UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(x) Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2000
or
( ) Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission file number: 0-18215

JOHN W. HENRY & CO./MILLBURN L.P.
---------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE 06-1287586
------------------------------- --------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

C/O MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT PARTNERS INC.
PRINCETON CORPORATE CAMPUS
800 SCUDDERS MILL ROAD - SECTION 2G
PLAINSBORO, NEW JERSEY 08536
----------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (609) 282-6996

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: None

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: Limited Partnership
Units

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
----- ----

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [X]

Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates of the registrant: the registrant is a limited partnership; as of
February 1, 2001, limited partnership units with an aggregate value of
$28,988,925 were outstanding and held by non-affiliates.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The registrant's "2000 Annual Report and Independent Auditors' Report," the
annual report to security holders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000,
is incorporated by reference into Part II, Item 8 and Part IV hereof and filed
as an Exhibit herewith.

JOHN W. HENRY & CO./MILLBURN L.P.

ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2000 ON FORM 10-K

Table of Contents
-----------------

PART I PAGE
------
----

Item 1. Business...................................................................................... 1

Item 2. Properties.................................................................................... 5

Item 3. Legal Proceedings............................................................................. 5

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders........................................... 5

PART II
-------

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters......................... 5

Item 6. Selected Financial Data....................................................................... 6

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations......... 11

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.................................... 15

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................................................... 21

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.......... 22

PART III
--------

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant............................................ 22

Item 11. Executive Compensation........................................................................ 24

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management................................ 24

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions................................................ 24

PART IV
-------

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K............................... 26

PART I

ITEM 1: BUSINESS

(a) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS:

John W. Henry & Co./Millburn L.P. (the "Partnership") was
organized under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act on August
29, 1989. The original public offering of the Partnership's units of limited
partnership interest (the "Series A Units") commenced on September 29, 1989, and
the Partnership commenced trading with respect to the Series A Units on January
5, 1990. A second public offering of Series B Units of limited partnership (the
"Series B Units") commenced on December 14, 1990. The Partnership began trading
with respect to the Series B Units on January 28, 1991. A third public offering
of Series C Units of limited partnership (the "Series C Units") commenced on
September 13, 1991. The Partnership began trading with respect to the Series C
Units on January 2, 1992. The Partnership's objective is achieving, through
speculative trading, substantial capital appreciation over time.

The proceeds of each of the three series of Units were each
initially allocated equally between the Partnership's two trading advisors --
John W. Henry & Company, Inc. ("JWH") and Millburn Ridgefield Corporation
("Millburn") (collectively, the "Advisors").

Merrill Lynch Investment Partners Inc. ("MLIP") acts as the
general partner of the Partnership. Merrill Lynch Futures Inc. ("MLF") is the
Partnership's commodity broker. MLIP is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merrill
Lynch Group Inc., which, in turn, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merrill
Lynch & Co., Inc. ("Merrill Lynch"). MLF is an indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of Merrill Lynch. MLIP, an indirect subsidiary of Merrill Lynch,
became a member of Merrill Lynch Investment Managers ("MLIM") - Alternative
Investments Group during October 2000. MLIM's Alternative Investments Group
creates and manages a variety of alternative investment products, including
managed futures funds, hedge funds, funds of funds, exchange funds and
private equity funds. MLIP is currently intending to convert to a Delaware
limited liability company to be named MLIM Alternative Strategies LLC. This
conversion is expected to occur in 2001.

JWH and Millburn (together, the "Advisors") have been the
Partnership's only trading advisors since inception. Each Advisor was
allocated 50% of the total assets of each Series as of the date such Series
began trading. Subsequently, these allocations have varied over time, but
have been periodically rebalanced to 50%/50%. All series have the same
percentage allocation of assets between the Advisors. As of December 31,
2000, 52% of the capital of each series of units was allocated to JWH and 48%
was allocated to Millburn. As of December 1, 1996, the Partnership placed all
of its assets under the management of the Advisors through investing in two
private limited liability companies ("Trading LLCs") sponsored by MLIP, each
one of which was traded by one of the Advisors. Investing assets in the
Trading LLCs rather than trading directly did not change the operation or fee
structure of the Partnership. The administrative authority over the
Partnership remains with MLIP.

As of December 31, 2000, the aggregate capitalization of the
Partnership was $29,423,145, the total capitalization of the Series A, Series B
and Series C Units was $7,499,854, $14,058,715 and $7,864,576, respectively, and
the Net Asset Value per Series A, Series B and Series C Units, originally $100
as of January 5, 1990, January 28, 1991 and January 2, 1992, respectively, had
risen to $258.05 (excluding a $20 per Series A Unit distribution paid as of
November 30, 1990), $209.67 and $163.40, respectively.

The highest month-end Net Asset Value per Series A Unit through
December 31, 2000 was $339.42 (June 30, 1999 adding back a $20 distribution
paid in 1990) and the lowest $100.31 (May 31, 1990); the highest month-end Net
Asset Value per Series B Unit through December 31, 2000 was $259.56 (June 30,
1999) and the lowest $91.20 (May 31, 1992); the highest month-end Net Asset
Value per Series C Unit through December 31, 2000 was $202.28 (June 30, 1999)
and the lowest $75.87 (May 31, 1992).

-1-

(b) FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT SEGMENTS:

The Partnership's business constitutes only one segment for
financial reporting purposes, i.e., a speculative "commodity pool." The
Partnership does not engage in sales of goods or services.

GENERAL

The Partnership trades (currently through its investment in the
Trading LLCs) in the international futures, options on futures and forward
markets with the objective of achieving substantial capital appreciation.

The Partnership has entered into advisory agreements with each
Advisor (the "Advisory Agreement"). JWH trades the Partnership's assets
allocated to it in four market sectors -- interest rates, stock indices,
currencies and metals -- pursuant to its Financial and Metals Program. Millburn
trades the Partnership's assets allocated to it pursuant to its currency
program, which concentrates exclusively on currency trading, primarily in the
interbank market.

One of the objectives of the Partnership is to provide
diversification to a limited portion of the risk segment of the Limited
Partners' portfolios. Commodity pool performance has historically often
demonstrated a low degree of performance correlation with traditional stock and
bond holdings. Since it began trading, the Partnership's returns have, in fact,
frequently been significantly non-correlated with the United States stock and
bond markets.

The Partnership accesses the Advisors not by opening individual
managed accounts with them, but rather through investing in private funds
sponsored by MLIP through which the trading accounts of different
MLIP-sponsored funds managed by the same Advisor and pursuant to the same
strategy are consolidated.

USE OF PROCEEDS AND INTEREST INCOME

MARKET SECTORS.

Under the direction of the two Advisors, the Partnership trades a
portfolio which is concentrated in the financial, currency and metals markets.
The limited focus of the Partnership's trading increases volatility and market
risk.

MARKET TYPES.

The Partnership trades on a variety of United States and foreign
futures exchanges. Substantially all of the Partnership's off-exchange trading
takes place in the highly liquid, institutionally-based currency forward
markets.

Many of the Partnership's currency trades are executed in the
spot and forward foreign exchange markets (the "FX Markets") where there are no
direct execution costs. Instead, the participants, banks and dealers, in the FX
Markets take a "spread" between the prices at which they are prepared to buy
and sell a particular currency and such spreads are built into the pricing of
the spot or forward contracts with the Partnership. In its exchange of futures
for physical ("EFP") trading, the Partnership acquires cash currency positions
through banks and dealers. The Partnership pays a spread when it exchanges these
positions for futures. This spread reflects, in part, the different settlement
dates of the cash and the futures contracts, as well as prevailing interest
rates, but also includes a pricing spread in favor of the banks and dealers,
which may include a Merrill Lynch entity.

-2-

As in the case of its market sector allocations, the Partnership's
commitments to different types of markets -- U.S. and non-U.S., regulated and
unregulated -- differ substantially from time to time, as well as over time. The
Partnership has no policy restricting its relative commitment to any of these
different types of markets.

CUSTODY OF ASSETS.

All of the Partnership's assets are currently held in customer
accounts at Merrill Lynch.

INTEREST PAID BY MERRILL LYNCH ON THE PARTNERSHIP'S U.S. DOLLAR
AND NON U.S. DOLLAR ASSETS.

The Partnership's U.S. dollar assets are maintained at MLF. On
assets held in U.S. dollars, Merrill Lynch credits the Partnership with
interest at the prevailing 91-day U.S. Treasury bill rate. The Partnership is
credited with interest on any of its net gains actually held by Merrill Lynch
in non-U.S. dollar currencies at a prevailing local rate received by Merrill
Lynch. Merrill Lynch may derive certain economic benefit, in excess of the
interest which Merrill Lynch pays to the Partnership, from possession of such
assets.

Merrill Lynch charges the Partnership Merrill Lynch's cost of
financing realized and unrealized losses on the Partnership's non-U.S.
dollar-denominated positions.

CHARGES

Each of the series of Units is subject to the same charges.
However, these charges are calculated separately with respect to each Series,
each of which maintains its own Net Asset Value.

During 2000 and 1999, all of the Partnership's assets were
invested in the two Trading LLCs mentioned above. Therefore, no direct charges
were incurred by the Partnership during these two years.

The Fund's average month-end Net Assets during 2000, 1999 and 1998
equaled $30,694,862, $51,197,421 and $56,223,504, respectively.

The Partnership pays brokerage commissions to MLF at a flat
monthly rate of .708 of 1% (a 8.50% annual rate) of the Partnership's month-end
assets. Prior to October 1, 2000, the rate was .792 of 1% (a 9.50% annual rate),
and the Partnership pays MLIP a monthly administrative fee of .021 of 1% (a .25%
annual rate) of the Partnership's month-end assets.

-3-

DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CHARGES
RECIPIENT NATURE OF PAYMENT AMOUNT OF PAYMENT

MLF Brokerage Commissions A flat-rate monthly commission of 0.708
of 1% of the Partnership's month-end
assets (a 8.50% annual rate). Prior to
October 1, 2000, the rate was 0.792 of
1% (a 9.50% annual rate).

MLIP estimates that the round-turn
equivalent rates charged to ML Millburn
Global L.L.C. (Millburn LLC) during the
years ended 2000, 1999 and 1998 were
approximately $324, $461 and $151, respectively.
MLIP estimates that the round-turn
equivalent rates charged to ML JWH Financial
and Metals Portfolio L.L.C. ("JWH
LLC") during the years ended 2000, 1999
and 1998 were approximately $146, $316 and
$133, respectively.

MLF Use of Partnership assets Merrill Lynch may derive an economic benefit
from the deposit of certain of the
Partnership's U.S. dollar assets.

MLIP Administrative Fees The Partnership pays MLIP a monthly
Administrative Fee equal to 0.020833 of
1% of the Partnership's month-end assets
(0.25% annually). MLIP pays all of the
Partnership's routine administrative
costs.

Other Bid-ask spreads Bid-ask spreads on forward and related trades.
Counterparties

Advisors Profit Shares Profit shares of 20% of any New Trading
Profit, either as of the end of each
calendar quarter or year, achieved by
each Advisor's Fund account,
individually, were paid to JWH and
Millburn, respectively. Profit Shares are
also paid upon redemption of Units. New
Trading Profit is calculated separately
in respect of each Advisor, irrespective
of the overall performance of the Partnership.
Prior to October 1, 2000, JWH's rate was
15%.

Advisors Consulting Fees MLF pays the Advisors annual consulting fees
of 2% of the average month-end assets allocated
to them for management. JWH agreed to reduce
its consulting fee from 4% to 2% as of October 1, 2000.

MLF; Extraordinary expenses Actual costs incurred; none paid to date.
Others

-4-

REGULATION

MLIP, the Advisors and MLF are each subject to regulation by
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the "CFTC") and the National Futures
Association. Other than in respect of its periodic reporting requirements under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Partnership itself is generally not
subject to regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission. However, MLIP
itself is registered as an "investment adviser" under the Investment Advisers
Act of 1940.

(i) through (xii)-- not applicable.
(xiii) The Partnership has no employees.

(d) FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT GEOGRAPHIC AREAS

The Partnership trades on a number of foreign commodity exchanges.
The Partnership does not engage in the sales of goods or services.

ITEM 2: PROPERTIES

The Partnership does not use any physical properties in the
conduct of its business.

The Partnership's only place of business is the place of business
of MLIP (Princeton Corporate Campus, 800 Scudders Mill Road - Section 2G,
Plainsboro, New Jersey 08536). MLIP performs all administrative services for the
Partnership from MLIP's offices.

ITEM 3: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Merrill Lynch, the sole stockholder of Merrill Lynch Group, Inc.
(which is the sole stockholder of MLIP and MLF and the 100% indirect owner of
all Merrill Lynch entities involved in the operation of the Partnership) as well
as certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates have been named as defendants in
civil actions, arbitration proceedings and claims arising out of their
respective business activities. Although the ultimate outcome of these actions
cannot be predicted at this time and the results of legal proceedings cannot be
predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management that the result of
these matters will not be materially adverse to the business operations or
financial condition of MLIP or the Partnership.

MLIP itself has never been the subject of any material litigation.

ITEM 4: SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

The Partnership has never submitted any matter to a vote of its
Limited Partners.

PART II

ITEM 5: MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Item 5(a)

(a) MARKET INFORMATION:

There is no established public trading market for the Units, nor
will one develop. Rather, Limited Partners may redeem Units as of the end of
each month at Net Asset Value.

-5-

(b) HOLDERS:

As of December 31, 2000, there were 264, 781 and 390 holders of
the Series A, B and C Units, respectively, including MLIP.

The Partnership has made only one distribution ($20 per Series A
Unit payable as of November 30, 1990) since trading commenced. MLIP does not
presently intend to make any further distributions.

Item 5(b)
Not applicable.

ITEM 6: SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected financial data has been derived from the
audited financial statements of the Partnership.

FOR THE YEAR FOR THE YEAR FOR THE YEAR FOR THE YEAR FOR THE YEAR
ENDED ENDED ENDED ENDED ENDED
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
INCOME STATEMENT DATA 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Revenues:
Trading Profits (Loss)
Realized $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,749,410
Change in Unrealized - - - - (1,760,218)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Trading Results - - - - 6,989,192
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest Income - - - - 1,842,887
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Revenues - - - - 8,832,079
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expenses:
Brokerage Commissions - - - - 5,406,851
Administrative Fees - - - - 115,039
Profit Shares - - - - 97,468
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Expenses - - - - 5,619,358
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (Loss) from Investments (2,426,515) (6,145,111) 1,867,451 7,357,688 7,171,609
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income (Loss) $ (2,426,515) $ (6,145,111) $ 1,867,451 $ 7,357,688 $ 10,384,330
=============================================================================

DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
BALANCE SHEET DATA 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Partnership Net Asset Value $29,423,145 $42,876,172 $56,163,313 $63,024,164 $60,834,088
Net Asset Value per Series A Unit $258.05 $260.14 $296.13 $284.11 $252.54
Net Asset Value per Series B Unit $209.67 $211.47 $240.61 $230.87 $205.27
Net Asset Value per Series C Unit $163.40 $164.80 $187.52 $179.92 $159.97

Variations in income statement line items are due to investing assets in the
Trading LLCs.

-6-

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MONTH-END NET ASSET VALUE PER SERIES A UNIT
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1996 $231.67 $209.48 $205.35 $213.42 $204.22 $207.21 $206.87 $201.95 $208.39 $237.92 $255.50 $252.54
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 $273.52 $270.58 $267.94 $261.04 $251.03 $257.22 $283.93 $270.03 $274.52 $273.84 $277.30 $284.11
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1998 $281.00 $268.85 $270.14 $248.62 $257.02 $249.67 $238.22 $270.01 $305.92 $298.60 $280.52 $296.13
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 $287.86 $291.22 $288.12 $297.02 $303.11 $319.42 $310.07 $302.24 $289.40 $263.84 $261.74 $260.14
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 $255.72 $238.38 $230.44 $230.52 $221.13 $201.51 $199.30 $197.17 $189.80 $203.48 $220.58 $258.05
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MONTH-END NET ASSET VALUE PER SERIES B UNIT
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1996 $188.93 $171.14 $167.47 $173.94 $166.31 $168.64 $168.41 $164.21 $169.49 $193.51 $207.63 $205.27
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 $222.32 $219.93 $217.78 $212.17 $204.08 $209.10 $230.77 $219.46 $223.11 $222.53 $225.33 $230.87
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1998 $228.36 $218.48 $219.55 $202.07 $208.90 $202.93 $193.60 $219.40 $248.57 $242.64 $227.97 $240.61
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 $233.92 $236.65 $234.15 $241.40 $246.31 $259.56 $251.96 $245.60 $235.20 $214.43 $212.74 $211.47
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 $207.89 $193.79 $187.32 $187.37 $179.72 $163.78 $161.98 $160.25 $154.25 $165.39 $179.25 $209.67
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MONTH-END NET ASSET VALUE PER SERIES C UNIT
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1996 $147.90 $133.80 $130.88 $135.93 $129.91 $131.79 $131.69 $128.12 $132.22 $150.96 $161.74 $159.97
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 $173.26 $171.40 $169.73 $165.35 $159.04 $162.96 $179.85 $171.03 $173.88 $173.43 $175.61 $179.92
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1998 $177.97 $170.27 $171.11 $157.48 $162.80 $158.15 $150.88 $170.99 $193.72 $189.10 $177.67 $187.52
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 $182.30 $184.43 $182.48 $188.13 $191.96 $202.28 $196.36 $191.41 $183.30 $ 167.12 $165.80 $164.80
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 $162.02 $151.03 $145.99 $146.03 $140.07 $127.64 $126.24 $124.89 $120.24 $ 128.90 $139.70 $163.40
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pursuant to CFTC policy, monthly performance is presented from January 1, 1996
even though all Series were outstanding prior to such date.

-7-

JOHN W. HENRY & CO./MILLBURN L.P.
(SERIES A UNITS)
DECEMBER 31, 2000

TYPE OF POOL: Selected-Advisor/Publicly-Offered/Non-"Principal Protected"(1)
INCEPTION OF TRADING: January 5, 1990
AGGREGATE SUBSCRIPTIONS: $18,182,000
CURRENT CAPITALIZATION: $7,499,854
WORST MONTHLY DRAWDOWN(2):(9.58)% (2/96)
WORST PEAK-TO-VALLEY DRAWDOWN(3):(40.59)% (7/99-9/00)

NET ASSET VALUE PER SERIES A UNIT, DECEMBER 31, 2000: $258.05

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MONTHLY RATES OF RETURN(4)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Month 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

January (1.70)% (2.79)% (1.09)% 8.31% 10.17%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
February (6.78) 1.17 (4.32) (1.07) (9.58)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
March (3.33) (1.06) 0.48 (0.98) (1.97)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
April 0.03 3.09 (7.97) (2.58) 3.93
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
May (4.07) 2.05 3.38 (3.83) (4.31)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
June (8.87) 5.38 (2.86) 2.47 1.46
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July (1.10) (2.93) (4.58) 10.38 (0.17)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
August (1.07) (2.53) 13.34 (4.90) (2.38)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September (3.74) (4.25) 13.30 1.66 3.19
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October 7.21 (8.83) (2.39) (0.25) 14.17
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 8.40 (0.80) (6.05) 1.26 7.39
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 16.99 (0.61) 5.56 2.46 (1.16)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compound Annual (0.81)% (12.15)% 4.24% 12.49% 20.09%
Rate of Return
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Pursuant to applicable CFTC regulations, a "Multi-Advisor"
fund is defined as one that allocates no more than 25% of its trading assets to
any single manager. As the Partnership allocates over 25% of its assets to each
of JWH and Millburn, it is referred to as a "Selected-Advisor" fund. Certain
funds, including funds sponsored by MLIP, are structured so as to guarantee to
investors that their investment will be worth no less than a specified amount
(typically, the initial purchase price) as of a date certain after the date of
investment. The CFTC refers to such funds as "Principal Protected." The
Partnership has no such feature.

(2) Worst monthly Drawdown represents the largest negative monthly
Rate of Return experienced since January 1, 1996 by the Series; a Drawdown is
measured on the basis of month-end Net Asset Value only, and does not reflect
intra-month figures.

(3) Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown represents the greatest
percentage decline since January 1, 1996 from a month-end cumulative monthly
Rate of Return without such cumulative monthly Rate of Return being equaled or
exceeded as of a subsequent month-end. For example, if the monthly Rate of
Return was (1)% in each of January and February, 1% in March and (2)% in April,
the Peak-to-Valley Drawdown would still be continuing at the end of April in the
amount of approximately (3)%, whereas if the monthly Rate of Return had been
approximately 3% in March, the Peak-to-Valley Drawdown would have ended as of
the end of February at approximately the (2)% level.

(4) Monthly Rate of Return is the net performance of the Series
during the month of determination (including interest income and after all
expenses have been accrued or paid) divided by the total equity of the Series as
of the beginning of such month.
-8-

JOHN W. HENRY & CO./MILLBURN L.P.
(SERIES B UNITS)
DECEMBER 31, 2000

TYPE OF POOL: Selected-Advisor/Publicly-Offered/Non-"Principal Protected"(1)
INCEPTION OF TRADING: January 28, 1991
AGGREGATE SUBSCRIPTIONS: $50,636,000
CURRENT CAPITALIZATION: $14,058,715
WORST MONTHLY DRAWDOWN(2): (9.41)% (2/96)
WORST PEAK-TO-VALLEY DRAWDOWN(3):(40.57)% (7/99-9/00)
-------------
NET ASSET VALUE PER SERIES B UNIT, DECEMBER 31, 2000: $209.67

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MONTHLY RATES OF RETURN(4)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MONTH 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

January (1.69)% (2.78)% (1.09) % 8.31% 10.47%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
February (6.78) 1.17 (4.33) (1.08) (9.41)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
March (3.34) (1.06) 0.49 (0.98) (2.14)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
April 0.02 3.10 (7.96) (2.58) 3.86
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
May (4.08) 2.04 3.38 (3.81) (4.38)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
June (8.87) 5.38 (2.86) 2.46 1.40
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July (1.10) (2.93) (4.60) 10.36 (0.14)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
August (1.07) (2.52) 13.33 (4.90) (2.49)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September (3.73) (4.24) 13.30 1.66 3.22
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October 7.20 (8.83) (2.39) (0.26) 14.17
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 8.38 (0.79) (6.05) 1.26 7.30
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 16.97 (0.60) 5.54 2.46 (1.14)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compound Annual
Rate of Return (0.86)% (12.11)% 4.20% 12.46% 20.03%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-9-

JOHN W. HENRY & CO./MILLBURN L.P.
(SERIES C UNITS)
DECEMBER 31, 2000

TYPE OF POOL: Selected-Advisor/Publicly-Offered/Non-"Principal Protected"(1)
INCEPTION OF TRADING: January 2, 1992
AGGREGATE SUBSCRIPTIONS: $40,000,000
CURRENT CAPITALIZATION: $7,864,576
WORST MONTHLY DRAWDOWN(2): (9.54)% (2/96)
WORST PEAK-TO-VALLEY DRAWDOWN(3): (40.57)% (7/99-9/00)
-------------

NET ASSET VALUE PER SERIES C UNIT, DECEMBER 31, 2000: $163.40

January (1.69)% (2.78)% (1.08)% 8.31% 10.52%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
February (6.78) 1.17 (4.33) (1.07) (9.54)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
March (3.34) (1.06) 0.49 (0.97) (2.18)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
April 0.02 3.10 (7.97) (2.58) 3.86
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
May (4.08) 2.04 3.38 (3.82) (4.43)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
June (8.87) 5.38 (2.86) 2.46 1.45
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July (1.10) (2.93) (4.60) 10.36 (0.08)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
August (1.07) (2.52) 13.33 (4.90) (2.71)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September (3.73) (4.24) 13.29 1.67 3.21
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October 7.20 (8.83) (2.38) (0.26) 14.17
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 8.38 (0.79) (6.05) 1.26 7.14
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 16.97 (0.60) 5.54 2.45 (1.09)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compound Annual
Rate of Return (0.86)% (12.11)% 4.20% 12.47% 19.54%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Pursuant to applicable CFTC regulations, a "Multi-Advisor"
fund is defined as one that allocates no more than 25% of its trading assets to
any single manager. As the Partnership allocates approximately 50% of its assets
to each of JWH and Millburn, it is referred to as a "Selected-Advisor" fund.
Certain funds, including funds sponsored by MLIP, are structured so as to
guarantee to investors that their investment will be worth no less than a
specified amount (typically, the initial purchase price) as of a date certain
after the date of investment. The CFTC refers to such funds as "Principal
Protected." The Partnership has no such feature.

(2) Worst monthly Drawdown represents the largest negative
monthly Rate of Return experienced since January 1, 1996 by the Series; a
drawdown is measured on the basis of month-end Net Asset Value only, and does
not reflect intra-month figures.

-10-

(4) Monthly rate of return is the net performance of the series
during the month of determination (including interest income and after all
expenses have been accrued or paid) divided by the total equity of the series as
of the beginning of such month.

ITEM 7: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

GENERAL

JWH and Millburn have been the Partnership's two Advisors since
inception. Although from time to time one of the Advisors is allocated a greater
percentage of the Partnership's assets than the other as a result of
differential performance, MLIP periodically rebalances the Partnership's asset
allocation to approximately 50%/50%.

The Advisors are both trend-following traders, whose programs
do not attempt to predict price movements. No fundamental economic supply or
demand analyses are used by either JWH or Millburn, and no macroeconomic
assessments of the relative strengths of different national economies or
economic sectors. Instead, their programs apply proprietary computer models
to analyzing past market data, and from this data alone attempt to determine
whether market prices are trending. As technical traders, JWH and Millburn
base their strategies on the theory that market prices reflect the collective
judgment of numerous market participants and are, accordingly, the best and
most efficient indication of market movements. However, there are frequent
periods during which fundamental factors external to the market dominate
prices.

If an Advisor's models identify a trend, they signal positions
which follow it. When these models identify the trend as having ended or
reversed, these positions are either closed out or reversed. Due to their
trend-following character, the Advisors' programs do not predict either the
commencement or the end of a price movement. Rather, their objective is to
identify a trend early enough to profit from it and detect its end or reversal
in time to close out the Partnership's positions while retaining most of the
profits made from following the trend.

In analyzing the performance of trend-following programs such as
those implemented by JWH and Millburn, economic conditions, political events,
weather factors, etc., are not directly relevant because only market data has
any input into trading results. Furthermore, there is no direct connection
between particular market conditions and price trends. There are so many
influences on the markets that the same general type of economic event may lead
to a price trend in some cases but not in others. The analysis is further
complicated by the fact that the programs are designed to recognize only certain
types of trends and to apply only certain criteria of when a trend has begun.
Consequently, even though significant price trends may occur, if these trends
are not comprised of the type of intra-period price movements which their
programs are designed to identify, either or both Advisors may miss the trend
altogether.

Performance Summary

This performance summary is an outline description of how the
Partnership performed in the past, not necessarily any indication of how it will
perform in the future. In addition, the general causes to which certain price
movements are attributed may or may not in fact have caused such movements, but
simply occurred at or about the same time.

Both Advisors are unlikely to be profitable in markets in which
such trends do not occur. Static or erratic prices are likely to result in
losses. Similarly, unexpected events (for example, a political upheaval,
natural disaster or governmental intervention) can lead to major short-term
losses, as well as gains.

While there can be no assurance that either Advisor will be
profitable, under any given market condition, markets in which substantial and
sustained price movements occur typically offer the best profit potential for
the Partnership.

-11-

2000

Trading in the currency and interest rate sectors was
profitable for the Partnership in 2000. However, losses sustained in stock
market index and metals sectors more than offset those gains as the
Partnership's overall trading strategy was unprofitable.

Currency trading alternated throughout the year until December,
when most of the gains were realized. The year began with the decline in the
Euro as officials from the Group of Seven met and failed to express concern
about the low levels of the European currency. The Euro's weakness can be
attributed to a number of factors, including the slow pace of microeconomic
reform in Europe, plans for a European withholding tax and the scale of
direct investments outside of Europe. In April, long Swiss franc positions
proved profitable despite interest rate hikes by the Swiss National Bank.
Losses in Japanese yen occurred as the yen finished weaker against the U.S.
dollar in anticipation that the U.S. Federal Reserve would continue to
increase interest rates. The Euro hit all time lows against the U.S. dollar
and the yen in early September despite European Central Bank intervention,
benefiting the Partnership's short Euro positions. December was quite
profitable on the resurgence of the Euro versus both the U.S. dollar and yen
and the weakness of the yen versus the U.S. dollar.

Although profitable at year end, trading in the interest rate
markets was volatile. Losses were realized in the Japanese 10-year bond, U.S.
10-year U.S. Treasury note positions and long U.S. Treasury positions as the
yield curve fluctuated widely during the first quarter. U.S. yields continued to
fall mid year as investors shifted to Treasuries due to increased volatility in
the NASDAQ and other equity markets. Short Euro positions resulted in losses as
the Euro improved after the European Central Bank's 50 basis point repo rate
hike. Japanese government bonds were slightly profitable in the third quarter.
In November and December, gains were realized from Japanese 10-year bond and
U.S. 10-year note trading as uncertainty surrounding the U.S. Presidential
election resulted in investors favoring bond markets over equities.

Stock Index markets trading was unprofitable. Early on,
positions in the FTSE Financial Times Stock Index resulted in profits as the
United Kingdom economy grew at a robust rate and was accompanied by low
inflation. Losses were sustained in Nikkei 225 and S&P 500 positions in the
second quarter, as signs of rising inflation fueled fears that the U.S.
Federal Reserve would continue to raise interest rates to slow the robust
economy. As the Federal Reserve raised rates throughout the year, investors
shifted to the safehaven of Treasuries, away from an increasingly volatile
NASDAQ.

Trading in the metals markets was also unprofitable. Concerns
about higher U.S. interest rates and sharp declines in global equity prices
during January created a somewhat nervous and defensive tone in base metals
trading. Trading in long Copper positions resulted in losses as a Freeport,
Indonesia mine announced output cuts would not be as large as the Indonesian
government forecast. Gold prices dropped in July as a result of the Bank of
England's bullion auction. Nickel prices declined as demand slowed for stainless
steel in Europe and Asia. Gold prices were impacted during December by adverse
currency movements.

Trading results are not included for 2000 because the Partnership
traded exclusively through investing in the Trading LLC's.

1999

The Partnership finished 1999 with gains in currencies and stock
index trading and losses in metals and interest rate trading. Commodities spent
1999 in a transition phase, shifting from bear market trading to more neutral
positions. Lack of demand, particularly in Asia, was the dominant factor in the
overall decline in commodity prices.

-12-

Currency trading produced gains throughout the year. The Bank
of Japan lowered rates to keep their economy sufficiently liquid to allow
fiscal spending to restore some growth to the economy and to drive down the
surging yen. The yen continued to grow and reached a two-year high in the
third quarter. The European Central Bank raised the repo rate in November due
to inflation pressures. On a trade-weighted basis, the Swiss franc ended the
first quarter to close at a seven-month low, mostly as a result of the
stronger U.S. dollar, yet regained strength in November. The Canadian dollar
also underwent similar fluctuations throughout the year.

Stock index trading was profitable for 1999. The Dow Jones
Industrial Average closed above the 10,000 mark for the first time in March,
setting a record for the index. Equity markets rallied worldwide in April and
June. In the second half of the year, the Partnership suffered losses in stock
index positions as trading was mixed due to significant volatility globally.
However, there was profitable trading in the Hang Seng and Nikkei 225 positions
resulting in gains during November and December. This activity depicted evidence
of Japan's stronger than expected recovery coupled with a sudden decline in the
unemployment rate.

Metals trading was mixed for the year as gold played a major part
in the volatility of the metals market. Gold had failed to maintain its status
as a safety vehicle and a monetary asset during the first half of 1999. In early
June, gold had reached its lowest level in over 20 years. A major statement from
the president of the European Central Bank stated that the member banks had
agreed not to expand their gold lending. This sent gold prices sharply higher in
late September. Unfortunately, the Partnership held short positions in gold
futures at that time. Gold prices had stabilized in the fourth quarter following
the price surge. Early in the year, burdensome warehouse stocks and questionable
demand prospects weighed on base metals as aluminum fell to a five-year low and
copper fell to nearly an 11-year low. The economic scenario for Asia, Brazil,
Europe and emerging market nations helped to keep copper and other base metals
on the defensive as demand receded with virtually no supply side response in the
second quarter. A substantial increase in Chinese imports combined with recovery
in the rest of Asia and Europe had significantly improved demand for aluminum
pushing prices higher during December.

Interest rate trading was also volatile as the flight to quality
in the bond market reversed during the first half of 1999 and the Federal
Reserve raised interest rates three times during the year. Early in the year,
interest rate trading proved unprofitable for the Partnership, which was
triggered by the Japanese Trust Fund Bureau's decision to absorb a smaller share
of futures issues, leaving the burden of financing future budget deficits to the
private sector. Interest rate trading did gain strength at mid-year as the
flight to quality in the bond market reversed and concerns about higher interest
rates in the U.S. continued to rattle the financial markets. During the third
quarter, Eurodollar trading generated losses amidst speculation of the
probability of a tightening by the U.S. Federal Reserve, which became evident
with the higher interest rates in their November 16 meeting due to concerns of
inflation. In December, the yield on the 30-year Treasury bond recently
surpassed its October high propelled by inflation worries and fears the Federal
Reserve might tighten further in 2000.

Trading results are not included for 1999 because the Partnership
traded exclusively through investing in the Trading LLC's.

1998

Global interest rate markets provided the Partnership with its
most profitable positions in the first quarter, particularly in European bonds
where an extended bond market rally continued despite an environment of robust
growth in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, as well as a strong
pick up in growth in continental Europe. In the second quarter, swings in the
U.S. dollar and developments in Japan affected bond markets, causing the
Partnership's interest rate trading to result in losses. This was turned around
in the third quarter, as markets worldwide were turned upside down and the
Partnership's non-correlation with general equity and debt markets was strongly
exhibited. Global investors staged a major flight to quality, resulting in a
significant widening of credit spreads on a global basis. In October, investors
pushed the yields on U.S. Treasury bonds to a 31-year low. The long bond

-13-

yield fell about 75 basis points in 1998 as the world economy slowed more than
expected, inflation continued to fall, the anticipated small U.S. budget deficit
turned into substantial surplus, and the Federal Reserve lowered interest rates.

Gold prices began the year drifting sideways, and continued to
weaken following news in the second quarter of a European Central Bank consensus
that ten to fifteen percent of reserves should be made up of gold bullion, which
was at the low end of expectations. Gold was unable to extend third quarter
rallies or to build any significant upside momentum, resulting in a trendless
environment. This was also the case in the fourth quarter, as gold's cost of
production declined. Also, silver markets remained range-bound, while also
experiencing a significant selloff in November, and aluminum traded at its
lowest levels since 1994, with many aluminum smelters operating at a loss.

In currency markets, results early in the year were mixed,
although marginally unprofitable. During the second quarter, the Japanese yen
weakened during June to an eight-year low versus the U.S. dollar. In the third
quarter, Japan's problems spread to other sectors of the global economy, causing
commodities prices to decline as demand from the Asian economies weakened, and
Japan's deepening recession and credit crunch continued through the fourth
quarter.

Trading results in stock index markets were also mixed in early
1998, despite a strong first-quarter performance by the U.S. equity market as
several consecutive weekly gains were recorded with most market averages setting
new highs. Second quarter results were profitable as the Asia-Pacific region's
equity markets weakened across the board. In particular, Hong Kong's Hang Seng
index trended downward during most of the second quarter and traded at a
three-year low. As U.S. equity markets declined in July and August, the
Partnership profited from short positions in the S&P 500, most notably during
August, when the index dropped 14.5%. Volatility in September made for a
difficult trading environment in the stock index sector, and the Partnership
incurred modest losses, although results remained profitable for the quarter and
the year overall in these markets.

Trading results are not included for 1998 because the Partnership
traded exclusively through investing in the Trading LLCs.

VARIABLES AFFECTING PERFORMANCE

The principal variables which determine the net performance of the
Partnership are gross profitability and interest income.

During all periods set forth under "Selected Financial Data," the
interest rates in many countries were at unusually low levels. The low interest
rates in the United States (although higher than in many other countries)
negatively impacted revenues because interest income is typically a major
component of the Partnership's profitability. In addition, low interest rates
are frequently associated with reduced fixed income market volatility, and in
static markets the Partnership's profit potential generally tends to be
diminished. On the other hand, during periods of higher interest rates, the
relative attractiveness of a high risk investment such as the Partnership may be
reduced as compared to high yielding and much lower risk fixed-income
investments.

The Partnership's Brokerage Commissions and Administrative Fees
are a constant percentage of the Partnership's assets allocated to trading. The
only Partnership costs (other than the insignificant currency trading costs)
which are not based on a percentage of the Partnership's assets (allocated to
trading or total) are the Profit Shares payable to each of JWH and Millburn
separately on their individual performance, irrespective of the overall
performance of the Partnership. During periods when Profit Shares are a high
percentage of net trading gains, it is likely that there has been substantial
performance non-correlation between JWH and Millburn (so that the total Profit
Shares paid to the Advisor which has traded profitably are a high percentage, or
perhaps even in excess, of the total profits recognized, as the other Advisor
incurred offsetting losses, reducing overall trading gains but not the Profit
Shares paid to the successful Advisor) -- suggesting the likelihood of generally
trendless, non-consensus markets.

-14-

Unlike many investment fields, there is no meaningful distinction
in the operation of the Partnership between realized and unrealized profits.
Most of the contracts traded by the Partnership are highly liquid and can be
closed out at any time.

Except in unusual circumstances, factors -- regulatory approvals,
cost of goods sold, employee relations and the like -- which often materially
affect an operating business have virtually no impact on the Partnership.

LIQUIDITY; CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Partnership borrows only to a limited extent and only on a
strictly short-term basis in order to finance losses on non-U.S. dollar
denominated trading positions pending the conversion of the Partnership's
U.S. dollar deposits. These borrowings are at a prevailing short-term rate in
the relevant currency.

Substantially all of the Partnership's assets are held in cash.
The Net Asset Value of the Partnership's cash is not affected by inflation.
However, changes in interest rates could cause periods of strong up or down
price trends, during which the Partnership's profit potential generally
increases. Inflation in commodity prices could also generate price movements
which the strategies might successfully follow.

Substantially all of the Partnership's assets are held in cash.
Accordingly, except in very unusual circumstances, the Partnership should be
able to close out any or all of its open trading positions and liquidate any or
all of its securities holdings quickly and at market prices. This permits an
Advisor to limit losses as well as reduce market exposure on short notice should
its strategies indicate doing so. In addition, because there is a readily
available market value for the Partnership's positions and assets, the
Partnership's monthly Net Asset Value calculations are precise, and investors
need only wait ten business days to receive the full redemption proceeds of
their Units.

ITEM 7A: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS.

INTRODUCTION

PAST RESULTS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE

The Partnership is a speculative commodity pool. Unlike an
operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not
incidental, to the Partnership's main line of business.

Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair market
value of the Partnership's open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and
cash flow. The Partnership's market risk is influenced by a wide variety of
factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates,
equity price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts,
the diversification effects among the Partnership's open positions and the
liquidity of the markets in which it trades.

The Partnership, under the direction of the two Advisors which it
has retained since inception, rapidly acquires and liquidates both long and
short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not
possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect
performance, and the Partnership's past performance is not necessarily
indicative of its future results.

-15-

Value at Risk is a measure of the maximum amount which the
Partnership could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector.
However, the inherent uncertainty of the Partnership's speculative trading and
the recurrence in the markets traded by the Partnership of market movements far
exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far
beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Partnership's experience to date
(i.e., "risk of ruin"). In light of the foregoing, as well as the risks and
uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the quantifications included
in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or
representation that the Partnership's losses in any market sector will be
limited to Value at Risk or by the Partnership's attempts to manage its market
risk.

QUANTIFYING THE PARTNERSHIP'S TRADING VALUE AT RISK

QUANTITATIVE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The following quantitative disclosures regarding the
Partnership's market risk exposures contain "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such
statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth
in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934). All quantitative disclosures in this
section are deemed to be forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe
harbor, except for statements of historical fact.

The Partnership's risk exposure in the various market sectors
traded by the Advisors is quantified below in terms of Value at Risk. Due to the
Partnership's mark-to-market accounting, any loss in the fair value of the
Partnership's open positions is directly reflected in the Partnership's earnings
(realized or unrealized) and cash flow (at least in the case of exchange-traded
contracts in which profits and losses on open positions are settled daily
through variation margin).

Exchange maintenance margin requirements have been used by the
Partnership as the measure of its Value at Risk. Maintenance margin requirements
are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum loss in the fair value of
any given contract incurred in 95%-99% of the one-day time periods included in
the historical sample (generally approximately one year) researched for purposes
of establishing margin levels. The maintenance margin levels are established by
dealers and exchanges using historical price studies as well as an assessment of
current market volatility (including the implied volatility of the options on a
given futures contract) and economic fundamentals to provide a probabilistic
estimate of the maximum expected near-term one-day price fluctuation.

In the case of market sensitive instruments which are not
exchange-traded (almost exclusively currencies in the case of the Partnership),
the margin requirements for the equivalent futures positions have been used as
Value at Risk. In those rare cases in which a futures-equivalent margin is not
available, dealers' margins have been used.

The fair value of the Partnership's futures and forward positions
does not have any optionality component. However, both JWH and Millburn trade
options on futures to a limited extent. The Value at Risk associated with
options is reflected in the following table as the margin requirement
attributable to the instrument underlying each option.

100% positive correlation in the different positions held in each
market risk category has been assumed. Consequently, the margin requirements
applicable to the open contracts have been aggregated to determine each trading
category's aggregate Value at Risk. The diversification effects resulting from
the fact that the Partnership's positions are rarely, if ever, 100% positively
correlated have not been reflected.

-16-

THE PARTNERSHIP'S TRADING VALUE AT RISK IN DIFFERENT MARKET SECTORS

The following table indicates the average, highest and lowest
trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership's open positions by market
category for the fiscal year 2000. During the fiscal year 2000, the
Partnership's average capitalization was approximately $30,694,862. As of
December 31, 1999, the average capitalization was approximately $51,751,051.

The Partnership does not trade commodities or energy futures.

Fiscal Year 2000

Average Value % of Average Highest Value Lowest Value
MARKET SECTOR at Risk Capitalization at Risk at Risk
- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------

Interest Rates $ 1,613,452 5.26% 1,946,896 1,251,901
Currencies 1,368,913 4.46% 1,799,436 1,410,850
Stock Indices 509,390 1.66% 597,509 411,258
Metals 441,829 1.44% 723,667 252,200
-------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
TOTAL $ 3,933,584 12.82% 5,067,508 3,326,209
============== ============== ============== ==============

Average, highest and lowest Value at Risk amounts relate to
quarter-end amounts for each calendar quarter-end during the fiscal year.
Average Capitalization is the average or the Partnership's capitalization at the
end of each quarter of fiscal year 2000.

FISCAL YEAR 1999

Average Value % of Average Highest Value at Lowest Value at
MARKET SECTOR at Risk Capitalization Risk Risk
- ------------- ---------------- -------------- ---------------- ---------------

Interest Rates $2,136,156 4.13% $3,515,796 $1,371,379
Currencies 2,188,695 4.23% 2,213,543 1,981,912
Stock Indices 670,728 1.30% 1,443,880 440,776
Metals 651,854 1.25% 932,200 464,883
---------------- -------------- ---------------- --------------
TOTAL $5,647,433 10.91% 8,105,419 4,258,950
================ ============== ================ ==============

Average, highest and lowest Value at Risk amounts related to
the quarter-end amounts for each calendar quarter-end during the fiscal year.
Average Capitalization is the average of the Partnership's capitalization at
the end of each quarter of fiscal year 1999.

MATERIAL LIMITATIONS ON VALUE AT RISK AS AN ASSESSMENT OF MARKET RISK

The face value of the market sector instruments held by the
Partnership is typically many times the applicable maintenance margin
requirement (maintenance margin requirements generally ranging between
approximately 1% and 10% of contract face value) as well as many times the
capitalization of the Partnership. The magnitude of the Partnership's open
positions creates a "risk of ruin" not typically found in most other investment
vehicles. Because of the size of its positions, certain market conditions --
unusual, but historically recurring from time to time -- could cause the
Partnership to incur severe losses over a short period of time. The foregoing
Value at Risk table -- as well as the past performance of the Partnership --
give no indication of this "risk of ruin."

-17-

NON-TRADING RISK

FOREIGN CURRENCY BALANCES; CASH ON DEPOSIT WITH MLF

The Partnership has non-trading market risk on its foreign cash
balances not needed for margin. However, these balances (as well as the market
risk they represent) are immaterial.

The Partnership also has non-trading market risk on the
approximately 90%-95% of its assets which are held in cash at MLF. The value of
this cash is not interest rate sensitive, but there is cash flow risk in that if
interest rates decline so will the cash flow generated on these monies. This
cash flow risk is immaterial.

QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES REGARDING PRIMARY TRADING RISK EXPOSURES

The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Partnership's
market risk exposures -- except for (i) those disclosures that are statements of
historical fact and (ii) the descriptions of how the Partnership manages its
primary market risk exposures -- constitute forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act. The Partnership's primary market risk exposures as well
as the strategies used and to be used by MLIP and the Partnership's two Advisors
for managing such exposures are subject to numerous uncertainties, contingencies
and risks, any one of which could cause the actual results of the Partnership's
risk controls to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies.
Government interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid markets, the
emergence of dominant fundamental factors, political upheavals, changes in
historical price relationships, an influx of new market participants, increased
regulation and many other factors could result in material losses as well as in
material changes to the risk exposures and the risk management strategies of the
Partnership. There can be no assurance that the Partnership's current market
exposure and/or risk management strategies will not change materially or that
any such strategies will be effective in either the short- or long-term.
Investors must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of the time value of
their investment in the Partnership.

The following were the primary trading risk exposures of the
Partnership as of December 31, 2000, by market sector.

INTEREST RATES.

Interest rate risk is the principal market exposure of the
Partnership. Interest rate movements directly affect the price of derivative
sovereign bond positions held by the Partnership and indirectly the value of
its stock index and currency positions. Interest rate movements in one country
as well as relative interest rate movements between countries materially impact
the Partnership's profitability. The Partnership's primary interest rate
exposure is to interest rate fluctuations in the United States and the other
G-7 countries. However, the Partnership also takes positions in the government
debt of smaller nations -- e.g., New Zealand and Australia. MLIP anticipates
that G-7 interest rates will remain the primary market exposure of the
Partnership for the foreseeable future.

CURRENCIES.

The Partnership trades in a large number of currencies,
including cross-rates -- i.e., positions between two currencies other than
the U.S. dollar. However, the Partnership's major exposures have typically
been in the dollar/yen and dollar/Euro positions. MLIP does not anticipate
that the risk profile of the Partnership's currency sector will change
significantly in the future. The currency trading Value at Risk figure
includes foreign margin amounts converted into U.S. dollars with an
incremental adjustment to reflect the exchange rate risk inherent to the U.S.
dollar-based Partnership in expressing Value at Risk in a functional currency
other than U.S. dollars.

-18-

STOCK INDICES.

The Partnership's primary equity exposure is to equity index
price movements. The stock index futures traded by the Partnership are by law
limited to futures on broadly based indices. As of December 31, 2000, the
Partnership's primary exposures were in the S&P 500, Financial Times (England),
Nikkei (Japan) and DAX (Germany) stock indices. MLIP anticipates little, if
any, trading in non-G-7 stock indices. The Partnership is primarily exposed to
the risk of adverse price trends or static markets in the major U.S., European
and Japanese indices.

METALS.

The Partnership's primary metals market exposure is to
fluctuations in the price of gold and silver. Although certain of the Advisors
will from time to time trade base metals such as aluminum, copper and tin, the
principal market exposures of the Partnership have consistently been in the
precious metals, gold and silver (and, to a much lesser extent, platinum).
However, gold prices have remained volatile over this period, and the
Advisors have from time to time taken substantial positions as they have
perceived market opportunities to develop. MLIP anticipates that gold and
silver will remain the primary metals market exposure for the Partnership.

QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES REGARDING NON-TRADING RISK EXPOSURE

The following were the only non-trading risk exposures of the
Partnership as of December 31, 2000.

FOREIGN CURRENCY BALANCES.

The Partnership's primary foreign currency balances are in
Japanese yen, British pounds and Euros. The Partnership has de minimis exchange
rate exposure on these balances.

U.S. DOLLAR CASH BALANCE.

The Partnership holds U.S. dollars only in cash at MLF. The
Partnership has immaterial cash flow interest rate risk on its cash on
deposit with MLF in that declining interest rates would cause the income from
such cash to decline.

QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES REGARDING MEANS OF MANAGING RISK EXPOSURE

TRADING RISK

MLIP has procedures in place intended to control market risk,
although there can be no assurance that they will, in fact, succeed in doing
so. These procedures focus primarily on monitoring the trading of JWH and
Millburn, calculating the Net Asset Value of the Partnership accounts managed
by the two Advisors as of the close of business on each day and reviewing
outstanding positions for over-concentrations. While MLIP does not itself
intervene in the markets to hedge or diversify the Partnership's market
exposure, MLIP may urge either or both of JWH and Millburn to reallocate
positions managed by the two Advisors, in an attempt to avoid
over-concentrations. However, such interventions are unusual.

-19-

Each of JWH and Millburn applies its own risk management policies
to its trading.

JWH RISK MANAGEMENT

JWH attempts to control risk in all aspects of the investment
process -- from confirmation of a trend to determining the optimal exposure in a
given market, and to money management issues such as the startup or upgrade of
investor accounts. JWH double checks the accuracy of market data, and will not
trade a market without multiple price sources for analytical input. In
constructing a portfolio, JWH seeks to control overall risk as well as the risk
of any one position, and JWH trades only markets that have been identified as
having positive performance characteristics. Trading discipline requires plans
for the exit of a market as well as for entry. JWH factors the point of exit
into the decision to enter (stop loss). The size of JWH's positions in a
particular market is not a matter of how large a return can be generated but of
how much risk it is willing to take relative to that expected return.

To attempt to reduce the risk of volatility while maintaining the
potential for excellent performance, proprietary research is conducted on an
ongoing basis to refine the JWH investment strategies. Research may suggest
substitution of alternative investment methodologies with respect to particular
contracts; this may occur, for example, when the testing of a new methodology
has indicated that its use might have resulted in different historical
performance. In addition, risk management research and analysis may suggest
modifications regarding the relative weighting among various contracts, the
addition or deletion of particular contracts from a program, or a change in
position size in relation to account equity. The weighting of capital committed
to various markets in the investment programs is dynamic, and JWH may vary the
weighting at its discretion as market conditions, liquidity, position limit
considerations and other factors warrant.

JWH may determine that risks arise when markets are illiquid or
erratic, such as may occur cyclically during holiday seasons, or on the basis of
irregularly occurring market events. In such cases, JWH at its sole discretion
may override computer-generated signals and may at times use discretion in the
application of its quantitative models, which may affect performance positively
or negatively.

Adjustments in position size in relation to account equity have
been and continue to be an integral part of JWH's investment strategy. At its
discretion, JWH may adjust the size of a position in relation to equity in
certain markets or entire programs. Such adjustments may be made at certain
times for some programs but not for others. Factors which may affect the
decision to adjust the size of a position in relation to account equity include
ongoing research, program volatility, assessments of current market volatility
and risk exposure, subjective judgment, and evaluation of these and other
general market conditions.

MILLBURN RISK MANAGEMENT

Millburn attempts to control risk through the systematic
application of its trading method, which includes a multi-system approach to
price trend recognition, an analysis of market volatility, the application of
certain money management principles, which may be revised from time to time,
and adjusting leverage or portfolio size. In addition, Millburn limits its
trading to markets which it believes are sufficiently liquid in respect of the
amount of trading it contemplates conducting.

Millburn develops trading systems using various classes of
quantitative models and data such as price, volume and interest rates, and
tests those systems in numerous markets against historical data to simulate
trading results. Millburn then analyses the profitability of the systems
looking at such features as the percentage of profitable trades, the worst
losses experienced, the average giveback of maximum profits on profitable
trades and risk adjusted returns. The performance of all systems in the market
are then ranked, and three or four systems are

-20-

selected which make decisions in different ways at different times. This
multi-system approach ensures that the total risk intended to be taken in a
market is spread over several different strategies.

Millburn also attempts to assess market volatility as a means of
monitoring and evaluating risk. In doing so, Millburn uses a volatility overlay
system which measures the risk in a portfolio's position in a market and
signals a decrease in position size when risk increases and an increase in
position size when risk decreases. Millburn's volatility overlay maintains
overall portfolio risk and distribution of risk across markets within
designated ranges.

Millburn's risk management also focuses on money management
principles applicable to a portfolio as a whole rather than to individual
markets. The first principle is reducing overall portfolio volatility through
diversification among markets. Millburn seeks a portfolio in which returns from
trading in different markets are not highly correlated, that is, in which
returns are not all positive or negative at the same time. Additional money
management principles include limiting the assets committed as margin or
collateral, generally within a range of 15% to 30% of an account's net assets;
avoiding the use of unrealized profits in a particular market as margin for
additional positions in the same market; and changing the equity used for
trading an account solely on a controlled periodic basis, not automatically due
to an increase in equity from trading profits.

Another important risk management function is the careful control
of leverage or portfolio size. Leverage levels are determined by simulating the
entire portfolio over the past five or ten years to determine the worst case
experienced by the portfolio in the simulation period. The worst case or
peak-to-trough drawdown, is measured from a daily high in portfolio assets to
the subsequent daily low whether that occurs days, weeks or months after the
daily high. If Millburn considers the drawdown too severe, it reduces the
leverage or portfolio size.

Millburn determines asset allocation among markets and position
size on the basis of the money management principles and trading data research
discussed above and the market experience of Millburn's principles. From time
to time Millburn may adjust the size of a position, long or short, in any given
market. Decisions to make such adjustments require the exercise of judgment and
may include consideration of the volatility of the particular market; the
pattern of price movements, both inter-day and intra-day; open interest; volume
of trading; changes in spread relationships between various forward contracts;
and overall portfolio balance and risk exposure.

NON-TRADING RISK

The Partnership controls the non-trading exchange rate risk by
regularly converting foreign balances back into U.S. dollars (no less
frequently than twice a month, and more frequently if a particular foreign
currency balance becomes unusually high).

The Partnership has cash flow interest rate risk on its cash on
deposit with MLF in that declining interest rates would cause the income from
such cash to decline. However, a certain amount of cash or cash equivalents must
be held by the Partnership in order to facilitate margin payments and pay
expenses and redemptions. MLIP does not take any steps to limit the cash flow
risk on its cash held on deposit at MLF.

ITEM 8: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The financial statements required by this Item are included in
Exhibit 13.01.

The supplementary financial information ("selected quarterly
financial data" and "information about oil and gas producing activities")
specified by Item 302 of Regulation S-K is not applicable. MLIP promoted the
Partnership and is its controlling person.

-21-

ITEM 9: CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There were no changes in or disagreements with independent
auditors on accounting or financial disclosure.

PART III

ITEM 10: DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

10(a) & 10(b) IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS:

As a limited partnership, the Partnership itself has no officers
or directors and is managed by MLIP. Trading decisions are made by the Advisors
on behalf of the Partnership.

The directors and executive officers of MLIP and their business
backgrounds are as follows.

RONALD S. ROSENBERG Chairman and Director

FABIO P. SAVOLDELLI President and Director

FRANK M. MACIOCE Vice President and Director

STEVEN B. OLGIN Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer
and Director

MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Ronald S. Rosenberg was born in 1961. Mr. Rosenberg is Chairman
and a Director of the MLIP and head of the Alternative Investments Group for
MLIM Americas, which creates alternative investment products and strategies for
Merrill Lynch's large institutional and high net worth private clients. These
products include funds of funds investing in hedge funds, private equity funds,
exchange funds, as well as other specialized investment products. Most
recently, Mr. Rosenberg ran the Global Hedge Fund Sales Group and International
Fixed Income Groups which sold investment products to hedge funds worldwide. He
joined Merrill Lynch in 1995 from JP Morgan, where he was also responsible for
sales groups that sold investment products to hedge funds. Mr. Rosenberg was
educated at the Wharton Business School, where he received a Master of Business
Administration in Finance. He graduated Phi Beta Kappa from Rutgers University
with a Bachelor of Arts in Computer Science and Economics.

Fabio P. Savoldelli was born in 1961. Mr. Savoldelli is
President and a Director of MLIP. He oversees the Partnership's investments.
Most recently, Mr. Savoldelli was Chief Investment Officer for the Americas
at the Chase Manhattan Private Bank, responsible for managers investing
assets in international and domestic institutional, private client and ERISA
funds. Previously, he was Deputy Chief Investment Officer and Head of Fixed
Income and Foreign Exchange at Swiss Bank Corp. London Portfolio Management
International. Mr. Savoldelli was educated at the University of Windsor,
Canada, and the London School of Economics.

-22-

Frank M. Macioce was born in 1945. Mr. Macioce is a Vice President
and a Director of MLIP and the senior legal counsel responsible for Alternative
Investments. He joined MLIM in February 2000. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. Macioce was
General Counsel of Operations, Services and Technology for Merrill Lynch, and
from 1993 to 1995 served as Merrill Lynch Investment Banking General Counsel.
From 1980 to 1993 he served as Assistant General Counsel of Merrill Lynch
responsible for Corporate Law. During his 28 years with Merrill Lynch, he has
served as a director and officer of a number of its affiliates. Mr. Macioce
graduated from Purdue University with a Bachelor of Science in Economics and
Psychology in 1967 and from Vanderbilt Law School with a Juris Doctor in 1972.
Mr. Macioce is a member of the New York Bar.

Steven B. Olgin was born in 1960. Mr. Olgin is Vice President,
Chief Administrative Officer and Director of MLIP. He joined MLIP in July
1994 and became a Vice President in July 1995. From 1986 until July 1994, Mr.
Olgin was an associate of the law firm of Sidley & Austin. In 1982, Mr. Olgin
graduated from The American University with a Bachelor of Science degree in
Business Administration and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics. In 1986,
he received his Juris Doctor degree from The John Marshall Law School. Mr.
Olgin is a member of the Managed Funds Association's Government Relations
Committee and has served as an arbitrator for the NFA. Mr. Olgin is also a
member of the Committee on Futures Regulation of the Association of the Bar
of the City of New York.

Michael L. Pungello was born in 1957. Mr. Pungello is Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of MLIP. He was First Vice
President and Senior Director of Finance for Merrill Lynch's Operations,
Services and Technology Group from January 1998 to March 1999. Prior to that,
Mr. Pungello spent over 18 years with Deloitte & Touche LLP, and was a partner
in their Financial Services practice from June 1990 to December 1997. He
graduated from Fordham University in 1979 with a Bachelor of Science degree in
accounting and received his Master of Business Administration degree in Finance
from New York University in 1987.

As of December 31, 2000, the principals of MLIP had no investment
in the Partnership, and MLIP's general partnership interest was valued at
$323,921.

MLIP acts as general partner to eleven public futures funds whose
units of limited partnership interest are registered under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: The Futures Expansion Fund Limited Partnership, ML
Futures Investments L.P., ML Futures Investments II L.P. , The S.E.C.T.O.R.
Strategy Fund (SM) L.P., The SECTOR Strategy Fund (SM) II L.P., The SECTOR
Strategy Fund (SM) V L.P., The SECTOR Strategy Fund (SM) VI L.P., ML Global
Horizons L.P., ML Principal Protection L.P., ML JWH Strategic Allocation Fund
L.P. and the Partnership. Because MLIP serves as the sole general partner of
each of these funds, the officers and directors of MLIP effectively manage them
as officers and directors of such funds.

None.

(d) FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS:

None.

(e) BUSINESS EXPERIENCE:

See Item 10(a)(b) above.

(f) INVOLVEMENT IN CERTAIN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS:

-23-

None.

(g) PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS:

Not applicable.

ITEM 11: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The officers of MLIP are remunerated by MLIP in their respective
positions. The Partnership does not itself have any officers, directors or
employees. The Partnership pays Brokerage Commissions to an affiliate of MLIP
and Administrative Fees to MLIP. MLIP or its affiliates also may receive certain
economic benefits from holding the Partnership's dollar assets in offset
accounts, as described in Item 1(c) above. The directors and officers receive no
"other compensation" from the Partnership, and the directors receive no
compensation for serving as directors of MLIP. There are no compensation plans
or arrangements relating to a change in control of either the Partnership or
MLIP.

ITEM 12: SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

(a) SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS:

As of December 31, 2000, no person or "group" is known to be or
have been the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Units. All of the
Partnership's units of general partnership interest are owned by MLIP.

(b) SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT:

As of December 31, 2000, the Advisors owned 515 Series A Units,
500 Series B Units and 1,000 Series C Units and MLIP owned 327 Series A Units,
728 Series B Units and 532 Series C Units (unit-equivalent general partnership
interests) which was, in each case, less than 2% of each series of the total
Units outstanding, respectively.

None.

ITEM 13: CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

(a) TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN MERRILL LYNCH AND THE PARTNERSHIP

All of the service providers to the Partnership, other than the
Advisors, are affiliates of Merrill Lynch. Merrill Lynch negotiated with the
Advisors over the level of their advisory fees and Profit Shares. However,
none of the fees paid by the Partnership to any Merrill Lynch party were
negotiated, and they are higher than would have been obtained in arm's-length
bargaining.

The Partnership pays Merrill Lynch substantial Brokerage
Commissions and Administrative Fees as well as bid-ask spreads on forward
currency trades. The Partnership also pays MLF interest on short-term loans
extended by MLF to cover losses on foreign currency positions.

Within the Merrill Lynch organization, MLIP is the direct
beneficiary of the revenues received by different Merrill Lynch entities from
the Partnership. MLIP controls the management of the Partnership and serves

-24-

as its promoter. Although MLIP has not sold any assets, directly or indirectly,
to the Partnership, MLIP makes substantial profits from the Partnership due to
the foregoing revenues.

No loans have been, are or will be outstanding between MLIP or any
of its principals and the Partnership.

MLIP pays substantial selling commissions and trailing commissions
to MLPF&S for distributing the Units. MLIP is ultimately paid back for these
expenditures from the revenues it receives from the Partnership.

(b) CERTAIN BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:

MLF, an affiliate of MLIP, acts as the principal commodity broker
for the Partnership.

In 2000, the Partnership expensed through its investment in the
Trading LLCs: (i) Brokerage Commissions of $2,905,596 to MLF, which included
$861,354 in consulting fees earned by the Advisors; and (ii) Administrative Fees
of $78,254 to MLIP. In addition, MLIP and its affiliates may have derived
certain economic benefits from possession of the Partnership's assets, as well
as from foreign exchange and EFP trading.

The Partnership is prohibited from making any loans, to management
or otherwise.

(d) TRANSACTIONS WITH PROMOTERS:

Not applicable.

-25-

PART IV

ITEM 14: EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)1. Financial Statements: Page
--------------------- ----

Independent Auditors' Report 1

Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 2

For the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998:
Statements of Operations 3
Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital 4

Notes to Financial Statements 5-14

(a)2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES:

Financial statement schedules not included in this Form 10-K
have been omitted for the reason that they are not required or are not
applicable or that equivalent information has been included in the financial
statements or notes thereto.

(a)3. EXHIBITS:

The following exhibits are incorporated by reference or are
filed herewith to this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION

3.01(ii) Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the Partnership.

EXHIBIT 3.01(ii): Is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.01(ii) contained in Amendment No. 1
(as Exhibit A) to the Registration Statement (File No. 33-41373) filed on August 20,
1991, on Form S-1 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Registrant's Registration
Statement").

3.02(c) Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Partnership, dated July
27, 1995.

EXHIBIT 3.02(c): Is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.02(c) contained in the Registrant's report
on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1995.

10.01(o) Form of Advisory Agreement between the Partnership, Merrill Lynch Investment Partners
Inc., Merrill Lynch Futures Inc. and each of John W. Henry & Company, Inc. and
Millburn Ridgefield Corporation.

EXHIBIT 10.01(o): Is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.01(o) contained in the Registrant's
report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1995.

10.02(a) Form of Consulting Agreement between each trading advisor, the Partnership and Merrill
Lynch Futures Inc.

-26-

EXHIBIT 10.02(a): Is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.02(a) contained in Amendment No. 1
to the Registration Statement (File No. 33-30096) dated as of September 21, 1989, on
Form S-1 under the Securities Act of 1933.

10.03 Form of Customer Agreement between the Partnership and Merrill Lynch Futures Inc.

EXHIBIT 10.03: Is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.03 contained in the Registrant's
Registration Statement.

10.06 Foreign Exchange Desk Service Agreement, dated July 1, 1993 among Merrill Lynch
International Bank, Merrill Lynch Investment Partners Inc., Merrill Lynch Futures Inc.
and the Partnership.

EXHIBIT 10.06: Is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.06 contained in the Registrant's
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.

10.07(a) Form of Advisory and Consulting Agreement Amendment among Merrill Lynch Investment
Partners Inc., each Advisor, the Partnership and Merrill Lynch Futures.

EXHIBIT 10.07(a): Is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.07(a) contained in the Registrant's
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.

10.07(b) Form of Amendment to the Customer Agreement among the Partnership and MLF.

EXHIBIT 10.07(b) Is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.07(b) contained in the Registrant's
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.

13.01 2000 Annual Report and Independent Auditors' Report.

EXHIBIT 13.01: Is filed herewith.

13.01(a) 2000 Annual Reports and Independent Auditors' Reports for the following Trading
Limited Liability Companies sponsored by Merrill Lynch Investment Partners' Inc.:
ML Millburn Global L.L.C.
ML JWH Financial and Metals Portfolio L.L.C.

EXHIBIT 13.01(a): Is filed herewith.

28.01 Prospectus of the Partnership dated September 29, 1989.

EXHIBIT 28.01: Is incorporated by reference as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to Rule 424 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on
October 10, 1989.

28.02 Prospectus of the Partnership dated December 14, 1990.

EXHIBIT 28.02: Is incorporated by reference as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to Rule 424 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on
December 20, 1990.

28.03 Prospectus of the Partnership dated September 13, 1991.

EXHIBIT 28.03: Is incorporated by reference as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to Rule 424 under the Securities Act of 1933, Registration Statement on
September 23, 1991.

(b) Report on Form 8-K:

No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the fourth quarter of
2000.

-27-

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

JOHN W. HENRY & CO./MILLBURN L.P.

BY: MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT PARTNERS INC.
General Partner

By: /s/
---
Ronald S. Rosenberg
Chairman and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed on March 30, 2001 by the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated.

Signature Title Date

/s/Ronald S. Rosenberg Chairman and Director March 30, 2001
- ----------------------
Ronald S. Rosenberg (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/Fabio Savoldelli President and Director March 30, 2001
- -------------------
Fabio Savoldelli

/s/ Steven B. Olgin Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, March 30, 2001
- ------------------------
Steven B. Olgin and Director

/s/ Michael L. Pungello Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer March 30, 2001
- -----------------------
Michael L. Pungello (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

(Being the principal executive officer, the principal financial and accounting
officer and a majority of the directors of Merrill Lynch Investment Partners
Inc.)

MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT General Partner of Registrant March 30, 2001
PARTNERS INC.

BY: /s/Ronald S. Rosenberg
- ----------------------------
Ronald S. Rosenberg

-28-

JOHN W. HENRY & CO./MILLBURN L.P.

2000 FORM 10-K

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit
-------

Exhibit 13.01 2000 Annual Report and Independent Auditors' Report

Exhibit 13.01(a) 2000 Annual Report and Independent Auditors' Report
ML Millburn Global, LLC
ML JWH Financials & Metals Portfolio, LLC

-29-