As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2003
An Exhibit List can be found on page II-10.
Registration No. 333-________
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON D.C. 20549
_____________________________
FORM SB-2
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
_____________________________
INSYNQ, INC.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
NEVADA 6510 74-2964608
(State or other (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer
Jurisdiction of Classification Code Number) Identification No.)
Incorporation or
Organization)
1127 BROADWAY PLAZA, SUITE 202
TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402
(253) 284-2000
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices
and principal place of business)
JOHN P. GORST, PRESIDENT
1127 BROADWAY PLAZA, SUITE 202
TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402
(253) 284-2000
(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)
Copies to:
GREGORY SICHENZIA, ESQ.
STEPHEN FLEMING, ESQ.
SICHENZIA ROSS FRIEDMAN FERENCE LLP
1065 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, 21ST FLR.
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10018
(212) 930-9700
(212) 930-9725 (FAX)
APPROXIMATE DATE OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC:
From time to time after this Registration Statement becomes effective.
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant
to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the
Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. ________
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(C) under
the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. _________
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under
the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. _________
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434,
please check the following box. _________
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
- ------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------------ --------------------
TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF AMOUNT TO BE PROPOSED PROPOSED AMOUNT OF
SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED REGISTERED (1) MAXIMUM MAXIMUM REGISTRATION FEE
OFFERING AGGREGATE
PRICE PER OFFERING PRICE
SHARE (2)
- ------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------------ --------------------
Common Stock, $.001 par 136,579,317(3) $.07 $9,560,552.19 $879.57
value
- ------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------------ --------------------
Common Stock, $.001 par 9,200,000(4) $.25 $2,300,000.00 $211.60
value, issuable upon
exercise of warrants
- ------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------------ --------------------
Total 145,779,317 $.07 $11,860,552.19 $1,091.17
- ------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------------ --------------------
(1) Includes shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, which may
be offered pursuant to this registration statement, which shares are
issuable upon conversion of secured convertible debentures and the exercise
of outstanding warrants held by the selling stockholders. In addition to
the shares set forth in the table, the amount to be registered includes an
indeterminate number of shares issuable upon conversion of the debentures
and exercise of the warrants, as such number may be adjusted as a result of
stock splits, stock dividends and similar transactions in accordance with
Rule 416. The number of shares of common stock registered hereunder
represents a good faith estimate by us of the number of shares of common
stock issuable upon conversion of the debentures and upon exercise of the
warrants. For purposes of estimating the number of shares of common stock
to be included in this registration statement, we calculated a good faith
estimate of the number of shares of our common stock that we believe will
be issuable upon conversion of the debentures and upon exercise of the
warrants to account for market fluctuations, and antidilution and price
protection adjustments, respectively. Should the conversion ratio result in
our having insufficient shares, we will not rely upon Rule 416, but will
file a new registration statement to cover the resale of such additional
shares should that become necessary.
(2) Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee in
accordance with Rule 457(c) and Rule 457(g) under the Securities Act of
1933, using the average of the high and low price as reported on the
Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board on March 13, 2003.
(3) Includes a good faith estimate of the shares underlying convertible
debentures to account for market fluctuations. (4) Includes a good faith
estimate of the shares underlying warrants exercisable at $.25 per share to
account for antidilution and price protection adjustments.
THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE
OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT
SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION
STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(A),
MAY DETERMINE.
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED MARCH 14 2003
INSYNQ, INC.
145,779,317 SHARES OF
COMMON STOCK
This prospectus relates to the resale by the selling stockholders of up
to 145,779,317 shares of our common stock, based on current market prices. The
selling stockholders may sell common stock from time to time in the principal
market on which the stock is traded at the prevailing market price or in
negotiated transactions. The selling stockholders may be deemed underwriters of
the shares of common stock, which they are offering. We will pay the expenses of
registering these shares.
Our common stock is registered under Section 12(g) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and is listed on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board under
the symbol "ISYN". The last reported sales price per share of our common stock
as reported by the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board on March 13, 2002, was
$.07.
INVESTING IN THESE SECURITIES INVOLVES SIGNIFICANT RISKS. SEE "RISK FACTORS"
BEGINNING ON PAGE 4.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities
commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this
Prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
THE DATE OF THIS PROSPECTUS IS _______, 2003.
The information in this Prospectus is not complete and may be changed.
This Prospectus is included in the Registration Statement that was filed by
Insynq, Inc., with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The selling
stockholders may not sell these securities until the registration statement
becomes effective. This Prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and
is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the sale
is not permitted.
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
The following summary highlights selected information contained in this
prospectus. This summary does not contain all the information you should
consider before investing in the securities. Before making an investment
decision, you should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the "risk
factors" section, the financial statements and the notes to the financial
statements.
INSYNQ, INC.
We are an application service provider, or ASP, and we have been
delivering outsourced software application hosting and managed information
technology services through our IQ Data Utility Services since 1997. We install
software applications on our servers located at the data center, allowing our
customers, with a Web-enabled computer, access to computing services. This
service is called application hosting. We also provide managed software
services, Web-hosting services, and access to Internet marketing assistance and
related equipment and services. We offer these products and services as an
integrated whole, either sold directly or on a fee or subscription basis.
Our principal offices are located at 1127 Broadway Plaza, Suite 202,
Tacoma, Washington 98402, and our telephone number is (253) 284-2000. We are a
Nevada corporation.
The Offering
<s> <c>
Common stock offered by selling stockholders............ Up to 145,779,317 shares, based on
current market prices and assuming full
conversion of the convertible debentures,
with accrued interest to date, and the full exercise
of the warrants (includes a good faith
estimate of the shares underlying
convertible debentures and shares underlying
warrants to account for market fluctuations,
and antidilution and price protection
adjustments, respectively). This number would
represent 89.6% of the outstanding stock after
the offering.
Common stock to be outstanding after the offering....... Up to 162,726,938 shares
Use of proceeds......................................... We will not receive any proceeds
from the sale of the common stock.
Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board Symbol.................. ISYN
The above information regarding common stock to be outstanding after
the offering is based on 16,947,621 shares of common stock outstanding as of
February 24, 2003 and assumes the subsequent conversion of all of the issued
convertible debentures, with interest, and exercise of all of the warrants by
our selling stockholders.
The debentures bear interest at 12%, mature one year from the date of
issuance, which has been extended to February 25, 2004, and are convertible into
our common stock, at the selling stockholders' option, at the lower of (i) $0.30
or (ii) 40% of the average of the three lowest intraday trading prices for the
common stock on its principal market for the 20 trading days before but not
including the conversion date. Accordingly, there is in fact no limit on the
number of shares into which the debentures may be converted.
The selling stockholders have contractually agreed to restrict their
ability to convert or exercise their warrants and receive shares of our common
stock such that the number of shares of common stock held by them and their
affiliates after such conversion or exercise does not exceed 4.99% of the then
issued and outstanding shares of common stock. See the "Selling Stockholders"
and "Risk Factors" sections for a complete description of the convertible
debentures.
RISK FACTORS
This investment has a high degree of risk. Before you invest you should
carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other
information in this prospectus. If any of the following risks actually occur,
our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed and the
value of our stock could go down. This means you could lose all or a part of
your investment.
RISKS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS:
WE HAVE HISTORICALLY OPERATED AT A LOSS, HAVE EXPERIENCED NEGATIVE
OPERATING CASH FLOWS, AND ANTICIPATE THAT LOSSES WILL CONTINUE, AND IF LOSSES
CONTINUE WE MAY BE REQUIRED TO CEASE OR CURTAIL OUR OPERATIONS.
We have experienced net losses and negative cash flows since we began
implementing our current business plan. For the three and six months ended
November 30, 2002, we have incurred a net loss of $386,142 and $1,250,514,
respectively. We expect that the ongoing implementation of our current business
plan will increase our net losses and our negative cash flows for the
foreseeable future as we continue to incur significant operating expenses and
make capital investments in our business. We may never generate sufficient
revenues to achieve profitability, and if we are unable to make a profit, we may
not be able to continue to operate our business. Even if we do become
profitable, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a
quarterly or annual basis.
WE HAVE RECEIVED A GOING CONCERN OPINION FROM OUR AUDITORS INDICATING THERE
IS DOUBT AS TO WHETHER WE CAN REMAIN IN BUSINESS.
In its audit report dated September 6, 2002, our auditors indicated
that there was substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going
concern and that our ability to continue as a going concern was dependant upon
our obtaining additional financing for our operations or reaching profitability.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve either of these.
WE ARE DELINQUENT IN THE PAYMENT OF BUSINESS AND PAYROLL TAXES. IF WE ARE
UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE WORKOUT ARRANGEMENTS OR TO MAKE TIMELY PAYMENTS, WE COULD
EXPERIENCE A SEVERE NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS OR OUR RESOURCES.
As of February 21, 2003, we are delinquent in the payment of
approximately $699,059 of business and payroll taxes, plus an estimated $270,028
of related assessed penalties and interest. The majority of the past due amount
is for payroll taxes, penalties and interest due to the Internal Revenue
Service. In April 2002, the Internal Revenue Service filed a federal tax lien on
our assets for the past due employment related taxes, penalties and interest. We
have retained legal counsel to represent us in our current negotiations with the
Internal Revenue Service and we have submitted an offer in compromise, seeking
relief on a portion of our overall obligation and structure a payment plan on
the settled amount of taxes due. The Internal Revenue Service has imposed
certain conditions on us in order to proceed with negotiations, one of which
requires us to remain current on all future payroll tax deposits and reporting.
We have also been in contact with four other respective taxing
authorities and have agreed to workout plans to settle past due taxes totaling
approximately $59,850. Terms of these four workouts require us to pay between
$290 and $1,500 per month until the respective tax obligation is fulfilled. One
of the taxing agencies filed a lien on our assets to protect its position during
the workout period.
Additionally, a lien on our assets has been filed by the State of Utah
for approximately $28,000 for prior year's income taxes assessed to our
predecessor company. This amount is in dispute and amended returns to correct
this deficiency have been filed.
There can be no assurances, however, that we will be able to agree or
commit to any proposed terms set forth by the Internal Revenue Service or
favorably negotiate terms with other taxing authorities. If we are unsuccessful,
the taxing authorities could take possession of some or all of our assets.
Should this occur, we likely would be forced to cease our operations.
WE ARE IN DEFAULT ON AN EQUIPMENT LEASE OBLIGATION IN THE AMOUNT OF
$866,082 AS OF FEBRUARY 21, 2003, AND, IF WE ARE UNABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY
RESTRUCTURE THIS LEASE OBLIGATION, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO DELIVER TO OUR
CUSTOMERS THEIR CONTRACTED SERVICES.
As of February 21, 2003, we are in default on an equipment lease
obligation in the amount of $866,082. We are attempting to renegotiate with the
lessor and have initiated contact with them. When they are prepared to enter
discussions we will attempt to negotiate for a lesser amount owed and we believe
that given the current market conditions, we should be successful in such
negotiations. However, there is no assurance that we will be successful in such
attempts. If we are unable to successfully restructure this lease obligation, we
may be required to seek other equipment or methods of delivering our services.
In the meantime, we have signed an additional lease agreement for equipment to
support our customer base. However, there is no assurance that we would be able
to locate other necessary equipment or methods on acceptable terms, or at all.
In addition, because we are in default we may be obligated to pay penalties. As
such, the lessor could repossess the equipment. Moreover, any such actions could
negatively impact our ability to obtain services for the maintenance of our
equipment under applicable warranties, and ultimately make it difficult for our
business to continue.
WE ARE DELINQUENT IN THE PAYMENT OF CERTAIN TRADE PAYABLES IN THE AMOUNT OF
$863,526 AS OF FEBRUARY 21, 2003. IF WE ARE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE WORKOUT
ARRANGEMENTS OR TO MAKE TIMELY PAYMENTS, WE COULD EXPERIENCE A SEVERE NEGATIVE
IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS OR OUR RESOURCES.
As of February 21, 2003, we were late in payment of certain creditor
trade payables in the amount of $863,526. We have initiated contact with these
vendors and have offered three separate payment plans and definitive agreements
have been finalized with some, but not all, of these vendors. If we are unable
to negotiate payment plans with the remaining vendors, or if we are unable to
execute such negotiated payment plans with those who have accepted such plans,
we could experience a severe negative impact on our business resources.
OUR STOCK COULD BE THE VICTIM OF SHORT SELLING AND, IF THIS OCCURS, THE
MARKET PRICE OF OUR STOCK COULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED.
It is conceivable that our stock could be subject to the practice of
short selling. Short selling, or "shorting," occurs when stock is sold which is
not owned directly by the seller; rather, the stock is "loaned" for the sale by
a broker-dealer to someone who "shorts" the stock. In most situations, this is a
short-term strategy by a seller, and based upon volume, may at times drive stock
values down. If such shorting occurs in our common stock, there could be a
negative effect on the trading price of our stock.
IN ORDER TO EXECUTE OUR BUSINESS PLAN, WE WILL NEED TO RAISE ADDITIONAL
CAPITAL. IF WE ARE UNABLE TO RAISE ADDITIONAL CAPITAL, WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO
ACHIEVE OUR BUSINESS PLAN AND YOU COULD LOSE YOUR INVESTMENT.
We need to raise additional funds through public or private debt or
equity financings as well as obtain credit from our vendors to be able to fully
execute our business plan. Any additional capital raised through the sale of
equity may dilute your ownership interest. We may not be able to raise
additional funds on favorable terms, or at all. If we are unable to obtain
additional funds or credit from our vendors, we will be unable to execute our
business plan and you could lose your investment.
Our future capital requirements will depend upon many factors, including the
following:
o Costs to develop and maintain our on-line hosting of hardware and software;
o The rate at which we expand our operations;
o The extent to which we develop and upgrade our technology;
o The occurrence, timing, size and success of acquisitions; and
o The response of competitors to our service offerings.
We have recently negotiated with many of our vendors to reduce the
amounts owed or to extend more favorable payment terms. While these negotiated
terms have reduced cash out-lays and expenditures, we cannot rely on future
relationships with these vendors, which could result in limiting our purchasing
and credit abilities.
WE RELY ON THIRD-PARTY OUTSIDE SALES ORGANIZATION TO REFER MANY OF OUR
CLIENTS TO US.
We rely on referrals from third-party organizations for a portion of
our business. Companies, with whom we have such a relationship, including
Peregrine and Macola, refer their customers to us because we can provide an
array of services that complement the products and services they offer. However,
these companies may stop or substantially reduce referring business to us or
they may decide to cooperate with our competitors and thereby adversely impact
or eliminate the amount of referrals made to us. If these third party referrals
cease or materially decrease, our sales will materially decline.
IF WE ARE UNABLE TO OBTAIN KEY SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS AND HARDWARE
COMPONENTS FROM CERTAIN VENDORS, WE WILL BE UNABLE TO DELIVER OUR SERVICES.
We rely on third-party suppliers, including Microsoft, Citrix, and
Cisco to provide us with key software applications and hardware components for
our infrastructure. Certain components or applications are only available from
limited sources. If we are unable to obtain these products or other services,
including connectivity services, in a timely manner at an acceptable cost or at
all, it may substantially inhibit our ability to deliver our services.
SOME OF OUR APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER SERVICE CONTRACTS GUARANTEE
CERTAIN SERVICE LEVELS.
Some of our application service provider contracts contain service
guarantees that obligate us to provide our hosted applications at a guaranteed
level of performance. To the extent we fail to meet those service levels we may
be obligated to provide our customers certain services free of charge. If we
continue to fail to meet these service levels, our application service provider
customers have the right to cancel their contracts with us. These credits or
cancellations will cost us money and damage our reputation with our customers
and prospective customers.
WE DEPEND HEAVILY ON OUR MANAGEMENT TEAM THAT HAS LITTLE EXPERIENCE WORKING
TOGETHER OR MANAGING A PUBLIC COMPANY.
Our success depends, to a significant extent, upon the efforts and
abilities of John P. Gorst, President, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer, as well as on the efforts of other officers and senior management. Loss
of the services of any or all of our executive management team could materially
adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition,
and could cause us to fail to successfully implement our business plan. Also,
our executive management team has worked together for less than two years. The
short period of time that they have worked together, or their inability to work
successfully together, may adversely affect our ability to manage growth.
Moreover, our executive management team has a limited amount of experience
managing a public company. Our executive management team may not be able to
manage future growth, if any, or the demands of successfully operating a public
company.
THERE IS INTENSE COMPETITION FOR QUALIFIED TECHNICAL PROFESSIONALS AND
SALES AND MARKETING PERSONNEL, AND OUR FAILURE TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN THESE
PEOPLE COULD AFFECT OUR ABILITY TO RESPOND TO RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES AND TO
INCREASE OUR REVENUES.
Our future success also depends upon our ability to attract and retain
qualified technical professionals and sales and marketing personnel. Competition
for talented personnel, particularly technical professionals, is intense. This
competition could increase the costs of hiring and retaining personnel. We may
not be able to attract, retain, and adequately motivate our personnel or to
integrate new personnel into our operations successfully.
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO PROTECT OUR PATENTS, COPYRIGHTS, TRADEMARKS AND
PROPRIETARY AND/OR NON-PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY, AND WE MAY INFRINGE UPON THE
PATENTS, COPYRIGHTS, TRADEMARKS AND PROPRIETARY RIGHTS OF OTHERS.
Our services are highly dependent upon proprietary technology, which
allows us to upgrade and manage the customer's computing environment, both at
the data center and customer level. In addition, we rely on contracts,
confidentiality agreements, and copyright, patent, trademark, and trade-secrecy
laws to protect our proprietary rights in our technology. We have also obtained,
or are pursuing, several trademark, copyright, and patent registrations for our
various product names. The protective steps we have taken may not be adequate to
deter misappropriation of our proprietary information. In addition, some
end-user license provisions protecting against unauthorized use, copying,
transfer and disclosure of a licensed program may be unenforceable under the
laws of certain jurisdictions and foreign countries. In addition, the laws of
some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as
the laws of the United States. Failure to adequately protect our intellectual
property could harm our brand name, devalue our proprietary content, and affect
our ability to compete effectively. Furthermore, defending our intellectual
property rights could result in the expenditure of significant financial and
managerial resources, which could materially adversely affect our business,
results of operations and financial condition. Also, it is possible that our
competitors or others will adopt product or service brands similar to ours,
possibly leading to customer confusion.
WE UTILIZE OPEN SOURCE SERVICES AND CODE FOR SOME PRODUCTS. WHILE WE CAN
MODIFY OPEN SOURCE AND CHARGE FOR IT, WE MUST RELEASE CERTAIN CHANGES BACK TO
THE OPEN SOURCE COMMUNITY, WHICH MAY INCLUDE COMPETITORS. THIS COULD NEGATIVELY
AFFECT OUR ABILITY TO COMPETE EFFECTIVELY AND HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE AFFECT
ON OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Some of our technology, including our proprietary code, performs
functions similar to technology available from third parties. Therefore, we
could be subject to claims that our technology infringes the proprietary rights
of third parties. Claims against us, even if without merit, could subject us to
costly litigation and could divert the time and attention of our technical and
management teams. A claim of infringement may require us, and our customers, to
obtain one or more licenses from third parties. We cannot assure you that we or
our customers will be able to obtain necessary licenses from third parties at a
reasonable cost or at all. Any failure to obtain a required license could
negatively affect our ability to do business.
DISRUPTIONS TO THE DATA CENTERS, OR TO THE OFFSITE BACKUP STORAGE
FACILITIES OF THIRD PARTIES WITH WHOM WE DO BUSINESS, COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT
OUR BUSINESS.
The continued and uninterrupted performance of our computer systems,
and of the backup storage facilities of third parties with whom we do business,
is critical to our success. Any system failure that causes interruptions in our
ability to deliver our products and services to our customers, including
failures that affect our customers' abilities to access our hosted hardware,
software, and stored data, could reduce customer satisfaction and, if sustained
or repeated, would reduce the attractiveness of our services or result in
material liabilities or costs.
Our hardware and software hosting business strategy, including data
backup and storage, depends on the consistent performance of the data centers
and those of third parties. We offer offsite back-up storage of data for all
customers. The current data centers, and those of third parties, may be
vulnerable to interruption from fire, earthquake, flood, power loss,
connectivity failures, vandalism and other malicious acts, and other events
beyond our control, including natural disasters. If the data centers are damaged
in any way, a customer whose data is stored there may lose some or all data,
despite routine backup procedures. Our operations are dependent on our ability
to protect our computer system, and customer systems, applications and data
against damages, including, but not limited to those from computer viruses,
fire, earthquake, flood, power loss, connectivity failures, vandalism and other
malicious acts, and other events beyond our control, including natural
disasters. Damage to our computer system, or to the systems, applications, or
data of our customers, could delay or prevent delivery of our products and
result in the loss of our customers or in material liabilities. In addition, a
failure of our telecommunication providers to provide the data communications
capacity in the time frame required by us for any reason could cause
interruptions in the delivery of our products. Substantially all of our computer
and communications hardware is located at two facilities and the loss of this
hardware or the data it contains would cause severe business interruptions. In
the event that we experience significant disruptions that affect the data
centers, we could lose customers or fail to attract new customers.
WE COULD EXPERIENCE BREACHES OF SECURITY WHEN TRANSMITTING DATA TO OR FROM
OUR CUSTOMERS, INCLUDING THE USE OF THIRD PARTY VENDOR SECURITY TECHNOLOGIES AND
METHODOLOGIES.
Our business depends upon our ability to securely transmit confidential
information between the data centers, third-party backup locations, and the
servers of our customers, including the use of third-party vendor security
technologies and methodologies. Despite our physical design and setup and the
implementation of a variety of security measures, there exists the risk that
certain unauthorized access, computer viruses, accidental or intentional
disturbances could occur. We may need to devote substantial capital and
personnel resources to protect against the threat of unauthorized penetration of
our delivery system or to remedy any problems that such penetration might cause.
The occurrence of any of these events could cause us to lose customers, cause
harm to our reputation, and expose us to material liability.
WE DEPEND ON LICENSED SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS.
We depend on contracts with third-party software manufacturers to allow
their software applications to be hosted or run at the data centers and provided
to our customers. We have entered into non-exclusive agreements with third-party
companies, including, but not limited to, Microsoft and Citrix, that allow us to
host some of their software applications at the data center or re-license their
software applications to our customers. Under most of these agreements, the
software manufacturer can terminate its relationship with us for any reason by
giving us as little as 30 days notice. In these instances, the software
manufacturer is not liable to us, or to our customers, for any damages resulting
from termination. If our relationships with these software manufacturers are
terminated, or if these or other software manufacturers do not allow our
customers to obtain a license to operate the software application on the data
centers, our ability to do business would be severely inhibited.
THE HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE WE USE IS COMPLEX AND MAY CONTAIN DEFECTS.
Our service offerings depend on complex hardware and software that may
contain defects, particularly when initially introduced or when new versions are
released. Although we test internal and third party software applications prior
to deployment, we may not discover software defects that could affect our new or
current services or enhancements until deployed. These defects could cause
service interruptions or the loss of data, which could damage our reputation,
increase our operating costs, impair our ability to generate or collect revenue,
delay market acceptance or divert our management and technical resources. Any
software modifications we perform as part of our integration services could
cause problems in application delivery. Also, because we offer an open-source
software solution to our customers, they are likely to hold us accountable for
any problems associated with their software, even if the manufacturer caused the
problem or defect. Typically, software manufacturers disclaim liability for any
damages suffered as a result of software defects and provide only limited
warranties. As a result, we may have no recourse against the providers of
defective software applications.
GROSS MARGINS ON CERTAIN PRODUCTS OR LINES OF BUSINESS MAY DECLINE OVER
TIME.
Gross margins may be adversely affected by increases in material or
labor costs, heightened price competition, changes in channels of distribution,
or in the mix of products sold. We have recently introduced several new
products, and we plan to release additional new products in the future. If
warranty costs associated with new products are greater than we have experienced
historically, gross margins may be adversely affected. Geographic mix, as well
as the mix of configurations within each product group, may also impact our
gross margins. We continue to expand third party and indirect distribution
channels, which generally result in reduced gross margins. In addition,
increasing third party and indirect distribution channels generally results in
greater difficulty in forecasting the mix of our products, and to a certain
degree, the timing of our orders.
WE ARE INVOLVED IN, AND MAY BECOME INVOLVED IN, LEGAL PROCEEDINGS WITH
FORMER EMPLOYEES, CONSULTANTS, AND OTHER THIRD PARTIES THAT, IF DETERMINED
AGAINST US, COULD REQUIRE US TO PAY DAMAGES. THE PAYMENT OF DAMAGES COULD
MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION AND, THEREFORE, OUR ABILITY
TO ACHIEVE OUR BUSINESS PLAN.
We are involved in the current legal proceedings:
o We are a party to a lawsuit, dated May 31, 2001, in which our former vice
president of sales and marketing seeks payment for various claims in the
amount of approximately $115,000. We have reached a partial settlement of
the matter.
o We are a party to a lawsuit, dated August 6, 2001, in which one of our
vendors seeks payment for goods and services provided in the amount of
$20,760. We have reached a partial settlement of the matter.
o We are a party to a lawsuit, dated October 4, 2001, by our former
landlords. The allegations relate to the default by us of our long-term
lease obligations and a settlement agreement dated May 2001.
o We are a party to a lawsuit, dated July 2, 2002, by our former director of
sales and marketing. The lawsuit alleges breach of contract, wage and hour
violations and violation of the Washington law against discrimination. We
have reached a settlement of the matter.
In the past, we have negotiated with third parties and entered into
contracts, in the normal course of our business, with advisors, consultants and
others based on business plans and strategies that we may no longer be pursuing.
We believe that such negotiations were terminated and that those contracts are
no longer effective. However, it is possible that the other parties to those
negotiations and contracts could claim that we did not fulfill our obligations.
If a court finds that we are obligated under any of those contracts,
arrangements or otherwise, we could be liable for an undeterminable amount of
compensation or stock or both.
If any such litigation occurs, it is likely to be expensive for us. If
such suits are determined against us and a court awards a material amount of
cash damages, our business, results of operations and financial condition will
be materially adversely affected. In addition, any such litigation could divert
our management's attention and resources.
MANY COMPANIES USE NAMES SIMILAR IN SOUND OR SPELLING TO "INSYNQ."
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS AGAINST US FOR THE USE OF THE NAME
"INSYNQ", OR ONE SIMILAR IN SOUND OR SPELLING, EVEN IF WITHOUT MERIT, COULD BE
EXPENSIVE TO DEFEND AND DIVERT MANAGEMENT'S ATTENTION FROM OUR BUSINESS. IF A
CLAIM TO STOP US FROM USING OUR NAME IS SUCCESSFUL, WE WILL HAVE TO EITHER BUY
THE RIGHT TO USE OUR NAME, WHICH MAY BE EXPENSIVE, OR CHANGE OUR NAME, WHICH MAY
ALSO BE EXPENSIVE.
We are aware that other companies have claimed use of names similar to
"Insynq" for products or services similar to our own. We are in the process of
investigating the rights, if any, others may have to the name. In addition, we
are attempting to register "Insynq" as a trademark in the United States, Europe,
and Canada. However, we may not be able to obtain proprietary rights to the use
of this name. We will incur expenses if called to defend our use of the "Insynq"
name. Any such litigation, even if without merit, may be time consuming and
expensive to defend. It also could divert our management's attention and
resources and require us to enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements.
In addition, if any company in our industry is able to establish a use of the
"Insynq" name that is prior to our use, we could be liable for damages and could
be forced to stop using the name unless we are able to buy the right to use the
name. If we were unable to buy the right to use our name after we lose an
infringement claim, we would have to change our name, which may require us to
spend money to build new brand recognition and incur other costs. Third parties
may assert other infringement claims against us. Any of these events could
divert management attention and complicate our ability to do business.
OUR INDUSTRY IS CHARACTERIZED BY RAPIDLY CHANGING TECHNOLOGY WITH
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENTS IN BOTH COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, AND RAPID
OBSOLESCENCE OF CURRENT SYSTEMS. IF WE DO NOT RESPOND EFFECTIVELY AND ON A
TIMELY BASIS TO RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE IN OUR INDUSTRY, WE WILL NOT BE ABLE
TO EFFECTIVELY SELL OUR SERVICES AND OUR SALES WILL MATERIALLY ADVERSELY
DECLINE.
We must continually buy new computer hardware and license new computer
software systems to effectively compete in our industry. Our software delivery
methodologies must be able to support changes in the underlying software
applications that are delivered to our customers. The rapid development of new
technologies increases the risk that current or new competitors could develop
products or services that would reduce the competitiveness of our products or
services. We rely on software providers to produce software applications that
keep pace with our customers' demands.
There is no assurance that we will successfully develop or adopt new
technologies, introduce new services or enhance our existing services on a
timely basis, or that new technologies, new services or enhancements we use or
develop will achieve market acceptance. If we fail to address these
developments, we will lose sales to our competitors.
ALTHOUGH OUR CURRENT OPERATIONS INCLUDE OPERATING AS A TECHNOLOGY-FOCUSED
COMPANY, OUR PREVIOUS BUSINESS ACTIVITIES INCLUDED GAMING, NATURAL RESOURCE
MINING, AND EXPLORATION. AS A RESULT, WE MAY BE EXPOSED TO UNKNOWN ENVIRONMENTAL
AND OTHER LIABILITIES THAT COULD REQUIRE US TO EXPEND OUR FINANCIAL RESOURCES
AND MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION.
The assets of a predecessor company were acquired by a publicly-traded
company that was engaged, prior to August 1999, in gaming, and prior to 1993, in
natural resource exploration and development, including mining, and oil and gas.
We no longer own any mining, oil and gas, or gaming-related assets. The mining,
mineral processing, and oil and gas industries are subject to extensive
governmental regulations for the protection of the environment, including
regulations relating to air and water quality, site reclamation, solid and
hazardous waste handling and disposal and the promotion of occupational safety.
We could be held responsible for any liabilities relating to our previous
involvement in gaming, mining or oil and gas exploration and development, which
liabilities would result in our spending our cash resources.
WE HAVE NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED THE RELIABILITY OF MARKET DATA CONTAINED
HEREIN AND SUCH DATA MAY BE INCOMPLETE AND/OR INACCURATE.
Market data used within this report was obtained from internal sources
and from industry publications. Such industry publications typically contain a
statement to the effect that the information contained therein was obtained from
sources considered to be reliable, but that the completeness and accuracy of
such information is not guaranteed. While we believe that the market data
presented herein is reliable, we have not independently verified such data.
Similarly, market data supplied by internal sources, which we believe to be
reliable, has not been verified by independent sources.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY:
THE FAILURE OF THE INTERNET TO GROW OR REMAIN A VIABLE COMMERCIAL MEDIUM
COULD HARM OUR GROWTH.
Our success depends in large part on the maintenance of the Internet
infrastructure as a reliable network frame that provides adequate speed, data
capacity, and security. Our success also depends on the timely development of
products, such as high-speed modems, that enable reliable Internet access and
services. The Internet may continue to experience significant growth in the
number of users, frequency of use and amount of data transmitted. The Internet
infrastructure may not be able to support the demands placed on it and the
performance or reliability of the Internet may be adversely affected by this
continued growth. In addition, the Internet could lose its commercial viability
if the number of people who use the Internet does not continue to grow. A number
of factors, including unreliable service, unavailability of cost-effective,
high-speed access to the Internet or concerns about security, could impede this
growth. The infrastructure or complementary products and services necessary to
maintain the Internet, as a viable commercial medium may not be developed, and,
as a result, the Internet may not continue to be a viable commercial medium for
us.
IF THE GOVERNMENT ADOPTS REGULATIONS THAT CHARGE INTERNET ACCESS FEES OR
IMPOSE TAXES ON SUBSCRIPTIONS TO OUR WEB-BASED PRODUCTS, OUR OPERATING EXPENSE
WILL INCREASE.
Currently, there are few laws or regulations that specifically regulate
communications or commerce on the Internet. However, laws and regulations may be
adopted that address issues such as pricing and the characteristics of products
and services. In addition, several connectivity companies have petitioned the
Federal Communications Commission to regulate Internet and on-line service
providers in a manner similar to long-distance telephone carriers and to impose
access fees on them. This regulation, if imposed, could increase the cost of
transmitting data over the Internet. Moreover, it may take years to determine
the extent to which existing laws relating to issues such as intellectual
property ownership and infringement, libel, obscenity and personal privacy are
applicable to the Internet. Finally, state tax laws and regulations relating to
the provision of products and services over the Internet are still developing. A
few states have tried to impose taxes on products and services provided over the
Internet. If additional states try to do so, our operating costs may increase
and we may not be able to increase the price that we charge for our products to
cover these costs. Any new laws or regulations or new interpretations of
existing laws and regulations relating to the Internet could decrease the growth
in the use of the Internet, decrease the demand for traffic on our Website,
increase our operating expenses, or otherwise adversely affect our business.
RISKS RELATING TO OUR CURRENT FINANCING ARRANGEMENT:
THERE ARE A LARGE NUMBER OF SHARES UNDERLYING OUR CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES
AND WARRANTS THAT MAY BE AVAILABLE FOR FUTURE SALE AND THE SALE OF THESE SHARES
MAY DEPRESS THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK.
As of February 24, 2003, we had 16,947,621 shares of common stock
issued and outstanding and convertible debentures outstanding that may be
converted into an estimated 76,861,087 shares of common stock at current market
prices, and outstanding options and warrants to purchase 5,500,000 shares of
common stock. In addition, the number of shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of the outstanding convertible debentures may increase if the market
price of our stock declines. All of the shares, including all of the shares
issuable upon conversion of the debentures and upon exercise of our warrants,
may be sold without restriction. The sale of these shares may adversely affect
the market price of our common stock.
THE CONTINUOUSLY ADJUSTABLE CONVERSION PRICE FEATURE OF OUR CONVERTIBLE
DEBENTURES COULD REQUIRE US TO ISSUE A SUBSTANTIALLY GREATER NUMBER OF SHARES,
WHICH WILL CAUSE DILUTION TO OUR EXISTING STOCKHOLDERS.
Our obligation to issue shares upon conversion of our convertible
debentures is essentially limitless. The following is an example of the amount
of shares of our common stock that are issuable, upon conversion of our
convertible debentures in the amount of $1,912,110.45 (including accrued
interest) issued pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreements entered in June
2001 and January 2002, based on market prices 25%, 50% and 75% below the market
price, as of March 6, 2003 of $.07.
Number % of
% Below Price Per With Discount of Shares Outstanding
MARKET SHARE AT 60% ISSUABLE STOCK
<s>
25% $.0525 $.0210 91,052,878 84.31%
50% $.0350 $.0140 136,579,317 88.96%
75% $.0175 $.0070 273,158,634 94.16%
As illustrated, the number of shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of our convertible debentures will increase if the market price of
our stock declines, which will cause dilution to our existing stockholders.
THE CONTINUOUSLY ADJUSTABLE CONVERSION PRICE FEATURE OF OUR CONVERTIBLE
DEBENTURES MAY ENCOURAGE INVESTORS TO MAKE SHORT SALES IN OUR COMMON STOCK,
WHICH COULD HAVE A DEPRESSIVE EFFECT ON THE PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK.
The convertible debentures are convertible into shares of our common
stock at a 60% discount to the trading price of the common stock prior to the
conversion. The significant downward pressure on the price of the common stock
as the selling stockholder converts and sells material amounts of common stock
could encourage short sales by investors. This could place further downward
pressure on the price of the common stock. The selling stockholder could sell
common stock into the market in anticipation of covering the short sale by
converting their securities, which could cause the further downward pressure on
the stock price. In addition, not only the sale of shares issued upon conversion
or exercise of debentures, warrants and options, but also the mere perception
that these sales could occur, may adversely affect the market price of the
common stock.
THE ISSUANCE OF SHARES UPON CONVERSION OF THE CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES AND
EXERCISE OF OUTSTANDING WARRANTS MAY CAUSE IMMEDIATE AND SUBSTANTIAL DILUTION TO
OUR EXISTING STOCKHOLDERS.
The issuance of shares upon conversion of the convertible debentures
and exercise of warrants may result in substantial dilution to the interests of
other stockholders since the selling stockholders may ultimately convert and
sell the full amount issuable on conversion. Although the selling stockholders
may not convert their convertible debentures and/or exercise their warrants if
such conversion or exercise would cause them to own more than 4.99% of our
outstanding common stock, this restriction does not prevent the selling
stockholders from converting and/or exercising some of their holdings and then
converting the rest of their holdings. In this way, the selling stockholders
could sell more than this limit while never holding more than this limit. There
is no upper limit on the number of shares that may be issued which will have the
effect of further diluting the proportionate equity interest and voting power of
holders of our common stock, including investors in this offering.
As of March 6, 2003, we had an aggregate of $1,912,110.45 secured
convertible debentures, including accrued interest, issued pursuant to the
Securities Purchase Agreement entered into in June 2001 and January 2002
outstanding. In addition, we also have $240,000 secured convertible debentures
issued pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement entered into in September
2002 outstanding. As of March 6, 2003, warrants to purchase 5,080,000 shares of
common stock issued to the purchasers of the debentures were outstanding. These
warrants are exercisable for a term of five years from the date of issuance at a
price equal to $.25 per share. 4,600,000 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of these warrants are being registered pursuant to this registration
statement.
As of March 6, 2003, 6,051,442 shares of common stock were reserved
for issuance upon exercise of our outstanding warrants and options other than
those issued in connection with the debentures being registered herewith, and an
additional 145,779,317 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance upon
conversion of the debentures and exercise of the warrants issued in connection
with the debentures being registered herewith. As of March 24, 2003, there were
16,947,621 shares of common stock outstanding. Of these outstanding shares,
1,818,861 shares were freely tradable without restriction under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, unless held by affiliates.
IF WE ARE REQUIRED FOR ANY REASON TO REPAY OUR OUTSTANDING CONVERTIBLE
DEBENTURES, WE WOULD BE REQUIRED TO DEPLETE OUR WORKING CAPITAL, IF AVAILABLE,
OR RAISE ADDITIONAL FUNDS. OUR FAILURE TO REPAY THE CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES, IF
REQUIRED, COULD RESULT IN LEGAL ACTION AGAINST US, WHICH COULD REQUIRE THE SALE
OF SUBSTANTIAL ASSETS.
In September 2002, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement for
the sale of an aggregate of $450,000 principal amount of convertible debentures.
In addition, we have also entered into Securities Purchase Agreements in June
2001 and January 2002 for an aggregate of $1,750,000 principal amount of
convertible debentures. The convertible debentures are due and payable, with 12%
interest, one year from the date of issuance, unless sooner converted into
shares of our common stock. Although under the September 2002 Securities
Purchase Agreement, we currently have $240,000 convertible debentures
outstanding, the investor is obligated to purchase additional convertible
debentures in the aggregate of $210,000. In addition, any event of default as
described in the convertible debentures could require the early repayment of the
convertible debentures, including a default interest rate of 15% on the
outstanding principal balance of the debentures if the default is not cured with
the specified grace period. We anticipate that the full amount of the
convertible debentures, together with accrued interest, will be converted into
shares of our common stock, in accordance with the terms of the convertible
debentures. If we were required to repay the convertible debentures, we would be
required to use our limited working capital and raise additional funds. If we
were unable to repay the debentures when required, the debenture holders could
commence legal action against us and foreclose on all of our assets to recover
the amounts due. Any such action would require us to curtail or cease
operations.
RISKS RELATING TO OUR COMMON STOCK:
IF WE FAIL TO REMAIN CURRENT ON OUR REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, WE COULD BE
REMOVED FROM THE OTC BULLETIN BOARD WHICH WOULD LIMIT THE ABILITY OF
BROKER-DEALERS TO SELL OUR SECURITIES AND THE ABILITY OF STOCKHOLDERS TO SELL
THEIR SECURITIES IN THE SECONDARY MARKET.
Companies trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, such as us, must be
reporting issuers under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and must be current in their reports under Section 13, in order to
maintain price quotation privileges on the OTC Bulletin Board. If we fail to
remain current on our reporting requirements, we could be removed from the OTC
Bulletin Board. As a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be
severely adversely affected by limiting the ability of broker-dealers to sell
our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the
secondary market.
OUR DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS BENEFICIALLY OWN APPROXIMATELY 68.1%
OF OUR STOCK; THEIR INTERESTS COULD CONFLICT WITH YOURS; SIGNIFICANT SALES OF
STOCK HELD BY THEM COULD HAVE A NEGATIVE EFFECT ON OUR STOCK PRICE; STOCKHOLDERS
MAY BE UNABLE TO EXERCISE CONTROL.
As of February 21, 2003, our executive officers, directors and
affiliated persons beneficially owned approximately 68.1% of our common stock.
As a result, our executive officers, directors and affiliated persons will have
significant influence to: o elect or defeat the election of our directors; o
amend or prevent amendment of our articles of incorporation or bylaws; o effect
or prevent a merger, sale of assets or other corporate transaction; and o
control the outcome of any other matter submitted to the stockholders for vote.
As a result of their ownership and positions, our directors and
executive officers collectively are able to significantly influence all matters
requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval
of significant corporate transactions. In addition, sales of significant amounts
of shares held by our directors and executive officers, or the prospect of these
sales, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Management's
stock ownership may discourage a potential acquirer from making a tender offer
or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us, which in turn could reduce our
stock price or prevent our stockholders from realizing a premium over our stock
price.
OUR COMMON STOCK IS SUBJECT TO THE "PENNY STOCK" RULES OF THE SEC AND THE
TRADING MARKET IN OUR SECURITIES IS LIMITED, WHICH MAKES TRANSACTIONS IN OUR
STOCK CUMBERSOME AND MAY REDUCE THE VALUE OF AN INVESTMENT IN OUR STOCK.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which
establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for the purposes relevant to us,
as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or
with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain
exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the
rules require:
o that a broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in
penny stocks; and
o the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the
transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to
be purchased.
In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny
stocks, the broker or dealer must:
o obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the
person; and
o make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are
suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and
experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of
transactions in penny stocks.
The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a
penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Commission relating to the
penny stock market, which, in highlight form:
o sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability
determination; and
o that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the
investor prior to the transaction.
Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in
securities subject to the "penny stock" rules. This may make it more difficult
for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market
value of our stock.
Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny
stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the
commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative,
current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to
an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly
statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny
stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.
ANTI-TAKEOVER ACTIONS AND/OR PROVISIONS COULD PREVENT OR DELAY A CHANGE IN
CONTROL.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Nevada law may
make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if so doing would
be beneficial to our stockholders. These include the following:
o Our board of directors is authorized to issue of up to 10,000,000 shares of
preferred stock and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and
restrictions of those shares without any further vote or action by the
stockholders, which may be used by the board to create voting impediments
or otherwise delay or prevent a change in control or to modify the rights
of holders of our common stock;
o A prohibition on cumulative voting in the election of directors, which
would otherwise allow less than a majority of stockholders to elect
directors; and
o Limitations on who may call annual and special meetings of stockholders.
USE OF PROCEEDS
This prospectus relates to shares of our common stock that may be
offered and sold from time to time by the selling stockholders. We will not
receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock in this offering.
However, we will receive the sale price of any common stock we sell to the
selling stockholder upon exercise of the warrants. We expect to use the proceeds
of any such sales for general working capital purposes.
MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol
"ISYN". Our common stock has been quoted on the OTCBB since November of 1997.
For the periods indicated, the following table sets forth the high and
low bid prices per share of common stock. These prices represent inter-dealer
quotations without retail markup, markdown, or commission and may not
necessarily represent actual transactions. This table gives effect to our two
for one stock forward split that occurred on August 3, 2000 and our one for one
hundred reverse stock split that occurred on December 23, 2002.
High ($) Low ($)
2000
May 31, 2000 1,000.00 200.00
2001
August 31, 2000 625.00 175.00
November 30, 2000 250.00 69.00
February 29, 2001 94.00 31.00
May 31, 2001 72.00 5.00
2002
August 31, 2001 9.00 4.50
November 30, 2001 5.00 1.30
February 28, 2002 1.30 1.00
May 31, 2002 1.20 0.55
2003
August 31, 2002 2.00 0.80
November 30, 2002 3.00 3.00
February 28, 2003 0.07 0.05
HOLDERS
As of February 21, 2003, we had approximately 1,017 holders of our
common stock. The number of record holders was determined from the records of
our transfer agent and does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose
shares are held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and
registered clearing agencies. The transfer agent of our common stock is Colonial
Stock Transfer Company, Inc., 66 Exchange Place, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111.
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock.
We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends to stockholders in the
foreseeable future. In addition, any future determination to pay cash dividends
will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon
our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, and such
other factors as the Board of Directors deem relevant.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Some of the information in this Form SB-2 contains forward-looking
statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify
these statements by forward-looking words such as "may," "will," "expect,"
"anticipate," "believe," "estimate" and "continue," or similar words. You should
read statements that contain these words carefully because they:
o discuss our future expectations;
o contain projections of our future results of operations or of our financial
condition; and
o state other "forward-looking" information.
We believe it is important to communicate our expectations. However,
there may be events in the future that we are not able to accurately predict or
over which we have no control. Our actual results and the timing of certain
events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking
statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under "Risk
Factors," "Business" and elsewhere in this prospectus. See "Risk Factors."
OVERVIEW
We were incorporated as in the State of Utah on May 22, 1980, as Ward's
Gas & Oil, Inc. to engage in the oil and gas business, which business was
terminated a few years after operations commenced. We then changed our name to
Palace Casinos, Inc. and from November 1992 until approximately 1995, we were
engaged, through our wholly owned subsidiary, in the development of a dockside
gaming facility in Biloxi, Mississippi. On December 1, 1994, together with our
wholly owned subsidiary we each filed voluntary petitions for bankruptcy under
Chapter 11 of the federal bankruptcy laws. On June 16, 1999, the bankruptcy
court confirmed a plan of reorganization whereby our obligations to our
creditors were satisfied. On February 18, 2000, we closed an asset purchase
agreement with Insynq, Inc. a Washington company formed on August 31, 1998, in
which we acquired substantially all of the assets of Insynq. Subsequent to the
asset purchase transaction, we continued to develop the business of Insynq. On
August 3, 2000, at a special meeting of our stockholders, we completed a
re-incorporation merger with a wholly owned subsidiary, Insynq, Inc., a Delaware
corporation. On December 23, 2002, Insynq, Inc., a Delaware corporation, merged
with and into its wholly owned subsidiary, Insynq, Inc., a Nevada corporation
whereby Insynq, Inc. (Delaware) was reincorporated as a Nevada corporation.
Pursuant to the merger, each holder of Insynq Delaware common stock received one
share of common stock of Insynq Nevada for every one hundred shares of common
stock and the holders of preferred stock in Insynq Delaware received ten shares
of common stock of Insynq Nevada for every share of preferred stock of Insynq
Nevada. Today, as the combined and surviving entity, Insynq, Inc. continues to
develop the IQ Data Utility Service.
We provide managed and hosted software services, Web hosting services,
Web-based local and wide area networks, and access to Internet marketing
assistance and related equipment and services. These products and services are
offered as components or as an integrated whole, either sold directly or on a
fee or subscription basis.
We target small and medium enterprises and the high-end segment of the
small office and home office market for the sale of hosted software and access
to Internet-related services. We provide products and services to our customer
subscriber base, which allows our customers to adopt "Web-based" computing that
serves as an alternative to both traditional local wide area networks and
traditional client-server implementations. Generally, we market our self as an
Internet utility company that can provide all of the computer software,
connectivity and Internet-access needs for its customers on a cost effective
basis.
The complete IQ Data Utility Service includes managed network and
application services, which can span from a customer's keyboard to the data
center. The service can also include Internet-access services provided by us or
by a user selected telecommunications partner/provider. The final piece is the
data center, which is located in Bellingham, Washington. This facility, with
redundant power, bandwidth, and cooling, houses the servers and routers and
equipment.
In fiscal 2003 (fiscal year ending May 31, 2003), we plan to focus on
sales growth, controlling expenses and restructuring our debt. We will strive to
build on our core value of customer service and delivery of our hosted services
at a competitive price.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - FOR THE THREE MONTHS AND SIX MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30,
2002 AND THE THREE MONTHS AND SIX MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2001
We incurred a net loss of $386,142 and $1,250,515 for the three months
and six months ended November 30, 2002 as compared to a net loss of $1,207,338
and $2,864,176 for the three months and six months ended November 30, 2001. The
net loss for the three and six months ended November 30, 2002 resulted primarily
from:
o discounted or free services as we marketed our products and services,
o professional and consulting fees,
o issuance and amortization of common stock, warrants and options for
services,
o contract settlements, and
o interest expense.
The decrease in the net loss for the six months ended November 30,
2002 of $1,656,838 as compared to the six months ended November 30, 2001
resulted primarily from:
o increase in net revenue,
o decrease in legal and consulting fees,
o decrease in wages and related taxes and benefits,
o decrease in rent, and
o decrease in abandoned leasehold improvements.
Total revenue for three months ended November 30, 2002 and 2001 was
$251,942 and $227,729, respectively, representing an increase of $24,213. The
primary sources of revenue during the three month period ended November 30, 2002
were the following:
o seat subscription revenue of $187,030, net of discounts,
o managed software and support service revenue of $17,376, and
o licensing and other revenue of $47,536.
Total revenue for the six months ended November 30, 2002 and November
30, 2001 was $486,104 and $422,294, respectively. Primary revenue sources for
the six-month period ended November 30, 2002 were:
o seat subscription revenue of $376,566, net of discounts,
o managed software service revenue of $22,934, and
o licensing and services revenue of $86,605.
Seat revenue for the six months ended November 30, 2002 increased
approximately 15.5% over the same period ended November 30, 2001. For the six
months ended November 30, 2002, seat revenue accounted for approximately 77.5%
of total revenue. While we have experienced growth in revenue in recent periods,
prior growth rates should not be considered as necessarily indicative of future
growth rates or operating results for fiscal year ending 2003. We expect future
revenue from all sources to trend away from our practice of providing discounts
and free offerings experienced in the first and second quarters, fiscal 2003,
because we are continuing to develop our sales programs, implement our sales and
marketing strategies, increase consumer understanding and awareness of our
technology, and improve our business model.
The increase in revenue can be directly attributed to an acquisition of
126 seats from another application service provider company in September of
2001, which is the result of increased marketing over the Internet and new
managed services agreements.
Our continued growth is significantly dependent upon our ability to
generate sales relating to our subscription and managed software services. Our
main priorities relating to revenue are:
o increase market awareness of our products and services through our strategic
marketing plan,
o growth in the number of customers and seats per customer,
o continue to accomplish technological economies of scale, and
o continue to streamline and maximize efficiencies in our system
implementation model.
COSTS AND EXPENSES
During the three months ended November 30, 2002, we incurred direct
costs of services provided of $187,664. This represents a decrease of $150,880
as compared to the same three month period ended November 30, 2001. Network and
infrastructure costs were $0.00 and $3,458 for the three months ended November
30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. For the six-month periods ended November 30,
2002 and November 30, 2001, we incurred $379,310 and $658,401 in direct costs
and $1,802 and $32,785 in network and infrastructure costs, respectively.
Selling and general and administrative costs were $407,533 and $800,383
for the three months ended November 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The current
decrease in expenses for the three months ended November 30, 2002 can be
directly attributed to our management's committed efforts, beginning in the fall
of 2000, to restructure our operations and reduce our expenses. Of significance
for the three months ended November 30, 2002, is a $140,773 decrease of
comparable period expenses requiring non-cash compensation. Non-cash
compensation is generally representative of the fair value of common stock,
options and warrants issued for services, and the amortization of unearned
compensation. Cash expenses for the three months ended November 30, 2002 and
2001 were $286,332 and $538,409, respectively. The decrease of $252,077 is the
result of management's plans and continual efforts to cut costs in all
departments. For the six months ended November 30, 2002 and 2001, selling,
general and administrative expenses were $864,627 and $2,043,049, respectively.
Non-cash compensation for the six months ended November 30, 2002 and 2001 was
$252,562 and $778,642, respectively. Cash compensation for the six months ended
November 30, 2002 and 2001 was $538,409 and $1,264,407, respectively.
Of significance is the reduction of the professional and consulting
fees. These specific expenses accounted for approximately 42% and 62% of the
total selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended
November 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Accordingly, there was over a $902,000
reduction in these expenses as recorded between these two periods. This
reduction accounts for approximately 76.5% of the total selling, general and
administrative reduction between these two respective periods. This is a direct
result from management's concerted efforts to reduce and control these expenses.
Overall, we reduced operating expenses for the three and six months
ended November 30, 2002, as compared to the three and six months ended November
30, 2001, by over $583,400 and $1,583,700, respectively, but maintained an
average consistent growth rate in total revenue of approximately 14% for the six
months ended November 30, 2002 as compared to November 30, 2001.
Interest expense was $428,637 for the three months ended November 30,
2002 as compared to $337,584 for the same period ended November 30, 2001. The
increase of $91,053 was due primarily to the recognition in the current period:
(a) accruing interest on the related party promissory notes, convertible
debentures, and capitalized leases, and (b) accounting for non-cash interest
recognized on the fair value of convertible debentures and warrants issued.
Interest expense for the six months ended November 30, 2002 and 2001 was
$873,519 and $528,026, respectively.
Accounting for non-cash interest resulted in an increase of $167,797
between the two comparable three month periods ended November 30, 2002 and
2001. For the six-month periods ended November 30, 2002 and 2001, interest
expense was $873,519 and 528,026, respectively. Accounting for non-cash interest
resulted in $409,213 and $243,416 of reported expense for the three months ended
November 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and, $827,210 and $347,394 for the six
month periods ended November 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Non-cash interest
expense for the six months ended November 30, 2002 included $533,326 related to
discount amortization of the 12% convertible debentures. Cash interest decreased
$74,744 and $134,323 for the three and six-month periods ended November 30, 2002
as compared to November 2001.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - FOR THE YEARS ENDED MAY 31, 2002 AND 2001
We incurred a net loss of $4,599,430 and $14,075,218 for the years
ended May 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The respective annual losses resulted
primarily from:
o providing discounted or free services as we marketed our products and
services,
o initial and continuing network, infrastructure, and research and
development costs associated with both operational and the start-up of
operations,
o salaries, deferred compensation and other employee related benefits,
o professional and consulting fees,
o the issuance of warrants and options for services, and
o interest expense.
Total revenue for the years ended May 31, 2002 and May 31, 2001 was
$889,136 and $493,008, respectively, representing an increase of $396,128 over
the prior year, or approximately 80.4%. The primary sources of revenue are as
follows:
YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2002 YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2001 2002 INCREASE OVER 2001
Revenue
Source Amount Percent of Amount Percent of Amount Percent
Total Total
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Seat subscriptions, $711,595 80.0% $379,423 76.9% $332,172 87.6%
net of discounts
2. Managed software and 79,540 8.9 76,208 15.5 3,332 4.4%
support
3. License rentals, 98,001 11.1 37,377 7.6 60,624 162.2%
hardware and software
sales, and other
Total $889,136 100.0% $493,008 100.0% $396,128 80.4%
The increase in revenue can be directly attributed to the acquisition
of 126 seats from another application service provider company and the result of
increased marketing over the Internet. While we have experienced growth in
revenue in each year of our existence, prior growth rates should not be
considered as necessarily indicative of future growth rates or operating results
for the fiscal ending 2003. We expect future revenue from all sources to trend
away from our practice of providing discounts and free offerings experienced in
the fiscal years 2001 and the fiscal 2002, as we continue to develop our sales,
implement our sales and marketing strategies, increase consumer understanding
and awareness of our technology, and prove our business model.
Our continued growth is significantly dependent upon our ability to
generate sales relating to our subscription and managed software services. Our
main priorities relating to revenue are:
o increase market awareness of our products and services through our
strategic marketing plan,
o growth in the number of customers and seats per customer,
o continue to accomplish technological economies of scale, and
o continue to streamline and maximize efficiencies in our system
implementation model.
COSTS AND EXPENSES
During the fiscal 2002, we incurred direct costs of services provided
of $1,150,849. This represents a decrease over the prior year of $108,083.
Network and infrastructure costs were $37,347 and $154,445, for the fiscal years
2002 and 2001, respectively.
Selling and general and administrative costs were $3,143,112 and
$8,814,076 for the fiscal years ended 2002 and 2001, respectively. The decrease
in expenses can be directly attributed to our management's committed efforts,
beginning in the fall of 2000, to restructure our operations and reduce our
expenses. Of significance for the year ended May 31, 2002, is a $3,166,613
decrease of comparable period expenses requiring non-cash compensation. Non-cash
compensation is generally representative of the fair value of common stock,
options and warrants issued for services, and the amortization of unearned
compensation. Cash expenses for the years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 was
$2,067,653 and $4,572,004, respectively. The decrease, $2,504,351, is
significant and reflects well on management's plans and continual efforts to cut
costs in all departments, yet still be able to provide excellent support for its
customers, vendors, investors and employees.
Overall, we reduced the fiscal 2002 operating expenses, as compared to
the fiscal 2001, by over $6,069,000.
Interest expense was $1,459,886 for the year ended May 31, 2002 versus
$3,941,175 for the year ended May 31, 2001. A decrease of $2,481,289 in the
prior period due primarily to:
o accounting for non-cash interest recognized on the fair value of warrants
issued with notes payable and convertible debentures,
o interest recognized for the beneficial conversion features on the
conversion of debentures and notes payable, and
o reductions in the original conversion prices offered significantly below
the fair market value of the common stock on the conversion dates.
Accounting for non-cash interest resulted in a decrease of $2,665,539
between the two comparable fiscal years 2002 and 2001. Cash interest increased
$184,250 over the fiscal 2001, which was due to primarily the interest accrued
on the 12% convertible debentures, related party promissory notes and interest
assessed by various taxing agencies. For the year ended May 31, 2002, non-cash
interest expense included $987,329 related to discount amortization of the 12%
convertible debentures.
We have reported other income of $474,528 for the year ended May 31,
2002. The reported amount represents approximately $463,000 of favorable vendor
and creditor negotiated settlements.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company's financial statements for the three and six months ended
November 30, 2002 have been prepared on a going concern basis, which
contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and
commitments in the normal course of business. For the six months ended November
30, 2002, the Company had a net loss of $1,250,514 and a negative cash flow from
operations of $371,168. The Company had a working capital deficit of $6,267,159
and a stockholders' deficit of $5,883,256 at November 30, 2002. The Company's
working capital deficit as of November 30, 2002 may not enable it to meet
certain financial objectives as presently structured.
We had cash and cash equivalents of $34,523 as of November 30, 2002,
and a deficit in working capital of $6,267,159 at the same date. For the six
months ended November 30, 2002, we used cash in our operating activities
totaling $371,168 as compared to the same period one year ago of $1,173,172. The
decrease in our usage of cash of over $802,000 was the result of management's
expense reduction plan, while increasing sales and maintaining customer service.
We finance our operations and capital requirements primarily through
private debt and equity offerings. For the six months ended November 30, 2002,
we received cash totaling $437,926 from:
o borrowing on our credit line - $2,887,
o release of restricted cash held in escrow $10,355,
o issuance of convertible debentures totaling $400,000,
o issuance of short term notes payable totaling $2,000, and
o advance from officer/stockholder $1,684
As of November 30, 2002, we had approximately $6,663,425 in current
liabilities and past due debt. Of the total current debt, approximately $403,400
is deemed as a current trade payable, accrual or taxes due.
We are late in payment of certain creditor trade payables of
approximately $696,150.
Recently, management has initiated re-negotiations with many of its
creditors by offering them cash payments for substantially less than the
amounts due, or requesting a total forgiveness of the debt. We believe by
continuing this important effort with a high degree of intensity, we will be
able to reduce a significant part our past due creditor trade obligations.
However, if we are not able to negotiate and execute payment plans or complete
cash settlements with these creditors/vendors, we could experience a severe
negative impact on our business resources and we may be forced to cease
operations.
We lease equipment under four capital leases, each expiring in 2003. As
of November 30, 2002, our principal capital lease obligation for computer
hardware, printers and related infrastructure is in default in the amount of
approximately $877,213. In December 2002, we settled on lease for approximately
$9,500 in cash. We have initiated discussions to restructure these remaining
obligations, and, given the current market conditions, believe we will be
successful in such attempts. If we are unable to successfully restructure these
obligations, options remain open to us including, for example, returning the
equipment and purchasing new equipment on the open market. As a precautionary
measure, in fiscal 2002, we signed an additional operating lease agreement for
similar equipment to support our current customer base. If negotiations do not
go as planned, there still is no assurance that we would be able to locate other
similar and necessary equipment or raise the funds necessary to make such
further purchases or execute new leases. If all other methods fail, we might be
able to outsource our data center function; however, there is no assurance that
such methods will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. If this were
to occur then we may be unable to deliver to our customers their contracted
services.
As of February 21, 2003, we are delinquent in the payment of
approximately $699,059 of business and payroll taxes, plus an estimated $270,028
of related assessed penalties and interest. The majority of the past due amount
is for payroll taxes, penalties and interest due to the Internal Revenue
Service. In April 2002, the Internal Revenue Service filed a federal tax lien
against our assets for the past due employment related taxes, penalties and
interest. We have retained legal counsel to represent us in our current
negotiations with the Internal Revenue Service and we have submitted an offer in
compromise, seeking relief on a portion of our overall obligation and structure
a payment plan on the settled amount of taxes due. The Internal Revenue Service
has imposed certain conditions on us in order to proceed with negotiations, one
of which requires us to remain current on all future payroll tax deposits and
reporting.
We have executed workout agreements for past due taxes with four other
respective taxing authorities. As of February 21, 2003, the total principal
balance due for these workouts is approximately $25,051. Terms of these four
workouts require us to pay between $290 and $1,500 per month until the
respective tax obligation is fulfilled. Three of the taxing agencies have either
filed a lien against our assets or a warrant with the local county authorities
to protect its position during the respective workout periods.
Additionally, two liens against our assets have been filed by two other
states for past due taxes, plus accrued interest and penalties. One lien was
filed by the State of Utah for approximately $28,000 for prior year's income
taxes assessed to our predecessor company. This amount is in dispute and amended
returns to correct this deficiency have been filed, but not yet approved or
denied. The second lien was filed by the State of California for past due
payroll taxes, assessed penalties and accrued interest. Recently, the Company
submitted a proposal for a long-term workout of the tax debt. We believe the
proposal is currently in review and under consideration with the state
authorities.
There can be no assurances, however, that we will be able to agree or
commit to any proposed terms set forth by the Internal Revenue Service or
favorably negotiate terms with any of the other taxing authorities. If we are
unsuccessful in our negotiations or fail to make our workout payments timely,
the taxing authorities could take possession of some or all of our assets.
Should this occur, we likely would be forced to cease our operations.
As of November 30, 2002, we have approximately $257,325 of employee
agreement related obligations in the form of accrued and deferred salaries.
These obligations are primarily a result of applying the terms of existing
employment agreements against that which we actually paid. Currently, management
is negotiating with employees with employment agreements in order to reduce all
deferred and accrued salaries. In July 2002, an officer forgave $24,501 of
deferred compensation in consideration for 350,000 shares of common stock with a
market value of $1,050.
As of November 30, 2002, we have approximately $1,582,350 in short-term
related party promissory notes, loans and accrued interest. All these
obligations are past due. In settlement of these debts, our board of directors
may authorize the issuance of a class of preferred stock. To-date, we have
received a letter of intent to convert approximately $1,300,000 of this debt
into preferred stock.
As of November 30, 2002, we have also recorded outstanding convertible
debentures of $1,823,950 plus related accrued interest of approximately $194,800
and unamortized discounts of $325,645.
On June 29, 2001, we entered into a private financing transaction with
three investors for a total of $1,200,000, 12% convertible debentures. The
debentures are convertible into shares of common stock at the lesser of (i)
$0.30 or (ii) the average of the lowest three trading prices in the twenty-day
trading period immediately preceding the notice to convert, discounted by sixty
percent (60%). The convertible debentures carry attached warrants that allow the
investor, under the terms of the warrants, to purchase up to 2,400,000 shares of
common stock at $0.25 per share. The terms of the debentures provide for full
payment on or before one year from the date of issuance, plus accrued interest
at 12% per annum. Pursuant to the agreement, we may not, without consent, (i)
engage in any future equity financing involving the issuance of common stock for
a period of six months from the date of closing, and (ii) may not engage in such
transactions for a period of two years without first giving the investors the
opportunity to purchase shares on a pro-rata basis. As of February 21, 2003,
principal in the amount of $1,123,950 plus accrued interest of approximately
$176,318 is outstanding. These obligations were to be repaid or converted into
common stock on or before the conversion (maturity) date. These convertible
debentures have been amended to provide a maturity date of March 6, 2004 upon
which these obligations are to be repaid or converted into common stock at the
investor's option.
On January 24, 2002, we entered into a second agreement to issue
$550,000, 12% convertible debentures, and 2,200,000 warrants to four investors.
The debentures are convertible into shares of common stock at the lesser of (i)
$0.30 or (ii) the average of the lowest three trading prices in the twenty-day
trading period immediately preceding the notice to convert, discounted by sixty
percent (60%). The convertible debentures carry attached warrants that allow the
investor, under the terms of the warrants, to purchase up to 2,200,000 shares of
common stock at $0.25 per share. Terms of the debentures provide for full
payment on or before one year from the date of issuance, plus accrued interest
at 12% per annum. Pursuant to the agreement, we may not, without consent, (i)
engage in any future equity financing involving the issuance of common stock for
a period of six months from the date of closing, and (ii) may not engage in such
transactions for a period of two years without first giving the investors the
opportunity to purchase shares on a pro-rata basis. As of February 21, 2003,
principal in the amount of $550,000 plus accrued interest of approximately
$61,842.36 is outstanding. These obligations were to be repaid or converted into
common stock on or before the conversion (maturity) date. These convertible
notes have been amended to provide a maturity date of March 6, 2004 upon which
these obligations are to be repaid or converted into common stock at the
investor's option.
On September 27, 2002, we entered into a third private financing
transaction to sell $450,000 of 12% convertible debentures, to four investors
under which the investors initially purchased $120,000. Proceeds from this
initial transaction, net of fees and professional expenses, were $50,481. The
maturity date of the debentures is the one-year anniversary date of the issuance
of the debentures. The conversion price of the debentures is the lesser of
$0.03, the fixed conversion price, or, the average of the lowest three intra-day
trading prices during the twenty days immediately prior to the conversion date,
discounted by 50%. For each one-dollar ($1.00) of debenture investment, we
issued warrants to the investors to purchase two (2) shares of common stock. The
warrant is exercisable from time to time up to five (5) years from date of
issuance, at an exercise price of $0.01. Pursuant to terms of the agreement,
additional investments in $30,000 increments will be made every thirty-days
until a total of $450,000 has been invested. As of March 6, 2003, we have
received a total of $240,000 and issued 480,000 warrants.
The payment date for the amounts due under convertible debentures
issued pursuant to the June 2001 and the January 2002 Securities Purchase
Agreements has been extended until March 6, 2004. The payment date for the
convertible debentures issued pursuant to the September 2002 Securities Purchase
Agreement will commence in September 2003 and continue through August 2004. We
do not currently have the funds to repay the amounts that may become due if not
converted and we may not have the funds available to meet those requirements
when they come due. Pursuant to the June 2001, the January 2002 and the
September 2002 debenture agreements, any amount of principal and / or interest
which is not paid when due is in default, and shall bear interest at the rate of
fifteen percent (15%) per annum from the due date thereof until the same is
paid. Management anticipates negotiations with the investors about amending the
terms of the agreements.
Our continuation as a going concern is dependent on our ability to
obtain additional financing, and, generate sufficient cash flow from operations
to meet our obligations on a timely basis. Our ability to raise capital in the
future will be difficult because our securities purchase agreements with our
debenture investors prohibit us from entering into any financial arrangement,
that would involve the issuance of common stock for a period of two years
without offering a right of first refusal to the debenture investors. Moreover,
our ability to raise capital will also be difficult because our debentures
issued in connection with the June 29, 2001, January 24, 2002 and September 27,
2002 private placements have floating conversion features which, when converted,
would cause purchasers of our common stock to experience a substantial dilution
of their investment.
On September 6, 2001, we were served with a summons and complaint by
our former landlords asserting:
o a breach of a settlement agreement entered into in May 2001 to register
5,000 shares of common stock, valued at $80,000, in partial settlement of
the then existing lease, and
o a default by us on two new long-term lease obligations.
Terms of the first lease call for base monthly payments of $12,046 for
the period of August 1, 2001 to July 31, 2006, plus estimated triple net charges
currently at $3,038 per month and beginning in year two, annual consumer price
index with a minimum annual increase of 3%. Minimum aggregate lease payments and
triple net charges approximate $954,500 over the term of the lease, excluding
late fees, interest, legal fees and other charges. Terms of the second lease
called for monthly payments, beginning in June 2001 of approximately $4,000 per
month, or a total of $80,000 for the remaining term of the lease from August 1,
2001 to May 31, 2003. On October 4, 2001, our former landlords filed a summons
and complaint with the Superior Court of Washington for Pierce County for a
summary judgment motion on all claims. All claims under this motion were denied.
On May 10, 2002, the Court awarded a partial summary judgment in favor of the
former landlords for approximately $170,000. We anticipate filing a motion
requesting the court to vacate the summary judgment in light of new evidence
and/or appeal the court's decision.
We deny the allegations under this claim and believe it is without
merit. Management and our legal counsel believe that the settlement agreement
signed in May 2001 that required the signing of the new leases were entered into
under economic duress, based on misrepresentation and fraud and were signed in
bad faith on the part of the former landlords. As such, it is our management's
opinion that the settlement agreement and the lease agreement are void. We
intend to continue to vigorously defend against this lawsuit.
We currently have no material commitments for capital requirements. If
we were forced to purchase or lease new equipment to replace the equipment we
currently lease, any new leases would constitute a material capital commitment;
however, we are currently unable to quantify such amounts. If this occurs, we
will attempt to raise the necessary finances to make such purchases, but there
is no assurance that we will be able to do so. Without the ability to quantify
these amounts, we nonetheless believe that it would have a material impact on
our business and our ability to maintain our operations.
Since September 2000, we began implementation of an internal cost
restructuring of our operations, both in sales and marketing, as well in our
executive management team, and other critical cost cutting measures. In June
2001, we negotiated with many of our vendors to materially reduce amounts owed
or attain more favorable long-term payment terms. In October 2001, we further
reduced our staffing requirements and as a result of these measures, we have
tightened the controls over our use of cash and, additionally, have taken steps
to improve the billing and collection process. Our management forecasts the
continuing effects of these changes will result in a substantial improvement of
monthly cash flows. In addition to these changes, we have implemented a
marketing program through our recently developed accounting vertical, which has
dramatically reduced customer acquisition costs. The combination of the internal
restructuring efforts and increased operational efficiencies will allow us to
move toward profitability and to achieve our business plan and goals. We are
also pursuing opportunities to merge and/or acquire compatible companies with
which to leverage management, financial and operational resources. We believe
these changes and strategies will position us well for future opportunities.
We have recently signed several sales and marketing agreements. In
particular, we have completed negotiations with a large U.S. telecommunication
firm who will re-market, via private label, various services. We began this
relationship by test marketing hosted software applications and managed services
such as Microsoft Windows, MS Office, MS Exchange, virus protection, data
storage and many other products and services to be bundled with broadband
solutions. After a year of market test and product development, the
telecommunication firm has agreed to go to market with these services. These
bundled services or products will be delivered on a subscription basis.
We have recently launched our e-Accounting Center portal located at
WWW.CPA-ASP.COM, which has been designed to help the accounting professional
manage and expand their business. It includes resources for marketing,
promotion, professional education, and web design, as well as, step-by-step tips
for transforming a traditional accounting business into an e-Accounting
practice. In addition, we host the Intuit QuickBooks software application in our
secure Data Center for CPA firms throughout the country. By centrally hosting
the application and data in our Data Center, we give the CPA secure central
access to all his remote customers' data. This gives the CPA the ability to
manage more customers with fewer staff and, thereby, generating greater
profitability for the CPA firm.
We have entered into an agreement with an accounting affiliation, which
allows us to market our services to apporximately 60,000 subscribers of the
organization. Other services include business functions such as e-commerce,
sales force automation, customer support, human resource and financial
management, messaging and collaboration, and professional services automation.
We believe that technology outsourcing, focused on these business fundamentals,
will be the primary adopters of application service providers and managed
service solutions in the next year. We are focusing all possible resources in
developing our domain expertise in these areas to gain additional leverage and
build broader service offerings that compliment our current services already
being delivered to those markets. There can be no assurances, however, that we
will substantially increase our monthly recurring revenues.
We currently have no arrangements or commitments for accounts
receivable financing. We believe our need for additional capital going forward
will be met from private debt and equity offerings, and, increasingly, from
revenues from operations as we continue to implement our strategic plan;
however, future operations will be dependent upon our ability to secure
sufficient sources of financing and adequate vendor credit. However, there can
be no assurance that we will achieve any or all of these requirements.
We are currently developing and refining our acquisition and expansion
strategy. If we expand more rapidly than currently anticipated, if our working
capital needs exceed our current expectations, or if we consummate acquisitions,
we will need to raise additional capital from equity or debt sources. We cannot
be sure that we will be able to obtain the additional financings to satisfy our
cash requirements or to implement our growth strategy on acceptable terms or at
all. Our ability to raise capital in the future will be difficult because our
securities purchase agreements with our debenture investors prohibit us from
entering into any financial arrangement which would involve the issuance of
common stock for a period of two years from the date this registration statement
becomes effective without offering a right of first refusal to the debenture
investors. If we cannot obtain such financings on terms acceptable to us, our
ability to fund our planned business expansion and to fund our on-going
operations will be materially adversely affected. If we incur debt, the risks
associated with our business and with owning our common stock could increase. If
we raise capital through the sale of equity securities, the percentage ownership
of our stockholders will be diluted. In addition, any new equity securities may
have rights, preferences, or privileges senior to those of our common stock.
New Accounting Pronouncements
- -----------------------------
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No.
4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.
SFAS 145 rescinds the provisions of SFAS No. 4 that requires companies to
classify certain gains and losses from debt extinguishments as extraordinary
items, eliminates the provisions of SFAS No. 44 regarding transition to the
Motor Carrier Act of 1980 and amends the provisions of SFAS No. 13 to require
that certain lease modifications be treated as sale leaseback transactions. The
provisions of SFAS 145 related to classification of debt extinguishments are
effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. Earlier application is
encouraged. The Company does not believe the adoption of this standard will have
a material impact the financial statements.
In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Restructuring
Costs." SFAS 146 applies to costs associated with an exit activity (including
restructuring) or with a disposal of long-lived assets. Those activities can
include eliminating or reducing product lines, terminating employees and
contracts and relocating plant facilities or personnel. Under SFAS 146, the
Company will record a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal
activity when that liability is incurred and can be measured at fair value. SFAS
146 will require the Company to disclose information about its exit and disposal
activities, the related costs, and changes in those costs in the notes to the
interim and annual financial statements that include the period in which an exit
activity is initiated and in any subsequent period until the activity is
completed. SFAS 146 is effective prospectively for exit or disposal activities
initiated after December 31, 2002, with earlier adoption encouraged. Under SFAS
146, a company cannot restate its previously issued financial statements and the
new statement grandfathers the accounting for liabilities that a company had
previously recorded under Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 94-3. The Company
does not believe the adoption of this standard will have a material impact the
financial statements.
In October 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 147 ("SFAS 147),
"Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions." SFAS 147 addresses financial
accounting and reporting for the acquisition of all or part of a financial
institution, except for a transaction between two or more mutual enterprises.
SFAS 147 also provides guidance on the accounting for the impairment or disposal
of acquired long-term customer-relationship intangible assets of financial
institutions, including those acquired in transactions between two or more
mutual enterprises. The provisions of the statement will be effective for
acquisitions on or after October 1, 2002.
In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board Issued Statement
No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure-an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 123", ("SFAS 148"). SFAS 148 amends FASB
Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation" ("SFAS 123") and
provides alternative methods for accounting for a change by registrants to the
fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation. Additionally, SFAS
148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123 to require disclosure in the
significant accounting policy footnote of both annual and interim financial
statements of the method of accounting for stock-based compensation and the
related pro-forma disclosures when the intrinsic value method continues to be
used. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2002, and disclosures are effective for the first fiscal quarter beginning after
December 15, 2002.
BUSINESS
GENERAL
Except for historical information, the following description of our
business contains forward-looking statements based on current expectations that
involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from
those set forth in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of
factors, including those set forth in this prospectus under the heading "Risk
Factors."
We are an application service provider, or ASP and we have been
delivering out-sourced software application hosting and managed information
technology services through our IQ Data Utility Service since 1997. We host
software applications on our servers located at the data center, rent computing
services to our customers for a monthly fee, and perform remote management and
maintenance of our customers' servers from our network operations center. Our
customers connect to our facilities over the Internet, through a dedicated
telecommunications line or by wireless connection. Our goal is to provide our
services with the speed, simplicity and reliability of a utility service. Like a
utility company, we allow business customers to "turn on", or access, their
software applications and data instantly through any web enabled computer,
regardless of operating system. We currently have 939 users, which can freely
access their software and data in real time from any computer, anywhere in the
world.
We provide our customers with the tools necessary to implement business
workflow and process ideas quickly and cost effectively. We make it possible for
many businesses to take advantage of technology solutions that have typically
been reserved for larger business enterprises. These solutions enable our
customers to benefit from reliable technology operations, which can grow to
accommodate increasing business needs and can be delivered without undertaking
the difficulty and expense associated with building the required expertise
in-house.
We provide our services through our IQ Data Utility Service, which
allow us to consistently deploy our customers operations across multiple
locations and to maintain those services through our centralized operations
center. Among other things, our services enable our customers to:
o Quickly expand their Internet presence as business opportunities arise in
new geographies; and
o Efficiently incorporate new technologies into their existing business
operations as these technologies evolve.
The application service provider model of distributing computer
processing services over the Internet has proven itself to deliver a lower total
cost of ownership as compared to building and maintaining physically separated
information technology systems. This is due in part to the increasing
complexities of successfully deploying and maintaining the various components of
software solutions, as well as the hardware and connectivity required for a
successful Internet business operation. In addition, the in-house expertise
required to meet these challenges is significant and typically requires a host
of technical specialists.
We target small and medium enterprises and the high-end segment of the
small office and home office market for the sale of hardware and hosted software
and access to Internet-related services. We provide products and services to our
customer subscriber base that allows our customers to adopt "Web-based"
computing that serves as an alternative to both local area networks and
traditional network implementations. Generally, we market ourselves as an
Internet utility company that can provide all of the computer software,
hardware, connectivity and Internet-access needs for its customers on a cost
effective basis.
HISTORY
Our predecessor company, Xcel Management, Inc., formerly known as
"Palace Casinos, Inc.," was inactive from the end of 1995 until the consummation
of an asset purchase transaction with Insynq, Inc., a Washington corporation.
During the two-year period prior to the transaction with Insynq, Xcel and its
management, worked to complete a plan of reorganization confirmed in the United
States Bankruptcy Court under Chapter 11 of the federal bankruptcy laws. Xcel
also undertook necessary steps to position Xcel to seek new business
combinations, including either a merger or reorganization, or an acquisition
transaction. These efforts resulted in Xcel entering into the asset purchase
agreement with Insynq, which was completed in February 2000.
Xcel was originally incorporated in the state of Utah on May 22, 1980,
under the name Ward's Gas & Oil, to engage in the oil and gas business. This
business was terminated after a few years of operations. From November 1992
until approximately the end of 1995, Xcel (then called Palace Casinos, Inc.),
was engaged, through its then wholly-owned subsidiary, Maritime Group, Ltd., in
the development of a dockside gaming facility in Biloxi, Mississippi. In April
1994, the subsidiary completed the development of the Biloxi gaming facility,
Palace Casino, and commenced operations.
On December 1, 1994, Xcel and its subsidiary separately filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the federal bankruptcy laws in the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Utah, Central Division.
Xcel's Chapter 11 proceedings were then transferred to the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. On September 22,
1995, Xcel, having been operating as a debtor-in-possession in connection with
the bankruptcy proceeding, entered into an asset purchase agreement under the
terms of which it agreed, subject to the approval of the bankruptcy court, to
sell substantially all of its subsidiary's operating assets. This transaction
was approved by the bankruptcy court and completed in the end of 1995, which
resulted in all of the net proceeds of the transaction being distributed to
creditors. Following the completion of the sale of the subsidiary's assets, Xcel
had essentially no assets and liabilities and its business operations ceased.
In February 1999, Steve Rippon and Edward D. Bagley, Xcel's management,
submitted to the bankruptcy court a plan of reorganization, which was confirmed
by the bankruptcy court on June 16, 1999. Under the terms of the plan:
o all of Xcel's priority creditors were paid a total of $5,000;
o unsecured creditors, holding between $300,000 and $500,000 in claims, were
issued pro rata a total of 900 shares of post-bankruptcy common stock in
full satisfaction of such obligations; and
o all of the equity holders of Xcel common stock were issued, pro rata, a
total of approximately 900 shares of common stock in lieu of a total 87,944
shares of preferred and common stock issued and outstanding, which resulted
in 0.000102 shares of common stock of Xcel being issued for each previously
outstanding share of common stock and preferred stock.
Under the terms of the plan, all of Xcel's outstanding warrants and
options expired. In connection with the plan, Messrs. Rippon and Bagley,
creditors of the bankruptcy estate and the plan proponents, were elected as
Xcel's officers and directors and were issued a total of 16,200 shares of
common stock (8,100 shares each) in consideration of their contributions of
services and approximately $20,000 in cash provided to pay for legal services
and costs incurred in the plan confirmation process and related activities.
Following the confirmation of the plan in June 1999, Xcel completed the
plan in accordance with its terms. Immediately following the confirmation of the
plan, Xcel had a total of approximately 18,000 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding. On December 3, 1999, the bankruptcy court, after reviewing the
efforts by the plan proponents, issued an order closing the bankruptcy estate.
Subsequent to the completion of the plan, Xcel completed updated
financial statements, prepared and filed updated periodic reports with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, and undertook actions to enable Xcel to seek
a business opportunity for merger or acquisition. These efforts resulted in the
entering of the asset purchase transaction with Insynq.
On January 26, 2000, Xcel entered into an asset purchase agreement with
Insynq. Since September 1998, Insynq was engaged in the business of providing
hardware, software, computer Internet and related connectivity services and
products to the small to medium enterprise and the high-end small office home
office markets. The terms of the asset purchase agreement entered between Xcel
and Insynq were substantially completed on February 18, 2000. Under the terms of
the asset purchase agreement, Xcel acquired substantially all of the assets of
Insynq and assumed substantially all of the obligations of Insynq, in exchange
for the issuance by Xcel of a total of 76,041 shares of restricted common stock
of Xcel to the Insynq shareholders pro rata. As a result of the transaction,
Xcel had a total of approximately 94,041 shares issued and outstanding, of which
the former Insynq shareholders held 76,041 shares, or approximately 80.9%. In
connection with the asset purchase agreement, Insynq obtained approval of the
sale of its assets by its shareholders at a duly called and convened
shareholders' meeting.
As a result of the asset purchase agreement, Xcel acquired essentially
all of the assets, tangible and intangible, of Insynq and became engaged in
Insynq's business. These assets included computer hardware and software and
related equipment, furniture and fixtures, proprietary technology developed by
Insynq, all contractual rights including capitalized lease equipment and other
leasehold rights, trade names and trademarks, all client lists and marketing
data and materials, cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, inventory,
work-in-progress and related assets. Xcel also assumed essentially all of the
obligations and liabilities of Insynq, including capital lease obligations on
equipment, accounts payable, accrued payroll and other business taxes, notes
payable, and other liabilities. In addition to such liabilities, Xcel agreed to
assume all other contractual obligations of Insynq. In that regard, Xcel entered
into employment contracts with certain individuals who were executives or key
employees of Insynq on substantially the same terms as the terms of employment
between Insynq and such individuals.
Prior to September 1998, the business, which ultimately became Insynq's
business was under development as a potential product/services line of
Interactive Information Systems Corporation, a company wholly owned by M.
Carroll Benton, our secretary, treasurer and chief administrative officer. In
September 1998, Interactive transferred to Charles Benton, husband of Ms. Benton
and then a creditor of Interactive, in satisfaction of a debt obligation owed by
Interactive to Charles Benton, all of Interactive's right, title and interest in
and to the following:
o certain equipment and other tangible personal property, and
o the intellectual properties, computer software, trademarks, copyrights,
ideas, work-in-progress, and other tangible and intangible property
comprising the system known as the "Insynq Project" which later developed
into our IQ Delivery System.
Mr. Benton then contributed all of the Insynq Project intellectual
property assets to Insynq in exchange for the initial shares of common stock
issued by Insynq at the time of its formation. Mr. Benton also sold the
equipment and other tangible property to the newly formed Insynq in exchange for
a note. Mr. Benton then sold all of his shares of Insynq common stock to M.
Carroll Benton and John P. Gorst, our chief executive officer, chairman of the
board and president. Insynq continued the development of the Insynq Project
business until February 18, 2000, when Xcel acquired all of that business under
the terms of the asset purchase agreement.
Under the asset purchase agreement, Xcel also agreed to assume all
equipment leases, leaseholder obligations covering office space utilized by
Insynq, all consulting contracts, and all other contract obligations. Finally,
at the time of completion of the Insynq asset acquisition, Insynq had
outstanding to various shareholders a number of warrants and options which
entitled the holders to purchase shares of restricted common stock of Insynq,
which warrants and options were converted into like warrants and options to
purchase shares of Xcel's common stock.
On August 3, 2000, at a special meeting of stockholders, Xcel completed
a re-incorporation merger with its wholly owned subsidiary, Insynq, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, pursuant to a plan of merger dated June 30, 2000. Pursuant
to the plan of merger, each stockholder of Xcel received two (2) shares of
Insynq common stock for each one (1) share of Xcel stock held on the date of the
merger and the Company's state of incorporation was changed to the State of
Delaware. On December 23, 2002, Insynq, Inc., a Delaware corporation, merged
with and into its wholly owned subsidiary, Insynq, Inc., a Nevada corporation
whereby Insynq, Inc. (Delaware) was reincorporated as a Nevada corporation.
Pursuant to the merger, each holder of Insynq Delaware common stock received one
share of common stock of Insynq Nevada for every one hundred shares of common
stock and the holders of preferred stock of Insynq Delaware received ten shares
of common stock of Insynq Nevada for every share of preferred stock of Insynq
Nevada.
INDUSTRY BACKGROUND
THE INTERNET
The Internet is fundamentally changing the way businesses interact with
their customers, partners and other businesses and has become an important
medium for both commerce and communications. Improvements in the quality and
reliability of global telecommunications networks and common Internet protocols
permit large volumes of data to be delivered to end users over a variety of
Internet-enabled devices. Businesses are now able to access and distribute a
wide array of software services over the Internet, allowing them to, among other
things, implement supply chain management solutions and enable other operating
functions on-line, market and sell products and services to customers and offer
web-based customer self-service programs. As a result, businesses are
substantially increasing their investments in Internet sites, services,
software, network infrastructure, information technology personnel and hardware
to utilize the reach and efficiency of the Internet.
Even as companies have increased their investments in Internet
infrastructure, the complexity of successfully deploying and maintaining
Internet business operations continues to increase. In particular, the software
infrastructure required to deploy and maintain Internet business operations has
become increasingly complex. For example, businesses deploying Internet business
operations can choose from multiple software applications with varying levels of
functionality and complexity, all of which must integrate to become a seamless
information system. In addition, with increasing globalization, businesses often
must maintain their operations in multiple locations and design their
infrastructure to accommodate local standards, while remaining synchronized with
operations in other geographies.
The in-house expertise required to meet these challenges is significant
and typically requires a host of technical specialists, including network
administrators, systems administrators, database administrators, security
experts, monitoring and management experts, project managers, software
operations specialists, troubleshooting specialists and performance engineers.
It is often difficult, time consuming and costly to hire and retain these
experts. Even if businesses can effectively hire and retain these experts,
deploying this talent to maintain a business' Internet infrastructure is
inefficient as it diverts these resources from enhancing a business' core
competencies.
To effectively manage the increasing complexity of Internet business
operations, we believe that companies require a new set of infrastructure
services to run Internet business operations on an automated and global basis. A
reliable, secure, expandable and cost-effective software infrastructure network
would permit businesses to focus on their core competencies and provide greater
functionality and flexibility than they could otherwise attain on their own.
Businesses could also access a global and robust technology infrastructure
without incurring the time or financial costs associated with building
equivalent functionality on their own. In addition, businesses would be able to
access the operational capacity they require to efficiently run their
Internet-based software applications, and to efficiently increase or reduce that
capacity as business needs dictate. The solution would also consistently deploy
and maintain businesses' operations across multiple locations via centralized
network operations centers.
We believe that we provide all of these services in an affordable and
easy to deliver package and that corporate information technology departments
have a resource that they can depend on to deliver advanced technology
solutions.
THE INDUSTRY
An application service provider can be defined as an entity that
supplies another company with leased applications, information technology
infrastructure and support services. Instead of buying hardware and business
software from vendors and using its own information technology staff to
implement and maintain the system, a customer contracts with an application
service provider for software applications and services that may include system
administration, upgrades and day-to-day operations such as backup, recovery and
security.
This arrangement enables customers to focus on getting value from
leased applications, free of the need to administer, maintain and upgrade them.
Renting rather than buying may provide a financial advantage, since such
services are treated as operating expenses, rather than capital investments.
There are many benefits available to organizations that utilize the
services of application service providers. We believe these benefits include a
solution to the scarcity of information technology staff, rapid software
application deployment, and a lower total cost of ownership. By avoiding the
time and cost of developing internal systems, customers also save money that
would otherwise be spent on maintenance, updates and training, raising their
overall productivity. Finally, application service provider customers are
protected from technological obsolescence and benefit from the latest
applications and services.
THE TECHNOLOGY
We believe that the following key features of our technology allow us
to provide dependable and affordable services to our clients:
Our IQ Data Utility Service was originally developed by Interactive, a
computer integration company located in Tacoma, Washington. The early stages of
the IQ Data Utility Services was purchased by Insynq in September 1998 and were
subsequently assumed by Xcel as part of the Insynq asset purchase agreement
entered into between Xcel and Insynq in February 2000. The complete IQ Data
Utility Service includes managed network and application services and can span
from a customer's keyboard to the data center. The final piece of the service is
the data center, which is located in Bellingham, Washington. This facility
houses our server equipment and routers and has redundant power, bandwidth, and
cooling.
In the process of developing the IQ Data Utility Service, we believe we
developed valuable technological expertise. We created new methodologies and
produced hardware and software that we believe is essential to the configuration
and effective management of Internet-based networks and outside deployment of
shared software applications.
To support Microsoft Corporation's Windows-based applications, the IQ
Data Utility Service uses proprietary Citrix Systems, Inc. independent computer
architecture software to increase end-user performance and reduce a customer's
total cost of owning and maintaining computer hardware and software. Our
technology allows us to manage all hosted application processing functions. The
centrally managed servers also house customers' data, provide storage and
backup, file and directory security, and anti-virus protection.
The IQ Data Utility Service receives and transmits information in the
form of images rather than data, requiring less bandwidth than traditional
network configurations. Customers may connect to the IQ Data Utility Service via
a variety of carriers and connectivity technologies, including public access
over the Internet with encryption, through private connections, or other
available access methods. Properly provisioned connections, whether public or
private, generally provide a quality end-user experience.
The first type of customer configuration, Internet browser-based Thin
Client devices, also called Internet Appliances, allow a user to interact with
the images transmitted over the Internet using only a monitor, keyboard, and a
mouse. The Internet Appliance actually does very little since its functions are
limited to sending user instructions to centrally managed servers. Using the IQ
Data Utility Services, an Internet Appliance communicates the user's data-entry
and retrieval commands to servers located at the data center, where all
computing functions are performed. Internet Appliances do not have disk or tape
drives which generally increases customer productivity by restricting users'
ability to install extraneous software applications, such as computer games, or
tamper with a computer's operating system. This access device imposes a
singleness of purpose upon the operation, and improves manageability,
simplicity, and reliability.
The traditional computer workstation, utilizing a central processing
unit and disk resources, constitutes the second type of customer configuration.
These customers may need to use fully equipped workstations for certain
individuals that utilize non-Windows software applications or very specialized,
complex applications such as computer aided design used, for example, in
engineering. This is not our recommended option because it does not free the
customer from the technical problems and service costs associated with
maintaining this type of configuration. Customers may choose to use existing
workstations to connect to the IQ Data Utility Services, however, because this
machine uses an operating system that we do not manage, the workstation may be
more susceptible to various failures.
Once connected to the IQ Data Utility Service, users can acquire any of
the following computer services:
VIRTUAL OFFICE - We can establish a virtual office for a customer, allowing
professionals, employers, employees, clients, and customers to utilize a wide
variety of software applications and/or interact directly in a network
environment. This office is always open, irrespective of the time of day or the
user's location.
OFFICE SOFTWARE SUITE - Customers may select from one (1) of three (3) Office
Software Suites as part of the virtual desktop subscription. Customers may also
select from a wide variety of other fully supported Windows-based software
applications. We serve some vertical markets and in many cases incorporate
specialized software for these customers. We regularly test new applications and
make them available to our customers. If a customer wishes to use Windows-based
software that is not already offered for use with our service, we may test, and
subsequently configure, load, and maintain compatible applications for an
additional monthly fee.
INTERNET CONNECTION - We may provide customers with connectivity to the Internet
through their Virtual Office as part of our service. Our customers must provide
their own local Internet connection in order access their service with us.
Customers may also provide private connections to our data centers.
WEB SITE HOSTING - For an additional fee, we may put the customer's Internet Web
site on one of our servers and host the site for them. Further, we can assist
our customer in performing Web site changes and updates.
DATA BACK-UP AND STORAGE - The IQ Data Utility Service provides daily automatic
backup of customer data on high-speed tape and logs the activity. Upon request,
a customer can receive their backup data and related backup logs. On average we
provide one (1) gigabyte of data storage with each business subscription. For
larger customers, we tailor storage requirements to the customers' needs and
price it accordingly.
SECURITY - We believe our IQ Data Utility Service generally raise the level of a
customer's computer security in several ways. First, our servers are located in
secured rooms with keycard access. Second, customers utilizing thin client
technology additionally prevents unauthorized disk installation and installation
of extraneous software, both of which can introduce computer corruptions and
viruses. Third, access to customer data is restricted through the use of secured
application servers located at the data centers, which are protected by firewall
filters and Internet protocol based networking rules. Last, customer data is
rarely transmitted; transmissions between the customer's site and the servers
located in the data centers generally occur in the form of indecipherable,
encrypted images.
REDUNDANCY - Our IQ Data Utility Service secures customer data on redundant disk
arrays with ready spare disk drives. We make a best effort to assure application
redundancy, so that if one server fails, we can reroute customers to similar
servers, thereby minimizing customer downtime.
OUR STRATEGIC PLAN
MARKET DRIVERS
We believe that the information technology requirements of midsize
enterprises are almost identical to those of Fortune 1000 enterprises. Despite
their large numbers and information technology requirements, small to medium
sized enterprises have limited budgets, which rarely makes them the direct
target of sophisticated professional service providers who are considered our
competitors. As a result, this sector of the economy remains open to the
services of emerging professional services providers like us.
KEY DIFFERENTIATORS
We believe we are different from other service providers due to our
focus on the information technology needs of both the small to medium sized
enterprise and the small office home office customers for low cost services.
These businesses require the same level of reliable information technology
services as Fortune 1000 businesses, but generally do not have the financial
resources to make the required investment for Internet business operations. We
enable these customers to rent, on an as needed basis, their information
technology needs.
CHALLENGES
Our greatest challenge is to educate our target markets regarding the
cost savings and productivity enhancements gained through using Internet based
computing services as an alternative to traditionally deployed computer
networks.
STRATEGY
We will continue to position our products and services as a cost
effective way to utilize the latest computer network technologies without making
a significant investment in computer equipment, software or private
telecommunications network infrastructure.
We market and sell our services primarily through the sales
organizations of independent software vendors, telecommunications and Internet
service providers, managed service providers and technology consultants.
We intend to continue to invest in the development and integration of
additional services that address the evolving needs of our customers. Our goal
is to integrate additional product enhancements that extend the capabilities of
our services across a large universe of existing and potential customers. We
believe that by continuing to broaden our service offerings, we will be viewed
by our customers as the single and best source for all of their information
technology service requirements. There can be no assurance, however, that we
will be successful in accomplishing our goal.
In addition to expanding the scope of our services, we are also
developing services geared to the needs of particular segments of our customer
base. We will continue to review the applicability of our service offerings to
our target customers and create additional category- specific offerings based on
the size and profitability of the market segment.
While we believe that it is paramount that we remain focused on our
plan, we must have the ability inherent in any company to adapt to changing
market conditions.
In addition to internally generated growth, we intend to expand our
business through strategic acquisitions in the United States and possibly
abroad. We believe our acquisitions will allow us to accelerate our penetration
of key geographical markets, broaden our offerings of products and services,
expand our technical staff, as well as our market entry points. To attain this
goal, we are aggressively pursuing opportunities to merge and/or acquire
compatible companies with which to utilize management, financial and operational
resources. We presently do not have any current plans to enter into an
acquisition, financing or other business combination.
SALES AND MARKETING
We focus our sales and marketing efforts on the small to medium size
enterprise and the small office home office market. Although specific definition
for these market segments vary somewhat, we view the high-end small office home
office market to represent small offices with up to ten employees, and the small
to medium size enterprise market to represent companies that employs
approximately 11 to 500 people. We will occasionally pursue larger
opportunities. We sell to these segments through the sales organizations of the
software publishers, information technology consultants, telecommunication
carriers and Internet service providers.
We have developed a packaged service offering targeting these small
businesses that delivers a combination of software and marketing services
designed for these market segments.
COMPETITION
The market for Internet based data processing and information
technology services is rapidly evolving and intensely competitive. In addition
to internally built and supported operations, our primary current and
prospective competitors include:
o providers of computer equipment;
o co-location, web site hosting and related services;
o technology vendors that have recently announced their intentions to offer
some of the services that we offer currently to a portion of our targeted
customer base; and
o providers of Internet based systems integration or professional services.
Many of our competitors have been in business longer than us, have
significantly greater financial, technical, and other resources, or greater name
recognition. Our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or
emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements. Competition could
negatively impact our ability to sell additional services on terms favorable to
us. Competitive pressures could cause us to lose market share or to reduce the
price of our services, either of which could harm our business, financial
condition and operating results.
We believe that the principal competitive factors in our market
include:
o quality and reliability of services offered;
o scope of supported applications and technology platforms;
o ability to expand the operational environments supported;
o extent to which the services offered provide a complete solution to a
potential customer's operations requirements;
o engineering and technical expertise and development of automation software;
o rapid deployment of services;
o quality of customer service and support;
o and price.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
There are currently few laws or regulations directly governing access
to, or commerce upon, the Internet. Due to the increasing popularity and use of
the Internet, it is possible that a number of laws and regulations may be
adopted with respect to the Internet, covering issues such as user privacy,
pricing and characteristics and quality of products and services.
Such legislation could dampen the growth in the use of the Internet
generally and decrease the acceptance of the Internet as a communications and
commercial medium, and could, thereby, have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition. Other nations,
including Germany, have taken actions to restrict the free flow of material
deemed to be objectionable on the Internet. In addition, several connectivity
carriers are seeking to have connectivity over the Internet regulated by the
Federal Communications Commission in the same manner as other connectivity
services. For example, America's Carriers Connectivity Association has filed a
petition with the Commission for this purpose. In addition, because the growing
popularity and use of the Internet has burdened the existing connectivity
infrastructure and many areas with high Internet use have begun to experience
interruptions in phone service, local telephone carriers, such as Pacific Bell,
have petitioned the Commission to regulate Internet service providers and online
service providers, in a manner similar to long distance telephone carriers and
to impose access fees on these service providers. If either of these petitions
is granted, or the relief sought therein is otherwise granted, the costs of
communicating on the Internet could increase substantially, potentially slowing
the growth in use of the Internet, which could in turn decrease the demand for
our products.
Also it is possible that laws will be adopted or current laws
interpreted in a manner to impose liability on online service providers, such as
us, for linking to third party content providers and other Internet sites that
include materials that infringe copyrights or other rights of others. Such laws
and regulations if enacted could have an adverse effect on our business,
operating results and financial condition. Moreover, the applicability to the
Internet upon the existing laws governing issues such as property ownership,
copyright defamation, obscenity and personal privacy is uncertain, and we may be
subject to claims that our services violate such laws. Any such new legislation
or regulation or the application of existing laws and regulations to the
Internet could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results
and financial condition.
In addition, as our products and services are available over the
Internet in multiple states and foreign countries, such jurisdictions may claim
that we are required to qualify to do business as a foreign corporation in each
such state or foreign country. We are qualified to do business only in the
states of Washington and California, and our failure to qualify as a foreign
corporation in a jurisdiction where we are required to do so could subject us to
taxes and penalties and could result in the our inability to enforce contracts
in such jurisdictions. Any such new legislation or regulation, the application
of laws and regulations from jurisdictions whose laws do not currently apply to
our business, or the application of existing laws and regulations to the
Internet and other online services may severely restrict the sale of new
contracts and materially effect our ability to maintain our current customers.
At present, we do not collect sales or other similar taxes in respect
of sales and shipments of our products through Internet purchases. However,
various states have sought to impose state sales tax collection obligations on
out-of-state direct marketing companies similar to us. A successful assertion by
one or more of these states that it should have collected or be collecting sales
tax on the sale of our products could result in additional costs and
corresponding price increases to its customers. The U.S. Congress has passed
legislation limiting for three years the ability of states to impose taxes on
Internet-based transactions. Failure to renew this legislation could result in
the broad imposition of state taxes on e-commerce.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND PROPRIETARY RIGHTS
We regard our service marks, trademarks, domain names, and similar
intellectual property as critical to our success. We have applied for federal
trademark or service mark registration of a number of names and terms, including
"Insynq," "Your Internet Utility Company," "Interlynq," and "Idesq." Our domain
names include, INSYNQ.com, ON-Q.net, SIMPLENETWORKS.net, APPLICATIONVAULT.com,
MESSAGEIQ.com, OURACCOUNTING.com, OURBOOKEEPER.com, and RAPIDNETWORKS.com, all
of which are now owned by us. We have also applied for a patent covering our
multi-platform network application management and connectivity system: our
InterLynQ and IdesQ components of our customer premise equipment solution.
We rely on trademark, unfair competition and copyright law, trade
secret protection and contracts such as confidentiality and license agreements
with our employees, customers, partners, and others to protect our proprietary
rights. Despite precautions, it may be possible for competitors to obtain and/or
use the proprietary information without authorization, or to develop
technologies similar to ours and independently create a similarly functioning
infrastructure. Furthermore, the protection of proprietary rights in
Internet-related industries is uncertain and still evolving. The laws of some
foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent, as do
the laws of the United States. Protection for proprietary rights in the United
States or abroad may not be adequate.
We intend to continue to license certain technology from third parties
such as Citrix, Microsoft, and others, for our technologies that support
business systems. The market is evolving and we may need to license additional
technologies to remain competitive. We may not be able to license these
technologies on commercially reasonable terms or at all. In addition, we may
fail to successfully integrate licensed technology into our operations.
Although we are not aware of any infringement or misappropriation of
our intellectual property or similar proprietary rights, it may be anticipated
that infringements and misappropriations will occur as our business grows and
there is more brand loyalty attaching to our trade names and domain names. We
intend to police against infringement or misappropriation. However, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to enforce our rights and enjoin the alleged
infringers from their use of confusingly similar trademarks, service marks,
telephone numbers, and domain names.
In addition, third parties may assert infringement claims against us.
We cannot be certain that our technologies or trademarks do not infringe valid
patents, trademarks, copyrights, or other proprietary rights held by third
parties. We may be subject to legal proceedings and claims from time to time
relating to the intellectual property of others in the ordinary course of our
business. Intellectual property litigation is expensive and time-consuming and
could divert management resources away from running the business.
RECENT RESTRUCTURING
We have implemented cost restructuring strategies of our operations,
both in sales and marketing and in our executive management team, and
implemented certain cost-cutting measures. We believe this restructuring and the
cost-cutting measures, which resulted in a workforce reduction of approximately
55 people - mostly in sales-related positions - in addition to changes to our
executive management team, will allow us to:
o reduce operating costs,
o provide operational efficiencies, and
o focus on the development of strategic business plans in preparation for
future growth initiatives.
As part of our corporate cost restructuring, we consolidated our sales
activities into our corporate headquarters office in Tacoma, Washington. We are
planning a redeployment of a national direct sales force in the future to
augment our relationship with outside sales organizations; however, there can
be no assurance that the redeployment will occur.
In addition to the restructuring, retroactive to September 1, 2000 we
reduced salaries and benefits for certain members of executive management and
certain other employees. Also, we have negotiated with many of our vendors to
reduce the amounts owed or to extend more favorable payment terms. We have also
entered into a letter of intent whereby our board of directors will designate a
portion of our 10,000,000 shares of authorized preferred stock, which, pursuant
to the letter of intent, will be sold to one individual in exchange for the
cancellation of approximately $1,300,000 of our long-term debt. Should our
directors authorize the designation of class A preferred stock and should a
definitive preferred stock purchase agreement be entered into, the class A
preferred stock issued to the debt holder will be convertible into 25% of our
company.
We believe that the combination of the restructuring, the salary
reductions and negotiated trade payables and other liabilities will reduce our
corporate overhead.
CUSTOMER SERVICE
Our customer support service is comprised of Customer Service
Representatives, Customer Support Representatives and is further supplemented by
Senior Technical Support Representatives consisting of Microsoft, Citrix, Novell
and Cisco Certified Engineers and Insynq Server Technicians. Customer Support is
available via toll-free telephone lines to offer support for any aspect of the
IQ Data Utility Service.
EMPLOYEES
We currently have ten employees, including four full-time management,
one part-time clerical, two technical people, two customer support personnel,
one marketing and sales personnel. We may, from to time, review our staffing
requirements.
MANAGEMENT
Our board of directors consists of John P. Gorst, M. Carroll Benton and
David D. Selmon, each of whom took this position upon or shortly after the
consummation of the asset purchase on February 18, 2000, and continued in these
positions after the re-incorporation merger effected on August 3, 2000. On
November 19, 2001, our stockholders approved the election of Donald Kaplan as
a director. Donald Kaplan subsequently resigned effective June 3, 2002.
Our executive officers include:
o John P. Gorst, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the
Board;
o M. Carroll Benton, Chief Administrative Officer, Secretary and Treasurer;
and
o Joanie C. Mann, Vice President of Strategic Alliances.
In September 2000, we appointed Stephen C. Smith as our interim chief
financial officer. On May 6, 2002 we accepted Stephen Smith's resignation
effective June 30, 2002. In April 2001, James R. Leigh, III, president and chief
technology officer resigned from executive management to become our general
manager of technical operations and subsequently resigned his position with us
in November 2001.
NEED FOR ADDITIONAL CAPITAL
Our securities purchase agreements with our debenture investors
prohibit us from entering into any financial arrangement that would involve
the issuance of common stock for a period of two years from the date of two
registration statements filed October 3, 2001 and June 25, 2002, respectively,
without offering a right of first refusal to the debenture investors.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES
Our principal executive offices are located at 1127 Broadway Plaza,
Suite 202, Tacoma, Washington, 98402, and our telephone number is (253)
284-2000. Under our current internal cost restructuring, we have leased, for a
term of one year, new facilities, which consist of approximately 4,000 square
feet and is located in Tacoma Washington. We pay a monthly fee of $2,100 for the
use of these facilities. These new facilities consolidate all of our
departments, such as, sales, customer, engineering and administrative services.
We have consolidated our data center requirements to facilities located in
Bellingham, Washington with a renewable one-year term for a monthly fee of
$5,950.
In addition, we have terminated leased facilities in Newport Beach,
California and three leased facilities in Tacoma, Washington. We believe this
consolidation arrangement is adequate to support our future operations.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We were a party to a lawsuit filed in the Superior Court for the State
of Washington for Pierce County, dated May 31, 2001, by William G. Hargin,
former vice president of sales and marketing. The lawsuit alleged that we
breached a written employment contract and breached a written termination
agreement. Mr. Hargin alleged that under such contract and agreement, he was
owed $114,858.39 plus 12% interest and options to purchase 1,500 fully vested
shares of our common stock exercisable at $34.00 per share. In August 2001, we
entered into a settlement and release agreement under the terms of which we were
to pay Mr. Hargin $17,500 and issue a non-qualified stock option for 2,000
shares of common stock with an exercise price of $6.50 per share. As of
September 10, 2002, we have not made the cash payment and the option remain
unexercised.
We were a party to a lawsuit filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey
Hudson County, dated August 6, 2001, by PR Newswire Association, Inc., one of
our vendors. The lawsuit alleged that we breached a promise to pay for goods and
services rendered. PR Newswire alleged that under such promise it is owed
$20,760. In February 2002, PR Newswire obtained a default judgment against us in
the amount $16,500, plus reasonable attorney fees. As of September 10, 2002, the
amount of the judgment is unpaid.
On September 6, 2001, the Company was served with a summons and
complaint by our former landlords, asserting:
o a breach of a settlement agreement entered into in May 2001 to register
5,000 shares of common stock, valued at $80,000, in partial settlement of
its then existing lease, and
o a default by us on two new long-term lease obligations.
This lawsuit, dated October 4, 2001, was filed in Superior Court of
Pierce County. Terms of the first lease call for base monthly payments of
$12,046 for the period of August 1, 2001 to July 31, 2006, plus triple net
charges estimated at approximately $3,038 per month and beginning in year two,
an increase equal to the change in the annual consumer price index but not less
than annual increase of 3%. Minimum aggregate lease payments and triple net
charges approximate $954,500 over the term of the lease. Terms of the second
lease call for monthly payments, beginning in June 2001 of approximately $4,000
per month, or a total of $80,000 for the remaining term of the lease from August
1, 2001 to May 31, 2003. On October 4, 2001, our former landlords filed a
summons and complaint with local jurisdictional court for a summary judgment
motion on all claims. All claims under this motion were initially denied.
However, on May 10, 2002, the court awarded a partial summary judgment in favor
of the former landlords for approximately $170,000. We anticipate filing a
motion to request the court to vacate the partial summary judgment in light of
new evidence and/or appeal the court's decision.
We are delinquent in the payment of approximately $699,059 of business
and payroll taxes, plus an estimated $270,028 of related assessed penalties and
interest. In April 2002, the Internal Revenue Service filed a federal tax lien
against our assets for the past due employment related taxes, penalties and
interest. We have retained legal counsel to represent us in our current
negotiations with the Internal Revenue Service about a payment plan for the past
due taxes. We have submitted an offer in compromise to the Internal Revenue
Service seeking relief on a portion of our overall obligation and structure a
payment plan on the settled amount of taxes due. The Internal Revenue Service
has imposed certain conditions on us in order to proceed with negotiations, one
of which requires us to remain current on all future payroll tax deposits and
reporting. There can be no assurances, however, that we will be able to agree or
commit to any proposed terms set forth by the Internal Revenue Service. If we
are unsuccessful, the Internal Revenue Service could take possession of some or
all of our assets. Should this occur, we likely would be forced to cease our
operations.
We are a party to a lawsuit, dated July 2, 2002, by Frank Codispoti,
former director of sales and marketing. The lawsuit alleges breach of contract,
wage and hour violations and violation of the Washington law against
discrimination. We have reached a settlement of the matter.
We have defaulted on an equipment lease entered into with Hewlett
Packard.
We have defaulted on a Software License Agreement dated September 29,
2000 entered into with National Associates, Inc. (McAfee).
We have defaulted on a Service Provider License Agreement dated
September 6, 2000 entered into with Microsoft, Inc.
MANAGEMENT
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The names of our directors and executive officers, their principal
occupations, and the year in which each of our directors and executive officers
initially joined the board of directors are set forth below.
NAME AGE POSITION
<c>
John P. Gorst 34 Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director
M. Carroll Benton 58 Chief Administrative Officer, Secretary,
Treasurer and Director
David D. Selmon 46 Director
Joanie C. Mann 41 Vice President of Strategic Alliances
JOHN P. GORST has served as our Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and Director since February 2000, and served as our President since
April 2001. Mr. Gorst, a co-founder of Insynq-WA, was with Insynq-WA from 1998
until its acquisition by Xcel Management, Inc. in 2000. Mr. Gorst has over
twelve years experience in founding entrepreneurial technology ventures,
specifically in the development of software and data services for businesses.
The prior experience of Mr. Gorst includes serving as a co-founder of
Microcomputer Training Professionals, Inc., a training/IS consulting business in
conjunction with Nynex Business Centers of New York, from 1989 to 1991; Vice
President and General Manager of Business Development for Relational Technology
Professionals, Inc. from 1991 to 1993; and as Vice President and General Manager
of Interactive Information Systems Corp. from 1996 to 1998.
M. CARROLL BENTON has served as our Chief Administrative Officer,
Secretary, Treasurer and Director since February 2000. Ms. Benton was a
co-founder of Insynq-WA and has been with us since its inception. Ms. Benton has
worked with banking systems and higher education institutions where she assisted
in information systems development and deployment strategies. She managed a 13
state insurance brokerage firm and has been a consultant to the small-to
medium-sized business markets via accounting system design, support, and
business practice analysis. Carroll also taught undergraduate accounting courses
at several Puget Sound colleges and universities. Formerly with a local CPA
firm, she brings us over 25 years of business and financial expertise.
DAVID D. SELMON has served as our director since February 2000. Mr.
Selmon is a certified tax professional and has practiced with David Selmon, Inc.
since 1982. In August 1999, a complaint against Mr. Selmon was filed by the
National Futures Association, or NFA, alleging that Mr. Selmon violated high
standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principals of trade in that
he, along with others, aided and abetted an individual in acting in a manner
which required such individual to be an NFA member or associated after such
individual had been barred permanently from the NFA. Mr. Selmon, without
admitting or denying the allegations raised in such complaint, agreed to
withdraw from the NFA in all capacities and to refrain from applying in the
future for any status with the NFA.
JOANIE C. MANN has served as our vice president of strategic alliances
since February 2001, and served as our vice president of operations from July
2000 to February 2001. She brings over 18 years of experience in multi-user
system design and implementation, voice and data networking integrations. Ms.
Mann also has extensive experience in business process automation and a strong
background in business accounting principles. Previous positions held include
founder of Com-Pacific Resources, Inc., a network integration firm whose
business operations were sold to Communications World International, for whom
she worked from 1984 to 1993, manager of the Seattle-based computer telephony
and data integration division of Commworld from 1994 to 1996, and IS Management
Consultant for Interactive Information Systems from 1998 to 1999.
There are no family relationships among any of our directors or
executive officers. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" for a
description of transactions between our directors, executive officers and/or
their affiliates.
In a consulting agreement we assumed with One Click Investments, LLC,
originally entered into on September 20, 1999, with Insynq-WA, One Click was
granted the right to appoint one person to serve on our board of directors. One
Click has not yet exercised the right to appoint a member to our board.
In a business services agreement we assumed with Consulting & Strategy
International, LLC, originally entered into on November 18, 1999, with Insynq-
WA, CSI was granted the right to appoint two persons to serve on our board of
directors, such members not to exceed forty percent (40%) of our board, subject
to our stock becoming publicly traded. Pursuant to the purchase of Insynq-WA by
Xcel, our stock began trading publicly on February 18, 2000. CSI has not yet
exercised its right to appoint two members to our board.
Pursuant to a consulting agreement we entered into with David D.
Selmon, Mr. Selmon will receive 35 shares of our common stock for each full
fiscal quarter he serves on our board beginning June 1, 2000. Mr. Selmon also
receives $250 for each board meeting attended. To date, Mr. Selmon has received
31,500 shares as director compensation and 1,295,614 shares in lieu of cash
payments for expenses.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table summarizes the compensation earned by or paid to
our Chief Executive Officer and the other most highly compensated executive
officers whose total salary and bonuses exceeded $100,000 for services rendered
in all capacities during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2002. We refer to these
individuals as our named executive officers.
The total compensation for the three fiscal years ended May 31, 2002 of
John P. Gorst, our Chief Executive Officer, M. Carroll Benton, our Chief
Administrative Officer, and James R. Leigh, III, our former President and Chief
Technology Officer and current general manager of technical operations, is set
forth below in the following Summary Compensation Table. No other person
received cash compensation in excess of $100,000 during the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2002.
ANNUAL COMPENSATION LONG-TERM AWARDS
SECURITIES
NAME AND PRINCIPAL OTHER ANNUAL UNDERLYING OPTIONS ALL OTHER
POSITION YEAR SALARY ($) BONUS ($) COMPENSATION ($) (3) (#) COMPENSATION ($)
John P. Gorst 2002 $112,000 -- -- 42,196 --
President, Chief 2001 $160,000 -- $ 6,876 754 --
Executive Officer 2000 $107,919 $1,624 $20,129 30,000 (2) --
M. Carroll Benton 2002 $67,500 -- -- 30,307
Secretary, Treasurer
and Chief 2001 $96,900 -- $ 6,876 746 --
Administrative Officer 2000 $58,750 $8,060 $10,543 20,000 (2) --
James R. Leigh, III (4) 2002 $ 53,852 -- -- 728 --
Chief Technical 2001 $102,630 -- $ 6,876 215 --
Officer 2000 $ 74,957 $1,624 $25,000 7,800 --
(1) The compensation described in this table does not include medical,
group life insurance or other benefits received by the named executive
officers that are available generally to all of our salaried employees,
and may not include certain perquisites and other personal benefits
received by the named executive officers that do not exceed the lesser
of $50,000 or ten percent (10%) of any such officer's salary and bonus
disclosed in the table.
(2) Represents options for class A common stock granted under our 2000
Executive Long Term Incentive Plan. As of February 21, 2003, these
options have been exercised and have been converted to common stock
pursuant to the terms of the Plan.
(3) Includes non-cash compensation, in the form of common stock, for
services performed for us. During fiscal year 2001 each executive
officer rescinded the non-cash compensation received in fiscal year
2000.
OPTION/SAR GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
LONG TERM INCENTIVE AWARDS
The following table provides information related to long-term incentive
awards granted to our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended May
31, 2002. The information in this table reflects options granted by the board of
directors under our 2000 Executive Long Term Incentive Plan and our 2000 Long
Term Incentive Plan, which plans were approved by our stockholders on August 3,
2000.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION FISCAL YEAR AWARDS
----------------------------------------------------------
NUMBER OF SHARES, UNITS PERFORMANCE OR OTHER PERIOD
OR OTHER RIGHTS UNTIL MATURATION OR PAYOUT
(#)
<s> <c> <c> <c>
John P. Gorst, President, Chief 2002 42,196 Vested upon grant
Executive Officer and Director
M. Carroll Benton, Secretary, 2002 30,307 Vested upon grant
Treasurer; Chief Administrative
Officer and Director
James R. Leigh, III 2002 728 Vested Upon Grant
Chief Technical Officer (1)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
The following table provides information related to options granted to
our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2002. The
information in this table reflects options granted by the board of directors
under our 2000 Executive Long Term Incentive Plan and our 2000 Long Term
Incentive Plan, which plans were approved by our stockholders on August 3, 2000.
The following table sets forth each grant of stock options made during
the fiscal year ended May 31, 2002, to the named executive officers:
% OF TOTAL
NUMBER OF SECURITIES OPTIONS GRANTED
UNDERLYING IN FISCAL 2001 EXERCISE PRICE EXPIRATION
NAME OPTIONS GRANTED (1) PER SHARE DATE (3)
<s> <c> <c> <c> <c>
John P. Gorst 586 * $34.38 6/1/11
15,000 10.96% $1.30 12/1/11
26,661 19.45% $1.40 1/31/12
M. Carroll Benton 307 * $34.38 6/1/11
15,000 10.96% $1.40 1/31/12
15,000 10.96% $1.40 1/31/12
James R. Leigh (2) 728 * $34.38 6/1/11
o Less than 1%
(1) Based on a total of 136,841 options granted during the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2002.
(2) Options may terminate before their expiration date upon death, disability,
or termination of employment.
AGGREGATE OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR END OPTION VALUES
The following table sets forth, for each of the named executive
officers, information concerning the number of shares received during fiscal
2002 upon exercise of options and the aggregate dollar amount received from such
exercise, as well as the number and value of securities underlying unexercised
options held on May 31, 2002.
NUMBER OF SECURITIES
SHARES ACQUIRED VALUE UNDERLYING OPTIONS VALUE OF IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS
ON EXERCISE (#) REALIZED ($)(1) AT YEAR END (#) AT YEAR-END ($)(2)
EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
NAME
<s> <c> <c> <c> <c> <c> <c>
John P. Gorst 30,000 -- 42,950 -- -- --
M. Carroll Benton 20,000 -- 31,053 -- -- --
James R. Leigh, III -- -- 942 -- -- --
(1) Based on the difference between the option exercise price and the fair
market value of our common stock on the exercise date as determined
pursuant to the terms of the 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan and the 2000
Executive Long Term Incentive Plan.
(2) Based on the difference between the option exercise price and the closing
sale price of $0.30 of our common stock as reported on the OTC Bulletin
Board on May 31, 2002, the last trading day of our 2002 fiscal year. None
of these options are currently in the money.
(3) Represents options for class A common stock granted under our 2000
Executive Long Term Incentive Plan. As of February 21, 2003, these options
have been exercised and have been converted to common stock pursuant to the
terms of the Plan.
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS AND TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
In March 2000, we entered into executive employment agreements with
each of John P. Gorst and M. Carroll Benton. Our board of directors approved the
principal terms of the executive agreements on February 21, 2000, and on January
30, 2001, approved amendments to each executive agreement.
The executive agreement, as amended, with Mr. Gorst, pursuant to which
Mr. Gorst is employed as our chief executive officer, extends the initial term
of employment from three to four years and provides for an annual salary of
$225,000 during the first year; $175,000 during the second year; $200,000 during
the third year and $275,000 during the fourth year of employment. In addition,
the amended agreement provides the following:
o at the end of the second year for the payment of payroll taxes with regard
to sales of stock up to $30,000 and an option grant of 5,000 shares of
common stock if our stock trades at or over $3.00 per share in any 30-day
trading period during the year;
o at the end of the third year a cash bonus of $30,000 and an option grant of
5,000 shares of common stock if our stock trades at or over $6.00 per share
in a 30-day trading period during the year; and
o at the end of the fourth year a cash bonus of $30,000 and an option grant
of 5,000 shares of common stock granted if our stock trades at or over
$12.00 per share in a 30-day trading period during the year.
All other provisions of the original employment agreement remain the
same.
The executive agreement, as amended, with Ms. Benton, pursuant to which
Ms. Benton is employed as our chief administrative officer, extends the initial
term of employment from three to four years and provides for an annual salary of
$135,000 during the first year; $125,000 during the second year; $140,000 during
the third year; and $165,000 during the fourth year of employment. In addition,
the amended agreement provides, (a) at the end of the second year for an option
grant of 3,000 shares of common stock if our stock trades at or over $3.00 per
share in a 30-day trading period during the year; (b) at the end of third year
an option grant of 3,000 shares of common stock if our stock trades at or over
$6.00 per share in a 30-day trading period during the year; (c) and at the end
of the fourth year an option for 3,000 shares of common stock if our stock
trades at or over $12.00 per share in a 30-day trading period during the year.
All other provisions of the original employment agreement remain the same.
We entered into an employment agreement with James R. Leigh, III,
effective as of February 20, 2000, providing for his employment as our chief
technical officer. Mr. Leigh was appointed as our President on September 22,
2000. The employment agreement provides for an initial employment term of three
years and for automatic one-year renewals thereafter unless terminated by either
party in writing on or before ninety days prior to the end of a current term of
the agreement. Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Leigh will be
paid an annual salary of no less than $105,000 plus $8,000 bonus for the first
year of employment. This salary will be increased to no less than $130,000 in
the second year and no less than $150,000 in the third year. Mr. Leigh has been
granted options to purchase a total of 7,800 shares of our common stock as
follows: 500 vested options at an exercise price of $50.00 and 7,300 options
which will vest and are exercisable at an exercise price of $100.00 as follows:
24,334 shares vested on February 20, 2001, and thereafter in increments of 1/24
(203) each month beginning March 20, 2001, and continuing until 2003. The
agreement contains both non-disclosure and non-competition clauses. Effective
April 4, 2001, Mr. Leigh resigned his position as both president and chief
technical officer to become our general manager of technical operations. Mr.
Leigh retains his stock options. Subsequently, in November 2001, Mr. Leigh
resigned his position with us.
We entered into an employment agreement with Stephen C. Smith,
effective as of September 18, 2000, providing for Mr. Smith's interim employment
as chief financial officer. The initial employment agreement provided for an
initial employment term of fifteen weeks, which would be continued on a weekly
basis for a period of one (1) year, on such terms and conditions set forth in
the employment agreement. Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Smith
will be paid a weekly salary of no less than $100 per week plus a signing bonus
of $2,500 and an incentive stock option to purchase 600 shares of our common
stock at an exercise price of $30.00 per share. The agreement contains both
non-disclosure and non-competition clauses. On December 1, 2000, Mr. Smith
executed Amendment No. 1 to his employment agreement in which his base salary
was increased to $2,500 per week to be received for any week he is located at
our headquarters. All of the options granted under the original employment
agreement were terminated. On July 20, 2001, Mr. Smith executed Amendment No. 2
to his employment agreement in which he will receive a stock option in the
amount of 2,500 shares of common stock on the filing date of each Form 10-KSB
and a stock option in the amount 250 shares of common stock on the filing date
of each Form 10-QSB with an exercise price determined on the date of filing. In
addition, Mr. Smith will receive $2,500 for each week he is located at our
headquarters.
We entered into an employment agreement with Joanie C. Mann on February
20, 2000, providing for her employment as our vice president of operations. The
employment agreement provides for an initial employment term of three years, and
automatic one-year renewals thereafter, unless terminated by either party in
writing on or before ninety days prior to the end of a current term of the
agreement. Under the terms of the employment agreement, Ms. Mann will be paid an
annual salary of no less than $85,000 for the first year of employment. This
salary will be increased to no less than $110,000 in the second year and no less
than $125,000 in the third year. Ms. Mann has been granted options to purchase a
total of 4,500 shares of our common stock as follows: 500 options that are
currently exercisable at an exercise price of $50.00 and 4,000 options which
will vest and are exercisable at an exercise price of $100.00 as follows: 1,334
shares on February 20, 2001, and thereafter in increments of 1/24 (112) each
month beginning March 20, 2001, and continuing until 2003. The agreement
contains both non-disclosure and non-competition clauses. On September 25, 2000,
Ms. Mann executed Amendment No. 1 to her agreement in which she agreed to a
thirty percent (30%) reduction in salary until the earlier of (a) an elapse of
three months or (b) we receive $1 million in financing. Also on September 25,
2000, Ms. Mann executed Amendment No. 2 to her agreement in which she received
an increase in her base salary to $95,000 per year. In February 2001, Ms. Mann
assumed the position of vice president of strategic alliances.
We may enter into other employment agreements from time to time with
other executives and key employees.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Interactive is a company wholly owned by M. Carroll Benton, our Chief
Administrative Officer, Secretary and Treasurer. John P. Gorst, our Chief
Executive Officer, was also Vice President and general manager of Interactive.
During their time at Interactive, Ms. Benton and Mr. Gorst began developing the
"Insynq Project," which later developed into our current business. On September
16, 1998, Interactive transferred to Charles Benton, husband of Ms. Benton and
then a creditor of Interactive, all of Interactive's title and interest in and
to
o certain equipment and other tangible personal property, and
o the intellectual properties, computer software, trademarks, copyrights,
ideas, work-in-progress, and other tangible and intangible property
comprising the system known as the "Insynq Project" to retire a $200,000
debt obligation owed by Interactive to Charles Benton.
These assets later developed into Insynq's IQ Delivery System. Mr.
Benton contributed all of the "Insynq Project" intellectual property assets to
Insynq-WA in exchange for the initial 55,000 shares of common stock issued by
Insynq-WA at the time of its formation. On the same date, Mr. Benton sold the
equipment and other tangible property to the newly formed Insynq-WA, in exchange
for a $70,000 promissory note. Mr. Benton then sold 27,500 shares to each of Ms.
Benton and Mr. Gorst in exchange for a $65,000 note from each of them secured by
the shares. During the start-up operations of Insynq-WA, the business contacts
of Interactive were utilized in the purchase of supplies and other items for
Insynq-WA. As of September 30, 1999, Insynq-WA owed Interactive $117,024 related
to these purchases, and on November 12, 1999, the board of Insynq-WA approved
the issuance of 1,180 shares of its common stock in full payment of this debt,
after a board determination that the shares of Insynq-WA should be valued at
$100 per share.
On September 22, 2000, we executed a Release Agreement with M. Carroll
Benton, our chief administrative officer, secretary and treasurer, John Gorst,
our chief executive officer, Charles Benton, the husband of Ms. Benton,
Interactive Information Systems, an entity owned by Ms. Benton, and entities
controlled by Mr. Benton, which, with certain exceptions, releases the parties
from any and all claims, if any, arising from the parties' prior relationships
and dealings prior to the release date. Among the consideration given for the
Release Agreement, we granted Mr. Benton registration rights to register his
shares of common stock. In addition, Mr. Gorst, Mr. Benton and Ms. Benton
executed a Release Agreement (the Gorst Release) to fully and finally release
Mr. Gorst personally of any obligations arising under the $65,000 promissory
note he owed to Mr. Benton secured by shares of our stock he originally
purchased from Mr. Benton, as well as a general release of Mr. Gorst, with
certain exceptions, by Mr. and Mrs. Benton and certain entities affiliated with
them. In consideration of the Gorst Release, Mr. Gorst agreed to transfer 1,500
shares of our common stock held by him to Mr. Benton, and Ms. Benton transferred
approximately 980 shares of common stock held by her to Mr. Benton.
On October 17, 2000, we executed a Lock-Up and Waiver Agreement with
Mr. Benton with respect to the 4,965 shares of our common stock owned by him.
Under the agreement, he waived any rights he may have to exercise any
registration right for a period of 180 trading days after a contemplated
registration statement is filed with the SEC. This agreement was amended on
November 30, 2000, to allow Mr. Benton to sell 500 shares per calendar quarter
during the term of the lock up agreement.
On October 31, 2000, we executed a Consulting Agreement with CFB
Associates, Inc., and specifically Charles F. Benton, CPA, for him to provide
consulting services on general operational issues for a period of three (3)
months. We have agreed to compensate CFB in the amount of $350 per hour. For
previous consulting services performed by Mr. Benton, we have agreed to
guarantee Mr. Benton a minimum of eighty-six (86) hours at this rate.
Additionally, we agree to pay to CFB $5,000 per month for eight (8) consecutive
months beginning November 30, 2000. On November 1, 2001, we amended the term of
the agreement effective August 1, 2001 through November 30, 2002.
On June 1, 2000, we entered into a Master Licensing Agreement with My
Partner Online, Inc. (MPO), a company two-thirds owned by M. Carroll Benton and
Charles Benton. The agreement is for a term of five (5) years with an automatic
one-year extension unless either party notifies the other of termination within
ninety (90) days. Either party for breach or insolvency may terminate the
agreement at any time. Under the agreement, MPO has a non-exclusive, worldwide
license to promote, market, distribute and sublicense application hosting
services, bundled or unbundled with MPO products. MPO must use reasonable
commercial efforts to market, promote, and distribute our services by marketing
them through their sales activity. We have agreed to charge MPO a below-market
rate for subscription pricing and to forgive the $5,000 monthly maintenance fee
in exchange for the right to exercise an option to purchase a five percent (5%)
equity position in MPO. On November 29, 2000, this agreement was amended to
specifically detail the services MPO is to provide, and also requires that MPO
purchase 100 of our seats at $50.00 per seat for a period of twelve (12) months,
beginning on December 1, 2000. On November 1, 2001, we amended the term of the
agreement through December 1, 2002.
On November 28, 2000, we executed an Independent Consultant Agreement
with MPO and Summer J. Mathews, MPO's president. The Consultant Agreement is for
a term of three (3) months beginning December 1, 2000, and is automatically
renewable for additional three (3) month terms unless terminated by either party
upon thirty (30) days notice. For consulting services, we have agreed to pay a
consulting fee of $15,000 in the form of shares of our common stock at $96.75
per share. We also agreed to register these shares within 45 days of their
issuance.
On June 21, 2001, in exchange for the waiver of certain registration
rights by One Click Investments, LLC, John P. Gorst gifted to One Click 10,000
shares of common stock with voting rights retained by Gorst and agreed that One
Click's securities dated August 2000 and January 2001 will be included in the
next SB-2 Registration that we file and the February 2000 warrants were
re-priced at an exercise price of $25 per share of common stock with an exercise
date extending to December 31, 2004, with a cashless provision. Subsequently, in
exchange for a waiver of registration rights previously granted, One Click's
February 2000 warrants were re-priced at an exercise price of $5 per share of
common stock and One Click rescinded the stock gifted by John P. Gorst.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial
ownership of our common stock as of February 21, 2003.
o by each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our
common stock;
o by each of our officers and directors; and
o by all of our officers and directors as a group.
NAME NUMBER PERCENT
Directors and Officers:
John P. Gorst (1) 5,660,792 33.0%
M. Carroll Benton (2) 4,471,586 26.0%
David D. Selmon (3) 1,377,184 8.1%
Tomina Associates, Ltd. 1,300,000 7.45%
Warfield Capital, Ltd. 1,200,000 6.92%
Graham J. Douglas 1,000,000 5.57%
Karin Hoermann 1,000,000 5.57%
Paul McAteer 1,100,000 6.49%
Joanie C. Mann (4) 390,733 2.3%
All executive officers and directors as a group (4 persons)(5)(6) 11,900,295 68.1%
(1) This includes (a) 1,000 shares of common stock held by One Click
Investments, LLC, (b) 11,500 shares of common stock held by Kathleen McHenry,
(c) 3,500 shares of common stock held by Hagens Berman LLP, (d) 16,000 shares of
common stock held by Cellini Investments, Ltd to which Mr. Gorst holds a voting
proxy and as to which Mr. Gorst disclaims beneficial ownership. Also includes
242,949 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock
options that are presently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days
of February 21, 2003.
(2) Includes 4,465 shares of common stock held by Charles Benton, the husband of
Ms. Benton, as to which Ms. Benton disclaims beneficial ownership. Also includes
231,052 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock
options that are presently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days
of February 21, 2003.
(3) Includes 50,070 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding
stock options that are presently exercisable or will become exercisable within
60 days of February 21, 2003.
(4) Includes 5,449 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding
stock options that are presently exercisable or will be come exercisable within
60 days of February 21, 2003.
(5) Includes 529,520 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
outstanding stock options held by our executive officers that are presently
exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of February 21, 2003.
(6) Adjusted for the two-for-one stock split effected on August 3, 2000 and a
one for one hundred stock split effected December 23, 2002. On October 16, 2002,
pursuant to an exchange agreement, each of the officers and directors converted
a majority of their shares of common stock into shares of our Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock. On December 23, 2002, we entered into an Agreement
of Plan of Merger, whereby we reincorporated in the state of Nevada and each of
the Series A Convertible Preferred stock holders of our Company received ten
shares of common stock of Nevada for each share of Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock outstanding. Furthermore, each shareholder of common stock of
our Company received one share of common stock of Insynq Nevada for each 100
shares of our Company outstanding.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
COMMON STOCK
We are authorized to issue up to 500,000,000 shares of Common Stock,
par value $0.001. As of February 21, 2003, there were 16,947,621 shares of
common stock outstanding. Holders of the common stock are entitled to one vote
per share on all matters to be voted upon by the stockholders. Holders of common
stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared
by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor. Upon the
liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of our company, the holders of common
stock are entitled to share ratably in all of our assets which are legally
available for distribution after payment of all debts and other liabilities and
liquidation preference of any outstanding common stock. Holders of common stock
have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights. The
outstanding shares of common stock are validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable.
We have engaged Colonial Stock Transfer Company, Inc., located in Salt
Lake City, Utah, as independent transfer agent or registrar.
PREFERRED STOCK
We are authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock,
par value $0.001. As of February 21, 2003, there were no shares of preferred
stock outstanding. The shares of preferred stock may be issued in series, and
shall have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such
designations, preferences and relative participating, optional or other special
rights, and qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be
stated and expressed in the resolution or resolutions providing for the issuance
of such stock adopted from time to time by the board of directors. The board of
directors is expressly vested with the authority to determine and fix in the
resolution or resolutions providing for the issuances of preferred stock the
voting powers, designations, preferences and rights, and the qualifications,
limitations or restrictions thereof, of each such series to the full extent now
or hereafter permitted by the laws of the State of Nevada.
LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLANS
On March 31, 2000, our board of directors adopted the following
incentive plan:
INSYNQ, INC. 2000 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
Our Insynq, Inc. 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan provides for the
issuance of incentive and non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights
and restricted stock to our directors, officers, employees and consultants. At
the adoption of this plan, we set aside 166,753 shares of common stock, which
may be issued upon the exercise of options granted. On November 19, 2001, our
shareholders approved an amendment to the plan, which would set aside an
additional 150,000 shares of common stock for a total of 316,753 shares of
common stock, which may be issued upon the exercise of options granted. As of
February 21, 2003, options available for issuance are 125,390.
2002 DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND CONSULTANTS STOCK OPTION, STOCK WARRANT
AND STOCK AWARD PLAN
The 2002 Directors, Officer and Consultants Stock Option, Stock Warrant
and Stock Award Plan provides for the issuance of incentive and non-qualified
stock options, restricted stock, unrestricted bonuses and past salaries and fees
payable in unrestricted stock and convertible preferred stock. At the adoption
of this plan, we set aside 16,000,000 shares of common stock, which may be
issued upon the exercise of options granted. As of February 21, 2003, we have
issued 2,700,000 shares of common stock under this Plan.
Our board of directors administers the above plans and our board may
amend or terminate the plans if it does not cause any adverse effect on any then
outstanding options or unexercised portion thereof. All options generally have
an exercise price equal the fair value of the underlying common stock on the
date of grant, vest immediately and expire in ten years.
WARRANTS
In connection with a Securities Purchase Agreements dated June 2001,
January 2002 and September 2002, we have issued 5,080,000 warrants to purchase
shares of common stock and we are obligated to issue an additional 420,000
warrants to purchase shares of common stock. The warrants are exercisable until
five years from the date of issuance at a purchase price of $0.25 per share.
CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES
To obtain funding for our ongoing operations, we entered into the
following securities purchase agreements:
JUNE 29, 2001
On June 29, 2001, we entered into a private financing transaction with
three investors for a total of $1,200,000, 12% convertible debentures. The
debentures are convertible into shares of common stock at the lesser of (i)
$0.30 or (ii) the average of the lowest three trading prices in the twenty-day
trading period immediately preceding the notice to convert, discounted by sixty
percent (60%). The convertible debentures carry attached warrants that allow the
investor, under the terms of the warrants, to purchase up to 2,400,000 shares of
common stock at $0.25 per share. The terms of the debentures provide for full
payment on or before one year from the date of issuance, plus accrued interest
at 12% per annum. Pursuant to the agreement, we may not, without consent, (i)
engage in any future equity financing involving the issuance of common stock for
a period of six months from the date of closing, and (ii) may not engage in such
transactions for a period of two years without first giving the investors the
opportunity to purchase shares on a pro-rata basis. As of February 21, 2003,
principal in the amount of $1,123,950 plus accrued interest of approximately
$176,318 is outstanding. These obligations were to be repaid or converted into
common stock on or before the conversion (maturity) date. These convertible
debentures have been amended to provide a maturity date of March 6, 2004 upon
which these obligations are to be repaid or converted into common stock at the
investor's option.
JANUARY 24, 2002
On January 24, 2002, we entered into a second agreement to issue
$550,000, 12% convertible debentures, and 2,200,000 warrants to four investors.
The debentures are convertible into shares of common stock at the lesser of (i)
$0.30 or (ii) the average of the lowest three trading prices in the twenty-day
trading period immediately preceding the notice to convert, discounted by sixty
percent (60%). The convertible debentures carry attached warrants that allow the
investor, under the terms of the warrants, to purchase up to 2,200,000 shares of
common stock at $0.25 per share. Terms of the debentures provide for full
payment on or before one year from the date of issuance, plus accrued interest
at 12% per annum. Pursuant to the agreement, we may not, without consent, (i)
engage in any future equity financing involving the issuance of common stock for
a period of six months from the date of closing, and (ii) may not engage in such
transactions for a period of two years without first giving the investors the
opportunity to purchase shares on a pro-rata basis. As of February 21, 2003,
principal in the amount of $550,000 plus accrued interest of approximately
$61,842.36 is outstanding. These obligations were to be repaid or converted into
common stock on or before the conversion (maturity) date. These convertible
debentures have been amended to provide a maturity date of March 6, 2004 upon
which these obligations are to be repaid or converted into common stock at the
investor's option.
SEPTEMBER 27, 2002
On September 27, 2002, we entered into a securities purchase agreement
with four investors for the sale of (i) $450,000 in convertible debentures and
(ii) a warrants to buy 900,000 shares of our common stock. The investors are
obligated to provide us with the funds as follows:
o $240,000 has been disbursed to date; and
o an aggregate of $210,000 will be disbursed at the rate of $30,000 per month
on the final business day of each month ending in August 2003.
The debentures bear interest at 12%, mature on one year from the date
of issuance, and are convertible into our common stock, at the investors'
option, at the lower of:
o $0.30; or
o 40% of the average of the three lowest intraday trading prices for the
common stock on a principal market for the 20 trading days before but not
including the conversion date.
The full principal amount of the convertible debentures is due upon
default under the terms of convertible debentures. In addition, we have granted
the investors a security interest in substantially all of our assets and
intellectual property and registration rights. The warrants are exercisable
until five years from the date of issuance at a purchase price of $0.25 per
share. In addition, the exercise price of the warrants will be adjusted in the
event we issue common stock at a price below market, with the exception of any
securities issued as of the date of this warrant. The conversion price of the
debentures and the exercise price of the warrants may be adjusted in certain
circumstances such as if we pay a stock dividend, subdivide or combine
outstanding shares of common stock into a greater or lesser number of shares, or
take such other actions as would otherwise result in dilution of the selling
stockholder's position. The selling stockholders have contractually agreed to
restrict their ability to convert their convertible debentures or exercise their
warrants and receive shares of our common stock such that the number of shares
of common stock held by them in the aggregate and their affiliates after such
conversion or exercise does not exceed 4.9% of the then issued and outstanding
shares of common stock. We have granted the selling stockholders a security
interest in all of our assets against the convertible debentures.
INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES
Our Articles of Incorporation, as amended, provide to the fullest
extent permitted by Nevada law, our directors or officers shall not be
personally liable to us or our shareholders for damages for breach of such
director's or officer's fiduciary duty. The effect of this provision of our
Articles of Incorporation, as amended, is to eliminate our rights and our
shareholders (through shareholders' derivative suits on behalf of our company)
to recover damages against a director or officer for breach of the fiduciary
duty of care as a director or officer (including breaches resulting from
negligent or grossly negligent behavior), except under certain situations
defined by statute. We believe that the indemnification provisions in our
Articles of Incorporation, as amended, are necessary to attract and retain
qualified persons as directors and officers.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities
Act of 1933 (the "Act" or "Securities Act") may be permitted to directors,
officers or persons controlling us pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or
otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed
in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
The selling stockholders and any of their respective pledgees, donees,
assignees and other successors-in-interest may, from time to time, sell any or
all of their shares of common stock on any stock exchange, market or trading
facility on which the shares are traded or in private transactions. These sales
may be at fixed or negotiated prices. The selling stockholders may use any one
or more of the following methods when selling shares:
o ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer
solicits the purchaser;
o block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as
agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to
facilitate the transaction;
o purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer
for its account;
o an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable
exchange;
o privately-negotiated transactions;
o short sales;
o broker-dealers may agree with the selling stockholders to sell a specified
number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;
o through the writing of options on the shares;
o a combination of any such methods of sale; and
o any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.
The selling stockholders may also sell shares under Rule 144 under the
Securities Act, if available, rather than under this prospectus. The selling
stockholders shall have the sole and absolute discretion not to accept any
purchase offer or make any sale of shares if they deem the purchase price to be
unsatisfactory at any particular time.
The selling stockholders may pledge their shares to their brokers under
the margin provisions of customer agreements. If a selling stockholders defaults
on a margin loan, the broker may, from time to time, offer and sell the pledged
shares.
The selling stockholders may also engage in short sales against the
box, puts and calls and other transactions in our securities or derivatives of
our securities and may sell or deliver shares in connection with these trades.
The selling stockholders or their respective pledgees, donees,
transferees or other successors in interest, may also sell the shares directly
to market makers acting as principals and/or broker-dealers acting as agents for
themselves or their customers. Such broker-dealers may receive compensation in
the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling stockholders
and/or the purchasers of shares for whom such broker-dealers may act as agents
or to whom they sell as principal or both, which compensation as to a particular
broker-dealer might be in excess of customary commissions. Market makers and
block purchasers purchasing the shares will do so for their own account and at
their own risk. It is possible that a selling stockholder will attempt to sell
shares of common stock in block transactions to market makers or other
purchasers at a price per share which may be below the then market price. The
selling stockholders cannot assure that all or any of the shares offered in this
prospectus will be issued to, or sold by, the selling stockholders. The selling
stockholders and any brokers, dealers or agents, upon effecting the sale of any
of the shares offered in this prospectus, may be deemed to be "underwriters" as
that term is defined under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the rules and regulations under
such acts. In such event, any commissions received by such broker-dealers or
agents and any profit on the resale of the shares purchased by them may be
deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act.
We are required to pay all fees and expenses incident to the
registration of the shares, including fees and disbursements of counsel to the
selling stockholders, but excluding brokerage commissions or underwriter
discounts.
The selling stockholders, alternatively, may sell all or any part of
the shares offered in this prospectus through an underwriter. No selling
stockholder has entered into any agreement with a prospective underwriter and
there is no assurance that any such agreement will be entered into.
The selling stockholders and any other persons participating in the
sale or distribution of the shares will be subject to applicable provisions of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations
under such act, including, without limitation, Regulation M. These provisions
may restrict certain activities of, and limit the timing of purchases and sales
of any of the shares by, the selling stockholders or any other such person.
Furthermore, under Regulation M, persons engaged in a distribution of securities
are prohibited from simultaneously engaging in market making and certain other
activities with respect to such securities for a specified period of time prior
to the commencement of such distributions, subject to specified exceptions or
exemptions. In regards to short sells, the selling stockholder can only cover
its short position with the securities they receive from us upon conversion. All
of these limitations may affect the marketability of the shares.
We have agreed to indemnify the selling stockholders, or their
transferees or assignees, against certain liabilities, including liabilities
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or to contribute to payments the
selling stockholders or their respective pledgees, donees, transferees or other
successors in interest, may be required to make in respect of such liabilities.
If the selling stockholders notify us that they have a material
arrangement with a broker-dealer for the resale of the common stock, then we
would be required to amend the registration statement of which this prospectus
is a part, and file a prospectus supplement to describe the agreements between
the selling stockholders and the broker-dealer.
PENNY STOCK
The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which
establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for the purposes relevant to us,
as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or
with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain
exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the
rules require:
o that a broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in
penny stocks; and
o the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the
transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to
be purchased.
In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny
stocks, the broker or dealer must:
o obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the
person; and
o make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are
suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and
experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of
transactions in penny stocks.
The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a
penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Commission relating to the
penny stock market, which, in highlight form:
o sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability
determination; and
o that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the
investor prior to the transaction.
Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny
stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the
commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative,
current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to
an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly
statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny
stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
The table below sets forth information concerning the resale of the
shares of common stock by the selling stockholders. We will not receive any
proceeds from the resale of the common stock by the selling stockholders. We
will receive proceeds from the exercise of the warrants. Assuming the selling
stockholders sell all the shares registered below, none of the selling
stockholders will continue to own any shares of our common stock.
The following table also sets forth the name of each person who is
offering the resale of shares of common stock by this prospectus, the number of
shares of common stock beneficially owned by each person, the number of shares
of common stock that may be sold in this offering and the number of shares of
common stock each person will own after the offering, assuming they sell all of
the shares offered.
Total Shares of Total Shares of Beneficial Percentage Beneficial Percentage
Common Stock Percentage Common Ownership of Common Ownership of Common
Issuable Upon of Common Stock Before the Stock Owned After the Stock Owned
Conversion of Stock, Included in Offering** Before Offering (3) After
Name Debentures Assuming Prospectus Offering** Offering (3)
and/or Warrants* Full (1)
Conversion
- ----------------------- ------------------ -------------- ------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- --------------
<s> <c> <c> <c> <c> <c> <c> <c>
AJW Offshore, Ltd. (2) 24,296,550 68.91% Up to 890,102 4.99% -- --
48,593,100
shares of
common
stock (1)
AJW Partners, LLC (2) 20,287,968 54.49% Up to 890,102 4.99% -- --
40,575,936
shares of
common
stock (1)
New Millennium 20,287,968 54.49% Up to 890,102 4.99% -- --
Capital Partners, II, 40,575,936
LLC shares of
common
stock (1)
AJW Qualified 8,017,173 32.11% Up to 890,102 4.99% -- --
Partners, LLC (2) 16,034,345
shares of
common
stock (1)
*This column represents an estimated number based on a conversion price as of a
recent date of March 13, 2003 of $.028, divided into the principal amount.
**These columns represent the aggregate maximum number and percentage of shares
that the selling stockholders can own at one time (and therefore, offer for
resale at any one time) due to their 4.99% limitation.
The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined in
accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other
purpose. Under such rule, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which
the selling stockholders has sole or shared voting power or investment power and
also any shares, which the selling stockholders has the right to acquire within
60 days. The actual number of shares of common stock issuable upon the
conversion of the convertible debentures is subject to adjustment depending on,
among other factors, the future market price of the common stock, and could be
materially less or more than the number estimated in the table.
(1) Includes a good faith estimate of the shares issuable upon conversion of the
convertible debentures and exercise of warrants, based on current market prices.
Because the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the
convertible debentures is dependent in part upon the market price of the common
stock prior to a conversion, the actual number of shares of common stock that
will be issued upon conversion will fluctuate daily and cannot be determined at
this time. Under the terms of the convertible debentures, if the convertible
debentures had actually been converted on March 13, 2003, the conversion
price would have been $.028. The actual number of shares of common stock offered
in this prospectus, and included in the registration statement of which this
prospectus is a part, includes such additional number of shares of common stock
as may be issued or issuable upon conversion of the convertible debentures and
exercise of the related warrants by reason of any stock split, stock dividend or
similar transaction involving the common stock, in accordance with Rule 416
under the Securities Act of 1933. However the selling stockholders have
contractually agreed to restrict their ability to convert their convertible
debentures or exercise their warrants and receive shares of our common stock
such that the number of shares of common stock held by them in the aggregate and
their affiliates after such conversion or exercise does not exceed 4.9% of the
then issued and outstanding shares of common stock as determined in accordance
with Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, the number of shares of
common stock set forth in the table for the selling stockholders exceeds the
number of shares of common stock that the selling stockholders could own
beneficially at any given time through their ownership of the convertible
debentures and the warrants. In that regard, the beneficial ownership of the
common stock by the selling stockholder set forth in the table is not determined
in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
(2) The selling stockholders are affiliates of each other because they are under
common control. AJW Partners, LLC is a private investment fund that is owned by
its investors and managed by SMS Group, LLC. SMS Group, LLC, of which Mr. Corey
S. Ribotsky is the fund manager, has voting and investment control over the
shares listed below owned by AJW Partners, LLC. AJW Offshore, Ltd., formerly
known as AJW/New Millennium Offshore, Ltd., is a private investment fund that is
owned by its investors and managed by First Street Manager II, LLC. First Street
Manager II, LLC, of which Corey S. Ribotsky is the fund manager, has voting and
investment control over the shares owned by AJW Offshore, Ltd. AJW Qualified
Partners, LLC, formerly known as Pegasus Capital Partners, LLC, is a private
investment fund that is owned by its investors and managed by AJW Manager, LLC,
of which Corey S. Ribotsky and Lloyd A. Groveman are the fund managers, have
voting and investment control over the shares listed below owned by AJW
Qualified Partners, LLC. The selling stockholders have notified us that they are
not broker-dealers or affiliates of broker-dealers and that they believe they
are not required to be broker-dealers.
(3) Assumes that all securities registered will be sold.
TERMS OF CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES
To obtain funding for our ongoing operations, we entered into the
following securities purchase agreements:
JUNE 29, 2001
On June 29, 2001, we entered into a private financing transaction with
three investors for a total of $1,200,000, 12% convertible debentures. The
debentures are convertible into shares of common stock at the lesser of (i)
$0.30 or (ii) the average of the lowest three trading prices in the twenty-day
trading period immediately preceding the notice to convert, discounted by sixty
percent (60%). The convertible debentures carry attached warrants that allow the
investor, under the terms of the warrants, to purchase up to 2,400,000 shares of
common stock at $0.25 per share. The terms of the debentures provide for full
payment on or before one year from the date of issuance, plus accrued interest
at 12% per annum. Pursuant to the agreement, we may not, without consent, (i)
engage in any future equity financing involving the issuance of common stock for
a period of six months from the date of closing, and (ii) may not engage in such
transactions for a period of two years without first giving the investors the
opportunity to purchase shares on a pro-rata basis. As of February 21, 2003,
principal in the amount of $1,123,950 plus accrued interest of approximately
$176,318 is outstanding. These obligations were to be repaid or converted into
common stock on or before the conversion (maturity) date. These convertible
debentures have been amended to provide a maturity date of March 6, 2004 upon
which these obligations are to be repaid or converted into common stock at the
investor's option.
JANUARY 24, 2002
On January 24, 2002, we entered into a second agreement to issue
$550,000, 12% convertible debentures, and 2,200,000 warrants to four investors.
The debentures are convertible into shares of common stock at the lesser of (i)
$0.30 or (ii) the average of the lowest three trading prices in the twenty-day
trading period immediately preceding the notice to convert, discounted by sixty
percent (60%). The convertible debentures carry attached warrants that allow the
investor, under the terms of the warrants, to purchase up to 2,200,000 shares of
common stock at $0.25 per share. Terms of the debentures provide for full
payment on or before one year from the date of issuance, plus accrued interest
at 12% per annum. Pursuant to the agreement, we may not, without consent, (i)
engage in any future equity financing involving the issuance of common stock for
a period of six months from the date of closing, and (ii) may not engage in such
transactions for a period of two years without first giving the investors the
opportunity to purchase shares on a pro-rata basis. As of February 21, 2003,
principal in the amount of $550,000 plus accrued interest of approximately
$61,842.36 is outstanding. These obligations were to be repaid or converted into
common stock on or before the conversion (maturity) date. These convertible
debentures have been amended to provide a maturity date of March 6, 2004 upon
which these obligations are to be repaid or converted into common stock at the
investor's option.
SEPTEMBER 27, 2002
On September 27, 2002, we entered into a securities purchase agreement
with four investors for the sale of (i) $450,000 in convertible debentures and
(ii) a warrants to buy 900,000 shares of our common stock. The investors are
obligated to provide us with the funds as follows:
o $240,000 has been disbursed to date; and
o an aggregate of $210,000 will be disbursed at the rate of $30,000 per month
on the final business day of each month ending in August 2003.
The debentures bear interest at 12%, mature on one year from the date
of issuance, and are convertible into our common stock, at the investors'
option, at the lower of:
o $0.30; or
o 40% of the average of the three lowest intraday trading prices for the
common stock on a principal market for the 20 trading days before but not
including the conversion date.
The full principal amounts of the convertible debentures are due upon
default under the terms of convertible debentures. In addition, we have granted
the investors a security interest in substantially all of our assets and
intellectual property and registration rights.
The warrants are exercisable until five years from the date of issuance
at a purchase price of $0.25 per share. In addition, the exercise price of the
warrants will be adjusted in the event we issue common stock at a price below
market, with the exception of any securities issued as of the date of this
warrant.
The conversion price of the debentures and the exercise price of the
warrants may be adjusted in certain circumstances such as if we pay a stock
dividend, subdivide or combine outstanding shares of common stock into a greater
or lesser number of shares, or take such other actions as would otherwise result
in dilution of the selling stockholder's position.
The selling stockholders have contractually agreed to restrict their
ability to convert their convertible debentures or exercise their warrants and
receive shares of our common stock such that the number of shares of common
stock held by them in the aggregate and their affiliates after such conversion
or exercise does not exceed 4.9% of the then issued and outstanding shares of
common stock.
We have granted the selling stockholders a security interest in all of
our assets against the convertible debentures.
A complete copy of the Securities Purchase Agreement and related
documents were filed with the SEC as exhibits to our Form SB-2 relating to this
prospectus.
SAMPLE CONVERSION CALCULATION
The number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the
debentures is determined by dividing that portion of the principal of the
debenture to be converted and accrued interest, if any, by the conversion price.
For example, assuming conversion of $1,912,110.44, of debentures including
accrued interest, on March 13, 2003, a conversion price of $.028 per share,
the number of shares issuable upon conversion would be:
$1,912,110.45/$.028 = 68,289,659 shares
The following is an example of the amount of shares of our common stock
that are issuable, upon conversion of the principal amount of our convertible
debentures, including accrued interest, based on market prices 25%, 50% and 75%
below the market price, as of March 13, 2003 of $.07.
Number % of
% Below Price Per With Discount of Shares Outstanding
MARKET SHARE AT 60% ISSUABLE STOCK
25% $.0525 $.0210 91,052,878 84.31%
50% $.0350 $.0140 136,579,317 88.96%
75% $.0175 $.0070 273,158,634 94.16%
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
On October 11, 2000, our board of directors decided to terminate our
auditor, G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, for the quarter ended August 31, 2000. Grant
Thornton LLP was appointed to be our auditor. Grant Thornton's office is located
in at 701 Pike Street, Suite 1500, Seattle, Washington 98101. On November 19,
2001, a majority of our stockholders ratified the selection of Grant Thornton
LLP for our fiscal year ending 2002.
During the year ended May 31, 2000, and up to and including the
present, there have been no disagreements between Beckstead and us on any matter
of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or
auditing scope or procedures. Beckstead's report on our financial statements for
the fiscal year ended May 31, 2000, indicated that substantial doubt existed
regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.
On July 22, 2002, our board of directors decided to terminate our
auditor, Grant Thornton LLP. Weinberg & Co., P.A. was appointed to be our
auditor. A majority of our stockholders ratified the change in accountants.
During the year ended May 31, 2000, and up to and including the
present, there have been no disagreements between Grant Thornton LLP and us on
any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement
disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures. Grant Thornton LLP `s report on our
financial statements for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2001, indicated that
substantial doubt existed regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the shares of common stock being offered hereby will be
passed upon for us by Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP, New York, New York.
EXPERTS
Weinberg & Company. P.A., Certified Public Accountants, have audited,
as set forth in their report thereon appearing elsewhere herein, our financial
statements at May 31, 2002 and 2001, and for the years then ended that appear in
the prospectus. The financial statements referred to above are included in this
prospectus with reliance upon the auditors' opinion based on their expertise in
accounting and auditing.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
We have filed a registration statement on Form SB-2 under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, relating to the shares of common stock being
offered by this prospectus, and reference is made to such registration
statement. This prospectus constitutes the prospectus of Insynq, Inc., filed as
part of the registration statement, and it does not contain all information in
the registration statement, as certain portions have been omitted in accordance
with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, which requires us to file reports, proxy statements and
other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such reports,
proxy statements and other information may be inspected at public reference
facilities of the SEC at Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street N.W., Washington D.C.
20549. Copies of such material can be obtained from the Public Reference Section
of the SEC at Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549 at
prescribed rates. Because we file documents electronically with the SEC, you may
also obtain this information by visiting the SEC's Internet website at
HTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INSYNQ, INC.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of November 30, 2002 and May 31, 2002 and for the Three and Six Months
ended November 30, 2002 and November 30, 2001 (unaudited)
Condensed Balance Sheets F-2
Condensed Statements of Operations F-3
Condensed Statement of Stockholders' Deficit F-4
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows F-5
Condensed Notes to Financial Statements F-6 to F-13
As of May 31, 2002 and For the Years Ended May 31, 2002 and May 31, 2001
Independent Auditors' Report F-14
Balance Sheet F-15
Statements of Operations F-16
Statements of Stockholders' Deficiency F-17
Statements of Cash Flows F-19
Notes to Financial Statements F-20 to F-33
Insynq, Inc.
Condensed Balance Sheets
November 30, 2002 May 31, 2002
----------------- ------------
ASSETS (unaudited)
Current assets
Cash .................................................... $ 34,523 $ 9,760
Restricted cash ......................................... -- 10,355
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $25,000 at November 30, 2002 and
May 31, 2002, respectively .......................... 44,673 21,964
Related party receivables ............................... 88,221 68,601
Prepaid expenses ........................................ 228,849 238,715
------------ ------------
Total current assets .................... 396,266 349,395
------------ ------------
Equipment, net .............................................. 352,770 485,617
------------ ------------
Other assets
Interest and other receivables - related party .......... 9,953 3,604
Intangible assets, net .................................. 13,585 26,585
Deposits ................................................ 7,595 6,345
------------ ------------
Total other assets ............................... 31,133 36,534
------------ ------------
Total assets ..................................... $ 780,169 $ 871,546
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities
Notes payable ........................................... $ 21,175 $ 19,833
Related party notes payable ............................. 1,307,274 1,315,429
Accounts payable ........................................ 841,147 983,516
Accrued liabilities ..................................... 1,993,545 1,845,099
Convertible debentures, net of discount of $325,645
and $458,971, respectively ........................... 1,498,305 969,479
Customer deposits ....................................... 42,724 33,070
Deferred compensation ................................... 82,042 61,043
Capital lease obligations ............................... 877,213 818,840
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities ........................ 6,663,425 6,046,309
------------ ------------
Commitments and contingencies ............................... -- --
Stockholders' deficit
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares
authorized, 1,331,411 issued and outstanding ......... 1,331 --
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares
authorized, 50,000 issued and outstanding at May 31,
2002 and no shares outstanding at November 30, 2002 .. -- 50
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares
authorized, 590,134 issued and outstanding as
of November 30, 2002; 594,570 shares issued and
outstanding as of May 31, 2002 ....................... 590 595
Additional paid-in capital .............................. 18,098,544 17,654,731
Notes receivable from officers .......................... (90,000) (90,000)
Unearned compensation and services ...................... (46,217) (143,149)
Accumulated deficit ..................................... (23,847,504) (22,596,990)
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' deficit ...................... (5,883,256) (5,174,763)
------------ ------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit ...... $ 780,169 $ 871,546
============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial
statements.
F-2
Insynq, Inc.
Condensed Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
November 30, November 30,
------------------------------ ------------------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
---- ---- ---- ----
Revenues .......................... $ 251,942 $ 227,729 $ 486,104 $ 422,294
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Costs and expenses
Direct cost of services ........ 187,654 338,534 379,310 658,401
Selling, general and
administrative
Non-cash compensation ......... 121,201 261,974 252,562 778,642
Other ......................... 286,332 538,409 612,065 1,264,407
Network and infrastructure costs -- 3,458 1,802 32,785
Research and development ....... -- 36,250 -- 95,231
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
595,187 1,178,625 1,245,739 2,829,466
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Loss from operations .............. (343,245) (950,896) (759,635) (2,407,172)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Other income (expense)
Other income .................... 7,742 2,247 11,113 3,024
Forgiveness and settlements of
debts ............................. 404,265 77,610 404,266 113,610
Gain (loss) from disposal of
assets ............................ (26,267) 1,285 (32,739) (45,612)
Interest expense
Non-cash ...................... (409,213) (243,416) (827,210) (347,394)
Other ......................... (19,424) (94,168) (46,309) (180,632)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total other income (expense) .... (42,897) (256,442) (490,879) (457,004)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net loss .......................... $ (386,142) $(1,207,338) $(1,250,514) $(2,864,176)
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Net loss per share, basic and
diluted ......................... $ (0.62) $ (3.09) $ (1.98) $ (7.67)
=========== =========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial
statements.
F-3
Insynq, Inc.
Condensed Statement of Stockholders' Deficit
(unaudited)
Six Months Ended November 30, 2002
Preferred Stock Class A Common Common Stock
Stock
Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance, May 31, 2002 ............... -- $ -- 50,000 $ 50 594,570 $ 595
--------- ---------- ------ ------ ------- -----
Issuance of common stock in
conjunction with exercise of options -- -- -- -- 10,705 11
Issuance of common stock in
conjunction with exercise of warrants -- -- -- -- 2,500 2
Issuance of common stock for
consulting and marketing services ... 80,000 80 -- -- 9,000 9
Issuance of common stock for employee
compensation ........................ -- -- -- -- 12,500 12
Issuance of common stock in
conjunction with conversion of
debentures .......................... -- -- -- -- 36,000 36
Issuance of common stock in
conjunction with the conversion of
class A common stock ................ -- -- (50,000) (50) 50,000 50
Issuance of convertible preferred in
conjunction with exchange of common
stock ............................... 1,251,410 1,251 -- -- (125,141) (125)
Amortization of unearned compensation -- -- -- -- -- --
Allocation of discount on convertible
debentures .......................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Issuance of stock options to non
employees ........................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Net loss, six months ended November
30, 2002 ............................ -- -- -- -- -- --
--------- ---------- ------- --- ------- -----
Balance, November 30, 2002 .......... 1,331,410 $ 1,331 -- $ -- 590,134 $ 590
========= ========== ======= === ======= =====
F-4
(Continued from table above, first column repeated)
Additional Notes Unearned Accumulated Total
Paid-In Receivable Compensation Deficit Stockholders'
Capital From Deficit
Officers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance, May 31, 2002 ............... $ 17,654,731 $ (90,000) $ (143,149) $(22,596,990) $ (5,174,763)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Issuance of common stock in
conjunction with exercise of options 3,329 -- -- -- 3,340
Issuance of common stock in
conjunction with exercise of warrants (2) -- -- -- --
Issuance of common stock for
consulting and marketing services ... 2,961 -- -- -- 3,050
Issuance of common stock for employee
compensation ........................ 3,737 -- -- -- 3,749
Issuance of common stock in
conjunction with conversion of
debentures .......................... 4,464 -- -- -- 4,500
Issuance of common stock in
conjunction with the conversion of
class A common stock ................ -- -- -- -- --
Issuance of convertible preferred in
conjunction with exchange of common
stock ............................... (1,126) -- -- -- --
Amortization of unearned compensation -- -- 96,932 -- 96,932
Allocation of discount on convertible
debentures .......................... 400,000 -- -- -- 400,000
Issuance of stock options to non
employees ........................... 30,450 -- -- -- 30,450
Net loss, six months ended November
30, 2002 ............................ -- -- -- (1,250,514 (1,250,514)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Balance, November 30, 2002 .......... $ 18,098,544 $ (90,000) $ (46,217) $(23,847,504) $ (5,883,256)
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this condensed financial
statement.
Insynq, Inc.
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
Six Months Ended November 30,
-------------------------------------------
2002 2001
---- ----
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss ..................................................... $(1,250,514) $(2,864,176)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization ............................ 113,108 122,697
Loss on disposal of assets ............................... 32,739 121,648
Gain on forgiveness and settlement of debts .............. (403,833) (113,610)
Issuance of common stock for services .................... 10,139 96,381
Issuance of options and warrants for services ............ 30,450 --
Amortization off unearned compensation ................... 96,932 569,277
Discount on capital lease ................................ 15,734 15,733
Warrants and beneficial conversion features of debentures 533,326 439,462
Capitalized interest on leased assets and notes receivable 42,776 43,245
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable - trade .......................... (22,835) (18,253)
Related party receivables ............................ (19,620) 34,686
Prepaid expenses ..................................... 9,866 10,792
Accounts payable ..................................... 119,459 190,951
Accrued liabilities .................................. 250,951 183,864
Customer deposits .................................... 9,654 (10,712)
Deferred compensation ................................ 60,500 11,188
----------- -----------
Net cash used in operating activities ............. (371,168) (1,166,827)
----------- -----------
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds on notes payable .................................... 4,887 1,900
Proceeds from related party notes payable .................... 1,684 80,056
Payments on notes payable .................................... (13,872) (24,574)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and exercise of options
and warrants ............................................. -- 35,526
Proceeds from convertible debentures ......................... 400,000 1,200,000
Payments on capital lease obligations ........................ (5,873) (11,270)
Proceeds from restricted cash released from escrow ........... 10,355 --
Deposits ..................................................... (1,250) (6,345)
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by financing activities ......... 395,931 1,275,293
----------- -----------
Net increase in cash ............................................. 24,763 108,466
Cash at beginning of period ...................................... 9,760 26,900
----------- -----------
Cash at end of period ............................................ $ 34,523 $ 135,366
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial
statements.
F-5
Insynq, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
November 30, 2002
(unaudited)
Note 1 - Business and Significant Accounting Policies
Business
- --------
Insynq, Inc. (the Company) is a Nevada corporation headquartered in Tacoma,
Washington. The Company is an application hosting and managed software service
provider that provides server-based computing access and services to customers
who decide to augment all or part of their information technology requirements.
Customers pay a monthly fee for their services and connect to Company's server
farm primarily through either the Internet, wireless or DSL connection.
On July 25, 2002, the Board of Directors approved the Company to a
re-incorporation merger with its wholly owned subsidiary, Insynq, Inc., a Nevada
corporation, and to effectuate a 100:1 common stock exchange of the Company's
currently issued and outstanding shares of common stock. December 23, 2002, the
effective date of the re-incorporation, resulted in the exchange of 59,013,393
common shares of the terminating entity for 590,134 common shares of the
surviving entity, Insynq, Inc. (Nevada).
All shares and per share amounts have been retroactively restated to reflect
this transaction.
Fair Value of financial Instruments
- -----------------------------------
Financial instruments, consists principally of cash, accounts and related party
receivables, trade and related party payables, accrued liabilities, short and
long-term obligations. The carrying amounts of such financial instruments in the
accompanying balance sheet approximate their fair values. It is management's
opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant currency or credit risks
arising from these financial instruments
Use of Estimates
- ----------------
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
New Accounting Pronouncements
- -----------------------------
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4,
44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections. SFAS
145 rescinds the provisions of SFAS No. 4 that requires companies to classify
certain gains and losses from debt extinguishments as extraordinary items,
eliminates the provisions of SFAS No. 44 regarding transition to the Motor
Carrier Act of 1980 and amends the provisions of SFAS No. 13 to require that
certain lease modifications be treated as sale leaseback transactions. The
provisions of SFAS 145 related to classification of debt extinguishments are
effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. Earlier application is
encouraged. The Company does not believe the adoption of this standard will have
a material impact the financial statements.
In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Restructuring
Costs." SFAS 146 applies to costs associated with an exit activity (including
restructuring) or with a disposal of long-lived assets. Those activities can
include eliminating or reducing product lines, terminating employees and
contracts and relocating plant facilities or personnel. Under SFAS 146, the
Company will record a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal
activity when that liability is incurred and can be measured at fair value. SFAS
146 will require the Company to disclose information about its exit and disposal
activities, the related costs, and changes in those costs in the notes to the
interim and annual financial statements that include the period in which an exit
activity is initiated and in any subsequent period until the activity is
completed. SFAS 146 is effective prospectively for exit or disposal activities
initiated after December 31, 2002, with earlier adoption encouraged. Under SFAS
146, a company cannot restate its previously issued financial statements and the
new statement grandfathers the accounting for liabilities that a company had
previously recorded under Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 94-3. The Company
does not believe the adoption of this standard will have a material impact the
financial
F-6
statements.
In October 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 147 ("SFAS 147), "Acquisitions of
Certain Financial Institutions." SFAS 147 addresses financial accounting and
reporting for the acquisition of all or part of a financial institution, except
for a transaction between two or more mutual enterprises. SFAS 147 also provides
guidance on the accounting for the impairment or disposal of acquired long-term
customer-relationship intangible assets of financial institutions, including
those acquired in transactions between two or more mutual enterprises. The
provisions of the statement will be effective for acquisitions on or after
October 1, 2002.
In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board Issued Statement No.
148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure-an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 123", ("SFAS 148"). SFAS 148 amends FASB
Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation" ("SFAS 123") and
provides alternative methods for accounting for a change by registrants to the
fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation. Additionally, SFAS
148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123 to require disclosure in the
significant accounting policy footnote of both annual and interim financial
statements of the method of accounting for stock-based compensation and the
related pro-forma disclosures when the intrinsic value method continues to be
used. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2002, and disclosures are effective for the first fiscal quarter beginning after
December 15, 2002.
Interim Condensed Financial Statements
- --------------------------------------
The condensed financial statements as of November 30, 2002 and for the three
months and six months ended November 30, 2002 and 2001 are unaudited. In the
opinion of management, such condensed financial statements include all
adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for the
fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations. The
results of operations for the three and six months ended November 30, 2002 and
2001 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full
year. The condensed balance sheet information as of May 31, 2002 was derived
from the audited financial statements included in the Company's annual report
Form 10-KSB. The interim condensed financial statements should be read in
conjunction with that report.
Note 2 - Going Concern and Management Plans
The Company's financial statements for the three and six months ended November
30, 2002 have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the
realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the
normal course of business. For the six months ended November 30, 2002, the
Company had a net loss of $1,250,514 and a negative cash flow from operations of
$371,168. The Company had a working capital deficit of $6,267,159 and a
stockholders' deficit of $5,883,256 at November 30, 2002. The Company's working
capital deficit as of November 30, 2002 may not enable it to meet certain
financial objectives as presently structured.
As of November 30, 2002, the Company is in default on its capitalized lease
obligations, six related party notes payable and four convertible debentures.
The assets of an underlying computer equipment lease are critical to the
Company's operations. The Company has initiated contact to restructure the most
significant lease obligation, and, due to the current economic climate and
current market for the equipment, the Company anticipates that it can
successfully restructure this obligation. As a contingency plan for the backup
of this equipment, the Company entered into another equipment lease agreement in
August 2001 for similar equipment to support its customer base. The Company is
past due on six related party notes payable with principal totaling
approximately $1,307,300, and four convertible debentures with a face value of
$1,123,950. Total accrued interest related to these obligations is approximately
$423,100 at November 30, 2002. In addition, the Company has a letter of intent
from one related party to convert approximately $1,300,000 of principle and
accrued interest into preferred stock.
The development and marketing of the Company's technology and products will
continue to require a commitment of substantial funds. Currently, pursuant to
Item 303(b)(1) and (3) of Regulation SB, the Company has no material capital
commitments. However, should the Company be forced to seek other equipment in
the open market, based on its inability to restructure its capital lease
obligation, the Company would attempt to raise the necessary finances. These
amounts, however, are currently not quantifiable, and there is no assurance that
the Company will be successful in obtaining additional financing.
The Company has retained legal counsel for representation in current
negotiations with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regarding an Offer In
Compromise and eventually structuring a payment plan for past due taxes. The IRS
has required the Company to meet certain conditions in order to proceed with the
offer and negotiations, one of which is to be current on all payroll tax
deposits and reporting. If the Company is unsuccessful in its offer, the IRS
could seize and sell some, if not all, the assets of the Company or the
F-7
Company will be forced to file for bankruptcy.
The condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
The Company is devoting its efforts into establishing a business in the new
emerging Managed Services Provider industry. The Company is establishing
alliances with Independent Software Vendors and Internet Service Providers to
provide access to their applications for their customers and building new
channels for marketing products to potential customers. As a result of these new
alliances and products, the Company believes it will be able to provide
additional and enhanced services to customers. The Company is continuing to
develop new products to enable the deployment of and on going management of the
Company services.
The Company successfully implemented cost containment strategies and continues
to devote significant efforts in the development of new products and opening new
markets. Also, the Company continues to contact vendors with past due account
balances with the intention of settling the balance due for cash at either less
than face or structure a long-term payment plan. To date, Company negotiations
to settle creditors' debts have been very favorable and well received.
However, the rate at which the Company expends its resources is variable, may be
accelerated, and will depend on many factors. The Company will need to raise
substantial additional capital to fund its operations and may seek such
additional funding through public or private equity or debt financing. There can
be no assurance that such additional funding, if any, will be available on
acceptable terms. The Company's continued existence as a going concern is
ultimately dependent upon its ability to secure additional funding for
completing and marketing its technology and products, and, therefore, the
success of its future operations.
Note 3 - Loss Per Common Share
Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding available to common stockholders
during the period. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding for
basic and diluted loss per share was 627,274 and 390,288 for the three months
ended November 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and, 632,058 and 373,368 for six
months ended November 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Common stock equivalents
have been excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share for the
periods presented, as their effect would be anti-dilutive.
Note 4 - Notes Receivables - Officers
In January 2002, the Company entered into two promissory notes totaling $90,000
with two of its officers in conjunction with the exercising of non qualified
Class A Common Stock options. Each note bears interest at 12% per annum, payable
on or before June 2003 and is secured with shares of Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock and common stock. As of November 30, 2002 total accrued interest
is approximately $9,400.
Note 5 - Notes Payable
The Company has the following notes payable:
November 30, May 31,
2002 2002
----------------- -----------------
Note payable to bank, $15,000 revolving line of $ 13,156 $ 13,277
credit, bearing interest at prime plus 6.0% and is
unsecured. Prime rate of interest at November 30,
2002 is 4.25%
Note payable to corporation owned by corporate
officer. Past due, originally due on October 23,
2002, bearing interest at 10% and is unsecured. 2,000 --
Two notes payable to vendors. Both notes are past
due. One note is due on demand; the other note is
serviced at $25 per month. Interest ranges from 18%
to 21%, and both are unsecured 6,019 6,556
----------- -----------
F-8
$ 21,175 $ 19,833
=========== ===========
Note 6 - Related Party Notes Payable
The Company has short-term promissory notes with stockholders, a corporate
officer, and a prior employee. All related party notes, plus accrued interest,
are generally due within one year of issuance or on demand and consist of the
following at:
November 30, 2002 May 31, 2002
----------------- ------------
Note payable to stockholder, past due, originally $ 1,162,000 $ 1,162,000
due November 2, 2001, plus accrued interest; bearing
interest at 10% and is unsecured. The Company has
received a letter of intent to convert the principle
and accrued interest, totaling approximately
$1,300,000, into preferred stock
Various notes payable to related parties, past due,
with various due dates ranging through April 20, 2002;
bearing default interest ranging from 18% to
21%, and are unsecured 145,274 153,429
------------- -----------
$ 1,307,274 $ 1,315,429
============== ===========
Note 7- Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following as of:
November 30, 2002 May 31,
2002 2002
----------------- -------
Salaries and benefits ........ $ 214,874 $ 290,759
Taxes
Payroll ................. 461,772 515,182
Business ................ 64,428 109,683
Penalties and interest .. 263,374 233,296
Interest ..................... 473,050 272,506
Licenses, consulting and other 516,047 423,673
---------- ----------
$1,993,545 $1,845,099
========== ==========
As of November 30, the Company was delinquent on approximately $778,800 of its
payroll and business taxes and related penalties and interest. The majority of
the past due amount, or approximately $684,500, is for payroll taxes, penalties
and interest due to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). In April 2002, the IRS
filed a Federal Tax Lien on the assets of the Company for all past due
employment taxes, penalties and accrued interest. The Company has submitted an
OFFER IN COMPROMISE (OIC) to the Internal Revenue Service seeking relief on a
portion of its overall obligation and structure a payment plan on the settled
amount of taxes due. The OIC is subject to the Company remaining current on all
current and future payroll tax deposits and reporting. Unless the Company and
the IRS agree to a mutually agreeable workout, the IRS could take possession of
the Company's assets or the Company will be forced to file for bankruptcy.
The Company has consummated workout arrangements with four state taxing agencies
for past due taxes. As of November 30, 2002, the Company owes approximately
$29,300 pursuant to these workout agreements. Terms of these workouts require
monthly
F-9
payments ranging from $290 to $1,500, to include varying rates of
interest, over periods ranging from ten to twenty-four months. Three of the
above state taxing agencies filed either a warrant or a lien with local county
authorities to protect its position during their respective workout periods.
Additionally, two liens have been filed by two other states for past due taxes,
plus accrued penalties and interest. One lien, for approximately $28,000, is to
a state for prior year's income taxes assessed to the predecessor company of
Insynq, Inc. This amount has been disputed and amended returns to correct this
deficiency have been filed, but not yet approved. The second lien is to another
state for payroll taxes, penalties and interest totaling approximately $30,100.
The Company has submitted a proposal for a workout settlement on this state's
payroll taxes but has not yet received either acceptance or rejection of its
offer.
Note 8 - Convertible Debentures
On June 29, 2001, the Company entered into a private financing transaction with
three investors for a total of $1,200,000, 12% convertible debentures. The
debentures are convertible into shares of common stock at the lesser of (i)
$18.00 or (ii) the average of the lowest three trading prices in the twenty-day
trading period immediately preceding the notice to convert, discounted by fifty
percent (50%). The convertible debentures carry attached warrants that allow the
investor, under the terms of the warrants, to purchase up to 24,000 shares of
common stock at $4.00 per share. The terms of the debentures provide for full
payment on or before one year from the date of issuance, plus accrued interest
at 12% per annum. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company may not, without
consent, (i) engage in any future equity financing involving the issuance of
common stock for a period of six months from the date of closing, and (ii) may
not engage in such transactions for a period of two years without first giving
the investors the opportunity to purchase shares on a pro-rata basis. As of
November 30, 2002 four separate issuances of convertible debentures with
principal totaling $1,123,950 plus accrued interest of approximately $148,000
matured. These obligations were to be converted into cash and/or common stock on
or before the conversion (maturity) date. These four financial instruments are
in default and are subject to default interest at fifteen percent (15%) per
annum.
On January 24, 2002, the Company entered into a second agreement to issue
$550,000, 12% convertible debentures, and 22,000 warrants. The debentures are
convertible into shares of common stock at the lesser of (i) $0.80 or (ii) the
average of the lowest three trading prices in the twenty-day trading period
immediately preceding the notice to convert, discounted by 50%. The convertible
debentures carry attached warrants that allow the investor, under the terms of
the warrants, to purchase up to 22,000 shares of common stock at the lesser of
$0.70 per share or the average of the lowest three trading prices during the
twenty trading days immediately prior to exercise. Terms of the debentures
provide for full payment on or before one year from the date of issuance, plus
accrued interest at 12% per annum. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company may
not, without consent, (i) engage in any future equity financing involving the
issuance of common stock for a period of six months from the date of closing,
and (ii) may not engage in such transactions for a period of two years without
first giving the investors the opportunity to purchase shares on a pro-rata
basis. In July 2002 the Company received $250,000 of debentures from this
agreement and issued 10,000 warrants. The Company also recorded discounts of
$250,000, equal to the fair value of the convertible debentures and warrants as
determined using the Black Scholes pricing model and the intrinsic value of the
beneficial conversion features. As of November 30, 2002, the Company has
received $550,000 from the issuance of these secured convertible debentures.
However, $300,000 of this convertible debenture matures on January 24, 2003. The
Company does not anticipate it will be able to pay off this obligation plus the
accrued interest pursuant to the terms of this agreement. The Company
anticipates negotiations with the investors about amending the terms of the
agreement.
On September 27, 2002, the Company entered into a third agreement to issue
$450,000, 12% convertible debentures, and 9,000 warrants. The debentures are
convertible into shares of common stock at the lesser of (i) $3.00 or (ii) the
average of the lowest three trading prices in the twenty-day trading period
immediately preceding the notice to convert, discounted by 50%. The convertible
debentures carry attached warrants that allow the investor, under the terms of
the warrants, to purchase up to 9,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share
for an exercise period up to five years from the date of issuance. Terms of the
debentures provide for full payment on or before one year from the date of
issuance, plus accrued interest at 12% per annum. Pursuant to the agreement, the
Company may not, without consent, (i) engage in any future equity financing
involving the issuance of common stock for a period of six months from the date
of closing, and (ii) may not engage in such transactions for a period of two
years without first giving the investors the opportunity to purchase shares on a
pro-rata basis. On September 30 and November 6, 2002 the Company received
$120,000 and $30,000, respectively, of debentures from this agreement and issued
a total of 3,000 warrants. On December 6, 2002, the Company received an
additional $30,000 from this convertible debenture. The Company also recorded
discounts totaling of $150,000, equal to the fair value of the convertible
debentures and warrants as determined using the Black Scholes pricing model and
the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features.
As of November 30, 2002, investors have purchased a total of $1,900,000 of
convertible debentures, and have converted $76,050 of debentures and $27,993 of
accrued interest into 193,232 shares of common stock.
F-10
For the six months ended November 30, 2002, the Company recognized $533,326 of
interest expense on the discounts of the convertible debentures. The unamortized
discount at November 30, 2002 is $325,645.
Note 9 - Capital Lease Obligation
As of November 30, 2002, the Company was in default on four capital lease
obligations. Accordingly, the leases have been classified as a current
obligation. One lease was paid off in December 2002. (Also see Note 2)
Note 10 - Preferred Stock
On July 25, 2002, the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of a series of
preferred stock designated Series A Convertible Preferred in the amount
2,100,000 shares with a par value of $0.001, which designation was filed and
became effective in October 2002. Each share is entitled to vote 50 times the
number of common stock, and, is convertible upon the merger, initially, at the
rate of 10 shares of common stock for each full share of convertible preferred
stock. On October 16 ,2002, Directors, Officers, employees and one investor
executed Exchange Agreements under which they exchanged 10 shares of common
stock for 1 share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. A total of 12,514,110
shares of common stock were exchanged for 1,251,410 shares of preferred stock.
Under the Plan of Merger, effective December 23, 2002, all the preferred shares
were converted into 12,514,110 shares of common stock of the Nevada corporation.
Note 11 - Stock Options
On March 31, 2000, the Company's Board of Directors adopted two long-term
incentive plans (Plans), the 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) and the 2000
Executive Long Term Incentive Plan (Executive LTIP). As of November 30, 2002 the
LTIP had 111,875 options available for issuance and outstanding option granted
totaled 125,355. As of November 30, 2002 the Executive LTIP had 4,000 shares of
Class A Common Stock available for issuance and had no outstanding options.
On July 25, 2002, the Board of Directors adopted a third incentive plan, the
2002 Directors, Officers and Consultants Stock Option, Stock Warrant and Stock
Award Plan (2002 SP). The 2002 SP provides for the issuance of incentive and
non-qualified deferred stock incentives to certain executives, directors and key
employees of the Company who contribute significantly to the long-term
performance and growth of the Company. The Company may make awards in form of
options, warrants, restricted common or convertible preferred or unrestricted
common or convertible preferred and other awards, or any combination thereof.
The Company has set aside 16,000,000 shares of common stock under this plan at
its adoption. As of November 30, 2002, 3,200,000 shares of common stock under
the 2002 SP have been set aside for consultants in conjunction with agreements
yet to be performed.
Note 12 - Warrants
For the six-month period ended November 30, 2002, the Company issued 13,000
warrants to purchase common stock in connection with the sale of the Company's
convertible debentures. Warrants outstanding to purchase common stock as of
November 30, 2002 totaled 175,053. (See also Note 8 - Convertible Debentures).
Note 13 - Contingencies and Commitments
On September 6, 2001, the Company was served with a summons and complaint by its
former landlords, asserting: (a.) a breach of a settlement agreement entered
into in May 2001 to register 5,000 shares of common stock, valued at $80,000, in
partial settlement of its then existing lease, and, (b.) a default by the
Company on two new long-term lease obligations. Terms of the first lease call
for base monthly payments of $12,046 for the period of August 1, 2001 to July
31, 2006, plus triple net charges estimated at approximately $3,038 per month
and beginning in year two, an increase equal to the change in the annual
consumer price index but not less than annual increase of 3%. Minimum aggregate
lease payments and triple net charges approximate $954,500 over the term of the
lease. Terms of the second lease call for monthly payments, beginning in June
2001 of approximately $4,000 per month, or a total of $80,000 for the remaining
term of the lease from August 1, 2001 to May 31, 2003. On October 4, 2001, the
Company's former landlords filed a summons and complaint with local
jurisdictional court for a summary judgment motion on all claims. All claims
under this motion were initially denied. However, on May 10, 2002, the Court
awarded a partial summary judgment in favor of the
F-11
former landlords for approximately $170,000. The Company has previously recorded
approximately $170,000 of expense related to this award. The Company anticipates
filing a motion to request the Court to vacate the partial summary judgment in
light of new evidence and/or appeal the Court's decision.
It is the opinion of management and its legal counsel that the settlement
agreement signed in May 2001 requiring the signing of the two new leases was
entered into under economic duress, based on misrepresentation, and, was signed
in bad faith on the part of the former landlords. As such, it is management's
opinion that the settlement agreement and the two lease agreements are void.
Management believes that the ultimate outcome of this litigation will be that
the former landlords will not be successful in their assertions under their
claim(s). Any additional claim under this dispute is not recognized in the
accompanying condensed financial statements. The Company denies the allegations
under this claim and believes this claim is without merit and intends to
continuously and vigorously defend itself against this lawsuit.
On October 9, 2002, the Company settled an alleged grievance filed by a former
employee for $30,000. As of November 30, 2002, the Company recorded an expense
of $30,000 and made two monthly payments of $1,500 pursuant to terms of the
settlement.
Note 14 - Other Disclosures
Forgiveness and Settlements of Debts
- ------------------------------------
The Company has executed complete settlements and reductions of the outstanding
obligations due certain creditors and employees. For the six months ended
November 30, 2002 the Company has settled approximately $414,000 of obligations
for $10,550. Settlements are generally in the form of cash, common stock,
repriced warrants or a combination thereof. In connection with the forgiveness
and settlements, the Company recorded other income of $404,265 and $404,266 for
the three and six months ended November 30, 2002.
Non-cash Investing and Financing
- --------------------------------
Non-cash investing and financing activities included the following for the six
months ended:
November 30,
2002 2001
--------------- ----------------
Discount on convertible debentures ............... $ 400,000 $1,142,549
Convertible debentures converted into common stock 4,500 36,750
Accrued liabilities converted into common stock .. -- 69,036
Accounts payable converted into common stock ..... -- 2,000
Notes payable converted into warrants ............ -- 14,000
Accrued liabilities converted into warrants ...... -- 3,500
Cash paid for interest ........................... $ 11,584 $ 23,646
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended are:
November 30,
2002 2001
------------------- ---------------
Salaries $ 327,088 $ 447,722
Benefits 4,806 26,234
Rent 10,756 142,182
Consulting 214,082 965,265
Legal, accounting and professional 145,248 296,235
Telephone and utilities 10,292 26,714
Taxes (9,063) 51,168
F-12
Administration, supplies and repairs 11,963 23,864
Travel and entertainment 7,500 19,992
Insurance 2,305 (1,318)
Other and settlements 139,650 44,991
------------------- ---------------
Total $ 864,627 $ 2,043,049
=================== ===============
Non-cash compensation $ 252,562 $ 778,642
Other 612,065 1,264,407
------------------- ---------------
Total $ 864,627 $ 2,043,049
=================== ===============
F-13
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Board of Directors
Insynq, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Insynq, Inc. (the "Company")
as of May 31, 2002 and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
deficiency, and cash flows for the years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Insynq, Inc. as of May 31, 2002
and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended May 31,
2002 and 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 4 to the
financial statements, the Company has a net loss of $4,599,430 and a negative
cash flow from operations of $1,567,369 for the year ended May 31, 2002 and has
a working capital deficiency of $5,696,914 and a stockholders' deficiency of
$5,174,763 at May 31, 2002. These matters raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plan in regards
to these matters is also described in Note 4. The financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
WEINBERG & COMPANY, P.A.
Boca Raton, Florida
September 6, 2002
F-14
Insynq, Inc.
Balance Sheet
May 31, 2002
Assets
Current assets
Cash .................................................... $ 9,760
Restricted cash, held in escrow ......................... 10,355
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $25,000 ................................. 21,964
Related party receivables ............................... 68,601
Prepaid expenses ........................................ 238,715
-------
Total current assets ................................ 349,395
-------
Equipment, net ............................................ 485,617
-------
Other assets
Interest receivable - related party ..................... 3,604
Intangible assets, net .................................. 26,585
Deposits ................................................ 6,345
-------
Total other assets .................................. 36,534
------
Total assets ........................................ $ 871,546
========
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficiency
Current liabilities
Convertible debentures, net of discount of $458,971 ...... $ 969,479
Related party notes payable ............................. 1,315,429
Notes payable ........................................... 19,833
Capitalized lease obligations ........................... 818,840
Accounts payable ........................................ 983,516
Accrued liabilities ..................................... 1,845,099
Customer deposits ....................................... 33,070
Deferred compensation ................................... 61,043
------
Total current liabilities ........................... 6,046,309
---------
Stockholders' deficiency
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding ............ --
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares
authorized, 5,000,000 shares issued and outstanding ..... 5,000
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares
authorized, 59,457,001 shares issued and outstanding .... 59,457
Additional paid-in capital .............................. 17,590,919
Notes receivable from officers .......................... (90,000)
Unearned compensation ................................... (143,149)
Accumulated deficiency .................................. (22,596,990)
-----------
Total stockholders' deficiency ...................... (5,174,763)
----------
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficiency $ 871,546
===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement.
F-15
Insynq, Inc.
Statements of Operations
Years ended May 31,
--------------------
2002 2001
---- ----
Revenues $ 889,136 $ 493,008
----------- -----------
Costs and expenses
Direct cost of services ........... 1,150,849 1,258,932
Selling, general and administrative
Non-cash compensation ........... 1,075,459 4,242,072
Other ........................... 2,067,653 4,572,004
Network and infrastructure costs .. 37,347 154,445
Research and development .......... 123,598 296,703
----------- ------------
Total costs and expenses ............ 4,454,906 10,524,156
----------- ------------
Loss from operations ................ (3,565,770) (10,031,148)
----------- ------------
Other income (expense)
Other income ...................... 474,528 11,569
Loss on disposal of equipment ..... (48,302) (114,464)
Interest expense
Non-cash ........................ (1,015,044) (3,680,583)
Other ........................... (444,842) (260,592)
----------- ------------
Other expense, net .................. (1,033,660) (4,044,070)
----------- ------------
Net loss ............................ $(4,599,430) $(14,075,218)
=========== ============
Net loss per common share -
basic and diluted $ (0.10) $(0.57)
======== ======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-16
Insynq, Inc.
Statements of Stockholders' Deficiency
Years Ended May 31, 2002 and 2001
Class A Common Common Stock
Stock Additional
Paid In
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital
------ ------ ------ ------ -------
Balance, May 31, 2000 .... -- $ -- 19,620,846 $ 19,621 $3,132,903
Issuance of common stock
for cash ................. -- -- 692,000 692 312,499
Issuance of common stock
in conjunction with
exercise of options ...... -- -- 3,655,687 3,656 430,802
Issuance of common stock
in conjunction with
exercise of warrants ..... -- -- 133,000 133 39,027
Issuance of common stock
for consulting and
marketing services
received and record
unearned income .......... -- -- 2,958,667 2,959 2,598,864
Issuance and rescission of
common stock for
compensation ............. -- -- 526,566 527 120,496
Issuance of common stock
for accounts payable ..... -- -- 697,028 697 134,546
Issuance of common stock
in conjunction with
conversion of debentures
and accrued interest ..... -- -- 1,855,796 1,856 2,313,658
Issuance of common stock
for notes payable and
accrued interest ......... -- -- 1,658,488 1,658 1,936,892
Issuance of common stock
for put options .......... -- -- 1,733,016 1,733 1,070,052
Allocation of discount on
convertible debentures ... -- -- -- -- 900,000
Allocation of discount on
notes payable with
attached warrants ........ -- -- -- -- 229,000
Issuance of warrants to
non employees and record
unearned compensation .... -- -- -- -- 991,952
Issuance of stock options
to non employees and
record unearned
compensation ............. -- -- -- -- 352,006
Issuance of stock options
to employees with exercise
price below fair market
value on date of grant ... -- -- -- -- 867,810
Net loss, year ended May
31, 2001 ................. -- -- -- -- --
----- ----- ---------- ------ ----------
Balance, May 31, 2001 .... -- $ -- 33,531,094 $33,532 $15,430,507
<page>
(Continued from table above, first column repeated)
Notes
Receivable Total
From Unearned Accumulated Stockholders'
Officers Compensation Deficiency Deficiency
-------- ------------ ------- ----------
Balance, May 31, 2000 .... $ -- $ -- $(3,922,342) $ (769,818)
Issuance of common stock
for cash ................. -- -- -- 313,191
Issuance of common stock
in conjunction with
exercise of options ...... -- -- -- 434,458
Issuance of common stock
in conjunction with
exercise of warrants ..... -- -- -- 39,160
Issuance of common stock
for consulting and
marketing services
received and record
unearned income .......... -- (509,046) -- 2,092,777
Issuance and rescission of
common stock for
compensation ............. -- -- -- 121,023
Issuance of common stock
for accounts payable ..... -- -- -- 135,243
Issuance of common stock
in conjunction with
conversion of debentures
and accrued interest ..... -- -- -- 2,315,514
Issuance of common stock
for notes payable and
accrued interest ......... -- -- -- 1,938,550
Issuance of common stock
for put options .......... -- -- -- 1,071,785
Allocation of discount on
convertible debentures ... -- -- -- 900,000
Allocation of discount on
notes payable with
attached warrants ........ -- -- -- 229,000
Issuance of warrants to
non employees and record
unearned compensation .... -- (13,205) -- 978,747
Issuance of stock options
to non employees and
record unearned
compensation ............. -- (203,466) -- 148,540
Issuance of stock options
to employees with exercise
price below fair market
value on date of grant ... -- -- -- 867,810
Net loss, year ended May
31, 2001 ................. -- -- (14,075,218) (14,075,218)
-- -------- ----------- -----------
Balance, May 31, 2001 .... $ -- $(725,717) $(17,997,560) $(3,259,238)
-- -------- ----------- -----------
Continued
F-17
Class A Common Common Stock Additional
Stock Paid In
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital
------ ------ ------ ------ -------
Issuance of common stock
for cash .................. -- $ -- 355,556 $ 356 $ 31,644
Issuance of common stock
in conjunction with
exercise of warrants ...... -- -- 28,208 28 3,498
Issuance of common stock
for non employee
compensation and record
unearned compensation ..... -- -- 4,070,000 4,070 225,510
Issuance of common stock
for trade debt ............ -- -- 3,277,249 3,277 83,063
Rescission of common stock
issued to employees ....... -- -- (540,000) (540) (91,260)
Issuance of common stock
in conjunction with
exercise of options by
employees ................. -- -- 3,011,651 3,011 124,763
Issuance of common stock
in conjunction with
conversion of debentures
and accrued interest ...... -- -- 15,723,243 15,723 83,820
Allocation of discount for
convertible debentures
with warrants and
beneficial conversion
features .................. -- -- -- -- 1,442,549
Adjustment to re-price
warrants .................. -- -- -- -- 107,803
Stock options issued in
lieu of payment of
promissory note and
accrued liability ......... -- -- -- -- 17,500
Issuance of Class A common
stock and record notes
receivable from officers .. 5,000,000 5,000 -- -- 85,000
Recognition of forgiveness
of debts by related parties -- -- -- -- 46,522
Amortization of unearned
compensation .............. -- -- -- -- --
Net loss, year ended May
31, 2002 .................. -- -- -- -- --
--------- ------ ----------- -------- ------------
Balance, May 31, 2002 ..... 5,000,000 $5,000 59,457,001 $ 59,457 $ 17,590,919
========= ====== =========== ======== ============
<page>
(Continued from table above, first column repeated)
Notes
Receivable Total
From Unearned Accumulated Stockholders'
Officers Compensation Deficiency Deficiency
-------- ------------ ------- ----------
Issuance of common stock
for cash .................. -- -- -- 32,000
Issuance of common stock
in conjunction with
exercise of warrants ...... -- -- -- 3,526
Issuance of common stock
for non employee
compensation and record
unearned compensation ..... -- (180,000) -- 49,580
Issuance of common stock
for trade debt ............ -- -- -- 86,340
Rescission of common stock
issued to employees ....... -- -- -- (91,800)
Issuance of common stock
in conjunction with
exercise of options by
employees ................. -- -- -- 127,774
Issuance of common stock
in conjunction with
conversion of debentures
and accrued interest ...... -- -- -- 99,543
Allocation of discount for
convertible debentures
with warrants and
beneficial conversion
features .................. -- -- -- 1,442,549
Adjustment to re-price
warrants .................. -- -- -- 107,803
Stock options issued in
lieu of payment of
promissory note and
accrued liability ......... -- -- -- 17,500
Issuance of Class A common
stock and record notes
receivable from officers .. (90,000) -- -- --
Recognition of forgiveness
of debts by related parties -- -- -- 46,522
Amortization of unearned
compensation .............. 762,568 -- 762,568
Net loss, year ended May
31, 2002 .................. -- (4,599,430) (4,599,430)
--------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance, May 31, 2002 ..... $ (90,000) $ (143,149) $(22,596,990) $(5,174,763)
========= =========== ============ ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-18
Insynq, Inc.
Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended May 31,
-------------------
2002 2001
---- ----
Cash flows from operating activities
loss ................................................ $(4,599,430) $(14,075,218)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization ....................... 243,422 279,329
Loss on disposal of equipment ....................... 48,302 114,464
Loss on forfeited deposit ........................... 71,000 --
Forgiveness of debts ................................ (463,767) --
Capitalized interest on leased assets and notes ..... 85,442 --
receivable
Issuance and rescission of common stock for services 162,722 2,246,975
and compensation
Issuance of options and warrants for services ....... 762,568 1,127,287
Issuance of options to employees under fair market .. -- 867,810
value
Warrants issued with debt and capital leases ........ 31,467 1,392,967
Warrants and beneficial conversion features of ...... 1,095,132 2,287,616
debentures
Change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable and related party receivables 36,994 (63,054)
Prepaid expenses ................................ (176,753) (14,705)
Inventories ..................................... -- 29,512
Deposits ........................................ (5,345) 93,584
Accounts payable ................................ 345,090 795,282
Accrued liabilities ............................. 858,533 1,167,466
Customer deposits ............................... (16,614) 398
Deferred compensation ........................... (46,132) 107,175
------- -------
Net cash used in operating activities ........ (1,567,369) (3,643,112)
---------- ----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of equipment ................................... -- (68,862)
---------- -------
Net cash used in investing activities ........ -- (68,862)
---------- -------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from notes payable and related party notes
payable ............................................... 109,387 2,129,887
Proceeds from issuance of common stock .................. -- 734,320
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants .... 35,526 --
Proceeds from on convertible debentures ................. 1,500,000 800,000
Payments on short term notes payable .................... -- (18,133)
Payments on capital lease obligations ................... (23,137) (14,006)
Payments on notes payable ............................... (61,192) --
Restricted cash - held in escrow ........................ (77,000) --
Payments from restricted cash - held in escrow .......... 66,645 --
------ --------
Net cash provided by financing activities .... 1,550,229 3,632,068
--------- ---------
Net (decrease) in cash ..................................... (17,140) (79,906)
Cash at beginning of period ................................ 26,900 106,806
------ -------
Cash at end of period ...................................... $ 9,760 $ 26,900
=========== ============
Supplemental non-cash investing and financing activities - See Note 20. The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-19
Insynq, Inc.
Notes To Financial Statements
May 31, 2002
Note 1 - Nature of Business
Insynq, Inc. (the Company) is a Delaware corporation headquartered in Tacoma,
Washington USA. The Company is an application hosting and managed software
service provider that provides server-based computing access and services to
customers who decide to augment all or part of their information technology
requirements. Customers pay a monthly fee for their services and connect to
Company's server farm primarily through either the Internet, wireless or DSL
connection.
Note 2 - Basis of Presentation
On February 18, 2000, the Company closed an asset purchase transaction
(Acquisition) in which Xcel Management, Inc. (Xcel), a non-operating public
shell company, acquired substantially all of the assets of Company. Under
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the
Acquisition was considered to be a capital transaction in substance, rather than
a business combination. That is, the Acquisition was equivalent to the issuance
of stock by the Company for the net monetary assets of Xcel accompanied by a
recapitalization, and was accounted for as a change in capital structure.
Accordingly, the accounting for the Acquisition was identical to that resulting
from a reverse acquisition, except that no goodwill was recorded. Under reverse
takeover accounting, the post-reverse-acquisition financial statements of the
"legal acquirer" Xcel, are those of the "legal acquiree" Insynq (the accounting
acquirer).
On August 3, 2000, Xcel completed a re-incorporation as a Delaware corporation
and changed its' name to Insynq, Inc. In connection with the re-incorporation,
the stockholders unanimously voted for the adoption of a plan of
re-capitalization pursuant to which the issued and outstanding shares of the
Company's common stock, would forward split, two-for-one, so that holders of
common stock would receive two shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common
stock for each share held. The 9,915,424 shares of common stock outstanding
immediately prior to the reorganization were converted to 19,830,848 shares of
common stock, and outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares were
converted into options and warrants entitling the holders to purchase twice as
many shares upon exercise of such options and warrants. Loss per share
calculations includes the Company's change in capital structure for all periods
presented.
The Company was considered a development stage company, as defined under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 7, through May 31, 2001.
Although the Company is still devoting substantially all of its present efforts
to establishing its core business, its planned business operations have
commenced, and, accordingly operating revenues are being generated. As a result,
the company is no longer considered a development stage company beginning in the
fiscal year 2002.
Note 3 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in the
preparation of the accompanying financial statements is as follows:
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company's principal source of revenue is generated from application hosting,
managed software and related type services. Payments received in advance of the
service, even if non-refundable, are recorded as customer deposits. Generally,
any prepaid amount is an advance payment and is applied to the last month
service fee. Revenues are recognized over the service period. Revenue from the
sale of computer hardware is recorded upon delivery, or upon installation when
specified under contact terms. Customer discounts are recorded as a reduction of
revenue.
EQUIPMENT
Equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization.
Depreciation and amortization is calculated using the straight-line method over
the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging between three to seven years.
Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the lesser of the useful lives of
the improvements or the term of the lease. Depreciation and amortization begins
in the period when the asset is placed in service.
F-20
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets consist of the rights to a proprietary data utility services
system acquired by the Company. The cost is being amortized over sixty months.
Accumulated amortization totaled $103,415 as of May 31, 2002.
LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Long-lived assets, including, but not limited to, equipment and identifiable
intangibles held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the
asset may not be recoverable. If such review indicates that the asset is
impaired, when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the sum of its expected
future cash flows on an undiscounted basis, the asset's carrying amount is
written down to fair value. The Company believes that no impairment of the
carrying amount of its long-lived assets existed at May 31, 2002.
CLASS A COMMON STOCK
The Board of Directors is authorized to issue of up to 10,000,000 shares of
Class A common stock pursuant to which the holders are entitled to three votes
for each share held, on all matters submitted to stockholders, which voting
power may be used by the holders of such stock to create voting impediments or
otherwise delay or prevent a change in control or to modify the rights of
holders of the Company's common stock. On January 31, 2002, 5,000,000 options to
purchase Class A common stock were exercised by two officers. As of May 31,
2002, 5,000,000 shares of Class A common stock are issued and outstanding. The
exercise of these options and purchase of the stock is more fully discussed in
Notes 6 and 15.
LOSS PER SHARE
Basic loss per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of common shares
outstanding was 45,943,387 and 24,808,590 for the years ended May 31, 2002 and
2001, respectively. Diluted loss per share includes the effect of all
potentially dilutive common stock issuances. Diluted loss per share is not
presented because the effect would be anti-dilutive. At May 31, 2002 and 2001,
there were 29,450,632 and 21,447,545 shares of potentially issuable common
stock, respectively.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS
Research and development costs are expensed in the period incurred.
ADVERTISING EXPENSE
Advertising costs are expensed in the period incurred. For the years ended May
31, 2002 and 2001, advertising costs totaled $33,746 and $198,726, respectively.
CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
The Company sells the majority of its services throughout North America. The
majority of the Company's sales are made to customers who are billed monthly on
open account and no collateral is required. For the year ended May 31, 2002,
approximately thirty-two percent (32%) of revenues were from five customers,
one, is a related party that is owned by the husband of a director and officer
of the corporation, comprised nine percent (9%) of the total revenues.
The Company has established eight vendor relationships that are critical to the
day-to-day operations. The vendors are in the software, hardware, systems and
communications industries. These vendors supply software and hardware to run the
programs and systems, and provide the means through which the Company connects
and communicates with its customers.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Financial instruments, consists principally of cash, accounts and related party
receivables, trade and related party payables, accrued liabilities, short and
long-term obligations. The carrying amounts of such financial instruments in the
accompanying balance sheet approximate their fair values. It is management's
opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant currency or credit risks
arising from these financial instruments.
F-21
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2001 presentation in order to
conform to the 2002 presentation.
NEW AUTHORITATIVE ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The Financial Accounting Standards Board has recently issued several new
Statements of Financial Accounting Standards. Statement No. 141, "Business
Combinations" supersedes Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 16 and
various related pronouncements. Pursuant to the new guidance in Statement No.
141, all business combinations must be accounted for under the purchase method
of accounting; the pooling-of-interests method is no longer permitted. SFAS 141
also establishes new rules concerning the recognition of goodwill and other
intangible assets arising in a purchase business combination and requires
disclosure of more information concerning a business combination in the period
in which it is completed. This statement is generally effective for business
combinations initiated on or after July 1, 2001. Statement No. 142, "Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets" supercedes APB Opinion 17 and related
interpretations. Statement No. 142 establishes new rules on accounting for the
acquisition of intangible assets not acquired in a business combination and the
manner in which goodwill and all other intangibles should be accounted for
subsequent to their initial recognition in a business combination accounted for
under SFAS No. 141. Under SFAS No. 142, intangible assets should be recorded at
fair value. Intangible assets with finite useful lives should be amortized over
such period and those with indefinite lives should not be amortized. All
intangible assets being amortized as well as those that are not, are both
subject to review for potential impairment under SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for
the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed
of". SFAS No. 142 also requires that goodwill arising in a business combination
should not be amortized but is subject to impairment testing at the reporting
unit level to which the goodwill was assigned to at the date of the business
combination.
SFAS No. 142 is effective for the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001
and must be applied as of the beginning of such year to all goodwill and other
intangible assets that have already been recorded in the balance sheet as of the
first day in which SFAS No. 142 is initially applied, regardless of when such
assets were acquired. Goodwill acquired in a business combination whose
acquisition date is on or after July 1, 2001, should not be amortized, but
should be reviewed for impairment pursuant to SFAS No. 121, even though SFAS No.
142 has not yet been adopted. However, previously acquired goodwill should
continue to be amortized until SFAS No. 142 is first adopted.
Statement No. 143 "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" establishes
standards for the initial measurement and subsequent accounting for obligations
associated with the sale, abandonment, or other type of disposal of long-lived
tangible assets arising from the acquisition, construction, or development
and/or normal operation of such assets. SFAS No. 143 is effective for the fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 2002, with earlier application encouraged.
In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets". This statement addresses financial accounting
and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and supercedes
FASB Statement No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and
for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of". The provisions of the statement are
effective for financial statements issued for the fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2001.
The adoption of these pronouncements is not expected to have a material effect
on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
Note 4 - Going Concern and Management Plan
The Company's financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2002 have been
prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets
and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of
business. For the year ended May 31, 2002, the Company has a net loss of
$4,599,430 and a negative cash flow from operations of $1,567,369. The
F-22
Company had a working capital deficiency of $5,696,914 and a stockholders'
deficiency of $5,174,763 at May 31, 2002. The Company's working capital
deficiency as of May 31, 2002 may not enable it to meet certain objectives as
presently structured.
The Company is also in default on a capitalized lease obligation and certain
related party notes payable as discussed in Notes 8 and 11, respectively. The
assets of this underlying lease are critical to the Company's operations. The
Company has initiated contact to restructure this lease obligation, and, due to
the current economic climate and current market for the equipment, the Company
anticipates that it can successfully restructure this obligation. As a
contingency plan for the backup of this equipment, the Company entered into
another equipment lease agreement in August 2001 for similar equipment to
support its customer base.
The development and marketing of the Company's technology and products will
continue to require a commitment of substantial funds. Currently, pursuant to
Item 303(b)(1) and (3) of Regulation SB, the Company has no material capital
commitments. However, should the Company be forced to seek other equipment in
the open market, based on its inability to restructure its capital lease
obligation, the Company would attempt to raise the necessary finances. These
amounts, however, are currently not quantifiable.
The Company has retained legal counsel for representation in current
negotiations with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regarding an Offer In
Compromise and eventually structuring a payment plan for past due taxes. The IRS
has required the Company to meet certain conditions in order to proceed with the
offer and negotiations, one of which is to be current on all payroll tax
deposits and reporting. If the Company is unsuccessful in its offer, the IRS
could seize and sell some, if not all, the assets of the Company or the Company
will be forced to file for bankruptcy. (See also Note 7.)
The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from
the outcome of these uncertainties.
The Company is devoting its efforts into establishing a business in the new
emerging Managed Services Provider industry. The Company is establishing
alliances with Independent Software Vendors (ISV) to provide access to their
applications for their customers and building new channels for marketing
products to potential customers. As a result of these new alliances and
products, the Company will be able to provide additional and enhanced services
to customers. The Company is continuing to develop new products to enable the
deployment of and on going management of The Company services. In addition, on
December 21, 2001, the Company completed negotiations with a national
communication corporation. After another year of market testing and product
development, the telecommunication firm has agreed to go to market with these
services. These bundled services or products will be delivered on a subscription
basis.
Over the past eighteen months, the Company successfully implemented cost
containment strategies and continues to devote significant efforts in the
development of new products and opening new markets. The Company initiated
vendor negotiations on many past due accounts with favorable results in improved
payment terms, and/ or reductions in the total amounts due. As a result of such
negotiations, the Company has recognized, in other income, approximately
$463,000 of forgiveness of debt in the accompanying statement of operations for
the year ended May 31, 2002. Also, the Company has a letter of intent with a
related party to convert $1,300,000 of principle and accrued interest into
preferred stock. Management anticipates initiating negotiations with the holders
of its convertible debentures to amend the terms of the Securities Purchase
Agreements on those portions due.
However, the rate at which the Company expends its resources is variable, may be
accelerated, and will depend on many factors. The Company will need to raise
substantial additional capital to fund its operations and may seek such
additional funding through public or private equity or debt financing. There can
be no assurance that such additional funding, if any, will be available on
acceptable terms. The Company's continued existence as a going concern is
ultimately dependent upon its ability to secure additional funding for
completing and marketing its technology and products, and, therefore, the
success of its future operations.
Note 5 - Equipment
Equipment consists of the following as of May 31, 2002:
Capitalized leased equipment $ 668,959
Equipment ................... 145,467
Software .................... 97,443
Computer hardware............ 81,820
Furniture and fixtures ...... 43,990
----------
F-23
1,037,679
Less accumulated depreciation 552,062
----------
$ 485,617
==========
Accumulated depreciation on capitalized lease equipment totaled $344,974 at May
31, 2002
Note 6 - Notes Receivable From Officers
In January 2002, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to enter into two
promissory notes totaling $90,000 with two of its officers in conjunction with
the exercise of non-qualified Class A common stock options. Each note bears
interest at 12%, are due June 2003, and are secured with 5,000,0000 shares of
Class A common stock. These notes receivable have been reflected in the
Statement of Stockholders' Deficiency. (See also Note 15.)
Note 7 - Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following as of May 31, 2002:
Salaries and benefits ........ $ 290,759
Taxes
Payroll ................. 515,182
Business ................ 109,683
Penalties and interest .. 233,296
Interest ..................... 272,506
Licenses, consulting and other 423,673
----------
$1,845,099
==========
As of May 31, 2002, the Company was delinquent on approximately $848,000 of its
payroll and business taxes and related penalties and interest. The majority of
the past due amount, or approximately $704,000, is for payroll taxes, penalties
and interest due to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). In April 2002, the IRS
filed a Federal Tax Lien on the assets of the Company for all past due
employment taxes, penalties and accrued interest. The Company has submitted an
Offer In Compromise (OIC) to the Internal Revenue Service seeking relief on a
portion of its overall obligation and structure a payment plan on the settled
amount of taxes due. The OIC is subject to the Company remaining current on all
current and future payroll tax deposits and reporting. Unless the Company and
the IRS agree to a mutually agreeable workout, the IRS could take possession of
the Company's assets or the Company will be forced to file for bankruptcy.
The Company has made other workout arrangements with four State taxing agencies
for past due taxes totaling approximately $60,000. Terms of these workouts
require monthly payments ranging from $290 to $1,000, to include varying rates
of interest, over periods ranging from ten to twenty-four months. Two of the
above State taxing agencies filed either a warrant or a lien with local County
authorities to protect its position during their respective workout periods.
Additionally, two liens have been filed by two other States for past due taxes,
plus accrued penalties and interest. One lien, for approximately $28,000, is to
a state for prior year's income taxes assessed to the predecessor company of
Insynq, Inc. This amount has been disputed and amended returns to correct this
deficiency have been filed, but not yet approved. The second lien is to another
state for payroll taxes, penalties and interest totaling approximately $29,000.
Note 8 - Related Party Notes Payable
The Company has short-term promissory notes with stockholders, a corporate
officer, and a prior employee. All related party notes, plus accrued interest,
are due within one year or on demand and consist of the following at May 31,
2002:
F-24
Note payable to stockholder, past due, originally due November 2, 2001,
plus accrued interest; bearing interest at 10% and is unsecured. The Company has
received a letter of intent to convert the principle and accrued interest,
totaling approximately $1,300,000, into preferred stock ..................... $1,162,000
Various notes payable to related parties, past due, with various due dates
ranging through April 20, 2002; bearing default interest ranging from 18%
to 21%, and are unsecured ................................................... 147,529
Note payable to officer, due March 5, 2003, bearing interest at 12%, secured
with equipment .............................................................. 5,900
----------
$1,315,429
==========
On July 17, 2000, the Company entered into two stockholder promissory note
agreements totaling $255,000. In addition, the stockholders were granted
warrants to purchase a total of 325,000 shares of common stock at a price of $2
per share. The Company recorded a discount on the loans, totaling $229,000, for
the fair value of warrants granted. The Company recognized $229,000 of interest
expense on the discount for the year ended May 31, 2001. In November 2000, the
loans were converted into 510,000 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share.
In October 2000, the Company entered into three additional stockholder loans
totaling $500,000. These notes were also converted, in November 2000, into
1,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share. As an inducement to the
holders to convert the loans, the Company agreed to convert the loans into
common stock at a price below the fair market value of the common stock at the
time of conversion. This resulted in additional interest expense totaling
$1,132,500 for the year ended May 31, 2001.
On December 1, 2000, the Company entered into a promissory note agreement with a
stockholder for $50,000 with interest at prime, plus 3%. The principal and
accrued interest was converted to 148,488 shares of common stock on January 30,
2001.
For the year ended May 31, 2002, the Company entered into four additional
short-term promissory notes to related parties totaling $86,787. During the same
period, certain parties forgave a total of $45,458 of related party promissory
notes. Two officers also loaned the Company $21,000 in January 2002 and were
repaid in the same month.
Note 9 - Notes Payable
The Company has a $15,000 revolving line of credit with a bank. As of May 31,
2002, the balance was $13,277. This note is unsecured and bears interest at
prime plus 6%. Prime at May 31, 2002 was 4.75%. The outstanding amount is
included in notes payable in the accompanying balance sheet.
The Company has two notes payable to two vendors. Both notes are past due.
Monthly installment payments were $1,692, including default interest at 18%, and
are unsecured. At May 31, 2002, the outstanding balance of the notes amounted to
$6,556, and is included in notes payable in the accompanying balance sheet.
At May 31, 2001, the Company had an additional note payable totaling $14,000 due
on demand. The holder of this note was issued warrants in September 2001, as
part of a settlement agreement, with terms essentially equal to the value of the
note. The warrants were exercised in July 2002 and converted into 200,000 shares
of common stock valued at $14,000.
Note 10 - Convertible Debentures
On June 29, 2001, the Company entered into a private financing transaction with
three investors for a total of $1,200,000, 12% convertible debentures. The
debentures are convertible into shares of common stock at the lesser of (i)
$0.18 or (ii) the average of the lowest three trading prices in the twenty-day
trading period immediately preceding the notice to convert, discounted by fifty
percent (50%). The convertible debentures carry attached warrants that allow the
investor, under the terms of the warrants, to purchase up to 2,400,000 shares of
common stock at $0.04 per share. The terms of the debentures provide for full
payment on or before one year
F-25
from the date of issuance, plus accrued interest at 12% per annum. Pursuant to
the agreement, the Company may not, without consent, (i) engage in any future
equity financing involving the issuance of common stock for a period of six
months from the date of closing, and (ii) may not engage in such transactions
for a period of two years without first giving the investors the opportunity to
purchase shares on a pro-rata basis. Two issuances of convertible debentures
totaling $574,450 plus accrued interest of approximately $44,509 matured on June
29, 2002 and August 14, 2002. These obligations are in default and were to be
converted into cash and/or common stock on or before the conversion (maturity)
date. (See also Note 21.)
On January 24, 2002, the Company entered into a second agreement to issue
$550,000, 12% convertible debentures, and 2,200,000 warrants. The debentures are
convertible into shares of common stock at the lesser of (i) $0.008 or (ii) the
average of the lowest three trading prices in the twenty-day trading period
immediately preceding the notice to convert, discounted by 50%. The convertible
debentures carry attached warrants that allow the investor, under the terms of
the warrants, to purchase up to 2,200,000 shares of common stock at the lesser
of $0.007 per share or the average of the lowest three trading prices during the
twenty trading days immediately prior to exercise. Terms of the debentures
provide for full payment on or before one year from the date of issuance, plus
accrued interest at 12% per annum. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company may
not, without consent, (i) engage in any future equity financing involving the
issuance of common stock for a period of six months from the date of closing,
and (ii) may not engage in such transactions for a period of two years without
first giving the investors the opportunity to purchase shares on a pro-rata
basis. As of May 31, 2002, the Company received $300,000 of debentures from this
agreement and issued 1,200,000 warrants. On July 10, 2002, the Company received
the final $250,000 of convertible debentures and issued 1,000,000 warrants. (See
also Note 21.)
As a condition to the January 24,2002 convertible debenture agreement, $77,000
was held back in escrow for the purpose of settling certain creditor payables.
As of May 31,2002, $66,645 was disbursed to various creditors. On June 27, 2002
the Company received $10,355, the remaining undistributed funds held in escrow.
As of May 31, 2002, the investors have purchased a total of $1,500,000 of
convertible debentures, and have converted $71,550 of debentures and $27,993 of
accrued interest into 15,723,243 shares of common stock.
For the year ended May 31, 2002, the Company recorded discounts on the
convertible debentures totaling $1,446,300, equal to the fair value of the
warrants, as determined using the Black Scholes pricing model, and the intrinsic
value of the beneficial conversion features, aggregating $1,446,300. The Company
recognized $987,329 of interest expense on the discounts for the year ended May
31, 2002. The unamortized discount at May 31, 2002 was $458,971.
Note 11 - Capital Lease Obligations
The Company leases equipment under four capital leases, each expiring in 2003.
As of May 31, 2002, the Company's principal capital lease (for computer
hardware, printers and related infrastructure) obligation is in default;
accordingly, the entire lease obligation, plus imputed interest is classified as
a current obligation on the accompanying balance sheet.
The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments together with the
present value of the minimum payments under capital lease obligations as of May
31, 2002:
Year ending May 31, 2003
------------------------
Future minimum lease payments ................ $856,523
Less amount representing interest and discount 37,683
--------
Present value of minimum lease payments ...... $818,840
========
Current portion .............................. $818,840
Long-term portion ............................ --
--------
$818,840
========
Note 12 - Put Option Obligation
F-26
During the year ended May 31, 2001, pursuant to amended conversion agreements
with four investors (stockholders), the Company exchanged 410,714 of the
investors' put shares for 2,143,730 shares of common stock. The recorded amount
of the converted put shares was $1,071,785.
Note 13 - Commitments and Contingencies
OPERATING LEASES
The Company conducts a substantial portion of its operations utilizing leased
facilities for its corporate headquarters and for its server farm racks.
A one-year lease was entered into for its corporate offices on August 1, 2001.
It terminated on July 31, 2002. Rent was $1,600 per month for the term of the
lease. Currently, the company is on a month-to-month agreement with the same
terms and monthly rent of $1,600.
On March 1, 2002 the Company entered into a twenty-four month lease by which it
receives racking and bandwidth for its server farm. Terms require escalating
monthly payments starting at $3,000 per month and on the twenty-first month
payments are maximized at $7,900 through the term of the remaining lease.
In October 2002, the Company entered into a thirty-six month equipment lease.
Payments are $3,000 per month.
The following is a schedule of approximate future minimum operating lease
payments under non-cancelable leases greater than one year as of May 31, 2002:
Years ending May 31,
--------------------
2003 $ 111,000
2004 104,000
2005 12,000
---- ------
$ 227,000
=======
For the years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001, rent expense for facilities and
racking, including a forfeited lease deposit, was approximately $255,700 and
$375,000, respectively.
LAWSUITS
The Company was party to a lawsuit filed by a prior employee. The lawsuit claim
is for approximately $115,000 (plus accrued interest) for unpaid wages,
severance, bonuses, benefits and expenses. The Company has settled the matter
calling for a cash payment of $17,500 and the issuance of a non-qualified stock
option for 200,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.065 per
share. As of May 31, 2002, the Company has not paid the cash settlement and the
stock options remain unexercised.
The Company has settled a lawsuit filed by a prior employee and paid the
claimant $10,000 in cash and issued 85,000 shares of common stock resulting in a
charge to operations of $39,233 for the year ended May 31, 2001.
The Company settled threatened litigation by a prior employee with the issuance
of non-qualified stock option for 114,114 shares of common stock with an
exercise price of $0.71 per share and cash payments totalling $15,277. As of May
31, 2002, the stock options remain unexercised.
The Company settled threatened litigation by a former acquisition target
relating to allegations of an improper termination of acquisition proceedings
and the repayment of a $14,000 loan, the Company entered into a settlement
agreement. The agreement provided for the issuance of: (a) 200,000 options to
purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.07 per share, and,
(b) 50,000 options to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$0.07 for the participating
F-27
attorney. As a result, the Company charged $17,500 to operations for the year
ended May 31, 2002.
On September 6, 2001, the Company was served with a summons and complaint by its
former landlords, asserting: (a.) a breach of a settlement agreement entered
into in May 2001 to register 500,000 shares of common stock, valued at $80,000,
in partial settlement of its then existing lease, and, (b.) a default by the
Company on two new long-term lease obligations. Terms of the first lease call
for base monthly payments of $12,046 for the period of August 1, 2001 to July
31, 2006, plus triple net charges estimated at approximately $3,038 per month
and beginning in year two, an increase equal to the change in the annual
consumer price index but not less than annual increase of 3%. Minimum aggregate
lease payments and triple net charges approximate $954,500 over the term of the
lease. Terms of the second lease call for monthly payments, beginning in June
2001 of approximately $4,000 per month, or a total of $80,000 for the remaining
term of the lease from August 1, 2001 to May 31, 2003. On October 4, 2001, the
Company's former landlords filed a summons and complaint with local
jurisdictional court for a summary judgment motion on all claims. All claims
under this motion were initially denied. However, on May 10, 2002, the Court
awarded a partial summary judgment in favor of the former landlords for
approximately $170,000. As of May 31, 2002, the Company recorded approximately
$170,000 of expense related to this award. The Company will file a motion
requesting the Court to vacate the partial summary judgment in light of new
evidence and/or appeal the Court's decision.
It is the opinion of management and its legal counsel that the settlement
agreement signed in May 2001 requiring the signing of the two new leases was
entered into under economic duress, based on misrepresentation, and, was signed
in bad faith on the part of the former landlords. As such, it is management's
opinion that the settlement agreement and the two lease agreements are void.
Management believes that the ultimate outcome of this litigation will be that
the former landlords will not be successful in their assertions under their
claim(s). Any additional claim under this dispute is not recognized in the
accompanying financial statements. The Company denies the allegations under this
claim and believes this claim is without merit and intends to continuously and
vigorously defend against this lawsuit.
Certain vendors of the Company have also indicated in writing that if they do
not receive satisfactory payment of amounts owed to them that they may file suit
against the Company.
CONSULTING AGREEMENTS
During the year ended May 31, 2001, the Company had several on-going agreements
with investor relation consultants, financial advisory, advertising and
marketing consultants, and sales persons. Terms of these agreements range from
six months to three years and most have automatic renewable provisions.
Compensation for these agreements may be in the form of cash or cash plus common
stock or options. Certain agreements contain provisions that are performance
based only, whereby an individual representing the Company must consummate an
acceptable transaction before the common stock or stock options will be issued.
Short-term (six months or less) monthly cash fees for consultants approximated
$18,500 and one long-term agreement (three years) is $10,000 per month. As of
May 31, 2002, all but the three-year agreement have been terminated or
fulfilled.
On July 1, 2001, the Company entered into a six-month agreement with an
independent consultant/advisor, in which the consultant provided expertise in
financing, mergers and acquisitions. The agreement called for a total of $67,500
paid over the term of the contract. The consultant also received 2,000,000
shares of common stock in July 2001 valued at $180,000. An additional 500,000
shares of common stock will be available for issue to the consultant if there is
an acquisition of another company.
In July 2001, the Company extended the business consulting agreement entered
into on October 31, 2000 with a related party to a corporate officer, for an
additional eight (8) months through November 30, 2002. The agreement calls for a
continuation of services at $5,000 per month.
The Company has an agreement with a consulting group to provide financial
advisory services from June 1, 2002 to August 31, 2002 for $35,100 and 900,000
shares of common stock.
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS
As of May 31, 2002, the Company has three employment contracts with its key
officers and an employee. Each agreement calls for a base annual compensation,
currently ranging between $110,000 and $200,000. Each agreement contains wage
escalation clauses effective on the anniversary date of the agreement. The
agreements generally are written for three to four years in duration. Each
agreement has an incentive clause with rights to exercise vested stock options
agreements at a predetermined price, generally granted
F-28
at market value, and range between $.018 and $2.00 per share. A total 5,700,000
options had been granted under these agreements, of which 5,000,000 were
exercised during this fiscal year. (See also Note 15.)
Note 14 - Common Stock
On November 19, 2001, by a majority vote of the stockholders, the Company
authorized an additional 150,000,000 shares of common stock, increasing the
total to 250,000,000.
Note 15 - Stock Options
On March 31, 2000, the Company's Board of Directors adopted two long-term
incentive plans (Plans), described as follows:
2000 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (LTIP)
The LTIP provides for the issuance of incentive and non-qualified stock options,
stock appreciation rights and restricted stock to directors, officers, employees
and consultants. At the adoption of this plan, the Company set aside 16,675,300
shares of common stock, which may be issued upon the exercise of options
granted. On November 19, 2001 the stockholders approved an amendment to the
LTIP, which would set aside an additional 15,000,000 shares of common stock for
a total of 31,675,300 shares of common stock, which may be issued upon the
exercise of options granted. As of May 31, 2002, options available for issuance
are 11,069,748.
2000 EXECUTIVE LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (EXECUTIVE LTIP)
The Executive LTIP provides for the issuance of incentive and non-qualified
stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock to executive
officers of the Company. The Company set aside 5,400,000 shares of Class A
common stock under this plan at its adoption. On December 10, 2001, the Company
was authorized by the Board of Directors to re-price all of the Executive LTIP
stock options from an exercise price of $0.50 per share to an exercise price
$0.018 per share, which was the fair market value on December 10, 2001. On
January 31, 2002, all outstanding non-qualified stock options totaling 5,000,000
shares were exercised into Class A common stock in exchange for two promissory
notes totaling $90,000, as described in Note 6. In accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP), because of the reduction of the exercise
price and the consideration received by the Company, the two non-recourse notes
collateralized by the shares issued, these transactions are accounted for as
modifications of the original option agreements requiring variable accounting
and the promissory notes are classified as a reduction of stockholders' equity.
The Company's Board of Directors administers the Plans and the Board may amend
or terminate the Plans if it does not cause any adverse effect on any then
outstanding options or unexercised portion thereof. All options generally have
an exercise price equal the fair value of the underlying common stock on the
date of grant, vest immediately and expire in ten years.
The Company's stock option plan is subject to the provisions of SFAS No 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Under the provisions of this standard,
employee and director stock-based compensation expense is measured using either
the intrinsic-value method as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB)
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related
Interpretations, or the fair value method described in SFAS No. 123. The Company
has elected to account for its employee and director stock-based awards under
the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25. Under APB Opinion No. 25, compensation
cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the fair value of
the underlying common stock on the date of grant over the exercise price of the
stock option.
The Company is required to implement the provisions of SFAS No. 123 for
stock-based awards to those other than employees and directors. Stock-based
compensation expense for all equity instruments is recognized on an accelerated
basis based on the related service or vesting periods. Companies choosing the
intrinsic-value method are required to disclose the pro forma impact of the fair
value method on net income. The pro forma effect on net loss and loss per share
are as follows for the years ended May 31:
2002 2001
---- ----
Net loss as reported ..... $ (4,599,430) $ (14,075,218)
Pro forma net loss ....... $ (5,212,032) $ (17,054,018)
F-29
Loss per share as reported $ (0.10) $ (0.57)
Pro forma loss per share $ (0.11) $ (0.69)
The fair value of options granted under the Company's stock option plans during
the years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 was estimated on the date of grant, using
the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions:
2002 2001
---- ----
Weighted average of expected risk-free interest rates 4.50% 6.50%
Expected years from vest date to exercise date ..... 3 - 10 2 - 10
Expected stock volatility .......................... 194% 90%
Expected dividend yield ............................ 0% 0%
A summary of the Company's LTIP and Executive LTIP stock option activity is as
follows:
Weighted Average
Activity Number of Shares Exercise Price
-------- ---------------- ---------------
Balance at May 31, 2000 ........... 7,011,802 $ 0.510
Options granted ................... 8,568,760 0.410
Option exercised .................. (2,816,229) 0.110
Options forfeited ................. (1,851,802) 1.780
---------- -----
Balance at May 31, 2001 ........... 10,912,531 0.650
Options granted ................... 14,484,070 0.052
Options exercised ................. (9,075,646) 0.033
Options forfeited ................. (2,807,288) 0.656
---------- -----
Balance at May 31, 2002 ........... 13,713,677 $ 0.240
========== ==========
Exercisable options at May 31, 2002 12,713,260 $ 0.246
========== ==========
The weighted average remaining contractual life, in years, and weighted average
exercise price of options outstanding as of May 31, 2002 were as follows:
Weighted
Weighted Average Options Weighted
Range of Average Remaining Exercisable at Average
Exercise Options Exercise Contractual May 31, Exercise
Price Outstanding Price Life 2002 Price
- ---------------- ----------- --------- ----------- -------------- ---------
0.01 - 0.30 9,764,500 $ 0.022 9.05 9,614,500 $ 0.020
0.34 - 0.71 2,536,086 0.366 3.28 1,946,086 0.373
1.00 - 1.03 450,000 1.003 7.34 283,333 1.005
1.63 - 2.31 963,091 1.763 3.93 869,341 1.738
- ---- ---- ------- ----- ---- ------- -----
13,713,677 12,713,260
========== ==========
The weighted average fair value of the options granted during the years ended
May 31, 2002 and 2001 were $0.24 and $0.66, respectively.
During the year ended May 31, 2002, the Company granted 767,206 options to
non-employees, of which 691,706 options were exercised and 72,000 options
expired. Exercise prices of granted options to non-employees ranged between
$0.017 and $0.15 per share.
Note 16 - Warrants
Warrants outstanding to purchase common stock as of May 31, 2002 totaled
16,737,316. Warrant exercise prices, exclusive of
F-30
warrants attached to convertible debentures (see Note 10) range between $0.024
and $3.75 per share of common stock. Substantially all warrants will expire on
or before May 31, 2006.
During the year ended May 31, 2001, the Company recorded unearned services
totaling $344,051 for the fair value of warrants granted to consultants as a
reduction of stockholders' equity in the accompanying financial statements. Such
amount is being amortized ratably over the service period.
During the year ended May 31, 2002, the Company recorded an additional $180,000
of unearned compensation for the fair value of warrants granted to a consultant
as a reduction of stockholders' equity and amortized ratably over the service
period.
Warrants issued by the Company are valued on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes valuation model and applied similarly to options granted.
Note 17 - Employee Benefits
On May 1, 2000 the Company adopted a 401(k) retirement plan (the plan). The plan
is funded by voluntary employee contributions. In addition, the Company provided
a mandatory matching contribution up to a stipulated percentage of an employee's
contributions. The Company's matching contributions to the 401(k) plan totaled
$251 and $5,393 in 2002 and 2001, respectively. Effective January 1, 2002 the
company amended the 401(k) retirement plan to discontinue the mandatory matching
requirement. The amended plan calls for discretionary rights to match employee
contributions. On June 7, 2002 the Board approved the termination of the 401(k)
retirement plan.
Note 18 - Income Taxes
The Company utilizes the liability method of accounting for income taxes as set
forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized based on the anticipated future tax effects arising from the
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases of assets and liabilities using
enacted tax rates.
The income tax provision reconciled to the tax computed at the statutory federal
rate is as follows for the year ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 are:
2002 2001
---- ----
Tax benefit at federal statutory rate of 34% $(1,535,000) $(4,785,000)
Permanent differences ...................... 415,000 1,015,000
----------- -----------
(1,120,000) (3,770,000)
Increase in valuation allowance ............ 1,120,000 3,770,000
--------- ---------
$ -- $ --
========== ===========
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant
components of deferred Federal income tax are as follows at May 31, 2002:
Deferred tax asset
Net operating loss carryforwards .......... $ 10,714,000
Amortization .............................. 20,000
Capitalized interest ...................... 30,000
Accrued vacation .......................... 18,000
Allowance for doubtful accounts ........... 8,000
Deferred compensation ..................... 21,000
Employee stock options .................... 352,000
F-31
Warrants issued to consultants ............ 840,000
------------
Total deferred tax assets ................. 12,003,000
------------
Deferred tax liability
Depreciation ..................... 77,000
------------
Total deferred tax liabilities 77,000
------------
Net deferred tax assets ............. 11,926,000
Valuation allowance ................. (11,926,000)
------------
$ --
============
The Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the full amount of the
deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of future utilization of net
operating loss carryforwards and realization of other deferred tax assets. At
May 31, 2002, net operating loss carryforwards totaling approximately
$35,000,000, and expiring through 2022, are available to offset future taxable
income. Utilization of these carryforwards is significantly dependent on future
taxable income, and, any future tax benefit is further limited due to a change
of control in the Company's ownership as defined by the Internal Revenue Code,
Section 382.
Note 19 - Related Party Transactions
During the years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company sold $74,617 and
$41,400 of services, respectively, and received $60,000 and $37,500,
respectively, of consulting services from two parties related to a corporate
officer, director and stockholder. Also, see Notes 6, 8, 13 and 15 for related
party transactions.
Note 20 - Other Disclosures
Non-cash investing and financing activities, and supplemental cash flow
information, for the years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 are:
2002 2001
---- ----
Discount for warrants granted and beneficial conversion features on
convertible debentures ........................................... $1,446,300 $ 900,000
Conversion of debentures and accrued interest into common stock ....... 71,550 2,315,512
Notes payable and accrued interest forgiven by related parties ........ 46,522
Accrued liabilities converted into common stock ....................... 39,840 --
Note payable converted into warrants .................................. 14,000 --
Accounts payable converted to common stock ............................ 8,000 154,557
Accrued liabilities converted into warrants ........................... 3,500 --
Notes payable and interest converted to common stock .................. -- 1,938,550
Conversion of put options into common stock ........................... -- 1,071,785
Discount for warrants granted with short term notes payable and capital
leases ........................................................... -- 229,000
Equipment purchased under capital leases .............................. -- 15,669
Cash paid for interest ................................................ $ 31,688 $ 17,411
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the years ended May 31,2002 and
2001 are:
2002 2001
---- ----
Salaries ......................... $ 654,646 $2,861,649
Benefits ......................... 22,560 67,663
Rent ............................. 143,903 375,641
Consulting ....................... 1,339,586 3,561,058
F-32
Legal, accounting and professional 422,105 854,283
Telephone and utilities .......... 51,033 105,442
Taxes ............................ 104,141 212,917
Supplies and repairs ............. 23,558 78,226
Travel and entertainment ......... 43,596 158,927
Insurance ........................ 1,113 117,563
Other ............................ 336,871 420,707
---------- ----------
Total: ........................ $3,143,112 $8,814,076
========== ==========
Non-cash compensation ............ $1,075,459 $4,242,072
Other ............................ 2,067,653 4,572,004
---------- ----------
Total: ........................ $3,143,112 $8,814,076
========== ==========
Note 21 - Subsequent Events
On July 10, 2002, the Company received $250,000 from the issuance of additional
convertible debentures. These funds are from the private financing transaction
with four investors under which the investors initially purchased $300,000 on
January 24, 2002 from a total of $550,000 12% convertible debentures. (See Note
10 for similar terms and provisions of this transaction.)
Two convertible debenture issuances totaling $574,450 plus accrued interest of
approximately $44,509 had maturity dates on June 29, 2002 and August 17, 2002,
respectively. These obligations were to be converted into cash and/or common
stock on or before the conversion (maturity) dates. These two financial
instruments are in default and are subject to default interest at fifteen
percent (15%) per annum.
F-33
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 24. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.
Our Articles of Incorporation, as amended, provide to the fullest
extent permitted by Nevada law, our directors or officers shall not be
personally liable to us or our shareholders for damages for breach of such
director's or officer's fiduciary duty. The effect of this provision of our
Articles of Incorporation, as amended, is to eliminate our right and our
shareholders (through shareholders' derivative suits on behalf of our company)
to recover damages against a director or officer for breach of the fiduciary
duty of care as a director or officer (including breaches resulting from
negligent or grossly negligent behavior), except under certain situations
defined by statute. We believe that the indemnification provisions in its
Articles of Incorporation, as amended, are necessary to attract and retain
qualified persons as directors and officers.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities
Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of
the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the
registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling
person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in
the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent,
submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities
Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
ITEM 25. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION.
The following table sets forth an itemization of all estimated
expenses, all of which we will pay, in connection with the issuance and
distribution of the securities being registered:
NATURE OF EXPENSE AMOUNT
SEC Registration fee $ 1,097.17
Accounting fees and expenses 10,000.00*
Legal fees and expenses 35,000.00*
Miscellaneous 3,092,83*
TOTAL $50,000.00*
===========
o Estimated.
ITEM 26. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES.
The following sets forth information regarding all sales of our
unregistered securities during the past three years. All of these shares were
exempt from registration under the Securities Act by reason of Section 4(2) of
the Securities Act, or Regulation D promulgated thereunder, as transactions by
an issuer not involving a public offering, or were exempt by reason of the
application of Regulation S. The recipients of securities in each of these
transactions represented their intentions to acquire the securities for
investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any
distribution of the securities, and appropriate legends were affixed to the
share certificates and warrants issued in such transactions. All recipients had
adequate access, through their relationships with us or otherwise, to
information about us. Unless otherwise indicated, the issuances of the
securities described below were affected without the involvement of
underwriters. Where applicable, each of the disclosures has been adjusted to
account for the 1.41056 to 1 stock split of Insynq-WA, the 1 for 2 stock split
of Xcel effective on January 24, 2000, the 2 for 1 stock split of
Insynq-Delaware effective on August 3, 2000 and the 100 for 1 stock split
effective December 23, 2002.
On February 20, 2000, we entered into a consulting agreement with Vijay
Alimchandani (VJ), under the terms of which we engaged VJ to provide us with
general consulting services for which we granted options to VJ as follows: (a)
5,000 shares, exercisable at any time prior to February 21, 2005, at a price of
$25 per share; and (b) 4,000 shares, exercisable one year from the commencement
date of the contract, for a period of five years, at an exercise price of $50.00
per share. We also agreed to grant to VJ (a) an additional option, entitling him
to purchase a total of 1,800 shares for a five-year period beginning at the end
of 24 months from the date of the agreement, if such agreement is extended by
us, at price of $75 per share; and (b) bonus options of between 500 to 1,000
shares to be granted at the discretion of the board of directors at an exercise
price of not more than $150 per share. On July 10, 2001, we entered into an
agreement to provide professional services with Central Software Services Inc.
(Central Software). Under the terms of the agreement, the previous agreement
with VJ, dated February 20, 2000, was cancelled in its entirety. For a term of
six months, Central Software will provide professional services in the form of
identifying and negotiating acquisition opportunities and other merger
consulting as appropriate. Under the terms of the agreement, Central Software
received 20,000 shares of restricted common stock at $7.00 per share and monthly
payments of $10,000. In addition, we will issue an additional 5,000 shares of
restricted shares of common stock upon the successful completion of each
acquisition.
On or about April 6, 2000, we sold a total of 619 shares of common
stock to two investors, The Perry Family Trust and John Anderson, under the
terms of which the Perry Trust and Mr. Anderson were granted a total of 619
warrants to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price of $325 per
share.
On or about April 26, 2000, we sold a total of 2,857 shares of common
stock to Plazacorp Investors Limited, an Ontario corporation, at a price of $175
per share. In connection with this sale, Plazacorp was granted warrants to
purchase an additional 5,714 shares of common stock, exercisable at any time for
a five (5) year period, at a price of $275 per share with respect to 2,857
shares, and $375 per share with respect to the remaining 2,857 shares. In
connection with this transaction, Plazacorp was granted registration rights
under a Registration and Repurchase Agreement (the "Agreement") requiring us to
file a registration statement by October 31, 2000 and to cause the registration
statement to be effective on or before January 31, 2001. In the event we did not
file a registration statement by October 31, 2000, or the registration statement
was not declared effective by December 13, 2000, Plazacorp had the right, but
not the obligation, to require us to repurchase the shares (but not shares
issuable on exercise of the warrants), at a price of $250 per share. On November
1, 2000, we entered into an Agreement with Plazacorp under which Plazacorp
agreed to relinquish its right to require us to repurchase the 2,857 shares at
$250 in exchange for the conversion of those shares into the right to receive
14,287 shares with an agreed value of $50 per share.
On or about May 17, 2000, we sold a total of 1,250 shares of common
stock at a price of $200 per share to the following investors: Raymond Betz -
2,500 shares; Timothy Horan - 5,000 shares; and International Fluid Dynamics,
Inc. (IFD) - 5,000 shares. In connection with this transaction, the purchasers
were granted warrants to purchase an equivalent number of additional shares (or
a total of 1,250 shares), at any time on or before May 17, 2005, at an exercise
price of $300 per share. In connection with this transaction, the purchasers
were granted registration rights under a Registration and Repurchase Agreement
(the "Agreement") requiring us to file a registration statement by October 31,
2000, and to cause the registration statement to be effective on or before
January 31, 2001. In the event we did not file a registration statement by
October 31, 2000, or the registration statement was not declared effective by
January 31, 2001, the purchasers had the right, but not the obligation, to
require us to repurchase the shares (but not shares issuable on exercise of
warrants), at a price of $286 per share. On November 1, 2000, we entered into an
Agreement with each of Betz, Horan and IFD under which each agreed to relinquish
the right to require us to repurchase their respective number of shares at $286
in exchange for the conversion of those shares into the right to receive an
aggregate of 71,500 shares with an agreed value of at $50 per share.
On May 26, 2000, we entered into a consulting agreement with MQ
Holdings, Inc. (MQ), under the terms of which we issued a total of 4,000 shares
of restricted common stock to two individuals - Mark DeStefano and T J Jesky -
for services to be rendered in assisting us in our corporate and securities
filings, and other consulting services. Under the terms of the consulting
agreement, we filed an S-8 registration statement for the registration of the
shares issued on October 4, 2000. In December 2000, MQ Holding, rescinded 2,000
shares of common stock with no future claims.
On or about June 15, 2000, we entered into a non-exclusive financial
advisory agreement with Sunstate Equity Trading, Inc., a Florida corporation,
which is a member of the NASD, under the terms of which we have engaged
Sunstate, on a non-exclusive basis, to provide financial advisory services and
advice. In consideration of the services undertaken by Sunstate, we issued to
Sunstate a total of 1,250 shares of restricted common stock. This agreement was
amended on September 22, 2000, to include the provision of additional services
by Sunstate, including, but not limited to, sponsoring us in conferences with
various investments groups. In consideration of these additional services, we
issued to Sunstate an additional 2,500 shares of restricted common stock.
On June 16, 2000, we entered into a private financing transaction with
two investors, Travin Partners, L.L.L.P. (TPL) and TCA Investments, Inc. (TCA),
under the terms of which TPL and TCA each loaned us the sum of $325,000 (the
loans), and were sold convertible debentures and granted warrants, described
below. The loans are payable pursuant to the terms of identical convertible
debentures, providing for full payment on or before June 16, 2002 (the due
date), with interest at the current Bank of America prime rate, plus 1/2%. All
accrued interest under each Debenture is payable only in shares of our common
stock at a price of $71 per share. In addition to the Debentures, TPL and TCA
were granted warrants entitling each of them to purchase a total of 4,577 shares
of our common stock at a price of $100 per share, at any time after November 15,
2000 and before June 15, 2005. On November 1, 2000, we entered into an Agreement
with each of TPL and TCA under which each agreed to relinquish its right to
convert the debentures into shares of common stock at $71 per share in exchange
for the conversion of those debentures into the right to receive an aggregate of
13,000 shares with an agreed value of $50 per share.
On July 17, 2000, we entered into a private financing transaction with
two investors, International Fluid Dynamics, Inc. (IFD) and Garnier Holdings,
Inc. (Garnier), under the terms of which IFD and Garnier each loaned us the sum
of $127,500 (the loans), and were granted warrants described below. The loans
are payable pursuant to the terms of a promissory note (the note), providing for
full payment on or before August 1, 2000 (the due date), with interest
compounded annually at the Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. rate quoted as its prime.
The warrants entitle each of IFD and Garnier to purchase a total of 3,250 shares
of our common stock at a price of $200 per share at any time after December 28,
2000 and before July 17, 2005. If the notes were not paid by 5:00 p.m. CST on
August 17, 2000, the exercise price would have decreased by one-half, or $100,
and on and after each additional ten (10) day period that the notes remain
unpaid, the exercise price would have decreased by an additional ten percent
(10%). On November 1, 2000, we entered into an Agreement with each of Garnier
and IFD under which each of them agreed to relinquish its right to payment under
the promissory notes in exchange for the conversion of those notes into the
right to receive an aggregate of 5,100 shares with an agreed value of $50 per
share. Under that same agreement, each of Garnier and IFD agreed to lock in the
exercise price of the warrants under the Warrant Agreement at $50 per share.
On August 2, 2000, we entered into a private financing transaction with
five foreign investors under the terms of which the investors purchased an
aggregate of 2,000 shares of our common shares at a price of $60 per share.
On August 4, 2000, we sold a total of 2,000 shares of common stock to
One Click Investments, LLC, at a price of $60 per share. In connection with this
sale, One Click was granted warrants to purchase an additional 2,000 shares of
common stock, exercisable at any time for a five (5) year period, at a price of
$200 per share.
On August 24, 2000, we entered into a private financing transaction
with certain foreign investors under the terms of which the investors purchased
an aggregate of 1,350 of our common shares at a price of $29.63 per share.
On September 11, 2000, we entered into a private financing transaction
with two investors, Travin Partners, L.L.L.P. (TPL) and TCA Investments, Inc.
(TCA), under the terms of which Travin and TCA each loaned us the sum of
$125,000 (the loans), and we issued the convertible debentures and granted
warrants, described below. The loans were payable pursuant to the terms of
identical convertible debentures providing for full payment on or before October
11, 2000 (the due date), with interest at the current Bank of America prime
rate, plus1/2%. All principal and accrued interest under each debenture was
convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of (a) $1.00
per share or (b) sixty percent (60%) of the average of the bid price, whichever
is lower on the date of conversion. In addition to the debentures, TPL and TCA
were granted warrants entitling each of them to purchase a total of 1,250 shares
of our common stock at a price of $100 per share, at any time after September
11, 2000 and before September 11, 2005. These warrants have a "cashless"
exercise provision allowing TPL and/or TCA to exercise the warrants for a
reduced number of shares pursuant to a formula set forth in the warrants. On
November 1, 2000, we entered into an Agreement with each of TPL and TCA under
which each agreed to relinquish its right to convert the debentures into shares
of common stock in exchange for the conversion of those debentures into the
right to receive an aggregate of 5,000 shares with an agreed value of $50 per
share.
On October 20, 2000, we entered into a private financing transaction
with three investors, International Fluid Dynamics, Inc. (IFD), Plazacorp
Investments Limited (Plazacorp) and Travin Partners, L.L.L.P. (TPL), under the
terms of which IFD and TPL each loaned us the sum of $125,000 and Plazacorp
loaned us the sum of $250,000 (the loans). The loans are payable pursuant to the
terms of a promissory note (the note), providing for full payment on or before
November 3, 2000 (the maturity date), with interest payable on the maturity date
of ten percent (10%) per annum based on a 365-day year. On November 1, 2000, we
entered into an Agreement with each of IFD, Plazacorp and TPL under which each
of them agreed to relinquish its right to payment under the promissory notes in
exchange for the conversion of those notes into the right to receive an
aggregate of 10,000 shares with an agreed value of $50 per share.
On November 1, 2000, we entered into a private financing transaction
with Plazacorp Investments Limited (Plazacorp) under the terms of which
Plazacorp agreed to loan us up to $1,120,000 (the loan). The loan is payable
pursuant to the terms of a promissory note (the note), providing for full
payment on or before November 2, 2001 (the maturity date), with interest payable
on the maturity date of ten percent (10%) per annum based on a 365-day year.
Under the terms of the note, upon our written request Plazacorp shall advance to
us up to $300,000.00 under this note in each calendar month during which
advances can be requested thereunder (a monthly advance). An advance can be
requested during each of November 2000, December 2000 and January 2001 at any
time after the 10th day of each month. During the term of the note and after the
effective date of a registration statement filed with the SEC registering the
shares of our common stock held by Plazacorp, we can request in writing, and
Plazacorp shall pay within 10 business days of the written request, an advance
of up to an additional $220,000.00 (an additional advance) for the payment of
certain obligations of ours that are currently due and owing. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, if we raise funds in a financing of either our debt or equity
securities during the term of the note (a new financing), and (a) the new
financing is up to, but does not exceed, $220,000.00, Plazacorp's obligation to
advance the additional advance amount, if it has not already done so, shall be
reduced dollar for dollar by the amount of the new financing, or (b) the new
financing exceeds $220,000.00, Plazacorp shall not be obligated to advance the
additional advance amount, if it has not already done so, and in addition, the
obligation of Plazacorp to advance the monthly advances remaining to be advanced
thereunder, if any, shall be reduced dollar for dollar by the amount of the
funds raised in the new financing.
On November 11, 2000, we entered into an agreement with Bridge 21,
Inc., a Wyoming corporation, under the terms of which we have formed a
relationship to provide seats to Bridge 21's members. In consideration of the
relationship, we granted to Bridge 21 a total of 300 options to purchase our
common stock at a price to be determined on the date of exercise based on
certain performance goals.
On December 7, 2000, for services rendered, we granted to Locke Liddell
& Sapp LLP warrants to purchase 1,000 shares of common stock, exercisable at any
time for a five (5) year period, at an exercise price of $50 per share.
On February 19, 2001, we entered into a business advisory and
consulting services agreement with Tarshish Capital Markets, Ltd., an Israel
corporation, under the terms of which we have engaged Tarshish, on a best
efforts basis, to seek funding sources for a private offering exempt from
registration requirements. In consideration of the services undertaken by
Tarshish, we will compensate Tarshish in the form of a success fee equal to 13%
of funds so invested and warrants equal to 10% of the funds raised at an
exercise price of 110% of the sales price of each transaction. In connection
with the agreement, on March 2, 2001, four foreign investors purchased 1,350
shares of restricted stock at $25 per share and March 15, 2001, two foreign
investors purchased 220 shares of restricted stock at $20 per share. In addition
we issued to Tarshish warrants to purchase 135 shares at an exercise price of
$27.50 per share and 22 shares at an exercise price of $22 per share.
On March 5, 2001, for services rendered, we granted to Americom
Technology, Inc., specifically Patrick Berkil, Ronald Richter and Patrick
Richter (collectively, Americom), warrants to purchase an aggregate of 750
shares of restricted common stock, exercisable at any time for a one year
period, at an exercise price of $43.20 per share.
On March 26, 2001, we entered into a consulting agreement with Internet
PR Group under the terms of which we have engaged Internet PR Group, on a
non-exclusive basis, to provide investor relations and related advisory services
and advice. The agreement is for an initial term of one year, and may be
extended for additional terms as agreed upon by the parties. In consideration of
the services undertaken by Internet PR Group, we issued to Internet PR Group a
total of 2,250 shares of restricted common stock at $34.38 per share. In
connection with this transaction, Internet PR Group was granted registration
rights granting Internet PR Group (a) one demand registration right on or after
November 1, 2001, and (b) "piggyback" registration rights.
On March 22, 2001, we entered into a consulting agreement with
Metromedia Research Group, LLC under the terms of which we have engaged
Metromedia, on a non-exclusive basis, to provide investor relations and related
advisory services and advice. The agreement is for an initial term of ninety
days and must be renewed in writing by both parties. In consideration of the
services undertaken by Metromedia, we issued a total 2,000 shares of restricted
stock at $34.38 per share. In connection with this transaction, Metromedia was
granted registrations rights granting Metromedia (a) one demand registration
right on or after April 30, 2001, and (b) "piggyback" registration rights. On
April 9, 2001 the consulting agreement was amended to include an additional
issuance of 3,000 shares of restricted common stock, with a fair market value of
$18 per share, as compensation for a designated consultant specializing in the
small and micro-cap markets. All other provisions of the consulting agreement
remain the same.
On March 22, 2001, for services rendered, we granted to Ward and
Associates, specifically William Collins, Stephen Ward, Cheryl Ward and Lucia
Churches (collectively, Ward), warrants to purchase an aggregate of 220 shares
of restricted common stock, exercisable at any time for a one year period, at an
exercise price of $50 per share.
On April 1, 2001, we entered into a consulting agreement with one
entity for a term of three months. Under the terms of the agreement, in
consideration of the services undertaken by the entity, we issued monthly,
through the term of the agreement, (a) 1,250 shares of our common stock and (b)
$25,000. The fair market value for each issuance of common stock was $32.81, $17
and $10, respectively.
On April 1, 2001, we entered into a letter agreement with Barretto
Pacific Corporation under the terms of which we have engaged Barretto, on a
non-exclusive basis, to provide investor relations and related advisory services
and advice. The agreement is for an initial term of one year and may be extended
for such periods of time and upon such terms and conditions as may be mutually
agreed upon, in writing, by the parties, and may be cancelled by either party
giving the other party written notice received by the end of each three month
period ending on July 1, 2001, October 1, 2001, and January 1, 2002. In
consideration of the services undertaken by Barretto, we issued an initial
payment of 920 shares of restricted stock with a fair market value of $32.81 per
share, and, subsequent payments of $27,500, whether in cash or stock
equivalents, payable quarterly through the term of the agreement, providing the
agreement has not been terminated by either party. In connection with this
transaction we have granted Barretto a warrant to purchase 1,000 shares of
restricted common stock with an exercise price of $30 per share, of which 250
shares vest immediately and the remainder vest quarterly, provided the agreement
has not been terminated, and are exercisable through November 1, 2002.
On April 4, 2001, in consideration of past consulting services rendered
to us, we granted a warrant to Robert J. Torres entitling him to purchase a
total of 433 shares of restricted common stock at any time prior to April 4,
2002, at an exercise price of $25 per share.
On April 12, 2001, we granted 200 shares of restricted common stock to
each of our then 27 employees located at the Broadway Plaza, Tacoma Washington
facility. The fair market value on the date of grant was $17 per share.
Subsequently, the stock grants were rescinded on December 27, 2001.
On or about April 25, 2001 we sold a total of 3,150 shares of common
stock at a price of $7 per share to International Fluid Dynamics (IFD). In
connection with this transaction, IFD was granted warrants to purchase an
equivalent number of additional shares, at any time on or before the fifth
anniversary date of the registration rate, of such securities, at an exercise
price of $7 per share. In connection with this transaction, IFD was granted
registration rights granting IFD one demand registration right on or after June
30, 2001.
On or about May 3, 2001, we entered into a consulting agreement with
DiabloStocks, Inc. under the terms of which we have engaged DiabloStocks, on a
non-exclusive basis, to provide investor relations and related advisory services
and advice. The agreement is for a term of one year. In consideration for the
services undertaken by DiabloStocks, we issued to them a total of 2,900 shares
of restricted common stock at $16 per share.
On May 3, 2001, we entered into a consulting agreement with Eugene R.
Zachman for a term of two years. Under the terms of the agreement, and in
consideration of the services undertaken by Zachman, we issued a stock option
for 7,500 shares of common stock under our 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan with a
fair market value of $34.38, which will vest upon performance. On May 30, 2001
we amended the agreement to include a grant of 5,000 shares of our common stock
upon the signing of certain contracts. In addition, we have agreed to register
the grant on Form S-8.
On or about May 4, 2001, for services rendered, we issued to Internet
Solutions Partners, Inc. 666 shares of restricted stock at $15 per share.
On May 17, 2001, we entered into a settlement agreement with our
landlord Howe/Horizon Holdings, LLC, owner of the facilities located at 1101
Broadway Plaza, Tacoma WA and Horizon Holdings I, Inc. owner and landlord of the
facilities located 1401 Court C, Tacoma WA. In connection with the settlement,
we issued the following: (a) 2,900 shares of common stock and a warrant to
purchase 8,000 shares of restricted common stock with an exercise price per
share of $50 to Howe/Horizon Holdings and (b) 2,100 shares of restricted common
stock and a warrant to purchase 2,000 shares of common stock with an exercise
price of $50 per share to Horizon Holdings I. In connection with this
transaction, we granted each of Howe/Horizon Holdings and Horizon Holdings I
registration rights granting both one demand registration right on or after
September 17, 2001.
On May 17 2001, we entered into a consulting agreement with James
Zachman for a term of six months. Under the terms of the agreement and in
consideration of the services undertaken by Zachman, we will issue monthly
payments of $4,500 and a stock option for 3,500 shares of common stock issued
under our 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan with a fair market value of $19, which
will vest upon performance. On May 30, 2001 we amended the agreement to include
a grant of 5,000 shares of our common stock upon the signing of certain
contracts. In addition, we have agreed to register the grant on Form S-8.
On or about May 28, 2001, we entered into a selling agreement with
Taconic Capital Partners, LP, Internet Solutions Partners, Inc, and Salvani
Investments, Inc., specifically Joseph Salvani and Rene Jimenez, under the terms
of which we agreed to issue an aggregate of 4,350 shares of common stock to the
parties for entering into this agreement. In addition, pursuant to the
agreement, if total sales during the campaign reach certain amounts, we will
issue up to 15,000 additional shares as follows: (a) $750,000, we will issue an
additional 4,350 shares; (b) $1.25 million we will issue an additional 2,900
shares; and (c) $2 million we will issue an additional 3,350 shares. We also
agreed to file an S-8 registration statement within one month of signing of this
agreement. The term of the selling agreement is for one year unless terminated
with thirty (30) days written notice. On July 16, 2001 we terminated the selling
agreement for non-performance.
On June 29, 2001, we entered into a private financing transaction with
three investors for a total of $1,200,000, 12% convertible debentures. The
debentures are convertible into shares of common stock at the lesser of (i)
$0.30 or (ii) the average of the lowest three trading prices in the twenty-day
trading period immediately preceding the notice to convert, discounted by sixty
percent (60%). The convertible debentures carry attached warrants that allow the
investor, under the terms of the warrants, to purchase up to 2,400,000 shares of
common stock at $0.25 per share. The terms of the debentures provide for full
payment on or before one year from the date of issuance, plus accrued interest
at 12% per annum. Pursuant to the agreement, we may not, without consent, (i)
engage in any future equity financing involving the issuance of common stock for
a period of six months from the date of closing, and (ii) may not engage in such
transactions for a period of two years without first giving the investors the
opportunity to purchase shares on a pro-rata basis. As of February 21, 2003,
principal in the amount of $1,123,950 plus accrued interest of approximately
$176,318 is outstanding. These obligations were to be repaid or converted into
common stock on or before the conversion (maturity) date. These convertible
debentures have been amended to provide a maturity date of March 6, 2004 upon
which these obligations are to be repaid or converted into common stock at the
investor's option.
On September 1, 2001, we entered into a consulting agreement with one
entity for a term of three months. Under the terms of the agreement, in
consideration of the services undertaken the entity, we issued monthly, through
the term of the agreement, (a) 1,000 shares of our common stock and (b) $21,500.
The fair market value for each issuance is $6.50, $5.00 and $2.80, respectively.
On September 3, 2001, in settlement of a loan dispute, we entered into
a settlement agreement with Martin E. Darrah. In connection with the settlement,
we issued the following: (a) 2,000 options to purchase shares of common stock
with an exercise price per share of $7 to Mr. Darrah, and (b) 5,000 options to
purchase shares of common stock with an exercise price of $7 per share to John
Spencer, legal counsel to Mr. Darrah, as consideration for legal fees.
On September 13, 2001, we offered a temporary re-pricing to the holders
of our A and B warrants. Beginning September 15, 2001 and ending October 31,
2001, warrant holders could exercise the A warrant and the B warrant for $12.50
per share, which warrants are currently priced at $177 and $284, respectively.
The warrant holder could exercise all or any part of their total holdings until
October 31, 2001. A total of 282 shares of common stock were exercised as a
result and the remaining A and B warrants to purchase 25,954 shares of common
stock expired December 31, 2001.
On January 1, 2002, we entered into a consulting agreement with one
entity for a term or three months. Under the terms of the agreement, in
consideration of the services undertaken by the entity, we issued monthly,
through the term of the agreement, (a) 2,150 shares of our common stock, and (b)
$13,500. The fair market value for each issuance is the first business of the
month through the term of the agreement.
On January 24, 2002, we entered into a second agreement to issue
$550,000, 12% convertible debentures, and 2,200,000 warrants. The debentures are
convertible into shares of common stock at the lesser of (i) $0.30 or (ii) the
average of the lowest three trading prices in the twenty-day trading period
immediately preceding the notice to convert, discounted by sixty percent (60%).
The convertible debentures carry attached warrants that allow the investor,
under the terms of the warrants, to purchase up to 2,200,000 shares of common
stock at $0.25 per share. Terms of the debentures provide for full payment on or
before one year from the date of issuance, plus accrued interest at 12% per
annum. Pursuant to the agreement, we may not, without consent, (i) engage in any
future equity financing involving the issuance of common stock for a period of
six months from the date of closing, and (ii) may not engage in such
transactions for a period of two years without first giving the investors the
opportunity to purchase shares on a pro-rata basis. As of February 21, 2003,
principal in the amount of $550,000 plus accrued interest of approximately
$61,842.36 is outstanding. These obligations were to be repaid or converted into
common stock on or before the conversion (maturity) date. These convertible
debentures have been amended to provide a maturity date of March 6, 2004, upon
which these obligations are to be repaid or converted into common stock at the
investor's option.
We entered into an employment agreement with Donald M. Kaplan,
effective as of December 1, 2001, providing for Mr. Kaplan's employment. We
agreed to issue to Mr. Kaplan a stock grant of 40,000 shares of our common stock
and a compensatory non-qualified stock option to purchase 10,000 shares of
common stock. The option shall be vested on the effective date of the agreement.
On May 10, 2002, we issued to Mr. Kaplan 30,000 shares of common stock. On May
13, 2002, Mr. Kaplan rescinded the shares of common stock and we agreed to issue
to Mr. Kaplan an option to purchase 40,000 shares of our common stock in lieu of
the common stock grant, vesting on the effective date of the agreement. The
option is exercisable anytime up to December 1, 2011 at an exercise price of
fair market value of $2.40.
On July 8, 2002, we granted stock six of our employees an aggregate of
900,000 share of common stock each at a fair market value on date of grant. On
October 16, 2002, pursuant to an exchange agreement, these shares of common
stock were converted into 90,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.
On December 23, 2002, we entered into an Agreement of Plan of Merger whereby we
reincorporated in the state of Nevada and each of the Series A Convertible
Preferred stockholders received ten shares of common stock of Insynq Nevada for
each share of Series A Convertible Preferred outstanding. As a result of the
Agreement and Plan of Merger, the six employees held 900,000 shares of common
stock of Insynq Nevada.
On July 8, 2002, an officer forgave $24,501 in deferred compensation
and the company granted 350,000 shares of common stock at a fair market value of
$1,050. On October 16, 2002, pursuant to an exchange agreement, these shares of
common stock were converted into 35,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock. On December 23, 2002, we entered into an Agreement of Plan of Merger
whereby we reincorporated in the state of Nevada and each of the Series A
Convertible Preferred stock holders received ten shares of common stock of
Insynq Nevada for each share of Series A Convertible Preferred outstanding. As a
result of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, the officer held 350,000 shares of
common stock of Insynq Nevada.
In July 2002, we entered into a consulting agreement with one entity
for a term or three months. Under the terms of the agreement, in consideration
of the services undertaken by the entity, we issued monthly, through the term of
the agreement, (a) 3,000 shares of our common stock, and (b) $13,500. The fair
market value for each issuance is the first business of the month through the
term of the agreement.
On September 27, 2002, we entered into a securities purchase agreement
with four investors for the sale of (i) $450,000 in convertible debentures and
(ii) a warrants to buy 900,000 shares of our common stock. The investors are
obligated to provide us with the funds as follows:
o $240,000 has been disbursed to date; and
o an aggregate of $210,000 will be disbursed at the rate of $30,000 per month
on the final business day of each month ending in August 2003.
The debentures bear interest at 12%, mature on one year from the date
of issuance, and are convertible into our common stock, at the investors'
option, at the lower of:
o $0.30; or
o 40% of the average of the three lowest intraday trading prices for the
common stock on a principal market for the 20 trading days before but not
including the conversion date.
The full principal amounts of the convertible debentures are due upon
default under the terms of convertible debentures. In addition, we have granted
the investors a security interest in substantially all of our assets and
intellectual property and registration rights. The warrants are exercisable
until five years from the date of issuance at a purchase price of $0.25 per
share. In addition, the exercise price of the warrants will be adjusted in the
event we issue common stock at a price below market, with the exception of any
securities issued as of the date of this warrant. The conversion price of the
debentures and the exercise price of the warrants may be adjusted in certain
circumstances such as if we pay a stock dividend, subdivide or combine
outstanding shares of common stock into a greater or lesser number of shares, or
take such other actions as would otherwise result in dilution of the selling
stockholder's position. The selling stockholders have contractually agreed to
restrict their ability to convert their convertible debentures or exercise their
warrants and receive shares of our common stock such that the number of shares
of common stock held by them in the aggregate and their affiliates after such
conversion or exercise does not exceed 4.9% of the then issued and outstanding
shares of common stock. We have granted the selling stockholders a security
interest in all of our assets against the convertible debentures.
On December 18, 2002, we entered into a consulting agreement. Under the
terms of the agreement, in consideration of the services undertaken, we issued
250,000 shares of common stock. The fair market value is $0.05 per share.
On February 1, 2003, we entered into a consulting agreement. Under the
terms of the agreement, in consideration of the services undertaken, we issued
87,500 shares of common stock under the 2002 Directors, Officers and Consultants
Stock Option, Stock Warrant and Stock Award Plan at the fair market value of
$0.06 per share and 300,000 warrants to purchase common stock at $0.40 per
share.
Except as expressly set forth above, the individuals and entities to
whom we issued securities as indicated in this section of the registration
statement are unaffiliated with the Company.
ITEM 27. EXHIBITS.
The following exhibits are included as part of this Form SB-2. References to
"the Company" in this Exhibit List mean Insynq, Inc., a Nevada corporation.
2.1 Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 18, 2000, by and
between Xcel Management, Inc. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K,
filed March 3, 2000).
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K
filed August 17, 2000).
3.2 Certificate of Incorporation of Insynq, Inc. as amended by Amendment
No 1 dated November 21, 2001. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1 to the Company's Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A filed
February 25, 2002).
3.3 By-Laws of Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 17, 2000).
3.4 By-Laws of Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Information Statement on Form 14C filed December 10, 2002).
4.1 Form of Specimen Common Stock Certificate. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
September 13, 2000).
4.2 Form of Warrant Agreement issued to Consulting & Strategy
International, LLC on February 24, 2000, as amended by Amendment No. 1
dated June 9, 2000, Amendment No. 2 dated July 31, 2000, Amendment No.
3 dated August 31, 2000, Amendment No. 4 dated October 1, 2000,
Amendment No. 5 dated October 28, 2000 and Amendment No. 6 dated
December 1, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14,
2000).
4.3 Amendment No. 7 dated February 1, 2001 and Amendment No. 8 dated
February 27, 2001, to Warrant Agreement issued to Consulting &
Strategy International, LLC on February 24, 2000. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB filed April 20, 2001).
4.4 Letter Agreement dated January 31, 2001 between Consulting & Strategy
International, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July
31, 2001).
4.5 Form of Warrant Agreement issued to International Fluid Dynamics, Inc.
on May 17, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed September 13, 2000).
4.6 Form of Registration and Repurchase Agreement issued to International
Fluid Dynamics, Inc. on May 17, 2000, as amended. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
filed September 13, 2000).
4.7 Form of Warrant Agreement issued to Plazacorp Investors Limited on
April 26, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed September 13, 2000).
4.8 Form of Registration and Repurchase Agreement issued to Plazacorp
Investors Limited on April 26, 2000, as amended. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
filed September 13, 2000).
4.9 Form of Warrant Agreement issued to TCA Investments, Inc. on June 16,
2000, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated August 31, 2000, Extension
dated September 5, 2000, Amendment No. 2 dated September 14, 2000,
Amendment No. 3 dated October 1, 2000, Amendment No. 4 dated October
28, 2000 and Amendment No. 5 dated December 1, 2000 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000).
4.10 Amendment No. 6 dated February 28, 2001, to Warrant Agreement issued
to TCA Investments, Inc. on June 16, 2000 (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.7 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form10-QSB filed
April 20, 2001).
4.11 Form of Convertible Debenture issued to TCA Investments, Inc. on June
16, 2000, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated August 31, 2000,
Extension dated September 5, 2000, Amendment No. 2 dated September 14,
2000, Amendment No. 3 dated October 1, 2000 and Amendment No. 4 dated
October 28, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit to Exhibit 4.2
to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December
14, 2000).
4.12 Form of Warrant Agreement issued to Garnier Holdings, Ltd. on July 17,
2000, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated September 22, 2000,
Amendment No. 2 dated October 1, 2000, Amendment No. 3 dated October
19, 2000, Amendment No. 4 dated October 28, 2000 and Amendment No. 5
dated December 1, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to
the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14,
2001).
4.13 Amendment No. 6 dated February 27, 2001, to Warrant Agreement issued
to Garnier Holdings, Ltd. on July 17, 2000 (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.9 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form10-QSB filed
April 20, 2001).
4.14 Form of Promissory Note issued to Garnier Holdings, Ltd. on July 17,
2000, as amended by Extension No. 1 dated September 11, 2000 and
Extension No. 2 dated October 1, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.10 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed
October 23, 2000).
4.15 Form of Warrant Agreement issued to One Click Investments, LLC on
August 4, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed September 13, 2000).
4.16 Form of Registration Rights Agreement issued to One Click Investments,
LLC on August 4, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed September 13, 2000).
4.17 Form of Warrant Agreement issued to Series A & B warrant holders.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB filed September 13, 2000).
4.18 Form of Warrant Agreement issued to One Click Investments, LLC on
September 20, 1999, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.14 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed September 13,
2000).
4.19 Form of Warrant Agreement issued to Hewlett-Packard on June 1, 1999.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB filed September 13, 2000).
4.20 Form of Registration Agreement issued to Hewlett-Packard on February
20, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to the Company's
Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10- KSB/A filed December 6,
2000).
4.21 Form of Subscription Agreement between TCA Investments, Inc. and
Insynq, Inc. dated June 16, 2000. (Incorporated by referenced to
Exhibit 4.17 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed
October 23, 2000).
4.22 Form of Subscription Agreement between TCA Investments, Inc. and
Insynq, Inc. dated September 11, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.17 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed
October 23, 2000).
4.23 Form of Warrant Agreement issued to TCA Investments, Inc. dated
September 11, 2000, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated December 1,
2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit to Exhibit 4.19 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14,
2000).
4.24 Form of Convertible Debenture issued to TCA Investments, Inc. dated
September 11, 2000, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated October 6,
2000 and Amendment No. 2 dated October 19, 2000. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.20 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB filed October 23, 2000).
4.25 Form of Consent of Plazacorp Investors Limited to the Extension of the
filing of the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 dated September 22,
2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.21 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed October 23, 2000).
4.26 Form of Consent of Plazacorp Investors Limited to the Extension of the
filing of the Registration Statement on From SB-2 dated October 2,
2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.22 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed October 23, 2000).
4.27 Form of Consent of TCA Investments, Inc. to Extension of the filing of
the Registration Statement on From SB-2 dated September 22, 2000.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.23 to the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB filed October 23, 2000).
4.28 Form of Consent of TCA Investments, Inc. to Extension of the filing of
the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 dated October 2, 2000.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.24 to the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB filed October 23, 2000).
4.29 Form of Consent of International Fluid Dynamics, Inc. to Extension of
the filing of the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 dated September
22, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.25 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed October 23, 2000).
4.30 Form of Consent of International Fluid Dynamics, Inc. to Extension of
the filing of the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 dated October 2,
2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.26 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed October 23, 2000).
4.31 Registration Rights Agreement dated September 22, 2000 between Charles
Benton and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.27 to
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed October 23,
2000).
4.32 Form of Promissory Note issued to International Fluid Dynamics, Inc.
on October 20, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.28 to the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed October 23, 2000).
4.33 Agreement dated November 1, 2000 between International Fluid Dynamics,
Inc. and Insynq. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.29 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14,
2000).
4.34 Agreement dated November 1, 2000 between Travin Partners, L.L.L.P. and
Insynq. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.30 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000).
4.35 Agreement dated November 1, 2000 between TCA Investments, Inc. and
Insynq. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.31 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000).
4.36 Agreement dated November 1, 2000 between Plazacorp Investors Limited
and Insynq. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.32 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14,
2000).
4.37 Agreement dated November 1, 2000 between Garnier Holdings, Ltd. and
Insynq. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.33 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000).
4.38 Agreement dated November 1, 2000 between International Fluid Dynamics,
Inc. and Insynq. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.34 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14,
2000).
4.39 Agreement dated November 1, 2000 between Timothy Horan and Insynq.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.35 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000).
4.40 Agreement dated November 1, 2000 between Raymond Betz and Insynq.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.36 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000).
4.41 Agreement dated November 1, 2000 between Travin Partners, L.L.L.P. and
Insynq. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.37 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000).
4.42 Form of Warrant Agreement dated December 7, 2000 between Locke Liddell
& Sapp LLP and Insynq. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.38 to
the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14,
2000).
4.43 Lock-Up and Waiver Agreement dated October 17, 2000, as amended by
Amendment No. 1 dated December 1, 2000, by Charles F. Benton.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.39 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000).
4.44 Lock-Up and Waiver Agreement dated October 17, 2000 by John P. Gorst.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.40 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000).
4.45 Lock-Up and Waiver Agreement dated October 17, 2000 by M. Carroll
Benton. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.41 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000).
4.46 Lock-Up and Waiver Agreement dated October 15, 2000 by Vijay
Alimchandani. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.42 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14,
2000).
4.47 Lock-Up and Waiver Agreement dated October 16, 2000 by One Click
Investments LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.43 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14,
2000).
4.48 Promissory Note dated December 1, 2000 between One Click Investments,
LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.44 to the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed April 20, 2001).
4.49 Agreement dated January 30, 2001 between One Click Investments, LLC
and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.45 to the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed April 20, 2001).
4.50 Registration Agreement dated January 30, 2001 between One Click
Investments, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.46 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed
April 20, 2001).
4.51 Warrant Agreement dated February 20, 2001 between TCA Investments,
Inc. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.47 to
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed April 20, 2001).
4.52 Registration Agreement dated February 20, 2001 between TCA
Investments, Inc. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.48 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed
April 20, 2001).
4.53 Form of Warrant Agreement dated March 5, 2001 between Patrick Birkel
and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.53 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July 31, 2001).
4.54 Warrant Agreement dated March 5, 2001 between Bransville Limited and
Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.54 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July 31, 2001).
4.55 Form of Warrant Agreement dated March 22, 2001 between William R.
Collins and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.55 to
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July 31, 2001).
4.56 Registration Rights Agreement dated March 26, 2001 between Internet PR
Group and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.56 to
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July 31, 2001).
4.57 Warrant Agreement dated March 25, 2001 between Bransville Limited and
Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.57 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July 31, 2001).
4.58 Form of Warrant Agreement dated April 25, 2001 between International
Fluid Dynamics, Inc. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.58 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July
31, 2001).
4.59 Form of Subscription Agreement dated April 25, 2001 between
International Fluid Dynamics, Inc. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.59 to the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB filed July 31, 2001).
4.60 Form of Registration Agreement dated April 25, 2001 between
International Fluid Dynamics, Inc. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.60 to the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB filed July 31, 2001).
4.61 Warrant Agreement dated April 1, 2001 between Barretto Pacific
Corporation and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.61 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July 31,
2001).
4.62 Form of Warrant Agreement dated May 17, 2001 between Horizon Holdings
I, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.62 to
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July 31, 2001).
4.63 Form of Registration Agreement dated May 17, 2001 between Horizon
Holdings I, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.63 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July 31,
2001).
4.64 Securities Purchase Agreement dated June 29, 2001 between AJW
Partners, LLC, New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC, AJW/New
Millennium Offshore, Ltd. and Insynq. Inc. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.64 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
July 31, 2001).
4.65 Form of Stock Purchase Warrant dated June 29, 2001 between AJW
Partners, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.65 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July 31,
2001).
4.66 Form of Secured Convertible Debenture dated June 29, 2001 between AJW
Partners, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.66 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July 31,
2001).
4.67 Guaranty and Pledge Agreement dated June 29, 2001 between M. Carroll
Benton, AJW Partners, LLC, New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC,
and AJW/New Millennium Offshore, Ltd. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.67 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July
31, 2001).
4.68 Registration Rights Agreement dated June 29, 2001 between AJW
Partners, LLC, New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC Millennium
Capital Partners II, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.68 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
July 31, 2001).
4.69 Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated January 24 between AJW
Partners, LLC, New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC, AJW/New
Millennium Offshore, Ltd and Pegasus Capital Partners, LLC and Insynq,
Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's
Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/Q filed February 25, 2002).
4.70 Form of Stock Purchase Warrant dated January 24, 2002 between AJW
Partners, LLC, New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC, AJW/New
Millennium Offshore, Ltd and Pegasus Capital Partners, LLC and Insynq,
Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's
Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A filed February 25, 2002).
4.71 Form of Secured Convertible Debenture dated January 24, 2002 AJW
Partners, LLC, New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC, AJW/New
Millennium Offshore, Ltd and Pegasus Capital Partners, LLC and Insynq,
Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's
Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A filed February 25, 2002).
4.72 Form of Registration Rights Agreement dated January 24, 2002 between
AJW Partners, LLC, New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC, AJW/New
Millennium Offshore, Ltd and Pegasus Capital Partners, LLC and Insynq,
Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's
Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A filed February 25, 2002).
4.73 Amendment No. 1 to Securities Purchase Agreement dated April 8, 2002
between AJW Partners, LLC, New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC,
AJW/New Millennium Offshore, Ltd and Pegasus Capital Partners, LLC and
Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.73 to the
Company's Amended Registration Statement on Form SB-2/A filed April
11, 2002)
4.74 Amendment No. 2 to Securities Purchase Agreement dated May 14, 2002
between AJW Partners, LLC, New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC,
AJW/New Millennium Offshore, Ltd and Pegasus Capital Partners, LLC and
Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.74 to the
Company's Registration Statement on From SB-2 filed June 11, 2002).
4.75 Form of Stock Purchase Warrant dated September 27, 2002 between AJW
Partners, LLC, New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC and Insynq,
Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Form
10-QSB for the quarter ending August 31, 2002)
4.76 Form of Secured Convertible Debenture dated September 27, 2002 AJW
Partners, LLC, New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC and Insynq,
Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Form
10-QSB for the quarter ending August 31, 2002)
4.77 Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated September 27, 2002 between
AJW Partners, LLC, New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC, and
Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending August 31, 2002)
4.78 Form of Registration Rights Agreement dated September 27, 2002 between
AJW Partners, LLC, New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC, and
Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending August 31, 2002)
4.79 Stock Purchase Warrant dated November 5, 2002 between AJW Offshore,
Ltd. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending November 30, 2002)
4.80 Stock Purchase Warrant dated November 5, 2002 between AJW Qualified
Partners, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.2 to the Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending November 30,
2002)
4.81 Secured Convertible Debenture dated November 5, 2002 between AJW
Offshore, Ltd. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.3 to the Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending November 30,
2002)
4.82 Secured Convertible Debenture dated November 5, 2002 between AJW
Qualified Partners, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
November 30, 2002)
4.83 Stock Purchase Warrant dated December 6, 2002 between AJW Offshore,
Ltd. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending November 30, 2002)
4.84 Stock Purchase Warrant dated December 6, 2002 between AJW Qualified
Partners, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.5 to the Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending November 30,
2002)
4.85 Stock Purchase Warrant dated December 6, 2002 between AJW Partners,
LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending November 30, 2002)
4.86 Secured Convertible Debenture dated December 6, 2002 between AJW
Qualified Partners, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.7 to the Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
November 30, 2002)
4.87 Secured Convertible Debenture dated December 6, 2002 between AJW
Offshore, Ltd. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.8 to the Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending November 30,
2002)
4.88 Secured Convertible Debenture dated December 6, 2002 between AJW
Partners, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.9 to the Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending November 30,
2002)
4.89* Stock Purchase Warrant dated January 29, 2003 between AJW Offshore,
Ltd. and Insynq, Inc. (filed herewith)
4.90* Stock Purchase Warrant dated January 29, 2003 between AJW Qualified
Partners, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (filed herewith)
4.91* Stock Purchase Warrant dated January 29, 2003 between AJW Partners,
LLC and Insynq, Inc. (filed herewith)
4.92* Secured Convertible Debenture dated January 29, 2003 between AJW
Qualified Partners, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (filed herewith)
4.93* Secured Convertible Debenture dated January 29, 2003 between AJW
Offshore, Ltd. and Insynq, Inc. (filed herewith)
4.94* Secured Convertible Debenture dated January 29, 2003 between AJW
Partners, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (filed herewith)
4.95* Letter Agreement dated March 6, 2003 amending the debentures and
warrants issued in connection with the June 2001 and January 2002
Securities Purchase Agreement between Insynq, Inc. and AJW Partners,
LLC, New Millennium Partners II, LLC, AJW Offshore, Ltd. and AJW
Qualified Partners, LLC
4.96* Letter Agreement dated March 6, 2003 amending the debentures and
warrants issued in connection with the September 2002 Securities
Purchase Agreement between Insynq, Inc. and AJW Partners, LLC, New
Millennium Partners II, LLC, AJW Offshore, Ltd. and AJW Qualified
Partners, LLC
5.1* Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP Opinion and Consent (filed
herewith)
10.1 Insynq, Inc. 2000 Executive Long Term Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB filed September 13, 2000).
10.2 Insynq, Inc. 2000 Executive Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended by
Amendment No 1 dated August 14, 2001. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Amended Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB/A filed February 25, 2002).
10.3 Insynq, Inc. 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended by Amendment
No. 1 dated September 1, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed October
23, 2000).
10.4 Insynq, Inc. 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan as amended by Amendment No
3 dated November 21, 2001. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6
to the Company's Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A filed
February 25, 200).
10.5 Business Services Contract with Consulting & Strategy International,
L.L.C. dated November 18, 1999, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated
August 31, 2000, Amendment No. 2 dated September 14, 2000, Amendment
No. 3 dated October 1, 2000, Amendment No. 4 dated October 28, 2000,
Amendment dated October 31, 2000, and Amendment No. 5 dated December
1, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000).
10.6 Amendment No. 6 dated February 6, 2002, to Business Services Contract
with Consulting & Strategy International, L.L.C. dated November 18,
1999 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed April 20,2001).
10.7 Independent Marketing Consultant Agreement with Vijay Alimchandani
dated February 20, 2000, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated June 30,
2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed October 23, 2000).
10.8 Financial Public Relations Consulting Agreement with One Click
Investments, LLC dated September 20, 1999, as amended by Amendment No.
1 dated June 30, 2000 and Amendment No. 2 dated October 31, 2000.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000).
10.9 Amendment No. 3 dated January 30, 2001, to Financial Public Relations
Consulting Agreement with One Click Investments, LLC dated September
20, 1999 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed April 20, 2001).
10.10 Form of Registration Rights Agreement upon the issuance of shares to
investors under the bridge financing dated December 14, 1999.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB filed September 13, 2000).
10.11 Form of Registration Rights Agreement upon the issuance of shares to
investors under the bridge financing dated January 24, 2000.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB filed September 13, 2000)
10.12 Engagement Letter with Rosenblum Partners, LLC dated July 7, 2000.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB filed September 13, 2000).
10.13 Employment Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2000, between John P.
Gorst and Xcel Management, Inc., as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated
September 25, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14,
2000).
10.14 Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement dated January 30, 2001,
between John P. Gorst and Xcel Management, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form10-QSB filed April 20, 2001).
10.15 Employment Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2000, between M.
Carroll Benton and Xcel Management, Inc., as amended by Amendment No.
1 dated September 27, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.10 the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December
14, 2000).
10.16 Amendment No. 2 dated January 30, 2001, between M. Carroll Benton and
Xcel Management, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed April 20, 2001).
10.17 Employment Agreement dated as of February 20, 2000, between James R.
Leigh, III, and Xcel Management, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
September 13, 2000).
10.18 Employment Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2000, between DJ
Johnson and Xcel Management, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.12 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
September 13, 2000).
10.19 Employment Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2000, between Joanie C.
Mann and Xcel Management, Inc., as amended by Amendment No.1 dated
September 25, 2000 and Amendment No. 2 dated September 25, 2000.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 the Company's Registration
Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000)
10.20 Employment Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2000, between Jim
Zachman and Xcel Management, Inc., as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated
September 16, 2000 and Amendment No. 2 dated September 27, 2000.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 the Company's Registration
Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000)
10.21 Employment Agreement, dated as of July 20, 1999, between Donald L.
Manzano and Insynq, Inc.- Washington. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
September 13, 2000).
10.22 Employment Agreement, dated as of July 20, 1999, between Carey M.
Holladay and Insynq, Inc.- Washington. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
September 13, 2000).
10.23 Employment Agreement, dated as of June 28 2000, between William G.
Hargin and Xcel Management, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.17 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed September
13, 2000).
10.24 Employment Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2000, between Barbara D.
Brown and Xcel Management, Inc., as amended by Addendum No. 1 dated
November 29, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 the
Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000)
10.25 Employment Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2000, between Christopher
Todd and Xcel Management, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.19 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed September
13, 2000).
10.26 Employment Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2000, between David
Wolfe and Insynq, Inc., as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated September
27, 2000, Amendment No. 1 dated October 19, 2000, Amendment No. 2
dated November 29, 2000 and Addendum dated December 7, 2000.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 the Company's Registration
Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000)
10.27 Lease Agreement dated January 3, 2000 between Howe/Horizon Holdings
LLC and Insynq, Inc., for 1101 Broadway Plaza, Tacoma, Washington, as
amended by Amendment No. 1 dated October 26, 2000. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.21 the Company's Registration Statement on
Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000)
10.28. Sublease Agreement dated November 1, 1999 between Duane and Wendy
Ashby, d/b/a Cargocare and Insynq Data Utilities for the property in
the Seafirst Plaza Building in Tacoma, Washington, at the Northwest
corner of South 9th and A Streets. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.22 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
September 13, 2000)
10.29 Lease Termination Agreement dated April 1, 2001 between Duane and
Wendy Ashby, d/b/a Cargocare and Insynq Data Utilities. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB filed July 31, 2001).
10.30 Lease Agreement dated March 21, 2000 between Walaire, Inc. and Insynq,
Inc., for 3017 Douglas Boulevard, Suite 220 and 240, Roseville,
California. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed September 13, 2000).
10.31 Master Licensing Agreement dated May 19, 2000 between Macola, Inc. and
Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed September 13, 2000).
10.32 Citrix iLicense Agreement dated March 2, 2000 between Citrix and
Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed September 13, 2000).
10.33 Citrix iBusiness Application Service Provider Agreement dated March 2,
2000 between Citrix and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.26 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
September 13, 2000).
10.34 Master Licensing Agreement dated March 1, 2000 between Legacy
Solutions and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27
to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed September 13,
2000).
10.35 Master Licensing Agreement dated April 7, 2000 between Electronic
Registry Systems, Inc. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.28 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
September 13, 2000).
10.36 Master Licensing Agreement dated March 22, 2000 between Viking
Software Services, Inc. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.29 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
September 13, 2000).
10.37 Master Licensing Agreement dated June 1, 2000 between My Partner
Online and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed September 13, 2000).
10.38 Amendment B to Master Licensing Agreement dated November 1, 2001
between My Partner Online and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed
January 16, 2002).
10.39 Master Licensing Agreement dated April 24, 2000 between Veracicom and
Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed September 13, 2000).
10.40 Master Licensing Agreement dated August 21, 2000 between
CastaLink.com, Inc. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.32 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
September 13, 2000).
10.41 Application Hosting Agreement dated May 12, 2000 between Remedy
Corporation and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.33 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed September
13, 2000).
10.42 Novell Internet Commercial Service Provider Agreement dated July 24,
2000 between Novell, Inc. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.34 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
September 13, 2000).
10.43 Agreement to Provide Collaborative Management Services dated July 15,
1999 between Horizon Holdings I, LLC, and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB filed September 13, 2000).
10.44 Referral Partner Agreement dated July 29, 1999 between Global Crossing
Telecommunications, Inc. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.36 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
September 13, 2000).
10.45 Application Hosting and Delivery Agreement dated August 18, 2000
between Donor Management, Inc. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB dated October 23, 2000).
10.46 Application Service Provider Agreement dated August 21, 2000 between
Corel Corporation and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.38 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB dated
October 23, 2000).
10.47 Application Services Agreement dated September 6, 2000 between
Microsoft and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39
to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB dated October 23,
2000).
10.48 Consulting Agreement dated September 20, 2000 between David D. Selmon
and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed October 23, 2000).
10.49 Amendment No 1 to Consulting Agreement dated September 12, 2001
between David D. Selmon and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed
January 16, 2002)
10.50 Release Agreement dated September 22, 2000 with Charles Benton.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB filed October 23, 2000).
10.51 Release Agreement dated September 22, 2000 with Charles Benton.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB filed October 23, 2000).
10.52 Employment Agreement dated September 18, 2000 between Stephen C. Smith
and Insynq, Inc. as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated December 1, 2000.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to the Company's Quarterly
Reported on Form 10-QSB filed October 23, 2000).
10.53 Amendment No. 2 dated July 20, 2001 to Employment Agreement between
Stephen C. Smith and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.49 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July
31, 2001).
10.54 Non-Exclusive Financial Advisory Agreement dated June 15, 2000 between
Sunstate Equity Trading, Inc. and Xcel Management, Inc., as amended by
Amendment No. 1 dated September 22, 2000. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.44 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2
filed December 14, 2000)
10.55 Independent Consulting Agreement dated September 16, 2000 between
Steven Tebo and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.45 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB dated October
23, 2000).
10.56 Independent Consulting Agreement dated September 16, 2000 between
Franklin C. Fisher and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.46 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB dated
October 23, 2000).
10.57 Independent Consulting Agreement dated October 31, 2000 between
Charles F. Benton and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.47 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2
filed December 14, 2000)
10.58 Amendment No 1 to Consulting Agreement dated November 1, 2001 between
Charles F. Benton (CFB and Associates) and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Quarterly Report of Form
10-QSB filed January 16, 2002)
10.59 Independent Consulting Agreement dated November 28, 2000 between My
Partner Online, Inc. and Insynq. Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.48 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2
filed December 14, 2000)
10.60 Letter of Understanding dated November 11, 2000 and Agreement dated
November 11, 2000 between Bridge 21, Inc. and Insynq, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000)
10.61 Contract of Engagement dated September 27, 2000 between Cardinal
Securities, L.L.C. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.50 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2
filed December 14, 2000)
10.62 Agreement dated November 30, 2000 between Kathleen McHenry, John P.
Gorst and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 to
the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed December 14,
2000)
10.63 Voting Agreement dated November 30, 2000 between Kathleen McHenry,
Hagens Berman LLP, John P. Gorst and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.52 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000).
10.64 Registration Rights Agreement dated November 30, 2000 between Kathleen
McHenry, Hagens Berman LLP and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.53 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2
filed December 14, 2000).
10.65 Application Service Provider Reseller Agreement dated October 27, 2000
between Wireless Knowledge, Inc. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.54 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form SB-2 filed December 14, 2000).
10.66 Independent Consultant Agreement dated January 2, 2001 between One
Click Investments, LLC and Eric Estoos and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.55 to the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB dated April 20, 2001).
10.67 Independent Consultant Agreement dated January 2, 2001 between Michael
duPont and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.56 to
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB dated April 20, 2001).
10.68 Non-Exclusive Financial Advisory Agreement dated January 26, 2001
between Morgan Brewer Securities, Inc. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.57 to the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB dated April 20, 2001).
10.69 Business Advisory and Consulting Services Agreement dated February 19,
2001 between Tarshish Capital Markets, LTD. and Insynq, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.58 to the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB dated April 20, 2001).
10.70 Consulting Agreement dated March 22, 2001 between Metromedia Research
Group LLC and Insynq, Inc., as amended dated April 9, 2001.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.65 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB filed July 31, 2001).
10.71 Registration Rights Agreement dated March 22, 2001 between Metromedia
Research Group, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.66 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July
31, 2001).
10.72 Consulting Agreement dated March 23, 2002 between Internet PR Group
and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.67 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July 31, 2001).
10.73 Letter Agreement dated April 1, 2001 between Barretto Pacific
Corporation and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.68 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July 31,
2001).
10.74 Consulting Agreement dated April 1, 2001 between consultant and
Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.69 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July 31, 2001).
10.75 Consulting Agreement dated May 3, 2001 and Amendment dated May 30,
2001 between Eugene R. Zachman and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.70 to the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB filed July 31, 2001).
10.76 Settlement Agreement dated May 17, 2001 between Howe/Horizon Holdings,
LLC, Horizon Holdings I, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.71 to the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB filed July 31, 2001).
10.77 Equipment Co-Location License Agreement dated May 16, 2001 between
Horizon Holdings I, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.72 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July
31, 2001).
10.78 Lease Agreement dated May 10, 2001 between Howe/Horizon Holdings, LLC
and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.73 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July 31, 2001).
10.79 Consulting Agreement dated May 17, 2001 and Amendment dated May 30,
2001 between James Zachman and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.74 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
July 31, 2001).
10.80 Agreement to Provide Professional Service dated July 10, 2001 between
Central Software Services and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.75 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
July 31, 2001).
10.81 Consulting Agreement dated May 3, 2001 between DiabloStocks, Inc. and
Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.76 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July 31, 2001).
10.82 Selling Agreement dated May 28, 2001 between Taconic Capital Partners,
LP, Internet Solutions Partners, Inc., Salvani Investments, Inc. and
Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.77 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed July 31, 2001).
10.83 Acquisition Purchase Agreement dated June 1, 2001 between Omnibus
Subscriber Computing, Inc. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.78 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
July 31, 2001).
10.84 Settlement Agreement dated June 21, 2001 between One Click
Investments, LLC and John P. Gorst. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.79 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed
July 31, 2001).
10.85 Settlement Agreement dated February 15, 2002 between One Click
Investments, LLC and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Amended Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB/A filed February 25, 2002).
10.86 Lease Agreement dated July 6, 2001 between Simon-Marten, LLC and
Insynq, Inc. for 1127 Broadway Plaza, Suite 10, Tacoma, Washington,
98402. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.80 to the Company's
Amended Registration Statement on Form SB2/A filed September 19, 2001)
10.87 Settlement Agreement dated September 6, 2001 between Martin E.
Darrah and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.81 to
the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed September 19,
2001.)
10.88 Consulting Agreement dated September 1, 2001 between consultant and
Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Company's Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A filed February 25,
2002).
10.89 Consulting Agreement dated January 1, 2002 between consultant and
Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the
Company's Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A filed February 25,
2002).
10.90 Services Agreement dated December 20, 2001 between Qwest Business
Resources, Inc. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.9 to the Company's Amended Quarterly Report on From 10-QSB/A filed
February 25, 2002).
10.91 Employment Agreement dated December 1, 2001 between Donald M. Kaplan
and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the
Company's Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A filed February 25,
2002).
10.92 Acquisition Purchase Agreement dated June 1, 2001 between Omnibus
Subscriber Computing, Inc. and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.92 to the Company's Registration Statement on From SB-2
filed June 11, 2002).
10.93 Managed Services Agreement dated December 1, 2001 between Omnibus
Canada Corporation and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.93 to the Company's Registration Statement on From SB-2
filed June 11, 2002).
10.94 Amendment No. 1 to Managed Services Agreement dated December 2, 2001
between Omnibus Canada Corporation and Insynq, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.94 to the Company's Registration Statement on
From SB-2 filed June 11, 2002).
10.95 Insynq, Inc. 2002 Director, Officers and Consultants Stock Option,
Stock Warrant and Stock Award Plan (Incorporated by reference to the
Company's Information Statement on Form 14-C filed December 10, 2002).
10.96* Exchange Agreement dated October 16, 2002 between Kelly D. Miller and
Insynq, Inc.
10.97* Exchange Agreement dated October 16, 2002 between Delores Hall and
Insynq, Inc.
10.98* Exchange Agreement dated October 16, 2002 between William D.
Schmechel and Insynq, Inc.
10.99* Exchange Agreement dated October 16, 2002 between Robert A. Harville
and Insynq, Inc.
10.100* Exchange Agreement dated October 16, 2002 between Mark Rasanzoff and
Insynq, Inc.
10.101* Exchange Agreement dated October 16, 2002 between Joanie C. Mann and
Insynq, Inc.
10.102* Exchange Agreement dated October 16, 2002 between David D. Selmon and
Insynq, Inc.
10.103* Exchange Agreement dated October 16, 2002 between International Fluid
Dynamics and Insynq, Inc.
10.104* Exchange Agreement dated October 16, 2002 between M. Carroll Benton
and Insynq, Inc.
10.105* Exchange agreement dated October 16, 2002 between John P. Gorst and
Insynq, Inc.
16.1 Letter on Change in Certifying Accountant (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed May
23, 2000).
16.2 Letter on Change in Certifying Accountant (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed July
25, 2002.)
23.1* Consent of Weinberg & Company, P.A. (filed herewith).
23.3* Consent of legal counsel (see Exhibit 5).
o Filed Herewith
ITEM 28. UNDERTAKINGS.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to:
(1) File, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a
post-effective amendment to this registration statement to:
(i) Include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act");
(ii) Reflect in the prospectus any facts or events which, individually or
together, represent a fundamental change in the information in the
registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or
decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of
the securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and
any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum
offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with
the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act if, in
the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than
a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the
"Calculation of Registration Fee" table in the effective registration
statement, and
(iii) Include any additional or changed material information on the plan of
distribution.
(2) For determining liability under the Securities Act, treat each
post-effective amendment as a new registration statement of the
securities offered, and the offering of the securities at that time to
be the initial bona fide offering.
(3) File a post-effective amendment to remove from registration any of the
securities that remain unsold at the end of the offering.
(4) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act,
treat the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part
of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained
in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule
424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act as part of this
registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.
(5) For determining any liability under the Securities Act, treat each
post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus as a new
registration statement for the securities offered in the registration
statement, and that offering of the securities at that time as the
initial bona fide offering of those securities.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities
Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the
registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant
has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act
and is, therefore, unenforceable.
In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities
(other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a
director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer
or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the
registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction
the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication
of such issue.
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all
of the requirements of filing on Form SB-2 and authorizes this registration
statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, in the City of Tacoma,
State of Washington, on March 18, 2003.
INSYNQ, INC.
By: /s/ John P. Gorst
---------------------------------------
John P. Gorst, Chairman, CEO President,
and Director
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement was signed by the following persons in the capacities and
on the dates stated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
/s/ M. Carroll Benton Chief Administrative Officer, Secretary March 18, 2003
- -------------------------------- Treasurer and Director
M. Carroll Benton
/s/ David D. Selmon Director March 18, 2003
- --------------------------------
David D. Selmon