UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 Commission File No. 0-26206

NORLAND MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE 06-1387931
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

106 CORPORATE PARK DRIVE, SUITE 106, WHITE PLAINS, NY 10604
(Address of principal executive
offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (914) 694-2285

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.0005 PER SHARE

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /X/ No / /

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K [ ]

The aggregate market value of the registrant's Common Stock, par value
$0.0005 per share, held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of April 4, 2001
was $2,739,016 based on the price of the last reported sale on the OTC Bulletin
Board.

As of April 4, 2001 there were 30,433,509 shares of the registrant's
Common Stock, par value $0.0005 per share, outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Items 10, 11, 12 and 13 of Part III of this Form 10-K are incorporated
by reference to the Norland Medical Systems, Inc. Proxy Statement for the 2001
Annual Meeting of Stockholders. A definitive proxy statement will be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the
fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE

INTRODUCTION.................................................................1

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.........................................................1

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES......................................................17

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS...............................................17

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.............18

ITEM 4A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS..............................................19
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.....................................20

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.........................................20

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS......................22

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISKS....................................................29

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.....................30

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.............................52

ITEMS 10, 11, 12 and 13.....................................................52

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON
FORM 8-K........................................................53

INTRODUCTION

The statements included in this Report regarding future financial
performance and results and other statements that are not historical facts
constitute forward-looking statements. The words "believes," "intends,"
"expects," "anticipates," "projects," "estimates," "predicts," and similar
expressions are also intended to identify forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and are subject to
risks and uncertainties. In connection with the "safe harbor" provisions of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company cautions the
reader that actual results or events could differ materially from those set
forth or implied by such forward-looking statements and related assumptions due
to certain important factors, including, without limitation, the following: (i)
the effect of product diversification efforts on future financial results; (ii)
the availability of new products and product enhancements that can be marketed
by the Company; (iii) the importance to the Company's sales growth that the
efficacy of new therapies for the treatment of osteoporosis and other bone
disorders be demonstrated and that regulatory approval of such therapies be
granted, particularly in the United States; (iv) the acceptance and adoption by
primary care providers of new osteoporosis therapies and the Company's ability
to expand sales of its products to these physicians; (v) adverse affect
resulting from changes in the reimbursement policies of governmental programs
(e.g., Medicare and Medicaid) and private third party payors, including private
insurance plans and managed care plans; (vi) the high level of competition in
the bone densitometry market; (vii) changes in bone densitometry technology;
(viii) the Company's ability to continue to maintain and expand acceptable
relationships with third party dealers and distributors; (ix) the Company's
ability to provide attractive financing options to its customers and to provide
customers with fast and efficient service for the Company's products; (x)
changes that may result from health care reform in the United States may
adversely affect the Company; (xi) the Company's cash flow and the results of
its ongoing financing efforts; (xii) the effect of regulation by the United
States Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") and other government agencies;
(xiii) the effect of the Company's accounting policies; (xiv) the outcome of
pending litigation; (xv) other risks described elsewhere in this Report and in
other documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The Company is also subject to general business risks, including
adverse state, federal or foreign legislation and regulation, adverse publicity
or news coverage, changes in general economic factors and the Company's ability
to retain and attract key employees. Any forward-looking statements included in
this Report are made as of the date hereof, based on information available to
the Company as of the date hereof, and the Company assumes no obligation to
update any forward-looking statements.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

Norland Medical Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively,
"Norland" or the "Company" or "NMS") develops, manufactures, sells and services
a wide range of bone densitometers used to assess bone mineral content and
density, one of several factors used by physicians to aid in the diagnosis and
monitoring of bone disorders, particularly osteoporosis. Osteoporosis progresses
as a symptomless disease characterized by bone loss and deterioration of the
skeleton, leading to bone fragility and increased risk of fracture. According to
the National Osteoporosis Foundation ("NOF"), 28 million Americans, 80% of whom
are women, are affected by osteoporosis, and left unchecked, that number is
predicted to increase to 41 million by 2015. Driven by the availability of new
treatments for bone-related disorders, the Company is focusing on bringing
affordable, state-of-the-art diagnostic technology directly into the physician's
office in order to address a number of bone health issues.

During the past three years, the Company has experienced aggregate losses
of approximately $25,168,142 and has incurred a total negative cash flow of
approximately $3,028,913 for the same three-year period. The Company does not
currently have an operating line of credit. These matters raise doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company has been pursuing
an aggressive strategy of cost reduction and containment to make a profit on
reduced sales. Operating expenses for example, for fiscal year 2000 have been
reduced by over $6,800,000 or 48% from the amount incurred in fiscal year 1998.
Primarily as a result of these cost savings, the operating loss in the fourth
quarter of fiscal year 2000 was reduced to $157,507. The Company believes it has
positioned itself to return to profitability in 2001 assuming it is able to
reach its current sales volume. The Company is pursuing initiatives to increase
liquidity, including external investments and obtaining a line of credit. The
Company does not have a commitment for such financing, and there can be no
guarantee that the Company will be able to obtain such financing.

In November 1999, the Company announced a product diversification program
into musculoskeletal development and pain management which was extended to
urology in February 2000. To penetrate these potentially large markets, Norland
is launching the sale of new lines of products used in sports medicine,
musculoskeletal development, pain management and urology. The Company has
obtained exclusive distribution rights for certain products that are used to
provide aid in musculoskeletal development, the management of pain associated
with soft tissue and the treatment of kidney stones.

On September 11, 1997, the Company purchased all of the outstanding stock
of Norland Corporation ("Norland Corp.") from Norland Medical Systems B.V. ("NMS
BV"). Norland Corp. develops and manufactures bone densitometry systems based on
dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry ("DXA") technology, which, since 1987, has been
a standard for measuring bone mass reduction, one of the primary indicators of
osteoporosis. Prior to September 11, 1997, Norland had exclusive worldwide
distribution rights to all products developed and manufactured by Norland Corp.
and Stratec Medizintechnik GmbH ("Stratec"), a former subsidiary of NMS BV which
develops and manufacturers bone densitometry systems based on peripheral
quantitative computed tomography ("pQCT") technology. As part of the acquisition
of Norland Corp., Norland entered into a new exclusive Distribution Agreement
with Stratec. This agreement became limited to the North American market on
December 31, 2000.

The Company's bone diagnostic product line has five types of bone
densitometers comprised of seventeen models utilizing several different
technologies. The Company manufactures and markets a line of traditional full
size DXA-based bone densitometry products. The Excell, the Excell plus and the
XR46 are highly effective and offer essential features at competitive prices.
Because of the cost, space requirements and training required, these systems are
generally found in hospitals, large clinics and research institutions, as
opposed to physician's offices, where patients would benefit from timely and
easy access to bone density testing and monitoring.

The Company's peripheral x-ray line of bone densitometers consists of the
Apollo DXA, the pDEXA and the Discovery systems, which are lower priced high
performance portable systems based on DXA technology. The pDEXA, which scans the
forearm, was the first desktop DXA-based system to receive FDA marketing
clearance and the first system to receive FDA marketing clearance for use in
fracture risk assessment. Sales of the pDEXA were discontinued as of January 1,
2001 as a result of the Company's development efforts and replaced with the
Discovery, which is the forearm scanning successor to the pDEXA, which was
introduced as a prototype in September 1999. The Apollo DXA, which performs
scans of the heel in fifteen seconds, was introduced in May 1998.

In June 1999, the Company acquired certain distribution rights for the
C.U.B.A.Clinical ultrasound based bone measurement system that was developed by
McCue Plc (the "C.U.B.A.Clinical") (Contact Ultrasound Bone

Analyzer). The C.U.B.A.Clinical uses technology to gently apply pressurized
water-filled membranes to the patient's heel through which the velocity of sound
and broad band ultrasound attenuation readings are measured and analyzed to
assess the patient's calcaneus (heel bone). In January 2000, the FDA approved
the C.U.B.A.Clinical for sale in the United States.

The Company also markets a line of products based on pQCT technology.
Systems using pQCT technology can make separate, three-dimensional measurements
of the cortical and trabecular bone, allowing a more detailed assessment of the
biomechanical soundness of the bone. In addition, pQCT permits the detection of
minute changes within bone that occur over short periods of time.

The Company's research line includes versions of its pQCT products that
have been purchased by large pharmaceutical companies, including Eli Lilly &
Company, Novartis, Procter & Gamble and Glaxo Wellcome, and several universities
to assist in monitoring the effectiveness of potential new therapies for the
treatment of osteoporosis and related bone disorders. The Company also offers a
DXA-based research product.

In 1999, the Company announced a product diversification program into
musculoskeletal development and pain management that started to generate modest
sales in fiscal year 2000. The Company is also seeking additional new
diversified products to distribute through its existing network of independent
dealers, sales representatives and Company sales personnel. Pursuant to an
October 1, 1999 sub-distribution agreement between the Company and Bionix L.L.C.
(U.S.) ("Bionix") which runs through September 30, 2003, the Company obtained
the right to exclusively distribute the Galileo exercise systems in U.S.
hospitals, clinics, group practices and private medical offices involved in
sports medicine and physical therapy. The Galileo system features an efficient
method of muscle strength development through mechanical stimulation. Pursuant
to a separate sub-distribution agreement between the Company and Bionix dated
October 1, 1999 which runs through September 30, 2003, the Company obtained the
right to exclusively distribute the Orbasone system within the U.S., subject to
FDA market clearance. The Orbasone system which provides relief to patients from
minor pain in soft tissue is targeted toward orthopedic surgeons, podiatrists,
and pain management specialists.

During 2000, the Company decided to expand its diversification program
into urology. Pursuant to a sub-distribution agreement dated February 17, 2000
between the Company and Bionix, which runs through February 28, 2004, the
Company obtained the right to exclusively distribute the Genestone 190 within
the U.S. The Genestone 190 is a novel lithotripter used to treat kidney stones,
which has received premarket approval from the FDA.

The Company's Chairman controls Bionix. In addition a Company shareholder
controls Stratec and Novotec Machinen GmbH, a German Corporation ("Novotec") and
the manufacturer of the Galileo products.

BACKGROUND

OSTEOPOROSIS
Osteoporosis is a disease generally associated with aging and
characterized by excessive loss of bone mineral and deterioration of the
skeleton over time. Bone is a dynamic organ which can be separated into two
basic structural components, outer cortical bone and inner trabecular bone. This
combination of a solid outer bone surrounding the inner bone is constantly
broken down and regenerated through a process known as bone remodeling, which
consists of bone resorption (removal) followed by bone formation. When
remodeling does not function properly, the result is a net loss of bone mass,
often causing the amount of bone to become deficient in meeting the body's
needs. Factors contributing to this condition include age, low calcium intake,
excessive alcohol consumption and certain drug therapies.

Osteoporosis is a "silent disease" and typically has no overt symptoms
in its early stages. The first sign of osteoporosis is often bone fracture.
Osteoporosis leads to increased risk of fracture, chronic pain and
immobility, usually at the hip, forearm or spine. As indicated above, the
National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) estimates that osteoporosis affects
more than 28 million people in the United States (80% of whom are women), a
number which, if unchecked, is predicted to increase to 41 million by 2015.
The post-menopausal female population has the highest incidence of
osteoporosis and the highest rate of morbidity (loss of quality of life) and
mortality due to osteoporosis. Hip fractures produce the most serious
consequences. According to the NOF, there are more than 300,000 hip fractures
per year in the United States and 50% of hip fracture patients never walk
independently again. The NOF estimates that in the United States osteoporosis
contributes to more than 1.5 million fractures annually, a majority of which
are of the spine and hip, and that annual direct medical expenditures for
osteoporosis and associated fractures is $13.8 billion, a figure that is
expected by the NOF to increase to $62 billion by the year 2020.

Until recently, osteoporosis was thought to be an inevitable and
untreatable consequence of aging. The Company believes that the recent
availability of more effective drug therapies, the aging of the population and
an increased focus on women's health issues and preventive medical practices
have created a growing awareness among patients and physicians that osteoporosis
is in many cases a disease which can be treated.

THERAPIES
The Company believes that the historic limitations of treatment options in
the United States contributed to a low level of demand for the diagnosis of
osteoporosis and other bone disorders. Until 1995, available therapies for
osteoporosis were limited. Most were classified as anti-resorptive and were
designed to maintain bone mass by decreasing the effective rate of bone
resorption. There was no scientific proof that they promoted bone formation.
Such therapies included the taking of drugs such as calcitonin and
first-generation bisphosphonates, or a hormone replacement regime using estrogen
supplements. In the United States, available therapies were limited to
calcitonin, estrogen and over-the-counter calcium and vitamin D supplements; and
only two therapies, calcitonin and estrogen, were approved specifically as
therapies for bone disorders. However, women's concerns regarding possible
complications relating to the prolonged use of hormone replacement therapy using
estrogen and the availability of calcitonin only in injectable form contributed
to low patient acceptance of these drugs.

In September 1995, the FDA approved the drug Fosamax for the treatment of
established osteoporosis in post-menopausal women. Fosamax, developed by Merck &
Co., Inc. ("Merck"), is a second-generation bisphosphonate that acts by coating
the bone surface and inhibiting bone resorption. Fosamax was shown in clinical
trials to increase bone density without significant adverse side effects. Other
therapies approved by the FDA in 1995 to treat osteoporosis include Miacalcin,
an intra-nasal formulation of calcitonin developed by Novartis, and Premarin
MPA, a one-tablet hormone replacement therapy combining estrogen and progestin
developed by Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories.

Merck's Fosamax was originally approved only for the treatment of patients
with established osteoporosis. In April 1997, the FDA expanded the permitted use
of Fosamax to include the prevention of osteoporosis. In December 1997, Eli
Lilly & Company received FDA approval for its new osteoporosis drug, Evista, a
selective estrogen receptor modulator. Drugs of this type are currently being
studied for their selective ability to act like estrogen in certain tissues but
not in others. Actonel (risedronate), a new generation of bisphosphonate
developed by Proctor & Gamble, was approved by the FDA in March 2000.

The Company believes that worldwide there are more than 50 pharmaceutical
and biotechnology companies with programs to develop new therapies for
osteoporosis, some of which are in late-stage clinical

trials. Therapeutic products under development include new anti-resorptive
agents and bone-formation stimulators.

The Company believes that advances in treatment options for osteoporosis
will increase the demand for the diagnosis and monitoring of osteoporosis and
other bone disorders. Merck and other pharmaceutical companies have launched
extensive educational and marketing campaigns targeting gynecologists and family
practice physicians to promote education and awareness of the fact that
osteoporosis is now a treatable disease. Patients and physicians will become
increasingly aware of the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of
osteoporosis. The Company believes that as this awareness increases, more people
will be tested for osteoporosis and that primary care providers such as
gynecologists and family practice physicians will play a key role in providing
such tests.

DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF OSTEOPOROSIS
Typically, there are no overt symptoms of early stage osteoporosis. Diagnostic
efforts have focused on an individual's propensity for fracture by determining
bone mass and comparing it to normal healthy and age-related reference
populations, as well as monitoring bone mass over time for changes.
Absorptiometry is the primary technique for measuring bone mass and is based on
the principle that bone absorbs radiation at a different rate than does soft
tissue. The inner trabecular region, which is a lattice-like structure crucial
to the maintenance of bone strength, absorbs radiation at a rate different from
the cortical region of the bone, enabling systems capable of separately
measuring cortical and trabecular bone to more effectively assess biomechanical
soundness.

There are a number of different types of technologies that can be used to
assess bone mineral status. Single photon absorptiometry ("SPA") uses a single
energy radioactive source and has limited ability to measure bone in complex
body regions. Dual photon absorptiometry ("DPA") reduces measurement error
through complex body regions by using a dual-energy radioactive source.
X-ray-based systems provide improved precision, faster scan times and lower
operating costs as compared to single and dual photon absorptiometry and have
largely replaced SPA and DPA technology. Single-energy x-ray absorptiometry
("SXA") technology replaces the radioactive source with a single energy X-ray
source. DXA, which has become the standard for bone mass analysis, uses a
dual-energy X-ray source. Radiographic absorptiometry ("RA") measures bone
density from two X-ray images of the hand. Although it does not require a
dedicated bone densitometry system since it uses traditional X-ray equipment, RA
does not provide point of care measurement of bone density, as the radiographs
have to be sent out to a laboratory for interpretation. All of these
technologies produce only two-dimensional (planar) measurements. Quantitative
computed tomography ("QCT") is capable of separate, three-dimensional
measurement of cortical and trabecular bone, providing volumetric density and
allowing more precise assessment of the biomechanical soundness of the bone.
Ultrasound technology measures the velocity of sound and broad band attenuation.
Ultrasound has recently been improved to the point that it has gained acceptance
as a viable technology to assess bone at peripheral sites. IN VITRO diagnostic
testing (biochemical markers) measures the level of certain byproducts in body
fluids to determine the rate of bone resorption and bone formation. However,
these tests do not provide information about bone mass or bone structure and
cannot be used independently to diagnose osteoporosis or assess fracture risk.
Nevertheless, Company believes that biochemical marker testing may complement
bone densitometry in monitoring the effectiveness of drug therapies.

PRODUCTS

BONE DENSITOMETRY PRODUCTS
The Company believes it markets the broadest line of bone densitometers
available today with a wide range of price points and capabilities to satisfy
diverse customer needs. The Company currently offers five

product types comprised of 17 models. The following is a description of each of
the Company's product types and primary models.

1. PERIPHERAL DXA-BASED SYSTEMS
The Apollo DXA, the pDEXA and the Discovery are the Company's peripheral
DXA-based systems. These affordable, easy-to-use systems are designed for
physician's offices, small clinics and other settings beyond large hospitals and
clinics, including pharmacies and other consumer environments. Like the much
larger traditional DXA systems, they measure bone mass and compare it to a
normal reference population. However, the peripheral systems measure only
specific bone sites such as the heel and forearm that correlate well to hip and
spine measurements, enabling them to be more compact, and, therefore, more
affordable than traditional DXA systems.

The Apollo DXA introduced in May of 1998, measures weight-bearing
trabecular bone in the heel in just 15 seconds. It provides quantitative
analysis of bone mass, including bone mineral density ("BMD") as well as
comparisons to normal reference populations, from an easy-to-use hand held
control console. The Apollo DXA's Fracture Risk Assessment Option allows the
bone density measurements from the Apollo DXA to be used as an aid to physicians
in determining fracture risk.

The Discovery, developed as a prototype in September 1999, is based on the
pDEXA, which was the first system to bring DXA-based technology to the desktop.
The Discovery and the pDEXA measure the forearm at a site that is mostly
cortical bone and at another site that is mostly trabecular bone. The software
used in the devices measure bone mineral content ("BMC") and BMD as well as make
comparisons to normal reference populations and to the patient's prior
examinations. They also provide skeletal images of the region of interest as
well as graphical presentations of the results. In January 1998, the pDEXA
became the first bone densitometry system to receive FDA approval of a Fracture
Risk Assessment Option.

2. TRADITIONAL DXA SYSTEMS
The traditional DXA-based bone densitometers marketed by the Company are
the compact Excell and Excell plus and the full size XR46. The target market for
these systems is hospitals, clinics and large physician group practices. With
its low price relative to other traditional systems, the Excell and Excell plus
can also be attractive to primary care physicians. Each system is capable of
performing axial (hip and spine) and peripheral scans. The XR46 also performs
full body scans. All three systems measure BMD and BMC and make comparisons to
reference populations and to the patient's prior examination. Price and service
are the primary competitive factors among DXA products offering similar basic
capabilities.

3. PQCT - CLINICAL SYSTEMS
The XCT line of systems brings a unique type of bone densitometer based on
pQCT technology to the market. Unlike DXA-based densitometers, pQCT systems
permit separate, three-dimensional measurement of cortical and trabecular bone
by taking multiple images in a 360-degree rotation around the scanned limb,
providing true volumetric density and allowing more precise assessment of
biomechanical soundness of the bone. The ability to measure trabecular bone
precisely also permits detection over short periods of time of minute changes in
bone, indicating changes in metabolic status. The pQCT systems use the same
miniaturized low-radiation X-ray source as the pDEXA. The pQCT-based XCT 2000
scans the forearm and is marketed to hospitals, including pediatric care
hospitals that require a device capable of measuring changes in smaller bones,
clinics and private practices. The pQCT-based XCT 3000 can also scan the tibia
and the femur and is capable of three-dimensional measurement of the entire
femoral neck, providing more precise assessment of hip fractures and monitoring
of implants following hip replacements.

4. RESEARCH SYSTEMS
The Company markets a series of pQCT-based research scanners: the XCT
Research SA, the XCT Research SA PLUS, the XCT Research M, the XCT Research M
PLUS and the XCT 3000 Research, for research involving laboratory animals, the
XCT Microscope, and the XCT Fan Beam m-Scope for research IN VITRO at a maximum
resolution of 15 microns. The Company also markets the Sabre, a DXA-based system
for research with small laboratory animals.

5. PERIPHERAL ULTRASOUND SYSTEMS
The Company has distribution rights in North America and certain other
countries for the C.U.B.A.Clinical dry ultrasound system, pursuant to an
agreement with McCue Plc the company that developed the system. The
C.U.B.A.Clinical measures the velocity of sound and broadband ultrasound
attenuation at the heel. In January 2000, the FDA approved the C.U.B.A. Clinical
system for sale in the United States. As with peripheral x-ray systems, the
target market for the C.U.B.A.Clinical is physician's offices.

OTHER USES FOR BONE DENSITOMETRY PRODUCTS
The Company has received FDA approval of a Body Composition Option for its
pDEXA and traditional DXA-based systems. This option assesses the non-bone
tissue determined during the bone density scans and estimates such items as soft
tissue mass, fat mass, lean mass, and ratio of total bone mineral content to
lean body mass. These measurements are useful to physicians in their management
of diseases such as chronic renal failure, anorexia nervosa, excessive obesity,
AIDS/HIV and cystic fibrosis. It is also a convenient alternative to hydrostatic
weighing and skin fold measurements.

MUSCULOSKELETAL DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTS
In 1999, the Company announced a product diversification program into
musculoskeletal development that started generating modest sales in fiscal year
2000. Pursuant to an October 1, 1999 distribution agreement between the Company
and Bionix, the Company obtained the right to exclusively distribute the Galileo
series of products to U.S. hospitals, clinics, group practices and private
medical offices involved in sports medicine and physical therapy for a four-year
period. The products are made by Novotec and sold to Bionix according to a
distribution agreement. The Company's Chairman controls Bionix and a Company
shareholder controls Novotec.

The Galileo 2000, 900, XS and 100 systems are devices that feature an
efficient method of muscle strength development. The systems mechanically
stimulate targeted muscles at a specific frequency, typically 20 to 25 impulses
per second, causing the muscles to respond by contracting and relaxing by
natural reflex 20 to 25 times per second. The Galileo systems target the leg and
lower back (Galileo 2000, XS and 900), the arm and shoulder muscles (Galileo
I00). Based on its larger size, the Galileo 2000 has the potential for a more
robust exercise routine, than the Galileo 900 and XS systems.

PAIN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

In 1999, the Company announced a product diversification program into pain
management systems that began generating modest sales of such products in fiscal
year 2000. Pursuant to an October 1, 1999 distribution agreement between the
Company and Bionix, the Company obtained the right to exclusively distribute the
Orbasone system within the U.S. for a four-year period. The Orbasone is made by
MIP GmbH, a Swiss Corporation ("MIP") and exclusively sold to Bionix according
to a distribution agreement. The Orbasone was classified in August 1998 by the
FDA as a Class I therapeutic vibrator (21CFR ss.890.5975) exempt from the 510(k)
requirements of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. The Orbasone delivers
energy waves that provide relief to patients from minor pain in soft tissues at
the treatment site, which is typically, the foot, ankle, elbow or shoulder. The
30 to 40 minute treatment sessions are delivered to patients under the
supervision and

care of a physician such as an orthopedic surgeon or podiatrist. On June 21,
2000, the FDA informed MIP that it erred in its 1998 decision and rescinded its
determination that the Orbasone was an exempt product. As a result, the Company
suspended sales of the Orbasone pending FDA review of the product. The FDA
recently determined that the Orbasone is a Class III device requiring premarket
approval, but MIP is seeking reconsideration of this determination and
discussions between the FDA and MIP are continuing.

LITHOTRIPSY SYSTEMS

In fiscal year 2000, the Company further expanded its product
diversification program into urology. Pursuant to a February 17, 2000
distribution agreement between the Company and Bionix, the Company obtained the
right to exclusively distribute the Genestone 190 System within the U.S. for a
four-year period. The Genestone 190 is made by Genemed GmbH, a Swiss Corporation
("Genemed") and exclusively sold to Bionix according to a distribution
agreement. The Genestone 190 has obtained premarket approval from the FDA and
therefore may be sold in the U.S. It is a compact lithotripter used by
urologists to treat kidney stones. It uses shock wave technology to fragment
upper urinary tract stones such as renal calyceal stones, renal pelvic stones
and upper ureteral stones. Its relative low cost and transportability makes it
suitable for private urology practices, community hospitals and mobile services.
The Company did not sell any Genestone systems during fiscal year 2000.

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

The Company focuses its product development on DXA-based bone densitometry
systems. At March 31, 2001, the Company had 5 persons engaged in research and
development who were all devoted to software development. Product development
work with respect to other bone densitometry systems, musculoskeletal
development products and pain management systems are performed by the companies
(McCue Plc, Stratec, Novotec, Genemed and MIP) that supply the Company with
their respective products.

SALES AND MARKETING

The Company currently employs five regional sales managers, two who cover
the United States and three of whom cover Europe, the Middle East and Asia
(other than the Pacific Rim), Latin America and the Pacific Rim, respectively.
The Company's customers are primarily third party dealers and distributors. The
Company also sells directly to end-users in those markets where the Company does
not have third party dealers or distributors. The Company typically uses an
exclusive dealer, independent representative or distributor to cover one or more
states, a single country or portions thereof. Each Company regional sales
manager is responsible for the support and supervision of several dealers,
distributors and independent representatives within their geographic region.
Support includes participation in trade shows, symposiums, customer visits,
product demonstrations, ongoing distribution of literature and publications,
sales training and presentations of financing programs. In 1997, the Company
opened small sales offices in London, from which the regional manager for
Europe, Africa and the Middle East operates, and Singapore, where the regional
manager for the Pacific Rim operates. The Company intends to expand its network
of U.S. third party dealers, distributors and independent representatives to
exploit the country's large market of gynecologists and primary care physicians,
and to its sales in the hospitals, imaging and mammography center markets. As
part of such expansion, distribution agreements were signed with Cooper
Surgical, Inc. in November 2000 and with Marconi Medical System, Inc. in January
2001.

In 1999, the Company reorganized its marketing department, which presently
consists of three employees. Marketing efforts are focused primarily on
supporting the Vice Presidents for Sales in their

management of dealers and distributors, developing and maintaining relationships
and joint programs with pharmaceutical companies, managing sales lead generation
programs, managing product introductions and new product financing programs.

The Company sold products in 46 countries in fiscal year 2000. For a more
detailed breakdown of the Company's 2000 sales by geographic territory, see Note
14 to the Company's consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this
Report.

MANUFACTURING

BONE DENSITOMETRY PRODUCTS
Manufacturing consists primarily of testing of components, final assembly
and systems testing. The Company manufactures its DXA-based systems, at its ISO
9001 certified facility in Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin for sale worldwide. McCue
Plc manufactures the C.U.B.A.Clinical ultrasound system. All establishments,
whether foreign or domestic, manufacturing medical devices for sale in the
United States are subject to periodic inspections by or under the authority of
the FDA to determine whether the manufacturing establishment is operating in
compliance with FDA Quality System Regulation ("QSR") requirements. Stratec
manufactures pQCT systems for sale worldwide. Stratec's manufacturing facilities
are located in Pforzheim, Germany.

Some components are manufactured in accordance with custom specifications
and require substantial lead times. While efforts are made to purchase
components from more than one source and to use generally available parts,
certain components, including X-ray tubes and detectors, are available from only
one or a limited number of sources. In the past, there have been delays in the
receipt of certain components, although to date no such delays have had a
material adverse effect on the Company. The Company believes that the Company,
Stratec and McCue Plc have sufficient manufacturing capacity to supply the
Company's product needs for at least the next twelve months.

Manufacturing processes for the products marketed by the Company are
subject to stringent federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the
use, generation, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of certain
materials and wastes. In the United States, such laws and regulations include
the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Environmental Protection Act, the
Toxic Substances Control Act, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
The Company believes that it has complied in all material respects with such
laws and regulations. There can be no assurance that the Company will not be
required to incur significant costs in the future with respect to compliance
with such laws and regulations.

MUSCULOSKELETAL DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTS
The Galileo products marketed by the Company were developed and
manufactured by Novotec at its facilities located in Pforzheim, Germany.
Manufacturing consists primarily of testing components, forming and painting of
plastic covers, final assembly and quality assurance testing. The Company is
dependent on Novotec to manufacture the Galileo products that the Company and
others market in amounts and at levels of quality necessary to meet demand. The
Company has no ownership interest in Novotec.

Some components are manufactured in accordance with specifications that are
specific to the Galileo products and require substantial lead times. Until such
time as production quantities increase to a level that provides for
opportunities to realize economies of scale and dual sourcing of components,
each component is generally purchased from a limited number of sources and is
subject to the risk that its availability could become delayed. To date there
have been no delays in production which have had a material adverse effect on
the

Company. The Company believes that Novotec has sufficient capacity to supply the
Company's need for Galileo products for at least the next 12 months.

PAIN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
The Orbasone system was developed by MIP and is manufactured for MIP under
a contractual arrangement by Nippon Infrared Industries Co., Ltd. (Japan), which
has its manufacturing facilities in Tokyo, Japan. Manufacturing consists
primarily of testing components, final assembly and quality assurance testing.
If and when the Orbasone receives market clearance, the Company will be
dependent on MIP to provide manufactured Orbasone systems in amounts and at
levels of quality necessary to meet demand and be competitive. The Company has
no ownership interest in MIP or Nippon Infrared Industries Co., Ltd.

Some components are manufactured in accordance with specifications that
are specific to the Orbasone and require substantial lead times. Until such time
as production quantities increase to a level that provides for opportunities to
realize economies of scale and dual sourcing of components, each component is
generally purchased from a limited number of sources and is subject to the risk
that its availability could become delayed.

LITHOTRIPSY SYSTEMS
The Genestone 190 System was developed by Genemed and manufactured for
Genemed under a contractual agreement by Kimchuk, Inc. which has its
manufacturing facilities in Connecticut. Manufacturing consists of primarily
testing of components, final assembly and quality assurance testing. The Company
depends upon Genemed to provide manufactured Genestone 190 systems in amounts
and at levels of quality necessary to meet demand and be competitive. The
Company has no ownership interest in Genemed or Kimchuk, Inc.

Some components are manufactured in accordance with specifications that
are specific to the Genestone 190 and require substantial lead times. Until such
time as production quantities increase to a level that provides for
opportunities to realize economies of scale and dual sourcing of components,
each component is generally purchased from a limited number of sources and is
subject to the risk that its availability could become delayed. The Company
believes that Genemed has sufficient manufacturing capacity to supply the
Company's product needs for at least the next twelve months.

CUSTOMER SUPPORT SERVICES

The Company offers one-year warranties on both the hardware and software
included in its systems, as well as extended warranty contracts. The Company and
third party service representatives provide warranty services to its customers.
Any costs incurred by the Company in connection with a warranty of a system not
manufactured by the Company are borne by such manufacturer pursuant to the
distribution agreements.

The Company has no obligation to provide any other services to its third
party dealers or distributors or other customers. However, the Company does
offer non-warranty services and a range of other product support services in
cooperation with its third-party dealers, including a telephone hotline for
customer inquiries, product installation, product enhancements and maintenance
releases. On April 1, 2000, the Company signed a service agreement with Marconi
Medical Systems, Inc. ("Marconi"). Under the agreement, Marconi will augment the
Company's network servicing its traditional DXA systems which consists of the
Company's service employees and third party service representatives. The Company
also offers training at customer locations and the Company's facilities to
end-user customers, third-party dealers and service technicians.

DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENTS

STRATEC
On October 1, 1999, the Company and Stratec agreed to terminate their
September 11, 1997 distribution agreement and enter into a new arrangement.
Stratec and Bionix entered into a distribution agreement dated October 1, 1999
granting Bionix the right to exclusively distribute Stratec products in North
and Latin America. Bionix and the Company also entered into an exclusive
sub-distribution agreement with respect to the sale of Stratec products in North
and Latin America through September 30, 2003. Under terms of the
sub-distribution agreement, the Company may purchase Stratec products at a fixed
percentage discount from the product's actual sales price to the customer. As a
result of a lack of sales of pQCT systems in Latin America, the sub-distribution
agreement was limited to North America on December 31, 2000. Stratec markets its
pQCT systems outside of North America through other distributors.

MCCUE
The Company and McCue entered into a distribution agreement dated June 17,
1999 granting the Company the right to exclusively distribute the
C.U.B.A.Clinical ultrasound system in North America and certain countries in
Europe, the Pacific Rim and the Middle East. Under terms of the five-year
agreement, there are non-binding sales targets. In addition, in the event that
the Company does not purchase a specified minimum number of C.U.B.A.Clinical
devices in any twelve-month period starting in January 2001, McCue has the right
to make the Company's distribution rights in North America non-exclusive.

BIONIX
The Company and Bionix also entered into two exclusive sub-distribution
agreements dated October 1, 1999 with respect to the Orbasone and Galileo
systems/products and into an exclusive sub-distributor agreement dated February
17, 2000 with respect to the Genestone 190, each of which products are sold
through Bionix pursuant to its distribution agreements with the third party
manufacturers. Under the terms of the four-year sub-distribution agreements, the
Company may purchase products from Bionix at a fixed percentage discount from
contractually stated selling prices with a mechanism to periodically adjust the
contractual selling prices.

COMPETITION

BONE DENSITOMETRY PRODUCTS
The bone densitometry systems market is highly competitive. Several
companies have developed or are developing bone densitometers or other devices
that compete or will compete with products marketed by the Company. Many of the
Company's existing and potential competitors have substantially greater
financial, marketing and technological resources, as well as established
reputations for success in developing, selling and servicing products. The
Company's primary competitors for the sale of bone densitometry systems are
General Electric, Hologic, Inc. ("Hologic"), Aloka, Diagnostic Medical Systems
and OSI Systems. These companies have products that compete directly with the
products marketed by the Company. The Company expects existing and new
competitors will continue to introduce products that are directly or indirectly
competitive with those marketed by the Company, including alternatives to
absorptiometry such as ultrasound and IN VITRO diagnostics. Such competitors may
succeed in developing products that are more functional or less costly than
those sold by the Company and may be more successful in marketing such products.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to compete
successfully in this or any other market.

The ultrasound market is particularly competitive. There are approximately
20 other companies, including General Electric and Hologic, that are marketing
ultrasound bone assessment systems outside the United States. In addition,
General Electric and Hologic have FDA approval to market their ultrasound
systems in the United States.

The Company believes the products it markets compete primarily on the
basis of price/performance characteristics, accuracy and precision of results,
ease and convenience of use, features and functions, quality of

service and price. In the small clinic and physician's office market, price,
ease of use and convenience are of particular importance. In the hospital and
large clinic market, traditional DXA systems are predominant and price is the
primary competitive factor among products that provide similar basic
capabilities. The Company believes that its DXA-based systems are competitive.
In the research market, the range, accuracy and precision of measurements are
the principal competitive factors. The Company believes the pQCT-based products
it markets provide measurement capabilities, such as three-dimensional
measurements and separate measurement of cortical and trabecular bone, not
available with traditional DXA-based technology, at prices competitive with
systems using that technology.

MUSCULOSKELETAL DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTS
The Galileo products offer a novel approach to muscle strength
development. The owner of Novotec has applied for patents regarding the Galileo
products. Despite the absence of directly similar products, there are a number
of competing approaches and products that develop muscle strength. Many of the
Company's existing competitors and potential competitors have substantially
greater financial, marketing and technological resources, as well as established
reputations for success in developing, selling and servicing products. The
Company expects existing and new competitors will continue to introduce products
that are directly or indirectly competitive with the Galileo products. Such
competitors may be more successful in marketing such products. There can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully in this market.

The Company's primary competitors for the sale of musculoskeletal
development products are marketers of exercise equipment such as OMNI Fitness
and Stairmaster. These companies have products that compete directly with the
products marketed by the Company in certain segments of the market. The Company
believes that the present design of the Galileo products should be enhanced to
better suit the requirements of the U.S. market. There can be no assurance that
Novotec can or will improve the product design, nor that the Company's
competitors will fail to develop and market products that make use of the
Galileo's novel approach or that are lower priced or better performing as
compared to the Galileo products. In addition, there is a risk that the patents
that have been applied for by the owner of Novotec regarding Galileo products
will not be issued.

The Company believes that the products it markets compete primarily on the
basis of price/performance characteristics, perceived efficacy of results, ease,
convenience and safeness of use, quality of service and price. The Company is
using its initial product marketing efforts to assess the competitiveness of the
Galileo products, which the Company recently introduced to the U.S. market.

PAIN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
The pain management systems market is highly competitive. Several
companies have developed or are developing devices that compete or will compete
with the Orbasone. Many of the Company's competitors existing and potential
competitors have substantially greater financial, marketing and technological
resources, as well as established reputations for success in developing, selling
and servicing products. The Company expects existing and new competitors will
continue to introduce products that are directly or indirectly competitive with
the Orbasone. Such competitors may be more successful in marketing such
products. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to compete
successfully in this market.

The Company's primary competitors for the sales of pain management systems
are HealthTronics, Inc., Domier MedTech, Storz Medical, Siemens AG and MTS
Medical Technologies & Services GmbH. These companies have or potentially plan
to have products that are in various stages of the FDA review process for the
purpose of obtaining premarket approval. The Orbasone was classified in August
1998 as a Class I therapeutic vibrator (21CFR ss.890.5975) exempt from the 510
(k) requirements of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. However, on June
21, 2000, the FDA informed MIP that it erred in its 1998 decision and rescinded
its determination that the Orbasone was an exempt product. As a result the
Company suspended sales of the Orbasone pending FDA review of the product. The
FDA recently determined that the Orbasone is a Class III device requiring
premarket approval, but MIP is seeking reconsideration of this determination and
discussions between the FDA and MIP are continuing.

THIRD PARTY REIMBURSEMENT

BONE DENSITOMETRY PRODUCTS AND PAIN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
The bone densitometry products marketed by the Company are purchased
principally by hospitals, managed care organizations, including independent
practice associations and physician practice organizations or independent
physicians or physician groups, who are regulated in the United States by
federal and state authorities and who typically bill and are dependent upon
various third party payors, such as federal and state governmental programs
(E.G., Medicare and Medicaid), private insurance plans and managed care plans,
for reimbursement for use of the Company's products. The Health Care Financing
Administration ("HCFA") establishes new reimbursement codes and recommended
reimbursement rates effective January 1 of each calendar year. On several
occasions, HCFA has effected increases and decreases in its recommended
reimbursement rates for bone densitometry examinations and has made changes in
the types of examinations eligible for reimbursement. There can be no assurance
that HCFA will not continue to make changes from time to time. The Company could
be materially and adversely affected by such changes.

In August 1997, President Clinton signed into law the Medicare Bone Mass
Measurement Coverage Standardization Act as a provision in the Balanced Budget
Act. The provision sets forth a national mandate that requires Medicare, under
certain specified conditions, to cover bone density diagnostic tests utilizing
radiologic, radioisotopic, or other procedures approved by the FDA for the
purpose of identifying bone mass or detecting bone loss deterioration. This
mandate became effective July 1, 1998.

In a number of European countries, Japan and several other countries,
third party payors provide reimbursement for bone densitometry scans.

Postoperative pain management is reimbursed under limited circumstances.
There can be no assurance that HCFA or other third party payers will reimburse
patients for pain management systems and pain treatment sessions involving the
Orbasone system.

MUSCULOSKELETAL DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTS
As with general exercise equipment which requires no professional
supervision, the Galileo series of musculoskeletal development products are not
covered under federal or state health care insurance programs or by third party
health insurance payors.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

The development, testing, manufacturing and marketing of the bone
densitometry and pain management products marketed by the Company are regulated
by the FDA in the United States and by various foreign regulatory agencies. The
testing for, preparation of, and subsequent FDA review of required applications
is expensive, lengthy and uncertain. Moreover, regulatory approval or clearance,
if granted, can include significant limitations on the indicated uses for which
a product may be marketed. Failure to comply with applicable regulations can
result in warning letters, civil penalties, refusal to approve or clear new
applications or notifications, withdrawal of existing product approvals or
clearances, product seizures, injunctions, recalls, operating restrictions, and
criminal prosecutions. Delays in receipt of or failure to receive clearances or
approvals for new products would adversely affect the marketing of such products
and the results of future operations.

Medical devices are classified as either Class I, II, or III based on the
risk presented by the device. Class I devices generally do not require review
and approval or clearance by the FDA prior to marketing in the U.S. Class II
devices generally require premarket clearance through the Section 510(k)
premarket notification process, and Class III devices generally require
premarket approval through the lengthier premarket approval application ("PMA")
process. Norland markets Class I, II, and III devices. Section 510(k)
submissions may be filed only for those devices that are "substantially
equivalent" to a legally marketed Class I or Class II device or to a Class III
device for which the FDA has not called for PMAs. A Section 510(k) submission
generally requires less data

than a PMA. The FDA must determine whether or not to clear a Section 510(k)
submission within 90 days of its receipt. The FDA may extend this time period,
however, if additional data or information is needed to demonstrate substantial
equivalence. If a device is not "substantially equivalent" to a legally marketed
Class I or Class II device or to a Class III device for which the FDA has not
previously called for PMAs, a PMA is required. The premarket approval procedure
involves a more complex and lengthy testing and FDA review process than the
Section 510(k) premarket notification process. There can be no assurances that
clearances or approvals will be obtained on a timely basis, if at all.
Modifications or enhancements to products that are either cleared through the
Section 510(k) process or approved through the PMA process that could effect a
major change in the intended use, or affect the safety or effectiveness, of the
device may require further FDA review and clearance or approval through new
Section 510(k) or PMA submissions.

The Company has received Section 510(k) clearance for all its bone
densitometers marketed in the U.S. for use in humans, except for the
C.U.B.A.Clinical ultrasound densitometer for which the manufacturer, McCue Plc,
has received FDA premarket approval. The pain management devices (Orbasone)
marketed by the Company in the U.S. was classified by the FDA in August 1998 as
Class I devices exempt from Section 510(k) premarket notification requirements.
On June 21, 2000, the FDA determined that it erred in its classification of the
Orbasone and the Company suspended marketing of the Orbasone. The FDA recently
determined that the Orbasone is a Class III device requiring premarket approval,
but MIP is seeking reconsideration of this determination and discussions between
the FDA and MIP are continuing. The Galileo musculoskeletal development products
are not medical devices subject to FDA regulation but are consumer products
subject to regulation under the Consumer Product Safety Act. The manufacturer of
the Genestone 190 lithotripter, Genemed, has received FDA pre-market approval
for the Genestone 190.

All entities, whether foreign or domestic, manufacturing medical devices
for sale in the United States are subject to periodic inspections by or under
authority of the FDA to determine whether the manufacturing establishment is
operating in compliance with QSR requirements. Manufacturers must continue to
expend time, money and effort to ensure compliance with QSR requirements. The
FDA also requires that medical device manufacturers undertake post-market
reporting for serious injuries, deaths, or malfunctions associated with their
products. If safety or efficacy problems occur after the product reaches the
market, the FDA may take steps to prevent or limit further marketing of the
product. Additionally, the FDA actively enforces regulations concerning
marketing of devices for indications or uses that have not been cleared or
approved by the FDA.

The Company's products also are subject to regulatory requirements for
electronic products under the Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of
1968. The FDA requires that manufacturers of diagnostic x-ray systems comply
with certain performance standards, and record keeping, reporting, and labeling
requirements.

The Company may export a medical device not approved in the United States
to any country without obtaining FDA approval, provided that the device (i)
complies with the laws of that country and (ii) has valid marketing
authorization or the equivalent from the appropriate authority in a "listed
country." The listed countries are Australia, Canada, Israel, Japan, New
Zealand, Switzerland, South Africa and countries in the European Union and the
European Economic Area. Export of unapproved devices that would be subject to
PMA requirements if marketed in the United States and that do not have marketing
authorization in a listed country generally continue to require prior FDA export
approval.

PROPRIETARY RIGHTS

The Company believes that its sales are dependent in part on certain
proprietary features of the products it manufactures and/or markets. The Company
relies primarily on know-how, trade secrets and trademarks to protect those
intellectual property rights and has not sought patent protection for such
products. There can be no assurance that these measures will be adequate to
protect the rights of the Company. To the extent that intellectual property
rights are not adequately protected, the Company may be vulnerable to
competitors who attempt to copy the Company's products or gain access to the
trade secrets and know-how related to such

products. Further, there can be no assurance that the Company's competitors will
not independently develop substantially equivalent or superior technology. The
Company is not the subject of any litigation regarding proprietary rights, and
the Company believes that the technologies used in its products were developed
independently. In addition, the Company's business depends on proprietary
information regarding customers and marketing, and there can be no assurance
that the Company will be able to protect such information.

BACKLOG

Backlog consists of signed purchase orders received by the Company from
its customers. Backlog as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 totaled approximately
$835,000 and $980,000, respectively. The Company's ability to ship products
depends on its production capacity and that of the other manufacturers whose
products are distributed by the Company. Purchase orders are generally
cancelable. The Company believes that its backlog as of any date is not a
meaningful indicator of future operations or net revenues for any future period.

PRODUCT LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Company's business involves the inherent risk of product liability
claims. If such claims arise in the future they could have a material adverse
impact on the Company. The Company maintains product liability insurance on a
"claims made" basis with respect to its products in the aggregate amount of $4.0
million, subject to certain deductibles and exclusions. The Company's agreements
with the manufacturers of other products distributed by the Company require that
such manufacturers maintain product liability insurance that covers the Company
as an additional named insured. There is no assurance that existing coverage
will be sufficient to protect the Company from risks to which it may be subject,
including product liability claims, or that product liability insurance will be
available to the Company at a reasonable cost, if at all, in the future or that
insurance maintained by the other manufacturers will cover the Company.

EMPLOYEES

At April 9, 2001, the Company had 52 employees, of whom 9 were engaged in
direct sales and marketing activities and 9 were engaged in manufacturing
activities. The remaining employees are in finance, administration, product
development and customer service. No employees of the Company are covered by any
collective bargaining agreements, and management considers its employee
relations generally to be good.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company leases its principal executive offices, which are located at
106 Corporate Park Drive, Suite 106, White Plains, New York 10604. The lease
expires on July 31, 2003. The Company also leases approximately 28,500 square
feet of space in Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin pursuant to two separate leases. One
lease with respect to 18,000 square feet expires on August 31, 2006, and the
second lease with respect to the remaining 10,500 square feet expires on June
30, 2002. The Company uses this space for manufacturing, research and
development, sales and marketing, customer services, administration and
warehousing and considers the facilities to be well maintained and adequate for
the Company's present needs.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Common Stock from February 25, 1997 through March 16, 1998. Plaintiffs sought
compensatory damages in an unspecified amount, together with prejudgement
interest, costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees and disbursements). On
August 10, 1998, prior to the expiration of the defendants time to respond to
the complaint, the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint purporting to
expand the class period through March 31, 1998. On or about December 23, 1999,
the parties executed a Stipulation of Settlement which provides for a settlement
of $1.7 million, to be funded solely by the Company's directors and officer's
insurance carrier. The United States District Court approved this Stipulation of
Settlement at a March 30, 2000 hearing, this case is now settled without any
additional liability to the Company.

In addition, in the normal course of business, the Company is named as
defendant in lawsuits in which claims are asserted against the Company. In the
opinion of management, the liabilities, if any, which may ultimately result from
such lawsuits are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the
financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote to the Company's security holders
during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.

ITEM 4A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Company's current executive officers are as follows:

Age as of
Name April 9, 2001 Position
- ---- ------------- --------

Reynald G. Bonmati 53 Chairman of the Board; President; and
Treasurer

Richard L. Rahn 49 Vice President, Finance; and Secretary

Terry Pope 49 Vice President, General Manager--Fort
Atkinson Facility; and Assistant
Secretary

Ralph J. Cozzolino 54 Vice President, Sales and Marketing

MR. BONMATI has served as a Director of the Company since its formation in
December 1993 and has served as Chairman of the Board, President and Treasurer
of the Company since January 1994. Mr. Bonmati has served as President of
Novatech Resource Corporation, a private investment firm, since its formation in
1981, as President of Bones, LLC, a private investment firm, since its formation
in 1997, and as President of Bionix LLC, an importer of medical and non-medical
devices since its formation in 1998. Mr. Bonmati received BS and MS degrees from
the Institut National Superieur de Chimie Industrielle, France, an MS degree
from the Ecole Nationale Superieure du Petrole et des Moteurs and an MBA from
the University of Paris, France.

MR. RAHN joined the Company in September of 2000 and has served as
Controller/Vice President Finance and Secretary. From 1997 until he joined
Norland Mr. Rahn was Controller/CFO for Power Proxy Adhesives, a developer,
manufacturer and distributor of epoxy adhesives. Mr. Rahn also served as
Controller/CFO for Ortho-Kinetics, Inc., a multinational manufacturer of durable
medical equipment from 1989 to 1995 and from 1995 to 1997 for S. J. Brown, a
designer, manufacturer and seller of point of purchase displays. Mr. Rahn
received his BBA degree from University of Wisconsin Whitewater and is CPA
certified.

MR. POPE joined the Company in February 1999 and has served as Vice
President, General Manager--Fort Atkinson Facility, since October 1999. From
1996 until he joined Norland as Service Manager, Mr. Pope was Service Manager
for Dynapro Thin Films, a manufacturer and servicer of touch screen systems and
electronic controls. From 1991 to 1996 he was also Service Manager for Source 7,
a service and maintenance provider for nuclear medicine and other medical
systems. Mr. Pope holds a BA in business from Lakeland College.

MR. COZZOLINO has served as Vice President, Sales for North America since
October 1998. From May 1996 to September 1998, Mr. Cozzolino was the Company's
Regional Sales Manager for the eastern United States and Canada. From January
1995 to April 1996, Mr. Cozzolino was Vice President, Operations and Sales, of
World Technologies, Inc., a manufacturer of PC-based imaging equipment. Prior to
1995, he was National Sales Manager of Luxor Corporation, a manufacturer of
surgical lasers. Mr. Cozzolino received his MA degree from New York University.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The Company's Common Stock is traded on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin
Board under the symbol "NRLD". Prior to September 23, 1998, the Company's Common
Stock was traded on the NASDAQ National Market. The following table sets forth,
for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices per share of Common
Stock, as reported by the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board for the respective
periods.

PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1999 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1999:

HIGH LOW
---- ---

First Quarter $0.50 $0.19
Second Quarter 0.66 0.31
Third Quarter 0.88 0.41
Fourth Quarter 0.69 0.31

PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 2000 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2000:

HIGH LOW
---- ---

First Quarter $1.03 $0.41
Second Quarter 0.69 0.38
Third Quarter 0.50 0.22
Fourth Quarter 0.31 0.09

As of April 9, 2001 there were approximately 75 outstanding stockholders
of record of the Company's Common Stock. This number excludes persons whose
shares were held of record by a bank, broker or clearing agency.

The Company has not paid any cash dividends on its shares of Common Stock
and does not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The
Company's policy has been to reinvest any earnings in the continued development
and operations of its business.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

The Company began operations in January 1994 as the exclusive distributor
throughout much of the world for the bone densitometry products developed and
manufactured by Norland Corp. and Stratec. The Company acquired Norland Corp.
from NMS BV on September 11, 1997. A Company shareholder controls Stratec.
Certain of the Company's stockholders control NMS BV. The Company has no
ownership interest in NMS BV or Stratec.

The financial data as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and for the periods
ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998 has been derived from the consolidated
financial statements of the Company for the periods indicated and should be read
in conjunction with such financial statements and notes thereto, which are
included at Item 8 of this Report, and with "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations", included at Item 7
of this Report.

NORLAND MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996(1) 1997(2) 1998 1999 2000

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Revenue ..................................... $ 24,326,134 $ 20,530,376 $ 14,384,491 $ 17,798,035 $ 13,402,823
Cost of revenue ............................. 15,709,420 15,568,876 8,888,947 9,549,677 7,596,306
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Gross profit .............................. 8,616,714 4,961,500 5,495,544 8,248,358 5,806,517

Sales and marketing expense ................. 3,756,391 5,635,469 6,711,653 5,482,817 4,231,221
General and administrative expense .......... 1,900,598 4,688,132 5,690,071 3,377,520 2,701,889
Research and development expense ............ 271,917 749,847 1,889,583 1,325,116 564,771
In-process research and development charge .. 0 7,900,000 0 0 0
Non-recurring charges ....................... 397,697 7,228,287 400,000 0 7,258,036
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Income (loss) from operations ............. 2,290,111 (21,240,235) (9,195,763) (1,937,095) (8,949,400)
Loss on investment in Vitel, Inc. ........... 0 0 (260,000) 0 0
Interest expense ............................ 0 (383,962) (1,289,665) (273,005) (216,619)
Interest income ............................. 703,744 345,745 86,168 34,453 5,704
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Income (loss) before income taxes (benefit) 2,993,855 (21,278,452) (10,659,260) (2,175,647) (9,160,315)
Income taxes (benefit) ...................... 1,216,000 (2,694,447) (946,000) 0 4,118,920
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Net income (loss) ......................... $ 1,777,855 $(18,584,005) $ (9,713,260) $ (2,175,647 $(13,279,235)
============ ============ ============ ============ ============

Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic ..................................... $ 0.26 $ (2.60) $ (1.35) $ (0.10) $ (0.49)
Diluted ................................... 0.25 (2.60) (1.35) (0.10) (0.49)

Weighted average number of
Common shares outstanding:
Basic .................................... 6,824,590 7,145,465 7,183,032 21,616,010 27,029,566
Diluted .................................. 7,168,871 7,145,465 7,183,032 21,616,010 27,029,566

AS OF DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Working capital ............................. $ 17,522,404 $ 11,624,860 $ 2,407,993 $ 1,124,033 $ (2,082,688)
Total assets ................................ 30,115,136 29,378,525 19,057,907 17,732,288 3,644,736
Long-term debt .............................. 0 14,439,756 4,685,690 1,106,562 0
Stockholders' equity ........................ 26,107,346 7,610,985 8,791,883 11,028,068 (1,287,403)

- ----------
(1) The results of operations of Dove Medical Systems, Inc. have been included
from the April 2, 1996 date of acquisition.

(2) The results of operations of Norland Corp. have been included from the
September 11, 1997 date of acquisition.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION OF THE FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE RELATED NOTES THERETO INCLUDED IN ITEM 8 OF THIS
REPORT. THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WHICH
INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED IN THE INTRODUCTION
TO THIS REPORT. THE COMPANY'S ACTUAL RESULTS COULD DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE
ANTICIPATED IN THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AS A RESULT OF CERTAIN FACTORS,
INCLUDING THOSE DISCUSSED IN THE INTRODUCTION.

GENERAL

Revenues and costs of revenues for systems and spare parts are generally
recognized at the time products are shipped and title passes to the customer.
Service revenue is recognized at the time the service is performed. Sales to
customers are generally made in U.S. dollars.

Prior to September 11, 1997, the Company had exclusive worldwide
distribution rights to all products developed and manufactured by Norland Corp.
and Stratec. Under the arrangements with Norland Corp. and Stratec, the margins
between their costs of manufacturing the products and the amounts for which the
Company sold the products was divided between the Company and the manufacturers
as provided in the Company's Distribution Agreement with Norland Corp. and
Stratec. On September 11, 1997, the Company acquired Norland Corp. from NMS BV.
The $17,500,000 purchase price was paid at closing, $1,250,000 in cash and
$16,250,000 by the Company's 7% promissory note issued to NMS BV (the "Purchase
Note"). A $1,250,000 principal payment on the Purchase Note was originally
payable on March 11, 1998. The Purchase Note was amended to provide that such
payment would not be due until such time as the Company receives at least
$2,000,000 in proceeds from a debt or equity financing. The balance was payable
on September 11, 2002 with a right on the part of the Company to extend the
maturity for up to an additional two years. If the maturity was so extended, the
applicable interest rate would be subject to increases during the extension
period. The Purchase Note provided that it could be repaid at any time and that,
except for the $1,250,000 payment referred to above, the Company could make
payments of principal by delivering shares of its Common Stock, valued at the
average closing price for the five trading days preceding the delivery.

On December 31, 1998, in connection with the settlement of previously
disclosed litigation, the terms of the Norland Corp. acquisition were amended.
Effective as of December 31, 1998, the original $17,500,000 purchase price was
reduced to $8,700,000 by reducing the principal amount of the Purchase Note from
$16,250,000 to $7,450,000. The interest rate on the Purchase Note was reduced to
6 1/2 %. In addition, $1,890,000 of principal of the reduced Purchase Note was
paid on December 31, 1998 by delivering 7,000,000 shares of the Company's Common
Stock to NMS BV priced at $0.27 per share, the average closing price for the
prior five trading days. On March 28, 1999, the Company exercised its right to
pay $4,310,000 of the remaining $5,560,000 of the Purchase Note principal by
delivering 11,122,580 additional shares of Common Stock priced at $0.3875 per
share, the average closing price for the prior five trading days.

As a result of the acquisition of Norland Corp., the Company now receives
the entire margin between the cost of Norland Corp. products manufactured after
the date of acquisition and the amount for which the Company sells such
products. The Company entered into a new Distribution Agreement with Stratec
which is described in Item 1 of this Report.

RESULT OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain items
from the Company's Statements of Operations as a percentage of revenue:

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------

Revenue .................................. 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of revenue .......................... 56.7 53.7 61.8
------- ------- -------
Gross profit ........................... 43.3 46.3 38.2

Sales and marketing expense .............. 31.6 30.8 46.7
General and administrative expense ....... 20.2 19.0 39.5
Research and development expense ......... 4.2 7.4 13.1
In-process research and development charge -- 0.0 0.0
Non-recurring charges .................... 54.2 0.0 2.8
------- ------- -------
Loss from operations ................... (66.9) (10.9) (63.9)
Loss on investment in Vitel, Inc. ........ 0 0.0 1.8
Interest income .......................... 0 (0.2) (0.6)
Interest expense ......................... 1.6 1.5 9.0
------- ------- -------
Loss before income taxes ............... (68.5) (12.2) (74.1)
Income taxes expense (benefit) ......... (30.7) 0.0 (6.6)
------- ------- -------
Net loss ............................... (99.2) (12.2) (67.5)
======= ======= =======

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE COMPANY'S YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 COMPARED TO ITS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1999.

Revenue for fiscal year 2000 decreased $4,395,212 (24.7%) to $13,402,823
from $17,798,035 for fiscal year 1999. The decline in sales is primarily due to
lower DXA-based central system sales in the United States and the Pacific Rim
region. Sales in the United States, Europe / Africa / Middle East and Pacific
Rim represented 60.6%, 22.0% and 12.5%, respectively, of total revenue for 2000
and 62.6%, 18.6% and 12%, respectively, of total revenue for 1999. A majority of
the Company's revenue for fiscal years 2000 and 1999 was derived from sales of
the Excell, Eclipse and XR36 central systems. Sales of complete bone
densitometry systems represented 78.1% and 86.8% of total revenue for fiscal
years 2000 and 1999, respectively. Sales of new musculoskeletal therapy products
accounted for 4.4% of sales in 2000 compared to none in 1999. Sales of parts and
services and rental income comprised the balance of revenue for such periods.

Sales in the United States have been negatively affected by changes in the
Medicare reimbursement rates for bone densitometry tests. In November 1996 the
Health Care Financing Administration ("HCFA") announced changes for 1997 that
significantly reduced the reimbursement rate for peripheral bone densitometry
tests. In June 1997 HCFA published proposed changes for 1998 that would have
increased the reimbursement rate for peripheral systems and significantly
reduced the rate for central systems. These proposed reimbursement rates for
1998 were not adopted by HCFA. Instead, the 1998 rates for both peripheral and
central systems, as finally adopted, were increased slightly over their
applicable rates for 1997. Such reimbursement rates are subject to

further changes. Several regional Medicare carriers did not allow any
reimbursement for peripheral bone densitometry tests. However, effective July 1,
1998, the HCFA's national policy mandates Medicare coverage of bone density
diagnostic tests for qualified individuals. Revenues and the mix of products
sold are expected to continue to be influenced by the relative degree of
difference in reimbursement rate levels for peripheral and central systems. They
will also be influenced by the Company's ability to bring systems to the market
that can be operated more profitably by end users at the applicable
reimbursement levels. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
bring such systems to the market.

With the osteoporosis market remaining flat, especially in the U.S., and
management's expectation that conditions in the osteoporosis market might not
change in the short-term, the Company announced in November 1999 a product
diversification program into musculoskeletal development and pain management. In
2000, the Company decided to expand its diversification program into urology.
The Company is launching the distribution of new lines of products in several
musculoskeletal market segments, including sports medicine, pain management and
physical therapy, and in urology for the treatment of kidney stones. The Company
is also exploring other opportunities to distribute new products as part of its
sales diversification program. There can be no assurance that the Company will
be able to successfully distribute such products.

Norland's new musculoskeletal products include four models of the GALILEO,
a patent-pending exercise system designed for use in sports medicine to improve
muscle strength and in physical therapy to improve mobility through the
rebuilding of muscles. The diversification program includes another product, the
ORBASONE, a novel therapeutic device designed for use in pain management. The
Orbasone was classified in August 1998 by FDA as a Class I therapeutic vibrator
(21CFR ss.890.5975) exempt from the 510(k) requirements of the Federal Food,
Drug and Cosmetic Act. On June 21, 2000, the FDA informed MIP GmbH, the
manufacturer of the Orbasone, that it erred in its 1998 decision and rescinded
its determination that the Orbasone was an exempt product. As a result, the
Company suspended sales of the Orbasone pending FDA review of the product. The
FDA recently determined that the Orbasone is a Class III device requiring
premarket approval, but MIP is seeking reconsideration of this determination and
discussions between the FDA and MIP are continuing. Norland's new urological
product, the GENESTONE 190, has obtained premarket approval from the FDA and
therefore may be sold in the U.S. It is a compact lithotripter used by
Urologists to treat kidney stones. The distribution rights for these products
were made available to Norland by Bionix L.L.C., in an effort to bolster sales
through product diversification. Bionix is a limited liability company
controlled by Norland's Chairman. Sales of these new products were 4.4% of sales
in 2000, and there can be no assurance that the Company will sell a material
quantity of such products.

Cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue was 56.7% and 53.7% for 2000
and 1999, respectively, resulting in a gross margin of 43.3% in 2000 compared to
46.3% for 1999. The 2000 gross margin is 3% lower than 1999 as there were very
few sales of previously reserved inventory items in fiscal year relative to
fiscal year 1999. The increase in gross margin for 1999 as compared to 1998 was
primarily the result of the benefits derived in fiscal year 1999 from sale of
inventory previously partially reserved for as obsolete (the reserve on such
items was $676,439). Such amounts equaled $379,000 in 1999 from sales of
relatively low carrying cost refurbished demonstration systems and by the
$117,000 of repossessed new bone densitometry systems that were previously
written off from the Company's inventory held by a former dealer and repossessed
in the third quarter of 1999.

Sales and marketing expense decreased $1,251,596 (22.8%) to $4,231,221 for
2000 from $5,482,817 for 1999, but increased as a percentage of revenue to 31.6%
from 30.8% .The categories that were lower included

advertising expenses, labor costs and travel related expenses incurred by sales
personnel and third party customer service representatives. The expense
reductions are attributed to improvements in the cost-effectiveness of the
sales, marketing and service functions and are not expected to adversely affect
future sales.

General and administrative expense decreased $675,631 (20.2%) to 2,701,889
for 2000 from $3,377,520 for 1999. The dollar decrease was primarily due to
decreased consulting fees, lower labor expenses and a legal reserve of $150,000
was reserved as it was no longer needed. The Company expects general and
administrative expenses to remain at or slightly below the 2000 level in the
foreseeable future.

Research and development expense decreased $760,345 (57.4%) to $564,771
for 2000 from $1,325,116 for 1999, and also decreased as a percentage of revenue
to 4.2% from 7.4%. The lower 2000 costs reflects the trend started in 1999 and
the completion of several projects around mid year. The Company expects the
research and development costs to continue at the 2000 levels for the
foreseeable future.

The Company recognized a non-recurring charge of $7,258,036 in 2000, none
in 1999 and $400,000 in 1998. Management evaluated its financial position in
2000 and determined to charge to operations the remaining unamortized cost of
goodwill and related tax benefits. In 1998, the Company settled certain patent
infringement litigation and, in connection with the settlement, agreed to pay a
minimum of $400,000 in patent licensing fees, the timing of such payments to be
based on future sales of certain products through August 2004. A $50,000 advance
payment was made in 1998, $168,377 was paid in 1999 and $181,623 in 2000.

Interest expense of $216,619 and $273,005 for 2000 and 1999, respectively,
represents interest on the Purchase Note issued by the Company in connection
with the acquisition of Norland Corp. The decrease in expense reflects the fact
that the principal balance on the Purchase Note was reduced from $16,250,000 to
$5,560,000 on December 31,1998 and was further reduced to $1,250,000 on March
28, 1999. Interest income in 1999 consisted primarily of interest earned on the
Company's cash balances, reduced by other expenses consisting primarily of bank
charges and other fees related to bank transfers. The decrease in interest
income in 2000 as compared to 1999 reflects reduced interest income resulting
from the Company's reduced cash position. In 1998, the Company also wrote off
its $260,000 minority interest investment in Vitel, Inc.

The income tax charge as a percentage of loss before income taxes was
49.2% and 0.0% for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The
charge was due to the management's decision to charge operations for the
unrealized deferred taxes carried on its books. Accordingly, net deferred tax
assets decreased $3,969,841 to $0 at December 31, 2000.

The Company had a net loss of $13,279,235 ($0.49 per share) for 2000
compared to a net loss of $2,175,647 ($0.10 per share) for 1999.

The Company has significant relationships with related parties and the
amount of transactions with these related parties is expected to increase.
The Company believes that its related party transactions have been made at
arms' length terms, have been fair to the Company and that the terms of the
transactions could have been received from third parties.

THE COMPANY'S YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 COMPARED TO ITS YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998.

Revenue for 1999 increased $3,413,544 (23.7%) to $17,798,035 from
$14,384,491 for 1998. The increase was largely the result of increased sales of
DXA based central systems, especially in the U.S. and Europe. The increase was
partially offset by decreased sales of DXA-based peripheral systems, especially
in the Pacific Rim as a result of a 1998 large single order sale of peripheral
systems in the Pacific Rim. Sales in the United States, Europe/Africa/Middle
East and the Pacific Rim represented 62.6%, 18.6% and 12.0%, respectively, of
total revenue for 1999 and 66.7%, 11.7% and 14.3%, respectively, of total
revenue for 1998. A majority of the Company's revenue for 1999 and 1998 was
derived from sales of the Excell, Eclipse and XR36 central systems. Sales of
complete bone densitometry systems represented 86.8% and 91.4% of total revenue
for 1999 and 1998, respectively. Sales of parts and services and rental income
comprised the balance of revenue for such periods.

Sales in the United States have been affected by changes in the Medicare
reimbursement rates for bone densitometry tests. In November 1996 the HCFA
announced changes for 1997 that significantly reduced the reimbursement rate for
peripheral bone densitometry tests. In June 1997 the HCFA published proposed
changes for 1998 that would have increased the reimbursement rate for peripheral
systems and significantly reduced the rate for central systems. These proposed
reimbursement rates for 1998 were not adopted by the HCFA. Instead, the 1998
rates for both peripheral and central systems, as finally adopted, were
increased slightly over their applicable rates for 1997. Such reimbursement
rates are subject to further changes. Several regional Medicare carriers did not
allow any reimbursement for peripheral bone densitometry tests. However,
effective July 1, 1998, HCFA's national policy mandates Medicare coverage of
bone density diagnostic tests for qualified individuals. Revenues and the mix of
products sold are expected to continue to be influenced by the relative degree
of difference in reimbursement rate levels for peripheral and central systems.
They will also be influenced by the Company's ability to bring systems to the
market that can be operated more profitably by end users at the applicable
reimbursement levels. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
bring such systems to the market.

With the osteoporosis market remaining flat for the past twelve months,
especially in the U.S., and management's expectation that conditions in the
osteoporosis market might not change in the short-term, the Company announced in
November 1999 a product diversification program into musculoskeletal development
and pain management. The Company is launching the distribution of new lines of
products in several musculoskeletal market segments, including sports medicine,
pain management and physical therapy. The Company is also exploring other
opportunities to distribute new products as part of its sales diversification
program. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully
distribute such products.

Cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue was 53.7% and 61.8% for 1999
and 1998, respectively, resulting in a gross margin of 46.3% for 1999 compared
to 38.2% for 1998. The increase in gross margin for 1999 as compared to 1998 was
primarily the result of the benefits derived in fiscal year 1999 from sale of
inventory previously partially reserved for as obsolete (the reserve on such
items was $676,439). Such amounts equaled $379,000 in 1999 from sales of
relatively low carrying cost refurbished demonstration systems and by the
$117,000 of repossessed new bone densitometry systems that were previously
written off from the Company's inventory held by a former dealer and repossessed
in the third quarter of 1999. In addition, the gross margin for 1998 was
adversely affected by a $443,323 charge for an increased inventory reserve and
improved by the $712,000 third quarter 1998 sale of certain systems that had
been written off in prior periods.

Sales and marketing expense decreased $1,228,836 (18.3%) to $5,482,817 for
1999 from $6,711,653 for 1998, and decreased as a percentage of revenue to 30.8
% from 46.7%. The dollar decrease was primarily due to decreased advertising and
marketing promotion expenses, labor expenses and travel related expenses
incurred by sales personnel and third party customer service representatives.
The expense reductions are attributed to improvements in the cost-effectiveness
of the sales, marketing and service functions.

General and administrative expense decreased $2,312,551 (40.6%) to
$3,377,520 for 1999 from $5,690,071 for 1998 and decreased as a percentage of
revenue to 19.0% from 39.5%. The dollar decrease was primarily due to decreased
professional fees and $334,000 in proceeds received in August 1999 in connection
with a directors and officers liability insurance claim and decreased bad debt
expense in 1999 as a result of improved credit and collections management
beginning in 1998.

Research and development expense decreased $564,467 (29.9%) to $1,325,116
for 1999 from $1,889,583 for 1998, and also decreased as a percentage of revenue
to 7.4% from l3.1%. The decreases in l999 expenses as compared to l998 were
primarily due to non-recurring expenses in connection with certain development
projects, including the Excell and Apollo DXA bone densitometers that were
introduced in December and May 1998, respectively.

The decreases in expense as a percentage of revenues referred to in the
three preceding paragraphs are also attributable to the Company's increased
revenues for 1999.

The Company recognized a non-recurring charge of $400,000 in 1998. In
1998, the Company settled certain patent infringement litigation and, in
connection with the settlement, agreed to pay a minimum of $400,000 in patent
licensing fees, the timing of such payments to be based on future sales of
certain products through August 2004. A $50,000 advance payment was made in 1998
and $168,377 was paid in 1999.

Interest expense of $273,005 and $1,289,665 for 1999 and 1998,
respectively, represents interest on the Purchase Note issued by the Company in
connection with the acquisition of Norland Corp. The decrease in expense
reflects the fact that the principal balance on the Purchase Note was reduced
from $16,250,000 to $5,560,000 on December 31,1998 and was further reduced to
$1,250,000 on March 28, 1999. Interest income in 1999 and 1998 consisted
primarily of interest earned on the Company's cash balances, reduced by other
expenses consisting primarily of bank charges and other fees related to bank
transfers. The decrease in interest income in 1999 as compared to 1998 reflects
reduced interest income resulting from the Company's reduced cash position. In
1998, the Company also wrote off its $260,000 minority interest investment in
Vitel, Inc.

The income tax benefit as a percentage of loss before income taxes was
0.0% for the year ended December 31, 1999 as compared to a benefit percentage of
8.9% for 1998. The income tax benefit for 1999 was derived primarily from the
1999 operating loss and was fully offset by the valuation allowance referred to
below and the non-deductibility of goodwill amortization. The 1998 income tax
benefit was also derived primarily from the 1998 operating loss and was reduced
to an effective rate of 8.9% by the valuation allowance referred to below and
the non-deductibility of goodwill amortization.

Net deferred tax assets increased $577,000 to $3,969,841 at December 31,
1999 from $3,392,841 at December 3 1998, primarily as a result of an additional
asset recognized for 1999 changes in liabilities having differences between book
and tax treatment which was reduced by a $2,262,434 valuation allowance. The

deferred tax assets can be realized primarily through future taxable income.
Management believes that based on the Company's history of operating earnings,
exclusive of the nonrecurring and other charges, and its expected income, it is
more likely than not that future levels of income will be sufficient to realize
the deferred tax assets, as recorded.

The Company had a net loss of $2,175,647 ($0.10 per share) for 1999
compared to net loss of $9,713,260 ($1.35 share) for 1998. Excluding the after
tax effect of the nonrecurring charge discussed above, the net loss for 1998
would be $9,475,660 ($1.32 per share). The Company has significant relationships
with related parties and the amount of transactions with these related parties
are expected to increase. The Company believes that its related party
transactions have been made at arms' length terms, have been fair to the Company
and that the terms of the transactions could have been received from third
parties.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

At December 31, 2000, the Company had cash of $53,289 compared to $67,666
at December 31, 1999. The decrease in cash was primarily the result of the
payment of operating expenses, repayment of the bank debt of $312,000, a
reduction in accounts payable and modest capital expenditures partially offset
by decreased accounts receivable, reduction in inventory and the $300,000 in
proceeds from a common stock issuance.

The Company's accounts receivable decreased $1,021,129 or 40.6% to
$1,496,454 at December 31, 2000.The reduction primarily reflects lower revenue
and strong collection efforts.

Property and equipment as of December 31, 2000 consisted of computer and
telephone equipment, a management information system, demonstration systems,
office furniture, leasehold improvements, and tooling for the products
manufactured by the Company. At the present time, capital expenditures for 2001
are estimated to be minimal.

In connection with the settlement of the litigation relating to the
Company's acquisition of Norland Corp., the Purchase Note issued as part of the
purchase price for Norland Corp. was amended on December 31, 1998 to, among
other things, reduce the principal amount by $8,800,000 and reduce the interest
rate from 7% to 6.5%. An additional $1,890,000 of principal was paid by
delivering 7,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock to NMS BV. On March
28, 1999, the Company paid $4,310,000 of the remaining $5,560,000 of principal
by delivering 11,122,580 shares of Company common stock. Interest payments on
the $1,250,000 principal of the Purchase Note will is approximately $20,000 per
quarter. Interest on the original $16,250,000 of principal for the period from
July 1, 1998 through December 31, 1998 ($577,184) was outstanding on December
31, 1998. $455,208 was paid in 1999, and the Company and NMS BV agreed that the
remainder was paid in stock during 2000. The Company is in default of the
interest due on the remaining balance of this note as of December 31, 2000, and
accordingly the note has been classified as a current liability.

The Company believes that its current cash position, together with cash
flow from operations, will be adequate to fund the Company's operations for at
least the next twelve months. In order to increase its cash flow, the Company is
continuing its efforts to stimulate sales of bone densitometers and launch new
products through its diversification program. The Company is also continuing to
focus its efforts on improving the aging of its accounts receivable and reducing
the level of bone densitometer inventory. To do so, the Company has implemented
higher credit standards for its customers and is emphasizing the receipt of down
payments from

customers at the time their purchase orders are received and is attempting to
more closely coordinate the timing of purchases of parts and sub-assemblies. The
Company is also continuing to be more aggressive in seeking to collect
outstanding receivables and selling its inventory of used bone densitometers.

The Company has been seeking additional equity and debt financing. The
Company does not have a commitment for such bank financing or other financing at
this time, and there can be no guarantee that the Company will be able to obtain
such financing. The failure to do so could have a materially adverse affect on
the Company and its operations. In addition, the nature of the Company's
business is such that it is subject to changes in technology, government
approval and regulation, changes in third-party reimbursement in the United
States and numerous foreign markets and loss of product distribution rights.
Significant changes in one or more of these factors in a major market for the
Company's products could significantly affect the Company's cash needs.

ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activity", becomes effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2001. The
Company does not expect the adoption of this statement to have a material impact
on the Company's financial statements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS.

The table below provides information about the Company's market sensitive
financial instruments and constitutes a "forward-looking statement". The
Company's major financial market risk exposure is changing interest rates,
primarily in the United States. The Company's policy has been to manage its
interest rate risks through use of a fixed rate debt. See Note 8 for a
description of the Note Payable. All items described are non-trading and are
stated in U.S. dollars.

EXPECTED MATURITY DATES FAIR VALUE
--------------------------- -----------------
2001 THEREAFTER TOTAL DECEMBER 31, 2000
--------------------------- -----------------

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Money Market Mutual Fund Shares
and bank deposits -non interest bearing $ 53,289 $ 53,289 $ 53,289

Average interest rate - 4.8%

NOTE PAYABLE

Fixed interest rate - 6.5% $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $1,159,686

The company has defaulted with regard to interest payments on the note payable.
Accordingly the note has been reclassified as currently payable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INDEX
-----

PAGE

Independent Auditors' Reports F-31

Financial Statements:

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 F-32

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 F-33

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' (Deficit)
Equity for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 F-34

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 F-35

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-37

Financial Statement Schedule:

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts F-51

F-1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Norland Medical Systems, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the
financial statement schedule of Norland Medical Systems, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders'
equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our
audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Norland Medical Systems, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the consolidated results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2000 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such
financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.

The accompanying financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2000 have
been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As
discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company's recurring losses
from operations raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 30, 2001

F-2

NORLAND MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

as of December 31, 2000 and 1999

ASSETS

2000 1999
------------ ------------

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 53,289 $ 67,666
Accounts receivable - trade, less allowance for doubtful
accounts of $301,000 and $351,000 at December 31, 2000
and 1999, respectively 1,496,454 2,517,583
Inventories, net 1,223,591 2,244,317
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 76,117 201,370
Deferred income taxes (note 4 and 11) -- 1,690,755
------------ ------------
Total current assets 2,849,451 6,721,691
------------ ------------

Property and equipment, net 786,777 1,175,947
Other 8,508 --
Deferred income taxes, net (Note 4 and 11) -- 2,279,086
Goodwill, net (Note 4) -- 7,555,564
------------ ------------
Total assets $ 3,644,736 $ 17,732,288
============ ============

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Bank borrowings $ -- $ 311,816
Note payable, net of discount 1,159,686 --
Accounts payable - related parties 178,338 372,244
Accounts payable - trade 1,655,941 2,218,639
Accrued expenses 1,098,623 1,633,641
Accrued warranty expense 335,000 530,000
Unearned service revenue 466,965 387,598
Accrued interest expense 37,586 143,720
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 4,932,139 5,597,658
------------ ------------

Note payable, net of discount -- 1,106,562

Stockholders' (deficit) equity:
Common Stock -29,233,509 and 25,956,278 shares issued
and outstanding and 45,000,000 shares authorized at
both December 31, 2000 and 1999 14,615 12,977
Additional paid-in capital 38,504,405 37,542,279
Accumulated deficit (39,806,423) (26,527,188)
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' (deficit) equity (1,287,403) 11,028,068
------------ ------------

Total liabilities and stockholders' (deficit) equity $ 3,644,736 $ 17,732,288
============ ============

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-3

NORLAND MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998

2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------ ------------

Revenue (including Revenue (including sales to affiliates of
$9,449, $92,883 and $9,803, in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively) $ 13,402,823 $ 17,798,035 $ 14,384,491
Cost of revenue 7,596,306 9,549,677 8,888,947
------------ ------------ ------------
Gross profit 5,806,517 8,248,358 5,495,544

Sales and marketing expense 4,231,221 5,482,817 6,711,653
General and a General and administrative expense 2,701,889 3,377,520 5,690,071
Research and development expense 564,771 1,325,116 1,889,583
Non-recurring charges 7,258,036 -- 400,000
------------ ------------ ------------

Operating (loss) (8,949,400) (1,937,095) (9,195,763)

Other income (expense):
Interest expense (216,619) (273,005) (1,289,665)
Interest income 5,704 34,453 86,168
Loss on investment in Vitel, Inc. -- -- (260,000)
------------ ------------ ------------

Loss before income taxes (9,160,315) (2,175,647) (10,659,260)
Income tax expense (benefit) 4,118,920 -- (946,000)
------------ ------------ ------------

Net loss (13,279,235) $ (2,175,647) $ (9,713,260)
============ ============ ============

Basic and diluted weighted average shares: 27,029,566 21,616,010 7,183,032

Basic and diluted loss per share: $ (0.49) $ (0.10) $ (1.35)

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-4

NORLAND MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS'(DEFICIT) EQUITY

Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998

Additional
Common Paid-In (Accumulated
Total Shares Stock Capital Deficit)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Balance as of January 1, 1998 $ 7,610,985 7,162,531 $ 3,580 $ 22,245,686 $(14,638,281)

Issuance of shares of stock options exercised 1 1,500 1 -- --
Reduction in Norland Corp. acquisition price
by reduction of principal of note payable,
net of discount 9,004,157 -- -- 9,004,157 --
Issuance of shares in partial payment
of note payable 1,890,000 7,000,000 3,500 1,886,500 --
Net loss (9,713,260) -- -- -- (9,713,260)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Balance as of December 31, 1998 8,791,883 14,164,031 7,081 33,136,343 (24,351,541)

Issuance of shares for stock options exercised 2 3,000 2 -- --

Issuance of common stock 500,000 666,667 333 499,667 --
Issuance of shares in partial payments of note
Payable 3,911,830 11,122,580 5,561 3,906,269 --
Net loss (2,175,647) -- -- -- (2,175,647)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Balance as of December 31, 1999 11,028,068 25,956,278 12,977 37,542,279 (26,527,188)

Issuance of shares for inventory 500,500 888,888 444 500,056 --
Issuance of common stock 300,000 1,166,666 583 299,417 --
Issuance of stock in payment of note 163,264 1,221,677 611 162,653 --
Net loss (13,279,235) -- -- -- (13,279,235)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Balance as of December 31, 2000 $ (1,287,403) 29,233,509 $ 14,615 $ 38,504,405 $(39,806,423)
============ ============ ============ ============ ============

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-5

NORLAND MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998

2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------ ------------

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss (13,279,235) $ (2,175,647) $ (9,713,260)
------------ ------------ ------------
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities:
Non-recurring charges 7,258,036 -- 350,000
Provision for doubtful accounts (50,000) 45,249 1,357,769
Deferred income taxes 3,969,841 (340,000) (496,000)
Amortization expense 648,180 705,455 733,811
Depreciation expense 302,639 574,072 408,535
Loss on investment in Vitel, Inc. -- -- 260,000
Inventory write-off (recovery) -- (676,439) 443,323
Other -- 92,746 --
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of businesses acquired:
Accounts receivable 1,071,129 (685,561) 2,930,427
Inventories 1,223,698 953,467 2,199,014
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 116,745 (28,713) 19,867
Accounts payable (756,604) 862,952 (878,752)
Accrued expenses (643,521) (1,157,444) 404,090
Income taxes receivable -- 340,000 1,434,314
Customer deposits -- -- (500,000)
------------ ------------ ------------
Total adjustments 13,140,143 685,784 8,666,398
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (139,092) (1,489,863 (1,046,862)
------------ ------------ ------------

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment (44,401) (355,733) (925,401)
Sale of demonstration equipment 130,932 -- --
Loans to officers -- (3,696) (4,800)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 86,531 (359,429) (930,201)
------------ ------------ ------------

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 300,000 500,000 --
Net bank borrowings (repayments) (311,816) 311,816 --
Proceeds from stock options exercised -- 2 1
Proceeds from borrowings 50,000 -- --
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 38,184 811,818 1
------------ ------------ ------------

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (14,377) (1,037,474) (1,977,062)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 67,666 1,105,140 3,082,202
------------ ------------ ------------

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 53,289 $ 67,666 $ 1,105,140
============ ============ ============

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-6

NORLAND MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998

Noncash investing and financing activities:

On December 31, 1998, March 28,1999 and June 16,1999 the Company issued 7000,
4,588,469 and 6,534,111 of shares of common stock, respectively, in
satisfaction of portions of Note Payable. In addition, the principal amount
of the Note Payable was reduced on December 31, 1998 by $8,800,000 in
connection with the reduction of the purchase price for Norland Corporation.

In the year ended December 31, 1999, the Company reclassified $340,000 of income
taxes receivable to deferred income taxes.

On February 17, 2000, the Company exchanged 888,888 shares of its common
stock (market value $500,000) for a marketing credit of $500,000. The credit
was utilized by the Company to purchase inventory through an affiliate,
Bionix LLC.

On December 2, 2000, the Company elected to pay $163,264 of outstanding debt by
the issuance of 1,221,677 shares of its common stock.

Cash paid for:

2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------

Income taxes $ 9,079 $ 376 $ 23,915

Interest expense $216,619 $596,069 $858,102

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-7

NORLAND MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998

1. THE COMPANY:

Norland Medical Systems, Inc. ("NMS" or the "Company") develops, manufactures,
markets, sells, distributes and services bone densitometry systems which aid in
the detection and monitoring of bone diseases, and in the assessment of the
effect of existing and potential therapies for the treatment of such diseases
throughout the world to individual practitioners, hospitals, clinics, research
institutions and pharmaceutical companies. NMS also markets and services
therapeutic devices used in sports medicine, rehabilitative medicine and in pain
management to treat joints, muscles, and ligaments. NMS is the exclusive
marketer and distributor of certain medical products and technologies of Bionix
L.L.C. (U.S.) ("Bionix"), McCue Plc (U.K.) and Stratec Medizintechnik GmbH
(Germany) ("Stratec"). Bionix is controlled by the Chairman of NMS and has
certain exclusive distribution rights to certain products that it makes
available to NMS through exclusive sub-distribution agreements. Stratec is
wholly owned by a NMS shareholder.

The Company has been pursuing an aggressive strategy of cost reduction and
containment to make a profit on reduced sales. Operating expenses in fiscal 2000
were reduced by approximately $6,800,000 or 48% from the amount incurred in
fiscal year 1998. The Company believes it has positioned itself to return to
profitability in 2001 assuming it is able to reach its forecasted sales volume.
The Company is pursuing initiatives to increase liquidity, including external
investments and obtaining a line of credit. The Company does not have a
commitment for such financing, and there can be no guarantee that the Company
will be able to attain such financing.

In order to increase its cash flow, the Company is continuing its efforts to
stimulate sales of bone densitometers and new product offerings through its
diversification program. The Company is also continuing to focus its efforts on
improving the aging of its accounts receivable and reducing the level of bone
densitometer inventory. To do so, the Company has implemented higher credit
standards for its customers and is emphasizing the receipt of down payments from
customers at the time their purchase orders are received and attempting to more
closely coordinate the timing of purchases of parts and sub-assemblies.

F-8

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
its wholly owned subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and balances are
eliminated in consolidation.

REVENUE AND COST RECOGNITION

The Company primarily sells its products through third party dealers and
distributors. Revenue is generally recognized at the time products are shipped
and title passes to the customer. The Company estimates and records provisions
for product installation and user training in the period that the sale is
recorded.

The Company purchases certain products from Stratec through a company owned by
CEO of the Company. Management believes the gross profit recognized by NMS on
products purchased from the manufacturers materially approximates that which
would have been realized had the Company used unaffiliated suppliers.

The Company offers one-year warranties on both hardware and software components
of its bone densitometry systems. The provision for product warranties
represents an estimate for future claims arising under the terms of the
Company's various product warranties. The estimated future claims are accrued at
the time of sale. To the extent that the Company provides warranty services for
products that it does not manufacture the Company invoices the manufacturer for
the costs of performing such warranty services.

The Company has no obligations to provide any other services to any of its third
party dealers or distributors or their customers.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid short-term investments purchased
with initial maturities of three months or less.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock-based compensation related to employees and directors is accounted for in
accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion Number 25 "Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees".

INVESTMENTS

The Company also has a minority interest in Vitel, Inc. (U.S.) that was
accounted for as a long-term investment according to the cost method. In 1998
the investment was written off reflecting management's estimate that its
carrying value was other than temporarily impaired.

F-9

INVENTORY

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market; cost is determined
principally by the first-in, first-out method. Systems used in the Company's
short-term rental program are carried in inventory at the lower of cost or net
realizable value until the time of sale.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Machinery, equipment, management information systems, furniture and fixtures are
recorded at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over three
to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the
remaining life of the lease or ten years.

The Company's demonstration systems used for marketing and customer service
purposes are carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value until the time
of sale. From time to time, the Company may judge it desirable for marketing
purposes to provide a device to a prominent scientist or research institution.
In such cases, the Company will carry the device at cost less amortization, with
amortization calculated on a straight-line basis over thirty-six months.

GOODWILL

Goodwill, net of amortization, was $0 and $7,555,564 at December 31, 2000 and
1999, respectively, and was being amortized on a straight-line basis over 15
years. Accumulated amortization of goodwill was $0 and $1,370,281 at December
31, 2000 and 1999, respectively (see Note 4).

LONG-LIVED ASSETS

Management evaluates on an ongoing basis whether events or changes in
circumstances exist that would indicate that the carrying value of the Company's
long-lived assets may not be recoverable. Should there be an indication of
impairment in the value of its long-lived assets, management would estimate the
future cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets and their
eventual disposition and recognize a specific provision against such assets if
the aggregate nominal estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the
carrying value of the assets. In considering whether events or changes in
circumstances exist, management assesses several factors, including a
significant change in the extent or manner in which the assets are used, a
significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that
could affect the value of the assets, an adverse action or assessment of a
regulator, and a current period operating or cash flow loss combined with a
history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that
demonstrates continuing losses associated with such assets.

INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for deferred income taxes by recognizing the tax
consequences of "temporary differences" by applying enacted statutory tax rates
applicable to future years to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities. The
effect of a change in tax rates on deferred taxes is recognized in income in the
period that includes the enactment date. The Company realizes an income tax
benefit from the exercise of certain stock options or the early disposition of
stock acquired upon exercise of certain options. This benefit results in an
increase in additional paid in capital.

F-10

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Research and development costs are charged to operations as incurred.

LOSS PER SHARE

Basic per share amounts are computed using the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding. Diluted per share amounts are computed using the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding, after giving effect to dilutive
options, using the treasury stock method.

Options to purchase 1,804,500, 952,000 and 867,500 shares of common stock were
outstanding at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively, but were not
included in the computation of diluted loss per share because their effect was
anti-dilutive.

CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

The Company generally sells on credit terms ranging from thirty to ninety days
or against irrevocable letters of credit. Any financing of the end user is the
decision of, and dependent on, the distributor in each territory. At December
31, 2000 and 1999, and for the years then ended, no customer had outstanding
trade receivables in excess of 10% of total outstanding trade receivables nor
accounted for more than 10% of revenues. The Company sells to customers in
various geographic territories worldwide (see Note 14).

MANAGEMENT ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting period. Estimates are used when accounting for the allowance for
doubtful accounts, potentially excess and obsolete inventory, depreciation and
amortization, warranty reserves, income tax valuation allowances and
contingencies, among others. Actual results could differ significantly from
those estimates.

FOREIGN EXCHANGE EXPOSURE

The Company's purchases and sales of products and services are made primarily in
U.S. dollars. As a result, the Company has minimal exposure to foreign exchange
risk in the short-term. However, a portion of the Company's products are
supplied by Stratec and sold along with the Company's products into foreign
markets. Any significant and lasting change in the exchange rates between the
U.S. dollar and the currencies of those countries could have a material effect
on both the costs and sales of those products and services.

F-11

ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity",
becomes effective for the Company's fiscal years beginning January 1, 2001. The
Company does not expect the adoption of this statement to have a material impact
on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

3. DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT:

On October 1, 1999, the Company and Stratec agreed to terminate their September
11, 1997 distribution agreement and enter into a new arrangement. Stratec and
Bionix entered into a distribution agreement dated October 1, 1999 with respect
to the right to exclusively distribute Stratec products in North and Latin
America. Concurrently, Bionix and NMS entered into an exclusive sub-distribution
agreement with respect to the sale of Stratec products in North and Latin
America through September 30, 2003. Under terms of the sub-distribution
agreement, NMS may purchase Stratec products at a fixed percentage discount from
the products' actual selling prices to the customers. As a result of a lack of
sales of pQCT systems in Latin America, the sub-distribution agreement was
limited to North America on December 31, 2000. Stratec markets its pQCT systems
outside of North America through other distributors.

NMS and Bionix also entered into two exclusive sub-distribution agreements dated
October 1, 1999 with respect to certain non-bone densitometry products sold
through Bionix according to its distribution agreements with the third party
companies. Under terms of the four-year sub-distribution agreements, NMS may
purchase products from Bionix at a fixed percentage discount from contractually
stated selling prices subject to a mechanism to periodically adjust the
contractual selling prices.

4. NON-RECURRING AND OTHER CHARGES:

The Company recognized non-recurring charges of $7,258,036, $0 and $400,000 in
2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The Company had incurred operating losses for
eleven consecutive quarters. Although the losses have declined substantially as
a result of cost containment measures taken by the Company, gross revenue has
continued to decline. Sales of new products associated with the Company's
diversification program have not met Company expectations and have not offset
the decline in the Company's bone densitometry equipment lines. Further, sales
of the Company's Orbasone product (less than 10% of gross sales) have been
impacted by the FDA review of the product.

As a result of the above, in the second quarter, the Company's management
evaluated its financial position and determined that it would be appropriate to
charge to operations the remaining unamortized costs of goodwill due to
impairment. In addition, the Company determined that it was more likely than not
that the remaining deferred tax assets would not be realized and accordingly
increased the valuation allowance to fully provide for the deferred tax assets.
(See Note 11). Such second quarter charges aggregated $11,367,877; $7,258,036
for goodwill and $4,109,841 for deferred taxes. The impairment was based on the
excess carrying value of the assets over the assets fair value. The fair value
of the assets was generally determined as the estimates of future discounted
cash flows from operations necessary to realize those assets.

In November 1998 the Company settled certain patent infringement litigation and,
in connection with the settlement, agreed to pay $400,000 in patent licensing
fees, the timing of such payments to be based on future

F-12

sales of certain products through August 2004. The company paid $181,623,
$168,377 and $50,000 in 2000, 1999 and 1998 respectively, associated with this
settlement.

5. INVENTORIES:

Inventories consist of the following as of December 31:

2000 1999
----- ----

Raw materials, product kits,
Spare parts and sub-assemblies $ 966,652 $2,093,351
Work in progress 334,090 380,511
Finished goods 734,619 420,455
Inventory reserve (811,770) (650,000)
---------- ----------

$1,223,591 $2,244,317
========== ==========

6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:

Property and equipment consisted of the following as of December 31:

2000 1999
----- ----
Machinery and equipment $1,628,710 $1,482,475
Demonstration systems 278,581 664,640
Tooling 712,345 659,674
Furniture and fixtures 436,592 436,629
Leasehold improvements 116,896 116,896
Construction in progress -- 154,479
---------- ----------
3,173,124 3,514,784

Accumulated depreciation
and amortization (2,386,347) (2,338,837)
---------- ----------

$ 786,777 $1,175,947
========== ==========

7. ACQUISITIONS:

NORLAND CORP.

On September 11, 1997, the Company acquired Norland Corp. in a transaction
accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The consolidated
financial statements reflect the acquisition of all of the issued and
outstanding stock of Norland Corp. for $17,500,000 from the date of acquisition.
The $17,500,000 consideration consisted of a $1,250,000 cash payment made on
September 11, 1997 and a $16,250,000 Purchase Note (the "Note") (see Note 8).

F-13

On December 31, 1998, in connection with the settlement of certain litigation,
the terms of the Norland Corp. acquisition were amended. Effective as of
December 31, 1998, the original $17,500,000 purchase price was reduced to
$8,700,000 by reducing the principal amount of the Note from $16,250,000 to
$7,450,000 and the annual interest rate was reduced to 6 1/2% from 7%.

8. BANK BORROWINGS AND NOTE PAYABLE:

On August 10, 1999, the Company entered into a $2 million bank line of credit
agreement in which the Company may make borrowings according to an accounts
receivable based formula. Interest on any outstanding borrowings accrued at a
variable rate based on prime plus 1.25%. Borrowings under the agreement were
collateralized by the Company's assets. In connection with such agreement, the
Company had granted to the bank warrants to purchase 20,000 shares of Company
common stock at $0.01 per share. As of December 31, 1999, the Company had
outstanding borrowings of $311,816 with interest accruing at 9.75%. The line of
credit expired on August 11, 2000, the loan was repaid in full and there was no
outstanding liability as of December 31, 2000.

In connection with the acquisition of Norland Corp. (See Note 7), consideration
included a $16,250,000 Note bearing interest at the rate of 7% per annum
beginning September 30, 1997. A $1,250,000 portion of the Note was originally
payable in cash on March 11, 1998. The Note was amended to provide that such
payment is not due until such time as the Company receives at least $2,000,000
in proceeds from a debt or equity financing. The remaining principal was due and
payable on September 11, 2002. The Company could prepay the Note at any time,
pay the principal (except for the $1,250,000 payment referred to above) with
shares of Company

F-14

common stock valued at the time of payment and extend the September 11, 2002
maturity date by up to two years (at increasing interest rates). The Note is
collateralized by a pledge of the shares of Norland Corp.

Effective as of December 31,1998, in connection with the amendment of the terms
of the Norland Corp. acquisition, the Note principal was reduced from
$16,250,000 to $7,450,000 and the annual interest rate was reduced from 7% to 6
1/2%. The other payment terms, including those with respect to maturity,
prepayment and the ability to pay principal by delivering shares of common
stock, were not changed. Also on December 31, 1998, the Company paid $1,890,000
in Note principal by delivering 7,000,000 shares of Company's common stock to
NMS BV priced at $0.27 per share, the average closing price for the five trading
days prior to December 31, 1998. The fair value of the Note was determined as of
the December 31, 1998 amendment date using a market rate of interest of 10.75%,
which resulted in the establishment of a $874,310 note discount.

On March 28, 1999, the Company exercised its right to pay $4,310,000 of the
remaining $5,560,000 of Note principal by delivering 11,122,580 additional
shares of Common Stock priced at $0.3875 per share, the average closing price
for the prior five trading days. With the $4,310,000 reduction in Note
principal, the Note discount was reduced by $635,170 and the remaining $239,140
of Note discount being amortized using the effective interest method over the
Note's remaining term. The fair value of the Note approximates its carrying
value. The Company is in default of the interest due on this note as of December
31,2000, and accordingly the note has been classified as a current liability.

The Note activity described above may be summarized as follows as of December
31, 2000:

Note principal as of September 11, 1998
acquisition date $16,250,000
Reduction in Note principal from reduced
purchase price (8,800,000)
Payment of Note principal by delivering
18,122,580 shares (6,200,000)
Note discount for market rate of interest (90,314)
-----------
Note payable, net of discount $ 1,159,686
===========

9. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT):

Effective with stockholder approval received on June 2, 1999, the Company
amended its Certificate of Incorporation increasing the number of authorized
shares of Common Stock from 20,000,000 to 45,000,000. The Company has authorized
1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0005 per share, issuable in
series with such rights, powers and preferences as may be fixed by the Board of
Directors. At December 31, 2000 and 1999, there was no preferred stock
outstanding.

10. COMPENSATION PROGRAMS:

STOCK OPTION PLAN

The Company has a stock-based compensation plan whereby stock options may be
granted to officers, employees and non-employee consultants to purchase a
specified number of shares of Common Stock. All outstanding options granted have
an exercise price not less than 100% of the market value of the Company's Common
Stock at the date of grant, are for a term not to exceed 10 years, and vest over
a four year period at 25% per year.

The amended and restated 1994 Stock Option Plan includes 3,500,000 shares of
Common Stock reserved for issuance. This includes an increase of 1,250,000
approved on June 1, 2000. On June 2, 1999,

F-15

the Company established a new Board of Directors Stock Option Plan (the "Board
Plan"). Under the board Plan, 500,000 shares of Common Stock are reserved for
issuance to non-employee Board members, including the automatic option grant
program grants options to new non-employee Board members to purchase 30,000
shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value at
the grant date for a maximum term of ten years and is subject to 25% vesting
each year and early termination upon the Optionee's leaving the Board. In
addition, Board members are granted 20,000 options as compensation for attending
Board meetings. The Board Plan was increased by 150,000 shares to 500,000 shares
on June 1, 2000.

On October 6, 1998 and December 14, 1998, the Board of Directors approved the
repricing of certain employee stock options. Approximately 673,750 shares were
repriced to $0.67 per share on October 6, 1998 and December 14, 1998,
representing a price that was not less than the market value at such dates. On
December 14, 2000 the Board of Directors approved the repricing of certain
options and accordingly 1,524,500 shares were repriced to $.15 per share.
Subsequent to the option repricing on December 14, 2000, the company will
measure compensation expense using variable plan accounting. Compensation cost
will continue to be adjusted for increases or decreases in the intrinsic value
over the term of the options or until they are exercised or forfeited, or
expire. The effect of this change was not material in 2000.

The following is a summary of options related to the 1994 Stock Option Plan and
the Board Plan as of December 31:

Range of Range of Range of
Option Option Option
Prices Prices Prices
2000 Per Share 1999 per Share 1998 per Share
-------- ------------- --------- ------------- ------- -----------

Options outstanding
at beginning 952,000 $0.0005-15.00 867,500 $0.0005-15.00 751,750 $0.0005-15.00
of year

Cancellations (283,500) $0.15 (70,500) $0.53-6.38 (115,500) $6.38-20.00

Granted 1,137,500 $0.15-0.67 158,000 $0.35-0.67 232,750 $0.67

Exercised (1,500) $0.0005 (3,000) $0.0005 (1,500) $0.0005
--------- ------- --------

Options outstanding
at end of year 1,804,500 $0.15-0.67 952,000 $0.0005-15.00 867,500 $0.0005-15.00
========= ======= =======

Options exercisable
at end of year 487,438 430,250 251,313
========= ======= ========

Additions to
incentive stock
option plan 1,400,000
=========

Options available
for grant at end
of year 2,195,500 665,000 752,500
========= ======= ========

F-16

The following table summarizes information about significant groups of stock
options outstanding at December 31, 2000:

Weighted Weighted
Weighted Average Weighted Average
Average Remaining Average Remaining
Exercise Options Exercise Contractual Life Options Exercise Contractual Life
Prices Outstanding Price in Years Exercisable Price in Years
-------- ----------- -------- ---------------- ----------- -------- ----------------

$0.15 1,529,500 $0.15 8 424,938 $0.15 6

$0.53 25,000 $0.53 9 0 $0.53 10

$0.67 250,000 $0.67 8 62,500 $0.67 8

Had compensation expense for the Company's 2000, 1999 and 1998 grants for the
stock-based compensation plan been determined based on the fair value of the
options at their grant dates consistent with SFAS 123 "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation", the Company's net loss and loss per common share for
2000, 1999 and 1998 would approximate the pro forma amounts below:

2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
Net loss:
As reported $(13,279,235) $(2,175,647) $ (9,713,260)
Pro forma $(13,389,074) $(2,707,945) (10,168,139)

Loss per share:
As reported - Basic
and diluted $(0.49) $(0.10) $(1.35)
Pro forma - Basic and
diluted $(0.49) $(0.13) $(1.41)

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions used for
grants during each of the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998: dividend
yield of 0%, risk-free weighted average interest rate of 5.2%, 6.5% and 5%,
expected volatility factor of 128%, 146%, and 117%, respectively and an expected
option term of 4 years. The weighted average fair value at date of grant for
options granted during 2000, 1999 and 1998 was $0.27, $2.31 and $0.49 per
option, respectively.

401(K) PLAN

Pursuant to the Norland Medical Systems, Inc. and Norland Corporation Retirement
Savings Plans, eligible employees may elect to contribute a portion of their
salary on a pre-tax basis. With respect to employee contributions of up to 7% of
salary, the Company makes a contribution at the rate of 25 cents on the dollar.
Contributions are subject to applicable limitations contained in the Internal
Revenue Code. Employees are at all times vested in their own contributions;
Company matching contributions vest gradually over six years of service. The
Company's policy is to fund plan contributions as they accrue. Contribution
expense was $30,403, $42,703 and $42,710 for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998, respectively.

F-17

11. INCOME TAXES:

The components of income taxes (benefit) for the years ended December 31 were as
follows:

2000 1999 1998
----- ----- ----

Current:
Federal -- $ 340,000 $(463,000)
State $ 149,079 -- 13,000
---------- --------- ---------
$ 149,079 340,000 (450,000)

Deferred:
Federal 3,437,882 (340,000) (452,000)
State 531,959 -- (44,000)
---------- --------- ---------
3,969,841 (340,000) (496,000)
---------- --------- ---------
Total $4,118,920 $ -- $(946,000)
========== ========== ==========

Income tax (benefits) differ from the statutory federal income tax rate of
34% for the years ended December 31 as follows:

2000 1999 1998
----- ----- ----

Statutory income tax rate (34.0%) (34.0%) (34.0%)
Valuation allowance 49.9% 23.1% 23.0%
State income taxes, net of
Federal benefit 1.6% -- (0.3%)
Non-deductible goodwill 26.5% 9.9% 1.9%

Other 0.2% 1.0% 0.5%
----- ----- -----

Effective income tax rate 44.2% 0.0% (8.9%)
===== ===== =====

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial statement
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes and net operating loss
carryforwards. Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and
liabilities as of December 31 are summarized below.

2000 1999
Deferred tax assets and
liabilities:

Inventory $1,141,343 $1,143,706

Allowance for doubtful
accounts 112,273 130,923
Accrued liabilities 74,640 318,743
Other 97,384 97,383
Valuation allowance (1,425,640) --
---------- ----------
Net current deferred tax
assets -- 1,690,755
Net operating loss
carryforwards 5,567,889 4,564,726
Discount on note payable (33,687) (53,502)
Other 27,152 30,296
Valuation allowance (5,561,354) (2,262,434)
Net noncurrent deferred
tax assets -- 2,279,086
---------- ----------
Total deferred tax
assets $ -- $3,969,841
========== ==========

F-18

Realization of the deferred tax asset is dependent on the Company's ability to
generate sufficient taxable income in future periods. Based on the historical
operating losses and the Company's existing financial condition, in 2000, the
Company determined that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets
would not be realized. Accordingly, the Company recorded a valuation allowance
to reduce the deferred tax assets.

The Company has utilizable federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $14,800,000 at December 31, 2000 for income tax purposes, which
expire in 2008 through 2020.

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

WESLEY D. JOHNSON AND PAMELA S. T. JOHNSON V. REYNALD G. BONMATI, KURT W.
STREAMS AND NORLAND MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. This shareholder's class action was
filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
on April 12, 1998 against the Company, Reynald G. Bonmati, its Chief Executive
Officer, and Kurt W. Streams, its Chief Financial Officer. The complaint made
claims under Sections 10(b) and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
arising from the Company's announcement on March 16, 1998 that it would be
restating its financial statements with respect to the fourth quarter of 1996,
and the first three quarters of 1997. The claims were made on behalf of a
purported class of certain persons who purchased the Company's Common Stock from
February 25, 1997 through March 16, 1998. Plaintiffs seek compensatory damages
in an unspecified amount, together with prejudgement interest, costs and
expenses (including attorneys' fees and disbursements). On August 10, 1998,
prior to the expiration of the defendants' time to respond to the complaint, the
lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint purporting to expand the class period
through March 31, 1998. On or about December 23, 1999 the parties executed a
Stipulation of Settlement, which provides for a settlement of $1.7 million, to
be funded solely by the Company's directors and officer's insurance carrier. The
United States District Court approved this Stipulation of Settlement at a March
30, 2000 hearing, this case is now settled without any additional liability to
the Company. Upon settlement of this case in 2000, the Company reduced to $0 the
$150,000 liability which was recorded to cover any additional loss with respect
to this matter. This adjustment is reflected in general and administrative
expenses within the Company's 2000 statement of operations.

In addition, in the normal course of business, the Company is named in lawsuits
in which claims are asserted against the Company. In the opinion of management,
the liabilities if any, which may ultimately result from such lawsuits are not
expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of
operations or cash flows of the Company.

LEASES

The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments as of December 31,
2000:

2001 $220,467
2002 201,506
2003 154,184
2004 114,480
2005 114,480
Thereafter 76,320

F-19

13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:

SALES AND PURCHASES

During 2000, 1999 and 1998, the Company sold, $9,449, $92,883 and $9,803,
respectively, of products and services to Stratec. During 2000, 1999, and
1998, the Company purchased $799,588, $972,679, and $1,244,766, respectively,
from Stratec. The amounts owed at December 31, 2000, and 1999 by NMS to
Stratec for such purchases were $372,244 and $292,315, respectively. The
Company purchased $1,476,685 of products from Bionix during 2000; the amount
owed to Bionix at December 31, 2000 was $178,338. During 1999, the Company
purchased $243,404 of products from Bionix. The amount owed at December 31,
1999 by NMS to Bionix for such purchases was $135,375.

NOTE PAYABLE

In connection with the acquisition of Norland Corp. (Note 7), consideration
included a Note Payable (Note 8) issued to the seller, NMS BV. As of December
31, 2000 and 1999, $90,281 of the Note payable was held by Bones L.L.C., a
private investment firm that is controlled by the Chairman of NMS, and the
remainder is held by a third party distributor of NMS products in Japan.

14. SUPPLEMENTAL SALES AND CUSTOMER INFORMATION:

For the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, no customer accounted for
more than 10% of revenues. The Company's largest customers are medical device
distributors.

The Company's sales consisted of domestic sales to customers and export sales to
customers in the following geographic territories:

2000 1999 1998
----- ----- ----

Pacific Rim $1,670,201 12.5% $ 2,135,821 12.0% $ 2,053,356 14.3%

Europe/Middle East 661,560 4.9 3,305,159 18.6 1,688,945 11.7
Latin America
---------- ----- ----------- ----- ----------- -----
2,945,601 22.0 1,214,493 6.8 1,043,031 7.3
---------- ----- ----------- ----- ----------- -----

Export Sales 5,277,362 39.4 6,655,473 37.4 4,785,332 33.3
---------- ----- ----------- ----- ----------- -----

Domestic Sales 8,125,461 60.6 11,142,562 62.6 9,599,159 66.7
---------- ----- ----------- ----- ----------- -----
$13,402,82 100.0% $17,798,035 100.0% $14,384,491 100.0%
---------- ----- ----------- ----- ----------- -----

F-20

15. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED):

2000 Quarters
-----------------------------------------------------------------
First Second Third Fourth Total
----- ------- ----- ------- -----

Revenue $ 3,979,286 $ 3,846,585 $ 2,824,507 $ 2,752,445 $ 13,402,823
Gross profit 1,775,739 1,726,690 1,244,405 1,059,683 5,806,517
Operating loss (502,433) (7,718,578) (600,431) (127,958) (8,949,400)
Net loss (579,190) (11,884,531) (658,007) (157,507) (13,279,235)

Weighted average shares:
Basic and diluted 26,005,118 26,979,232 27,045,166 27,648,283 27,029,566

Basic and diluted loss
per share $ (0.02) $ (0.44) $ (0.02) $ (0.00) $ (0.49)

1999 Quarters
-----------------------------------------------------------------
First Second Third Fourth Total
----- ------- ----- ------- -----

Revenue $ 4,825,934 $ 4,357,201 $ 4,383,712 $ 4,231,188 $ 17,798,035
Gross profit 2,294,036 2,351,061 1,903,432 1,699,829 8,248,358
Operating income (479,908) (375,414) (329,521) (752,252) (1,937,005)
Net loss (614,884) (406,372) (363,153) (791,238) (2,175,647)

Weighted average shares
basic and diluted 14,265,997 20,332,175 25,735,887 25,956,278 21,616,010

Basic and diluted loss
per share: $ (0.04) $ (0.02) $ (0.01) $ (0.03) $ (0.10)

F-21

NORLAND MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

SCHEDULE II

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000, 1999 AND 1998

Balance at Charged to Balance at
Beginning Costs and End of
of Period Expenses Deductions Period
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
2000
- ----

Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts $ 351,000 $ (50,000) -- $301,000
========== ========== =========== ========

Obsolescence Reserve $ 650,000 $ 203,923 $ (42,152) $811,771
========== ========= =========== ========

1999
- ----

Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts $ 300.00 $ 45,249 $ 5,751 $351,000
========== ========= =========== ========

Obsolescence Reserve $1,400,000 $(676,439) $ (73,561) $650,000
========== ========== =========== ========

1998
- ----

Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts $2,200,000 $1,357,769 $(3,257,769) $300,000
========== ========== =========== ========

Obsolescence Reserve $1,275,000 $ 443,323 $ (318,323) $1,400,000
========== ========= =========== ==========

F-22

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

PART III

ITEMS 10, 11, 12 AND 13.

The information required under these items is contained in the Company's Proxy
Statement relating to its 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the
close of the Company's fiscal year end. This information is incorporated herein
by reference.

F-23

PART IV

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) Financial Statement and Financial Statement Schedules.

See Index to Financial Statements at Item 8 of this Report.

(b) Exhibits.

Exhibit
Number Description

2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Dove Medical Systems,
DMS Acquisition Corp. and Norland Medical Systems, Inc., (C)

2.2 Purchase Agreement by and among Robert L. Piccioni and Joan
Piccioni, CHC, Inc., Mirella Monte Belshe and Norland Medical
Systems, Inc. (C)

2.3 Stock Purchase Agreement between Norland Medical Systems, Inc.
and Norland Medical Systems B.V. (G)

2.4 Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of December 31,
1998 between Norland Medical Systems, B.V. and Norland Medical
Systems, Inc. (I)

3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Norland Medical Systems,
Inc. (H)

3.2 By-laws of Norland Medical Systems, Inc., as amended (A)

+10.1 Distribution Agreement dated as of April 1, 1995 by and among
Norland Corporation, Stratec Medizintechnik GmbH and Norland
Medical Systems, Inc. (A)

+10.2 Product Development Loan Agreement dated as of June 1, 1995 by
and among Stratec Medizintechnik GmbH, Norland Corporation and
Norland Medical Systems, Inc. (A)

10.3 Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (G)

10.4 Exclusive Distributor Agreement dated as of July 1, 1996 among
Norland Medical Systems, Inc., Nissho Iwai Corporation and Nissho
Iwai American Corporation (E)

10.5 Exclusive Distributor Agreement dated as of June 2, 1995 between
Norland Medical Systems, Inc. and Meditec Co., Ltd. (A)

10.6 Amendment No. 1 to Distribution Agreement by and among Norland
Corporation, Stratec Medizintechnik GmbH and Norland Medical
Systems, Inc. (B)

10.7 Amendment No. 2 to Distribution Agreement by and among Norland
Corporation, Stratec Medizintechnik GmbH and Norland Medical
Systems, Inc. (D)

II-1

+10.8 Amendment No. 3 to Distribution Agreement by and among Norland
Corporation, Stratec Medizintechnik GmbH and Norland Medical
Systems, Inc. (F)

+10.9 Amended Distribution Agreement dated as of September 11, 1997
among Stratec Medizintechnik GmbH, Norland Medical Systems, Inc.
and Norland Corporation (G)

10.10 Amendment No. 1 to Amended Distribution Agreement dated as of
December 7, 1998 by and among Stratec Medizintechnik GmbH,
Norland Medical Systems, Inc. and Norland Corporation. (A)

21 Subsidiaries

None

- ------------------------

+ Confidentiality requested as to certain provisions

(A) This Exhibit was previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-93220), effective
August 1, 1995, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(B) This Exhibit was previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Report on
Form 10-K dated March 27, 1996 and is incorporated herein by reference.

(C) This Exhibit was previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Report on
Form 8-K dated April 15, 1996 and is incorporated herein by reference.

(D) This Exhibit was previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-05303) and is
incorporated herein by reference.

(E) This Exhibit was previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Report on
Form 10-Q dated August 13, 1996 and is incorporated herein by reference.

(F) This Exhibit was previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company's report on
Form 10-K dated March 28, 1997 and is incorporated herein by reference.

(G) This Exhibit was previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Proxy
Statement dated July 25, 1997 and is incorporated herein by reference.

(H) This Exhibit was previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company's report on
Form 10-Q dated November 13, 1997 and is incorporated herein by reference.

(I) This Exhibit was previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company's report on
Form 10-K dated March 31, 1999 and is incorporated herein by reference.

II-2

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of White
Plains, New York, on the 12th day of April, 2001.

NORLAND MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

By: /s/ REYNALD G. BONMATI
------------------------------
Name: Reynald G. Bonmati
Title: President

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints
Reynald G. Bonmati and Kurt W. Streams, or either of them, the true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent of the undersigned, with full power of substitution
and resubstitution, for and in the name, place and stead of the undersigned, in
any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report and
to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Commission, and hereby grants to such attorneys-in-fact and
agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite or desirable to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as the
undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitutes, may lawfully do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant, Norland Medical Systems, Inc., in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.

Signature Capacity In Which Signed Date
--------- ------------------------ ----

/s/ REYNALD G. BONMATI Chairman of the Board and April 12, 2001
- ------------------------- President (Principal
Reynald G. Bonmati Executive Officer); and
Director

/s/ RICHARD L. RAHN Vice President, Finance April 12, 2001
- ------------------------- (Principal Financial
Richard L. Rahn Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)

II-3

Signature Capacity In Which Signed Date
--------- ------------------------ ----

/s/ JEREMY ALLEN Director April 12, 2001
- -------------------------
Jeremy Allen

/s/ JAMES J. BAKER Director April 12, 2001
- -------------------------
James J. Baker

/s/ MICHAEL W. HUBER Director April 12, 2001
- -------------------------
Michael W. Huber

/s/ ANDRE-JACQUES NEUSY Director April 12, 2001
- -------------------------
Andre-Jacques Neusy

/s/ ALBERT S. WAXMAN Director April 12, 2001
- -------------------------
Albert S. Waxman

II-4