BOSTON FINANCIAL TAX CREDIT FUND VIII, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                   101 Arch Street
                                   Boston, MA 02110
                                           

                                                       August 18, 1997

Dear Limited Partner: 

        As you are by now aware, two unrelated bidders have made offers to 
purchase units representing units of limited partnership interests ("Units") 
of Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII, A Limited Partnership (the 
"Partnership"):

        (i)   Oldham Institutional Tax Credits LLC, a Massachusetts limited 
              liability company ("Oldham"), has made an offer (the "Oldham 
              Offer") to purchase Units for an increased cash purchase price 
              of $880 per Unit.  The Purchaser is an affiliate of Arch Street 
              VIII Limited Partnership , the general partner of the 
              Partnership (the "General Partner"), and

        (ii)  Everest Tax Credit Investors, LLC, a California limited 
              liability company, and Everest Tax Credit Investors II, LLC, a 
              California limited liability company (together, "Everest"), has 
              made an offer (the "Everest Offer") to purchase Units for a 
              cash purchase price of $840 per Unit.

        Because the General Partner is affiliated with Oldham, the General 
Partner is expressing no opinion and are remaining neutral with respect to 
the Oldham Offer and the Everest Offer . Although the General Partner is not 
making a recommendation with respect to either offer, the General Partner 
believes that Limited Partners should carefully consider the following 
factors in making their own decision of whether to accept or reject the 
Oldham Offer or the Everest Offer:

- -   Oldham is an affiliate of the General Partner.  The executive officers 
    and directors of the managing member of Oldham also serve as the 
    executive officers and directors of the General Partner.  Therefore, the 
    General Partner, subject to its fiduciary duties, may have a conflict of 
    interest with respect to certain matters involving the Partnership and 
    its Limited Partners:

      -    There may be a conflict of interest in responding to the Oldham 
           Offer.
               
      -    If Oldham is successful in acquiring a significant number of Units 
           pursuant to the Oldham Offer, Oldham could be in a position to 
           significantly influence all Partnership decisions on which Limited 
           Partners may vote.



           This voting ability could prevent nontendering Limited Partners 
           from taking action that they desired but Oldham and the General 
           Partner opposed and enable Oldham and the General Partner to take 
           action desired by the Partnership but opposed by the nontendering 
           Limited Partners.
               
      -    There may also be a conflict of interest if Oldham's acquisition 
           of Units has the effect of making any future change in the 
           Partnership's current management by the General Partner more 
           difficult.

- -   The Everest Offer is for $840 per Unit.  The Oldham Offer exceeds the 
    Everest Offer by $40 per Unit.

- -   The Everest Offer is NOT net of transfer fees, which means that a Limited 
    Partner who tenders to Everest will be required to pay a transfer fee of 
    $10 per Unit transferred ($100 minimum).

- -   The Everest Offer is for a maximum of 1,825 Units, which is less than 
    Oldham's maximum of 9,125 Units.  It is a more likely possibility that 
    Everest may not be able to accept all the Units tendered to it because 
    proration, or rejection, of some tendered Units may occur at the lower 
    maximum level established by Everest.

- -   Both offers will provide Limited Partners with an immediate opportunity 
    to liquidate their investment in the Partnership. Limited Partners who 
    have a present or future need for the tax credits and/or tax losses from 
    the Units may, however, prefer to retain their Units and not tender them 
    pursuant to either offer.
 
- -   As stated by Oldham  in the Oldham Offer, there may be a conflict of 
    interest between Oldham's desire to purchase the Units at a low price and 
    a Limited Partner's desire to sell its Units at a high price.  Therefore, 
    Limited Partners might receive greater value if they hold their Units, 
    rather than tender. Furthermore, Limited Partners should be aware that a 
    secondary market exists for the Units.
 
- -   The Partnership Agreement of the Partnership provides that no sale or 
    transfer of Units may be made if such sale, when aggregated with all 
    other transfers during the same year would result in both (i) the 
    transfer of Units (excluding certain transfers permitted under the 
    Partnership Agreement ("Permitted Transfers")) representing more than a 
    5% interest in Partnership capital or profits and (ii) the transfer of 
    Units (excluding Permitted Transfers and transfers made through a 
    "Matching Service" (as such term is used  in Internal Revenue Service 
    Notice 88-75)) representing more than a 2% interest in Partnership 
    capital or profits (the "Safe Harbor Percentages"), unless the General 
    Partner shall have received an opinion of counsel that such sale or 
    transfer may be made without material adverse tax consequence to any 
    partner of the Partnership.  Since the Partnership has permitted 
    transfers during taxable year 1997, Oldham has stated in its Offer that 
    it will obtain an opinion of counsel that consummation of the Oldham 
    Offer

                                     2


    will not result in material adverse tax consequences to the Partnership's 
    partners.  Everest does not make a similar statement in its offer.  
    However, in order to comply with the Partnership Agreement, if the Units 
    acquired by Everest pursuant to the Everest Offer, when aggregated with 
    all other transfers during 1997, would result in the Partnership 
    exceeding the Safe Harbor Percentages, the General Partner will require 
    that Everest obtain an opinion of counsel that consummation of the 
    Everest offer will not result in adverse tax consequences to the partners.
               
- -   LIMITED PARTNERS WILL NO LONGER RECEIVE THE TAX CREDITS AND/OR TAX LOSSES 
    FROM THE UNITS SHOULD THEY TENDER PURSUANT TO THE  EITHER OFFER.

- -   Limited Partners who tender their Units will lose the right to receive 
    any future distributions from the Partnership, including distributions 
    from any refinancing or sale of the Partnership's properties.  The 
    Partnership has made no distributions to Limited Partners in the past, 
    and there can be no assurance as to the timing, amount or occurrence of 
    any future distributions.

- -   Limited Partners should consult with their respective advisors about the
    financial, tax, legal and other consequences of  both offers.
 
        Enclosed is a copy of the Partnership's amended Statement on Schedule 
14D-9 which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and 
sets forth the Partnership's response to the offers.  Limited Partners are 
advised to carefully read the amended Schedule 14D-9.
 
        Please do not hesitate to call the Partnership at (800) 829-9213 
(ext. 10) for assistance in any Partnership matter.

                              BOSTON FINANCIAL TAX CREDIT FUND 
                              VIII, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                                     3