SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
               Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
                       Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]

Check the appropriate box:

[_]  Preliminary Proxy Statement

[_]  Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
     14a-6(e)(2))

[X]  Definitive Proxy Statement

[_]  Definitive Additional Materials

[_]  Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12

                 FAIRFIELD INN BY MARRIOTT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)


Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X]  No fee required.

[_]  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.


     (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
         pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which
         the filing fee is calculated and state how it is determined):

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (5) Total fee paid:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------

[_]  Fee paid previously with preliminary proxy materials.

[_]  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
     Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
     was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
     number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

     (1) Amount previously paid:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement no.:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (3) Filing Party:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (4) Date Filed:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------




                 FAIRFIELD INN BY MARRIOTT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                              10400 Fernwood Road
                           Bethesda, Maryland 20817
                                (301) 380-9000

                                                                  July 13, 2001

To the Limited Partners of Fairfield Inn
by Marriott Limited Partnership:

  We are seeking your consent to certain amendments to the partnership
agreement to permit the implementation of a Restructuring Plan intended to
address the critical needs of the partnership. The amendments and the
Restructuring Plan are discussed in detail in the attached consent
solicitation statement, which you are urged to read in its entirety and to act
upon promptly. Your vote is important.

  As we previously reported to you, the Inns have experienced a substantial
decline in operating results over the past several years. Forecasts indicate
that the partnership's operating cash flow will be insufficient to cover debt
service obligations to the partnership's mortgage lender during 2001, as was
the case in 2000. In addition, the decline in operating results has led to a
projected shortfall of more than $15 million for capital improvements to the
Inns as required under the management agreement for the Inns. The manager of
the Inns has notified us that it believes that failure to fund this shortfall
would constitute a default under the management agreement, which in turn could
result in the loss of the partnership's right to operate some or all of the
Inns as part of the Fairfield Inn by Marriott brand.

  We have developed a Restructuring Plan for the partnership that is intended
to address the partnership's continued decline in operating results and
provide up to $23 million of additional capital. The Restructuring Plan
contemplates the following:

  .  a new management group, which will include (1) a new general partner for
     the partnership, the principals of which have extensive experience in
     partnership, asset and property management, and (2) a new hotel manager
     for the Inns with extensive experience in managing limited service
     hotels similar to those owned by the partnership;

  .  the opportunity for all limited partners to participate in a new
     unsecured loan of up to $23 million to the partnership and the
     commitment of an affiliate of the new general partner to provide any
     funds not supplied by limited partners;

  .  a new franchise agreement with Marriott International for each Inn on
     terms which include the ability to sell up to five Inns without payment
     by the partnership of termination fees estimated at $2.5 million;

  .  a guarantee by the new general partner's affiliate of up to $25 million
     of the partnership's obligations under certain circumstances to Marriott
     International under the new franchise agreements; and

  .  a ground lease amendment providing for the reduction of the ground rent
     payable by the partnership, substantially more favorable terms with
     respect to the partnership's right to purchase the land underlying 32
     Inns and cancellation of the partnership's obligation to pay all unpaid
     deferred ground rent, which could be as much as $2.3 million by the end
     of 2001.

  If the Restructuring Plan is approved and implemented, the partnership
intends to make a distribution to limited partners of a portion of the funds
currently being held as cash reserves by the partnership. Limited partners
will have the option of retaining the distribution or applying the
distribution towards their participation in the proposed new loan to the
partnership, which is referred to as the "New Loan." The partnership intends
for the distribution to equal approximately $25 per partnership unit.


  The substitution of the general partner and the New Loan each require the
approval of the limited partners. In addition, the substitution of the general
partner, the New Loan and various other aspects of the Restructuring Plan
require the approval or consent of the partnership's mortgage lender (the
partnership has already obtained all necessary approvals from the
partnership's mortgage lender to the substitution of the general partner
subject to approval by the limited partners of the amendments to the
partnership agreement discussed below). In order to implement the
Restructuring Plan, we are seeking your approval in the attached consent
solicitation statement to the following amendments to the partnership
agreement:

    1. an amendment to provide for our voluntary withdrawal as the general
  partner of the partnership and the substitution of AP-Fairfield GP, LLC as
  the new general partner of the partnership; and

    2. an amendment to enable the partnership to obtain the New Loan, on
  economic terms to be determined by the new general partner, from an
  affiliate of the new general partner and from limited partners who elect to
  participate.

  You are being asked to vote on each amendment separately. Accordingly, you
may vote to approve the amendment authorizing the substitution of the general
partner without voting to approve the amendment authorizing the New Loan. The
New Loan, the retention of the new manager for the Inns and the financial
concessions and other benefits of the Restructuring Plan relating to Inn
operations will not be available or occur unless the limited partners approve
both amendments. In addition, the partnership will not have approval under its
mortgage agreement for the substitution of the general partner if the limited
partners do not approve both of the proposed amendments to the partnership
agreement. For the reasons described in the attached consent solicitation
statement, we recommend that you vote "YES" to both amendments by checking
both "YES" boxes on the enclosed consent form. In making your decision, you
should carefully review and consider the information set forth under "Risk
Factors and Possible Effects of the Restructuring Plan" in the consent
solicitation statement.

  Your vote on these matters is very important. Abstentions or failure to
return the enclosed consent form will have the same effect as voting against
the amendments. Therefore, you are requested to complete, sign and return the
consent form in the enclosed postage-paid envelope at your earliest
convenience and, in any event, by the expiration date of the consent period
which is 12:00 midnight, New York City time, on August 13, 2001, or such later
date and time as we may set.

  If you have any questions about the consent solicitation statement, please
call our information agent, MacKenzie Partners, Inc., at (800) 322-2885.

                                          FIBM One LLC
                                          General Partner


                 FAIRFIELD INN BY MARRIOTT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                        CONSENT SOLICITATION STATEMENT

  You are receiving this consent solicitation statement as a holder of units
of limited partnership interest of Fairfield Inn by Marriott Limited
Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership. FIBM One LLC, the general partner
of the partnership, has developed the restructuring plan for the partnership
described in this consent solicitation statement (the "Restructuring Plan").
The Restructuring Plan is intended to address the critical needs of the
partnership by providing the partnership with (1) a new general partner and a
new manager for the Inns with extensive experience in hotel management, (2) up
to $23 million of additional capital and (3) financial concessions and other
benefits to the partnership under various agreements related to Inn
operations. In order to implement the Restructuring Plan, the general partner
is soliciting your consent to two amendments to the partnership agreement. The
amendments, which are more particularly described in this consent solicitation
statement and the full texts of which are attached as Exhibit A-1 and A-2,
would:

    1. provide for the voluntary withdrawal of FIBM One LLC as the general
  partner of the partnership and the substitution of AP-Fairfield GP, LLC as
  the new general partner of the partnership; and

    2. enable the partnership to obtain a new loan of up to $23 million (the
  "New Loan"), on economic terms to be determined by the new general partner,
  from an affiliate of the new general partner and from limited partners who
  elect to participate.

  You are being asked to vote on each amendment separately. The New Loan, the
retention of the new manager for the Inns and the financial concessions and
other benefits of the Restructuring Plan relating to Inn operations will not
be available or occur unless the limited partners approve both amendments. In
addition, the partnership will not have approval under its mortgage agreement
for the substitution of the general partner if the limited partners do not
approve both of the proposed amendments to the partnership agreement. For the
reasons described in this consent solicitation statement, we recommend that
you vote "YES" to both amendments by checking both "YES" boxes on the enclosed
consent form. In making your decision, you should carefully review and
consider the information set forth below under "Risk Factors and Possible
Effects of the Restructuring Plan."

  Only limited partners of record at the close of business on July 12, 2001
are entitled to notice of and to vote on the amendments. On the record date,
there were 83,337 units issued and outstanding, held of record by 2,720
limited partners. Approval of each amendment requires the affirmative vote of
limited partners holding a majority of the outstanding units.

  This consent solicitation will expire at 12:00 midnight, New York City time,
on August 13, 2001, unless the general partner extends the period for giving
consents. You may revoke your consent at any time before the expiration of the
consent solicitation period.

  Your vote is important. Failure to return the enclosed consent form will
have the same effect as a vote against the amendments. You are encouraged,
therefore, to review carefully this consent solicitation statement and to
complete, date, sign and mail your consent form in the enclosed postage-paid
envelope.

  This consent solicitation statement is dated July 13, 2001. The consent
solicitation statement and the related consent form is being mailed to limited
partners on or about July 13, 2001.


                               TABLE OF CONTENTS


                                                                         
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE REQUESTED CONSENTS......................... i
FORWARD-LOOKING AND OTHER STATEMENTS.......................................   1
BACKGROUND OF THE AMENDMENTS...............................................   1
  Overview.................................................................   1
  Capital Shortfall........................................................   2
  Potential Loss of Brand Affiliation......................................   2
  Debt Service Shortfall; Downgrade of Debt Rating; Appointment of Special
   Servicer................................................................   2
RESTRUCTURING PLAN.........................................................   3
  Reorganization of Inn and Partnership Management.........................   4
    Substitution of General Partner........................................   4
    Franchise Agreement....................................................   5
    New Manager for the Inns...............................................   6
  New Loan.................................................................   6
  Financial Concessions and Other Concessions Related to Restructuring
   Plan....................................................................   7
    Ground Lease Modifications.............................................   7
    Franchisor Concessions.................................................   8
    Possible Sale of Certain Inns..........................................   8
RISK FACTORS AND POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF THE RESTRUCTURING PLAN................   8
DESCRIPTION OF RELATED AGREEMENTS..........................................  13
  General Partner Substitution Agreement...................................  13
  Sale of Limited Partnership Interests....................................  13
THE AMENDMENTS AND GENERAL PARTNER RECOMMENDATION..........................  13
  Amendment No. 1: Amendment to Permit New Loan............................  13
  Amendment No. 2: Approval of Withdrawal and Substitution of General
   Partner.................................................................  15
  General Partner Recommendation...........................................  16
VOTING RIGHTS AND INFORMATION..............................................  16
  Record Date..............................................................  16
  Required Vote............................................................  16
  Solicitation Period......................................................  16
  Consents.................................................................  17
  Effective Time of Amendments.............................................  17
  Cost of Solicitation.....................................................  17
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.............  18


EXHIBIT A-1 FORM OF FINANCING AMENDMENT

EXHIBIT A-2 FORM OF SUBSTITUTION AMENDMENT


              QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE REQUESTED CONSENTS

  The following highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this
consent solicitation statement and may not contain all of the information that
may be important to you. To understand the proposed amendments fully and for a
more complete description of the consents being requested, you should read
this entire document carefully (including exhibits).

Why is the general partner soliciting consents?

  The general partner is seeking your consent to certain amendments to the
partnership agreement to permit the implementation of a Restructuring Plan
intended to address the critical needs of the partnership. Among other things,
the Restructuring Plan contemplates a new general partner and a new manager
for the partnership's Inns as well as a new unsecured loan of up to $23
million to the partnership in which all limited partners will be entitled to
participate and the commitment of an affiliate of the proposed new general
partner to provide any funds not supplied by the limited partners. The
substitution of the general partner and the New Loan each require the approval
of the limited partners. Certain aspects of the Restructuring Plan also
require the consent of the partnership's mortgage lender. See "Restructuring
Plan," pages 3 through 8.

What are the proposed amendments to the partnership agreement?

  In order to implement the Restructuring Plan, the general partner is seeking
your approval to the following amendments to the partnership agreement:

    (1) an amendment to provide for the substitution of AP-Fairfield GP, LLC
  as the new general partner of the partnership, and

    (2) an amendment to enable the partnership to obtain the New Loan, on
  economic terms to be determined by the proposed new general partner, from
  an affiliate of the new general partner and from limited partners who elect
  to participate.

  The proposed amendments are described in detail under the heading "The
Amendments and General Partner Recommendation," pages 13 through 16.

What are the benefits to the partnership and to me if the amendments are
approved?

  If both of the amendments are approved and the consent of the partnership's
mortgage lender is obtained, the Restructuring Plan will be implemented in an
effort to address the partnership's continued decline in operating results and
provide up to $23 million of additional capital to the partnership. In
addition to the substitution of the general partner, a new manager with
substantial experience managing properties similar to the partnership's Inns,
Sage Management Resources III, LLC, will be retained and various financial
concessions will be implemented which are intended to reduce the overall costs
of Inn operations. There can be no assurance, however, that the implementation
of the actions contemplated by the Restructuring Plan will be successful in
reversing the decline in the partnership's operating results or, if
successful, will be sufficient to remedy the partnership's debt service and
capital expenditure shortfalls.

  In addition, if the Restructuring Plan is implemented, the partnership
intends to make a distribution to limited partners of a portion of the funds
currently being held as cash reserves by the partnership. The distribution is
intended to give existing limited partners the benefit of a portion of the net
unrestricted cash of the partnership. The partnership expects to be able to
make this distribution upon consummating the Restructuring Plan because of the
investment of new capital into the partnership at that time. The partnership
intends for the distribution to equal approximately $25 per partnership unit.
See "Restructuring Plan," pages 3 through 8.

  Notwithstanding any potential benefits of the Restructuring Plan for the
partnership, because of the financial condition of the partnership, the
interest rate and the other terms of the proposed New Loan are likely to be
favorable to the debt-holders. Accordingly, if the amendment permitting the
New Loan is approved and the New Loan is advanced, limited partners should not
expect any additional economic benefits in their capacity as limited partners
other than the distribution to be made in connection with the New Loan, unless
the partnership experiences an improvement in operating results in excess of
what the current general partner believes is likely to occur. See "Risk
Factors And Possible Effects Of Restructuring Plan," pages 8 through 12.

                                      (i)


What is the tax impact to me if the amendments are approved?

  If the amendments are approved, it is likely that, over time, depreciation
deductions (in a maximum aggregate amount equal to the principal amount of the
New Loan) and deductions attributable to accrued interest on the New Loan that
otherwise would have been allocable to all of the limited partners will be
allocated solely to holders of the New Loan.

  If you do not participate in the New Loan, these allocations may initially
result in an increase in the amount of partnership taxable income allocated to
you. It is not possible to predict with certainty at this time when, or to
what extent, this increase in taxable income will occur. As the New Loan is
repaid, the holders of the New Loan will be allocated income and gain that
will offset the depreciation and accrued interest deductions allocated to them
in previous years as a result of the New Loan. Accordingly, the taxable income
of the partners who do not participate in the New Loan will decrease at that
time as a result of such allocations.

  If the amendments are approved but the New Loan is not respected as
indebtedness of the partnership for federal income tax purposes, then limited
partners who do not participate in the New Loan could suffer adverse tax
consequences.

  In reaching your decision as to whether you will approve the amendments, you
are strongly urged to consult with your own tax advisors concerning the tax
consequences that would result to you if the Restructuring Plan is approved.
See "Risk Factors And Possible Effects Of Restructuring Plan," pages 8 and 12.

What is the future for the partnership if the amendments are not approved?

  If both of the amendments to the partnership agreement are not approved by
limited partners holding a majority of the outstanding units (excluding units
held by the general partner and its affiliates), the Restructuring Plan will
not be implemented. If the Restructuring Plan is not implemented, the general
partner will continue its efforts to develop alternative solutions to rectify
the decline in Inn operating results. There is a significant risk that the
general partner will be unable to develop alternative means of reversing the
partnership's deteriorating financial condition or access additional capital.
In that event, the partnership would ultimately be unable to meet its
obligations under its debt agreements and under its management agreement and
the Inns may lose their brand affiliation, in which case the partnership may
ultimately lose its ownership of the Inns. See "Risk Factors And Possible
Effects Of Restructuring Plan," pages 8 through 12.

What is the tax impact to me if the amendments are not approved?

  The failure to implement the Restructuring Plan increases the likelihood of
a default under the partnership's mortgage loan. In the event the partnership
were to lose its ownership of the Inns as a result of foreclosure or other
action taken by the mortgage lender, such event would constitute a taxable
disposition of the Inns by the partnership and, under the terms of the
partnership's partnership agreement, would cause the partnership to dissolve
and wind up its affairs.

  As a limited partner in the partnership, you would be allocated by the
partnership your share of the aggregate taxable income and gain resulting from
the disposition of the Inns and repayment of debt, although you would not
receive any cash from the partnership except in the very unlikely event that
proceeds from the disposition of the Inns exceeded the partnership's
liabilities at the time of the disposition. If your basis in your partnership
interest is less than your share of the partnership's basis in its assets, the
amount of any income or gain recognized by you would be increased by this
difference.

  If, at the time the partnership is dissolved, you have a tax basis in your
partnership interest that exceeds zero (taking into account the allocations to
you of income and gain resulting from the disposition of the Inns and
repayment of the debt), you would have a capital loss (assuming you held your
interest as a capital asset) that could be applied to offset allocations of
capital gain by the partnership to you during the taxable year.

                                     (ii)


  In reaching your decision as to whether you will approve the amendments, you
are strongly urged to consult with your own tax advisors concerning tax
consequences that would result to you if the Restructuring Plan is not
approved. See "Risk Factors And Possible Effects Of Restructuring Plan," pages
8 and 12.

Who is AP-Fairfield GP, LLC?

  AP-Fairfield GP, the proposed new general partner, is a Delaware limited
liability company that is affiliated with Apollo Real Estate Advisors, L.P.
and Winthrop Financial Associates. Apollo Real Estate Advisors, L.P. is an
investment advisor that oversees in excess of $20 billion of investments in
real estate assets, joint ventures and operating companies. Winthrop Financial
Associates is a Boston-based full-service real estate firm that provides asset
management services, investor relation services and property management
services to over 350 limited partnerships that own commercial property and
other assets and also makes investments in real estate.

What are the terms of the New Loan?

  As part of the Restructuring Plan, the new general partner will provide
limited partners the opportunity to participate in the New Loan. The New Loan
will be unsecured and subordinate to the partnership's existing mortgage loan
and will otherwise be on terms determined by the proposed new general partner
and acceptable to the partnership's mortgage lender. Limited partners will be
entitled to participate in the New Loan in proportion to their percentage
interests in the partnership, but will not have the right to subscribe for
amounts not subscribed for by other limited partners. If you participate in
the New Loan, you will be required to include in your taxable income interest
on the New Loan as it accrues, which interest will be taxable as ordinary
income. Any portion of the New Loan not provided by limited partners will be
provided by an affiliate of the new general partner. The new general partner
has informed the general partner that the economic terms of the New Loan have
not been finally determined and are, in part, contingent on approval of the
partnership's mortgage lender.

Who is entitled to vote on the proposed amendments to the partnership
agreement?

  You are entitled to vote on the proposed amendments to the partnership
agreement if you owned units on July 12, 2001 and have been admitted as a
limited partner. See "Voting Rights and Information--Record Date," page 16.

How do I consent to the proposed amendments?

  If you wish to consent to the amendments, you should complete, sign, date
and return the consent form to the information agent in the enclosed envelope
with pre-paid postage. YOUR VOTE ON THESE MATTERS IS VERY IMPORTANT. Your
failure to return the enclosed consent form will have the same effect as a
vote against the amendments. See "Voting Rights and Information--Consents,"
page 17.

How long do I have to consent?

  You may submit your signed consent form now. In order for your consent form
to be accepted, it must be received by the information agent no later than
12:00 midnight, New York City time, August 13, 2001, unless the general
partner extends the period for giving consents, in which case the new
expiration date will be the last date on which your consent form will be
accepted. See "Voting Rights and Information--Solicitation Period," page 16.

How will I be notified if the consent period is extended?

  If the consent period is extended, the general partner will issue a press
release announcing the extension no later than 9:00 a.m., New York City time,
on the next business day after the day the consent period was scheduled to
expire. See "Voting Rights And Information--Solicitation Period," page 16.

                                     (iii)


How do I withdraw or change my consent?

  You may withdraw or change your executed and returned consent form at any
time prior to the expiration of the solicitation period by delivering to the
information agent a signed and subsequently dated consent form or a written
notice stating that your consent is revoked. After the expiration of the
solicitation period, all consents previously executed and delivered and not
revoked will become irrevocable. See "Voting Rights and Information--
Consents," page 17.

What happens if only one of the amendments is approved?

  You are being asked to vote on each amendment separately. Accordingly, you
may vote to approve the amendment authorizing the substitution of the general
partner without voting to approve the amendment authorizing the New Loan.
However, the New Loan, the retention of the new manager for the Inns and the
financial concessions and other benefits of the Restructuring Plan relating to
Inn operations will not be available or occur unless the limited partners
approve both amendments. In addition, the partnership will not have approval
under its mortgage agreement for the substitution of the general partner if
the limited partners do not approve both of the proposed amendments to the
partnership agreement.

What happens if I vote against the amendments, but the amendments nevertheless
receive the required limited partner approval?

  Whether or not you vote against the amendments, if the amendments receive
the approval of limited partners holding a majority of the outstanding units
(excluding units held by the general partner and its affiliates), the
amendments will be adopted.

To whom may I speak if I have questions about the Restructuring Plan or the
consent solicitation?

  The partnership has retained Mackenzie Partners, Inc. as the information
agent to answer your questions about the Restructuring Plan and regarding
completion of the consent form and to provide you with additional copies of
this consent solicitation, the consent form, and other related materials. The
telephone number of Mackenzie Partners is (800) 322-2885.

                                     (iv)


                     FORWARD-LOOKING AND OTHER STATEMENTS

  This consent solicitation statement contains certain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking
statements include information relating to the partnership's and the proposed
new general partner's intent, belief or current expectations, primarily, but
not exclusively, with respect to:

  .  economic outlook

  .  capital needs and expenditures

  .  cost reductions

  .  cash flow

  .  operating performance

  .  financing activities

  .  possible inability to comply with debt agreements and maintain brand
     standards or

  .  related industry developments, including trends affecting the
     partnership's business, financial condition and results of operations.

  Forward-looking statements in this consent solicitation statement are
identified by words or phrases such as "anticipate," "believe," "estimate,"
"expect," "intend," "may be," "objective," "plan," "predict," "project" and
"will be" and similar words or phrases (or the negative thereof). Actual
events or results may differ materially from those discussed in forward-
looking statements as a result of various factors, including, without
limitation, those discussed elsewhere in this consent solicitation statement.

  Information contained herein regarding the proposed new general partner, its
business, affiliates, beliefs and intentions is based solely upon information
provided by the proposed new general partner.

                         BACKGROUND OF THE AMENDMENTS

  The following is a summary of significant operating and financial issues
facing the partnership which led to the development of the Restructuring Plan.
More information, including the most recent financial statements for the
partnership, is included in the Form 10 filed by the partnership with the
Securities Exchange Commission registering the partnership's units under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. A copy of the Form 10 will be provided to
limited partners upon request. Limited partners can obtain a copy of the Form
10 from the general partner or from the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Overview

  The Inns have experienced a substantial decline in operating results over
the past several years and this decline has continued through the second
quarter of 2001. This decline in operating results is primarily due to
increased competition, an over-supply of limited service hotels in the markets
where the Inns operate, the deferral of capital improvements needed to make
certain of the Inns competitive in their marketplaces because of a lack of
funds, and a slowdown in the economy resulting in a softness in the lodging
industry as a whole. The deterioration in operating results has led to various
related problems for the partnership, which include: (1) debt service and
capital expenditure shortfalls and (2) the potential cancellation of the
partnership's management agreement and the ability to use the "Fairfield Inn
by Marriott" brand. The Restructuring Plan is designed to address these
problems. There can be no assurance, however, that the Restructuring Plan will
reverse the partnership's decline in operations, provide adequate capital to
satisfy debt service and capital expenditure shortfalls or enable the
partnership to avoid the loss of brand affiliation.


Capital Shortfall

  In light of the age of the Inns, which range from 11 to 14 years, capital
expenditures are required over the next several years for the Inns to (1)
remain competitive with the significant number of newly-opened limited service
hotels in the markets in which the Inns operate and (2) satisfy brand
standards required by the partnership's management agreement with Fairfield
FMC Corporation, which is a subsidiary of Marriott International. Substantial
capital expenditures are needed for room refurbishments and the replacement of
roofs, facades, carpets, wall vinyl and furniture for certain of the Inns.
Based upon information provided by the manager, the estimated capital
expenditure shortfall for the Inns by the end of 2001 is expected to be $15 to
$20 million. The amount of the shortfall will be dependent upon the actual
capital needs, the amount of funds contributed to the partnership's FF&E
escrow accounts and the amount of unrestricted cash available to the
partnership. Until a resolution is reached concerning the funding of this
capital expenditure shortfall, the partnership will defer discretionary
expenditures for capital improvements that cost more than the amount available
in the partnership's property improvement fund and the partnership's
unrestricted cash reserves.

  The Restructuring Plan would provide the additional funds for capital
improvements through the New Loan and, through the change in manager and other
financial concessions, may increase revenues and cash flow from operations,
thus providing additional funding for the capital expenditure shortfall.

Potential Loss of Brand Affiliation

  The management agreement provides that the manager may terminate the
management agreement and the partnership's right to operate using the
Fairfield Inn by Marriott brand with respect to any Inns which it determines
do not meet brand standards due to insufficient capital improvements. The
partnership recently received a notice from the manager stating its belief
that the partnership's failure to fund its capital shortfall constitutes a
default under the management agreement, which would give the manager the right
to terminate the management agreement if the partnership does not cure the
shortfall. The partnership notified the manager that it disagrees with the
determination that there is a default under the management agreement giving
rise to a right of termination because the manager did not send a notice of
the alleged default within the required time period. If the Restructuring Plan
is not approved and these issues are not satisfactorily resolved, however, the
manager may have the right to terminate the management agreement and the
partnership's right to use the Fairfield Inn by Marriott brand and the
Marriott International reservation system as early as the first quarter of
2002.

  The general partner believes that the loss of brand affiliation with respect
to some or all of the Inns would likely significantly impair the partnership's
revenues and cash flow and, consequently, the aggregate value of the Inns.
Moreover, to the extent that the partnership is unable to meet its debt
service and other obligations, the impairment of revenues and cash flows could
lead to a default under the partnership's mortgage debt. The failure to remedy
a default under the mortgage debt could result in a foreclosure proceeding by
the mortgage lender which, if successful, could lead to the loss of title to
the Inns and the elimination of the partners' economic interests in the Inns.

Debt Service Shortfall; Downgrade of Debt Rating; Appointment of Special
Servicer

  The current manager of the Inns has provided forecasts which indicate that
the partnership's operating cash flow will be insufficient to cover the
partnership's debt service obligations to its mortgage lender during 2001, as
was the case in 2000. If the Restructuring Plan described below is not
implemented, the partnership will be forced to fund the debt service shortfall
from unrestricted partnership cash, amounts currently being held in various
cash reserve accounts and the deferral of a portion of the partnership's
ground rent. If operating results fail to improve, debt service shortfalls
will continue and, notwithstanding the ability to defer a portion of ground
rent, reserve accounts and available cash will be depleted.

  If cash flows from operations continue to be less than scheduled debt
service and, as a result, the partnership's cash reserves are depleted, the
partnership may be forced to default under its mortgage loan. Failure to
remedy any loan default could result in a foreclosure proceeding by the
mortgage lender which, if successful, could lead to the loss of title to the
Inns and the elimination of the partners' economic interests in the Inns.

                                       2


  The partnership's mortgage lender securitized the partnership's mortgage
loan through the issuance and sale of commercial mortgage backed securities
backed by mortgages on a total of 71 properties. The Inns represent 50 of the
71 properties and approximately thirty-three percent of the principal amount
of the securities. As a result of the continued decline in the partnership's
operating performance, Fitch IBCA, a major credit rating agency, downgraded
the two lowest classes of the securities on September 2, 1999 and further
downgraded those two classes on May 23, 2000. While the downgrade of these
securities has no effect on the current terms of the partnership's mortgage
loan, it impairs the partnership's ability to obtain new financing from other
sources.

  In November 2000, the partnership's mortgage lender notified it that the
mortgage loan has been declared a "specially serviced mortgage loan" to be
managed by a special servicer appointed by the lender. In connection with the
Restructuring Plan, the general partner is currently in negotiations with the
special servicer to secure the mortgage lender's consent to the Restructuring
Plan. The partnership has agreed to pay the special servicer specified fees
and to reimburse the special servicer for expenses incurred in connection with
its review of the Restructuring Plan.

                              RESTRUCTURING PLAN

  The Restructuring Plan involves the following elements, each of which is
described in greater detail below:

  (1) Reorganization of Inn and Partnership Management

    .  substitution of a new general partner, the principals of which have
       extensive experience in partnership, asset and property management;

    .  substitution of a new manager for the Inns with extensive experience
       in hotel management, particularly with respect to the type of lodging
       facilities owned by the partnership; and

    .  as a result of the decision to change management of the Inns while
       maintaining brand affiliation, the execution of franchise agreements
       with Marriott International for each Inn (collectively, the
       "franchise agreement") that would permit the partnership to continue
       to use the Fairfield Inn by Marriott brand following the replacement
       of the current manager.

  (2) New Loan

    .  up to $23 million of new unsecured financing to be used for capital
       expenditures and to provide working capital;

    .  an opportunity for all limited partners to participate in the New
       Loan to the partnership; and

    .  a commitment by an affiliate of the new general partner to provide
       any funds not otherwise provided by the limited partners.

  (3) Financial Concessions and Other Benefits Relating to the Restructuring
Plan

    Ground Lease:

    .  a ground lease modification agreement providing for a reduction of
       the ground rent payable by the partnership following the
       implementation of the Restructuring Plan and substantially more
       favorable terms under which the partnership may purchase the land
       underlying 32 of the Inns.

    .  cancellation of the partnership's obligation to pay all deferred
       ground rent accrued in 2000 and in 2001, currently estimated at $2.3
       million.

    Franchise:

    .  the sale of up to five Inns without payment by the partnership of
       termination fees estimated at $2.5 million;

    .  a royalty fee equal to 4% of gross room revenues, which is less than
       the standard franchise fee; and

    .  credit enhancement, as required by the franchisor, from an affiliate
       of the new general partner in the form of a guaranty of up to $25
       million ($10 million under certain circumstances) of certain
       obligations of the partnership under the franchise agreement.

                                       3


    Lender:

    .  the flexibility to sell a limited number of Inns and apply the
       proceeds of any such sale to repayment of the existing mortgage debt
       without satisfying the collateral substitution requirements discussed
       below.

  Pursuant to the General Partner Substitution Agreement dated as of April 16,
2001, as described under "Description of Related Agreements," AP-Fairfield GP,
LLC, the proposed new general partner, has agreed to use commercially
reasonable efforts to negotiate the new management agreement, the franchise
agreement and the ground lease modification agreement referred to above on the
terms described in this consent solicitation statement and to implement the
New Loan to the partnership if such agreements are finalized and all required
approvals are obtained. AP-Fairfield GP has informed the general partner that
it has reached agreements in principle on most of the principal terms of these
agreements. AP-Fairfield GP will enter into such agreements on behalf of the
partnership if (1) the limited partners approve the amendments to the
partnership agreement, (2) the Restructuring Plan is approved by the
partnership's mortgage lender and (3) satisfactory final terms are agreed
upon.

  There can be no assurance, however, that the new general partner will be
successful in finalizing these agreements or, if these agreements are
finalized, that they will contain substantially the same terms described in
this consent solicitation.

  As of March 23, 2001, the partnership had approximately $5.6 million of cash
not held in lender or manager reserve accounts. If both amendments are
approved and the Restructuring Plan is implemented, thereby facilitating the
partnership's ability to obtain the New Loan, the partnership intends to make
a distribution to limited partners of approximately $25 per unit. The
distribution is intended to give existing limited partners the benefit of a
portion of the net unrestricted cash of the partnership. The partnership
expects to be able to make this distribution upon consummating the
Restructuring Plan because of the investment of new capital into the
partnership at that time. The distribution will be made concurrently with the
funding of the New Loan. Limited partners will be given the option of
retaining the distribution or applying it towards their participation in the
New Loan.

Reorganization of Inn and Partnership Management

 Substitution of General Partner

  The initial step of the Restructuring Plan is the withdrawal of the existing
general partner and substitution of a new general partner. The partnership has
already obtained all necessary approvals under its mortgage agreement to the
substitution of the general partner subject to approval by the limited
partners of both of the proposed amendments to the partnership agreement. If
the general partner substitution and the amendment permitting the New Loan are
approved by the limited partners, FIBM One LLC will voluntarily withdraw as
general partner of the partnership and AP-Fairfield GP will be substituted as
the new general partner of the partnership. The New Loan, the retention of the
new manager for the Inns and the financial concessions relating to Inn
operations contemplated by the Restructuring Plan are conditioned upon the
substitution of AP-Fairfield GP for the existing general partner. The
replacement of the general partner, however, is not dependent on approval by
the limited partners of the New Loan or the implementation of the other
elements of the Restructuring Plan.

  AP-Fairfield GP is a Delaware limited liability company that is affiliated
with Apollo Real Estate Advisors, L.P. and Winthrop Financial Associates.
Apollo is an investment advisor that oversees in excess of $20 billion of
investments in real estate assets, joint ventures and operating companies.
Winthrop Financial Associates is a Boston-based full-service real estate firm
that provides asset management services, investor relation services and
property management services to over 350 limited partnerships which own
commercial property and other assets and also makes investments in real
estate. The officers of the manager of AP-Fairfield GP are Michael L. Ashner,
Chief Executive Officer; Peter Braverman, Executive Vice President; Carolyn
Tiffany, Vice President and Treasurer; and Lara Sweeney, Vice President and
Secretary.

  The principal occupations and relevant affiliations of the officers of the
manager of AP-Fairfield GP are as follows:

                                       4


  Michael L. Ashner. Mr. Ashner serves as the Chief Executive Officer of
Winthrop Financial Associates and its affiliates, a position he has held since
January 15, 1996, as well as the Chief Executive Officer of The Newkirk Group.
Mr. Ashner is also President and a Director of Shelbourne Properties I, Inc.,
Shelbourne Properties II, Inc. and Shelbourne Properties III, Inc., each of
which is a real estate investment trust whose shares were recently listed for
trading on the American Stock Exchange. From June 1994 until January 1996, Mr.
Ashner was a Director, President and Co-chairman of National Property
Investors, Inc., a real estate investment company. Mr. Ashner was also a
Director and executive officer of NPI Property Management Corporation from
April 1984 until January 1996. In addition, since 1981 Mr. Ashner has been
President of Exeter Capital Corporation, a firm which has organized and
administered real estate limited partnerships. Mr. Ashner also currently
serves on the Board of Directors of the following publicly traded companies:
Nexthealth Corp., a provider of alternative health care services, Great Bay
Hotel and Casino Inc., a hotel and casino company, Burnham Pacific Properties,
Inc., a real estate investment trust, and NBTY Inc., a manufacturer, marketer
and retailer of nutritional supplements.

  Peter Braverman. Mr. Braverman has served as the Executive Vice President of
Winthrop Financial Associates and its affiliates since January 1996. Mr.
Braverman is also a Vice President of Shelbourne Properties I, Inc.,
Shelbourne Properties II, Inc. and Shelbourne Properties III, Inc. Mr.
Braverman also serves as the Executive Vice President of The Newkirk Group.
From June 1995 until January 1996, Mr. Braverman was a Vice President of
National Property Investors, Inc. and NPI Property Management Corporation.
From June 1991 until March 1994, Mr. Braverman was President of the Braverman
Group, a firm specializing in management consulting for the real estate and
construction industries.

  Carolyn Tiffany. Ms. Tiffany has been with Winthrop Financial Associates
since January 1993. Ms. Tiffany is also a Vice President of Shelbourne
Properties I, Inc., Shelbourne Properties II, Inc. and Shelbourne Properties
III, Inc. From 1993 to September 1995, Ms. Tiffany was a Senior Analyst and
Associate in Winthrop Financial Associates' accounting and asset management
departments. Ms. Tiffany was a Vice President in the asset management and
investor relations departments of Winthrop Financial Associates from October
1995 to December 1997, at which time she became the Chief Operating Officer of
Winthrop Financial Associates. In addition, Ms. Tiffany is the Chief Operating
Officer of The Newkirk Group.

  Lara Sweeney. Ms. Sweeney has been a Senior Vice President of Winthrop
Financial Associates since 1996. Ms. Sweeney is also a Vice President and
Secretary of Shelbourne Properties I, Inc., Shelbourne Properties II, Inc. and
Shelbourne Properties III, Inc. Ms. Sweeney was Director of Investor Relations
for National Property Investors, Inc. from 1994 until 1996.

 Franchise Agreement

  As part of the Restructuring Plan, the new general partner intends to cause
the partnership to enter into a franchise agreement with Marriott
International which will permit the partnership to continue to use the
Fairfield Inn by Marriott brand following the termination of the existing
management agreement with Fairfield FMC Corporation.

  The new general partner believes that the terms of the franchise agreement
with Marriott International contain the most favorable terms currently offered
by Marriott International to its franchisees. In addition, the total fees and
expenses payable by the partnership under the franchise agreement and the new
management agreement described below, exclusive of the incentive management
fee payable to the new manager, do not exceed the amount currently paid by the
partnership to Fairfield FMC Corporation under the existing management
agreement.

  Under the franchise agreement, the partnership will pay the following fees
for each Inn:

    (i) a $10,000 non-refundable application fee per Inn to cover transaction
        expenses of Marriott International and property improvement plan
        reviews for each Inn;

    (ii) a royalty fee of 4% of gross room revenue, which is less than the
        standard franchise fee;


                                       5


    (iii) a marketing fund contribution of 2.5% of gross room revenue;

    (iv) a reservation system fee equal to 1% of gross room revenue, plus
        $3.50 for each reservation confirmed and a communication support fee
        of $379 per month for each Inn;

    (v)  a property management system fee equal to $323 per month for each
        Inn plus an additional $30 per month for each Inn to access the
        Marriott intranet site; and

    (vi) training and software charges.

  In addition, the partnership will be required to deposit seven percent of
each Inn's gross monthly revenues into an escrow account to be applied towards
capital improvements. The franchise agreement includes a fee payable by the
partnership to the franchisor if the franchise for a particular Inn is
terminated. To facilitate a potential sale, the termination fee is not payable
with respect to five specified Inns if the Inns are sold within 18 months of
the commencement date of the franchise agreement. The franchise agreement will
have a 10-year term. The partnership will have the option to renew the
agreement for two additional five-year periods subject to its successful
maintenance of brand standards.

  As a condition for entering into franchise arrangements for the Inns,
Marriott International has required that the partnership obtain a guaranty
from a creditworthy party of the partnership's obligations to pay termination
fees and other amounts that may come due under the franchise agreement. An
affiliate of the new general partner has agreed to provide the guaranty. The
guaranty would cover the payment of certain termination fees payable by the
partnership under the franchise agreement, up to a maximum of $25 million, and
a guaranty of all other obligations of the partnership under the franchise
agreement, subject to a maximum of $10 million.

 New Manager for the Inns

  As part of the Restructuring Plan, the new general partner intends to
terminate the partnership's existing management agreement with Fairfield FMC
Corporation and retain Sage Hospitality Resources, LLC to manage the Inns. The
general partner believes that Sage has the expertise and managerial skills
required to address the operating performance and capital improvement issues
faced by the Inns. Sage is a privately held, nationally recognized hospitality
company not affiliated with the current or new general partner. Sage currently
manages 25 Fairfield Inn by Marriott hotels and 36 Marriott International
brand franchise hotels. Including its experience in the management of the
Fairfield Inn by Marriott brand, Sage:

  .  has managed over 225 hotels, many in turn-around situations;

  .  has significant experience as a work-out manager;

  .  manages 41 limited service hotels; and

  .  manages 36 Marriott International franchise hotels.

  The new management agreement with Sage will provide that the Inns will be
operated as part of the Fairfield Inn by Marriott franchise system, and that
Sage will be generally responsible for the day to day operations of the Inns.
The management agreement will have a five-year term, subject to the
partnership's right to terminate the agreement under certain circumstances,
including cause, change in control of Sage or if certain performance levels
are not achieved by the fourth anniversary of the commencement date of the
management agreement. Sage will receive a base management fee equal to three
percent of the partnership's adjusted gross revenue, and an incentive
management fee generally equal to ten percent of the excess of "EBITDA"
(earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization of all the
Inns during the applicable fiscal year) over (i) $25,000,000 (during the first
three years of the term of the management agreement) and (ii) the greater of
(a) $26,875,000 or (b) 107.5% of the prior year's EBITDA (during the last two
years of the term of the management agreement).

New Loan

  As part of the Restructuring Plan, the new general partner will provide
limited partners, including an affiliate of the new general partner that owns
a 22% limited partner interest, the opportunity to participate in a New Loan

                                       6


of up to $23 million to the partnership. The New Loan will be unsecured and
subordinate to the partnership's existing mortgage loan and will otherwise be
on terms determined by the new general partner and acceptable to the
partnership's mortgage lender. Limited partners will be entitled to
participate in the New Loan in proportion to their percentage interests in the
partnership, without any right to subscribe for amounts not subscribed for by
other limited partners. Any portion of the New Loan not provided by limited
partners will be provided by an affiliate of the new general partner. The new
general partner has informed the general partner that the economic terms of
the New Loan have not been finally determined and are, in part, contingent on
approval of the partnership's mortgage lender. Nevertheless, the general
partner expects that the New Loan will be structured to provide a potential
rate of return in excess of 20% per annum. Consequently, it is unlikely that
limited partners who do not participate in the New Loan will receive any
future distributions from the partnership after the distribution expected to
be made concurrently with the funding of the New Loan, unless the partnership
experiences an improvement in operating results in excess of what the current
general partner believes is likely to occur. See "Risk Factors and Possible
Effects of the Restructuring Plan."

   The New Loan is intended to provide the partnership with the capital
   necessary to:

  .  make necessary capital improvements to the Inns;

  .  fund the property improvement programs under the proposed franchise
     agreement with Marriott International;

  .  furnish working capital to the partnership;

  .  fund prepayment shortfalls under the mortgage debt if Inns are sold but
     proceeds from sale are insufficient to satisfy prepayment minimums
     (prepayments will reduce the outstanding balance and the amount of debt
     service if the mortgage lender approves); and

  .  stabilize the financial position of the partnership.

Financial Concessions and Other Concessions Related to Restructuring Plan

 Ground Lease Modifications

  Financial concessions continue to be negotiated in connection with the
ground lease arrangements relating to the Inns. As part of the Restructuring
Plan, the partnership's existing ground leases for the land on which 32 Inns
are located are expected to be modified to:

    (i) reduce the annual ground rent for all of the Inns. While the ground
  lessor has agreed in principle to a reduction in the ground rent to $1.0
  million per year for 24 months and thereafter to $3.0 million a year, and
  to eliminate the requirement to pay a percentage rent based on the gross
  revenues of the Inns, the new general partner is seeking significantly more
  favorable ground rent reductions;

    (ii) cancel the partnership's obligation to pay all deferred ground rent
  accrued in 2000 and in 2001, which is currently estimated to be $2.3
  million;

    (iii) grant the partnership an option, exercisable at any time after 10
  years, to purchase the land underlying any or all of the Inns at an
  aggregate purchase price of $43,000,000, less the aggregate amount, as of
  the time the option is exercised, of all quarterly option payments of
  $187,500 that the partnership will be required to make in accordance with
  the ground lease modifications; provided, however, that prior to December
  31, 2052, the option may be exercised only in connection with the sale of
  any or all of the Inns then being sold;

    (iv) grant the partnership the right to assign at any time the foregoing
  option to purchase the land underlying any of the Inns; and

    (v) grant the partnership the option to purchase during the first 18
  months the land underlying five of six specified Inns in connection with
  the sale of such Inns for the allocable portion of the $43,000,000 purchase
  price referred to above reduced by an allocable portion of the option
  payments made through the date of the acquisition.

The new general partner is continuing to negotiate with the ground lessor with
respect to the ground lease modification and there can be no assurance that
the new general partner will be successful in obtaining acceptable terms for
the ground lease modification, including the more favorable ground rent
reductions discussed above.

                                       7


 Franchisor Concessions

  As described above, Marriott International made certain concessions in
connection with negotiating the terms of the franchise agreement for the Inns.
These included a lower than standard royalty fee and the right of the
partnership to sell a limited number of Inns without paying termination fees.
Under the franchise agreement described above, no termination fees are payable
by the partnership in connection with the sale of up to five Inns if the sales
occur within 18 months of the commencement of the franchise agreement.

 Possible Sale of Certain Inns

  The new general partner has identified eight Inns for potential sale and may
attempt to sell such Inns subject to approval of the amendments to the
partnership agreement by the limited partners and the approval of the mortgage
lender to the terms and conditions of sale. The new general partner does not
believe that funding the anticipated capital improvements to these Inns will
improve their performance sufficiently to justify such investment.

  The partnership's current mortgage loan permits sales of Inns only if U.S.
government securities in specified amounts are substituted as collateral for
the benefit of the lender. The new general partner is attempting to obtain a
waiver of this provision in order to allow proceeds from the sale of the Inns
to be applied to reduce the outstanding balance on the mortgage loan which, if
approved and subsequently undertaken, will reduce debt service commensurately.
If such a waiver is obtained, the proceeds of sales may not be sufficient to
satisfy required prepayment minimums. In that event, the partnership may
supplement sales proceeds with proceeds from the New Loan in order to satisfy
the required prepayment minimums.

  There can be no assurance that any waiver will be obtained from the lender
or, if obtained, that the partnership will have sufficient cash to fully fund
the required minimum prepayment amounts.

                                 RISK FACTORS
                                      AND
                  POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF THE RESTRUCTURING PLAN

  Limited partners should consider the following risks in evaluating whether
to consent to the amendments, which are a prerequisite to implementing the
Restructuring Plan.

  The failure to implement the Restructuring Plan increases the likelihood of
a default under the partnership's mortgage loan and its management agreement.
In order to permit the partnership to obtain the benefits of the Restructuring
Plan, both the consent of the limited partners to the amendments to the
partnership agreement and the consent of the mortgage lender to the
Restructuring Plan must be obtained. If for any reason the requisite consent
is not obtained, the general partner may fund anticipated partnership debt
service shortfalls using unrestricted partnership cash, amounts held in
reserve accounts and the deferral of ground rent. The partnership continues to
experience a decline in revenues and operating cash flow is insufficient to
fund debt service. In the first quarter of 2001, Inn revenues declined over
$1.0 million, or 6.6%, as compared to the first quarter of 2000. Under these
circumstances, the partnership will defer discretionary expenditures for
capital improvements that cost more than the amount available in the
partnership's property improvement fund and the partnership's unrestricted
cash reserves.

  The general partner will continue its efforts to develop alternative
solutions to rectify the decline in Inn operating results. As described in the
following section, there is a significant risk, however, that the general
partner will be unable to develop an alternative means of reversing the
partnership's deteriorating financial condition or access additional capital,
in which event the partnership would ultimately be unable to meet its
obligations under its debt agreements and under its management agreement and
the Inns may lose their brand affiliation, in which case the partnership may
ultimately lose its ownership of the Inns.

                                       8


  In the event the partnership were to lose its ownership of the Inns as a
result of foreclosure or other action taken by the mortgage lender, such event
would constitute a taxable disposition of the Inns by the partnership and,
under the terms of the partnership agreement, would cause the partnership to
dissolve and wind up its affairs. Each limited partner would be allocated by
the partnership his share of the aggregate taxable income and gain resulting
from the disposition of the Inns and repayment of debt, measured by the
difference between the amount realized by the partnership and the
partnership's adjusted tax bases in the Inns. The amount realized by the
partnership would generally equal the amount of liabilities encumbering the
Inns or to which the Inns were subject at the time of disposition. Although a
limited partner would be allocated taxable income or gain as a result of the
disposition of the Inns, such limited partner would not receive any cash from
the partnership except in the very unlikely event that proceeds from the
disposition of the Inns exceeded the partnership's liabilities at the time of
the disposition. If a limited partner's basis in his partnership interest is
less than his or her share of the partnership's basis in its assets, the
amount of any income or gain recognized by the limited partner would be
increased by this difference. If, at the time the partnership is dissolved and
its affairs wound up, a limited partner has a tax basis in his partnership
interest that exceeds zero (taking into account the allocations to such
partner of income and gain resulting from the disposition of the Inns and
repayment of the debt), the limited partner would have a capital loss
(assuming such limited partner held his partnership interest as a capital
asset) that could be applied to offset allocations of capital gain by the
partnership to the limited partner during the taxable year. There can be no
assurance that implementation of the Restructuring Plan would avoid the
consequences described herein.

  There are various alternatives to the Restructuring Plan that could be
pursued but the General Partner believes that they either are not likely to be
successfully implemented or would not likely provide better prospects for
future returns to limited partners than the Restructuring Plan. Before
deciding to pursue the Restructuring Plan, the general partner sought to
identify and evaluate various alternatives that might be available to the
partnership to address its deteriorating financial condition, including, but
not limited to: (1) a sale of Inns or partnership interests, (2) a change in
the brand under which the Inns operate, and (3) a change of management while
continuing to operate under the Fairfield Inn by Marriott brand without
additional capital investment. As described in the following paragraphs, the
general partner believes either that the partnership would not likely be
successful in implementing these alternatives or that these alternatives would
not likely provide better prospects of future distributions to limited
partners from the partnership.

  (1) Sale of Inns or Partnership Interests. In mid-1998, the partnership
engaged an investment banking firm to assist in selling the Inns or finding a
buyer for your limited partnership interests. At that time, the partnership
received only a few indications of interest, none of which was on terms that
would have resulted in proceeds to the limited partners. Based on this prior
experience, the significant decline in operating results and deteriorating
financial condition of the partnership and the need for approximately $36
million in capital expenditures over the next two years to maintain brand
standards, the general partner does not believe that it is currently feasible
to sell the Inns for a price that would result in net proceeds to the limited
partners.

  (2) Change of Brand Affiliation. The general partner has also considered
whether a change of brand might improve the operating results of the Inns by
reducing the capital expenditure requirements needed to maintain brand
standards. The general partner believes that maintaining the Fairfield Inn by
Marriott brand for the Inns is in the best interests of the partnership. The
general partner has considered various matters in this connection, including
the following:

  .  The Inns have been operated under the Fairfield Inn by Marriott brand
     for 11 to 14 years and thus, the general partner believes, have the
     benefit of brand and customer loyalty.

  .  The general partner believes that the Inns benefit from the Marriott
     International affiliation, its reservation system and the "Marriott
     Rewards" frequent traveler program, each of which would be lost if the
     partnership were to switch brands, and that the inclusion of the Inns
     within the nationwide Fairfield Inn by Marriott hotel system provides
     advantages of name recognition, centralized reservations and
     advertising, system-wide marketing and promotion, centralized purchasing
     and training and support services.

                                       9


  .  If the partnership were to change brands, the general partner believes
     it is unlikely that it would be able to obtain its first or second
     alternate choice of a new brand for each of its Inns since most brands
     are already represented in many of the markets in which the Inns are
     located.

  .  While other brands may have lower capital expenditure requirements, the
     general partner believes the revenues generated by operating under
     another brand, particularly brands that are not a first or second
     alternate choice, likely would not be sufficient to yield a net increase
     in cash flow after capital expenditures to the partnership.

  (3) Maintain Current Brand with New Manager Without Additional Capital
Investment. Believing that retaining the Fairfield Inn by Marriott brand
affiliation is in the partnership's best interests, the general partner has
considered whether a change of Inn management might help to improve the
partnership's operating results. The general partner believes that Sage
Management Resources III, LLC has the expertise and managerial skills required
to address the operating performance and capital improvement issues faced by
the Inns. Sage currently manages 25 Fairfield Inn by Marriott hotels and 36
Marriott International brand franchise hotels and has significant experience
managing hotels in work-out situations.

  In order to retain Sage or any other third-party as the new manager for the
Inns and to continue to operate the Inns using the Fairfield Inn by Marriott
brand, the partnership must enter into a franchise arrangement with Marriott
International and obtain additional financing to meet the requirements for a
franchise agreement, which include making approximately $36 million of capital
expenditures necessary for the Inns to meet brand standards. In addition, as a
condition for a franchise agreement, Marriott International has stated that it
requires a guaranty of certain of the partnership's obligations under any
franchise agreement. In light of the deteriorating financial condition of the
partnership, the partnership does not have sufficient resources to make the
additional capital expenditures required for a franchise agreement or
sufficient credit capacity necessary to provide the guaranty required by
Marriott International. As a result, the partnership is pursuing the
Restructuring Plan to permit it to satisfy the requirements for a franchise
agreement and enable it to retain Sage as the new manager for the Inns.

  (4) Other Alternatives. The general partner has also considered various
other alternatives, including the feasibility of restructuring the
partnership's mortgage debt without bringing in a new financing source and
whether a reorganization under bankruptcy laws would be in the best interests
of partners. The general partner does not believe that any of these other
alternatives would satisfactorily address the partnership's need for
additional capital, which, in the general partner's opinion, is the principal
issue facing the partnership. Without additional capital, the general partner
does not believe that there is a reasonable prospect for a viable long-term
reorganization of the partnership's business.

  On May 18, 2001, a limited partner of the partnership sent a letter to the
general partner expressing its interest in becoming the replacement general
partner. This limited partner indicated that it did not contemplate investing
additional capital into the partnership. The general partner is precluded from
discussing such a proposal pursuant to the terms of the General Partner
Substitution Agreement, dated as of April 16, 2001, to which it is a party
with AP-Fairfield GP and which is described under "Description of Related
Agreements."

  If the Restructuring Plan is implemented, limited partners should not expect
to receive cash distributions in their capacity as limited partners other than
the distribution to be made in connection with the New Loan. As part of the
Restructuring Plan, an affiliate of the proposed new general partner together
with participating limited partners will provide a New Loan of up to $23
million to the partnership. The new general partner has informed the general
partner that the terms of the New Loan have not been finalized. You should be
aware, however, that because of the financial condition of the partnership the
interest rate and the other terms of the New Loan are likely to be favorable
to the debt-holders. Accordingly, if the financing amendment is approved and
the New Loan advanced, limited partners should not expect any additional
economic benefits in their capacity as limited partners other than the
distribution to be made in connection with the New Loan, unless the
partnership experiences an improvement in operating results in excess of what
the current general partner believes is likely to occur.


                                      10


  Implementation of the Restructuring Plan may not reverse the partnership's
decline in operating results. The Restructuring Plan is intended to address
the partnership's continued decline in operating results which, among other
things, has resulted in debt service and capital expenditure shortfalls for
the partnership. There can be no assurance, however, that the implementation
of the actions contemplated by the Restructuring Plan will be successful in
reversing the decline in the partnership's operating results or, if
successful, will be sufficient to remedy the partnership's debt service and
capital expenditure shortfalls.

  The partnership's operating results may be negatively affected by external
factors despite the implementation of the Restructuring Plan. Following
implementation of the Restructuring Plan, the partnership will continue to be
subject to a number of factors, many of which are beyond the partnership's
control, which may have a negative effect on the partnership's operating
results. These factors include:

  .  increased competition in the markets where the Inns are located;

  .  increases in operating costs at the Inns;

  .  seasonal variances in room occupancy rates;

  .  operational challenges encountered in the transition period during which
     a new general partner and a new manager assume control of partnership
     operations and hotel operations, respectively;

  .  national and local economic and business conditions;

  .  changes in laws or regulations applicable to the Inns; and

  .  future changes in valuation methodologies applied to hotel assets such
     as those owned by the partnership.

In addition, future operating results could be affected by factors such as a
decision by Marriott International to increase brand standards which would
require additional capital expenditures by the partnership to the extent that
the partnership desires to maintain the Fairfield Inn by Marriott brand
affiliation. Accordingly, even if the Restructuring Plan is implemented as
contemplated in this consent solicitation statement, there can be no assurance
that the operating results of the partnership will improve.

  The proposed New Loan may create conflicts of interest between the new
general partner and the limited partners of the partnership. If an affiliate
of the new general partner participates in the New Loan as contemplated by the
Restructuring Plan, certain decisions concerning the operations or financial
structure of the partnership may present conflicts of interest between the new
general partner and the limited partners of the partnership, other than in
their capacity as participants in the New Loan.

  The interests of the existing general partner in the implementation of the
Restructuring Plan are different from the interests of the limited partners of
the partnership. If the general partner substitution and the amendment
permitting the New Loan are approved by the limited partners, FIBM One LLC
will voluntarily withdraw as general partner of the partnership and AP-
Fairfield GP will be substituted as the new general partner of the
partnership. FIBM One LLC will not receive any payment for its general
partnership interest, nor will it have liability with respect to the ongoing
operations of the partnership and its $1.4 million of capital will no longer
be exposed to potential claims of creditors of the partnership. In addition,
in connection with the Restructuring Plan, FIBM One LLC has sold its limited
partnership interests in the partnership to an affiliate of the new general
partner and, following its withdrawal as general partner, will no longer have
any economic interest in the partnership.

  The terms of the agreements needed to implement the Restructuring Plan have
not been finalized. Pursuant to the General Partner Substitution Agreement
dated as of April 16, 2001 as described under "Description of Related
Agreements," the general partner has obtained the agreement of AP-Fairfield
GP, the proposed new general partner, to use commercially reasonable efforts
to negotiate the agreements required to implement the Restructuring Plan. AP-
Fairfield GP has informed the general partner that it has reached agreements
in principle on most of the principal terms of these agreements. AP-Fairfield
GP will enter into such agreements on behalf of the partnership as the new
general partner if satisfactory final terms are agreed upon, the limited
partners approve

                                      11


the amendments to the partnership agreement and the Restructuring Plan is
approved by the partnership's mortgage lender. There can be no assurance,
however, that AP-Fairfield GP will be successful in finalizing these
agreements or, if these agreements are finalized, that they will contain
substantially all of the terms described in this consent solicitation
statement. In addition, since the substitution of the general partner is not
dependent on the finalization of these agreements, it is possible, if these
agreements are not finalized, that the general partner may be substituted
while some or all of the remaining elements of the Restructuring Plan may not
occur.

  The age of the Inns owned by the partnership suggest that further capital
will be required in the future. Significant capital expenditures are currently
required in order for the Inns to remain competitive and to satisfy brand
standards required by the partnership's management agreement with Fairfield
FMC Corporation. The age and physical condition of the partnership's Inns,
which range from 11 to 14 years, make it likely that further and, perhaps,
more substantial capital expenditures will be required in the future. There
can be no assurance that the New Loan contemplated by the Restructuring Plan
will be sufficient to fund any future capital shortfalls that may arise and,
given current operating levels, there can be no assurances that cash from
operations in the future will be sufficient to fund these expenditures.

  Lender consent may not be obtained. Even if the limited partners approve the
amendments, there can be no assurance that the New Loan will be obtained
because the consent of the partnership's mortgage lender is required to
implement various aspects of the Restructuring Plan. Lender consent or
approval must be obtained with regard to the following:

    (i) the appointment of Sage as manager;

    (ii) the modification of the ground leases;

    (iii) entering into the franchise agreement;

    (iv) obtaining the New Loan; and

    (v) the proposed application of Inn sale proceeds to repay existing
  mortgage debt.

  There can be no assurance that the lender will consent to or approve any of
the aspects of the Restructuring Plan as to which its consent, approval or
waiver is being sought. The partnership has already obtained all necessary
approvals under its mortgage agreement to the substitution of the general
partner subject to approval by the limited partners of both of the proposed
amendments to the partnership agreement.

  The proposed New Loan may result in the allocation of additional taxable
income to the limited partners of the partnership who do not participate in
the New Loan. If the partnership obtains the New Loan as contemplated by the
Restructuring Plan and the New Loan is respected as a loan for federal income
tax purposes, it is likely that, over time, depreciation deductions (in a
maximum aggregate amount equal to the principal amount of the New Loan) and
deductions attributable to accrued interest on the New Loan that otherwise
would have been allocable to the limited partners will be allocated solely to
the holders of the New Loan (including those limited partners who participate
in the New Loan). Because operating income of the partnership will continue to
be allocated to the limited partners as provided under the partnership
agreement, the decrease in depreciation and accrued interest deductions
allocable to those limited partners who do not participate in the New Loan
would cause a commensurate increase in the taxable income of such limited
partners. It is impossible to predict with certainty when, or to what extent,
this increase in taxable income will occur. As the New Loan is repaid, the
holders of the New Loan will be allocated income and gain that will offset the
depreciation and accrued interest deductions allocated to them in previous
years as a result of the New Loan (and, accordingly, the taxable income of the
partners who do not participate in the New Loan will decrease at that time as
a result of such allocations).

  The limited partners could suffer adverse consequences if the terms of the
Restructuring Plan were not respected for federal income tax purposes. If the
New Loan is not respected as indebtedness of the partnership for federal
income tax purposes, then limited partners who do not participate in the New
Loan could suffer adverse tax consequences. The nature and extent of any such
adverse tax consequences could depend to some extent upon the circumstances of
the individual limited partner. Whether the New Loan will be respected as
indebtedness for federal income tax purposes ultimately will depend on a
number of factors, including a finding that the partnership has retained the
burdens and benefits of ownership of the Inns. No legal opinion will be
provided to the partnership concerning this issue.

                                      12


                       DESCRIPTION OF RELATED AGREEMENTS

  In connection with the Restructuring Plan, the general partner entered into
certain agreements with the new general partner and its affiliates. The
principal agreements provided for the withdrawal and substitution of the
general partner and the sale of the general partner's limited partner
interests, each of which are described below.

General Partner Substitution Agreement

  On April 16, 2001, the general partner and its affiliate, Host Marriott,
L.P., entered into an agreement with the new general partner and its
affiliate, Apollo Real Estate Advisors, L.P. The agreement provides for FIBM
One LLC to voluntarily withdraw, and for AP-Fairfield GP to be substituted, as
the general partner of the partnership, subject to receipt of the approval of
the limited partners and the lender and other customary closing conditions.
The partnership has already obtained all necessary approvals under its
mortgage agreement to the substitution of the general partner subject to
approval by the limited partners of both of the proposed amendments to the
partnership agreement. The general partner will not receive any payment for
its general partnership interest. The new general partner has agreed to use
commercially reasonable efforts to negotiate the new management agreement, the
franchise agreement and the ground lease modification agreement on the terms
described in this consent solicitation statement and to implement the New Loan
if required approvals are obtained. The general partner has agreed to
cooperate with the new general partner in connection with this consent
solicitation.

  The agreement prohibits the general partner, until the agreement terminates,
from, directly or indirectly soliciting, initiating, or encouraging any
inquiries or proposals from, discussing or negotiating with, providing any
non-public information to, or considering the merits of any unsolicited
inquiries or proposals from, any person (other than the new general partner)
relating to any transaction involving (i) the sale of the business or assets
of the partnership, (ii) any merger, consolidation, business combination, or
similar transaction involving the partnership, (iii) the sale, transfer or
assignment of the general partner interest in the partnership or (iv) the
election or substitution of anyone other than the new general partner as
general partner of the partnership. The foregoing restriction has not
precluded the general partner from complying with requests of a limited
partner for information regarding the partnership's business affairs to the
extent required by the partnership agreement and applicable law, which limited
partner has indicated its interest in becoming the replacement general partner
of the partnership.

  The agreement may be terminated by either party if, among other reasons,
limited partners do not approve the replacement of the general partner
pursuant to this consent solicitation.

  In the event that the agreement is terminated by either party by reason of
the other party's material breach of its obligations, the defaulting party
(that is, the existing general partner and Host, on the one hand, or the new
general partner or Apollo, on the other hand, and in neither case the
partnership) will be required to pay a $500,000 termination fee to the non-
defaulting party. The failure of limited partners or the partnership's lender
to provide necessary approvals will not give rise to payment of a termination
fee.

Sale of Limited Partnership Interests

  Pursuant to an agreement with the general partner entered into on April 16,
2001, an affiliate of the new general partner purchased 8,379 units of limited
partnership interest from the general partner for $10,000. That affiliate has
agreed to transfer these units to a charitable organization if the limited
partners fail to approve the general partner substitution amendment or if the
new general partner is not substituted on a timely basis following the
approval of the limited partners and the mortgage lender. The affiliate of the
new general partner has advised the partnership that it will vote its limited
partner interests in favor of the proposed amendments.

               THE AMENDMENTS AND GENERAL PARTNER RECOMMENDATION

Amendment No. 1: Amendment to Permit New Loan

  The general partner submits for your consideration and approval the proposed
amendment to the partnership agreement to facilitate an unsecured debt
financing of up to $23 million for the partnership. The following summary is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the proposed
financing amendment, which is attached as Exhibit A-1 to this consent
solicitation statement, as well as to the text of the partnership agreement,
as currently in effect.

                                      13


  The financing amendment adds a new section to the partnership agreement
which provides that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary that may be set
forth in the partnership agreement, an affiliate of the new general partner
may loan the partnership up to $23 million, on terms to be determined by the
new general partner, so long as the limited partners are offered the right to
participate in providing such financing in proportion to their respective
interests in the partnership without any right to subscribe for amounts not
subscribed for by other limited partners.

  Section 5.01E(vi) of the partnership agreement provides that (i) any
agreement, contract, or arrangement which relates to or secures any funds
advanced or loaned to the partnership by the general partner or any of its
affiliates must reflect commercially reasonable terms and (ii) any such loan
or advance must not be subject to any prepayment charge or penalty and must
otherwise be on terms and conditions that, in the reasonable judgment of the
general partner, are as favorable to the partnership as those the partnership
could obtain from unaffiliated third parties or banks for the same purpose in
the geographic location where the property securing such loan is located (in
the case of loans made in connection with a single property or several
properties in a single geographic location) or, in all other cases, where the
general partner has its principal place of business (without reference to the
financial abilities or guarantees of the general partner or any of its
affiliates).

  Section 5.06C of the partnership agreement provides, among other things,
that any advances made by the general partner to meet any liabilities or
obligations of the partnership shall (i) be deemed loans to the partnership by
the general partner and shall accrue interest per annum at one percentage
point in excess of the prime rate announced from time to time by The First
National Bank of Chicago (or the highest lawful rate under the laws of the
State of Delaware, whichever is less) payable in arrears on the first day of
each fiscal quarter of the partnership and (ii) be due and payable upon the
fifth anniversary of the date on which the advance was made. In addition,
Section 5.06C of the partnership agreement provides that, upon the liquidation
or dissolution of the partnership or the distribution to the partners of any
proceeds from the sale of an Inn, all such advances shall be paid prior to
distributions to the partners out of any "cash available for distribution" to
the partners, except for distributions with respect to "partners' preferred
distributions" (i.e., an annual non-cumulative amount equal to 10% of the
average daily outstanding net invested capital of the partnership). Section
5.08(xvii) makes the provisions of Section 5.06C applicable to advances made
by affiliates of the general partner.

  Section 5.08(xvi) of the partnership agreement provides that the partnership
shall not borrow any money from the general partner or any of its affiliates,
if the principal amount of the loan is scheduled to be paid over a period of
48 months or longer or if not less than 50% of the principal amount of the
loan is scheduled to be paid during the first 24 months, subject to certain
exceptions made with respect to loans made to the partnership by the general
partner.

  The effect of the financing amendment is to make the provisions of Sections
5.01E(vi), 5.06C and 5.08(xvi) (and any other provisions of the partnership
agreement that may directly or indirectly impede the ability of the
partnership to borrow from an affiliate of the new general partner)
inapplicable to the New Loan proposed by the partnership so long as limited
partners are offered the right to participate in the New Loan in proportion to
their respective percentage interests in the partnership, without any right to
subscribe for amounts not subscribed for by other limited partners, and the
affiliate of the new general partner provides the amount not subscribed for by
the limited partners.

  Section 5.02B(vii) of the partnership agreement provides that, without the
consent of the limited partners, the general partner shall not have authority
on behalf of the partnership to permit or cause the partnership to incur any
debt in excess of $250,000 (other than certain permitted debt described
therein) that is otherwise permitted to be incurred pursuant to the terms of
the partnership agreement if such debt would not constitute in its entirety
"qualified nonrecourse financing" within the meaning of section 465(b)(6)(B)
of the Internal Revenue Code and the applicable Treasury Regulations and a
"Nonrecourse Liability" (as defined in the partnership agreement) unless the
general partner, in accordance with its fiduciary duties as a general partner
and taking into consideration both the reasonably foreseeable tax consequences
to the limited partners as a group and the alternatives that the general
partner believes are reasonably available to the partnership, determines that
such

                                      14


action is not detrimental to the best interests of the limited partners (and
in making such determination, the general partner may rely upon an opinion of
independent counsel as to the tax consequences to the limited partners as a
group). If the limited partners approve the amendment permitting the New Loan
to the partnership, it will not be necessary under the terms of the
partnership agreement for the general partner to make the determination
described in Section 5.02B(vii). For a description of the potential material
tax consequences to the limited partners resulting from the Restructuring
Plan, see "Risk Factors and Possible Effects of the Restructuring Plan--The
failure to implement the Restructuring Plan increases the likelihood of a
default under the partnership's mortgage loan and its management agreement,"
"--The proposed New Loan may result in the allocation of additional taxable
income to the limited partners of the partnership who do not participate in
the New Loan" and "--The limited partners could suffer adverse consequences if
the terms of the Restructuring Plan were not respected for federal income tax
purposes," above.

  While the terms of the New Loan have not been finalized, limited partners
will have not less than 30 days notice with regard to the option to
participate in, and fund, the New Loan.

  Under the partnership agreement, approval of the financing amendment
requires the affirmative consent of limited partners holding a majority of the
issued and outstanding units, excluding any units held by the general partner
or any of its affiliates. As of the record date for the determination of
limited partners entitled to notice of and to vote upon this amendment,
neither the general partner nor any of its affiliates owned any units.

Amendment No. 2: Approval of Withdrawal and Substitution of General Partner

  The general partner submits for your consideration and approval the proposed
amendment to the partnership agreement to facilitate its voluntary withdrawal
and the substitution of AP-Fairfield GP as the sole general
partner of the partnership. The following summary is qualified in its entirety
by reference to the full text of the proposed general partner substitution
amendment, which is attached as Exhibit A-2 to this consent solicitation
statement, as well as to the text of the partnership agreement, as currently
in effect.

  Section 5.02B(vii) of the partnership agreement requires that the general
partner must obtain the consent of the limited partners in order to
voluntarily withdraw as a general partner of the partnership. By consenting to
the general partner substitution amendment, you thereby consent to the
voluntary withdrawal of FIBM One LLC as a general partner of the partnership.

  The general partner substitution amendment replaces all references in the
partnership agreement to "FIBM One LLC, a Delaware limited liability company"
with "AP-Fairfield GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company."

  Section 5.03D of the partnership agreement requires the general partner to
use its reasonable best efforts to maintain at all times a net worth at an
amount equal to at least $8,417,878 in excess of its investment in the
partnership. To facilitate the substitution of AP-Fairfield GP as the new
general partner of the partnership, the general partner substitution amendment
amends Section 5.03D of the partnership agreement to provide that the general
partner of the partnership will be required to use its reasonable best efforts
to maintain at all times a net worth at an amount equal to at least $1,385,000
which represents the estimated amount of the current net worth of the
withdrawing general partner.

  Section 6.01 of the partnership agreement currently provides that the
general partner must give at least 90 days' prior notice before withdrawing as
the general partner of the partnership. In addition, Section 6.03 of the
partnership agreement provides that the partnership has the right to purchase
the interest of a withdrawing general partner within 60 days following the
withdrawal at the "present fair market value" of such interest as determined
by agreement between the partnership and the withdrawing general partner or,
in the absence of such an agreement, as determined by arbitration under the
rules of the American Arbitration Association. By consenting to the general
partner substitution amendment, you agree to waive the prior notice
requirement of Section 6.01

                                      15


of the partnership agreement and the partnership's right to purchase the
interest of the withdrawing general partner under Section 6.03 of the
partnership agreement. FIBM One LLC is waiving its right to receive any
payment from the partnership for its general partnership interest.

  Under the partnership agreement, approval of the general partner
substitution amendment requires the affirmative consent of limited partners
holding a majority of the issued and outstanding units of limited partnership
interest, excluding any units held by the general partner or any of its
affiliates. As of the record date for the determination of limited partners
entitled to notice of and to vote upon this amendment, neither the general
partner nor any of its affiliates owned any units.

General Partner Recommendation

  For the reasons set forth elsewhere in this consent solicitation statement,
and because approval of both Amendments is necessary to realize the benefits
of the Restructuring Plan, the general partner recommends that you vote "YES"
in favor of both amendments.

  The general partner encourages you to review the information contained in
this consent solicitation statement and make your own determination. In making
your decision, you should carefully review and consider the information set
forth under "Risk Factors and Possible Effects of the Restructuring Plan" in
the consent solicitation statement. In particular, you should consider both
the possible consequences of approving the Restructuring Plan and of failing
to approve the Restructuring Plan, including the discussion of the
alternatives to the Restructuring Plan described in that section. You also
should take into account the differing interests of the general partner in
connection with implementation of the Restructuring Plan, which are discussed
in that section.

                         VOTING RIGHTS AND INFORMATION

Record Date

  The general partner has set the close of business on July 12, 2001 as the
record date for the determination of limited partners entitled to notice of
and to vote upon the amendments. Only limited partners of record as of the
record date will be entitled to vote upon the amendments. On the record date,
there were 83,337 units issued and outstanding, held of record by 2,720
limited partners. The partnership has no other class of securities.

Required Vote

  Under the terms of the partnership agreement, approval of each amendment
requires the affirmative consent of limited partners holding a majority of the
issued and outstanding units, excluding units held by the general partner and
its affiliates. As of the record date, neither the general partner nor any of
its affiliates owned any units. Abstention or failure to return the enclosed
consent form will have the same effect as a vote against the amendments. Each
limited partner who has been admitted to the partnership is entitled to cast
one vote for each unit held of record on each of the amendments. Holders of
half-units are entitled to cast half a vote for each half-unit held of record.

  Each of the amendments will be considered and voted on separately by limited
partners. You may vote "YES" or "NO" or abstain on either of the two
amendments.

Solicitation Period

  The solicitation period is the time during which limited partners may vote
for or against the amendments. The solicitation period will commence upon
delivery of this consent solicitation statement and the consent form

                                      16


and will continue until August 13, 2001. The general partner may, in its sole
discretion, elect to extend the solicitation period. If the solicitation
period is extended, the general partner will issue a press release announcing
the extension no later than 9:00 a.m., New York City time, on the next
business day after the day the solicitation period was scheduled to expire.

Consents

  A consent form is included with this consent solicitation statement. All
consent forms that are properly executed and returned to the partnership's
information agent, MacKenzie Partners, Inc., prior to the expiration of the
solicitation period will be voted in accordance with the instructions
contained therein. All properly executed consent forms that contain no voting
instructions will be deemed to have voted in favor of each of the amendments.
Consent forms will be effective only when actually received by the
partnership's information agent. Consent forms may be withdrawn at any time
prior to the expiration of the solicitation period. In addition, following the
submission of a consent form, but before the expiration of the solicitation
period, limited partners may change their vote. For a withdrawal or change of
vote to be effective, you must execute and deliver, prior to the expiration of
the solicitation period, a subsequently dated consent form or a written notice
stating that the consent is revoked to MacKenzie Partners, Inc., 156 Fifth
Avenue, New York, New York 10010. Consent forms and notices of withdrawal or
change of vote dated after the expiration of the solicitation period will not
be valid. If you have any questions about (i) how to complete the consent
form, (ii) where to send the consent or (iii) how to obtain additional consent
forms, please contact MacKenzie Partners, Inc. at (800) 322-2885.

Effective Time of Amendments

  If approved by the limited partners, an amendment will become effective when
the withdrawing general partner and the new general partner, as applicable,
execute and deliver the amendment in the form attached to this consent
solicitation statement. Assuming an amendment is approved, the withdrawing
general partner and the new general partner, as applicable, will execute and
deliver the amendment as soon as practicable following the expiration date of
the solicitation period and receipt of approval under the partnership's
mortgage agreement to the substitution of the general partner. The partnership
has already obtained all necessary approvals under its mortgage agreement to
the substitution of the general partner subject to approval by the limited
partners of both of the proposed amendments to the partnership agreement. If
for any reason the substitution amendment is not approved by the limited
partners, then neither of the proposed amendments will be adopted.

  Each amendment will apply prospectively from and after the date it becomes
effective. All limited partners will be bound by each amendment, if it becomes
effective, whether or not they vote in favor of that amendment. You do not
have a statutory or contractual right to be paid the fair value of your units
in connection with the proposals described in this consent solicitation
statement.

Cost of Solicitation

  The partnership will bear the costs of preparing and mailing this consent
solicitation statement, including up to $150,000 of legal expenses, in
addition to the fees and reasonable out-of-pocket expenses of the information
agent.

  To assist in the solicitation of consents, the partnership has engaged
MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to act as information agent for a fee of $30,000,
plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. In addition to solicitations by mail,
consents may be solicited by the general partner's executive officers and
managers and by officers of the new general partner. These managers and
officers will not be additionally compensated, but may be reimbursed for out-
of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation. Arrangements
also will be made to furnish copies of solicitation materials to custodians,
nominees, fiduciaries and brokerage houses for forwarding to beneficial owners
of units. Such persons will be paid for reasonable expenses incurred in
connection therewith.

                                      17


                         SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
                       BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

  The following table sets forth each person that, to our knowledge,
beneficially owned more than 5% of the total number of limited partner units
as of July 12, 2001. No units are owned by executive officers or managers of
the general partner.



      Name and address of
        beneficial owner          Number of units             Percent of total units
      -------------------         ---------------             ----------------------
                                                        
      AP-Fairfield LP, LLC            18,379                           22%
      5 Cambridge Center
      9th Floor
      Cambridge, MA 02142


  Pursuant to the General Partner Substitution Agreement dated as of April 16,
2001, as described under "Description of Related Agreements," a change of
control of the partnership will occur if the withdrawal of the general partner
and substitution of AP-Fairfield GP as the new general partner is approved as
described in this consent solicitation statement.

Date: July 13, 2001

                                          FIBM ONE LLC,
                                          General Partner

                                      18


                                  EXHIBIT A-1

                          FORM OF FINANCING AMENDMENT


                                                                    EXHIBIT A-1

                        THIRD AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND
                   RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                      OF
                 FAIRFIELD INN BY MARRIOTT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

  THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP OF FAIRFIELD INN BY MARRIOTT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (this "Third
Amendment"), dated as of      , 2001, is entered into by FIBM One LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company, as general partner (the "General
Partner"), of Fairfield Inn By Marriott Limited Partnership (the
"Partnership"), for itself and on behalf of the limited partners of the
Partnership (the "Limited Partners").

  WHEREAS, Section 11.02B of the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership of the Partnership, as amended (the "Partnership Agreement"),
permits the amendment of the Partnership Agreement upon the Consent (as
defined in the Partnership Agreement) of the Limited Partners, subject to
certain exception set forth therein;

  WHEREAS, the General Partner, being the sole general partner of the
Partnership and Limited Partners holding, in their capacity as Limited
Partners and not as assignees, a majority of the outstanding Units (as defined
in the Partnership Agreement), desire to further amend the Partnership
Agreement as set forth below.

  NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the General Partner hereby amends the Partnership Agreement as
follows:

  SECTION 1. A new Section 5.09 is hereby added to read as follows:

    SECTION 5.09. New Financing. Notwithstanding the provisions of this
  Agreement, the Partnership may borrow up to $23,000,000 from an Affiliate
  of the General Partner, upon terms proposed by the General Partner,
  provided that Limited Partners are offered the right to participate in such
  financing on a pro rata basis in accordance with their Interest in the
  Partnership without any right to subscribe for amounts not subscribed for
  by other Limited Partners.

  All defined terms contained in this Third Amendment, unless otherwise
defined herein, shall have the meaning contained in the Partnership Agreement.
Except as modified herein, all terms and conditions of the Partnership
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, which terms and conditions
the General Partner hereby ratifies and affirms.

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Third Amendment has been duly executed by the
General Partner as of the date first written above.

                                          FIBM ONE LLC, as General Partner and
                                           on behalf of existing Limited
                                           Partners

                                          By: _________________________________

                                          Name: _______________________________

                                          Title: ______________________________


                                  EXHIBIT A-2

                         FORM OF SUBSTITUTION AMENDMENT


                                                                    EXHIBIT A-2

                        FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND
                   RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                      OF
                 FAIRFIELD INN BY MARRIOTT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

  THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP OF FAIRFIELD INN BY MARRIOTT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (this "Fourth
Amendment"), dated as of      , 2001, is entered into by FIBM One LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (the "Withdrawing General Partner"), as
general partner of Fairfield Inn by Marriott Limited Partnership (the
"Partnership"), for itself and on behalf of the limited partners of the
Partnership (the "Limited Partners"), and AP-Fairfield GP, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (the "Substitute General Partner"), with principal
executive offices at 5 Cambridge Center, 9th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02142.

  WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 5.02B(vii) and Section 6.01 of the
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Fairfield Inn by
Marriott Limited Partnership, as heretofore amended (the "Partnership
Agreement"), the Withdrawing General Partner desires to voluntarily withdraw
as the general partner of the Partnership and the Substitute General Partner
desires to become the substitute general partner of the Partnership.

  NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the Withdrawing General Partner hereby amends the Partnership
Agreement as follows, and the Substitute General Partner accepts and agrees to
be bound by the Partnership Agreement as so amended:

    1. All references in the Partnership Agreement to the phrase "FIBM One
  LLC, a Delaware limited liability company" are hereby replaced with the
  phrase "AP-Fairfield GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company."

    2. Section 5.03D of the Partnership Agreement is hereby amended and
  restated in its entirety to read as follows:

      D. The General Partner shall use its reasonable best efforts to
    maintain at all times a net worth at an amount equal to at least
    $1,385,000.

    3. The Substitute General Partner shall be deemed to be admitted to the
  Partnership on the same day as and immediately prior to the withdrawal of
  the Withdrawing General Partner and the Withdrawing General Partner shall
  be deemed to have withdrawn as general partner of the Partnership on the
  same day as and immediately following the effectiveness of this Fourth
  Amendment.

  All defined terms contained in this Fourth Amendment, unless otherwise
defined herein, shall have the meaning contained in the Partnership Agreement.
Except as modified herein, all terms and conditions of the Partnership
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Fourth Amendment, and
this Fourth Amendment shall be effective, as of the date first set forth above.

                                          FIBM ONE LLC, as Withdrawing General
                                           Partner and on behalf of existing
                                           Limited Partners

                                          By: _________________________________

                                          Name: _______________________________

                                          Title: ______________________________

                                          AP-FAIRFIELD GP LLC, as Substitute
                                           General Partner

                                          By: _________________________________

                                          Name: _______________________________

                                          Title: ______________________________


                                 CONSENT FORM

  THIS WRITTEN CONSENT IS SOLICITED BY THE GENERAL PARTNER OF FAIRFIELD INN BY
MARRIOTT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT OF LIMITED PARTNERS
TO BE EFFECTIVE AS SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT SOLICITATION ACCOMPANYING THIS
CONSENT FORM.

  This Consent Form ("Consent Form") must be completed and returned by every
limited partner who wishes to vote for or against the proposals (the
"Proposals") to amend the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership, as amended from time-to-time (the "Partnership Agreement"), of
Fairfield Inn by Marriott Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") that are
described in the Consent Solicitation Statement accompanying this Consent
Form.

  This Consent Form must be returned to and received by:

                           MacKenzie Partners, Inc.
                          Attention: Proxy Department
                               156 Fifth Avenue
                           New York, New York 10010

prior to 12:00 midnight, New York City time, on Monday, August 13, 2001, or
such later date as may be designated in a mailing to all limited partners (the
"Expiration Date"). The Consent Form will be effective only when it is
actually received by MacKenzie Partners, Inc. A self-addressed return envelope
has been provided for your convenience, and it is recommended that you use
certified or registered mail, return receipt requested.

  All Consent Forms that are properly executed and returned to MacKenzie
Partners, Inc. prior to the Expiration Date will be voted in accordance with
the elections set forth therein. Any limited partner who abstains or fails to
return a signed Consent Form will be deemed to have voted AGAINST the
Proposals. Properly executed Consent Forms that are not marked as to a
particular Proposal will be deemed to be voted FOR the Proposal.

  Before completing this Consent Form, you and your advisor, if any, should
carefully review the Consent Solicitation Statement. Each of the proposed
amendments to the Partnership Agreement, including the text of such
amendments, is set forth in detail in the Consent Solicitation Statement.

  If you have any questions regarding the Proposals or if you would like
assistance in completing this Consent Form, please contact MacKenzie Partners,
Inc. at (800) 322-2885.

  Consent Forms may be withdrawn at any time prior to the Expiration Date. In
addition, you may change your vote subsequent to the submission of a Consent
Form, but prior to the Expiration Date. For a withdrawal or change of vote to
be effective, you must execute and deliver, prior to the Expiration Date, a
subsequently dated Consent Form or a written notice stating that the consent
is revoked to MacKenzie Partners, Inc. at the address set forth above. Consent
Forms and notices of withdrawal or change of vote dated after the Expiration
Date will not be valid.


                                    CONSENT

  The undersigned, with respect to each Unit in Fairfield Inn by Marriott
Limited Partnership held of record by the undersigned on July 12, 2001, hereby
sets forth his, her or its vote in connection with the written consent
solicited by the general partner of the Partnership as described in the
Consent Solicitation accompanying this Consent Form. You may vote for,
against, or abstain from voting on the Proposals by marking the appropriate
boxes set forth in the items below. In order to effect the Proposals, they
must be approved by limited partners holding a majority of the outstanding
Units, excluding Units held by the general partner and its affiliates.
Accordingly, abstentions on the Proposals will have the same effect as voting
AGAINST the Proposals.

  Amendment No. 1: Approval of Amendment to Permit the Withdrawal and
Substitution of the General Partner

                        [_] YES   [_] NO   [_] ABSTAIN

  Amendment No. 2: Approval of Amendment to Permit New Unsecured Debt
Financing

                        [_] YES   [_] NO   [_] ABSTAIN

  The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Consent Solicitation
Statement, dated July 13, 2001. If Units are owned jointly, all joint owners
must sign below.

                                     Date: ____________________________________

                                     Signature of Owner: ______________________

                                     Signature of Joint Owner: ________________