SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]

Check the appropriate box:

[_] Preliminary Proxy Statement [_] Soliciting Material Under Rule
[_] Confidential, For Use of the 14a-12
Commission Only (as permitted
by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[_] Definitive Additional Materials

STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X] No fee required.
[_] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

________________________________________________________________________________
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

________________________________________________________________________________

3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant
to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):

________________________________________________________________________________
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

________________________________________________________________________________
5) Total fee paid:

________________________________________________________________________________
[_] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:

________________________________________________________________________________
[_] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

1) Amount previously paid:

________________________________________________________________________________
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

________________________________________________________________________________
3) Filing Party:

________________________________________________________________________________
4) Date Filed:

________________________________________________________________________________

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
May 17, 2001

April 17, 2001

To the Shareholders of
STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC.:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of STANDARD
MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC. (the "Company") will be held in the offices of The Chase
Manhattan Bank, 270 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017, on Thursday, the 17th day
of May, 2001 at 2:00 o'clock in the afternoon (New York Time). The meeting will
be held for the following purposes:

1. To elect eleven directors of the Company, all of whom shall hold
office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their
successors are elected and qualified. \

2. To consider and vote upon a shareholder proposal concerning preferred
share purchase rights; and

3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting.

Whether or not you plan to attend the Meeting, please vote, date and sign
the enclosed Proxy, which is solicited by the Board of Directors of the Company,
and return it in the preaddressed envelope, to which no postage need be affixed,
if mailed in the United States.

By Order of the Board of Directors

SANFORD KAY
Secretary

ONLY SHAREHOLDERS OF RECORD AT THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON APRIL 6, 2001 WILL BE
ENTITLED TO NOTICE OF OR TO VOTE AT THE MEETING, OR ANY ADJOURNMENT THEREOF

STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC.
37-18 NORTHERN BOULEVARD o LONG ISLAND CITY, N.Y. 11101

MANAGEMENT PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS, May 17, 2001

This statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies
by the Board of Directors of Standard Motor Products, Inc. (the "Company") for
use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May 17,
2001, or at any adjournment thereof. Proxy material is being mailed on or about
April 17, 2001, to the Company's approximately 583 shareholders of record. The
total number of shares outstanding and entitled to vote on April 6, 2001, was:

Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,445,179

The purposes of the annual meeting are: (1) to elect eleven directors, (2)
to consider and vote upon a shareholder proposal concerning preferred share
purchase rights, and (3) to transact such other business as may properly come
before the meeting.

Proposal 1. Election of Directors

At the annual meeting, eleven directors are to be elected to hold office
until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are
elected and qualified. Unless otherwise specified in the proxy, the shares
represented by the proxy hereby solicited will be voted by the persons
designated as proxies for the persons named below, all of whom are currently
directors of the Company. Should any of these nominees become unable to accept
nomination or election (which is not anticipated), it is the intention of the
persons designated as proxies to vote for the election of the remaining nominees
named and for such substitute nominees as the management may recommend.

The nominees are: Marilyn F. Cragin, Arthur D. Davis, Susan F. Davis,
Robert M. Gerrity, John L. Kelsey, Kenneth A. Lehman, Arthur S. Sills, Lawrence
I. Sills, Peter J. Sills, Robert J. Swartz and William H. Turner.

Proposal 2: Shareholder Proposal Concerning Preferred Share Purchase Rights

GAMCO Investors, Inc., One Corporate Center, Rye, New York 10580-1434,
which claims beneficial ownership of 2,510,024 shares of the Company's common
stock (as shown in an amendment filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on September 7, 2000 with respect to its earlier Schedule 13D), has
submitted the following proposal:

"RESOLVED: that the shareholders of Standard Motor Products, Inc. (the
"Company") hereby request the Board of Directors to redeem the Preferred Share
Purchase Rights issued pursuant to the Rights Agreement dated as of February 15,
1996, unless said issuance is approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of
the outstanding shares at a meeting of the shareholders held as soon as
practical."

The shareholder's statement in support of the proposal is as follows:

"As of February 15, 1996, the Board of Directors adopted a Rights
Agreement, which authorized the issuance of one Preferred Share Purchase Right
(the "Rights") for each outstanding share of common stock of the Company. These
Rights are a type of corporate anti-takeover device, commonly known as a "poison
pill."

"The Rights generally are exercisable when a person or group acquires a
beneficial interest in 20% or more of the common stock of the Company, or upon
the commencement or public announcement of the intention of any person to
commence a tender or exchange offer that would result in any person becoming the
beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Company's common stock. The result of the
issuance of the Rights is to vastly increase the cost to a potential bidder of
effecting any merger or tender offer that is not approved by the Board of
Directors. The Company may redeem the Rights for $.001 per Right.

"We believe the shareholders are entitled to decide on what is a fair price
for their holdings. However, as a consequence of the poison pill, potential
bidders for the Company's stock are forced to negotiate with management, and are
effectively precluded from taking their offer directly to the shareholders.

"The Board, in an effort to improve shareholder value, should redeem the
Rights or put their continuance to a shareholder vote as soon as practical."

GAMCO Investors, Inc. Urges Shareholders To Vote For This Resolution.

-------------

Your Board of Directors Recommends a Vote Against the Above Proposal.

The Board of Directors adopted the Company's Preferred Share Purchase
Rights Agreement in February 1996 to enhance the ability of the Board to
preserve and protect shareholder value in the event of certain unsolicited
takeover attempts. Similar rights plans have been adopted by a majority of the
corporations included in the Standard & Poor's 500.

The Board believes the Rights Agreement allows the Company to more
effectively address situations involving a potential change in control or sale
of our Company. A potential acquiror who obtained beneficial ownership of more
than 20% of the Company's voting stock, without approval of the Board, would
risk substantial dilution of its holdings through operation of the Rights
Agreement. As a result, the Board believes that the Rights Agreement encourages
a potential acquiror to negotiate directly and in good faith with the Board. By
encouraging negotiation, the Rights Agreement puts the Board in a better
position to defend against unfair offers, such as coercive, partial or
two-tiered bids and stock accumulation programs in which all shareholders may
not share in the premium associated with a change in control. The Rights
Agreement also gives the Board, as elected representatives of the shareholders,
flexibility and a greater period of time within which it can properly evaluate
and determine if an offer reflects the full value of the company and is fair to
all shareholders, and if not, to reject the offer or to seek an alternative that
meets these criteria.

The Rights Agreement is not intended to and will not prevent a takeover on
terms determined by the Board to be fair and equitable to all shareholders. If
the Board determines that an offer adequately reflects the value of the Company
and is in the best interests of all stockholders, the Board may redeem the
Rights.

A study released by Georgeson & Co. in November 1997 found that takeover
bids were actually more likely to be completed when the target had a rights
plan. Georgeson also concluded that, from 1992 to 1996, companies with rights
plans received an added $13 billion in additional takeover premiums than did
companies without rights plans.

The Board's fiduciary duty to the shareholders dictates that it evaluate
the merits of each and every acquisition proposal presented to it and seek to
insure that any proposed business combination or acquisition delivers full value
to the shareholders. The Board believes that the adoption of a Rights Agreement
is appropriately within the scope of responsibilities of the Board of Directors,
acting on behalf of the shareholders. Redeeming the Rights would remove an
important tool that the Board believes it should have for the protection of
shareholders. The Board therefore believes that any decision to redeem the
Rights should be made in the context of a specific acquisition proposal.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THIS
PROPOSAL.

-------------

Information With Respect to Nominees and Major Shareholders

Information with respect to each nominee is set forth in Chart "A" on page
3. Additional information with respect to major shareholders of the Company,
including their percentage ownership in the Company's voting stock is set forth
in Chart "B" on page 4.

Beneficial shares of Common Stock owned directly or held as trustee by Fife
family members aggregate 2,382,539 shares (19.2%). Shares of Common Stock owned
directly or held as trustee by Sills family members aggregate 2,693,154 shares
(21.5%). The 252,125 shares of Common Stock owned by charitable foundations of
which various members of the Fife and Sills families are trustees represent 2.0%
of the total outstanding voting securities of the Company.

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's
directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of a
registered class of the Company's Common Stock, to file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange initial reports of ownership
and reports of changes in ownership of the Common Stock of the Company.
Officers, directors and greater than ten-percent shareholders are required by
SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms
they file. To the Company's knowledge, based solely upon a review of the copies
of such reports furnished to the Company and representations that no other
reports were required, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 all
Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers and directors were
complied with.

CHART A--INFORMATION ABOUT NOMINEES

Has Shares of Common Stock
Office with Company and Served Beneficially Owned Directly
Principal Occupation as Director or Indirectly as of
Name Age During the Past Five Years Since March 15, 2001*
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Marilyn F. Cragin. . . . 49 Director of the Company (7) 1995 536,548
70,960 (1)
32,801 (2)
495,273 (3)
Arthur D. Davis . . . . . 53 Vice Chairman of the Board and
Director of the Company (8) 1986 87,369
452,407 (1)
247,637 (3)

Susan F. Davis . . . . . 52 Director of the Company (9) 1998 98,236
31,600 (2)
247,637 (3)

Robert M. Gerrity . . . . 63 Director of the Company 1996 7,283
Chairman & CEO, Antrim Group, Inc. (10)

John L. Kelsey . . . . . 75 Director of the Company (11) 1964 8,964

Kenneth A. Lehman . . . . 57 Director of the Company 1999 2,153
Managing Director, KKP Group LLC (12)

Arthur S. Sills . . . . . 57 Director of the Company (13) 1995 480,444
38,976 (1)

Lawrence I. Sills . . . . 61 Chief Executive Officer, Chairman 1986 637,307 (4)
And Director of the Company (14) 328,663 (1)
608,164 (5) (6)

Peter J. Sills . . . . . 54 Director of the Company (15) 2000 492,685
38,976 (1)

Robert J. Swartz . . . . 75 Director of the Company 1992 6,621
Former Senior Partner of KPMG LLP (16)

William H. Turner . . . . 61 Director of the Company 1990 8,283
Chairman, PNC Bank, N. A. New Jersey (17)

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Shares are subject to family trusts in which beneficial ownership is
disclaimed.

(2) Held as custodian for minor children.

(3) Arthur D. Davis, Susan F. Davis, Marilyn F. Cragin and John Cragin
(Marilyn's husband) are trustees of various Fife family trusts which total
990,547 shares.

(4) Includes 4,026 shares allocated to the account of Lawrence I. Sills under
the Company's ESOP.

(5) Shares in the Estate of Nathaniel L. Sills of which Lawrence I. Sills is
Executor.

(6) Excludes 143,062 shares held in the Sills Family Foundation.

(7) Marilyn F. Cragin is an adult daughter of Bernard Fife (deceased) and
sister of Susan F. Davis. She is a co-owner of an art gallery. Prior to
that she was a practicing psychotherapist.

(8) Arthur D. Davis is an adult son-in-law of Bernard Fife and husband of Susan
F. Davis. He was appointed Vice President, Materials Management of the
Company in May 1986 and held that position until January 1989 when he
resigned this position. He was appointed Vice Chairman of the Board on
December 14, 2000.

(9) Susan F. Davis is an adult daughter of Bernard Fife, wife of Arthur D.
Davis and sister of Marilyn F. Cragin.

(10) Mr. Gerrity has been the Chairman & CEO of the Antrim Group, Inc. since
1996. Prior to that he was the Vice Chairman of New Holland, n. v. He is
also a director of Harnischfeger Industries Inc., Libralter Engineering
Systems Inc. and Birmingham Steel Inc.

(11) Mr. Kelsey, now retired, was Advisory Director, PaineWebber Inc. in which
capacity his responsibilities included all facets of investment banking.

(12) Mr. Lehman has been the Managing Director of the KKP Group LLC since 1999.
Prior to that he was the Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fel-Pro
Incorporated from 1990 through February 24, 1998. He is also a Director of
Gold Eagle Co.

(13) Arthur S. Sills is an adult son of Nathaniel l. Sills, deceased, and
brother of Lawrence I. Sills and Peter J. Sills. He has been an educator
and administrator for more than twenty years.

(14) Lawrence I. Sills is an adult son of Nathaniel I. Sills and brother of
Arthur S. Sills and Peter J. Sills. He was appointed President of the
Company in May 1986. He was appointed the Chairman of the Board on December
14, 2000.

(15) Peter Sills is an adult son of Nathaniel I. Sills and brother of Lawrence
I. Sills and Arthur S. Sills. He is an attorney. He was appointed to the
Board on December 14, 2000.

(16) Mr. Swartz was a senior partner in the accounting firm of KPMG LLP (and
predecessor firms). On March 31, 1991 Mr. Swartz retired from KPMG LLP and
is currently working as an independent financial consultant. He is the
President of 745 Service Corp., Vice President of The Alco Capital Group
and Vice President of Abacus Advisory and Consulting Corporation, LLC. He
is also a director of Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.

(17) Mr. Turner assumed his present position on September 8, 1999. Prior to that
he was the President of PNC Bank, N.A. from August 1, 1997. He was
President & Co-CEO of Franklin Electronic Publishers, Inc. from October 1,
1996 to July 31, 1997. He was the Vice Chairman, Chase Manhattan Bank, and
its predecessor Chemical Banking Corporation before his employment with
Franklin Electronics Publishers, Inc. He is also a director of Franklin
Electronic Publishers, Inc., Volt Information Sciences, Inc. and New Jersey
Resources Corporation.

* Mrs. Marilyn F. Cragin, Mr. Arthur D. Davis, Mrs. Susan F. Davis, Mr.
Arthur S. Sills, Mr. Lawrence I. Sills and Peter J. Sills disclaim
beneficial ownership of securities with respect to which their ownership is
specified to be indirect.

CHART B--HOLDINGS OF MANAGEMENT AND HOLDERS OF 5% OR MORE OF ANY
CLASS OF THE COMPANY'S VOTING SECURITIES

Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Title of Address of Ownership Percent of
Class Beneficial Owner as of March 15, 2000 Class
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Marilyn F. Cragin (9) ........ Common 37-18 Northern Boulevard 536,548 4.20
Long Island City, NY 70,960 (1) .56
32,801 (2) .26
495,273 (3) 3.87

Arthur D. Davis (10) ......... Common 37-18 Northern Boulevard 87,369 (5) .68
Long Island City, NY 452,407 (1) 3.54
247,637 (3) 1.94

Susan F. Davis (11) .......... Common 37-18 Northern Boulevard 98,236 .77
Long Island City, NY 31,600 (2) .25
247,637 (3) 1.94

Robert M. Gerrity ............ Common 114 Division Street 7,283 .06
Bellaire, MI.

John L. Kelsey ............... Common 460 Coconut Palm Road 8,964 .07
Vero Beach, FL

Kenneth A. Lehman ............ Common 2715 Sheridan Road 2,153 .02
Evanston, IL

Arthur S. Silla (12) ......... Common 37-18 Northern Boulevard 480,444 3.76
Long Island City, NY 38,976 (1) .30

Lawrence I. Silla (13) ....... Common 37-18 Northern Boulevard 637,307 4.98
Long Island City, NY 328,663 (1) 2.57
608,164 (5) (6) 4.76

Peter J. Sills(14) ........... Common 37-18 Northern Boulevard 492,685 3.85
Long Island City, nY 38,976 (1) .30

Robert J. Swartz ............. Common 1500 Palisade Avenue 6,621 .05
Ft. Lee, NJ

William H. Turner Common 2 Tower Center Blvd 8,283 .06
East Brunswick, NJ
Directors and Officers as a
Group (nineteen persons) ..... 5,364,432 (7) 41.96

GAMCO Investors, Inc. ........ Common One Corporate Center 2,510,024 (8) 20.02
Rye, NY

Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc. .. Common 1299 Ocean Avenue 801,150 6.44
Santa Monica, CA

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Shares are subject to family trusts in which beneficial ownership is
disclaimed.

(2) Held as custodian for minor children.

(3) Arthur D. Davis, Susan F. Davis, Marilyn F. Cragin and John Cragin
(Marilyn's husband) are trustees of various Fife family trusts which total
990,547 shares.

(4) Includes 4,026 shares allocated to the accounts of Lawrence I. Sills under
the Company's ESOP.

(5) Shares in the Estate of Nathaniel I. Sills of which Lawrence I. Sills is
Executor.

(6) Excludes 143,062 shares of Common Stock held in the Sills Family
Foundation.

(7) Includes 16,853 shares allocated to all officers under the Company's ESOP.

(8) In an amendment, dated September 7, 2000, to its Schedule 13D, GAMCO
Investors, Inc. stated that it and certain affiliated entities beneficially
owned an aggregate of 2,510,024 shares of the Company's Common Stock. As to
such shares GAMCO or its affiliates state that they have sole voting power
for 2,460,024.

(9) Marilyn F. Cragin is an adult daughter of Bernard Fife (deceased) and
sister of Susan Davis.

(10) Arthur D. Davis is an adult son-in-law of Bernard Fife.

(11) Susan F. Davis is an adult daughter of Bernard Fife and sister of Marilyn
F. Cragin.

(12) Arthur S. Sills is an adult son of Nathaniel L. Sills, deceased, and a
brother of Lawrence I. Sills and Peter J. Sills.

(13) Lawrence I. Sills is an adult son of Nathaniel L. Sills and a brother of
Arthur S. Sills and Peter J. Sills.

(14) Peter J. Sills is an adult son of Nathaniel I. Sills and a brother of
Lawrence L. Sills and Arthur S. Sills.

* Mrs. Marilyn F. Cragin, Mr. Arthur D. Davis, Mrs. Susan F. Davis, Mr.
Arthur S. Sills, Mr. Lawrence I. Sills, and Mr. Peter J. Sills disclaim
beneficial ownership of securities with respect to which their ownership is
specified to be indirect.

Meetings of the Board of Directors and Its Committees

In the last full fiscal year the total number of meetings of the Board of
Directors, including regularly scheduled and special meetings was six.

The Company has a Compensation Committee and an Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors, each consisting of all five independent outside directors.
The members of both committees are Robert M. Gerrity, John L. Kelsey, Kenneth A.
Lehman, Robert J. Swartz and William H. Turner. The Compensation Committee's
function is to approve the compensation packages (salary and bonus) of the
Company's officers, to administer the Company's Stock Option Plan and to review
the Company's overall compensation policies. The Compensation Committee was
established in late 1992 and held two meetings in 2000. The Audit Committee
recommends to the Board of Directors the engagement of the independent auditors
of the Company and reviews with the independent auditors the scope and results
of the Company's audits, the professional services furnished by them to the
Company and their Management Letter with comments on the Company's internal
accounting controls. The Audit Committee met three times in 2000. The Company
does not have a nominating committee charged with the search for and
recommendation to the Board of potential nominees for Board positions. This
function is performed by the Board as a whole, which considers all
recommendations for potential nominees.

Directors who are not officers or related to officers (the "Outside
Directors") were paid a retainer of $20,000 of which at least $10,000 must be in
shares of the Company's Common Stock valued as of the date of the Annual Meeting
of Shareholders. The Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional
retainer of $3,500. In addition, pursuant to the Company's Independent Outside
Directors' Stock Option Plan, the Outside Directors each received a stock option
grant of 2,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock with an exercise price per
share equal to the price of the stock on the New York Stock Exchange as of the
date of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Outside Directors also received
$1,000 for each Board, Audit Committee and Compensation Committee meeting they
attended. Marilyn F. Cragin, Arthur D. Davis, Susan F. Davis and Arthur S. Sills
received $500 for each meeting they attended. Mr. Arthur D. Davis was appointed
Vice Chairman of the Board on December 14, 2000 and at that time Mr. Davis was
awarded 50,000 stock options. These stock options become exercisable at the rate
of 10,000 a year over five years starting in 2001. All other directors, being
officers of the Company, received no payment for the fulfillment of their
directorial responsibilities. Certain Transactions

During 2000 three executive officers, Lawrence I. Sills, Chairman of the
Board, John P. Gethin, President -Chief Operating Officer and James J. Burke,
Vice President Finance-Chief Financial Officer were indebted to the Company as a
result of loans made to them by the Company.

Officers who are granted options under the Company's 1994 Omnibus Stock
Option Plan are required to attain a Common Stock ownership position with a
market value equal to 50% of the grantee's base salary within a specified period
after the date of the original grant. The Compensation Committee permitted the
Company to make available to each grantee a loan to achieve his stock ownership
requirement at a fixed rate of interest equal to the Company's short-term
interest rate the day the loan was made. The Committee also required that any
loan made for the above purpose must be repaid within four years and must be
collateralized by the Common Stock acquired with the loan proceeds.

In 1997 Mr. Gethin borrowed $77,488 for the purchase of the Company's Common
stock to meet the above-mentioned stock ownership requirement. At March 31,
2001, the amount of this indebtedness was $38,744. In addition, Mr. Gethin has
an outstanding loan balance of $200,000 relating to his 1999 relocation to Texas
to fulfill his responsibilities as General Manager of the Company's Temperature
Control Division. This loan carries an interest rate equal to the Company's
short-term interest rate. The terms of repayment require equal annual principal
payments of one-fourth of the original principal plus accrued interest. The
payments are to be made in April of each year beginning April 2001. The greatest
amount of Mr. Gethin's indebtedness with respect to all loans in 2000 was
$78,840.

In November 1999 Mr. Burke borrowed $79,943 for the purchase of the
Company's Common stock to meet the above-mentioned stock ownership requirement.
The greatest amount of Mr. Burke's indebtedness with respect to all loans in
2000 was $78,840. At March 31, 2001, the amount of this indebtedness was
$67,341.

In August 2000 Mr. Sills borrowed $75,500 to purchase company stock under a
plan that was put in place on November 11, 1999 allowing Officers of the Company
to borrow up to 25% of their gross annual salary to purchase shares of the
Company's common stock. The loan must be paid back in four years and carries an
interest rate equal to the Company's short-term interest rate. At March 31,
2001, the amount of the indebtedness was $70,740.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the annual compensation for the Chief
Executive Officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers
of the Company.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Long-Term
Compensation All Other
Annual Compensation Awards Compensation
Name and ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Principal Other Stock Options
Position Year Salary Bonus Compensation (1) Granted (2)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lawrence I. Sills . . . . . . . . . . . 2000 $300,000 $ 861 25,000 $ 12,553
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman 1999 300,000 25,000 25,000 22,913
and Director 1998 290,000 264,271 - 25,073

John P. Gethin . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2000 303,000 - 20,000 12,627
President - Chief Operating Officer 1999 295,000 24,000 20,000 20,691
1998 275,000 242,249 - 23,069

Joseph G. Forlenza . . . . . . . . . . . 2000 293,000 144,304 15,000 12,352
Vice President and 1999 280,000 26,640 15.000 20,375
General Manager Standard Division 1998 275,000 220,165 - 29,653

Donald Herring. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2000 203,000 24,825 15,000 8,416
Vice President - Aftermarket Sales 1999 194,000 11,097 15,000 13,049
1998 189,000 121,162 - 18,494

James J. Burke . . . . . . . . . . . . 2000 203,000 15,226 47,250 8,450
Vice President - Chief Financial
Officer 1999 174,375 12,000 - 10,029
1998 145,000 64,533 6,000 14,235

(1) Does not include compensation associated with perquisites because such
amounts do not exceed the lesser of either $50,000 or 10% of total salary
and bonus disclosed.

(2) Represents company contributions to the Profit Sharing, 401K, ESOP and SERP
programs on behalf of the named individual.

OPTION GRANTS IN THE LAST FISCAL YEAR

Potential Realizable
Value at Assumed
Annual Rates of
Stock Appreciation
Individual Grants for Option Term (4)
----------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------
% Of Total
Options/SARs
Options/ Granted to Exercise or
SARs Employees in Base Price Expiration
Name Granted (#) Fiscal Year ($/Sh) (1) Dates (2) 5% 10%
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lawrence I. Sills 25,000 5% $9.29-$11.29 5/18/06-5/18/08 $39,125 $116,766
John P. Gethin 20,000 5% $9.29-$11.29 5/18/06-5/18/08 35,212 105,089
Joseph G. Forlenza 15,000 3% $9.29-$11.29 5/18/06-5/18/08 23,475 70,059
Donald E. Herring 15,000 3% $9.29-$11.29 5/18/06-5/18/08 23,475 70,059
James J. Burke 15,000 3% $9.29-$11.29 5/18/06-5/18/08 23,475 70,059
James J. Burke (3) 32,250 7% $21.59-$24.84 1/2/05-5/27/07 - -

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Except as discussed in Footnote 3, below, stock options granted in 2000
vest equally over a three year period beginning on the first anniversary of
the grant. The exercise price in the first year of vesting is $9.29 and
increases by $1.00 each subsequent year.

(2) Except as discussed in Footnote 3, below, stock options expire as the rate
of one-third of the total grant on May 18th of each year beginning May 18,
2002.

(3) These options were granted to James Burke in 2000 with terms identical to a
like number of options that had been granted in prior years to a former
executive whose position Mr. Burke assumed. These options were granted with
the original exercise prices from the prior years' grants. These grants
vest over various periods based on terms in the original grants.

(4) The dollar amounts under these columns are the result of calculations at
five percent and ten percent rates set by the Securities and Exchange
Commission and therefore are not intended to forecast possible future
appreciation, if any, of the Company's stock price.

OPTION EXERCISES AND HOLDINGS

The following table provides information with respect to option exercises
in 2000 by the Named Officers and the value of such Named Officers' unexercised
options at December 31, 2000.

AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN 2000
AND DECEMBER 31, 2000 OPTION VALUES

(1) Number of Shares Underlying Value of Unexercised
Shares Unexercised Options at In-the-Money Options at
Acquired on Value Fiscal Year-End Fiscal Year-End (2)
Name Exercise Realized Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lawrence I. Sills - - 82,834 51,666 - -
John P. Gethin - - 48,917 44,583 - -
Joseph G. Forlenza - - 38,250 30,750 - -
Donald Herring - - 38,250 30,750 - -
James J. Burke - - 22,500 30,750 - -

(1) No shares of stock were acquired by exercising a stock option in 2000.

(2) Market value of unexercised options is based on the closing price of the
Company's Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange of $7.375 per share
on December 29, 2000 (the last trading day of 2000), minus the exercise
price. All of the stock options unexercised at December 29, 2000 have an
exercise price per share greater than the market value on December 29, 2000
($7.375) and, therefore, are not "In-the-Money."

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Company's Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors was established
in 1992. The Committee is responsible for approving the compensation packages
(base salary and bonus) of the Company's officers, for administering the
Company's Stock Option Plans, and for reviewing the Company's overall
compensation policies including the structure of its bonus program.

Effective January 1, 1998 the company modified its MBO Bonus Program into an
Economic Value Added (EVA) based program. Simply stated, EVA is equal to net
operating profit after tax, less a charge for the cost of capital. Bonuses tied
to EVA are such that increasing EVA year over year will be favorable for the
Company's shareholders as well as those whose compensation is based on EVA. In
the event of decreasing EVA, bonuses will be affected negatively to the point of
erasing the portion based upon EVA.

EVA bonuses earned in any one year may not necessarily be paid out in full. In
order to promote longer-term shareholder improvement and to provide for years
which may produce "negative EVA" results, the entire bonus structure is
monitored through a "banking" feature. The "bank" allows only a portion of the
year's earnings to be paid out in any given year, saving the remainder for lean
year's growth or negative growth. Due to this feature, it is possible to receive
a nominal bonus in a poor year only because the individual has a bank upon which
to draw. It is also possible to completely exhaust the bank or create a negative
bank. In the case of a negative bank, bonuses tied to EVA would not be paid
until the bank is once again positive. However, in January 2001 any negative
bank balances were reset to zero in order to preserve an incentive for
continuous effort in future years.

The change to EVA was made to more closely align executive compensation to
continuous improvements in corporate performance and increases in shareholder
value. In this regard, the Compensation Committee endorses the following
guidelines for compensation decisions:

o Provide a competitive total compensation package that enables the
Company to attract and retain key executive talent.

o Align all pay programs with the Company's annual and long-term
strategies and objectives.

o Provide variable compensation incentives directly linked to the
performance of the Company and improvement in shareholder return.

Under the EVA bonus program, the bonuses of the officers are based 80% on
year-over-year improvement in Company EVA and 20% on MBO goals approved by the
Compensation Committee. Earned MBO bonuses are paid out in full each year.

As part of the Company's compensation program, the Compensation Committee, from
time to time, grants stock options to the Company's executive officers and other
key employees. This feature further strengthens the link between continuous
Company improvement and long-term compensation. These grants generally include
proportional vesting over multi-year periods at increasing exercise prices. The
grants also require a holding period before they may be exercised. To gain
access to the non-vested portions, executive officers must retain ownership of
specified numbers of shares of the Company's Common Stock.

Submitted by:
Robert M. Gerrity
John L. Kelsey
Kenneth A. Lehman
Robert J. Swartz
William H. Turner

Five Year Performance Graph
Comparison of Five Year Cumulative Total Return*

For Standard Motor Products, Inc., S&P 500 Index and a Peer Group (1)

[PERFORMANCE GRAPH APPEARS HERE]

SMP S&P PEER
500 GROUP (1)
1995 100 100 100
1996 95 123 125
1997 155 164 184
1998 167 211 213
1999 115 255 122
2000 59 232 52

Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 1995 in Standard Motor Products, Inc.
Common stock, S&P 500 Index and a Peer Group (1).

* Total Return assumes reinvestment of dividends.

(1) The Peer Group companies consist of Federal-Mogul Corp., Dana Corp., Arvin
Meritor, Inc. and R&B, Inc.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee oversees the Company's financial reporting process on
behalf of the Board of Directors. The Committee is composed of five independent
Directors, met three times in 2000, and operates under a written charter
(Appendix A) adopted by the Board of Directors. Management has the primary
responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including
the Company's systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight
responsibilities, the Committee reviewed the audited financial statements in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K with management, including a discussion of the
quality and the acceptability of the Company's financial reporting and controls.

The Committee reviewed with the independent auditors, who are responsible
for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial
statements with generally accepted accounting principles, their judgements as to
the quality and the acceptability of the Company's financial reporting and such
other matters as are required to be discuss with the Committee under generally
accepted auditing standards. In addition, the Committee has discussed with the
independent auditors the auditors' independence from management and the Company,
including the matters in the auditors' written disclosures required by the
Independence Standard's Board.

The Committee also discussed with the Company's internal and independent
auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Committee
meets periodically with the internal and the independent auditors, with and
without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their
evaluations of the Company's internal controls, and the overall quality of the
Company's financial reporting.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee
recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000
for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Committee also
evaluated and recommended to the Board the reappointment of the Company's
independent auditors for the year 2001.

Audit Committee:
Robert J. Swartz, Chairman
Robert M. Gerrity
John L. Kelsey
Kenneth A. Lehman
William H. Turner

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FEES

In addition to retaining KPMG LLP to audit the consolidated financial
statements for 2000, the Company and its affiliates retained KPMG to provide
various consulting services in 2000, and expect to do so in the future. The
aggregate fees incurred for professional services by KPMG in 2000 were:

o Audit Fees: $511,000 for services rendered for the annual audit of the
Company's consolidated financial statements for 2000 and the quarterly
reviews of the financial statements included in the Company's Forms 10-Q:

o Tax Related Matters: $258,000 for tax services performed in 2000 and

o All Other Fees: $131,000 for other services provided by KPMG in 2000.

Information as to Voting Securities

The close of business on April 6, 2001 has been fixed by the Board of
Directors as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to
notice of, and vote at, the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be
held on May 17, 2001.

Holders of shares of Common Stock have the right to one vote for each share
registered in their names on the books of the Company as of the close of
business on the record date. On that date 12,445,179 shares of Common Stock were
outstanding and entitled to vote.

Voting and Revocation of Proxies

The persons named in the accompanying form of proxy will vote the shares
represented thereby, as directed in the proxy, if the proxy appears to be valid
on its face and is received on time. In the absence of specific instructions,
proxies so received will be voted for the election of the named nominees to the
Company's Board of Directors. Proxies are revocable at any time before they are
exercised by sending in a subsequent proxy (with the same or other
instructions), by appearing at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and voting in
person or by notifying the Company that it is revoked.

Votes Required

Nominees receiving a plurality of the votes cast will be elected as
directors. An affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting is
required to approve the shareholder proposal with respect to preferred share
purchase rights. Only those votes cast for or against a proposal are used in
determining the results of a vote. Abstentions are counted for quorum purposes
only. Broker non-votes have the same effect as abstentions.

Method and Expense of Proxy Solicitation

The solicitation of proxies will be made primarily by mail. Proxies may
also be solicited personally and by telephone by regular employees of the
Company at nominal cost.

The Company does not expect to pay compensation for any solicitation of
proxies but may pay brokers and other persons holding shares in their names, or
in the name of nominees, their expenses for sending proxy material to beneficial
owners for the purpose of obtaining their proxies. The Company will bear all
expenses in connection with the solicitation of proxies.

Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors of the Company has appointed KPMG LLP to audit the
accounts of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2001. Management
does not believe it is necessary for shareholders to ratify this appointment due
to the satisfactory services of KPMG LLP, in the prior year. There is no
requirement under Federal or New York law that the appointment of independent
auditors be approved by shareholders. Management's recommendation for the
appointment of KPMG LLP was unanimously approved by the Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors. It is expected that representatives of KPMG LLP will be
present at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders with an opportunity to make a
statement if they so desire and to respond to questions.

Shareholder Proposals for the 2002 Annual Meeting

To be considered for inclusion in next year's Proxy Statement pursuant to
the provisions of Rule 14a-8 of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, shareholder
proposals must be received at the Company's offices no later than the close of
business on December 18, 2001. Proposals should be addressed to Sanford Kay,
Secretary, Standard Motor Products, Inc., 37-18 Northern Boulevard, Long Island
City, New York 11101.

For any shareholder proposal that is not submitted for inclusion in next
year's Proxy Statement, but is instead sought to be presented directly at the
2002 Annual Meeting, SEC rules permit management to vote proxies in its
discretion if the Company: (1) receives notice of the proposal before the close
of business on March 4, 2002, and advises shareholders in the 2002 Proxy
Statement about the nature of the matter and how management intends to vote on
such matter, or (2) does not receive notice of the proposal prior to the close
of business on March 4, 2002. Notices of intention to present proposals at the
2002 Annual Meeting should be addressed to Sanford Kay, Secretary, Standard
Motor Products, Inc., 37-18 Northern Boulevard, Long Island City, New York
11101.

General

The Company's 2000 Annual Report has been mailed to shareholders. A copy of
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K will be furnished to any shareholder
who requests the same free of charge (except for Exhibits thereto for which a
nominal fee covering reproduction and mailing expenses will be charged.)

Other Matters

On the date this Proxy Statement went to press, management knew of no other
business that will be pre-

APPENDIX A

STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC.

CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

sented for action at the meeting. In the event that any other business should
come before the meeting, it is the intention of the proxyholders named in the
proxy card to take such action as shall be in accordance with their best
judgment.

By Order of the Board of Directors

SANFORD KAY
Secretary

Dated: April 17, 2001

I. AUDIT COMMITTEE

There shall be an Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, composed of at
least three Directors, appointed annually by the Board of Directors, each of
whom shall have no relationship to the Company that may interfere with the
exercise of their independence from management and the Company and shall
otherwise satisfy the applicable membership requirements under the rules of the
New York Stock Exchange, Inc., as such requirements are interpreted by the Board
of Directors in its business judgment. All members of the Committee shall have a
basic understanding of finance and accounting and be able to read and understand
fundamental financial statements, and at least one member of the Committee shall
have accounting or related financial management expertise.

II. AUDIT COMMITTEE PURPOSE

The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors to assist the
Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities. In fulfilling
their responsibilities hereunder, it is recognized that members of the Audit
Committee are not full-time employees of the Company and are not, and do not
represent themselves to be experts in accounting or auditing. The Audit
Committee's primary duties are to:

1. Review the integrity of the Company's financial reporting process and
systems of internal controls regarding finance, accounting and legal
compliance.

2. Review the independence and performance of the Company's independent
auditors and internal auditing department.

3. Provide an avenue of communication among the independent auditors,
management, the internal auditing department, and the Board of Directors.
The Audit Committee has the authority to conduct any investigation
appropriate to fulfilling its responsibilities and it has direct access to
the independent auditors as well as anyone in the organization. The Audit
Committee has the ability to retain, at the Company's expense, special
legal, accounting, or other consultants or experts it deems necessary in
the performance of its duties.

III. AUDIT COMMITTEE RESPONSIBILITIES

The Audit Committee's primary duties and responsibilities are to:

1. Review the annual audited financial statements prior to filing or
distribution. Discuss any significant changes to the Company's accounting
principles and any items required to be communicated by the independent
auditors in accordance with Statement of Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 61.

2. Review the financial information contained in the Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q prior to its filing or prior to the release of earnings.

3. Have a clear understanding with management and the independent auditors
that the independent auditors are ultimately accountable to the Board of
Directors and the Audit Committee, as representatives of the Company's
shareholders. The Committee shall have the ultimate authority and
responsibility to evaluate and where appropriate, replace the independent
auditors.

4. Review the independent auditors audit plan and approve the fees and other
significant compensation to be paid to the independent auditors.

5. Review the independent auditors' Management Letter recommendations and
discuss with them the steps management has taken to implement such
recommendations.

6. Review the internal audit charter and the scope of work of the internal
audit department.

A-1

7. Review the significant reports to Management prepared by the internal audit
department.

8. Obtain from the independent auditor assurance that Section 10A of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (added by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995) has not been implicated.

9. Obtain reports from Management, the Company's senior internal audit
executive and the independent auditor that the Company's subsidiary/
foreign affiliated entities are in conformity with applicable legal
requirements and the Company's Code of Conduct.

10. Review and update the Audit Committee Charter periodically, at least
annually, as conditions dictate. The Charter shall be submitted to the
Board of Directors for approval and published at least every three years in
accordance with SEC regulations.

11. Annually prepare a report to shareholders as required by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The report should be included in the Company's annual
proxy statement.

IV. MEETINGS

The Audit Committee shall meet as and when deemed appropriate by the Chair
of the Committee, however, not less than three times annually. Three members of
the Committee shall constitute a quorum for the transactions of business.

V. REPORTING OF COMMITTEE ACTIVITIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Audit Committee will maintain minutes and other relevant records of
their meetings that will document its activities and recommendations. The
General Auditor who shall act as Secretary to the Committee will compile said
documentation.

A-2

THIS PAGE WILL PRINT BLANK