INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. ___)

Filed by the Registrant /x/

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant / /

Check the appropriate box:

/ / Preliminary Proxy Statement

/x/ Definitive Proxy Statement

/ / Definitive Additional Materials

/ / Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12

/ / Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only
(as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e) (2))

The France Growth Fund, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement
if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

/x/ No fee required.

-2-

[Graphic Omitted
THE FRANCE GROWTH FUND, INC.
666 THIRD AVENUE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017
-----------------
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
APRIL 30, 2001
-----------------

THIS IS THE FORMAL AGENDA FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF THE FRANCE
GROWTH FUND, INC. (THE "FUND"). IT TELLS YOU WHAT MATTERS WILL BE VOTED ON AND
THE TIME AND PLACE OF THE MEETING, IN CASE YOU WANT TO ATTEND IN PERSON.

To our Stockholders:

The Annual Meeting of the Fund's Stockholders will be held at 2:00 p.m., New
York City time, on Monday, April 30, 2001, at the offices of PaineWebber, Inc.,
14th Floor Boardroom, 1285 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10019, for
the following purposes:

1. To elect four (4) Directors in Class I to serve for a term expiring on
the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2004.

2. To consider and act upon a stockholder proposal recommending that the
Board of Directors repeal all amendments made to the By-laws in June
2000. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS STRONGLY URGES ALL STOCKHOLDERS TO VOTE
AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL.

3. To consider and act upon a stockholder proposal recommending that the
Board of Directors amend the By-laws to allow stockholders holding not
less than 5% of the shares entitled to vote to request a Special Meeting
of Stockholders. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS STRONGLY URGES ALL STOCKHOLDERS
TO VOTE AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL.

Stockholders of record of the Fund's common stock at the close of business on
March 29, 2001 are entitled to vote at this meeting and any related adjourned
meeting.

/s/ STEVEN M. CANCRO
--------------------
Steven M. Cancro
Secretary

Dated: April 16, 2001

WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE AND RETURN THE
ENCLOSED PROXY CARD. PLEASE TAKE A FEW MINUTES TO VOTE NOW AND HELP SAVE THE
FUND THE COST OF ADDITIONAL SOLICITATIONS.

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF THE FRANCE GROWTH FUND, INC.

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

The accompanying notice of meeting and proxy statement presents proposals to be
considered at The France Growth Fund Inc.'s (the "Fund") Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on April 30, 2001.

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you elect Mr. Kipp as a
Board member of the Fund and that you re-elect Messrs. Arvis, Daviron and
Spurdle who are standing for re-election as Board members of the Fund (PROPOSAL
1). Two of the nominees, Messrs. Daviron and Spurdle have been Directors since
the Fund's inception. Mr. Arvis has been a Director of the Fund since 1993.
Messrs. Arvis, Daviron and Spurdle have brought valuable experience and insight
to the Board from their varied careers within the financial services industry
and have participated on a Board which has taken significant actions to create
value for its stockholders. They have and would continue to make positive
contributions to the Fund. Mr. Kipp is a representative of Bankgesellschaft
Berlin AG, the Fund's largest shareholder as of the record date.

At the meeting, you will also be asked to consider a proposal from one of the
Fund's stockholders with respect to the repeal of all amendments made to the
By-laws in June 2000 (PROPOSAL 2). The Board adopted these amendments to the
By-laws to improve the governance of the Fund and believes the change is in the
best interest of the Fund's stockholders. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS
VOTE AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL.

The Fund also has received a proposal with respect to amending the By-laws to
allow stockholders holding not less than 5% of the shares entitled to vote to
request a Special Meeting of Stockholders (PROPOSAL 3). THE BOARD RECOMMENDS
THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL.

If you have any questions about the Meeting agenda or how to vote, please call.
Thank you for investing in the Fund.

Yours sincerely,

/s/ JEAN A. ARVIS
-----------------
Jean A. Arvis

Chairman

THE FRANCE GROWTH FUND, INC.
666 THIRD AVENUE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
APRIL 30, 2001
-------------
PROXY STATEMENT
-------------

This proxy statement is being used by the Board of Directors of The France
Growth Fund, Inc. (the "Fund") to solicit proxies to be voted at the Annual
Meeting of the Fund's Stockholders (the "Meeting"). This Meeting will be held at
2:00 p.m., New York City time, on Monday, April 30, 2001, at the offices of
PaineWebber, Inc., 14th Floor Boardroom, 1285 Avenue of the Americas, New York,
New York 10019. The purposes of the Meeting are to elect four (4) Directors and
to consider and act upon two stockholder proposals. This proxy statement and
form of proxy are being mailed to stockholders on or about April 16, 2001. The
Fund's Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 was mailed to
stockholders on March 1, 2001. STOCKHOLDERS MAY OBTAIN, WITHOUT CHARGE, A COPY
OF THE FUND'S MOST RECENT ANNUAL REPORT BY WRITING TO THE FUND AT THE ADDRESS
LISTED ABOVE OR BY CALLING 800-852-4750.

WHO IS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE

Stockholders of record on March 29, 2001 are entitled to attend and vote at
the Meeting or any related adjourned meeting. Each share of common stock is
entitled to one vote. Shares represented by properly executed proxies, unless
revoked before or at the Meeting, will be voted according to stockholders'
instructions. If you sign a proxy but do not fill in a vote, your shares will be
voted FOR the election of the nominees for Director named in this proxy
statement, AGAINST a stockholder proposal with respect to repealing all
amendments made to the By-laws in June 2000 and AGAINST a stockholder proposal
with respect to amending the By-laws to allow stockholders holding not less than
5% of the shares entitled to vote to request a Special Meeting of the
Stockholders.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

TENDER OFFER. The Fund completed a tender offer on February 28, 2001, for
3,018,000 shares of the Fund's common stock. The shares were purchased at a
price of $10.6624 per share, which was 98% of the net asset value of the shares
on February 28, 2001. A total of 11,729,545 shares were tendered pursuant to the
tender offer and, after giving effect to proration, approximately 26% of the
shares tendered by each stockholder were purchased pursuant to the tender offer.
Pursuant to the tender offer, the Fund purchased 671,695 shares of common stock
from Bankgesellschaft Berlin AG (the "Bank"). Two of the current Directors, Mr.
Gregory L. Melville and Mr. Moritz Sell, and one of the nominees to serve as a
Class I Director, Mr. Dirk Kipp, are affiliated with the Bank.

AGREEMENT WITH BANKGESELLSCHAFT BERLIN AG. The Fund has entered into a
memorandum of understanding, dated as amended January 30, 2001 (the
"Agreement"), with the Bank, its largest shareholder. The Agreement provided for
the terms of the tender offer and certain corporate governance matters. In the
Agreement, the Fund and the Bank agreed, among other things, to the following
matters:

o The Class I directors nominated by the Board for election at the Meeting
are Jean A. Arvis, Pierre H.R. Daviron and John W. Spurdle, Jr., who are
currently Class I directors of the Fund, and Dirk Kipp, a director of the
Bank.

o The Bank will vote all of the shares of the common stock that the Bank
owns or controls at the Meeting in favor of those nominees.

o The Bank will abstain from voting on any proposals submitted by other
stockholders for consideration at the Meeting, including the two
stockholder proposals in this proxy statement.

o The Fund will appoint a nominee of the Bank to fill the first vacancy
created by the resignation or removal of a Director from the Board. In
that connection, Bernard Chauvel has resigned, effective immediately
following the Meeting, as President of the Fund and a Class II director.
The Fund has been informed that the Bank's nominee will be Serge
Demoliere, a General Manager of the Bank responsible for equities and
equity derivatives.

o The Fund's By-laws were amended to provide that a Special Meeting of the
Board may be called by any two Directors on the Board.

o The threshold in the By-laws for stockholders to call a Special Meeting
of Stockholders was reduced from 50% to 40% of the outstanding shares of
common stock, effective at the conclusion of the Meeting. This provision
and the "opt out" of the provision of Maryland law that placed exclusive
authority to determine the threshold for stockholders to call a Special
Meeting of Stockholders were amended so that the stockholder requested
special meeting provisions in the By-laws may only be amended by
stockholders, with such provision to take effect as of the 2002 Annual
Meeting.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(PROPOSAL 1)

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE NOMINEES.

The Fund's Articles of Incorporation provide that the Board of Directors
shall be divided as equally as possible into three classes of Directors (Class
I, Class II and Class III) serving staggered three-year terms. The term of
office for Directors in Class I expires upon the election of Directors at the
Meeting, Class II at the 2002 annual meeting and Class III at the 2003 annual
meeting. Four (4) Class I nominees are named in this proxy statement for
election to a term expiring on the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in
2004 or until their successors are elected and qualified.

A plurality of all votes cast at the Meeting, with a quorum present, is
sufficient to elect a Director. This means that the four (4) nominees for
Director who receive the greatest number of votes will be elected. Unless
authority is withheld, it is the intention of the persons named in the form of
proxy to vote each proxy for the election of all of the nominees listed below.
Each nominee has indicated he will serve as a Director if elected, and the Board
of Directors knows of no reason why any of these nominees would be unable to
serve. However, if any nominee should be unable to serve, the proxies received
will be voted for any other person designated to replace the nominee by the
Board of Directors.

INFORMATION REGARDING DIRECTORS AND NOMINEES

The following table shows certain information about the Directors and
nominees. Each Director, including each nominee, has served as a Director of the
Fund since 1990, except for Mr. Jean A. Arvis who became a Director in February
1993, Messrs. Melville and Sell who became Directors in April 2000 and Mr. Kipp,
who is being nominated to this Board for the first time.

The following have been nominated for election or re-election at the
Meeting:

SHARES OF THE COMMON
STOCK OF THE FUND
BENEFICIALLY OWNED
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATIONS DURING PAST FIVE YEARS AND (DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY)
NAME AGE DIRECTORSHIPS ON MARCH 29, 2001(1)
- ----- ---- ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------

Jean A. Arvis (2) 66 Chairman of the Fund (since February 1993); 6,123
Class I President, French Federation of Insurance
Companies (insurance) (since March 1997);
Special Advisor, American International Group,
Inc. (insurance) (since January 1993); Senior
Adviser, Compagnie de Suez (until December
1995); Director, AXA Equity and Law (U.K.)
(insurance), Fonciere Lyonnaise, AIG Banque,
Sofrace (Liban) and New London PLC.

Pierre H.R. Daviron 59 Executive Vice President, Marque Millennium 1000
Class I Capital Management Ltd. (since January 2000);
Partner, DR Associates (consulting) (September
through December 1999); Managing Director
(until September 1999), President and Chief
Investment Officer (August 1993-September
1998), Oppenheimer Capital International
(asset management); and Chairman of the Board
of the Fund (May 1990-February 1993).

Dirk Kipp 39 Director, Bankgesellschaft Berlin AG, responsible
for the Bank's proprietary equity trading.

John W. Spurdle, Jr. (2) 63 Managing Partner, Spurdle & Company (private 1,000
Class I finance); Chairman, Investment Management
Partners Inc. (holding company); President,
Asset Management Investment Co. (since August
1997); and Advisory Director, Bluestone
Capital Partners (investment banking) (since
January 1998).

- --------------
(1) As of March 29, 2001, the Directors and nominees listed above who owned
shares of the Common Stock owned individually less than 1% of the Fund's
outstanding shares, and the Directors and officers of the Fund beneficially
owned, directly or indirectly, in the aggregate less than 1% of the Fund's
outstanding shares.

(2) Member of the Audit Committee.

The following are Directors whose terms continue:

Thomas C. Barry 56 President and Chief Executive Officer, Zephyr 1,333
Class III Management, Inc. (since December 1993);
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Rockefeller & Co., Inc. (registered investment
adviser) (March 1983-December 1993).

W. L. Lyons 64 Director, Pennzoil - Quakerstate Company, 1000
Brown, Jr. Westvaco Corporation; Chairman of the Board
Class III of Trustees of the Winterthur Museum; Trustee
of the World Monuments Fund and the Thomas
Jefferson Foundation; Advisory Board member,
Bessemer Holdings, L.P.; Trustee, Alumni Board
of Trustees, University of Virginia Endowment
Fund; President, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, Brown-Forman Corporation (1975 - July
1993); Appointed honorary consul of France
(1975 - 1990).

John A. Bult 65 Chairman, PaineWebber International, Inc.; 1,779
Class II* Director, The Germany Fund, Inc., The New
Germany Fund, Inc., The Central European
Equity Fund, Inc. and The Greater China Fund,
Inc. (investment companies).

Bernard L. Chauvel (3) 48 President of the Fund since (June 1997); Regional 371
Class II** Manager, Credit Agricole Indosuez (U.S.
operations) (since April 1997); President,
Credit Agricole (U.S.) (banking, asset
management and finance) (January 1991 to May
1997).

Walter J.P. Curley 78 Venture Capital Investor; United States 1,562
Class III Ambassador to Ireland (1975-77) and to France
(1989-93); Director, Sotherby's Holdings,
Inc.; President, Curley Land Company; Board of
Trustees, The Frick Collection, Achelis
Foundation and Bodman Foundation; Executive
Committee Member, The American Society of the
French Legion of Honor; and Honorary Chairman
of the French American Foundation.

Gregory L. Melville 44 Assistant Director, Bankgesellschaft Berlin AG 0
Class III

Michel A. Rapaccioli (2) 67 President, Arfin (consulting) (since June 1995); 9,382
Class II Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
Texasgulf Inc. (fertilizers) (until May 1995);
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, Elf Aquitaine, Inc. (holding company)
(until 1994); Chairman and Director, Elf
Trading, Inc. (oil) (until 1994); Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer, Elf Technologies,
Inc. (until 1994) and Director and officer of
other affiliates of the Elf group of companies
(until 1994).

Moritz Sell 33 Market Strategist, Bankgesellschaft Berlin AG 0
Class III

- ---------------

(1) As of March 29, 2001, the Directors and nominees listed above owned
individually less than 1% of the Fund's outstanding shares, and the
Directors and officers of the Fund beneficially owned, directly or
indirectly, in the aggregate less than 1% of the Fund's outstanding shares.

(2) Member of the Audit Committee.

(3) Mr. Chauvel has announced his resignation, effective immediately after the
Meeting, as the President and Director of the Fund.

* Denotes an "interested person," as defined in the Investment Company Act of
1940. Mr. Bult is an "interested person" by reason of his affiliation with
PaineWebber Incorporated. PaineWebber Incorporated and its affiliate,
PaineWebber International (U.K.) Ltd., were among the principal underwriters
of the initial offering of the Fund's Common Stock in 1990. PaineWebber
Incorporated was the dealer-manager of the Fund's rights offering in 1994.
PaineWebber Incorporated, a broker-dealer registered under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, is the parent company of the Fund's Administrator.

** Denotes an "interested person," as defined in the Investment Company of
1940. Mr. Chauvel is an "interested person" by reason of his affiliation
with Caisse Nationale De Credit Agricole, the indirect parent company of the
Fund's Investment Adviser.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee composed of independent
members, as required by the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The Audit
Committee is currently composed of Messrs. Arvis, Longchampt, Rapaccioli and
Spurdle (Chairman). The Board has agreed to appoint Mr. Sell as a Member of the
Audit Committee. None of the members are an "interested person", as defined in
the Investment Company Act of 1940, of the Fund or of the Investment Adviser.
The Audit Committee makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the
selection of independent accountants and reviews with the independent
accountants the scope and results of the audit engagement. The Audit Committee
also considers the range of audit and non-audit fees, reviews and approves
non-audit services provided by the independent accountants and reviews the
annual financial statements of the Fund. The Audit Committee held four (4)
meetings during the Fund's fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.

The Board no longer has a Nominating Committee. Instead, all of the
Directors who are not "interested persons", as defined in the Investment Company
Act of 1940 Act, of the Fund or the Investment Adviser consider all candidates
for selection as a Director of the Fund and nominate the nominees to stand for
election by the stockholders. The Directors who are not "interested persons"
will not consider prospective nominees suggested by stockholders.

At the present time, the Board of Directors has no Compensation Committee
or other committee performing similar functions.

During the Fund's fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, the Board of
Directors met seven (7) times, and each Director attended at least 75% of the
aggregate number of meetings of the Board and meetings of committees of the
Board of Directors on which such Director served.

One of the Fund's Directors, Mr. Rapaccioli, and one of the Fund's
nominees, Mr. Arvis, are residents of France, one of the Fund's Directors, Mr.
Melville and one of the Fund's nominees, Mr. Kipp, are residents of Germany, and
one of the Fund's Directors, Mr. Sell, is a resident of England. Substantially
all of the assets of such persons may be located outside of the United States
and as a result, it may be difficult for United States investors to effect
service of process upon such Directors within the United States or to realize
judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon civil liabilities of
such Directors under the federal securities laws of the United States.

INFORMATION REGARDING EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Executive Officers of the Fund are as follows:

POSITION PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION
NAME AGE WITH FUND DURING PAST FIVE YEARS
- ---- --- --------- ----------------------

Bernard L. Chauvel ....... 48 President (since June 1997) Previously indicated.

Steven M. Cancro ......... 46 Vice President (since First Vice President and
June 1992) and Secretary Senior Counsel, Credit Agricole
(since 1991) Indosuez (New York).

Frederick J. Schmidt ..... 41 Vice President (since Vice President, Indocam Interna-
June 1992) and Treasurer tional Investment Services (since
(since 1990) July 1997); Vice President,
Credit Agricole Indosuez (New
York); Treasurer, Indocam Asia
Strategic Growth Fund, Inc.
(since 1994); VP, Treasurer,
Secretary & Director, EPEM (since
1999).

The persons listed above as Executive Officers of the Fund are also
employees of Credit Agricole Indosuez. The Executive Officers of the Fund were
elected by the Board of Directors at a meeting of the Board of Directors in
April 2000. Messrs. Cancro and Schmidt have indicated beneficial ownership of
4,000 and 1,000 shares of the Fund, respectively, which represents less than 1%
of the shares of the Fund outstanding.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Investment Adviser pays the compensation and certain expenses of its
personnel, if any, who serve as Directors and Officers of the Fund. The Fund
pays each of its Directors who is not an "interested person", as defined in the
Investment Company Act of 1940 Act, of the Fund (except by reason of being a
Director) or of the Investment Adviser, the Fund's Administrator or any
principal underwriter of the Fund, an annual fee of $7,500 plus an attendance
fee of $700 for each meeting of the Board of Directors or of the Audit Committee
attended. In addition, the Fund reimburses all Directors for certain
out-of-pocket travel expenses in connection with their attendance at meetings of
the Board of Directors or any committees thereof. The Fund pays an additional
fee of $5,000 per year to Mr. Arvis for providing certain consulting services to
the Fund and an additional fee of $3,000 per year to Mr. Spurdle for services as
Chairman of the Audit Committee.

The following table provides information regarding the fees paid by the
Fund to the non-interested Directors for their services for the Fund's fiscal
year ended December 31, 2000.

PENSION OR
RETIREMENT
AGGREGATE BENEFITS TOTAL COMPENSATION
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ACCRUED FROM THE FUND
- -------- ------------ ------- ------------------

Jean A. Arvis ............................. 19,500 0 19,500
Thomas C. Barry ........................... 11,000 0 11,000
W.L. Lyons Brown, Jr. ..................... 1,325 0 1,325
Walter J.P. Curley ........................ 11,000 0 11,000
Pierre H.R. Daviron ....................... 11,700 0 11,700
Michel Longchampt ......................... 14,500 0 14,500
Gregory L. Melville** ..................... 5,225 0 5,225
Michel A. Rapaccioli ...................... 14,500 0 14,500
Jacques Regniez ........................... 11,700 0 11,700
Moritz Sell** ............................. 5,225 0 5,225
Bernard Simon-Barboux* .................... 6,475 0 6,475
John W. Spurdle, Jr. ...................... 17,500 0 17,500

- ----------------
* Mr. Simon-Barboux no longer served as a director after the April 27, 2000
meeting of the Board.
** The fees paid for services rendered by the representatives of
Bankgesellschaft Berlin AG on the Board of Directors of the Fund, Messrs.
Melville and Sell, are paid directly to Bankgesellschaft Berlin AG.

OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK

As of March 29, 2001, to the knowledge of the management of the Fund, there
were no persons known to be control persons of the Fund, as such term is defined
in Section 2(a)(9) of the Investment Company Act of 1940. As of such date, the
only persons known to the Fund to have record or beneficial ownership of more
than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock are the following:

NAME AND ADDRESS AMOUNT OF
OF BENEFICIAL/ BENEFICIAL/ PERCENT
RECORD OWNER RECORD OWNERSHIP OF CLASS
------------ ---------------- --------
(RECORD OWNER)

Cede & Co., as nominee for 11,823,149 shares 97.9%
The Depository Trust Company
P.O. Box 20
Bowling Green Station
New York, NY 10004
(BENEFICIAL OWNERS)
Bankgesellschaft Berlin AG
Alexanderplatz 2
D-10178 Berlin
Germany 1,948,805 shares 16.1%
Lazard Freres & Co. LLC
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10020* 1,890,900 shares 12.32%
President and Fellows of Harvard College,
c/o Harvard Management Co., Inc.
600 Atlantic Ave.,
Boston, MA 02210** 1,725,701 shares 11.3%

- -----------------
* Based upon Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 13, 2001. The percentage ownership reported in this filing does not
reflect shares which were subsequently repurchased by the Fund pursuant to
the tender offer.
** Based upon Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 9, 2001. The percentage ownership reported in this filing does not
reflect shares which were subsequently repurchased by the Fund pursuant to
the tender offer.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL
WITH RESPECT TO REPEALING AMENDMENTS
MADE TO THE JUNE 2000 BY-LAWS
(PROPOSAL 2)

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE FUND UNANIMOUSLY AND STRONGLY RECOMMENDS THAT
STOCKHOLDERS VOTE AGAINST PROPOSAL 2. THE DIRECTORS BELIEVE THE PROPOSAL IS
CONTRARY TO THE BEST INTERESTS OF STOCKHOLDERS.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL 2

A stockholder has submitted the following proposal and supporting statement
for inclusion in this proxy statement. The stockholder claims beneficial
ownership of common stock of the Fund valued at over $2,000. The Fund will
provide the address of the proposing stockholder to any person who requests that
information by written or oral request to Steven M. Cancro, Secretary of the
Fund, 666 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10017.

"RESOLVED, that shareholders recommend the Board take every necessary step
to repeal all amendments to the Bylaws adopted by the Board in June 2000 that
weaken the power of shareholders or strengthen the Board's power -- since these
changes disenfranchise shareholders in a number of ways, and also are
inconsistent with the voting preferences expressed by shareholders at the April
2000 annual meeting. Furthermore, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in
the "unspoiled" Bylaws in effect prior to June 2000, it is recommended that
future changes to affected sections of the Bylaws may not be amended, altered or
repealed except by the vote of shareholders.."

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Shareholders should retaliate against heavy-handedness. The Bylaw
amendments shareholders should SEEK TO REPEAL through VOTING FOR THIS PROPOSAL
were fabricated in June 2000 to make it increasingly difficult, if not close to
impossible, for shareholder democracy to determine the Fund's future direction.
While conveniently timed changes in Maryland law opened the door for the Fund to
pursue these shareholder-unfriendly amendments, NONE WERE REQUIRED BY LAW to be
pursued. Policies in place for over a decade were abruptly changed after the
votes of shareholders -- 69.1% of those voting, and 49.6% of outstanding shares
- -- signaled a landslide of support to eliminate the discount to NAV at which
Fund shares trade in the open market. "Establishment" directors were ousted in
favor of dissident shareholders, and a tender offer proposal was also passed,
both by wide margins. The Board, however, moved to entrench the status quo with
its Bylaw amendments . . . . anyway!

Rather than responding to the will of the shareholders, the Board increased
its reliance on legal tactics to fend off the owners of the company, the
constituency whose interests, ironically, the Board has a fiduciary duty to
represent. The Board's concerted effort to ignore the shareholder vote can be
described as poor corporate governance -- "Nothing Ado About Much," as one
commentator aptly characterized the lack of follow up action commensurate with
the April 2000 voting outcomes.

Most offensive to shareholder interests, in our view, were Board tactics to
amend the Bylaws to allow for the number of Board seats to be increased, yet
filling these newly created seats without seeking a shareholder vote to confirm
appointees for up to three years! The practical result was the reinstatement of
a director, John Bult, who had been handily defeated barely four months earlier
by shareholder-sponsored directors whose platform was to "more aggressively
pursue measures intended to enhance shareholder value." It does not seem a reach
to conclude that Mr. Bult was reinstated, along with the appointment of another
new, hand-picked director, to mitigate the results from a proxy contest in which
continuation of the status quo was strongly rejected by shareholders.

An appropriate remedy to these entrenchment tactics is to rescind the Bylaw
amendments that allowed for such disgraceful actions to be perpetuated. A VOTE
FOR THIS SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL IS A VOTE TO SIGNAL DISSATISFACTION WITH
INAPPROPRIATE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS' RESPONSE TO THE STOCKHOLDER'S PROPOSAL:

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY OPPOSES THE PROPOSAL DESCRIBED ABOVE AND
STRONGLY URGES ALL STOCKHOLDERS TO VOTE AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL. THE REASONS FOR
THIS UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION ARE AS FOLLOWS:

The Board adopted in June 2000 certain amendments to the Fund's By-laws
that were intended to modernize the By-laws and to improve the governance of the
Fund. These amendments were adopted in accordance with Maryland law and the
Fund's Article and By-laws. The revisions reflect the Board's judgement as to
the form of By-laws that are in the best interests of the Fund's stockholders
taken as a whole.

Many of the changes that were made to the By-laws are intended merely to
modernize the By-laws. For example, the revisions provide for electronic voting
and permit delivery of Notice to Directors in electronic form.

The revisions also reflect the Board's election to "opt-in" to certain
amendments to the Maryland General Corporation Law. The Maryland General
Corporation Law was amended in 1999 to allow the board of directors of a
Maryland corporation to elect for the corporation to be governed by up to five
new provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law. These provisions allow
the Board, among other things, to increase the threshold for calling a special
meeting, to increase the percentage approval required to remove a director, to
provide that only the board can set the number of directors and to vest in the
board the exclusive power to fill vacancies on the board. The Maryland
legislature's adoption of these provisions and the ability of a board to
"opt-in" to the provisions without stockholder approval are clearly reflective
of the legislature's judgment as to the appropriate relative responsibilities of
a board and stockholders.

The Board determined that electing for the Fund to be governed by some of
the new provisions was appropriate and in the best interests of all Fund
stockholders. The Board then amended certain sections of the By-laws to reflect
the Board's decision to "opt-in" under the Maryland General Corporation Law.

The amendments to the By-laws also incorporated provisions that the Board
believes will make the Fund's governance fairer to all stockholders. A provision
was added requiring that the Fund receive advance notice, 90 days prior to the
anniversary of the date on which the prior year's proxy statement was mailed, of
any nominees for Director or stockholder proposals. The purpose of this
amendment is not to prevent any stockholder from presenting a proposal, whether
or not supported by the Board, for inclusion in the Fund's proxy statement. The
inclusion of this stockholder proposal and the other stockholder proposal in
Proposal 3 in this proxy statement demonstrates that the amendments to the
By-laws were not intended to achieve that purpose. Rather, the advance notice
requirement is intended to provide notice of proposals to all stockholders and
to allow all interested parties, including the Board, to express their views as
to the merits of a proposal. Without an advance notice provision, there is
nothing to prevent a proposal being raised and voted at a stockholder meeting,
in which case any stockholder who is present at the meeting by proxy--which is
the majority of those voting at a meeting--will have no notice of or say in the
outcome of the proposal. Similarly, as discussed in greater detail under
Proposal 3, the amendment to the By-laws increasing the percentage of the
outstanding shares required to call a special meeting is intended to maintain
the original purpose of a special meeting--to act in extraordinary
circumstances--and not to allow a special meeting to serve as a tool for
professional dissident investors.

The proponent makes two accusations in the supporting statement that need
to be corrected. First, the Board took very seriously last year's stockholder
vote in favor of realizing net asset value. The Fund, at the direction of the
Board, has:

o Activated the Fund's open-market purchase plan and acquired 255,333
shares on the market at a cost of $3,428,224;

o Successfully completed a tender offer for approximately 20% of the
outstanding shares of the Fund at 98% of net asset value; and

o Continued to distribute quarterly at least 3% of the Fund's net assets
(as of December 31, 2000) pursuant to the Tax Managed Distribution Plan
(the "Plan"). Since the inception of the Plan in 1998, the Fund has
distributed over $144,787,712 to stockholders. The Plan's initial three
year term will expire in June 2001, at which time the Board will consider
whether the Plan should be renewed.

The Board believes that these actions demonstrate the Board's resolve to
address the "discount" issue but to do so in a responsible manner that considers
the best interests of all of the Fund's stockholders. Second, the increase in
the size of the Board and the reappointment of Mr. Bult was not intended to
oppose the interests of stockholders. The appointment of Mr. Bult did not deny a
seat on the Board to anyone who was nominated by any stockholder. His
reappointment allowed the Fund to retain the services of a Director who has
unique knowledge of the closed-end fund business and actions other closed-end
funds are taking to address the discount.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL
WITH RESPECT TO ALLOWING STOCKHOLDERS HOLDING NOT LESS THAN
5% OF THE SHARES TO REQUEST A SPECIAL MEETING
(PROPOSAL 3)

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE FUND UNANIMOUSLY AND STRONGLY RECOMMENDS THAT
STOCKHOLDERS VOTE AGAINST PROPOSAL 3. THE DIRECTORS BELIEVE THE PROPOSAL IS
CONTRARY TO THE BEST INTERESTS OF STOCKHOLDERS.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL 3

A stockholder has submitted the following proposal and supporting statement for
inclusion in this proxy statement. The stockholder claims beneficial ownership
of common stock of the Fund valued at over $2,000. The Fund will provide the
address of the proposing stockholder to any person who requests that information
by written or oral request to Steven M. Cancro, Secretary of the Fund, 666 Third
Avenue, New York, New York 10017.

"RESOLVED, that the stockholders of The France Growth Fund, Inc. (the "Fund")
recommend that the Board of Directors amend Section 3 of the By-laws to reflect
that stockholders entitled to cast not less than 5% of all the votes entitled to
be cast at such meeting may request a Special Meeting of Stockholders, and that
hereafter, this amendment of the By-laws may not be further amended, altered or
repealed except by the vote of stockholders."

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

The Fund has failed to implement numerous proposals passed by its stockholders
at the last two annual meetings in 1999 and 2000. Additionally, the Fund's Board
of Directors has taken away the 25% threshold previously in place to request a
special meeting, instead doubling the threshold to 50%. We believe a shareholder
vote to substantially lower that threshold will serve to create a more
appropriate checks-and-balances system for the company's owners, its
stockholders, to participate in corporate gov-

ernance matters. At the same time, the 5% threshold and the responsibility of
the requesting stockholder(s) to front the costs for the special meeting to the
Fund should go a long way to preventing the calling of special meetings except
for matters of genuine significance to investors.

The Fund fought to omit our shareholder proposal from its proxy statement
and deny shareholders consideration of this matter. However, the SEC would not
accept the Fund's arguments to exclude this proposal. The Fund's opposition
statement is more concerned with the self-interests of Fund management and the
Board of Directors than the true best interests of the Fund's shareholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS' RESPONSE TO THE STOCKHOLDER'S PROPOSAL:

The Board does not believe that this proposal furthers the interests of
stockholders and is being proposed only to allow stockholders with a modest
investment in the Fund to harass the Fund's management at the expense of other
stockholders. The Fund holds annual meetings for election of Directors and for
consideration of any matter properly presented by a stockholder, regardless of
the size of the stockholder's holding in the Fund. The Fund has in the past and,
as a matter of Maryland law, will continue in the future to hold annual
meetings. The Fund is obligated by the laws of Maryland and the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission to allow all of the Fund's stockholders to
present the Fund with proposals for matters to be considered at the annual
meeting. As the inclusion of the two stockholder proposals in this proxy
statement demonstrates, the Fund includes stockholder proposals for
consideration at an annual meeting whether or not the Board supports the
proposal.

Contrary to the stockholder's assertion in the supporting statement, the
Board has not sought to "deny shareholders consideration of this matter".
Because the Board did not believe that the stockholder's proposal, in its
original form, was a proper matter for consideration under Maryland state law,
the Fund asked the Securities and Exchange Commission to review the proposal.
The Securities and Exchange Commission agreed with the Fund's analysis, and
required the stockholder to revise its proposal to comply with State law in
order for the proposal to be included in the proxy statement.

Special meetings are intended to be called only in extraordinary
circumstances. Since its incorporation, no stockholder has requested the Fund
hold a special meeting. The Fund's By-laws provide that a special meeting of
stockholders may be called by one or more stockholders who own in the aggregate
40% of the outstanding shares of the Fund's common stock. The Board believes
that if a matter is sufficiently urgent to necessitate the cost and distraction
of a special meeting, either the Board will call the meeting or stockholders
holding more than 40% of the Fund's shares will be prepared to call the meeting.

A meeting of stockholders costs the Fund a significant amount of money and
is a distraction for management of the Fund. The holding of a meeting of
stockholders entails expenses for the Fund, including the cost of preparing,
printing and mailing a notice of meeting and proxy statement, legal fees,
solicitation costs, travel expenses for the Independent Directors who attend the
special meeting and the costs of engaging an independent entity to certify the
voting results, if required. The 2000 Meeting of Stockholders, for example, cost
the Fund approximately $175,000. THE MAJORITY OF THESE COSTS ARE PAID FOR BY ALL
OF THE FUND'S STOCKHOLDERS AND NOT JUST THE STOCKHOLDER CALLING THE SPECIAL
MEETING. The stockholder requesting the special meeting may only be charged the
cost of printing and mailing the notice of meeting and proxy statement.

A meeting of stockholders, particularly a special meeting, also requires
management of the Fund to focus on the meeting and all of the tasks associated
with holding the meeting rather than on Fund management.

By setting a low threshold for calling a special meeting, a dissident
stockholder which owns a very small percentage of the Fund's outstanding shares
will be in a position to require the Fund to hold several meetings a year and,
among other things, to repeatedly consider similar proposals or a barrage of new
proposals which could more efficiently be considered in connection with the
Fund's annual meetings. The added expense and time of repeatedly holding special
meetings of shareholders would both distract the investment adviser from its
primary responsibility of seeking to maximize total return for stockholders and
increase Fund expenses for all stockholders.

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors have selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC") as
the Fund's independent accountants for the current fiscal year ending December
31, 2001. Representatives of PwC will be present and available for questions at
the Meeting.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Audit Committee of the Fund's Board of Directors is currently composed
of 4 members and acts under a written charter first adopted and approved on
April 27, 2000. A copy of this charter is attached to this proxy statement as
Appendix A. The members of the Audit Committee are independent directors, as
defined by its charter and the rules of New York Stock Exchange. The Audit
Committee held four (4) meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.

The role of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in its
oversight of the Fund's financial reporting process. Management of the Fund is
responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Fund's
financial statements, the Fund's accounting and financial and reporting
principles and internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance
with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The independent
public accountants, PwC, is responsible for auditing the Fund's financial
statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.

The Audit Committee reviewed the Fund's audited financial statements for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 at a meeting on February 26, 2001 and
discussed these financial statements with the Fund's management. The Audit
Committee also reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements and the
matters required by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication with
Audit Committees) with PwC, the Fund's independent accountants. The Fund's
independent accountants also provided the Audit Committee with the written
disclosures and the letter required by Independence Standards Board Standard No.
1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees). In addition, the Audit
Committee discussed with the independent accountants their independence from the
Fund.

Stockholders are reminded, however, that the Members of the Audit Committee
are not professionally engaged in the practice of auditing or accounting and are
not experts in the fields of auditing or accounting, including in respect of
auditor independence. Members of the Committee rely without independent
verification on the information provided to them and on the representations made
by Management and PwC. Accordingly, the Audit Committee's oversight does not
provide an independent basis to determine that Management has maintained
appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or appropriate
internal control and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting
standards and applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, the Audit
Committee's considerations and discussions referred to above do not assure that
the audit of the Fund's financial statements has been carried out in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, that the financial statements are
presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or that
the Fund's independent accountant's are, in fact, "independent."

Based on its discussions with management and the independent accountants,
and its review of the representations and information provided by management and
the independent accountants, and sub-

ject to the limitation on the role and responsibility of the Audit Committee
referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Fund's Board of
Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Fund's Annual
Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2001.

By the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors:

John W. Spurdle, Jr., Chairman
Jean A. Arvis
Michel Longchampt
Michael Rapaccioli

AUDIT FEES

The aggregate fees paid to PwC in connection with the annual audit of the
Fund's financial statements and reports issued for certain security counts for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 was $75,000.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION FEES

There were no financial information systems design and implementation
services rendered by PwC to the Fund, its investment adviser, and entities
controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Investment Adviser
that provide services to the Fund for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.

ALL OTHER FEES

The aggregate fees billed for all other non-audit services, including fees
for tax-related services, rendered by PwC to the Fund, its investment adviser,
and entities controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the
adviser that provide services to the Fund for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2000 was $3.5 million.

INFORMATION CONCERNING THE MEETING

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

The cost of preparing, printing and mailing these proxy materials will be
borne by the Fund. In addition to the mailing of these proxy materials, proxies
may be solicited by telephone, by fax or in person by the Directors, officers
and employees of the Fund; Indocam International Investment Services, the Fund's
Investment Adviser, whose principal address is 90, boulevard Pasteur, 75015
Paris France; or Mitchell Hutchins Asset Management, Inc., the Fund's
Administrator, whose principal address is 51 West 52nd Street, New York, New
York 10019. Shareholder Communications Corporation, a third party solicitation
firm, has agreed to provide proxy solicitation services to the Fund at a cost of
approximately $10,000. Brokerage houses, banks and other fiduciaries may also be
requested to forward these proxy materials to the beneficial owners of Fund
shares to obtain authorization for completing the proxies and will be reimbursed
by the Fund for their out-of-pocket expenses.

REVOKING PROXIES

A stockholder signing and returning a proxy has the power to revoke it at any
time before it is exercised by filing a written notice of revocation with the
Fund's secretary, c/o The France Growth Fund, Inc., 666 Third Avenue, New York,
NY 10017; or by returning a duly executed proxy with a later date before the
time of the Meeting; or if a stockholder has executed a proxy but is present at
the Meeting and wishes to vote in person, by notifying the secretary of the Fund
(without complying with any formalities) at any time before it is voted.

Being present at the Meeting alone does not revoke a previously executed and
returned proxy.

OUTSTANDING SHARES AND QUORUM

As of March 29, 2001, 12,072,000 shares of Common Stock of the Fund were
outstanding. Only stockholders of record on March 29, 2001 are entitled to
notice of and to vote at the Meeting. Thirty-three percent (33%) of the shares
of Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Meeting will
be considered a quorum for the transaction of business.

VOTING RIGHTS AND REQUIRED VOTE

A plurality of all votes cast at the Meeting, with a quorum present, is
sufficient to elect a Director. This means that the four (4) nominees for
Director who receive the greatest number of votes will be elected. The
affirmative vote of a majority of the shares cast at the Meeting, with a quorum
present, is required for approval of the stockholder proposal with respect to
repealing all amendments made to the By-laws in June 2000 and approval of the
stockholder proposal with respect to amending the By-laws to allow stockholders
holding not less than 5% of the shares entitled to vote to request a Special
Meeting of the Stockholders.

The Fund expects that broker-dealer firms holding shares of the Fund in
"street name" for the benefit of their customers and clients will ask their
customers and clients how they want their shares voted on each proposal before
the Meeting. The Fund understands that, under the rules of the NYSE, these
broker-dealers may, without instructions from their customers and clients, grant
authority to the proxies designated by the Fund to vote on certain items to be
considered at the Meeting if no instructions have been received prior to the
date specified in the broker-dealer firm's request for voting instructions.
Certain-broker-dealer firms may also exercise discretion over shares held in
their name for which no instructions are received by voting such shares in the
same proportion as they have voted shares for which they have received
instructions.

The shares as to which the broker-dealer firms have granted authority to
the proxies designated by the Fund to vote on the items to be considered at the
Meeting, the shares as to which broker-dealer firms have declined to vote
("broker non-votes"), and the shares as to which proxies are returned by record
stockholders but which are marked "abstain" on any item will be included in the
Fund's tabulation of the total number of votes present for purposes of
determining whether the necessary quorum of stockholders exists. However,
abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast. Therefore,
abstentions and broker non-votes will not have an effect on the election of
Directors or the stockholder proposals with respect to the repealing amendments
made to the June 2000 By-laws and with respect to allowing stockholders holding
not less than 5% of the shares to request a special meeting, although they will
count toward the presence of a quorum.

OTHER BUSINESS

The Board of Directors knows of no other matters to be presented for
consideration at the Meeting. If other business including any question as to an
adjournment of the Meeting is properly brought before the Meeting, proxies will
be voted according to the best judgment of the persons named as proxies.

TRANSACTIONS BY AFFILIATES

During the fiscal year of the Fund ended December 31, 2000, there were no
transactions in the common stock of the Investment Adviser, its parents or
subsidiaries by any officer, Director or nominee for election of Director of the
Fund or the Investment Adviser in an amount equal to or exceeding 1% of the
outstanding common stock of such entity. Mr. Arvis has indicated ownership of
Directors' qualifying shares (less than 1% of the outstanding shares) of Credit
Agricole Indosuez, an affiliate of the Investment Adviser.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Stockholder proposals intended to be presented at the Fund's Annual Meeting
of Stockholders in 2002 must be received by the Fund on or before December 17,
2001, in order to be included in the Fund's proxy statement and form of proxy
relating to that meeting. For a stockholder proposal which is not included in
the Fund's proxy statement to be considered timely, it must be received by the
Fund at least 90 days before the anniversary date of the mailing of the Fund's
proxy materials for the prior year's annual meeting.

/s/ STEVEN M. CANCRO
--------------------
Steven M. Cancro
Secretary

Dated: April 16, 2001

WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING, COMPLETE AND RETURN THE
ENCLOSED PROXY CARD. PLEASE TAKE A FEW MINUTES TO VOTE NOW AND HELP SAVE THE
COST OF ADDITIONAL SOLICITATIONS.

EXHIBIT A

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

THE FRANCE GROWTH

1. COMPOSITION OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE: The Audit Committee of The France
Growth Fund, Inc. (the "Fund") shall be comprised of at least three
directors, each of whom shall have no relationship to the Fund or any of
its investment adviser, administrator or custodian that may interfere
with the exercise of his or her relationship to the Fund and shall
otherwise satisfy the applicable membership requirements under the rules
of the New York Stock Exchange, as such requirements are interpreted by
the Board of Directors in its business judgement.

2. PURPOSES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE: The purposes of the Audit Committee are
to assist the Board of Directors:

(a) to oversee the Fund's accounting and financial reporting policies
and practices and related controls and procedures maintained by or
on behalf of the Fund;

(b) to oversee the quality and objectivity of the Fund's financial
statements and the independent audit thereof;

(c) to select (or nominate the outside auditors to be proposed for
stockholder approval in any proxy statement), evaluate and, where
deemed appropriate, replace the outside auditors; and

(d) to evaluate the independence of the outside auditors.

The function of the Audit Committee is oversight. It is management's
responsibility to maintain appropriate systems for accounting and
internal control, and the outside auditors' responsibility to plan and
carry out a proper audit. In fulfilling their responsibilities hereunder,
it is recognized that members of the Audit Committee are not accountants
or auditors by profession or experts in the fields of accounting or
auditing. Accordingly, it is not the their responsibility to conduct
independent auditing or accounting reviews, and each member of the Audit
Committee shall be entitled to rely on (i) the integrity of those persons
and organizations within and outside the Fund that it receives
information from and (ii) the accuracy of the financial and other
information provided to the Audit Committee by such persons or
organizations absent actual knowledge to the contrary (which shall be
promptly reported to the Board of Directors).

The outside auditors for the Fund are ultimately accountable to the Board
of Directors. The Board of Directors, with the assistance of the Audit
Committee, has the ultimate authority and responsibility to select,
evaluate and, where appropriate, replace outside auditors.

The outside auditors shall submit to the Fund annually a formal written
statement delineating all relationships between the outside auditors and
the Fund (the "Statement of Independence"), addressing at least the
matters set forth in Independence Standards Board No. 1. Such statement
shall also delineate any professional, tax or consulting services to the
investment adviser, administrator or custodian.

3. MEETINGS OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE: The Audit Committee shall meet at least
twice annually to discuss with management the annual audited financial
statements and periodic performance results. In addition, the Audit
Committee shall meet separately at least annually with management and the
outside auditors to discuss any matters that the Audit Committee believes
should be discussed privately. The Audit Committee is empowered to hold
special meetings as circumstances require.

4. DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE: To carry out its purposes,
the Audit Committee shall have the following duties and powers:

(a) to recommend the selection, retention or termination of the outside
auditors and, in connection therewith, to evaluate the independence
of the outside auditors, including whether the outside auditors
provide any consulting services to the adviser or any of the Fund's
other service providers, and to receive the outside auditors'
specific representations as to their independence;

(a) to meet with the outside auditors, including private meetings, as
necessary (i) to review the arrangements for and scope of the annual
audit and any special audits; (ii) to discuss any matters of concern
relating to the Fund's financial statements, including any
adjustments to such statements recommended by the auditors, or other
results of said audit(s); (iii) to consider the outside auditors'
comments with respect to the Fund's financial policies, procedures
and internal accounting controls and management's responses thereto;
and (iv) to review the form of opinion the auditors propose to
render to the Board and shareholders;

(a) to consider the effect upon the Fund of any changes in accounting
principles or practices proposed by management or the outside
auditors;

(a) to review the fees charged by the outside auditors for audit and
non-audit services;

(a) to investigate improprieties or suspected improprieties in fund
operations; and

(a) to report its activities to the full Board on a regular basis and to
make such recommendations with respect to the above and other
matters as the Audit Committee may deem necessary or appropriate.

(a) to prepare any report, including any recommendation of the Audit
Committee, required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission to be included in the Fund's annual proxy statement or other
required disclosure document.

5. RESOURCES AND AUTHORITY OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE: The Audit Committee shall
have the resources and authority appropriate to discharge its
responsibilities, including the authority to retain special counsel and
other experts or consultants at the expense of the Fund.

6. ANNUAL REVIEW: The Audit Committee shall review this Charter at least
annually and recommend any changes to the full Board of Directors.

APPROVED: APRIL 2000

THE FRANCE GROWTH FUND, INC.
666 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10017

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints Frederick J. Schmidt and Steven M. Cancro
as Proxies, each with full power of substitution, and hereby authorizes each of
them, with the authority in each to act in the absence of the other, to
represent and to vote, as designated below, all the shares of Common Stock of
The France Growth Fund, Inc. (the "Fund") held of record by the undersigned on
March 29, 2001 at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Fund to be held on
April 30, 2001, or any adjournments thereof.

PROPOSALS (Please check one box for each proposal)

YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE NOMINEES.

1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS. To elect four (4) Directors in Class I to
serve for a term expiring on the date of the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders in 2004.

FOR all nominees listed below [ ] WITHHOLD AUTHORITY [ ]
(except as marked to the contrary below) to vote for all nominees
listed below

Nominees: Jean A. Arvis, Pierre H.R. Daviron, Dirk Kipp and John W. Spurdle
(UNLESS AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR ANY OF THE FOREGOING NOMINEES IS WITHHELD, THIS
PROXY WILL BE DEEMED TO CONFER AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR EVERY NOMINEE WHOSE NAME IS
NOT LISTED BELOW.) INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual
nominee, write that nominee's name in the following space:

----------------------------------------------------------------

YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST PROPOSAL 2.

2. TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL RECOMMENDING THAT THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPEAL ALL AMENDMENTS MADE TO THE BY-LAWS IN
JUNE 2000.

FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN [ ]

YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST PROPOSAL 3.

3. TO CONISDER AND ACT UPON A STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL RECOMMENDING THAT THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AMEND THE BY-LAWS TO ALLOW STOCKHOLDERS HOLDING NOT
LESS THAN 5% OF THE SHARES ENTITLED TO VOTE TO REQUEST A
SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS.

FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN [ ]

PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY
USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

4. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to consider and act upon
such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments
thereof. THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED
HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL
BE VOTED FOR PROPOSAL 1 AND AGAINST PROPOSALS 2 AND 3.

PLEASE SIGN EXACTLY AS NAME APPEARS BELOW. If shares are held jointly, each
Shareholder named should sign. If only one signs, his or her signature will be
binding. If the Shareholder is a corporation, the President or a Vice President
should sign in his or her own name, indicating title. If the Shareholder is a
partnership, a partner should sign in his or her own name, including that he or
she is a "Partner."

Dated: , 2001
------------------------------

(By)
------------------------------
Signature
(By)
------------------------------
Signature