- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------
FORM 10-K
/X/ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED]
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
OR
/ / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-7568
COLTEC INDUSTRIES INC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
PENNSYLVANIA 13-1846375
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification
No.)
430 PARK AVENUE,
NEW YORK, N.Y. 10022
(Address of principal (Zip Code)
executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 940-0400
------------------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
TITLE OF EACH CLASS ON WHICH REGISTERED
- --------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share......................... New York Stock Exchange
Pacific Stock Exchange
11 1/4% Debentures Due December 1, 2015........................ Pacific Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes _X_ No ____
------------------------
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. _X_
On February 25, 1994, there were outstanding 69,762,203 shares of the
registrant's Common Stock, par value $.01 per share. On February 25, 1994, the
aggregate market value of the registrant's voting stock (based on a closing
price of $20.00 per share as reported by the Composite Tape Association) held by
non-affiliates was $971,378,700. For purposes of the foregoing calculation, all
directors and officers of the registrant have been deemed to be affiliates, but
the registrant disclaims that any of such directors or officers is an affiliate.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant's 1993 Annual Report to its shareholders are
incorporated by reference into Part I (Item 1), Part II (Items 6, 7 and 8) and
Part IV (Item 14) hereof.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
Coltec Industries Inc and its consolidated subsidiaries (together referred
to as "Coltec") manufacture and sell a diversified range of highly-engineered
aerospace, automotive and industrial products in the United States and, to a
lesser extent, abroad. Coltec's operations are conducted through three principal
segments: Aerospace/Government, Automotive and Industrial. Set forth below is a
description of the business conducted by the respective divisions within
Coltec's three industry segments. The tabular five-year presentation of
financial information in respect of each industry segment under the caption
"Industry Segment Information" of Coltec's 1993 Annual Report to its
shareholders and the information in Note 11 of the Notes to Financial Statements
of Coltec's 1993 Annual Report to its shareholders are incorporated herein by
reference.
AEROSPACE/GOVERNMENT
Through its Aerospace/Government segment, Coltec is a leading manufacturer
of landing gear systems, engine fuel controls, turbine blades, fuel injectors,
nozzles and related components for commercial and military aircraft, and also
produces high-horsepower diesel engines for naval ships and diesel, gas and
dual-fuel engines for electric power plants. The divisions, principal products
and principal markets of the Aerospace/Government segment are as follows:
DIVISIONS PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS PRINCIPAL MARKETS
- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- -----------------------------
Menasco Aircraft landing gear systems Commercial and military
and components, flight aircraft manufacturers
control actuation systems
and other aircraft
components
Chandler Evans Control Aircraft fuel pumps and Aircraft engine manufacturers
Systems control systems
Walbar Blades, vanes and discs for Aircraft engine manufacturers
jet engines
Delavan Gas Turbine Products Fuel injectors, spraybars and Aircraft engine manufacturers
other components for gas
turbine engines
Lewis Engineering Cockpit instrumentation and Commercial and military
sensors aircraft and engine
manufacturers
Fairbanks Morse Engine Large engines powered by U.S. Navy, electric utilities
diesel fuel or natural gas
With reductions in domestic military spending, Coltec has placed an
increasing emphasis on sales by its Aerospace/Government segment to commercial
aircraft manufacturers. In addition to producing landing gear for various
Boeing, McDonnell Douglas and other aircraft, Coltec has been awarded a contract
to supply main landing gear for the Boeing 737-700 aircraft. In the case of
Coltec's successful bid to become the supplier of landing gear for the Boeing
777 aircraft, Coltec developed and delivered the first landing gear set ahead of
schedule in August 1993. Coltec has also been successful in increasing its
penetration of the commercial aircraft engine market, including the commuter
aircraft and general aviation markets, through its Chandler Evans Control
Systems, Walbar and Delavan Gas Turbine Divisions. See "Aerospace Controls",
"Aircraft Engine Components" and "Gas Turbine Products" below.
In most of the divisions in this segment, Coltec is a leading manufacturer
in the markets it services and has focused its efforts on manufacturing quality
products involving a high engineering content or proprietary technology. In many
cases in which Coltec developed components for use in a specific aircraft,
Coltec has become the primary source for replacement parts and, in some cases,
service for these products in the aftermarket. Many of the programs for which
Coltec has been awarded a contract or for which Coltec has been selected as a
manufacturer are subject to termination or modification. See "--Contract Risks".
LANDING GEAR SYSTEMS
Coltec, through its Menasco Aerosystems and Menasco Overhaul Divisions and
its Canadian subsidiary, Menasco Aerospace Ltd. (collectively referred to as
"Menasco"), designs, manufactures and markets landing gear systems, parts and
components for medium-to-heavy commercial aircraft and for military aircraft and
provides spare parts and overhaul services for these products. Menasco is one of
the leading suppliers of landing gear for medium-to-heavy commercial and
military aircraft. It also designs and manufactures aircraft flight control
actuation systems and is a team leader in a flight control systems research and
development program directed toward the design, validation and implementation of
advanced "fly-by-wire/fly-by-light" flight control technology. Landing gear,
including components, parts, and overhaul services for landing gear, accounted
for approximately 87% of Menasco's sales and 11% of Coltec's sales during 1993.
For the years 1993, 1992 and 1991, commercial sales accounted for 62%, 73% and
70%, respectively, of Menasco's total sales.
Menasco has been awarded contracts to supply the main and nose landing gear
for the Boeing 777 aircraft. Delivery of landing gear for the Boeing 777
aircraft commenced in 1993. The Boeing Company ("Boeing") has announced that 147
firm orders and options for an additional 108 of its 777 aircraft have been
placed as of December 31, 1993. Menasco has been selected to replace a
competitor as the supplier of the main landing gear for the Fokker Fo-100
aircraft as well as to supply the main landing gear and flight controls for the
Fokker Fo-70. Menasco has supplied most of the flight controls for the Fo-100
since this aircraft was introduced. Other commercial programs for which Menasco
is currently producing landing gear and flight controls include the main and
nose landing gear for the Boeing 757 aircraft, the main landing gear for the
Boeing 737 aircraft, the nose landing gear for the Boeing 767 aircraft, the main
landing gear for the McDonnell Douglas MD-80/90 aircraft, the flight controls
for the Canadair RJ-601 aircraft and landing gear components for the Airbus
Industrie A-320 and A-330/340 aircraft.
Menasco is supplying the main and nose landing gear for the Taiwanese
Indigenous Defense Fighter being built for the Taiwanese government and is
developing the main and nose landing gear for the Lockheed/Boeing F-22 Advanced
Tactical Fighter. Other military programs for which Menasco is currently
producing landing gear and flight controls include the main and tail landing
gear for the McDonnell Douglas AH-64 Apache helicopter, the nose landing gear
and flight controls for the McDonnell Douglas C-17 military transport, the main
and nose landing gear for the F-16 aircraft produced by Lockheed Corp.
("Lockheed") and the Lockheed C-130 military transport.
Landing gear and flight controls are designed for specific aircraft and
produced by a single manufacturer. Menasco has been the sole supplier of this
equipment for each program it has been awarded. The price of landing gear
constitutes approximately 2% of the total cost of an aircraft.
2
Menasco joined with Messier-Bugatti for the development and production of
landing gear for the Boeing 777 and the Airbus 330/340 aircraft and has agreed
to cooperate on future ventures where appropriate, which may include Airbus and
McDonnell Douglas programs, although no major commercial programs are currently
formalized.
In addition to manufacturing and marketing aircraft landing gear and flight
controls, Menasco provides complete overhaul services on a worldwide basis for
landing gear and actuation systems through its overhaul facilities in the United
States and Canada.
In view of the relatively small number of medium-to-heavy aircraft
manufacturers, Menasco's commercial sales of landing gear have historically been
concentrated among a limited number of purchasers, primarily Boeing, McDonnell
Douglas and Lockheed in the United States and Fokker in Europe.
The market for landing gear is highly competitive, with a small number of
airframe manufacturers evaluating potential suppliers based on design, price and
record of past performance. Menasco has made significant investments in
long-term marketing to promote working relationships with customers and to
enhance Menasco's engineering department's understanding of customer
requirements. Menasco believes it is this engineering expertise, together with
its record of on-time delivery, quality and price, which has made Menasco one of
the leading producers of medium-to heavy-aircraft landing gear worldwide.
Menasco's primary domestic competitors are Cleveland Pneumatic Division of The
B.F. Goodrich Company and Bendix Brake and Strut Division of Allied-Signal Inc.
("Allied-Signal"). Foreign competitors include Messier-Bugatti, Dowty of England
and Dowty Canada Ltd. The overhaul business has become increasingly competitive.
Menasco believes its competitive strengths in the overhaul business include its
name, which carries a reputation for quality and service.
Raw materials and finished products essential to Menasco's manufacturing
operations are available in sufficient quantity from various sources.
AEROSPACE CONTROLS
Coltec, through its Chandler Evans Control Systems Division ("Chandler
Evans"), manufactures a variety of aircraft engine fuel control systems and fuel
pumps and engine and aircraft components for the aerospace industry. Chandler
Evans' products are highly engineered and contain proprietary technology.
Principal customers for these products include gas turbine engine manufacturers,
aircraft manufacturers, domestic and foreign airlines, commercial fleet
operators and the military services. For the years 1993, 1992 and 1991,
commercial sales accounted for 67%, 71% and 63%, respectively, of Chandler
Evans' total sales.
Chandler Evans produces for sale to the commercial aircraft engine market
the main fuel pump for certain models of the General Electric CF-6 and CF-34
engines, both used on various commercial aircraft, and the Textron Lycoming
LF-507 engine used on the British Aerospace BAe 146 aircraft. Chandler Evans
also produces for sale to the military aircraft engine market the main fuel pump
for certain models of the United Technologies F-100 engine used on the McDonnell
Douglas F-15 aircraft, the main and afterburner fuel pumps for the General
Electric F-404 engine used on the McDonnell Douglas F-18 aircraft and fuel
control systems for the Textron Lycoming T-53 engine used on the Bell UH-1
Utility and Cobra attack helicopters. The main and afterburner pump for the
GE-414 engine is currently in development. Except for the General Electric CF-6
and the United Technologies F-100 (for which different manufacturers supply
components for specific engine versions having different thrust), Chandler Evans
is the sole source of the pumps and fuel control systems that it supplies for
the engine programs described above.
3
Chandler Evans was selected to develop and manufacture a full authority
digital electronic control ("FADEC") for the Allison 250 engine. Delivery of
this system is scheduled to begin in late 1994. Also, Chandler Evans has
developed a FADEC for the T800-LHT helicopter engine, a joint venture of Allison
Engine Company and Allied-Signal Garrett, which has commercial and military
applications. Chandler Evans is likely to remain the sole source of these
components for the life of these programs.
Chandler Evans also supports its products with aftermarket sales of spare
units, parts and overhaul service. For the year 1993, 52% of Chandler Evans'
revenues were attributable to the aftermarket. Aftermarket sales are very
significant, since proprietary programs allow Chandler Evans to realize
favorable operating margins.
Chandler Evans competes with Argo-Tech and the Aviation Division of
Sundstrand Corporation in fuel pumps and with the Bendix Control Division of
Allied-Signal and the Hamilton Standard Division of United Technologies
Corporation in fuel controls. Due to the highly engineered, proprietary nature
of its products, Chandler Evans maintains a substantial portion of aftermarket
sales, with competition limited to a small number of imitation parts
manufacturers.
AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENTS
Coltec, through its Walbar Inc subsidiary and its Canadian subsidiary,
Walbar Canada Inc. (together referred to as "Walbar"), manufactures turbine
components, compressor airfoils, and turbine and compressor rotating parts
primarily for aircraft gas turbine engines and, to a lesser extent, for
land-based, marine and industrial gas turbine applications, and performs
services including repairs and protective coatings for these products. Coltec
believes that Walbar is one of the leading independent manufacturers of blades,
impellers and rotating components for jet engines. Although Walbar does not
typically design the products it manufactures, its manufacturing processes are
highly sophisticated.
Walbar manufactures products for commercial engines including the Pratt &
Whitney 100 used on the deHavilland Dash 8, Alenia ATR 40 and Alenia ATR 72
aircraft, the Pratt & Whitney 200 used on the McDonnell Douglas Helicopter MDX,
the Pratt & Whitney 300 used on the British Aerospace BAe 1000 aircraft, the
Pratt & Whitney PT6 used on various commercial and military aircraft, and the
Garrett Auxiliary Power Units used on various commercial aircraft. Walbar's
original equipment and replacement components are also utilized in a number of
other commercial aircraft, including the Boeing 727, 737, 747, 757 and 767; the
Airbus A300, A310 and A320; and the McDonnell Douglas DC-8, DC-9, DC-10 and
MD-80. Walbar's blades, vanes and discs are employed on many of the leading
models of turboprop, business jet and commuter aircraft currently in service.
Walbar supplies a number of different compressor and turbine blades for the new
Allison 3007/2100/T406 engine family. These engines are designed for use on
several business and regional commuter aircraft and also have military
applications. Targeting the commuter aircraft market is part of Walbar's
strategy of emphasizing the production of turbine engine components for
commercial aircraft applications. Turbine blades for Rolls Royce engines are
produced for commercial and military aircraft. For the years 1993, 1992 and
1991, commercial sales accounted for approximately 85%, 74% and 60%,
respectively, of Walbar's total sales.
Walbar manufactures products for military engines, including the General
Electric F-404 used on the McDonnell Douglas F-18 aircraft, the General Electric
F-110 used on the Grumman F-14 aircraft, the McDonnell Douglas F-15 aircraft and
the Lockheed F-16 aircraft, the GE LM
4
2500 used on the U.S. Navy's Spruance class destroyers, the Textron Lycoming AGT
1500 used on the U.S. Army M-1 Abrams main battle tank, the Volvo RM12 engine
for the SAAB JAS39 aircraft and Turbo Union RB199 engine for the Panavia Tornado
aircraft.
Walbar's market has become increasingly competitive over the past several
years as airlines have sought to limit parts inventories and defense procurement
has been reduced. Although Walbar does not typically design its own products,
management believes that its highly sophisticated applied manufacturing
technology, responsive production capabilities and focus on cost reduction have
made Walbar one of the leading independent manufacturers of blades, impellers
and rotating components for jet engines. Chromalloy American Corporation and
Howmet Turbine Components Corporation provide competition in all aspects of this
industry. In addition, Walbar's principal customers possess, in varying degrees,
integrated production capacity for producing and servicing the components that
Walbar supplies.
GAS TURBINE PRODUCTS
Coltec, through its Delavan Inc subsidiary operating as the Delavan Gas
Turbine Products Division ("Delavan"), manufactures highly engineered fuel
injectors, spraybars and other components for commercial and military aircraft
gas turbine engines. Coltec believes that Delavan is the leading producer of
these products for small-to-medium size aircraft engines. These products are
made to design specifications using sophisticated production processes and are
marketed directly to engine manufacturers pursuant to production contracts. The
principal customers include General Electric Company, Allied-Signal Engines,
Pratt & Whitney Canada Inc., Textron Lycoming and the Allison Engine Company.
Delavan also supports its products with aftermarket sales of spare units and
overhaul services. For the years 1993, 1992 and 1991, commercial sales accounted
for 69%, 58% and 66%, respectively, of Delavan's total sales. The market for
Delavan products is considered highly competitive. Competitive pressure is
focused on price at the manufacturing level and on service and price in the
aftermarket segment. Coltec believes that Delavan has achieved its leading
position as a supplier of fuel injectors, spraybars and other components to
producers of small-to-medium size aircraft engines due essentially to superior
product performance, development support and a leadership role in the use of
computer modeling in the design of nozzles. Delavan competes worldwide with
Textron Fuel Systems Division of Textron Inc. and Parker-Hannifin Corporation.
AIRCRAFT INSTRUMENTATION
Coltec, through its Lewis Engineering Operation, designs, develops and
produces electro-mechanical and electronic instrumentation for aircraft cockpits
and temperature sensors for aircraft and engine systems. Lewis competes with
several manufacturers of aircraft instruments.
ENGINES
Coltec, through its Fairbanks Morse Engine Division ("Fairbanks Morse"),
manufactures and markets large, heavy-duty diesel, gas and dual-fuel engines and
parts for such engines. Fairbanks Morse manufactures engines in conventional "V"
and in-line opposed piston configurations which are used as power drives for
compressors, large pumps and other industrial machinery, for marine propulsion
and for stationary and marine power generation. Engines are offered from 4 to 18
cylinders, ranging from 640 to 29,320 horsepower. Such products are sold in the
domestic market primarily through regional sales offices and field sales
engineers and in foreign markets through the domestic sales network and foreign
sales representatives. Parts are sold primarily through factory and regional
sales offices. Approximately 50% of Fairbanks Morse's sales are for replacement
parts and service for Fairbanks Morse engines.
5
Large heavy-duty diesel engines are sold to the U.S. Navy and Coast Guard
and to electric utilities, municipal power plants, oil and gas producers, firms
engaged in ship and tug operations, offshore drilling activities and local,
state and federal governments.
Under a license agreement with Societe d'Etudes de Machines Thermiques, S.A.
groupe Alsthom, a French company, Fairbanks Morse has the right to manufacture
the Colt-Pielstick PC2 and PC4 lines of large diesel engines, which operate on
oil fuel (including heavy oil) and, in the case of the PC2, dual-fuel, and range
in size from 4,400 to 29,320 horsepower. Engines manufactured under this license
are used for primary power by electric utilities, standby power for nuclear
electric generating plants and ship propulsion.
Over the last several years, Fairbanks Morse has supplied each of the ships
in the U.S. Navy Landing Ship Dock ("LSD") program with four 16-cylinder PC2.5
engines, each delivering 8,500 horsepower for main propulsion, and four
12-cylinder opposed piston engines for shipboard power generation. The LSD ships
hold amphibious craft and troops for close deployment in emergencies. Engines
for 11 LSD and LSD Cargo Variant ships have been delivered and engines for one
additional ship are scheduled for delivery in 1995. Another major program for
Fairbanks Morse is the TAO fleet oiler program. These ships are powered by two
10-cylinder PC4.2 engines, each delivering 16,290 horsepower. A total of 15
ships of this series have been ordered by the U.S. Navy. Engines for 14 ships
have been delivered and the remaining shipset is in production. Fairbanks Morse
has also received a firm order to produce four 10-cylinder PC4.2 engines for the
first new ship in the nation's Sealift Program with options for an additional
five to eight ships. The four engines for the first ship are scheduled to be
delivered in 1995. If the options are converted to firm orders by the U.S. Navy,
four engines would be delivered each year beginning in 1996.
Contracts are awarded in the heavy-duty diesel engine market based on price
and successful operation in similar applications. Coltec attributes its strong
position in this market to its history as a supplier to the U.S. Navy in a
variety of propulsion and generator set applications and its ability to meet the
U.S. Navy's military specification requirements. Management believes that
Fairbanks Morse and its primary competitor, the Cooper-Bessemer Reciprocating
Division of Cooper Industries, Inc., lead the field of four domestic
manufacturers serving the market for heavy-duty diesel engines in power ranges
from 5,000 to 30,000 horsepower. Fairbanks Morse competes with six domestic
manufacturers in the medium speed (1,000 to 5,000 horsepower) engine market,
dominated by General Motors Corporation ("General Motors") and Caterpillar Inc.,
and with several foreign manufacturers. Numerous domestic and foreign
manufacturers compete in the under 1,500 horsepower engine market.
In the first quarter of 1994, Fairbanks Morse acquired equipment and other
assets related to the Alco engine business from General Electric Transportation
Systems ("GE Transportation"). Under the terms of the agreement, Fairbanks Morse
will manufacture and sell engines and aftermarket parts for Alco diesel engines
used in power plants and marine markets. GE Transportation will retain the
rights to sell and market Alco engines and aftermarket parts for its locomotive
markets. Fairbanks Morse has been issued a preferred supplier contract to
manufacture these engines and parts for General Electric's locomotive needs.
Fairbanks Morse expects to begin producing Alco engines and aftermarket parts in
April 1994.
6
AUTOMOTIVE
Coltec's Automotive segment manufactures and markets a selected line of high
value-added products, including fuel injection system assemblies and components,
transmission controls, suspension controls, emission control air pumps, oil
pumps and seals for domestic original equipment manufacturers and the
replacement parts market. The divisions, principal products and principal
markets of the Automotive segment are as follows:
DIVISION PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS PRINCIPAL MARKETS
- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- -----------------------------
Holley Automotive Fuel injection components, Automotive manufacturers
transmission controls and
suspension controls
Coltec Automotive Air pumps and oil pumps Automotive manufacturers
Holley Replacement Parts New and remanufactured Automotive manufacturers,
replacement and performance wholesale distributors and
carburetors, and electronic retailers in replacement
fuel injection components markets
Farnam Sealing Systems Gaskets and seals Automotive industry
Stemco Truck Products Oil seals, exhaust systems Fleet truck operators, truck
and hubodometers parts distributors
Performance Friction Products Synchronizers and clutch Automotive and truck
plates manufacturers
Coltec's principal automotive products have strong brand name recognition.
Coltec has targeted the development of highly-engineered components for fuel
injection systems, transmission controls, suspension controls and air and oil
pumps. By forming close, interactive relationships with the domestic automotive
manufacturers, Coltec has taken advantage of a shift by these manufacturers from
internal sourcing to procurement of components from outside suppliers.
AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTS
Coltec, through its Holley Automotive Division, designs and manufactures
fuel injection components, electrohydraulic control devices for transmissions
and suspensions, transmission modulators and other automotive products used in
passenger cars and trucks. Holley has been recognized for its engineering
excellence and has strategically changed its structure and product line to
accommodate the evolving automotive market. These products are sold directly to
original equipment manufacturers, Chrysler Corporation ("Chrysler"), Ford Motor
Company ("Ford") and General Motors.
Holley currently produces all of the multi-point throttle bodies used on
Chrysler imported 3.0 liter engines and the Chrysler-manufactured 3.3 liter
engines. These six-cylinder engines propel the LeBaron Convertible, Shadow,
Sundance and Acclaim, as well as the Minivan. Holley also is the sole source of
the upper intake module and throttle body for the Chrysler 3.5 liter engine used
on the Chrysler LH mid-size sedans (the Chrysler Concorde, Dodge Intrepid and
Eagle Vision) and also the Chrysler New Yorker and LHS.
7
In the non-fuel area, significant business has been established in
transmission control devices. Holley supplies high volumes of aneroid and
non-aneroid modulators to the General Motors Powertrain Division. Holley has
expanded its design capabilities to include electronic solenoids for automatic
transmission control. Holley's first electronic transmission solenoid
application was introduced by Chrysler in 1989. Applications were expanded to
Saturn in 1991, and to Ford and General Motors in 1992 with additional
applications for Ford for the 1994 model year. Holley has increased design and
manufacturing capabilities further in development and sales of suspension
solenoids to a major suspension manufacturer selling to Ford.
Coltec, through its Coltec Automotive Division, produces a mechanical air
pump that supplies additional air to the exhaust system which enhances the
oxidation process and reduces pollutants emitted into the atmosphere. Coltec
Automotive is the sole independent domestic supplier of automotive mechanical
air pumps. Major customers are Ford and Chrysler and, with the acquisition of
the assets of the General Motors air pump manufacturing business, Coltec
Automotive will become the sole source of these components to General Motors'
North American operations. Coltec Automotive has also developed an advanced
electric air pump designed to cope with increasingly stringent emission
standards. In early 1994, Coltec Automotive began supplying mechanical air pumps
to Isuzu Motors Limited for use in its Rodeo and Trooper sport utility models
and one of its truck models. Coltec expects to ship 30,000 air pumps a year to
Isuzu, half for the Japanese market, and half for the U.S. market.
Coltec Automotive has also developed a line of engine oil pumps for use in
many of Ford's cars and light trucks. Applications have expanded to Ford's
Modular and Zetec engines.
Coltec, through its Holley Replacement Parts Division, manufactures and
markets fuel injection components and other fuel metering devices and controls
such as intake manifolds, electric fuel pumps, emission control devices, and
engine and road speed governors, new and remanufactured automotive and marine
carburetors, remanufactured automotive air conditioning compressors, carburetor
parts and repair kits, mechanical fuel pumps, valve covers and related engine
components under the Holley name. Holley carburetors and components are used in
domestic and foreign vehicles and marine engines and are sold directly to
original equipment manufacturers, principally Chrysler, Ford, General Motors and
Outboard Marine Corporation, and, through distributors and mass merchandisers to
the parts and replacement market.
In the domestic market, this segment competes principally with Ford, General
Motors and several independent manufacturers. To date, Coltec has not been a
significant supplier to foreign vehicle manufacturers.
TRUCK PRODUCTS AND SEALING SYSTEMS
Coltec, through its Stemco Inc subsidiary operating as the Stemco Truck
Products Division ("Stemco"), is one of the leading domestic manufacturers of
wheel lubrication systems for heavy-duty trucks. Stemco also produces mileage
recording devices (hubodometers) and exhaust systems for the heavy-duty truck,
medium-duty truck and school bus markets and manufactures moisture ejectors and
other related products for vehicle and stationary air systems. Approximately 80%
of Stemco revenues are derived from replacement parts. Stemco, through its
Performance Friction Products Operation, manufactures a line of asbestos-free
fluorocarbon friction materials, a line of carbon-based friction materials and
synchronizers and clutch plates for transmissions, transfer cases and wet brakes
for use in trucks, off highway equipment and passenger cars. Coltec, through its
Farnam Sealing Systems Division, manufactures and markets automotive and
industrial gaskets, seals and other sealing system products for engines, fuel
systems and transmissions. Stemco's truck products and Coltec's sealing systems
include highly-engineered proprietary products.
8
INDUSTRIAL
In the Industrial segment, Coltec, through its Garlock Inc subsidiary
("Garlock"), is a leading manufacturer of industrial seals, gaskets, packing
products and self-lubricating bearings and, through its Delavan-Delta, Inc.
subsidiary, is a producer of technologically advanced spray nozzles for
agricultural, home heating and industrial applications. Coltec also produces air
compressors for manufacturers. The divisions, principal products and principal
markets of the Industrial segment are as follows:
DIVISION PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS PRINCIPAL MARKETS
- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- -----------------------------
Garlock Mechanical Packing Seals, gaskets, packings and Chemical, pulp and paper,
expansion joints utilities and industrial
manufacturers
Garlock Valves & Industrial Valves, PTFE sheet and tape Chemical and industrial
Plastics manufacturers
France Compressor Products Compressor valves and seals Compressor manufacturers and
users
Garlock Bearings Self-lubricating metal-backed Industrial and automotive
bearings and materials manufacturers
Delavan Commercial Products Industrial, agricultural, and Agricultural operations, oil
heating unit spray nozzles burner manufacturers and
replacement market
Ortman Fluid Power Hydraulic and pneumatic Industrial manufacturers
cylinders
Haber and Sterling Cold-forming dies and Fastener and automotive
thread-rolling dies manufacturers
FMD Electronics Electronic ignition systems Industrial manufacturers
and level control
instruments
Quincy Compressor Helical screw and Manufacturing and oil and gas
reciprocating air industries
compressors
Coltec's Industrial segment manufactures and markets a wide range of
products for use in various industries. In this segment, Coltec's strategy has
involved developing high quality products, capitalizing on brand name
recognition, targeting specific, well-defined markets and building good
distribution systems.
In January 1994, Coltec sold its Central Moloney Transformer Division.
SEALS, PACKINGS AND GASKETING MATERIAL
Coltec, under the Garlock name, is a leading manufacturer of industrial
seals, gasketing material and gasket assemblies and packing products. Through
its France Compressor Products Division of Garlock ("France"), Coltec
manufactures and markets rod packings, piston rings,
9
valves and components for reciprocating gas and air compressors used primarily
in the hydrocarbon processing industry. These products withstand high
temperature, corrosive environments, prevent leakage and exclude contaminants
from rotating and reciprocating machinery and seal joints.
Manufacturing processes involve plastics, rubbers, metals, textiles,
chemicals, aramid fibers, carbon fibers, or a combination of the same. Garlock
has been a leader in using advancements in materials technology to develop new
products, including its GYLON line of products, and in converting to
asbestos-free products. Approximately 95% of the gasketing and packing materials
currently manufactured by Garlock worldwide are asbestos-free. Because the raw
materials for Garlock's products are widely available, the seals, gasketing
materials and packings business of Garlock is not dependent on a limited number
of suppliers.
Garlock's seals, gasketing material and packings are marketed through sales
personnel, sales representatives, agents and distributors to numerous industrial
customers involved principally in the petroleum, steel, chemical, food
processing, power generation and pulp and paper industries.
Most seals, gasketing material and packings wear out during the life of the
product in which they are incorporated. Accordingly, the service and replacement
market for these products is significant. In 1993, the service and replacement
market accounted for approximately 80% of Garlock's sales of seals, gasketing
material and packings.
Manufacturers in this market compete on the basis of price and aftermarket
services. Garlock's extensive distribution network, and its leadership in
product development, have contributed to the establishment of what Coltec
believes to be its leading position in the market for seals, gasketing products
and packings. France believes it is a leading supplier of premium components in
the aftermarket, where it competes primarily with C. Lee Cook and Cook Manley,
subsidiaries of Dover Corporation, and Hoerbinger Corporation of America Inc.
BEARINGS, VALVES, PLASTICS, NOZZLES, CYLINDERS, FORMING
TOOLS, IGNITION SYSTEMS AND LEVEL CONTROLS
Coltec, through Garlock, is a leading manufacturer of steel-backed and
fiberglass-backed self-lubricating bearings and bearing materials primarily for
the automotive, truck, agricultural and construction markets. Garlock also
manufactures polytetrafluoroethylene ("PTFE") lined butterfly and plug valves
and components and PTFE tapes.
Coltec, through its Delavan-Delta, Inc. subsidiary operating as the Delavan
Commercial Products Division, manufactures and markets spray nozzles and
accessories for the agricultural, industrial and home heating markets. These
products are sold to original equipment manufacturers, distributors and other
end-users throughout the world.
Coltec, through Garlock's Ortman Fluid Power operation, manufactures
hydraulic and pneumatic cylinders in bore diameter sizes from 1 1/2 to 24
inches. Coltec, under the Sterling and Haber names, manufactures and markets a
wide variety of metal cutting and metal forming tools. Sales of these products
are primarily made directly to consumers. Competition for such products is
provided by numerous companies.
Coltec, through its FMD Electronics Operation, manufactures magnetos,
ignition systems and level control instruments. These products are sold to
original equipment manufacturers and through factory and regional sales forces
to various accounts for resale.
10
AIR COMPRESSORS
Coltec, through its Quincy Compressor Division ("Quincy"), manufactures and
markets reciprocating and helical screw air compressors and vacuum pumps.
Helical screw air compressors are manufactured and sold under a non-exclusive
license and technical assistance agreement with Svenska Rotor Maskiner
Aktiebolag, a Swedish licensor.
Reciprocating and helical screw air compressors have a wide range of
industrial applications, providing compressed air for general plant services,
pneumatic climate and instrument control, dry-type sprinkler systems, air loom
weaving, paint spray processes, diesel and gas engine starting, pressurization,
pneumatic tools and other air-actuated equipment. Engine-driven skid-mounted
models of helical screw air compressors are used in energy related services,
such as air-assisted deep-hole drilling, both on offshore drilling platforms and
in tertiary recovery schemes involving on-site combustion approaches. Quincy air
compressors are marketed through a well-developed distribution network
consisting of field sales personnel and distributors to original equipment
manufacturers located in major industrial centers throughout the United States,
Canada, Mexico and the Pacific Rim.
In the domestic market for small, industrial and reciprocating air
compressors, management believes that Ingersoll-Rand is the major competitor,
with Champion Pneumatic Machinery Co., Inc. and the Campbell-Hausfeld division
of Scott Fetzer as other competitors. In the domestic market for helical screw
air compressors, management believes that Ingersoll-Rand and Sullair are the
dominant competitors, with Gardner-Denver Division of Cooper Industries, Inc.
and Atlas Copco Corporation as other competitors.
INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
Coltec's international operations, mainly in Canada, are conducted through
foreign-based manufacturing or sales subsidiaries, or both, and by export sales
of domestic divisions to unrelated foreign customers. Export sales of products
of the Automotive segment and diesel engines are made either directly or through
foreign representatives. Compressors are sold through foreign distributors.
Certain products of the Industrial segment are sold in foreign countries through
salesmen and sales representatives or sales agents.
Coltec's manufacturing and marketing activities in Canada are carried on
through subsidiaries. Menasco Aerospace Ltd., an indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of Coltec, manufactures landing gear systems and aircraft flight
controls and provides overhaul service for Canadian and other customers. Walbar
Canada Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Walbar, manufactures jet engine
compressor blades, vanes and turbine components in Canada. Garlock of Canada
Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Garlock, manufactures and markets seals,
gasketing material, packings and truck products. It also markets parts for
Fairbanks Morse diesel engines and accessories as well as other products for use
in Canada and for export to other countries.
Through wholly owned or majority controlled foreign subsidiaries, Coltec
operates 15 plants in Canada, Mexico, France, the United Kingdom, Australia and
Germany. In addition, Coltec occupies leased office and warehouse space in
various foreign countries.
Devaluations or fluctuations relative to the United States dollar in the
exchange rates of the currency of any country where Coltec has foreign
operations could adversely affect the profitability of such operations in the
future.
For financial information on operations by geographic segments, see Note 11
of the Notes to Financial Statements of Coltec's 1993 Annual Report to its
shareholders incorporated herein by reference.
11
Coltec's contracts with foreign nations for delivery of military equipment,
including components, are subject to deferral or cancellation by United States
Government regulation or orders regulating sales of military equipment abroad.
Any such action on the part of the United States Government could have a
material effect on Coltec's results of operations and financial condition.
SALES TO THE MILITARY AND BY CLASS OF PRODUCTS
Sales to the military and other branches of the United States Government,
primarily in the Aerospace/Government segment, were 14%, 15% and 16% of total
Coltec sales in 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. During the last three fiscal
years, landing gear systems was the only class of similar products that
accounted for at least 10% of total Coltec sales. In 1993, 1992 and 1991, sales
of landing gear systems constituted 11%, 12% and 14%, respectively, of total
Coltec sales.
BACKLOG
At December 31, 1993, Coltec's backlog of firm unfilled orders was $669.7
million compared with $709.1 million at December 31, 1992. Of the $669.7 million
backlog at December 31, 1993, approximately $255.2 million is scheduled to be
shipped after 1994.
CONTRACT RISKS
Coltec, through its various divisions, primarily Menasco, Chandler Evans,
Walbar and Delavan Gas Turbine Products, produces products for manufacturers of
commercial aircraft pursuant to contracts that generally call for deliveries at
predetermined prices over varying periods of time and that provide for
termination payments intended to compensate for certain costs incurred in the
event of cancellation. In addition, certain commercial aviation contracts
contain provisions for termination for convenience similar to those contained in
United States Government contracts described below. Longer-term agreements
normally provide for price adjustments intended to compensate for deferral of
delivery depending upon market conditions.
A significant portion of the business of Coltec's Menasco, Chandler Evans,
Walbar and Delavan Gas Turbine Products divisions has been as a subcontractor
and as a prime contractor in supplying products in connection with military
programs. Substantially all of Coltec's government contracts are firm
fixed-price contracts. Under firm fixed-price contracts, Coltec agrees to
perform certain work for a fixed price and, accordingly, realizes all the
benefit or detriment occasioned by decreased or increased costs of performing
the contracts. From time to time, Coltec accepts fixed-price contracts for
products that have not been previously developed. In such cases, Coltec is
subject to the risk of delays and cost over-runs. Under United States Government
regulations, certain costs, including certain financing costs, portions of
research and development costs, and certain marketing expenses related to the
preparation of competitive bids and proposals, are not allowable. The Government
also regulates the methods under which costs are allocated to Government
contracts. With respect to Government contracts that are obtained pursuant to an
open bid process and therefore result in a firm fixed price, the Government has
no right to renegotiate any profits earned thereunder. In Government contracts
where the price is negotiated at a fixed price rather than on a cost-plus basis,
as long as the financial and pricing information supplied to the Government is
current, accurate and complete, the Government similarly has no right to
renegotiate any profits earned thereunder. If the Government later conducts an
audit of the contractor and determines that such data were inaccurate or
incomplete and that the contractor thereby made an excessive profit, the
Government may take action to recoup the amount of such excessive profit, plus
treble damages, and take other enforcement actions.
United States Government contracts are, by their terms, subject to
termination by the Government either for its convenience or for default of the
contractor. Fixed-price-type contracts
12
provide for payment upon termination for items delivered to and accepted by the
Government, and, if the termination is for convenience, for payment of the
contractor's costs incurred plus the costs of settling and paying claims by
terminated subcontractors, other settlement expenses, and a reasonable profit on
its costs incurred. However, if a contract termination is for default, (a) the
contractor is paid such amount as may be agreed upon for completed and
partially-completed products and services accepted by the Government, (b) the
Government is not liable for the contractor's costs with respect to unaccepted
items, and is entitled to repayment of advance payments and progress payments,
if any, related to the terminated portions of the contracts, and (c) the
contractor may be liable for excess costs incurred by the Government in
procuring undelivered items from another source.
In addition to the right of the Government to terminate, Government
contracts are conditioned upon the continuing availability of Congressional
appropriations. Congress usually appropriates funds on a fiscal-year basis even
though contract performance may take many years. Consequently, at the outset of
a major program, the contract is usually partially funded, and additional monies
are normally committed to the contract by the procuring agency only as
appropriations are made by Congress for future fiscal years.
A substantial portion of Coltec's automotive products are sold pursuant to
the terms and conditions (including termination for convenience provisions) of
the major domestic automotive manufacturers' purchase orders, and deliveries are
subject to periodic authorizations which are based upon the production schedules
of such automotive manufacturers.
RESEARCH AND PATENTS
Most divisions of Coltec maintain staffs of manufacturing and product
engineers whose activities are directed at improving the products and processes
of Coltec's operations. Manufactured and development products are subject to
extensive tests at various divisional plants. Total research and development
cost, including product development, was $22.1 million for 1993, $22.9 million
for 1992 and $23.8 million for 1991. Coltec presently has approximately 370
employees engaged in research, development and engineering activities.
Coltec owns a number of United States and other patents and trademarks and
has granted licenses under some of such patents and trademarks. Management does
not consider the business of Coltec as a whole to be materially dependent upon
any patent, patent right or trademark.
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
As of December 31, 1993, Coltec had approximately 10,000 employees, of whom
approximately 4,000 were salaried. Approximately 40% of the hourly employees are
represented by unions for collective bargaining purposes. Union agreements
relate, among other things, to wages, hours and conditions of employment, and
the wages and benefits furnished are generally comparable to industry and area
practices.
Nine collective bargaining agreements covering approximately 2,500 hourly
employees which expired in 1993 have been renegotiated. In 1994, four collective
bargaining agreements covering approximately 400 hourly employees are due to
expire. Coltec considers the labor relations of Coltec to be satisfactory,
although Coltec does experience work stoppages from time to time.
Coltec is subject to extensive Government regulations with respect to many
aspects of its employee relations, including increasingly important occupational
health and safety and equal employment opportunity matters. Failure to comply
with certain of these requirements could
13
result in ineligibility to receive Government contracts. These conditions are
common to the various industries in which Coltec participates and entail the
risk of financial and other exposure.
For litigation relating to labor and other matters, see Item 3. "Legal
Proceedings.--Other Litigation."
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
Coltec operates 60 manufacturing plants in 21 states and in Canada, Mexico,
France, the United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. In addition, Coltec has other
facilities throughout the United States and in various foreign countries, which
include sales offices, repair and service shops, light manufacturing and
assembly facilities, administrative offices and warehouses.
Certain information with respect to Coltec's principal manufacturing plants
that are owned in fee, all of which (other than Palmyra, New York) are
encumbered pursuant to the 1994 Credit Agreement between Coltec and certain
banks and related security documents, is set forth below:
APPROXIMATE
NUMBER OF APPROXIMATE
SEGMENT LOCATION SQUARE FEET ACREAGE
- --------------------------- -------------------------------------- ------------ ---------------
Aerospace/Government West Hartford, Connecticut(a) 1,200,000 111
Beloit, Wisconsin 856,000 73
Burbank, California(b) 472,000 19
Ft. Worth, Texas 324,000 43
Oakville, Ontario 213,000 14
Mississauga, Ontario 153,000 10
Automotive Bowling Green, Kentucky(c) 456,000 60
Longview, Texas 265,000 52
Sallisaw, Oklahoma 220,000 53
Industrial Palmyra, New York 696,000 121
<FN>
- ---------
(a) Approximately 239,000 square feet are utilized by the Aerospace/Government
segment with the balance leased, available for lease or available for sale.
(b) During 1994, the Burbank, California facility will be closed and production
of landing gear will be consolidated at the Ft. Worth, Texas and Oakville,
Ontario facilities.
(c) Approximately 352,000 square feet are utilized by the Automotive segment
with the balance available for sale.
In addition to above facilities, certain manufacturing activities of some
industry segments are conducted within leased premises, the largest of which is
approximately 173,000 square feet. The Automotive segment has significant
manufacturing facilities on leased premises in Water Valley, Mississippi (lease
expires in 1994) and Longview, Texas (lease expires in 1997). The Industrial
segment has leased facilities located in Quincy, Illinois (lease expires in
1998). Some of these leases provide for options to purchase or to renew the
lease with respect to the leased premises.
Coltec's total manufacturing facilities presently being utilized aggregate
approximately 6,500,000 square feet of floor area of which approximately
5,800,000 square feet of area are owned in fee and the balance is leased.
Coltec leases approximately 39,000 square feet at 430 Park Avenue, New York,
New York, for its executive offices, and has renewal options under such lease
through 2001.
14
In the opinion of management, Coltec's principal properties, whether owned
or leased, are suitable and adequate for the purposes for which they are used
and are suitably maintained for such purposes. See Item 3. "Legal
Proceedings.--Environmental Regulations" for a description of proceedings under
applicable environmental laws regarding certain of Coltec's properties.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
As of December 31, 1993, two subsidiaries of Coltec were among a number of
defendants (typically 15 to 40) in approximately 68,500 actions (including
approximately 6,100 actions in advanced stages of processing) filed in various
states by plaintiffs alleging injury or death as a result of asbestos fibers. As
of December 31, 1992, the number of such actions approximated that as of
December 31, 1993. Through December 31, 1993, approximately 94,600 of the
approximately 163,100 total actions brought have been settled or otherwise
disposed of.
The damages claimed for personal injury or death vary from case to case and
in many cases plaintiffs seek $1 million or more in compensatory damages and $2
million or more in punitive damages. Although the law in each state differs to
some extent, management believes that liability for compensatory damages would
be shared among all responsible defendants, thus limiting the potential monetary
impact of such judgments on any individual defendant.
Following a decision of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in a case in which
neither Coltec nor any of its subsidiaries were parties, that held insurance
carriers are obligated to cover asbestos-related bodily injury actions if any
injury or disease process, from first exposure through manifestation, occurred
during a covered policy period (the "continuous trigger theory of coverage"),
Coltec settled litigation with its primary and most of its first level excess
insurance carriers, substantially on the basis of the Court's ruling. Coltec is
currently negotiating with its remaining excess carriers to determine, on behalf
of its subsidiaries, how payments will be made with respect to such insurance
coverage for asbestos claims. Coltec believes that agreement can be achieved
without litigation, and on substantially the same basis that it has resolved the
issues with its primary and first-level excess carriers. On this basis, Coltec
will have available to it a significant amount of coverage from its solvent
carriers for asbestos claims.
Settlements are generally made on a group basis with payments made to
individual claimants over periods of one to four years. In 1993, two
subsidiaries of Coltec received approximately 27,400 new lawsuits with a
comparable number of lawsuits received in 1992 and 1991. The subsidiaries made
payments with respect to asbestos liability and related costs aggregating $38.7
million in 1993, $39.8 million in 1992 and $48.4 million in 1991, substantially
all of which were covered by insurance. In accordance with Coltec's internal
procedures for the processing of asbestos product liability actions and due to
the proximity to trial or settlement, certain outstanding actions have
progressed to a stage where Coltec can reasonably estimate the cost to dispose
of these actions. As of December 31, 1993, Coltec estimates that the aggregate
remaining cost of the disposition of the settled actions for which payments
remain to be made and actions in advanced stages of processing, including
associated legal costs, is approximately $52.6 million and Coltec expects that
this cost will be substantially covered by insurance.
With respect to the 62,400 outstanding actions as of December 31, 1993 which
are in preliminary procedural stages, Coltec lacks sufficient information upon
which judgments can be made as to the validity or ultimate disposition of such
actions, thereby making it difficult to estimate with reasonable certainty the
liability or costs to Coltec. When asbestos actions are received they are
typically forwarded to local counsel to ensure that the appropriate preliminary
procedural response is taken. The complaints typically do not contain sufficient
information to
15
permit a reasonable evaluation as to their merits at the time of receipt, and in
jurisdictions encompassing a majority of the outstanding actions, the practice
has been that little or no discovery or other action is taken until several
months prior to the date set for trial. Accordingly, Coltec generally does not
have the information necessary to analyze the actions in sufficient detail to
estimate the ultimate liability or costs to Coltec, if any, until the actions
appear on a trial calendar. A determination to seek dismissal, to attempt to
settle or to proceed to trial is typically not made prior to the receipt of such
information.
It is also difficult to predict the number of asbestos lawsuits that
Coltec's subsidiaries will receive in the future. Coltec has noted that, with
respect to recently settled actions or actions in advanced stages of processing,
the mix of the injuries alleged and the mix of the occupations of the plaintiffs
are changing from those traditionally associated with Coltec's asbestos-related
actions. Coltec is not able to determine with reasonable certainty whether this
trend will continue. Based upon the foregoing, and due to the unique factors
inherent in each of the actions, including the nature of the disease, the
occupation of the plaintiff, the presence or absence of other possible causes of
a plaintiff's illness, the availability of legal defenses, such as the statute
of limitations or state of the art, and whether the lawsuit is an individual one
or part of a group, management is unable to estimate with reasonable certainty
the cost of disposing of outstanding actions in preliminary procedural stages or
of actions that may be filed in the future. However, Coltec believes that it is
in a favorable position compared to many other defendants because, among other
things, the asbestos fibers in its asbestos-containing products were
encapsulated. Considering the foregoing, as well as the experience of Coltec's
subsidiaries and other defendants in asbestos litigation, the likely sharing of
judgments among multiple responsible defendants, and the significant amount of
insurance coverage that Coltec expects to be available from its solvent
carriers, Coltec believes that pending and reasonably anticipated future claims
are not likely to have a material effect on Coltec's results of operations and
financial condition.
Although the insurance coverage that Coltec has is substantial, insurance
coverage for asbestos claims is not available to cover exposures initially
occurring on and after July 1, 1984.
In addition to claims for personal injury, the subsidiaries were among 40
named defendants in a class action seeking recovery of the cost of asbestos
removal from school buildings. Twenty-nine similar school building cases have
been dismissed without prejudice to the plaintiffs and without payment by
Coltec's subsidiaries. Coltec's subsidiaries continue to be named as defendants
in new cases.
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS
Coltec and its subsidiaries are subject to numerous federal, state and local
environmental laws, many of which are becoming increasingly stringent, giving
rise to increased compliance costs. For example, the Clean Air Amendments will
require abatement of chemical air emissions that were previously unregulated and
will require certain existing, and many newly constructed or modified,
facilities to obtain air emission permits that were not previously required.
Because many of the regulations under the Clean Air Amendments have not yet been
promulgated, Coltec cannot estimate their impact at this time. Coltec, however,
believes that it will not be at a competitive disadvantage in complying with the
Clean Air Amendments and that any increase in costs to comply with the Clean Air
Amendments will not have a material effect on its results of operations and
financial condition.
16
Coltec's annual expenditures (including capital expenditures) relating to
environmental matters over the three years ended December 31, 1993 ranged from
$4 million to $6 million, and Coltec expects such expenditures to range from $8
million to $11 million in each of 1994 and 1995.
Many of the facilities of Coltec and its subsidiaries are subject to the
federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 ("RCRA"), and its
analogous state statutes. Although the costs under RCRA for the treatment,
storage and disposal of hazardous materials generated at Coltec's facilities are
increasing, Coltec does not believe that such costs will have a material effect
on Coltec's results of operations and financial condition.
Coltec has been notified that it is among the Potentially Responsible
Parties ("PRPs") under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended ("CERCLA"), or similar state
laws, for the costs of investigating and in some cases remediating contamination
by hazardous materials at several sites. CERCLA imposes joint and several
liability for the costs of investigating and remediating properties contaminated
with hazardous materials. Liability for these costs can be imposed on present
and former owners or operators of the properties or on parties who generated the
wastes that contributed to the contamination. The process of investigating and
remediating contaminated properties can be lengthy and expensive. The process is
also subject to the uncertainties occasioned by changing legal requirements,
developing technological applications and liability allocations among PRPs.
Among the sites where Coltec or its subsidiaries have been designated a PRP are:
Acme Solvents, Winnebago, Illinois; Clare Water Supply, Clare, Michigan;
Stringfellow Acid Pits, Riverside, California; Quincy Municipal Landfill #2 and
#3, Quincy, Illinois; Water Valley, Mississippi; Byron Barrel and Drum, Byron,
New York; Operating Industries, Monterey Park, California; Fulton Terminal Site,
Oswego, New York; Parker Landfill, Lyndonville, Vermont; Solvents Recovery
Service of New England, Southington, Connecticut; San Fernando Valley Site,
Glendale, California; Acqua-Tech Site, Greer, South Carolina; and Hardage,
Criner, Oklahoma. Based on the progress to date in the investigation, cleanup
and allocation of responsibility for these sites, Coltec does not believe that
its costs in connection with these sites will have a material effect on Coltec's
results of operations and financial condition. Progress toward the
investigation, cleanup and responsibility allocation at the Liberty Industrial
Finishing site, Farmingdale, New York has not been sufficient to allow Coltec at
this time to determine the extent of any potential financial responsibility for
this site; however, Coltec does not believe that its costs in connection with
Liberty Industrial Finishing will have a material effect on Coltec's results of
operations and financial condition.
OTHER LITIGATION
In September 1983, the local employees' union at Menasco Canada Ltee. (now
Menasco Aerospace Ltd.) ("Menasco Canada"), a federation of trade unions and
several member-employees filed a complaint in the Province of Quebec Superior
Court against Menasco Canada, alleging, among other things, an illegal lock-out,
failure to negotiate in good faith, interference with the affairs of the union
and various violations of local law. The plaintiffs are collectively seeking
approximately Cdn. $14 million in damages, and Menasco Canada has filed a
cross-claim for Cdn. $21 million and has closed its operations in Quebec
Province. Coltec does not believe that this action will have a material effect
on Coltec's results of operations and financial condition.
On September 24, 1986, approximately 150 former salaried employees of
Crucible Inc (a former subsidiary of Coltec) commenced an action claiming
benefits under a plant shutdown plan that had been created in 1969 (George
Henglein v. Colt Industries Operating Corporation Informal Plan for Plant
Shutdown Benefits for Salaried Employees, U.S. District Court for the
17
Western District of Pennsylvania, C.A. 86-2021). Future eligibility of any
employee for such Plan was eliminated by Crucible Inc in November 1972.
Plaintiffs claim that they did not receive notice of such termination and
therefore were entitled to benefits in 1982 when the Midland steel-making
facility closed. Following a non-jury trial in the U.S. District Court for the
Western District of Pennsylvania, defendant's motion to dismiss was granted and
the plaintiffs appealed. The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit remanded the
case to the District Court directing it to make specific findings of fact and
conclusions of law and also found for the defendant on the jurisdiction of the
District Court. The defendants' motion to dismiss was granted by the District
Court, appealed to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and remanded to the
District Court for additional findings of fact. On February 10, 1994, the
District Court dismissed the plaintiffs' complaint and the plaintiffs have
appealed to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Coltec does not believe that
this action will have a material effect on Coltec's results of operations and
financial condition.
In an alleged class action filed in June 1984, a group of former salaried
employees whose employment had been terminated due to the closing of the Midland
steelmaking facility have asserted claims for damages in amounts equal to the
present value of the collective bargaining unit's pension plan, insurance and
unemployment benefits (Donald A. Nobers v. Crucible Inc, Court of Common Pleas
of Beaver County, Pennsylvania, Civil Action No. 843-1984). The case was
dismissed by the Common Pleas Court due to the preemptive provisions of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"). The
Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed the lower court and held that the
plaintiffs' claim was based upon an alleged contract. The Pennsylvania Supreme
Court refused to hear the appeal and reinstated the case in the Court of Common
Pleas. On February 16, 1993, the Court of Common Pleas granted defendants'
motion for summary judgment because the Court concluded that it lacked
jurisdiction of the subject matter. On January 19, 1994, the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania affirmed the Court of Common Pleas grant of defendant's motion for
summary judgment. The plaintiffs have appealed to the Supreme Court of
Pennsylvania. Coltec does not believe that this action will have a material
effect on Coltec's results of operations and financial condition.
On January 19, 1993, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Colt's
Manufacturing Company, Inc. filed a fraudulent conveyance action against Coltec
and other defendants (The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Colt's
Manufacturing Company, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Coltec Industries Inc et al., U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut, Case No. 93-2020) in
connection with the sale on March 22, 1990 of substantially all the assets of
the Colt Firearms Division to a company formed by a group of private investors.
Coltec does not believe that this action will have a material effect on Coltec's
results of operations and financial condition.
In addition to the litigation described above, there are various pending
legal proceedings involving Coltec which are routine in nature and incidental to
the business of Coltec. Some product liability cases pending against Coltec
involve claims for large amounts of compensatory damages (the coverage for which
is subject to substantial deductibles) as well as, in some instances, punitive
damages (which insurance carriers uniformly contend are not covered by product
liability insurance).
The United States Government conducts investigations into procurement of
defense contracts as a part of a continuing process. Under current federal law,
if such investigations establish such improper activities, among other matters,
debarment or suspension of a company from participating in the procurement of
defense contracts could result. These conditions are
18
common to the aerospace and government industries in which Coltec participates
and entail the risk of financial and other exposure. Coltec is not aware of any
such investigation, nor is Coltec aware of any facts which, if known to
investigators, might prompt any investigation.
PRODUCT LIABILITY INSURANCE
Coltec has product liability insurance coverage for liabilities arising from
aircraft products which Coltec believes to be in adequate amounts. In addition,
with respect to other products, (exclusive of liability for exposure to asbestos
products) Coltec has product liability insurance in amounts exceeding $2.5
million per occurrence, which Coltec believes to be adequate.
Coltec has been self-insured with respect to liability for exposure to
asbestos products since third party insurance became unavailable in July 1984.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Coltec's Common Stock (symbol COT) is listed on the New York and Pacific
Stock Exchanges. The high and low prices of the stock since it began trading on
March 25, 1992, based on the Composite Tape, were as follows:
1993 1992
-------------------- --------------------
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
--------- --------- --------- ---------
First quarter................................... $ 19 1/4 $ 16 1/4 $ 19 $ 17
Second quarter.................................. 17 1/2 14 7/8 21 3/4 17
Third quarter................................... 18 15 1/4 19 1/4 15 3/8
Fourth quarter.................................. 19 3/8 16 19 1/4 14 1/8
At December 31, 1993, there were 591 shareholders of record. No dividends were
paid in 1993 and 1992, and no dividends are expected to be paid in 1994.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The five year tabular presentation under the caption "Selected Financial
Data" of Coltec's 1993 Annual Report to its shareholders is incorporated herein
by reference.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATION.
The information under the caption "Financial Review" of Coltec's 1993 Annual
Report to its shareholders is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
The "Quarterly Sales and Earnings" information in Note 14 of the Notes to
Financial Statements of Coltec's 1993 Annual Report to its shareholders and the
Consolidated Balance Sheet, the Consolidated Statement of Earnings, the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, the Consolidated Statement of
Shareholders' Equity, the Notes to Financial Statements and the Report of
Independent Public Accountants of Coltec's 1993 Annual Report to its
shareholders are incorporated herein by reference.
19
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
The following table provides certain information about each of the current
directors and executive officers of Coltec. Directors are indicated by an
asterisk. Unless otherwise indicated, each occupation set forth opposite an
individual's name refers to employment with Coltec.
PRESENT PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION OR
EMPLOYMENT/MATERIAL POSITIONS HELD
NAME AND AGE DURING PAST FIVE YEARS
- ------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Donald P. Brennan (53)* Member of the Stock Option and Compensation Committee of Coltec.
Managing Director of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated ("Morgan
Stanley") since prior to 1989; head of Morgan Stanley Merchant Banking
Division; member of Morgan Stanley Management Committee. Chairman,
President and Director of Morgan Stanley Leveraged Equity Fund II,
Inc., Morgan Stanley Equity Investors Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital
Partners III, Inc., Director of Agricultural Minerals and Chemicals
Inc., Agricultural Minerals Corporation, A/S Bulkhandling, Beaumont
Methanol Corporation, Container Corporation of America, Fort Howard
Corporation, Hamilton Services Limited, Jefferson Smurfit Corporation,
PSF Finance Holdings Inc., SIBV/MS Holdings, Inc., Shuttleway and
Stanklav Holdings, Inc., Waterford Wedgwood plc (Deputy Chairman) and
Waterford Wedgwood U.K. plc.
Salvatore J. Cozzolino (69)* Retired January 1, 1994. Vice Chairman of the Board from May 1991 to
January 1994. Executive Vice President and Treasurer from prior to
1989 to May 1991.
John M. Cybulski (57) Senior Vice President, Aerospace since May 1991. Group President from
March 1989 to May 1991. President of Menasco Aerospace Ltd. from prior
to 1989 to June 1991.
Richard L. Dashnaw (57) Senior Vice President, Group Operations and President of the Fairbanks
Morse Engine Division since January 1994. Group President and
President of the Fairbanks Morse Engine Division from February 1991 to
December 1993. President of the Fairbanks Morse Engine Division from
prior to 1989 to February 1991.
Anthony J. diBuono (63) Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel since January
1994. Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel since prior
to 1989 to January 1994.
20
PRESENT PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION OR
EMPLOYMENT/MATERIAL POSITIONS HELD
NAME AND AGE DURING PAST FIVE YEARS
- ------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------
John W. Guffey, Jr.(56)* President and Chief Operating Officer since May 1991. President of the
Mechanical Packing Division of Garlock Inc from October 1987 to May
1991. Group President from prior to 1989 to May 1991.
Andrew C. Hilton (65)* Retired January 1, 1994. Vice Chairman of the Board from May 1991 to
January 1994. Executive Vice President from prior to 1989 to May 1991.
Howard I. Hoffen (30)* Member of the Stock Option and Compensation Committee of Coltec. Vice
President of Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley Leveraged Equity Fund II,
Inc., Morgan Stanley Equity Investors Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital
Partners III, Inc. since January 1994. Associate of Morgan Stanley
from September 1989 to January 1994. Director of Amerin Guaranty
Corporation and Interstate Natural Gas Company.
David I. Margolis (64)* Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since prior to 1989.
President from prior to 1989 to May 1991. Director of Burlington
Industries Inc.
James J. McHugh (64) Vice President, Labor Relations since prior to 1989.
J. Bradford Mooney, Jr. (63)* Chairman of the Audit Committee and member of the Stock Option and
Compensation Committee of Coltec. Rear Admiral, U.S. Navy (retired).
President and Managing Director of Harbor Branch Oceanographic
Institution, Inc. from January 1989 to March 1992. Consultant in ocean
engineering and research management following retirement from the U.S.
Navy in September 1987.
Joel Moses (52)* Chairman of the Stock Option and Compensation Committee and member of
the Audit Committee of Coltec. Dean, School of Engineering and D.C.
Jackson Professor of Computer Science and Engineering, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology ("MIT"), since January 1991. Head of the
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science of MIT from
prior to 1989 to August 1989. Visiting Professor, Harvard Business
School, Harvard University from September 1989 to June 1990. Director
of Analog Devices, Inc.
Laurence H. Polsky (50) Executive Vice President, Administration since January 1994. Senior
Vice President, Administration from April 1992 to December 1993. Vice
President, Personnel for Cooper Industries, Inc. from prior to 1989 to
April 1992.
21
PRESENT PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION OR
EMPLOYMENT/MATERIAL POSITIONS HELD
NAME AND AGE DURING PAST FIVE YEARS
- ------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul G. Schoen (49) Executive Vice President, Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of Coltec since January 1994. Senior Vice President, Finance,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Coltec from May 1991 to
December 1993. Senior Vice President and Controller of Coltec from
January 1991 to May 1991. Vice President, Accounting of Coltec from
prior to 1989 to December 1990.
Frank V. Sica (43)* Managing Director of Morgan Stanley since prior to 1989. Vice
President and Director of Morgan Stanley Leveraged Equity Fund II,
Inc., Morgan Stanley Equity Investors Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital
Partners III, Inc. Director of ARM Financial Group, Inc., Consolidated
Hydro, Inc., EMMIS Broadcasting Corporation, Fort Howard Corporation,
Integrity Life Insurance Company, Interstate Natural Gas Company,
Kohl's Corporation, National Integrity Life Insurance Company,
PageMart, Inc., Southern Pacific Rail Corporation and Sullivan
Communications, Inc.
The initial dates of election of the directors are as follows: Mr. Brennan,
November 1991; Mr. Cozzolino, May 1985; Mr. Guffey, May 1991; Dr. Hilton, May
1985; Mr. Hoffen, March 1990; Mr. Margolis, May 1963; Messrs. J. Bradford
Mooney, Jr. and Joel Moses, June 1992; and Mr. Sica, November 1991. Pursuant to
a Registration and Management Rights Agreement, among other things, The Morgan
Stanley Leveraged Equity Fund II, L.P. is permitted to designate a person to be
nominated for election to the Board of Directors of Coltec.
All officers serve at the pleasure of the Board. None of the executive
officers or directors of Coltec is related to any other executive officer or
director by blood, marriage or adoption.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
SUMMARY OF CASH AND CERTAIN OTHER COMPENSATION
The following table provides certain summary information concerning
compensation of Coltec's Chief Executive Officer and each of the four other most
highly compensated executive officers of Coltec (determined as of December 31,
1993) (hereinafter referred to as the "named executive officers") for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991:
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG TERM COMPENSATION
-------------------------------------
AWARDS
------------------------- PAYOUTS
ANNUAL COMPENSATION ----------
---------------------------------------- (F) (G)
(E) ---------- ------------- (H) (I)
(A) (C) (D) ------------ RESTRICTED SECURITIES ---------- -------------------
- ------------------------- (B) -------- ---------- OTHER ANNUAL STOCK UNDERLYING LTIP ALL OTHER
NAME AND PRINCIPAL ---- SALARY BONUS COMPENSATION AWARDS OPTIONS PAYOUT COMPENSATION
POSITION YEAR ($) ($)(1) ($) ($)(2) (#) ($) ($)(3)
- ------------------------- ---- -------- ---------- ------------ ---------- ------------- ---------- -------------------
David I. Margolis........ 1993 $643,920 $1,545,500 $ $ -- -- $ -- $ 120,535
Chairman of the Board and 1992 599,040 1,717,500 1,426,788 300,000 144,242
Chief Executive Officer 1991 599,040 1,478,500 -- --
John W. Guffey, Jr....... 1993 471,960 1,125,500 -- -- -- 113,529
President and Chief 1992 410,040 1,166,900 637,200 225,000 97,047
Operating Officer 1991 318,615 500,000 -- --
Salvatore J. Cozzolino... 1993 353,040 696,750 -- -- -- 64,123
Vice Chairman of the 1992 353,040 815,800 494,388 165,000 78,685
Board 1991 353,040 701,500 -- --
Andrew C. Hilton......... 1993 353,040 696,750 -- -- -- 60,770
Vice Chairman of the 1992 353,040 815,800 494,388 165,000 75,332
Board 1991 353,040 701,500 -- --
Anthony J. diBuono....... 1993 249,540 394,300 -- -- -- 40,987
Executive Vice President, 1992 236,520 433,850 221,994 80,000 47,436
General Counsel and 1991 236,520 365,600 -- --
Secretary
<FN>
- ------------
(1) Includes the following annual amounts accrued but not paid under the 1977
Long-Term Performance Plan (the "Performance Plan") for each of the named
executive officers: Mr. Margolis, 1993, $465,500; 1992, $577,500; 1991,
$528,500; Mr. Guffey, 1993, $332,500; 1992, $412,500; Messrs. Cozzolino
and Hilton, each, 1993, $177,750; 1992, $247,500; 1991, $226,500; and Mr.
diBuono, 1993, $79,800; 1992, $98,850; 1991, $90,600. Effective as of
December 31, 1993, subject to the approval of the Coltec 1994 Long-Term
Incentive Plan by the shareholders, Coltec has terminated the Performance
Plan. For periods after 1993, no additional performance awards will accrue
under the Performance Plan. Accrued amounts for periods prior to 1994 will
be credited with annual interest from January 1, 1994 to the date of
payment to the named executive at rate of interest (adjusted annually)
equal to Coltec's cost of U.S. borrowings, and will be paid in accordance
with the original payment provisions of the plan.
(2) The restricted stock owned by each of the named executive officers at
December 31, 1993 and the values thereof based on the closing price of the
Common Stock on December 31, 1993 were as follows: Mr. Margolis, 79,266
shares, $1,486,238; Mr. Guffey, 35,400 shares, $663,750; Messrs. Cozzolino
and Hilton, 27,466 shares, $514,988 each; and Mr. diBuono, 12,333 shares,
$231,244. Restrictions on one third of the number of such shares of
restricted stock are scheduled to lapse on each of January 2, 1995, 1996
and 1997. Any dividends payable on the Common Stock would also be payable
on such restricted stock.
(3) Pursuant to the Retirement Savings Plan for Salaried Employees, the
amounts credited by Coltec for 1993 and 1992 for each of the named
executive officers were $8,994 and $8,728, respectively, and such amounts
are included in the amounts in column (i) above. Pursuant to the defined
contribution portion of the Benefits Equalization Plan, the amounts
credited by Coltec for 1993 and 1992 for each of the named executive
officers were as follows: Mr. Margolis, 1993, $111,541; 1992, $135,514;
Mr. Guffey, 1993, $85,168; 1992, $72,874; Messrs. Cozzolino and Hilton,
1993, $51,776 each; 1992, $66,604 each; and Mr. diBuono, 1993, $30,098;
1992, $36,813, and such amounts are included in
23
the amounts in column (i) above. The cost to Coltec for 1993 and 1992 for
whole life insurance, measured by the excess of premiums paid over the
cash surrender value, pursuant to arrangements wherein Coltec is the sole
owner and beneficiary of the insurance policy with an obligation to make
certain payments to a beneficiary over a 15 year period in the event of an
executive officer's death while employed for the named executive officers
were as follows: Mr. Guffey, 1993, $19,367; 1992, $15,445; Mr. Cozzolino,
1993, $3,353; 1992, $3,353; and Mr. diBuono, 1993, $1,895; 1992, $1,895,
and such amounts are included in the amounts in column (i) above.
STOCK OPTIONS
The following table contains information concerning 1993 grants of stock
options under Coltec's 1992 Stock Option and Incentive Plan to the named
executive officers and the potential realizable value of these option grants
based on assumed rates of stock appreciation of 5% and 10% per year over the
10-year term of the options.
OPTION GRANTS IN 1993
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS POTENTIAL REALIZABLE
----------------------------------------------------------------- VALUE AT ASSUMED
ANNUAL RATES OF STOCK
(B) APPRECIATION FOR
NUMBER OF (C) OPTION TERM
SECURITIES % OF TOTAL (D) ---------------------
UNDERLYING OPTIONS GRANTED EXERCISE OR
(A) OPTIONS TO EMPLOYEES IN BASE PRICE (E) (F) (G)
NAME GRANTED(#)(1) 1993 ($/SH) EXPIRATION DATE 5%($) 10%($)
- ----------------------- --------------- --------------- ----------- ------------------ --------- ----------
Anthony J. diBuono..... 40,000 13.8 $ 18.75 December 16, 2003 $ 471,700 $1,195,300
<FN>
- ------------
(1) The options are nonqualified options exercisable to the extent of 20% of
the total, cumulatively, commencing December 17, 1994 and annually
thereafter until fully exercisable on December 17, 1998. Exercise of an
option may be by cash, negotiable certificates representing whole shares of
Coltec Common Stock (or, subject to the approval of the Compensation
Committee (the "Compensation Committee"), through withholding of Common
Stock which would otherwise have been received upon exercise of the option)
or any combination thereof. The option agreements contain change-in-control
provisions. See "Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment and
Change-In-Control Arrangements" for additional information.
24
OPTION EXERCISES AND HOLDINGS
The following table provides information with respect to the named executive
officers concerning the options held as of December 31, 1993 (none of the named
executive officers exercised options during 1993):
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN 1993
AND DECEMBER 31, 1993 OPTION VALUES
(C)
(B) VALUE OF
NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNEXERCISED
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY
OPTIONS AT OPTIONS AT
DECEMBER 31, 1993 DECEMBER 31, 1993
(A) -------------------------- --------------------------
NAME EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
- ---------------------------------------------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
David I. Margolis................................... 60,000 240,000 $ 225,000 $ 900,000
John W. Guffey, Jr.................................. 45,000 180,000 168,750 675,000
Salvatore J. Cozzolino.............................. 33,000 132,000 123,750 495,000
Andrew C. Hilton.................................... 33,000 132,000 123,750 495,000
Anthony J. diBuono.................................. 16,000 104,000 60,000 240,000
PENSION PLAN
The following table shows the estimated annual pension benefits payable to a
covered participant at normal retirement age (age 65) on a single life annuity
basis under Coltec's qualified defined benefit plan, as well as nonqualified
supplemental pension plans that provide benefits that would otherwise be denied
participants by reason of certain Internal Revenue Code limitations on qualified
plan benefits, based for the most part on five-year average final compensation
(salary and bonus during the 60 highest-paid consecutive months out of the last
120 months) and years of service with Coltec and its subsidiaries and not
subject to deduction for Social Security or other payments:
PENSION PLAN TABLE
YEARS OF SERVICE
FIVE-YEAR AVERAGE --------------------------------------------------------
ANNUAL COMPENSATION 15 20 25 30 35
- --------------------------- -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
$ 400,000.................. $ 99,400 $ 132,600 $ 165,700 $ 198,900 $ 232,000
600,000.................. 150,400 200,600 250,700 300,900 351,000
800,000.................. 201,400 268,600 335,700 402,900 470,000
1,000,000................. 252,400 336,600 420,700 504,900 589,000
1,200,000................. 303,400 404,600 505,700 606,900 708,000
1,400,000................. 354,400 472,600 590,700 708,900 827,000
1,600,000................. 405,400 540,600 675,700 810,900 946,000
1,800,000................. 456,400 608,600 760,700 912,900 1,065,000
2,000,000................. 507,400 676,600 845,700 1,014,900 1,184,000
2,200,000................. 558,400 744,600 930,700 1,116,900 1,303,000
2,400,000................. 609,400 812,600 1,015,700 1,218,900 1,422,000
2,600,000................. 660,400 880,600 1,100,700 1,320,900 1,541,000
2,800,000................. 711,400 948,600 1,185,700 1,422,900 1,660,000
3,000,000................. 762,400 1,016,600 1,270,700 1,524,900 1,779,000
3,200,000................. 813,400 1,084,600 1,355,700 1,626,900 1,898,000
25
As of December 31, 1993, the five-year average final compensation and
current years of credited service for each of the following persons were: Mr.
Margolis, $2,620,816 and 31 years; Mr. Guffey, $877,655 and 15 years (including
7 years of additional credited service as an employee of one of Coltec's
subsidiary corporations); Mr. Cozzolino, $1,363,302 and 24 years; Dr. Hilton,
$1,363,302 and 31 years; and Mr. diBuono, $722,680 and 23 years. Compensation
covered under the pension plans includes amounts reported in columns (c) and (d)
of the Summary Compensation Table (other than accrued but unpaid amounts under
the Performance Plan reported in column (d) of the table). Coltec has agreed to
calculate Mr. Guffey's pension benefits as if his prior credited service with
the subsidiary were provided under the plan (the benefits of which are set forth
in the above table) with payments to be made to him from the qualified plan,
non-qualified plans and from Coltec.
DESCRIPTION OF THE 1994 INCENTIVE PLAN. On January 12, 1994, the
Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors adopted the 1994 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (the "1994 Incentive Plan"), subject to the approval of the 1994
Incentive Plan by the shareholders of Coltec. The 1994 Incentive Plan will be
submitted to the shareholders of Coltec for approval at the 1994 annual meeting
of shareholders.
The summary of the 1994 Incentive Plan which follows is not intended to be
complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the 1994
Incentive Plan which has been filed as Exhibit 10.16 to this Form 10-K.
The 1994 Incentive Plan provides for annual grants of performance units
("Units") to officers and senior operations management employees of Coltec who
are selected for grants of Units by the Compensation Committee. Approximately 15
officers and senior operations management employees of Coltec and its
subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the 1994 Incentive Plan. The 1994
Incentive Plan is intended to replace the 1977 Long-Term Performance Plan.
The value of each Unit is determined on the basis of Coltec's cumulative
operating profit measured over a three-year performance cycle. Operating profit
for each fiscal year in a performance cycle is generally defined as the net
earnings of Coltec and its consolidated subsidiaries, plus interest expense and
provisions for income taxes, minus interest income and excluding nonrecurring
items, extraordinary items, accounting principle changes and discontinued
operations (as such terms are defined under United States generally accepted
accounting principles).
For each three-year performance cycle, the threshold target for cumulative
operating profit is $600 million. If that target is achieved, each Unit will
have an award value of $36.00 (for the performance cycle beginning January 1,
1994) and $12.00 (for each performance cycle beginning after 1994 (the "1994
Cycle")). The award value of each Unit granted for a performance cycle will
increase by $.10 (with respect to the 1994 Cycle) and by $.0333 (with respect to
later cycles) for each $1 million that cumulative operating profit for the award
cycle exceeds $600 million. There is no maximum limit on the award value which
may be earned for a Unit. No amounts are payable for a Unit if cumulative
operating profit for the performance cycle is less than $600 million.
The 1994 Incentive Plan provides that no more than 300,000 Units may be
awarded for any performance cycle, and that no more than 50,000 Units may be
awarded to any participant for a given cycle. The 1994 Incentive Plan is
administered by the Compensation Committee which has responsibility for the
selection of participants, for construing the terms of the 1994 Incentive Plan
and for certifying that the targets for each performance cycle have been
achieved. Under the terms of the 1994 Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee
also has the discretion to adjust the targets for operating profit prior to the
inception of a performance cycle or to
26
adjust the targets after the inception of a cycle to take into account
extraordinary corporate transactions.
The award value earned in respect of Units is generally payable following
the press release announcing Coltec's unaudited annual financial results for the
last fiscal year in the applicable performance cycle. Two-thirds of the award
value of the Units will generally be paid in cash; and one-third of such award
value will be paid in shares of Common Stock (the "Restricted Shares"). The 1994
Incentive Plan permits participants to elect, prior to the start of the third
year of a performance cycle, to have some or all of the portion of the award
value that would otherwise be paid in cash be paid in Restricted Shares. As an
incentive to encourage participants to make share elections, the 1994 Incentive
Plan increases by 15% the number of Restricted Shares which would otherwise have
been awarded to a participant in lieu of the foregone cash payment. The 1994
Incentive Plan limits the number of Restricted Shares that may be awarded in any
calendar year to .5% (1% for 1997) of the number of shares of Common Stock
issued and outstanding on January 1 of such year.
Performance Units are forfeited if a participant's employment ends for any
reason other than death, disability or retirement. In the event a participant's
employment ends as a result of death, disability or retirement, a pro rata
portion of the award value will generally be paid to the participant (or, in the
event of death, the participant's beneficiary) following the completion of the
performance cycle (although, in appropriate circumstances, the Compensation
Committee may accelerate the payment in settlement of these outstanding Units).
Restricted Shares awarded in payment of Units vest in one third increments
on each of the first through third anniversaries of the end of the applicable
performance cycle. Unvested Restricted Shares are forfeited if a participant's
employment ends for any reason other than death, disability or retirement.
Subject to certain limited exceptions set forth in the 1994 Incentive Plan, a
participant will be fully vested in all Restricted Shares in the event the
participant's employment ends as a result of death, disability or retirement.
DESCRIPTION OF THE 1992 STOCK PLAN. On January 12, 1994, the Board of
Directors authorized an amendment to the 1992 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
(the "1992 Stock Plan") to increase the number of shares of Common Stock that
may be issued under the 1992 Stock Plan from 3,000,000 to 7,360,000. The
amendment further provides that no employee may be awarded in any 36-month
period beginning on or after January 1, 1994 options or stock appreciation
rights in excess of 15% of the number of shares of Common Stock which are
authorized for awards under the 1992 Stock Plan immediately after the 1994
annual meeting of shareholders. Both such changes are subject to the approval of
the amendment to the 1992 Stock Plan by the shareholders of Coltec. The
amendment to the 1992 Stock Plan will be submitted to the shareholders of Coltec
for approval at the 1994 annual meeting of shareholders. The full text of the
amendment has been filed as Exhibit 10.15 to this Form 10-K.
The 1992 Stock Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. The
Compensation Committee has authority under the 1992 Stock Plan to adopt rules
and regulations with respect thereto, to select the employees to whom awards
will be made, to determine the nature and size of each award and to interpret,
construe and implement the 1992 Stock Plan. Approximately 250 employees of
Coltec and its subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the 1992 Stock Plan.
The 1992 Stock Plan provides for grants of stock options, restricted shares,
incentive stock rights, stock appreciation rights and dividend equivalents, the
making of loans to participants to accomplish the purposes of the 1992 Stock
Option Plan and other equity incentive awards established under the plan. The
number of stock options, restricted shares, incentive stock rights, stock
appreciation rights, dividend equivalents or other incentive benefits granted to
any
27
individual, the periods during which they vest or otherwise become exercisable
or remain outstanding, and the other terms and conditions with respect to awards
under the 1992 Stock Plan are set by the Compensation Committee.
Shares issued under the 1992 Stock Plan may be in whole or in part, as the
Compensation Committee shall from time to time determine, authorized and
unissued shares or issued shares that may have been reacquired by Coltec.
Awards under the 1992 Stock Plan may be made only to salaried employees who
are officers or who are employed in an executive, administrative, operations,
sales or professional capacity by Coltec or its subsidiaries or to those other
employees with potential to contribute to the future success of Coltec or its
subsidiaries. Such awards may be made to a director of Coltec provided that the
director is also an officer or salaried employee of Coltec or a subsidiary
thereof.
The 1992 Stock Plan provides for equitable adjustments with respect to
awards made thereunder upon the occurrence of any increase in, decrease in or
exchange of the outstanding shares of Common Stock through merger,
consolidation, recapitalization, reclassification, stock split, stock dividend
or similar capital adjustment. In addition, the 1992 Stock Plan allows the
Compensation Committee, in the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the
1992 Stock Plan), to protect the holders of awards granted under the 1992 Stock
Plan by taking certain actions which it deems equitable and in the best
interests of Coltec.
DESCRIPTION OF THE ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN. On March 15, 1994, the
Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors adopted an amended and
restated version of the Coltec Annual Incentive Plan (the "Annual Incentive
Plan"), subject to the approval of the Annual Incentive Plan by the shareholders
of Coltec. The Annual Incentive Plan will be submitted to the shareholders of
Coltec for approval at the 1994 annual meeting of shareholders.
The summary of the Annual Incentive Plan which follows is not intended to be
complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Annual
Incentive Plan which has been filed as Exhibit 10.17 to this Form 10-K.
The Annual Incentive Plan is an amended and restated version of the prior
Coltec annual incentive plan which was previously approved by the shareholders
of Coltec in 1965 and, as amended, in 1986. The principal purpose of the amended
and restated version of the Annual Incentive Plan is to permit amounts paid
under the plan to qualify as performance-based compensation which is deductible
for federal income tax purposes. Under recently enacted federal tax law changes,
a public company is generally precluded from deducting annual compensation in
excess of $1 million that is paid to an executive officer named in the summary
compensation table of the proxy statement for that year unless, among other
things, the compensation qualifies as performance-based compensation. Amounts
paid under the amended and restated Annual Incentive Plan are generally intended
to qualify as performance-based compensation, which is excluded from the $1
million limit on deductible compensation.
The Annual Incentive Plan provides for an annual bonus pool for cash
incentive awards for any year equal to 6% of operating profit of Coltec and its
consolidated subsidiaries. For purposes of the Annual Incentive Plan, operating
profit is generally defined in the same manner as in the 1994 Incentive Plan.
SEE "Description of the 1994 Incentive Plan." The Annual Incentive Plan provides
that no award may be paid to executive officers of Coltec unless operating
profit for the year exceeds $100 million and that the two executive officers at
the end of such year who have the highest base salary for such year may each
receive no more than 20% of the bonus pool for any year. As the bonus pool is
determined as a percentage of operating profit, there is no maximum limit on the
size of the pool for any year.
28
Only officers of Coltec and senior executive employees who are not covered
by an annual incentive plan of one of Coltec's divisions or subsidiaries are
eligible to participate in the Annual Incentive Plan. Approximately 50 officers
and senior executive employees of Coltec and its subsidiaries are eligible to
participate in the Annual Incentive Plan. The Annual Incentive Plan is
administered by the Compensation Committee which has discretion under the plan
to select plan participants from among the class of eligible persons and,
subject to the limits noted above, to determine the amount of the award paid to
plan participants. The Compensation Committee may require that the payment of
some or all of an award be deferred until a later date or dates specified by the
committee.
Amounts paid under the Annual Incentive Plan (as in effect on December 31,
1993) are included in column (d) of the Summary Compensation Table.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
Directors who are not also employees of Coltec or of Morgan Stanley receive
a retainer at the annual rate of $25,000 ($30,000 if Chairperson of a Committee)
and receive $1,250 per meeting for attendance at meetings of the Board of
Directors and its committees with a maximum of $2,000 for more than one meeting
on the same day ($2,500 if Chairperson of one of the meetings). The Board of
Directors of Coltec has established a retirement age policy which provides that
a director shall not be eligible for nomination to the Board of Directors if
such person has attained the age of 70. In connection therewith, the Board of
Directors also established a pension arrangement for directors who are not
affiliated with Morgan Stanley or not entitled to a pension from Coltec or any
subsidiary thereof, with payments for life commencing at the later of retirement
or age 70. The annual amount of such payment is calculated on the basis of the
number of years of service as a director and would equal $10,000 for five years
of service plus an additional $2,000 for each additional year of service up to a
maximum annual amount of $20,000.
A director may defer payment of any portion of any retainer, committee or
attendance fees in any year, upon advance notice to Coltec, to such time as he
or she may determine. Balances of such deferred compensation accrue additional
compensatory amounts quarterly at the average cost of United States borrowings
of Coltec and its consolidated subsidiaries during the preceding calendar year.
Such borrowing cost in 1992 was 7.2%. There are no amounts being deferred at the
present time.
In addition to the foregoing amounts, on March 15, 1994, the Board of
Directors adopted the 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors (the "1994
Directors Option Plan"), subject to the approval of the 1994 Directors Option
Plan by the shareholders of Coltec. The 1994 Directors Option Plan will be
submitted to the shareholders of Coltec for approval at the 1994 annual meeting
of shareholders.
The summary of the 1994 Directors Option Plan which follows is not intended
to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the
1994 Directors Option Plan which has been filed as Exhibit 10.18 to this Form
10-K.
The 1994 Directors Option Plan provides for automatic grants of stock
options to each member of the Board of Directors who is not an employee of
Coltec or any of its subsidiaries ("Outside Directors"). Each individual elected
as an Outside Director at the 1994 annual shareholders meeting (or who is
initially elected as a director by the shareholders at an annual or special
meeting of shareholders occurring after the 1994 annual meeting) will be granted
an option to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock (an "Initial Option"). On
each subsequent Alternate Re-Election Date, as defined in the 1994 Directors
Option Plan, each Outside Director will be granted an additional option to
purchase 2,000 shares of Common Stock (a "Subsequent
29
Option"). The date of grant of each Initial or Subsequent Option will be the
date of the applicable annual or special meeting. The per share exercise price
of each option will be the average closing price of a share of Common Stock as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape for the date of grant and
the four preceding trading days.
The Initial Options will vest 20% per year beginning on the first
anniversary date of the date of grant. The Subsequent Options will vest 50% per
year beginning on the first anniversary date of the date of grant. Each option
granted under the 1994 Directors Option Plan will terminate on the tenth
anniversary of the date of grant of the option. In the event of an Outside
Director's resignation, removal (other than for cause) or termination as a
member of the Board, the unvested portion of any option granted to an Outside
Director will terminate as of the date of such event, but the vested portion of
the option will remain exercisable until the first anniversary of the date of
such event. In the event of the removal of the Outside Director from the Board
of Directors for cause, the option (including the vested portion thereof) will
terminate in its entirety as of the date of such removal.
The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be awarded under the
1994 Directors Option Plan will not exceed 108,000 shares. The 1994 Directors
Option Plan is administered by the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") of Coltec.
The CEO has authority under the 1994 Directors Option Plan to interpret,
administer and apply the Plan, and to execute and deliver option certificates on
behalf of Coltec.
Subject to certain limitations set forth in the plan document, the Board of
Directors has the right to amend or terminate the 1994 Directors Option Plan at
any time. Unless earlier terminated by the Board of Directors, the 1994
Directors Option Plan will terminate on July 1, 2004 and no further options
under the plan will be awarded after that date.
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS AND TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE-IN-CONTROL
ARRANGEMENTS
All currently outstanding agreements granting restricted stock or stock
options to the named executive officers in the Summary Compensation Table above
contain change-in-control provisions. In the case of the restricted stock, in
the event of a change-in-control, all restrictions on assignment, transfer or
other disposition of the restricted stock lapse. In the case of stock options,
in the event of a change-in-control, the options become fully exercisable or, in
the alternative, the executive officer may surrender all or part of the option
to Coltec during a one-year period after the change-in-control in exchange for a
cash payment for each option surrendered equal to the excess of the fair market
value of the Common Stock on the date of surrender over the option price. Fair
market value for this purpose equals the last sales price of the Common Stock on
the exercise date on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape (or, if no such
sale occurred on such date, the last date preceding such date on which a sale
was reported), except that in the case of a change of ownership of more than 35%
of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, it shall mean the amount of cash and
fair market value of other consideration tendered for such outstanding shares.
As of June 10, 1988, Coltec entered into an employment contract (the
"Employment Contract") with Mr. Margolis which by its terms is scheduled to
terminate on January 24, 1995. The Employment Contract provides for certain
severance payments and continuation of benefits for the remaining term of the
Employment Contract following termination of employment. The amount of the
payments that may be made will vary depending upon the level of compensation and
benefits at the time employment terminates and whether such employment is
terminated prior to the end of the term by Coltec for "cause" or by Mr. Margolis
for "good reason" or otherwise during the term of the contract. In the event
that termination of employment is by
30
Mr. Margolis for "good reason" or by Coltec without "cause", such payments are
to consist of amounts equal to full salary, bonus payments on each January based
on an average of the three prior annual bonus payments pro rated for partial
years, an additional one-time payment at the time of termination of the bonus
amount pro rated for a partial year, either continuation of participation in
compensation and benefit plans or the provision of comparable benefits,
reimbursement for any legal fees expended in connection with the termination of
employment and gross-up payments for any golden parachute excise taxes paid. Mr.
Margolis is required to seek other employment and any amounts paid as a result
of such employment offset amounts otherwise payable under the Employment
Contract. The Employment Contract includes multi-year non-compete provisions.
As of July 1, 1991, Coltec entered into employment agreements with Messrs.
Guffey and diBuono. Mr. Guffey's agreement expires on July 1, 1996 and Mr.
diBuono's agreement expires on October 13, 1995. Compensation payable thereunder
is at salary rates not less than those in effect on July 1, 1991 and with
comparable participation in incentive and employee benefit plans at the
discretion of the Board of Directors. However, if during the term of the
agreement a change of control (as defined in the agreement) occurs, (a) the
executive's functions, duties and responsibilities shall not be subject to
change, (b) in the event the executive in good faith determines that his
functions, duties or responsibilities or any aspect of his employment has been
changed adversely, he may elect to serve for a terminal employment period of two
years or, if earlier, until the executive attains age 65, and (c) the terminal
employment period is followed by a consulting period of two years. During the
terminal employment period, the executive is entitled to salary not less than
that in effect prior to this period and comparable participation in benefits
plans. During the consulting period, the executive is entitled to consulting
fees at an annual rate no less than the annual rate of his salary on July 1,
1991 and to participation in all Coltec life and medical insurance programs or
comparable benefits.
31
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
Set forth below is certain information (as of February 25, 1994) with
respect to persons known to Coltec to be the beneficial owners of more than five
percent of the Common Stock. This information is based on statements on
Schedules 13D or 13G filed by beneficial owners with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and other information available to Coltec.
AMOUNT AND
NATURE OF
BENEFICIAL PERCENT OF
NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNERSHIP CLASS (A)
- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------
Morgan Stanley Group Inc..................................... 19,074,406 27.3(b)
1251 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020
Oppenheimer Group, Inc....................................... 7,770,760 11.1(c)
Oppenheimer Tower
World Financial Center
New York, NY 10281
The Equitable Companies Incorporated......................... 7,258,920 10.4(d)
787 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
The Capital Group, Inc....................................... 4,420,450 6.3(e)
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071
<FN>
- ---------
(a) The percentage is calculated on the basis of 69,762,203 shares of Common
Stock outstanding on February 25, 1994.
(b) In its Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G dated February 14, 1994, Morgan
Stanley Group Inc. reports that it may be deemed to have shared voting and
investment power for 16,539,263 shares held by affiliates and has sole
investment power for 2,535,143 shares. In the same Amendment No. 1, The
Morgan Stanley Leveraged Equity Fund II, L.P., the general partner of which
is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley Group Inc., reports shared
voting and investment power for 14,898,000 shares.
(c) In its Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13G dated February 1, 1994, Oppenheimer
Group, Inc. reported that it has shared voting power and shared investment
power (with certain of its affiliates) with respect to all of such shares
and that it had filed such Schedule 13G on its behalf and on behalf of
certain of its affiliates as a parent holding company.
(d) In its Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13G dated February 9, 1994, The
Equitable Companies Incorporated reported that with respect to the Common
Stock it had sole voting power for 4,953,320 shares, shared voting power
for 108,000 shares, sole investment power for 7,258,920 shares and that it
had filed such 13G on its behalf and on behalf of certain of its affiliates
as a parent holding company.
(e) The Capital Group, Inc. reported that certain of its operating subsidiaries
exercised investment discretion over various institutional accounts which
held as of December 31, 1993, 4,420,450 shares of Coltec Common Stock (6.3%
of the outstanding class). CAPITAL GUARDIAN TRUST COMPANY, a bank, and one
of such operating companies, exercised investment discretion over 3,077,450
of said shares. CAPITAL RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a registered
investment adviser, and CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL, S.A., another operating
subsidiary, had invesment discretion with respect to 1,211,000 and 132,000
shares, respectively, of the above shares.
32
Set forth below is information as of February 25, 1994, concerning ownership
of Common Stock by all directors, individually, the executive officers named in
the Summary Compensation Table above and all present executive officers and
directors of Coltec as a group:
AMOUNT AND
NATURE OF
BENEFICIAL PERCENT OF
NAME OWNERSHIP CLASS (A)
- ---------------------------------------- ---------- -----------
Donald P. Brennan....................... 0 0
Salvatore J. Cozzolino.................. 465,916 *
Anthony J. diBuono (b)(c)............... 96,846 *
John W. Guffey, Jr. (b)................. 159,219 *
Andrew C. Hilton........................ 465,916 *
Howard I. Hoffen........................ 0 0
David I. Margolis (b)................... 1,133,048 1.6
J. Bradford Mooney, Jr.................. 0 0
Joel Moses.............................. 200 *
Paul G. Schoen (b)...................... 50,387 *
Frank V. Sica........................... 0 0
All directors and present executive
officers as a group, consisting of 15
persons................................ 2,637,300 3.8
<FN>
- ---------
* Less than 1%.
(a) The percentages are calculated on the basis of 69,762,203 shares of Common
Stock outstanding on February 25, 1994, plus, for any individual or the
group, that number of shares deemed to be outstanding because the indicated
persons or certain members of the group, respectively, have the right to
acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days.
(b) Messrs. diBuono, Guffey, Margolis and Schoen share certain voting power of
2,468,612 shares (as of February 25, 1994) as trustees of the Coltec
Retirement Savings Plan for Salaried Employees (the "Savings Plan"). They
disclaim beneficial ownership as to such shares. However, as participants
in the Savings Plan, they have the following shares of Common Stock
credited to their individual accounts as of December 31, 1993 and such
shares are included in the table above: Mr. diBuono, 1,853 shares; Mr.
Guffey, 4,023 shares; Mr. Margolis, 2,657 shares; and Mr. Schoen, 4,021
shares.
(c) 50,660 shares of the 96,846 shares of Common Stock are owned by Mr.
diBuono's wife and he disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
The members of the Stock Option and Compensation Committee are Joel Moses
(Chairman), Donald P. Brennan, Howard I. Hoffen and J. Bradford Mooney, Jr. None
of the members was formerly an officer of Coltec or any of its subsidiaries. Mr.
Brennan was an officer and director and Mr. Hoffen was a director of Coltec
Holdings Inc. ("Holdings") before it became a wholly owned subsidiary of Coltec
in November 1993.
Mr. Brennan is a managing director and Mr. Hoffen is a vice president of
Morgan Stanley and they along with another managing director of Morgan Stanley,
Frank V. Sica, constituted all of the directors of Holdings, the owner of 100%
of the outstanding shares of Common Stock from June 1988 to the recapitalization
of Coltec effected in April 1992, which included the public offering by Coltec
of 44,275,000 shares of Common Stock (the "1992 Recapitalization"). At the time
of the 1992 Recapitalization, Holdings owned 36.1% of the outstanding shares of
Common Stock.
33
In the 1992 Recapitalization, Morgan Stanley was sole underwriter of a debt
offering for which it received an underwriting commission of $11,250,000 and was
one of several underwriters of an equity offering for which it received a
portion of the total underwriting commission of $36,527,000. Also, as one of the
dealer managers for a tender offer by Holdings for the outstanding Holdings
14 3/4% senior discount debentures, a part of the 1992 Recapitalization, Morgan
Stanley received fees of $1,049,000 from Holdings. In October 1992, Morgan
Stanley acted as sole underwriter in connection with the issuance by Coltec of
$150 million of its 9 3/4% Senior Notes due 1999 for which it received an
underwriting commission of $2,625,000. In connection with an industrial revenue
bond refinancing in 1993, Morgan Stanley received a fee of $309,000.
As of November 18, 1993, pursuant to a Reorganization Agreement, Coltec and
Holdings completed a stock-for-stock exchange that resulted in Holdings'
stockholders holding directly shares of Coltec Common Stock and Holdings became
a wholly owned subsidiary of Coltec.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(1) Financial Statements (incorporated by reference from the 1993 Annual Report to
Shareholders):
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 1993 and 1992
Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the Three Years ended December 31, 1993
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Three Years ended December 31,
1993
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity for the Three Years Ended
December 31, 1993
Notes to Financial Statements
Report of Independent Public Accountants
(2) Financial Statement Schedules listed in the Index to Financial Statement
Schedules on page S-1 hereof.
(3) The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K as listed in the
accompanying exhibit index commencing on page I-1 hereof.
(b) Coltec filed a Form 8-K dated October 13, 1993 reporting under Item 1.
Changes in Control of Registrant, the approval of a stock-for-stock exchange
between Coltec and Coltec Holdings Inc.
(c) Exhibits 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 4.10, 4.11, 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, 10.3, 10.13,
10.15, 10.16, 10.17, 10.18, 12.1, 13.1, 21.1 and 23.1 are filed herewith.
34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Coltec Industries Inc
(Registrant)
Date: March 22, 1994 By: ________/s/_PAUL G. SCHOEN_______
Paul G. Schoen
Executive Vice President Finance
and Treasurer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant in the capacities noted on March 22, 1994.
NAME AND TITLE NAME AND TITLE
- ----------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
/s/ DONALD P. BRENNAN /s/ DAVID I. MARGOLIS
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
Donald P. Brennan David I. Margolis
Director Chairman of the Board and Director
(Chief Executive Officer)
/s/ SALVATORE J. COZZOLINO /s/ J. BRADFORD MOONEY, JR.
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
Salvatore J. Cozzolino J. Bradford Mooney, Jr.
Director Director
/s/ JOHN W. GUFFEY, JR. /s/ JOEL MOSES
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
John. W. Guffey, Jr. Joel Moses
President, Chief Operating Officer Director
and Director
/s/ ANDREW C. HILTON /s/ PAUL G. SCHOEN
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
Andrew C. Hilton Paul G. Schoen
Director Executive Vice President Finance
and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
/s/ HOWARD I. HOFFEN /s/ FRANK V. SICA
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
Howard I. Hoffen Frank V. Sica
Director Director
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
3.1 -- Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Coltec, filed as Exhib-
it 3.1 to Coltec's Registration Statement on Form S-2 (No. 33-44846) (the
"Form S-2 Registration Statement") and incorporated herein by reference.
3.2 -- By-laws of Coltec, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Form S-2 Registration
Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
4.1 -- Form of Senior Securities Indenture, dated as of December 1, 1985,
between Coltec and Mellon Bank, N.A., as Trustee, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to
Coltec's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-1811) and
incorporated herein by reference.
4.2 -- Agreement of Resignation, Appointment and Acceptance, dated as of May 10,
1991, by and among Coltec, Mellon Bank, N.A. and The Bank of New York,
filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Form S-2 Registration Statement and
incorporated herein by reference.
4.3 -- Specimen certificate for 11 1/4% Debentures Due December 1, 2015, filed
as Exhibit 4.14 to Coltec's Registration Statement on Form S-2 and S-3
(Nos. 33-8585 and 33-1811) the ("Form S-2/S-3 Registration Statement")
and incorporated herein by reference.
4.4 -- Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 1, 1992, between Coltec and The
Bank of New York, as Trustee, relating to the Senior Securities
Indenture, dated as of December 1, 1985, between Coltec and Mellon Bank,
N.A., as the original Trustee, filed as Exhibit 6 to Coltec's Current
Report on Form 8-K dated April 1, 1992 (the "Form 8-K") and incorporated
herein by reference.
4.5 -- Credit Agreement, dated as of March 24, 1992 (the "Credit Agreement")
among Coltec and the financial institutions party thereto, Bankers Trust
Company, Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, Barclays Bank PLC, New York
Branch and Credit Lyonnais New York Branch, as Agents, and Bankers Trust
Company, as Administrative Agent, filed as Exhibit 4.13 to Coltec
Holdings Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1991 and incorporated herein by reference.
4.6 -- First Amendment, dated as of April 1, 1992, to the Credit Agreement,
dated as of March 24, 1992, filed as Exhibit 3 to the Form 8-K and
incorporated herein by reference.
4.7 -- Second Amendment, dated as of April 8, 1992, to the Credit Agreement.
4.8 -- Third Amendment and Waiver, dated as of September 3, 1992, to the Credit
Agreement.
4.9 -- Fourth Amendment and Consent, dated as of September 25, 1992, to the
Credit Agreement.
4.10 -- Fifth Amendment, dated as of May 26, 1993, to the Credit Agreement.
4.11 -- Sixth Waiver, dated as of August 3, 1993, to the Credit Agreement.
4.12 -- Seventh Consent, dated as of October 27, 1993, to the Credit Agreement.
4.13 -- Eighth Waiver, dated as of December 23, 1993, to the Credit Agreement.
I-1
4.14 -- Credit Agreement among Coltec, Various Banks, The Co-Agents and Bankers
Trust Company, as Administrative Agent dated as of March 24, 1992 and
Amended and Restated as of January 11, 1994.
4.15 -- Form of Indenture, dated as of October 26, 1992, between Coltec and
United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee, realting to Coltec's
9 3/4% Senior Notes Due 1999 (including the form of 9 3/4% Senior Note
Due 1999), filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Coltec's Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 33-52414) and incorporated herein by reference.
4.16 -- Indenture, dated as of April 1, 1992, between Coltec and United States
Trust Company of New York, as Trustee, relating to Coltec's 9 3/4% Senior
Notes Due 2000 (including the form of 9 3/4% Senior Note Due 2000), filed
as Exhibit 4 to the Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference.
4.17 -- Indenture, dated as of April 1, 1992, between Coltec and Norwest Bank
Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee, relating to Coltec's 10 1/4%
Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2002 (including the form of 10 1/4% Senior
Subordinated Note Due 2002), filed as Exhibit 5 to the Form 8-K and
incorporated herein by reference.
4.18 -- Form of Indenture between Coltec and United States Trust Company of New
York, as Trustee, relating to Coltec's 9 3/4% Senior Notes due 1999
(including the form of Senior Note due 1999), filed as Exhibit 4.1 to
Coltec's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-52414) and
incorporated herein by reference.
Pursuant to paragraph (4)(iii) of Item 601(b) of Regulation S-K, there
are omitted certain agreements, which the registrant hereby agrees to
furnish to the Commission upon request.
10.1* -- Form of Family Protection Agreement used in connection with Coltec's
Family Protection Program, filed as Exhibit 3.5.1 to Coltec's
Registration Statement on Form 8-B, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 25, 1976 and incorporated herein by
reference.
10.2* -- Benefits Equalization Plan of Coltec, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Coltec's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1988
and incorporated herein by reference.
10.3* -- Amendment No. 1 to the Benefits Equalization Plan.
10.4* -- Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan of Coltec, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to
Coltec's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 1988 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.5* -- Coltec's 1977 Long-Term Performance Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the
Form S-2/S-3 Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
10.6* -- Amendment to Coltec's 1977 Long-Term Performance Plan described in
Proposal 2 of Coltec's Proxy Statement for its 1981 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Form S-2/S-3 Registration
Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
10.7* -- Amendment No. 2 to Coltec's 1977 Long-Term Performance Plan, filed as
Exhibit 10.7 to the Form S-2/S-3 Registration Statement and incorporated
herein by reference.
I-2
10.8* -- Employment Agreement, dated June 10, 1988, between Coltec and David I.
Margolis, filed as Exhibit 10.12 to Coltec's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1988 and incorporated herein by
reference.
10.9* -- Form of Employment Agreements between Coltec and John W. Guffey, Jr.,
Anthony J. diBuono and certain other Executive Officers of Coltec, filed
as Exhibit 10.13 to the Form S-2 Registration Statement and incorporated
herein by reference.
10.10* -- Employment Letter Agreement, dated August 1, 1990, between Coltec and
John M. Cybulski, filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Form S-2 Registration
Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
10.11* -- Resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of Coltec on July 14, 1982
establishing a pension program for directors who are not otherwise
entitled to a pension from Coltec, filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the Form
S-2/S-3 Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
10.12* -- The Incentive Plan for Certain Employees of Coltec and Subsidiaries (the
"Incentive Plan"), filed as Exhibit 10.22 to the Form S-2 Registration
Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
10.13* -- Amendments to the Incentive Plan.
10.14* -- Coltec's 1992 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.24 to
Coltec's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 1991 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.15* -- Amendment No. 1 to the Coltec 1992 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.
10.16* -- 1994 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Coltec.
10.17* -- Annual Incentive Plan For Certain Employees of Coltec Industries Inc and
Its Subsidiaries.
10.18 -- 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.
10.19* -- Form of Registration and Management Rights Agreement, dated as of October
13, 1993 among Coltec, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and the
individuals and institutions named therein filed as Exhibit B to
Reorganization Agreement dated as of October 13, 1993, among Coltec,
Coltec Holdings Inc. and the institutions and individuals named therein,
filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Coltec's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October
13, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference.
12.1 -- Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
13.1 -- Portions of Coltec's 1993 Annual Report to Shareholders.
21.1 -- List of Subsidiaries of Coltec.
23.1 -- Consent of Arthur Andersen & Co.
<FN>
- ---------
* These exhibits are management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements
required to be filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-K pursuant to item 14(c) of
Form 10-K.
I-3
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
PAGE NUMBER
----------------
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES 1993 1992 1991
- -------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ---- ----
V -- Property, Plant and Equipment..................... S-2 S-3 S-4
VI -- Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization of
Property, Plant and Equipment..................... S-2 S-3 S-4
VII -- Guarantees of Securities of Other Issuers......... S-5 -- --
VIII -- Valuation and Qualifying Accounts................. S-6 S-6 S-6
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS OF COLTEC INDUSTRIES INC:
We have audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
consolidated financial statements included in Coltec Industries Inc and
subsidiaries' annual report to shareholders incorporated by reference in this
Form 10-K, and have issued our report thereon dated January 24, 1994. Our audits
were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial
statements taken as a whole. The schedules listed in the index to financial
statement schedules are the responsibility of the company's management and are
presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange
Commission's rules and are not part of the basic financial statements. These
schedules have been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits
of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly state in all
material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.
New York, N.Y.
January 24, 1994
S-1
SCHEDULES V AND VI
1993
COLTEC INDUSTRIES INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE V--PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(IN THOUSANDS)
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E COLUMN F
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER
BALANCE AT ADDITIONS CHANGES BALANCE
BEGINNING AT ADD AT END
CLASSIFICATION OF PERIOD COST RETIREMENTS (DEDUCT) OF PERIOD
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land and improvements................... $ 18,637 $ 64 $ 439 $ (60 )(2) $ 18,202
Buildings and equipment................. 132,013 936 2,289 (575 )(2) 130,085
Machinery and equipment................. 462,992 34,157 15,296 (2,633 )(2) 479,220
Leasehold improvements.................. 8,491 132 151 (27 )(2) 8,445
Construction in progress................ 17,988 3,298(1) (1 )(2) 21,285
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 640,121 $38,587 $18,175 $(3,296) $ 657,237
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
- ---------
Notes:
(1) Net change in construction in progress.
(2) Foreign currency translation adjustments.
SCHEDULE VI--ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(IN THOUSANDS)
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E COLUMN F
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONS OTHER
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO CHANGES BALANCE
BEGINNING COSTS AND ADD AT END
DESCRIPTION OF PERIOD EXPENSES RETIREMENTS (DEDUCT) OF PERIOD
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land improvements....................... $ 4,586 $ 223 $ 63 $ (4 )(1) $ 4,742
Buildings and equipment................. 68,621 4,361 926 (194 )(1) 71,862
Machinery and equipment................. 334,070 28,305 11,602 (1,711)(1) 349,062
Leasehold improvements.................. 6,035 349 129 (13 )(1) 6,242
------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 413,312 $33,238 $12,720 ($1,922) $ 431,908
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
- ---------
Notes:
(1) Foreign currency translation adjustments.
S-2
SCHEDULES V AND VI
1992
COLTEC INDUSTRIES INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE V--PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1992
(IN THOUSANDS)
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E COLUMN F
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER
BALANCE AT ADDITIONS CHANGES BALANCE
BEGINNING AT ADD AT END
CLASSIFICATION OF PERIOD COST RETIREMENTS (DEDUCT) OF PERIOD
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land and improvements................... $ 19,050 $ 168 $ 385 $ (196)(2) $ 18,637
Buildings and equipment................. 131,131 2,583 49 (1,652)(2) 132,013
Machinery and equipment................. 461,930 16,798 9,229 (6,507)(2) 462,992
Leasehold improvements.................. 8,345 554 386 (22)(2) 8,491
Construction in progress................ 13,094 4,894(1) 17,988
-------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 633,550 $ 24,997 $ 10,049 $ (8,377) $ 640,121
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
- ---------
Notes:
(1) Net change in construction in progress.
(2) Foreign currency translation adjustments.
SCHEDULE VI--ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1992
(IN THOUSANDS)
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E COLUMN F
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONS OTHER
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO CHANGES BALANCE
BEGINNING COSTS AND ADD AT END
DESCRIPTION OF PERIOD EXPENSES RETIREMENTS (DEDUCT) OF PERIOD
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land improvements....................... $ 4,391 $ 230 $ 30 $ (5)(1) $ 4,586
Buildings and equipment................. 64,322 4,800 24 (477)(1) 68,621
Machinery and equipment................. 316,245 29,847 8,097 (3,925)(1) 334,070
Leasehold improvements.................. 5,978 429 364 (8)(1) 6,035
------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 390,936 $ 35,306 $ 8,515 $ (4,415) $ 413,312
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
- ---------
Notes:
(1) Foreign currency translation adjustments.
S-3
SCHEDULES V AND VI
1991
COLTEC INDUSTRIES INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE V--PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1991
(IN THOUSANDS)
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E COLUMN F
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER
BALANCE AT ADDITIONS CHANGES BALANCE
BEGINNING AT ADD AT END
CLASSIFICATION OF PERIOD COST RETIREMENTS (DEDUCT) OF PERIOD
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land and improvements................... $ 19,223 $ 34 $ 240 $ 33(2) $ 19,050
Buildings and equipment................. 125,484 5,953 426 120(2) 131,131
Machinery and equipment................. 453,234 17,629 9,187 254(2) 461,930
Leasehold improvements.................. 8,320 77 28 (24)(2) 8,345
Construction in progress................ 10,548 2,546(1) 13,094
-------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 616,809 $ 26,239 $ 9,881 $ 383 $ 633,550
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
- ---------
Notes:
(1) Net change in construction in progress.
(2) Foreign currency translation adjustments.
SCHEDULE VI--ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1991
(IN THOUSANDS)
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E COLUMN F
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONS OTHER
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO CHANGES BALANCE
BEGINNING COSTS AND ADD AT END
DESCRIPTION OF PERIOD EXPENSES RETIREMENTS (DEDUCT) OF PERIOD
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land improvements....................... $ 4,177 $ 256 $ 41 $ (1)(1) $ 4,391
Buildings and equipment................. 60,416 4,158 250 (2)(1) 64,322
Machinery and equipment................. 292,037 32,050 7,970 128(1) 316,245
Leasehold improvements.................. 5,599 411 21 (11)(1) 5,978
------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 362,229 $ 36,875 $ 8,282 $ 114 $ 390,936
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
- ---------
Notes:
(1) Foreign currency translation adjustments.
S-4
SCHEDULE VII
1993
COLTEC INDUSTRIES INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE VII--GUARANTEES OF SECURITIES OF OTHER ISSUERS
DECEMBER 31, 1993
(IN THOUSANDS)
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E COLUMN F COLUMN G
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NATURE OF ANY
DEFAULT BY ISSUER
OF SECURITIES
GUARANTEED IN
AMOUNT PRINCIPAL,
OWNED AMOUNT IN INTEREST,
NAME OF ISSUER OF TOTAL BY PERSON TREASURY SINKING FUND OR
SECURITIES TITLE OF ISSUE OF AMOUNT OR PERSONS OF ISSUER REDEMPTION
GUARANTEED BY EACH CLASS OF GUARANTEED FOR WHICH OF PROVISIONS, OR
PERSON FOR WHICH SECURITIES AND STATEMENT SECURITIES NATURE OF PAYMENT OF
STATEMENT IS FILED GUARANTEED OUTSTANDING IS FILED GUARANTEED GUARANTEE DIVIDENDS
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Onondaga County 9 7/8% Pollution $ 2,575 -- -- (1) --
Industrial Control
Development Agency Revenue Bonds
(New York)
City of Elizabethtown, 9 7/8% Industrial 5,800 -- -- (1) --
Kentucky Development
Revenue Bonds
The Industrial 9 7/8% Industrial 575 -- -- (1) --
Development Board of Development
the City of Huntsville Revenue Bonds
(Alabama)
Onondaga County 7 1/4% Pollution 5,215 -- -- (1) --
Industrial Control
Development Agency Revenue Bonds
(New York)
Allegheny County 7 1/4% Pollution 1,000 -- -- (1) --
Industrial Development Control Revenue
Authority Bonds
(Pennsylvania)
Beaver County Industrial 7% Pollution Control 11,975 -- -- (1) --
Development Authority Revenue Bonds
(Pennsylvania)
-----------
$ 27,140
-----------
-----------
<FN>
- ------------
Notes:
(1) Coltec is contingently liable for lease payments relating to these
industrial revenue bonds, which have been assumed by others.
S-5
SCHEDULE VIII
1993, 1992 AND
1991
COLTEC INDUSTRIES INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE VIII--VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(IN THOUSANDS)
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONS
--------------------------
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO CHARGED TO BALANCE AT
BEGINNING COSTS AND OTHER END
DESCRIPTION OF PERIOD EXPENSES ACCOUNTS DEDUCTIONS(1) OF PERIOD
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1993
Valuation accounts deducted from assets--
Allowance for doubtful accounts...... $ 4,614 $ 335 $ -- $ 779 $ 4,170
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Reserve for potential losses from
excess and slow-moving
inventories........................ $ 16,789 $ 6,379 $ -- $ 5,082 $ 18,086
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1992
Valuation accounts deducted from assets--
Allowance for doubtful accounts...... $ 4,624 $ 206 $ -- $ 216 $ 4,614
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Reserve for potential losses from
excess and slow-moving
inventories........................ $ 16,569 $ 5,252 $ -- $ 5,032 $ 16,789
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1991
Valuation accounts deducted from assets--
Allowance for doubtful accounts...... $ 4,587 $ 631 $ -- $ 594 $ 4,624
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Reserve for potential losses from
excess and slow-moving
inventories........................ $ 15,946 $ 3,561 $ -- $ 2,938 $ 16,569
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
- ---------
Notes:
(1) Deductions are for the purposes for which the valuation accounts were
created.
S-6