Hutton/ConAm Realty Investors 3
1996 ANNUAL REPORT
Exhibit 13
Hutton/ConAm Realty Investors 3
Hutton/ConAm Realty Investors 3 is a California limited
partnership formed in 1983 to acquire, operate and hold
for investment multifamily housing properties. At
November 30, 1996, the Partnership's portfolio
consisted of three apartment properties located in
Colorado, Arizona and Florida. Provided below is a
comparison of average occupancy levels for the years
ended November 30, 1996 and 1995.
Average Occupancy
Property Location 1996 1995
Autumn Heights Colorado Springs, Colorado 96% 96%
Ponte Vedra Beach Village II Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida 95% 93%
Skyline Village Tucson, Arizona 93% 94%
Contents
1 Message to Investors
3 Performance Summary
4 Financial Highlights
5 Consolidated Financial Statements
8 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
14 Report of Independent Accountants
15 Net Asset Valuation
Administrative Inquiries Performance Inquiries/Form 10-Ks
Address Changes/Transfers First Data Investor Services Group
Service Data Corporation P.O. Box 1527
2424 South 130th Circle Boston, Massachusetts 02104-1527
Omaha, Nebraska 68144-2596 Attn: Financial Communications
800-223-3464 800-223-3464
Message to Investors
Presented for your review is the 1996 Annual Report for Hutton/ConAm Realty
Investors 3 (the "Partnership"). In this report we discuss general market
conditions affecting the Partnership's three properties and provide information
on the Partnership's future operating strategies. We have also included a
performance summary which addresses operations at each of the properties and
financial highlights for the year.
Cash Distributions
The Partnership paid cash distributions totaling $10.00 per Unit for the year
ended November 30, 1996, including the fourth quarter distribution of $2.50 per
Unit, which was credited to your brokerage account or sent directly to you on
January 15, 1997. Since inception, the Partnership has paid distributions
totaling $402.50 per original $500 Unit, including $250 per Unit in return of
capital payments. The General Partners will determine the amount of future
distributions based on the Partnership's available cash from operations each
quarter.
Existing problems with the roofs at Ponte Vedra Beach Village II were
aggravated by severe tropical rain storms late in 1996. After evaluating the
damages, the General Partners received several competitive bids to repair the
roofs, and subsequently selected a contractor. The roof repairs are currently
underway and are scheduled to be completed this year. The anticipated cost of
repairing the roofs is approximately $200,000.
Operations Overview
Multi-family real estate continued to perform well during 1996, with property
values and apartment rents increasing in many areas of the country. In
particular, Jacksonville and Colorado Springs were among the strongest
multifamily housing markets in the country in 1996. The improving conditions
prompted a rise in new construction in the markets where the Partnership owns
properties, causing a slowdown in leasing activity towards the end of the year.
In Tucson, market conditions were also impacted by the decision of many renters
to purchase homes. This increased the use of rent specials at many large
apartment properties, including Skyline Village, to attract new tenants.
Nonetheless, the Partnership's properties maintained average occupancy levels
for the year of at least 93%, and the Partnership's rental income for the three
properties increased by 3.9% from the previous year. It is expected that the
competitive conditions will persist in all three markets in 1997, but continued
economic improvement and a slowdown in construction should prevent these areas
from becoming significantly overbuilt.
The General Partners continually monitor the operations of the Partnership's
properties, the status of the real estate markets, and other factors to
determine the optimum time to sell the Partnership's properties to maximize
value. Those efforts resulted in the sale of Bernardo Point Apartments in
1990, and Country Place Village II in 1995, and special distributions from the
sales, aggregating $177 per Unit were paid to the limited partners. Given the
improvement in the performance of the Partnership's properties, and the
improvement in the real estate capital markets which has increased demand by
potential buyers, the General Partners have determined that it is in the best
interest of the Partnership to attempt to sell the remaining three properties
in an orderly manner over the next few years. Assuming these efforts are
successful, we would expect to distribute the sales proceeds and subsequently
dissolve the Partnership in 1998 or 1999. However, meeting this objective will
be dependent upon a variety of factors, many of which are not within the
Partnership's control. There can be no assurance that any specific property or
all the properties can be sold, that particular prices will be achieved, or
that all the properties can be sold within this time frame. We will keep you
apprised of our sales efforts in future correspondence.
General Information
As you are probably aware, several third parties have commenced partial tender
offers to purchase units of the Partnership at grossly inadequate prices which
are substantially below the Partnership's Net Asset Value. In response, we
recommended that limited partners reject these offers because they do not
reflect the underlying value of the Partnership's assets. To date, holders of
over 98% of the outstanding units agreed that these offers were inadequate,
rejected the offer and did not tender their units. Please be assured that if
any additional tender offers are made for your units, we will make every effort
to provide you with our position regarding such offer on a timely basis.
Summary
During 1997, we intend to monitor market conditions in an effort to sell the
three remaining properties within the next few years. In the interim, we will
also seek to maximize the performance of the properties and further improve
their marketability and appeal. We will keep you apprised of significant
developments affecting your investment in future reports.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Paul L. Abbott /s/ Daniel J. Epstein
Paul L. Abbott Daniel J. Epstein
President President
RI 3-4 Real Estate Services, Inc. Continental American
Development Inc. General Partner of ConAm Property
Services IV, Ltd.
February 28, 1997
Performance Summary
Autumn Heights Colorado Springs, Colorado
Autumn Heights, a 140-unit apartment complex located in the southwest section
of Colorado Springs, posted strong operations during 1996. Average occupancy
at the property during the year was 96%, unchanged from 1995. Additionally,
the property's rental income increased by 5.9% from 1995 to 1996. Strong
market conditions in Colorado Springs have resulted in a surge in new
construction of multifamily properties. This new supply is expected to have a
minimal impact on the multifamily market given the area's growing population
and strong economy. However, continuing construction at this pace or a
downturn in the area's economy could lead to a softening of the market in the
future.
Ponte Vedra Beach Village II Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida
Ponte Vedra Beach Village II is a 124-unit luxury apartment complex located in
an oceanside residential area to the southeast of Jacksonville. The property
reported an average occupancy level of 95% in fiscal 1996 and an increase in
rental income of 8.6% from the prior year. Property improvements for the year
included roof and asphalt repairs, carpet replacement and other improvements to
maintain the property's competitive position. Favorable market conditions in
the Jacksonville area have led to an increase in new multifamily construction.
Three new apartment complexes were recently completed in the Ponte Vedra Beach
submarket near Ponte Vedra Beach Village II containing approximately 631 units.
Despite the new units becoming available for rent, it is expected that the
market will remain stable in 1997. This is partially due to Jacksonville's
1996 ranking as one of the fastest growing labor markets in the country.
Skyline Village Tucson, Arizona
Skyline Village contains 168 units and is located in the northwest area of
Tucson. The property maintained an average occupancy rate of 93% during 1996
compared to 94% for 1995. The slight decline in occupancy caused a similar
decrease in the property's rental income. These operating results are
indicative of the increasing competition in the Tucson market. While Tucson's
economy began to slow in 1995 and 1996, construction of multifamily properties
has increased significantly. The addition of new properties is beginning to
put downward pressure on occupancy rates and is limiting rental rate increases.
The increased competition has also led to the reemergence of rental incentives.
In addition, the multifamily market has been unfavorably impacted by relatively
low interest rates which has made home ownership a viable alternative for
renters. A local survey of metropolitan Tucson conducted in the second quarter
of 1996 showed an average occupancy rate of 88.9% among multifamily properties,
down from 91.1% at the same period in 1995. In the Catalina Foothills
submarket, where Skyline Village is located, occupancy rates declined from 91%
in the second quarter of 1995 to 84.5% in the same period in 1996.
Financial Highlights
Selected Financial Data
For the periods ended November 30, 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
Dollars in thousands,
except for per unit data
Total Income $3,745 $4,203 $4,298 $4,033 $3,864
Loss on Sale of Property _ (84) _ _ _
Net Income (Loss) 354 85 18 3 (454)
Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities 1,205 1,185 1,197 1,154 943
Long-term Obligations 8,435 8,565 11,599 10,636 10,733
Total Assets at Year End 18,977 19,650 27,614 30,184 30,888
Net Income (Loss) per
Limited Partnership Unit* $3.98 .87 .20 .03 (5.61)
Distributions per
Limited Partnership Unit* 10.00 10.00 14.00 8.00 6.00
Special Distributions per
Limited Partnership Unit* _ 50.00 30.00 0.00 10.00
* 80,000 units outstanding
- - Total income decreased from fiscal 1995 to fiscal 1996, primarily due to
the July 1995 sale of Country Place Village II. Interest income also
declined from the 1995 period due to lower cash balances held by the
Partnership in 1996. This decrease was partially offset by increased
rental income at Autumn Heights and Ponte Vedra Beach Village II.
- - The increase in net income is due primarily to reductions in property
operating expenses and most other major expense categories resulting from
the sale of Country Place Village II. Also contributing to lower net
income in the 1995 period was the recognition of a loss on the sale of
Country Place Village II.
Cash Distributions
Per Limited Partnership Unit
1996 1995
Special Distributions* $ _ $ 50.00
First Quarter 2.50 2.50
Second Quarter 2.50 2.50
Third Quarter 2.50 2.50
Fourth Quarter 2.50 2.50
Total $ 10.00 $ 60.00
* On August 22, 1995, the Partnership paid a special cash distribution
totaling $50 per Unit, reflecting a return of capital from the net
proceeds of the July 1995 sale of Country Place Village II and the
remaining proceeds from the sale of Bernardo Point in 1990.
Consolidated Balance Sheets At November 30, At November 30,
1996 1995
Assets
Investments in real estate:
Land $5,817,668 $5,817,668
Buildings and improvements 22,326,780 22,164,580
28,144,448 27,982,248
Less accumulated depreciation (10,510,777) (9,645,010)
17,633,671 18,337,238
Cash and cash equivalents 1,084,483 1,060,348
Restricted cash 84,934 61,141
Other assets, net of accumulated amortization
of $163,192 in 1996 and $120,176 in 1995 173,569 191,114
Total Assets $18,976,657 $19,649,841
Liabilities and Partners' Capital
Liabilities:
Mortgages payable $8,434,843 $8,564,859
Distribution payable 222,222 222,222
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 156,786 174,724
Due to general partners and affiliates 15,808 15,010
Security deposits 118,601 109,876
Total Liabilities 8,948,260 9,086,691
Partners' Capital (Deficit):
General Partners (899,777) (846,302)
Limited Partners 10,928,174 11,409,452
Total Partners' Capital 10,028,397 10,563,150
Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital $18,976,657 $19,649,841
Consolidated Statements of Partners' Capital (Deficit)
For the years ended November 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994
General Limited
Partners Partners Total
Balance at November 30, 1993 $(650,821) $19,644,389 $18,993,568
Net income 1,751 15,758 17,509
Cash distributions (124,444) (3,520,000) (3,644,444)
Balance at November 30, 1994 (773,514) 16,140,147 15,366,633
Net income 16,100 69,305 85,405
Cash distributions (88,888) (4,800,000) (4,888,888)
Balance at November 30, 1995 (846,302) 11,409,452 10,563,150
Net income 35,413 318,722 354,135
Cash distributions (88,888) (800,000) (888,888)
Balance at November 30, 1996 $(899,777) $10,928,174 $10,028,397
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the years ended November 30, 1996 1995 1994
Income
Rental $3,688,364 $4,027,970 $4,146,674
Interest and other 57,109 174,780 151,152
Total Income 3,745,473 4,202,750 4,297,826
Expenses
Property operating 1,581,543 1,912,816 1,936,098
Depreciation and amortization 908,783 1,047,513 1,137,125
Interest 748,229 929,646 1,066,185
General and administrative 152,783 143,378 140,909
Total Expenses 3,391,338 4,033,353 4,280,317
Income from operations 354,135 169,397 17,509
Loss on sale of property _ (83,992) _
Net Income $354,135 $ 85,405 $ 17,509
Net Income Allocated:
To the General Partners $ 35,413 $ 16,100 $ 1,751
To the Limited Partners 318,722 69,305 15,758
$354,135 $ 85,405 $ 17,509
Per limited partnership unit
(80,000 outstanding)
Income from operations $3.98 $1.91 $.20
Loss on sale of property _ (1.04) _
Net Income $3.98 $ .87 $.20
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended November 30, 1996 1995 1994
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income $354,135 $85,405 $17,509
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 908,783 1,047,513 1,137,125
Loss on sale of property _ 83,992 _
Increase (decrease) in cash arising from
changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Fundings to restricted cash (156,654) (152,988) (143,834)
Release of restricted cash to property
operations 132,861 149,827 140,968
Other assets (25,471) 8,738 39,838
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (17,938) 16,885 (14,430)
Due to general partners and affiliates 798 (2,867) 1,450
Security deposits 8,725 (51,791) 18,061
Net cash provided by operating activities 1,205,239 1,184,714 1,196,687
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Net proceeds from sale of property _ 3,832,290 _
Additions to real estate (162,200) (158,367) (146,029)
Net cash provided by (used for)
investing activities (162,20) 3,673,923 (146,029)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Mortgage borrowings _ _ 5,500,000
Mortgage principal payments (130,016) (3,033,660) (4,537,574)
Distributions (888,888) (4,977,777) (3,555,555)
Mortgage fees _ _ (74,496)
Refund of deposit on mortgage refinancing _ _ 55,000
Net cash used for financing activities (1,018,904) (8,011,437) (2,612,625)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents 24,135 (3,152,800) (1,561,967)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning
of period 1,060,348 4,213,148 5,775,115
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $1,084,483 $1,060,348 $4,213,148
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow
Information:
Cash paid during the period for interest $748,229 $929,646 $1,066,185
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
November 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994
1. Organization
Hutton/ConAm Realty Investors 3 (the "Partnership") was organized as a limited
partnership under the laws of the State of California pursuant to a Certificate
and Agreement of Limited Partnership (the "Partnership Agreement") dated July
14, 1983. The Partnership was formed for the purpose of acquiring and operating
certain types of residential real estate. The general partners of the
Partnership are RI 3-4 Real Estate Services, Inc., an affiliate of Lehman
Brothers, Inc. (see below), and ConAm Property Services IV, Ltd., an affiliate
of Continental American Properties, Ltd. (the "General Partners"). The
Partnership will continue until December 31, 2010 unless sooner terminated
pursuant to the terms of the Partnership Agreement.
On July 31, 1993, Shearson Lehman Brothers Inc. sold certain of its domestic
retail brokerage and asset management businesses to Smith Barney, Harris Upham
& Co. Incorporated ("Smith Barney"). Subsequent to the sale, Shearson Lehman
Brothers Inc. changed its name to Lehman Brothers Inc. ("Lehman Brothers"). The
transaction did not affect the ownership of the General Partners. However, the
assets acquired by Smith Barney included the name "Hutton." Consequently,
effective October 8, 1993, the Hutton Real Estate Services VIII, Inc. General
Partner changed its name to "RI 3-4 Real Estate Services, Inc."
On March 15, 1996, based upon, among other things, the advice of legal counsel,
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, the General Partners adopted a resolution
that states, among other things, if a Change of Control (as defined below)
occurs, the General Partners may distribute the Partnership's cash balances not
required for its ordinary course day-to-day operations. "Change of Control"
means any purchase or offer to purchase more than 10% of the Units that is not
approved in advance by the General Partners. In determining the amount of the
distribution, the General Partners may take into account all material factors.
In addition, the Partnership will not be obligated to make any distribution to
any partner and no partner will be entitled to receive any distribution until
the General Partners have declared the distribution and established a record
date and distribution date for the distribution.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Financial Statements The consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of the Partnership and its affiliated ventures. The effect of transactions
between the Partnership and its ventures have been eliminated in consolidation.
Real Estate Investments Real estate investments are recorded at cost less
accumulated depreciation and include the initial purchase price of the
property, legal fees, acquisition and closing costs.
Leases are accounted for under the operating method. Under this method,
revenue is recognized as rentals are earned and expenses (including
depreciation) are charged to operations when incurred. Leases are generally for
terms of one year or less.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based upon the
estimated useful lives of the properties. Maintenance and repairs are charged
to operations as incurred. Significant betterments and improvements are
capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives.
For assets sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is
reflected in income for the period.
Accounting for Impairment In March 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121 "Accounting
for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be
Disposed Of" ("FAS" 121"), which requires impairment losses to be recorded on
long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present
and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are
less than the assets' carrying amount. FAS 121 also addresses the accounting
for long-lived assets that are expected to be disposed of. The Partnership
adopted FAS 121 in the fourth fiscal quarter of 1995.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments"
("FAS 107"), requires that the Partnership disclose the estimated fair values
of its financial instruments. Fair values generally represent estimates of
amounts at which a financial instrument could be exchanged between willing
parties in a current transaction other than in forced liquidation. However, in
many instances current exchange prices are not available for certain of the
Partnership's financial instruments, since no active market generally exists
for such financial instruments.
Fair value estimates are subjective and are dependent on a number of
significant assumptions based on management's judgment regarding future
expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of
various financial instruments, and other factors. In addition, FAS 107 allows
a wide range of valuation techniques, therefore, comparisons between entities,
however similar, may be difficult.
Other Assets Included in other assets are mortgage costs incurred in connection
with obtaining financing on the Partnership's properties. Such costs are
amortized over the initial term of the applicable loan.
Offering Costs Costs relating to the sale of limited partnership units were
deferred during the offering period and charged to the limited partners'
capital accounts upon the consummation of the public offering.
Income Taxes No provision for income taxes has been made in the financial
statements since income, losses and tax credits are passed through to the
individual partners.
Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid
short-term investments with maturities of three months or less from date of
issuance. Cash and cash equivalents include security deposits of $34,316 and
$32,096 at November 30, 1996 and 1995, respectively, the use of which is
restricted under certain state statutes.
Concentration of Credit Risk Financial instruments which potentially subject
the Partnership to a concentration of credit risk principally consist of cash
and cash equivalents in excess of the financial institution's insurance limits.
The Partnership invests available cash with high credit quality financial
institutions.
Restricted Cash Restricted cash consists of escrows for real estate taxes as
required by the first mortgage lender in the amount of $84,934 and $61,141 at
November 30, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified in order
to conform to the current year's presentation.
3. The Partnership Agreement
The Partnership Agreement provides that net cash from operations, as defined,
will be distributed quarterly, 90% to the limited partners and 10% to the
General Partners.
Net loss for any fiscal year will be allocated 99% to the limited partners and
1% to the General Partners. Net income for any fiscal year will generally be
allocated 90% to the limited partners and 10% to the General Partners.
Net proceeds from sales or refinancing will be distributed 100% to the limited
partners until each limited partner has received an amount equal to his
adjusted capital value (as defined) and an annual, cumulative 7% return
thereon. The balance, if any, will be distributed 85% to the limited partners
and 15% to the general partners. Generally, all gain from sales will be
allocated in the same manner as net proceeds from sales or refinancing.
4. Real Estate Investments
The Partnership has three residential apartment complexes acquired either
directly or through investments in joint ventures as follows:
Apartment Date Purchase
Property Name Units Location Acquired Price
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Autumn Heights 140 Colorado Springs, CO 1/25/85 $9,234,438
Skyline Village 168 Tucson, AZ 3/20/85 10,388,068
Ponte Vedra Beach Village II 124 Jacksonville, FL 8/22/85 6,547,829
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 20, 1990, Bernardo Point was sold to an unaffiliated party. The
gross sales price of $19,915,000, paid in cash, was determined based upon
current market values of comparable properties in the region. After paying off
the first mortgage loan of $7,400,000 and related closing costs, the
Partnership received net cash proceeds of $12,275,200. Gain on sale for
financial statement purposes in the fiscal year ended November 30, 1991 was
$8,450,578 and was allocated to the limited partners in accordance with the
Partnership Agreement. The General Partners distributed $7,760,000 of the net
sales proceeds amount while the remaining balance of approximately $4,515,000
was utilized to repay the Skyline Village mortgage loan in June 1991.
On July 20, 1995, the Partnership sold Country Place Village II (the
"Property") for $3,890,000 to an institutional buyer (the "Buyer"), which was
unaffiliated with the Partnership. The selling price was determined by arm's
length negotiations between the Partnership and the Buyer. The Partnership
received net proceeds of $3,832,290. The transaction resulted in a loss on
sale for the Property of $83,992 which was allocated in accordance with the
Partnership Agreement. On August 22, 1995, the General Partners paid a special
distribution of $4,000,000 to the limited partners. The special distribution
was comprised of a portion of the net proceeds from the sale of the Property
and Partnership cash reserves.
Skyline Village and Country Place Village II were acquired through joint
ventures with an unaffiliated developer. To each venture, the Partnership
assigned its rights to acquire the above properties and contributed cash equal
to the purchase price of the properties. The developer did not make an initial
capital contribution to these ventures.
In the case of Country Place Village II, the Joint Venture form was retained.
The Partnership entered into an amended and restated Agreement of General
Partnership, dated as of July 1, 1992 with its two corporate General Partners,
RI 3-4 Real Estate Services, Inc. and ConAm Property Services IV, Ltd. In the
case of Skyline Village, the joint venture has been converted to a limited
partnership. The Partnership entered into an amended and restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership, dated as of July 1, 1992 with its two corporate General
Partners, RI 3-4 Real Estate Services, Inc. and ConAm Property Services IV,
Ltd., as General Partners, and the Partnership as the sole limited partner.
There has been no interruption in either management or operating activities of
the Partnership as a result of the settlement. The amended limited partnership
and general partnership agreements of Skyline Village and Country Place Village
II substantially provide that:
a. Available cash from operations will be distributed 100% to the Partnership
until it has received an annual, non-cumulative preferred return of $675,000
and $450,000, respectively. Any remaining balance will be distributed 99% to
the Partnership and 1% to the corporate General Partners.
b. Net income will be allocated first, proportionately to partners with
negative capital accounts, as defined, until such capital accounts have been
increased to zero then, to the Partnership up to the amount of any payments
made on account of its preferred return and thereafter, 99% to the Partnership
and 1% to the corporate General Partners. All net losses will be allocated
first, to the partners with positive capital accounts, as defined, until such
accounts have been reduced to zero and then, 99% to the Partnership and 1% to
the corporate General Partners.
c. Income from a sale will be allocated first, to the Partnership until the
Partnership's capital accounts, as defined, are equal to the fair market value
of the ventures' assets at the date of the amendment. Then, any remaining
balance will be allocated 99% to the Partnership and 1% to the corporate
General Partners. Net proceeds from a sale or refinancing will be distributed
first, to the partners with the positive capital account balance, as defined;
thereafter, 99% to the Partnership and 1% to the corporate General Partners.
5. Mortgages Payable The Partnership's first mortgage loans are comprised as
follows:
Autumn Heights On October 9, 1985, the Partnership obtained a first mortgage
loan of $4,600,000 collateralized by a deed of trust encumbering Autumn
Heights. The loan had an initial term of five years and bore interest at an
annual rate of 11% with monthly payments of interest only for the first two
years. The loan was extended in 1990 for an additional three years bearing
interest at an annual rate of 10.00%. The remaining balance of $4,422,269
matured November 1, 1993. A regular monthly mortgage payment was made on
November 30, 1993 resulting in a principal balance of $4,411,215 at November
30, 1993. The General Partners submitted a financing application to the
existing lender, John Hancock Life Insurance Company ("John Hancock"), along
with a refundable good faith deposit equal to 2% of the new loan balance of
$5.5 million; 1% of the deposit was refundable and 1% represented John
Hancock's financing fee. John Hancock issued a loan commitment dated May 28,
1993.
On January 6, 1994, the Partnership obtained replacement financing from John
Hancock. Total proceeds of $5,500,000 were received and are collateralized by
a Deed of Trust, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing with Assignment of Rents
Agreement encumbering the property. The loan is for a term of seven years and
bears interest at an annual rate of 8% requiring monthly installments of
principal and interest based on a 25 year amortization schedule. The loan
requires monthly real estate tax escrow fundings. The proceeds in excess of
the maturing loan balance, approximately $1 million, were added to the
Partnership's cash reserve. Annual maturities for principal will be $90,857 in
fiscal year 1997, $98,399 in fiscal year 1998, $106,566 in fiscal year 1999,
$115,411 in fiscal year 2000 and $4,861,576 in fiscal year 2001.
Skyline Village On December 20, 1991, the venture obtained a first mortgage
loan of $3,350,000 from the Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company ("Penn Mutual")
collateralized by a deed of trust, the land and the improvements, and an
assignment of rents and security encumbering Skyline Village. During 1996,
Penn Mutual transferred the first mortgage loan to GE Capital Asset Management
Corp. under the existing terms. The loan is for a term of seven years and
bears interest at an annual rate of 10.125% requiring monthly installments of
principal and interest. Annual maturities for principal will be $51,014 in
fiscal year 1997, $56,426 in fiscal year 1998 and $3,054,594 in fiscal year
1999.
On May 27, 1992, the General Partners made a special cash distribution to the
limited partners with a portion of the mortgage loan proceeds. On January 27,
1994, the General Partners made an additional special cash distribution to the
limited partners from the remaining mortgage loan proceeds.
Country Place Village II On July 15, 1985, the venture obtained a first
mortgage loan of $3,000,000 collateralized by a mortgage encumbering Country
Place Village II. The loan had an initial term of five years and bore interest
at an annual rate of 12.5% with monthly interest payments only. The loan was
extended in 1990 for an additional five years bearing interest at an annual
rate of 10.15% with monthly principal and interest payments. The mortgage
matured in July 1995, with the remaining principal of $2,900,075 due. On June
29, 1995, the Partnership paid $2,925,099, representing principal and interest,
from cash reserves to fully satisfy its mortgage obligation on Country Place
Village II.
Annual maturities of mortgage notes principal at November 30, over the next
five fiscal years are as follows:
Year Amount
------------------------------
1997 $ 141,871
1998 154,825
1999 3,161,160
2000 115,411
2001 4,861,576
------------------------------
$8,434,843
Based on borrowing rates currently available to the Partnership for mortgage
loans with similar terms and average maturities, the fair value of long-term
debt approximates carrying value.
6. Transactions with Related Parties
The following is a summary of fees earned and reimbursable expenses to the
General Partners and affiliates for the years ended November 30, 1996, 1995 and
1994, and the unpaid portion at November 30, 1996:
Unpaid at
November 30, Earned
------------------------
1996 1996 1995 1994
RI 3-4 Real Estate Services, Inc.
and affiliates:
Out-of-pocket expenses $ _ $1,125 $3,105 $1,434
ConAm and affiliates:
Property operating salaries _ 233,653 258,010 280,845
Property management fees 15,808 184,685 203,107 207,193
Total $15,808 $419,463 $464,222 $489,472
7. Reconciliation of Financial Statement and Tax Information The following is a
reconciliation of the net income for financial statement purposes to net income
(loss) for federal income tax purposes for the years ended November 30, 1996,
1995 and 1994:
1996 1995 1994
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income per financial statements $354,135 $85,405 $ 17,509
Depreciation deducted for tax
purposes in excess of depreciation
expense per financial statements (143,654) (117,445) (182,687)
Tax basis gain on sale in
excess of GAAP loss on sale _ 852,564 _
Tax basis joint venture net
income (loss) in excess of GAAP
basis joint venture net loss (72,634) (74,889) (172,232)
Other (11,175) 3,951 (949)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Taxable net income (loss) $126,672 $749,586 $(338,359)
The following is a reconciliation of partners' capital for financial statement
purposes to partners' capital for federal income tax purposes as of November
30, 1996, 1995 and 1994:
1996 1995 1994
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partners' capital per financial statements $10,028,397 $10,563,150 $15,366,633
Adjustment for cumulative difference
between tax basis net income (loss) and
net income per financial statements (3,452,760) (3,225,297) (3,889,478)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partners' capital per tax return $6,575,637 $7,337,853 $11,477,155
8. Distributions Paid Cash distributions, per the consolidated statements of
partners' capital (deficit), are recorded on the accrual basis, which
recognizes specific record dates for payments within each fiscal year. The
consolidated statements of cash flows recognize actual cash distributions paid
during the fiscal year. The following table discloses the annual differences
as presented on the consolidated financial statements:
Distributions Distributions
Payable Distributions Distributions Payable
Beginning of Year Declared Paid November 30
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 $ 222,222 $ 888,888 $ 888,888 $ 222,222
1995 311,111 4,888,888 4,977,777 222,222
1994 222,222 3,644,444 3,555,555 311,111
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Report of Independent Accountants
To the Partners of
Hutton/ConAm Realty Investors 3:
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Hutton/ConAm Realty
Investors 3, a California limited partnership, and Consolidated Ventures as of
November 30, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, partners' capital (deficit) and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended November 30, 1996. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Hutton/ConAm Realty Investors 3, a California limited partnership, and
Consolidated Ventures as of November 30, 1996 and 1995, and the consolidated
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended November 30, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Hartford, Connecticut
February 14, 1997
Net Asset Valuation
Comparison of Acquisition Costs to Appraised Value and
Determination of Net Asset Value Per $250 Unit at November 30, 1996 (Unaudited)
Acquisition Cost
(Purchase Price Partnership's
Plus General Share of
Partners' November 30,
Acquisition 1996 Appraised
Property Date of Acquisition Fees) Value (1)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Autumn Heights 01-25-85 $ 9,687,174 $ 11,200,000 (1)
Skyline Village 03-20-85 10,838,195 7,200,000 (1)
Ponte Vedra Beach Village II 08-22-85 6,869,917 5,600,000 (1)
----------- ------------
$27,395,286 24,000,000
Cash and cash equivalents 1,169,417
Other assets 35,647
------------
25,205,064
Less:
Total liabilities (8,948,260)
------------
Partnership Net Asset Value (2) $16,256,804
Net Asset Value Allocated:
Limited Partners $16,187,639
General Partners 69,165
------------
$16,256,804
Net Asset Value Per Unit
(80,000 outstanding) $202.35 (2)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) This represents the Partnership's share of the November 30, 1996 Appraised
Values which were determined by an independent property appraisal firm.
(2) The Net Asset Value assumes a hypothetical sale at November 30, 1996 of
all the Partnership's properties at a price based upon their value as a
rental property as determined by an independent property appraisal firm,
and the distribution of the proceeds of such sale, combined with the
Partnership's cash after liquidation of the Partnership's liabilities,
to the Partners.
Limited Partners should note that appraisals are only estimates of current
value and actual values realizable upon sale may be significantly different.
A significant factor in establishing an appraised value is the actual selling
price for properties which the appraiser believes are comparable. In addition,
the appraised value does not reflect the actual costs which would be incurred
in selling the properties. As a result of these factors and the illiquid
nature of an investment in Units of the Partnership, the variation between the
appraised value of the Partnership's properties and the price at which Units of
the Partnership could be sold may be significant. Fiduciaries of Limited
Partners which are subject to ERISA or other provisions of law requiring
valuations of Units should consider all relevant factors, including, but not
limited to Net Asset Value per Unit, in determining the fair market value of
the investment in the Partnership for such purposes.
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
November 30, 1996
Consolidated
Residential Property: Venture
Autumn Ponte Vedra Skyline
Heights Beach Village II Village Total
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Colorado Jacksonville, FL Tucson, AZ na
Springs, CO
Construction date 1983-1985 1984-1985 1984-1985 na
Acquisition date 01-25-85 08-22-85 03-20-85 na
Life on which
depreciation
in latest income
statements is computed (3) (3) (3) na
Encumbrances $5,272,809 $ _ $3,162,034 $8,434,843
Initial cost to
Partnership:
Land $1,581,000 $788,000 $3,410,000 $5,779,000
Buildings and
improvements $8,123,598 $6,138,289 $7,510,205 $21,772,092
Costs capitalized
subsequent to
acquisition:
Land, buildings
and improvements $287,159 $201,225 $104,972 $593,356
Gross amount at which
carried at close of
period: (1)
Land $1,589,840 $789,882 $3,437,946 $5,817,668
Buildings and
improvements 8,401,917 6,337,632 7,587,231 22,326,780
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$9,991,757 $7,127,514 $11,025,177 $28,144,448
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accumulated
depreciation (2) $3,979,610 $2,873,296 $3,657,871 $10,510,777
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Represents aggregate cost for both financial reporting and Federal income
tax purposes.
(2) The amount of accumulated depreciation for Federal income tax purposes is
$17,898,507.
(3) Buildings and improvements - 25 years; personal property - 10 years.
A reconciliation of the carrying amount of real estate and accumulated
depreciation for the years ended November 30, 1996, 1995, and 1994 follows:
1996 1995 1994
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Real estate investments:
Beginning of year $27,982,248 $33,729,426 $33,583,397
Additions 162,200 158,367 146,029
Dispositions _ (5,905,545) _
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End of year $28,144,448 $27,982,248 $33,729,426
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accumulated depreciation:
Beginning of year $9,645,010 $10,629,776 $9,533,654
Depreciation expense 865,767 1,004,497 1,096,122
Dispositions _ (1,989,263) _
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End of year $10,510,777 $9,645,010 $10,629,776
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Report of Independent Accountants
Our report on the consolidated financial statements of Hutton/ConAm Realty
Investors 3, a California Limited Partnership, and Consolidated Ventures has
been incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K from the Annual Report to
Unitholders of Hutton/ConAm Realty Investors 3 for the year ended November 30,
1996. In connection with our audits of such financial statements, we have also
audited the related financial statement schedule listed in the index of this
Form 10-K.
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material aspects, the information required to be
included therein.
COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Hartford, Connecticut
February 14, 1997
</TEXT