As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 18, 1996
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
---------------
FORM 10-SB
GENERAL FORM FOR REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES OF
SMALL BUSINESS ISSUERS
UNDER SECTION 12(b) or (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
---------------
Commission file number 000-21143
WIRELESS CABLE & COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
Nevada 87-0545056
(State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
102 West 500 South, Suite 320
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
(801) 328-5618
(Address and telephone number of registrant's principal executive offices
and principal place of business)
---------------
Lance D'Ambrosio, President
Wireless Cable & Communications, Inc.
102 West 500 South, Suite 320
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
(801) 328-5618
(Name, Address and telephone number of agent for service)
---------------
Copies to:
J. Gordon Hansen, Esq.
Scott R. Carpenter, Esq.
Parsons Behle & Latimer
Utah One Center, Suite 1800
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
(801) 532-1234
---------------
Common Shares, par value $.01 per share
(Securities to be Registered Under Section 12(g) of the Act)
NOT APPLICABLE
(Name of each exchange on which each class is to be registered)
PART I
THE COMPANY
Overview of the Company's Business.
Business Operations. The Company is in the business of acquiring,
developing and operating wireless cable television systems. The Company owns a
non-operating wireless system comprised of four (4) channels and a leased
transmitter tower in Park City, Utah, and owns a non-operating wireless system
comprised of lease and license rights to a total of thirty (30) broadcast
channels (consisting of ten 2.5 GHz and twenty 40 GHz channels) in Auckland, New
Zealand. The Park City channels and tower rights are held through the Company's
wholly-owned subsidiary, Transworld Wireless Television, Inc., a Nevada
corporation ("TWTV Park City"), and the New Zealand channel rights are held
through the Company's 94.9% owned subsidiary, Auckland Independent Television
Services, Ltd., a New Zealand corporation ("AITS").
Business Strategy. The Company believes that a wireless cable operation
may successfully compete in the marketplace only where it provides a minimum
number of channels of programming to potential subscribers. Because only a
finite number of channels are authorized for each market area in the typical
wireless cable broadcast waveband (generally 32 channels in each United States
market and 12 channels in each New Zealand market in the 2.5 GHz range),
potential operators have historically been reluctant to enter market areas
(including a significant number of the United States markets) where ownership of
the licensing rights to channels in the market are either highly fragmented or
where those licensing rights are held by only one or two holders. However, as a
result of recent advancements in wireless cable technology which allow several
programs to be carried in the amount of channel bandwidth where only one program
traditionally was capable of being carried, the Company now believes it is
possible to launch a commercially viable wireless cable operation with as few as
4 channels. By using this new technology, the Company believes the channel
rights it currently holds will provide it with channel capacity to provide the
equivalent of up to 40 channels of programming with the use of the new
technology in the Park City, Utah market area and several hundred channels of
programming in the Auckland, New Zealand, area. The Company believes its current
channel rights will be sufficient to develop commercially viable operating
systems in each of those market areas. See "Overview of the Wireless Cable
Industry -- Industry Trends."
The Company also believes that a substantial number of non-United
States wireless cable markets present viable acquisition and/or development
markets. Many of these markets are in areas that are becoming increasingly
urbanized, where there is only limited existing competition and where there is
little or no governmental regulation of wireless cable television systems in
comparison to that found in the United States.
Accordingly, the Company intends to focus its business strategy on (i)
the build-out and launch of its Park City, Utah and New Zealand systems, (ii)
the acquisition of existing operating wireless cable systems both inside and
outside of the United States, and (iii) the acquisition and development of
groupings of channels in market areas both inside and outside of the United
States that are not currently used to provide programming to subscribers. In
each case, the Company intends to focus its efforts in markets where it believes
the population density and terrain are conducive to economical transmission of
wireless cable programming. The Company may also acquire groupings of channels
in market areas that are not currently used to provide programming to
subscribers or which do not represent prime development targets for the purpose
of "warehousing" those channels for exchange or sale to third-parties attempting
to develop operating systems.
The Company has developed a complex series of criteria which it will
use to evaluate potential channel and system acquisitions. These criteria
include wireless cable channel availability in the market in question, the
existence of established groupings or blocks of channels in the market, the
Company's ability to use compression technology in the market area to increase
the volume of programming deliverable over any existing groupings of channels,
the type of potential subscriber base in the market, existing competition, the
type and extent of governmental regulation, topography, demographics and other
factors.
Once the Company acquires or develops operating systems, it intends to
focus its marketing efforts first on households in geographical areas within the
system's coverage area not passed by traditional cable systems. The Company
believes its marketing efforts will emphasize to potential subscribers the
Company's ability to provide them with
1
programs that were previously unavailable to them, allowing higher market
penetration and lower subscriber turnover. The Company's secondary market focus
will be on households in the market which are passed by, but do not subscribe
to, traditional cable systems. The balance of the Company's marketing efforts
will be directed to households subscribing to traditional cable or other pay
television systems.
The Company has also established a goal of maintaining high levels of
customer satisfaction and service. The Company anticipates that its operating
systems will operate under a decentralized management structure, which will
allow each system to maximize its local presence in its market. Each of the
systems will be managed by a general manager, who will be responsible for the
day-to-day operations of his respective system, and the maintenance of staffing
and service procedures. The Company also anticipates that its operating systems
will design and implement specific marketing programs in their respective
markets based on local demand, general market characteristics and subscriber
surveys. The Company does not anticipate that its operating systems will target
all types of subscribers, but that each system will select and place marketing
emphasis on those subscriber segments it believes has the most growth potential
and will generate a loyal customer base with stable billings. The actual
programming in each market will be tailored to meet the demographics of that
market. To the extent possible, however, the Company intends to make major
programming and equipment purchases and budgeting and strategy decisions at the
Company level, rather than the operating system level.
The Company intends continuously to compile and analyze data regarding
the buying behavior of potential subscribers in each of its market areas in
order to refine its proposed marketing strategies. The Company's objective is to
design marketing packages that will develop a loyal subscriber base with
demographic and buyer characteristics consistent with the Company's intended
programming, pricing programs and long-term business strategies. By maintaining
market and service decisions at the system level, and major strategy, budgeting
and purchase decisions at the Company level, the Company believes its systems
will be able to compete more effectively with traditional cable operators and
other pay television services.
Current Market Areas. The Company holds channel rights in both the Park
City, Utah and Auckland, New Zealand market areas. Due to recent changes in
wireless cable technology, the Company believes that these channel groupings are
sufficient to launch commercially viable wireless cable television systems.
o The Park City Market. Currently, there is no competing
wireless cable system in the Park City, Utah area, although TCI operates a
traditional cable system in the area. The Company estimates that, once its Park
City system is launched, its basic wireless cable service (consisting of
approximately 30 channels of programming) will cost approximately $19.95 per
month. In contrast, the typical, basic traditional cable package (consisting of
32 channels of programming) provided by TCI is currently approximately $21.95
per month.
The Park City, Utah area had a total population of approximately 4,468
in 1990, in comparison to 2,883 in 1980. The corresponding figures for Summit
County, Utah (the area in which Park City, Utah is located) are 15,810 and
10,200, respectively. The Company estimates that there are approximately 7,500
households in the Park City, Utah area, of which the Company believes 6,750
households are serviceable and, of those homes, approximately 1,620 homes are
currently not passed by cable.
The Company anticipates that it will begin the build-out of its Park
City system in 1997, and that it will launch its subscriber drive at that time.
The Company further anticipates that its Park City, Utah system will have
approximately 1,100 subscribers by the first anniversary of the launch of the
system.
o Auckland, New Zealand Market. There are no competing
wireless cable systems in Auckland, New Zealand, although the area now has a 5
channel wireless UHF system in operation which has approximately 200,000
subscribers. The Company estimates that, once the Auckland, New Zealand system
is launched, its basic wireless cable service (consisting of approximately 22
channels of programming) will cost approximately $27.00 per month. In contrast,
the 5 channel wireless UHF system in operation in the Auckland area is currently
approximately $32.00 per month.
The Auckland, New Zealand area had a total population of approximately
950,000 in 1995. The area is the largest television market in New Zealand, and
the Company estimates that, of the approximately 320,000 total households
2
in the service area, approximately 275,000 of those homes are serviceable and,
of those homes, approximately 270,000 homes are not passed by cable.
The Company anticipates that it will begin the build-out of the
Auckland, New Zealand market in 1997, and that it will launch its subscriber
drive in late 1997. See Liquidity and Capital Resources. The Company further
anticipates that its Auckland, New Zealand system could have between 5,000 and
10,000 subscribers by the end of 1997, and between 55,000 and 65,000 subscribers
by the end of the fifth year of operation.
o Other Markets. The Company is currently pursuing additional
wireless cable license, lease and operating rights in a number of foreign
countries primarily in Central and South America. There can be no assurance that
the Company will be able to secure any such license, lease or operating rights.
On July 17, 1996 the Company entered into a Letter of Intent for a
payment of cash and shares in the Company for a controlling interest in Viva
Vision, S.A., a Venezuelan corporation which has rights to commercialize a
license in the 28 GHZ range, and to acquire a minority interest in
Comunicaciones Centurion, S.A., the company which holds the license rights from
the government of Venezuela. In connection with the execution of this letter of
intent, the Company acquired 3% of the voting capital stock of Comunicaciones
Centurion, S.A. in exchange for the payment of $300,000. The Company is pursuing
definitive agreements documenting the transaction. The Company estimates that
the Venezuela system, once fully constructed, would be able to service
approximately 700,000 line-of-site homes in the Caracas area and approximately
1,170,000 homes outside the Caracas area.
The Separation. The Company was formed for the purpose of continuing
the development of certain business assets formerly held by Transworld
Telecommunications, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation ("TTI"). TTI is also in the
wireless cable television industry and, through its joint venture entity,
Wireless Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("WHI"), owns operating wireless
cable systems in Spokane, Washington and San Francisco Bay, California and
non-operating wireless systems or channel lease rights in Seattle, Washington,
San Diego and Victorville areas of California and Greenville, South Carolina
(the "WHI Systems"). TTI also owns a 20% interest in an operating wireless cable
system located in Tampa Bay, Florida ("Tampa Bay"), and, prior to the formation
of the Company, owned the Company's interest in TWTV Park City and AITS. The WHI
Systems and Tampa Bay have approximately 35,000 subscribers. In late November,
1995, TTI and its other joint venturer in the WHI Systems and Tampa Bay agreed
to sell their interests in WHI and Tampa Bay to Pacific Telesis Group and
certain of its affiliates. That transaction is anticipated to close by the end
of 1996.
On July 26, 1995, the Board of Directors of TTI voted to separate its
business operations into two groups of business assets. The first group of
business assets consisted of TTI's interest in the WHI Systems and Tampa Bay.
The second group of business assets included TTI's interests in TWTV Park City
and AITS. Under the terms of the business separation (the "Separation"), TTI
agreed to form a new corporation to hold the separated business operations, and
the stock of that corporation was then to be distributed to TTI's shareholders.
In order to complete the Separation, the Company was incorporated on
July 31, 1995, and on August 1, 1995, it issued 3,500,000 shares of its common
stock, par value $.01 per share, to TTI in exchange for TTI's interest in AITS,
TWTV Park City and certain other miscellaneous assets. TTI immediately
transferred the shares in the Company to an escrow agent, Fidelity Transfer
Company of Salt Lake City, Utah, to be held for the benefit of TTI's
shareholders of record on August 1, 1995. The distribution of the 3,500,000
shares to TTI's shareholders will be delayed until the Company and TTI have
complied with certain requirements of the federal securities laws, including the
registration of the Company's shares pursuant to this Registration Statement
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"). The 3,500,000
shares will then be distributed to TTI shareholders of record as of August 1,
1995, on a non-pro rata basis, with the management and principal shareholder of
TTI relinquishing a portion of their shares in the Company in favor of the TTI
public shareholders. In general, the public shareholders will receive
approximately 1.6 shares of the Company's common stock for each 10 shares of TTI
common stock they held on August 1, 1995.
Principal Office. The Company's principal executive office and
principal place of business is at 102 West 500 South, Suite 320, Salt Lake City,
Utah 84101. The Company's telephone number at that address is (801) 328-5618.
3
Overview of the Wireless Cable Industry.
General. Wireless cable systems use microwave radio frequencies
licensed by governmental agencies to provide multiple channel television
programming services similar to that offered by traditional cable systems. The
radio frequencies used in such systems are typically in the 2.5 GHz band,
although other wavebands (such as 18, 28 or 40 GHz) may be used. The microwave
signals are transmitted over the air from a transmission tower (a "head-end") to
an antenna at each subscriber's home, eliminating the need for the networks of
cable and amplifiers utilized by traditional cable operators. Because of the
relatively simplified engineering and construction techniques required to
build-out a wireless cable system, systems typically can be completed in 90 to
120 days, whereas construction of a traditional cable system with a comparable
coverage area may take as long as 3 to 4 years.
The Company believes wireless cable is one of the most economical
technologies currently available for the delivery of pay television service.
Wireless cable systems do not require extensive networks of cable and
amplifiers, so the capital cost per installed wireless subscriber is generally
lower than for a traditional cable operator. This cost advantage generally
allows wireless cable operators to provide programming to subscribers at a lower
cost. The Company believes wireless cable will continue to maintain this cost
advantage, even following the deployment of fiber optics, direct broadcast
satellite and other microwave-based emerging technologies. See "Overview of the
Wireless Cable Industry -- Competition."
To the subscriber, a wireless cable system operates in the same manner
as a traditional cable system. At the subscriber's location, microwave signals
are received by an antenna and are passed through conventional coaxial cable to
a descrambling converter located near the subscriber's television set. However,
because wireless signals are transmitted over the air, rather than through
underground or above-ground cable networks, wireless systems are less
susceptible to outages and are less expensive to operate and maintain than
traditional cable systems. In contrast to traditional cable systems, most
service problems experienced by wireless cable subscribers are home-specific,
rather than neighborhood-wide problems.
A typical wireless cable system consists of the head-end equipment
(generally, satellite signal reception equipment, radio transmitters, and
transmission antennas) and reception equipment at each subscriber's location
(generally, an antenna, frequency conversion device and a set top device). Like
traditional cable operators, wireless cable operators generally are able to
offer a full range of basic and premium programming options, including local
off-air and on-air channels, movie channels, music channels, news and sports
channels and specialized programming.
Wireless cable systems using the 2.5 GHz format typically transmit
signals over distances of 20 to 40 miles from the head-end and, with an increase
in transmission power or tower height, may expand the coverage area to
approximately 40 or 50 miles. The transmission of wireless frequencies requires
a clear "line-of-sight" between the transmitter and the receiving antenna.
Buildings, dense foliage or hilly terrain can cause signal interferences which
can diminish or block signals. These line-of-sight constraints can be eliminated
by increasing the transmission power of the system and/or by using engineering
techniques such as pre-amplifiers, beam benders(TM) and signal repeaters, but
these techniques generally increase the cost of delivering programming to
subscribers.
Because wireless cable systems use high gain antennas at the subscriber
end, ghosting and reflection are generally minimized, so picture quality
typically exceeds that of a traditional cable picture. Further, wireless cable
systems typically broadcast their programming at a wavelength of 2.5 GHz (4.78
inches). This wavelength is long in relationship to the size of rain drops, hail
or snow, but is short in comparison to interference normally caused by
electrical utility currents and motors. As a result, wireless cable
transmissions are usually not affected by weather or electrical interference.
Further, in traditional cable systems the programming signal tends to decline in
strength as it travels along the cables and must be boosted by trunk and feeder
amplifiers. Each amplifier introduces some distortion into the television
signal. By contrast, wireless cable systems use only two principal pieces of
equipment -- a transmitter and a receiving antenna.
Like traditional cable systems, wireless cable systems are capable of
employing "addressable" subscriber authorization technology, which enables the
system operator to control centrally the programming available to each
subscriber without the need for a service call to the subscriber's home.
4
The Company's channel rights in the Auckland market consists of both
2.5 GHz channels ("MMDS" channels), as described above, and 40 GHz channels. The
40 GHz channels operate similarly to the MMDS channels, but at a high frequency.
Forty GHz channels are now being utilized in parts of Europe and are generally
considered to be alternative to 28 GHz systems. At present, equipment costs for
40 GHz systems are marginally higher than other types of systems, but 40 GHz
systems use smaller antennas.
Industry Trends. The Company's business will be affected by industry
trends and, in order to acquire, maintain and increase its potential subscriber
base, the Company will need to adapt rapidly and modify its practices to remain
competitive. The industry trends affecting the wireless cable industry include
the following:
o Compression. Several equipment manufacturers have developed
digital compression devices. These devices allow several programs to be carried
within the bandwidth that typically carried only one program. Various experts
have estimated that compression ratios as high as 10 to 1 are possible, allowing
operators to provide the equivalent of hundreds of channels of programming on
wireless cable systems. Currently, digital compression systems are in operation
in commercial systems which provide compression ratios of as high as 8 to 1.
The Company believes the typical subscriber may not use, or want to pay
for, the substantial increases in programming channel capacity available through
the application of compression technology. As a result, even though compression
may allow wireless cable operators to expand their programming capacity
significantly, that increased capacity may not result in either a substantial
increase in a wireless cable operator's subscriber base or a substantial
increase in the actual amount of programming provided by a wireless cable
operator. Instead, the Company believes that compression technology may have its
most important impact in the number of operators entering the wireless cable
market, since, by using compression technology, wireless cable operators with
rights to use as few as 3 or 4 channels may be able to provide the equivalent of
up to 30 or 40 channels of programming.
o Pay-per-view services. In recent years, the cable television
industry has developed services that enable customers to order and pay for
individually selected programs. This type of service, which is known as
"pay-per- view", has been generally successful for specialty events such as
concerts and sporting events. The cable industry has also been promoting the
pay-per-view concept for purchases of movies, with the intent of competing
directly with video rental stores and movie theaters. The Company believes
pay-per-view services will become increasing popular as additional exclusive
events become available for distribution on pay-per-view channels.
In order for subscribers to purchase the right to view pay-per-view
events, they must have addressable converters, which allow the cable company to
convert what the subscriber watches without having to visit the subscriber's
residence to change equipment. The Company anticipates that its converters will
be addressable, allowing subscribers to receive pay-per-view programming.
Pay-per-view services are generally subscribed for by having the subscriber use
a telephone line to order the event. Certain cable operators have made efforts
to increase the use of pay-per-view services by installing "impulse" devices
which make it easier for subscribers to select programming and which do not
require a telephone link to order the program in question. The Company may
utilize "impulse" devices on its converters.
o Interactivity. Several cable operators have recently
publicized their intention to develop services that allow subscribers to
interact with the wireless cable company. These systems allow the wireless cable
provider to offer features not generally available to television viewers,
including the ability to choose among different camera angles, take part in game
shows, and even choose particular types of commercial messages among the various
types offered by advertisers. These interactive services could also provide
customers with the ability to choose various types of home shopping and
information shows. The Company anticipates that it will offer interactive
services in its systems when they become available on a commercially reasonable
basis.
o Advertising. Most advertising on wireless and traditional
cable television systems has been sold by program suppliers, which sell national
advertising time as part of the signal they deliver to the cable operators.
Recently, however, advertisers have begun placing advertisements on channels
dedicated exclusively to advertising, as well as in the "local available time"
set aside by program suppliers for insertions of advertisements sold by local
cable operators. Use of local available time requires automatic "spot insertion"
equipment, which the Company expects to utilize in its systems when it becomes
economically prudent to do so.
5
Competition. The Company believes its primary competition will be from
traditional cable operators. The technology used by such operators is a co-axial
cable system that transmits signals from a head-end, delivering local and
satellite delivered programming via a distribution network consisting of
amplifiers, cable and other components to subscribers. Regular system
maintenance is necessary due to water ingress, weather changes and other
equipment problems, all of which may affect the quality of the signal delivered
by the cable company to its subscribers. Traditional cable systems also
typically cost more to build and maintain than wireless cable systems. Although
the Company believes the head-end equipment cost of its systems will be
comparable to those for traditional cable systems, it also believes the
installation of co-axial cable and amplifiers would be considerably more costly
to traditional cable operators than is the installation by the Company of its
reception antennas and related equipment.
Several technologies are currently under development which may
significantly affect the pay television industry and result in new competitors
entering into the market. The Company cannot predict the competitive impact of
these new technologies and competitors on the wireless cable industry. The
Company expects, however, that wireless cable operators will be able to expand
their programming capacity and introduce new services, while continuing to
maintain a cost advantage over the other providers of pay television services.
The Company intends to exploit its comparative cost advantage by targeting a
value-conscience subscriber base that may be unwilling to pay for more costly,
specialized programming.
The technologies which may significantly impact upon the competitive
nature of the wireless cable industry include the following:
o Fiber optics systems, digital compression and interactive
services. Traditional cable systems have historically been the principal
providers of pay television services. The maximum number of programming channels
offered by traditional cable systems has been limited, however, by the current
analog transmission and co-axial cable technologies. A number of new
technologies are under various stages of development to increase the channel
capacity of these systems. These new developments include the replacement of
traditional cable system co-axial cable networks with fiber optic matrix and the
use of digital techniques to compress more programming signals onto existing
co-axial cable or other networks.
The Company believes that the programming capacity of its wireless
cable systems, including the channel rights it holds through TWTV Park City and
AITS, may be substantially increased through the application of compression
technology. Depending upon the technology used, experts believe wireless cable
systems may be capable of transmitting up to 300 channels of programming. See
"Overview of the Wireless Cable Industry -- Industry Trends" and "The Company's
Property and Equipment." The Company believes that the application of
compression technology may tend to increase the potential number of wireless
cable system operators by reducing the minimum number of channels necessary for
a commercially viable system from between 20 and 25 channels to as few as 3 or 4
channels.
The Company also expects that digital technology will enable wireless
cable systems to transmit high definition television signals. Subject to the
various governmental agencies adopting rules governing the transmission of
digital signals, the Company anticipates that the wireless industry (and the
traditional cable industry) will have commercial access to compression
technology on a wide-spread basis in the near future. The introduction of
expanded channel capacity and interactive services by traditional cable systems
will require substantial new investment.
o Telephone Company Competition. A number of telephone
companies have developed technology capable of providing audio/video services
over telephone lines ("video dial tone" service). The FCC recently adopted new
regulations permitting local telephone companies to provide video dial tone
service in their telephone franchise areas on a common carrier basis and to
otherwise compete with wireless cable operators. The competitive effect of the
entry of telephone companies into the pay television business is still
uncertain, although the Company believes that wireless cable systems will
continue to maintain a cost advantage over video dial tone service technologies.
Telephone companies are currently permitted to operate traditional cable systems
in areas outside their telephone service areas and also are permitted to offer
pay telephone services inside their franchise areas under certain conditions
under the 1996 Act, as described below. Several large telephone companies have
announced plans either to enhance their existing distribution plants to offer
video dial tone service or to construct new distribution plants in conjunction
with local cable operators to offer video dial tone service.
6
Also, as noted above with respect to the acquisition by
Pacific Telesis Group and certain of its affiliates of TTI's interest in WHI and
Tampa Bay, a number of telephone companies have recently acquired or made
substantial investments in wireless cable operations. The competitive effect of
these acquisitions and investments is uncertain.
o Satellite Systems. "Backyard dish" or "direct-to-home"
("DTH") antenna distributors using satellites to beam in programming offer
customers access to programming similar to that offered by traditional cable
operators. The primary advantages of wireless cable systems over DTH systems are
lower equipment costs and broader availability of local programming. A
conventional DTH antenna system costs approximately $1,000 to $3,000 per
subscriber, depending on the features of the system, plus monthly fees for
access to certain programming. DTH systems typically cannot receive local
off-air broadcast channels, however, so DTH subscribers generally are not able
to watch local news, weather or sports programs. DTH programs, on the other
hand, enjoy the advantages of access to a wider variety of satellite
programming, generally superior reception and the ability to service areas not
serviceable by traditional or wireless cable systems.
Several companies have recently begun orbiting high-powered
transmission satellites to distribute high capacity programming to DTH antennas
as small as 18" in diameter ("directed broadcasting satellite" or "DBS"). The
cost of constructing and launching these new satellites is substantial, however,
and DBS receiver equipment for a single television set is typically
approximately $700 per customer, plus installation fees and monthly subscriber
fees for a descrambling unit. Due to the cost of the DBS satellites and
receiving equipment, and because local programming cannot be received on a DBS
system, the Company believes wireless cable systems will continue to enjoy a
comparative cost and local programming advantage over these satellite systems.
o Other Microwave Systems. Frequencies other than those
currently authorized for wireless cable operations may be used for the
distribution of pay television services. Recently, the Federal Communications
Commission ("FCC") in the United States proposed to relocate radio frequencies
in the 28 GHz range of the electro-magnetic spectrum for use in the "cellular"
pay television services. Because 28 GHz systems have relatively short
broadcasting ranges, however, multiple cellular transmission sites will probably
be required in order to cover a broadcast area typically covered by a wireless
cable system. Also, many European countries and New Zealand have authorized pay
television services to be carried in the 40 GHz range.
o Private Cable Systems. Private cable systems also compete
with wireless cable systems. Private cable systems are multiple channel
television services offered through a wired plant. Private cable systems are
similar to a traditional cable system, but they operate under agreements with
private land owners to service specific multiple dwelling units. Private cable
systems may be used in conjunction with wireless cable television operations.
Because private cable systems may only be used to provide programming to
multiple dwelling unit subscribers (such as hotels and large apartment
complexes) the Company believes wireless cable systems still enjoy a competitive
advantage over private cable only-systems.
Government Regulation. The use of the airways for microwave
transmission is generally subject to government regulation. The amount, type and
extent of that regulation varies from country to country. The following
information summarizes certain government regulations affecting the Company's
ability to operate its wireless cable television systems in the United States
and in New Zealand. The Company will also be required to meet the regulations
governing microwave transmissions in any other jurisdictions in which it owns
and operates any wireless cable system. These regulations may be similar to, or
vastly different from, the regulatory structure described below.
o United States Regulation. The wireless cable industry in the
United States is subject to regulation by the FCC under the provisions of the
Communications Act of 1934 as amended (the "Communications Act"). Among other
things, the FCC may issue, revoke, modify and renew new licenses within the
spectrum available to wireless cable; approve the ownership of such licenses;
determine the location of wireless cable systems; regulate the kind,
configuration and operation of equipment used by a wireless cable systems; and
impose certain equal employment opportunity requirements on wireless cable
licensees. Under the 1984 Cable Act, wireless cable systems are not "cable
systems" for purposes of the Communications Act. Accordingly, unlike a
traditional cable system, a wireless cable system does not require a local
government franchise and is subject to fewer local regulations. Moreover, all
transmission and reception
7
equipment associated with the wireless cable system can be located on private
property, eliminating the need for utility poles or dedicated easements, which
are required by traditional cable systems.
The FCC has authorized access for wireless cable service to a series of
channel groups, consisting of channels specifically allocated for wireless cable
(the "commercial" channels), and other channels originally authorized for
educational purposes. Excess capacity on the educational channels can be leased
by wireless cable providers. Currently, 33 channels are potentially available
for licensing or lease by wireless cable companies in most markets. Up to 12
channels in a given market typically can be licensed by commercial operators for
full-time commercial use. FCC rules generally prohibit the licensing or leasing
of commercial channels and educational channels by traditional cable companies
within their franchise areas.
Licenses have been issued, or applications are currently pending, for
the majority of commercial channel frequencies in most of the major United
States markets. In a number of markets, commercial channel and/or educational
channel frequencies are still available. However, except as noted below, the
eligibility for ownership of educational channel licenses is limited to
accredited institutions, certain governmental organizations engaged in the
formal education of enrolled students and other qualified entities ("qualified
educational entities"). Non-local applicants must demonstrate that they have
arranged with local educational entities to provide them with programming and
that they have established a local programming committee.
Of the 20 channels allocated for educational channel use in a given
market, at least 12 must be licensed to qualified educational entities.
Commercial applicants for educational channels must demonstrate that there are
not commercial channels available for application, purchase or lease in lieu of
the educational channels for which they apply. All wireless operators who hold
licenses for "commercial" educational channels are required to provide 20 hours
per week per channel of educational programming.
The FCC awards licenses to use commercial and educational channels
based on applications demonstrating that the applicant is qualified to hold the
license and that the operation of the proposed channel will not cause
impermissible interference to other channels entitled to interference
protection. Once a commercial license application is granted by the FCC, a
conditional license is issued, allowing construction of the station to commence
upon the satisfaction of certain specified conditions. Construction of
commercial stations generally must be completed within one year of the grant of
the conditional license. Construction of educational channels generally must be
completed within 18 months of the award of the license. If construction is not
completed in a timely manner, the license holder must file an extension
application with the FCC. If the extension application is not filed or granted,
the channel license is deemed canceled. Educational and commercial licenses
generally have terms of 10 years.
The FCC has imposed "freezes" on the filing of applications and
amendments to applications for new commercial channels and filings of
applications for new educational channel facilities or, in some instances, major
educational channel modifications. The freezes were intended to allow the FCC
time to update its wireless cable database and to review and possibly modify its
application rules related to those services. The freezes do not apply to the
granting of licenses for which applications were filed prior to the freeze.
Recently, the FCC adopted a competitive bidding (i.e., auction)
mechanism for the award of initial licenses for commercial channels. Auctions to
award initial commercial licenses began on November 13, 1995. Successful bidders
received a blanket authorization to serve entire basic trading areas ("BTAs"),
as defined by Rand McNally, on all commercial channels. The blanket
authorization will be subject to the submission of applications for commercial
channels demonstrating interference protection to the 35 mile radius protected
service areas of commercial and educational stations licensed, or for which
there is an application for a license pending as of September 15, 1995. A BTA
license holder must show coverage of at least two-thirds of the BTA within 5
years of receiving the BTA authorization. A successful bidder for a BTA also is
granted a right to match the final offer of any proposed lessee of an
educational channel licensed or to be licensed in the BTA. This matching right
applies only to new offers of lease channels and will not interfere with present
education lease rights or the renewal of such rights. Educational licenses are
exempt from the auction process and applications for educational licenses are
expected to continue to be awarded according to the FCC's existing comparative
criteria. The Company did not compete in the BTA auctions.
8
The United States Congress and the FCC have also recently begun to
update the rules and laws governing traditional and wireless cable systems. For
example, the FCC recently designated one of the wireless channels as a "return"
channel allowing signals to be received as well as transmitted by wireless cable
system operators. The Company believes this will allow the implementation and
use of interactive systems.
In October of 1992, the United States Congress enacted the 1992 Cable
Act. The 1992 Cable Act was intended to regulate pricing practices and
competition within the franchise cable television industry and to establish and
support existing and new competitive multi-channel video services such as
wireless cable. The 1992 Cable Act and the FCC rules promulgated thereunder it
contain a number of provisions that regulate the day to day operations of
traditional cable companies, including: (i) limits on rates for basic levels of
service, (ii) uniform pricing practices, (iii) compatibility of a cable
company's in-home equipment (e.g. set top boxes) with subscriber's television
sets and (iv) minimum customer service standards. In addition, certain levels of
basic service offered by traditional cable companies may be subject to
regulation if another multi-channel video provider in the market is not serving
at least 15% of the households in the market and a formal complaint is being
prosecuted by a local franchise authority before the FCC. The principal
regulatory provisions of the 1992 Cable Act (including, specifically, the
provisions regarding the regulation of rates) do not apply to wireless cable
systems.
While the 1992 Cable Act and its amendments had the intended effect of
reducing prices charged by franchise cable companies in certain markets, the
Company believes it will continue to maintain a price advantage over its
franchise cable competitors. Moreover, the Company believes the uniform pricing
provisions of the new legislation will limit the ability of franchise cable
companies to lower their prices on a selective basis and in a given market in an
effort to compete with the Company or other wireless providers.
The 1992 Cable Act also contains a number of provisions designed to
enhance the ability of other paid television media (such as wireless cable) to
compete with traditional cable companies. These provisions include: (i) a
requirement that vertically integrated programming suppliers (such as those in
which there is a 5% direct or indirect ownership by a franchise cable operator)
provide access to programming to competing multi-channel video providers (such
as wireless cable companies) on fair and reasonable terms, (ii) a provision
permitting local broadcasters either to require carriage on their local cable
systems or otherwise require traditional cable operators to compensate the
broadcaster for retransmitting the broadcast or signal over the traditional
cable company system, and (iii) restrictions on the size of traditional cable
multi-system operators. The Company expects to benefit from the programming
access provisions of the 1992 Cable Act in the form of access to previously
unavailable programming material and reduced costs for certain programming
materials. The retransmission consent provision of the 1992 Cable Act requires
wireless cable companies to compensate broadcasters if the wireless cable
operator elects to retransmit a local broadcast signal over the wireless cable
system. The Company does not anticipate rebroadcasting local broadcast channels,
although it may find it necessary to retransmit local broadcast channels in the
future. The Company expects that the compensation paid to local broadcasters for
the retransmission will not exceed amounts currently paid for comparable cable
programming. Accordingly, the Company expects retransmission consent
requirements not to have a material effect on the Company's proposed operational
costs.
In early 1996, Congress passed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the
"1996 Act"). The 1996 Act contains provisions for (i) opening up local exchange
markets, (ii) updating and expanding telecommunications service guarantees,
(iii) removing certain restrictions relating to AT&T former operating companies
resulting from the anti-trust consent decree issued by the federal courts in
1984, (iv) the entry of telephone companies into video services, (v) the entry
of cable television operators into other telecommunications industries, (vi)
changes in the rules for ownership of broadcasting and cable television
operations, and (vii) changes in the regulations governing cable television. The
1996 Act is intended to improve competition among the various telecommunications
services, although there can be no assurance that it will have that effect.
The 1996 Act provides the former AT&T operating companies and other
telephone companies with the right to offer cable television service in their
home territories under certain restrictions. The 1996 Act contains anti-buyout
rules designed to discourage such telephone companies from simply purchasing the
incumbent cable television operator as a means of entering into the video
programming business.
9
The 1996 Act also prohibits local authorities (such as municipalities,
zoning authorities and homeowner associations) from imposing rules on antenna
placement that impair the user's ability to receive television programming,
whether via satellite, wireless cable or over-the-air broadcast. Also, in
regulating the siting of personal wireless facilities, states and localities
cannot discriminate among service providers, directly or indirectly prohibit
personal wireless services, delay action, avoid divulging their reasoning and
evidence, or make decisions based upon considerations relating to radio
frequency emissions if the facilities in question comply with FCC regulations on
that subject.
The FCC is expected to issue extensive regulations relating to the 1996
Act. There can be no assurance that the 1996 Act or the regulations issued by
the FCC will not have an adverse effect on the Company and its intended or
proposed business operations within the United States.
o New Zealand Regulation. The regulation of multi-point
multi-distribution licenses and 40 GHz licenses in New Zealand is governed by
the Radio Communications Act of 1989 (the "New Zealand Act"). The New Zealand
Act governs the licensing and regulation of radio equipment or licensing to
authorize the transmission of radio waves. The New Zealand Act is administered
by the Ministry of Commerce.
The management rights for particular frequency bands are created by the
Secretary of Commerce. Any manager granted particular frequency rights has the
authority to create licenses to transmit radio waves on those frequencies. These
licenses are granted in accordance with the provisions of the New Zealand Act,
but the terms under which they are allocated are determined by the manager.
Management rights and licenses are generally issued for long periods, sometimes
for periods as long as 20 years. Management rights and licenses may be traded,
and are deemed to be assets of a business for purposes of the Commerce Act of
1986, as well as the New Zealand anti-trust statutes. No written instrument
dealing with the management rights or granting or transferring of any licenses
has affect until it is registered in accordance with the New Zealand Act.
Radio apparatus licensing is governed by the Radio Regulations of 1987,
which were continued under the New Zealand Act, and which provide for the
licensing of radio transmitting and receiving equipment. All radio apparatus
licenses granted by the Ministry of Commerce are renewable annually.
o Other Forms of Regulation. Under the United States copyright
laws, persons transmitting video programs must first secure permission from the
copyright holder of those transmissions. Under Section 111 of the Copyright Act,
certain "cable systems" are entitled to engage in the secondary transmission of
programming without the prior permission of the holders of the copyrights if
they first secure a compulsory copyright license. Compulsory licenses may be
obtained by filing certain required reports and paying the fees set by the
copyright royalty tribunal. Wireless cable operators typically rely on Section
111 of the Copyright Act in their broadcast operations. There can be no
assurance, however, that Section 111 of the Copyright Act will not be amended or
otherwise modified to prohibit or limit wireless cable company operators from
obtaining compulsory copyright licenses.
THE COMPANY'S PROPERTIY AND EQUIPMENT
Channel Rights and Broadcast Equipment.
TWTV Park City Channel Rights. TWTV Park City has rights to four
licenses for channels in the Park City, Utah broadcast market. The licenses were
issued by the FCC in 1995, expire in 2001, and are currently in the name of TWTV
Park City. TWTV Park City and the Company anticipate they will file applications
for the transfer of the control of the licenses to the Company. Each of the
licenses is subject to renewal but, while such renewals generally have been
granted by the FCC on a routine basis in the past, there can be no assurance
that TWTV Park City's licenses will continue to be renewed routinely in the
future. TWTV Park City's channels include the MDS-1 channel and the H1, H2 and
H3 channels.
In addition to its channel rights, TWTV Park City holds both a lease
for tower space and certain broadcast equipment. The tower lease requires
payments of $100 per year, is renewable annually, and is with Summit County.
The tower is located at Query Mountain, near Park City.
10
TWTV Park City's equipment includes transmitters and related equipment
for each of its H1, H2, H3 and MDS- 1 channels. Some of the equipment is leased
from Bay Area Cablevision, Inc. The equipment lease, which began on July 1, 1995
(for an initial term of 6 months, which subsequently has been renewed through
July 1, 1997), requires lease payments of $400 per month. TWTV Park City may
purchase the equipment for $20,189.90 at any time during the lease. The Company
believes the equipment lease will be renewable for additional 6 month terms on
similar conditions.
The Company is currently reviewing various compression systems for use
in its Park City system. The Company anticipates that it will need to acquire a
total of four compression systems for the Park City system, one for each of its
channels in order to make the system commercially viable.
The Company estimates that the cost of completing the construction of
the transmission facilities for the TWTV Park City system will be approximately
$500,000. Based on the Company's current construction schedule, it believes that
it will be able to launch the system in 1997.
AITS Channel Rights. The Company's other wireless cable assets are held
through AITS, and consist of 10 of the 12 available broadcast channels in the
Auckland, New Zealand area (the "MMDS Channels"), and license rights for 20
channels in the 40 GHz band (the "40 GHz Channels"). AITS' MMDS Channel rights
are governed by three separate lease agreements with Telecom New Zealand Limited
("Telecom"), the manager of the channels. The first lease, which covers six of
the MMDS Channels, requires annual license fee payments of $77,422 N.Z.
(approximately $54,195 U.S., based on the exchange rate on September 30, 1996).
This lease will expire on December 9, 1996. The second lease covers two of the
MMDS Channels and continues until 2001 with a guaranteed option to renew the
lease for an additional four years. This lease requires an annual license fee of
$28,680 N.Z. (approximately $20,076 U.S., based on the exchange rate on
September 30, 1996), plus 12.5% gross sales tax. The third lease covers two of
the MMDS Channels and continues until 2004. This lease requires a $75,000 U.S.
payment on September 1 of each of 1996, 1997 and 1998, and a $35,000 U.S.
payment on September 1 in the years 1999 through 2003. In addition, AITS is
required to pay $1,000 N.Z. (approximately $700 U.S. based on the exchange rate
on September 30, 1996) in annual license fees for the third lease.
The Telecom leases are renewable in Telecom's sole discretion, and
there is no guarantee that Telecom will renew all or any of the leases. If
Telecom fails or refuses to renew the lease expiring in December of 1996, the
Company still believes that, as a result of the newly available compression
technology, the remaining Telecom channels will provide sufficient capacity to
operate a commercially viable wireless cable system in the Auckland, New Zealand
market.
The Company's 40 GHZ Channels were licensed to it on February 28, 1996
by the Ministry of Commerce. At this point, the licenses are "conditional
licenses," in that they are granted subject to a one year use requirement. If
the Company does not begin transmission using the 40 GHZ Channels by March 1,
1997, they will revert to the Ministry of Commerce. If the Company uses the
licenses, it anticipates that they will be renewed for successive periods.
AITS has no head-end facilities or tower arrangements, although it has
had discussions regarding the lease of tower space with both Broadcast
Communications Limited (BCL) and Terrafirma, two groups that control transmitter
locations which the Company believes are suitable for the system's needs. The
BCL tower site is located in the Waitakere Mountain range, approximately 23
miles from the center of Auckland. The Terrafirma tower site is located on
Hopson Street, in the center of the city of Auckland.
AITS has also reached a tentative agreement with Isanbards, a local
television production company, to sublease space required for a head-end
location and to lease office space. The Company anticipates that the head-end
location will require a lease payment of approximately $1,000 U.S. per month,
and that the office space will be approximately $1 U.S.
per square foot per month.
The Company, through AITS, has also entered into discussions with a
variety of third parties for programming. The Company currently has firm
commitments for programming services from TNT/Cartoon, the Discovery Channel,
CNN, Nostalgia, the Box, Country Music Television and from various United States
studios for pay-per-view movies. The Company also intends to enter into
negotiations with ABC, CBN Philippines (which provides movies and children's
11
programming) and Australis Media Limited (which provides sports programming, as
well as PBC, Disney and various movie options).
As part of the Separation, TTI transferred to the Company an exclusive
agreement with Decathlon Communications, Inc. ("Decathlon"). The agreement
grants the Company the exclusive countrywide rights to deploy Decathlon's
digital compression technology in New Zealand. Under the terms of the agreement,
the Company anticipates that it will order 10 compression systems (one for each
MMDS Channel it leases) and approximately 200,000 set-top converters. This
agreement is subject to the negotiation of final terms and conditions acceptable
to both the Company and Decathlon and may be canceled at any time by the Company
or Decathlon without recourse or obligation to either party, prior to signing a
final agreement. The Company believes that Decathlon is one of the leading
developers of digital compression equipment for wireless cable television, and
that its equipment offers unique advantages over other compression equipment.
Decathlon is presently the only company employing compression at the head-end,
making it the only digital compression technology that is currently compatible
with existing analog head-end equipment. Decathlon's set-top converter boxes are
also fully addressable.
The Company estimates that the cost of building and installing the
head-end and related equipment for the New Zealand system will be approximately
U.S. $1,109,500. Based on the Company's current construction schedule, it plans
to launch the system in 1997, and anticipates that by the end of 1997 the
systems could have between 5,000 and 10,000 subscribers. The Company anticipates
that it could have between 55,000 and 65,000 subscribers at the end of the fifth
year of operation.
Office Space. The Company shares approximately 2,500 sq. ft. of leased
office space at 102 West 500 South, Suite 320, Salt Lake City, Utah. The lease
for the space requires monthly payments of $2,200, of which the Company is
responsible for $200. The Company believes the office space is adequate for its
current needs.
Neither AITS nor TWTV Park City lease space for their operations. The
Company anticipates that each system will lease space for its operations once
build-out of its respective system begins.
Employees. The Company does not have any full time employees. It does,
however, have consulting arrangements with two individuals in New Zealand to
provide consulting and technical services. See "Management -- Key Employees."
The Company believes that, once TWTV Park City and AITS launch their
systems, approximately 87% of the employees of each of TWTV Park City and AITS
will be directly involved in subscriber and technical services, and that
approximately 13% of their employees will be involved in administrative
services, including system management. Assuming the build-out and launch of the
Park City, Utah and Auckland, New Zealand systems occur on schedule, the Company
anticipates that AITS will have approximately 30 employees in December, 1997,
and that TWTV Park City will have approximately 14 employees in December, 1997.
PLAN OF OPERATION
The following should be read in conjunction with the Financial
Statements and Notes thereto and the other financial information appearing
elsewhere in this Registration Statement.
Overview. The Company was formed in connection with the Separation, and
is in the business of acquiring, developing, and operating wireless cable
television systems both inside and outside of the United States. The Company's
current wireless cable television assets consist of two groups of wireless cable
television channel rights -- 4 channels in the Park City, Utah area and 30
channels (consisting of the ten MMDS Channels and the twenty 40 GHZ Channels) in
the Auckland, New Zealand area. Neither of these channel groupings presently
comprise an operating wireless cable television system, and the Company will be
required to build out the systems and initiate marketing efforts to acquire
subscribers before either group of channel rights will begin generating
operating income.
12
In addition, although the Company anticipates that its applications
with the FCC for transfer of control of the Park City licenses will be granted,
there can be no assurance that these applications will be approved.
Since its inception, the Company has sustained net losses and negative
cash flow, due primarily to start-up costs, expenses and charges for
depreciation and amortization of capital expenditures and other costs relating
to its development of its wireless cable systems. The Company expects to
continue to experience negative cash flow through at least fiscal 1997, and may
continue to do so thereafter while it develops and expands its wireless cable
systems, even if individual systems of the Company become profitable and
generate positive cash flow.
The Company's assets (primarily its interest in TWTV Park City and
AITS) were formerly held by TTI and were transferred to the Company in
connection with the Separation. The financial statements included as part of
this Registration Statement are the audited consolidated financial statements
for the period from July 31, 1995 (date of inception) through December 31, 1995,
and the audited consolidated financial statements for the nine month period
ended September 30, 1996. There is no comparative analysis of the consolidated
statements of operations for these periods as the Company was formed on July 31,
1995.
For the nine months ended September 30, 1996, the Company had no
revenues, but incurred total expenses of $508,573. These expenses are comprised
of $143,595 in professional fees, $1,950 in depreciation expense, $238,308 in
amortization expense and lease expense which are directly related to the AITS
assets, $65,177 in general and administrative expenses, and $59,543 in interest
expense related to the TTI loan commitment agreement, as described below. The
total expenses of $508,573 were reduced by minority interest in the loss of AITS
of $13,173, to arrive at the total net loss of $495,400.
For the five months ended December 31, 1995, the Company had no
revenues, but incurred total expenses of $161,703. These expenses are comprised
of $17,935 in professional fees, $1,085 in depreciation expense, $128,921 in
amortization expense and lease expense which are directly related to the AITS
assets, $7,323 in general and administrative expenses, and $6,439 in interest
expense related to the TTI loan commitment agreement. The total expenses of
$161,703 were reduced by minority interest in the loss of AITS of $6,575, to
arrive at the total net loss of $155,128.
Liquidity and Capital Resources. At September 30, 1996, the Company's
current liabilities exceeded its current assets by $66,054. The Company's
business operations will require substantial capital financing on a continuing
basis. The availability of that financing will be essential to the Company's
continued operation and expansion. There can be no assurances, however, that the
Company will be able to acquire or generate sufficient capital to build-out its
existing channel rights or acquire other channel rights (in operating systems or
otherwise). Further, the Company expects to incur net losses for the foreseeable
future, although it anticipates that its individual systems may generate
positive monthly operating cash flow approximately 24 to 36 months after
start-up.
As of September 30, 1996, the Company had current assets of $216,112,
compared to $203,037 as of December 31, 1995, for an increase of $13,075. The
increase in current assets is primarily due to an increase in cash as a result
of increased borrowings. License rights decreased $130,500 from $1,092,333 as of
December 31, 1995 to $961,833 at September 30, 1996 due to amortization expense.
The Company had current liabilities of $282,166 as of September 30, 1996
compared to $218,851 as of December 31, 1995, for an increase of $63,315. The
increase in current liabilities is due to an increase in accounts payable
related to start-up expenses. Minority interest in subsidiary decreased $13,173
from $49,612 as of December 31, 1995 to $36,439 at September 30, 1996 due to
minority interest in loss of subsidiary. Long-term debt increased $586,428 from
$238,406 at December 31, 1995 to $824,834 at September 30, 1996. The increase
was due to additional advances by TTI, under a loan commitment agreement
described in Liquidity and Capital Resources below, and the related accrued
interest. Common stock and additional paid-in capital increased by $1,458 and
$37,997, respectively, between December 31, 1995 and September 30, 1996, due to
the June 1996 issuance of 145,833 shares of the Company's common stock for
$1,600 in cash.
The Company anticipates that it will obtain the financing necessary to fund
its future operations through loans, equity investments and other transactions.
While there can be no assurance that the Company will secure such financing, the
Company is currently in negotiations to obtain third party financing for its
activities; and management believes that this funding can be obtained under
terms satisfactory to the Company. In the event that the Company is unsuccessful
in
13
completing these financing arrangements or in obtaining substitute funding
commitments, the Company would have difficulty in meeting its operating
expenses, satisfying its existing or future debt obligations, or succeeding in
acquiring, developing or operating a cable system or adding subscribers to such
cable systems. If the Company does not have sufficient cash flow or is unable to
otherwise satisfy its debt obligations, its ongoing growth and operations could
be restricted or the viability of the Company could be adversely affected.
The Company has taken several actions which it believes will improve
its short-term and ongoing liquidity and cash flow. These actions include
establishing policies designed to conserve cash and control costs, obtaining an
agreement to borrow up to $1 million from TTI (see Note 4), and pursuing
additional financing and capital resources as described above.
Under the terms of the TTI loan commitment (the "Commitment"), all
amounts advanced by TTI must be repaid, together with interest at the rate of 8%
per annum, on August 1, 2001. At the Company's option, however, its obligations
to TTI may be converted to a term loan (payable in monthly payments of principal
and interest) with a maturity date of 10 years from the first day of the month
following the conversion if (i) the Company is not in default under the
Commitment, (ii) there has been no material change in the Company's financial
condition which TTI reasonably determines to be materially adverse to the
Company or which materially increases TTI's risk of nonpayment, (iii) the
construction and build-out of the Company's systems are, in the sole opinion of
TTI, occurring in accordance with a projected schedule agreed to by the parties,
and (iv) the Company provides TTI with certain documentation, including
information regarding the uses of the amounts advanced by TTI under the
Commitment.
The amounts advanced under the Commitment may be used only for (i)
acquiring, owning, building-out and operating wireless cable television systems
and operations and (ii) the payment of general administrative and office
expenses incurred by the Company in connection with those operations, all in
accordance with a budget to be agreed upon by the parties. No amounts advanced
under the Commitment may be used for general investment purposes unless that
investment is for a period of not more than 30 days and pending the expenditure
of the funds in question for approved purposes. At TTI's request, the Company
has agreed to grant TTI a security interest in all or part of its assets to
secure the Company's repayment obligations. As of September 30, 1996, $796,707
plus accrued interest of $28,127 was outstanding on the loan.
TTI's obligation to advance funds to the Company under the Commitment
is limited to amounts constituting "advanceable amounts." In general,
"advanceable amounts" are those amounts from TTI's cash flow, accounts
receivable and/or other amounts payable to it as TTI shall reasonably (and in
its sole discretion) determine are available for advance to the Company without
materially and adversely affecting TTI's ability to conduct its ongoing business
operations and meet its obligations as they become due. TTI has represented that
it will have sufficient "advanceable amounts" to fund the Commitment. On June
28, 1996, TTI borrowed approximately $2.5 million from an unrelated commercial
lending party which it will use, in part, to fund the Commitment. As an
inducement for the lender (the "Lender") to make the loan to TTI, the Company
issued 145,833 shares of its common stock (the "Lender Shares") to the Lender
for a total payment of $1,600. Because these shares were issued at below market
value, the Company recorded additional interest expense of $37,855 at the time
of the stock purchase. The Lender Shares represented approximately 4% of the
Company's issued and outstanding shares.
Material Expected Commitments. The Company's expected commitments
include those associated with its current contractual obligations for TWTV Park
City, AITS and those arising as a result of its acquisition and/or development
of those or any other channel groups or operating systems it acquires.
Commitments for Existing Systems.
o Auckland, New Zealand System. The Company estimates that the
cost to launch the AITS system will be approximately $1,109,500 (consisting of
approximately $787,500 for head-end equipment, $100,000 for tower related
equipment, $222,000 for office and radio equipment), and that the period between
the Company's initial build-out operations and the launch of the fully
functional system will be approximately 9 months. The Company anticipates that
the system will have between 5,000 and 10,000 subscribers within 12 months of
its launch, and that it could have between 55,000 and 65,000 subscribers by the
end of the fifth year after launch.
14
In addition to the payments described in the preceding paragraph, AITS
will be required to make certain lease payments with respect to its channels, as
follows:
Dollar Amount
Year (in U.S. Dollars)
---- -----------------
1996 -
1997 $98,286
1998 98,286
1999 58,286
2000 58,286
2001 58,286
2002 and thereafter 139,157
-------
Total future lease payments $510,587
========
The lease payments shown above are exclusive of the participation
payments required under one of the AITS channel leases, which requires AITS to
pay to Telecom 12.5% of the gross revenue from the operation of 2 of AITS' 10
MMDS licenses. The Company estimates that this participation fee will be
approximately $67,528 in 1997, $734,549 in 1998, $1,574,033 in 1999, $2,392,092
in 2000 and $2,826,904 on a yearly basis thereafter, assuming a subscriber base
of approximately 6,750; 24,750; 42,750; 57,075 and 60,375 at the end of each of
those years, respectively.
o Park City, Utah System. TWTV Park City currently has a
substantial portion of the equipment it will need for an operating system. In
order to complete the system, it will need to expend approximately $350,000 for
additional head-end equipment, approximately $10,000 for additional tower
related equipment, approximately $400,000 for compression and miscellaneous
equipment and approximately $1,000,000 for additional antenna, down converters
and installation expenses. The Company also anticipates that the set-top
converters necessary to supply 5,000 subscribers will be approximately
$2,250,000. The Company anticipates that the initial build-out of the TWTV Park
City system will begin in 1997, will take approximately 9 months, and the system
will have approximately 1,100 subscribers within 12 months of its launch.
Commitments for Additional Systems. The Company estimates that the
launch of a new wireless cable system in each market for which it controls
sufficient channel rights will require approximately $1,109,500 in start-up
expenses (exclusive of any acquisition costs for the license or lease rights),
consisting of approximately $887,500 for wireless cable system head-end and
transmission equipment, and $222,000 for other pre-operational start-up
expenses. In addition, each subscriber added to a system after launch will
require an incremental installation cost of approximately $370 to $510 for
equipment and labor at subscriber locations, depending on the number of
television set connections requested by the subscriber. Although the Company
anticipates that it will be required to make head-end and transmission
expenditures, as well as certain other start-up expenditures, before it can
begin to deliver programming to its subscribers, installation costs for
individual subscribers will be incurred only after the subscriber signs up for
the Company's services.
The actual amounts required to launch a system and for development and
expansion could be more than the estimated amounts described above if, among
other things, the development of a particular system is more difficult than
anticipated or if the Company decides to increase its estimated subscriber
installation activities. Actual expenditures could be less than the estimated
expenditures for a system if, among other things, the development of the system
is financed through debt, equipment lease or financing, or other arrangements.
The Company expects that any financing it obtains will be structured as
secured loans to the operating subsidiaries holding the systems. The Company may
also finance its operations through the sale of equity (either in a public or
private offering) and/or through equipment leasing or other financing
arrangements. There can be no assurance, however, that such additional
financing, whether debt, equipment leasing or equity, will be available, or
that, if available, the terms will be acceptable to the Company.
15
Forward-looking statements. This Registration Statement contains
forward-looking statements, which are not historical fact, within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements include the Company's
plans to launch the Auckland, New Zealand and Park City, Utah wireless cable
systems and corresponding financial and subscriber projections. Such
forward-looking statements also include the Company's expectations concerning
factors affecting the markets for its services, such as government regulations,
competitive factors, and demand growth for the services. Actual results could
differ from those projected in any forward-looking statements for the reasons
detailed in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of this Registration
Statement and other risks detailed within this Registration Statement. The
forward- looking statements are made as of the date of this Registration
Statement, and the Company assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking
statements, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those
projected in the forward-looking statements.
MANAGEMENT
Directors, Executive Officers and Other Key Employees. The Company's
directors, executive officers and key employees, and their respective ages and
positions with the Company, are set forth below in tabular form. Biographical
information on each person is set forth following the tabular information. There
are no family relationships between any of the Company's directors or executive
officers, with the exception of Lance D'Ambrosio and Troy D'Ambrosio, who are
brothers. The Company's Board of Directors is currently comprised of 3 members,
each of whom are elected for a 1 year term. Executive officers are chosen by and
serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Name Age Position
Lance D'Ambrosio 39 President and Director of the
Company
Paul Gadzinski 42 Executive Vice President
Anthony Sansone 31 Secretary and Treasurer of
the Company
Troy D'Ambrosio 36 Director
George Sorenson 40 Director of the Company
Lance D'Ambrosio - Mr. D'Ambrosio is the President and a director of the
Company, and holds other executive officer and director positions in the
Company's subsidiaries. Mr. D'Ambrosio is responsible for the Company's
acquisitions, strategic planning and mergers, and is responsible for all
financing plans for the Company. Mr. D'Ambrosio currently also serves as the
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of TTI, is President and a
director of WHI and holds executive offices and/or director positions in WHI's
subsidiaries. Between 1987 and 1992, Mr. D'Ambrosio was the President of
Bridgeport Financial, Inc., a holding company that acquired a full service
broker/dealer securities operation. During this period, Mr. D'Ambrosio was also
the President of First Eagle Investment, a securities broker/dealer. He was also
President of Tri-Bradley Investments of Utah, which was primarily involved in
raising venture capital for investments in high-tech companies. Mr. D'Ambrosio
holds a B.S. in Marketing and Management from the University of Utah, which he
obtained in 1979.
Paul Gadzinski - Mr. Gadzinski is the Executive Vice-President of the Company.
Since 1994, Mr. Gadzinski has also served as Vice-President for Market
Development for TTI and as Vice-President of Marketing for WHI. Between 1989 and
1994, Mr. Gadzinski served as Director of Marketing and was subsequently
promoted to Vice President and General Manager of Cross Country Wireless Cable,
a 40,000 plus subscriber wireless cable system located in Riverside, California
that was recently acquired by Pacific Telesis Group. Between 1985 and 1989, Mr.
Gadzinski was the Marketing Director and Operations Manager of Cablevision
International, a traditional cable operation located in Luquillo, Puerto Rico
(now doing business as TCI Cablevision of Puerto Rico, Inc.). Mr. Gadzinski
attended Santiago Community College, where he majored in Small Business.
16
Anthony Sansone - Mr. Sansone is the Secretary and Treasurer of the Company and
serves as its controller. Mr. Sansone is also the Treasurer and controller of
TTI. During 1993 and 1994, Mr. Sansone was the controller, Secretary and the
director of shareholder relations for Paradigm Medical Industries, Inc., a
manufacturer of ophthalmic cataract removal devices. During 1992 and 1993, he
was the assistant controller of HGM Medical Lasers, Inc., which manufactures and
sells surgical and dental lasers. Between 1988 and 1992, Mr. Sansone was the
assistant to the Vice President of Public Relations and the assistant to the
chairman of the board for American Stores Company, a large retail grocery and
drug store chain. Mr. Sansone received a Bachelors of Science Degree in
Accounting from Utah State University in 1988 and a Masters of Business
Administration from the University of Utah in 1991.
Troy D'Ambrosio - Mr. D'Ambrosio is a Director of the Company and also serves as
a director of TTI. Mr. D'Ambrosio is the manager of customer relations for
Wasatch Advisors, a mutual fund and investment services business. From November
of 1993 to September of 1996, Mr. D'Ambrosio held other executive positions in
TTI (where he served as Vice-President of Administration, Secretary and a
director) and WHI's subsidiaries. From July of 1992 to November of 1993, Mr.
D'Ambrosio was a vice-president and a partner in Reputation, a public relations
firm specializing in legal, economic and government relations for business.
Between 1985 and 1992, Mr. D'Ambrosio was with American Stores, most recently as
Vice-President of Corporate Communications and Government Relations. Mr.
D'Ambrosio received a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from the University
of Utah in 1982.
George Sorenson - Mr. Sorenson is a Director of the Company and also serves as a
director of TTI. Mr. Sorenson is a principal in FondElec Group, Inc., a
corporation which invests in energy and electricity markets in Latin America and
advises United States corporations on their investments in that area. Between
1990 and 1992, Mr. Sorenson was the Associate Director of Bear, Sterns & Co.,
Inc., where he was principally responsible for its international investment
banking in the Far East and coordinated product development, marketing and
account coverage for Japanese accounts in New York and Tokyo. Between 1983 and
1990, Mr. Sorenson worked for Drexel Burnham & Lambert, Inc., most recently as a
Senior Vice President in Tokyo, Japan, where he managed the company's high yield
bond operations in Asia. Mr. Sorenson received a Bachelors of Arts Degree in
Finance from the University of Utah in 1979, and a Masters in International
Business Management in 1981 from the American Graduate School of International
Management.
In addition to the officers and directors listed above, the Company
will rely on the services of several key employees and/or consultants. These
include Nicholas Fisher, a New Zealand barrister and solicitor, who acts as
consultant to the Company with respect to New Zealand legal affairs and the
proposed build-out and operation of the New Zealand system. Mr. Fisher
represents a number of communications clients (both locally and
internationally), and specializes in properties and communications law. Mr.
Fisher received his Bachelor of Laws from Auckland University in 1972. The
Company has retained Mr. Fisher as a consultant with respect to the application
of New Zealand's communications and investment laws to the Company's operations
in New Zealand. Under the terms of Mr. Fisher's agreements with the Company, the
Company pays Mr. Fisher for his consulting services on an hourly basis and at
his normal billing rate.
The Company also has a consulting arrangement with Robert Burgess, also
a New Zealand resident. Mr. Burgess primarily advises the Company with respect
to technical and administrative matters regarding the New Zealand wireless cable
industry. Mr. Burgess has held a number of consulting positions for listed
public New Zealand companies in the communications industry. Mr. Burgess is a
former director of Video Network News and between 1981 and 1988 was Managing
Director of Visionhire Holdings, a listed public New Zealand company. Under the
terms of Mr. Burgess' arrangement with the Company, the Company pays him $1,000
per month for his consulting services.
Director Compensation. Directors do not receive cash compensation for
serving on the Board of Directors, but are reimbursed for expenses they incur in
connection with attending Board or committee meetings.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
None of the Company's executive officers has received any cash
compensation, bonuses, stock appreciation rights, long-term compensation, stock
awards or long-term incentive rights from the Company since its inception.
17
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Company has entered into an agreement with TTI wherein, at TTI's
sole discretion, the Company will be allowed to borrow up to $1,000,000 for the
purposes of facilitating the acquisition, operation, build-out, and maintenance
of the Company's business operations. The term of the agreement, as amended,
provides for borrowings through December 31, 1996. Interest on any outstanding
balance will accrue at 8% per annum with the principal and interest becoming due
and payable in full on August 1, 2001. As of September 30, 1996, $796,707 plus
accrued interest of $28,127 was outstanding on the loan.
The Company has a current liability to an entity owned by the father of
the president of the Company in the amount of $100,000 for consulting services
related to the TTI acquisition of the New Zealand channel frequencies. This
liability was assumed during the Separation. The Company anticipates that
payment for this liability will be made upon acquiring additional funding.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table assumes the distribution of the common shares
issued to TTI for the benefit of its shareholders as having occurred on the
effective date of the Separation, August 1, 1995, and, based on that assumption,
shows the beneficial ownership (based on the distribution list prepared by TTI
and the Company with respect to the distribution of the common shares by the
escrow agent) of the Company's common stock as of the date hereof by (I) each
stockholder known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 10% of
the outstanding shares of common stock, (ii) each director, (iii) each executive
officer and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group. The following
table also reflects the issuance of the Lender Shares. The relative number of
the 3,500,000 shares to be distributed to the TTI shareholders is based in part
on those shareholders' respective interests in TTI, and the numbers set forth
below assume the exercise of all outstanding options by those shareholders to
acquire TTI shares as of the date of the Separation. The offices and positions
shown in parentheses after the names of certain of the persons shown below state
the current offices and positions held by those persons in the Company's
management. Unless otherwise indicated, each such person (either alone or with
family members) has been deemed to have authority or dispositive power of the
shares listed opposite that person's name:
Number of Percent of
Name and Address Shares Class Class1
Lance D'Ambrosio (President, Director) 291,532(2) Common 7.99%
6385 Shenandoah Park Avenue
Salt Lake City, Utah 84121
Paul Gadzinski (Executive Vice President) 24,305 Common *
6649 Wintertree Drive
Riverside, California 92506
Anthony Sansone (Secretary, Treasurer) 4,861 Common *
3692 South 645 East
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Troy D'Ambrosio (Director) 33,173 Common *
2914 Nila Way
Salt Lake City, UT 84124
George Sorenson (Director) 14,179(3) Common *
12 Fairgreen Lane
Old Greenwich, Connecticut 06870
18
F. Lorenzo Crutchfield, Jr. 1,214,360(4) Common 33.3%
3 Crossfield Court
Greensboro, North Carolina 27408
George D'Ambrosio 472,381(5) Common 12.96%
5451 South 1410 East
Salt Lake City, Utah 84117
All Officers and Directors as a Group 368,050 Common 10.09%
(5 persons)
- ----------------------------
* Less than 1%
(1) Assumes 3,645,833 issued and outstanding common shares, par value $.01
per share, and the effective distribution of all such shares currently held by
the escrow agent pursuant to the terms of the Separation.
(2) Includes 34,729 shares held in the name of Mr. D'Ambrosio and 256,803
shares held in the name of entities over which Mr. D'Ambrosio has voting and/or
beneficial control, and for which he does not disclaim beneficial ownership.
(3) Includes 1,216 shares held in the name of Mr. Sorenson and 12,963
shares held in the name of an entity over which Mr. Sorenson has voting and/or
beneficial control, and for which Mr. Sorenson does not disclaim beneficial
ownership.
(4) Includes 1,184,546 shares held in the name of Mr. Crutchfield and
29,814 shares held in the name of an affiliate of Mr. Crutchfield over which he
has voting and/or beneficial control, and for which he does not disclaim
beneficial ownership.
(5)Includes 63,355 shares held in the name of Mr. D'Ambrosio and 409,026
held in the name of entities over which Mr. D'Ambrosio has voting and/or
beneficial control, and for which he does not disclaim beneficial ownership. Mr.
D'Ambrosio is the father of Lance D'Ambrosio and Troy D'Ambrosio.
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
General. The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of 15
million shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, and 5 million shares
of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. Currently, 3,645,833 shares of
the Company's common stock are issued and outstanding (and are fully-paid and
non-assessable), of which 3,500,000 of such shares are held by an escrow agent
for the benefit of TTI's shareholders pursuant to the terms of the Separation.
No shares of preferred stock are issued or outstanding. Upon the distribution of
the common shares held in escrow, the outstanding shares of the Company will be
held of record by approximately 432 stockholders.
Common Stock. The holders of common stock are entitled to vote as a
single class on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders. Subject to
preferences that may be applicable to any then outstanding preferred stock, all
holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends as may be
declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available for
distribution. At December 31, 1995, no rights or preferences for the common
stock had been authorized by the Company's Board of Directors. In the event of a
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, holders of the common
stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of
liabilities and the liquidation preference of any then outstanding preferred
stock. Holders of common stock have no preemptive rights and no right to convert
their common stock into any other securities. There are also no redemption or
sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock. All outstanding shares
of common stock are fully paid and nonassessable.
19
In the election of directors, the holders of the common stock will be
entitled to elect the Company's directors. The holders of the common stock are
not entitled to cumulative voting in the election of directors. In general, each
of the Company's board of directors is elected for a 1 year term, and any action
by the Board of Directors will require the approval of the majority of the
members of the Board.
Preferred Stock. The Company's organizational documents authorize the
Board of Directors to issue the preferred stock in classes or series and to
establish the designations, preferences, qualifications, limitations, or
restrictions of any class or series with respect to the rate and nature of
dividends, the price and terms and conditions on which shares may be redeemed,
the terms and conditions for conversion or exchange of the preferred stock into
any other class or series of the stock, voting rights and other terms. The
Company may issue, without approval of the holders of common stock, preferred
stock which has voting, dividend or liquidation rights superior to the common
stock and upon terms which may adversely affect the rights of holders of common
stock. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in
connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could, among
other things, adversely affect the voting power of the holders of common stock
and, under certain circumstances, make it more difficult for a third party to
gain control of the Company. At December 31, 1995, no rights or preferences for
the preferred stock had been authorized by the Company's Board of Directors.
PART II
MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE COMPANY'S
COMMON EQUITY AND OTHER SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
The Company's equity securities are not traded on any established
public trading market, and its currently issued and outstanding common shares,
in the total number of 3,645,833 shares, are not subject to any outstanding
options or warrants to purchase, nor do they constitute securities convertible
into, any other equity security of the Company. Further, none of the currently
issued and outstanding shares of the Company could be sold pursuant to Rule 144
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act"). The Company has
not agreed to register any such shares under the 1933 Act for sale by such
security holders. No portion of the shares currently issued and outstanding are
being, or have been proposed to be, publicly offered by the Company except as
provided under the terms of the Separation. Under those terms, 3,500,000
currently issued common shares of the Company are held by the escrow agent for
distribution to TTI shareholders of record as of August 1, 1995, and will be
distributed to the TTI shareholders only after the compliance by TTI and the
Company of certain federal securities law requirements, including the
effectiveness of this Registration Statement.
Under the terms of the Company's sale of the Lender Shares to the
Lender, it agreed to provide the Lender with notice of any registration rights
it grants to any third party, and to provide the Lender with registration rights
comparable to the most favorable registration rights that it grants to other
parties from time to time. The Company also agreed to provide the Lender with
(i) a right to acquire any newly issued securities of the Company (which right
will terminate on, and not apply to, an initial underwritten public offering of
the Company's common stock or the 5th anniversary of the sale of the Lender
Shares to the Lender), and (ii) a right to require the Company to purchase all
or a portion of the Lender Shares (which right will expire on the closing of an
initial underwritten public offering of the Company's common stock) for the
greater of the Company's book value per share, or the 30 day average of the
closing prices of the Company's common stock prior to the exercise of the put if
it is listed on the Nasdaq National Market System, or the 30 day average of the
last sales price of the Company's common stock if it is traded over the counter,
or the value agreed to by the parties (unless there is no agreement, and in
which case the value will be established by appraisal).
The Company has not declared or paid any cash dividends on its common
stock at any time and does not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future.
Under Nevada law, the Company may pay a dividend on its common shares only if,
after giving effect to the dividend, the Company would be able to pay its debts
as they become due in the usual course of business or the Company's total assets
are in excess of the sum of its total liabilities plus the amount that would be
needed, if the Company were to be dissolved at the time of the dividend payment,
to satisfy any preferential liquidation or rights other than those of the
Company's common shareholders. In determining whether a dividend is allowed, the
Board of Directors may rely on financial statements prepared in accordance with
accounting practices that are reasonable
20
under the circumstances, a fair valuation of the Company's assets and
liabilities, or any other method that the Board deems reasonable under the
circumstances.
If a director relies in good faith on the books of account of the
Company (or statements prepared by any of its officials) as to the value and the
amount of its assets, liabilities or net profits, or any other fact pertinent to
the amount of money from which dividends may be properly declared, that director
is not liable to either the Company or its creditors for the Company's payment
of that dividend. If, however, directors determine a dividend may be paid based
on their gross negligence (or, in the process, willfully ignore facts which show
a dividend may not be paid), the directors voting for that dividend are jointly
and severally liable to the Company (and, in the event of its dissolution or
insolvency, to its creditors at the time of the violation) for the lesser of the
full amount of the dividend paid or any loss sustained by the Company by reason
of the dividend payment.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is not a party to any pending legal proceeding, and its
property is not the subject of any pending legal proceeding, other than routine
litigation incidental to its business operations. There is also no legal
proceeding pursuant to which any director, officer or affiliate of the Company,
or any owner of record or beneficially of 10% or more of any class of its voting
securities is a party adverse to the Company or in which any such person has a
material interest adverse to the Company.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANT
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
On September 5, 1996, Deloitte & Touche LLP replaced Jones, Jensen &
Company as the Company's Independent Accountants for the year ending December
31, 1995. Jones, Jensen & Company's relationship with the Company was not
terminated because of any, resolved or unresolved, disagreement on any matter of
accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing
scope or procedure. The decision to change Independent Accountants was approved
by the Company's Board of Directors.
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
The Company has entered into only two transactions involving the
issuance of its equity securities. The first issuance, the Separation, occurred
in connection with a transaction pursuant to which TTI contributed to the
Company all right, title and interest it held in and to AITS and TWTV Park City
in exchange for 3,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock. Those shares
were immediately distributed to the escrow agent, to be held for the benefit of
TTI's shareholders of record as of August 1, 1995, and subject to the
satisfaction by the Company and TTI of certain securities laws requirements,
including the effectiveness of this Registration Statement. Upon the
satisfaction of those requirements, the escrow agent will distribute the shares
to the TTI shareholders in accordance with the terms of the Separation
documents. In general, the distribution will be non-pro rata, with the
shareholders other than the inside shareholders of TTI acquiring shares in the
Company on the basis of approximately 1.6 shares of the Company's common stock
for each 10 shares of TTI stock they hold, and with the inside shareholders of
TTI acquiring shares of the Company at substantially reduced ratios. As a result
of the non-pro rata distribution of the Company's common shares to the TTI
shareholders, the non-inside TTI shareholders will own beneficially
approximately 54% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company,
versus approximately 46% of the issued and outstanding common shares of TTI
currently held by them. Upon the distribution of the shares by the escrow agent,
the Company will have approximately 432 shareholders. The Company believes that,
because the shares issued in connection with the Separation are being held in
escrow for the benefit of the TTI shareholders and will not be distributed to
those shareholders until after the effective date of this Registration
Statement, the distribution of the shares to the TTI shareholders should not
constitute a sale of an unregistered security in violation of the federal
securities acts.
21
The second issuance of the Company's common stock resulted from the
Company's issuance to the Lender of the Lender Shares as an inducement for the
Lender to provide financing to TTI. It is anticipated that a portion of this
financing will be used by TTI to fund the Commitment. In connection with the
issuance of the Lender Shares, the Lender represented and warranted to the
Company that (i) it was aware that the Lender Shares had not been registered
under federal securities laws, (ii) it was acquiring the Lender Shares for its
own account for investment purposes and not with a view to or for resale in
connection with any "distribution" for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933,
(iii) it understood that the Lender Shares must be indefinitely held unless they
are registered or an exemption from registration applies to their disposition,
(iv) it was aware that the certificate representing the Lender Shares would bear
a legend restricting their transfer, and (v) it was aware that there was no
public market for the shares. The Company believes that, in light of the
foregoing, and in light of the sophisticated nature of the Lender and the fact
that the Lender constituted the only purchaser of the Lender Shares, the sale of
the Lender Shares to the Lender should not constitute the sale of an
unregistered security in violation of the federal securities laws.
INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Under the Company's Articles of Incorporation, the Company is required
to indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent allowed by Nevada
law. Under Nevada law, a corporation's indemnification authority is relatively
broad, and includes the right to indemnify any officer or director who was or is
a party, or is threatened to be made a party to, any threatened, pending or
completed action, suit or proceeding (whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative), except an action by or in right of the corporation, by reason of
the fact that the person was an officer or director of the corporation (or is or
was serving at the request of the corporation as an officer or director of
another corporation or entity), against all expenses, including attorneys fees,
judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement, and which are actually and
reasonably incurred by the officer or director in connection with the action,
suit or proceeding. The right to such indemnification is premised on the
person's ability to show that he acted in good faith and in a manner which he
reasonably believed to be in (or not opposed to) the best interest of the
corporation. In order for a director or an officer to be indemnified for
criminal actions, the officer or director must have had no reasonable cause to
believe that the conduct in question was unlawful.
In addition, a corporation may indemnify any officer or director under
circumstances similar to those described in the preceding paragraph against
expenses (including amounts paid in settlement and attorneys fees actually and
reasonable incurred by that person) in connection with the defense or settlement
of the action or suit. This indemnification is also premised on the person's
ability to show that he acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably
believed to be in (or not opposed to) the best interest of the corporation.
However, indemnification for expenses is limited to the amount that the court,
after viewing all of the circumstances of the claim, believes is reasonable
under those circumstances.
Under Nevada law, corporations may also purchase and maintain insurance
or make other financial arrangements on behalf of any person who is or was a
director or officer (or is serving at the request of the corporation as a
director or officer of another corporation or entity) for any liability asserted
against that person and any expenses incurred by him in his capacity as a
director or officer. These financial arrangements may include the creation of
trust funds, self insurance programs, the granting of security interests,
letters of credit, guarantees and insurance policies.
The Company has not sought or obtained any director or officer
insurance coverages or made any other arrangements for the funding of any
indemnification obligations it might incur under the terms of its Articles of
Incorporation and Nevada law.
22
F/S
The following financial information is provided in accordance with the
requirements of Item 310 of Regulation S-B.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Item Page
Independent Auditors' Report 24
Consolidated Balance Sheets 25
Consolidated Statements of Operations 26
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity 27
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 28
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 29
23
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Board of Directors
Wireless Cable & Communications, Inc.
Salt Lake City, Utah
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Wireless Cable &
Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries (a development stage company) as of
December 31, 1995 and September 30, 1996 and the related consolidated statements
of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the period from July 31,
1995 (date of inception) through December 31, 1995 and for the nine months ended
September 30, 1996. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at
December 31, 1995 and September 30, 1996 and the results of its operations and
its cash flows for the period from July 31, 1995 (date of inception) through
December 31, 1995 and for the nine months ended September 30, 1996, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company is a development
stage enterprise engaged in the development of wireless cable television systems
both domestically and internationally. As discussed in Note 6 to the
consolidated financial statements, the Company does not have revenue sufficient
to cover its operating costs and its current liabilities exceed its current
assets. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue
as a going concern. Management's plans concerning these matters are also
described in Note 6. The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Salt Lake City, Utah
October 17, 1996
24
WIRELESS CABLE & COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, September 30,
1995 1996
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash $ 2,075 $ 18,410
Prepaid license lease fees (Notes 2 and 3) 200,962 197,702
------------------- --------------------
Total current assets 203,037 216,112
INVESTMENTS (Note 2) - 300,000
EQUIPMENT - Net (Note 2) 3,033 1,083
LICENSE RIGHTS, - Net (Note 3) 1,092,333 961,833
------------------- --------------------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 1,298,403 $ 1,479,028
=================== ====================
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable $ 16,668 $ 73,774
Accrued license lease fees (Note 3) 102,183 108,392
Accrued consulting fees (payable to
related party, Note 4) 100,000 100,000
------------------- --------------------
Total current liabilities 218,851 282,166
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Long-term debt (owed to related
party, Note 4) 238,406 824,834
MINORITY INTEREST IN SUBSIDIARY (Note 1) 49,612 36,439
------------------- --------------------
Total liabilities 506,869 1,143,439
------------------- --------------------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 3, 4 and
6) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Note 1):
Preferred stock; $0.01 par value;
5,000,000 shares authorized: and no
shares issued or outstanding
Common stock; $0.01 par value; 15,000,000
shares authorized: 3,500,000 and 3,645,833
shares issued and outstanding 35,000 36,458
Additional paid-in capital 911,662 949,659
Deficit accumulated during the
development stage (155,128) (650,528)
------------------- --------------------
Total stockholders' equity 791,534 335,589
------------------- --------------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 1,298,403 $ 1,479,028
=================== ====================
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
25
WIRELESS CABLE & COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 31, 1995 (DATE OF INCEPTION)
THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cumulative
July 31, 1995 from July 31,
(Date of 1995 (Date of
Inception) Nine Months Inception)
Through Ended Through
December 31, September 30, September 30,
1995 1996 1996
EXPENSES:
Professional fees $ 17,935 $ 143,595 $ 161,530
Depreciation and amortization 73,585 132,450 206,035
Lease expense (Note 3) 56,421 107,808 164,229
General and administrative 7,323 65,177 72,500
------------------ ------------------- ------------------
Total 155,264 449,030 604,294
INTEREST EXPENSE (Note 4) 6,439 59,543 65,982
------------------ ------------------- ------------------
NET LOSS BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST 161,703 508,573 670,276
MINORITY INTEREST IN LOSS OF
SUBSIDIARY (Note 1) 6,575 13,173 19,748
------------------ ------------------- ------------------
NET LOSS $ 155,128 $ 495,400 $ 650,528
================== =================== ==================
Net loss per common share $ (0.04) $ (0.14) $ (0.18)
================== =================== ==================
Weighted average common shares 3,500,000 3,550,030 3,532,104
================== =================== ==================
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
26
WIRELESS CABLE & COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 31, 1995 (DATE OF INCEPTION)
THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deficit
Accumulated
Additional During the
Common Stock Paid-in Development
Shares Amount Capital Stage
Issuance of common stock to TTI
shareholders in August 1995 (Note 1) 3,500,000 $35,000 $911,662
Net loss for the period from July 31, 1995
(date of inception) through December 31, 1995 $(155,128)
--------------- ------------ ------------- ---------------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1995 3,500,000 35,000 911,662 (155,128)
Issuance of common stock (Note 4) 145,833 1,458 37,997
Net loss for the nine months ended
September 30, 1996 (495,400)
--------------- ------------ ------------- ---------------
BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 3,645,833 $36,458 $949,659 $(650,528)
=============== ============ ============= ===============
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
27
WIRELESS CABLE & COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 31, 1995 (DATE OF INCEPTION)
THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cumulative
July 31, 1995 from July 31,
(Date of 1995 (Date of
Inception) Nine Months Inception)
Through Ended Through
December 31, September 30, September 30,
1995 1996 1996
CASH FLOWS FROM DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES:
Net loss $ (155,128) $ (495,400) $ (650,528)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
development activities:
Depreciation and amortization 73,585 132,450 206,035
Minority interest in loss of subsidiary (6,575) (13,173) (19,748)
Change in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in prepaid license lease fees (87,344) 3,260 (84,084)
Increase in accounts payable 9,062 57,106 66,168
Increase in accrued license lease fees 25,441 6,209 31,650
------------------ ------------------- -------------------
Net cash used in development activities (140,959) (309,548) (450,507)
------------------ ------------------- -------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Investment in shares (Note 2) - (300,000) (300,000)
------------------ ------------------- -------------------
Net cash provided by investing activities - (300,000) (300,000)
------------------ ------------------- -------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 2,000 39,455 41,455
Borrowings from related party (Note 4) 141,034 586,428 727,462
------------------ ------------------- -------------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 143,034 625,883 768,917
------------------ ------------------- -------------------
NET INCREASE IN CASH 2,075 16,335 18,410
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD - 2,075 -
------------------ ------------------- -------------------
CASH AT END OF PERIOD $ 2,075 $ 18,410 $ 18,410
================== =================== ===================
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF CASH FLOW
INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the year for interest and
income taxes NONE NONE NONE
================= =================== ===================
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE FOR NONCASH INVESTING AND
FINANCING ACTIVITIES In connection with the
Separation (see Note 1), the Company issued common
stock in exchange for the acquisition of assets and
the assumption of liabilities as follows:
Historical cost of assets acquired, including prepaid
license lease fees, equipment, and license rights $ 1,282,569
Common stock issued (946,662)
----------------
Liabilities assumed $ 335,907
================
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
29
WIRELESS CABLE & COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 31, 1995 (DATE OF INCEPTION)
THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. THE COMPANY
Wireless Cable & Communications, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in
Nevada on July 31, 1995. The Company is in the business of acquiring,
developing, and operating wireless cable television systems. The
Company owns a non-operating wireless system comprised of four channels
and a leased transmitter tower in Park City, Utah, and owns a
non-operating wireless system comprised of lease and license rights to
a total of thirty broadcast channels in Auckland, New Zealand
(consisting of ten 2.5 GHz and twenty 40 GHz channels). The Park City
channels and tower rights are held through the Company's wholly-owned
subsidiary, Transworld Wireless Television, Inc., a Nevada corporation
("TWTV Park City"), and the New Zealand channel rights are held through
the Company's 94.9% owned subsidiary, Auckland Independent Television
Services, Ltd., a New Zealand corporation ("AITS").
The authorized number of shares of the Company's preferred stock is
5,000,000, $0.01 par value. At December 31, 1995 and September 30,
1996, no preferred stock was issued or outstanding and no specific
rights or preferences for the preferred stock had been authorized or
established by the Company's Board of Directors.
The Company was formed for the purpose of continuing the development of
certain business assets formerly held by Transworld Telecommunications,
Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation ("TTI"). Under the terms of the
business separation (the "Separation"), TTI agreed to form a new
corporation to hold the separated business assets.
In order to complete the Separation, the Company was incorporated on
July 31, 1995, and on August 1, 1995, it issued 3,500,000 shares of its
common stock, par value $.01 per share, to TTI in exchange for TTI's
interest in AITS, TWTV Park City and certain other miscellaneous assets
with a carrying value of approximately $946,662 which represents the
historical cost of TTI. The assets related to TWTV Park City and AITS
were $4,118 and $1,278,451, respectively. TTI immediately transferred
the shares in the Company to an escrow agent to be held for the benefit
of TTI's shareholders of record on August 1, 1995. The distribution of
the 3,500,000 shares to TTI's shareholders will be delayed until the
Company and TTI have met certain requirements of the federal securities
laws. The 3,500,000 shares will then be distributed to TTI shareholders
of record as of August 1, 1995, on a non-pro rata basis, with the
management and principal shareholder of TTI relinquishing a portion of
their shares in the Company in favor of the TTI public shareholders. In
general, the public shareholders will receive approximately 1.6 shares
of the Company's common stock for each 10 shares of TTI common stock
they held on August 1, 1995.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company's
subsidiaries include AITS, which as of December 31, 1995 was owned
94.9% by the Company, and TWTV Park City, which is a wholly-owned
subsidiary. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have
been eliminated in the consolidation. The Company's
29
subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. Foreign
currency translation gains and losses are included in expenses as they
are incurred and were not material for the periods ended December 31,
1995 or September 30, 1996.
Use of Estimates in Preparing Financial Statements - The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Prepaid License Lease Fees - Prepaid license lease fees are prepayments
of annual license lease fees relating to the Company's license rights.
Investments - The Company uses the cost method of accounting for its
investments in voting shares of other entities where it holds less than
20% of the voting shares of the other entity and where the Company does
not exercise significant influence. As of September 30, 1996 the
Company had invested a total of $300,000 for a 3% interest in
Comunicaciones Centurion, S.A., a Venezuelan company.
Equipment - Equipment consisting entirely of transmission equipment is
stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method
over the expected useful life of the assets of five years. Accumulated
depreciation on the equipment was $9,967 and $11,917 at December 31,
1995 and September 30, 1996 respectively.
Income Taxes - The Company accounts for income taxes under an asset and
liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets
and liabilities for expected future tax consequences of events that
have been recognized in the Company's consolidated financial
statements.
3. LEASE AND LICENSE AGREEMENTS
The Company has certain lease and license agreements for various
multipoint multi-channel distribution service (MMDS or wireless cable)
channels and frequencies within New Zealand. Each license is for a
specified number of channels and frequencies for a specified length of
time. The licenses were obtained from TTI through the Separation and
are recorded at TTI's historical cost.
The Company has three license agreements relating to ten channels in
New Zealand. The first license is for six channels and consists of a
three year lease expiring December 9, 1996. The accrued license lease
fees balance of $102,183 at December 31, 1995 and $108,392 at September
30, 1996 relates to the three year lease expiring December 9, 1996. The
Company has not remitted the accrued balance at September 30, 1996 of
$108,392 which represents two annual license lease fee payments. The
contractual amounts of this license are denominated in New Zealand
dollars which are subject to foreign exchange risk. The December 31,
1995 accrued balance of $102,183 has been converted to U.S. dollars
using the December 31, 1995 exchange rate of $0.65. The September 30,
1996 accrued balance of $108,392 has been converted to U.S. dollars
using the September 30, 1996 exchange rate of $0.70. The second license
is for two channels and consists of an eight year lease expiring March
1, 2001 with a guaranteed option to renew the lease for an additional
four years. The third license is for two channels and consists of a ten
year lease expiring September 30, 2004.
License rights are amortized using the straight-line method over the
life of the leases ranging from three to twelve years. Accumulated
amortization on the license rights was $357,667 and $488,167 at
December 31, 1995 and September 30, 1996, respectively.
30
In addition to owning the rights to use these licenses, the Company is
required to make certain license lease fee payments which vary
depending on the lease. These license lease fee payments are generally
paid in advance. Certain lease payments are denominated in New Zealand
dollars which are subject to foreign exchange risk. Lease expense under
all noncancelable operating leases totaled $56,421 and $107,808 for the
periods from July 31, 1995 (date of inception) through December 31,
1995, and for the nine months ended September 30, 1996, respectively.
Prepaid license lease fees represent prepayments of annual license
lease fees and totaled $200,962 and $197,702 as of December 31, 1995,
and September 30, 1996, respectively.
The Company is obligated to make the following future minimum lease
payments which have been converted to U.S. dollars using the September
30, 1996 exchange rate of $0.70:
Year ending December 31:
1996 $ -
1997 98,286
1998 98,286
1999 58,286
2000 58,286
2001 58,286
2002 and thereafter 139,157
-------------
Total future lease payments $510,587
=============
4. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has entered into an agreement with TTI wherein, at TTI's
sole discretion, the Company will be allowed to borrow from TTI up to
$1,000,000 for the purpose of facilitating the acquisition, operation,
build-out, and maintenance of the Company's business operations.
Interest on any outstanding balance will accrue at 8% per annum with
the principal and interest becoming due and payable in full on August
1, 2001. As of December 31, 1995, $231,967 plus accrued interest of
$6,439 was outstanding on the loan. As of September 30, 1996, $796,707
plus accrued interest of $28,127 was outstanding on the loan. The
estimated fair value of this long-term debt at December 31, 1995 and
September 30, 1996 was not materially different from the carrying value
presented in the consolidated balance sheet.
The Company has a current liability to an entity owned by the father of
the president of the Company in the amount of $100,000 for consulting
services related to the TTI acquisition of the New Zealand channel
frequencies. This liability was assumed during the Separation.
In June 1996, TTI borrowed $2,500,000 (the Loan) from Pacific Mezzanine
Fund, L.P., an unrelated party. As partial consideration for making the
Loan, Pacific Mezzanine Fund, L.P. remitted $1,600 for the purchase of
145,833 shares of the Company's common stock. Because these shares were
issued at below market value, the Company recorded additional interest
expense of $37,855 at the time of the stock purchase. The terms of the
Loan will allow TTI to loan funds to the Company pursuant to the loan
commitment agreement between the Company and TTI.
31
5. INCOME TAXES
Under the asset and liability approach of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their existing tax bases.
The Company has federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $9,000 and $127,000 as of December 31, 1995 and September
30, 1996, respectively, that may be offset against future taxable
income through 2010.
The long-term net deferred tax assets of $10,000 and $108,100 at
December 31, 1995 and September 30, 1996, respectively, are fully
reserved due to the uncertainty of realization and are comprised of the
following:
December 31, September 30,
1995 1996
Net operating loss carryforwards $3,100 $50,900
Depreciation 400 400
Organizational expenditures 7,000 57,400
-------------- ---------------
Gross deferred tax asset 10,500 108,700
Less gross deferred tax liability - amortization (500) (600)
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance (10,000) (108,100)
-------------- ---------------
Total net deferred tax asset NONE NONE
============== ===============
6. GOING CONCERN
The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared using
generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern
which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of
liabilities in the normal course of business.
The Company's current wireless cable television assets consist of two
groups of wireless cable television channel rights, four channels in
the Park City, Utah area and 30 channels (consisting of the ten MMDS
Channels and the twenty 40 GHZ Channels) in the Auckland, New Zealand
area. Neither of these channel groupings presently comprise an
operating wireless cable television system, and the Company will be
required to build out the systems and initiate marketing efforts to
acquire subscribers before either group of channel rights will begin
generating operating income.
Since its inception, the Company has sustained net losses and negative
cash flow, due primarily to start-up costs, expenses, and charges for
depreciation and amortization of capital expenditures and other costs
relating to its development of its wireless cable systems. The Company
expects to continue to experience negative cash flow through at least
1997, and may continue to do so thereafter while it develops and
expands its wireless cable systems, even if individual systems of the
Company become profitable.
The Company anticipates that it will obtain the financing necessary to
fund its future operations through loans, equity investments and other
transactions. While there can be no assurance that the Company will
secure such financing, the Company is currently in negotiations to
obtain third party financing for its activities; and management
believes that this funding can be obtained under terms satisfactory to
the
32
Company. In the event that the Company is unsuccessful in completing
these financing arrangements or in obtaining substitute funding
commitments, the Company would have difficulty in meeting its operating
expenses, satisfying its existing or future debt obligations, or
succeeding in acquiring, developing or operating a cable system or
adding subscribers to such cable systems. If the Company does not have
sufficient cash flow or is unable to otherwise satisfy its debt
obligations, its ongoing growth and operations could be restricted or
the viability of the Company could be adversely affected.
The Company has taken several actions which it believes will improve
its short-term and ongoing liquidity and cash flow. These actions
include establishing policies designed to conserve cash and control
costs, obtaining an agreement to borrow up to $1 million from TTI (see
Note 4), and pursuing additional financing and capital resources as
described above.
33
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit No. Exhibit Page
3.1 Articles of Incorporation 35
3.2 Bylaws 38
10.1 Agreement and Plan of 51
Reorganization
10.2 Escrow Agreement between Fidelity 58
Transfer Company, TTI and the
Company
10.3 Commitment Agreement between 64
the Company and TTI
11.1 Computation of Earnings Per Share 74
16.1 Letter on Change in Independent 75
Certified Public Accountants
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant 76
23.1 Consent of Independent Certified 77
Public Accountants
27.1 Financial Data Schedule 78
In accordance with ss.12 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Company has caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Name Title Date
By: /s/ Lance D'Ambrosio President (Principal Executive October 18, 1996
---------------------- Officer) and Director
Lance D'Ambrosio
By: /s/ Paul Gadzinski Executive Vice President October 18, 1996
--------------------
Paul Gadzinski
By: /s/ Anthony Sansone Secretary and Treasurer October 18, 1996
------------------- (Principal Accounting Officer)
Anthony Sansone
By: /s/ Troy D'Ambrosio Director October 18, 1996
-------------------
Troy D'Ambrosio
By: /s/ George Sorenson Director October 18, 1996
-------------------
George Sorenson
34