- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
------------------------
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-24082
------------------------
STANDARD FINANCIAL, INC.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
DELAWARE 36-3941870
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (IRS EMPLOYER
ORGANIZATION OR INCORPORATION) IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)
800 BURR RIDGE PARKWAY 60521
BURR RIDGE, ILLINOIS (ZIP CODE)
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICES)
(630) 986-4900
(REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)
------------------------
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Not applicable
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
(TITLE OF CLASS)
------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
(1) Yes /X/ No / /
(2) Yes /X/ No / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrants's knowledge, in definitive
proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Yes /X/ No / /
Based upon the closing price of the registrant's common stock as of March
18, 1997, the aggregate value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant is $382.8 million.
Number of shares of common stock, par value $.01, outstanding
as of March 18, 1997: 16,204,235
Documents Incorporated by Reference: portions of the 1996 Annual Report to
Stockholders (Part I and Part II)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM PAGE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
PART I:
1. Business............................................................................................ 1
2. Properties.......................................................................................... 28-29
3. Legal Proceedings................................................................................... 29
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders................................................. 29
PART II:
5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters............................... 29
6. Selected Financial and Operating Data............................................................... 30
7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations............... 30
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data......................................................... 30
9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure................ 30
PART III:
10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.................................................. 31
11. Executive Compensation.............................................................................. 32
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management...................................... 40
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions...................................................... 41
PART IV:
14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K..................................... 42
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
GENERAL
Standard Financial, Inc. (the "Company") was incorporated under the laws of
the state of Delaware in March, 1994 by authorization of the Board of Directors
of Standard Federal Bank for savings, a federally chartered savings bank (the
"Bank"), for the purpose of becoming the holding company of the Bank upon the
Bank's conversion from a federally chartered mutual savings bank to a federally
chartered stock savings bank (the "Conversion"). The Conversion was consummated
in July of 1994.
As a Delaware corporation, the Company is authorized to engage in any
activity permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law. The Company
presently is conducting business as a non-diversified unitary thrift holding
company. The holding company structure allows the Board of Directors of the
Company greater flexibility to expand its business activities, through the
formation of subsidiaries or through acquisitions of insured depository
institutions and other companies.
The Company has been and continues to be a community oriented savings
institution which emphasizes retail financial services to individuals and
consumers within its market areas. The Company's principal business is
attracting retail deposits from the general public and investing those deposits,
together with funds generated from other operations, primarily in residential
mortgage loans secured by one- to four-family owner-occupied homes. To a lesser
extent, the Company also originates residential mortgage loans secured by
multi-family properties, consumer loans, commercial real estate loans, home
equity lines of credit and other loans. In addition, the Company invests in
securities issued by the U.S. Government and agencies thereof, mortgage-backed
and related securities and other investments permitted by federal laws and
regulations. The Company's revenues are derived principally from interest on its
mortgage loan portfolio, interest on mortgage-backed securities, interest and
dividends on its investment securities and non-interest income (including
deposit-related service charges and brokerage, insurance and annuity
commissions). The Company's principal sources of funds are deposits, principal
and interest payments on loans and mortgage-backed and related securities, and
advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago ("FHLB"). See "Average
Balance Sheet" and "Rate/Volume Analysis" on page 19 and 20, respectively, as
contained in the Company's 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders filed as an
exhibit hereto.
BUSINESS REGARDING AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 16, 1997
The Company and TCF Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("TCF"),
entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the "Reorganization
Agreement"), dated March 16, 1997, providing for the combination of the Company
and TCF (the "Transaction"). For Company shareholders, the Transaction will be
structured as a cash election merger in which the holders of Company Common
Stock will have the right to elect cash, TCF Common Stock or a combination
thereof, subject to certain limitations set forth in the Reorganization
Agreement. At the Effective Time of the Transaction, each outstanding share of
Company Common Stock will be converted into TCF Common Stock, cash or a
combination thereof, based on a value of TCF Common Stock determined over the 30
consecutive trading days ending on the Determination Date (as that term is
defined in the Reorganization Agreement). The Transaction is structured to be
tax-free to Company shareholders except to the extent they receive cash.
Completion of the Transaction is subject to certain conditions, including
(i) approval by the shareholders of the Company, (ii) approval by the Federal
Reserve Board, the offices of the Comptroller of Currency, the Office of Thrift
Supervision and other requisite regulatory authorities, (iii) receipt of
opinions of counsel for the Company and for TCF that the Transaction will be
treated, for federal income tax purposes, as a tax-free reorganization, and (iv)
other conditions to closing customary in transactions of this type.
1
If the Reorganization Agreement is terminated, under certain circumstances,
the Company would be required to pay TCF a cash termination fee of $15 million.
MARKET AREA AND COMPETITION
The Company offers a variety of deposit products, services and mortgage loan
products primarily within the greater metropolitan Chicago area. The Company's
principal office is located at 800 Burr Ridge Parkway, Burr Ridge, Illinois. The
Company's deposit gathering and lending markets are primarily concentrated in
the communities surrounding its full service offices located in the southwestern
and western parts of the City of Chicago and neighboring suburbs in Cook and
DuPage counties, Illinois. The Company currently operates out of 14 full-service
locations, three of which are located on the southwest side of Chicago and
eleven of which are located in the southwestern and western suburbs of Chicago.
Management believes that its offices are located in areas that generally can be
characterized as urban and suburban communities that include a mix of business,
industrial and residential characteristics, with stable residential
neighborhoods comprised predominately of one- to four-family residences and
middle-income families.
The Chicago metropolitan area has a large number of financial institutions,
and the Company has significant competition in its lending business, as well as
in attracting deposits. The Company's competition for loans is principally from
other thrift institutions, mortgage banking companies, insurance companies and
commercial banks. Its most direct competition for deposits historically has come
from other thrifts, commercial banks and credit unions.
LENDING ACTIVITIES
GENERAL
The largest component of the Company's loan portfolio, which totaled $1.467
billion at December 31, 1996, was first mortgage loans secured by owner-occupied
one-to-four family residences. At December 31, 1996, one-to-four family mortgage
loans totaled $1.402 billion or 95.6% of the Company's gross loan portfolio. Of
the total one-to-four family mortgage loans, $1.219 billion or 86.9% were
Adjustable Rate Mortgages ("ARMs"). Of the remaining loans held at December 31,
1996, $12.6 million or 0.9% of gross loans were in multi-family mortgage loans,
and the balance were in consumer, commercial real estate, home equity and other
loans. As part of its strategy to reduce interest rate risk, the Company
originates primarily Adjustable Rate Mortgage ("ARM") loans or fixed rate loans
which have shorter maturities for its own loan portfolio.
2
COMPOSITION OF LOAN PORTFOLIO
The following table sets forth the composition of the Company's loan
portfolio in dollar amounts and in percentages of the respective portfolio at
the dates indicated.
AT DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------------------- ------------------- -----------------
PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT
OF OF OF
AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL
---------- ------- ---------- ------- -------- -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Mortgage loans:
One-to-four family (1)................ $1,401,924 95.62% $ 969,435 95.52% $559,329 93.40%
Multi-family (2)...................... 12,634 0.86% 11,160 1.10% 10,674 1.78%
Commercial real estate (1).............. 8,153 0.56% 7,516 0.74% 8,215 1.37%
Home equity............................. 7,934 0.54% 5,272 0.52% 1,951 0.33%
---------- ------- ---------- ------- -------- -------
Total mortgage loans.................... 1,430,645 97.58% 993,383 97.88% 580,169 96.88%
Consumer and other loans (3)............ 35,511 2.42% 21,538 2.12% 18,659 3.12%
---------- ------- ---------- ------- -------- -------
Gross loans............................. 1,466,156 100.00% 1,014,921 100.00% 598,828 100.00%
------- ------- -------
------- ------- -------
Less:
Loans in process........................ (805) (1,951) (455)
Unearned premiums....................... 10,130 4,580 607
Unearned discounts...................... (1,247) (905) (743)
Allowance for loan losses............... (6,988) (5,048) (4,503)
Deferred loan origination fee........... (705) (820) (687)
---------- ---------- --------
Total loans, net........................ $1,466,541 $1,010,777 $593,047
---------- ---------- --------
---------- ---------- --------
1993 1992
----------------- -----------------
PERCENT PERCENT
OF OF
AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL
-------- ------- -------- -------
Mortgage loans:
One-to-four family (1)................ $501,470 92.33% $467,635 91.50%
Multi-family (2)...................... 11,360 2.09% 13,487 2.64%
Commercial real estate (1).............. 9,867 1.82% 10,086 1.97%
Home equity............................. 940 0.17% 1,006 0.20%
-------- ------- -------- -------
Total mortgage loans.................... 523,637 96.41% 492,214 96.31%
Consumer and other loans (3)............ 19,495 3.59% 18,883 3.69%
-------- ------- -------- -------
Gross loans............................. 543,132 100.00% 511,097 100.00%
------- -------
------- -------
Less:
Loans in process........................ (1,693) (2,159)
Unearned premiums....................... 0 6
Unearned discounts...................... (428) (398)
Allowance for loan losses............... (4,320) (1,824)
Deferred loan origination fee........... (722) (1,172)
-------- --------
Total loans, net........................ $535,969 $505,550
-------- --------
-------- --------
- ------------------------
(1) Includes loans and participations purchased. See "Business of the Bank--Loan
Sales, Servicing, and Purchases--Purchase of Mortgage Loans".
(2) Includes some construction loans.
(3) Includes credit card receivables, share loans, home improvement loans, auto
loans and student loans, but does not include home equity loans.
3
LOAN MATURITY
The following table sets forth the scheduled contractual amortization of the
Company's loan portfolio at December 31, 1996. Demand loans and loans having no
stated schedule for repayments and no stated maturity are reported as described
in the footnotes accompanying the table. The table does not include the effect
of prepayments, which would significantly shorten the average life of all
mortgage loans and may cause Company's actual repayment experience to differ
from that shown below.
AT DECEMBER 31, 1996
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ONE-TO- CONSUMER
FOUR MULTI- COMMERCIAL & OTHER HOME
FAMILY FAMILY REAL ESTATE LOANS (1) EQUITY (2) GROSS
------------ --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Amounts Due:
Within one year................................. $ 36,973 $ 0 $ 0 $ 36 $ 793 $ 37,802
After one year:
One to three years............................ 961 0 0 994 1,587 $ 3,542
Three to five years........................... 5,724 126 33 3,587 1,587 $ 11,057
Five to ten years............................. 21,184 2,653 881 17,115 3,967 $ 45,800
Ten to 20 years............................... 123,591 2,022 1,671 13,031 0 $ 140,315
Over 20 years................................. 1,213,491 7,833 5,568 748 0 $ 1,227,640
------------ --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------
Total due after one year.................... 1,364,951 12,634 8,153 35,475 7,141 1,428,354
------------ --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------
Total amounts due........................... 1,401,924 12,634 8,153 35,511 7,934 1,466,156
Less:
Undisbursed portion of loan proceeds.......... (805) 0 0 0 0 (805)
Allowance for loan losses..................... (6,382) (57) (37) (350) (162) (6,988)
Unearned discounts on loans................... (888) 0 0 (359) 0 (1,247)
Unearned premiums on loans.................... 10,130 0 0 0 0 10,130
Net deferred loan origination fees............ (705) 0 0 0 0 (705)
------------ --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------
Total loans, net............................ $ 1,403.274 $ 12,577 $ 8,116 $ 34,802 $ 7,772 $ 1,466,541
------------ --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------
------------ --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------
- ------------------------
(1) Includes share loans, home improvement loans and auto loans.
(2) Assumes home equity loans will be repaid 10% per year over ten years
beginning in 1996.
The following table sets forth at December 31, 1996 that portion of the
scheduled contractual principal payments on the Company's loan portfolio due to
be received after one year and whether such loans have fixed or adjustable
interest rates.
DUE AFTER DECEMBER 31, 1997
--------------------------------------
FIXED ADJUSTABLE TOTAL
---------- ------------ ------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Mortgage loans:
One-to-four family.................................. $ 177,689 $ 1,187,262 $ 1,364,951
Multi-family........................................ 2,623 10,011 12,634
Commercial real estate.............................. 180 7,973 8,153
Home equity loans..................................... 0 7,141 7,141
Consumer and other loans.............................. 35,475 0 35,475
---------- ------------ ------------
Total gross loans................................. $ 215,967 $ 1,212,387 $ 1,428,354
---------- ------------ ------------
---------- ------------ ------------
4
ONE-TO-FOUR FAMILY MORTGAGE LENDING
The Company's primary lending emphasis is on one-to-four family mortgage
lending. The Company offers both fixed rate mortgage loans and ARM loans secured
by owner-occupied, one-to-four family residences, including, condominium units
and townhouses, located in the Company's primary market areas, with maturities
up to 30 years. From time to time, the Company makes loans on non-owner occupied
one-to-four family properties acquired as an investment by the borrowers. At
December 31, 1996, $1.402 billion or 95.6% of the Company's gross loan portfolio
consisted of loans secured by one-to-four family residential properties, most of
which were located in the Company's market area. Of the one-to-four family
residential mortgage loans in the Company's gross loan portfolio at December 31,
1996, $182.5 million or 13.0% consisted of fixed rate loans and $1,219.4 million
or 87.0% consisted of ARM loans. The retention of ARM loans in the Company's
loan portfolio, as opposed to fixed rate residential loans, helps reduce the
Company's exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. However, ARM loans
generally pose credit risk different from the risks inherent in fixed rate
loans, primarily because as interest rates rise, the underlying loan payments
from the borrowers rise, thereby increasing the potential for default. At the
same time, the marketability of the underlying property may be adversely
affected by higher interest rates. In a decreasing interest rate environment,
mortgagors tend to refinance into fixed rate loans.
For the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company originated or purchased
$730.4 million in one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. Of this amount,
$698.4 million or 95.6% consisted of ARM loans and $32.0 million or 4.4%
consisted of fixed rate loans. The increase in loans receivable was due to the
expansion of the Company's correspondent loan origination network in 1996. In
1996, of the Company's $807.6 million of originations, $671.9 million were
originated by correspondents while in 1995, $368.4 million of the Company's
$559.0 million of originations were originated by correspondents. Correspondents
are mortgage bankers and brokers that originate loans for the Company using
rates and underwriting guidelines that the Company sets. The correspondents are
paid a fee for loans that are acquired. The Company underwrites all loans and
only funds those that meet its underwriting standards. As mortgage loan
production grows, the Company will increase the amount of loans sold and will
retain the servicing to generate additional fee income.
PURCHASE OF MORTGAGE LOANS
The Company has purchased loans originated and serviced by other lenders.
Loans purchased by the Company have consisted primarily of ARM loans. At
December 31, 1996, the carrying value of loans purchased was $57.8 million.
The Company generally purchases loans using the same underwriting standards
that the Company uses in the origination of its own loans and purchases
non-conforming loans. The Company purchased no loans serviced by others during
1996.
CONSUMER LENDING
The Company originates a variety of consumer loans, generally consisting of
automobile loans, loans secured by savings accounts and unsecured loans such as
overdraft protection lines of credit. At December 31, 1996, the total portfolio
of these other types of loans totaled $35.5 million or 2.4% of gross loans at
such date. The consumer loan portfolio consists primarily of automobile loans.
At December 31, 1996, these loans totaled $24.4 million.
5
LOAN DELINQUENCIES
At December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, delinquencies in the Company's loan
portfolio were as follows:
AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AT DECEMBER 31, 1995
--------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
90 DAYS OR 90 DAYS OR
60-89 DAYS MORE (1) 60-89 DAYS MORE (1)
------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------
NUMBER PRINCIPAL NUMBER PRINCIPAL NUMBER PRINCIPAL NUMBER PRINCIPAL
OF BALANCE OF BALANCE OF BALANCE OF BALANCE
LOANS OF LOANS LOANS OF LOANS LOANS OF LOANS LOANS OF LOANS
------ --------- ------ --------- ------ --------- ------ ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family........ 27 $2,468 45 $3,423 20 $1,773 39 $3,462
Multi-family............... 0 0 1 64 0 0 0 0
Commercial real estate..... 1 199 1 49 0 0 1 20
Home equity................ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-- --
--------- --------- ------ --------- ------ ---------
Total mortgage loans... 28 2,667 47 3,536 20 1,773 40 3,482
Consumer loans............. 0 0 0 0 83 158 212 411
-- --
--------- --------- ------ --------- ------ ---------
Total gross loans...... 28 $2,667 47 $3,536 103 $1,931 252 $3,893
-- --
-- --
--------- --------- ------ --------- ------ ---------
--------- --------- ------ --------- ------ ---------
Ratio of delinquent loans
to gross loans (1)(2).... 0.18% 0.24% 0.19% 0.38%
AT DECEMBER 31, 1994
---------------------------------------
90 DAYS
60-89 DAYS OR MORE (1)
------------------ ------------------
NUMBER PRINCIPAL NUMBER PRINCIPAL
OF BALANCE OF BALANCE
LOANS OF LOANS LOANS OF LOANS
------ --------- ------ ---------
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family........ 10 $731 33 $3,846
Multi-family............... 0 0 0 0
Commercial real estate..... 0 0 1 7
Home equity................ 0 0 0 0
--
--------- ------ ---------
Total mortgage loans... 10 731 34 3,853
Consumer loans............. 88 178 185 375
--
--------- ------ ---------
Total gross loans...... 98 $909 219 $4,228
--
--
--------- ------ ---------
--------- ------ ---------
Ratio of delinquent loans
to gross loans (1)(2).... 0.15% 0.71%
- ------------------------
(1) The Bank discontinues the accrual of interest on loans when the borrower is
delinquent as to a contractually due principal or by 90 days or more.
(2) Gross loans as of December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 were $1,466.2 million,
$1,014.9 million and $598.8 million, respectively.
6
NON-PERFORMING ASSETS
Loans are placed on non-accrual status when, in the judgment of Company
management, the probability of collection of principal or interest is deemed
insufficient to warrant further accrual of interest. The Company generally
discontinues the accrual of interest on loans when the borrower is delinquent as
to a contractually due principal or interest payment by 90 days or more, or
earlier if collection is deemed uncertain. Accrual of interest on a non-accrual
loan is resumed when all contractually past due payments are current and when
management believes the outstanding loan principal and contractually due
interest is likely to be collected.
Property acquired by the Company as a result of a foreclosure or property
upon which a judgment of foreclosure has been entered (but prior to foreclosure
sale) are classified as foreclosed properties. Foreclosed properties are
recorded at the lower of the unpaid principal balance of the related loan or
fair market value (less estimated selling costs). The amount by which the
recorded loan balance exceeds the fair market value at the time a property is
classified a foreclosed property is charged against the allowance for loan
losses. Any subsequent reduction in the carrying value of a foreclosed property,
along with expenses incurred to maintain or dispose of a foreclosed property, is
charged against current earnings. At December 31, 1996, the Company had
foreclosed properties with a carrying value of approximately $70,000.
Consumer loans largely consist of automobile loans. Non-accrual consumer
loans are recorded at cost or written down to the fair market value of the
collateral. At December 31, 1996, the Company had no consumer loans on
non-accrual.
Non-performing loans include loans placed on non-accrual status.
Non-performing assets include non-performing loans and mortgage-backed
securities and foreclosed properties. The following table sets forth the
Company's non-performing loans and assets at the dates indicated.
AT DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Non-accrual mortgage loans (1).................... $ 4,363 $ 2,795 $ 3,853 $ 3,948 $ 3,234
Non-accrual consumer loans........................ 0 411 375 224 169
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total non-performing loans.................... 4,363 3,206 4,228 4,172 3,403
Net real estate held for sale..................... 70 180 100 55 354
Non-accrual mortgage-backed and related
securities...................................... 11,138 8,508 10,547 5,296 --
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total non-performing assets....................... $ 15,570 $ 11,894 $ 14,875 $ 9,523 $ 3,757
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total non-performing assets to total assets....... 0.65% 0.57% 0.86% 0.63% 0.25%
Total non-performing loans to gross loans......... 0.30% 0.32% 0.71% 0.77% 0.67%
Allowances for loan losses to total non-performing
loans........................................... 162.20% 157.45% 106.50% 103.55% 53.60%
Total non-performing mortgage-backed and related
securities to gross mortgage-backed and related
securities...................................... 1.71% 1.06% 1.39% 0.70% --
Interest on non-performing loans and
mortgage-backed and related securities in
accordance with original terms.................. $ 1,811 $ 1,403 $ 1,335 $ 183 $ 176
Interest income included in net income............ 1,306 1,220 881 45 78
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net reductions of interest income................. $ 505 $ 183 $ 454 $ 138 $ 98
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
- ------------------------
(1) The Company had no troubled debt restructurings or impaired loans as defined
by SFAS No. 114 at any of the dates indicated. There are no concentrations
of loans exceeding 10% of loans which are not
7
otherwise disclosed as a category of loans. Most of the Company's loans are
secured by one-to-four family properties. As of December 31, 1996, the
Company was not aware of any loans which are not otherwise disclosed in this
report where known information about possible credit problems or borrowers
caused management to have serious doubts about the ability of such borrowers
to comply with the applicable loan repayment terms.
CLASSIFICATION OF ASSETS
Federal regulations and the Company's policy require the classification of
loans and other assets, such as debt and equity securities, considered to be of
lesser quality, as "substandard" or "doubtful" assets. An asset is considered
"substandard" if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and
paying capacity of the obligor or by the collateral pledged, if any.
"Substandard" assets include those characterized by the "distinct possibility"
that the institution will sustain "some loss" if the deficiencies are not
corrected. Assets classified as "doubtful" have all of the weaknesses inherent
in those classified "substandard," with the added characteristic that the
weaknesses present make "collection or liquidation in full," on the basis of
currently existing facts, conditions, and values, "highly questionable and
improbable."
If an asset is classified, the estimated fair value of the asset is
determined and if that value is less than the then carrying value of the asset,
the difference is established as a specific reserve. General reserves or general
valuation allowances represent loss allowances which have been established to
recognize the inherent risk associated with lending activities but, unlike
specific reserves, are not allocated to particular assets.
The Company's Asset and Liability Management Committee reviews and
classifies the Company's assets and reports the results of its review to the
Board of Directors. At December 31, 1996, the Company had aggregate classified
assets in the amount of $14.1 million, and $1.6 million classified as
substandard and doubtful, respectively. Of the $14.1 million classified as
substandard, $9.6 million related to five private mortgage-backed securities and
the remaining amount related to classified loans. The $1.6 million classified as
doubtful related to private mortgage-backed securities.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses in amounts management
considers adequate to cover estimated losses. In determining the amount of the
applicable allowance, management periodically evaluates the risk inherent in its
loan and mortgage-backed securities portfolio and the general economy. Such
evaluation, which includes a review of all loans on which full collectibility
may not be reasonably assured, considers, among other matters, the estimated net
realizable value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions, historical
loss experience and other factors that warrant recognition in providing for an
adequate loss allowance.
A specific allowance is established for certain problem loans based on
management's analysis of the fair value of the loan. This analysis may include
an appraisal, a drive-by inspection or a broker opinion. If the unpaid balance
of the loan is greater than such estimated value, a specific allowance is
established for the difference between the carrying value and the estimated net
realizable value. General allowances represent loss allowances which have been
established to recognize the inherent risks associated with lending and
investment activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, have not been
allocated to recognize probable losses on particular problem assets. There can
be no assurance that the allowance for loan losses will be adequate to cover
losses which may in fact be realized in the future and that additional
provisions for losses will not be required.
The allowance for loan losses at December 31, 1996 was $7.0 million or 0.48%
of gross loans, compared to an allowance for loan losses of $5.0 million or .50%
of gross loans at December 31, 1995. The increase in the allowance for loan
losses in 1996 reflects growth in the loan portfolio. The composition of the
Company's loan portfolio is predominantly an adjustable rate portfolio. The
adjustable rate loans have
8
not been subjected to higher levels of monthly payments that will be imposed as
the interest rate on loans adjusts upward. Management believes that the stress
of higher payments will cause higher delinquency rates and higher risk of loss
for the adjustable rate loans.
The Company has also purchased and originated a sizeable quantity of jumbo
mortgage loans in 1996. Jumbo loans are defined as loans secured by single
family homes with outstanding balances greater than $207,600. These loans
represent greater risk because the potential for loss caused by the deficiency
of an individual borrower is greater and the market for more expensive real
estate collateral, should there be a foreclosure, is much more limited.
The Company recorded a $2.5 million provision for loan losses in 1996, based
on management's consideration of the probability of credit losses arising from
factors such as increased market interest rates, adjustable rate loans, risks
inherent in certain loan products and the Company's historic loss experience.
The following table sets forth the Company's allowance for loan losses at
the dates indicated.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Balance at beginning of period....................... $ 5,048 $ 4,503 $ 4,320 $ 1,824 $ 1,912
Provision for loan losses............................ 2,500 1,695 660 3,053 390
Recoveries:
Mortgage loans:
One-to-four family............................... 0 0 0 0 0
Multi-family..................................... 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial real estate........................... 0 0 0 0 0
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total mortgage loans................................. 0 0 0 0 0
Consumer loans....................................... 45 91 45 41 14
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total recoveries..................................... 45 91 45 41 14
Charge-offs:
Mortgage loans:
One-to-four family............................... (12) (126) (2) (194) (55)
Multi-family..................................... 0 0 0 0 (88)
Commercial real estate........................... 0 0 0 (30) 0
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total mortgage loans................................. (12) (126) (2) (224) (143)
Consumer loans....................................... (593) (1,115) (520) (374) (349)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total charge-offs.................................... (605) (1,241) (522) (598) (492)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance at end of year............................... $ 6,988 $ 5,048 $ 4,503 $ 4,320 $ 1,824
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Percentage of loans to gross loans receivable:
Mortgage loans..................................... 97.58% 97.88% 96.88% 96.41% 96.31%
Consumer loans..................................... 2.42% 2.12% 3.12% 3.59% 3.69%
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to gross loans
receivable at the end of period.................... 0.48% 0.50% 0.75% 0.80% 0.36%
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to non-performing
loans at the end of period......................... 160.20% 157.45% 106.50% 103.55% 53.60%
Ratio of net charge-offs to average gross loans
during period (annualized)......................... 0.04% 0.15% 0.09% 0.11% 0.10%
9
The following table shows the Company's total allowance for loan losses and
the allocation to the various categories of loans at December 31 of the
indicated years.
1996 1995 1994
------------------------------- ------------------------------- -------------------------------
% OF % OF % OF
% OF LOANS IN % OF LOANS IN % OF LOANS IN
TOTAL CATEGORY TOTAL CATEGORY TOTAL CATEGORY
RESERVED TO TOTAL RESERVED TO TOTAL RESERVED TO TOTAL
ASSETS BY OUTSTANDING ASSETS BY OUTSTANDING ASSETS BY OUTSTANDING
AMOUNT CATEGORY LOANS AMOUNT CATEGORY LOANS AMOUNT CATEGORY LOANS
------ --------- ----------- ------ --------- ----------- ------ --------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Breakdown of Allowance:
Mortgage loans:
One- to four- family... $6,445 0.46% 95.62% $4,022 0.41% 96.15% $3,567 0.64% 93.41%
Multi-family........... 33 0.26% 0.86% 44 0.39% 1.09% 43 0.40% 1.78%
Commercial real
estate............... 58 0.71% 0.56% 53 0.80% 0.65% 54 0.81% 1.37%
Home equity............ 102 1.29% 0.54% 68 1.25% 0.53% 24 1.23% 0.33%
------ --- ----------- ------ --- ----------- ------ --- -----------
Total mortgage
loans.............. 6,638 0.46% 97.58% 4,187 0.42% 98.42% 3,688 0.64% 96.89%
Consumer loans........... 350 0.99% 2.42% 861 5.35% 1.58% 815 5.09% 3.11%
------ --- ----------- ------ --- ----------- ------ --- -----------
Total allowance for
loan losses........ $6,988 0.48% 100.00% $5,048 0.50% 100.00% $4,503 0.75% 100.00%
------ --- ----------- ------ --- ----------- ------ --- -----------
------ --- ----------- ------ --- ----------- ------ --- -----------
1993 1992
------------------------------- -------------------------------
% OF % OF
% OF LOANS IN % OF LOANS IN
TOTAL CATEGORY TOTAL CATEGORY
RESERVED TO TOTAL RESERVED TO TOTAL
ASSETS BY OUTSTANDING ASSETS BY OUTSTANDING
AMOUNT CATEGORY LOANS AMOUNT CATEGORY LOANS
------ --------- ----------- ------ --------- -----------
Breakdown of Allowance:
Mortgage loans:
One- to four- family... $3,417 0.68% 92.23% $1,455 0.31% 91.50%
Multi-family........... 46 0.41% 2.09% 19 0.14% 2.64%
Commercial real
estate............... 51 0.52% 1.82% 23 0.23% 1.97%
Home equity............ 15 1.60% 0.17% 13 1.29% 0.20%
------ --- ----------- ------ --- -----------
Total mortgage
loans.............. 3,529 0.67% 96.41% 1,510 0.31% 96.31%
Consumer loans........... 791 4.06% 3.59% 314 1.66% 3.69%
------ --- ----------- ------ --- -----------
Total allowance for
loan losses........ $4,320 0.80% 100.00% $1,824 0.36% 100.00%
------ --- ----------- ------ --- -----------
------ --- ----------- ------ --- -----------
10
INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES
GENERAL
The investment activities of the Company consist primarily of investments in
mortgage-backed and related securities and other investment securities,
consisting primarily of securities issued or guaranteed by the United States
Government or agencies thereof and corporate obligations. Typical investments
include federally sponsored agency mortgage pass-throughs such as the Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC"), Federal National Mortgage Association
("FNMA"), Government National Mortgage Association ("GNMA"), private issue and
senior-subordinated pass-throughs, and federally sponsored agency and private
issue Collateralized Mortgage Obligations ("CMOs") and Real Estate Mortgage
Investment Conduits ("REMICs"). Aggregate investment limitations and credit
quality parameters of each class of investment are prescribed in the Company's
investment policy. The Company performs analyzes on mortgage-backed and related
securities prior to purchase and on an ongoing basis to determine the impact on
earnings and market value under various interest rate and prepayment conditions.
Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") guidelines regarding
investment portfolio policy and accounting require companies to categorize
securities and certain other assets as held to maturity, available-for-sale, or
trading. On November 15, 1995, the FASB staff issued a Special Report, A GUIDE
TO IMPLEMENTATION OF STATEMENT 115 ON ACCOUNTING FOR CERTAIN INVESTMENTS IN DEBT
AND EQUITY SECURITIES. In accordance with provisions in that Special Report, the
Company chose to reclassify all securities from held to maturity to
available-for-sale. At the date of transfer, December 31, 1995, the amortized
cost of those securities was $872.4 million and the net unrealized gain on those
securities was $2.1 million, which is included in stockholders' equity, net of
tax. At December 31, 1996, the Company had no securities held to maturity and no
trading securities. There can be no assurance that the Company may not purchase
securities in the future which may be classified as held to maturity or trading
securities. The Company's investment securities portfolio, which the Company has
classified as available-for-sale, is accounted for on a "fair value" basis, with
unrealized gains and losses included as a separate component of stockholders'
equity.
MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES
Mortgage-backed securities represent a participation interest in a pool of
single-family or multi-family mortgages, the principal and interest payments on
which are passed from the mortgage originators through intermediaries that pool
and repackage the participation interest in the form of securities to investors
such as the Company. Such intermediaries may include quasi-governmental agencies
such as FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA which guarantee the payment of principal and
interest to investors.
The Company's mortgage-backed securities portfolio consists primarily of
seasoned fixed rate and adjustable rate mortgage-backed and mortgage-related
securities. At December 31, 1996, the Company had $357.5 million in
mortgage-backed securities (representing 57.2% of the Company's gross mortgage-
backed securities portfolio or 14.9% of total assets) insured or guaranteed by
FNMA, FHLMC or GNMA. At December 31, 1996, $267.2 million (representing 42.8% of
the Company's gross mortgage-backed securities portfolio or 11.1% of total
assets) consisted of private issue securities which are not guaranteed by FHLMC,
FNMA, GNMA or any governmental or quasi-governmental agency. Although all
securities in the Company's private mortgage-backed securities were rated "A" or
better by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's") when purchased, as of
December 31, 1996, $13.3 million of such securities were rated below "A" by
Moody's or were not rated. Non-performing mortgage-backed securities at December
31, 1996 were $11.1 million.
At December 31, 1996, the Company held private mortgage-backed securities of
three issuers that each exceeded 10% of stockholders' equity at such date. The
three issuers and the carrying amounts of private mortgage-backed securities
held were First Federal of Rochester, Residential Funding Corporation and
Salomon Brothers Inc, with gross carrying values of approximately $29.0 million,
$32.5 million and
11
$58.3 million, respectively. As each security is collateralized by individual
mortgage loans, management does not believe that this concentration poses
significant risk to the Company.
MORTGAGE-RELATED SECURITIES
CMOs and REMICs are typically issued by a special purpose entity, which may
be organized in a variety of legal forms, such as a trust, a corporation or a
partnership. The entity aggregates pools of pass-through securities, which are
used to collateralize the mortgage related securities. Once combined, the cash
flows can be divided into "tranches" or "classes" of individual securities,
thereby creating more predictable average lives for each security than the
underlying pass-through pools. Accordingly, under this security structure all
principal paydowns from the various mortgage pools are allocated to a mortgage
related securities' class or classes structured to have priority until it has
been paid off. These securities generally have fixed interest rates, and as a
result, changes in interest rates generally would affect the market value and
possibly the prepayment rates of such securities. The Company's mortgage-related
securities portfolio also contains inverse floating rate CMOs.
Some mortgage related securities instruments are like traditional debt
instruments due to their stated principal amounts and traditionally defined
interest rate terms. Purchasers of certain other mortgage related securities
instruments are entitled to the excess, if any, of the issuer's cash inflows.
These mortgage related securities instruments may include instruments designated
as residual interest and are riskier in that they could result in the loss of a
portion of the original investment. Cash flows from residual interests are very
sensitive to prepayments and, thus, contain a high degree of interest rate risk.
At December 31, 1996, the Company had $26.7 million in CMOs and REMICs or
1.1% of total assets, of this $11.0 million were inverse floating rate
securities. The Company's CMOs and REMICs had a weighted average yield of 11.34%
at December 31, 1996. The Company's current policy is to purchase CMOs and
REMICs rated "A" or better at the time of purchase by nationally recognized
rating services or issued by U.S. government agencies. All securities in the
Company's mortgage-related securities portfolio were rated "A" or better by
Moody's at the time of purchase.
12
COMPOSITION OF COMPANY'S MORTGAGE-BACKED AND RELATED SECURITIES PORTFOLIO
The table below sets forth certain information regarding the carrying value,
weighted average yields and maturities of the Company's mortgage-backed and
related securities at December 31, 1996, all of which were available-for-sale.
AT DECEMBER 31, 1996
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OVER ONE TO FIVE OVER FIVE TO TEN
ONE YEAR OR LESS YEARS YEARS OVER TEN YEARS
-------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
CARRYING AVERAGE CARRYING AVERAGE CARRYING AVERAGE CARRYING AVERAGE
VALUE YIELD VALUE YIELD VALUE YIELD VALUE YIELD
-------- --------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
MORTGAGE-BACKED AND
RELATED SECURITIES:
GNMA................... $0 0 $ 7 6.50% $ 28 7.13% $ 1,393 7.27%
FHLMC.................. 0 0 59 10.73% 110 8.97% 163,057 7.27%
FNMA................... 0 0 0 0 1,916 7.49% 190,944 7.27%
Private................ 0 0 0 0 0 0 267,235 6.74%
CMOs and REMICs........ 0 0 0 0 144 14.15% 26,550 11.32%
-- -
--- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total mortgage-backed
and related
securities........... $0 0 $66 10.28% $2,198 8.00% $649,179 7.22%
-- -
-- -
--- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
--- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
MORTGAGE-BACKED AND RELATED SECURITIES
TOTALS
--------------------------------------------
AVERAGE
REMAINING APPROXIMATE WEIGHTED
YEARS TO CARRYING MARKET AVERAGE
MATURITY VALUE VALUE YIELD
--------- -------- ----------- --------
MORTGAGE-BACKED AND
RELATED SECURITIES:
GNMA................... 22.04 $ 1,428 $ 1,428 7.26%
FHLMC.................. 24.34 163,226 163,226 7.27%
FNMA................... 24.00 192,860 192,860 7.27%
Private................ 25.13 267,235 267,235 6.74%
CMOs and REMICs........ 17.85 26,694 26,694 11.34%
--------- -------- ----------- --------
Total mortgage-backed
and related
securities........... 24.29 $651,443 $651,443 7.22%
--------- -------- ----------- --------
--------- -------- ----------- --------
13
The table below sets forth certain information regarding the carrying
values, market values and carrying values as a percentage of total carrying
value of the Company's mortgage-backed and related securities portfolio.
AT DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995
---------------------------- ----------------------------
CARRYING % OF MARKET CARRYING % OF MARKET
VALUE TOTAL VALUE VALUE TOTAL VALUE
-------- ------- -------- -------- ------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
MORTGAGE-BACKED AND RELATED
SECURITIES
GNMA............................. $ 1,428 0.21% $ 1,428 $ 1,819 0.23% $ 1,819
FHLMC............................ 163,226 25.06% 163,226 211,091 26.25% 211,091
FNMA............................. 192,860 29.61% 192,860 241,081 29.98% 241,081
Private.......................... 267,235 41.02% 267,235 304,114 37.82% 304,114
CMOs and REMICs.................. 26,694 4.10% 26,694 45,905 5.72% 45,905
-------- ------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Total mortgage-backed and related
securities..................... $651,443 100.00% $651,443 $804,010 100.00% $804,010
-------- ------- -------- -------- ------- --------
-------- ------- -------- -------- ------- --------
1994
----------------------------
CARRYING % OF MARKET
VALUE TOTAL VALUE
-------- ------- --------
MORTGAGE-BACKED AND RELATED
SECURITIES
GNMA............................. $ 1,973 0.26% $ 1,911
FHLMC............................ 204,184 26.87% 200,039
FNMA............................. 205,918 27.10% 201,696
Private.......................... 305,928 40.26% 296,217
CMOs and REMICs.................. 41,857 5.51% 42,691
-------- ------- --------
Total mortgage-backed and related
securities..................... $759,860 100.00% $742,554
-------- ------- --------
-------- ------- --------
14
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The Company invests in various types of liquid assets that are permissible
investments for federally chartered savings associations, including U.S.
Treasury obligations, securities of various federal agencies, certain
certificates of deposit of insured banks and savings institutions, federal funds
and, from time to time, repurchase agreements. Subject to various restrictions
applicable to all federally chartered savings associations, the Company also
invests its assets in commercial paper, investment grade corporate debt
securities and inverse floating rate securities. Investment securities are
accounted for on a "fair value" basis because it is management's intention to
hold such securities as available-for-sale. The Company's current investment
policy permits purchases only of investments rated at least "A" or "P-2" by
Moody's and "A" or "A-2" by S&P.
COMPOSITION OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES PORTFOLIO
At December 31, 1996, the Company had investment securities with a carrying
value and estimated market value of $153.5 million. Of these, $37.4 million
(carrying value) were corporate obligations and $116.1 million (carrying value)
were United States government and agency securities. Exclusive of United States
government and agency securities, there were no investment securities issued by
any one entity with a total carrying value in excess of 10% of retained equity
at December 31, 1996. The Company holds its investment securities as
available-for-sale. The adjustment for net unrealized holding gains on
available-for-sale securities is included as a separate component of
stockholders' equity.
15
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the carrying
values, market values and carrying value as a percent of total carrying value of
the Company's investment securities.
AT DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------------------------- ----------------------------- -----------------------------
CARRYING % OF MARKET CARRYING % OF MARKET CARRYING % OF MARKET
VALUE TOTAL VALUE VALUE TOTAL VALUE VALUE TOTAL VALUE
--------- ------ -------- ---------- ------ -------- ---------- ------ --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
INVESTMENT SECURITIES:
U.S. Government and agency
securities....................... $ 116,119 75.65% $116,119 $103,893 75.39% $103,893 $160,243 63.19% $157,364
Corporate obligations.............. 37,382 24.35% 37,382 33,914 24.61% 33,914 93,361 36.81% 92,391
--------- ------ -------- ---------- ------ -------- ---------- ------ --------
Total investment securities........ $ 153,501 100.00% $153,501 $137,807 100.00% $137,807 $253,604 100.00% $249,755
--------- ------ -------- ---------- ------ -------- ---------- ------ --------
--------- ------ -------- ---------- ------ -------- ---------- ------ --------
The table below sets forth certain information regarding the carrying value,
weighted average yields and maturities of the Company's investment securities at
December 31, 1995.
AT DECEMBER 31, 1996
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OVER ONE TO FIVE OVER FIVE TO TEN
ONE YEAR OR LESS YEARS YEARS OVER TEN YEARS
------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
CARRYING AVERAGE CARRYING AVERAGE CARRYING AVERAGE CARRYING AVERAGE
VALUE YIELD VALUE YIELD VALUE YIELD VALUE YIELD
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
U.S. Government and agency
securities..................... $ 40,047 6.57% $ 66,096 6.39% $ 0 0 $9,959 6.90%
Corporate obligations............ 36,795 6.52% 0 0 604 10.08% 0 0
-------- --- -------- --- -------- -------- -------- ---
Total............................ $ 76,842 6.70% $ 66,096 6.39% $604 10.08% $9,959 6.90%
-------- --- -------- --- -------- -------- -------- ---
-------- --- -------- --- -------- -------- -------- ---
INVESTMENT SECURITIES TOTALS
--------------------------------------------
AVERAGE
REMAINING APPROXIMATE WEIGHTED
YEARS TO CARRYING MARKET AVERAGE
MATURITY VALUE VALUE YIELD
--------- -------- ----------- --------
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
U.S. Government and agency
securities..................... 4.74 $116,102 $116,102 6.60%
Corporate obligations............ 0.25 37,399 37,399 6.58%
--- -------- ----------- ---
Total............................ 3.65 $153,501 $153,501 6.60%
--- -------- ----------- ---
--- -------- ----------- ---
16
SOURCES OF FUNDS
GENERAL
The Company's primary sources of funds for use in lending, investing and for
other general purposes are deposits, proceeds from principal and interest
payments on loans and investments, and to a lesser extent, FHLB advances and
reverse repurchase agreements. Contractual loan payments are a relatively stable
source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows and loan prepayments are
significantly influenced by general market interest rates and economic
conditions. Borrowings may be used on a short-term basis to compensate for
seasonal or other reductions in normal sources of funds or for deposit inflows
at less than projected levels. Borrowings also may be used on a longer-term
basis to support expanded lending or investment activities. The Company utilizes
advances from the FHLB-Chicago and reverse repurchase agreements as sources for
its borrowings. At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Company had advances from the
FHLB-Chicago of $385.0 million or 16.0% of total assets and $235.0 million or
11.3% of total assets, respectively. At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Company
had no reverse repurchase agreements outstanding. Of the Company's outstanding
FHLB-Chicago advances at December 31, 1996, none will mature before December 31,
1997. Based on sources and uses of funds projections, it is anticipated that all
of the maturing advances will be repaid upon their maturity dates.
DEPOSITS
The Company offers a variety of deposit accounts having a range of interest
rates and terms. The Company's deposits principally consist of core deposits and
certificates of deposit. Of the Company's deposit accounts, $191.7 million or
11.2% consist of individual retirement accounts. The flow of deposits is
influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in prevailing
interest rates and competition.
Net deposits (before interest credited) increased $106.8 million during 1996
compared to an increase of $81.4 million during the prior year. The following
table presents the deposit activity of the Company for the periods indicated.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------------ ------------ ------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Deposits................................................................ $ 1,051,582 $ 1,371,665 $ 1,245,293
Withdrawals............................................................. 944,783 1,290,221 1,273,354
------------ ------------ ------------
Net deposits (withdrawals).............................................. 106,799 81,444 (28,061)
Interest credited on deposits........................................... 73,897 64,350 49,368
Net changes in accrued interest payable................................. 58 194 37
------------ ------------ ------------
Total increase (decrease) in deposits................................... $ 180,754 $ 145,988 $ 21,344
------------ ------------ ------------
------------ ------------ ------------
At December 31, 1996, the Company had outstanding $23.7 million in
certificates of deposit in amounts of $100,000 or more maturing as follows:
AMOUNT AT
DECEMBER 31, 1996
-----------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Three months or less....................................................... $ 12,563
Over three through six months.............................................. 7,080
Over six through twelve months............................................. 3,949
Over twelve months......................................................... 100
-------
Total.................................................................... $ 23,692
-------
-------
17
The following table sets forth the distribution of the Company's deposit
accounts for the periods indicated and the weighted average nominal interest
rates on each category of deposits presented.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
PERCENT AVERAGE PERCENT AVERAGE PERCENT AVERAGE
AVERAGE OF TOTAL NOMINAL AVERAGE OF TOTAL NOMINAL AVERAGE OF TOTAL NOMINAL
BALANCE BALANCE RATE BALANCE BALANCE RATE BALANCE BALANCE RATE
---------- -------- -------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Core deposits:
Non-interest bearing NOW
accounts.................... $ 35,792 2.15% N/A $ 33,752 2.25% N/A $ 10,350 0.75% N/A
NOW accounts.................. 102,972 6.19 2.04% 96,807 6.47 2.07% 92,496 6.74 2.15%
Money market deposit
accounts.................... 78,665 4.73 3.10 82,031 5.48 3.28 102,710 7.49 2.73
Passbook accounts............. 366,828 22.03 2.51 385,897 25.77 2.50 451,604 32.92 2.61
---------- -------- -------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- -------- --------
Total core deposits......... 584,257 35.10 2.35 598,487 39.97 2.40 657,160 47.90 2.53
Certificate of deposit accounts:
6 months and less............. 165,839 9.96 5.08 136,793 9.14 5.28 161,852 11.81 3.36
6 to 12 months................ 495,638 29.77 5.68 382,604 25.55 5.74 161,639 11.78 3.78
12 to 24 months............... 177,186 10.64 5.71 84,502 5.64 4.67 85,487 6.23 4.08
24 to 36 months............... 116,483 7.00 5.41 148,814 9.94 5.24 133,694 9.74 4.70
36 to 48 months............... 16,611 1.00 5.24 21,201 1.42 5.40 34,712 2.53 6.23
48 to 60 months............... 58,643 3.52 5.70 74,368 4.97 6.30 90,469 6.59 6.92
60 to 72 months............... 12,490 0.75 6.33 17,668 1.18 6.74 15,425 1.12 6.83
72 to 84 months............... 16 0.00 12.50 40 0.00 10.00 72 0.01 9.06
84 to 96 months............... 10,080 0.61 7.60 9,732 0.65 7.57 9,609 0.70 7.57
96 to 120 months.............. 2,918 0.18 7.98 5,493 0.37 8.72 7,464 0.54 9.27
Jumbo......................... 24,457 1.47 5.03 17,493 1.17 5.79 14,453 1.05 3.79
---------- -------- -------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- -------- --------
Total certificates of
deposit................... 1,080,361 64.90 5.57 898,708 60.03 5.59 714,876 52.10 4.58
Total deposits.................. $1,664,618 100.00% 4.31% $1,497,195 100.00% 4.31% $1,372,036 100.00% 3.60%
---------- -------- -------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- -------- --------
---------- -------- -------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- -------- --------
18
The following table presents, by various rate categories, the amount of
certificate accounts outstanding at December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, and the
periods to maturity of the certificate accounts outstanding at December 31,
1996.
PERIOD TO MATURITY FROM DECEMBER 31, 1996
------------------------------------------------------------
AT DECEMBER 31, WITHIN TWO TO
------------------------------------ ONE ONE TO THREE
1996 1995 1994 YEAR TWO YEARS YEARS THEREAFTER TOTAL
------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Certificate of deposit
accounts:
3.00% and less........... $ 454 $ 3,015 $ 4,305 $ 454 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 454
3.00% to 3.99%........... 10,098 10,521 148,965 10,098 0 0 0 10,098
4.00% to 4.99%........... 111,419 89,419 277,257 99,953 9,205 2,261 0 111,419
5.00% to 5.99%........... 886,051 692,990 189,617 693,851 149,973 24,790 17,437 886,051
6.00% to 6.99%........... 148,437 133,115 86,847 130,529 5,656 2,970 9,282 148,437
7.00% to 7.99%........... 9,171 32,425 64,875 3,932 2,487 2,719 33 9,171
8.00% to 8.99%........... 7,160 6,783 6,692 2,175 4,985 0 0 7,160
9.00% and greater........ 0 1,396 3,150 0 0 0 0 0
------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ------------
Total.................. $ 1,172,790 $ 969,664 $ 781,708 $ 940,992 $ 172,306 $ 32,740 $ 26,752 $ 1,172,790
------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ------------
------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ------------
BORROWINGS AND OTHER FINANCING TRANSACTIONS
Although deposits are the Company's primary source of funds, the Company's
policy has been to utilize borrowings as an alternative or less costly source of
funds. The Company obtains advances from the FHLB-Chicago. These advances are
collateralized by the capital stock of the FHLB-Chicago held by the Company and
certain of its mortgage loans and mortgage-backed and related securities. Such
advances are made pursuant to several different credit programs, each of which
has its own interest rate and range of maturities. The maximum amount the
FHLB-Chicago will advance to member institutions, including the Company, for
purposes other than meeting withdrawal fluctuates from time to time in
accordance with policies of Office of Thrift Supervision (the "OTS") and the
FHLB-Chicago. The Company's unused advance line with the FHLB-Chicago was
approximately $25.0 million as of December 31, 1996. At December 31, 1996, the
Company's FHLB-Chicago advances totaled $385.0 million, representing 18.0% of
total liabilities, up from the $235.0 million outstanding at December 31, 1995.
The Company's borrowings from time to time include reverse repurchase
agreements. The form of reverse repurchase agreement used by the Company
involves the sale of securities owned by the Company with a commitment to
repurchase the same or substantially the same securities at a predetermined
price at a future date, typically within 30 to 90 days. These transactions are
authorized by the Company's Investment Policy and are governed by agreements
with primary government dealers under PSA Master Repurchase Agreements. At
December 31, 1996, there were no outstanding reverse repurchase agreements.
19
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Company's
FHLB-Chicago advances and reverse repurchase agreements at or for the years
ended on the dates indicated.
AT OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------------ ------------ -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
FHLB-CHICAGO ADVANCES:
Average balance outstanding........................................... $ 320,113 $ 109,168 $ 26,575
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end during the year........... 410,000 235,000 50,000
Balance outstanding at end of period.................................. 385,000 235,000 50,000
Weighted average interest rate during the period...................... 6.21% 6.28% 4.54%
Weighted average interest at the end of the period.................... 6.11% 6.08% 5.88%
REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS:
Average balance outstanding........................................... $ 1,746 $ 4,481 0
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end during the period......... 13,405 4,988 0
Balance outstanding at the end of the period.......................... 0 0 0
Weighted average interest rate during the period...................... 5.34% 6.00% 0
Weighted average interest at the end of the period.................... 0 0 0
TOTAL ADVANCE AND REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS:
Average balance outstanding........................................... $ 321,859 $ 113,649 $ 26,575
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end during the period......... 423,405 239,988 50,000
Balance outstanding at the end of the period.......................... 385,000 235,000 50,000
Weighted average interest rate during the period...................... 6.21% 6.27% 4.54%
Weighted average interest at the end of the period.................... 6.11% 6.08% 5.88%
20
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
GENERAL
Financial institutions and their holding companies are extensively regulated
under federal and state law. As a result, the growth and earnings performance of
the Company can be affected not only by management decisions and general
economic conditions, but also by the requirements of applicable state and
federal statutes and regulations and the policies of various governmental
regulatory authorities including, but not limited to, the OTS, the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "FRB"), the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC"), the Internal Revenue Service and state
taxing authorities and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). The
effect of such statutes, regulations and policies can be significant, and cannot
be predicted with a high degree of certainty.
Federal and state laws and regulations generally applicable to financial
institutions, such as the Company and its subsidiaries, regulate, among other
things, the scope of business, investments, reserves against deposits, capital
levels relative to operations, the nature and amount of collateral for loans,
the establishment of branches, mergers, consolidations and dividends. The system
of supervision and regulation applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries
establishes a comprehensive framework for their respective operations and is
intended primarily for the protection of the FDIC's deposit insurance funds and
the depositors, rather than the shareholders, of financial institutions.
The following references to material statutes and regulations affecting the
Company and its subsidiaries are brief summaries thereof and do not purport to
be complete, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to such statutes
and regulations. Any change in applicable law or regulations may have a material
effect on the business of the Company and its subsidiaries.
RECENT REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS
On September 30, 1996, President Clinton signed into law the "Economic
Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996" (the "Regulatory
Reduction Act"). Subtitle G of the Regulatory Reduction Act consists of the
"Deposit Insurance Funds Act of 1996" (the "DIFA"). The DIFA provides for a
one-time special assessment on each depository institution holding deposits
subject to assessment by the FDIC for the SAIF in an amount which, in the
aggregate, will increase the designated reserve ratio of the SAIF (I.E., the
ratio of the insurance reserves of the SAIF to total SAIF-insured deposits) to
1.25% on October 1, 1996. Subject to certain exceptions, the special assessment
was payable in full on November 27, 1996. As a SAIF-member, the Bank was subject
to the special assessment.
Under the DIFA, the amount of the special assessment payable by an
institution was determined on the basis of the amount of SAIF-assessable
deposits held by the institution on March 31, 1995, or acquired by the
institution after March 31, 1995 from another institution which held the
deposits on March 31, 1995, but was no longer in existence on November 27, 1996.
The DIFA provides for a 20% discount in calculating the SAIF-assessable deposits
of certain "Oaker" banks (I.E., Bank Insurance fund ("BIF") member banks that
hold deposits acquired from a SAIF member that remain SAIF insured) and certain
"Sasser" banks (I.E. institutions that converted from thrift to bank charters
but remain SAIF members). The DIFA also exempts certain institutions from
payment of the special assessment (including institutions that are
undercapitalized or that would become undercapitalized as a result of payment of
the special assessment), and allows an institution to pay the special assessment
in two installments if there is a significant risk that by paying the special
assessment in a lump sum, the institution or its holding company would be in
default under or in violation of terms or conditions of debt obligations or
preferred stock issued by the institution or its holding company and outstanding
on September 13, 1995.
On October 8, 1996, the FDIC adopted a final regulation implementing the
SAIF special assessment. In that regulation, the FDIC set the special assessment
rate at 0.657% of SAIF-assessable deposits held on
21
March 31, 1995. The amount of the special assessment paid by the Bank was
$9,576,778, the full amount of which was recorded as a charge against earnings
for the quarter ended September 30, 1996. As discussed below, however, the
recapitalization of the SAIF resulting from the special assessment should
significantly reduce the Bank's ongoing deposit insurance expense.
In light of the recapitalization of the SAIF pursuant to the special
assessment authorized by the DIFA, the FDIC, on December 11, 1996, took action
to reduce regular semi-annual SAIF assessments from the range of 0.23% - 0.31%
of deposits to a range of 0% - 0.27% of deposits. The new rates were effective
October 1, 1996 for Oaker and Sasser banks, but did not take effect for other
SAIF-assessable institutions until January 1, 1997. From October 1, 1996 through
December 31, 1996, assessments payable by SAIF-assessable institutions other
than Oaker and Sasser banks ranged from 0.18% to 0.27% of deposits, which
represents the amount the FDIC calculates as necessary to cover the interest due
for that period on outstanding obligations of the Financing Corporation (the
"FICO"), discussed below. Because SAIF-assessable institutions were previously
assessed at higher rates (I.E., 0.23% - 0.31% of deposits) for the semi-annual
period ending December 31, 1996, the FDIC will refund or credit back the amount
collected from such institutions for the period from October 1, 1996 through
December 31, 1996 which exceeds the amount due for that period under the reduced
assessment schedule. As a result of the FDIC's action, the deposit insurance
assessments payable by the Bank have been reduced significantly.
Prior to the enactment of the DIFA, a substantial amount of the SAIF
assessment revenue was used to pay the interest due on bonds issued by the FICO,
the entity created in 1987 to finance the recapitalization of the Federal
Savings an Loan Insurance Corporation (the "FSLIC"), the SAIF's predecessor
insurance fund. Pursuant to the DIFA, the interest due on outstanding FICO bonds
will be covered by assessments against both SAIF and BIF member institutions
beginning January 1, 1997. Between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 1999, FICO
assessments against BIF-member institutions cannot exceed 20% of the FICO
assessments charged SAIF-member institutions. From January 1, 2000 until the
FICO bonds mature in 2019, FICO assessments will be shared by all FDIC-insured
institutions on a PRO RATA basis. It has been estimated that the FICO
assessments for the period January 1, 1997 through December 31, 1999 will be
approximately 0.013% of deposits for BIF members versus approximately 0.064% of
deposits for SAIF members, and will be less than 0.025% of deposits thereafter.
The DIFA also provides for a merger of the BIF and the SAIF on January 1,
1999, provided there are no state or federally chartered, FDIC-insured savings
associations existing on that date. To facilitate the merger of the BIF and the
SAIF, the DIFA directs the Treasury Department to conduct a study on the
development of a common charter and to submit a report, along with appropriate
legislative recommendations, to the Congress by March 31, 1997.
In addition to the DIFA, the Regulatory Reduction Act includes a number of
statutory changes designed to eliminate duplicative, redundant or unnecessary
regulatory requirements. Among other things, the Regulatory Reduction Act
removes the percentage of assets limitations on the aggregate amount of credit
card and education loans that may be made by a savings association, such as the
Bank; increases from 10% to 20% of total assets the aggregate amount of
commercial loans that a savings association may make, provided that any amount
in excess of 10% of total assets represents small business loans; allows
education, small business and credit card loans to be counted in full in
determining a savings association's compliance with the qualified thrift lender
("QTL") test; and provides that a savings association may be deemed to meet the
QTL test if it qualifies as a domestic building and loans association under the
Internal Revenue code. The Regulatory Reduction Act also clarifies the liability
of a financial institution, when acting as a lender or in a fiduciary capacity,
under the federal environmental laws. Although the full impact of the Regulatory
Reduction Act on the operations of the Company and the Bank cannot be determined
at this time, management believes that the legislation may reduce compliance
costs to some extent and allow the Company and the Bank somewhat greater
operating flexibility.
22
On August 10, 1996, President Clinton signed into law the Small Business Job
Protection Act of 1996 (the "Job Protection Act"). Among other things the Job
Protection Act eliminates the percent-of-taxable-income ("PTI") method for
computing additions to a savings association's tax bad debt reserves for tax
years beginning after December 31, 1995, and requires all savings associations
that have used the PTI method to recapture, over a six year period, all or a
portion of their tax bad debt reserves added since the last taxable year
beginning before January 1, 1988. The Job Protection Act allows a savings
association to postpone the recapture of bad debt reserves for up to two years
if the institution meets a minimum level of mortgage lending activity during
those years. The Bank believes that it will engage in sufficient mortgage
lending activity during 1996 and 1997 to be able to postpone any recapture of
its bad debt reserves until 1998. As a result of these provisions of the Job
Protection Act, the Bank will determine additions to its tax bad debt reserves
using the same method as a commercial bank of comparable size, and, if the Bank
were to decide to convert to a commercial bank charter, the changes in the tax
bad debt recapture rules enacted in the Job Protection Act should make such
conversion less costly.
THE COMPANY
GENERAL. The Company, as the sole stockholder of the Bank, a savings and
loan holding company. As a savings and loan holding company, the Company is
registered with, and is subject to regulation by, the OTS under the Home Owners'
Loan Act, as amended (the "HOLA"). Under the HOLA, the Company is subject to
periodic examination by the OTS and is required to file with the OTS periodic
reports of its operations and such additional information as the OTS may
require.
INVESTMENTS AND ACTIVITIES. The HOLA prohibits a savings and loan holding
company, directly or indirectly, or through one or more subsidiaries from (i)
acquiring control of, or acquiring by merger or purchase of assets, another
savings association or savings and loan holding company without the prior
written approval of the OTS; (ii) subject to certain exceptions, acquiring more
than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of voting stock of a savings
association or savings and loan holding company except as part of an acquisition
of control approved by the OTS; or (iii) acquiring or retaining control of a
financial institution that does not have SAIF or BIF insurance of accounts.
A savings and loan holding company may acquire savings associations located
in more than one state in both supervisory transactions involving failing
savings associations and nonsupervisory acquisitions of healthy institutions,
subject to the requirement that in any nonsupervisory transaction, the law of
the state in which the savings association to be acquired is located must
specifically authorize the proposed acquisition, by language to that effect and
not merely by implication. State laws vary in the extent to which interstate
acquisitions of savings associations are permitted. Illinois law presently
permits savings and loan holding companies located in any state of the United
States to acquire savings associations or savings and loan holding companies
located in Illinois, subject to certain conditions, including the requirement
that the laws of the state in which the acquirer is located permit savings and
loan holding companies located in Illinois to acquire savings associations or
savings and loan holding companies in the acquirer's state.
A savings and loan holding company that controls only one savings
association subsidiary is generally not subject to any restrictions on the
non-banking activities that the holding company may conduct either directly or
through a non-banking subsidiary, so long as the holding company's savings
association subsidiary constitutes a QTL. If, however, the OTS determines that
there is reasonable cause to believe that the continuation by a savings and loan
holding company of a particular activity constitutes a serious risk to the
financial safety, soundness or stability of its savings association subsidiary,
the OTS may require the holding company to cease engaging in the activity (or
divest any subsidiary which engages in the activity) or may impose such
restrictions on the holding company and the subsidiary savings association as
the OTS deems necessary to address the risk, including imposing limitations on
(i) the payment of dividends by the savings association to the holding company,
(ii) transaction between the savings association and its affiliates and (iii)
any activities of the savings association that might create a serious risk that
liabilities of the holding company and its affiliates may be imposed on the
savings association.
23
Federal legislation also prohibits acquisition of "control" of a savings
association or savings and loan holding company, such as the Company, without
prior notice to certain federal bank regulators. "Control" is defined in certain
cases as acquisition of 10% of the outstanding shares of a savings association
or savings and loan holding company.
DIVIDENDS. The OTS possesses enforcement powers over savings and loan
holding companies to prevent or remedy actions that represent unsafe or unsound
practices or violations of applicable statutes and regulations. Among these
powers is the ability to proscribe the payment of dividends by savings and loan
holding companies. In addition to the restrictions on dividends that may be
imposed by the OTS, the Delaware General Corporation Law would allow the Company
to pay dividends only out of its surplus, or if the Company has no such surplus,
out of its net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared
and/or the preceding fiscal year.
FEDERAL SECURITIES REGULATION. The Company's common stock is registered
with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Consequently, the Company
is subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading and other
restrictions and requirements of the SEC under the Exchange Act.
THE BANK
GENERAL. The Bank is a federally chartered savings association, the
deposits of which are insured by the SAIF of the FDIC. As a SAIF-insured,
federally chartered savings association, the Bank is subject to the examination,
supervision, reporting and enforcement requirements of the OTS, as the
chartering authority for federal savings associations, the FDIC as administrator
of the SAIF. The Bank is also a member of the FHLB System, which provides a
central credit facility primarily for member institutions.
DEPOSIT INSURANCE. As an FDIC-insured institution, the Bank is required to
pay deposit insurance premium assessments to the FDIC. The FDIC has adopted a
risk-based assessment system under which all insured depository institutions are
placed into one of nine categories and assessed insurance premiums based upon
their respective levels of capital and supervisory evaluations. Institutions
classified as well-capitalized (as defined by the FDIC) and considered healthy
pay the lowest premium while institutions that are less than adequately
capitalized (as defined by the FDIC) and considered of substantial supervisory
concern pay the highest premium. Risk classification of all insured institutions
is made by the FDIC for each semi-annual assessment period.
During the period January 1, 1996 through September 30, 1996, SAIF
assessment rates ranged from 0.23% of deposits to 0.31% of deposits. As a result
of the recapitalization of the SAIF on October 1, 1996, SAIF assessment rates
were reduced, effective October 1, 1996, to a range of 0.18% of deposits to
0.27% of deposits and were further reduced, effective January 1, 1997, to a
range of 0% of deposits to 0.27% of deposits. SEE "--Recent Regulatory
Developments."
The FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any insured depository
institution if the FDIC determines, after a hearing, that the institution has
engaged or is engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or
unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law,
regulation, order or any condition imposed in writing by, or written agreement
with, the FDIC. The FDIC may also suspend deposit insurance temporarily during
the hearing process for a permanent termination of insurance if the institution
has no tangible capital. Management of the Company is not aware of any activity
or condition that could result in termination of the deposit insurance of the
Bank.
FICO ASSESSMENTS. Since 1987, a portion of the deposit insurance
assessments paid by SAIF members has been used to cover interest payments due on
the outstanding obligations of the FICO, the entity created to finance the
recapitalization of the FSLIC, the SAIF's predecessor insurance fund. Pursuant
to federal legislation enacted September 30, 1996, commending January 1, 1997,
both SAIF members and BIF members will be subject to assessments to cover the
interest payment on outstanding
24
FICO obligations. Such FICO assessments will be in addition to amounts assessed
by the FDIC for deposit insurance. Until January 1, 2000, the FICO assessments
made against BIF members may not exceed 20% of the amount of the FICO
assessments made against SAIF members. It is estimated that SAIF members will
pay FICO assessments equal to 0.064% of deposits while BIF members will pay FICO
assessments equal to 0.013% of deposits. Between January 1, 2000 and the
maturity of the outstanding FICO obligations in 2019, BIF members and SAIF
members will share the cost of the interest on the FICO bonds on a PRO RATA
basis. It is estimated that FICO assessments during this period will be less
than 0.025% of deposits.
OTS ASSESSMENTS. Federal savings associations are required to pay
supervisory fees to the OTS to fund the operations of the OTS. The amount of
such supervisory fees is based upon each institution's total assets, including
consolidated subsidiaries, as reported to the OTS. During the year ended
December 31, 1996, the Bank paid supervisory fees to the OTS totaling $335,506.
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS. The OTS has established the following minimum capital
standards for savings associations, such as the Bank: a core capital
requirement, consisting of a minimum ratio of core capital to total assets of
3%; a tangible capital requirement consisting of a minimum ratio of tangible
capital to total assets of 1.5%; and a risk-based capital requirement,
consisting of a minimum ratio of total capital to total risk-weighted assets of
8%, at least one-half of which must consist of core capital. For purposes of
these capital standards, core capital consists primarily of permanent
stockholders' equity less intangible assets other than certain supervisory
goodwill, certain mortgage servicing rights and certain purchased credit card
relationships and less investments in subsidiaries engaged in activities not
permitted for national banks; tangible capital is substantially the same as core
capital except that all intangible assets other than certain mortgage servicing
rights must be deducted; and total capital means core capital plus certain debt
and equity instruments that do not qualify as core capital and a portion of the
Bank's allowances for loan and leases losses.
The capital requirements described above are minimum requirements. Higher
capital levels will be required if warranted by the particular circumstances or
risk profiles of individual institutions. For example, the regulations of the
OTS provide that additional capital may be required to take adequate account of
interest rate risk or the risks posed by concentrations or credit or
nontraditional actitivities.
During the year ended December 31, 1996, the Bank was not required by the
OTS to increase its capital to an amount in excess of the minimum regulatory
requirements. As of December 31, 1996, the Bank exceeded its minimum regulatory
capital requirements with a core capital ratio of 8.49%, a tangible capital
ratio of 8.47% and a risk-based capital ratio of 21.46%.
Federal law provides the federal banking regulators with broad powers to
take prompt corrective action to resolve the problems of undercapitalized
institutions. The extent of the regulators' powers depends on whether the
institution in question is "well capitalized," "adequately capitalized,"
"undercapitalized," "significantly undercapitalized" or "critically
undercapitalized." Depending upon the capital category to which an institution
is assigned, the regulators' corrective powers include: requiring the submission
of a capital restoration plan; placing limits on asset growth and restrictions
on activities; requiring the institution to issue additional capital stock
(including additional voting stock) or to be acquired; restricting transactions
with affiliates; restricting the interest rate the institution may pay on
deposits; ordering a new election of directors of the institution; requiring
that senior executive officers or directors be dismissed; prohibiting the
institution from accepting deposits from correspondent banks; requiring the
institution to divest certain subsidiaries; prohibiting the payment of principal
or interest on subordinated debt; and ultimately, appointing a receiver for the
institution.
DIVIDENDS. OTS regulations impose limitations upon all capital
distributions by savings associations, including cash dividends. The rule
establishes three tiers of institutions. An institution that exceeds all fully
phased-in capital requirements before and after the proposed capital
distribution (a "Tier 1 Institution")
25
could, after prior notice to, but without the approval of, the OTS, make capital
distributions during a calendar year of up to the higher of (i) 100% of its net
income to date during the calendar year plus the amount that would reduce by
one-half its "surplus capital ratio" (i.e., the excess capital over its fully
phased-in capital requirements) at the beginning of the calendar year, or (ii)
75% of its net income over the most recent preceding four quarter period. Any
additional capital distributions would require prior regulatory approval. As of
December 31, 1996, the Bank was a Tier 1 Institution.
The payment of dividends by any financial institution or its holding company
is affected by the requirement to maintain adequate capital pursuant to
applicable capital adequacy guidelines and regulations, and a financial
institution generally is prohibited from paying any dividends if, following
payment thereof, the institution would undercapitalized. As described above, the
Bank exceeded its minimum capital requirements under applicable guidelines as of
December 31, 1996. Further, under applicable regulations of the OTS, the Bank
may not pay dividends in an amount which would reduce its capital below the
amount required for the liquidation account established in connection with the
Bank's conversion from the mutual to the stock form of ownership in 1994. As of
December 31, 1996, approximately $66.8 million was available to be paid as
dividends to the Company by the Bank. Notwithstanding the availability of funds
for dividends, however, the OTS may prohibit the payment of any dividends if the
OTS determines such payment would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.
INSIDER TRANSACTIONS. The Bank is subject to certain restrictions imposed
by the Federal Reserve Act on extensions of credit to the Company and its
subsidiaries, on investments in the stock or other securities of the Company and
its subsidiaries and the acceptance of the stock or other securities of the
Company or its subsidiaries as collateral for loans. Certain limitations and
reporting requirements are also placed on extensions of credit by the Bank to
its directors and officers, to directors and officers of the Company and its
subsidiaries, to principal stockholders of the Company, and to "related
interests" of such directors, officers and principal stockholders. In additions,
such legislation and regulations may affect the terms upon which any person
becoming a director or officer of the Company or one of its subsidiaries or a
principal stockholder of the Company may obtain credit from banks with which the
Bank maintains a correspondent relationship.
SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS STANDARDS. The OTS has adopted guidelines which
establish operational and managerial standards to promote the safety and
soundness of savings associations. The guidelines set forth standards for
internal controls, information systems, internal audit systems, loan
documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth,
compensation, fees and benefits, asset quality and earnings. In general, the
guidelines prescribe the goals to be achieved in each area, and each institution
is responsible for establishing its own procedures to achieve those goals. If an
institution fails to comply with any of the standards set forth in the
guidelines, the OTS may require the institution to submit a plan for achieving
and maintaining compliance. The preamble to the guidelines states that the OTS
expects to require a compliance plan from an institution whose failure to meet
one or more of the guidelines is of such severity that it could threaten the
safety and soundness of the institution. Failure to submit an acceptable plan,
or failure to comply with a plan that has been accepted by the OTS, would
constitute grounds for further enforcement action.
BRANCHING AUTHORITY. Federally chartered savings associations which qualify
as "domestic building and loan associations," as defined in the Internal Revenue
Code, or meet the QTL test (see "--The Bank--Qualified Thrift Lender Test") have
the authority, subject to receipt of OTS approval, to establish branch offices
anywhere in the United States, either DE NOVO or through acquisitions of all or
part of another financial institution. If a federal savings association fails to
qualify as a "domestic building and loan association," as defined in the
Internal Revenue Code, or fails to meet the QTL test the association generally
may establish a branch in a state other than the state of its home office only
to the extent authorized by the law of the state in which the branch is to be
located. As of December 31, 1996, the Bank
26
qualified as a "domestic building and loan association," as defined in the
Internal Revenue Code, and met the QTL test.
QUALIFIED THRIFT LENDER TEST. Under the QTL test in effect prior to
September 30, 1996, the Bank generally was required to invest at least 65% of
its portfolio assets in "qualified thrift investments," as measured on a monthly
average basis in nine out of every 12 months. Qualified thrift investments for
purposes of the QTL test consist principally of residential mortgage loans,
mortgage-backed securities and other housing and consumer-related investments.
The term "portfolio assets" is statutorily defined to mean a savings
association's total assets less goodwill and other intangible assets, the
association's business property and a limited amount if its liquid assets. Under
amendments to the HOLA enacted September 30, 1996, the Bank will be deemed to
satisfy the QTL test if it either holds qualified thrift investments equaling
65% or more of its portfolio assets or qualified as a domestic building and loan
association under the Internal Revenue Code. The new legislation also expanded
somewhat the definition of qualified thrift investments. SEE "--Recent
Regulatory Developments." As a December 31, 1996, the Bank satisfied with the
QTL test, with a ratio of qualified thrift investments to portfolio assets of
98.58% and qualified as a "domestic building and loan association," as defined
in the Internal Revenue Code.
LIQUIDITY REQUIREMENTS. OTS regulations currently require each savings
association to maintain, for each calendar month, an average daily balance of
liquid assets (including cash, certain time deposits, bankers' acceptances, and
specified United States Government, state or federal agency obligations) equal
to at least 5% of the average daily balance of its net withdrawable accounts
plus short-term borrowings (I.E., those repayable in 12 months or less) during
the preceding calendar month. This liquidity requirement may be changed from
time to time by the OTS to an amount within a range of 4% to 10% of such
accounts and borrowings, depending upon economic conditions and the deposit
flows of savings associations. OTS regulations also require each savings
association to maintain, for each calendar month, an average daily balance of
short-term liquid assets (generally liquid assets having maturities of 12 months
or less) equal to at least 1% of the average daily balance of its net
withdrawable accounts plus short-term borrowings during the preceding calendar
month. Penalties may be imposed for failure to meet liquidity ratio
requirements. At December 31, 1996, the Bank was in compliance with OTS
liquidity requirements, with an overall liquidity ratio of 7.46% and a
short-term liquidity ratio of 4.50%.
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM. FRB regulations, as presently in effect, require
depository institutions to maintain non-interest earning reserves against their
transaction accounts (primarily NOW and regular checking accounts), as follows:
for transaction accounts aggregating $49.3 million or less, the reserve
requirement is 3% of total transaction accounts; and for transaction accounts
aggregating in excess of $49.3 million, the reserve requirement is $1.479
million plus 10% of the aggregate amount of total transaction accounts in excess
of $49.3 million. The first $4.4 million of otherwise reservable balances are
exempted from the reserve requirements. These reserve requirements are subject
to annual adjustment by the FRB. The Bank is in compliance with the foregoing
requirements. The balances used to meet the reserve requirements imposed by the
FRB may be used to satisfy liquidity requirements imposed by the OTS.
27
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company neither owns nor leases any real property. At the present time,
the Company Uses the premises, equipment and furniture of the Bank without
direct payment of any rental fees to the Bank. The Bank conducts its business
through 14 full-service office locations and two limited service office
locations. Ten of the full-service branch offices are located in Cook County and
four are in DuPage County. The Bank has a five story, 83,000 square foot
facility that is used as an operations center. The facility is located on 13.8
acres in Burr Ridge Corporate Park in Burr Ridge, Illinois. Management believes
the Bank's current facilities will be adequate to meet present and immediately
foreseeable needs of the Bank and the Company. A listing of the Bank's offices
is as follows:
OWNED LEASE NET BOOK VALUE
YEAR OR EXPIRATION OF PROPERTY AT
BRANCH LOCATION OPENED LEASED DATE DECEMBER 31, 1996
- ------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- --------- ---------- ------------------
FULL SERVICE OFFICES:
Brighton Park Office ........................................ 1909 Owned -- $ 987,544
4192 South Archer Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60632
Downers Grove Office ........................................ 1976 Owned -- 824,038
5100 Forest Avenue
Downers Grove, Illinois 60515
Lombard Office .............................................. 1975 Owned -- 130,593
23 North Main Street
Lombard, Illinois 60148
Garfield Ridge Office ....................................... 1977 Owned -- 2,453,157
6141 Archer Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60638
Evergreen Park Office ....................................... 1988 Owned -- 986,391
3960 West 95th Street
Evergreen Park, Illinois 60642
98th Street Office .......................................... 1988 Owned -- 563,816
9801 South Cicero Avenue
Oak Lawn, Illinois 60453
47th Street Office .......................................... 1977 Owned -- 56,331
2555 West 47th Street
Chicago, Illinois 60632
Hickory Hills Office ........................................ 1977 Owned -- 1,109,430
9357 South Roberts Road
Hickory Hills, Illinois 60457
Hill Creek Office ........................................... 1977 Leased 05/31/97 60,601
8653 West 95th Street
Hickory Hills, Illinois 60457
Oak Lawn Office ............................................. 1980 Owned -- 857,301
10350 South Pulaski Road
Oak Lawn, Illinois 60453
Palos Heights Office ........................................ 1988 Owned -- 1,199,894
6410 West 127th Street
Palos Heights, Illinois 60463
28
OWNED LEASE NET BOOK VALUE
YEAR OR EXPIRATION OF PROPERTY AT
BRANCH LOCATION OPENED LEASED DATE DECEMBER 31, 1996
- ------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- --------- ---------- ------------------
Willowbrook Office .......................................... 1992 Owned -- $ 970,643
715 Plainfield Road
Willowbrook, Illinois 60521
Orland Park Office .......................................... 1993 Leased 12/31/97 19,325
15014 La Grange Road
Orland Park, Illinois 60462
Naperville Office ........................................... 1996 Owned -- 984,371
425 West Ogden Avenue
Naperville, IL 60563
LIMITED SERVICE OFFICES:
Burr Ridge Operations Center ................................ 1995 Owned -- 12,137,441
800 Burr Ridge Parkway
Burr Ridge, Illinois 60521-6486
Orland Park Drive-up Facility ............................... 1993 Leased 12/97 4,857
15255 94th Avenue
Orland Park, Illinois 60462
Other Land................................................... 75,000
------------------
TOTAL NET BOOK VALUE:........................................ $ 23,420,733
------------------
------------------
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
As of December 31, 1996, there were no material pending legal proceedings to
which the Company, or of which any of its property was subject, other than
routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business, which in
the aggregate involve amounts that are believed by management to be immaterial
to the financial condition of the Company.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIES HOLDERS.
During the quarter ended December 31, 1996, no matters were submitted to a
vote of security holders through a solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Information as to the principal market on which the Company's common stock
is traded, the approximate number of holders of record as of December 31, 1996,
and the high and low sales prices for each of the quarters of 1996 is
incorporated herein by reference from page 42 of the Company's 1996 Annual
Report to Stockholders filed as an exhibit hereto.
As of the close of business on March 18, 1997, the reported closing price
per share of Standard Financial, Inc. common stock was $23.63.
29
Under Delaware law, the Company may pay dividends out of surplus or, in the
event there is no surplus, out of net profits for the fiscal year in which the
dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year. Dividends may not be paid
out of net profits, however, if the capital of the Company has been diminished
to an amount less than the aggregate amount of capital represented by all
classes of preferred stock. There are various restrictions on the ability of the
Bank to pay dividends to the Company. See "Note 11--Stockholders' Equity and
Regulatory Capital" of the consolidated financial statements in the Company's
1996 Annual Report to Stockholders filed as an exhibit hereto.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
Selected consolidated financial data for the five years ended December 31,
1996, consisting of data captioned "Selected Consolidated Financial and Other
Data for Standard Financial, Inc. & Subsidiaries" on page 22 of the Company's
1996 Annual Report to Stockholders filed as an exhibit hereto is incorporated
herein by reference.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.
"Standard Financial, Inc.--Management's Discussion and Analysis" on pages 12
to 21 of the Company's 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders filed as an exhibit
hereto is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
The Consolidated Statements of Condition of Standard Financial, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the related Consolidated
Statements of Income, Stockholders' Equity and Cash Flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, together with the related
notes and the report of Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, on pages 24 to
41 of the Company's 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders filed as an exhibit
hereto, are incorporated herein by reference.
RECENT DEVELOPMENT:
See Part I, Item 1, Business Regarding the Agreement dated March 16, 1997,
between the Company and TCF Financial Corporation ("TCF") wherein the Company
would be merged with and into TCF, subject to regulatory and shareholder
approvals and other conditions.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
30
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
DIRECTORS
The directors of the Company are divided into three classes having staggered
terms of three years. Stockholders of the Company are not permitted to cumulate
their votes for the election of directors. No director or nominee for director
is related to any other director or executive officer of the Company by blood,
marriage or adoption, except that David H. Mackiewich, President, Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, is the father of Kurtis D.
Mackiewich, Senior Vice President of the Company, and Stasys J. Baras, a
retiring director, is the father-in-law of Tomas Kisielius, M.D. All of the
Board's nominees for director currently serve as directors of the Company. The
following table sets forth certain information concerning the Board's nominees
for director and each director whose term continues, including each such
person's tenure as a director of the Bank, as of February 25, 1997.
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION FOR THE PAST DIRECTOR
NAME AND AGE FIVE YEARS AND OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS SINCE (1)
- -------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
David H. Mackiewich ............ President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the 1979
(Age 57) Bank; President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
of the Company since 1994; various positions with the Bank prior to
being elected President in 1983
Tomas A. Kisielius, M.D. ....... Physician 1993
(Age 50)
Sharon Reese Dalenberg ......... President of The Astor Group, a management consulting firm, and 1987
(Age 52) President of Continental Courier Ltd. and Errand Boy, Inc., package
courier services; Director of D&N Financial Corporation, holding
company for D&N Bank (a federal savings bank located in Hancock,
MI) since 1994
Stasys J. Baras ................ Retired in 1986 as Senior Vice President of Operations of the Bank; 1983
(Age 76) employed in various positions with the Bank from 1958 until 1986
Fred V. Gwyer .................. Retired physician 1977
(Age 76)
George W. Lane ................. President of Creative Business Forms & Supplies, Inc. since 1979; 1989
(Age 57) President of Office Plus of Collinsville, Inc. and Chief Executive
Officer of Office Plus of Litchfield, Inc. since 1992
Albert M. Petkus ............... Executive Vice President of Universal Financial Products Corp., a 1995
(Age 42) computer sales and servicing company
Jack E. Levy (2) ............... President, Jack Levy & Associates, an advertising agency 1996
(age 58)
Thomas M. Ryan ................. Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial 1993
(Age 44) Officer of the Bank since 1991 and of the Company since 1994; Chief
Financial Officer of LaSalle Northwest National Bank prior to
joining the Bank in 1991
- ------------------------
(1) Dates prior to 1994 refer to the year first elected to the Board of
Directors of the Bank.
(2) In 1996, the Board appointed Jack E. Levy as a Class II director to fill a
vacancy resulting from the resignation of John A. Brdecka.
31
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the Executive
Officers of the Company, as of February 25, 1997.
EXECUTIVE
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION OFFICER
NAME AND AGE FOR THE PAST FIVE YEARS SINCE (1)
- -------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
Robert R. Harring, III ......... President, Standard Financial Mortgage Corp.; Vice President, 1995
(Age 49) Standard Federal Bank for savings since 1995; prior to joining the
Company, Mr. Harring served as Senior Vice President at First
Chicago/Midwest Mortgage Services
Kurtis D. Mackiewich ........... Senior Vice President since 1993; Vice President since 1992 1993
(age 32)
Ruta M. Staniulis .............. Senior Vice President 1987
(age 49)
Leonard A. Metheny, Sr. ........ Vice President and Corporate Secretary 1990
(age 58)
Randall R. Schwartz ............ Vice President and General Counsel 1989
(age 37)
- ------------------------
(1) Dates prior to 1994 refer to the positions held with the Bank.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that the Company's directors,
executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of the Company's Common
Stock file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Such persons are also required to furnish the Company with
copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on the Company's
review of the copies of such forms, the Company is not aware that any of its
directors and executive officers or 10% stockholders failed to comply with the
filing requirements of Section 16(a) during the period commencing January 1,
1996 through December 31, 1996.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
For the year ended December 31, 1996, each member of the Board of Directors
of the Bank who was not also an officer or employee of the Bank received an
annual retainer of $2,000 and an additional fee of $1,500 for each regular or
special meeting of the Board of Directors attended and $400 for each committee
meeting attended. Each committee chairman receives $600 per committee meeting.
Each non-management member of the Board of Directors of the Company who was not
also an officer or employee of the Bank received a fee of $1,500 for attendance
at meetings of the Board of Directors of the Company held on days other than
days on which the Board of Directors of the Bank met.
EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
Separate compensation apart from compensation paid for services performed as
officers of the Bank was not paid to the officers of the Company during 1996.
The Company and the Bank do not expect that officers of the Company will be paid
compensation separate from compensation paid to them as officers of the Bank
until such time as the officers of the Company devote significant time to
separate management of
32
Company affairs. The Board of Directors of the Company will determine whether
such compensation is appropriate.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation paid
or granted for the past three years to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and
to the Company's and the Bank's four other most highly compensated executive
officers.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG TERM COMPENSATION
AWARDS
ANNUAL COMPENSATION ---------------------------
(B) ------------------------ (G)
FISCAL (F) SECURITIES (H)
(A) YEAR (C) RESTRICTED UNDERLYING ALL OTHER
NAME AND ENDED SALARY (D) STOCK OPTIONS/ COMPENSATION
PRINCIPAL POSITION DECEMBER 31ST ($)(1) BONUS ($) AWARDS ($)(2) SARS (#)(3) ($)(4)
- ----------------------------- --------------- ------------ ---------- ------------- ------------ -------------
David H. Mackiewich ......... 1996 $ 424,412 $ 197,931 -- -- $ 198,524
President and Chief 1995 408,385 117,800 $ 1,332,000 $ 361,329 171,808
Executive Officer 1994 410,051 23,116 -- -- 122,923
Thomas M. Ryan .............. 1996 $ 194,906 $ 72,000 -- -- $ 84,915
Executive Vice President, 1995 159,600 38,304 $ 441,600 $ 119,939 49,180
Chief Financial 1994 160,214 6,138 -- -- 26,756
and Operating Officer
Robert R. Harring, III ...... 1996 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 -- -- $ 31,288
Vice President 1995 98,077 -- $ 360,000 $ 80,481 7,679
1994 -- -- -- -- --
Ruta M. Staniulis ........... 1996 $ 142,375 $ 45,943 -- -- $ 45,564
Senior Vice President 1995 121,225 43,360 $ 306,000 $ 82,705 33,016
1994 110,283 6,349 -- -- 15,123
Randall R. Schwartz ......... 1996 $ 114,835 $ 35,050 -- -- $ 43,669
Vice President and 1995 110,419 27,846 $ 294,000 $ 79,846 36,811
General Counsel 1994 106,659 6,130 -- -- 14,120
- ------------------------
(1) Amounts shown include compensation earned and deferred at the election of
the named executive officer during the year specified. For Mr. Harring, 1995
salary reflects period beginning May 1, 1995.
(2) Represents the dollar value of shares awarded under the Company's MRP based
upon the market price of the Common Stock on May 19, 1995, the effective
date of the awards (except for Mr. Harring, whose award date was September
20, 1995). Shares awarded under the MRP in 1995 vest at a rate of 20% per
year beginning on the first anniversary of the effective date of the grant.
Messrs. Mackiewich, Ryan, Harring and Schwartz, and Ms. Staniulis, were
awarded 111,000, 36,800, 30,000, 24,500 and 25,500 shares, respectively, and
the value of such shares at December 31, 1996, based upon the market price
of the Common Stock, was $2,178,375; $722,200; $588,750; $480,813; and
$500,438, respectively. Dividends will be paid on MRP shares but are held in
trust for the respective employee until the underlying shares vest.
(3) Represents options to purchase the stated number of shares of Common Stock
granted under the Stock Option Plan, which options become exercisable at a
rate of 20% per year beginning on the first anniversary of the May 19, 1995,
effective date of the grants (September 20, 1995 for Mr. Harring).
33
(4) Amounts shown represent allocations under the ESOP and the Bank's
contributions or payments with respect to the 401(k) Plan, the Supplemental
Top Executive Plan ("STEP Plan"), the Split Dollar Life Insurance Program
("Split Life"), supplemental life insurance, automobile allowances and club
dues. For 1994, such amounts also include the Bank's contribution to the
Bank's Retirement and Savings Fund (the "Pension Plan"). The Bank ceased
contributions to the Pension Plan and merged the Pension Plan into the
401(k) Plan as of May 13, 1994. The amount of each officer's allocation
under the ESOP is determined by multiplying the number of shares allocated
to such officer under the ESOP by the per share fair market value of the
Common Stock at the end of the respective fiscal year. The aggregate amount
of other compensation shown for each named officer for 1994, 1995 and 1996
consists of the following, respectively: (i) Mr. Mackiewich: ESOP
allocations of $8,465, $35,240 and $42,586, 401(K) matching contribution of
$955 for 1995 and $4,698 for 1996, supplemental life insurance premiums of
$3,015 for each year, deferred compensation under the STEP Plan of $84,604,
$126,502 and $141,120, club dues of $6,096, $6,096 and $7,105 and a Pension
Plan contribution of $20,743 for 1994; (ii) Mr. Ryan: ESOP allocations of
$8,465, $35,240 and $42,586, 401(k) matching contributions of $4,788, $4,420
and $4,500, supplemental life insurance premiums of $1,320 for each year,
premiums for a split life insurance policy of $3,000 for 1995 and $6,000 for
1996, automobile allowance of $6,000 for each year, club dues of $24,509 for
1996 and a Pension Plan contribution of $6,183 for 1994; (iii) Mr. Harring:
ESOP allocations of $21,293 for 1996, 401(k) matching contributions of
$2,077 for 1996, supplemental life insurance premiums of $1,139 for 1995 and
$1,918 for 1996, automobile allowance of $6,000 for 1995 and 1996 and club
dues of $540 for 1995; (iv) Ms. Staniulis: ESOP allocations of $6,688,
$28,479 and $40,421, 401(k) matching contributions of $3,302, $3,637 and
$3,120, supplemental life insurance premiums of $900 for each year, club
dues of $1,123 for 1996 and a Pension Plan contribution of $4,233 for 1994;
and (v) Mr. Schwartz: ESOP allocations of $6,457, $25,945 and $32,602,
401(k) matching contributions of $3,188, $3,313 and $3,445, supplemental
life insurance premiums of $388 for each year, automobile allowance of
$6,000 for 1995 and 1996, club dues of $1,165 for 1995 and $1,234 for 1996
and a Pension Plan contribution of $4,087 for 1994.
STOCK OPTION INFORMATION
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the number and
value of stock options at December 31, 1996 held by the named executive
officers. No stock options were exercised during 1996 by such persons.
AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR END AND FY-END
OPTIONS/SAR VALUES
NUMBER OF SECURITIES
SHARES UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
ACQUIRED OPTIONS/SARS AT FY-END IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS/SARS
ON VALUE (#)(D)(1) AT FY-END ($)(E)
NAME EXERCISE REALIZED -------------------------- --------------------------
(#)(A) (#)(B) ($)(C) EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
- ------------------------------------- ------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
David H. Mackiewich.................. -- -- 72,266 289,063 $ 523,929 $ 2,204,105
Thomas M. Ryan....................... -- -- 23,988 95,951 182,908 731,626
Robert R. Harring, III............... -- -- 16,096 64,385 82,492 329,973
Ruta M. Staniulis.................... -- -- 16,541 66,154 126,125 504,501
Randall R. Schwartz.................. -- -- 15,970 63,876 121,774 487,054
- ------------------------
(1) Options become exercisable in 20% increments on each anniversary of the May
19, 1995 grant date and have an exercise price of $12.00, except with
respect to Mr. Harring, whose options were granted on September 20, 1995 and
have an exercise price of $14.50.
34
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
The Bank has entered into employment agreements with Mr. David H. Mackiewich
and Mr. Thomas M. Ryan. These employment agreements are intended to ensure that
the Company and the Bank maintain a stable and competent management base. The
continued success of the Company and the Bank depends to a significant degree on
the skills and competence of these individuals.
The employment agreements were originally entered into as of July 28, 1994.
The agreements, as subsequently amended, provide for three-year terms commencing
on the first anniversary date and continuing each anniversary date thereafter.
The respective term of these agreements may be restored to three years by the
action of the Board of Directors, subject to the Board's annual performance
evaluations. Each agreement was extended an additional year in July 1996. The
agreements further provide that the term of the agreement may extend beyond the
end of the year in which the executive reaches age 65 and that the executive not
be required to actively seek employment following involuntary termination or
offset any compensation due by new compensation earned. Under these agreements,
the base salaries for Mr. Mackiewich and Mr. Ryan for 1996 were $424,412 and
$194,906, respectively. In addition to base salary, the agreements provide for,
among other things, bonuses, disability pay, participation in stock-based
incentive compensation plans and other fringe benefits applicable to executive
officers of the Bank. The agreements may be terminated by the Bank at any time.
In the event of involuntary termination other than for cause, as defined in the
agreements, death or disability, the executive is entitled to severance pay in
an amount equal to the amount due for the remaining term of the employment
agreement.
CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENTS
The Company has entered into Change in Control Agreements (each, a "Control
Agreement") with each of the executive officers named in the Summary
Compensation Table. The Control Agreements were entered into as of July 28, 1994
and provide for a three-year term. Commencing on the first anniversary date and
continuing on each anniversary date thereafter, the term of any Control
Agreement may be restored to three years by the Board of Directors, subject to
the Board's annual performance evaluations, and the term of each Control
Agreement was extended an additional year in July 1996. Each Control Agreement
provides that within two years following a change in control, as defined in the
Control Agreements, of the Company or the Bank, if the Company or the Bank
terminates the officer's employment for any reason other than cause, or if the
officer terminates his or her employment following his or her demotion, loss of
title, office or significant authority, a reduction in his or her compensation,
or relocation of his or her principal place of employment, the officer or, in
the event of death, the officer's beneficiary, would be entitled to receive a
severance payment equal to three times the sum of the officer's current base
salary plus the highest bonus paid in the two prior years and in addition will
be provided with other benefits. The Control Agreements also provide that change
of control benefits are payable if the executive elects to voluntarily terminate
employment within one year following a change of control. If the Company's
independent accountants acting as auditors determine, in consultation with legal
counsel acceptable to the parties, that any amount payable to the executive by
the Company would constitute an "excess parachute payment" within the meaning of
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and
be subject to the "excise tax" imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, the Company
shall pay the executive the amount of such excise tax and all federal and state
income or other taxes with respect to any such additional amount, as well as any
additional excise taxes plus interest, penalties and professional fees or
expenses resulting from any excise tax deficiency determination which may be
issued by the Internal Revenue Service at a later date.
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
INTRODUCTION
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the
"Compensation Committee") establishes compensation and benefits for the Chief
Executive Officer and reviews and
35
recommends compensation and benefits for other officers and employees of the
Bank. During 1996, officers of the Company were not paid compensation apart from
compensation paid for services performed as officers of the Bank. As of December
31, 1996, the Compensation Committee was comprised of Stasys J. Baras (Chair),
Albert M. Petkus and Sharon Reese Dalenberg.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION POLICY
The Bank's overall compensation policy can be summarized as follows:
- Attract and retain quality talent, which is critical to both the
short-term and long-term success of the Bank.
- Reinforce strategic performance objectives through the use of incentive
compensation programs.
- Create mutuality of interest between the Bank's executive officers and the
Company's stockholders through compensation structures that share the
rewards and risks of strategic decision making.
BASE COMPENSATION
The Compensation Committee's approach to base compensation is to offer
competitive salaries in comparison with current market pay practices. The
committee examines market compensation levels and trends observed in the labor
market. For its purposes, the Compensation Committee has defined the labor
market as the pool of executives who are currently employed in similar positions
in financial institutions of equivalent size. The Compensation Committee
compares the Bank's base salary practices against those of other financial
institutions managing approximately $2 billion in assets. Survey information on
median compensation practices, provided by compensation consultants, is used by
the Compensation Committee as a frame of reference for determining annual salary
adjustments and starting salaries.
The Compensation Committee makes salary decisions in a structured review
with input from the Chief Executive Officer. This review considers the
decision-making responsibilities of each position and the experience, work
performance and team-building skills of position incumbents. The Compensation
Committee views work performance as the single most important measurement
factor, although the Compensation Committee also views experience,
decision-making responsibilities and team-building skills as necessary factors
for the Bank's success. The Chief Executive Officer does not participate in the
review of, or decisions regarding, his compensation.
ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
In 1995, the Bank adopted an incentive compensation plan for senior officers
as an additional means to enhance stockholder value. The plan is designed to pay
a percentage of an officer's base compensation in the event the Bank achieved
specified financial performance. These criteria include earnings growth, asset
growth, return on average equity and net interest margin. The performance
criteria levels and the compensation percentage payout were established by the
plan's Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee also conducted year
end reviews of the performance of each officer to determine the final incentive
award. The actual amounts paid pursuant to the plan are indicated on the Summary
Compensation Table.
ANNUAL PROFIT BONUS
The Bank currently has an annual bonus plan to reward its employees,
excluding executive officers, based upon Bank profitability. The Compensation
Committee makes bonus decisions in a structured review based on Bank
profitability and the actual performance of employees, with input from the Chief
Executive Officer. Employees are eligible to receive a bonus in an amount equal
to a specified percentage, or a number of weeks, of base salary.
36
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
The Company currently maintains the Stock Option Plan and the MRP to reward
senior executives of the Company and the Bank for outstanding performance and to
help the Company attract and retain qualified personnel in key positions. The
plans are further designed to give key employees a proprietary interest in the
Company as an incentive to contribute to the success of the Company. Awards
under the Stock Option Plan and the MRP are determined by the Compensation
Committee based upon each respective officer's level of responsibility,
longevity of service, overall performance and significance to the Company's
future growth and profitability.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
The Bank's compensation program for its Chief Executive Officer is largely
based upon competitive practices. The Compensation Committee has defined the
comparable labor market as the pool of Chief Executive Officers who are
currently employed in financial institutions of equivalent size. The Bank
compares its base salary plus bonus practices against those of other
institutions managing approximately $2 billion in assets. Survey information on
median compensation practices, provided by compensation consultants, has been
used as a frame of reference for determining Chief Executive Officer salary plus
bonus levels and adjustments. Mr. Mackiewich's base salary combined with his
annual bonus is within the median range of the comparable market as identified
by an outside consultant using survey data.
Stasys J. Baras (Chair)
Albert M. Petkus
Sharon Reese Dalenberg
37
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The Compensation Committee of the Company establishes compensation and
benefits for the Chief Executive Officer and reviews and recommends compensation
and benefits for other officers and employees of the Bank. Directors who were
members of the Compensation Committee for all or part of the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996, included Ms. Reese Dalenberg and Messrs. Lane, Baras and
Petkus. During 1996, no executive officer of the Company served as a member of:
(i) the compensation committee of another entity in which one of the executive
officers of such entity served on the Company's Compensation Committee, (ii) the
Board of Directors of another entity in which one of the executive officers of
such entity served on the Company's Compensation Committee or (iii) the
compensation committee of another entity in which one of the executive officers
of such entity served as a member of the Company's Board of Directors. George W.
Lane, a director of the Company and an attorney, is President of Creative
Business Forms & Supplies, Inc., from which the Bank purchases office supplies
from time to time. The total amount paid to Creative Business Forms & Supplies,
Inc. by the Bank during 1996 was approximately $175,700. Mr. Lane has informed
the Company that such transactions constituted greater than five percent of that
firm's revenues during 1996. Sharon Reese Dalenberg, a director of the Company
and an attorney, is President of The Astor Group, a management consulting firm
which provides certain consulting services to the Bank from time to time. The
total amount paid to The Astor Group by the Bank during 1996 was approximately
$76,800. Ms. Reese Dalenberg is also President of Continental Courier Ltd. and
Errand Boy, Inc., which provide package courier services to the Bank from time
to time. The total amount paid to Continental Courier Ltd. and Errand Boy, Inc.
by the Bank during 1996 was approximately $81,300 and $9,400, respectively.
38
STOCKHOLDER RETURN PERFORMANCE PRESENTATION
The following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total returns on an
investment of $100 in the Company's Common Stock, a broad index of U.S.
companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market and an index of thrift stocks for
the periods shown. The Company's Common Stock was first listed for quotation on
the Nasdaq National Market System on August 1, 1994, and the information in the
graph is based upon the closing price of the Company's Common Stock on that
date. The graph was prepared at the Company's request by SNL Securities,
Charlottesville, Virginia.
CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON AUGUST 1, 1994
EDGAR REPRESENTATION OF DATA POINTS USED IN PRINTED GRAPHIC
STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE
SNL Thrifts (All)
Period Ending Standard Financial, Inc. Nasdaq - Total US Index
8/1/94 $100 $100 $100
12/31/94 85 105 89
12/31/95 131 148 140
12/31/96 180 182 182
* Total return assumes reinvestment of dividends
39
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the
beneficial ownership of the Company's Common Stock at February 25, 1997, by each
person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the
outstanding Common Stock, by each director or nominee (other than those set
forth in Appendix A), by each executive officer named in the Summary
Compensation Table, and by all directors and executive officers of the Company
as a group.
AMOUNT AND NATURE OF
NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP PERCENT OF
NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS IN GROUP (1) CLASS
- ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------- -----------
Standard Federal Bank for savings
Employee Stock Ownership Trust (2) ....................... 961,070 5.94%
4192 South Archer Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60632
LaSalle/Kross Partners, L.P. (3) ........................... 865,000 5.35%
350 East Michigan
Kalamazoo, Michigan 49007
DIRECTORS AND NOMINEES
David H. Mackiewich (4)..................................... 153,808 *
Thomas M. Ryan.............................................. 63,083 *
Stasys J. Baras............................................. 15,214 *
Tomas A. Kisielius.......................................... 9,201 *
George W. Lane.............................................. 12,851 *
Fred V. Gwyer............................................... 5,001 *
Jack E. Levy (5)............................................ 20,000 *
Sharon Reese Dalenberg...................................... 28,692 *
Albert M. Petkus (6)........................................ 37,923 *
OTHER NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Robert R. Harring, III...................................... 24,166 *
Ruta M. Staniulis........................................... 52,739 *
Randall R. Schwartz......................................... 49,576 *
All directors and executive officers as a group (14 546,913 3.38%
persons)..................................................
- ------------------------
* Less than 1% of the outstanding Common Stock.
(1) The information contained in this column is based upon information furnished
to the Company by the persons named above and the members of the designated
group. Includes shares purchased under the Bank's 401(k) Plan ("401(k)
Plan") and, except for with respect to the Standard Federal Bank for savings
Employee Stock Ownership Trust (the "Trust"), also includes shares allocated
to employees under the Bank's Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP").
Excludes shares awarded under the Company's Management Recognition and
Retention Plan ("MRP") and the Company's Stock Option Plan ("Stock Option
Plan") which have not yet vested and which are not otherwise includable
under Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Employees have sole voting power and no investment power
over shares allocated to their accounts under the ESOP. Except as indicated
in the preceding sentence and in the following footnotes, each individual
listed in the above table has sole voting and investment power with respect
to the indicated shares. Inclusion of shares shall not constitute an
admission of beneficial ownership or voting or investment power over such
shares.
40
(2) The Trust was established in connection with the ESOP. Under the terms of
the ESOP, the ESOP trustee must vote all allocated shares held in the ESOP
in accordance with the instructions of the participating employees.
Allocated shares for which employees do not give instructions are voted in
the same ratio on any matter as are those shares for which instructions are
given. Unallocated shares held in the ESOP are voted by the ESOP trustee in
accordance with its fiduciary duties as trustee.
(3) Based upon information reported in an Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13D filed
under the Exchange Act on January 21, 1997, Peter T. Kross and Richard J.
Nelson, who control the two general partners of LaSalle/Kross Partners,
Limited Partnership, and Wallace D. Riley, reported that they, as a group
with this partnership, have shared voting and dispositive power over 865,000
shares.
(4) Includes 2,334 shares held jointly with Mr. K. Mackiewich, an executive
officer of the Bank and Mr. Mackiewich's son, over which shares Mr.
Mackiewich has shared voting and investment power.
(5) Includes 10,000 shares held in a trust, over which shares Mr. Levy has no
voting or investment power.
(6) Includes 35,191 shares held as trustee and 2,334 shares held as custodian,
over which shares Mr. Petkus has sole voting and investment power, and also
includes 20 shares held by Mr. Petkus' spouse, over which shares Mr. Petkus
has shared voting and investment power.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
Directors and officers of the Company and its subsidiaries and their
associates, were customers of and had transactions with the Company and its
subsidiaries during 1996. Additional transactions may be expected to take place
in the future. All outstanding loans, commitments to loan, transactions in
repurchase agreements and certificates of deposit and depository relationships,
in the opinion of management, were made in the ordinary course of business, on
substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those
prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and did
not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other
unfavorable features. Federal law prohibits a savings institution such as the
Bank from making loans to its senior officers and directors at favorable rates
or on terms not comparable to those prevailing to the general public.
George W. Lane, a director of the Company, is President of Creative Business
Forms & Supplies, Inc., from which the Bank purchases office supplies from time
to time. The total amount paid to Creative Business Forms & Supplies, Inc. by
the Bank during 1996 was approximately $175,700. Mr. Lane has informed the
Company that such transactions constituted greater than five percent of that
firm's revenues during 1996.
Mary Lynn Mackiewich, wife of David H. Mackiewich, the Chairman of the
Company, is the sister of the President of Care Cleaning Service, Inc., which
provides certain office cleaning and maintenance services to the Bank. The total
amount paid to Care Cleaning Services, Inc. by the Bank during 1996 was
approximately $188,700.
Sharon Reese Dalenberg, a director of the Company and an attorney, is
President of The Astor Group, a management consulting firm which provides
certain consulting services to the Bank from time to time. The total amount paid
to The Astor Group by the Bank during 1996 was approximately $76,800. Ms. Reese
Dalenberg is also President of Continental Courier Ltd. and Errand Boy, Inc.,
which provide package courier services to the Bank from time to time. The total
amount paid to Continental Courier Ltd. and Errand Boy, Inc. by the Bank during
1996 was approximately $81,300 and $9,400, respectively.
The Company believes that the foregoing transactions were conducted on terms
no less favorable to the Company than could have been obtained by it in arms'
length negotiations with unaffiliated persons, and the Company intends that such
transactions will be approved by a majority of its independent outside directors
in the future.
41
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(a)(1) The following consolidated financial statements of the Company and
its subsidiaries included in the Company's 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders,
together with the report thereon of Ernst & Young LLP, dated January 27, 1997,
are incorporated herein by reference:
Consolidated Statements of Condition as of December 31, 1996 and 1995;
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994;
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December
31, 1996, 1995 and 1994;
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994; and
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The remaining information appearing in the Company's 1996 Annual Report to
Stockholders is not deemed to be filed as a part of this Report, except as
expressly provided herein.
(a)(2) All schedules are omitted because they are not required or are not
applicable or the required information is shown on the consolidated financial
statements or notes thereto.
(a)(3) The following exhibits are either filed as part of this Report or
are on file with the SEC and incorporated herein by reference:
EXHIBIT
NUMBER EXHIBIT
- ----------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.1 Amended Plan of Conversion of Standard Federal Bank for savings (incorporated herein by reference to the
Company's registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-76596), as amended)
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's registration
statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-76596), as amended)
3.2 Bylaws of Registrant as amended
11.1 Statement RE Computation of Per Share Earnings
13.1 Portions of Company's 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Company
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
27.1 Financial Data Schedule
42
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
STANDARD FINANCIAL, INC.
Registrant
March 27, 1997 By: /s/ DAVID H. MACKIEWICH
-----------------------------------------
David H. Mackiewich
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
By: /s/ THOMAS M. RYAN
-----------------------------------------
Thomas M. Ryan
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, AND CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE
- ------------------------------ ---------------------------
/s/ DAVID H. MACKIEWICH President (chief executive
- ------------------------------ officer) Chairman of the
David H. Mackiewich Board and Director
Executive Vice
President/Chief Financial
/s/ THOMAS M. RYAN Officer (principal
- ------------------------------ financial and accounting
Thomas M. Ryan officer)/ Chief
Operations Officer and
Director
/s/ STASYS J. BARAS
- ------------------------------ Director
Stasys J. Baras
/s/ FRED V. GWYER
- ------------------------------ Director
Fred V. Gwyer
/s/ TOMAS A. KISIELIUS
- ------------------------------ Director
Tomas A. Kisielius
/s/ GEORGE W. LANE
- ------------------------------ Director
George W. Lane
/s/ JACK E. LEVY
- ------------------------------ Director
Jack E. Levy
/s/ ALBERT M. PETKUS
- ------------------------------ Director
Albert M. Petkus
/s/ SHARON A. REESE
DALENBERG
- ------------------------------ Director
Sharon A. Reese Dalenberg
March 27, 1997
43