NOT BE THE ONLY ONES THAT WE FACE. ADDITIONAL RISKS
AND UNCERTAINTIES NOT PRESENTLY KNOWN TO US OR THAT WE CURRENTLY DEEM IMMATERIAL
MAY ALSO HARM OUR BUSINESS. IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
ACTUALLY OCCUR, OUR BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION OR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS COULD
BE HARMED. IN THIS EVENT, THE TRADING PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK COULD DECLINE,
AND YOU MAY LOSE SOME OR ALL OF YOUR INVESTMENT.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS
OUR LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY AND OUR SHIFT TO OFFERING INTERNET SERVICES MAKES
IT DIFFICULT FOR YOU TO ACCURATELY EVALUATE OUR PROSPECTS.
Due to our limited operating history, and our shift to offering Internet
services, our past results may not be meaningful and you should not rely on them
as indicators of our future performance. In 1998, 64% of our total revenue was
derived from the sale of traditional telecom services. In 1999, 20% of our total
revenue was derived from the sale of traditional telecom services, with the
balance from sales of network services. We do not expect to generate any
meaningful revenues in 2000 from traditional telecom services. We confront all
of the challenges and uncertainties encountered by growing, early-stage
companies, particularly companies in the new and rapidly evolving international
market for Internet connectivity and services. These challenges and
uncertainties include our ability to:
- expand our international ISP customer base;
- increase the services purchased from us by our customers and the revenue
we receive from each customer;
- satisfy the changing needs of our existing and future international ISP
customers;
- acquire, develop and market new Internet services;
- respond to the changing needs of the Internet content delivery market;
- upgrade and expand our network infrastructure;
- develop our strategic and business relationships;
- capitalize on our early entrant status; and
- recruit and retain key personnel.
BECAUSE WE HAVE INCURRED SUBSTANTIAL LOSSES AND ANTICIPATE CONTINUING LOSSES FOR
THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE, OUR FUTURE PROFITABILITY IS UNCERTAIN.
Since our inception we have incurred substantial losses. Because we expect
our losses to increase as we expand our operations, we do not believe that we
will achieve profitability in the foreseeable future. While we had net income of
approximately $89,000 in 1997, we experienced net losses of approximately
$1.3 million in 1998 and $10.9 million in 1999. We experienced negative cash
flows from operations of approximately $13,000 in 1997 and $6.9 million in 1999,
though, in 1998 cash flow provided by operations was approximately
$0.4 million. As of December 31, 1999, we had a deficit of $12.1 million. We
expect our losses and negative cash flow to continue and increase as we intend
to substantially expand our network and Internet service offerings and increase
our staff.
We expect that our expenses, particularly costs relating to acquiring
additional satellite transponder space and our selling, general and
administrative expenses, will increase both in absolute dollars and as a
percentage of our revenues as we grow. If our revenue fails to grow at
anticipated rates or if our operating
4
expenses increase without a commensurate increase in our revenue, our losses
will significantly increase and our financial results could be harmed.
Additionally, if we are not successful in raising funds in this offering, we
will have to take certain steps, such as delaying the acceptance of services
under our fixed fee contracts or renegotiating certain long-term contracted
obligations, to reduce our regular capital needs.
OUR PROFIT MARGIN AND OVERALL REVENUE WILL SUFFER IF WE DO NOT CONTINUE TO
EXPAND OUR CUSTOMER BASE.
Our success depends primarily on the continued growth of our customer base,
the retention of current customers and our ability to expand the number of
Internet services we offer so that revenue per customer and overall revenue
increase. Our customer contracts may be terminated without penalty at any time.
If we are unable to maintain and expand our customer base our profit margin and
overall revenue will suffer. Our ability to attract new customers and, to a
lesser degree, maintain current customers, as well as our ability to increase
the amount of revenue we receive from each customer, depends on a variety of
factors, including:
- continued growth in demand by international ISPs for Internet backbone
connectivity;
- our ability to provide adequate bandwidth to all of our customers;
- our ability to provide additional services across our network;
- our ability to broadcast content around the world;
- in each country in which we operate, the presence of a regulatory
environment that does not unduly impede our plans in that country;
- our ability to develop our strategic and business relationships;
- our success in establishing and maintaining business relationships with
content distributors, Internet backbone operators and regional satellite
owners; and
- the reliability and cost-effectiveness of our services.
IF WE ARE UNABLE TO MAINTAIN, EXPAND AND ADAPT OUR NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE, THE
DEMAND FOR OUR SERVICES MAY DECREASE.
We must continue to expand and adapt our network as the number of our
international ISP customers grows, as users place increasing demands on our
network, and as other requirements change. As we grow our customer base, we may
not be able to provide our customers with the increasing levels of data
transmission capacity that they may require for a number of reasons, such as our
possible inability to raise the funds needed to develop the network
infrastructure to maintain adequate transmission speeds and the lack of
additional network availability from third-party suppliers of satellite and
fiber optic cable transmission capacity. Our failure to achieve or maintain high
capacity transmissions could significantly reduce demand for our services and
decrease our revenue.
IF WE FAIL TO ACCURATELY PREDICT OUR SATELLITE BANDWIDTH REQUIREMENTS AND
EFFECTIVELY MANAGE OUR FIXED COSTS, OUR EXPENSES WILL GROW MORE RAPIDLY THAN OUR
REVENUES AND OUR OPERATING RESULTS WILL SUFFER.
If we do not obtain adequate satellite bandwidth capacity on acceptable
terms and realize corresponding customer volume for this bandwidth, it is
unlikely that we will achieve positive gross profit. We purchase this bandwidth
capacity based on our projected future needs on a fixed-price basis far in
advance of the sale of our services that utilize the bandwidth. Substantially
all of this bandwidth capacity can be purchased only on a long-term basis. We
sell our services on the basis of actual usage and total bandwidth capacity used
by our customers changes from month to month and is difficult to predict. If our
sales fail to match our projections, we could be subject to periods of excess
satellite capacity, which could seriously harm our business. As a result, we
must obtain enough bandwidth to meet our projected
5
customer needs, and we must realize adequate volume from our customers to
support and justify the bandwidth capacity and expense. If demand from existing
or potential customers exceeds our capacity, the quality of our service may
suffer or we may be unable to capitalize on potential business opportunities. If
that happens, we may lose existing or potential customers and our operating
results would suffer.
THE QUALITY OF OUR SERVICES AND OUR ABILITY TO PROVIDE THEM DEPENDS LARGELY ON
THIRD PARTIES, INCLUDING SATELLITE OPERATORS, AND IF THEY DO NOT PERFORM AS
EXPECTED, THE QUALITY OF OUR SERVICES AND OUR REPUTATION WILL SUFFER, AND WE MAY
LOSE CUSTOMERS.
We depend on third parties to provide us satellite transmission capabilities
that are essential to our network infrastructure. Our business will suffer if
our satellite availability or security is materially interrupted, the cost of
transponder space increases materially, one of our key satellite providers
terminates its contract with us or additional transponder space is not available
on acceptable terms or at all. For example, we rely heavily on Satmex 5 for
satellite coverage of Latin America. Any temporary or permanent loss of capacity
on this satellite could severely harm our operations. PanAmSat International
Systems, Inc., Satelites Mexicanos, Loral SpaceCom Corporation, British
Telecommunications plc and an affiliate of General Electric Company currently
provide us with our satellite transmission capabilities. We also depend on, and
face similar challenges with, our terrestrial fiber optic cable service
providers and the Internet access providers that we use to access the Internet
backbone. UUNET Technologies, Inc., Exodus Communications, Inc., AboveNet
Communications, Inc. and Singapore Telecommunications are our significant
terrestrial fiber optic cable service and Internet access providers. Our
customers depend on our ability to provide continuous service, and our ability
to provide this service is primarily dependent on these third party service
providers. As a result, if any service being provided to us by any of these
third party service providers is interrupted or otherwise not delivered as
expected, our reputation could be harmed and our customers could cease
purchasing services from us. Our satellite and fiber optic cable network is
subject to interruption from numerous forces, including:
- satellite or other telecommunications failure;
- human error;
- sunspots and solar activity and natural disasters, such as fire,
earthquakes and floods;
- power loss; or
- sabotage or vandalism.
RAPID GROWTH IN OUR OPERATIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURE IS PLACING A SIGNIFICANT
STRAIN ON OUR RESOURCES, AND THE FAILURE TO MANAGE THIS GROWTH EFFECTIVELY COULD
IMPAIR THE EXPANSION OF OUR BUSINESS.
We intend to grow and increase our business by expanding our global network
through, among other things, additional leases of satellite and fiber optic
cable capacity and related equipment. If we are unable to manage growth
effectively, we may lose customers or fail to attract new customers and our
business and financial results will suffer. The successful implementation of our
expansion plans will involve significant planning and resources and these plans
may be delayed or never completed. To successfully carry out our expansion
plans, we must:
- enter into additional leases with favorable terms for capacity on
satellite systems and fiber optic cables;
- successfully implement, market and sell connectivity, enhanced Internet
services and content distribution and other services that we develop;
- negotiate competitive arrangements with Internet backbone providers; and
- develop relationships with strategic and other business partners.
6
Problems associated with our expansion plans could severely harm us, such
as:
- shortage of transponder space on geostationary satellites;
- regulatory environments in the countries in which we operate that unduly
impede our plans;
- disruptions to operations arising from relocation of our facilities;
- failure to retain or to timely hire necessary employees, including sales
and technical personnel; and
- failure to accurately predict customer demand for existing and future
services and applications.
In addition, our costs will increase as we expand. These increased costs
include:
- implementing multiple and redundant satellite and telecommunications
connections;
- expenses associated with hiring, training and managing new employees;
- increasing marketing and sales efforts; and
- purchasing new equipment.
Many of these costs are fixed in the long-term and if our expansion plans
are not successful, our future operating results could be seriously harmed. We
may not be able to successfully implement and maintain our operational and
financial systems, or successfully obtain, integrate and utilize the employees,
facilities, third-party vendors and equipment, or management, operational and
financial resources necessary to manage a developing and expanding business in
our rapidly evolving and increasingly competitive industry.
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO OBTAIN SUFFICIENT FUNDS TO GROW OUR BUSINESS.
Our business may suffer if we require additional funding and we are not able
to obtain it. We expect to incur significant expenditures as part of our
expansion plans. We intend to enter into arrangements to secure additional
satellite transponder space and substantial fiber optic capacity. These
arrangements may require us to make substantial initial payments for long-term
capacity that could require us to seek debt or additional equity financing. We
believe that, following this offering, our cash reserves, available borrowings
and funds generated by operations will be adequate to fund our operations for at
least the next 12 months. However, we may require additional funds either during
or after such 12 month period. Future financing may not be available to us or
may only be available on terms that are not favorable to us. Our failure to
generate sufficient cash flows from sales of Internet connectivity and services
or to raise sufficient funds may require us to delay or abandon some or all of
our expansion plans or otherwise forego market opportunities. If additional
funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities, the percentage
ownership of our stockholders could be significantly diluted.
IF OUR SERVICES BECOME SUBJECT TO DOWNWARD PRICING PRESSURES, OUR GROSS MARGINS
WILL DECLINE.
The market for Internet access in the U.S. is subject to downward pricing
pressure caused by a number of factors, including increased competition and
technological advances. Pricing pressures outside of the U.S. in the markets we
serve may develop as international Internet access and services become more
available which will harm our gross margin. Our ESPRESSO Internet access service
is our primary Internet-based service. To operate ESPRESSO, we must lease
substantial satellite transmission capacity, which is relatively fixed in cost
and is generally not susceptible to downward pricing pressure. As a result, we
have little flexibility in lowering the price for our ESPRESSO service. If we
are affected by downward pricing pressure, we cannot assure you that we will be
able to offer our ESPRESSO service at prices that are competitive or profitable.
Our other Internet-based services and applications may also be subject to
varying degrees of downward pricing pressure. This problem is particularly acute
with our ESPRESSO VOICE service. For
7
example, due to increased competition and global deregulation of
telecommunications services, prices for international long distance calls have
been decreasing. If this downward pricing pressure continues, we cannot assure
you that we will be able to offer ESPRESSO VOICE services at costs competitive
with the traditional voice network services that compete with our telephony
services. To lower our prices for ESPRESSO VOICE, we may have to renegotiate
rates with our local service providers who complete calls for us. We may not be
able to renegotiate these terms favorably enough, or fast enough, to allow us to
profitably offer Internet telephony services.
OUR OPERATING RESULTS MAY FLUCTUATE SIGNIFICANTLY AND IF OUR FUTURE RESULTS ARE
BELOW INVESTOR AND MARKET ANALYST EXPECTATIONS, OUR STOCK PRICE WILL DECLINE.
As we have grown, we have experienced significant fluctuations in our
operating results. Thus, a period to period comparison of our operating results
is not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indicator of
future performance. Our operating results in the future may fall below the
expectations of securities analysts and investors. In this event, the trading
price of our common stock will likely decrease significantly. Our future
operating results may continue to fluctuate due to factors including:
- the rate of growth of the Internet, especially outside of the U.S.;
- demand for and market acceptance of our services;
- the level of utilization of our network and our Internet services;
- fluctuations in satellite transponder and telecommunications costs and
availability;
- costs relating to the expansion of our operations;
- fluctuations in bandwidth and the amount of our services used by
customers;
- introductions of new Internet services by us and our competitors;
- changes in our pricing policies and those of our competitors;
- changes in the nature, application or enforcement of regulatory laws and
policies;
- economic conditions, particularly those related to the Internet industry;
and
- the length and variability of our sales cycle.
In addition, a relatively large portion of our expenses are fixed in the
short-term, particularly with respect to satellite transponder capacity and
personnel. Our future operating results will be particularly sensitive to
fluctuations in revenue because of these and other short-term fixed costs.
PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH OPERATING IN INTERNATIONAL MARKETS COULD PREVENT US
FROM ACHIEVING OR SUSTAINING OUR INTENDED GROWTH.
The majority of our business is derived from ISPs and other businesses
located in foreign countries. Our failure to manage our international operations
effectively would limit the future growth of our business. We face certain
inherent challenges in conducting international operations, such as:
- telecommunications regulatory requirements or trade barriers that may
restrict our ability to deliver Internet services to our customers;
- the imposition of unanticipated fees, taxes and costs by foreign
governments, which could significantly increase our costs;
- political and economic instability disrupting the operations of our ISP
customers;
8
- protectionist laws and business practices favoring local competition
potentially giving unequal bargaining leverage to competitors; and
- currency fluctuations increasing the cost of our services to our
international customers.
OUR OPERATIONS ARE VULNERABLE TO SECURITY BREACHES THAT COULD HARM THE QUALITY
OF OUR SERVICES.
Despite our design and implementation of a variety of network security
measures, unauthorized access, computer viruses, accidental or intentional
action and other disruptions to our network and those of our providers could
occur. In addition, we may incur significant costs to prevent breaches in
security or to alleviate problems caused by such breaches. Any breaches that may
occur could harm the quality of our services and could result in liability to us
or the loss of existing customers and difficulty in attracting future customers.
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO HIRE OR RETAIN KEY EMPLOYEES, WHICH COULD PREVENT US FROM
EFFICIENTLY GROWING AND OPERATING OUR BUSINESS.
The market for highly qualified personnel is intensely competitive. If we
are unable to hire and retain the key personnel we need, we may provide poor
service and have difficulty signing up new customers and maintaining current
customers, which would cause our business to suffer. We are particularly
dependent on our ability to increase significantly the size of our technical
staff and sales and marketing organization with qualified candidates who speak
at least one foreign language. In addition, if, for any reason, our senior
executives do not continue to be active in management, our operations would
suffer. We may lose some of our key personnel and any loss may seriously harm
our business. We do not carry key person life insurance on any of our personnel.
CERTAIN MEMBERS OF OUR MANAGEMENT TEAM HAVE ONLY WORKED WITH US FOR A SHORT TIME
AND FAILURE TO EFFECTIVELY INTEGRATE THEM COULD IMPAIR OUR ABILITY TO IMPLEMENT
OUR STRATEGIES.
We depend on the ability of our management team to effectively execute our
strategies. We recently hired several of our key employees. In July 1999, we
hired our Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President--Operations, in
February 2000 we hired our Executive Vice President--Business and Legal Affairs
and in March 2000 we hired our Chief Operating Officer. Because certain members
of our management team have worked together only for a short period of time, we
need to integrate these officers into our operations. To integrate into our
operations, these individuals must spend a significant amount of time learning
our business model and management system, in addition to performing their
regular duties. Accordingly, the integration of new personnel has resulted and
will continue to result in some disruption to our ongoing operations. If we fail
to complete this integration in an efficient manner, our business and financial
results will suffer.
OUR OVERALL STRATEGIC GOALS MAY BE HARMED IF WE DO NOT SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE AND
INTEGRATE FUTURE ACQUISITIONS INTO OUR OPERATIONS.
The costs and challenges of our potential future acquisitions of key
technologies, applications, operations or companies may harm us. An acquisition
may result in the use of significant amounts of cash, potentially dilutive
issuances of equity securities, incurrence of debt or amortization expenses
related to goodwill and other intangible assets. We face a number of challenges
in any acquisition including:
- difficulties and unanticipated costs arising from the assimilation of the
acquired operations, technologies, products, policies and personnel;
- the diversion of management's attention from other business concerns;
- risks related to entering markets or managing operations in which we have
no or limited direct prior experience;
- our inability to maintain uniform standards and controls; and
9
- the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company.
WE MAY BE UNABLE TO PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, OR MAY HAVE TO
DEFEND CLAIMS OF THIRD PARTIES RELATING TO THEIR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS,
WHICH COULD PREVENT US FROM COMPETING EFFECTIVELY.
While the design and configuration of our Internet network is proprietary to
us, we have not patented our intellectual property rights and generally rely on
the protections offered by trade secret law. We generally enter into
confidentiality or licensing agreements with our employees, consultants and
corporate partners, and generally control access to and distribution of our
software, documentation and other proprietary information. Despite our efforts
to protect our intellectual property rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to
copy or otherwise obtain and use our technology or proprietary information.
Policing unauthorized use is difficult, and we cannot be sure that the steps we
have taken will prevent misappropriation of our technology or proprietary
information, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect
our proprietary rights as fully as in the U.S.
In addition, third parties may claim in the future that we violate their
intellectual property rights. Any successful claim by others that we violate
their intellectual property rights could seriously harm our business by forcing
us to cease using important intellectual property or requiring us to pay
monetary damages. Even if unsuccessful, these claims could harm our business by
damaging our reputation, requiring us to incur legal costs and diverting the
attention of our management personnel away from their normal business
activities.
WE MAY FACE LIABILITY OR ADDITIONAL REGULATION AS A RESULT OF INFORMATION
DISSEMINATED THROUGH OUR NETWORK.
The liability we may face as a result of information disseminated through
our network could have a negative impact on our financial condition. The law
relating to the liability of online services companies and Internet access and
content distributors for information carried on or disseminated through their
networks is currently unsettled. It is possible that claims could be made
against online services companies and Internet access providers under both U.S.
and foreign law for defamation, negligence, copyright or trademark infringement
or under other legal theories. Content distributed by us and our customers may
be regulated or banned. Several private lawsuits seeking to impose liability on
online services companies and Internet access providers are currently pending.
In addition, legislation has been recently passed and continues to be proposed
that imposes liability for or prohibits the transmission over the Internet of
certain types of information. We carry general liability insurance, but it may
not be adequate to compensate or may not cover us in the event we become liable
for information carried on or disseminated through our network.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY
WE FACE INTENSE COMPETITION FROM MANY OTHER COMPANIES AND IF WE DO NOT RESPOND
TO THIS COMPETITION EFFECTIVELY, OUR REVENUES AND OVERALL MARKET SHARE MAY
SUFFER.
Our business of delivering Internet access to international ISPs via our
network of leased satellite transponder space and fiber optic cable systems is
intensely competitive. If we do not respond to this competition effectively, our
revenues and overall market share may suffer. We expect to face additional
competition from existing and new competitors. Our most common competitor is the
Post, Telephone and Telegraph, or PTT, of the country where each of our
customers is located. We also face competition from our satellite providers,
Loral SpaceCom Corporation and PanAmSat International Systems, Inc., which offer
some services to the international ISP community that are similar to our service
offerings. We must distinguish ourselves in the international ISP marketplace
through our pricing policies, the quality and distinctiveness of our service and
the other Internet applications that we offer. As we sell our ESPRESSO VOICE
services we will compete with the PTTs of the countries where we offer such
services. As a result of our recent acquisition of certain assets and technology
in the United Kingdom and our agreements with iBEAM and RealNetworks we will be
delivering streaming content through our network. Although we
10
intend to partner with content distributors, the services we provide may also
make us a competitor in this industry. We may be unsuccessful in doing this.
Some of our competitors have certain advantages over us, including:
- substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources;
- more favorable regulatory treatment;
- lower cost basis arising from satellite, cable or other facility
ownership;
- longer operating histories;
- larger, more established customer bases;
- greater name recognition; and
- more established customer and vendor relationships.
We cannot be certain that we will have the resources or expertise to compete
successfully in the Internet-based services market.
OUR BUSINESS WILL NOT GROW WITHOUT INCREASED USE OF THE INTERNET, ESPECIALLY
OUTSIDE OF THE U.S.
Our success is largely a function of the growth in the use of the Internet,
particularly outside of the U.S., and that growth is uncertain and depends on a
variety of factors. The market for Internet connectivity, especially outside of
the U.S., is new and evolving. As a result, our financial condition may be
harmed if the market fails to develop, or develops more slowly than we expect.
The growth of the market depends on several uncertain events or occurrences,
including:
- the growth of the Internet as a global communications and commerce medium;
- the availability of personal computers in remote locations;
- changes in the nature, application or enforcement of regulatory laws and
policies;
- the use by international ISPs and businesses of the Internet connectivity
solutions we offer; and
- general worldwide economic conditions.
The Internet content delivery market is new and our business will suffer if
these markets do not continue to develop. We cannot be certain that a
sustainable market for content will emerge around the world. If it does not, an
essential aspect of our business strategy, to expand the delivery of Internet
content around the world, may fail.
WE MAY BE UNABLE TO MAINTAIN THE QUALITY OF OUR SERVICES AND MAY LOSE CUSTOMERS
IF THE INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE PROVES UNRELIABLE.
Our future success depends, in part, upon the reliability of the Internet
infrastructure. To the extent that the number of Internet users increases, the
Internet may be unable to support the demands placed on it, which may cause its
performance or reliability to decline. The Internet has experienced a variety of
outages and other delays as a result of portions of its infrastructure. Any
future outages or delays could harm our ability to provide connectivity to our
customers. Moreover, critical issues concerning the commercial use of the
Internet, including security, cost, ease of use and access, intellectual
property ownership and other legal liability issues, remain unresolved and could
inhibit the growth of Internet usage and harm our business.
THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ENVIRONMENT IN WHICH WE OPERATE IS UNCERTAIN AND WE
COULD BE SUBJECTED TO BURDENSOME AND COSTLY REGULATIONS OR CLAIMS, WHICH WOULD
CAUSE OUR BUSINESS TO SUFFER.
Because almost all of our business is conducted outside the U.S. in over 90
countries, we are susceptible to the governmental regulations and legal
uncertainties of foreign countries. Our failure to comply with foreign laws and
regulations could cause us to lose customers, restrict us from entering
11
profitable markets and seriously harm our business. In general, the laws of
countries outside the U.S. governing the Internet and Internet services, to the
extent they exist at all, vary widely, are unclear and in flux and have failed
to keep pace with the rapid advancements in Internet technology and expanding
Internet-based services offered. Partly because of these problems, and our view
that local regulatory compliance is a greater concern for our ISP customers, we
have not, and currently do not intend to, determine conclusively whether we
comply with the requirements of any particular foreign country. Any one or more
of the countries where we conduct business may require us to qualify to do
business in that particular country, or may find that we are liable for certain
taxes or tariffs, that we are otherwise subject to regulation or that we are
prohibited from conducting our business in that country. We cannot assure you
that we are currently in compliance with the legal requirements of any
particular country or all of the countries outside the U.S. in which we conduct
business, that we will be able to comply with any such requirements or that the
requirements will not change in a way that would render the receipt of our
services in a particular country illegal.
Our customers also face many of the governmental and legal uncertainties
that we face and are, or may become, subject to many of the same requirements to
which we may be subject. We make no effort to determine whether our customers
comply with applicable regulations. For example, a PTT in one country threatened
several of our ISP customers with the claim that the receipt of our ESPRESSO
satellite broadcast was illegal. The failure of our customers to comply with
applicable laws and regulations could cause us to lose customers or otherwise
seriously harm our business.
THE INTERNET INDUSTRY OPERATES IN AN UNCERTAIN LEGAL LANDSCAPE AND THE ADOPTION
OR INTERPRETATION OF FUTURE OR EXISTING REGULATIONS COULD HARM OUR BUSINESS.
In the U.S., our business and our network are susceptible to regulation by
federal and state government agencies, including the U.S. Federal Communications
Commission, or the FCC. However, the applicability of existing laws and
regulations to the Internet and Internet services is not always clear.
Furthermore, the laws and regulations regarding the Internet are in a constant
state of flux. The application of new or existing laws or regulations to our
business or our network could prevent or hinder us from providing service, cause
us to lose customers, substantially increase our costs, or otherwise seriously
harm our business. Certain of our services could be open to claims that they are
subject to regulation by the FCC as basic transmission services. A finding that
some of our services are basic transmission services and subject to regulation
could affect the manner in which we provide service to our customers or the
prices we charge for our services, could increase our costs by subjecting us to
surcharges and the like, or could otherwise seriously harm our business.
The Internet and the markets in which we offer our Internet services are
relatively new. Many of the laws and regulations that govern us and the Internet
have yet to be interpreted or enforced. It is likely that in the future many new
laws will take effect that will regulate the Internet and the markets in which
we operate. The applicability to the Internet of existing laws governing issues
such as property ownership, copyrights and other intellectual property issues,
taxation and tariffs, libel, consumer protection, obscenity, pricing and
personal privacy is uncertain. Current and future laws and regulations may:
- decrease the growth of the Internet;
- regulate our business or network in ways that hinder or prevent us from
providing service to our customers;
- regulate our customers in ways that harm our ability to sell our services
to them;
- decrease demand for our services; and
- impose taxes or other costly requirements or otherwise increase the cost
of doing business.
12
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO KEEP PACE WITH RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES OR EMERGING
INDUSTRY STANDARDS WHICH COULD MAKE OUR SERVICES OBSOLETE AND UNMARKETABLE.
Our services may become less useful to our customers if we are unable to
respond to technological advances that shape the Internet or alternative
technologies or services become available to them. Keeping pace with
technological advances in our industry may require substantial expenditures and
lead time. In addition, future advances in technology or fundamental changes in
the way Internet access or other Internet services can be delivered may render
our services obsolete or less cost competitive. We may not be able to adequately
respond to or incorporate technological advances on a cost-effective or timely
basis into our business.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR OFFERING
OUR COMMON STOCK PRICE MAY BE VOLATILE AND CAUSE US TO BECOME SUBJECT TO
SECURITIES LITIGATION.
The market price of our common stock may experience fluctuations in response
to a number of factors, including:
- actual or anticipated variations in our results of operations;
- new services introduced by us or our competitors;
- the entry of new competitors into one or more of our lines of business;
- changes in financial estimates by security analysts;
- conditions and trends in the Internet industry;
- potential acquisitions; and
- general market conditions.
The Nasdaq National Market has experienced extreme price and volume
fluctuations, as have other stock markets. Similar market fluctuations have
affected the market prices of equity securities of many Internet and technology
companies. The effects on the stock prices of these companies have often been
unrelated or disproportionate to their operating performance. These broader
market movements may negatively affect the market price of our common stock. Our
stock price may also decline as a result of general economic, political and
market conditions such as recession, interest rate changes or international
currency fluctuations. Class action litigation has often been instituted
following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities.
If such litigation were brought against us, it could distract our management and
may require us to incur significant expenses and possibly pay substantial
damages.
YOU WILL EXPERIENCE IMMEDIATE AND SUBSTANTIAL DILUTION IN THE NET TANGIBLE BOOK
VALUE OF THE STOCK YOU PURCHASE WHICH COULD NEGATIVELY AFFECT THE VALUE OF YOUR
INVESTMENT.
The initial public offering price of our common stock is substantially
higher than the net tangible book value per outstanding share of common stock.
Purchasers of our common stock will incur immediate and substantial dilution of
$8.94 per share in the net tangible book value of our common stock from the
assumed initial public offering price of $11. Additional dilution will occur
upon the exercise of outstanding options.
THE LIQUIDITY OF OUR COMMON STOCK IS UNCERTAIN BECAUSE IT HAS NOT BEEN PUBLICLY
TRADED AND MAY HAVE A LIMITED MARKET WHICH COULD DEPRESS OUR STOCK PRICE.
There has been no public market for our common stock. We cannot predict the
extent to which investor interest in our company will lead to the development of
an active, liquid trading market. In this offering, we intend to sell our common
stock primarily to a limited number of institutional investors, which
13
could limit the development of an active trading market. Active trading markets
generally result in lower price volatility and more efficient execution of buy
and sell orders for investors. The initial public offering price will be
determined by negotiations between InterPacket and the representatives of the
underwriters and may bear no relationship to the price at which our common stock
will trade upon completion of this offering.
THE SALE OF A SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK BY OUR EXISTING
STOCKHOLDERS AFTER THIS OFFERING MAY HARM OUR STOCK PRICE.
Sales of a large number of shares of our common stock in the market after
the offering or the perception that sales may occur could cause the market price
of our common stock to drop. See "Shares Eligible for Future Sale" for a more
detailed description of the substantial number of shares of common stock that
will be available for sale in the public market following this offering.
WE HAVE BROAD DISCRETION IN USING THE PROCEEDS OF THIS OFFERING, AND IF WE DO
NOT EFFECTIVELY UTILIZE THE PROCEEDS, OUR MARKET VALUE MAY DECLINE.
Our management will have considerable discretion in the application of the
net proceeds of this offering. The net proceeds may be used for corporate
purposes that do not increase our profitability or market value.
AFTER THE OFFERING, OUR SIGNIFICANT STOCKHOLDERS WILL RETAIN SUBSTANTIAL VOTING
CONTROL WHICH WILL ALLOW THEM TO INFLUENCE THE OUTCOME OF MATTERS SUBMITTED TO
STOCKHOLDERS FOR APPROVAL IN A MANNER THAT MAY BE ADVERSE TO YOUR INTERESTS.
Some of our stockholders own a large enough stake in us to have an influence
on matters presented to the stockholders. Our officers, directors and greater
than 5% stockholders, and their affiliates, will, in the aggregate, own
approximately 70.7% of our outstanding common stock after this offering. If
these parties acted in concert, they could influence, among other things, the
election and removal of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of all
or substantially all of our assets. This concentration of ownership may delay or
prevent a change in control which could discourage a potential acquirer from
making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us, or
control the outcome of any other matter submitted to the stockholders for a
vote. As a result, this concentration of ownership may have a negative effect on
our value and the price of our common stock. After the offering, Jeffrey
Sudikoff a founder and our former Chairman of the Board, will own approximately
7.0% of our outstanding common stock. In 1999, he pled guilty to three
violations in 1994 of federal securities laws relating to insider trading and
willfully failing to file a Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership of
Securities with the SEC with respect to another company's securities. Mr.
Sudikoff has entered into a voting agreement with us under which a committee
composed of three of our directors has an irrevocable proxy to vote his shares.
ANTITAKEOVER PROVISIONS IN OUR CHARTER DOCUMENTS AND DELAWARE LAW COULD PREVENT
OR DELAY A CHANGE IN CONTROL OF OUR COMPANY, WHICH COULD HARM OUR STOCK PRICE.
Delaware corporate law and our certificate of incorporation that will be in
effect upon the completion of this offering will contain provisions that could
delay, defer or prevent a change in control of our company or our management.
These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult
for you and other stockholders to elect directors and take other corporate
actions. Our certificate of incorporation will authorize the board of directors
to issue preferred stock with rights senior to the common stock without
obtaining prior stockholder approval. As a result, these provisions could limit
the price that investors are willing to pay in the future for shares of our
common stock.
14
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements under "Prospectus Summary," "Risk Factors," "Use of
Proceeds," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations," "Business" and elsewhere in this prospectus constitute
forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our or our industry's actual
results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements to be materially
different from any future results, levels of activity, performance, or
achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These
factors include, among other things, those listed under "Risk Factors" and
elsewhere in this prospectus. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking
statements by terminology, including "may," "will," "should," "expect," "plan,"
"anticipate," "intend," "believe," "estimate," "predict," "potential" or
"continue" or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These
statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially.
In evaluating these statements, you should specifically consider various
factors, including the risks outlined under "Risk Factors." Although we believe
that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are
reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance
or achievements.
-------------------
ESPRESSO-REGISTERED TRADEMARK-, POWERED BY ESPRESSO-REGISTERED TRADEMARK-
and INTERPACKET-REGISTERED TRADEMARK- are registered trademarks of InterPacket
Networks, Inc. We have a trademark application pending for EUROPACKET-TM- and
ESPRESSO BIZKIT-TM-. This prospectus contains other trade names, trademarks and
service marks of InterPacket and of other companies.
-------------------
15
USE OF PROCEEDS
The net proceeds to us from the sale of the shares being offered at an
assumed initial public offering price of $11.00 per share are estimated to be
$65.5 million, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering
expenses payable by us, or $75.5 million if the underwriters' over-allotment
option is exercised in full.
We intend to use approximately $25.0 million of the net proceeds of this
offering to increase the capacity of our existing network through leases for
additional satellite transponder space and fiber optic capacity and the purchase
of fiber optic capacity, with the balance of the proceeds used to increase our
sales and marketing personnel and activities, increase our working capital and
for other general corporate purposes.
We may use a portion of the net proceeds of this offering to acquire or
invest in businesses, products, services or technologies complementary to our
current business, through mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures or otherwise.
However, we have no specific agreements or commitments with respect to these
transactions.
The timing and amount of our actual expenditures will be based on many
factors, including cash flows from operations, the growth of our business and
the availability of attractive acquisitions and investment opportunities. Our
management will retain broad discretion as to the allocation of the net proceeds
of this offering. We intend to invest the net proceeds of this offering in
short-term, interest-bearing investment grade securities pending the above uses.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We
currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use
in the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any
cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
16
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of December 31, 1999 on
an actual, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted basis. All share numbers give
effect to our 2.2 for 1 stock split which will occur prior to completion of the
offering.
The Actual column reflects our capitalization as of December 31, 1999 on a
historical basis, without any adjustments to reflect subsequent events or
anticipated events.
The Pro Forma column reflects conversion of our outstanding shares of
preferred stock into 6,600,000 shares of our common stock upon completion of the
offering.
The Pro Forma As Adjusted column reflects our capitalization as of
December 31, 1999 with the receipt of the estimated net proceeds from our sale
of 6,500,000 shares of common stock at an assumed initial public offering price
of $11 per share and the conversion of our outstanding shares of preferred stock
into 6,600,000 shares of our common stock upon completion of the offering.
None of the columns set forth below reflects the 6,820,000 shares reserved
for issuance under our stock option plans as of December, 31, 1999, of which
5,705,884 shares were subject to outstanding options as of December 31, 1999.
The table below should be read in conjunction with our balance sheet as of
December 31, 1999 and the related notes, which are included at the end of this
prospectus.
DECEMBER 31, 1999
-------------------------------------
PRO FORMA
PRO FORMA AS ADJUSTED
ACTUAL (UNAUDITED) (UNAUDITED)
--------- ----------- -----------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
Capital leases of satellite transponders
(includes current maturities)............. $40,807 $40,807 $ 40,807
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock,
$.001 par value:
Authorized--3,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding
3,000,000 shares, actual
no shares, as adjusted................ 14,824 -- --
Stockholders' equity (deficit):
Common stock, $.001 par value:
Authorized--50,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding
26,826,573 shares, actual
33,426,573 shares, pro forma.......... 27 33 40
39,926,573 shares, pro forma as
adjusted
Additional paid-in capital................ 45,109 59,927 125,415
Stockholder receivables................... (35) (35) (35)
Deferred compensation..................... (30,585) (30,585) (30,585)
Other comprehensive income................ 2 2 2
Deficit................................... (12,126) (12,126) (12,126)
------- ------- --------
Stockholders' equity.................... 2,392 17,216 82,711
------- ------- --------
Total capitalization.................. $58,023 $58,023 $123,518
======= ======= ========
17
DILUTION
Our pro forma net tangible book value as of December 31, 1999 was
approximately $16.8 million or $0.50 per share. Pro forma net tangible book
value per share represents the amount of our total tangible assets reduced by
the amount of our total liabilities and divided by the total number of shares of
common stock outstanding, assuming conversion of our outstanding preferred
stock. Dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per share represents the
difference between the amount per share paid by purchasers of common stock in
this offering and the pro forma net tangible book value per share of common
stock immediately after the completion of this offering. After giving effect to
the sale of 6,500,000 shares of common stock offered by us at an assumed initial
public offering price of $11 per share, and after deducting the underwriting
discount and estimated offering expenses payable by us, our pro forma net
tangible book value at December 31, 1999 would have been approximately
$82.3 million or $2.06 per share of common stock. This represents an immediate
increase in pro forma net tangible book value of $1.56 per share to existing
stockholders and an immediate dilution of $8.94 per share to new investors
purchasing common stock in this offering. The following table illustrates this
dilution on a per share basis:
Assumed initial public offering price per share............. $ 11.00
Pro forma net tangible book value per share before the
offering.................................................. $ 0.50
Increase per share attributable to new investors............ 1.56
--------
Pro forma net tangible book value per share after the
offering.................................................. 2.06
--------
Pro forma net tangible book value dilution per share to new
investors................................................. $ 8.94
========
The following table summarizes on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to
this offering, as of December 31, 1999, the differences between the existing
stockholders and new investors with respect to the number of shares of common
stock purchased from us, the total consideration paid to us and the average
price per share paid (based upon an assumed initial public offering price of
$11.00 per share and before deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions
and our estimated offering expenses):
SHARES PURCHASED TOTAL CONSIDERATION
--------------------- ----------------------- AVERAGE PRICE
NUMBER PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT PER SHARE
---------- -------- ------------ -------- -------------
Existing stockholders.................. 33,426,573 83.7% $ 26,886,746 27.3% $ 0.80
New investors.......................... 6,500,000 16.3 71,500,000 72.7 11.00
---------- ------------
Totals................................. 39,926,573 100.0% $ 98,386,746 100.0% $ 2.46
========== ====== ============ ======
The preceding tables assume conversion of the preferred stock and no
exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option and exclude 6,820,000 shares
of common stock reserved for issuance under our stock option plans, of which
5,705,884 were subject to outstanding options as of December 31, 1999 at a
weighted average exercise price of $1.54 per share. To the extent these options
are exercised, there will be further dilution to new investors. See
"Management--Option Plans" and Notes 7 and 13 of our notes to consolidated
financial statements appearing at the end of this prospectus.
18
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
You should read the selected consolidated financial information set forth
below in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations" and our consolidated financial statements
and related notes appearing at the end of this prospectus. The consolidated
statement of operations data and selected consolidated balance sheet data set
forth below for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999 have
been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements appearing at the
end of this prospectus. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of
results to be expected for any future period.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
----------- ----------- -------- -------- --------
(UNAUDITED) (UNAUDITED)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Revenue:
Network services......................... $ -- $ -- $ 583 $ 4,115 $ 10,789
Traditional telecom services............. -- 43 1,176 7,295 2,685
----- ------ ------ ------- --------
Total revenue.......................... -- 43 1,759 11,410 13,474
----- ------ ------ ------- --------
Operating expenses:
Cost of network services................. -- -- 458 5,789 11,285
Cost of traditional telecom services..... -- 14 548 5,023 1,329
Selling and marketing expenses........... -- -- 132 828 2,397
General and administrative expenses...... -- 43 454 1,098 4,686
Non-cash compensation charges............ -- -- -- -- 2,488
Depreciation and amortization............ -- 2 9 88 1,346
----- ------ ------ ------- --------
Total operating expenses............... -- 59 1,601 12,826 23,531
----- ------ ------ ------- --------
Income (loss) from operations.............. -- (16) 158 (1,416) (10,057)
Other income (expense)..................... -- 18 1 20 (832)
----- ------ ------ ------- --------
Income (loss) before provision for income
taxes.................................... -- 2 159 (1,396) (10,889)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes....... -- -- 70 (68) 1
----- ------ ------ ------- --------
Net income (loss).......................... -- 2 89 (1,328) (10,890)
===== ====== ====== ======= ========
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common
share.................................... $ -- $ 0.00 $ 0.01 $ (0.07) $ (0.48)
===== ====== ====== ======= ========
Weighted average number of common shares... -- 8,380 15,950 18,506 22,862
===== ====== ====== ======= ========
Pro forma basic and diluted loss per common
share (unaudited)........................ $ (0.46)
========
Weighted average number of common shares
used to compute pro forma loss per common
share (unaudited)........................ 23,767
========
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
----------- ----------- -------- -------- --------
(UNAUDITED) (UNAUDITED)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash....................................... $ -- $ 2 $ -- $ 2 $ 15,948
Total assets............................... -- 38 952 3,077 64,291
Capital leases, net of current portion..... -- -- -- -- 38,669
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock..... -- -- -- -- 14,824
Retained earnings (deficit)................ -- 2 92 (1,236) (12,126)
Stockholders' equity....................... -- 5 168 (905) 2,392
19
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND THE RELATED NOTES APPEARING AT THE END OF THIS PROSPECTUS. OUR
DISCUSSION CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS BASED UPON CURRENT EXPECTATIONS
THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES, SUCH AS OUR PLANS, OBJECTIVES,
EXPECTATIONS AND INTENTIONS. ACTUAL RESULTS AND THE TIMING OF EVENTS COULD
DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED IN THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AS
A RESULT OF A NUMBER OF FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE SET FORTH UNDER "PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY," "RISK FACTORS," "USE OF PROCEEDS," "BUSINESS" AND ELSEWHERE IN THIS
PROSPECTUS.
OVERVIEW
We operate a satellite-based, high performance Internet network that
delivers Internet services to international ISPs and other businesses in more
than 90 countries. Our global network's open technical architecture enables us
to provide multiple categories of Internet services:
- global connectivity to the Internet backbone;
- enhanced Internet services, such as Internet telephony; and
- Internet content distribution, such as newsfeeds and streaming media.
We were incorporated in California in August 1995 under the name Territorial
Media, Inc. and we changed our name to InterPacket Group, Inc. in June 1996. In
November 1999, we reincorporated in the State of Delaware under the name
InterPacket Group, Inc. and changed our name to InterPacket Networks, Inc. in
February 2000. In 1997 and most of 1998, we generated most of our revenues
through the sale of traditional telecom services, consisting of traditional
switch-based telephony. At that time our primary customer was STAR
Telecommunications, Inc., an international long distance company. In the third
quarter of 1998, we began to focus our sales and marketing efforts on the
delivery of Internet services and began to offer our ESPRESSO connectivity
product worldwide. While we continued to provide traditional telecom services in
1999, we have stopped actively soliciting customers for this area of our
business and, over time, we have allowed that particular customer base to
gradually decline. For the year ending December 31, 2000 and beyond, we do not
anticipate generating any meaningful revenue from traditional telecom services.
REVENUE
We have derived revenue from two sources, the sale of high performance
Internet-based network services, including connectivity and multi-point
newsfeeds, and the sale of traditional telecom services. Revenue from network
services is derived from monthly fees payable by international ISPs for the
delivery of services. The amount of these fees varies, depending on the level of
bandwidth contracted for our customers and the nature of the other Internet
services that we deliver to them. Our international ISP customers are billed for
connectivity services and those fees are generally collected on a monthly basis,
in advance. Revenue is recognized in the month that our network services are
provided. Our ESPRESSO VOICE services will be billed to the customer monthly,
based on minutes of use, after the month of usage with revenue recognized at the
time of usage. To date, we have not been subject to any material currency or
collection risk from our network services business, as most of our customers are
billed in U.S. dollars prior to the delivery of services. Our risk of collection
will increase in future periods to the extent we increase revenue from
international telephony services, as these services are billed after delivery
based on minutes of use. We also believe that our currency risk will increase if
we begin to accept payment for our network services in foreign currencies. In
1999, we derived a significant majority of our revenue through the sale of
network services and in 2000, we anticipate that substantially all of our
revenue will be derived from this business area.
20
In 1997 and 1998, we derived a majority of our revenue from the sale of
traditional telecom services transmitted over a traditional switched-based
network. Traditional telecom services are billed on a monthly basis after the
month of usage based on minutes carried over our network. Revenue is recognized
at the time of customer usage. In recent periods, we have greatly reduced the
delivery of traditional telecom services and expect revenue from such services
to decline significantly in future periods. We also intend to provide all of our
future telephony services over our network and the Internet, via our ESPRESSO
VOICE service.
In providing our network application services, we are dependent on
uninterrupted satellite service which is currently provided by five vendors. In
the past, we experienced one significant interruption in satellite transmission
service for which we did not receive reimbursement from the provider. In
connection with this transmission failure, we refunded approximately $20,000 to
our customers. An extended period of disruption could harm our financial
position and results of operations.
COST OF NETWORK SERVICES
Our cost of network services consists primarily of leasing costs
attributable to satellite transponder space, teleports, equipment, expenses
attributable to leased fiber optic cable lines and Internet backbone
interconnection costs. The life of our satellite transponder space leases
accounted for in cost of network services ranges from one to five years and is
typically less than one year for our fiber optic cable lines. We anticipate an
increase in network services expenses in future periods as we expand our
Internet services.
COST OF TRADITIONAL TELECOM SERVICES
Cost of traditional telecom services consists primarily of the
rate-per-minute charges of the telecommunications vendors that terminate our
switch-based telephone traffic for us. We do not anticipate incurring any
meaningful traditional telecom services expenses for the year ending
December 31, 2000 and beyond, as we convert our remaining switch-based telecom
business to ESPRESSO VOICE.
SELLING AND MARKETING EXPENSES
Selling and marketing expenses consist of salaries, commissions and related
expenses for personnel engaged primarily in sales, marketing, customer service,
professional service expenses and travel and trade show expenses. We anticipate
that selling and marketing expenses will increase in future periods, both in
absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenues, as we add sales staff and
increase our presence internationally through, among other things, the
establishment of sales offices abroad.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
General and administrative expenses consist of salaries and related expenses
for executive, administrative and operational personnel and other general
corporate expenses. We expect general and administrative expenses to increase,
both in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenues, in future periods as
we expand our executive and support staff and incur additional costs relative to
the growth of our business.
NON-CASH COMPENSATION CHARGES
Non-cash compensation charges consist of the amortization of deferred stock
compensation resulting from the grant of stock options or purchase of shares of
stock at exercise or sale prices subsequently deemed to be less than the fair
value of the common stock on the grant date as well as charges relating to the
accelerated vesting of stock options. This amount is included as a reduction of
stockholders' equity and is amortized ratably over the vesting period of the
individual options, generally three years. In 1999, the non-cash compensation
charge was $2.5 million and we expect it to be $10.4 million in each of 2000 and
2001 and $9.8 million in 2002, based on options issued prior to December 31,
1999.
21
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
Depreciation and amortization is generated primarily from our leased
satellite transponders, high speed routers and other equipment and peripherals
necessary to provide our customers with our network services. With a portion of
the proceeds of this offering we intend to purchase indefeasible rights of use
on transoceanic fiber optic cable systems. We also intend to enter into
additional long-term leases for satellite transponder space and we will account
for these leases as capital items. Thus, we expect depreciation to increase
significantly, both in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue, in
future periods.
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Other income consists of earnings on our cash and cash equivalents. Other
expense consists primarily of interest expense on our capitalized satellite
transponder space leases. We anticipate that our interest expense will continue
to increase as we lease additional satellite transponder space.
We intend to continue investment in our network and personnel to support the
growth and expansion of our business, and we do not expect to be profitable in
the foreseeable future.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth our statement of operations data as a
percentage of revenue for the periods indicated. This information should be read
in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
-------- -------- --------
Revenue:
Network services.................................... 33% 36% 80%
Traditional telecom services........................ 67 64 20
---- ----- -----
Total revenue..................................... 100% 100% 100%
Operating expenses:
Cost of network services............................ 26 51 84
Cost of traditional telecom services................ 31 44 10
Selling and marketing expenses...................... 8 7 18
General and administrative expenses................. 26 10 35
Non-cash compensation charges....................... -- -- 18
Depreciation and amortization....................... 1 1 10
Total operating expenses.......................... 91 112 175
Income (loss) from operations....................... 9 (12) (75)
Other income (expense)................................ -- -- (6)
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes....... 9 (12) (81)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes.................. 4 (1) --
Net income (loss)..................................... 5% (12)% (81)%
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
REVENUE
Network services revenue increased 162% from $4.1 million in 1998 to
$10.8 million in 1999. Revenue from traditional telecom services decreased 63%
from $7.3 million in 1998 to $2.7 million in 1999. Our network services revenue
increased due to growth in the number of new ISP customers, as well as an
increase in sales to existing ISP customers as a result of bandwith upgrades.
Revenue from the sale of traditional telecom services declined as we continued
to de-emphasize traditional switch-based
22
telephone services and focus our sales efforts almost entirely on network
services. In 2000 and beyond, we do not anticipate generating meaningful revenue
from traditional telecom services.
OPERATING EXPENSES
COST OF NETWORK SERVICES. Cost of network services increased 95% from
$5.8 million in 1998 to $11.3 million in 1999 but decreased as a percentage of
network services revenue from 141% in 1998 to 105% in 1999. This absolute
increase was due to investments in our network infrastructure, particularly
increased satellite transponder space and fiber optic capacity, to support
current and anticipated future growth in revenue. We expect our cost of network
services to continue to grow, as we plan to aggressively pursue the expansion of
our Internet services to new customers and markets.
COST OF TRADITIONAL TELECOM SERVICES. Cost of traditional telecom services
decreased 74% from $5.0 million in 1998 to $1.3 million in 1999 and decreased as
a percentage of traditional telecom services revenue from 69% in 1998 to 49% in
1999. The absolute reduction in expenses was a result of deemphasizing
traditional telecom services.
SELLING AND MARKETING EXPENSES. Selling and marketing expenses increased
189% from $828,000 in 1998 to $2.4 million in 1999. As a percentage of revenues,
selling and marketing expenses increased from 7% to 18% period to period. These
expenses increased primarily as a result of increased staffing levels in all
areas of our company, and increased sales and marketing efforts to grow our
network services.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses
increased 327% from $1.1 million in 1998 to $4.7 million in 1999. As a
percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses increased from 10%
to 35% period to period, primarily due to our increase in staff and additional
facility costs.
NON-CASH COMPENSATION CHARGE. Non-cash compensation charge was
$2.5 million in 1999. We did not have a non-cash compensation charge in 1998.
The remaining deferred compensation of $30.6 million will be amortized ratably
over the vesting period of the individual options which is generally three
years.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION. Depreciation and amortization increased
1,438% from $88,000 in 1998 to $1.3 million in 1999. This increase was primarily
due to the depreciation of equipment needed to accommodate our growing customer
base including capital leases for satellite transponder space. We expect
depreciation to increase in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenues as
we further develop and expand our network by acquiring transoceanic fiber optic
cable lines and enter into long term leases for satellite transponder space that
we intend to account for as capital items.
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE). Other income (expense) decreased from net other
income of $20,000 in 1998 to a net other expense of $832,000 in 1999. This
increase in net expense was primarily due to an increase in interest expense of
$943,000 relating to increased acquisitions of capital assets, partially offset
by an increase in interest income of $183,000.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
REVENUE
Revenue from network services increased 606% from $583,000 in 1997 to
$4.1 million in 1998. Revenue from traditional telecom services increased 520%
from $1.2 million in 1997 to $7.3 million in 1998. Revenue from network services
increased primarily due to growth in the number of new international ISP
customers. Revenue from traditional telecom services grew due to the addition of
new international destinations during the latter part of 1997 and throughout
1998.
23
OPERATING EXPENSES
COST OF NETWORK SERVICES. Cost of network services increased 1,164% from
$458,000 in 1997, to $5.8 million in 1998. This increase was due to investments
in our network infrastructure to support current and anticipated future growth
in network services revenue.
COST OF TRADITIONAL TELECOM SERVICES. Cost of traditional telecom services
increased 817% from $548,000 in 1997 to $5.0 million in 1998. This increase was
due primarily to our purchasing telecom services from third parties to enable us
to offer telecom services to specific high volume international destinations
through the latter part of 1997 and through the first three quarters of 1998.
SELLING AND MARKETING EXPENSES. Selling and marketing expenses increased
529% from $132,000 in 1997 to $828,000 in 1998. As a percentage of revenue,
selling and marketing expenses remained relatively constant at approximately 7%
of revenue from period to period. These expenses increased primarily as a result
of increased staffing levels in all areas of our company and increased sales and
marketing efforts coinciding with the growth of our network services.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses
increased 142% from $454,000 in 1997 to $1.1 million in 1998, primarily as a
result of increased staffing levels in all areas of our company coinciding with
the growth in revenues. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative
expenses decreased from 26% in 1997 to 10% in 1998.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION. Depreciation and amortization increased 833%
from $9,000 in 1997 to $88,000 in 1998. This increase is primarily due to the
depreciation of equipment needed to accommodate the increase in our growing
customer base for network services.
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE). Net other income increased $19,000 from a net other
income of approximately $1,000 in 1997 to $20,000 in 1998. The increase is
primarily due to a $22,000 increase in interest income from investing funds
raised from private placements of common stock.
24
QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth unaudited quarterly statement of operations
data for the eight quarters ended December 31, 1999. This unaudited quarterly
information has been derived from our unaudited financial statements and, in the
opinion of our management, includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the information for
the periods covered. The quarterly data should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and related notes. The operating results for
any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for any
future period.
QUARTER ENDED
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAR. 31, JUNE 30, SEPT. 30, DEC. 31, MAR. 31, JUNE 30, SEPT. 30, DEC. 31,
1998 1998 1998 1998 1999 1999 1999 1999
-------- -------- --------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
(UNAUDITED, IN THOUSANDS)
Revenue:
Network services................. $ 508 $ 690 $1,404 $ 1,513 $ 1,916 $ 2,149 $ 2,997 $ 3,727
Traditional telecom services..... 484 1,288 3,479 2,044 1,160 752 513 260
------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total revenue.................. 992 1,978 4,883 3,557 3,076 2,901 3,510 3,987
------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Operating expenses:
Cost of network services......... 564 1,005 1,803 2,417 2,456 2,800 2,792 3,237
Cost of traditional telecom
services....................... 341 833 2,138 1,711 900 204 72 153
Selling and marketing expenses... 93 149 305 281 357 486 606 948
General and administrative
expenses....................... 143 235 255 465 511 641 1,535 1,999
Non-cash compensation charges.... -- -- -- -- -- 145 171 2,172
Depreciation and amortization.... 6 16 27 39 44 68 351 883
------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total operating expenses....... 1,147 2,238 4,528 4,913 4,268 4,344 5,527 9,392
------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Income (loss) from operations...... (155) (260) 355 (1,356) (1,192) (1,443) (2,017) (5,405)
Other income (expense)............. 5 5 3 7 8 26 (250) (617)
Provision (benefit) for income
taxes............................ (60) (8) 51 (51) -- -- -- --
------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net income (loss).................. $ (90) $ (247) $ 307 $(1,298) $(1,184) $(1,417) $(2,267) $(6,022)
====== ====== ====== ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
25
The following table sets forth certain selected items from our unaudited
quarterly statements of operations as a percentage of revenue for the quarters
indicated:
QUARTER ENDED
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAR. 31, JUNE 30, SEPT. 30, DEC. 31, MAR. 31, JUNE 30, SEPT. 30, DEC. 31,
1998 1998 1998 1998 1999 1999 1999 1999
-------- -------- --------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
(UNAUDITED)
Revenue:
Network services.................. 51% 35% 29% 43% 62% 74% 85% 93%
Traditional telecom services...... 49 65 71 57 38 26 15 7
--- --- --- --- ---- ---- ---- ----
Total revenue................... 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Operating expenses:
Cost of network services.......... 57 51 37 68 80 97 80 81
Cost of traditional telecom
services........................ 34 42 44 48 29 7 2 4
Selling and marketing expenses.... 9 8 6 8 12 17 17 24
General and administrative
expenses........................ 14 12 5 13 17 22 44 50
Non-cash compensation charge...... -- -- -- -- -- 5 5 54
Depreciation and amortization..... 1 1 1 1 1 2 10 22
Total operating expenses........ 116 113 93 138 139 150 157 236
Income (loss) from operations....... (16) (13) 7 (38) (39) (50) (57) (136)
Other income (expense).............. 1 0 0 0 0 1 (7) (15)
Provision (benefit) for income
taxes............................. (6) 0 1 (1) 0 0 0 0
Net income (loss)................... (9)% (12)% 6% (36)% (38)% (49)% (65)% (151)%
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Since inception, we have financed our operations primarily through private
sales of common stock and preferred stock, which through December 31, 1999,
totaled approximately $26.8 million. Net cash provided by financing activities
was $25.4 million in 1999, and $255,000 in 1998. Net cash provided by financing
activities in 1999 resulted primarily from the sale of $4.5 million of our
common stock through our private placement of shares in April and $6.7 million
in September and from the sale of $14.8 million of our preferred stock through
our private placement of shares in November. Net cash provided by financing
activities in 1998 consisted primarily of proceeds from the sale of common stock
to individual investors for $250,000.
Net cash used in operating activities was approximately $6.9 million in
1999, compared to cash provided by operations of $438,000 in 1998. Net cash used
in operating activities in 1999 resulted primarily from the net operating loss.
Net cash used in investing activities was $2.6 million in 1999, and $691,000
in 1998. Net cash used in investing activities for each of these periods
resulted primarily from purchases of property and equipment.
As of December 31, 1999 we had $15.9 million of cash. As of that date, our
principal commitments consisted of obligations outstanding under capital and
operating leases for satellite transponder space and related facilities, for
which we have contractual commitments of $18.0 million for the next 12 months.
We anticipate a substantial increase in our lease commitments and our cash
needs, consistent with the anticipated growth in operations and infrastructure,
including additional satellite transponder space and the acquisition of fiber
optic cable capacity.
We have also committed to lease three additional transponders on one
existing satellite under leases that start on August 15, 2000, May 15, 2001 and
November 15, 2001 and continue through the end of their useful lives, which is
expected to be October 2013. Estimated future payments under these commitments
are approximately $56.5 million, of which $569,000 will be paid during 2000.
26
We anticipate that we will continue to experience significant growth in our
operating expenses for the foreseeable future and that our operating expenses
will be a material use of our cash resources. Also, we anticipate substantial
expenditures and use of cash resources in our efforts to expand our
international ISP customer base.
We currently anticipate that the net proceeds of this offering, together
with funds on hand, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated needs for working
capital and capital expenditures through at least the next 12 months. We intend
to use approximately $25.0 million of the net proceeds of this offering to
increase the capacity of our existing network through leases for additional
satellite transponder space and fiber optic capacity with the balance of the
proceeds used to increase our sales and marketing personnel and activities,
increase our working capital and for other general corporate purposes. If the
offering is not completed and we decide to continue with our operating plan, we
will have to seek capital in the private marketplace, which, if available at
all, may be at lower valuations than would be available in the public market. We
may also need to raise additional funds prior to the expiration of such period
if, for example, we pursue acquisitions or experience operating losses that
exceed our current expectations. In any event, we cannot be certain that
additional financing will be available to use on favorable terms when required,
or at all. Alternatively, if we are not successful in raising funds through this
offering or a transaction in the private marketplace, we will have to take
certain steps, such as delaying the acceptance of services under our fixed fee
contracts, renegotiating certain long-term contracted obligations and reducing
the number of our employees, to reduce our regular capital needs. Under this
restricted operating plan, we believe that funds on hand will be sufficient to
meet our anticipated needs for working capital and capital expenditures through
at least the next 12 months if the offering is not completed.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We provide services primarily to customers located outside of the U.S. Thus,
our financial results could be impacted by foreign currency exchange rates and
market conditions abroad. As all of our services are paid for in U.S. dollars, a
strong dollar could make the cost of our services more expensive than the
services of non-U.S. based providers in foreign markets. We have not used
derivative instruments to hedge our foreign exchange risks though we may choose
to do so in the future. Our interest income is sensitive to changes in U.S.
interest rates but we do not believe that we are subject to any material market
risk exposure.
27
BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
We operate a satellite-based, high performance Internet network that
delivers Internet services to international ISPs and other businesses in more
than 90 countries. Our proprietary network design integrates the broadcast
capabilities of satellites with Internet networking technologies to offer our
customers an expandable, or scalable, solution to the constraints of the public
Internet infrastructure. Our global network's open technical architecture
enables us to provide multiple categories of Internet services, including:
- global high bandwidth, or broadband, connectivity to the Internet
backbone;
- enhanced Internet services, such as Internet telephony; and
- Internet content distribution, such as newsfeeds and streaming media.
From December 31, 1998 to December 31, 1999, we increased the number of our
customers from 69 to 343 and as of March 27, 2000 we had over 500 customers
worldwide.
INDUSTRY BACKGROUND
THE EXPANSION OF THE INTERNET
Strain on the worldwide Internet infrastructure is increasing, especially
outside the U.S., as the number of Internet users grows and as their bandwidth
needs expand. Connectivity provides access to the Internet and, once
established, avails Internet users of a variety of services, including Web site
browsing, content downloading, personal and business messaging, e-commerce,
Internet telephony and streaming audio and video broadcasting. International
Data Corporation estimates that the number of active Internet users worldwide
will grow from approximately 261 million in 1999, of which approximately 59%
resided outside of the U.S., to approximately 623 million by the end of 2003, of
which approximately 68% will reside outside of the U.S. Once online, users
quickly become more selective, demanding faster, more reliable access, a broad
choice of Internet-based services from their ISPs and richer, more interactive
Web sites. Despite an anticipated expansion in the number of Internet users
worldwide, advances in the global telecommunications infrastructure and the
public Internet have failed to keep pace with user demand. When connecting to
and navigating the Internet, international ISPs and their subscribers suffer
numerous problems caused by limited access to the Internet backbone, poor
telecommunications infrastructure and low bandwidth availability. These
difficulties are likely to increase as demand grows for rich Internet content,
such as streaming audio and video.
28
The table below sets forth the estimated worldwide growth in active Internet
users from 1999 to 2003 on a region-by-region basis based on International Data
Corporation estimates:
ESTIMATED WORLDWIDE GROWTH OF ACTIVE INTERNET USERS
1999 - 2003
(IN MILLIONS OF USERS)
COMPOUND
ANNUAL
1999 2003 GROWTH
------------------- ------------------- RATE
REGION TOTAL % TOTAL % 1999-2003
- ------ -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Western Europe..................................... 90.3 34.5% 223.6 35.9% 25.6%
Asia and Pacific Rim............................... 41.1 15.7 137.5 22.1 35.2
Latin America (includes Mexico).................... 7.1 2.7 19.1 3.1 28.3
Eastern Europe, Africa, Middle East................ 3.7 1.4 19.7 3.2 52.4
North America (U.S. and Canada).................... 119.3 45.7 223.4 35.8 17.0
------ ----- ------ ----- -----
Total............................................ 261.5 100.0% 623.3 100.0 24.3%
GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE CHALLENGES
The Internet relies on the global telecommunications infrastructure to
deliver an increasing variety of business applications and media. At the same
time, the swift growth of the Internet outside the U.S. and Europe is
constrained by the inadequacy of its infrastructure. In many parts of the world,
fiber-based Internet service is unavailable and other terrestrial connections
may be unreliable or in short supply due to the quality and availability of
local PTT facilities. For many of our customers, PTTs are their sole source of
telecommunications services. ISPs in many international markets must overcome
bottlenecks such as limited access to the Internet backbone, poor network
architecture and telecommunications infrastructure and a relative lack of
bandwidth provisioning from the local telecommunications provider. Network
performance may also be adversely affected by the inherent asymmetry of Web
traffic, where most of the bandwidth required is for the receipt of Web pages
from the Internet by the user. Network performance may be further diminished by
the necessity of routing data across multiple hops, or links, through multiple
networks. These shortcomings can severely impact the network performance of an
ISP and the quality of service that it provides to its subscribers.
Even in the U.S. and Europe, where broadband connectivity is more widely
available than in the rest of the world, the public Internet infrastructure
nevertheless requires multiple hops between routers to get from one point to
another reducing the quality and efficiency of the network. The Internet's
current infrastructure is poorly designed to efficiently transmit to other
countries increasingly bandwidth-intensive Internet content, such as
broadcast-style programming, streaming media, large graphics and animation. Web
site owners, traditional entertainment and media companies, Internet media
companies and creators of new online applications are making greater demands on
the public Internet infrastructure with the transmission of graphics,
high-definition images, video and audio streaming, animation and software
downloads.
Companies that provide Internet content and store it in servers close to end
users, known as edge servers, provide only part of the solution to the public
Internet limitations. Content distributors need a means to deliver data to their
servers in an efficient manner. Repeatedly sending individual point-to-point
transmissions to thousands of servers around the world is a costly and
inefficient use of bandwidth and has the potential to significantly increase
Internet infrastructure congestion.
FACILITATING THE CONTINUED GROWTH OF THE INTERNET
A number of Internet companies have attempted to address the international
architectural limitations of the Internet and the demand for bandwidth-intensive
Internet content. Caching, or the frequent storage
29
of commonly accessed Internet data and images in a server closer to the end
user, offers a hardware and software solution to reduce transmission costs and
delays. Outsourced Web server management by content hosting companies enables
Web sites to increase server reliability by establishing servers on multiple
points on the Internet. Terrestrial broadband services are being advanced by
traditional telecommunications companies and Internet backbone providers in an
effort to address the last mile limitation for Internet users.
Ultimately, none of these solutions sufficiently address the inherent
limitation of the infrastructure abroad. Caching requires expensive hardware and
software and does not address the need of Web site owners to continually deliver
their high performance Internet content reliably across the many interconnecting
networks that comprise the Internet. Web hosting is not designed to avoid
transmission disruption difficulties encountered as data and content traverse
the public Internet to the end user. Last mile solutions must rely on
terrestrial network connections and do not avoid congestion or degradation of
quality that arise as transmissions pass through various infrastructure
intersections across the Internet.
Conversely, satellites deliver Internet services and broadcast content in a
simultaneous, point-to-multipoint manner to locations throughout the world.
Satellite-based networks overlay the public Internet around the world, reducing
hops, which:
- avoids bottlenecks;
- improves broadcast quality;
- lowers distribution costs; and
- expands the availability of content to Internet users worldwide.
When comprehensively managed in a network that intelligently integrates
satellite and Internet protocol technologies, satellites are able to reach
remote places inadequately served by local telecommunications infrastructures
and can make broadband connectivity and the resulting flow of e-commerce, rich
content, and broadcast programming globally available.
THE INTERPACKET SOLUTION
Our satellite-based Internet network overlays the public Internet around the
world and offers solutions to many of the limitations of the current global
Internet infrastructure. Our network currently incorporates nine geostationary
satellites, uplinked from six strategically located earth-based satellite
transmission stations, or teleports, and allows for the rapid delivery of
Internet connectivity services worldwide. ESPRESSO, and ESPRESSO BIZKIT, our
branded satellite-based Internet connectivity services, supplement or bypass
local and international telecommunications connections, enabling our ISP
customers to deliver a more reliable, higher quality of Internet service to
their subscribers. Our enhanced Internet services, including ESPRESSO VOICE, our
Internet telephony service, are complementary to the broadband access we provide
to our international ISP customers and create additional revenue opportunities.
The broadcast capabilities of our satellite network create an efficient,
reliable means for Internet content distributors to transmit bandwidth-intensive
forms of rich, Web-based content simultaneously to multiple locations, known as
multicasting, around the world. We currently broadcast ESPRESSO NEWS, our
aggregated newsfeed, and we recently entered into agreements with iBEAM and
RealNetworks, leading Internet broadcast networks, to deliver streaming content
around the world.
Our satellite-based Internet network and services feature:
SCALABLE, PROPRIETARY AND GLOBAL NETWORK DESIGN. Our network incorporates a
proprietary design to integrate the broadcast capabilities of satellites with
Internet networking technologies to connect our international ISP customers to
the Internet backbone. Our network currently incorporates nine geostationary
satellites, uplinked from six strategically located teleports, which enable the
transmission of
30
data from terrestrial to satellite-based networks. The design of our network is
scalable, allowing us to rapidly and cost-effectively add satellite and fiber
optic cable capacity in response to our customers' Internet needs.
HIGH QUALITY, BRANDED SERVICE. ESPRESSO, our primary Internet connectivity
service, provides a high quality, direct connection to the Internet backbone.
ESPRESSO supplements or bypasses the Internet connections available to
international ISPs from their local telecommunications providers. This reduces
reliance on local Internet infrastructure and enables our ISP customers to
deliver more reliable, higher quality Internet services to their subscribers. We
believe ESPRESSO is a well known brand name in the international ISP
marketplace.
RAPID PROVISIONING. The simplex, or receive only, format of ESPRESSO allows
us to activate our new customers quickly and helps our customers avoid the costs
and delays of acquiring transmission facilities and regulatory approvals. Our
network and our customer service group deliver rapid provisioning of initial
Internet connectivity and subsequent bandwidth upgrades to our customers. This
system allows our ISP customers to avoid making the significant capital
investments necessary to establish and maintain fixed levels of bandwidth. Thus,
our ISP customers are afforded a cost-effective, pay-as-they-grow means to
increase the level of access and Internet services that they offer to their
subscribers.
ENHANCED INTERNET SERVICES. The broadband capacity of our network
facilitates the delivery of complementary Internet-based services to our ISP
customers. ESPRESSO VOICE enables our customers to route phone-to-phone calls
over our network in a cost-effective manner. Our ESPRESSO BIZKIT service
provides a direct-to-business Internet service through our ISP customers and
eliminates last mile connectivity issues for their business customers. We
recently initiated a managed co-location service with the introduction of
ESPRESSO COLO, contracting with Exodus Communications, Inc. and AboveNet
Communications, Inc. to deliver Web-hosting services to our ISP customers.
MULTICASTING CONTENT DELIVERY. The point-to-multipoint broadcast
capabilities of our satellite-based Internet network creates an efficient,
reliable means for Internet content distributors to transmit streaming forms of
Web-based content simultaneously to multiple locations across the globe. Our
network is designed to enable content distributors to deliver streaming audio
and video content to Internet users worldwide. We recently began multicasting
ESPRESSO NEWS, our aggregated newsfeed, to customers in Western Europe,
including the United Kingdom.
CUSTOMER-FOCUSED NETWORK MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT. Our experienced network
management team is able to customize sophisticated Internet solutions to meet
the needs of growing international ISPs. We are able to proactively manage
operations and solutions and can help our customers operate more efficiently in
an ever-changing Internet marketplace. Our network operations centers in Santa
Monica and London allow our technical staff to actively monitor the status and
performance of our network and customers on a 24 hour, seven day a week basis.
OUR STRATEGY
Our goal is to become the leading provider of global satellite Internet
services by building the world's largest, premier quality and cost-efficient
satellite-based Internet network. We also intend to capitalize on our
proprietary network design, our network's broadcast capabilities, and the global
reach of our satellite coverage to offer content delivery to Internet content
distributors. To achieve this goal we intend to:
INCREASE OUR GLOBAL CUSTOMER BASE. We had over 500 customers worldwide as
of March 27, 2000. We intend to increase our customer base by growing our sales
force and aggressively marketing our Internet services through a variety of
marketing activities, such as direct marketing and participation at trade shows.
We believe that heightened recognition of our ESPRESSO brand and the high
quality of our Internet services among ISPs internationally will continue to
facilitate additional growth among new
31
international ISP customers and establish us as the leading provider of global
satellite Internet connectivity, enhanced Internet services and content
distribution.
CAPITALIZE ON OUR EARLY ENTRANT STATUS. We have aggressively deployed our
network in over 90 countries and have developed an international reputation for
providing high quality Internet connectivity and related services abroad using
our satellite overlay network. Our international sales and marketing force of
approximately 45 individuals, many of whom are multilingual, leverages our
experience as one of the first providers of satellite-based Internet services
internationally and facilitates our entry into new countries and the development
of new business relationships. We intend to continue to capitalize upon our
reputation and experience as a leading provider of satellite-based Internet
services to the international ISP community.
BROADEN OUR INTERNET SERVICE OFFERINGS. We intend to continue to develop
additional Internet services and solutions that provide revenue-generating
opportunities. We plan to introduce caching, Internet applications delivery and
virtual private network services later this year. As the demand for additional
Internet services by our customers increases, their needs can be satisfied by
our network. We intend to continue to develop services that provide our ISP
customers with cost savings and with the Internet services they need to satisfy
the demands of their Internet users. The expansion of our Internet services also
serves to maintain the loyalty of our customers.
PROVIDE TURNKEY SOLUTIONS TO THE EMERGING INTERNET CONTENT INDUSTRY. We
intend to capitalize on the many advantages of our Internet network to become a
leading global supplier of managed satellite-based network services to the
emerging content distribution industry. Our network serves as an overlay to the
public Internet around the world, offering content distributors a turnkey
solution to the many distribution difficulties caused by the congestion and
inadequate bandwidth capacities of the international Internet infrastructure. We
hope to exploit this advantage and offer iBEAM, RealNetworks and our future
content distributor customers an efficient and cost-effective means to broadcast
their Internet products to ISPs, businesses and other users around the world.
EXPAND OUR NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE. We believe the increasing worldwide need
for Internet connectivity, services and rich content on demand will lead to a
greater need for our network. We intend to support and continue to assure the
quality and availability of our services with the acquisition of additional
satellite and fiber optic cable capacity. We will continue to pursue a strategy
of connecting to U.S. Internet backbone operators, regional satellite owners
abroad and operators of Internet exchange points to add regional and
intraregional links and make our Internet network more globally pervasive. We
have also recently begun to expand our points of presence domestically and have
entered into agreements to install satellite dishes and servers at data centers,
peering points and other locations throughout the U.S. and Western Europe. We
believe that the sophistication of our satellite-based Internet network will
provide us a competitive advantage as the global Internet infrastructure expands
and evolves.
DEVELOP OUR STRATEGIC AND BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS. We have entered into a
strategic relationships with iBEAM and RealNetworks. We expect that these
relationships will enable us to derive revenue from the emerging content
distribution industry. We intend to pursue additional strategic and business
relationships to accelerate market acceptance of our services and increase our
global brand recognition. We believe that these relationships will facilitate
our efforts to become the world's premier satellite-based Internet network.
INTERPACKET SERVICES
CONNECTIVITY
ESPRESSO. Our ESPRESSO connectivity service allows international ISPs to
use our global network of interconnected geostationary satellites and fiber
optic cable facilities to download content from the Internet at any time at
speeds ranging from 64 kilobits per second to 45 megabits per second. ESPRESSO'S
simplex,
32
or receive-only, format offers advantages over more traditional leased line
connections, which are typically unable to accommodate asymmetrical bandwidth
requirements of the Internet. An international ISP may link to our network and
receive ESPRESSO service with the customer's existing Internet links, regardless
of the provider of those links. While we also offer duplex service, or two-way
transmission, our customers typically choose the simplex format of ESPRESSO as
it does not require transmission equipment and may be activated quickly.
Transmission equipment is more expensive than receive-only equipment and
typically requires a local transmission license, which can often be
time-consuming and costly to obtain.
We assign every ESPRESSO customer a committed information rate, or
guaranteed transmission throughput, according to their capacity needs and
budget. The committed information rate acts as our guarantee that the customer
will be able to access the U.S. Internet backbone at that data rate on a
24 hour a day, seven day a week basis. The monthly cost of an ESPRESSO link
varies depending upon the committed information rate and further varies from
continent to continent based on facility costs, the particular satellite that we
use and the competition within the local market. The customer equipment for
ESPRESSO primarily includes a receive-only satellite dish and can be installed
and operational within several hours.
Most existing terrestrial networks normally require a number of hops to
reach the Internet backbone, which increases latency, or delay, and potential
data loss and lowers the quality of service. ESPRESSO is a direct connection to
the Internet backbone, with only a single hop between the Internet backbone and
our ISP customer. Our technical ability to provide guaranteed bandwidth and the
ability to configure the connection for any desired degree of asymmetry are
attractive features of our ESPRESSO service that are not generally available
from traditional telecommunications service providers.
ESPRESSO BIZKIT. We currently partner with over 40 of our ISP customers who
market our ESPRESSO BIZKIT application to their business customers seeking
significant download capacity. ESPRESSO BIZKIT is a high-speed receive-only
satellite service that allows the business subscriber to download data directly
from the Internet backbone via our network, eliminating connectivity and latency
issues in the last mile of terrestrial land lines. We believe that our ESPRESSO
BIZKIT application is an opportunity to expand our customer base to the
international corporate user market.
33
ENHANCED INTERNET SERVICES
ESPRESSO VOICE. Through ESPRESSO VOICE, our voice over Internet protocol,
or VoIP, service, we are able to provide high-quality communication services to
PTTs, ISPs and other international communications service providers. We can
provide our customers with a method to transmit carrier-grade quality voice
calls over our network at substantially lower costs than over traditional,
switch-based networks. We offer ESPRESSO VOICE in three configurations and
market them according to their capabilities and relative advantages available to
particular customers. In order to employ our ESPRESSO VOICE service, a customer
generally would need our full duplex ESPRESSO service and an
InterPacket-provided router. Many of our ISP customers that use our simplex
ESPRESSO connectivity service may also be able to offer their customers our
ESPRESSO VOICE service by routing outgoing calls through existing dedicated
Internet connections, though the transmission quality of such a call will not be
as high as a call transmitted over full duplex ESPRESSO service or over
traditional phone lines. We recently entered into an agreement to license a
personal computer-to-phone software application from Telic Communications, Inc.,
a technology company that offers VoIP software solutions. We intend to offer
this service to our international ISP customers to allow their end users to make
long distance telephone calls from their computers over our network.
ESPRESSO COLO. We provide on-site service and monitoring on behalf of our
international ISP customers of all equipment co-located through ESPRESSO COLO.
Co-location enables a customer to install its Web-servers and related equipment
at facilities, known as Internet data centers, owned and operated by another
company. We lease space from AboveNet and Exodus Communications to house the Web
servers of our ISP customers and their subscribers.
ESPRESSO NEWS. In September 1999, we completed our acquisition from Level 3
Communications Limited of certain assets and technology necessary to broadcast
ESPRESSO NEWS, our service that aggregates and multicasts USENET newsgroup
content to our ISP customers. This service eliminates the costs and bandwidth
requirements that would otherwise be necessary for the ISPs to access USENET
content directly.
CONTENT DISTRIBUTION. In January 2000, we entered into an agreement with
iBEAM. Under this non-exclusive agreement, we will deliver streaming content for
iBEAM customers via our global satellite broadcast network to iBEAM servers
located on our network in Asia, Europe, Latin America, Africa and the Middle
East. After iBEAM's use of our network reaches a minimum threshold level we will
receive a discounted fee based on usage, as well as a percentage of iBEAM's
revenue for our delivery of streaming content. We are in the process of
finalizing all network integration testing with iBEAM and plan to begin to
install iBEAM servers on our network over the course of the next quarter.
In March 2000, we entered into an agreement with RealNetworks. This
non-exclusive agreement calls for the development by RealNetworks Professional
Services for us of a proprietary streaming media system that will allow us to
multicast live and on-demand streaming content across our network. Under the
agreement we will also work with Real Broadcast Network, or RBN, to fully
interconnect our network with the RBN network. Additionally, our agreement with
RealNetworks allows us to resell RBN's Internet broadcast services and provides
RBN with content distribution capabilities via our satellite network.
RealNetworks Professional Services has initiated development efforts on our
streaming media system and we believe our network will be enabled with this
software by the third quarter of 2000.
We intend to enter into additional revenue sharing agreements with other
Internet content distribution companies.
OPERATIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURE
We provide our international Internet connectivity services through our
network of nine leased geostationary satellite and terrestrial fiber optic cable
interconnections to the Internet backbone.
34
SATELLITE NETWORK
The following table shows the satellites where we have leased capacity and
the percentage of our monthly revenue by satellite at March 27, 2000.
OUR SATELLITE COVERAGE
PERCENTAGE OF
MONTHLY
REVENUE
SATELLITE REGION COVERED AT MARCH 27, 2000
- --------- --------------------------------------------- ------------------
Satmex 5................. South America, most of North America 39%
Orion 1.................. Portions of Europe 1
GE-1E.................... Portions of Europe and North Africa 9
PanAmSat 2............... Portions of Asia and the Pacific Rim 2
PanAmSat 3............... Portions of Europe and Africa 13
PanAmSat 4............... Most of Europe and Africa, portions of Asia 13
PanAmSat 5............... Most of North and South America --
PanAmSat 8............... Portions of Asia and the Pacific Rim 12
TELSTAR 10............... Portions of Asia, the Pacific Rim and Africa 11
--------------------------------------------- -----------------
100%
We have long-term contracts with our satellite providers, with expiration
dates varying from 2002 to 2011. In general, a provider may terminate one of
these contracts only under limited circumstances, such as satellite failure or
material breach of contract. We are required to pay monthly lease charges per
satellite ranging from $300 to $360,000 for the bandwidth capacity we use under
the terms of these satellite contracts. Our contracts for satellite services are
with PanAmSat International Systems, Inc., Satelites Mexicanos (Satmex), Loral
SpaceCom Corporation (Orion and TELSTAR), British Telecommunications plc
(PanAmSat 8), and an affiliate of General Electric Company.
We have also committed to lease three additional transponders on one
existing satellite under leases that start on August 15, 2000, May 15, 2001 and
November 15, 2001 and continue through the end of their useful lives, which is
expected to be October 2013. Estimated future payments under these commitments
are approximately $56.5 million.
TERRESTRIAL NETWORK
Our hubs are located in the primary telephony buildings in Los Angeles, at
the One Wilshire Building, in New York, at 60 Hudson Street, in London, at
Telehouse, and in Singapore, at Singapore Telecom's Telepark. Locating in these
premier telecommunications facilities enables us to have superior operational
environments for our equipment. We are also able to interconnect to many
backbone providers and major telecommunications carriers with a presence in
these buildings at a relatively low cost. In Los Angeles, we are locating much
of our equipment at the new Exodus facility in El Segundo, California to provide
site redundancy to One Wilshire. We also locate some of our equipment supporting
our Napa Valley uplink, and San Francisco Bay area connections, at the AboveNet
facility in San Jose, California.
We connect to the Internet backbone via transit and peering arrangements at
several locations through several major providers. In Los Angeles, New York and
London we have arrangements with UUNET Technologies, Inc. for redundant transit
ports with capacity up to 45 Mbps. In Los Angeles, we have arrangements with
Exodus for transit to 100 Mbps, while at our Napa Valley uplink we have
arrangements with AboveNet for transit to 100 Mbps. In Singapore, we have 45
Mbps of dedicated transit provided by AboveNet, via Singapore Telecom. This
Singapore presence will be expanded in 2000 to include a dedicated,
point-to-point fiber optic cable connection between Singapore and Los Angeles.
In London, we have installed a 45 Mbps trans-Atlantic circuit connecting 60
Hudson Street, NY to Telehouse,
35
London. Diverse access to the UUNET backbone, via the transit arrangements in
both New York and London, is available in London via this link.
We have currently established a presence at two public peering points
outside the U.S. at the London Internet Exchange, or LINX, and the Singapore
Internet Exchange, or STIX, enabling us to more efficiently route Internet data.
We recently began to expand our points of presence domestically and have
entered into agreements to install satellite dishes and servers at data centers,
peering points and other locations throughout the United States and Western
Europe. We also recently entered into an agreement to purchase Inktomi
Corporation's Traffic Server Software with its Media-IXT option, which will
allow us to improve our network's efficiency and improve its ability to cache
both static and streaming Web content.
Our London-New York connection enables us to expand the variety of services
that we can offer to customers in many geographic areas. In the United Kingdom,
we intend to offer terrestrial frame relay and other leased line connections
which utilize our hybrid fiber-satellite infrastructure. We can also provide
terrestrial connections in Europe by extending our fiber optic network to the
continent.
Our Singapore-Los Angeles connection, which we expect to be completed by
mid-2000, will allow us to expand the use of regional satellites in Asia, which
are more plentiful and less expensive than satellite capacity crossing the
Pacific Ocean.
We currently maintain two network operations centers, the primary center at
our headquarters in Santa Monica, California and the second at our offices in
London, England. At our network operations centers our technical staff is able
to oversee the status of the entire network, including our international
satellite links, routers, and customer nodes. Our staff monitors the performance
and capacity utilization of each customer's link, makes any necessary
adjustments regarding the quality of service and equipment configuration of the
customer, troubleshoots problems and maintains the global network.
We expect to open our third network operations center in Singapore in the
second quarter of 2000. With personnel in Los Angeles, London, and Singapore,
our network operations centers will provide around-the-clock, local time-of-day
coverage to all of our customers worldwide. The network operations centers in
Santa Monica and London currently share coverage to ensure network monitoring
24 hours a day, seven days a week.
We had long-lived assets in foreign countries of approximately $37,000 in
1997, $280,000 in 1998 and $1.4 million in 1999.
SALES AND MARKETING
Our sales and marketing objective is to achieve broad market penetration and
increase brand name recognition for our ESPRESSO services. Our sales and
marketing efforts are directed primarily towards international ISPs because they
typically represent the largest consumers of bandwidth in each marketplace and
have the technical expertise to understand and take full advantage of our
network applications and service offerings. As we introduce additional services,
we intend to expand the focus of our sales and marketing efforts to include not
only the international ISPs that we currently target, but also other
foreign-based business customers. For example, with the recent introduction of
one of our latest services, ESPRESSO VOICE, we have expanded our sales and
marketing efforts beyond international ISPs to also include PTTs and other
international communications service providers. ESPRESSO NEWS provides us with
an additional base of ISP customers to which we hope to cross-market our
services. Additionally, these customers are located in a region that, due to the
generally high quality of its Internet infrastructure, was previously difficult
for us to penetrate.
To date, we have generated the majority of our sales from customers located
in emerging and developing markets around the globe. Emerging markets in areas
such as Latin America, Africa, and Asia offer excellent opportunities for our
expansion of ESPRESSO because Internet access across the existing
36
terrestrial network through the local PTTs is usually very expensive and
generally of a poor quality. Even in developed countries, where a significant
number of rural and regional centers do not have fiber optic cable capacity
devoted to Internet services, there are meaningful opportunities to sell our
ESPRESSO connectivity and other services. Also, for an ISP with multiple points
of presence, or POPs, across a country or region, the cost of linking those POPs
with high-speed domestic leased lines can be very expensive. In these instances,
ESPRESSO can be a cost-effective solution to providing unlimited download
bandwidth to a network of POPs connected by small bandwidth leased lines.
ESPRESSO may also be used in a duplex format by an ISP to service its Internet
subscribers and avoid the high cost of leasing lines from international
telecommunications companies.
We have built an international sales and marketing force that speaks over
20 languages including Spanish, French, Chinese, Portuguese and Arabic. As of
March 27, 2000, our sales and marketing department consisted of approximately 45
individuals, including several dedicated to enhanced services. We strive to
attract and retain high quality, motivated sales representatives who are from
the country or region they serve. We look for sales and marketing personnel that
have strong Internet backgrounds and ensure that they have knowledge of
potential applications of our ESPRESSO services to meet the critical needs of
targeted ISPs, PTTs, other international communications service providers and
businesses. Our sales and marketing department is divided into regional teams
that focus on the following areas: Latin America/Caribbean, Africa/Middle East,
Europe and Asia/Pacific. Sales leads are generated primarily from the following:
- researching the ISPs operating in a particular territory and making the
initial contact via email or voice;
- favorable word-of-mouth from other customers;
- telecommunications conventions and shows; and
- vendors with customers that have Internet requirements.
In addition, we have a growing network of more than 25 independent sales
agents around the world. In November 1998, we formed a joint venture in India,
which obtained one of the first ISP licenses to operate in Delhi, India. We have
a sales office in London and recently opened sales offices in Brazil and
Argentina. We believe that these countries offer attractive markets for our
services.
CUSTOMERS
Our customers are predominantly international ISPs. The vast majority of our
customers are located in emerging and developing markets around the world. Our
Internet-based services and applications are designed to meet the needs of
international ISPs looking to upgrade to the quality of service provided over
our network.
The following chart represents on an area-by-area basis our current
distribution of signed customers and the percentage of monthly revenue for
customers by region at March 27, 2000:
PERCENTAGE OF
MONTHLY
REVENUE
REGION NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS AT MARCH 27, 2000
- ------ ------------------- -----------------
Latin America/Caribbean.................... 185 40%
Africa/Middle East......................... 157 36
Asia/Pacific Rim........................... 117 14
Europe..................................... 94 10
Other...................................... 8 --
--- ---
Total.................................... 561 100%
37
We believe that none of our customers purchasing Internet-based services
accounted for more than 4% of our network services revenue for the year ended
December 31, 1998 or 1999. In the year ended December 31, 1998, STAR
Telecommunications accounted for approximately 80% of our total revenue and
approximately 25% of our total revenue in 1999. The majority of revenues
received from STAR Telecommunications were derived from the sale of traditional
telecom services transmitted over a switch-based network. We expect revenue from
STAR Telecommunications to be insignificant in current and future periods.
See Note 11 of notes to our consolidated financial statements which sets
forth the amount of domestic and foreign revenues that we earned in 1997, 1998
and 1999.
COMPETITION
We compete with many companies providing Internet connectivity and enhanced
Internet services around the world. Some of these competitors have advantages
over us, including greater financial, technical and marketing resources, lower
operating costs, longer operating histories, greater name recognition and more
established relationships in the Internet industry.
Our most common competitor in the Internet access market is the local PTT of
the country where our customer is located. Teleglobe, the former PTT of Canada,
operates globally and recently announced a global service intended to compete
with our services. Loral SpaceCom Corporation, through its Cyberstar subsidiary,
and PanAmSat, Inc., satellite system operators and vendors of ours, have their
own Internet services which they offer over their satellites. We also compete
with NetSat Express. In the content distribution market, we compete with Cidera,
Inc. In addition, some U.S. based companies that have teleports are also
starting to offer their own services to selected regions and may expand
globally.
On a regional basis, there are competitors who operate via satellite but
only to select areas. Examples of such providers are Impsat Latin America and
IHUG in Australia. There are also global providers such as UUNET, who offer
services based primarily terrestrially-based POPs located in the country to
which they are marketing their services. Other large ISPs and virtually all PTTs
also offer terrestrial-based connectivity which may be in competition with our
services.
If we successfully expand our ESPRESSO VOICE telephony applications, we will
be competing with many companies providing VoIP services as well as traditional
circuit-switch telephony services around the world. Our largest competitors in
this market would be the telecommunications carriers that operate the
international long distance networks over which traditional circuit-switch
telephony services are carried, such as AT&T, MCI WorldCom, Sprint and numerous
foreign telecommunications carriers. We will also compete directly with many
other Internet telephony service providers, such as ITXC Corp., OzEmail (which
was recently acquired by MCI WorldCom), Net2Phone, Inc. and iBasis, Inc. Smaller
competitors, such as Impsat and Infonet Services Corp. may also compete with us
in certain markets. In addition, a number of other companies have started or are
planning to start VoIP operations and are likely to compete with us in the near
future.
As a result of our recent acquisition of our ESPRESSO NEWS service and our
agreements with iBEAM and RealNetworks, we will be distributing content through
our network. Although we intend to partner with content distributors, the
services we provide may also put us in competition with these parties.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
U.S. GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF THE INTERNET AND INTERNET TELEPHONY
We currently characterize our services as "information" or "enhanced"
services, rather than as basic telecommunications services. As such, we believe
that our services are not currently subject to regulation by the FCC. We cannot
assure you that the FCC will not apply regulation to Internet-based services
such as ours in the future. Any change in the characterization of our services
as information services or in the
38
FCC's regulation of information services could affect how we provide our
services or the costs of providing our services which may harm our business.
To date, the FCC has not made any ruling or other definitive pronouncement
that Internet phone-to-phone telephony is a basic or enhanced service. However,
on April 10, 1998, the FCC issued a report to Congress discussing its
implementation of certain universal service provisions contained in the 1996
amendments to the Communications Act of 1934. In its report, the FCC stated that
it would undertake an examination of whether phone-to-phone Internet telephony
should be considered an information service or a telecommunications service. The
FCC noted that certain forms of phone-to-phone Internet telephony appeared to
lack the characteristics of an information service and to have the same
functionality as non-Internet protocol telecommunications services and could be
subject to federal regulation such as regulations governing universal service
funding and excise taxes. If the FCC determines that Internet telephony is
subject to regulation as a telecommunications service, it may subject providers
of Internet telephony services to traditional common carrier regulation and
require them to make universal service contributions and pay access charges. It
is also possible that the FCC will adopt a regulatory framework specific to
Internet telephony providers, different than that applied to traditional common
carriers. Finally, Congressional dissatisfaction with the FCC's conclusions
regarding Internet telephony could result in legislation requiring the FCC to
impose greater or lesser regulation.
Previously, the FCC expressly found that at least one kind of data
communications service using the frame relay protocol should be regulated as a
basic telecommunications service. This means that any service provider that is
providing voice over frame relay service could be classified as a
telecommunications common carrier and therefore subject to regulation, including
being required to contribute to universal service subsidies. Any determination
by the FCC that the simple transmission of voice over Internet protocols
constitutes a basic telecommunications service similar to frame relay could harm
our business.
The FCC has raised the issue of whether some local carriers can assess
interstate access charges on information service providers, including ISPs.
Currently, providers of traditional, regulated telephone service pay charges to
local telephone companies that substantially increase their cost of service. In
particular, if a carrier routes a long distance call on another carrier's
network, it must pay access charges to the carrier that delivers the call.
Information service providers, including ISPs, do not pay these access charges,
which in part has enabled them to provide long distance service at cost savings
over traditional telephone carriers. This advantage might be eliminated or
mooted by future FCC actions. Several incumbent local exchange carriers have
asked the FCC to rule that they may impose access charges on ISPs, and those
requests could be renewed in the future. Also, the FCC is in the process of
making further changes to the access charge system, which could result in
significant reductions in access charge levels as early as mid-2000. If access
charges are moved to, or at least much closer to, cost-based levels, the
advantage derived by ISPs from the access charge exemption will be mitigated,
which would increase our cost of doing business.
Efforts have been made to enact legislation that would either regulate or
exempt from regulation other aspects of services provided over the Internet. In
addition, Congress has adopted legislation that regulates, with respect to the
Internet, freedom of expression, user privacy, pricing, advertising,
intellectual property rights, taxation, Internet spamming, database privacy,
gambling, pornography and child protection, Internet fraud and privacy. We
cannot assure you that Internet-based services such as ours will not be
regulated in the future. In addition, increased regulation of the Internet may
slow its growth for a number of reasons, including by increasing the cost of
doing business over the Internet or other costly technical requirements, which
could seriously harm our business. In addition, legislation has been enacted
that prohibits or imposes liability for the transmission of some types of
information on the Internet, including sexually explicit and gambling
information. We could also be harmed by federal and state laws and regulations
relating to the liability of online services companies and Internet access
providers for information carried on or disseminated through their networks.
Several private lawsuits seeking to impose
39
such liability upon online services companies and Internet access providers are
currently pending. Congress has enacted legislation that limits liability for
online copyright infringement. That latter law includes exemptions which enable
ISPs to avoid copyright infringement if they merely transmit material produced
and requested by others. It is possible that other laws and regulations could be
enacted in the future that would place liability more directly on ISPs. The
imposition of potential liability on us and other Internet access providers for
information carried on or disseminated through their systems could require us to
implement measures to reduce our exposure to such liability, which may in turn
require us to expend substantial resources or to discontinue service offerings.
Any costs incurred as a result of such liability or asserted liability could
cause our business and prospects to suffer.
INTERNATIONAL GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF THE INTERNET AND INTERNET TELEPHONY
The regulatory treatment of the Internet and Internet telephony from country
to country varies widely and constantly changes. Some countries currently impose
little or no regulation on Internet telephony, as in the U.S. Conversely, other
countries that prohibit or limit competition for traditional voice telephony
services may not permit Internet telephony or strictly limit the terms under
which it may be provided. Still other countries regulate Internet telephony like
traditional voice telephony services or determine on a case-by-case basis
whether to regulate Internet telephony as a voice service or as another
telecommunications service. Finally, in many countries, Internet telephony has
not yet been addressed by legislation or the regulatory authorities.
In some of the countries in which we provide services, the regulatory
processes are not as transparent as in the U.S. and Europe. Changes in the
regulatory regimes of these countries that have the effect of limiting or
prohibiting Internet telephony, or that impose new or additional regulatory
requirements on providers of such services, may result in our being unable to
provide service to one or more countries. That result could negatively affect
our Internet telephony business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, as we expand into additional foreign countries, such countries
may assert that we are required to qualify to do business in the particular
foreign country, that we are otherwise subject to regulation, or that we are
prohibited from conducting our business in that country. Our failure to qualify
as a foreign corporation in a jurisdiction in which we are required to do so, or
to comply with foreign laws and regulations, could seriously harm our business,
including by subjecting us to taxes and penalties or by precluding us from, or
limiting us in, enforcing contracts in such jurisdictions. Likewise, our
customers may be or become subject to requirements to qualify to do business in
a particular foreign country, to otherwise comply with regulations, or to cease
from conducting business in that country. We cannot be certain that our
customers currently comply with regulatory or other legal requirements in their
respective countries, that they will be able to comply with existing or future
requirements, or that they will continue to comply with any requirements.
Finally, we may be subject to statutory or other legal requirements in foreign
countries regarding the protection of individual privacy and online data,
including the requirements of the European Union Directive on the Protection of
Individuals With Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free
Movement of Such Data. Our customers may be subject to the same laws and
requirements. Our failure or the failure of our customers to comply with these
requirements could harm our business.
CERTAIN OTHER U.S. REGULATIONS AFFECTING OUR SERVICES
STATE REGULATION. The proliferation of recent Internet use has prompted
state legislators and regulators to consider the adoption of laws and
regulations to govern Internet usage. It is possible that state legislatures and
regulators will attempt to regulate the Internet in the future, either by
regulating transactions or by restricting the content of the available
information and services. While state public utility commissions generally have
declined to directly regulate enhanced or information services, some states have
continued to regulate particular aspects of enhanced services in limited
circumstances, such as
40
where they are provided by local telecommunications carriers. Moreover, the
public utility commissions of several states continue to consider potential
regulation of such services. For example, some states have initiated proceedings
to consider regulating intrastate Internet telephony services. Enactment of such
legislation or adoption of such regulations could cause our business and
prospects to suffer.
Another area of adverse potential state regulation concerns taxes. In
October 1998, the U.S. Congress enacted a three-year moratorium on new state and
local taxes on the Internet, meaning those not generally imposed or actually
enforced prior to October 1, 1998, as well as on taxes that discriminate against
commerce through the Internet. Congress is presently studying and has solicited
recommendations that could serve as the basis for additional legislation. Future
laws or regulatory changes that lead to state taxation of Internet transactions
could harm our business.
One issue of growing importance revolves around contract law. The Internet
has also spawned a number of other state legal and regulatory issues, such as
whether and how provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code and various state
codes apply to transactions carried out on the Internet and how to decide which
jurisdiction's laws apply to a particular transaction. It is not possible to
predict how federal or state law will evolve to address new transactional
circumstances created by Internet commerce or whether the evolution of such laws
will cause our business and prospects to suffer.
State legislators and regulators have also sought to restrict the
transmission or limit access to certain materials on the Internet. For example,
in the past several years, various state legislators have sought to limit or
prohibit:
- certain communications between adults and minors;
- anonymous and pseudonymous use of the Internet; and
- on-line gambling.
Enforcement of such limitations or prohibitions in some states could affect
transmission in other states. State laws and regulations that restrict access to
such materials on the Internet could inadvertently block access to other
permissible sites. We cannot predict the impact, if any, that any future laws or
regulatory changes in this area may have on our business.
Some states have also sought to impose tort liability or criminal penalties
on certain conduct involving the Internet, such as the use of "hate" speech,
invasion of privacy, and fraud. The adoption of such laws could adversely impact
the transmission of non-offensive material on the Internet and, to that extent,
could harm our business.
LOCAL REGULATION. Although local jurisdictions generally have not sought to
regulate the Internet and related services, it is possible that such
jurisdictions will seek to impose regulations in the future. In particular,
local jurisdictions may attempt to tax various aspects of Internet access or
services, such as transactions handled through the Internet or subscriber
access, as a way of generating municipal revenue. Our networks may also be
subject to numerous local regulations such as building codes and licensing.
These regulations vary from city to city and county to county. The imposition of
local taxes and other regulatory burdens by local jurisdictions could cause our
business and prospects to suffer.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Our intellectual property consists of our trademarks, domain names, trade
secrets and other proprietary rights. ESPRESSO, POWERED BY ESPRESSO and
INTERPACKET are our registered U.S. trademarks. We have trademark applications
pending for EUROPACKET and ESPRESSO BIZKIT. In addition, we consider the design
and configuration of our Internet network to be proprietary to us. While we have
not patented any aspect of this design and configuration, we generally rely only
on the protection offered by trade secret law. Our intellectual property plays
an important role in our marketing strategy and our competitive position, and we
seek to protect it.
41
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we may be involved in litigation relating to claims
arising out of our ordinary course of business. We are not currently party to
any material legal proceedings.
EMPLOYEES
As of March 27, 2000, we had approximately 140 full-time employees. None of
our employees is represented by a labor union. We have not experienced any work
stoppages and consider our employee relations to be good.
FACILITIES
Our corporate offices are currently located in Santa Monica, California,
where we lease approximately 9,600 square feet under a lease that expires in
December 2003. Due to the expansion of our workforce and network operations
center we have entered into a lease for approximately 28,500 square feet in
another office building in Santa Monica expiring in 2006. We plan to relocate
our entire office and operations to this new location during the second quarter
of 2000. In addition, we lease approximately 2,800 square feet in Guildford,
Surrey, England for our UK operations under leases that expire in December 2003
and we are temporarily leasing space in Singapore for our Far East operations
under a lease that expires on April 30, 2000 and expect to enter into a
long-term lease for these operations.
42
MANAGEMENT
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, KEY EMPLOYEES AND DIRECTORS
The following is a list of our executive officers, key employees and
directors.
NAME AGE POSITION(S)
- ---- -------- -----------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan L. Gans....................... 41 Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
Norman J. Pattiz....................... 57 Chairman of the Board
James E. Kolsrud....................... 55 Chief Operating Officer and Director
Peter S. Zimble........................ 32 Executive Vice President
Julie M. Spira......................... 42 Executive Vice President--Sales
Timothy F. Sylvester................... 41 Executive Vice President--Business and Legal Affairs
Allen J. Sciarillo..................... 35 Chief Financial Officer
Jon Mansey............................. 34 Chief Science Officer
Kenneth R. Halloway.................... 37 Senior Vice President--Business Development
Timothy M. Jackson..................... 36 Senior Vice President--Operations
Jeffrey C. Barbakow.................... 55 Director
Brent N. Cohen......................... 41 Director
Lawrence D. Lenihan, Jr................ 35 Director
JONATHAN L. GANS is a founder of InterPacket and has been our Chief
Executive Officer and a director since its formation in August 1995. Mr. Gans
was also appointed President in February 2000. Mr. Gans served as our Chairman
of the Board from July 1999 to November 1999. From 1992 until the time of its
sale to The Thomson Corporation in September 1997, Mr. Gans served as Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of de Forest Research, an intellectual property
consulting firm serving the entertainment industry. From 1991 to July 1996, he
was Chief Financial Officer of Film Finances, Inc., a provider of completion
guaranty services to the film and television production industries. Mr. Gans is
a former attorney with the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom and
a former Vice President of Corporate Finance with the investment banking firm of
Drexel Burnham Lambert.
NORMAN J. PATTIZ has served as a director of InterPacket since June 1999,
and our Chairman of the Board since March of 2000. Mr. Pattiz has been serving
as the Chairman of Westwood One, America's largest radio network, since February
1994 and served as its Chief Executive Officer from its inception until January
1994. Founded by Mr. Pattiz in 1976, Westwood One is the parent company of NBC
Radio Networks, the Mutual Broadcasting System, Metro Networks, and distributes
CBS Radio and CNN. Mr. Pattiz serves on the Board of Trustees of the Museum of
Television & Radio, The Hollywood Radio & Television Society, The Broadcast
Education Association and The Communications Board of UCLA. He also serves as a
Commissioner on the State of California's "Commission on Building for the 21(st)
Century."
JAMES E. KOLSRUD became our Chief Operating Officer of InterPacket in March
2000. Mr. Kolsrud is a founder of InterPacket and has been a director since its
formation in August 1995. In addition, Mr. Kolsrud served as an Executive Vice
President--Operations and Engineering of Star Telecommunications, Inc. from
September 1996 to February 2000. From March 1995 to September 1996, Mr. Kolsrud
was an international telecommunications consultant. Prior to March 1995,
Mr. Kolsrud was Vice President of Corporate Engineering and Administration of
IDB Communications Group, Inc., an international communications company.
PETER S. ZIMBLE is a founder of InterPacket. He has been our Executive Vice
President since February 2000 and prior to that our President since formation.
Mr. Zimble also served as a Director from August 1995 until February 2000. From
January 1995 to August 1995, Mr. Zimble served as Vice President--General
Manager at Internet Holdings Group, an Internet investment concern. From
March 1994 to December 1994, Mr. Zimble served as Director of Business
Development at IDB Communications where he oversaw the technical and sales
growth of IDB's Digital Services Group which
43
operated a domestic audio distribution network. Mr. Zimble also served as Vice
President of Sonnet Communications from November 1992 to March 1994, which
operated a domestic network designed for the distribution of digital audio radio
commercials.
JULIE M. SPIRA has been our Executive Vice President--Sales since
June 1997. From January 1996 until she joined InterPacket, Ms. Spira served as
Vice President of Broadcast Sales of Xing Technology and was responsible for the
sales and marketing of Internet broadcast services to U.S. content distributors.
From 1987 to 1995, Ms. Spira served as Vice President of Broadcast Sales for IDB
Communications, overseeing the sales of satellite transmission services to radio
broadcasters and networks worldwide.
TIMOTHY F. SYLVESTER has been our Executive Vice President--Business and
Legal Affairs since February 2000. From 1998 until he joined InterPacket, he was
an equity principal at Riordan & McKinzie, a law firm in Los Angeles,
California. From 1996 to 1997, he was a non-equity principal and from 1989 to
1996, Mr. Sylvester was an associate at Riordan & McKinzie.
ALLEN J. SCIARILLO has served as our Chief Financial Officer since
July 1999. From October 1997 to June 1999, Mr. Sciarillo was Chief Financial
Officer of RSL Com USA, Inc., a division of RSL Com Ltd., a global
facilities-based telecommunications carrier. Prior to joining RSL,
Mr. Sciarillo was Vice President and Controller of Hospitality Worldwide
Services, Inc. from July 1996 to October 1997 and Controller of WCT
Communications, a long distance telephony services provider, from December 1993
to June 1996. Mr. Sciarillo began his career at Deloitte & Touche, where he
later served as a senior auditor.
JON MANSEY has been our Chief Science Officer since October 1997 and has
been in charge of the architecture of our network systems since that time.
Previously, he held the position of Chief Engineer for the Los Angeles office of
Solid State Logic, a U.K. based pro-audio systems company where he worked
closely with recording studio technology across the music, television, and film
production industries.
KENNETH R. HALLOWAY has been our Senior Vice President--Business Development
since February 2000. He was our Vice President--Finance from August 1998 to
July 1999, and our Vice President--Business Affairs from July 1999 to
February 2000. From 1986 to October 1997, Mr. Halloway was Chief Financial
Officer at Moviestore/Active Entertainment, a film production and distribution
company.
TIMOTHY M. JACKSON has been our Senior Vice President--Operations since
July 1999. From January 1999 until he joined InterPacket, Mr. Jackson was Vice
President of Broadcast Service for McKibben Communications, a satellite
communications facility. From July 1994 to December 1998 Mr. Jackson served as
Director of Technical Operations for Discovery Networks International, a
division of Discovery Communications, Inc., and was responsible for the
technical development of Discovery Channel's worldwide distribution network.
JEFFREY C. BARBAKOW has been a director of InterPacket since February 1999.
In addition, Mr. Barbakow has served as the Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of Tenet Healthcare Corporation, since June 1993. Prior to
joining Tenet Healthcare, Mr. Barbakow served as a Managing Director of
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation from September 1991 to
June 1993. Additionally, from October 1988 to November 1990 Mr. Barbakow served
as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer/United
Artists Communications Co.
BRENT N. COHEN has been a director of InterPacket since February 2000. In
February 2000, Mr. Cohen became President and Chief Executive Officer of US
SEARCH.com Inc., a leading Internet-based provider of public record information.
From November 1998 to the present, Mr. Cohen has served on numerous advisory
boards of Internet start-ups, and he possesses extensive experience in
high-technology, international and financial fields. From July 1987 to
October 1998, he held various senior management positions at Packard Bell
Electronics Inc., now Packard Bell NEC, a manufacturer of personal computers,
including President-Consumer and International, Chief Operating Officer and
Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Cohen currently serves as a director of US
SEARCH.com Inc. and Tag-It Pacific Group.
44
LAWRENCE D. LENIHAN, JR. has been a director of InterPacket since
November 1999. Mr. Lenihan is a Managing Director of Pequot Capital Management,
Inc., an investment fund firm. He joined the predecessor to this firm,
Dawson-Samberg Capital Management, in 1996. He is also a Managing Member of the
General Partner of Pequot Private Equity Fund II, L.P. Prior to joining Pequot,
Mr. Lenihan was a principal at Broadview Associates, LLC from 1993 to 1996.
Prior to joining Broadview, Mr. Lenihan held several positions at IBM, most
recently as the leader of an interactive multimedia software product business.
He currently serves as a director of Digital General Systems, Inc. and
Mediaplex, Inc.
All directors are elected to hold office until our next annual meeting of
stockholders and until their successors have been elected. Officers are elected
at the first board of directors meeting following the stockholders' meeting at
which the directors are elected and serve at the discretion of the board of
directors. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or
executive officers. Under our certificate of incorporation, the holders of our
preferred stock are entitled to elect one member to our board of directors.
Mr. Lenihan is the designee of the holders of our preferred stock. Upon the
completion of this offering, all shares of preferred stock will automatically
convert into common stock and our certificate of incorporation will be amended
to delete this election right of holders of our preferred stock.
BOARD COMMITTEES
The board of directors has established an audit committee to review the
results and scope of the annual audit and the services provided by our
independent accountants. The current members of our audit committee are Jeffrey
C. Barbakow, Lawrence D. Lenihan, Jr. and Brent N. Cohen.
The board of directors has also established a compensation committee that
reviews and recommends to the board of directors the compensation and benefits
of all our officers and establishes and reviews general policies relating to
compensation and benefits of our employees. The compensation committee also
administers our 1998 Stock Option Plan. The current members of the compensation
committee are Norman J. Pattiz and Lawrence D. Lenihan, Jr.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
Except as set forth below, none of the members of our compensation committee
has ever been an officer or employee of InterPacket. None of our executive
officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee
of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member
of our board of directors or compensation committee. From June 1999 to
December 1999, Jonathan L. Gans, our Chief Executive Officer and President, was
a member of the compensation committee.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Our directors do not currently receive any cash compensation from us for
their service as members of the board of directors. Non-employee directors are
eligible to receive stock options pursuant to our 1999 Director Stock Option
Plan and they are reimbursed for travel and lodging expenses in connection with
attendance at board and committee meetings. As of March 27, 2000, options to
purchase a total of 979,000 shares had been granted to our non-employee
directors under this plan. From November 1999 until his resignation in March
2000, we paid Peter Hirshberg an annual salary of $175,000 for serving as our
Chairman of the Board on a full-time basis. Mr. Pattiz, who currently serves as
our Chairman of the Board, is not an employee and receives no cash compensation
from us for this service. Mr. Pattiz received a grant under our 1999 Director
Stock Option Plan of 275,000 options at $6.82 share, subject to three year
vesting, in connection with his appointment as Chairman of the Board.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND CHANGE OF CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS
We have entered into employment agreements with Jonathan L. Gans, our Chief
Executive Officer and President, Julie M. Spira, our Executive Vice
President--Sales, and Timothy F. Sylvester, our
45
Executive Vice President--Business and Legal Affairs. The compensation, dates of
employment and other material terms under the employment agreements are as
follows:
- Mr. Gans is paid an annual base salary of $324,500, which will increase no
less than 10% per year. He is also entitled to receive a minimum annual
bonus of $100,000. The initial term of his employment began on July 1,
1999 and continues until June 30, 2002. If Mr. Gans' employment is
terminated by us without cause or if he terminates his employment with us
for good reason the employment agreement provides for the continued
payment of Mr. Gans' salary, the greater of his minimum guaranteed bonus,
the actual bonus paid to him during the preceding year, and the average of
the actual bonuses paid to him during the two preceding years, and health
and certain other benefits for a period of time equal to the greater of
the remainder of the employment agreement's term or if the term of the
employment agreement has less than one year remaining at the time of
termination, then such remaining amount of time plus 12 months.
- Ms. Spira will be paid an annual base salary of $270,000 during 2000 and
$300,000 during 2001. She is also entitled to receive an annual bonus
between $25,000 and $90,000 based on our performance. The initial term of
her employment began on January 1, 1999 and continues until December 31,
2001. If Ms. Spira's employment is terminated without cause by us or if
she terminates her employment with us for good reason the employment
agreement provides for the continued payment of Ms. Spira's salary, the
greater of her minimum guaranteed bonus, the actual bonus paid to her
during the preceding year, and the average of the actual bonuses paid to
her during the two preceding years, and health and other benefits for a
period of time equal to the greater of the remainder of the employment
agreement's term or if the term of the employment agreement has less than
one year remaining at the time of termination, then such remaining amount
of time plus 12 months.
- Mr. Sylvester is paid an annual base salary of $150,000. He is also
entitled to receive an annual bonus of $50,000 if we achieve certain
performance targets. The initial term of his employment continues until
January 31, 2003. If Mr. Sylvester's employment is terminated without
cause by us or if he terminates his employment with us for good reason the
employment agreement provides for the continued payment of
Mr. Sylvester's salary to him, the greater of the actual bonus paid to him
during the preceding year and the average of the actual bonus paid to him
during the two preceding years, if any, and health and other benefits for
a period of time equal to the greater of the remainder of the employment
agreement's term or if the term of the employment agreement has less than
one year remaining at the time of termination, then such remaining amount
of time plus 12 months. For Mr. Sylvester only, termination for good
reason includes InterPacket's requirement that he relocate his place of
work outside of Los Angeles County.
Generally, an employee may terminate the employment agreement for good
reason if:
- we breach any material term of the employment agreement for a period of
30 days after we receive written notice to cure this breach;
- if we assign to the employee duties and responsibilities substantially
inconsistent with the employee's described duties and responsibilities, if
another employee assumes the relevant employee's duties, or if we
substantially decrease the employee's responsibilities or authority; or
- upon a change in control.
A change in control means the happening of any of the following:
- if any person becomes the beneficial owner of 50% or more of the voting
power of our outstanding securities;
- the sale of all or substantially all of our assets;
46
- our merger with or into another corporation in which we are not the
surviving corporation, or our stockholders immediately before such merger
are the owners of less than 50% of the combined voting power of
InterPacket and such other corporation immediately after such merger; or
- the election of the board of directors where the incumbent directors
immediately before such election or consent do not constitute a majority
of the board of directors immediately after such election.
Each of the employment agreements provides that the employment agreement
shall be extended by an additional period of one year unless either party to the
employment agreement gives written notice to the other of its intent to
terminate the employment agreement not less than 30 days before expiration of
the employment agreement's initial term, and that if the employee's employment
is terminated by us without cause or if such employee terminates employment with
us for good reason, all of such employee's options granted under any of our
option plans will immediately vest and the exercise period for these options
will be extended for an additional two year period.
All of the employment agreements:
- impose restrictions relating to the disclosure of confidential information
during the term of the agreement and for periods of up to two years
thereafter,
- prohibit the employee during the term of the agreement from competing with
InterPacket, and
- prohibit the employee from soliciting any customer or supplier of
InterPacket during the term of the agreement and for periods of time
ranging from one to six months thereafter.
In the event of a change of control, all of the unvested options granted to
Jonathan Gans, Peter Zimble, Julie Spira and Timothy Sylvester and all unvested
options granted to Ken Halloway and Allen Sciarillo upon their respective dates
of hire under the 1998 Stock Option Plan will immediately vest and will be
exercisable for a period of two years from the date of the change of control.
Furthermore, if we are acquired by another company and if Messrs. Halloway's or
Sciarillo's employment with the acquiror is terminated without cause or for good
reason within 18 months of the acquisition or if the acquiring company does not
grant substitute or replacement options to Messrs. Halloway or Sciarillo, then
all other unvested options granted to Messrs. Halloway or Sciarillo under the
1998 Stock Option Plan after their respective dates of hire will vest and will
be exercisable for a period of two years from the date of the change of control.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the compensation received for services
rendered to InterPacket by our Chief Executive Officer and all other executive
officers whose salary and bonus exceeded $100,000 for the year ended
December 31, 1999.
47
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG-TERM
COMPENSATION
ANNUAL COMPENSATION AWARDS
------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------
SECURITIES
OTHER ANNUAL UNDERLYING
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY($) BONUS($) COMPENSATION($) OPTIONS(#)
- --------------------------- -------- ------------------------- -------- --------------- -------------------------
Jonathan L. Gans ........ 1999 221,267 100,000 -- 660,000
Chief Executive Officer
and President(1)
Peter S. Zimble ......... 1999 136,041 50,000 -- 242,000
Executive Vice
President(2)
Julie M. Spira .......... 1999 241,225 60,000 11,310(3) 132,000
Executive Vice
President--Sales and
Marketing
Kenneth R. Halloway ..... 1999 81,458 20,000 -- 132,000
Senior Vice President--
Business Development
ALL OTHER
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION COMPENSATION($)
- --------------------------- -------------------------
Jonathan L. Gans ........ --
Chief Executive Officer
and President(1)
Peter S. Zimble ......... --
Executive Vice
President(2)
Julie M. Spira .......... --
Executive Vice
President--Sales and
Marketing
Kenneth R. Halloway ..... --
Senior Vice President--
Business Development
- -------------------
(1) Mr. Gans, who became President in February 2000, did not serve as President
during 1999.
(2) Mr. Zimble served as President during 1999 and became Executive Vice
President in February 2000.
(3) Includes commission compensation paid to Ms. Spira.
OPTION GRANTS
The following table provides summary information regarding stock options
granted during the year ended December 31, 1999 to our Chief Executive Officer
and all other executive officers whose salary and bonus exceeded $100,000 for
the year ended December 31, 1999. We granted options to purchase an aggregate of
4,379,650 shares to some of our directors, officers and employees under our 1998
Stock Option Plan and 1999 Director Stock Option Plan during 1999. See "Option
Plans." Options were granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value
of our common stock, as determined by the board of directors on the date of
grant. The stock options that expire in March 2009 vest and become exercisable
over a period of three years. The stock options that expire in December 2009
vest and become exercisable over a period of four years. The potential
realizable value amount set forth in the table is calculated assuming the
options appreciate at the assumed offering price of $11.00 per share for the
entire term of the option and that the option is exercised at the exercise price
and sold on the last day of its term at the appreciated price. All options
listed have a term of ten years. Stock price appreciation of 5% and 10% is
assumed pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. There
can be no assurance that the actual stock price will appreciate over the
ten-year option term at the assumed 5% or 10% levels or at all. Unless the
market price of our common stock appreciates over the option term, no value will
be realized from the option grants made to the named executive officers. In
December 1999, Mr. Gans was granted an option to purchase 220,000 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price equal to the initial public offering share
price. The potential realizable value of this option grant has also been
calculated based on an assumed offering price of $11 per share.
48
OPTION GRANTS IN 1999
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS
------------------------------------------------ POTENTIAL REALIZABLE VALUE
PERCENT OF AT ASSUMED ANNUAL RATES
NUMBER OF TOTAL OF STOCK PRICE
SECURITIES OPTIONS APPRECIATION FOR OPTION
UNDERLYING GRANTED EXERCISE TERM
OPTIONS IN PRICE EXPIRATION --------------------------
NAME GRANTED(#) 1999(%) ($/SHARE) DATE 5% 10%
- ---- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Jonathan L. Gans.............. 220,000 5.0 1.02 03/01/09 $3,717,525 $6,052,457
220,000 5.0 2.27 12/16/09 3,442,525 5,777,457
220,000 5.0 11.00 12/16/09 1,521,925 3,856,857
Peter S. Zimble............... 132,000 3.0 1.02 03/01/09 2,230,515 3,631,474
110,000 2.5 2.27 12/16/09 1,721,262 2,888,728
Julie M. Spira................ 55,000 1.3 1.02 03/01/09 929,381 1,513,114
77,000 1.8 2.27 12/16/09 1,204,884 2,022,110
Kenneth R. Halloway........... 22,000 0.5 1.02 3/01/09 371,752 605,245
110,000 2.5 2.27 12/16/09 1,721,262 2,888,728
OPTION EXERCISES AND HOLDINGS
The following table provides summary information as of December 31, 1999
concerning the shares of common stock represented by outstanding stock options
held by our Chief Executive Officer and all other executive officers whose
salary and bonus exceeded $100,000 for the year ended December 31, 1999. Except
for Mr. Halloway, no options were exercised by the named executive officers
during 1999. In December 1999, Mr. Halloway exercised options to purchase 8,800
shares at an exercise price of $0.27 per share. The value of unexercised
in-the-money options is based on an assumed offering price of $11 per share for
our common stock.
1999 YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
NUMBER OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS AT
OPTIONS AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 DECEMBER 31, 1999
------------------------------- -------------------------------
NAME EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
- ---- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
Jonathan L. Gans....................... 220,000 880,000 $2,345,000 $6,435,000
Peter S. Zimble........................ 102,667 359,332 1,091,000 3,511,000
Julie M. Spira......................... 183,334 278,665 1,962,500 2,775,750
Kenneth R. Halloway.................... 35,200 220,000 371,700 2,112,500
OPTION PLANS
1998 STOCK OPTION PLAN. In January 1998, we adopted our 1998 Stock Option
Plan and in 2000 we amended and restated the 1998 plan. We have reserved a total
of 10,120,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the plan. As of
March 27, 2000, options to purchase a total of 7,405,750 shares of common stock,
with a weighted average exercise price of $2.13, had been granted, of which
909,691 have been canceled, and 511,896 have been exercised. If an outstanding
option expires or terminates unexercised or in the event that any shares of
common stock acquired pursuant to the plan are reacquired by us, then the shares
subject to that option or shares that are reacquired by us will again be
available for issuance under the 1998 plan.
49
The 1998 plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options and
nonqualified stock options to officers, key employees and consultants of
InterPacket or any of its subsidiaries and members of our board of directors.
The 1998 plan will terminate when all shares which may be issued under it have
been issued; however, our board of directors may terminate it earlier. Each
option granted under the 1998 plan will terminate as determined by the
compensation committee or our board of directors at the time of its grant, but
no later than ten years from the date the option is granted, subject to earlier
termination in the case of the termination of the grantee's employment or other
relationship with us.
The compensation committee or our board of directors administers the 1998
plan and determines dates on which options are granted and the terms and
conditions of the options granted, consistent with the 1998 plan, including the
number of shares subject to an option, the exercise price, and the term and
exercisability of the options. In addition, the committee may amend the 1998
plan as it deems advisable, so long as any amendment does not adversely affect
any outstanding options without the consent of the optionee.
Generally, the options are nontransferable and vest based on a chronological
vesting schedule. Payment of the purchase price of options may be made in cash
or other consideration as determined by the committee.
In connection with a change in control of our company, if outstanding
options are substituted by our acquiror, then 50% of the unvested shares of each
optionholder will accelerate and vest if the optionholder's employment is
terminated other than for cause. Alternatively, if our acquiror does not offer
substitute options to optionholders, then 50% of the unvested shares of each
optionholder will accelerate and vest on the consummation of the change in
control.
1999 DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN. In 1999 we adopted our 1999 Director Stock
Option Plan and in 2000 we amended and restated this 1999 plan. We have reserved
a total of 1,210,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the 1999 plan. As
of March 27, 2000, options to purchase 979,000 shares of common stock, with a
weighted average exercise price of $3.54 had been granted. None of these options
have been exercised.
The 1999 plan provides for the granting of options to non-employee directors
of InterPacket. The 1999 plan will terminate in June 2009, unless our board of
directors terminates it earlier. Each option granted under the 1999 plan will
terminate ten years from the date the option is granted, subject to earlier
termination upon the termination of the grantee's term as director.
The board of directors, the Chairman of the Board or an individual
designated by the board of directors or the Chairman may be responsible for its
administration. Currently, our board of directors administers the 1999 plan.
Each non-employee director who was a member of the board of directors on the
date the 1999 plan became effective in June 1999 was granted options to purchase
22,000 shares of common stock. Additionally, each non-employee director who was
or became a member of the board of directors on or after January 26, 2000, the
date the 1999 plan was amended and restated, received an option to purchase
165,000 shares of common stock. Additional grants of options may be made to
non-employee directors at any time under the 1999 plan. The exercise price of an
option shall equal the fair market value of our common stock on the date of
grant. Except as may be set forth in the option agreement between the
non-employee director and us or as otherwise determined by the plan
administrator, the options vest and become exercisable pro rata in equal annual
installments over the three year period commencing on the first anniversary of
the date of grant, provided that the individual has remained in continuous
service as a director of InterPacket or one of its subsidiaries for the 12
months prior to each such anniversary and is a non-employee director on the
applicable anniversary date. The options to purchase shares of common stock
granted in June 1999 are subject to a one year vesting schedule, provided that
the directors who received such options continue to serve as members of the
board of directors through that period. The options are generally
nontransferable but may be transferred to family members or a trust established
for the benefit of the director or such director's family members
50
with the approval of the administrator of this plan and payment of the exercise
price may be made in cash or other consideration. In addition, the board of
directors may amend the 1999 plan as it deems advisable, so long as any
amendment does not adversely affect any outstanding options without the consent
of the optionee. In the event of a change of control, dissolution or
liquidation, each outstanding option shall vest and become exercisable.
RECENT ISSUANCES OF STOCK OPTIONS
From January 1, 2000 through March 27, 2000, we granted to some of our
employees and directors options to purchase a total of 1,312,300 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $2.27 per share, options to purchase
262,900 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.64 per share and
options to purchase 537,900 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.82
per share.
INDEMNIFICATION AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Our bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers and may
indemnify our other employees and agents to the fullest extent permitted by law,
except for proceedings initiated by these persons without authorization from our
board of directors. We have entered into indemnification agreements providing
for indemnification to the fullest extent permitted by law with each of our
directors and executive officers.
In addition, our certificate of incorporation provides that our directors
will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for
any breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability:
- for any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to us or our
stockholders;
- for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
- under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law; or
- for any transaction from which the director derives an improper personal
benefit.
Our charter documents also provide that if Delaware law is amended further
eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors, then the liability
of a director shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by
the amended Delaware law. These provisions do not affect a director's
responsibilities under any other law, including the federal securities laws or
state or federal environmental laws.
51
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
SALES OF SECURITIES
Since January 1997, we have issued and sold the following securities to the
following related parties:
In June 1997, we issued and sold 3,704,800 shares of our common stock to
Peter Zimble for a total purchase price of $70,000. Mr. Zimble paid us $35,000
in cash for these shares and borrowed the $35,000 balance from us. No interest
is being paid on the outstanding balance and InterPacket can require Mr. Zimble
to repay the outstanding balance at any time.
In April 1999, we issued and sold a total of 4,419,500 shares of our common
stock at $1.02 per share. The following table lists the number of shares of
common stock purchased in this financing by our officers, directors and greater
than 5% stockholders and the value of the shares based on an assumed initial
public offering price of $11 per share.
VALUE BASED ON ASSUMED
NUMBER $11 PER SHARE INITIAL
INVESTORS OF SHARES PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE
- --------- --------- ----------------------
Jeffrey C. Barbakow............................ 977,776 $10,755,536
Brett Messing.................................. 488,888 5,377,768
Jeffrey P. Sudikoff............................ 293,334 3,226,674
Jonathan L. Gans............................... 146,665 1,613,315
James E. Kolsrud............................... 110,000 1,210,000
Julie M. Spira................................. 48,888 537,768
Brent Cohen(1)................................. 48,888 537,768
Kenneth R. Halloway............................ 24,442 268,862
Timothy F. Sylvester........................... 9,776 107,536
- -------------------
(1) Represents shares of common stock held by June Investments, LLC. Mr. Cohen
is a managing member of June Investments.
In August 1999, Jeffrey Sudikoff exercised options to purchase 132,000
shares of common stock. An option to purchase 22,000 of these shares at $0.57
per share was granted to Mr. Sudikoff in September 1998 and an option to
purchase the remaining 110,000 shares at $1.02 per share was granted to
Mr. Sudikoff in March 1999. These options were granted under our 1998 plan and
were granted to him in his capacity as an officer and Chairman of the Board of
InterPacket, positions he held at that time. In June 1999, Mr. Sudikoff resigned
as a director and as Chairman of the Board and was replaced as an officer and
our board of directors accelerated the vesting of these options.
In September 1999, we issued and sold a total of 3,258,074 shares of our
common stock at $2.05 per share. The following table lists the number of shares
of common stock purchased in this financing by our
52
officers, directors and greater than 5% stockholders and the value of the shares
based on an assumed initial public offering price of $11 per share.
VALUE BASED ON ASSUMED
NUMBER $11 PER SHARE INITIAL
INVESTORS OF SHARES PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE
- --------- --------- ----------------------
Gotel Investments Ltd.......................... 594,000 $6,534,000
Norman J. Pattiz............................... 488,890 5,377,790
Jeffrey C. Barbakow............................ 488,888 5,377,768
Brett Messing.................................. 488,888 5,377,768
Jeffrey P. Sudikoff............................ 220,000 2,420,000
Julie M. Spira................................. 48,888 537,768
Jonathan L. Gans............................... 24,444 268,884
Kenneth R. Halloway............................ 12,221 134,431
Timothy F. Sylvester........................... 12,221 134,431
Allen J. Sciarillo............................. 11,000 121,000
On November 12, 1999, we issued and sold an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of
our preferred stock at $5.00 per share. All of these shares of preferred stock
will automatically convert into 6,600,000 shares of our common stock upon the
completion of this offering. We issued and sold the shares to the following
parties in the following amounts:
VALUE BASED ON ASSUMED
$11 PER SHARE INITIAL
INVESTOR SHARES PURCHASED PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE
- -------- ---------------- ----------------------
Pequot Private Equity Fund II, L.P....... 1,800,000 $43,560,000
Intel Corporation........................ 800,000 19,360,000
BayStar Capital.......................... 200,000 4,840,000
Access Technology Partners, L.P.......... 160,000 3,872,000
Persons affiliated with Chase H&Q........ 40,000 968,000
The preferred shares were sold under a purchase agreement containing customary
company and investor representations and warranties. The agreement also contains
customary covenants limiting our ability to take some actions and obligating us
to take others. These covenants will terminate upon the completion of the sale
of the common stock being offered by this prospectus. We agreed with the
investors to indemnify each other for any breach of any of the foregoing
provisions.
On November 12, 1999, we entered into an investor rights agreement under
which we extended registration rights to all of the purchasers of our preferred
stock and to, among others, Messrs. Gans, Zimble, Kolsrud, Barbakow and Pattiz
and Ms. Spira, who, along with the holders of preferred stock, hold a combined
total of 23,794,423 shares of our common stock, after giving effect to the
conversion of our outstanding shares of preferred stock. Under this agreement,
the holders of the preferred stock or the common stock issued upon their
conversion have certain limited rights of first offer on future sales of any
shares of our capital stock. For a description of the registration rights under
this agreement, see "Description of Capital Stock--Registration Rights."
On February 1, 2000, we issued and sold 132,000 shares of our common stock
to Timothy F. Sylvester. The purchase price for these shares was paid by
Mr. Sylvester in the form of a cash payment of $150,000 and the delivery of a
promissory note in the amount of $150,000. The note has a term of three years,
bears annual interest at the applicable rate under U.S. Treasury regulations, is
secured by the shares purchased and is otherwise full recourse against Mr.
Sylvester.
We believe that the transactions identified above that involved us were made
on terms no less favorable to us than we could have been obtained from
disinterested third parties.
53
OTHER TRANSACTIONS
Since inception, we have provided traditional telecom services to STAR
Telecommunications, Inc. James E. Kolsrud, an executive officer, director and
greater than 5% stockholder of InterPacket, was also an Executive Vice President
of STAR. We received revenues from STAR of approximately $1.4 million in 1997,
$9.1 million in 1998 and $3.4 million in 1999. We purchased services from STAR
in the amount of approximately $21,000 in 1997, $641,000 in 1998 and $993,000 in
1999. During 1998, STAR paid us $75,000 as a one-time payment to obtain a lower
per-minute rate for a circuit to a particular country. We paid this amount to
another related party in order to buy-out a royalty interest in the revenues
generated from this circuit. We believe that these transactions were made on
terms no less favorable to us than we could have obtained from disinterested
third parties.
We lease our offices from KMK Capital Corp. under a lease that began on
January 1, 1999 and expires in December 2003. KMK Capital Corp. is the manager
of 1901 Main Street LLC, which is affiliated with Mr. Sudikoff. We currently
lease approximately 9,600 square feet for approximately $24,500 per month. This
rent increases 4% annually. We made total lease payments of $284,634 to KMK
Capital in 1999. We plan to relocate our offices to another office building in
Santa Monica during the second quarter of 2000. In 1997 and 1998, we leased our
offices at a different building, which was also managed by KMK Capital Corp.,
and made lease payments of $22,650 in 1997 and $71,096 in 1998. We believe that
these leases were made on terms no less favorable to us than we could have
obtained from disinterested third parties.
Mr. Sudikoff is one of our four founders and, until June 1999, he served as
the Chairman of our Board and as one of our officers. Mr. Sudikoff is a greater
than 5% stockholder of InterPacket. On February 19, 1999, Mr. Sudikoff pleaded
guilty to three violations of the federal securities laws relating to insider
trading and willfully failing to file a Statement of Changes in Beneficial
Ownership of Securities with the SEC in 1994 with respect to the securities of
another company. On December 3, 1999 he was sentenced to community confinement
for a period of one year and one day. Mr. Sudikoff also agreed to pay a fine of
$3 million in connection with these matters. On August 6, 1999, Mr. Sudikoff
agreed to settle the related civil action brought by the Securities and Exchange
Commission whereby he consented to a ban on serving as an officer or director of
a publicly traded issuer for 12 years, agreed not to violate the federal
securities laws in the future, agreed to disgorge $652,566, including interest,
and to pay a fine of $200,000.
On November 12, 1999, Mr. Sudikoff entered into a voting agreement and
irrevocable proxy with us under which he
- relinquished all voting rights on all of his shares of common stock;
- granted an irrevocable proxy on these shares to a voting committee
established by our board of directors currently composed of
Messrs. Barbakow, Lenihan and Cohen which, by resolution of our board, has
been directed to vote the shares in the same manner as those shares held
by our stockholders who are not our affiliates;
- agreed not to participate in our strategic planning, business or
operations in any manner; and
- agreed not to attend any of our board of directors meetings.
Under the agreement, Mr. Sudikoff retains dispositive powers with respect to
these shares. This agreement will terminate on the earlier of
- on November 1, 2004;
- transfer of Mr. Sudikoff's shares in accordance with the agreement;
- upon a change of control; and
54
- when, following InterPacket's initial public offering, for a period of 180
days, Mr. Sudikoff's holdings constitute less than 2% of InterPacket's
voting stock.
Prior to our formation in August 1995, Mr. Sudikoff was the Chairman of the
Board and CEO of IDB. James Kolsrud, Julie Spira and Peter Zimble were employed
by IDB at that time. Peter Zimble is Mr. Sudikoff's first cousin.
We loaned Peter Zimble $42,280 in 1998. On June 1, 1999, we signed a note
agreement with Mr. Zimble for the balance of this loan, $34,000. Under the terms
of that note, Mr. Zimble agreed to pay us interest on the unpaid principal at
the rate of six percent per annum. The first interest payment was payable on
October 7, 1999 and the outstanding principal amount and all accrued and unpaid
interest is due on September 7, 2000.
In our April 1999 offering discussed above, we sold 97,777 shares of our
common stock to each of the Patricia E. Cohen Zimble Trust and Kenneth H.
Zimble. Patricia E. Cohen Zimble, the beneficiary of the trust, is Peter
Zimble's mother, and Kenneth H. Zimble is Peter Zimble's father.
On July 21, 1999, Brett and Marla Messing acquired an option to purchase
1,144,000 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $2.27 per share from
Gotel Investments Ltd. Gotel is a greater than 5% stockholder of InterPacket. As
this option is presently exercisable, Mr. Messing is also a greater than 5%
stockholder of ours. Mr. Messing is an affiliate of Riverhorse Investments,
which is owned by Mr. Sudikoff.
As of March 6, 2000, we entered into a consulting services agreement with
Peter Hirshberg in connection with his resignation as our Chairman of the Board.
Mr. Hirshberg had been serving as our Chairman of the Board on a full-time basis
since November 1999, for which we paid him an annual salary of $175,000. Under
this agreement, Mr. Hirshberg agreed to provide full-time consulting services to
us including consulting services related to marketing. Mr. Hirshberg will be
paid approximately $14,600 per month. The term of this agreement commenced as of
March 6, 2000 and continues through June 6, 2000, at which time Mr. Hirshberg
will become a part-time consultant for a period of at least four months.
Thereafter, Mr. Hirshberg's consulting agreement may be extended through
June 6, 2003 with the mutual agreement of both parties. This agreement prohibits
Mr. Hirshberg from disclosing confidential information, competing with us or
soliciting our employees, customers and suppliers for limited periods of time.
As of March 6, 2000, we also entered into a separation agreement and mutual
release with Mr. Hirshberg. Under this agreement, Mr. Hirshberg relinquished his
right to purchase 660,000 shares pursuant to stock options and agreed to a new
vesting schedule with respect to certain other options that he holds. Under this
new vesting schedule, options to purchase 220,000 shares are immediately
exercisable, options to purchase 220,000 shares vest on June 6, 2000, if he has
performed under the consulting agreement and options to purchase 26,400 shares
will vest on the commencement of the extension of the consulting agreement
described above. Additionally, an option to purchase 193,600 shares will be
granted to Mr. Hirshberg and will vest monthly from October 2000 through June
2003 if he and InterPacket agree to extend his consulting agreement beyond
October 2000.
We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors
and executive officers under which we agree to indemnify these individuals to
the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. We have entered into employment
agreements with three of our executive officers. We also have two stock option
plans under which we have granted and will grant options to purchase our common
stock to our officers and directors. See "Management--Employment Agreements,"
"--Option Plans" and "--Indemnification and Limitation of Liability of Directors
and Officers" for a more detailed description of these matters.
We intend that all future transactions between us and our officers,
directors, principal stockholders and other affiliates will be approved by a
majority of the board of directors, including a majority of the independent and
disinterested outside directors on the board of directors, and will be on terms
no less favorable to us than could be obtained from disinterested third parties.
55
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information known to us regarding the
beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 27, 2000, and as adjusted
to reflect the sale of the common stock offered in this offering, the
simultaneous conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock into
common stock and our 2.2 for 1 stock split by:
- each stockholder known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our
common stock;
- each director;
- our Chief Executive Officer and all other executive officers whose salary
and bonuses exceeded $100,000 for the year ended December 31, 1999; and
- all directors and executive officers as a group.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. In computing the number of shares
beneficially owned by a person and the percentage of ownership held by that
person, shares of common stock subject to options held by that person that are
currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days after March 27,
2000 are deemed outstanding, while these shares are not deemed outstanding for
computing percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated
in the footnotes below, the persons and entities named in the table have sole
voting and investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned,
subject to community property laws where applicable. The address for those
individuals for which an address is not otherwise indicated is: c/o InterPacket
Networks, Inc., 1901 Main Street, 2nd Floor, Santa Monica, CA 90405. The
percentages of beneficial ownership assume no exercise of the underwriters'
over-allotment option.
PERCENT OF
COMMON STOCK
SHARES OF BENEFICIALLY
COMMON STOCK OWNED
BENEFICIALLY -------------------
OWNED BEFORE AFTER
------------ -------- --------
FIVE PERCENT STOCKHOLDERS
Pequot Private Equity Fund II, L.P. (1) .................... 3,960,000 11.7% 9.8%
500 Nyala Farm Road, Westport, CT 06880
Gotel Investments Ltd. (2) ................................. 2,794,000 8.2 6.9
c/o Walter Stresemann, 16 rue de la Pelisserie
1211 Geneva 3, Switzerland
Intel Corporation (3) ...................................... 1,760,000 5.2 4.4
2200 Mission College Boulevard
Santa Clara, CA 95052
Jeffrey P. Sudikoff (4) .................................... 2,845,334 8.4 7.0
P.O. Box 34127
Los Angeles, CA 90034
Brett Messing (5) .......................................... 2,121,776 6.3 5.3
1901 Main Street, Third Floor
Santa Monica, CA 90405
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Jonathan L. Gans (6)........................................ 4,864,446 14.2 12.0
Norman J. Pattiz............................................ 488,890 1.4 1.2
James E. Kolsrud(7)......................................... 4,524,669 13.3 11.2
Peter S. Zimble (8)......................................... 4,546,667 13.4 11.2
Julie M. Spira (9).......................................... 519,450 1.5 1.3
Kenneth R. Halloway (10).................................... 87,997 * *
Jeffrey C. Barbakow (11).................................... 1,466,665 4.3 3.6
Lawrence D. Lenihan, Jr. (12)............................... 3,960,000 11.7 9.8
Brent N. Cohen (13)......................................... 48,888 * *
All directors and executive officers as a group 20,650,672 60.9% 51.1%
(12 persons) (14).........................................
56
(1) Represents shares issuable upon conversion of 1,800,000 shares of preferred
stock upon completion of this offering. Pequot Private Equity Fund II, L.P.
is managed by Pequot Capital Management, Inc. Pequot Capital Management,
Inc. holds voting and dispositive power for all shares of preferred stock
held by Pequot Private Equity Fund II, L.P. The individuals who currently
possess this power on behalf of Pequot Capital Management, Inc. are Arthur
J. Somberg, Lawrence D. Lenihan, Jr. and Gerald A. Poch.
(2) The board of directors of Gotel holds voting and dispositive power for all
shares of common stock held by Gotel. Gotel's board of directors is
compromised of Walter Stresemann and Gregory Elias. Gotel has granted Brett
Messing a presently exercisable option to acquire 1,144,000 shares of
common stock that it owns. See footnote 5.
(3) Represents shares issuable upon conversion of 800,000 shares of preferred
stock upon completion of this offering.
(4) Under the terms of his voting agreement, Mr. Sudikoff relinquished all
voting power with respect to these shares via an irrevocable proxy granted
to a committee of independent directors of InterPacket under this
agreement, but continues to have sole dispositive power over these shares.
This voting agreement expires under certain circumstances. See "Certain
Transactions--Other Transactions."
(5) Includes 1,144,000 shares that may be acquired upon exercise of the option
from Gotel. See footnote 2.
(6) Includes 293,337 shares of common stock subject to options that are
exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of March 27, 2000.
(7) Includes 14,669 shares of common stock subject to options that are
exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of March 27, 2000.
(8) Includes 146,667 shares of common stock subject to options that are
exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of March 27, 2000.
(9) Includes 18,334 shares of common stock subject to options that are
exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of March 27, 2000.
(10) Includes 7,334 shares of common stock subject to options that are
exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of March 27, 2000.
(11) Does not include 2,845,334 shares owned by Mr. Sudikoff over which
Mr. Barbakow shares voting power as a member of the voting committee
pursuant to a voting agreement to which Mr. Sudikoff is a party. See
footnote 4 and "Certain Transactions--Other Transactions."
(12) Represents shares issuable upon conversion of 1,800,000 shares of
preferred stock upon completion of this offering held by Pequot Private
Equity Fund II, L.P. which is controlled by Pequot Capital Management,
Inc. See footnote 1. Mr. Lenihan is a managing director of Pequot Capital
Management, Inc. Mr. Lenihan disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares
attributed to Pequot Capital Management, Inc. Does not include
2,845,334 shares owned by Mr. Sudikoff over which Mr. Lenihan shares
voting power as a member of the voting committee pursuant to a voting
agreement to which Mr. Sudikoff is a party. See footnote 4 and "Certain
Transactions--Other Transactions."
(13) Represents shares of common stock held by June Investments, LLC.
Mr. Cohen is a managing member of June Investments. Does not include
2,845,334 shares owned by Mr. Sudikoff over which Mr. Cohen shares voting
power as a member of the voting committee pursuant to a voting agreement
to which Mr. Sudikoff is a party. See footnote 4 and "Certain
Transactions--Other Transactions."
(14) Includes the shares described in notes 6 through 13 above.
57
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
GENERAL
We are authorized to issue 250,000,000 shares of common stock, $.001 par
value, and 3,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.001 par value.
COMMON STOCK
We currently have approximately 70 holders of our common stock. The holders
of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted
upon by stockholders. After the holders of preferred stock, holders of common
stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends as may be declared by our
board of directors out of funds legally available for that purpose. In the event
of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of common stock are
entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities
and liquidation preferences of outstanding shares of preferred stock. The common
stock has no preemptive, conversion, subscription or other similar rights. All
outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid and non-assessable, and the
shares of common stock to be issued upon completion of this offering will be
fully paid and non-assessable.
PREFERRED STOCK
We currently have nine holders of our preferred stock. Upon the closing of
this offering, all outstanding shares of preferred stock will be converted into
6,600,000 shares of common stock. See Note 8 of notes to our consolidated
financial statements for a description of the currently outstanding preferred
stock. Following this conversion, our certificate of incorporation will be
amended and restated to delete all references to these shares of preferred
stock. Under the restated certificate of incorporation, our board of directors
has the authority, without further action by our stockholders, to issue up to
3,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the rights,
preferences, privileges, qualifications and restrictions granted to or imposed
upon the preferred stock, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting
rights, rights and terms of redemption, liquidation preference and sinking fund
terms, any or all of which may be greater than the rights of the common stock.
The issuance of preferred stock could negatively affect the voting power of
holders of common stock and reduce the likelihood that common stockholders will
receive dividend payments and payments upon liquidation. The issuance could have
the effect of decreasing the market price of the common stock. The issuance of
preferred stock also could have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing
a change in our control.
REGISTRATION RIGHTS
Under an investor rights agreement dated as of November 12, 1999, some of
our officers and directors and several of our investors, holding an aggregate of
23,794,423 shares of our common stock assuming conversion of our preferred
stock, have registration rights pertaining to the securities they hold. If we
propose to register any of our securities under the Securities Act for our own
account or the account of any of our stockholders other than these holders of
registrable shares, holders of these registrable shares are entitled to notice
of the registration and entitled to include registrable shares in that offering,
provided that the underwriters of that offering have the right to limit the
number of shares included in the registration. In addition, commencing 180 days
after the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus
is a part, we may be required to prepare and file a registration statement under
the Securities Act at our expense if requested to do so by the holders of at
least 30% of the shares of common stock issued upon the conversion of the
preferred stock, provided the anticipated total offering price will exceed
$5,000,000, excluding underwriting discounts and commissions. We are required to
use our best efforts to complete the registration. We are not obligated to
undertake more than two stockholder-initiated registrations. Further, under some
conditions, holders of the shares of common stock issued upon the conversion of
the preferred stock may require us to file registration statements on Form S-3
with respect
58
to these securities, though we are not required to complete any registrations on
Form S-3 unless the total price to the public is $1,000,000 or more.
We are required to bear substantially all costs incurred in these
registrations, other than underwriting discounts and commissions. The
registration rights described above could result in substantial future expenses
for us and adversely affect any future equity or debt offerings by us.
ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS
DELAWARE LAW
We are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware Law. In
general, Section 203 prohibits a public Delaware corporation from engaging in a
business combination, including mergers, asset sales or other transactions
financially benefiting the stockholder, with an interested stockholder, unless
the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. An interested
stockholder is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, has owned
within three years 15% or more of the corporation's voting stock. The statute
could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control
of our company.
CHARTER PROVISIONS
Upon the completion of this offering, our certificate of incorporation will
authorize our board of directors to issue preferred stock with rights senior to
those of common stock without stockholder approval. This provision could delay
or discourage some transactions involving an actual or potential change in
control of us or our management, including transactions in which stockholders
might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current prices, and
may limit the ability of stockholders to remove current management or approve
transactions that stockholders may deem to be in their best interests and could
adversely affect the price of our common stock.
THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET'S NATIONAL MARKET
We have applied to have our common stock approved for quotation on the
Nasdaq National Market under the trading symbol IPKT.
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is U.S. Stock Transfer
Corporation. U.S. Stock's mailing address is 1815 South Brand Boulevard,
Glendale, CA 91204, and its telephone number is (818) 502-1404.
59
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Future sales of substantial amounts of common stock in the public market
could lower prevailing market prices. As described below, substantially all
currently outstanding shares will not be available for sale immediately after
this offering. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public
market after the restrictions lapse could harm the prevailing market price and
impair our ability to raise equity capital in the future.
Upon completion of the offering, we will have approximately 40,400,333
outstanding shares of common stock. We will also have options outstanding to
purchase approximately 6,963,163 shares of common stock, of which 838,671 are
vested and exercisable as of March 27, 2000. Of the shares then outstanding, the
6,500,000 shares to be sold in this offering, plus any shares issued upon
exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option, will be freely tradable
without restriction under the Securities Act, unless purchased by our affiliates
as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. In general,
affiliates include officers, directors or greater than 10% stockholders.
The remaining 33,900,333 shares outstanding are "restricted securities"
within the meaning of Rule 144. Restricted securities may be sold in the public
market only if registered or if they qualify for an exemption from registration
under Rules 144, 144(k) or 701 promulgated under the Securities Act, which are
summarized below. Sales of the restricted securities in the public market, or
the availability of these shares for sale, could adversely affect the market
price of the common stock.
Our directors, officers and significant securityholders will enter into
lock-up agreements in connection with this offering generally providing that
they will not offer, sell, contract to sell or grant any option to purchase or
otherwise dispose of our common stock or any securities exercisable for or
convertible into our common stock owned by them for a period of 180 days after
the date of this prospectus without the prior written consent of Chase
Securities Inc. and Lehman Brothers. Taking into account the lock-up agreements,
and assuming Chase Securities Inc. and Lehman Brothers do not release
securityholders from these agreements, the number of shares that will be
available for sale in the public market under the provisions of Rule 144, 144(k)
and 701 will be:
- Beginning on the effective date of this prospectus, only the shares sold
in this offering will be immediately available for sale in the public
market.
- Beginning 180 days after the effective date of this prospectus,
approximately 27,021,670 shares will be eligible for sale.
In general, under Rule 144, after the expiration of the lock-up agreements,
a person who has beneficially owned restricted securities for at least one year
would be entitled to sell within any three-month period a number of shares that
does not exceed the greater of:
- one percent of the number of shares of common stock outstanding at that
time, which will equal approximately 404,000 shares immediately after the
offering; or
- the average weekly trading volume of the common stock during the four
calendar weeks preceding the sale.
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to requirements with respect to manner
of sale, notice and the availability of current public information about us.
Under Rule 144(k), a person who is not deemed to have been our affiliate at any
time during the three months preceding a sale and who has beneficially owned the
shares proposed to be sold for at least two years, is entitled to sell these
shares without complying with the manner of sale, public information, volume
limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144.
Rule 701 permits our employees, officers, directors or consultants who
purchased shares pursuant to a written compensatory plan or contract to resell
these shares in reliance upon Rule 144 but without compliance with specific
restrictions. Rule 701 provides that affiliates may sell their Rule 701 shares
under
60
Rule 144 without complying with the holding period requirement and that
non-affiliates may sell these shares in reliance on Rule 144 without complying
with the holding period, public information, volume limitation or notice
provisions of Rule 144.
Following the closing of this offering, we intend to file a registration
statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act covering shares of common stock
subject to outstanding options and reserved for issuance under our 1998 Stock
Option Plan and 1999 Director Stock Option Plan. Based on the number of shares
subject to outstanding options as of March 27, 2000 and currently reserved for
issuance under these plans, this registration statement would cover
approximately 10,766,800 shares. This registration statement will automatically
become effective upon filing. Accordingly, subject to the exercise of these
options, shares registered under this registration statement will be available
for sale in the open market immediately after the expiration of the 180 day
lock-up period.
61
UNDERWRITING
Chase Securities Inc., Lehman Brothers and CIBC World Markets Corp. are the
representatives of the underwriters. Subject to the terms and conditions of the
underwriting agreement, the underwriters named below, through their
representatives, have severally agreed to purchase from us, and we have agreed
to sell them, the number of shares of common stock listed opposite the name of
each underwriter below:
NUMBER OF
UNDERWRITERS SHARES
------------ ---------
Chase Securities Inc........................................
Lehman Brothers.............................................
CIBC World Markets Corp.....................................
---------
Total................................................... 6,500,000
=========
The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the underwriters
are subject to certain conditions precedent, including the absence of any
material adverse change in our business and the receipt of certain certificates,
opinions and letters from us, our counsel and the independent auditors. The
nature of the underwriters' obligation is such that they are committed to
purchase all of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus if they
purchase any shares.
The following table summarizes the per share and total underwriting
discounts and commissions we will pay to the underwriters in connection with
this offering:
TOTAL
------------------------------------------
PER WITHOUT WITH
SHARE OVER-ALLOTMENT OVER-ALLOTMENT
-------- -------------- --------------
Underwriting discounts and commissions.....
We estimate that the total expenses of this offering, excluding underwriting
discounts and commissions, will be approximately $1 million.
The underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock directly to the
public at the initial public offering price listed on the cover page of this
prospectus and to certain dealers at this price less a concession not in excess
of $ per share under the public offering price. The underwriters may
allow, and such dealers may reallow, a concession not in excess of $
per share to certain other dealers. After the initial public offering of the
shares, the offering price and other selling terms may be changed by the
representatives of underwriters.
We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable no later than
30 days after the date of this prospectus, to purchase up to 975,000 additional
shares of common stock at the initial public offering price, less the
underwriting discounts and commissions listed on the cover page of this
prospectus. To the extent that the underwriters exercise this option, each of
the underwriters will have a firm commitment to purchase approximately the same
percentage of such additional shares as the number of shares of common stock to
be purchased by it shown in the table above bears to the total number of shares
of common stock offered in this offering. We will be obligated to sell shares to
the underwriters to the extent the option is exercised. The underwriters may
exercise this option only to cover over-allotments made in connection with the
sale of common stock offered by us.
The offering of the shares is made for delivery when, as and if accepted by
the underwriters and subject to prior sale and to withdrawal, cancellation or
modification of the offering without notice. The underwriters reserve the right
to reject an order for the purchase of shares in whole or in part.
62
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act, and to contribute to payments
the underwriters may be required to make in respect of these liabilities.
Substantially all of our stockholders, including all of our executive
officers and directors, have agreed that they will not, without the prior
written consent of Chase Securities Inc. and Lehman Brothers, offer, sell, or
otherwise dispose of any shares of common stock, options or warrants to acquire
shares of common stock or securities exchangeable for or convertible into shares
of common stock owned by them for a period of 180 days following the date of
this prospectus. We have agreed that we will not, without the prior written
consent of Chase Securities Inc. and Lehman Brothers offer, sell or otherwise
dispose of any shares of common stock, options or warrants to acquire shares of
common stock or securities exchangeable for or convertible into shares of common
stock for a period of 180 days following the date of this prospectus, except
that we may issue shares upon the exercise of options granted prior to the date
hereof, and may grant additional options under our stock option plans. Without
the prior written consent of Chase Securities Inc. and Lehman Brothers, any
additional options granted shall not be exercisable during this 180-day period.
Certain persons participating in this offering may over-allot or effect
transactions which stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the market price of
the common stock at levels above those which might otherwise prevail in the open
market, including by entering stabilizing bids, effecting syndicate covering
transactions or imposing penalty bids. A stabilizing bid means the placing of
any bid or effecting of any purchase for the purpose of pegging, fixing or
maintaining the price of the common stock. A syndicate covering transaction
means the placing of any bid on behalf of the underwriting syndicate or the
effecting of any purchase to reduce a short position created in connection with
this offering. A penalty bid means an arrangement that permits the underwriters
to reclaim a selling concession from a syndicate member in connection with this
offering when shares of common stock sold by the syndicate member are purchased
in syndicate covering transactions. Such transactions may be effected on The
Nasdaq Stock Market, in the over-the-counter market, or otherwise. Such
stabilizing, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
Prior to the offering, there has been no public market for our common stock.
The initial public offering price for the common stock will be determined by
negotiation among us and the representatives. Among the factors to be considered
in determining the initial public offering price will be the prevailing market
and economic conditions, our revenues and earnings, market valuations of other
companies engaged in activities similar to our business operations, estimates of
our business potential and prospects, the present state of our business
operations, our management and other factors deemed relevant. The estimated
initial public offering price range set forth on the cover of this preliminary
prospectus is subject to change as a result of market conditions or other
factors.
At our request, the underwriters have reserved for sale at the initial
public offering price, 390,000 shares of common stock offered by this prospectus
for certain parties, including our directors, officers, employees, business
associates and related persons. There can be no assurance that any of the
reserved shares will be purchased. The number of shares of common stock
available for sale to the general public in this offering will be reduced to the
extent these individuals purchase the reserved shares. Any reserved shares which
are not so purchased will be offered by the underwriters to the general public
on the same basis as other shares offered by this prospectus.
In connection with this offering, certain underwriters and selling group
members, if any, who are qualified market makers on the Nasdaq National Market
may engage in passive market making transactions in our common stock on the
Nasdaq National Market in accordance with Rule 103 of Regulation M under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In general, a passive market maker
must display its bid at a price not in excess of the highest independent bid of
such security; if all independent bids are lowered below the passive market
maker's bid, however, such bid must then be lowered when certain purchase limits
are exceeded.
63
Chase Securities Inc. and persons associated with Chase Securities Inc.
beneficially own 1,366,642 shares of our common stock.
A person associated with CIBC World Markets Corp. beneficially owns
78,218 shares of our common stock.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the common stock offered under this prospectus will be
passed upon for InterPacket by Riordan & McKinzie, A Professional Law
Corporation, Los Angeles, California. Certain principals of Riordan & McKinzie
own an aggregate of 417,995 shares of InterPacket's common stock. Certain legal
matters raised in connection with this offering will be passed upon for the
underwriters by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, San Francisco, California.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements and schedule of InterPacket
Networks, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 1998 and 1999 and for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999 included in this
prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement have been audited by
Arthur Andersen LLP, independent public accountants, as indicated in their
reports with respect thereto, and are included herein in reliance upon the
authority of said firm as experts in giving said reports.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration
statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of
common stock offered in this offering. This prospectus does not contain all of
the information contained in the registration statement and the exhibits and
schedule filed with the registration statement. For further information with
respect to InterPacket and the common stock offered in this offering, we refer
you to the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules filed as part
of the registration statement. Statements contained in this prospectus
concerning the contents of any contract or any other document referred to are
not necessarily complete. If a contract or document has been filed as an exhibit
to the registration statement we refer you to the copy of the contract or
document that we have filed as an exhibit to the registration statement.
Our registration statement, including exhibits and schedules attached to our
registration statement, may be inspected without charge at the Securities and
Exchange Commission's public reference facilities in Room 1024, 450 Fifth
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, and at the Securities and Exchange
Commission's regional offices located at the Northwest Atrium Center, 500 West
Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60661 and Seven World Trade
Center, 13th Floor, New York, New York 10048. Please call the Securities and
Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation
of the public reference facilities. You may also obtain copies of all or any
part of our registration statement from such offices after payment of fees
prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains a worldwide website that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file
electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission at
HTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV.
64
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTENTS
Report of Independent Public Accountants.................... F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1998 and
1999...................................................... F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999.......................... F-5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31,
1997, 1998 and 1999....................................... F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999.......................... F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. F-8
F-1
After the stock split discussed in Note 9 to InterPacket Networks, Inc.'s
consolidated financial statements is effective, we expect to be in a position to
render the following audit report.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 11, 2000
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To InterPacket Networks, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of InterPacket
Networks, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiary as of December 31, 1998
and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity (deficit) and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1999. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of InterPacket Networks, Inc.
and subsidiary as of December 31, 1998 and 1999, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1999 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States.
F-2
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1999
ASSETS
PRO-FORMA
(SEE NOTE 8)
1998 1999 1999
---------- ----------- ------------
(UNAUDITED)
Current Assets:
Cash.................................................. $ 1,855 $15,948,294 $15,948,294
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of
$16,600 and $140,200 at December 31, 1998
and 1999, respectively.............................. 369,742 1,333,914 1,333,914
Accounts receivable from related parties,
net of allowance of $63,400 at
December 31, 1998................................... 1,308,844 206,274 206,274
Inventory............................................. 161,047 1,063,090 1,063,090
Advances to stockholder and employees................. 42,280 68,485 68,485
Deposits.............................................. 116,778 5,000 5,000
Prepaid expenses and other assets..................... 64,263 161,396 161,396
---------- ----------- -----------
Total current assets............................ 2,064,809 18,786,453 18,786,453
---------- ----------- -----------
Property and Equipment:
Operating equipment................................... 681,462 2,319,687 2,319,687
Computer equipment.................................... 90,367 442,726 442,726
Furniture and fixtures................................ 9,124 76,836 76,836
Satellite transponders under capital leases........... -- 41,456,658 41,456,658
---------- ----------- -----------
780,953 44,295,907 44,295,907
Less--Accumulated depreciation........................ (98,929) (1,422,989) (1,422,989)
---------- ----------- -----------
682,024 42,872,918 42,872,918
---------- ----------- -----------
Deposits.............................................. 330,378 1,570,457 1,570,457
Deposits to related parties........................... -- 26,344 26,344
Intangible assets, net of amortization of $22,433..... -- 426,228 426,228
Other assets.......................................... -- 608,179 608,179
---------- ----------- -----------
Total assets.................................... $3,077,211 $64,290,579 $64,290,579
========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated balance
sheets.
F-3
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1999
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
PRO-FORMA
(SEE NOTE 8)
1998 1999 1999
---------- ----------- ------------
(UNAUDITED)
Current Liabilities:
Bank overdraft............................................ $ 373,213 $ -- $ --
Accounts payable.......................................... 1,172,434 1,773,932 1,773,932
Accrued expenses.......................................... 931,807 1,804,938 1,804,938
Accounts payable and accrued expenses from related
parties................................................. 288,749 54,938 54,938
Deferred revenue.......................................... 681,671 1,831,711 1,831,711
Current portion of capital leases......................... -- 2,138,068 2,138,068
Customer deposits......................................... 352,657 751,835 751,835
Deposits from related party............................... 181,970 49,756 49,756
---------- ----------- -----------
Total current liabilities........................... 3,982,501 8,405,178 8,405,178
---------- ----------- -----------
Capital Leases of Satellite Transponders, net of Current
Portion................................................... -- 38,669,292 38,669,292
---------- ----------- -----------
Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock--$.001 par value:
Authorized--3,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding--3,000,000 shares at December 31,
1999.................................................... -- 14,823,800 --
---------- ----------- -----------
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 4)
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit):
Common stock--$.001 par value:
Authorized--50,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding--18,757,895 and 26,826,573
shares at December 31, 1998 and 1999 and 33,426,573
in pro forma 1999..................................... 18,758 26,827 33,427
Additional paid-in capital................................ 347,498 45,109,986 59,927,186
Stockholder receivables................................... (35,158) (35,158) (35,158)
Deferred compensation..................................... -- (30,585,462) (30,585,462)
Other comprehensive income................................ -- 2,173 2,173
Deficit................................................... (1,236,388) (12,126,057) (12,126,057)
---------- ----------- -----------
Stockholders' equity (deficit)...................... (905,290) 2,392,309 17,216,109
---------- ----------- -----------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
(deficit)......................................... $3,077,211 $64,290,579 $64,290,579
========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated balance
sheets.
F-4
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1998 AND 1999
1997 1998 1999
---------- ----------- ------------
Revenue:
Network services..................................... $ 406,895 $ 2,283,701 $ 10,051,114
Revenue from related parties--network services....... 175,924 1,831,233 738,362
Revenue from related parties--traditional telecom
services........................................... 1,176,330 7,294,757 2,684,751
---------- ----------- ------------
Total revenue.................................. 1,759,149 11,409,691 13,474,227
Operating Expenses:
Cost of network services............................. 452,748 5,284,329 10,346,284
Cost of traditional telecom services................. 531,834 4,749,765 1,273,645
Cost from related parties............................ 21,246 777,724 993,292
Selling and marketing expenses (excluding non-cash
compensation of $101,118 in 1999).................. 131,714 828,120 2,396,857
General and administrative expenses (excluding
non-cash compensation of $2,387,287 in 1999)....... 429,435 1,017,567 4,297,178
General and administrative expenses
from related parties............................... 24,565 80,480 389,075
Non-cash compensation charges........................ -- -- 2,488,405
Depreciation and amortization........................ 9,390 87,569 1,346,493
---------- ----------- ------------
Total operating expenses....................... 1,600,932 12,825,554 23,531,229
---------- ----------- ------------
Income (Loss) from Operations.......................... 158,217 (1,415,863) (10,057,002)
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income...................................... 902 22,886 205,792
Interest expense..................................... (129) (110) (942,990)
Other................................................ -- (2,824) (94,669)
---------- ----------- ------------
773 19,952 (831,867)
---------- ----------- ------------
Income (Loss) before Provision for
Income Taxes......................................... 158,990 (1,395,911) (10,888,869)
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes................... 69,613 (68,013) 800
---------- ----------- ------------
Net Income (Loss)...................................... $ 89,377 $(1,327,898) $(10,889,669)
========== =========== ============
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share....... $ 0.01 $ (0.07) $ (0.48)
========== =========== ============
Weighted average number of common shares............... 15,950,000 18,506,000 22,862,000
========== =========== ============
Pro forma basic and diluted loss per common share
(unaudited).......................................... $ (0.46)
============
Weighted average number of common shares used to
compute pro forma loss per common share
(unaudited).......................................... 23,767,000
============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
F-5
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1998 AND 1999
COMMON STOCK OTHER RETAINED
--------------------- ADDITIONAL STOCKHOLDER DEFERRED COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
SHARES AMOUNT PAID-IN CAPITAL RECEIVABLES COMPENSATION INCOME (DEFICIT)
---------- -------- --------------- ----------- ------------ ------------- ------------
Balance, at December 31,
1996...................... 13,895,200 $13,895 $ (10,737) $ (158) $ -- $ -- $ 2,133
Issuance of common stock.... 3,924,800 3,925 71,075 (40,000) -- -- --
Stockholder contributions... -- -- 38,098 -- -- --
Net income.................. -- -- -- -- -- -- 89,377
---------- ------- ----------- -------- ------------ ------ ------------
Balance, at December 31,
1997...................... 17,820,000 17,820 98,436 (40,158) -- -- 91,510
Issuance of common stock.... 937,895 938 249,062 -- -- -- --
Repayment of stockholder
note...................... -- -- -- 5,000 -- -- --
Net loss.................... -- -- -- -- -- -- (1,327,898)
---------- ------- ----------- -------- ------------ ------ ------------
Balance, at December 31,
1998...................... 18,757,895 18,758 347,498 (35,158) -- -- (1,236,388)
Issuance of common stock.... 7,898,544 7,899 11,552,264 -- -- --
Compensation expense
relating to issuance of
common stock.............. -- -- 1,775,954 -- -- --
Exercise of stock options... 170,134 170 136,357 -- -- -- --
Compensation expense
relating to stock
options................... -- -- 31,297,913 -- (30,585,462) -- --
Comprehensive income:
Net loss.................. -- -- -- -- -- -- (10,889,669)
Cumulative translation
adjustment.............. -- -- -- -- -- 2,173 --
Comprehensive loss.......... -- -- -- -- -- -- --
---------- ------- ----------- -------- ------------ ------ ------------
Balance, at December 31,
1999...................... 26,826,573 $26,827 $45,109,986 $(35,158) $(30,585,462) $2,173 $(12,126,057)
========== ======= =========== ======== ============ ====== ============
TOTAL
------------
Balance, at December 31,
1996...................... $ 5,133
Issuance of common stock.... 35,000
Stockholder contributions... 38,098
Net income.................. 89,377
------------
Balance, at December 31,
1997...................... 167,608
Issuance of common stock.... 250,000
Repayment of stockholder
note...................... 5,000
Net loss.................... (1,327,898)
------------
Balance, at December 31,
1998...................... (905,290)
Issuance of common stock.... 11,560,163
Compensation expense
relating to issuance of
common stock.............. 1,775,954
Exercise of stock options... 136,527
Compensation expense
relating to stock
options................... 712,451
Comprehensive income:
Net loss.................. (10,889,669)
Cumulative translation
adjustment.............. 2,173
------------
Comprehensive loss.......... (10,887,496)
------------
Balance, at December 31,
1999...................... $ 2,392,309
============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
F-6
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1998 AND 1999
1997 1998 1999
--------- ----------- ------------
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income (loss)......................................... $ 89,377 $(1,327,898) $(10,889,669)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Compensation expense relating to stock options.......... -- -- 712,451
Compensation expense relating to issuance of common
stock................................................. -- -- 1,775,954
Depreciation and amortization expense................... 9,390 87,569 1,346,493
Bad debt expense........................................ -- 80,000 183,574
Deferred income taxes................................... 68,813 (68,813) --
Decrease (increase) in assets, net of acquisition:
Accounts receivable................................... (61,032) (325,292) (1,119,207)
Accounts receivable from related parties.............. (804,352) (563,910) 1,102,570
Inventory............................................. -- (161,047) (902,043)
Advances to stockholder and employees................. -- (42,280) (26,205)
Deposits.............................................. -- (326,568) (1,266,423)
Prepaid expenses and other assets..................... (4,110) (180,741) 19,647
Increase (decrease) in liabilities, net of acquisition:
Bank overdraft........................................ 330,424 42,789 (373,213)
Accounts payable...................................... 79,451 1,092,983 601,498
Accrued expenses...................................... 154,908 776,899 810,577
Accounts payable and accrued expenses from related
parties............................................. 17,516 271,233 (233,811)
Deferred revenue...................................... 50,560 615,621 1,128,449
Deposits.............................................. 55,800 285,357 399,178
Deposits from related party........................... -- 181,970 (132,214)
--------- ----------- ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities........................................ (13,255) 437,872 (6,862,394)
--------- ----------- ------------
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures...................................... (55,621) (691,017) (1,956,353)
Payment for acquisition................................... -- -- (500,000)
Other assets.............................................. -- -- (125,373)
--------- ----------- ------------
Net cash used in investing activities............... (55,621) (691,017) (2,581,726)
--------- ----------- ------------
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Issuance of common stock.................................. 66,760 250,000 11,696,690
Issuance of preferred stock............................... -- -- 14,823,800
Repayment of stockholder note............................. -- 5,000 --
Repayment of capital lease obligations.................... -- -- (649,298)
Initial public offering costs included in other assets.... -- -- (482,806)
--------- ----------- ------------
Net cash provided by financing activities........... 66,760 255,000 25,388,386
--------- ----------- ------------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash..................... -- -- 2,173
Increase (decrease) in cash................................. (2,116) 1,855 15,946,439
Cash, beginning of period................................... 2,116 -- 1,855
--------- ----------- ------------
Cash, end of period......................................... $ -- $ 1,855 $ 15,948,294
========= =========== ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
F-7
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 1999
1. NATURE OF BUSINESS
InterPacket Networks, Inc. (the "Company" or "InterPacket") is a Delaware
corporation in the business of providing a satellite-based broadband Internet
network that delivers high-speed Internet services to international Internet
service providers and other businesses. The Company's proprietary network design
integrates the broadcast capabilities of satellites with Internet network
technologies to offer its international customers a scalable solution to the
contraints of the public Internet infrastructure. Effective December 1999, the
Company discontinued traditional telephony services to focus on its Internet
business.
On September 23, 1999, IPG Acquisition Inc. was incorporated in the State of
Delaware. On November 5, 1999, InterPacket Group, Inc. and IPG Acquisition Inc.
merged to become InterPacket Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation. On February
18, 2000, the Company changed its name to InterPacket Networks, Inc., which has
been retroactively reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
In September 1998, the Company established InterPacket (UK) Limited, a
wholly owned subsidiary in the United Kingdom, to expand operations in Europe.
In November 1998, the Company entered into a joint venture with Internet
Promoters India Limited ("IPIL") to provide Internet services in India. The
Company owns 49 percent of the equity of IPIL and accounts for the investment
under the equity method. The remaining 51 percent is owned by an Indian company
with the name of Internet Promoters India Limited. IPIL has not yet generated
revenue and its operations through December 31, 1999 are immaterial.
On September 28, 1999, the Company completed the acquisition of certain
assets and technology from a subsidiary of Level 3 Communications Limited, for a
cash price of approximately $500,000 (see Note 10).
The Company faces risks normally associated with early stage enterprises
including the need to raise additional capital to fund future operations and
expansion. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in
raising the needed capital. Also, should the Company be successful in obtaining
capital, there can be no assurances that profitable operations can be achieved.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
InterPacket and its wholly-owned subsidiary. All material intercompany
transactions have been eliminated.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company records revenue for Internet service during the month of service
and for long distance telecommunications sales at the time of customer usage.
Deferred revenue consists of advance billings for the following month's services
or prepayments from new customers not yet in service. Included in accounts
receivable and deferred revenue as of December 31, 1998 and 1999 are $409,475
and $794,217, respectively, of billed but unearned revenues.
Revenue from the sale of customer equipment for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999 was $101,000, $150,000 and $1,051,000,
respectively, and is included in network services. Installation fees for this
equipment was immaterial during 1997 and 1998 and approximately $37,000 in 1999.
Revenue on equipment and installation is recognized when the customer is
activated.
F-8
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
COST OF SERVICES
Cost of services represent direct charges from vendors that the Company
incurs to deliver service to its customers. These include access fees, leasing
costs for satellite facilities, teleports, Internet connectivity and the
rate-per-minute charges from other carriers that terminate traffic on behalf of
the Company.
TRANSLATION OF FOREIGN CURRENCIES
Management determined that the functional currency of its foreign subsidiary
is the local currency. Balance sheets prepared in their functional currencies
are translated to the reporting currency, the United States dollar, at exchange
rates in effect at the end of the accounting period except for stockholders'
equity accounts which are translated at rates in effect when these balances were
originally recorded. Revenue and expense accounts are translated at a weighted
average of exchange rates during the period. The cumulative effect of
translation is included in other comprehensive income in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
On January 1, 1998, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income." SFAS No. 130
requires that comprehensive income, which is the total of net income and all
other non-owner changes in equity, be displayed in the financial statements. The
adoption of SFAS No. 130 had no impact on total stockholders' equity. The
components of the Company's comprehensive income as presented in the
consolidated statements of stockholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive
income include net income and unrealized gains and losses from currency
translation.
BASIC AND DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
In accordance with SFAS No. 128, "Computation of Earnings Per Share," basic
earnings per share is computed by dividing the net earnings available to common
stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by
dividing the net earnings for the period by the weighted average number of
common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period.
Common equivalent shares, consisting of incremental common shares issuable
upon the exercise of stock options and the conversion of the preferred shares
are excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation as their effect is
anti-dilutive.
F-9
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
A summary of the shares used to compute net income (loss) per share and pro
forma net loss per share is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
---------- ---------- ----------
Weighted average common shares used to
compute basic net income (loss) per
common share............................ 15,950,000 18,506,000 22,862,000
Effect of dilutive securities............. -- -- --
---------- ---------- ----------
Weighted average common shares used to
compute diluted income (loss) per common
share................................... 15,950,000 18,506,000 22,862,000
========== ==========
Conversion of preferred stock............. 905,000
----------
Weighted average number of common shares
used to compute pro forma loss per
common share............................ 23,767,000
==========
Pro forma loss per common share gives effect to the conversion of 3,000,000
shares of preferred stock into common stock upon the effectiveness of the
initial public offering.
INVENTORY
Inventory represents purchased communications equipment which the Company
resells to its customers. The inventory is carried at the lower of cost or
market.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation of property and
equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the following
estimated useful lives:
Operating equipment.............................. 5 years
Computer equipment............................... 3 years
Furniture and fixtures........................... 5 years
Equipment under capital leases................... 11 to 13 years
Replacements and betterments, renewals and extraordinary repairs that extend
the life of the asset are capitalized; other repairs and maintenance are
expensed. The cost and accumulated depreciation applicable to assets sold or
retired are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss on disposition is
recognized in other income or expense.
Included in the Company's balance sheets at December 31, 1998 and 1999 are
approximately $280,000 and $42.9 million, respectively, of equipment which is
located outside of the United States.
F-10
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
DEPOSITS
Deposits represent payments made to satellite operators and long distance
providers to secure lower rates. These deposits are refunded or applied against
future services.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets represent the excess of cost over the fair market value of
net tangible assets acquired and are amortized using the straight-line method
over a five-year period. The Company continually evaluates whether events and
circumstances have occurred that indicate the remaining estimated useful life of
intangible assets might warrant revision or that the remaining balance of the
intangible assets and other long-lived assets may not be recoverable. When
factors indicate that the intangible assets and other long-lived assets should
be evaluated for possible impairment, the Company uses an estimate of
undiscounted future net cash flows over the remaining life of the assets to
determine if impairment has incurred. Assets are grouped at the lowest level for
which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent from other
asset groups. The Company uses discounted future expected net cash flows to
determine the amount of impairment loss.
OTHER ASSETS
Other assets include capitalized initial public offering costs of $482,806
and the investment in IPIL which is being accounted for under the equity method.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
During the periods ended December 31, 1997 and 1998, no cash was paid for
interest. During 1999, the Company paid $784,807 in interest charges. For the
same periods, cash paid for income taxes amounted to $1,600, $800 and $5,724,
respectively.
Non-cash investing and financing activities are as follows for the years
ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999:
1997 1998 1999
-------- -------- -----------
Issuance of common stock for notes............ $40,000 $ -- $ --
Conversion of debt to equity.................. $ 6,338 $ -- $ --
Assets acquired under capital leases.......... $ -- $ -- $41,456,658
These non-cash transactions are excluded from the statements of cash flows.
CONCENTRATIONS OF RISK
As of December 31, 1999, the Company had cash account balances of
approximately $15.1 million at financial institutions which were in excess of
federally-insured amounts.
The Company provided carrier grade telephony service to a single customer
who accounted for a substantial portion of the overall revenue of the Company.
The Company's largest customer accounted for 76 percent and 12 percent of gross
accounts receivable at December 31, 1998 and 1999, respectively. The Company's
largest customer represented 77 percent, 80 percent and 25 percent of revenue
during the
F-11
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
years ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999. The Company's largest customer is
a related party (see Note 3).
For the year ended December 31, 1999, 73 percent of total revenue and
91 percent of revenue from network services were generated outside the United
States.
Purchases from the four largest vendors for the years ended December 31,
1997 and 1998 amounted to 88 percent and 59 percent, respectively. Purchases
from the two largest vendors (PanAmSat and Satmex) for the year ended
December 31, 1999 amounted to 47 percent of total purchases.
In providing its network application services, the Company is dependent on
uninterrupted satellite service which is currently provided by five vendors. The
Company also relies predominantly on one vendor for uplink services. The Company
has experienced one significant interruption in satellite transmission service
for which it did not receive reimbursement from the provider. In connection with
this transmission failure, the Company had to refund approximately $20,000 to
its customers. An extended period of disruption could have a material adverse
effect on the Company's financial position and results of operations.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The carrying value of the Company's cash, receivables, payables and accrued
liabilities approximate their fair value because of the short maturities of
these instruments. The carrying value of the Company's capital leases
approximate their fair values because the interest rates are comparable to those
available to the Company on similar terms.
3. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
A significant stockholder and member of the board of directors of the
Company is an executive at STAR Telecommunications, Inc. ("STAR"). The Company
provided long distance telephone and network services to STAR which accounted
for approximately 77 percent, 80 percent and 25 percent of the Company's revenue
for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999, respectively. During the
year ended December 31, 1998, STAR paid the Company $75,000 as a one-time
payment to obtain a lower per-minute rate for a specific circuit to a particular
country. The Company then paid this amount to another related party to buy out a
royalty interest in the revenue generated from such circuit, thereby reducing
the per-minute rate. The pricing of related party transactions was determined by
management.
F-12
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
3. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes related party transactions:
COMPANY
COMPANIES OWNED BY
OWNED BY OR LOANS TO DIRECTOR,
CONSULTING RELATED TO EXECUTIVES EXECUTIVE
FEES TO FORMER AND OFFICER AND
TOTAL STAR CHAIRMAN CHAIRMAN EMPLOYEES STOCKHOLDER
---------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ---------- ------------
For the year ended December 31, 1997:
Revenue--network services...................... $ 175,924 $ 175,924 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
Revenue--traditional telecom services.......... 1,176,330 1,176,330 -- -- -- --
Cost of services............................... 21,246 21,246 -- -- -- --
General and administrative expenses............ 24,565 -- -- 24,565 -- --
For the year ended December 31, 1998:
Revenue--network services...................... 1,831,233 1,825,233 -- 6,000 -- --
Revenue--traditional telecom services.......... 7,294,757 7,294,757 -- -- -- --
Cost of services............................... 777,724 640,941 -- 136,783 -- --
General and administrative expenses............ 80,480 -- -- 80,480 -- --
For the year ended December 31, 1999:
Revenue--network services...................... 738,362 734,362 -- 4,000 -- --
Revenue--traditional telecom services.......... 2,684,751 2,684,751 -- -- -- --
Cost of network services....................... 938,292 938,292 -- -- -- --
Cost of traditional telecom services........... 55,000 55,000 -- -- -- --
General and administrative expenses............ 389,075 -- 43,750 315,841 -- 29,484
At December 31, 1998:
Accounts receivable............................ 1,308,844 1,281,003 -- 27,841 -- --
Advances to stockholder and employees.......... 42,280 -- -- -- 42,280 --
Accounts payable and accrued expenses.......... 288,749 287,801 -- 948 -- --
Customer deposits.............................. 181,970 181,970 -- -- -- --
At December 31, 1999:
Accounts receivable............................ 206,274 204,374 -- 1,900 -- --
Advances to stockholder and employees.......... 68,485 -- -- -- 68,485 --
Deposits....................................... 26,344 4,920 -- 21,424 -- --
Accounts payable and accrued expenses.......... 54,938 39,000 8,750 7,188 -- --
Customer deposits.............................. 49,756 49,756 -- -- -- --
F-13
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
4. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company has leases for satellite transponder space and related facilities
under various agreements expiring through 2011. At December 31, 1999, the
minimum aggregate payments under the capital leases of satellite transponders
and non-cancelable operating leases are summarized as follows:
CAPITAL LEASES OPERATING LEASES TOTAL
-------------- ---------------- ------------
Year Ending December 31,
2000............................... $ 5,870,548 $12,174,662 $ 18,045,210
2001............................... 5,802,000 10,590,441 16,392,441
2002............................... 5,802,000 8,777,266 14,579,266
2003............................... 5,802,000 6,611,840 12,413,840
2004............................... 5,802,000 2,894,250 8,696,250
Thereafter......................... 37,628,000 12,669,972 50,297,972
------------ ----------- ------------
66,706,548 $53,718,431 $120,424,979
=========== ============
Less: Amount representing
interest......................... (25,899,188)
------------
40,807,360
Less: Current portion.............. (2,138,068)
------------
$ 38,669,292
============
The Company has also committed to lease three additional transponders on one
existing satellite under leases that start on August 15, 2000, May 15, 2001 and
November 15, 2001. We have committed to leasing these transponders through the
end of their useful lives which is expected to be October 2013. Estimated future
payments under these commitments are approximately $56.5 million.
The Company has capital and operating leases of satellite transponders. The
leases provide for monthly payments ranging from $300 to approximately $360,000
per month over periods of 1 year to 12 years. Some of these leases require
security deposits and many may be extended upon timely notification. In case of
a satellite failure other than from a "force majeure," as defined, generally the
Company will receive a refund or suspension of its monthly payments. Most
agreements require early termination penalties including one year's fee, the net
present value of the remaining unpaid lease payments at a predetermined discount
rate, or the remaining lease payments through the end of the lease term. Some of
the agreements will provide for a refund to the Company if a space segment is
subsequently leased to another company.
Office space and office equipment rent expense for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999 was $22,650, $71,096 and $284,634,
respectively. Rental for leased lines, satellite access and related facilities
for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999 amounted to $317,551,
$6,281,302 and $10,433,321, respectively.
F-14
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
4. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)
The Company has employment agreements with three executives. The agreements
provide for a continuation of salary in the event of termination without cause.
Also, stock options will vest immediately upon certain events. The Company has
also committed to issue 220,000 stock options to the chief executive officer at
the initial public offering price.
5. INCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
"Accounting for Income Taxes," under which deferred assets and liabilities are
provided on differences between financial reporting and taxable income using
enacted tax rates. Deferred income tax expenses are based on the changes in
deferred income tax assets or liabilities from period to period.
Under SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets may be recognized for temporary
differences that will result in deductible amounts in future periods. A
valuation allowance is recognized if based on the weight of available evidence,
it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset
will not be realized. The net deferred tax asset of $3,884,019 at December 31,
1999 has been fully reserved.
The components of the net deferred taxes at December 31, 1998 and 1999 are
as follows:
1998 1999
--------- -----------
Deferred tax asset:
Net operating loss................................. $ 35,246 $ 5,830,352
Cash to accrual.................................... 480,388 2,158,807
--------- -----------
515,634 7,989,159
Deferred tax liability:
Depreciation....................................... (34,721) (3,036,996)
Cash to accrual.................................... -- (1,068,144)
--------- -----------
(34,721) (4,105,140)
--------- -----------
480,913 3,884,019
Less--valuation reserve.............................. (480,913) (3,884,019)
--------- -----------
Net deferred taxes................................... $ -- $ --
========= ===========
F-15
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
5. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
The provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998
and 1999 are as follows:
1997 1998 1999
-------- -------- --------
Current:
Federal taxes................................. $ -- $ -- $ --
State taxes................................... 800 800 800
-------- -------- --------
800 800 800
-------- -------- --------
Deferred:
Federal taxes................................. 58,542 (58,542) --
State taxes................................... 10,271 (10,271) --
-------- -------- --------
68,813 (68,813) --
-------- -------- --------
Provision (benefit) for income taxes............ $ 69,613 $(68,013) $ 800
======== ======== ========
Differences between the provision for income taxes and income taxes at the
statutory federal income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998
and 1999 are as follows:
1997 1998 1999
-------- --------- -----------
Income taxes at the statutory federal rate........... $54,057 $(474,610) $(3,702,215)
State income taxes, net of federal income tax
effect............................................. 9,276 (77,390) (619,439)
Permanent differences................................ 739 5,130 924,510
Change in valuation reserve.......................... -- 480,913 3,403,106
Other................................................ 5,541 (2,056) (5,162)
------- --------- -----------
$69,613 $ (68,013) $ 800
======= ========= ===========
The Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $13
million for Federal and State income tax purposes, which will expire through
2019 and 2004, respectively.
6. ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses at December 31, 1998 and 1999 consist of the following:
1998 1999
-------- ----------
Payroll and related costs.............................. $114,516 $ 383,746
Network costs.......................................... 774,291 835,453
Other.................................................. 43,000 585,739
-------- ----------
$931,807 $1,804,938
======== ==========
7. STOCK OPTIONS
On January 1, 1998, the Company adopted the 1998 Stock Option Plan (the
"Plan"). The Plan provides for the granting of stock options to purchase up to
6,380,000 shares of common stock and terminates in ten years. Options vest over
a period as determined by the Board of Directors, generally
F-16
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
7. STOCK OPTIONS (CONTINUED)
three years and expire in ten years. The option price is determined by the Board
of Directors but may not be less than the fair market value of the stock on the
date of grant, except for participants who are 10 percent stockholders of the
Company, for which the price may not be less than 110 percent of the fair market
value.
On June 14, 1999, the Company adopted the 1999 Director Stock Option Plan
(the "Directors Plan"). The Plan provides for the granting of stock options to
purchase up to 440,000 shares of common stock and terminates in ten years. Each
year all non-employee directors shall be granted options to purchase 22,000
shares of common stock. Options vest and become exercisable on the first
anniversary of the date of grant, provided that the individual has remained in
continuous service as a director of InterPacket for the preceding twelve-month
period. Options also vest and become exercisable upon a change in control, as
defined. The option price shall equal the fair market value of the stock on the
date of grant.
The Company has elected to adopt SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation," for disclosure purposes only and applies Accounting Principle
Board (APB) Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its
employee stock options.
The following is a summary of the Company's outstanding options and activity
for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1999:
1998 1999
-------------------- --------------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
SHARES AVERAGE SHARES AVERAGE
UNDER EXERCISE UNDER EXERCISE
OPTION PRICE OPTION PRICE
--------- -------- --------- --------
Options outstanding, at
beginning of year.................................. -- $ -- 1,672,000 $ 0.40
Granted............................................ 1,672,000 0.40 1,661,000 1.54
Granted below current market prices................ -- -- 2,718,650 2.14
Exercised.......................................... -- -- (170,136) 0.80
Canceled........................................... -- -- (175,630) 0.60
--------- ----- --------- ------
Options outstanding, at
end of year........................................ 1,672,000 $0.40 5,705,884 $ 1.54
========= ===== ========= ======
Options exercisable at end of year................... -- -- 730,400 $ 0.35
========= ===== ========= ======
Weighted average fair value of options granted during
the period......................................... $0.10 $ 0.36
===== ======
Weighted average fair value of options granted during
the period below their current market prices....... $15.12
======
F-17
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
7. STOCK OPTIONS (CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes information about the options outstanding at
December 31, 1999:
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING
------------------------------------------------- OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
RANGE OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE ------------------------------
EXERCISE NUMBER REMAINING WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER WEIGHTED AVERAGE
PRICES OUTSTANDING CONTRACTUAL LIFE EXERCISE PRICE EXERCISABLE EXERCISE PRICE
----------- ----------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------- ----------------
$ 0.23 673,200 8.1 years $0.23 441,465 $0.23
0.27-0.57 781,734 8.7 years 0.54 288,935 0.53
1.02-2.05 3,216,950 9.8 years 1.82 -- --
2.27 1,034,000 9.9 years 2.27 -- --
----------- ---------- --------- ----- ------- -----
$ 0.23-2.27 5,705,884 9.5 years $1.54 730,400 $0.35
=========== ========== ========= ===== ======= =====
As permitted by SFAS No. 123, the Company continues to apply the accounting
rules of APB No. 25 governing the recognition of compensation expense from its
stock option plan. Such accounting rules measure compensation expense on the
first date at which both the number of shares and the exercise price are known.
Under the Company's plan, this would typically be the grant date. The Company
generally issues its stock options with an exercise price based on the fair
market value of the Company's stock at the date of grant as determined by the
board of directors. The Company also issued certain stock options to Company
executives and employees at exercises prices below their current market prices.
The related compensation charges of $31,297,913 are amortized over the three
year vesting periods of the related options.
Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123, equity instruments granted to
non-employees are excluded from the pro forma disclosure requirements and are
recorded as compensation expense at fair value in the accompanying statements of
operations. The Company issued no options to non-employees during the periods
presented. During 1999, the Company changed the vesting term for the former
chairman of the board and another former employee which resulted in additional
compensation expense of $145,000 and $95,538, respectively.
Had the Company applied the fair value based method of accounting to all
grants of stock options, under SFAS No. 123, the Company would have recorded
additional compensation expense as follows for the years ended December 31, 1998
and 1999, respectively:
1998 1999
--------- -----------
Additional compensation expense............................. $ 25,572 $ 161,578
Net loss:
As reported............................................... 1,327,898 10,889,669
Pro forma................................................. 1,353,470 11,051,247
Net loss per share:
As reported............................................... 0.07 0.48
Pro forma................................................. 0.07 0.48
These pro forma amounts were determined by estimating the fair value of each
option on its grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
Assumptions of 5.4 percent and 5.49 percent for the risk free interest rate, 5
years for expected life, no volatility and no expected dividends were applied to
all grants.
F-18
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
8. MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK
On November 12, 1999, the Company entered into a Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement to issue 3 million shares of convertible
preferred stock at $5.00 per share. The preferred stockholders have certain
registration and preemptive rights; as well as preferential rights upon
dissolution of the Company. In the event of a liquidation or dissolution of the
Company (as defined), the preferred stockholders are guaranteed to receive such
funds to allow them an internal rate of return of 35 percent annually from the
original date of issuance. Each preferred share is convertible into 2.2 shares
of common stock if requested by the majority of the preferred stockholders or
upon a public offering at not less than $3.18 per share and which raises a
minimum of $25 million. The conversion ratio is subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances such as upon future sale of Company shares at a price below $2.27
per share for common stock. The preferred stockholders may request redemption at
the initial purchase price after November 12, 2003. See Note 2 for pro forma
weighted average number of common shares used to compute pro forma loss per
common share.
9. CAPITAL STOCK
On April 9, 1998, the Company sold 937,895 shares of common stock to an
investor for $250,000.
On April 14, 1999, the Company sold 4,419,500 shares of common stock through
a private placement for $4,519,928. The Company sold 1,307,772 of these shares
to employees and directors of the Company. In August 1999, the Company sold
74,307 additional shares for $75,997.
In September and October of 1999, the Company sold 3,258,074 shares of
common stock in a private placement for net proceeds of $6,664,242. The Company
sold 1,325,376 of these shares to employees and directors of the Company. In
December 1999, the Company sold 146,663 shares of common stock to an existing
stockholder for net proceeds of $299,996.
On September 3, 1997, the Board of Directors authorized an increase to the
authorized number of common shares from 10,000 to 10 million and effected a
1,000-for-1 stock split of the Company's issued and outstanding shares. This
increase became effective March 31, 1998. On June 1, 1999, the Board of
Directors approved a 2-for-1 stock split, which became effective July 7, 1999
and on March 29, 2000 the Board of Directors approved an additional 2.2 for 1
stock split. The stock splits have been retroactively reflected in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. On
February 24, 1999, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the authorized
common shares to 50 million. Approximately 17.2 million of the common shares
have certain registration rights pertaining to these securities.
10. ACQUISITION
On September 28, 1999, the Company acquired certain assets and technology
from a subsidiary of Level 3 Communications Limited for $500,000. The
acquisition has been accounted for by the purchase method of accounting and,
accordingly, the results of operations of SatinNet Limited for the period from
September 28, 1999 are included in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. In connection with this purchase, the Company recorded approximately
$449,000 of intangible assets which are being amortized over a five-year period.
F-19
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
10. ACQUISITION (CONTINUED)
The following unaudited pro forma information presents the results of
operations of the Company as if the acquisition had taken place on January 1,
1998:
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 DECEMBER 31, 1999
------------------ ------------------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER
SHARE AMOUNTS)
Revenue..................................... $11,571 $13,600
Net loss.................................... $ 1,541 $11,058
Net loss per common share................... $ 0.08 $ 0.48
These pro forma results of operations have been prepared for comparative
purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of the results of operations
which actually would have resulted had the acquisition occurred on the date
indicated, or which may result in the future.
11. BUSINESS SEGMENTS
During 1997, 1998 and 1999, the Company had two business segments, network
services and traditional telecom services. The network services segment derives
revenues from the sale of Internet-based network services, including
connectivity and multi-point newsfeeds.
The traditional telecom services segment provides traditional switched based
wholesale long distance service, primarily to STAR Telecommunications, Inc., an
international long distance company.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in
the significant accounting policies, however, the Company evaluates performance
based on gross margin before depreciation and amortization expense. The Company
does not internally analyze these segments below revenue less direct operating
expenses, therefore selling, general and administrative expenses and
depreciation expense is not allocated to any specific segment. The Company has
no intercompany sales among the network services
F-20
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
11. BUSINESS SEGMENTS (CONTINUED)
and the traditional telecom services segments. All capital leases relate to the
network services segment. Reportable segment information for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999 is as follows:
TRADITIONAL
NETWORK TELECOM UNALLOCATED
SERVICES SERVICES CORPORATE ASSETS TOTAL
----------- ----------- ---------------- -----------
December 31, 1997:
Revenue................................... $ 582,819 $1,176,330 $ -- $ 1,759,149
Gross margin before depreciation and
amortization............................ 124,926 628,395 -- 753,321
December 31, 1998:
Revenue................................... 4,114,934 7,294,757 -- 11,409,691
Gross margin before depreciation and
amortization............................ (1,674,316) 2,272,189 -- 597,873
Segment assets............................ 1,263,428 1,762,319 51,464 3,077,211
December 31, 1999:
Revenue................................... 10,789,476 2,684,751 -- 13,474,227
Gross margin before depreciation and
amortization............................ (495,100) 1,356,106 -- 861,006
Segment assets............................ 48,094,028 179,772 16,016,779 64,290,579
Information regarding the Company's domestic and foreign revenues are as
follows:
DOMESTIC FOREIGN TOTAL
---------- ---------- -----------
Fiscal 1997.............................................. $ 867,349 $ 891,800 $ 1,759,149
Fiscal 1998.............................................. 2,886,231 8,523,460 11,409,691
Fiscal 1999.............................................. 3,688,006 9,786,221 13,474,227
No individual foreign country represented more than 10 percent of revenue or
long-lived assets for any of the periods presented.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In January 2000, the Company entered into a renewable one-year agreement
with another entity to provide Internet content to the Company's customers.
InterPacket will receive a percentage of the revenue earned by this provider and
discounted usage fees after a minimum threshold level is reached.
On January 26, 2000, the Board increased the authorized number of shares
available for grant under the 1998 Stock Option Plan to 10.1 million and
increased the authorized number of shares available for grant under the 1999
Director Stock Option Plan to 1,210,000. The Board also amended the option terms
of several executives to accelerate vesting with an extended exercise period
under specified circumstances such as a change in control. The amended 1998
Stock Option Plan provides that upon a change in control 50 percent of the
unvested options outstanding immediately prior to such change accelerate and
become
F-21
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (CONTINUED)
fully vested, unless the employee is provided with replacement options. The
vesting periods were extended to three years for new options issued under the
1999 Director Stock Option Plan and to four years for new options issued under
the 1998 Stock Option Plan. The Board also approved to increase the authorized
number of common shares to 250 million and to adopt a 401(k) plan for the
benefit of the Company's employees.
Effective February 1, 2000, the Company signed an employment agreement with
a new executive. The agreement provides for the continuation of salary in the
event of termination without cause. This executive was allowed to purchase
132,000 shares of common stock at $2.27 per share. The compensation charge
related to this stock purchase is estimated at $1.5 million.
13. EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO THE AUDITORS' REPORT (UNAUDITED)
In March 2000, the Company entered into a software license and consulting
agreement for development of software that enables live and on-demand streaming
media delivery over the InterPacket network. The project is estimated to cost
$2.4 million dollars and out of pocket expenses plus a per copy license fee.
The Company has entered into new leases for satellite transponder space and
related facilities under various agreements expiring through March 2005
resulting in aggregate lease payments of approximately $19.1 million.
Through March 27, 2000, the Company has granted an additional 1,312,300
stock options at $2.27, 262,900 stock options at $3.64 and 537,900 stock options
at $6.82. The estimated compensation charge related to the option grants will be
approximately $15.6 million over a three to four-year vesting period assuming a
$11 offering price. Also, 341,760 stock options were exercised and 734,061 stock
options were canceled.
As of March 6, 2000, the Company entered into a separation agreement and
mutual release with an executive of the Company. Under this agreement, the
executive relinquished his right to purchase 660,000 shares pursuant to stock
options. He also agreed to a new vesting schedule with respect to certain other
options that he holds. Under that schedule, options to purchase 220,000 shares
are immediately exercisable; options to purchase 220,000 shares will vest on
June 6, 2000, if he has performed under a consulting agreement and options to
purchase 26,400 shares will vest on the commencement of an extension to his
consulting agreement. Additionally, an option to purchase 193,600 shares will
vest monthly from October 2000 through June 2003 if he and InterPacket agree to
extend his consulting agreement beyond October 2000.
F-22
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of InterPacket Networks, Inc. and
Subsidiary:
We have audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in
the United States the consolidated financial statements of InterPacket
Networks, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1998 and 1999 and for the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1999, included in this Registration
Statement on Form S-1, and have issued our report thereon dated February 11,
2000. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule of valuation
and qualifying accounts is the responsibility of the Company's management and is
presented for the purpose of complying with the Securities and Exchange
Commission's rules and is not part of the basic consolidated financial
statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied
in the audits of the basic consolidated financial statements and, in our
opinion, fairly states, in all material respects, the financial data required to
be set forth therein in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements
taken as a whole.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 11, 2000
F-23
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
SCHEDULE II--VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
BALANCE AT BALANCE
BEGINNING AT END OF
OF PERIOD PROVISION WRITE-OFF PERIOD
---------- ----------- --------- -----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Year ended December 31, 1997................. $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
Year ended December 31, 1998................. $ -- $ 16,600 $ -- $ 16,600
Year ended December 31, 1999................. $ 16,600 $ 183,600 $ (60,000) $ 140,200
Deferred tax valuation allowance
Year ended December 31, 1997................. $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
Year ended December 31, 1998................. $ -- $ (480,913) $ -- $ (480,913)
Year ended December 31, 1999................. $(480,913) $(3,403,106) $ -- $(3,884,019)
Receivable from related party
Year ended December 31, 1997................. $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
Year ended December 31, 1998................. $ -- $ 63,400 $ -- $ 63,400
Year ended December 31, 1999................. $ 63,400 $ -- $ (63,400) $ --
F-24
[INSIDE BACK COVER]
[POWERED BY ESPRESSO-REGISTERED TRADEMARK-
GRAPHIC AND DESIGN]
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6,500,000 Shares
[LOGO]
Common Stock
-----------------
PROSPECTUS
-----------------
CHASE H&Q LEHMAN BROTHERS
CIBC WORLD MARKETS
-----------------
, 2000
-----------------
You should rely only on information contained in this prospectus. We have
not authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that
contained in this prospectus. We are offering to sell, and seeking offers to
buy, shares of common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are
permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is current only as of
the date of this prospectus.
Until , 2000 (25 days after the date of this prospectus), all
dealers that buy, sell or trade in the securities in this offering, whether or
not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus.
This is in addition to the dealers' obligation to deliver a prospectus when
acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or
subscriptions.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 13. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION
The following table sets forth the various expenses and costs (other than
underwriting discounts and commissions) we expect to incur in connection with
our sale and distribution of the securities being registered. All of the amounts
shown are estimated except the registration fee of the SEC and the NASD filing
fee.
ITEM AMOUNT
- ---- ----------
SEC registration fee........................................ $ 23,681
NASD filing fee............................................. 9,470
Blue sky fees and expenses.................................. 5,000
Printing and engraving expenses............................. 150,000
Legal fees and expenses..................................... 300,000
Accounting fees and expenses................................ 400,000
Transfer agent and registrar fees........................... 15,000
Miscellaneous............................................... 96,849
----------
Total..................................................... $1,000,000
==========
ITEM 14. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Our certificate of incorporation provides that our directors shall not be
personally liable to InterPacket or our stockholders for monetary damages for
any breach of fiduciary duty as a director, to the fullest extent permitted by
law, except to the extent such exemption from liability is not permitted under
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "GCL"). Further, our
bylaws provide that we shall, to the maximum extent permitted by law, indemnify
our directors and officers and may indemnify our employees and other agents.
Subsection (a) of Section 145 of the GCL empowers a corporation to indemnify
any director or officer, or former director or officer, who was or is a party or
is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action,
suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative
(other than an action by or in the right of the corporation), against expenses
(including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement
actually and reasonably incurred in connection with such action, suit or
proceeding provided that such director or officer acted in good faith and in a
manner reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the
corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, provided
that such director or officer had no cause to believe his or her conduct was
unlawful.
Subsection (b) of Section 145 of the GCL empowers a corporation to indemnify
any director or officer, or former director or officer, who was or is a party or
is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action
or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor
by reason of the fact that such person acted in any of the capacities set forth
above, against expenses actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the
defense or settlement of such action or suit, provided that such director or
officer acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not
opposed to the best interests of the corporation, except that no indemnification
may be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such director
or officer shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and
only to the extent that the Court of Chancery or the court in which such action
was brought shall determine that despite the adjudication of liability such
director or officer is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such
expenses which the court shall deem proper.
II-1
Section 145 of the GCL further provides that to the extent a director or
officer of a corporation has been successful in the defense of any action, suit
or proceeding referred to in subsections (a) and (b) or in the defense of any
claim, issue or matter therein, he or she shall be indemnified against expenses
(including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in
connection therewith; that indemnification provided for by Section 145 shall not
be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which the indemnified party may be
entitled; and that the corporation shall have power to purchase and maintain
insurance on behalf of a director or officer of the corporation against any
liability asserted against him or her or incurred by him or her in any such
capacity or arising out of his or her status as such whether or not the
corporation would have the power to indemnify him or her against such
liabilities under Section 145.
We have also entered into indemnification agreements with each of our
directors and officers. The indemnification agreements may require us, among
other things, to indemnify our directors and officers against certain
liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or
officers (other than liabilities arising from willful misconduct of a culpable
nature), to advance their expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding
against them as to which they could be indemnified, and to obtain directors' and
officers' insurance if available on reasonable terms.
Reference is also made to our Underwriting Agreement contained in
Exhibit 1.1 hereto, which indemnifies our directors and officers against certain
liabilities.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities under the Securities Act may be
permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling InterPacket pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the SEC,
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act
and is therefore unenforceable.
ITEM 15. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
Since January 1997, we have granted or issued and sold the following
unregistered securities:
(a) In June 1997, we issued and sold 3,704,800 shares of our common stock
to Peter S. Zimble for an aggregate purchase price of $70,000.
(b) In September 1997, we issued and sold 220,000 shares of our common stock
to Julie M. Spira for an aggregate purchase price of $5,000.
(c) In April 1998, we issued and sold a total of 937,895 shares of our
common stock to Joseph T. Arsenio and the Delaware Charter Guarantee &
Trust Co., as trustee for Joseph T. Arsenio, for an aggregate purchase
price of $250,000.
(d) In April 1999, we issued and sold a total of 4,419,500 shares of our
common stock to certain accredited investors for an aggregate purchase
price of $4,519,928.
(e) In August 1999, we issued and sold 74,307 shares of our common stock to
Joseph T. Arsenio for an aggregate purchase price of $75,997.
(f) In September 1999, we issued and sold a total of 3,258,074 shares of
our common stock to certain accredited investors for an aggregate
purchase price of $6,664,242.
(g) In November 1999, we issued and sold a total of 3,000,000 shares of our
Series A Preferred Stock to certain accredited investors for an aggregate
purchase price of $15,000,000. The preferred stock will convert
automatically into 6,600,000 shares of common stock once this
Registration Statement is declared effective.
(h) In December 1999, we issued and sold a total of 146,663 shares of our
shares of our common stock to Joseph T. Arsenio and Delaware Charter
Guarantee & Trust Co., as trustee for Joseph T. Arsenio, and as trustee
for Meredith M. Arsenio, for an aggregate purchase price of $299,996.
II-2
(i) In February 2000, we issued and sold a total of 132,000 shares of our
common stock to Timothy F. Sylvester for a purchase price of $300,000.
(j) Through March 27, 2000, we have granted options to purchase an
aggregate of 8,384,750 shares of our common stock, at a weighted average
exercise price of $2.30, to directors, officers and employees pursuant to
our 1998 Stock Option Plan and our 1999 Director Stock Option Plan.
The issuances of the securities in the transactions above were exempt from
registration under the Securities Act pursuant to (1) Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act or Regulation D promulgated thereunder as transactions by an
issuer not involving a public offering, where the purchasers represented their
intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view to
distribution and received or had access to adequate information about
InterPacket or (2) Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions
pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan or a written contract relating to
compensation. No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection
with these sales, appropriate legends were affixed to the stock certificates
issued in these transactions and there was no general solicitation or
advertising.
ITEM 16. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(A) EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
- --------------------- -----------
1.1 Form of Underwriting Agreement.
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation, as currently in effect.*
3.2 Bylaws, as currently in effect.*
5.1 Opinion of Riordan & McKinzie, a Professional Law
Corporation.
9.1 Voting Agreement and Irrevocable Proxy dated as of November
12, 1999 between InterPacket Networks, Inc. and Jeffrey
Sudikoff.*
10.1 Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan of InterPacket
Networks, Inc.*
10.2 Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the Amended
and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan of InterPacket Networks,
Inc.*
10.3 Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the
Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan of InterPacket
Networks, Inc.*
10.4 Amended and Restated 1999 Director Stock Option Plan of
InterPacket Networks, Inc.*
10.5 Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the
Amended and Restated 1999 Director Stock Option Plan of
InterPacket Networks, Inc.*
10.6 Employment Agreement dated as of July 1, 1999 by and between
Jonathan L. Gans and InterPacket Networks, Inc.*
10.7 Promissory Note dated June 1, 1999 by Peter Zimble in favor
of InterPacket Networks, Inc.
10.8 Sublease dated as of February 1, 2000 by and between Rysher
Entertainment, Inc. and InterPacket Networks, Inc.
10.9 Consent to Sublease MGM Plaza dated as of March 17, 2000 by
and between Colorado Place Partners, LLC, Rysher
Entertainment, Inc. and InterPacket Networks, Inc.
10.10 Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 1999 by and
between Julie M. Spira and InterPacket Networks, Inc.*
10.11 Employment Agreement dated as of February 1, 2000 by and
between Timothy F. Sylvester and InterPacket Networks, Inc.*
10.12 Secured Promissory Note dated as of February 1, 2000 by
Timothy F. Sylvester in favor of InterPacket Networks, Inc.*
II-3
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
- --------------------- -----------
10.13 Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Agreement dated as of
November 12, 1999 among InterPacket Networks, Inc. and each
of the entities listed on the Schedule of Purchasers
attached thereto as Exhibit A.*
10.14 Form of Indemnification Agreement between InterPacket
Networks, Inc. and each director and executive officer.*
10.15 Standard Office Lease--Gross dated as of January 1, 1999 by
and between 1901 Main Street Partners, LLC and InterPacket
Networks, Inc.*
10.16 Contract dated as of September 1, 1999 by and between
Satelites Mexicanos, S.A. DE C.V. and InterPacket Networks,
Inc.*+
10.17 Form of Stock Subscription Agreement used in InterPacket
Networks, Inc.'s April and September 1999 private offerings.
10.18 Investor Rights Agreement dated as of November 12, 1999
among InterPacket Networks, Inc. and certain stockholders.*
10.19 Agreement dated as of January 19, 2000 by and between
InterPacket Networks, Inc. and iBEAM Broadcasting
Corporation.+
10.20 Software License and Consulting Services Agreement dated as
of March 20, 2000 by and between InterPacket Networks, Inc.
and RealNetworks, Inc.+
10.21 Separation Agreement and Release dated as of March 6, 2000
by and between InterPacket Networks, Inc. and Peter
Hirshberg.
10.22 Consulting Services Agreement dated as of March 6, 2000 by
and between InterPacket Networks, Inc. and Peter Hirshberg.
21 Subsidiaries.*
23.1 Consent of Riordan & McKinzie (included in Exhibit 5.1).
23.2 Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP.
24 Powers of Attorney.*
27 Financial Data Schedule.*
99.1 Consent of International Data Corporation.
- ------------------------
* Previously filed by InterPacket Networks, Inc. with the SEC on February 18,
2000 as an exhibit to this Registration Statement on Form S-1.
+ Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted from the copy filed as
part of InterPacket Networks, Inc.'s Registration Statement and are the
subject of a request for confidentiality.
(B) FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following schedule is filed as part of this Registration Statement:
Schedule II--InterPacket Networks, Inc.--Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.
All other schedules are omitted since the required information is not
present in amounts sufficient to require submission of any schedule, or because
the information required is included in the financial statements or the notes
thereto.
ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the
registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant
has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act
and is, therefore,
II-4
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such
liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or
paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction
the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication
of such issue.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriter
at the closing specified in the underwriting agreements certificates in such
denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriter to
permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act,
the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this
registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or
497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this
registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities
Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall
be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities
offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be
deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-5
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the Registrant has duly
caused this Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Santa Monica,
State of California, on the 7th day of April 2000.
INTERPACKET NETWORKS, INC.
By: /s/ JONATHAN L. GANS
-----------------------------------------
Jonathan L. Gans
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, this Registration
Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
Chief Executive Officer,
/s/ JONATHAN L. GANS President and Director
------------------------------------------- (Principal Executive April 7, 2000
Jonathan L. Gans Officer)
/s/ ALLEN J. SCIARILLO Chief Financial Officer
------------------------------------------- (Principal Financial and April 7, 2000
Allen J. Sciarillo Chief Accounting Officer)
*
------------------------------------------- Chairman of the Board April 7, 2000
Norman J. Pattiz and Director
*
------------------------------------------- Director April 7, 2000
Jeffrey C. Barbakow
*
------------------------------------------- Director April 7, 2000
Brent Cohen
*
------------------------------------------- Director April 7, 2000
James E. Kolsrud
/s/ LAWRENCE D. LENIHAN, JR.
------------------------------------------- Director April 7, 2000
Lawrence D. Lenihan, Jr.
*By: /s/ JONATHAN L. GANS
--------------------------------------
Jonathan L. Gans
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT