BOSTON FINANCIAL QUALIFIED HOUSING TAX CREDITS L.P. V,
                                A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                  101 Arch Street
                                  Boston, MA 02110
                                           
   
                                                        August 18, 1997
    
Dear Limited Partner: 
   
    As you are by now aware, two unrelated bidders have made offers to 
purchase units representing units of limited partnership interests ("Units") 
of Boston Financial Qualified Housing Tax Credit L.P. V, A Limited 
Partnership (the "Partnership"):

     (i)      Oldham Institutional Tax Credits LLC, a Massachusetts limited
         liability company ("Oldham"), has made an offer (the "Oldham Offer")
         to purchase Units for an increased cash purchase price of $635 per
         Unit. The Purchaser is an affiliate of Arch Street V, Inc. and Arch
         Street V Limited Partnership , the general partners of the Partnership
         (the "General Partners"), and

    (ii) Everest Tax Credit Investors, LLC, a California limited liability
         company, and Everest Tax Credit Investors II, LLC, a California
         limited liability company (together, "Everest"), has made an offer
         (the "Everest Offer") to purchase Units for a cash purchase price of
         $600 per Unit.

    Because the General Partners are affiliated with Oldham, the General 
Partners are expressing no opinion and are remaining neutral with respect to 
the Oldham Offer and the Everest Offer . Although the General Partners are 
not making a recommendation with respect to the either offer, the General 
Partners believe that Limited Partners should carefully consider the 
following factors in making their own decision of whether to accept or reject 
the Oldham Offer or the Everest Offer:

- -   Oldham is an affiliate of the General Partners.  The executive officers and
    directors of the managing member of Oldham also serve as the executive
    officers and directors of the Managing General Partner.  Therefore, the
    General Partners, subject to their fiduciary duties, may have a conflict of
    interest with respect to certain matters involving the Partnership and its
    Limited Partners:

    -    There may be a conflict of interest in responding to the Oldham Offer.
    
    -    If Oldham is successful in acquiring a significant number of Units
         pursuant to the Oldham Offer, Oldham could be in a position to
         significantly



         influence all Partnership decisions on which Limited Partners may 
         vote.  This voting ability could prevent nontendering Limited 
         Partners from taking action that they desired but Oldham and the 
         General Partners opposed and enable Oldham and the General Partners 
         to take action desired by the Partnership but opposed by the 
         nontendering Limited Partners.
    
    -    There may also be a conflict of interest if Oldham's acquisition of
         Units has the effect of making any future change in the Partnership's
         current management by the General Partners more difficult.

- -   The Everest Offer is for $600 per Unit.  The Oldham Offer exceeds the
    Everest Offer by $35 per Unit.

- -   The Everest Offer is not net of transfer fees, which means that a Limited
    Partner who tenders to Everest will be required to pay a transfer fee of
    $10 per Unit transferred ($100 minimum).

- -   The Everest Offer is for a maximum of 3,500 Units, which is less than
    Oldham's maximum of 17,200 Units.  It is a more likely possibility that
    Everest may not be able to accept all the Units tendered to it because
    proration, or rejection, of some tendered Units may occur at the lower
    maximum level established by Everest.

- -   Both offers will provide Limited Partners with an immediate opportunity to
    liquidate their investment in the Partnership. Limited Partners who have a
    present or future need for the tax credits and/or tax losses from the Units
    may, however, prefer to retain their Units and not tender them pursuant to
    either offer.
 
- -   As stated by Oldham  in the Oldham Offer, there may be a conflict of
    interest between Oldham's desire to purchase the Units at a low price and a
    Limited Partner's desire to sell its Units at a high price.  Therefore,
    Limited Partners might receive greater value if they hold their Units,
    rather than tender. Furthermore, Limited Partners should be aware that a
    secondary market exists for the Units.
 
- -   The Partnership Agreement of the Partnership provides that no sale or
    transfer of Units may be made if such sale, when aggregated with all other
    transfers during the same year would result in both (i) the transfer of
    more than 5% of the Units (excluding certain transfers permitted under the
    Partnership Agreement ("Permitted Transfers")) and (ii) the transfer of
    more than 2% of the Units (excluding Permitted Transfers and transfers made
    through a "Matching Service" (as such term is used  in Internal Revenue
    Service Notice 88-75)) (the "Safe Harbor Percentages"), unless the Managing
    General Partner shall have received an opinion of counsel that such sale or
    transfer may be made without material adverse tax consequences to any
    Partner of the Partnership.  Since the Partnership has permitted transfers
    during taxable year 1997, Oldham has stated in its offer that it will
    obtain an opinion of counsel that consummation of the Oldham Offer will not

                                     2


    result in material adverse tax consequences to the Partnership's partners. 
    Everest does not make a similar statement in its offer.  However, in order
    to comply with the Partnership Agreement, if the Units acquired by Everest
    pursuant to the Everest Offer, when aggregated with all other transfers
    during 1997, would result in the Partnership exceeding the Safe Harbor
    Percentages, the Managing General Partner will require that Everest obtain
    an opinion of counsel that consummation of the Everest Offer will not
    result in adverse tax consequences to the partners.
    
- -   LIMITED PARTNERS WILL NO LONGER RECEIVE THE TAX CREDITS AND/OR TAX LOSSES
    FROM THE UNITS SHOULD THEY TENDER PURSUANT TO THE  EITHER OFFER.
    
- -   Limited Partners who tender their Units will lose the right to receive any
    future distributions from the Partnership, including distributions from any
    refinancing or sale of the Partnership's properties. The Partnership has
    made no distributions to Limited Partners for the years ended March 31,
    1997, 1996, and 1995.  In the Partnership's early years, cash available for
    distribution was derived from interest earned on the temporary investment
    of funds held by the Partnership prior to paying capital contributions to
    Local Limited Partnerships.  There can be no assurance as to the timing,
    amount or occurrence of any future distributions.
   
- -   Limited Partners should consult with their respective advisors about the
    financial, tax, legal and other consequences of  both offers.
 
    Enclosed is a copy of the Partnership's amended Statement on Schedule 14D-9
which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and sets forth
the Partnership's response to the offers. Limited Partners are advised to
carefully read the amended Schedule 14D-9.
 
    Please do not hesitate to call the Partnership at (800) 829-9213 (ext. 10)
for assistance in any Partnership matter.
    
                   BOSTON FINANCIAL QUALIFIED HOUSING 
                   TAX CREDITS L.P. V, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                                     3