EXHIBIT C




                              MINUTES OF HERCULES
                           BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING

                                February 11, 2002




DISCUSSION DRAFT
RGD021902

[Redacted]

BD:0202:1      PROPOSED WATER BUSINESS DIVESTITURE
- --------------------------------------------------


     Dr. Joyce  introduced the topics for  discussion,  described the agenda for
the Meeting,  and reviewed the  negotiations  to date with GE in connection with
the  proposed  divestiture  of the  Company's  water  business.  Dr.  Joyce then
discussed the topics addressed in the management presentation materials that had
been  distributed  previously  to  the  Board  of  Directors  (BD:0211:265).  He
commented on "The Chemical Cycle",  "State of Hercules Business",  "Gross Profit
Trend  Analysis",  and  "Hercules'  Management  Projections".   Dr.  Joyce  also
discussed "Hercules Financials -- Strategic Plan",  "Hercules Financials -- Bank
Plan", and "Hercules Financials -- Historical Trend Plan".

     MR. HEYMAN EXPRESSED HIS OPINION THAT THE DATA BEING PRESENTED BY DR. JOYCE
WAS UNDULY  PESSIMISTIC AND A DISCUSSION ENSUED BETWEEN DR. JOYCE AND MR. HEYMAN
CONCERNING THEIR DIFFERENCES OF OPINION.


02/11/02                     February 11, 2002 BOD                        Page 2




DISCUSSION DRAFT
RGD021902


     Mr. [Redacted] discussed the impact of the refinancing on Hercules.  During
his discussion, he covered "Observations on Potential Trading Value", "Potential
Equity Issuance", and "Key Issues for Hercules".

     Mr.  [Redacted] then discussed the divestiture of the Water Business versus
the  alternative  of  keeping  the  Water  Business  and   refinancing   Company
indebtedness. During his discussion, he covered the "Implications of Selling the
Water Business".

     Dr. Joyce then discussed "Summary and Recommendations". He recommended that
the Company sell the Water Business, continue its cost reduction program, and be
open to  value-enhancing  "bolt-on"  acquisitions.  DR. JOYCE  STRESSED THAT THE
COMPANY IS NO LONGER IN A CRISIS MODE AND THAT THE  COMPANY CAN DO WHATEVER  THE
BOARD DECIDES TO DO. He stated that he would like to sell the BetzDearborn water
business,  pay down debt,  and then run the  remainder  of the Company to reduce
costs and  increase  shareholder  value.  In  response  to a  question  from Mr.
Drosdick,  Dr.  Joyce  indicated  that  under the  proposal  before the Board of
Directors,  the Company would retain approximately  one-third of the business it
purchased in 1998 with the acquisition of Betz-Dearborn as a public company.

     Mr. Heyman stated that he does not believe the proposed  transaction  makes
sense and requested  time to address the Board of Directors.  Mr.  Heyman's view
was  that  with  the sale of the  water  business,  the  Company  would  forfeit
significant  upside potential.  He stated that the transaction was substantially
earnings  dilutive and that  BetzDearborn  represented the Company's largest and
most stable asset. He stated that transaction multiples are at historic lows and
that most economists are predicting a turnaround in the



02/11/02                     February 11, 2002 BOD                        Page 7



DISCUSSION DRAFT
RGD021902


general  economy.  He stated his opinion that our competitors  are  experiencing
difficulty  and that the sale of  BetzDearborn  will  leave  Hercules  with more
cyclical businesses. According to Mr. Heyman, the Company's remaining businesses
are in poor shape and its  remaining  management is  lackluster.  He stated that
size is an  important  factor and that making the  corporation  smaller does not
create value.  He stated his belief that any "trend line approach" is flawed and
that  Dr.  Joyce's  view of the  future  of the  chemical  industry  was  overly
pessimistic.  Mr.  Heyman  then  stated  his  belief  that at  least  two  major
shareholders, in addition to ISP, were opposed to the sale. Dr. Joyce stated his
disagreement with Mr. Heyman's position (and the basis for his disagreement) and
reminded  Mr.  Heyman that the most  conservative  case that the Company had set
forth compares well to the published views of analysts for similar companies.

[Redacted]

02/11/02                     February 11, 2002 BOD                        Page 8