- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
----------------
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-26380
PIXTECH, INC.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
----------------
DELAWARE 04-3214691
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)
AVENUE OLIVIER PERROY, 13790 ROUSSET, FRANCE
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES INCLUDING ZIP CODE)
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE:
011-33- (0) 4-42-29-10-00
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT:
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
TITLE OF EACH CLASS ON WHICH REGISTERED
------------------- ---------------------
None None
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:
COMMON STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUE
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
YES X NO
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant as of March 3, 1997 was: $59,589,506.
There were 13,716,032 shares of the registrant's Common Stock outstanding as
of March 3, 1997.
----------------
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive proxy statement of the Registrant for the
Registrant's 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 18, 1997
which definitive proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the registrant's fiscal year
of December 31, 1996, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form
10-K.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
PixTech, Inc was incorporated in Delaware in November 1993 as the parent
company of PixTech S.A., a French corporation formed in June 1992. The
Company's principal executive offices are located at Avenue Olivier Perroy,
13790, Rousset, France. The Company's main telephone numbers are 011-33-
(0)442-29-10-00 and (408) 986-8868.
PixTech designs, develops and manufactures field emission displays ("FEDs"),
an emerging type of flat panel display ("FPD") technology. PixTech is
currently selling limited quantities of 5.2-inch (13 centimeters) monochrome
FEDs to original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs") for evaluation purposes. The
Company also publicly demonstrated a six-inch (15.2 cm) full color defect-free
FED, and a VGA 10.5-inch (26.6 cm) color FED in May 1996. In February 1996,
the Company commenced development of large-size FEDs suitable for use in
desktop monitor applications.
The Company is currently a development stage company with a pilot production
facility in Montpellier, France. In addition, the Company has entered into a
memorandum of understanding with Unipac Optoelectronics Corporation
("Unipac"), an AM-LCD manufacturer based in Taiwan. The Company plans to
contract manufacture commercial quantities of FEDs at Unipac's facilities in
order to satisfy the anticipated demand for FED products.
During 1996, the Company delivered limited quantities of displays to a
number of OEM customers in the telecommunication, military, instrumentation,
medical, industrial and transportation markets. The Company is in negotiation
with several customers to provide higher volumes of products over a several-
year period. While early customer deliveries are being made with displays
built at its pilot line, the Company intends to fill high volume orders from
its Asian-based production source.
THE FLAT PANEL DISPLAY INDUSTRY
Growth in the market for FPDs has been driven by a number of market forces,
including the increasing popularity of portable computer and other electronic
devices, the explosion of information and visual content available in
electronic formats, the proliferation of graphical user interfaces and
emerging multimedia applications and the conversion of traditional analog
displays to digital or graphical displays.
Flat panel displays are typically evaluated on their ability to match the
positive characteristics of traditional cathode ray tube ("CRT") displays,
such as those in desktop computer monitors and televisions. Performance
characteristics used to compare FPD technologies include viewing quality
(viewing angle, video speed, dynamic range and full color), range of
brightness, resolution, weight and size, power usage, reliability and
operating temperature range.
LCD Technologies. The FPD market is currently dominated by liquid crystal
displays (LCDs). The first commercialized LCD technology, passive matrix LCD
("PMLCD") technology, is widely used in calculators, watches and low-end
laptop computers. However, PMLCDs exhibit relatively low image quality and
slow response time, making them inadequate for many commercial and industrial
applications, especially those requiring video speed and a wide viewing angle.
Active matrix LCDs ("AMLCDs") incorporate a transistor at every pixel
location, which increases image quality and response time. However, AMLCDs
must incorporate high intensity backlights, which, together with the required
transistors, result in significant power consumption and manufacturing costs.
In addition, while AMLCDs have improved horizontal viewing angles and color
quality, they fall short of CRT viewing quality.
2
Both PMLCDs and AMLCDs also suffer from an inability to provide the wide
effective operating temperature range required by certain transportation and
military applications.
FED Technology. The Company believes that emerging FED technology has the
potential to address many of the shortcomings of AMLCDs.
The following table summarizes some of the differentiating characteristics
of CRT, PMLCD, AMLCD and FED technologies:
CHARACTERISTICS CRT PMLCD AMLCD FED
--------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Viewing angle Very wide Limited Wide Very wide
horizontal and horizontal and horizontal, horizontal and
vertical vertical limited vertical
vertical
Video speed High speed Unable to Adequate speed High speed
over full display video overlimited over full
temperature images with temperature temperature
range good quality range range
Brightness range From low to From low to From low From low to
very high, medium, tomedium, very high,
easy to dim limited limited easy to dim
dimming dimming
capabilities capabilities
Dynamic range* High Very limited Limited High
Operating temperature Wide range Very limited Limited range Wide range
range due to due to liquid
liquid crystal crystal
behavior
Power consumption High Current Current Comparable to
industry industry current
standard standard industry
standard
Manufacturability Mature process Fewer process Complex Early stage of
offering stepsthan process manufacturing
lowest cost AMLCD development
Fewer process
steps than
AMLCD
- --------
* Dynamic range results from a combination of contrast and peak brightness.
The information set forth above is based upon the Company's assessment of
existing CRT, PMLCD, and AMLCD products when compared to certain of the FED
monochrome products and color prototypes manufactured at PixTech's pilot
manufacturing facility in Montpellier, France, and components developed by
certain FED Alliance members. No assurance can be given that FEDs, if
manufactured in commercial quantities, will achieve such performance
characteristics on a cost-effective basis.
STRATEGY
The Company has adopted a two-pronged strategy for generating revenues both
from licensing its FED technology and from marketing its own FED products. Key
elements of this strategy include:
Establishment of Manufacturing Capability. PixTech has established a pilot
production facility in Montpellier, France, dedicated to developing products
and manufacturing processes, market introduction, and low volume production of
FEDs. Early customer deliveries are being made with displays built at this
pilot line. This facility is also used for the development of new processes
aimed at increasing performance and decreasing the cost of FEDs.
In addition, the Company has entered into a memorandum of understanding with
Unipac, a Taiwan-based manufacturer currently engaged in volume production of
AMLCDs. The Company intends to manufacture volume quantities of FEDs through
this manufacturing partnership in order to address commercial markets.
Focus on Selected High Margin Markets. In order to achieve early
commercialization of its screens, the Company is initially targeting high
margin market segments, such as telecommunications, military,
3
instrumentation, medical, industrial and transportation markets. Thereafter,
the Company will pursue additional marketing opportunities as it broadens its
product line and increases its manufacturing capacity.
Establishment and Expansion of the FED Alliance. The Company has created the
FED Alliance, as defined below, to leverage its technological leadership and
accelerate market penetration of FED products. The FED Alliance is structured
through licensing and cooperation agreements between PixTech and selected
leading companies. The licensing and cooperation agreements are designed to
provide the Company with license and technology transfer revenue as well as
future royalty revenue. The current members of the FED Alliance are Futaba
Corporation, Raytheon Company and Motorola, Inc. The Company is permitted
under the terms of the licensing and cooperation agreements to complete the
FED Alliance by adding up to three additional major multinational companies.
Development and Protection of Proprietary Technology. The Company intends to
continue its development efforts to advance the core proprietary technology
that it has licensed from the Laboratoire d'Electronique, de Technologie et
d'Instrumentation ("LETI"), a research laboratory of the French atomic energy
agency ("CEA"). The Company, as well as its FED Alliance partners, dedicate
significant resources to developing and protecting their intellectual
property. Through cross licensing agreements all patent rights are shared
within the FED Alliance. At present, PixTech and its partners have a portfolio
comprising more than 300 patents and patent applications.
Development of technical Materials and Component Partnerships. In certain
specific areas, such as materials and development of equipment, the Company is
developing technical partnerships with laboratories and companies that have
the ability to accelerate these developments. For example, PixTech has ongoing
cooperation programs on phosphor materials and special metal alloys.
THE FED ALLIANCE
A fundamental element of the Company's business strategy has been to form an
alliance (the "FED Alliance") with a limited number of leading companies that
are committed to the development and manufacturing of FED products. The
Company currently has agreements with Futaba Corporation ("Futaba"), Raytheon
Company ("Raytheon") and Motorola, Inc. ("Motorola"), and is seeking to enter
into a maximum of three additional FED Alliance contracts. In addition, Texas
Instruments Incorporated ("Texas Instruments") was a member of the FED
Alliance from June 1993 to March 1996.
Each agreement signed between the Company and a FED Alliance member provides
the member with a license to all FED technology from LETI, the Company, and
the other FED Alliance partners, a transfer of know-how from the Company, as
well as access to PixTech's pilot line in Montpellier. Each FED Alliance
agreement also provides PixTech with licensing and royalty revenues, as well
as a royalty free license to the FED Alliance member's FED background
technology and improvements in such technology occurring for a period of three
years following the date of the agreement, with rights to sub-license.
Following the three year period, the FED Alliance member has the option to
extend its membership for a two year period, including cross licensing of
subsequent technology improvements, or to terminate membership. For Futaba,
this three-year period expired in January 1997, and to date, Futaba has not
exercised its renewal option. For Raytheon and Motorola, this three-year
period ends in June 1997 and June 1998 respectively. PixTech's license to
technology developed by a member of the FED Alliance during the term of the
membership survives termination of such member's FED Alliance agreement.
To date, the FED Alliance efforts have resulted in significant achievements.
Futaba and Motorola are developing their own large production capacity for
FEDs, with the intention of expanding FED's share of the FPD market. At a
recent electronics show in Japan, Futaba presented its first two products, and
is now delivering samples in Japan.
4
COMPANY TECHNOLOGY
The basic principle used in FEDs is the same as in conventional CRTs. In
both technologies, electrons are extracted from a source (the "cathode") and
collected by a phosphor-coated screen (the "anode") held at positive voltage
to accelerate electrons. The electrons travel in a vacuum between the cathode
and the anode. The phosphor coating is a cathodoluminescent material, meaning
that it emits light when hit by electrons. Color is created by using different
colored phosphors and by directing the electrons so that they address each
different color phosphor separately.
The Company's proprietary technology represents advances developed by LETI,
the Company and FED Alliance members on the basic Spindt Cathode FED
technology. In a FED, each picture element (pixel) on the screen has multiple
electron sources from an array of electron-emitting microtips. The emitting
cathode surface, organized into a matrix of rows and columns, is held closely
to the receiving anode. Selection of cathode row and column voltages
determines which pixel will be illuminated.
A FED color display can be designed using either a low voltage or high
voltage structure between the anode and the cathode. The advantages of a high
voltage anode structure are that well characterized CRT phosphors can be used,
with high luminous efficiency. The drawbacks are that the use of high
voltage--at least 6,000 volts--between cathode and anode, requires development
of a spacer and assembly technology before production of such high voltage
FEDs can be contemplated. By using LETI's patented "switched anode"
technology, a low-voltage design significantly decreases the complexity and
cost of the manufacturing process of the device. In addition, this design
results in improved color purity and potentially higher resolution. However,
as the result of the low voltage, there is an inherent limitation to the
luminous efficiency of usable phosphors which prevents low-voltage FEDs from
attaining the lowest power consumption and higher brightness levels.
PixTech's cathode technology can be incorporated with equal performance and
cost effectiveness in the design of high voltage FEDs for large screen
applications or low voltage FEDs for smaller screen applications. Within the
FED Alliance, members are working both on high voltage and low voltage FED
product introduction programs. PixTech believes that the low voltage switched-
anode technology is the most cost effective solution for displays of 12 inches
(30 cm) or less, and that high voltage FED technology, with further
development, could address larger performance requirements.
PRODUCTS
In December 1995, the Company shipped its first commercial product, a 5.2-
inch (13 cm) 1/4 VGA monochrome display, FE-532M. This product is now
currently produced at the pilot production facility in Montpellier. It is sold
in limited quantities to OEMs for evaluation in the industrial,
instrumentation, medical and transportation markets.
The Company expects to introduce two additional commercial products during
1997: a high-brightness version of its 5.2-inch (13 cm) monochrome display,
and a 5-inch (12.7 cm) full color display.
In addition, the Company has from time to time sold FED cathodes to members
of the FED Alliance, with the goal of both supporting such members'
development efforts as well as facilitating the move by such members to pilot
production.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Company is focusing its research and development efforts in three areas:
(i) display performance enhancement, (ii) manufacturing efficiency, and (iii)
scaling-up of the technology to 15-inch (38 cm) and larger displays.
Display Performance Enhancement. Key elements of display performance are
brightness, and the display's stability over time (display reliability), as
well as power efficiency. PixTech is seeking to balance
5
luminous efficiency with power efficiency to produce bright, but low power-
consumption displays. Display reliability is heavily dependent upon the
manufacturing process used in assembling the displays as well as upon the
characteristics of the phosphors used on the anode. In order to produce color
displays that will provide the product life necessary for most applications,
the Company believes it will need to make further advances in phosphors and
related manufacturing technologies.
Second Generation Manufacturing Processes. Improvements in manufacturing
efficiency of FEDs can be obtained by simplifying manufacturing processes and
reducing the equipment costs associated with specific FED processes. PixTech
has a development program aimed at reducing the number of masking layers in
the cathode process. Furthermore, PixTech is pursuing the development of novel
lithography techniques for the small hole printing operations involved in the
cathode process.
Large Screen Development. PixTech has begun a technology development program
in cooperation with a major Japanese CRT manufacturer to demonstrate the large
display (15-inch (38 cm) and larger) capability of FED technology. Under a
contract with the CRT manufacturer, specific demonstration displays will be
jointly developed integrating processes and components from the CRT
manufacturer and PixTech. In February 1996, the Company acquired certain
patents and know-how in high voltage display construction which, combined with
PixTech cathode technology, establish a solid foundation for this development
program.
The Company's partners in these development tasks are primarily the FED
Alliance members and LETI. However, in certain specific areas, such as
materials and equipment development, the Company is developing technical
partnerships with laboratories and companies that have the ability to
accelerate these developments.
A significant portion of the Company's research and development activities
are carried out at LETI, a laboratory under the CEA. The Research and
Development Agreement between the CEA and PixTech (the "LETI Research
Agreement") provides for the Company and the CEA to fund equally research and
development activities at LETI in the FED field (the "Program"). The LETI
Research Agreement provides for the CEA to perform this research and
development work exclusively for PixTech. Under the LETI Research Agreement,
the CEA and PixTech jointly own FED technology developed by both parties under
the Program, and the CEA and PixTech are obligated to license to each other
technology developed solely by either party under the Program. The CEA's
rights in such technology have been exclusively licensed to PixTech under a
License Agreement (the "LETI License Agreement"). The Program has resulted in
the filing of numerous additional patent applications, which include a number
of improvements over the original FED technology developed by LETI. The
Program began on January 1, 1993 and was extended for a second three-year
period ending on January 1, 1999, subject to further extension by mutual
agreement of the parties.
The Company's research and development expenses in the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996 were $15.8 million, as compared to $15.6 million in 1995.
MANUFACTURING
Pilot Line Facility. In November 1994, the Company opened its Montpellier,
France, pilot manufacturing facility. This facility is presently producing
small quantities of displays to support the introduction of PixTech's 5.2-inch
(13 cm) products on the market, while establishing manufacturing know-how to
support the scale-up of production to large volume. The Company's Montpellier
facility has approximately 27,900 square feet (2,600 square meters) of space
and contains approximately 10,900 square feet (1,000 square meters) of clean
room ranging from class 10 to class 1000. The Company believes that it could
obtain additional space at the site for further expansion, if desirable. As of
December 31, 1996, the Company had 118 employees engaged in process
development and operations at this facility. FED Alliance members have access
to the Montpellier facility for training purposes and for development and
improvement of the manufacturing technology.
The Company was able to fabricate the first defect free display at this site
in February 1995. This was achieved through the closest replication of
processes which were developed at LETI, within a pure research
6
laboratory environment staffed by highly skilled personnel. Since that time,
the primary focus of PixTech's Montpellier facility has been to manage the
transition towards a well characterized, fully understood, and stabilized
manufacturing process that could be implemented on high productivity
manufacturing tools, operated by conventional manufacturing personnel in order
to support large volume low cost production.
While the Company is continuing development efforts to improve manufacturing
efficiencies, the Company believes it has demonstrated yield levels in
manufacturing processes that are compatible with the installation of the
technology in a large volume manufacturing line. However, in order to
demonstrate the low cost potential of its FED technology, the Company will
need to improve its manufacturing yields.
Yields. Key factors in the manufacturing cost equation include unit plate
cost, yields of cathodes and anodes per plate, and yield of the assembly
process. Unit plate cost is a function of process complexity, equipment cost
and productivity, materials cost and labor content. In the typical evolution
of novel microelectronics process technologies, the early output of product is
in general associated with low yield, resulting in high product cost. The
design and successful execution of a yield improvement program is a
prerequisite to production volume scale-up.
Yields are a function of particulate defect density, design margin, and
process uniformity over plates, from plate to plate in a lot, and from lot to
lot. Over the past eighteen months, PixTech has developed a better
understanding of yield limiting factors in its FED. Root cause analysis has
lead to the separate identification of yield detractors associated with
facility and plate handling methods, process uniformity associated with
certain pieces of equipment, and margins in product design. This understanding
is the result of extensive in-process monitoring, statistical process control
and process variations using design of experiment methodologies, as well as an
exhaustive analysis of rejects.
As a result of this on-going program, major progress has been made in yield
improvement and in the understanding of defect mechanisms. The overall output
of a manufacturing line is conditioned by average yield, but a good indication
of the potential of a technology is given by the best yielding lot. After
seeing progress in the best yielding lots, the average yield is then increased
by reduction in process spread and lot to lot variations. The Company's best
yielding lots on critical parts of the process have shown commercially
acceptable levels, while the average yield remains below this level because of
the wide distribution resulting from various factors including manual handling
and processing of plates.
Manufacturing Partnership. The Company believes that, by developing a
partnership with a large volume manufacturer of AMLCDs, PixTech would be able
to rapidly leverage the high productivity tools and manufacturing know-how
established for LCD production, and draw the cost benefits of its simpler FED
process. The manufacture of FED cathodes and anodes involves thin film
deposition of metals and dielectric materials, and micro-lithography and
etching of fine patterns, which steps are also the basic process steps
required in the manufacturing of AMLCDs. On the other hand, the Company is
aware of significant differences in the production processes of AMLCDs and
FEDs. It is expected that processing FEDs on the high productivity AMLCD
production equipment set with automated plate handling systems will lead to
low defect density and increased process uniformity, both essential
ingredients to achieve a narrow distribution of high yielding lots.
In November 1996, the Company executed a Memorandum of Understanding with
Unipac Optoelectronics Corporation, a Taiwanese large volume AMLCD
manufacturer. The preliminary tests conducted by the Company demonstrated
basic feasibility of the cathode process transfer to the manufacturing
partner. The Company assigned a team of engineers to work with this
manufacturing partner's engineers at the LCD facility and assist them in the
full installation and qualification of PixTech's glass panel manufacturing
process, selectively adding to such partner's installed equipment set to
permit the FED manufacturing process. The Memorandum of Understanding provides
that PixTech and this manufacturing partner will negotiate in good faith to
enter into a definitive display foundry agreement. The Company anticipates
that it will have to fund the acquisition of some or all of the new equipment
necessary to commence large volume manufacturing.
7
SALES AND DISTRIBUTION
PixTech is currently producing monochrome 5.2-inch (13 cm) displays for sale
in limited quantities. The Company's product offerings consist of full display
modules which incorporate the glass panel, drivers, controller, and
interfacing circuit boards. The Company is marketing its displays to OEMs and
systems integrators, including members of the FED Alliance. The Company is
focusing its marketing efforts in the instrumentation, military, medical,
industrial and transportation market segments. The Company is marketing its
products directly to large OEM accounts and plans to develop a network of
sales representatives and distributors to address specific portions of the
market and to offer customer support. The Company supports its marketing
efforts with trade show attendance, advertising, and participation in leading
technical conferences, and has been receiving coverage in industry wide
magazines.
The Company anticipates that OEMs will require manufacturing quality
assurance and controls and evidence of the Company's ability to manufacture
adequate quantities of displays on a timely and reliable basis. In addition,
the Company anticipates that sales and distribution of its products may be
delayed by the need to have its displays incorporated into an OEM's design
cycle. Factors affecting the length of this delay include the type of
application, and whether the displays are being designed into new products or
fitted into existing applications. For certain products, this delay
attributable to a manufacturer's design cycle may be a year or longer.
COMPETITION
The market for flat panel display products is intensely competitive and is
expected to remain intensely competitive. The market is currently dominated by
LCD technology. Certain LCD manufacturers, such as Sharp, NEC and Hitachi,
have substantially greater name recognition and financial, technological,
marketing and other resources than the Company, and LCD manufacturers have
made and continue to make substantial investments in improving LCD technology,
manufacturing processes and in manufacturing facilities. The recent
substantial increases in world-wide manufacturing capacity of FPDs and the
entrance of new competitors in the FPD market has caused over-supply
conditions leading to dramatic reductions in the price of FPDs over the last
year. In order to effectively compete, the Company could be required to
increase the performance of its products or to reduce prices. In the event of
price reductions, the Company's ability to maintain gross margins would depend
on its ability to reduce its cost of sales.
There are a number of domestic and international companies developing and
marketing display devices using alternative technologies, such as passive
matrix LCDs, active matrix LCDs (AMLCDs), vacuum fluorescent displays,
electroluminescent panels, and plasma panels.
In addition, some of the basic FED technology is in the public domain and,
as a result, the Company has a number of potential direct competitors
developing FED displays. The Company is aware of several other companies which
are developing FED technologies similar to that of the Company, including but
not limited to, Sony, Fujitsu, and Samsung as well as smaller companies,
including Candescent, FED Corporation, Micron Display Technology and SI
Diamond Technology Incorporated. Many of these companies have made, and may
continue to make, significant advancements to their FED technology.
Most U.S. display manufacturers have joined the U.S. Display Consortium, a
nonprofit industry/government partnership formed to develop the U.S.
infrastructure required to support a domestic manufacturing capability for
high definition displays.
Although the Company has proprietary rights to significant technological
advances in FED technology, its technology and products are still in the
development stage. There can be no assurance that such potential competitors
have not developed or will not develop comparable or superior FED technology.
Many of these developers of alternative FPD and competing FED technologies
have substantially greater name recognition and financial, research and
development, manufacturing and marketing resources than the Company, and have
made and continue to make substantial investments in improving their
technologies and manufacturing processes. The
8
members of the FED Alliance may also sell FED products based on the shared
technology of the FED Alliance in markets that the Company has targeted or
will target for sales of its FED products. In the event efforts by the
Company's competitors result in the development of products that offer
significant advantages over the Company's products, and the Company is unable
to improve its technology or develop or acquire alternative technology that is
more competitive, the Company would be adversely affected.
PATENTS AND TRADE SECRETS
As of December 31, 1996, the Company held or had license to 96 U.S. patents
and 134 pending U.S patent applications. The Company also actively pursues
foreign patent protection in countries of interest to the Company. As of
December 31, 1996, the Company had filed, or was licensed under, 77 patent
applications in foreign countries.
The Company's fundamental technology was developed by LETI and licensed to
PixTech in 1992. Under the LETI License Agreement, which has a term of twenty
years, the CEA granted the Company an exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing
license, with the right to sub-license, of all FED technology developed by the
CEA (including LETI) prior to the effective date of the LETI License
Agreement, as well as of the CEA's rights in technology developed pursuant to
the LETI Research Agreement.
In addition to the payment of royalties on sales of products incorporating
the licensed technology, the Company must pass through to CEA a percentage of
any lump sum sub-license fees earned after 1993 and royalties on the licensed
product sales by the sub-licensees. All technology licensed to the Company
pursuant to the LETI License Agreement is sublicensed to the other members of
the FED Alliance under the terms of the FED Alliance agreements.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 1996, the Company had 136 full-time employees, and 13
part-time employees. The average number of employees was 51, 90 and 143 during
1994, 1995 and 1996, respectively. At December 31, 1996, 21 employees were
engaged in research and development, 105 in process development and
operations, 8 in marketing and sales and 15 in general and administrative
functions. The Company's success will depend in large part on its ability to
attract and retain skilled and experienced employees. None of the Company's
employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and the Company
considers its relations with its employees to be good.
ITEM 1A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
As of December 31, 1996, the current executive officers of the Company were
as follows:
NAME AGE POSITION HELD WITH THE COMPANY
---- --- -------------------------------------------
Jean-Luc Grand-Clement.............. 57 President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
Francis Courreges................... 44 Executive Vice President
Michel Garcia....................... 49 Vice President, Industrial Partners
Thomas M. Holzel.................... 56 Vice President of Marketing and Sales
Richard Rodriguez................... 52 Vice President of Operations
Yves Morel.......................... 31 Director of Finance and Administration
Each officer's term of office extends until the first meeting of the Board
of Directors following the next annual meeting of stockholders and until a
successor is elected and qualified.
9
Jean-Luc Grand-Clement, a co-founder of the Company, has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
since the Company's inception in 1992. Prior to founding the Company, Mr.
Grand-Clement co-founded European Silicon Structures ("ES2"), a European
applications specific integrated circuit supplier for cell based and full
custom CMOS products, and served as Chief Executive Officer and then as
Chairman of the Board of Directors of ES2 from its founding in 1985 until
1991. From 1967 to 1978 and from 1982 to 1985, Mr. Grand-Clement held various
positions with Motorola, Inc., most recently as Vice-President and Assistant
General Manager of the Motorola European Semiconductor Group from 1983 to
1985. From 1978 to 1982, Mr. Grand-Clement was the Managing Director of
Eurotechnique, a MOS semiconductor design and fabrication joint venture
between National Semiconductor and Saint-Gobain. Mr. Grand-Clement graduated
from Ecole Nationale Superieure des Telecommunications in Paris.
Francis Courreges was appointed Executive Vice President of the Company in
July 1995. Before that, he served as Vice-President of Marketing and
Development of the Company since July 1993. Prior to joining the Company, Mr.
Courreges was a co-founder of ES2, and served as Manager of direct write
technology for MOS and gate array products from 1985 to 1991 and Vice-
President of Marketing from 1991 to 1992. Prior to joining ES2, Mr. Courreges
was product engineering manager at Sierra Semiconductor from 1984 to 1985. He
held various process and product engineering positions at Electronic Arrays
from 1977 to 1979, at National Semiconductor, from 1979 to 1980 and at
Eurotechnique, from 1980 to 1984. Mr. Courreges graduated from Ecole Nationale
Superieure des Arts et Metiers and holds M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Materials
Science from Stanford University.
Michel Garcia is a co-founder of the Company and was appointed Vice
President, Industrial Partners in August 1995. Before that, he had served as
Vice-President of Equipment Engineering since the Company's inception. In
1986, Mr. Garcia founded Microsolve, a semiconductor processing equipment
company, which he managed for five years. From 1981 to 1985, he served as
operations manager at Eurotechnique, which became known as Thomson
Microelectronics in 1983; from 1979 to 1981, he served as fab process manager
at Eurotechnique; and from 1977 to 1979 he served as a process engineer at
Motorola. In 1970, Mr. Garcia graduated from Ecole Nationale Superieure
d'Electronique et de Radioelectricite de Grenoble, and he received a degree of
Doctor of Microelectronics from Grenoble University.
Thomas M. Holzel was appointed Vice President of Marketing and Sales of the
Company in July 1995. Mr. Holzel served as Marketing Manager of Display
Devices at Raytheon Company from 1988 to 1995. In 1981, he founded Arcturus,
Inc., a company that developed the first computer compatible large screen
displays, and was president of Arcturus from 1981 to 1988. Prior to that, Mr.
Holzel was Director of Industrial Marketing at Advent Corporation. Mr. Holzel
holds an economics degree from Dartmouth College.
Richard Rodriguez joined PixTech in May 1996 as Vice-President of
Operations. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Rodriguez spent 22 years with
IBM. He was Director of Operations, managing three advanced semiconductor
lines at IBM France's Corbeil Plant from 1991 to 1994, before directing the
reengineering program of the plant since early 1994. Prior to such positions,
Mr. Rodriguez held a number of senior manufacturing and engineering management
positions as Director of a 500 person CMOS facility, US based program manager,
process and test engineering, quality assurance. Mr. Rodgriguez graduated from
Ecole Superieure de Mecanique at d'Electricite, received a postgraduate degree
in Electronics from Orsay University and holds a degree from Institut
d'Administration des Entreprises.
Yves Morel joined the Company in April 1994 as Director of Finance and
Administration. From 1993 to 1994, Mr. Morel was Finance Manager of
International Software Enterprise, a hardware and software distribution group.
From 1992 to 1993, Mr. Morel served as Controller at Genoyer S.A., a
manufacturing and distribution company in the industrial valve and piping
field. From 1989 to 1992, Mr. Morel was employed at Price Waterhouse. Mr.
Morel graduated from the Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales and he obtained
a Diplome d'Etudes Superieures Comptables et Financieres.
10
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company's corporate offices are in an approximately 11,000 square foot
(1,000 square meter) facility located in Rousset, France. The Company owns the
facility and occupies approximately 5,500 square feet (500 square meters) of
floor space. A third party rents the rest of the area under a lease which
terminates in 1999. The Company leases a facility including a clean room,
office area, and engineering laboratories in Montpellier, France, having
27,986 square feet (2,600 square meters) of space. The Montpellier lease
terminates in 2003, with an option to renew.
Also, the company leases an 8,000 square foot (750 square meter) facility
including an office area and engineering laboratory area in Santa Clara,
California. The lease on this facility terminates in 1999.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In May 1994, an individual commenced a lawsuit in France against the CEA and
the Company alleging infringement of a French patent (the " Patent") In
addition to the French patent, the plaintiff held patents in the United States
and through the European Patent Office, in each case concerning a specific
method for addressing a display which uses microtips through the screen's
controller. The trial in this lawsuit took place in September 1996. The
decision of the judge made in November 1996 was that only the electronic
circuitry used by PixTech to drive the panels was infringing the Patent.
Therefore, CEA and PixTech were barred from producing, using or selling this
electronic circuitry as well as FED displays including such circuitry in
France. CEA notified PixTech in January 1997 that CEA had acquired the Patent,
as well as all its extensions outside France from such individual, and that
PixTech would immediately be licensed to the recently acquired patents, with
an exclusive right to sublicense.
In accordance with PixTech's license agreement with the CEA, the CEA has
assumed responsibility for the cost of common defense counsel, and has assumed
settlement cost with the plaintiff, with the exception of approximately
$40,000 that PixTech has agreed to assume as a contribution to such
settlement.
To the best of the Company's knowledge, there are no claims or litigation
which could have an adverse material impact on the assets, financial
conditions, results or the activity of the Company.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The Company's Common Stock commenced trading on July 18, 1995 on the Nasdaq
National Market under the symbol "PIXT". As of March 3, 1997, there were 68
holders of record of the Company's common stock.
On February 20, 1996, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 150,000 shares
of its Common Stock at a per share exercise price of $11.67 to PanoCorp., Inc.
as partial consideration for the purchase by the Company of substantially all
of the assets of PanoCorp. The Company relied on Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act") for an exemption from the
registration requirements of Section 5 of the Act, as the transaction entailed
no offers or sales to the public.
The following table sets forth, for the fiscal periods indicated, the range
of high and low closing prices for the Company's Common Stock on the Nasdaq
National Market.
HIGH LOW
------- ------
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
Third Quarter (beginning July 18, 1995).................. $10 $6 3/8
Fourth Quarter........................................... $10 $9 1/8
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
First Quarter............................................ $14 $8 1/4
Second Quarter........................................... $10 3/8 $6 5/8
Third Quarter............................................ $ 7 1/4 $4 5/8
Fourth Quarter........................................... $ 6 3/4 $3 3/8
11
The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its capital
stock. The Company currently anticipates that it will retain all future
earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of its business and does
not anticipate paying any cash dividends on its Common Stock in the
foreseeable future.
Since February 12, 1997, the shares of the Common Stock of the Company have
been listed on the European Association of Securities Dealers Automated
Quotation ("Easdaq") System under the Symbol "PIXT". See Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements--Note 20--Subsequent Events.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial data set forth below as of December 31, 1996 and 1995
and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996 are
derived from the Company's financial statements included elsewhere in this
Report, which have been audited by Ernst & Young, independent public
accountants. The selected financial data set forth below as of December 31,
1994, 1993 and 1992 and for the years ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992
are derived from audited financial statements not included in this Report.
This data should be read in conjunction with the Company's financial
statements and related notes thereto and "Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" under Item 7 of this report.
FISCAL YEAR
-------- ---------------------- ----
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
-------- ------- ------ ----- ----
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE)
OPERATIONS
Total Revenues........................ $ 7,644 $11,513 6,225 2,328 --
Loss from operations.................. (12,041) (9,278) (4,940) (906) (551)
Net income (loss)..................... (11,719) (6,305) (2,979) (120) (506)
Net income (loss) per share........... (1.44) (0.82) (0.51)
Shares used in computing net income
(loss) per share..................... 8,137 7,697 5,840
BALANCE SHEET
Working deficit / capital............. (859) 15,919 813 7,967 367
Total assets, less current assets..... 19,701 18,569 15,300 1,663 549
Long term liabilities, less current
portion.............................. 6,743 9,958 6,626 341 --
Stockholders' equity.................. 12,099 24,530 9,487 9,289 436
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OVERVIEW
The Company was founded in June 1992 to develop and commercialize FEDs.
Since its inception, the Company has been a development stage company devoting
a majority of its resources to conducting research and development, recruiting
personnel, establishing a pilot manufacturing facility, forming the FED
Alliance and raising capital. To date, most of the Company's revenues have
been cooperation and license revenues under agreements with members of the FED
Alliance and revenues from funding under grants from the French government and
the European Union. In the future, the Company expects to generate its revenue
primarily from two sources: (i) sale of products, from which the Company has
only recorded limited revenues to date, and (ii) cooperation and license
revenues, including royalties, under the FED Alliance agreements. The Company
does not anticipate receiving any significant revenues from the sale of its
products until the commencement of volume production and anticipates that it
will not maintain the level of cooperation and license revenues from members
of the FED Alliance it has historically achieved until one or more of the
existing members of the FED Alliance commences volume production, or until the
Company succeeds in expanding the FED Alliance.
In view of the development stage of the Company and the current transition
from revenues solely from the FED Alliance to the addition of product sales
revenues, the Company believes that historical financial results are not
meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of future
performance.
12
The Company's expectations regarding its sources of future revenue are
forward-looking statements. The amount, time and source of revenue generation
will be affected by numerous matters including the availability of funds to
finance its activities until volume shipments of products begin; the continued
development of the Company's products, including the cost-effective
reproduction of the favorable characteristics demonstrated by the Company's
current prototypes in the context of commercial production; the successful
transition of the Company's prototype manufacturing processes to commercial
manufacturing processes to achieve commercially viable yields; the successful
development of a volume supply of FED products under contract manufacturing,
the successful commercialization of FEDs by other members of the FED Alliance,
and the successful development of sufficient market demand for the Company's
products.
The Company's products and its manufacturing processes are still in the
early stages of development and testing. To date, the Company has only shipped
limited quantities of products incorporating FED technology. The Company's
only commercially available displays are a 5.2-inch (13 cm) monochrome
display, offered for sale as part of an evaluation kit. To date, among the
members of the FED Alliance, only Futaba has announced the availability of
commercial products in limited quantities.
Pursuant to a license agreement with the CEA, the Company is obligated to
make royalty payments on its product sales and to pass-through a portion of
certain up-front license fees earned after 1993 and royalties on sales of
products by the Company and such sublicensees (the "LETI License Agreement").
An amount of $1.0 million, reflected under the caption "Cost of revenues,
license fees and royalties" was accrued in 1995 with respect to such royalties
and pass-through expenses payable to CEA. An amount of $45,000 was recognized
in 1996, including $40,000 related to the termination of a litigation with an
individual in which CEA and PixTech were both involved. See Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements--Note 12--Litigation.
All of the Company's expenses to date, except royalties and pass-through
expenses payable to CEA and tax expenses directly associated with revenues
from FED Alliance members, have been recorded as operating expenses, since the
Company has not shipped products in quantities sufficient to determine a
meaningful cost of products sold category.
The Company has incurred cumulative losses of $21.6 million from inception
to December 31, 1996. The Company has incurred operating losses every quarter
since inception, except during the three-month period ending December 31,
1995, and expects to incur additional operating losses. The magnitude and
duration of the Company's losses will depend on a number of factors within and
outside of the Company's control, including the Company's ability to expand
the FED Alliance and the rate at which it can successfully manufacture and
commercialize its FEDs, if at all, and the related costs of such efforts.
Successful commercialization of such displays will in turn depend on a number
of factors, including the successful development of sufficient market demand
for the Company's products.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Cooperation and License Revenues. The Company recognized cooperation and
license revenues under the FED Alliance agreements of $9.9 million in 1995 and
$5.6 million in 1996. These revenues represent the achievement by the Company
of contractual milestones with FED Alliance members. However, the Company has
now recorded most of the expected revenues associated with the achievement of
contractual milestones with existing FED Alliance members and future FED
Alliance milestone revenues are mostly subject to expansion of the FED
Alliance. The Company recognizes milestone-related revenue under FED Alliance
agreements when it is earned as a result of meeting the applicable milestone.
In 1996, the Company recognized $1.3 million, representing the value of in-
kind payments with respect to technology transfer made by the Company to Texas
Instruments under the Cooperation and License Agreement with Texas Instruments
executed on June 29, 1993 and terminated on July 15, 1996. To the extent the
members of the FED Alliance successfully incorporate the cross-licensed
technology in products, the Company will recognize royalty revenues as such
members sell the products. The Company also performs services in the field of
technology development for FED Alliance members; the related revenues are
recognized when the services are rendered and the revenues become irrevocable.
13
Product Sales. The Company recognized product sales of $808,000 in 1995 and
$791,000 in 1996. Product sales in 1995 were related to the shipment of
several types of cathodes to members of the FED Alliance, with a goal of
supporting FED Alliance members' own development programs, and also related to
limited quantities of displays shipped in December 1995. Product sales in 1996
represented the shipment of FED displays in limited quantities for evaluation
by OEM customers, demonstration units and FED cathodes to members of the FED
Alliance. Although the Company expects to increase product shipments in 1997,
the Company does not expect to achieve volume production in 1997, since its
Asian based production source will not be able to manufacture FED displays
before 1998.
Other Revenues. Other revenues is comprised of funding under French or
European Union development contracts and other miscellaneous revenues. Other
revenues were $840,000 in 1995 and $1,413,000 in 1996, reflecting additional
public funding as a result of a development contract entered into in 1993 and
1994.
In November 1993, the Company entered into an agreement with the European
Union, as part of a European Strategic Programme for Research and Development
in Information Technologies Program. This contract was started in December
1993 for a two-year period. Total funding under this contract approximates
$467,000 over the period of the contract. The Company recognized $241,000 in
1994 and $226,000 in 1995. No revenue was recorded with respect to this
funding in 1996.
In December 1994, the Company was awarded a grant from the French Ministry
of Industry, Telecommunications and Foreign Trade to support manufacturing of
FEDs. This grant covers technology development by the Company from October
1994 to October 1996. Total potential funding under this contract is
approximately $2.8 million. The Company records deferred revenues with respect
to this grant on a pro-rata basis over the period, and recognizes portions of
this revenue when certain contractual conditions are met. At December 31, 1995
and 1996, deferred revenues in the amount of $1.9 million and $2.1 million,
respectively, were included in non-current liabilities. The Company did not
recognize any revenue under this grant in 1995; revenues of $800,000 were
recorded in 1996.
Research and Development Expenses--Acquisition of intellectual property
rights. The Company expensed $3.1 million in 1995 for the acquisition of
intellectual property rights from certain members of the FED Alliance. No such
expenses were recorded in 1996.
Other research and development expenses. Other research and development
expenses include obligations to the CEA under the LETI Research Agreement,
contract consulting fees, salaries and associated operating expenses for in-
house research and development activities and the cost of staffing and
operating the Company's pilot manufacturing facility.
Other research and development expenses increased from $12.5 million in 1995
to $15.8 million in 1996. These included expenses recorded under the LETI
Research Agreement of $1.3 million in 1995, and $644,000 in 1996. Part of the
increase recorded in 1996 in the Company's research and development expenses
is related to the launching of a new research effort in Santa Clara,
California, involving 7 technicians and engineers with a view to developing
large-size FEDs. The increase also reflects the continued development of the
Company's FED technology and manufacturing processes and the expansion of the
Company's research and development and pilot manufacturing operations to 118
employees at December 31, 1996.
Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses decreased from
$1.7 million in 1995 to $1.0 million in 1996. This 41% decrease reflects the
reallocation of a limited number of engineers from sales & marketing to
research & development. The Company believes sales and marketing expenses will
increase in the future, as contact with potential customers and shipments of
FED displays will develop.
Such expectation regarding increased product shipments and customer
contracts is a forward-looking statement, the fulfillment of which is
dependent on numerous factors. See Item 1. Business--Strategy. In addition, in
order to achieve its objectives, the Company will need to expand its business
rapidly and add sales,
14
marketing, manufacturing, administrative and management personnel, as well as
establish and manage its international operations.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses
increased from $2.2 million in 1995 to $2.7 million in 1996. These increased
expenses reflect an overall increase in administrative and support activities
within the Company, including personnel additions, legal fees in connection
with FED Alliance agreements and other professional fees resulting from
becoming a public company.
Interest Income (Expense), Net. Interest income is comprised of interest on
cash and short term investments. Interest expense is comprised of interest
payable on long-term obligations. Net interest expense was $27,000 in 1995,
while the Company recorded a net income of $66,000 in 1996 as the effect of
the decrease in long-term liabilities outweighed the effect of declining cash
balances.
Currency Fluctuations. Although a significant portion of the Company's
revenues are denominated in U.S. dollars, a substantial portion of the
Company's operating expenses are denominated in French francs. Gains and
losses on the conversion to U.S. dollars of assets and liabilities denominated
in French francs may contribute to fluctuations in the Company's results of
operations, which are reported in U.S. dollars. The Company recorded net
foreign exchange gains of $280,000 in 1995 and $256,000 in 1996. The Company
cannot predict the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on future operating
results. To date, the Company has not undertaken hedging transactions to cover
its currency exposure, but it may do so in the future.
Income tax. The Company has recognized French income tax benefits of $5.1
million since inception, including $1.7 million in 1994 and $2.7 million in
1995. These income tax benefits represent tax credits for research and
development activities conducted in France and the benefits of net operating
loss carryforwards, net of valuation allowance. The increase in tax benefit
from 1994 to 1996 is due to the expansion of the Company's research and
development activities. As of December 31, 1996, a valuation allowance of
$10.9 million was provided against a net deferred tax asset of $16 million.
The tax credits for research and development activities will be paid in cash
to the Company if the Company is not able to credit them against future income
tax liabilities within three fiscal years. In Januray 1997 , the Company
collected $29, representing income tax benefit recorded in 1992.
The Company did not recognize any income tax benefit in 1996. The Company
does not expect to record significant additional tax credits for research and
development activities, if any, in the foreseeable future, as the benefit is
based on increases in eligible research and development expenses in a given
year over the two previous fiscal years.
As of December 31, 1996, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards in
France of approximately $18.5 million of which an aggregate $12.3 million will
expire in 2000 and 2001 if they are not utilized.
15
QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents certain unaudited quarterly financial
information for each quarter in 1995 and 1996. In the opinion of the Company's
management, this information has been prepared on the same basis as the
audited consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Report
and includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments)
necessary to present fairly the unaudited quarterly results set forth herein.
The Company's quarterly results are subject to fluctuations and thus, the
operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative for any
future period.
THREE MONTHS ENDED
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAR. 31, JUNE 30, SEPT. 30, DEC. 31, MAR. 31, JUNE 30, SEPT. 30, DEC. 31,
1995 1995 1995 1995 1996 1996 1996 1996
-------- -------- --------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
REVENUES:
Cooperation and license
revenues............... $ -- $ 3,000 $ 1,859 $5,006 $ 1,890 $ 2,636 $ 707 $ 207
Product sales........... 102 -- 44 662 183 178 67 363
Other revenues.......... 204 305 136 195 934 47 11 421
------- ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- -------
306 3,305 2,039 5,863 3,007 2,861 785 991
Cost of revenues:
License fees and
royalties.............. -- (600) -- (714) -- -- -- (45)
------- ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- -------
Gross margin: 306 2,705 2,039 5,149 3,007 2,861 785 946
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Research and
development:
Acquisition of
intellectual property
rights................. -- 3,111 -- -- -- -- -- --
Other................... 2,928 2,467 3,148 4,041 3,501 3,721 4,269 4 356
------- ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- -------
2,928 5,578 3,148 4,041 3,501 3,721 4,269 3 410
Sales and marketing..... 243 307 419 662 232 214 309 333
General and
administrative......... 448 465 607 631 688 787 630 599
------- ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- -------
Total operating
expenses............... 3,619 6,350 4,174 5,334 4,421 4,722 5,208 5 288
------- ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- -------
Loss from operations.... (3,313) (3,645) (2,135) (185) (1,414) (1,861) (4,423) (4 342)
Interest income
(expense), net......... (203) (69) 109 137 97 (9) 3 (25)
Foreign exchange gain
(loss)................. 675 (74) (343) 22 26 316 (137) 51
------- ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- -------
Loss before income tax
benefit................ (2,841) (3,788) (2,369) (26) (1,291) (1,554) (4,557) (4 316)
Income tax benefit...... 200 507 408 1,605 -- -- -- --
------- ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- -------
Net income (loss)....... $(2,641) $(3,281) $(1,961) $1,579 $(1,291) $(1,554) $(4,557) $(4 316)
======= ======= ======= ====== ======= ======= ======= =======
The Company expects that it will continue to experience fluctuations in its
quarterly operating results. In the past, these fluctuations have been caused
by a variety of factors, including the success of the Company in entering new
FED Alliance Agreements, achieving revenue-producing milestones under the FED
Alliance agreements, and rate of growth of the Company's research and
development activities.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company has used $13.3 million in cash to fund its operations from
inception through December 31, 1996, and $16.4 million in capital
expenditures. Through December 31, 1996, the Company has funded its operations
and capital expenditures, including expenditures made in connection with the
prosecution and maintenance of patents, primarily from sales of $34.0 million
of equity securities and $8.8 million of proceeds from borrowings and sale-
leaseback transactions. In addition, the Company has been able to acquire a
license and equipment in return for the issuance of long-term debt and capital
lease obligations in the aggregate amount of $2.7 million, thereby partially
reducing its need to expend cash.
16
Capital expenditures were $2.5 million in 1995 and $5.9 million in 1996.
These capital expenditures were primarily for leasehold improvements, facility
expansion, and equipment installed in its pilot manufacturing facility. As of
December 31, 1996, the Company had commitments for capital expenditures of
approximately $70,000.
The Company has existing contracts with two different French ministries
providing for the payment of grants to the Company totaling approximately $5.0
million, of which the Company has collected an aggregate amount of $1.5
million through December 31, 1996 and for which the Company has recognized
revenues in the aggregate amount of $800,000 included in "other revenues".
$2.2 million of these grants are payable in three installments subject to
achievement by the Company of hiring and capital expenditure milestones by
December 31, 1996. The Company collected the first installment, representing
$670,000 in 1995, which is included under the caption "deferred revenues--long
term"; $2.8 million of these grants are payable in four installments (see
"Other revenues"). The Company collected the first installment, representing
$800,000, in January 1996 and recognized it as a revenue. This installment is
irrevocably granted to the Company. In January 1997, the Company collected the
second installment, representing $707,000, which has not been recorded in the
1996 profit and loss account. When collected, the balance of this grant may
have to be repaid if the Company does not conduct a specified technical
program or does not comply with other terms of the grant, including certain
restrictions on transfer of the Company's technology.
The Company believes that cash available at December 31, 1996 together with
the estimated proceeds of its sales of shares in February 1997 (See Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements--Note 20--Subsequent Events), anticipated
funds from the FED Alliance agreements and from the grants described above
will be sufficient to meet its cash requirements, including repayment of the
current portion of its long term obligations in the amount of $3.8 million at
December 31, 1996, for at least 12 months.
The Company will require substantial funds to conduct research, development
and testing, to develop and expand commercial-scale manufacturing systems and
to market any resulting products. Changes in technology or a growth of sales
beyond currently anticipated levels will also require further investment. The
Company's capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the rate
at which the Company can develop its products, the market acceptance of such
products, the levels of promotion and advertising required to launch such
products and attain a competitive position in the marketplace and the response
of competitors to the Company's products. There can be no assurance that funds
for these purposes, whether from equity or debt financing, or other sources,
will be available when needed or on terms acceptable to the Company.
OUTLOOK: ISSUES AND RISKS
The Company is focused on the continued development of the FED technology,
the strengthening and expansion of the FED Alliance, the improvement of
manufacturing yields, and the reliability testing of new products which the
Company expects will lead to the shipment of commercial products in the near
future. In evaluating this outlook, the following risks and issues, among
others, which are common with development stage companies, should be
considered.
Revenues from FED Alliance members. Future technology transfer payments to
the Company under the FED Alliance agreements are based on the achievement by
specified dates of certain technical, manufacturing and marketing milestones.
There can be no assurance as to whether or when such milestones will be
attained. To date, the Company has recorded most of the expected revenues
associated with the achievement of contractual milestones with existing FED
Alliance members and certain of the future FED Alliance milestone revenues are
subject to expansion of the Alliance. There can be no assurance that the
Company will be successful in entering into any new FED Alliance agreements
with other companies that have proprietary display-related technology, and
failure to expand the FED Alliance could adversely affect the Company. In
addition, a decision by any member of the FED Alliance to limit or terminate
its development effort in the area of field emission displays could have a
material adverse effect on the Company, and the Company could lose a material
portion of its revenue base while still bearing significant costs.
17
Products and manufacturing processes under development, Need to increase
Yields, Costs of Products. The Company's products and its manufacturing are in
the development stage. The Company has to date encountered a number of delays
in the development of its products and manufacturing processes. No assurance
can be given that further delays will not occur. The Company does not plan to
increase production from its pilot facility beyond low volume levels. The
Company believes that contract manufacturing with its Asian partner will make
it possible to manufacture volume quantities of FEDs at commercially
acceptable cost. However, moving from pilot production to volume production
involves a number of steps and challenges. This transition will require the
refinement of manufacturing technologies and processes, involving the
commitment of significant engineering and management resources. No assurance
can be given that the result of such development efforts will be successful.
In particular, in order to demonstrate the low cost potential of its FED
technology, the Company will need to improve its manufacturing yields. Failure
to improve manufacturing yields would have a material adverse effect on the
Company. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to implement
processes for the manufacture of volume quantities of FED products at
commercially viable cost levels or on a timely basis. If such processes are
not successfully implemented, the Company would be materially adversely
affected.
Risks Associated with Contract Manufacturing of FEDs. The Company believes
that its ability to commercialize medium to large volumes of FEDs is highly
dependent on its ability to have FEDs manufactured by a major manufacturer in
the AMLCD industry. To date, the Company has executed a Memorandum of
Understanding with Unipac, an AMLCD manufacturer based in Taiwan, and has
initiated field work with this manufacturer, but the Company has not yet
signed a definitive Display Foundry Agreement. If such contract manufacturing
agreement is not entered into on favorable terms, or on a timely basis, the
Company will not be able to ship medium to large volumes of FED products, or
to obtain a commercially acceptable cost on its FED displays. If the Company
is unable to have its FEDs manufactured in a cost effective manner, the
Company would be materially adversely affected.
Although the Company believes many FED manufacturing process steps can be
carried out with equipment similar to that used by AMLCD manufacturers,
significant capital expenditure will be required in order to install at the
contract manufacturers' facility equipment that is not common to the AMLCD
manufacturing process. In addition, the amount of the capital expenditures
required to adapt to FED manufacturing has not been quantified. There can be
no assurance that the Company will have sufficient resources to fund such
costs, once known. Further, in the event that the Company funds such capital
expenditures to adapt an AMLCD manufacturer's equipment to FED manufacturing,
there can be no assurance that such investment will be recovered by the
Company, especially in the event such manufacturing partnership is not
successful.
The Company currently does not expect to have its FED displays manufactured
by more than one AMLCD manufacturer in the foreseeable future. Should the
Company be successful in establishing a contract manufacturing relationship,
the Company's reliance on a single contract manufacturer will involve several
risks, including a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of
required products, and reduced control over the price, timeliness of delivery,
reliability and quality of finished products. Any inability to obtain timely
deliveries of products having acceptable qualities or any circumstance that
would cause the Company to delay the shipment of its products could damage
relationships with customers and have a material adverse effect on the
Company.
Competition and Competing Technologies. The market for flat panel display
products is intensely competitive and is expected to remain intensely
competitive. The market is currently dominated by products utilizing liquid
crystal display technology. LCD technology has continued to improve, and there
can be no assurance that advances in LCD technology will not overcome its
current limitations. In addition, the recent substantial increases in world-
wide manufacturing capacity of FPDs and the entrance of new competitors in the
FPD market may cause over-supply conditions leading to dramatic reductions in
the price of FPDs. In order to effectively compete, the Company could be
required to increase the performance of its products or to reduce prices. In
the event of price reductions, the Company's ability to maintain gross margins
would depend on its ability to reduce its cost of sales.
18
There are a number of domestic and international companies developing and
marketing display devices using alternative technologies, such as vacuum
fluorescent displays, electroluminescent panels and plasma panels. In
addition, some of the basic FED technology is in the public domain and, as a
result, the Company has a number of potential direct competitors developing
FED displays. In the event that efforts by the Company's competitors result in
the development of products that offer significant advantages over the
Company's products, and the Company is unable to improve its technology or
develop or acquire alternative technology that is more competitive, the
Company would be adversely affected.
No Assurance of Market Acceptance. The potential size and timing of market
opportunities targeted by PixTech and the members of the FED Alliance are
uncertain. The Company anticipates marketing its displays to original
equipment manufacturers ("OEMs"), and its success will depend on whether OEMs
select the Company's products for incorporation into their products and upon
their successful introduction of such products, as well as the successful
commercialization of products developed by members of the FED Alliance. There
can be no assurance that demand for any particular product will be sustained
or that new markets will develop as expected by the Company, or at all. The
failure of existing and new markets to develop as expected by the Company or
to be receptive to PixTech's products would have a material adverse effect on
the Company.
Patents and Protection of Proprietary Technology. The Company's ability to
compete effectively with other companies will depend, in part, on the ability
of the Company to maintain the proprietary nature of its technology. Although
the Company has been granted, has filed applications for and has been licensed
under a number of patents in the United States and foreign countries, there
can be no assurance as to the degree of protection offered by these patents,
as to the likelihood that pending patents will be issued or as to the validity
or enforceability of any issued patents. Patent applications in the United
States are maintained in secrecy until patents issue, and since publication of
discoveries in the scientific or patent literature tends to lag behind actual
discoveries by several months, the Company cannot be certain that it was the
first creator of inventions covered by pending patent applications or the
first to file patent applications on such inventions.
In addition, because of the developmental stage of the Company, claims that
the Company's products infringe on the proprietary rights of others are more
likely to be asserted after commencement of commercial sales incorporating the
Company's technology. Although the Company believes that its products do not
infringe the patents or other proprietary rights of third parties, there can
be no assurance that other third parties will not assert infringement claims
against the Company or that such claims will not be successful. There can also
be no assurance that competitors will not infringe the Company's patents. Even
successful defense and prosecution of patent suits are both costly and time-
consuming. An adverse outcome in a suit in which the Company asserts its
patent rights could result in the loss of such rights, and could subject the
Company to substantial costs and diversion of Company resources.
Foreign exchange. A large percentage of the Company's net assets and of the
Company's costs is expressed in French Francs. Fluctuations of the parity of
the US dollar versus French Franc may cause significant foreign exchange gains
or losses.
Other important factors which may impact upon the achievement of such goals
and forward-looking statements are set forth in Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10-
K, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. No assurance may be
given that the Company's strategic goals and other forward-looking statements
discussed in this section and elsewhere in this Form 10-K will be achieved.
19
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE(S)
-------
Report of Independent Accountants....................................... 21
Balance Sheets.......................................................... 22
Statements of Operations................................................ 23
Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)............................ 24-25
Statements of Cash Flows................................................ 26
Notes to Financial Statements........................................... 27-46
Financial statement schedules have been omitted
since they are not required or are inapplicable
20
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
PixTech, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PixTech, Inc.
(a development stage company) as of December 31, 1995 and 1996 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
the period from June 18, 1992 (date of inception) through December 31, 1996 and
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position
of PixTech, Inc. (a development stage company) as of December 31, 1995 and
1996 and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the
period June 18, 1992 (date of inception) through December 31, 1996 and for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996 in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
New York, New York
February 24, 1997
21
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------
1995 1996
------- --------
A S S E T S
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents..................................... $17,563 $ 4,266
Accounts receivable
Trade....................................................... 5,420 1,655
Other....................................................... 187 198
Inventory..................................................... 411 770
Other......................................................... 3,229 2,975
------- --------
Total current assets........................................ 26,810 9,864
Property, plant and equipment, net.............................. 12,608 13,409
Goodwill, net................................................... -- 298
Deferred tax assets............................................. 5,469 5,167
Other assets--long term......................................... 492 342
Deferred offering costs......................................... -- 485
------- --------
Total assets.................................................. $45,379 $ 29,565
======= ========
L I A B I L I T I E S A N D S H A R E H O L D E R S' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Current portion of long term debt............................. $ 623 $ 990
Current portion of capital lease obligations.................. 907 921
Current portion of long term liabilities...................... 1,650 1,890
Accounts payable (including amounts due to related parties of
$1,000 and $39 in 1995 and 1996, respectively)............... 6,140 5,132
Accrued expenses.............................................. 1,290 1,773
Other......................................................... 281 17
Total current liabilities................................... 10,891 10,723
Deferred revenue................................................ 3,093 3,226
Long term debt, less current portion............................ 3,268 2,146
Capital lease obligation, less current portion.................. 1,825 833
Other long term liabilities, less current portion (including
amounts due to related parties of $0 and $7 in 1995 and 1996,
respectively).................................................. 1,772 538
------- --------
Total liabilities........................................... 20,849 17,466
======= ========
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized shares--30,000,000;
issued shares--8,112,063; 8,141,156, respectively;
outstanding shares: 8,112,063; 8,141,156, respectively....... 81 81
Additional paid-in capital.................................... 33,844 34,085
Cumulative translation adjustment............................. 515 (438)
Deficit accumulated during development stage.................. (9,910) (21,629)
------- --------
Total shareholders' equity.................................. 24,530 12,099
------- --------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity.................. $45,379 $ 29,565
======= ========
See accompanying notes.
22
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
PERIOD
FROM
JUNE 18,
1992
(DATE OF
INCEPTION)
YEAR ENDED THROUGH
DECEMBER 31ST, DEC. 31ST,
---------------------------- ----------
1994 1995 1996 1996
-------- -------- -------- ----------
Revenues
Cooperation & license revenues...... $ 5,645 $ 9,865 $ 5,440 $ 23,278
Product sales....................... 37 808 791 1,636
Other revenues...................... 543 840 1,413 2,796
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total revenues.................... 6,225 11,513 7,644 27,710
Cost of revenues
License fees and royalties (of which
$1,000 and $45 to related parties
in 1995 and 1996, respectively).... -- (1,314) (45) (1,359)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Gross margin.......................... 6,225 10,199 7,599 26,351
Operating expenses
Research, development
Acquisition of intellectual prop-
erty rights...................... (1,654) (3,111) -- (4,765)
Other (of which $1,100; $1,300 and
$644 to related parties in 1994,
1995 and 1996, respectively)..... (7,157) (12,527) (15,848) (37,742)
-------- -------- -------- --------
(8,811) (15,638) (15,848) (42,507)
Marketing and sales................. (741) (1,688) (1,089) (3,678)
Administrative and general ex-
penses............................. (1,613) (2,151) (2,703) (7,882)
-------- -------- -------- --------
(11,165) (19,477) (19,640) (54,067)
Loss from operations.................. (4,940) (9,278) (12,041) (27,716)
Other income (expense)
Interest income..................... 277 466 428 1,261
Interest expense.................... (61) (493) (362) (922)
Foreign exchange gains.............. 38 280 256 600
-------- -------- -------- --------
254 253 322 939
Loss before income tax benefit........ (4,686) (9,025) (11,719) (26,777)
Income tax benefit.................... 1,707 2,720 -- 5,148
Net loss.............................. $ (2,979) $ (6,305) $(11,719) $(21,629)
======== ======== ======== ========
Net loss per share.................. $ (.51) $ (.82) $ (1.44)
======== ======== ========
Shares used in computing net loss
per share.......................... 5,840 7,697 8,137
======== ======== ========
See accompanying notes.
23
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
SERIES A SERIES B SERIES C SERIES D
------------------ ---------------- ------------------- -----------------
SHARES SHARES SHARES SHARES
ISSUED AMOUNT ISSUED AMOUNT ISSUED AMOUNT ISSUED AMOUNT
---------- ------ -------- ------ ---------- ------- -------- -------
BALANCE AT JUNE 18, 1992
Issuance of Series A
convertible preferred
stock, net of issuance
costs--$8 in June...... 211,681 $ 130
Issuance of Series B
convertible preferred
stock in June.......... 57,522 $ 38
Issuance of Common stock
in June................
Issuance of Series A
convertible preferred
stock in August........ 29,451 32
Issuance of Series A
convertible preferred
stock in September..... 293,455 544
Issuance of Series B
convertible preferred
stock in September..... 65,483 121
Translation adjustment..
Net Loss from June 18,
1992 (date of
inception) through
December 31, 1992......
---------- ------ -------- ---- ---------- ------- -------- -------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1992 534,587 706 123,005 159
Issuance of Series A
convertible preferred
stock in January....... 145,600 181
Issuance of Common stock
in January.............
Issuance of Series A
convertible preferred
stock in March......... 876,816 1,481
Issuance of Series B
convertible preferred
stock in March......... 240,442 430
Issuance of Series C
convertible preferred
stock, net of issuance
costs--$71 in
December............... 1,999,011 $ 5,686
Issuance of Series D
convertible preferred
stock, net of issuance
costs--$15 in
December............... 430,208 $ 1,224
Translation adjustment..
Net income--Year ended
December 31, 1993......
---------- ------ -------- ---- ---------- ------- -------- -------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1993 1,557,003 2,368 363,447 589 1,999,011 5,686 430,208 1,224
Issuance of Common stock
under stock option plan
in April...............
Purchase of 28,761
shares of Common
stock--Treasury stock
in April...............
Issuance of Series C
convertible preferred
stock, net of issuance
costs--$37 in April.... 472,918 1,324
Issuance of Series C
convertible preferred
shares, net of issuance
costs--$45 in June..... 572,917 1,605
Translation adjustment..
Net loss--Year ended
December 31, 1994......
---------- ------ -------- ---- ---------- ------- -------- -------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1994 1,557,003 2,368 363,447 589 3,044,846 8,615 430,208 1,224
Reissuance of 28,761
shares of Common stock
held in treasury in
January................
Issuance of Common stock
under stock option
plan...................
Common stock issued in
initial public
offering, net of
issuance costs--
$1,080.................
Conversion of preferred
stock.................. (1,557,003) (2,368) (363,447) (589) (3,044,846) (8,615) (430,208) (1,224)
Translation adjustment..
Net loss-Twelve months
ended December 31,
1995...................
---------- ------ -------- ---- ---------- ------- -------- -------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1995
Issuance of Common stock
under stock option
plan...................
Issuance of warrants in
connection with
acquisition of the
assets of PanoCorp.....
Translation adjustment..
Net loss--Twelve months
ended December 31,
1996...................
---------- ------ -------- ---- ---------- ------- -------- -------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1996
========== ====== ======== ==== ========== ======= ======== =======
24
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
COMMON STOCK
----------------
DEFICIT
ACCUMULATED
ADDITIONAL CUMULATIVE DURING
SHARES PAID-IN TRANSACTION DEVELOPMENT TREASURY
ISSUED AMOUNT CAPITAL ADJUSTMENT STAGE STOCK TOTAL
--------- ------ ---------- ----------- ----------- -------- --------
BALANCE AT JUNE 18, 1992
Issuance of Series A
convertible preferred
stock, net of issuance
costs--$8 in June...... $ 130
Issuance of Series B
convertible preferred
stock in June.......... 38
Issuance of Common stock
in June................ 115,045 $ 1 $ 75 76
Issuance of Series A
convertible preferred
stock in August........ 32
Issuance of Series A
convertible preferred
stock in September..... 544
Issuance of Series B
convertible preferred
stock in September..... 121
Translation adjustment.. $ 1 1
Net Loss from June 18,
1992 (date of
inception) through
December 31, 1992...... $ (506) (506)
--------- --- ------- ----- -------- --- --------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1992 115,045 1 75 1 (506) 436
Issuance of Series A
convertible preferred
stock in January....... 181
Issuance of Common stock
in January............. 17,256 0 21 21
Issuance of Series A
convertible preferred
stock in March......... 1,481
Issuance of Series B
convertible preferred
stock in March......... 430
Issuance of Series C
convertible preferred
stock, net of issuance
costs--$71 in
December............... 5,686
Issuance of Series D
convertible preferred
stock, net of issuance
costs--$15 in
December............... 1,224
Translation adjustment.. (50) (50)
Net income--Year ended
December 31, 1993...... (120) (120)
--------- --- ------- ----- -------- --- --------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1993 132,301 1 96 (48) (626) 9,288
Issuance of Common stock
under stock option plan
in April............... 77,356 1 28 29
Purchase of 28,761
shares of Common
stock--Treasury stock
in April............... (11) (11)
Issuance of Series C
convertible preferred
stock, net of issuance
costs--$37 in April.... 1,324
Issuance of Series C
convertible preferred
shares, net of issuance
costs--$45 in June..... 1,605
Translation adjustment.. 230 230
Net loss--Year ended
December 31, 1994...... (2,979) (2,979)
--------- --- ------- ----- -------- --- --------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1994 209,657 2 123 181 (3,605) (11) 9,487
Reissuance of 28,761
shares of Common stock
held in treasury in
January................ 3 11 14
Issuance of Common stock
under stock option
plan................... 6,902 0 3 3
Common stock issued in
initial public
offering, net of
issuance costs--
$1,080................. 2,500,000 25 20,973 20,898
Conversion of preferred
stock.................. 5,395,504 54 12,742
Translation adjustment.. 334 334
Net loss--Year ended
December 31, 1995...... (6,305) (6,305)
--------- --- ------- ----- -------- --- --------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1995 8,112,063 81 33,844 515 (9,910) 24,530
Issuance of Common stock
under stock option
plan................... 29,083 0 11 11
Issuance of warrants in
connection with
acquisition of the
assets of PanoCorp..... 230 230
Translation adjustment.. (953) (953)
Net loss--Year ended
December 31, 1996...... (11,719) (11,719)
--------- --- ------- ----- -------- --- --------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1996 8,141,146 $81 $34,085 $(438) $(21,629) $ 12,099
========= === ======= ===== ======== === ========
25
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
PERIOD
FROM
JUNE 18, 1992
(DATE OF
INCEPTION)
YEAR ENDED THROUGH
DECEMBER 31ST, DEC. 31ST,
-------------------------- -------------
1994 1995 1996 1996
------- ------- -------- -------------
Operating activities
Net (loss).......................... $(2,979) $(6,305) $(11,719) $(21,629)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss)
to net cash (used) by operating ac-
tivities:
Depreciation and amortization....... 378 3,488 3,934 7,825
Gain on disposal of fixed assets.... -- -- (31) (31)
Deferred taxes...................... (1,664) (2,721) (53) (5,163)
Revenues receivable "in kind"....... -- -- -- (312)
Expenses payable "in kind".......... 1,379 24 -- 1,420
Deferred "in kind" revenues......... -- -- -- 312
Change in assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable--Trade......... 1,692 (4,825) 3,749 (1,353)
Accounts receivable--Other......... (70) 504 (21) 293
Inventory.......................... (226) (148) (393) (767)
Other assets....................... (242) (793) (280) (1,679)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses
and other assets and liabilities.. 1,155 2,287 (634) 4,739
Deferred revenue................... 205 2,572 300 3,077
Taxes, other than income........... 244 (275) -- (23)
------- ------- -------- --------
Net cash used in operating activi-
ties............................... (128) (6,192) (5,148) (13,291)
------- ------- -------- --------
Investing activities
Additions to property, plant, and
equipment.......................... (6,964) (2,452) (5,866) (16,295)
Additions to patents................ -- -- (130) (130)
------- ------- -------- --------
Net cash used in investing activi-
ties............................... (6,964) (2,452) (5,996) (16,425)
Financing activities Stock issued.... 2,958 20,998 3 33,923
(Purchase) sale of treasury stock... (11) 11 -- --
Proceeds from long-term borrowings.. 1,678 4,161 97 6,287
Proceeds from sale leaseback trans-
actions............................ -- 2,731 -- 2,731
Payments for equipment purchases
financed by accounts payable....... -- (2,709) (997) (3,706)
Repayment of long-term borrowings... -- (2,074) (215) (2,289)
Repayment of capital lease obliga-
tions.............................. -- (855) (876) (1,731)
------- ------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in) fi-
nancing activities................. 4,625 22,263 (1,988) 35,215
Effect of exchange rates on cash.... (232) (792) (165) (1,233)
------- ------- -------- --------
Net increase/(decrease) in cash
equivalents........................ (2,699) 12,827 (13,297) 4,266
Cash and cash equivalents beginning
of period........................... 7,435 4,736 17,563 --
------- ------- -------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents end of pe-
riod................................ $ 4,736 $17,563 $ 4,266 $ 4,266
======= ======= ======== ========
Supplemental disclosures of noncash
activities:
Equipment acquired under capitalized
leases.............................. $ 4,132 -- -- $ 1,209
Equipment purchases financed by ac-
counts payable...................... $ 3,284 -- -- $ 920
Licenses acquired payable over two or
three years......................... $ 1,654 $ 2,111 -- $ 3,765
Acquisitions of intangible by issu-
ance of warrants.................... -- -- $ 230 $ 230
Fixed assets disposed of in like-kind
exchange............................ -- -- $ 468 $ 468
Fixed assets acquired through like-
kind exchange....................... -- -- $ 499 $ 499
Repayment of long term borrowing..... -- -- $ 394 $ 394
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow
information:
Interest paid........................ $ 15 $ 668 $ 52 $ 741
See accompanying notes.
26
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS ACTIVITY
PixTech, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of Delaware on October 27,
1993. On November 30, 1993, PixTech, Inc. acquired 100% beneficial ownership
of PixTech S.A., through a share exchange agreement. PixTech S.A. was
incorporated under the laws of France on June 18, 1992. For accounting
purposes, the acquisition has been treated as a recapitalization of PixTech
S.A. As used herein, "the Company" refers to PixTech, Inc. and PixTech S.A.
The Company was founded to improve, utilize and license certain background
technology developed by LETI (Laboratoire Electronique de Technologie et
d'Instrumentation), a French government-owned research and development
laboratory in the field of flat panel displays using electron emitters, known
as field emission displays (FEDs).
The Company has devoted substantially all its efforts to raising capital,
conducting research and development activities, recruiting personnel,
establishing a pilot manufacturing facility and forming an alliance of
industrial partners (the "FED Alliance"). Revenues from principal planned
operations will consist of product sales and royalties on the sale of FEDs
produced by members of the FED Alliance. As these revenues have not commenced,
PixTech, Inc. is still in a development stage and falls under the provisions
of FAS No. 7 "Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises".
2. SUMMARY OF THE SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements were prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of
financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PixTech, Inc.
and its wholly owned subsidiary PixTech S.A. Intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Fiscal Year
The Company ends its financial year on December 31.
Revenue recognition--Cooperation and License Agreements
The Company has entered into Cooperation and License agreements with members
of the FED Alliance. Under these contracts, the Company shares technology with
such members through cross licensing provisions. Each contract provides for
certain fees and royalties to be paid to the Company. The Company believes
that each of the cooperation and license agreements are long-term
construction/production contracts pursuant to SOP 81-1 and that the criteria
herein have been satisfied to entitle the Company to partially recognize the
revenue under those contracts. Certain fees payable to the Company under these
agreements are milestone-related and are due in accordance with the terms of
each agreement when the milestone is achieved. Once paid, such fees are
irrevocable. The Company recognizes this milestone-related revenue only when
each milestone has been fully
27
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
performed, as agreed by the parties. Costs incurred under these contracts are
considered costs in the period incurred, regardless of when related revenue is
recognized.
Texas Instruments. The company entered into a Cooperation and License
Agreement with Texas Instruments Incorporated ("TI") on June 29, 1993 (the "TI
Agreement"). In order to reach certain of the specified milestones under the
TI Agreement, the Company performed services in the field of technology
development. In accordance with the TI Agreement, such milestone-related
payments were payable in part in cash and in part in the form of goods or
services, primarily consulting services.
In March 1996, TI announced its decision to suspend its FED efforts, and a
termination agreement between TI and the Company was executed on July 15,
1996. Under this agreement, the Company has a continuing license from TI which
covers all subject technology developed by TI prior to the date of
termination. In addition, TI acknowledged that all payments heretofore made in
kind to the Company with respect to technology transfer from the Company to TI
are and shall remain the property of the Company. Included in accounts payable
at December 31, 1995 and as of the date of the Termination Agreement was
$1,336 representing goods delivered and services rendered by TI as in-kind
technology transfer payments pursuant to the TI Agreement. In 1996, the
Company recorded cooperation and license revenues in the amount of $1,336 and
canceled the in-kind liability of same amount included in accounts payable.
Futaba Corporation. The Company entered into a Cooperation and License
Agreement with Futaba Corporation on November 27, 1993 (the "Futaba
Agreement"). Pursuant to the Futaba Agreement, Futaba agreed to pay the
Company a license fee upon signing the agreement, which was recognized upon
execution of the agreement. Futaba also agreed to a technology transfer fee,
payable to the Company in three installments upon the occurrence of certain
milestones, and an additional fee payable annually upon the achievement of
further product development milestones. Finally, to the extent that Futaba
successfully incorporates the cross-licensed technology into products, Futaba
must make royalty payments in connection with the sale of products
incorporating the technology licensed by the Company. Then the Company will
recognize royalty revenues.
In order to reach certain of the specified milestones under the Futaba
Agreement, the Company performs services in the field of technology
development. In accordance with the Futaba Agreement, the milestone-related
revenue is recognized when the milestone is achieved. As of December 31, 1996,
most of the revenues associated with the achievement of the contractually
specified milestones have been recorded by the Company.
Raytheon Company. The Company entered into a Cooperation and License
Agreement with Raytheon Company on June 1, 1994 (the "Raytheon Agreement").
Pursuant to the Raytheon Agreement, Raytheon agreed to pay the Company a
license fee payable in part upon signing the agreement and in part a specified
number of months thereafter. Such license fee was recognized when due.
Raytheon also agreed to make two additional payments based on the achievement
of milestones. Raytheon also must make royalty payments in connection with the
sale of products incorporation the technology licensed by the Company.
In order to reach certain of the specified milestones under the Raytheon
Agreement, the Company performs services in the field of technology
development. As of December 31, 1996, all the revenues associated with the
achievement of the milestones specified under the Raytheon Agreement have been
recorded by the Company.
To the extent that Raytheon successfully incorporates the cross-licensed
technology into products the Company will recognize royalty revenues as
Raytheon sells the products.
Motorola, Inc. The Company entered into a Cooperation and License Agreement
with Motorola, Inc. on June 13, 1995 (the "Motorola Agreement"). Pursuant to
the Motorola Agreement, Motorola, Inc. agreed to pay
28
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
the Company a license fee upon signing the agreement, which was recognized
upon execution of the agreement. Motorola, Inc. also agreed to a technology
transfer fee, payable to the Company upon the occurrence of certain
milestones, and an additional technology update fee payable annually over a
period of three years. Finally, Motorola must make royalty payments in
connection with the sale of products incorporating the technology licensed by
the Company.
In order to reach certain of the specified milestones under the Motorola
Agreement, the Company performs services in the field of technology
development. In accordance with the Motorola Agreement, the milestone-related
payments are irrevocable when paid. In accordance with the Motorola Agreement,
such milestone-related payments are payable in cash, or upon mutual agreement,
in in-kind services or goods. The Company has not agreed to receive any in-
kind services or goods under the Motorola Agreement. Cash milestone-related
revenue is recognized when the milestone is achieved.
To the extent that Motorola successfully incorporates the cross-licensed
technology into products, the Company will recognize royalty revenues as
Motorola sells the products.
Revenue Recognition--Product Revenue
Product revenue is recognized upon shipment in the case of standard
deliveries, and upon acceptance by the customer in the case of first delivery
of a specified product.
Revenue Recognition--Grants
The Company recognizes revenue from unconditional grants received from
governmental agencies in the period granted. Revenue from conditional grants
received are recognized when all conditions outlined in the grant have been
met.
Foreign Currency Translation
Assets and liabilities of PixTech S.A. are translated into U.S. dollar
equivalents at the rate of exchange in effect on the balance sheet date;
income and expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing
during the period. The related translation adjustments are reflected in
stockholders' equity. Foreign currency gains or losses resulting from
transactions are included in results of operations, except for transaction
gains and losses attributable to intercompany transactions, and for foreign
currency transactions or cash balances that hedge foreign currency
commitments; such transactions and cash balances are recorded in the same
manner as translation adjustments, as recommended by the Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No 52, "Foreign currency translation" (SFAS
52).
Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of
shares, convertible preferred shares assuming conversion at date of issuance,
and dilutive equivalent shares from stock options and warrants using the
treasury stock method. Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission
Staff Accounting Bulletins, shares and equivalent shares issued by the Company
at prices below the assumed public offering price during the twelve-month
period prior to the proposed offering have been included in the calculation as
if they were outstanding for all periods presented through the period in which
the initial public offering took place (using the treasury stock method and
assuming an initial public offering price). Net income (loss) per share also
reflects for all periods presented a 2 for 3 reverse stock split which was
effective at the closing of the Company's initial public offering.
29
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Per Share amounts for the periods after the initial public offering have
been calculated in accordance with the provisions of APB 15.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an
original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Investments
At January 1, 1994, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities" (SFAS 115). The cumulative effect as of January 1, 1994, of
adopting SFAS No 115 is considered to be immaterial. Under SFAS 115,
investments are classified as held-to-maturity when the Company has the
positive intent an ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held-to-
maturity securities are stated at amortized cost with corresponding premiums
or discounts amortized over the life of the investment to interest income.
Trading securities are reported at fair value and unrecognized gains or losses
are included in earnings. Marketable equity and debt securities not classified
as held-to-maturity or trading securities are classified as available-for-sale
and reported at fair value. Unrecognized gains or losses on available-for-sale
securities are included, net of tax, in equity until their disposition.
Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-
temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in net income. The
cost of securities sold is determined by the specific identification method.
The Company had no investments at December 31, 1996 or 1995. There were no
realized gains or losses on sales of investments in 1996 or 1995.
Inventory
Inventory is valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) basis or
market. Inventory consists of raw material and spare parts.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are initially recorded at cost. Depreciation
and amortization are provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated
useful lives of the assets, generally five years for equipment, ten years for
building improvements and twenty years for buildings. Equipment financed under
capital leases are depreciated over the shorter of estimated useful life and
lease term. Amortization expense is included with depreciation expense.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
In January 1996, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for
Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of", which establishes criteria for the
recognition and measurement of impairment loss associated with long-lived
assets. Adoption of FAS 121 did not have a material impact on the Company's
financial position or results of operations.
Patents and Other Intangible Assets
Patent application and establishment costs are expensed as incurred as
research and development costs.
30
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The carrying value of intangible assets are reviewed on an ongoing basis to
assess if facts or circumstances suggest that the Company's intangible assets
may be impaired. If this review indicates that intangible assets will not be
recoverable, as determined based on the expected future cash flows to be
generated by these assets over their remaining amortization period, the
Company's carrying value of the intangible assets is reduced by the estimated
shortfall of discounted cash flows.
Employee Stock Option Plans
In 1996, the Company adopted the disclosure provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards N(degrees) 123 (SFAS 123), "Accounting for
Stock Based Compensation". As permitted by SFAS 123, the Company has elected
to continue to account for its employee stock option plans and the Employee
Stock Purchase Plans in accordance with the provisions of the Accounting
Principles Board N(degrees) 25 (APB 25), "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees".
Accounting for Income Taxes
The Company uses the liability method in accounting for income taxes. Under
this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on
differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and
liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be
in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.
Pension Costs
In France, legislation requires that lump sum retirement indemnities be paid
to employees based upon their years of services and compensation at
retirement. The actuarial liability of this unfunded obligation as at December
31, 1995 and 1996 is $18 and $32 respectively. Pension expense incurred was $5
in 1994, $13 in 1995 and $14 in 1996.
3. OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
The components of other current assets are as follows:
DECEMBER 31,
-------------
1995 1996
------ ------
Value added tax refundable........................ $ 881 $ 720
Grants receivable................................. 1,871 2,091
Other............................................. 477 164
------ ------
$3,229 $2,975
====== ======
4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The components of Property, Plant and Equipment are as follows:
DECEMBER 31,
----------------
1995 1996
------- -------
Buildings and improvements...................... $ 1,597 $ 3,092
Machinery and equipment......................... 14,243 16,566
Furniture and fixtures.......................... 823 1,099
------- -------
16,663 20,757
Less accumulation depreciation.................. (4,055) (7,348)
------- -------
$12,608 $13,409
======= =======
31
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
In 1994, the Company entered into capital lease agreements for production
equipment. The gross and net book values of equipment financed under capital
leases amounted $4,680 and $3,452 respectively at December 31, 1995 and $4,409
and $2,207 at December 31, 1996 respectively.
At December 31, 1995 machinery and equipment included $671 of equipment on
which the Company and LETI each had a 50% title. This equipment was recorded
by the Company at 50% of its cost and was depreciated based on this
acquisition value. On March 22, 1996, the Company entered into an agreement
with LETI under which (i) certain pieces of equipment, with an acquisition
value and a net value in the Company's books of $380 and $240 at March 31,
1996, respectively, became the sole property of the Company; these assets were
then recorded in the Company's books with an acquisition value of $509, and
are now depreciated over their remaining expected lifetime; and (ii) certain
pieces of equipment with an acquisition value and a net value in The Company's
books of $336 and $238, respectively, became the sole property of LETI.
On November 15, 1996, an agreement was executed between Steag MicroTech GmbH
(SMT) and the Company (the "SMT agreement"), in order to settle technical
acceptance issues related to a piece of equipment acquired in 1994 from SMT
for an amount of $850. Under the SMT agreement, SMT waived the balance payable
under a loan ($421) granted by SMT to the Company at the time of the equipment
purchase. In return, the Company waived future claims on this piece of
equipment. The Company recorded in "Other Revenues" a net gain of $148 from
this transaction representing the $421 forgiveness of debt less a $273 write-
down of the carrying value of the equipment due to permanent impairment of
value.
5. GOODWILL
On February 20, 1996, the Company acquired substantially all the assets of
PanoCorp, Inc., a research and development company located in California, in a
transaction accounted for as a purchase. The assets of PanoCorp, Inc.,
including principally fixed assets valued at $120, were purchased for $250 in
cash plus 150,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company's common stock at
an exercise price of $11.67 per share. See Note 13. Stockholders' Equity--
Warrants.
The fair value of the 150,000 warrants was computed using the Black-Scholes
model. Pursuant to the APB Statement 16, the value of such warrants was
estimated at $230 and the global transaction generated goodwill of $360. This
goodwill is depreciated over 5 years.
The purchase agreement also calls for the issuance of up to 600,000
additional warrants to the shareholders of PanoCorp, Inc., contingent upon the
achievement by the Company of specified technical milestones over the next 3
years. No such warrants have been issued at December 31, 1996.
6. DEFERRED OFFERING COSTS
The Company incurred expenses in preparation for a public offering of new
shares in Europe. See Note 20--Subsequent events. These expenses have been
deferred and will be recorded as a reduction of paid-in capital upon
completion of the offering.
7. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
Included in accounts payable at December 31, 1995 were $1,336 representing
goods delivered and services rendered by Texas Instruments as in-kind payments
pursuant to the TI Agreement. As described in Note 2 under "Revenue
recognition--Cooperation and License Agreements.", following the execution of
the Termination Agreement and the subsequent confirmation that the in-kind
liability to Texas Instruments would not be payable,
32
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
the Company canceled the in-kind liability included in accounts payable in the
amount of $1,336 and recorded in 1996 cooperation and license revenues of same
amount.
8. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following:
DECEMBER 31,
--------------
1995 1996
------ ------
Non interest bearing loan from ANVAR (a).......... $2,551 $2,482
Equipment purchase loans (b)...................... 828 269
Loan payable (c).................................. 143 118
Loan payable (d).................................. 366 267
Interest accrued.................................. 3 --
------ ------
3,891 3,136
Less: current portion............................. (623) (990)
Total long-term debt, less current portion........ $3,268 $2,146
====== ======
- --------
(a) The Company entered into a development contract with a French Public
agency ANVAR in 1993. Under this agreement, the Company received a non-
interest bearing loan. Repayment of this loan is expected to start in
1997.
(b) In 1994, the Company was granted two loans from equipment suppliers, of
$421 and $686 respectively. The first loan was canceled in November 1996
pursuant to the SMT agreement. See note 5--Property, Plant and Equipment.
The second loan is payable in 8 installments of $77, including interest at
6.50%, over a period of 4 years starting in May 1996.
(c) The Company was granted a loan, which bears interest at 5% and is
repayable in 8 installments of approximately $17 over two years starting
in December 1996.
(d) The Company was granted a loan, which bears interest at 6.37% and is
repayable in 20 installments of approximately $20 over 5 years starting in
July 1995.
Future minimum payments under these obligations are as follows:
Year ending December 31,
1997...................................................... $ 990
1998...................................................... 981
1999...................................................... 1,126
2000...................................................... 39
------
Total minimum payments.................................... $3,136
======
9. CAPITAL LEASES
DECEMBER 31,
--------------
1995 1996
------ ------
Capital lease obligations......................... $2,732 $1,753
Less: current portion............................. (907) (921)
------ ------
$1,825 $ 833
====== ======
33
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
In December 1994, the Company completed several sale-leaseback transactions
whereby equipment with a net book value of $4,219 was financed through three
to five-year capital lease obligations, effective December 1994. At December
31, 1996, the net book value of these equipment was $ 2,207.
For the period from June 18, 1992 (date of inception) through December 31,
1996, the non-cash amount related to this transaction was $1,209.
Future minimum payments under these obligations are as follows:
Year ending December 31,
1997...................................................... $1,011
1998...................................................... 673
1999...................................................... 170
2000...................................................... 36
Total minimum payments.................................... 1,890
------
Less amount representing interest......................... (137)
------
Present value of minimum capitalized lease payments....... $1,753
------
10. COMMITMENTS
Operating lease
The Company is obligated under operating lease agreements for equipment and
manufacturing and office facilities.
The Company leases certain equipment under a cancelable operating lease with
terms of 60 months through 1999. This lease included a significant prepayment
of rent ($151 at December 31, 1996 which were included in "Other Assets" on
the balance sheet). The total amount of the base rent payments has been
charged to expense on the straight line method over the term of the lease.
The Company leases its main manufacturing and office facilities under a non-
cancelable operating lease which expires September 2000.
Minimum annual rental commitments under non cancelable leases at December
31, 1996, are as follows :
Year ending December 31,
1997...................................................... 1,414
1998...................................................... 1,426
1999...................................................... 1,263
2000...................................................... 859
------
Total minimum payments.................................... $4,962
======
Rental expense for all operating leases consisted of the following:
1994 1995 1996
------ ------ ------
Rent expense for operating leases......... $1 013 $1 237 $1 439
====== ====== ======
34
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
License Agreement and Research and Development Agreement with CEA
See Note 18--Related Party Transactions
11. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
At December 31, 1996, the carrying values of financial instruments such as
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and payable, other receivables
and accrued liabilities and the current portion of long-term debt approximated
their market values, based on the short-term maturities of these instruments.
At December 31, 1995 and 1996, the fair values of long-term debt and other
long-term liabilities, with book value of $6,865 and $3,517 were $5,607 and
$3,128 respectively. Fair value is determined based on expected future cash
flows, discounted at market interest rates, and other appropriate valuation
methodologies.
12. LITIGATION
In May 1994, an individual commenced a lawsuit in France against the
Commissariat--l'Energie Atomique (CEA) and the Company alleging infringement
of a French patent (the "Patent"). In addition to the French patent, the
plaintiff held patents in the United States and through the European Patent
Office (the "EPO"), in each case concerning a specific method for addressing a
display which uses microtips through the screen's controller. The decision of
the judge made in November 1996 was that only the electronic circuitry used by
the Company to drive the panels was infringing the Patent. Therefore, CEA and
PixTech were barred from producing, using or selling this electronic circuitry
as well as FED displays including such circuitry in France. CEA notified the
Company in January 1997 that CEA had acquired the Patent, as well as all its
extensions outside France from such individual, and that, under the license
agreement between CEA and the Company, the Company would get an exclusive
license to the recently acquired patents, with a right to sublicense.
In accordance with the Company's license agreement with the CEA, the CEA has
assumed responsibility for the cost of common defense counsel, and has assumed
settlement cost with the plaintiff, with the exception of approximately $40
that the Company has agreed to assume as a contribution to such settlement.
13. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
The share amounts and per share dollar amounts included herein reflect the
effect of the 2 for 3 reverse stock split which was effective on July 18,
1995.
Common Stock
On July 18, 1995, the Company sold 2,500,000 shares of common stock for net
proceeds of $20,998 in its initial public offering on Nasdaq. At December 31,
1996, all outstanding shares are shares of Common Stock.
Convertible preferred stock
All of the Company's issued shares of Convertible Preferred Stock
automatically converted into shares of Common Stock upon the closing of the
Company's initial public offering. There is no longer any Convertible
Preferred Stock outstanding.
Preferred Stock
The Company's Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 1,000,000
shares of Preferred Stock and to fix the relative rights thereof.
35
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Stock Options
The Company has elected to follow APB 25 in accounting for its employee
stock options because, as discussed below, the alternative fair value
accounting provided for under SFAS 123 requires the use of option valuation
models that were not developed for use in valuing employee stock options.
Under APB 25, when the exercise price of the Company's employee stock options
is less than the market price of the underlying shares of the date of grant,
compensation expenses is recognized.
The Company adopted a stock option plan on November 30, 1993 (which was
amended and restated in May 1995), under which options to purchase shares of
common stock may be granted to key employees and consultants of the Company.
The plan provides that the option price shall be determined by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and that no portion of the
option may be exercised beyond ten years from the date of grant. Options which
are outstanding at December 31, 1996, become exercisable within a certain
period of time or when specific milestones are completed.
During the twelve months prior to the Company's initial public offering, the
Company issued stock options for its Common Stock pursuant to its stock option
plan at exercise prices substantially below the initial public offering price.
Specifically, the Company granted options exercisable for an aggregate of
20,467 shares in December 1994 with an exercise price of $.38 per share and
for an aggregate of 466,667 shares with an exercise price of $.75 per share.
Such option prices were determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors to be equal to fair market value of a share of the underlying
Common Stock on the date of grant of the options.
Prior to the Company's initial public offering, determinations of the fair
market value of a share of the Company's Common Stock were made in connection
with each option grant by the Compensation Committee after careful review of
relevant factors affecting the value of the Company's Common Stock. The
following factors were among those considered by the Compensation Committee:
(i) the subordination of the Company's Common Stock to its several series of
Convertible Preferred Stock with respect to dividends, liquidation
preferences, voting control, antidilution rights and other rights and
privileges, (ii) the Company's financial condition and results of operations
(most notably, the Company's operating losses and the fact that the Company's
tangible net worth was less than the liquidation preference of the outstanding
Convertible Preferred Stock), (iii) the sale of Series C and D Convertible
Preferred Stock at a price of $2.88 per share and (iv) the absence of a public
market for the Company's securities. After the Company successfully produced a
defect-free prototype from its pilot manufacturing plant in February 1995,
resulting in serious negotiations with Motorola to join the FED Alliance, and
commenced discussions with investment bankers which led to the Company's
initial public offering, the Company priced its next option grant for 10,000
shares in May 1995 at $7.65 per share, representing 85% of the midpoint of the
proposed initial public offering price range.
36
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The activity under the option plan was as follows:
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE OPTION
SHARES OPTIONS PRICE
AVAILABLE OUTSTANDING PER SHARE
--------- ----------- --------------
BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 1993............. 119,646 527,409 0.375
Additional shares reserved............... 675,984 -- --
Options granted.......................... (205,071) 205,071 0.375
Options exercised........................ -- (77,356) 0.375
Options terminated unexercised........... 17,083 (17,083) 0.375
-------- --------- -----
BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 1994............. 607,642 638,041
Additional shares reserved............... 533,333 --
Options granted.......................... (604,936) 604,936 2.554
Options exercised........................ -- (6,903) 0.375
Options terminated unexercised........... 8,000 (8,000) 0.609
-------- --------- -----
BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 1995............. 544,039 1,228,074
-------- --------- -----
Options granted.......................... (365,850) 365,850 8.018
Options exercised........................ -- (29,083) 0.375
Options terminated unexercised........... 100,567 (100,567) 2.859
-------- --------- -----
BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 1996............. 278,756 1,464,274
======== =========
Options to purchase 491,058 shares and 450,556 shares were exercisable at
weighted-average exercise prices of $0.375 and $0.415 respectively, at
December 31, 1995 and 1996.
Exercise prices for options outstanding as of December 31, 1996 ranged from
$0.375 to $9.750. The weighted average remaining contractual life of those
options is 8.01 years.
In May 1995, the Company adopted the 1995 Director Stock Option Plan (the
"Director Stock Plan"), which provides for the issuance of up to 50,000 shares
of the Company's stock. The Director Stock Plan provides for an automatic
grant of options to purchase the Company's stock at its fair market value to
the non-employee directors of the Company upon election or re-election to the
Board of Directors. Under the Director Stock Plan a director was granted 6,000
options in April 1996 at an exercise price of $8.625.
Pro forma information regarding net loss and loss per share is required by
SFAS 123, and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its
employee stock options under the fair value method of SFAS 123. The fair value
for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following average assumptions for both years:
risk-free interest rates of 3%; dividend yields of 0%; volatility factors of
the expected market price of the Company's shares of Common Stock of 0.30; and
a weighted-average expected life of the option of 4 years.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating
the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are
fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the imput of
highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility.
Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options, and because the changes
in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value
estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily
provide a reliable single measure of its employee stock options.
37
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the
options is amortized to expense over the option's vesting period. The
Company's pro forma information follows (in thousands except for loss per
share information):
1995 1996
------- --------
Pro forma net loss........................... $(6,352) $(12,073)
Pro forma loss per share..................... $ (.83) $ (1.48)
The weighted-average fair value of options granted during 1995 and 1996 were
$0.84 and $3.95, respectively.
Warrants
In December 1994, in connection with various equipment leases, the Company
entered into a warrant agreement. Under this agreement, the Company granted a
right to purchase 62,500 shares of Common Stock of the Company at a purchase
price of $2.88 per share. No value was ascribed to the warrant. This warrant
expires on July 18, 2000.
In February 1996, in order to finance partially the purchase of PanoCorp
assets, Inc., the Company granted 150,000 warrants to purchase shares of the
Company's common stock at an exercise price of $11.67 per share. See Note 5--
Goodwill.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In May 1995, the Company adopted an employee stock purchase plan (the
"Purchase Plan") under which employees may purchase shares of Common Stock at
a discount from fair market value. 100,000 shares of Common Stock are reserved
for issuance under the Purchase Plan. To date, no shares have been issued
under the Purchase Plan. Rights to purchase Common Stock under the Purchase
Plan are granted at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, which
determines the frequency and duration of individual offerings under the Plan
and the dates when the stock may be purchased. Eligible employees, which
represent all full-time employees (as defined by the Purchase Plan),
participate voluntarily and may withdraw from any offering at any time before
the stock is purchased. The purchase price per share of Common Stock in an
offering is 85% of the lesser of its fair market value at the beginning of the
offering period or on the applicable exercise date and may be paid through
payroll deductions, periodic lump sum payments or a combination of both. The
Purchase Plan terminates on May 9, 2005.
At December 31, 1996 2,105,530 shares of Common Stock are reserved for
shares issuable under the Purchase Plan or upon exercise of stock options and
warrants.
38
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
14. OTHER AND DEFERRED REVENUES
Other revenues and deferred revenues include the following:
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1995 1996
-------------- ---------------
OTHER DEFERRED OTHER DEFERRED
----- -------- ------ --------
Grant from European Union, Esprit Program(a).... $227
Grant from French Ministry of Industry(b)....... $1,871 $ 800 $ 2,091
Grant from French local authorities(c).......... $ 871 $ 117 $ 1,044
Other(d)........................................ $613 $ 351 $ 496 $ 91
---- ------ ------ -------
TOTAL........................................... $840 $3,093 $1,413 $ 3,226
==== ====== ====== =======
- --------
(a) In November 1993, the Company entered into an R&D agreement with the
European Union and other European industrial companies for two years
starting December 1, 1993. The contribution of the European Union to the
costs incurred by the Company amounts to $450 over the period. The Company
received $330 in 1994, and $120 in 1995 from this contribution. This
contribution was recognized as income ratably over the contract period as
required costs were incurred to meet the conditions of the grant, at which
point such portion of the contribution was irrevocable as stipulated in
the agreement.
(b) In December 1994, the Company was awarded a grant of $2,800 from the
French Ministry of Industry to support manufacturing of Field Emission
Displays. This grant covered a period of two years. In 1996, the Company
collected $800. This payment was recognized as income in 1996, as all
conditions have been met. An additional amount of $707 was received in
January 1997 and was not recognized as income in 1996.
(c) PixTech SA was awarded certain incentives to establish its manufacturing
facilities in Montpellier, France. These incentives are partially subject
to maintaining an operating facility in this location for a certain period
of time. Revenue is deferred until all conditions are met. In 1996, as
certain conditions were met, revenue in the amount of $117 was recognized.
(d) Amounts relating to payments received by the Company from entities
primarily for the performance of miscellaneous services.
15. INCOME TAXES
Income (loss) before income tax benefit consists of the following:
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1994 1995 1996
------- ------- --------
France........................................ $(4,788) $(9,792) $(10,556)
Rest of world................................. 102 767 (1,161)
------- ------- --------
Income (loss) before income tax benefit..... $(4,686) $(9,025) $(11,719)
======= ======= ========
The income tax benefit consists of the following:
DECEMBER 31,
------------------
1994 1995 1996
------ ------ ----
Deferred:
France................................................ $1,707 $2,720 --
---
Rest of world......................................... -- -- --
------ ------ ---
$1,707 $2,720 --
====== ====== ===
39
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
A reconciliation of income taxes computed at the French statutory rate
(33.3% for 1994, 36.67% for 1995 and 1996) to the income tax benefit is as
follows:
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------
1994 1995 1996
------- ------- -------
Income taxes computed at the French statutory
rate........................................ $ 1,560 $ 3,309 $ 4,297
Operating losses not utilized................ (1,560) (3,309) (4,297)
Research credits............................. 1,707 2,720 --
------- ------- -------
Total.................................... $ 1,707 $ 2,720 --
======= ======= =======
No U.S. income tax expense was realized and no U.S. income taxes were paid
in periods ended December 31, 1994, 1995 and 1996.
Deferred taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between
the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components
of the Company's deferred taxes consist of the following:
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1994 1995 1996
------- ------- --------
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards............. $ 1,649 $ 4,357 $ 6,788
Deferred revenue............................. 171 1,263 1,201
Research credit carryforwards................ 3,142 7,087 8,193
------- ------- --------
4,962 12,707 16,181
Deferred tax liabilities:
Revenue not currently taxable................ -- (741) --
Deferred expense............................. (115) (272) (145)
------- ------- --------
Total deferred tax assets.................. 4,847 11,694 16,039
Valuation allowance............................ (2,350) (6,225) (10,869)
------- ------- --------
Deferred tax assets............................ $ 2,497 $ 5,469 $ 5,167
======= ======= ========
Net operating loss carryforwards can be credited against future income in
France. Net operating loss carryforward of: $5,996 expire in 2000 and $6,389
in 2001 and $6,125 can be carried forward indefinitely.
Research credit carryforwards derive from the Company's subsidiary PixTech
SA. In France, research credit carryforwards are calculated following certain
rules defined by the Tax administration. The Company is entitled to full
payment by the Tax administration of these research credit carryforwards if
they are not credited against income tax liabilities within a period of three
financial years.
16. INDUSTRY AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The Company operates in one industry segment, the development, manufacturing
and licensing of flat panel displays using electron emitters. Operations are
conducted in France. Revenues are principally derived from relationships with
companies in the United States and Japan, and grant revenue from authorities
in France.
40
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
17. SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS
Historically, the Company derived its revenues principally from members of
the FED Alliance. Net revenues from the FED Alliance customers represented
approximately 90%, 90% and 75% of the Company's net revenues for the fiscal
years 1994, 1995 and 1996.
Revenues derived from FED Alliance members are of a non-recurring nature.
18. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In September 1992, the Company entered into a license agreement with CEA.
CEA is the French atomic energy agency, and holds a controlling interest in
CEA Industrie, a shareholder of the Company. Under this agreement, CEA granted
to the Company a royalty bearing, worldwide, exclusive license to all patents
held by CEA in the field of FEDs, with a right to sublicense these patents
under certain conditions. The consideration for this license is a payment of
license fees and royalties based on the Company's sales and the license fees
and royalties collected by the Company. No expense was recorded in 1993 and
1994 in respect of license fees and royalties due to CEA. In 1995, $1,000 was
accrued in respect of license fees and royalties due to CEA in 1996. In order
for the Company to maintain an exclusive license, it was required to make
minimum royalty payments beginning in 1996. An amount of $45 payable to CEA in
1997 was accrued in 1996; this amount includes royalties obligations under the
license agreement and contribution to settlement of litigation (see Note 12--
Litigation). By paying the remaining amount due to LETI, the Company will
fulfill the minimum royalty obligations to LETI through 1998.
In September 1992, the Company entered into a three-year renewable R&D
agreement with CEA, under which CEA, through its laboratory LETI, performs
certain research and development activities for the benefit of the Company.
This program was extended for a second three-year period ending on January 1,
1999, subject to further extension by mutual agreement of the parties. The
consideration received by the CEA for this R&D activity in 1996 amounted to
approximately $640.
In connection with the above R&D agreement with CEA, the Company paid
$1,600, $1,700 and $644 in 1994, 1995 and 1996, of which $1,100, $1,300 and
$644 is included in research and development costs in 1994, 1995, and 1996
respectively. The balance primarily represents purchases of equipment, less
recoverable value added tax.
19. LICENSE
In connection with the Company's license of its technology to an FED
Alliance member, the Company acquired a worldwide, non-exclusive royalty-free
license to such FED Alliance member's background FED technology, as well as a
right to grant royalty-free sublicenses to the other FED Alliance members. The
Company is obligated to pay certain license fees in connection with the
acquisition of these rights from such FED Alliance member; these payments to
the FED Alliance member are $650 in 1995, $650 in 1996, and $700 in 1997. The
present value of this payment stream, discounted at a 10% interest rate, is
$1,654 and has been classified as an Other Long Term Liability and has been
expensed in 1994.
In connection with the Company's license of its technology to another FED
Alliance member, the Company also acquired a worldwide, non-exclusive license,
without the right to sublicense, to certain technology of such FED Alliance
member. The Company is obligated to pay certain license fees in connection
with the acquisition of these rights; these payments to the FED Alliance
member are $1,000 in 1995, $1,000 in 1996, $1,000 in 1997
41
PIXTECH, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
and $500 in 1998. The present value of this payment stream, discounted at a
10% interest rate, is $3,111 and has been classified as an Other Long Term
Liability and was expensed in 1995.
Total license fees to be paid are expensed in the year in which the
commitment is made due to the uncertainty regarding the recoverability of the
amounts paid arising from the unpredictability of future payments to be
received by the Company from such FED Alliance members in respect of the
license to such members of the Company's technology.
20. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On February 7, 1997, the Company sold 3,333,000 shares of Common Stock in a
public offering in Europe at a price of $4.50 per share, resulting in net
proceeds of $13,949 before expenses payable by the Company, which are
estimated at $660. The Company granted the Underwriters a 30-day option to
purchase up to 663,000 Shares, and the Underwriters exercised such option and
purchased such Shares on February 12, 1997. Including the sale of such shares,
the total price to public, underwriting discount, and proceeds to the Company
were $17,982, $1,259, and $16,723 respectively.
In February 1997, the Company sold 463,708 of the Company's shares of Common
Stock to Motorola, Inc., in a private placement at a price of $4.50 per share,
resulting in net proceeds of $2,086. As consideration for this stock purchase,
an amount of $686 has been received in cash and the remaining $1,400 was paid
in forgiveness of $1,400 of obligations from PixTech S.A. to Motorola. In
connection with such private placement, Motorola received warrants to purchase
an additional 463,708 shares of the Common Stock of the Company at a price of
$5.50 per share, which warrants must be exercised before December 31, 1998.
In February 1997, the Company sold 1,111,111 of the Company's shares of
Common Stock to UMC, Unipac's parent Company, in a private placement at a
price of $4.50 per share resulting in net proceeds of $5,000.
42
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
Not Applicable
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The response to this item is contained in part under the caption "Executive
Officers of the Registrant" in Part I, Item 1A hereof and the remainder is
incorporated herein by reference from the discussion responsive thereto under
the caption "Election of Directors" in the Company's Proxy Statement relating
to its Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled for April 18, 1997 (the "Proxy
Statement").
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The response to this item is incorporated herein by reference from the
discussion responsive thereto under the caption "Executive Compensation" in
the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The response to this item is incorporated herein by reference from the
discussion responsive thereto under the caption "Share Ownership" in the Proxy
Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The response to this item is incorporated herein by reference from the
discussion responsive thereto under the caption, "Compensation Committee
Interlocks and Insider Participation" in the Proxy Statement and from Note 18
to the Financial Statements included herein.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(A) 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The financial statements are listed under Item 8 of this report.
2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The financial statement schedules are listed under Item 8 of this report.
(B) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
Two reports on Form 8-K have been filed during the fourth quarter of 1996,
one on November 22, 1996 reporting under Item 5 the announcement of the
Registrant's public offering in Europe, and the other on December 6, 1996
reporting under Item 5 various events regarding financings, manufacturing
partnerships and the resolution of outstanding litigation of the Registrant.
(C) EXHIBITS
NUMBER FOOTNOTE DESCRIPTION
------ -------- -----------
3.1 1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant.
3.3 2 Restated By-Laws of Registrant.
4.1 3 Specimen certificate for shares of Common Stock of the
Registrant.
4.2 3 Warrant to purchase 62,500 shares of Common Stock of the
Registrant issued to Comdisco, Inc.
43
NUMBER FOOTNOTE DESCRIPTION
------ -------- -----------
4.3 6 Warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of Common Stock of the
Registrant issued to PanoCorp Display Systems, Inc.
4.4 Warrant to purchase 463,708 shares of Common Stock of the
Registrant issued to Motorola, Inc.
10.1 3,4,5 License Agreement in the Field of Flat Microtip Screens dated
as of September 17, 1992 between the Registrant and the
Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique (the "CEA"), as amended.
10.2 3,4,5 Research and Development Agreement in the Field of Flat
Microtip Screens dated September 17, 1992 between the
Registrant and the CEA.
10.3 3,5 Cooperation and License Agreement dated June 29, 1993 between
the Registrant and Texas Instruments Incorporated.
10.4 3,5 Cooperation and License Agreement dated November 27, 1993
between the Registrant and Futaba Corporation.
10.5 3,5 License Agreement dated November 27, 1993 between the
Registrant and Futaba Corporation.
10.6 3,5 Cooperation and License Agreement dated June 1, 1994 between
the Registrant and Raytheon Company.
10.7 3 ESPRIT Project: 8730 Active Interest for Multimedia with Field
Emission Display dated December 1, 1993 among the Registrant
and other project participants.
10.8 3 Master Lease Agreement dated December 12, 1994 between
COMDISCO France S.A. and PixTech France.
10.9 3 Purchase Agreement dated December 23, 1994 between COMDISCO
France S.A. and PixTech France.
10.10 3 Guarantee dated November 29, 1994 between the Registrant and
COMDISCO.
10.11 3 Leaseback Agreement dated April 5, 1995 between COMDISCO
France S.A. and PixTech France.
10.12 3,4 Contract between L'Agence Nationale de Valorisation de la
Recherche and PixTech France dated March 3, 1993.
10.13 3,4 Loan agreement between the Banque Worms and PixTech France
dated December 13, 1994, as amended.
10.14 3 Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan.
10.15 3 1995 Director Stock Option Plan.
10.16 3 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
10.17 3 Amended and Restated Investor Rights and Stockholder Voting
Agreement dated as of December 24, 1993, as amended, among the
Registrant and certain of its stockholders.
10.18 3,4 Real Estate Agreement between PixTech France and IBM France
dated February 15, 1994 for space located in Montpellier,
France.
10.19 3,4,5 Agreement of State Support of Technical Development and
Research dated December 30, 1994 between PixTech France and
the Ministry of Industry, Postal Services and
Telecommunications and Foreign Trade.
44
NUMBER FOOTNOTE DESCRIPTION
------ -------- -----------
10.20 3 Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and
each of its directors.
10.21 3,5 Cooperation and License Agreement dated as of June 12, 1995
between the Registrant and Motorola, Inc.
10.22 6 Lease dated as of July 31, 1995 between the Registrant, as
Lessee, and Pecton Court Associates as Lessor.
10.23 6 Lease dated as of March 1, 1996, between the Registrant, as
Lessee, and Frank Deverse as Lessor.
10.24 6 Registration Rights Agreement between the Registrant and
Panocorp Display Systems, Inc. dated February 20, 1996.
10.25 5,7 Termination Agreement dated July, 15, 1996 between the
Registrant and Texas Instrument Incorporated
10.26 5 Amendment No. 1, dated February 6, 1997, to the Cooperation
and Licence Agreement between the Registrant and Motorola.
10.27 Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 14, 1997, between the
Registrant and United Microelectronics Corporation
10.28 Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated February 6, 1997
between the Registrant and Motorola, Inc.
11.1 3 Statement re: computation of per share earnings--Pro Forma.
12.1 3 Statement re: computation of ratios
21.1 3 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young.
99.1 Important Factors Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
- --------
(1) Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the PixTech, Inc. Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Commission File No. 33-93024) and incorporated herein by reference.
(2) Filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the PixTech, Inc. Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Commission File No. 33-93024) and incorporated herein by reference.
(3) Filed as an exhibit with the same number to the PixTech, Inc. Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No. 33-93024) and incorporated
herein by reference.
(4) English translation filed
(5) Certain confidential material contained in the document has been omitted
and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant
to Rule 406 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
(6) Filed as an exhibit with the same number to the PixTech, Inc. Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995 and incorporated herein by
reference.
(7) Filed as Exhibit 10 to the PixTech, Inc. Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference.
45
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES OF
1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY
THE UNDERSIGNED.
PixTech
Dated: March 28, 1997 By: /s/ Jean-Luc Grand-Clement
----------------------------------
JEAN-LUC GRAND-CLEMENT,
PRESIDENT
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
/s/ Jean-Luc Grand-Clement President, Chief March 28, 1997
- ------------------------------------- Executive Officer
JEAN-LUC GRAND-CLEMENT and Chairman of the
Board of Directors
(Principal
Executive and
Financial Officer)
/s/ Yves Morel Chief Financial March 28, 1997
- ------------------------------------- Officer
YVES MOREL
/s/ Jean-Pierre NoBlanc Director March 28, 1997
- -------------------------------------
JEAN-PIERRE NOBLANC
/s/ Pierre-Michel Piccino Director March 28, 1997
- -------------------------------------
PIERRE-MICHEL PICCINO
/s/ William C. Schmidt Director March 28, 1997
- -------------------------------------
WILLIAM C. SCHMIDT
/s/ John A. Hawkins Director March 28, 1997
- -------------------------------------
JOHN A. HAWKINS
46