EXHIBIT 8.1
                      [FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LETTERHEAD]
    

   
                                February 1, 1996
    

   
BRE Properties, Inc.
One Montgomery Street
Suite 2500, Telesis Tower
San Francisco, CA 94104
    

        Re: Federal Income Tax Consequences of Merger Transactions

Gentlemen:

    You have requested our opinion as to certain federal income tax consequences
in connection with the proposed merger transactions set forth in the October 11,
1995 Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended ("Merger Agreement"), by and among
(i)  BRE Properties,  Inc., a  Delaware corporation  ("BRE"), for  itself and on
behalf of  BRE  Maryland,  Inc.,  a  Maryland  corporation  and  a  wholly-owned
subsidiary  of  BRE  ("BRE/Maryland"),  (ii)  Real  Estate  Investment  Trust of
California, a California real  estate investment trust  ("RCT"), and (iii)  Real
Estate   Investment  Trust  of  Maryland,  a   Maryland  business  trust  and  a
wholly-owned  subsidiary  of  RCT  ("RCT/Maryland").  Pursuant  to  the   Merger
Agreement  (i) RCT will be merged  with and into RCT/Maryland, (ii) RCT/Maryland
will be merged with  and into BRE, and  (iii) BRE will be  merged with and  into
BRE/Maryland. This opinion is being furnished to you at your request pursuant to
Section 6.1(g) of the Merger Agreement.

    In  rendering our opinion, we have examined and relied upon the accuracy and
completeness of the facts, information, covenants and representations  contained
in  the Merger Agreement,  the Joint Proxy  Statement and Prospectus  of BRE and
RCT, and such other documents we have deemed necessary or appropriate as a basis
for the  opinion set  forth below.  In  addition, we  have relied  upon  certain
statements and representations made by BRE, BRE/Maryland, RCT, and RCT/Maryland.
Our  opinion is conditioned  on, among other things,  the initial and continuing
accuracy of the facts, information,  covenants and representations set forth  in
the  documents referred to above and  the statements and representations of BRE,
BRE/Maryland, RCT, and RCT/Maryland.

    In our  examination  we have  assumed  the  legal capacity  of  all  natural
persons,  the  genuineness  of  all  signatures,  and  the  authenticity  of all
documents submitted to us.  In making our examination  of documents executed  by
the  parties, we have assumed that such parties have the power to enter into and
perform all obligations thereunder and  have also assumed the due  authorization
by  all requisite action and the valid execution and delivery by such parties of
such documents and the validity,  binding effect and enforceability thereof.  We
also   have  assumed  that  the  transactions   related  to  RCT's  merger  into
RCT/Maryland, RCT/Maryland's merger into BRE, and BRE's merger into BRE/Maryland
will be consummated in accordance with the Merger Agreement and as described  in
the  Joint  Proxy Statement  and Prospectus,  and that  such mergers  qualify as
statutory mergers under the laws of the State of Maryland.

    In rendering our opinion,  we have considered  the applicable provisions  of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), Treasury Regulations
promulgated  thereunder, pertinent judicial authorities, interpretive rulings of
the Internal Revenue Service  and such other authorities  as we have  considered
relevant.  It should be noted that statutes, regulations, judicial decisions and
administrative interpretations are subject  to change at any  time and, in  some
circumstances,  with retroactive  effect. A  material change  in the authorities
upon which our opinion is based could affect our conclusions.

   
BRE Properties, Inc.
February 1, 1996
Page 2
    

                                    OPINION

    Based solely on the foregoing, and subject to the assumptions,  limitations,
exceptions and qualifications set forth herein, we are of the opinion that under
current law:

        (1)  The merger of  RCT/Maryland with and  into BRE will  be treated for
    federal income  tax  purposes as  a  reorganization within  the  meaning  of
    Section 368(a)(1)(A) of the Code.

        (2)  The merger of  BRE with and  into BRE/Maryland will  be treated for
    federal income  tax  purposes as  a  reorganization within  the  meaning  of
    Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Code.

        (3)  No gain  or loss  will be  recognized by  BRE or  BRE/Maryland as a
    result of the mergers described in (1) and (2) above.

        (4) No gain or loss  will be recognized by  the shareholders of BRE  who
    receive shares of BRE/ Maryland in exchange for shares of BRE.

    This opinion is furnished by us to you solely for your benefit in connection
with the Merger Agreement, and may not be quoted in full or in part or otherwise
referred  to, filed with,  furnished to, or  relied upon by  any other person or
entity, or by you for any other purpose, with or without reference to our  firm,
without the prior written consent of this firm.

   
    We  hereby  consent to  the  filing of  this opinion  as  an exhibit  to the
Registration Statement and to the use of the name of our firm therein. In giving
this consent, we do not admit that  we are within the category of persons  whose
consent is required by Section 7 of the 1933 Act.
    

                                          Very truly yours,

   
                                          /S/  FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL
    

   
                                          FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL
    

FB&M:pm