FORM 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.

(Mark One)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 (FEE REQUIRED)
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)
For the transition period from to
----- -----
Commission file number: 0-11912

CABLE TV FUND 11-C, LTD.
------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Colorado 84-0918165
-------- ----------
(State of Organization) (IRS Employer Identification No.)

P.O. Box 3309, Englewood, Colorado 80155-3309 (303) 792-3111
- --------------------------------------------- --------------
(Address of principal executive office and Zip Code) (Registrant's
telephone no. including
area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Limited Partnership
Interests

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants, (1) have filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days:

Yes x No
--- ---

Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant: N/A

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K ((S)229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
-------

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None

(27543)

Information contained in this Form 10-K Report contains "forward-
looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical facts,
included in this Form 10-K Report that address activities, events or
developments that the Partnership, the Venture or the General Partner expects,
believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements are based upon certain assumptions
and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results could
differ materially from the results predicted by these forward-looking
statements.

PART I.
-------

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
-----------------

THE PARTNERSHIP. Cable TV Fund 11-C, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a
Colorado limited partnership that was formed pursuant to the public offering of
limited partnership interests in the Cable TV Fund 11 Limited Partnership
Program (the "Program"), which was sponsored by Jones Intercable, Inc. (the
"General Partner"). Cable TV Fund 11-A, Ltd. ("Fund 11-A"), Cable TV Fund 11-B,
Ltd. ("Fund 11-B") and Cable TV Fund 11-D, Ltd. ("Fund 11-D") are the other
partnerships that were formed pursuant to the Program. The Partnership, Fund
11-A, Fund 11-B and Fund 11-D formed a general partnership known as Cable TV
Joint Fund 11 (the "Venture") in which the Partnership owns an 27 percent
interest, Fund 11-A owns an 18 percent interest, Fund 11-B owns a 8 percent
interest and Fund 11-D owns a 47 percent interest. The Partnership and the
Venture were formed for the purpose of acquiring and operating cable television
systems.

The Partnership does not directly own any cable television systems.
The Partnership's only asset is its 27 percent ownership interest in the
Venture, and the Venture's only asset is the cable television system serving
subscribers in Manitowoc, Wisconsin (the "Manitowoc System").

PROPOSED DISPOSITION OF CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM. The Venture has
entered into an asset purchase agreement to sell the Manitowoc System to the
General Partner. Because the City of Manitowoc had not consented to the
transfer of the franchise by the asset purchase agreement's original expiration
date of September 30, 1996, the Venture and the General Partner amended the
asset purchase agreement to extend the period in which to close the sale of the
Manitowoc System to June 30, 1997. Under the terms of the asset purchase
agreement, as amended, the sale price for the Manitowoc System will be
$16,122,333.

The closing of the sale of the Manitowoc System is subject to the
approval of the limited partners of each of the partnerships that comprise the
Venture. There can be no assurance that any such approvals will be obtained.
The General Partner, on behalf of the partnerships that comprise the Venture, is
in the process of preparing proxy solicitation materials to seek the approval of
the limited partners of the four constituent partnerships of the Venture.

If the proposed sale of the Manitowoc System is closed, the Venture
will pay all of its indebtedness, which totaled $3,679 at December 31, 1996, and
then the net sale proceeds plus the Venture's cash on hand will be distributed
to the four constituent partnerships of the Venture in proportion to their
ownership interests in the Venture. The Partnership accordingly will receive 27
percent of such proceeds, estimated to total approximately $5,232,549, which
will be distributed to its partners. The Partnership also will distribute its
cash on hand from the remaining proceeds from the prior sales of systems and
from operations. Cash generated from operations totaling approximately $375,138
will be distributed 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the General Partner.
Because limited partners have already received distributions in an amount in
excess of the capital initially contributed to the Partnership by the limited
partners, the Partnership's portion of the remaining proceeds from the sale of
other Wisconsin systems formerly owned by the Venture and the net proceeds from
the Manitowoc System's sale will be distributed 75 percent to the limited
partners and 25 percent to the General Partner. Based upon pro forma financial
information as of December 31, 1996, the limited partners of the Partnership
as a group, will receive approximately $4,014,812 and the General Partner will
receive approximately $1,217,737. Limited partners will receive approximately
$145 for each $500 limited partnership interest, or $290 for each $1,000
invested in the Partnership.

Once the Partnership has completed the distribution of its portion of these
amounts, limited partners of the Partnership will have received a total of
$1,125 for each $500 limited partnership interest, or $2,250 for each $1,000
invested in the Partnership, taking into account the prior distributions to
limited partners made in 1990. After the Partnership distributes these amounts,
the Partnership will be dissolved and liquidated.

CABLE TELEVISION SERVICES. The Manitowoc System offers to its
subscribers various types of programming, which include basic service, tier
service, premium service, pay-per-view programs and packages including several
of these services at combined rates.

Basic cable television service usually consists of signals of all four
national television networks, various independent and educational television
stations (both VHF and UHF) and certain signals received from satellites. Basic
service also usually includes programs originated locally by the system, which
may consist of music, news, weather reports, stock market and financial
information and live or videotaped programs of a public service or entertainment
nature. FM radio signals are also frequently distributed to subscribers as part
of the basic service.

The Manitowoc System offers tier services on an optional basis to its
subscribers. A tier generally includes most of the cable networks such as
Entertainment and Sports Programming Network (ESPN), Cable News Network (CNN),
Turner Network Television (TNT), Family Channel, Discovery and others, and the
cable television operators buy tier programming from these networks. The
Manitowoc System also offers a package that includes the basic service channels
and the tier services.

The Manitowoc System also offers premium services to its subscribers,
which consist of feature films, sporting events and other special features that
are presented without commercial interruption. The cable television operators
buy premium programming from suppliers such as HBO, Showtime, Cinemax or others
at a cost based on the number of subscribers the cable operator serves. Premium
service programming usually is significantly more expensive than the basic
service or tier service programming, and consequently cable operators price
premium service separately when sold to subscribers.

The Manitowoc System also offers to subscribers pay-per-view
programming. Pay-per-view is a service that allows subscribers to receive
single programs, frequently consisting of motion pictures that have recently
completed their theatrical exhibitions and major sporting events, and to pay for
such service on a program-by-program basis.

REVENUES. Monthly service fees for basic, tier and premium services
constitute the major source of revenue for the Manitowoc System. At December
31, 1996, the Manitowoc System's monthly basic service rate was $11.08, the
monthly basic and tier ("basic plus") service rate was $20.66 and the monthly
premium services ranged from $4.97 to $9.95 per premium service. In addition,
the Venture earns revenues from pay-per-view programs and advertising fees.
Related charges may include a nonrecurring installation fee that ranges from
$1.99 to $35.00; however, from time to time the Manitowoc System has followed
the common industry practice of reducing or waiving the installation fee during
promotional periods. Commercial subscribers such as hotels, motels and
hospitals are charged a nonrecurring connection fee that usually covers the cost
of installation. Except under the terms of certain contracts with commercial
subscribers and residential apartment and condominium complexes, the subscribers
are free to discontinue the service at any time without penalty. For the year
ended December 31, 1996, of the total fees received by the Manitowoc System,
basic service and tier service fees accounted for approximately 72% of total
revenues, premium service fees accounted for approximately 17% of total
revenues, pay-per-view fees were approximately 1% of total revenues, advertising
fees were approximately 4% of total revenues and the remaining 6% of total
revenues came principally from equipment rentals, installation fees and program
guide sales. The Venture is dependent upon the timely receipt of service fees
to provide for maintenance and replacement of plant and equipment, current
operating expenses and other costs of the Manitowoc System.

FRANCHISES. The Venture holds one franchise for the City of Manitowoc.
The term of the original franchise with the City of Manitowoc expired in 1995.
Effective as of January 1, 1997, the Venture entered into a new franchise with
the City of Manitowoc with a five-year term, said term expiring on December 31,
2001.

The Manitowoc System's franchise provides for the payment of a
franchise fee to the City of Manitowoc in the amount of 5% of the gross revenues
of the Manitowoc System. The 1984 Cable Act prohibits franchising authorities
from imposing annual franchise fees in excess of 5% of gross revenues and also
permits the cable television system operator to seek renegotiation and
modification of franchise requirements if warranted by changed circumstances.

COMPETITION. Cable television systems currently experience
competition from several sources.

Broadcast Television. Cable television systems have traditionally
---------------------
competed with broadcast television, which consists of television signals that
the viewer is able to receive directly on his television without charge using an
"off-air" antenna. The extent of such competition is dependent in part upon the
quality and quantity of signals available by such antenna reception as compared
to the services provided by the local cable system. Accordingly, it has
generally been less difficult for cable operators to obtain higher penetration
rates in rural areas where signals available off-air are limited, than in
metropolitan areas where numerous, high quality off-air signals are often
available without the aid of cable television systems.

Traditional Overbuild. Cable television franchises are not exclusive,
---------------------
so that more than one cable television system may be built in the same area
(known as an "overbuild"), with potential loss of revenues to the operator of
the original cable television system. The General Partner has experienced
overbuilds in connection with certain systems that it has owned or managed for
limited partnerships, and currently there are overbuilds in the systems owned or
managed by the General Partner. Constructing and developing a cable television
system is a capital intensive process, and it is often difficult for a new cable
system operator to create a marketing edge over the existing system. Generally,
an overbuilder would be required to obtain franchises from the local
governmental authorities, although in some instances, the overbuilder could be
the local government itself. In any case, an overbuilder would be required to
obtain programming contracts from entertainment programmers and, in most cases,
would have to build a complete cable system, including headends, trunk lines and
drops to individual subscribers homes, throughout the franchise areas.

DBS. High-powered direct-to-home satellites have made possible the
---
wide-scale delivery of programming to individuals throughout the United States
using small roof-top or wall-mounted antennas. Several companies began offering
direct broadcast satellite ("DBS") service over the last few years and
additional entrants are expected. Companies offering DBS service use video
compression technology to increase channel capacity of their systems to 100 or
more channels and to provide packages of movies, satellite network and other
program services which are competitive to those of cable television systems.
DBS cannot currently offer its subscribers local programming, although at least
one future DBS entrant is attempting to offer customers regional delivery of
local broadcast signals. In addition to emerging high-powered DBS competition,
cable television systems face competition from a major medium-powered satellite
distribution provider and several low-powered providers, whose service requires
use of much larger home satellite dishes. Not all subscribers terminate cable
television service upon acquiring a DBS system. The General Partner has
observed that there are DBS subscribers that also elect to subscribe to cable
television service in order to obtain the greatest variety of programming on
multiple television sets, including local programming not available through DBS
service. The ability of DBS service providers to compete successfully with the
cable television industry will depend on, among other factors, the ability of
DBS providers to overcome certain legal and technical hurdles and the
availability of equipment at reasonable prices.

Telephone. Federal cross-ownership restrictions historically limited
---------
entry by local telephone companies into the cable television business. The 1996
Telecommunications Act (the "1996 Telecom Act") eliminated this cross-ownership
restriction, making it possible for companies with considerable resources to
overbuild existing cable operators and enter the business. Several telephone
companies have begun seeking cable television franchises from local governmental
authorities and constructing cable television systems. Ameritech, one of the

seven regional Bell Operating Companies ("BOCs"), which provides telephone
service in a multi-state region including Illinois, has been the most active BOC
in seeking local cable franchises within its service area. It has already begun
cable service in Naperville, Illinois and has also obtained franchises for Glen
Ellyn and Vernon Hills, Illinois, all of which are currently served by cable
systems owned by three partnerships managed by the General Partner. The General
Partner cannot predict at this time the extent of telephone company competition
that will emerge to owned or managed cable television systems. The entry of
telephone companies as direct competitors, however, is likely to continue over
the next several years and could adversely affect the profitability and market
value of the General Partner's owned and managed systems. The entry of electric
utility companies into the cable television business, as now authorized by the
1996 Telecom Act, could have a similar adverse effect.

Private Cable. Additional competition is provided by private cable
-------------
television systems, known as Satellite Master Antenna Television (SMATV),
serving multi-unit dwellings such as condominiums, apartment complexes, and
private residential communities. These private cable systems may enter into
exclusive agreements with apartment owners and homeowners associations, which
may preclude operators of franchised systems from serving residents of such
private complexes. Private cable systems that do not cross public rights of way
are free from the federal, state and local regulatory requirements imposed on
franchised cable television operators. In some cases, the Partnership has been
unable to provide cable television service to buildings in which private
operators have secured exclusive contracts to provide video and telephony
services. The Partnership is interested in providing these same services, but
expects that the market to install and provide these services in multi-unit
buildings will continue to be highly competitive.

MMDS. Cable television systems also compete with wireless program
----
distribution services such as multichannel, multipoint distribution service
("MMDS") systems, commonly called wireless cable, which are licensed to serve
specific areas. MMDS uses low-power microwave frequencies to transmit
television programming over-the-air to paying subscribers. The MMDS industry is
less capital intensive than the cable television industry, and it is therefore
more practical to construct MMDS systems in areas of lower subscriber
penetration. Wireless cable systems are now in direct competition with cable
television systems in several areas of the country, including the system in Pima
County, Arizona owned by the General Partner. Telephone companies have recently
acquired or invested in wireless companies, and may use MMDS systems to provide
services within their service areas in lieu of wired delivery systems.
Enthusiasm for MMDS has waned in recent months, however, as Bell Atlantic and
NYNEX have suspended their investment in two major MMDS companies. To date, the
Venture has not lost a significant number of subscribers, nor a significant
amount of revenue, to MMDS operators competing with the Venture's cable
television systems. A series of actions taken by the FCC, however, including
reallocating certain frequencies to the wireless services, are intended to
facilitate the development of wireless cable television systems as an
alternative means of distributing video programming. The FCC recently held
auctions for spectrum that will be used by wireless operators to provide
additional channels of programming over larger distances. In addition, an
emerging technology, Local Multipoint Distribution services ("LMDS"), could also
pose a significant threat to the cable television industry, if and when it
becomes established. LMDS, sometimes referred to as cellular television, could
have the capability of delivering more than 100 channels of video programming to
a subscriber's home. The potential impact, however, of LMDS is difficult to
assess due to the newness of the technology and the absence of any current fully
operational LMDS systems.

Cable television systems are also in competition, in various degrees
with other communications and entertainment media, including motion pictures and
home video cassette recorders.

REGULATION AND LEGISLATION
- --------------------------

The operation of cable television systems is extensively regulated by
the FCC, some state governments and most local governments. The new 1996 Telecom
Act alters the
5

regulatory structure governing the nation's telecommunications providers. It
removes barriers to competition in both the cable television market and the
local telephone market. Among other things, it also reduces the scope of cable
rate regulation.

The 1996 Telecom Act requires the FCC to undertake a host of
implementing rulemakings, the final outcome of which cannot yet be determined.
Moreover, Congress and the FCC have frequently revisited the subject of cable
regulation. Future legislative and regulatory changes could adversely affect
the Venture's operations. This section briefly summarizes key laws and
regulations affecting the operation of the Venture's cable systems and does not
purport to describe all present, proposed, or possible laws and regulations
affecting the Venture.

Cable Rate Regulation. The 1992 Cable Act imposed an extensive rate
---------------------
regulation regime on the cable television industry. Under that regime, all
cable systems are subject to rate regulation, unless they face "effective
competition" in their local franchise area. Federal law now defines "effective
competition" on a community-specific basis as requiring either low penetration
(less than 30%) by the incumbent cable operator, appreciable penetration (more
than 15%) by competing multichannel video providers ("MVPs"), or the presence of
a competing MVP affiliated with a local telephone company.

Although the FCC rules control, local government units (commonly
referred to as local franchising authorities or "LFAs") are primarily
responsible for administering the regulation of the lowest level of cable -- the
basic service tier ("BST"), which typically contains local broadcast stations
and public, educational, and government ("PEG") access channels. Before an LFA
begins BST rate regulation, it must certify to the FCC that it will follow
applicable federal rules, and many LFAs have voluntarily declined to exercise
this authority. LFAs also have primary responsibility for regulating cable
equipment rates. Under federal law, charges for various types of cable
equipment must be unbundled from each other and from monthly charges for
programming services. The 1996 Telecom Act allows operators to aggregate costs
for broad categories of equipment across geographic and functional lines. This
change should facilitate the introduction of new technology.

The FCC itself directly administers rate regulation of any cable
programming service tiers ("CPST"), which typically contain satellite-delivered
programming. Under the 1996 Telecom Act, the FCC can regulate CPST rates only
if an LFA first receives at least two rate complaints from local subscribers and
then files a formal complaint with the FCC. When new CPST rate complaints are
filed, the FCC now considers only whether the incremental increase is justified
and will not reduce the previously established CPST rate.

Under the FCC's rate regulations, most cable systems were required to
reduce their BST and CPST rates in 1993 and 1994, and have since had their rate
increases governed by a complicated price cap scheme that allows for the
recovery of inflation and certain increased costs, as well as providing some
incentive for expanding channel carriage. The FCC has modified its rate
adjustment regulations to allow for annual rate increases and to minimize
previous problems associated with regulatory lag. Operators also have the
opportunity of bypassing this "benchmark" regulatory scheme in favor of
traditional "cost-of-service" regulation in cases where the latter methodology
appears favorable. Premium cable services offered on a per-channel or per-
program basis remain unregulated, as do affirmatively marketed packages
consisting entirely of new programming product. Federal law requires that the
BST be offered to all cable subscribers, but limits the ability of operators to
require purchase of any CPST before purchasing premium services offered on a
per-channel or per-program basis.

The 1996 Telecom Act sunsets FCC regulation of CPST rates for all
systems (regardless of size) on March 31, 1999. It also relaxes existing
uniform rate requirements by specifying that uniform rate requirements do not
apply where the operator faces "effective competition," and by exempting bulk
discounts to multiple dwelling units, although complaints about predatory
pricing still may be made to the FCC.

Cable Entry Into Telecommunications. The 1996 Telecom Act provides
-----------------------------------
that no state or local laws or regulations may prohibit or have the effect of
prohibiting any entity from providing any interstate or intrastate
telecommunications service. States are authorized, however, to impose
"competitively neutral" requirements regarding universal service, public safety
and welfare, service quality, and consumer protection. State and local

governments also retain their authority to manage the public rights-of-way and
may require reasonable, competitively neutral compensation for management of the
public rights-of-way when cable operators provide telecommunications service.
The favorable pole attachment rates afforded cable operators under federal law
can be gradually increased by utility companies owning the poles (beginning in
2001) if the operator provides telecommunications service, as well as cable
service, over its plant.

Cable entry into telecommunications will be affected by the regulatory
landscape now being fashioned by the FCC and state regulators. One critical
component of the 1996 Telecom Act to facilitate the entry of new
telecommunications providers (including cable operators) is the interconnection
obligation imposed on all telecommunications carriers. Review of the FCC's
initial interconnection order is now pending before the Eighth Circuit Court of
Appeals.

Telephone Company Entry Into Cable Television. The 1996 Telecom Act
---------------------------------------------
allows telephone companies to compete directly with cable operators by repealing
the historic telephone company/cable cross-ownership ban. Local exchange
carriers ("LECs"), including the BOCs, can now compete with cable operators both
inside and outside their telephone service areas. Because of their resources,
LECs could be formidable competitors to traditional cable operators, and certain
LECs have begun offering cable service. As described above, the General Partner
is now witnessing the beginning of LEC competition in a few of its cable
communities.

Under the 1996 Telecom Act, a LEC providing video programming to
subscribers will be regulated as a traditional cable operator (subject to local
franchising and federal regulatory requirements), unless the LEC elects to
provide its programming via an "open video system" ("OVS"). To qualify for OVS
status, the LEC must reserve two-thirds of the system's activated channels for
unaffiliated entities.

Although LECs and cable operators can now expand their offerings
across traditional service boundaries, the general prohibition remains on LEC
buyouts (i.e., any ownership interest exceeding 10 percent) of co-located cable
systems, cable operator buyouts of co-located LEC systems, and joint ventures
between cable operators and LECs in the same market. The 1996 Telecom Act
provides a few limited exceptions to this buyout prohibition, including a
carefully circumscribed "rural exemption." The 1996 Telecom Act also provides
the FCC with the limited authority to grant waivers of the buyout prohibition
(subject to LFA approval).

Electric Utility Entry Into Telecommunications/Cable Television. The
---------------------------------------------------------------
1996 Telecom Act provides that registered utility holding companies and
subsidiaries may provide telecommunications services (including cable
television) notwithstanding the Public Utilities Holding Company Act. Electric
utilities must establish separate subsidiaries, known as "exempt
telecommunications companies" and must apply to the FCC for operating authority.
Again, because of their resources, electric utilities could be formidable
competitors to traditional cable systems.

Additional Ownership Restrictions. The 1996 Telecom Act eliminates
---------------------------------
statutory restrictions on broadcast/cable cross-ownership (including broadcast
network/cable restrictions), but leaves in place existing FCC regulations
prohibiting local cross-ownership between co-located television stations and
cable systems. The 1996 Telecom Act also eliminates the three year holding
period required under the 1992 Cable Act's "anti-trafficking" provision. The
1996 Telecom Act leaves in place existing restrictions on cable cross-ownership
with SMATV and MMDS facilities, but lifts those restrictions where the cable
operator is subject to effective competition. In January 1995, however, the FCC
adopted regulations which permit cable operators to own and operate SMATV
systems within their franchise area, provided that such operation is consistent
with local cable franchise requirements.

Pursuant to the 1992 Cable Act, the FCC adopted rules precluding a
cable system from devoting more than 40% of its activated channel capacity to
the carriage of affiliated national program services. A companion rule
establishing a nationwide ownership cap on any cable operator equal to 30% of
all domestic cable subscribers has been stayed pending further judicial review.

There are no federal restrictions on non-U.S. entities having an
ownership interest in cable television systems or the FCC licenses commonly
employed by such systems. Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act does,
however, prohibit foreign ownership of FCC broadcast and telephone licenses,
unless the FCC concludes that such foreign ownership is consistent with the
public interest. BCI's investment in the General Partner could, therefore,
adversely affect any plan to acquire FCC broadcast or common carrier licenses.
The Partnership, however, does not currently plan to acquire such licenses.

Must Carry/Retransmission Consent. The 1992 Cable Act contains
---------------------------------
broadcast signal carriage requirements that allow local commercial television
broadcast stations to elect once every three years between requiring a cable
system to carry the station ("must carry") or negotiating for payments for
granting permission to the cable operator to carry the station ("retransmission
consent"). Less popular stations typically elect "must carry," and more popular
stations typically elect "retransmission consent." Must carry requests can
dilute the appeal of a cable system's programming offerings, and retransmission
consent demands may require substantial payments or other concessions. Either
option has a potentially adverse affect on the Venture's business.
Additionally, cable systems are required to obtain retransmission consent for
all "distant" commercial television stations (except for satellite-delivered
independent "superstations" such as WTBS). The constitutionality of the must
carry requirements has been challenged and is awaiting a decision from the U.S.
Supreme Court.

Access Channels. LFAs can include franchise provisions requiring
---------------
cable operators to set aside certain channels for public, educational and
governmental access programming. Federal law also requires cable systems to
designate a portion of their channel capacity (up to 15% in some cases) for
commercial leased access by unaffiliated third parties. The FCC has adopted
rules regulating the terms, conditions and maximum rates a cable operator may
charge for use of the designated channel capacity, but use of commercial leased
access channels has been relatively limited. The FCC released revised rules in
February 1997 which mandate a modest rate reduction and could make commercial
leased access a more attractive option to third party programmers.

Access to Programming. To spur the development of independent cable
---------------------
programmers and competition to incumbent cable operators, the 1992 Cable Act
imposed restrictions on the dealings between cable operators and cable
programmers. Of special significance from a competitive business posture, the
1992 Cable Act precludes video programmers affiliated with cable companies from
favoring cable operators over competitors and requires such programmers to sell
their programming to other multichannel video distributors. This provision
limits the ability of vertically integrated cable programmers to offer exclusive
programming arrangements to cable companies.

Other FCC Regulations. In addition to the FCC regulations noted
---------------------
above, there are other FCC regulations covering such areas as equal employment
opportunity, subscriber privacy, programming practices (including, among other
things, syndicated program exclusivity, network program nonduplication, local
sports blackouts, indecent programming, lottery programming, political
programming, sponsorship identification, and children's programming
advertisements), registration of cable systems and facilities licensing,
maintenance of various records and public inspection files, frequency usage,
lockbox availability, antenna structure notification, tower marking and
lighting, consumer protection and customer service standards, technical
standards, and consumer electronics equipment compatibility. The FCC is
expected to impose new Emergency Alert System requirements on cable operators
this year. The FCC has the authority to enforce its regulations through the
imposition of substantial fines, the issuance of cease and desist orders and/or
the imposition of other administrative sanctions, such as the revocation of FCC
licenses needed to operate certain transmission facilities used in connection
with cable operations.

Two pending FCC proceedings of particular competitive concern involve
inside wiring and navigational devices. The former rulemaking is considering
ownership of cable wiring located inside multiple dwelling unit complexes. If
the FCC concludes that such wiring belongs to, or can be unilaterally acquired
by the complex owner, it will become easier for complex owners to terminate
service from the incumbent cable operator in favor of a new entrant. The latter
rulemaking is considering whether cable customers must be allowed to purchase
cable converters from third party vendors. If the FCC concludes that such
distribution is required, and does not

make appropriate allowances for signal piracy concerns, it may become more
difficult for cable operators to combat theft of service.

Copyright. Cable television systems are subject to federal copyright
---------
licensing covering carriage of television and radio broadcast signals. In
exchange for filing certain reports and contributing a percentage of their
revenues to a federal copyright royalty pool (that varies depending on the size
of the system and the number of distant broadcast television signals carried),
cable operators can obtain blanket permission to retransmit copyrighted material
on broadcast signals. The possible modification or elimination of this
compulsory copyright license is the subject of continuing legislative review and
could adversely affect the Partnership's ability to obtain desired broadcast
programming. In addition, the cable industry pays music licensing fees to BMI
and is negotiating a similar arrangement with ASCAP. Copyright clearances for
nonbroadcast programming services are arranged through private negotiations.

State and Local Regulation. Cable television systems generally are
--------------------------
operated pursuant to nonexclusive franchises granted by a municipality or other
state or local government entity in order to cross public rights-of-way.
Federal law now prohibits franchise authorities from granting exclusive
franchises or from unreasonably refusing to award additional franchises. Cable
franchises generally are granted for fixed terms and in many cases include
monetary penalties for non-compliance and may be terminable if the franchisee
fails to comply with material provisions.

The terms and conditions of franchises vary materially from
jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Each franchise generally contains provisions
governing cable operations, service rates, franchise fees, system construction
and maintenance obligations, system channel capacity, design and technical
performance, customer service standards, and indemnification protections. A
number of states subject cable television systems to the jurisdiction of
centralized state governmental agencies, some of which impose regulation of a
character similar to that of a public utility. Although LFAs have considerable
discretion in establishing franchise terms, there are certain federal
limitations. For example, LFAs cannot insist on franchise fees exceeding 5% of
the system's gross revenues, cannot dictate the particular technology used by
the system, and cannot specify video programming other than identifying broad
categories of programming.

Federal law contains renewal procedures designed to protect incumbent
franchisees against arbitrary denials of renewal. Even if a franchise is
renewed, the franchise authority may seek to impose new and more onerous
requirements such as significant upgrades in facilities and services or
increased franchise fees as a condition of renewal. Similarly, if a franchise
authority's consent is required for the purchase or sale of a cable system or
franchise, such authority may attempt to impose more burdensome or onerous
franchise requirements in connection with a request for consent. Historically,
franchises have been renewed for cable operators that have provided satisfactory
services and have complied with the terms of their franchises.

GENERAL. The Venture's business consists of providing cable
television services to a large number of customers, the loss of any one of which
would have no material effect on the Venture's business. The Manitowoc System
has had some subscribers who later terminated the service. Terminations occur
primarily because people move to another home or to another city. In other
cases, people terminate on a seasonal basis or because they no longer can afford
or are dissatisfied with the service. The amount of past due accounts in the
Manitowoc System is not significant. The General Partner's policy with regard
to past due accounts is basically one of disconnecting service before a past due
account becomes material.

The Venture does not depend to any material extent on the availability
of raw materials; it carries no significant amounts of inventory and it has no
material backlog of customer orders. Neither the Venture nor the Partnership
has any employees because all properties are managed by employees of the General
Partner. The General Partner has engaged in research and development activities
relating to the provision of new services but the amount of the Venture's funds
expended for such research and development has never been material.

Compliance with federal, state and local provisions that have been
enacted or adopted regulating the discharge of materials into the environment or
otherwise relating to the protection of the environment has had no material
effect upon the capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position of the
Venture.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
-------------------

The Manitowoc System was acquired by the Venture in April 1984. The
following sets forth (i) the monthly basic plus service rate charged to
subscribers and (ii) the number of basic subscribers and pay units for the
Manitowoc System. The monthly basic service rate set forth herein represents
the basic service rate charged to the majority of the subscribers within the
Manitowoc System. In cable television systems, basic subscribers can subscribe
to more than one pay TV service. Thus, the total number of pay services
subscribed to by basic subscribers are called pay units. As of December 31,
1996, the Manitowoc System operated cable plant passing approximately 16,300
homes, with an approximate 71% penetration rate. Figures for numbers of
subscribers and homes passed are compiled from the General Partner's records and
may be subject to adjustments.

At December 31,
---------------------------------
MANITOWOC SYSTEM 1996 1995 1994
- --------------------------------- -------- ------- -------

Monthly basic plus service rate $ 20.66 $ 20.66 $ 19.86
Basic subscribers 11,055 10,800 10,219
Pay units 6,914 7,753 6,639

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
--------------------------

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
------------------------------------------------------------

None.

PART II.
--------

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK
-------------------------------------------------
AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS
-----------------------------------

While the Partnership is publicly held, there is no public market for
the limited partnership interests, and it is not expected that a market will
develop in the future. As of February 14, 1997, the number of equity security
holders in the Partnership was 2,322.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data
- --------------------------------

For the Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cable TV Fund 11-C, Ltd.(a) 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
- ------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

Revenues $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Net Income 113,414 123,056 101,169 66,836 88,256
Net Income
per Limited
Partnership Unit 4.06 4.40 3.62 2.39 3.16
Weighted Average
Number of Limited
Partnership Units
Outstanding 27,657 27,657 27,657 27,657 27,657
General Partner's
Deficit (98,609) (99,743) (100,974) (101,986) (102,654)
Limited Partners'
Capital 2,651,416 2,539,136 2,417,311 2,317,154 2,250,986
Total Assets 2,552,807 2,439,393 2,316,337 2,215,168 2,148,332
Debt - - - - -
General Partner
Advances - - - - -

(a) Activity in Cable TV Fund 11-C, Ltd. is limited to its 27 percent equity
interest in Cable TV Joint Fund 11. See selected financial data for Cable TV
Joint Fund 11.

For the Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------
Cable TV Joint Fund 11 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
- ---------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Revenues $3,726,329 $3,632,675 $3,296,103 $3,292,675 $3,244,023
Depreciation and
Amortization 442,456 545,237 522,593 517,441 499,110
Operating Income 396,465 296,393 309,189 416,589 426,058
Net Income 418,346 453,912 373,181 246,536 325,547
Partners' Capital 7,470,103 7,051,757 6,597,845 6,224,664 5,978,128
Total Assets 8,028,846 7,504,046 7,099,110 6,610,142 6,723,916
Debt 3,679 9,917 26,385 20,129 29,188
Advances from
Jones Intercable, Inc. - 45,258 72,764 32,825 52,745

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
of Operations
- -------------

The following discussion of Cable TV Fund 11-C, Ltd.'s (the
"Partnership") and Cable TV Joint Fund 11's ("Joint Fund 11") financial
condition and results of operations contains, in addition to historical
information, forward-looking statements that are based upon certain assumptions
and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. The Partnership's and
Joint Fund 11's actual results may differ significantly from the results
predicted in such forward-looking statements.

FINANCIAL CONDITION
- -------------------

Cable TV Fund 11-C, Ltd. -
- ------------------------

The Partnership's investment in Joint Fund 11, accounted for under the
equity method, has increased by $113,414 to $2,552,807 at December 31, 1996 from
$2,439,393 at December 31, 1995. This increase represents the Partnership's
proportionate share of income generated by Joint Fund 11. Refer to Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for
Joint Fund 11 for details pertaining to its financial condition.

Joint Fund 11 has entered into an asset purchase agreement to sell the
Manitowoc System to the General Partner. Because the City of Manitowoc had not
consented to the transfer of the franchise by the asset purchase agreement's
original expiration date of September 30, 1996, Joint Fund 11 and the General
Partner amended the asset purchase agreement to extend the period in which to
close the sale of the Manitowoc System to June 30, 1997. Under the terms of the
asset purchase agreement, as amended, the sales price of the Manitowoc System
will be $16,122,333.

The closing of the sale of the Manitowoc System is subject to the
approval of the limited partners of each of the partnerships that comprise the
Venture. There can be no assurance that such approvals will be obtained. The
General Partner, on behalf of the partnerships that comprise Joint Fund 11, is
in the process of preparing proxy solicitation materials to seek the approval of
the limited partners of the four constituent partnerships of Joint Fund 11.

The Partnership will receive 27 percent of the net sales proceeds,
estimated to total approximately $5,232,549, which will be distributed to its
partners. The Partnership also will distribute its cash on hand from the
remaining proceeds from prior sales of systems and from operations. Cash
generated from operations of approximately $375,138 will be distributed 99
percent to the limited partners and 1 percent to the General Partner. Because
limited partners have already received distributions in an amount in excess of
the capital initially contributed to the Partnership by the limited partners,
the Partnership's portion of the remaining proceeds from the sale of other
Wisconsin systems formerly owned by the Venture and the net proceeds from the
sale of the Manitowoc System will be distributed 75 percent to the limited
partners and 25 percent to the General Partner. Based upon pro forma financial
information as of December 31, 1996, the limited partners of the Partnership, as
a group, will receive approximately $4,014,812 and the General Partner will
receive approximately $1,217,737. As a result, it is anticipated that the
limited partners will receive approximately $145 for each $500 limited
partnership interest, or approximately $290 for each $1,000 invested in the
Partnership. Once the Partnership has completed the distribution of these
amounts, limited partners of the Partnership will have received a total of
approximately $1,125 for each $500 limited partnership interest, or
approximately $2,250 for each $1,000 invested in the Partnership, taking into
account the prior distributions to limited partners made in 1990. After the
Partnership distributes these amounts, the Partnership will be dissolved and
liquidated.

Cable TV Joint Fund 11 -
- ----------------------

The closing of the sale of the Manitowoc System is subject to the
approval of the limited partners of each of the partnerships that comprise Joint
Fund 11. There can be no assurance that such approvals will be obtained. The
General Partner, on behalf of the partnerships that comprise Joint Fund 11, is
in the process of preparing proxy solicitation materials to seek the approval of
the limited partners of the four constituent partnerships of Joint Fund 11.

Upon the consummation of the proposed sale of the Manitowoc System, Joint
Fund 11 will pay all of its indebtedness, which totaled $3,679 at December 31,
1996, and then the net sales proceeds plus cash on hand will be distributed to
Cable TV Fund 11-A, Ltd., Cable TV Fund 11-B, Ltd., Cable TV Fund 11-C, Ltd. and
Cable TV Fund 11-D, Ltd. The net sales proceeds plus cash on hand will be
distributed as follows: Cable TV Fund 11-A, Ltd. will receive approximately
$3,516,674; Cable TV Fund 11-B, Ltd. will receive approximately $1,501,632;
Cable TV Fund 11-C, Ltd. will receive approximately $5,232,549 and Cable TV Fund
11-D, Ltd. will receive approximately $9,050,322. After Joint Fund 11
distributes the proceeds from the sale of the Manitowoc System to its partners,
Joint Fund 11 will be liquidated and dissolved.

Joint Fund 11 had no bank debt outstanding at December 31, 1996.

During 1996, Joint Fund 11 expended approximately $367,000 for capital
expenditures in the Manitowoc System. These expenditures were used for various
enhancements to maintain the value of the system until it is sold and were
funded from cash generated from operations. Capital expenditures in 1997 for the
Manitowoc System will consist of expenditures necessary to maintain the value of
the Manitowoc System until it is sold. Joint Fund 11 has sufficient liquidity
and capital resources, including cash on hand and its ability to generate cash
from operations, to meet its anticipated needs.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
- ---------------------

Cable TV Fund 11-C, Ltd. -
- ------------------------

Substantially all of the Partnership's operations are generated through
its 27 percent interest in Joint Fund 11. Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for Joint Fund 11 should be
reviewed for pertinent comments regarding the Partnership's performance compared
to prior periods.

Cable TV Joint Fund 11 -
- ----------------------

1996 compared to 1995
---------------------

Revenues in Joint Fund 11's Manitowoc System increased $93,654, or
approximately 3 percent, to $3,726,329 in 1996 compared to $3,632,675 in 1995.
An increase in the number of basic subscribers primarily accounted for the
increase in revenues in 1996. The number of basic subscribers increased by 255
subscribers, or approximately 2 percent, to 11,055 at December 31, 1996 from
10,800 at December 31, 1995. No other individual factor contributed
significantly to the increase in revenues.

Operating expenses consist primarily of costs associated with the
operation and administration of the Manitowoc System. The principal cost
components are salaries paid to system personnel, programming expenses,
professional fees, subscriber billing costs, rent for leased facilities, cable
system maintenance expenses and marketing expenses.

Operating expenses in the Manitowoc System increased $107,377, or
approximately 5 percent, to $2,434,731 in 1996 compared to $2,327,354 in 1995.
Operating expenses represented approximately 65 percent of revenues in 1996
compared to approximately 64 percent of revenues in 1995. The increase in
operating expenses was due primarily to an increase in programming expenses and
an increase in copyright fees. No other individual factor significantly
affected the increase in operating expenses.

Management fees and allocated overhead from the General Partner decreased
$11,014, or approximately 2 percent, to $452,677 in 1996 compared to $463,691 in
1995. The decrease was due to a decrease in allocated overhead from the General
Partner.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $102,781, or
approximately 19 percent, to $442,456 in 1996 compared to $545,237 in 1995, due
to the maturation of the intangible asset base.

Operating income increased $100,072, or approximately 34 percent, to
$396,465 in 1996 compared to $296,393 in 1995. The increase was due to the
increase in revenues and the decreases in depreciation and amortization expense
and management fees and allocated overhead from the General Partner exceeding
the increase in operating expenses.

The cable television industry generally measures the financial
performance of a cable television system in terms of operating income before
depreciation and amortization. This measure is not intended to be a substitute
or improvement upon the items disclosed on the financial statements, rather it
is included because it is an industry standard. Operating income before
depreciation and amortization decreased $2,709, or less than 1 percent, to
$838,921 in 1996 compared to $841,630. The decrease was due to the increase in
operating expenses exceeding the increase in revenues and decrease in management
fees and allocated overhead from the General Partner.

Interest income decreased $5,202, or approximately 3 percent, to $161,078
in 1996 compared to $166,280 in 1995. This decrease was due to lower interest
rates on interest-bearing accounts in 1996.

Other expense totaled $139,197 in 1996 compared to other income of $1,242
in 1995. This change was due primarily to additional expenses incurred in 1996
from a sales and use tax audit. There are no open audits as of December 31,
1996.

Net income of Joint Fund 11 decreased $35,566, or approximately 8
percent, to $418,346 in 1996 compared to $453,912 in 1995. The decrease was due
primarily to the increase in other expense.

1995 compared to 1994
---------------------

Revenues in Joint Fund 11's Manitowoc System increased $336,572, or
approximately 10 percent, to $3,632,675 in 1995 compared to $3,296,103 in 1994.
An increase in the subscriber base accounted for approximately 55 percent of the
increase in revenues in 1995. The number of basic subscribers increased by 581
subscribers, or approximately 6 percent, to 10,800 at December 31, 1995 from
10,219 at December 31, 1994. The number of premium subscriptions increased by
614 subscriptions, or approximately 9 percent, to 7,253 at December 31, 1995
from 6,639 at December 31, 1994. Basic service rate increases accounted for
approximately 14 percent of the increase in revenues. An increase in
advertising sales activity accounted for approximately 22 percent of the
increase in revenues. No other individual factor contributed significantly to
the increase in revenues.

Operating expenses in the Manitowoc System increased $300,591, or
approximately 15 percent, to $2,327,354 in 1995 compared to $2,026,763 in 1994.
Operating expenses represented approximately 64 percent of revenues in 1995
compared to approximately 61 percent of revenues in 1994. The increase in
expenses was primarily due to an increase in programming fees, property tax
expense and advertising sales related expenses. The increase in advertising
sales related expenses was due, in part, to an increase in advertising sales
activity. No other individual factor significantly affected the increase in
operating expenses.

Management fees and allocated overhead from the General Partner increased
$26,133, or approximately 6 percent, to $463,691 for 1995 compared to $437,558
in 1994. The increase was due to the increase in revenues, upon which such fees
and allocations are based, and increases in allocated expenses from the General
Partner.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $22,644, or approximately
4 percent, to $545,237 in 1995 compared to $522,593 in 1994 due to capital
additions in 1995 and 1994.

Operating income decreased $12,796, or approximately 4 percent, to
$296,393 in 1995 compared to $309,189 in 1994. The decrease was due to the
increases in operating expenses, management fees and allocated overhead from the
General Partner and depreciation and amortization expense exceeding the increase
in revenues.

Operating income before depreciation and amortization increased $9,848,
or approximately 1 percent, to $841,630 for 1995 compared to $831,782 in 1994.
The increase was due to the increase in revenues exceeding the increases in
operating expenses and management fees and allocated overhead from the General
Partner.

Interest income increased $79,146, or approximately 91 percent, to
$166,280 in 1995 compared to $87,134 in 1994. This increase was due to higher
cash balances and higher interest rates on interest-bearing accounts in 1995.

Interest expense decreased $5,713, or approximately 36 percent, to
$10,003 in 1995 compared to $15,716 in 1994. The decrease was due to lower
outstanding balances on interest bearing obligations in 1995.

Net income of Joint Fund 11 increased $80,731, or approximately 22
percent, to $453,912 in 1995 compared to $373,181 in 1994. The increase was due
primarily to the increase in interest income.

Item 8. Financial Statements
- -----------------------------

CABLE TV FUND 11-C, LTD. AND
----------------------------
CABLE TV JOINT FUND 11
----------------------

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND 1995
--------------------------------

INDEX
-----

Page
-------------------------

11-C Joint Fund 11
---- -------------
Report of Independent Public Accountants 16 24

Balance Sheets 17 25

Statements of Operations 18 27

Statements of Partners' Capital (Deficit) 19 28

Statements of Cash Flows 20 29

Notes to Financial Statements 21 30

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
----------------------------------------

To the Partners of Cable TV Fund 11-C, Ltd.:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of CABLE TV FUND 11-C,
LTD. (a Colorado limited partnership) as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the
related statements of operations, partners' capital (deficit) and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the General Partner's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cable TV Fund 11-C,
Ltd. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Denver, Colorado,
March 7, 1997.

CABLE TV FUND 11-C, LTD.
------------------------
(A Limited Partnership)

BALANCE SHEETS
--------------

December 31,
--------------------------
ASSETS (Note 1) 1996 1995
------ ------------ ------------

INVESTMENT IN CABLE TELEVISION JOINT VENTURE $ 2,552,807 $ 2,439,393
============ ============

PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT)
---------------------------

PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT):
General Partner-
Contributed capital $ 1,000 $ 1,000
Distributions (4,428,171) (4,428,171)
Accumulated earnings 4,328,562 4,327,428
------------ -------------

(98,609) (99,743)
------------ ------------
Limited Partners-
Net contributed capital
(27,657 units outstanding at
December 31, 1996 and 1995) 11,548,455 11,548,455
Distributions (27,113,013) (27,113,013)
Accumulated earnings 18,215,974 18,103,694
------------ -------------

2,651,416 2,539,136

Total partners' capital (deficit) $ 2,552,807 $ 2,439,393
============ ============

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these balance sheets.

CABLE TV FUND 11-C, LTD.
------------------------
(A Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
------------------------

For the Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
----------- -------- ----------
EQUITY IN NET INCOME OF CABLE
TELEVISION JOINT VENTURE $113,414 $ 123,056 $101,169
-------- --------- --------

NET INCOME $113,414 $ 123,056 $101,169
======== ========= ========

ALLOCATION OF NET INCOME:
General Partner $ 1,134 $ 1,231 $ 1,012
======== ========= ========

Limited Partners $112,280 $ 121,825 $100,157
======== ========= ========

NET INCOME PER LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP UNIT $ 4.06 $ 4.40 $ 3.62
======== ========= ========

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP UNITS OUTSTANDING 27,657 27,657 27,657
======== ========= ========

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these statements.

CABLE TV FUND 11-C, LTD.
------------------------
(A Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT)
-----------------------------------------

For the Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
----------- ----------- -----------
GENERAL PARTNER:
Balance, beginning of year $ (99,743) $ (100,974) $ (101,986)
Net income for year 1,134 1,231 1,012
---------- ---------- ----------

Balance, end of year $ (98,609) $ (99,743) $ (100,974)
========== ========== ==========

LIMITED PARTNERS:
Balance, beginning of year $2,539,136 $2,417,311 $2,317,154
Net income for year 112,280 121,825 100,157
---------- ---------- ----------

Balance, end of year $2,651,416 $2,539,136 $2,417,311
========== ========== ==========

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these statements.

CABLE TV FUND 11-C, LTD.
------------------------
(A Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
------------------------

For the Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
--------- ---------- ----------

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $113,414 $ 123,056 $ 101,169
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Equity in net income of cable
television joint venture (113,414) (123,056) (101,169)
-------- --------- ---------

Net cash provided by operating activities - - -
-------- --------- ---------

Cash, beginning of year - - -
-------- --------- ---------

Cash, end of year $ - $ - $ -
======== ========= =========

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURE:
Interest paid $ - $ - $ -
======== ========= =========

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these statements.

CABLE TV FUND 11-C, LTD.
------------------------
(A Limited Partnership)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-----------------------------

(1) ORGANIZATION AND PARTNERS' INTERESTS
------------------------------------

Formation and Business
----------------------

Cable TV Fund 11-C, Ltd. (the "Partnership"), a Colorado limited
partnership, was formed on October 7, 1983, under a public program sponsored by
Jones Intercable, Inc. The Partnership was formed to acquire, construct,
develop and operate cable television systems. Jones Intercable, Inc.
("Intercable"), is the "General Partner" and manager of the Partnership. The
General Partner and its subsidiaries also own and operate cable television
systems. In addition, Intercable manages cable television systems for other
limited partnerships for which it is general partner and, also, for affiliated
entities. The Partnership owns a 27 percent interest in Cable TV Joint Fund 11
("Joint Fund 11") through capital contributions made during 1984 of $12,200,000,
net of commissions and syndication costs. Joint Fund 11 owns and operates the
cable television system serving the areas in and around the city of Manitowoc,
Wisconsin (the "Manitowoc System").

Proposed Sale of Cable Television System
----------------------------------------

The closing of the sale of the Manitowoc System is subject to the
approval of the limited partners of each of the partnerships that comprise the
Venture. There can be no assurance that such approvals will be obtained. The
General Partner, on behalf of the partnerships that comprise Joint Fund 11, is
in the process of preparing proxy solicitation materials to seek the approval of
the limited partners of the four constituent partnerships of Joint Fund 11.

Contributed Capital
-------------------

The capitalization of the Partnership is set forth in the accompanying
statements of partners' capital (deficit). No limited partner is obligated to
make any additional contribution to partnership capital.

Intercable purchased its interest in the Partnership by contributing
$1,000 to partnership capital.

All profits and losses of the Partnership are allocated 99 percent to the
limited partners and 1 percent to the General Partner, except for income or gain
from the sale or disposition of cable television properties, which will be
allocated to the partners based upon the formula set forth in the Partnership
Agreement and interest income earned prior to the first acquisition by the
Partnership of a cable television system, which was allocated 100 percent to the
limited partners.

(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
------------------------------------------

Accounting Records
------------------

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on the accrual
basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
The Partnership's tax returns are also prepared on the accrual basis.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires the General Partner's management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Investment in Cable Television Joint Venture
--------------------------------------------

The Partnership's investment in Joint Fund 11 is accounted for under the
equity method due to the Partnership's influence on Joint Fund 11 as a General
Partner. When compared to the December 31, 1995 balance, this investment has
increased by $113,414. This increase represents the Partnership's share of
income generated by Joint Fund 11 during 1996. The operations of Joint Fund 11
are significant to the Partnership and should be reviewed in conjunction with
these financial statements. Reference is made to the accompanying financial
statements of Joint Fund 11 on pages 25 to 33.

(3) TRANSACTIONS WITH THE GENERAL PARTNER AND AFFILIATES
----------------------------------------------------

Management Fees and Distribution Ratios
---------------------------------------

Intercable manages the Partnership and Joint Fund 11 and receives a fee
for its services equal to 5 percent of the gross revenues of Joint Fund 11,
excluding revenues from the sale of cable television systems or franchises.

Any distributions made from cash flow (defined as cash receipts derived
from routine operations, less debt principal and interest payments and cash
expenses) are allocated 99 percent to the limited partners and 1 percent to
Intercable. Any distributions other than interest income on limited partner
subscriptions earned prior to the acquisition of the Partnership's first cable
television system or from cash flow, such as from sale or refinancing of the
system or upon dissolution of the Partnership, will be made as follows: first,
to the limited partners in an amount which, together with all prior
distributions, will equal the amount initially contributed to partnership
capital by the limited partners; the balance, 75 percent to the limited partners
and 25 percent to Intercable. In July 1990, a distribution of $27,113,013 was
made to the limited partners from funds received from Joint Fund 11. This
amount included the return of initial contributed capital of $13,828,500. In
addition, $4,428,171 was distributed to Intercable.

(4) INCOME TAXES
------------

Income taxes have not been recorded in the accompanying financial
statements because they accrue directly to the partners. The federal and state
income tax returns of the Partnership are prepared and filed by Intercable.

The Partnership's tax returns, the qualification of the Partnership as
such for tax purposes, and the amount of distributable income or loss are
subject to examination by federal and state taxing authorities. If such
examinations result

in changes with respect to the Partnership's qualifications as such, or in
changes with respect to the Partnership's recorded income or loss, the tax
liability of the General and limited partners would likely be changed
accordingly.

Taxable income reported to the partners is different from that reported
in the statements of operations due to the difference in depreciation allowed
under generally accepted accounting principles and the expense allowed for tax
purposes under the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS). There are
no other significant differences between taxable income and the net income
reported in the statements of operations.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
----------------------------------------

To the Partners of Cable TV Joint Fund 11:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of CABLE TV JOINT FUND 11
(a Colorado general partnership) as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the
related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the General Partners' management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cable TV Joint Fund
11 as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Denver, Colorado,
March 7, 1997.

CABLE TV JOINT FUND 11
----------------------
(A General Partnership)

BALANCE SHEETS
--------------

December 31,
-------------------------
ASSETS (Note 1) 1996 1995
------ ----------- -----------

CASH $ 3,573,400 $ 2,984,284

TRADE RECEIVABLES, less allowance for doubtful
receivables of $9,076 and $6,374 at
December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively 102,383 133,491

INVESTMENT IN CABLE TELEVISION PROPERTIES:
Property, plant and equipment, at cost 6,472,080 7,957,720
Less- accumulated depreciation (4,030,821) (5,441,063)
----------- -----------

Total investment in cable television
properties 2,441,259 2,516,657

DEPOSITS, PREPAID EXPENSES AND DEFERRED CHARGES 1,911,804 1,869,614
----------- -----------

Total assets $ 8,028,846 $ 7,504,046
=========== ===========

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these balance sheets.

CABLE TV JOINT FUND 11
----------------------
(A General Partnership)

BALANCE SHEETS
--------------

December 31,
-----------------------------
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL 1996 1995
--------------------------------- ------------- -------------

LIABILITIES:
Capital lease obligations $ 3,679 $ 9,917
Accounts payable-Jones Intercable, Inc. - 45,258
Trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities 533,675 381,765
Subscriber prepayments 21,389 15,349
------------- -------------

Total liabilities 558,743 452,289
------------- -------------

PARTNERS' CAPITAL:
Contributed capital 45,000,000 45,000,000
Distributions (118,914,493) (118,914,493)
Accumulated earnings 81,384,596 80,966,250
------------- -------------

7,470,103 7,051,757
------------- -------------

Total liabilities and
partners' capital $ 8,028,846 $ 7,504,046
============= =============

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these balance sheets.

CABLE TV JOINT FUND 11
----------------------
(A General Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
------------------------

For the Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
----------- ----------- -----------

REVENUES $3,726,329 $3,632,675 $3,296,103

COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Operating expenses 2,434,731 2,327,354 2,026,763
Management fees and allocated
overhead from Jones Intercable, Inc. 452,677 463,691 437,558
Depreciation and amortization 442,456 545,237 522,593
---------- ---------- ----------

OPERATING INCOME 396,465 296,393 309,189
---------- ---------- ----------

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense - (10,003) (15,716)
Interest income 161,078 166,280 87,134
Other, net (139,197) 1,242 (7,426)
---------- ---------- ----------

Total other income (expense), net 21,881 157,519 63,992
---------- ---------- ----------

NET INCOME $ 418,346 $ 453,912 $ 373,181
========== ========== ==========

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these statements.

CABLE TV JOINT FUND 11
----------------------
(A General Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
-------------------------------

For the Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------- ---------- ----------

CABLE TV FUND 11-A, LTD. (18%):
Balance, beginning of year $1,314,503 $1,231,800 $1,163,806
Net income for year 76,223 82,703 67,994
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance, end of year $1,390,726 $1,314,503 $1,231,800
---------- ---------- ----------

CABLE TV FUND 11-B, LTD. (8%):
Balance, beginning of year $ 585,797 $ 550,483 $ 521,450
Net income for year 32,547 35,314 29,033
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance, end of year $ 618,344 $ 585,797 $ 550,483
---------- ---------- ----------

CABLE TV FUND 11-C, LTD. (27%):
Balance, beginning of year $2,439,393 $2,316,337 $2,215,168
Net income for year 113,414 123,056 101,169
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance, end of year $2,552,807 $2,439,393 $2,316,337
---------- ---------- ----------

CABLE TV FUND 11-D, LTD. (47%):
Balance, beginning of year $2,712,064 $2,499,225 $2,324,240
Net income for year 196,162 212,839 174,985
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance, end of year $2,908,226 $2,712,064 $2,499,225
---------- ---------- ----------

TOTAL:
Balance, beginning of year $7,051,757 $6,597,845 $6,224,664
Net income for year 418,346 453,912 373,181
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance, end of year $7,470,103 $7,051,757 $6,597,845
========== ========== ==========

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these statements.

CABLE TV JOINT FUND 11
----------------------
(A General Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
------------------------

For the Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
----------- ----------- -----------

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ 418,346 $ 453,912 $ 373,181
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 442,456 545,237 522,593
Decrease (increase) in trade receivables 31,108 (41,381) (41,640)
Increase in deposits, prepaid
expenses and deferred charges (42,112) (43,080) (1,372)
Increase (decrease) in trade accounts
payable, accrued liabilities and
subscriber prepayments 157,950 (5,002) 69,592
Increase (decrease) in advances from
Jones Intercable, Inc. (45,258) (27,506) 39,939
---------- ---------- ----------

Net cash provided by operating activities 962,490 882,180 962,293
---------- ---------- ----------

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment, net (367,136) (311,031) (379,930)
---------- ---------- ----------

Net cash used in investing activities (367,136) (311,031) (379,930)
---------- ---------- ----------

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from borrowings - - 18,264
Repayment of debt (6,238) (16,468) (12,008)
---------- ---------- ----------

Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities (6,238) (16,468) 6,256
---------- ---------- ----------

Increase in cash 589,116 554,681 588,619

Cash, beginning of year 2,984,284 2,429,603 1,840,984
---------- ---------- ----------

Cash, end of year $3,573,400 $2,984,284 $2,429,603
========== ========== ==========

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURE:
Interest paid $ 8,306 $ 10,003 $ 15,716
========== ========== ==========

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these statements.

CABLE TV JOINT FUND 11
----------------------
(A General Partnership)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-----------------------------

(1) ORGANIZATION AND PARTNERS' INTERESTS
------------------------------------

Formation and Business
----------------------

Cable TV Joint Fund 11 ("Joint Fund 11"), a Colorado general partnership,
was formed on February 1, 1984, through a joint venture agreement made by and
among Cable TV Fund 11-A, Ltd. ("Fund 11-A"), Cable TV Fund 11-B, Ltd. ("Fund
11-B"), Cable TV Fund 11-C, Ltd. ("Fund 11-C") and Cable TV Fund 11-D, Ltd.
("Fund 11-D"), all Colorado limited partnerships (the "Joint Venture Partners").
Joint Fund 11 was formed to acquire, construct, develop and operate cable
television systems. Joint Fund 11 owns and operates the cable television system
serving areas in and around the city of Manitowoc, Wisconsin (the "Manitowoc
System"). Jones Intercable, Inc. ("Intercable"), who is the "General Partner"
of each of the Joint Venture Partners, manages Joint Fund 11. Intercable and
its subsidiaries also own and operate other cable television systems. In
addition, Intercable manages cable television systems for other limited
partnerships for which it is general partner and, also, for affiliated entities.

Proposed Sale of Cable Television System
----------------------------------------

Upon the consummation of the proposed sale of the Manitowoc System, Joint
Fund 11 will pay all of its indebtedness, which totaled $3,679 at December 1996,
and then the net sales proceeds plus cash on hand will be distributed to the
Joint Venture Partners in proportion to their ownership interests in Joint Fund
11. The net sales proceeds plus cash on hand will be distributed as follows:
Fund 11-A will receive approximately $3,516,674; Fund 11-B will receive
approximately $1,501,632; Fund 11-C will receive approximately $5,232,549 and
Fund 11-D will receive approximately $9,050,322.

Contributed Capital, Sharing Ratios and Distributions
-----------------------------------------------------

The capitalization of Joint Fund 11 is set forth in the accompanying
statements of partners' capital. Profits and losses of Joint Fund 11 are
allocated to the partners in proportion to their respective partnership
interests.

All partnership distributions, including those made from cash flow
(defined as cash receipts derived from routine operations, less debt principal
and interest payments and cash expenses), from the sale or refinancing of
partnership property and on dissolution of Joint Fund 11, are made to the
partners also in proportion to their approximate respective interests in Joint
Fund 11 as follows:

Cable TV Fund 11-A, Ltd. 18%
Cable TV Fund 11-B, Ltd. 8%
Cable TV Fund 11-C, Ltd. 27%
Cable TV Fund 11-D, Ltd. 47%
----

100%
====

(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
------------------------------------------

Accounting Records
------------------

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on the accrual
basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Joint Fund 11's tax returns are also prepared on the accrual basis.

Property, Plant and Equipment
-----------------------------

Depreciation is determined using the straight-line method over the
following estimated service lives:

Cable distribution systems 5 - 15 years
Equipment and tools 3 - 5 years
Buildings 20 years
Office furniture and equipment 5 years
Vehicles 3 years

Replacements, renewals and improvements are capitalized and maintenance
and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.

Property, plant and equipment and the corresponding accumulated
depreciation are written off as certain assets become fully depreciated and are
no longer in service.

Intangible Assets
-----------------

Costs assigned to franchises and subscriber lists were amortized using
the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. These costs have
been fully amortized.

Revenue Recognition
-------------------

Subscriber prepayments are initially deferred and recognized as revenue
when earned.

(3) TRANSACTIONS WITH JONES INTERCABLE, INC. AND AFFILIATES
-------------------------------------------------------

Management Fees and Reimbursements
----------------------------------

Intercable manages Joint Fund 11 and receives a fee for its services
equal to 5 percent of the gross revenues, excluding revenues from the sale of
the cable television systems or franchises. Management fees paid to Intercable
during 1996, 1995 and 1994 were $186,316, $181,634 and $164,805, respectively.

Intercable is reimbursed for certain allocated overhead and
administrative expenses. These expenses represent the salaries and related
benefits paid for corporate personnel, rent, data processing services and other
corporate facilities costs.

Such personnel provide engineering, marketing, administrative, accounting, legal
and investor relations services to Joint Fund 11. Such services, and their
related costs, are necessary to the operations of the Venture and would have
been incurred by the Venture if it was a stand alone entity. Allocations of
personnel costs are primarily based on actual time spent by employees of
Intercable with respect to each partnership managed. Remaining expenses are
allocated based on the pro rata relationship of the Partnership's revenues to
the total revenues of all systems owned or managed by Intercable and certain of
its subsidiaries. Systems owned by Intercable and all other systems owned by
partnerships for which Intercable is the general partner are also allocated a
proportionate share of these expenses. Intercable believes that the methodology
used in allocating overhead and administrative expenses is reasonable. The
amount of allocated overhead and administrative expenses charged to Joint Fund
11 during 1996, 1995 and 1994 was $266,361, $282,057 and $272,753, respectively.

Joint Fund 11 was charged interest during 1996 at an average interest
rate of 8.58 percent on the amounts due Intercable, which approximated
Intercable's weighted average cost of borrowings. Total interest charged during
1996, 1995 and 1994 was $5,640, $6,848 and $13,306, respectively.

Payments to/from Affiliates for Programming Services
----------------------------------------------------

Joint Fund 11 receives programming from Superaudio, Jones Education
Company and Product Information Network, all of which are affiliates of
Intercable.

Payments to Superaudio totaled $7,138, $6,318 and $6,105 in 1996, 1995
and 1994, respectively. Payments to Jones Education Company totaled $22,229,
$19,519 and $8,848 in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.

Joint Fund 11 receives a commission from Product Information Network
based on a percentage of advertising revenue and number of subscribers. Product
Information Network paid commissions to Joint Fund 11 totaling $1,199, $4,559
and $510 in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.

(4) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
-----------------------------

Property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, consisted
of the following:

1996 1995
----------- -----------

Cable distribution systems $ 5,976,411 $ 7,279,475
Equipment and tools 159,216 259,414
Office furniture and equipment 128,648 147,163
Buildings 113,431 113,431
Vehicles 94,374 158,237
----------- -----------

6,472,080 7,957,720
Less - accumulated depreciation (4,030,821) (5,441,063)
----------- -----------

$ 2,441,259 $ 2,516,657
=========== ===========

(5) DEBT
----

Debt consists of capital lease obligations with maturities of 1 to 3
years. Installments due on debt principal for the five years in the period
ending December 31, 2001, respectively, are: $1,559, $1,559, $561, $-0- and
$-0-.

(6) INCOME TAXES
------------

Income taxes have not been recorded in the accompanying financial
statements because they accrue to the partners of Funds 11-A, 11-B, 11-C and 11-
D, which are general partners in Joint Fund 11.

Joint Fund 11's tax returns, the qualification of the Partnership as such
for tax purposes, and the amount of distributable partnership income or loss are
subject to examination by federal and state taxing authorities. If such
examinations result in changes with respect to Joint

Fund 11's qualification as such, or in changes with respect to Joint Fund 11's
recorded income or loss, the tax liability of the general and limited partners
would likely be changed accordingly.

(7) SUPPLEMENTARY PROFIT AND LOSS INFORMATION
-----------------------------------------

Supplementary profit and loss information is presented below:

For the Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
-------- -------- --------

Maintenance and repairs $ 33,874 $ 27,102 $ 41,329
======== ======== ========

Taxes, other than income and
payroll taxes $ 13,113 $124,403 $ 52,294
======== ======== ========

Advertising $ 47,800 $ 62,160 $ 81,763
======== ======== ========

Depreciation of property,
plant and equipment $442,456 $416,869 $379,817
======== ======== ========

Amortization of intangible assets $ - $128,368 $142,776
======== ======== ========

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
---------------------------------------------------------
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
-----------------------------------

None.

PART III.
---------

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
------------------------------------------------------------

The Partnership itself has no officers or directors. Certain
information concerning the directors and executive officers of the General
Partner is set forth below. Directors of the General Partner serve until the
next annual meeting of the General Partner and until their successors shall be
elected and qualified.

Glenn R. Jones 67 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Derek H. Burney 57 Vice Chairman of the Board
James B. O'Brien 47 President and Director
Ruth E. Warren 47 Group Vice President/Operations
Kevin P. Coyle 45 Group Vice President/Finance
Christopher J. Bowick 41 Group Vice President/Technology
George H. Newton 62 Group Vice President/Telecommunications
Raymond L. Vigil 50 Group Vice President/Human Resources
Cynthia A. Winning 45 Group Vice President/Marketing
Elizabeth M. Steele 45 Vice President/General Counsel/Secretary
Larry W. Kaschinske 37 Vice President/Controller
Robert E. Cole 64 Director
William E. Frenzel 68 Director
Donald L. Jacobs 58 Director
James J. Krejci 55 Director
John A. MacDonald 43 Director
Raphael M. Solot 63 Director
Howard O. Thrall 49 Director
Siim A. Vanaselja 40 Director
Sanford Zisman 57 Director
Robert B. Zoellick 43 Director

Mr. Glenn R. Jones has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner since its formation in 1970,
and he was President from June 1984 until April 1988. Mr. Jones is the sole
shareholder, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Jones
International, Ltd. He is also Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
subsidiaries of the General Partner and of certain other affiliates of the
General Partner. Mr. Jones has been involved in the cable television business
in various capacities since 1961, is a member of the Board of Directors and the
Executive Committee of the National Cable Television Association. Additionally,
Mr. Jones is a member of the Board of Governors for the American Society for
Training and Development, and a member of the Board of Education Council of the
National Alliance of Business. Mr. Jones is also a founding member of the James
Madison Council of the Library of Congress. Mr. Jones has been the recipient of
several awards including the Grand Tam Award in 1989, the highest award from the
Cable Television Administration and Marketing Society; the President's Award
from the Cable Television Public Affairs Association in recognition of Jones
International's educational efforts through Mind Extension University (now
Knowledge TV); the Donald G. McGannon Award for the advancement of minorities
and women in cable from the United Church of Christ Office of Communications;
the STAR Award from American Women in Radio and Television, Inc. for exhibition
of a commitment to the issues and concerns of women in television and radio; the
Cableforce 2000 Accolade awarded by Women in Cable in recognition of the General
Partner's innovative employee programs; the Most Outstanding Corporate
Individual Achievement Award from the International Distance Learning Conference
for his contributions to distance education; the Golden Plate Award from the

American Academy of Achievement for his advances in distance education; the Man
of the Year named by the Denver chapter of the Achievement Rewards for College
Scientists; and in 1994 Mr. Jones was inducted into Broadcasting and Cable's
Hall of Fame.

Mr. Derek H. Burney was appointed a Director of the General Partner in
December 1994 and Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors on January 31, 1995.
Mr. Burney joined BCE Inc., Canada's largest telecommunications company, in
January 1993 as Executive Vice President, International. He has been the
Chairman of Bell Canada International Inc., a subsidiary of BCE, since January
1993 and, in addition, has been Chief Executive Officer of BCI since July 1993.
Prior to joining BCE, Mr. Burney served as Canada's ambassador to the United
States from 1989 to 1992. Mr. Burney also served as chief of staff to the Prime
Minister of Canada from March 1987 to January 1989 where he was directly
involved with the negotiation of the U.S. - Canada Free Trade Agreement. In
July 1993, he was named an Officer of the Order of Canada. He also is a director
of Bell Cablemedia plc, Mercury Communications Limited, Videotron Holdings plc,
Tele-Direct (Publications) Inc., Teleglobe Inc., Bimcor Inc., Rio Algom Limited,
The Montreal General Hospital Corporation, The Japan Society, Moore Corporation
Limited, Northbridge Programming Inc. and certain subsidiaries of Bell Canada
International.

Mr. James B. O'Brien, the General Partner's President, joined the
General Partner in January 1982. Prior to being elected President and a
Director of the General Partner in December 1989, Mr. O'Brien served as a
Division Manager, Director of Operations Planning/Assistant to the CEO, Fund
Vice President and Group Vice President/Operations. Mr. O'Brien was appointed
to the General Partner's Executive Committee in August 1993. As President, he
is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the cable television systems
managed and owned by the General Partner. Mr. O'Brien is a board member of
Cable Labs, Inc., the research arm of the U.S. cable television industry. He
also serves as Vice Chairman and a director of the Cable Television
Administration and Marketing Association and as a member of the Executive
Committee and a director of the Walter Kaitz Foundation, a foundation that
places people of ethnic minority groups in positions with cable television
systems, networks and vendor companies.

Ms. Ruth E. Warren joined the General Partner in August 1980 and has
served in various operational capacities, including system manager and Fund Vice
President, since then. Ms. Warren was elected Group Vice President/Operations
of the General Partner in September 1990.

Mr. Kevin P. Coyle joined The Jones Group, Ltd. in July 1981 as Vice
President/Financial Services. In September 1985, he was appointed Senior Vice
President/Financial Services. He was elected Treasurer of the General Partner
in August 1987, Vice President/Treasurer in April 1988 and Group Vice
President/Finance and Chief Financial Officer in October 1990.

Mr. Christopher J. Bowick joined the General Partner in September 1991
as Group Vice President/Technology and Chief Technical Officer. Previous to
joining the General Partner, Mr. Bowick worked for Scientific Atlanta's
Transmission Systems Business Division in various technical management
capacities since 1981, and as Vice President of Engineering since 1989.

Mr. George H. Newton joined the General Partner in January 1996 as
Group Vice President/Telecommunications. Prior to joining the General Partner,
Mr. Newton was President of his own consulting business, Clear Solutions, and
since 1994 Mr. Newton has served as a Senior Advisor to Bell Canada
International. From 1990 to 1993, Mr. Newton served as the founding Chief
Executive Officer and Managing Director of Clear Communications, New Zealand,
where he established an alternative telephone company in New Zealand. From 1964
to 1990, Mr. Newton held a wide variety of operational and business assignments
with Bell Canada International.

Mr. Raymond L. Vigil joined the General Partner in June 1993 as Group
Vice President/Human Resources. Previous to joining the General Partner, Mr.
Vigil served as Executive Director of Learning with USWest. Prior to USWest,
Mr. Vigil worked in various human resources posts over a 14-year term with the
IBM Corporation.

Ms. Cynthia A. Winning joined the General Partner as Group Vice
President/Marketing in December 1994. Previous to joining the General Partner,
Ms. Winning served since 1994 as the President of PRS Inc., Denver, Colorado, a
sports and event marketing company. From 1979 to 1981 and from 1986 to 1994,
Ms. Winning served as the Vice President and Director of Marketing for Citicorp
Retail Services, Inc., a provider of private-label credit cards for ten national
retail department store chains. From 1981 to 1986, Ms. Winning was the Director
of Marketing Services for Daniels & Associates cable television operations, as
well as the Western Division Marketing Director for Capital Cities Cable. Ms.
Winning also serves as a board member of Cities in Schools, a dropout
intervention/prevention program.

Ms. Elizabeth M. Steele joined the General Partner in August 1987 as
Vice President/General Counsel and Secretary. From August 1980 until joining
the General Partner, Ms. Steele was an associate and then a partner at the
Denver law firm of Davis, Graham & Stubbs, which serves as counsel to the
General Partner.

Mr. Larry Kaschinske joined the General Partner in 1984 as a staff
accountant in the General Partner's former Wisconsin Division, was promoted to
Assistant Controller in 1990, named Controller in August 1994 and was elected
Vice President/Controller in June 1996.

Mr. Robert E. Cole was appointed a Director of the General Partner in
March 1996. Mr. Cole is currently self-employed as a partner of First Variable
Insurance Marketing and is responsible for marketing to National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. firms in northern California, Oregon, Washington and
Alaska. From 1993 to 1995, Mr. Cole was the Director of Marketing for Lamar
Life Insurance Company; from 1992 to 1993, Mr. Cole was Senior Vice President of
PMI Inc., a third party lender serving the special needs of Corporate Owned Life
Insurance (COLI) and from 1988 to 1992, Mr. Cole was the principal and co-
founder of a specialty investment banking firm that provided services to finance
the ownership and growth of emerging companies, productive assets and real
property. Mr. Cole is a Certified Financial Planner and a former United States
Naval Aviator.

Mr. William E. Frenzel was appointed a Director of the General Partner
in April 1995. Mr. Frenzel has been a Guest Scholar since 1991 with the
Brookings Institution, a research organization located in Washington D. C.
Until his retirement in January 1991, Mr. Frenzel served for twenty years in the
United States House of Representatives, representing the State of Minnesota,
where he was a member of the House Ways and Means Committee and its Trade
Subcommittee, the Congressional Representative to the General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade (GATT), the Ranking Minority Member on the House Budget
Committee and a member of the National Economic Commission. Mr. Frenzel also
served in the Minnesota Legislature for eight years. He is a Distinguished
Fellow of the Tax Foundation, Vice Chairman of the Eurasia Foundation, a Board
Member of the U.S.-Japan Foundation, the Close-Up Foundation, Sit Mutual Funds
and Chairman of the Japan-America Society of Washington.

Mr. Donald L. Jacobs was appointed a Director of the General Partner
in April 1995. Mr. Jacobs is a retired executive officer of TRW. Prior to his
retirement, he was Vice President and Deputy Manager of the Space and Defense
Sector; prior to that appointment, he was the Vice President and General Manager
of the Defense Systems Group and prior to his appointment as Group General
Manager, he was President of ESL, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of TRW.
During his career, Mr. Jacobs served on several corporate, professional and
civic boards.

Mr. James J. Krejci was President of the International Division of
International Gaming Technology, International headquartered in Reno, Nevada,
until March 1995. Prior to joining IGT in May 1994, Mr. Krejci was Group Vice
President of Jones International, Ltd. and was Group Vice President of the
General Partner. He also served as an officer of subsidiaries of Jones
International, Ltd. until leaving the General Partner in May 1994. Mr. Krejci
has been a Director of the General Partner since August 1987.

Mr. John A. MacDonald was appointed a Director of the General Partner
in November 1995. Mr. MacDonald is Executive Vice President of Business
Development and Chief Technology Officer of Bell Canada International Inc.
Prior to joining Bell Canada in November 1994, Mr. MacDonald was President and
Chief

Executive Officer of The New Brunswick Telephone Company, Limited, a post he had
held since March of that year. Prior to March 1994, Mr. MacDonald was with NBTel
for 17 years serving in various capacities, including Market Planning Manager,
Corporate Planning Manager, Manager of Systems Planning and Development and
General Manager, Chief Engineer and General Manager of Engineering and
Information Systems and Vice President of Planning. Mr. MacDonald was the former
Chairman of the New Brunswick section of the Institute of Electrical and
Electronic Engineers and also served on the Federal Government's Information
Highway Advisory Council. Mr. MacDonald is Chairman of MediaLinx Interactive
Inc. and Stentor Canadian Network Management and is presently a Governor of the
Montreal Exchange. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Tele-Direct
(Publications) Inc., Bell-Northern Research, Ltd., SRCI, Bell Sygma, Canarie
Inc., and is a member of the University of New Brunswick Venture Campaign
Cabinet.

Mr. Raphael M. Solot was appointed a Director of the General Partner
in March 1996. Mr. Solot is an attorney and has practiced law for 31 years with
an emphasis on franchise, corporate and partnership law and complex litigation.

Mr. Howard O. Thrall was appointed a Director of the General Partner
in March 1996. Mr. Thrall had previously served as a Director of the General
Partner from December 1988 to December 1994. Mr. Thrall is Senior Vice
President-Corporate Development for First National Net, Inc., a leading service
provider for the mortgage banking industry, and he heads First National Net's
Washington, D.C. regional office. From September 1993 through July 1996, Mr.
Thrall served as Vice President of Sales, Asian Region, for World Airways, Inc.
headquartered at the Washington Dulles International Airport. From 1984 until
August 1993, Mr. Thrall was with the McDonnell Douglas Corporation, where he
concluded as a Regional Vice President, Commercial Marketing with the Douglas
Aircraft Company subsidiary. Mr. Thrall is also a management and international
marketing consultant, having active assignments with McDonnell Douglas
Aerospace, JAL Trading, Inc., Technology Solutions Company, Cheong Kang
Associated (Korea), Aero Investment Alliance, Inc. and Western Real Estate
Partners, among others.

Mr. Siim A. Vanaselja was appointed a Director of the General Partner
in August 1996. Mr. Vanaselja joined BCE Inc., Canada's largest
telecommunications company, in February 1994 as Assistant Vice-President,
International Taxation. In June 1994, he was appointed Assistant Vice-President
and Director of Taxation, and in February 1995, Mr. Vanaselja was appointed
Vice-President, Taxation. On August 1, 1996, Mr. Vanaselja was appointed the
Chief Financial Officer of Bell Canada International Inc., a subsidiary of BCE
Inc. Prior to joining BCE Inc. and since August 1989, Mr. Vanaselja was a
partner in the Toronto office of KPMG Peat Marwick Thorne. Mr. Vanaselja has
been a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario since 1982
and is a member of the Canadian Tax Foundation, the Tax Executives Institute and
the International Fiscal Association.

Mr. Sanford Zisman was appointed a director of the General Partner in
June 1996. Mr. Zisman is a member of the law firm, Zisman & Ingraham, P.C. of
Denver, Colorado and has practiced law for 31 years, with an emphasis on tax,
business and estate planning and probate administration. Mr. Zisman currently
serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Saint Joseph Hospital, the
largest hospital in Colorado, and he has served as Chairman of the Board,
Chairman of the Finance Committee and Chairman of the Strategic Planning
Committee of the hospital. Since 1992, he has also served on the Board of
Directors of Maxim Series Fund, Inc., a subsidiary of Great-West Life Assurance
Company.

Mr. Robert B. Zoellick was appointed a Director of the General Partner
in April 1995. Mr. Zoellick is Executive Vice President for Housing and Law of
Fannie Mae, a federally chartered and stockholder-owned corporation that is the
largest housing finance investor in the United States. From August 1992 to
January 1993, Mr. Zoellick served as Deputy Chief of Staff of the White House
and Assistant to the President. From May 1991 to August 1992, Mr. Zoellick
served concurrently as the Under Secretary of State for Economic and
Agricultural Affairs and as Counselor of the Department of State, a post he
assumed in March 1989. From 1985 to 1988, Mr. Zoellick served at the Department
of Treasury in a number of capacities, including Counselor to the Secretary. Mr.
Zoellick received the Alexander Hamilton and Distinguished Service Awards,
highest honors of the Departments of Treasury and State, respectively. The
German Government awarded him the Knight Commanders Cross for his work on
Germany unification. Mr. Zoellick currently serves on the boards of Alliance
Capital, Said Holdings, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Congressional
Institute, the German Marshall Fund of the

U.S., the European Institute, the National Bureau of Asian Research, the
American Council on Germany, the American Institute for Contemporary German
Studies and the Overseas Development Council.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
--------------------------------

The Partnership has no employees; however, various personnel are
required to operate the Manitowoc System. Such personnel are employed by the
General Partner and, the cost of such employment is charged by the General
Partner to the Venture as a direct reimbursement item. See Item 13.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGERS
----------------------------------------------------------------------

As of March 4, 1997, no person or entity owned more than 5 percent of
the limited partnership interests of the Partnership.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
--------------------------------------------------------

The General Partner and its affiliates engage in certain transactions
with the Venture. The General Partner believes that the terms of such
transactions are generally as favorable as could be obtained by the Venture from
unaffiliated parties. This determination has been made by the General Partner
in good faith, but none of the terms were or will be negotiated at arm's-length
and there can be no assurance that the terms of such transactions have been or
will be as favorable as those that could have been obtained by the Venture from
unaffiliated parties.

TRANSACTIONS WITH THE GENERAL PARTNER

The General Partner charges a management fee, and the General Partner
is reimbursed for certain allocated overhead and administrative expenses. These
expenses represent the salaries and benefits paid to corporate personnel, rent,
data processing services and other corporate facilities costs. Such personnel
provide engineering, marketing, administrative, accounting, legal and investor
relations services to the Partnership. Allocations of personnel costs are based
primarily on actual time spent by employees of the General Partner with respect
to each partnership managed. Remaining expenses are allocated based on the pro
rata relationship of the Partnership's revenues to the total revenues of all
systems owned or managed by the General Partner and certain of its subsidiaries.
Systems owned by the General Partner and all other systems owned by partnerships
for which Jones Intercable, Inc. is the general partner are also allocated a
proportionate share of these expenses.

The General Partner also advances funds and charges interest on the
balance payable. The interest rate charged approximates the General Partner's
weighted average cost of borrowing.

TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Jones Education Company ("JEC") is owned 63% by Jones International,
Ltd. ("International"), an affiliate of the General Partner, 9% by Glenn R.
Jones, 12% by Bell Canada International Inc. ("BCI") and 16% by the General
Partner. JEC operates two television networks, JEC Knowledge TV and Jones
Computer Network. JEC Knowledge TV provides programming related to computers
and technology; business, careers and finance; health and wellness; and global
culture and languages. Jones Computer Network provides programming focused
primarily on computers and technology. JEC sells its programming to certain
cable television systems owned or managed by the General Partner.

Jones Galactic Radio, Inc. is a company now owned by Jones
International Networks, Ltd., an affiliate of International. Superaudio, a
joint venture between Jones Galactic Radio, Inc. and an unaffiliated entity,
provides satellite programming to certain cable television systems owned or
managed by the General Partner.

The Product Information Network Venture (the "PIN Venture") is a
venture among a subsidiary of Jones International Networks, Ltd., an affiliate
of International, and two unaffiliated cable system operators. The PIN Venture
operates the Product Information Network ("PIN"), which is a 24-hour network
that airs long-form advertising generally known as "infomercials." The PIN
Venture generally makes incentive payments of approximately 60% of its net
advertising revenue to the cable systems that carry its programming. Most of
the General Partner's owned and managed systems carry PIN for all or part of
each day. Revenues received by the Venture from the PIN Venture relating to the
Manitowoc System totaled approximately $1,199 for the year ended December 31,
1996.

The charges to the Venture for related party transactions are as
follows for the periods indicated:

For the Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------
Cable TV Joint Fund 11 1996 1995 1994
- ---------------------- --------------- --------- ---------

Management fees $186,316 $181,634 $164,805
Allocation of expenses 266,361 282,057 272,753
Interest on advances paid to the
General Partner 5,640 6,848 13,306
Amount of advances outstanding 0 45,258 72,764
Highest amount of advances outstanding 45,258 77,215 72,764
Programming fees:
Jones Education Company 22,229 19,519 8,848
Superaudio 7,138 6,318 6,105

PART IV.
--------

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) 1. See index to financial statements for
the list of financial statements and
exhibits thereto filed as part of this
report.

3. The following exhibits are filed
herewith.

2.1 Asset Purchase Agreement dated
September 5, 1995 between Cable TV
Joint Fund 11 and Jones Intercable,
Inc. relating to the Manitowoc System.
(1)

2.2 Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement
dated September 30, 1996 between Cable
TV Joint Fund 11 and Jones Intercable, Inc.

4.1 Limited Partnership Agreement of Cable
TV Fund 11-C, Ltd. (2)

10.1.1 Copy of a franchise and related
documents thereto granting a community
antenna television system franchise for
the City of Manitowoc, Wisconsin.
(Joint Fund 11)

27 Financial Data Schedule
__________

(1) Incorporated by reference from
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K
dated September 8, 1995.

(2) Incorporated by reference from
Registrant's Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1985.

(27) Financial Data Schedule

(b) Reports on Form 8-K.

None.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CABLE TV FUND 11-C, LTD.
a Colorado limited partnership
By: Jones Intercable, Inc.
By:/s/ Glenn R. Jones
--------------------------------
Glenn R. Jones
Chairman of the Board and Chief
Dated: March 14, 1997 Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By:/s/ Glenn R. Jones
--------------------------------
Glenn R. Jones
Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
Dated: March 14, 1997 (Principal Executive Officer)

By:/s/ Kevin P. Coyle
--------------------------------
Kevin P. Coyle
Group Vice President/Finance
Dated: March 14, 1997 (Principal Financial Officer)

By:/s/ Larry Kaschinske
--------------------------------
Larry Kaschinske
Vice President/Controller
Dated: March 14, 1997 (Principal Accounting Officer)

By:/s/ James B. O'Brien
--------------------------------
James B. O'Brien
Dated: March 14, 1997 President and Director

By:/s/ Derek H. Burney
--------------------------------
Derek H. Burney
Dated: March 14, 1997 Director

By:/s/ Robert E. Cole
--------------------------------
Robert E. Cole
Dated: March 14, 1997 Director

By: /s/ WILLIAM E. FRENZEL
--------------------------------
William E. Frenzel
Dated: March 14, 1997 Director

By: /s/ DONALD L. JACOBS
--------------------------------
Donald L. Jacobs
Dated: March 14, 1997 Director

By: /s/ JAMES J. KREJCI
--------------------------------
James J. Krejci
Dated: March 14, 1997 Director

By:
--------------------------------
John A. MacDonald
Dated: March 14, 1997 Director

By: /s/ RAPHAEL M. SOLOT
--------------------------------
Raphael M. Solot
Dated: March 14, 1997 Director

By:
--------------------------------
Howard O. Thrall
Dated: March 14, 1997 Director

By: /s/ SIIM A. VANASELJA
--------------------------------
Siim A. Vanaselja
Dated: March 14, 1997 Director

By: /s/ SANFORD ZISMAN
--------------------------------
Sanford Zisman
Dated: March 14, 1997 Director

By: /s/ ROBERT B. ZOELLICK
--------------------------------
Robert B. Zoellick
Dated: March 14, 1997 Director