SCHEDULE 14A

                                 (Rule 14a-101)

                     INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
              Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) Securities
                              Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant |_|

Filed by a party other than the Registrant

         Check the appropriate box:

[ ]      Preliminary Proxy Statement

[ ]      Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only
           (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

[ ]      Definitive Proxy Statement

[X]      Definitive Additional Materials

[ ]      Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12

                       REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED III

                (Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

                             BOND PURCHASE, L.L.C.

    (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X]      No fee required

[ ]      Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11


         (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

         (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transactions applies:




         (3) Per unit price or other  underlying  value of transaction  computed
             pursuant to  Exchange  Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which
             the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined.)

         (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

         (5) Total Fee paid:

[ ]      Fee paid previously with preliminary materials

[ ]      Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange  Act
         Rule  0-11(a)(2)  and identify the filing for which the  offsetting fee
         was paid  previously.  Identify  the  previous  filing by  registration
         statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

         (1) Amount previously paid:

         (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

         (3) Filing party:

         (4) Date filed:


                              Bond Purchase, L.L.C.
                                 104 Armour Road
                        North Kansas City, Missouri 64116


                                  May 25, 2001

                         WHO IS BOND PURCHASE, L.L.C.?

Dear Fellow Limited Partner:

   Many   limited   partners  in  Real  Estate   Associates   Limited  III  (The
"Partnership")  have asked, "Who is Bond Purchase,  L.L.C. and David L. Johnson,
and why should I vote for Bond  Purchase,  L.L.C.,  to remove  NAPICO as general
partner of the Partnership?"

   Bond Purchase,  L.L.C.,  is a Missouri limited liability company of which Mr.
Johnson is a majority member. Mr. Johnson is also the Chairman,  Chief Executive
Officer and a member of the board of trustees of Maxus  Reality  Trust,  Inc., a
publicly traded real estate  investment trust (NASDAQ  symbol:MRTI).  He is also
President of Maxus  Capital  Corp.,  the general  partner of Maxus Real Property
Investors-Four,  L.P., a publicly reporting limited  partnership  similar to the
Partnership and Chairman,  Chief Executive Officer and a majority shareholder of
Maxus Properties,  Inc., which specializes in commercial property management for
affiliates.  Mr. Johnson has a proven track record  in  the  management  of real
estate companies.

   In an attempt to disparage Bond Purchase and Mr. Johnson,  NAPICO has claimed
that Bond Purchase has acquired interests in real estate companies with the view
to replacing  management and  liquidating  assets of the real estate  companies.
NAPICO statements relate to a lawsuit involving Bond Purchase and its affiliates
in which Bond Purchase and its  affiliates  gained  control of the management of
Nooney Realty Trust, Inc. (later renamed Maxus Realty Trust, Inc.) (the "Trust")
in  November  1999.  Since  gaining  control  of the Trust,  affiliates  of Bond
Purchase and the new management of the Trust have:

   - reinstated  a quarterly  dividend  of $.16 in May 2000,  (after it had been
     suspended for the prior two years);

   - increased the quarterly dividend to $.20 in May of 2001;

   - reduced management fees by at least 10%;

   - reduced Trustee fees by at least 10%; and

   - liquidated one of the Trust's assets (resulting in the increased  quarterly
     dividend).



   Other  parties  are  entitled  to their  opinions;  however,  we feel we have
liberated  the Trust from  ineffective  management  and  benefited  the  Trust's
shareholders,  which  is a  situation  we hope to  duplicate  with  Real  Estate
Associates Limited III.

           We stand by our record of liberating value for unitholders.

     Bond Purchase was also  successful  in replacing  the  management of Nooney
Real  Property   Investors-Four,   L.P.   (later  renamed  Maxus  Real  Property
Investors-Four,  L.P.) in November 1999.  After  replacing the management of its
general  partner with its  affiliates,  the new  management  was  successful  in
negotiating a sale of one of its real estate properties to an unaffiliated third
party in May 2000 for $5,100,000.  The previous  management of this  partnership
had attempted to sell the same  property to an affiliate of the  then-management
of the  partnership  for  $3,400,000 in January 1999. We hope to duplicate  this
type of success for our Partnership.

           We stand by our record of liberating value for unitholders.

     Our position is clear,  with your support,  as the single largest  minority
unitholder  in Real Estate  Associates  Limited III, we hope to replace  current
management.  We also anticipate causing the new general partner to liquidate the
Partnership after a careful review of the books and records of the Partnership -
documents we have been denied  access to by NAPICO as late as May 24,  2001.  Is
NAPICO hiding something?

                          NAPICO'S RETALIATORY LAWSUIT

   NAPICO's  lawsuit  against Mr. Johnson and others,  initiated on September 1,
2000,  is baseless and without  merit.  We are  vigorously  defending  ourselves
against NAPICO'S retaliatory lawsuit.

                     -------------------------------------

                We urge you to reject NAPICO and the status quo.
      Please cast your vote on the BLUE consent form and vote FOR a change.

                         [X] Vote FOR proposal number 1
                         [X] Vote FOR proposal number 2

   Regardless of the number of units you hold, your vote is very  important.  We
are receiving  overwhelming  support from your fellow limited  partners who have
voted.  However,  we still need your vote. Please take this opportunity to mark,
sign,  date and return the enclosed BLUE consent form in the postage paid return
envelope.   Alternatively,   you  may  fax  your   consent  form  toll  free  to
1.866.470.4300.

This letter is being mailed to limited partners on or about May 25, 2001.



Thank you for your continued support.


                                                Very Truly Yours,

                                                Bond Purchase, L.L.C.



                         [ENVELOPE INSERT ON PINK STOCK]

                       HOW HAS YOUR INVESTMENT PREFORMED?


                       REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED III

   Unit cost in 1981:..............................................$5,000.00
   -------------------------------------------------------------------------

   Cash returns, 1981 - 1998:..........................................$0.00

   Limited partnership cash on the sale
   of 22  Partnership  assets  sold to a
   NAPICO affiliate, 1981 - 1998:..................................$1,201.00

   Estimated value of cash on hand that
   has been held since 1998:......................................~$1,000.00

   Current returns, 1999 - present:....................................$0.00

   Current estimated value:...........................................+$?.??

   Your tax savings:..................................................+$?.??
      (less cash on hand)

   Additional cost of professional services
   For K1 Tax reporting:..............................................-$?.??
                                                                      ------

   Return on your investment after 20 years:......................~$2,201.00*

             *Based on our review of publicly-filed documents.

   $5,000 in a bank @ 4.00% for 20 years:..........................10,955.62




 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                             ---- IMPORTANT ----                              |
|                                                                              |
|     Please be sure to mark, sign, date and return your BLUE consent form.    |
|        We urge you not to sign any consent card which is sent to you         |
|            by Real Estate Associates Limited III. If you execute a           |
|              white consent card it will invalidate your consent              |
|                        to remove the general partners.                       |
|                                                                              |
|                 WE URGE YOU NOT TO SIGN A WHITE CONSENT CARD.                |
|                                                                              |
|    If you have questions or need assistance in voting your units, please     |
|          contact N.S. Taylor & Associates, Inc. who is assisting us          |
|                               with this matter:                              |
|                                                                              |
|                        N.S. Taylor & Associates, Inc.                        |
|                                                                              |
|                                1.800.711.8662                                |
|                                                                              |
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------