SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]
For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 1999
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]
For the transition period from_________________to_______________
Commission File No. 000-21724
FUEL-TECH N.V.
----------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Netherlands Antilles N/A
- --------------------------------- ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation of organization) Identification Number)
Fuel-Tech N.V. Fuel Tech, Inc.
- --------------------------------- ---------------------------
(Registrant) (U.S. Operating Subsidiary)
Castorweg 22-24 Suite 703, 300 Atlantic Street
Curacao, Netherlands Antilles Stamford, CT 06901
(599) 9-461-3754 (203) 425-9830
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock $0.01
par value per share The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
------------------- ---------------------------------------
(Title of Class) (Name of Exchange on Which Registered)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes _X_ No___
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.
Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant based on the average bid and asked prices of March 15, 2000:
$33,108,319
Indicate number of shares outstanding of each of the registered classes of
Common Stock at March 15, 2000: 18,470,673 shares Common Stock, $0.01 par value.
Documents incorporated by reference:
Certain portions of the Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of stockholders
to be held in 2000 described in Parts II, III, and IV hereof are incorporated by
reference in this report.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
----
PART I
Item 1. Business 1
Item 2. Description of Property 5
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 5
Item 4. Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders 5
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters 6
Item 6. Selected Financial Data 7
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations 8
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 13
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 14
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants and
Financial Disclosure 28
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 28
Item 11. Executive Compensation 28
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management 28
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 28
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K 29
Signatures 31
i
TABLE OF DEFINED TERMS
Term Definition
- ---- ----------
AEFLGR(TM) Amine Enhanced Fuel Lean Gas Reburn
ABC American Bailey Corporation
AES Advanced Engineering Services
CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
CDT Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc.
CFD Computational Fluid Dynamics
Common Shares Shares of the common stock of the Company
Company Fuel-Tech N.V. and its subsidiaries and affiliates
EPRI Electric Power Research Institute
FTI Fuel Tech, Inc.
FUEL CHEM(R) FTI's fuel and flue gas treatment processes, including its
Targeted In-Furnace Injection programs for slagging, fouling
and corrosion control and plume abatement
FLGR(TM) Fuel Lean Gas Reburn
Investors The purchasers of Company securities pursuant to a
Securities Purchase Agreement of March 23, 1998
Loan Notes Nil Coupon Non-redeemable Convertible Unsecured Loan Notes
of the Company
NOx Oxides of nitrogen
NOxOUT CASCADE(R) Catalyst added to the NOxOUT Process
NOxOUT(R)Process The Company's SNCR process for the reduction of NOx
NOxOUT SCR(R) Urea used as a catalyst reagent
SCR Selective Catalytic Reduction
SIP Call State Implementation Plan Rulemaking Procedure
SNCR Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction
SO(2) Sulfur dioxide
SOxOUT CASCADE(R) The Company's process for the reduction of SO(2)
ii
Fuel-Tech N.V. Subsidiaries and Affiliates
December 31, 1999
---------------
| |
| FINV |
| Netherlands | ----------------------------------------------
| Antilles | | 100% | 21.8%
| | | |
--------------- ------------ ------------
| 100% | | | |
| | PPI | | CDT |
--------------- | Delaware | | Delaware |
| | | | | |
| FII | ------------ ------------
--------------------------------------|Massachusetts|
| 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| | | ---------------
----------- ---------- ---------- | 100%
| | | | | | |
| FTJL | | FIL | | Sp.zo.o| ---------------
| Jamaica | | Canada | | Poland | | |
| | | | | | | HOLDINGS |
----------- ---------- ---------- | Netherlands |
| Antilles |
| |
---------------
| 100%
|
---------------
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| BV | | |
----------------------------------| Netherlands | | FINV - Fuel-Tech N.V. |
| 100% | 100% | | | FII - Fuel Tech, Inc. |
| | --------------- | HOLDINGS - Fuel Tech Holdings N.V. |
------------ ------------- | 100% | BV - Fuel Tech BV |
| | | | | | GmbH - Fuel Tech GmbH |
| Italian | | Taiwan | --------------- | FIL - Fuel Tech Targeted Injection |
| Branch | | Branch | | | | Chemicals Limited |
| | | | | GmbH | | FTJL - Fuel Tech Jamaica Limited |
------------ ------------- | Germany | | Sp.zo.o - Fuel Tech Sp.zo.o |
| | | PPI - Platinum Plus, Inc. |
--------------- | CDT - Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. |
| |
---------------------------------------------------
iii
PART I
Forward Looking Statements
Statements in this Form 10-K which are not historical facts, so-called
"forward-looking statements," are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors are cautioned
that all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including
those detailed in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. See "Risk Factors of the Business" in Item 1 and also Item 7
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations."
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
The Company
Fuel-Tech N.V., including its subsidiaries (the "Company"), is a technology
company active in the business of air pollution control through its wholly owned
subsidiary Fuel Tech, Inc. ("FTI") and its affiliate Clean Diesel Technologies,
Inc. ("CDT"). Fuel-Tech N.V., incorporated in 1987 under the laws of the
Netherlands Antilles, is registered at Castorweg 22-24 in Curacao under No.
1334/N.V.
Fuel Tech, Inc.
FTI's special focus is the worldwide marketing of its oxides of nitrogen
("NOx") reduction and FUEL CHEM(R) products. The NOx reduction technologies,
which include the NOxOUT(R), NOxOUT CASCADE(R), NOxOUT SCR(R) and AEFLGR(TM) and
FLGR(TM) Processes, reduce NOx emissions in flue gas from boilers, incinerators,
furnaces and other stationary combustion sources. The FUEL CHEM business uses
chemical processes for slagging, fouling, and corrosion control and plume
abatement in furnaces and boilers through the addition of chemicals into the
fuel or by Targeted In-Furnace Injection. FTI has a number of other
technologies, both commercial and in the development stage, for the most part
add-ons to the NOxOUT Process or similar in their technological base. FTI's
business is materially dependent on the continued existence and enforcement of
worldwide air quality regulations.
Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc.
CDT, a Delaware corporation, is a specialty chemical company supplying fuel
additives and systems that reduce harmful emissions from internal combustion
engines while improving fuel economy. CDT's two main technology areas are
Platinum Fuel Catalysts ("PFC's") for emission control and fuel economy
improvement in diesel and gasoline-fueled engines and NOx reduction systems and
chemicals for control of NOx emissions from diesel engines. CDT was formed in
1994 as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, which had conducted
fundamental work regarding the Company's technologies. CDT was spun off by the
Company in a 1995 rights offering. At December 31, 1999, the Company held 21.8%
of the equity of CDT in the form of CDT common stock and Series A Convertible
preferred stock. CDT is a public company registered under the Securities Act of
1934. CDT's technology was in part acquired by assignment from the Company,
which assignment obligates CDT until 2008 to pay to the Company royalties of
2.5% of gross revenues derived from sale of the PFC's.
American Bailey Corporation
American Bailey Corporation ("ABC") performs management services for the
Company under an Agreement dated April 30, 1998, as amended. Ralph E. Bailey,
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of the Company, and
Douglas G. Bailey, Managing Director of the Company, are shareholders of ABC.
See the more detailed information relating to this subject under the caption
"Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" in the Company's Proxy
Statement to be distributed in connection with the Company's 2000 Annual General
Meeting of Shareholders, which information is incorporated by reference. Also,
refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
NOx Reduction
Regulations and Markets
The global air pollution control market is estimated by management at more
than $18 billion, of which the estimated global stationary equipment market is
$3.4 billion. The domestic U.S. air pollution control market is the primary
driver in the Company's business. This domestic market is estimated to be $320
million per year. This market is dependant on air pollution regulations and
their continued enforcement. These regulations are based on the Clean Air Act
Amendments of 1990 (the "CAAA") which require reductions in NOx emissions on
varying timetables with respect to various sources of emissions. Under Title I -
Ozone Non-Attainment (Ozone Transport) of the CAAA, over 1000 utility and large
industrial boilers in 19 states must achieve certain NOx reduction targets from
2003 to 2005. Under Title III - Air Toxics of the CAAA, 80 municipal solid waste
facilities in the U.S. must achieve certain NOx reduction targets by December
2000. Also, in Europe under European Union Directives, over 100 industrial units
must achieve NOx reductions by 2005.
1
In 1994, governors of eleven Northeastern states, known collectively as the
Ozone Transport Region, signed a Memorandum of Understanding requiring utilities
to reduce their NOx emissions by 55% to 65% from 1990 levels by May 1999. Also,
in 1998, the EPA announced more stringent regulations. The Ozone Transport State
Implementation Plan (SIP) Call regulation, designed to mitigate the effects of
wind-aided ozone transported from the Midwestern and Southeastern U.S. into the
Northeastern non-attainment areas, requires, following the litigation described
below, 19 states to make even deeper reductions of 85% from 1990 levels by the
summer of 2003. Over 1,000 utility and large industrial boilers are affected by
these mandates. Additionally, most other states with non-attainment areas are
also required to meet ambient air quality standards for ozone by 2007.
On May 14, 1999, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit issued a decision and opinion in American Trucking Association,
Inc. et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al (No. 97-1440), in which the
Court found that the 1997 EPA adoption of primary and secondary national ambient
air quality standards for particulate matter and ozone involved an
unconstitutional delegation of Congressional power and remanded the case to the
EPA for action. Also, on May 25, 1999 in a separate case, State of Michigan et
al v. Environmental Protection Agency (No. 98-1497), the same Court ordered a
partial stay of implementation of the SIP Call regulation until further order of
the Court. This order was in response to a motion of the plaintiffs to delay
implementation of the SIP Call regulation until resolution of their suit
challenging that regulation. On March 3, 2000, a three-judge panel issued a
ruling in the above stated Michigan case upholding the SIP Call regulation as it
applies to 19 of the 22 states involved, but did not lift the stay, which
continues in effect.
Products
The Company's NOxOUT Process is a Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction
("SNCR") process that uses non-hazardous urea as the reagent rather than
ammonia. The NOxOUT Process on its own is capable of reducing NOx by up to 40%
for utilities and by potentially significantly greater amounts for industrial
units on many types of plants with capital costs ranging from $6 - $20/kw for
utility boilers and with annualized operating costs ranging from $400 -
$1,500/ton of NOx removed.
The Company's NOxOUT CASCADE Process provides for the addition of catalyst
as an add-on to the NOxOUT Process to achieve performance similar to Selective
Catalytic Reduction ("SCR"). Based on recent demonstrations, NOxOUT CASCADE's
capital cost is less than that of SCR, while operating costs are competitive
with those experienced by SCR.
The Company's NOxOUT SCR Process utilizes urea as a catalyst reagent to
achieve NOx reductions of up to 90% from stationary combustion sources with
capital and operating costs competitive with equivalently sized, standard SCR
systems.
Fuel Lean Gas Reburn (FLGR), licensed from the Gas Research Institute on a
co-exclusive basis, utilizes injection of natural gas to react with and reduce
NOx by 25-40%. Amine Enhanced Fuel Lean Gas Reburn (AEFLGR), which the Company
licensed from the Gas Research Institute on an exclusive basis, combines FLGR
with the injection of urea to obtain NOx reductions in the 60% range with
capital and operating costs of $15 - $30/kw and $1200 - $2000/ton of NOx
removed, respectively.
Sales of the NOx reduction technologies were $27.5 million and $19.9
million for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
2
NOx Reduction Competition
Processes competitive with the Company's NOx reduction products may be
expected from combustion modifications, SCR and ammonia SNCR, among others.
Combustion modifications, including low NOx burners, can be fitted to most
types of boilers with cost and effectiveness varying with specific boilers.
Combustion modifications may effect 20-50% NOx reduction economically with
capital costs ranging from $5 - $40/kw and annualized operating costs ranging
from $300 - $1,000/ton of NOx removed. Such companies as ABB Ltd., Foster
Wheeler Corporation, The Babcock & Wilcox Company, Steam Sales Corporation, and
Todd Combustion Ltd. are active competitors in the low-NOx burner business.
SCR is an effective and proven method of control for the removal of up to
90% of NOx. SCR has a high capital cost ranging from $55 - $150/kw on retrofit
coal applications. Such companies as ABB Ltd., The Babcock & Wilcox Company,
Cormetech, Inc., Engelhard Corporation, Foster Wheeler Corporation, Peerless
Manufacturing Company, and the Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation are active
SCR competitors.
The use of ammonia as the reagent for the SNCR process was developed by the
Exxon Mobil Corporation. The Company understands that the Exxon Mobil patents
on this process have expired. This process can reduce NOx by 30% to 70% on
incinerators, but has limited applicability in the utility industry. Ammonia
system capital costs range from $15 - $22/kw for utility applications;
annualized operating costs range from $1,000 - $3,000/ton of NOx removed. These
systems require the use of stored ammonia, a hazardous substance.
In addition to or in lieu of using the foregoing processes, certain
customers will elect to close or derate plants, purchase electricity from third
party sources, switch from higher to lower NOx emitting fuels or purchase NOx
emission allowances.
3
FUEL CHEM
Product and Markets
The Company's fireside and fuel additive programs, FUEL CHEM, help improve
unit performance and reduce customer-operating costs. Through the program,
customers have enjoyed returns on their investments up to 500%. The Targeted
In-Furnace Injection program, a key FUEL CHEM technology on which two patents
have already been issued, is a uniquely engineered and economical solution to
furnace fouling and corrosion problems. Electric utilities, the pulp and paper
industry and municipal solid waste incinerator facilities make up the principal
markets for the program.
Sales of the FUEL CHEM products were $5.8 million and $6.0 million for the
years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
Competition
In 1999, oil prices nearly tripled having a significant effect on
oil-fired electric utilities and the pulp and paper market. This price increase
caused many customers operating in these markets to switch to natural gas, a
less costly fuel, and reduce the capital expenditures and equipment purchases
required to participate in FUEL CHEM programs.
Competition for the Company's FUEL CHEM product line include chemicals
sold by specialty chemical companies, such as Nalco Chemical Company and
Hercules Incorporated, primarily in the traditional heavy-fuel-oil treatment
area. No substantive competition currently exists for the Company's technology
for Targeted In-Furnace Injection of additives for control of slagging, fouling,
and corrosion and for plume abatement, but there can be no assurance that such
lack of substantive competition will continue.
Advanced Engineering Services
The Company's Advanced Engineering Services ("AES") continued in 1999 to
support the sale of the Company's NOx reduction systems, particularly through
the use of computational fluid dynamics ("CFD") tools. These CFD tools assist in
the prediction of the behavior of gas flows, thereby enhancing the
implementation of the Company's NOx reduction systems and the application of its
FUEL CHEM slag and corrosion control processes. Also, in 1999 the Company
significantly augmented its AES staff and equipment with a view toward not only
better serving the Company's customers but also to seek other applications for
its services. The Company anticipates that it will apply AES to other
applications in the future.
Intellectual Property
See Item 2 "Description of Property" for information on the Company's
intellectual property and proprietary position, which are material to its
business.
Employees
The Company has 70 full-time employees, 62 in North America and 8 in
Europe and Asia. The Company enjoys good relations with its employees and is not
a party to any labor management agreements.
Risk Factors of the Business
Investors in the Company should be mindful of the following risk factors
relative to the Company's business.
(i) Lack of Diversification
The Company is engaged in only one principal business, involving the
marketing of products to reduce air pollution. An adverse development in the
Company's business as a result of competition, technological change, government
regulation, or any other factor could have a significantly greater impact than
if the Company maintained diverse operations.
(ii) Common Shareholders Subordinate to Loan Note Holders
In the event of a liquidation of the Company, the holders of the common
shares of the Company will be subordinate to the prior claims of the holders of
the Company's Loan Notes in principal amount at the date of this report of
approximately $4.0 million.
(iii) No Dividends
The Company has not to date paid dividends on its common stock and does
not intend to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.
4
(iv) Possible Volatility of Stock Price
There has been significant volatility in the market prices of publicly
traded shares of emerging growth technology companies. Economic trends and
factors such as announcements of technical developments, establishment of
strategic alliances, changes in governmental regulations, and developments in
patent or proprietary rights may have a significant effect on the market price
of the Company's common shares.
(v) Competition - Pricing - Participation in Title I, Phase Two Market
Competition in the NOx control market will come from processes utilizing
low-NOx burners, over-fired air, flue gas recirculation, ammonia SNCR, SCR and,
with respect to particular uses of urea not infringing the Company's patents,
urea (see Item 2 "Description of Property"). Competition will also come from
business practices such as the purchase rather than the generation of
electricity, fuel switching, closure or derating of units, and sale or trade of
pollution credits. Utilization by customers of such processes or business
practices or combinations thereof may adversely affect the Company's pricing and
participation in the Title I, Phase Two NOx Control market if customers elect to
comply with regulations by methods other than the Company's NOxOUT and NOxOUT
CASCADE or FLGR and AEFLGR processes. See above under this Item I the text under
the captions "Products" and "NOx Reduction Competition."
(vi) Dependence on Regulations and Enforcement
The Company's business is primarily regulatory driven. That business will
be adversely impacted to the extent that regulations are repealed or amended to
significantly reduce the level of required NOx reduction, or to the extent that
regulatory authorities minimize enforcement. See also the text above under the
caption "Regulations and Markets."
(vii) Protection of Patents and Proprietary Rights
The Company holds licenses to or owns a number of patents and has patents
pending. There can be no assurance that pending patent applications will be
granted or that outstanding patents will not be challenged or circumvented by
competitors. Certain critical technology relating to the Company's products is
protected by trademark and trade secret laws and confidentiality and licensing
agreements. There can be no assurance that such protection will prove adequate
or that the Company will have adequate remedies for disclosure of its trade
secrets or violations of its intellectual property rights. See Item 2
"Description of Property".
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The Company's NOxOUT Process was based originally on the Electric Power
Research Institute ("EPRI") urea technology embodied in two patents licensed to
the Company ("EPRI Patents"), of which one expired in 1997 and the other in
1999. The Company now owns 160 patents worldwide and has 5 patents pending,
covering some 50 inventions, 39 related to the NOxOUT Process. The Company's
FLGR and AEFLGR technologies are held under licenses from the Gas Research
Institute expiring in November and December 2003, with seven-year optional terms
thereafter.
The NOxOUT process was originally based on the EPRI urea technology
embodied in two patents licensed to the Company by EPRI. These EPRI patents and
license have expired. The Company believes that the protection provided by the
numerous claims in the above referenced patents or patent applications of the
Company is substantial and, regardless of the expired EPRI urea patents, affords
the Company a significant competitive advantage in the SNCR field. Accordingly,
any significant reduction in the protection afforded by these patents or any
significant development in competing technologies could have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business.
Apart from its intellectual property, the property of the Company is not
material.
The Company and its subsidiaries operate from short-term leased office and
engineering facilities in Curacao, Netherlands Antilles; Batavia, Illinois;
Stamford, Connecticut; Essen, Germany; and Milan, Italy.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company has no pending litigation material to its business.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
During the fourth quarter of 1999, no matters were submitted to a vote of
security holders.
5
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Market
The Company's common shares have been traded since September 1993 on The
NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. (Small Capitalization) and the Berlin Stock Exchange.
Prices
The table below sets forth the high and low sales prices during each
calendar quarter since January, 1998.
High Low
1999 ------ -----
----
Fourth Quarter 3 5/8 1 3/4
Third Quarter 3 3/4 1 29/32
Second Quarter 2 3/16 0 7/8
First Quarter 2 3/8 1 3/8
1998
----
Fourth Quarter 2 15/32 0 7/8
Third Quarter 2 9/16 1 1/16
Second Quarter 2 1/16 1 1/32
First Quarter 1 13/16 1 5/16
Dividends
The Company has not to date paid dividends on its common shares and is not
expected to do so in the foreseeable future.
Holders
Based on information from the Company's Transfer Agent, as of February 22,
2000, there were 431 registered holders of the Company's common stock.
Management believes that, on such date, there were approximately 1,800
beneficial holders of the Company's common stock.
Transfer Agent
The Transfer Agent and Registrar for the common shares is Chase Mellon
Shareholder Services, L.L.C., 85 Challenger Road, Overpeck Centre, Ridgefield
Park, New Jersey 07660.
Exchange Controls
The Company received a license of unlimited duration from the Central Bank
of the Netherlands Antilles to exempt it from foreign exchange controls in
dealings with parties outside of the Netherlands Antilles or with parties in the
Netherlands Antilles holding a similar license. The Company also received a
business license of unlimited duration that allows the securities of the Company
to be held by non-residents of the Netherlands Antilles. There are no other
restrictions on the rights of such non-residents as shareholders. The books of
the Company are maintained in United States dollars, however, there are
occasional transactions in other currencies.
Taxation
Under the Netherlands Antilles tax code applicable to the Company until at
least the fiscal year 2019, the Company's income taxes in the Netherlands
Antilles, which are based on profits exclusive of Dutch dividends received, are
computed at a rate of 2.4% on the first 100,000 Netherlands Antilles Guilders
(approximately $60,000) and 3% on the excess. Also, capital gains and losses are
not included in the taxable profit of the Company. Based on a tax ruling
received by the Company, Dutch dividends received will be taxed to the Company
at a rate of 5.5%. Fuel-Tech N.V. is not now liable for tax in any jurisdiction
other than the Netherlands Antilles. The subsidiaries of the Company are
generally subject to the tax regimes of the jurisdictions where they are
incorporated and conduct operations but not in the Netherlands Antilles.
Dividends paid by the Company to United States persons who are not engaged
in a trade or business through a permanent establishment in the Netherlands
Antilles are currently not subject to tax in the Netherlands Antilles. Gain or
loss derived by a United States person from the sale or exchange of the
Company's common shares are exempt from Netherlands Antilles income tax. The tax
treaty between the United States and the Netherlands Antilles was terminated
effective December 31, 1987.
6
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Selected financial data is presented below as of the end of and for each of the
fiscal years in the five-year period ended December 31, 1999. The selected
financial data should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated
financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 1999, and
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. "(1)
For the years ended December 31
-------------------------------------------------------------------
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for per share data)
Net sales $ 33,325 $ 25,864 $ - $ - $ -
Royalty income from NFT - - 148 245 210
Loss (income) from equity interest in joint venture - - 853 128 (273)
Selling, general and administrative and other costs
and expenses 9,691 8,927 2,064 2,216 3,661
Net income (loss) 3,008 539 (2,571) (1,845) (2,857)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Basic income (loss) per common share $ 0.17 $ 0.03 $ (0.21) $ (0.15) $ (0.23)
Diluted income (loss) per common share $ 0.16 $ 0.03 $ (0.21) $ (0.15) $ (0.23)
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding 17,752,000 15,680,000 12,387,000 12,380,000 12,350,000
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding 19,335,000 17,437,000 12,387,000 12,380,000 12,350,000
December 31
-------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE SHEET DATA 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for per share data)
Working capital $ 12,126 $ 9,047 $ 1,766 $ 3,951 $ 4,842
Total assets 24,464 19,153 5,947 8,472 10,294
Total liabilities 10,773 8,837 701 481 400
Shareholders' equity (2) 13,691 10,316 5,246 7,991 9,894
Net tangible book value per share (3) $ 0.52 $ 0.45 $ 0.37 $ 0.56 $ 0.70
- -------------------
(1) Effective April 30, 1998, Fuel Tech, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of
Fuel-Tech N.V. (the "Company"), purchased Nalco Chemical Company's 50%
interest in the Nalco Fuel Tech (NFT) joint venture. As a result of this
transaction, the Company now owns 100% of the assets and liabilities of
NFT. The 1998 operations of NFT have been consolidated with those of the
Company for the entire year. The Company's operating results for 1995-1997
reflect the Company's 50% share of operating results on the equity basis of
accounting. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
(2) Shareholders' equity includes outstanding nominal nil coupon non-redeemable
perpetual loan notes. See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.
(3) Assumes full conversion of the Company's nil coupon non-redeemable
perpetual loan notes into shares of the Company's common stock.
7
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Effective April 30, 1998, Fuel Tech, Inc. (FTI), a wholly owned subsidiary
of Fuel-Tech N.V. (the "Company"), purchased Nalco Chemical Company's 50%
interest in the Nalco Fuel Tech (NFT) joint venture. As a result of this
transaction, the Company now owns 100% of the assets and liabilities of NFT. The
1998 operations of NFT have been consolidated with those of the Company for the
entire year with Nalco's 50% share of NFT's operating results prior to April 30,
1998, included in minority interest. The Company's operating results for 1997
reflect the Company's 50% share of NFT's operating results on the equity basis
of accounting.
The purchase price for Nalco's 50% interest in NFT was $1.1 million cash,
the issuance of a $3.0 million note and up to $5.5 million in contingent
payments based upon the achievement of gross margin targets for 1998 through
2001. Simultaneously with this transaction, principals of American Bailey
Corporation, an investment and management company, invested $3.35 million in the
Company in exchange for 4.75 million shares of the Company's common stock, and
warrants to purchase an additional 3.0 million common shares at an exercise
price of $1.75 per share. The Company recorded approximately $1.03 million in
goodwill from this transaction, including the contingent payment obligation for
1998 of $113,000.
On September 1, 1999, the Company satisfied its remaining obligations to
Nalco by paying Nalco approximately $4.5 million, representing the $2.5 million
remaining balance on the note plus accrued interest, and a buyout of the balance
of the contingent payment obligation for approximately $2.0 million. At the time
of the transaction, a maximum of approximately $5.4 million remained outstanding
under the contingent payment obligation. This transaction was financed by a $4.5
million term loan from the Company's existing bank (see Note 8 to the
consolidated financial statements). As a result of this transaction, the Company
recorded approximately $2.0 million of additional goodwill.
The following table includes proforma information for the Company for 1997,
assuming NFT's operating results for that year had been consolidated with those
of the Company rather than being reflected on the equity basis. The Company
believes this presentation allows for a more meaningful discussion of its
operating results.
Proforma
1999 1998 1997
For the years ended December 31 -------- -------- --------
(amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars)
Net revenues $ 33,325 $ 25,864 $ 20,066
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales 18,805 14,334 11,266
Selling, general and administrative 8,887 7,897 10,344
Research and development 804 1,030 1,046
-------- --------- --------
28,496 23,261 22,656
-------- --------- --------
Operating income (loss) 4,829 2,603 (2,590)
Loss from equity interest in affiliate - (500) (495)
Interest expense (309) (206) (44)
Other (expense) income, net (213) 117 200
-------- --------- --------
Income (loss) before minority interest and taxes 4,307 2,014 (2,929)
Less: Minority interest in NFT - (112) 358
-------- --------- --------
Income (loss) before income taxes 4,307 1,902 (2,571)
Income tax expense (1,299) (1,363) -
-------- --------- --------
Net income (loss) $ 3,008 $ 539 $ (2,571)
======== ========= ========
8
1999 versus 1998
The Company operates primarily in the air pollution control business. It
distributes its products through its direct sales force, licensees and agents.
Principal markets for its products are stationary combustion sources that
produce nitrogen oxide (NOx) and other emissions. The Company sells its fuel
treatment chemicals through its direct sales force and agents to industrial and
utility power-generation facilities.
Net sales in 1999 totaled $33,325,000 versus net sales of $25,864,000 in
1998, an increase of 29%. The increase primarily represents a $4,872,000
increase in domestic NOx project revenue and a $2,746,000 increase in Asian
pollution control revenue. The gains were marginally offset by a decline in the
domestic fuel treatment chemical business.
The domestic NOx increase is due to the substantial increase in utility
industry air pollution control project revenue caused, in part, by Phase II of
Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA). The federal mandate to
further reduce NOx in 22 states by May 2003, the "SIP Call," also contributed to
record revenues even though the decision on implementation was not yet clear.
However, on March 3, 2000, an appellate court of the D.C. Circuit upheld the
validity of the SIP Call for 19 of the 22 states, which is expected to
significantly increase NOx control project revenues during the next several
years, once the partial stay of the SIP Call is lifted.
The increase in Asian revenue is the direct result of one large contract at
a Korean utility. Asian revenues in 2000 are expected to decrease from the 1999
level. However, excluding the one-time utility contract in Korea, Asian revenues
are expected to increase from historical levels from both NOx project and fuel
treatment chemical sales.
The decline in domestic fuel treatment chemical sales is tied directly to
the increased market price for fuel oil. As the price of fuel oil has increased,
customers have switched fuels to natural gas. Revenues in this market in the
year 2000 will be dependent upon this market driver, as well as the Company's
ability to obtain non-fuel-oil-dependent business. In the year 2000, the Company
is directing its sales and marketing efforts toward the proliferation of its
patented Targeted In-Furnace Injection technology for the segments of the market
that are not dependent on commodity pricing. Examples of these market segments
are the pulp and paper industry, municipal solid waste facilities and other
solid-fuel-fired units.
Gross margin percentages were 43.6% in 1999 compared with 44.6% in 1998.
The slight decline in margin percentage was due primarily to the impact of
low-margin air pollution control projects in Europe in 1999, which were driven
by a heavily competitive marketplace. When excluding this factor, the gross
margin on air pollution control revenues as a whole remained relatively flat
year on year.
Selling, general and administrative costs increased $990,000 from 1998 due
predominantly to selling expenses from accelerated business activity.
The Company has a 21.8% common stock ownership interest in Clean Diesel
Technologies, Inc. (CDT), as of December 31, 1999. In 1995, the Company loaned
CDT $745,000; the outstanding balance of this note as of December 31, 1997, was
$495,000. In February 1998, the Company made an additional $500,000 loan to CDT.
The Company converted both of these loans and interest thereon of $20,000 into
2,029 shares of Series A Convertible preferred stock in CDT in November 1998.
The Company has accounted for its investment in CDT using the equity method and
recorded a loss of $500,000 in 1998 and $495,000 in 1997 related to its share of
CDT's operating results in those years. The CDT common and preferred stock have
no carrying value in the Company's balance sheets as of December 31, 1999 and
1998.
Interest expense increased by $103,000 from 1998. The increase was due to
the financing required to satisfy the contingent obligation due to Nalco as part
of the Company's purchase of Nalco's 50% share of NFT. The $4.5 million term
loan financing was received on September 1, 1999, and was used to retire a note
held by Nalco with a remaining principal balance of $2.5 million, and to pay off
the aforementioned contingent payment obligation.
The Company recorded $1.3 million of income tax expense in 1999 versus $1.4
million in 1998. The Company has $47.4 million in U.S. federal income tax loss
carryforwards (the deferred tax benefit of which has been offset by a valuation
allowance in the Company's balance sheet). Because the Company effected a
quasi-reorganization on March 31, 1985, and reduced the value of certain assets,
tax benefits resulting from the utilization of tax loss carryforwards existing
as of the date of the quasi-reorganization are required to be excluded from the
Company's results of operations and recorded as an increase to additional
paid-in capital when realized. Consequently, additional paid-in capital was
increased by $.7 million and $1.4 million in 1999 and 1998, respectively. At
December 31, 1999, all tax loss carryforwards existing at the time of the
quasi-reorganization have been fully utilized.
9
In the opinion of management, the Company's revenue growth in the short
term is directly related to the implementation of the requirements of the CAAA.
Each state has responsibility for implementing the requirements of this Act
under its own program. There will, therefore, be wide variations in the level of
control and the timing of regulations by states. The Company's implementor
strategy will enable the Company to provide the NOxOUT Process to an increasing
number of customers without significantly adding technical and support staff.
Customers purchase the NOxOUT Process and related technologies from either the
Company or its implementors. If customers purchase the NOxOUT Process from
implementors, the per contract revenues to the Company may be lower, but more
installations may be handled.
1998 versus 1997
Net sales in 1998 totaled $25,864,000 versus proforma net sales of
$20,066,000 in 1997, an increase of 29%. The increase primarily represents an
$8,237,000 increase in domestic NOx project revenue, partially offset by a
$1,677,000 decrease in Asian air pollution control project revenue and a
$722,000 decline in international fuel treatment chemical sales. The domestic
increase is primarily the result of increased utility industry revenue caused,
in part, by Phase II of Title I of the CAAA.
The decline in revenue in Asia is the result of fewer bookings in 1998 than
1997. The decline in international fuel treatment chemical sales is the result
of a significant customer ceasing treatment of its fuel oil; whether it will use
Fuel Tech products in the future is uncertain.
Gross margin percentages were 44.6% in 1998 compared with 43.9% (proforma)
in 1997. Gross margin percentage improved because most of the losses recorded on
NFT's SOxOUT CASCADE Project in Poland occurred in 1997. Gross margins on air
pollution control projects increased 4.2 percentage points, largely the result
of favorable changes in customer mix in 1998.
Selling, general and administrative costs decreased $2,447,000 from
proforma 1997. The decrease was primarily due to a substantial reduction in
Polish administrative costs between 1997 and 1998, costs incurred in 1997
related to the closing of the Company's offices in the United Kingdom and Taiwan
and reduced commissions on international fuel treatment chemical sales. The
Company's research and development expenses were $1,030,000 and $1,046,000
(proforma) in 1998 and 1997, respectively.
The Company had a 27.6% common stock ownership interest in CDT as of
December 31, 1998. In 1995, the Company loaned CDT $745,000; the outstanding
balance of this note as of December 31, 1997, was $495,000. In February 1998,
the Company made an additional $500,000 loan to CDT. The Company converted both
of these loans and interest thereon of $20,000 into 2,029 shares of Series A
Convertible preferred stock in CDT in November 1998. The Company accounted for
its investment in CDT using the equity method and recorded a loss of $500,000 in
1998 and $495,000 in 1997 related to its share of CDT's operating results in
those years. The CDT common and preferred stock had no carrying value in the
Company's balance sheets as of December 31, 1998 and 1997.
Interest expense increased by $162,000 from proforma 1997. The increase was
largely the result of interest accrued on the $3.0 million note payable to Nalco
resulting from the purchase of its 50% interest in NFT. Minority interest
includes half of the net income of NFT prior to April 30, 1998. For 1998, this
was $112,000. For 1997, half of NFT's loss was $358,000.
The Company recorded $1.4 million of income tax expense in 1998; no income
tax expense was recorded in 1997. The income tax expense is largely a non-cash
charge given that the Company had $53.0 million in U.S. federal income tax loss
carryforwards (the deferred tax benefit of which has been offset by a valuation
allowance in the Company's balance sheet). Because the Company effected a
quasi-reorganization on March 31, 1985, and reduced the value of certain assets,
tax benefits resulting from the utilization of tax loss carryforwards existing
as of the date of the quasi-reorganization are required to be excluded from the
Company's results of operations and recorded as an increase to additional
paid-in capital when realized. Consequently, additional paid-in capital was
increased by $1.4 million and the total equity position of the Company was
unaffected by the income tax charge in the statement of operations for the
period ended December 31, 1998. The Company utilized approximately $4.0 million
of the $6.0 million of tax loss carryforwards that existed at the date of the
quasi-reorganization.
10
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company's cash and cash equivalents increased by $3.2 million in 1999.
Operating activities provided $5.0 million of cash in 1999, primarily due to the
Company's operating profits coupled with improved working capital management.
Investing activities used cash of ($2,753,000) during the year, comprising the
contingent payment obligation to Nalco ($1,958,000) and the continued investment
in equipment and intellectual property ($795,000). Financing activities provided
$997,000 of cash flow during the year, primarily driven by the proceeds from
borrowings during the year net of debt repayments of $1,275,000, and the
purchase and retirement of nil coupon loan notes ($444,000), which are discussed
further below.
Historically, the Company has financed its operations principally through
the private placement of its common shares and the private placement of nil
coupon non-redeemable convertible unsecured loan notes (the "Loan Notes"). The
Loan Notes are convertible at any time into the Company's common stock. They
bear no interest, have no maturity date and are repayable generally only in the
event of the winding up of the Company. The Company has therefore classified the
Loan Notes within shareholders' equity in its balance sheet.
At December 31, 1999, the Company had $8,959,000 in cash and cash
equivalents. Working capital at December 31, 1999, was $12,126,000.
Effective April 30, 1998, FTI purchased Nalco's 50% interest in NFT for
$1.1 million cash, the issuance of a $3.0 million note and up to $5.5 million in
contingent payments based upon FTI's future performance. The acquisition of the
aforementioned 50% interest in NFT was accounted for as a purchase. The notes
bore interest at 10% per annum, payable quarterly, with principal payments of
$250,000, payable quarterly, beginning on March 31, 1999. One-half of the
contingent payments ($2.75 million) were based on the achievement of annual
gross margin targets for the years 1998-2001, with the other half payable upon
the achievement of a cumulative gross margin target for the years 1998-2001. The
notes and contingent payment obligation were secured by materially all of the
Company's assets. At December 31, 1998, the financial statements include an
accrual of $113,000 for the contingent payment earned by Nalco in 1998. Such
amount is included in goodwill in the Company's balance sheet.
Simultaneously with this transaction, principals of American Bailey
Corporation (ABC) invested $3.35 million in the Company in exchange for 4.75
million shares of the Company's common stock, and warrants to purchase an
additional 3.0 million shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price
of $1.75 (a 12% premium over Fuel Tech's share price at the time the transaction
was negotiated with ABC). Such shares (and shares underlying the warrants) are
restricted from sale for a period of three years from the date of the
transaction, and give the holder certain registration rights.
On September 1, 1999, the Company satisfied its remaining obligations to
Nalco by paying Nalco approximately $4.5 million, representing the $2.5 million
remaining balance on the note, plus accrued interest, and a buyout of the
balance of the contingent payment obligation for approximately $2.0 million. At
the time of the transaction, a maximum of approximately $5.4 million remained
outstanding under the contingent payment obligation. This transaction was
financed by a $4.5 million term loan from the Company's existing bank (see Note
8 to the consolidated financial statements). As a result of this transaction,
the Company recorded approximately $2.0 million of additional goodwill.
In 1999, the Company established with a bank a $3.0 million revolving
credit facility that expires August 31, 2002. The facility can be used for both
cash advances and letters of credit. At December 31, 1999, there were no
borrowings under the facility, however, approximately $489,000 in standby
letters of credit were outstanding.
As a result of the aforementioned transactions, the pending regulatory
deadlines in the U.S. and the current cash and working capital positions, the
Company believes that it will have sufficient resources to fund its growth and
operations going forward.
The Company's NOxOUT Process is based on the Electric Power Research
Institute (EPRI) urea technology embodied in two patents licensed to the Company
("EPRI patents"). One of these patents expired in 1997 and the other expired in
1999. In addition to these, the Company owns 160 patents worldwide, with 5
patent applications pending in the U.S., covering some 50 inventions, 39 related
to the NOxOUT Process. These inventions represent significant enhancements of
the application and performance of the technologies. The Company does not
believe that the expiration of the EPRI patents will have a material adverse
impact on the Company's business, results of operations, liquidity or financial
condition. The Company also offers other NOx reduction technologies that provide
its customers with a wide range of NOx reduction opportunities. The Company's
most recent NOx reduction technologies are Fuel Lean Gas Reburn (FLGR) and Amine
Enhanced Fuel Lean Gas Reburn (AEFLGR), both of which are licensed from the Gas
Research Institute in Chicago, Illinois.
11
MARKET RISK
Refer to Item 7A "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk."
IMPACT OF YEAR 2000
In prior years, the Company discussed the nature and progress of its plans
to become Year 2000 ready. In late 1999, the Company completed its remediation
and testing of systems. As a result of those planning and implementation
efforts, the Company experienced no significant disruptions in mission-critical
information technology and non-information technology systems and believes those
systems successfully responded to the Year 2000 date change. The Company spent
approximately $400,000 in total during 1999 and 1998 in connection with
remediating its systems. The Company is not aware of any material problems
resulting from Year 2000 issues, either with its products, its internal systems
or the products and services of third parties. The Company will continue to
monitor its mission-critical computer applications and those of its suppliers
and vendors throughout the year 2000 to ensure that any latent Year 2000 matters
that may arise are addressed promptly.
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
From time to time, information provided by the Company, statements made by
its employees or information included in its filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (including this Annual Report) may contain statements that
are not historical facts, so-called "forward-looking statements." These
forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company's actual
future results may differ significantly from those stated in any forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and
uncertainties, including, but not limited to, product demand, pricing, market
acceptance, litigation, risk of dependence on significant customers, third-party
suppliers and intellectual property rights, risks in product and technology
development and other risk factors detailed in this Annual Report and in the
Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
12
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company's earnings and cash flow are subject to fluctuations due to
changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company does not enter into
foreign currency forward contracts or into foreign currency option contracts to
manage this risk due to the immaterial nature of the transactions involved.
The Company is also exposed to changes in interest rates primarily due to
its long-term debt arrangement (refer to Note 8 to the consolidated financial
statements). The Company uses interest rate derivative instruments (an interest
rate swap) to manage exposure to interest rate changes. The Company has entered
into an interest rate swap transaction that fixes the rate of interest at 8.91%
on approximately 50% of the outstanding principal balance during the term of the
loan. A hypothetical 100 basis point adverse move in interest rates along the
entire interest rate yield curve would not have a materially adverse effect on
interest expense during the upcoming year ended December 31, 2000.
13
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF FUEL-TECH N.V.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Fuel-Tech N.V.
as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, cash flows and shareholders' equity for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1999. These consolidated financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Fuel-Tech N.V. at December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the consolidated results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended Decemeber 31, 1999, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 1, 2000
14
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data)
1999 1998
-----------------------------------
December 31
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $8,959 $5,792
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful
accounts of $114 and $42, respectively 9,636 9,011
Inventories 227 123
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 471 717
-------- --------
Total current assets 19,293 15,643
Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $3,948 and
$3,637, respectively 1,428 1,406
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $256 and $57,
respectively 2,784 1,025
Other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $826
and $865, respectively 579 702
Other 380 377
-------- --------
Total Assets $24,464 $19,153
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Current portion of note payable $ 900 $1,000
Accounts payable 4,077 3,094
Accrued liabilities:
Employee compensation 922 755
Other accrued liabilities 1,268 1,747
-------- --------
Total current liabilities 7,167 6,596
Note payable 3,375 2,000
Other liabilities 231 241
-------- --------
Total liabilities 10,773 8,837
Shareholders' equity:
Common stock, $.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized,
18,328,673 and 17,235,996 shares issued, respectively 182 172
Additional paid-in capital 85,693 71,898
Accumulated deficit (74,989) (77,997)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income (25) 52
Treasury stock (1,058) (1,058)
Nil coupon perpetual loan notes 3,888 17,249
-------- --------
Total shareholders' equity 13,691 10,316
-------- --------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $24,464 $19,153
======== ========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
15
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data)
1999 1998 1997
------------ ------------ ------------
For the years ended December 31
Net revenues
Net sales $ 33,325 $ 25,864 $ -
Royalty income from NFT - - 148
------------ ------------ ------------
$ 33,325 $ 25,864 $ 148
------------ ------------ ------------
Cost and expenses:
Cost of sales 18,805 14,334 -
Selling, general and administrative 8,887 7,897 2,064
Research and development 804 1,030 -
------------ ------------ ------------
28,496 23,261 2,064
------------ ------------ ------------
Operating income (loss) 4,829 2,603 (1,916)
Loss from equity interest in affiliates - (500) (853)
Interest expense (309) (206) -
Other (expense) income, net (213) 117 198
------------ ------------ ------------
Income (loss) before minority interest and taxes 4,307 2,014 (2,571)
Less: Minority interest in NFT - (112) -
------------ ------------ ------------
Income (loss) before taxes 4,307 1,902 (2,571)
Income tax expense (1,299) (1,363) -
------------ ------------ ------------
Net income (loss) $ 3,008 $ 539 $ (2,571)
============ ============ ============
Net income (loss) per common share:
Basic $ 0.17 $ 0.03 $ (0.21)
Diluted 0.16 0.03 (0.21)
Average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic 17,752,000 15,680,000 12,387,000
Diluted 19,335,000 17,437,000 12,387,000
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
16
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data in thousands)
Accumulated
Common Stock Additional Other Treasury Stock Nil Coupon
----------------- Paid-in Accumulated Comprehensive -------------- Perpetual
Shares Amount Capital Deficit Income (Loss) Shares Amount Loan Notes Total
------ ------ ---------- ----------- ------------- ------ ------ ----------- -----
Balance January 1, 1997 12,478 $ 125 $ 67,415 $ (75,965) $ 140 94 $ (1,058) $17,334 $ 7,991
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss (2,571) (2,571)
Foreign currency
translation
adjustment (174) (174)
-------
Comprehensive loss (2,745)
-------
Conversion of nil coupon
perpetual loan notes
into common stock 6 - 72 (72) -
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 1997 12,484 $ 125 $ 67,487 $ (78,536) $ (34) 94 $ (1,058) $ 17,262 $ 5,246
Comprehensive income:
Net income 539 539
Foreign currency
translation
adjustment 86 86
-------
Comprehensive income 625
-------
Conversion of nil coupon
perpetual loan notes
into common stock 2 - 13 (13) -
Tax benefit from years prior
to quasi-reorganization 1,363 1,363
Issuance of new shares 4,750 47 3,035 3,082
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 1998 17,236 $172 $ 71,898 $ (77,997) $ 52 94 $ (1,058) $ 17,249 $ 10,316
Comprehensive income:
Net income 3,008 3,008
Foreign currency
translation
adjustment (77) (77)
-------
Comprehensive income 2,931
-------
Conversion of nil coupon
perpetual loan notes
into common stock 963 10 10,372 (10,382) -
Purchase of nil coupon
perpetual loan notes 2,535 (2,979) (444)
Tax benefit from years prior
to quasi-reorganization 722 722
Exercise of stock options 129 - 211 211
Other (45) (45)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 1999 18,328 $182 $85,693 $ (74,989) $ (25) 94 $ (1,058) $3,888 $ 13,691
====================================================================================================
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
17
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
1999 1998 1997
------- ------- -------
For the years ended December 31
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss) $ 3,008 $ 539 $(2,571)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation 519 317 25
Amortization 261 57 -
Loss on equipment disposals 246 52 13
Loss from equity interest in affiliates - 388 853
Income taxes 722 1,363 -
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (625) (4,156) -
Receivable from NFT - - 273
Inventories, prepaid expenses, other current assets
and other noncurrent assets 139 403 -
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other
noncurrent liabilities 661 411 220
Other 69 90 -
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 5,000 (536) (1,187)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Sale of short-term securities - - 1,563
Repayments by (advances to) CDT - (500) 250
Purchase of 50% in NFT, net of cash acquired (1,958) 514 -
Consolidation of opening NFT cash balance - 1,595 -
Purchases of equipment and patents (795) (396) -
------- ------- -------
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (2,753) 1,213 1,813
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issuance of common shares (45) 3,082 -
Exercise of stock options 211 - -
Purchase and retirement of nil coupon loan notes (444) - -
Repayment of borrowings (3,225) - -
Proceeds from borrowings 4,500 - -
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by financing activities 997 3,082 -
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash (77) 86 16
------- ------- -------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 3,167 3,845 642
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 5,792 1,947 1,305
------- ------- -------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 8,959 $ 5,792 $ 1,947
======= ======= =======
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
18
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization
Fuel-Tech N.V. (the "Company") is a holding company active in the business
of air pollution control. The Company's primary focus, through its wholly owned
subsidiary, Fuel Tech, Inc. (FTI), is on selling, worldwide, its NOxOUT(R)
Process and related technologies for the reduction of oxides of nitrogen (NOx)
and other emissions from boilers, furnaces and other stationary combustion
sources. The Company's business is materially dependent on the continued
existence and enforcement of air quality regulations, particularly in the United
States. The Company has expended significant resources in the research and
development of new technologies in building its proprietary portfolio of air
pollution control, fuel treatment chemicals, computer modeling and advanced
visualization technologies.
For the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, 25%, 20% and 38% of
the Company's revenues, respectively, were derived from international markets,
principally in Europe and Asia.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions have been
eliminated. As more fully discussed in Note 2, on April 30, 1998, FTI purchased
Nalco Chemical Company's (Nalco's) 50% share in the Nalco Fuel Tech (NFT) joint
venture, increasing FTI's ownership of the joint venture's assets and
liabilities to 100%. The accompanying financial statements consolidate the
results of NFT from January 1, 1998, and reflect Nalco's 50% interest in the
joint venture for the period from January 1, 1998, through April 30, 1998, as a
minority interest. Prior to 1998, the Company accounted for its 50% interest in
NFT using the equity method of accounting.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts included in prior year financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Foreign Currency Translation
The functional currency for the Company and its subsidiaries is the
currency of the country in which each entity transacts its business. In
accordance with SFAS No. 52, "Foreign Currency Translation," assets and
liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are translated
into U.S. dollars at current exchange rates, and revenues and expenses are
translated using average rates of exchange prevailing during the year.
Adjustments resulting from translation of financial statements denominated in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar are included in accumulated other
comprehensive income or loss. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are
included in the determination of net income.
Cash Equivalents and Financial Instruments
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of
three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. At December 31,
1999, substantially all of the Company's cash and cash equivalents are on
deposit with three financial institutions. All financial instruments are
reflected in the accompanying balance sheets at amounts that approximate fair
market value.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage the economic
impact of fluctuations in interest rates. To achieve this the Company enters
into interest rate swaps. The Company uses an interest rate swap to manage the
duration and interest rate characteristics of its outstanding debt. The interest
differential paid or received is recognized as an adjustment to interest expense
on an ongoing basis.
19
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable includes unbilled receivables, representing costs and
estimated earnings in excess of billings on contracts under the percentage of
completion method. At December 31, 1999 and 1998, unbilled receivables were
approximately $4,413,000 and $4,305,000, respectively.
Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Goodwill recognized as a result of the transactions described in Note 2 is
being amortized by the straight-line method over periods of nine and ten years,
which represent the estimated remaining useful life of the Company's
intellectual property. Other intangibles consist principally of third-party
costs related to the development of patent rights. These costs are being
amortized by the straight-line method over a period of 10 years from the date of
patent issuance. Patent maintenance fees are charged to operations as incurred.
Equipment
Equipment is stated on the basis of cost. Provisions for depreciation are
computed by the straight-line method, using estimated useful lives as follows:
Laboratory equipment.................................... 5-10 years
Furniture and fixtures.................................. 3-10 years
Computer equipment and software......................... 3-5 years
Field equipment......................................... 3-4 years
Vehicles................................................ 3 years
Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets and certain intangible assets for
impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount
of an asset may not be recoverable. In the event the sum of the expected
undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset is less than
the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss equal to the excess of the
asset's carrying value over its fair value is recorded. The impact of such
losses was immaterial to the financial results of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 1999.
Revenue Recognition
The Company uses the percentage of completion method of accounting for
certain long-term equipment construction and license contracts. Under the
percentage of completion method, sales and gross profit are recognized as work
is performed based on the relationship between actual engineering hours and
equipment construction costs incurred and total estimated hours and costs at
completion. Sales and gross profit are adjusted prospectively for revisions in
completion estimates and contract values.
Royalty income represents royalties from NFT for sales of the NOxOUT
Process, and is recognized in the period of the underlying sale.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock option grants in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees." Under the Company's current plans, options may be granted at not
less than the fair market value on the date of grant, and therefore, no
compensation expense is recognized for the stock options granted.
20
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share excludes the dilutive effects of stock
options and of the nil coupon non-redeemable convertible unsecured loan notes
(see Note 5). Diluted earnings (loss) per share includes the dilutive effect of
the nil coupon non-redeemable convertible unsecured loan notes and of stock
options and warrants. The following table sets forth the weighted-average shares
used in calculating earnings (loss) per share (in thousands):
1999 1998
------ ------
Basic weighted-average shares 17,752 15,680
Conversion of unsecured loan notes 591 1,715
Unexercised options and warrants 992 42
------ ------
Diluted weighted-average shares 19,335 17,437
====== ======
Diluted weighted-average shares were the same as basic weighted-average
shares in 1997 because the conversion of the loan notes and exercise of the
options and warrants would be antidilutive.
2. The Nalco and American Bailey Corporation Transactions
Effective April 30, 1998, FTI purchased Nalco's 50% interest in NFT for
$1.1 million cash, the issuance of a $3.0 million note, and up to $5.5 million
in contingent payments based upon FTI's future earnings. The acquisition was
accounted for as a purchase. The notes bear interest at 10% per annum, payable
quarterly, with principal payments of $250,000, payable quarterly, beginning on
March 31, 1999. One-half of the contingent payments ($2.75 million) was based on
the achievement of annual gross margin targets for the years 1998-2001, with the
other half payable upon the achievement of a cumulative gross margin target for
the years 1998-2001. The note and contingent payment obligations were secured by
substantially all of the Company's assets. The 1998 financial statements include
an accrual of $113,000 for the contingent payment earned by Nalco based on 1998
gross margins. Goodwill, net of amortization, resulting from this acquisition
totaled $1,025,000, including the contingent payment obligation, at December 31,
1998.
Simultaneously with this transaction, principals of American Bailey
Corporation (ABC) invested $3.35 million in the Company in exchange for 4.75
million shares of the Company's common stock, and warrants to purchase an
additional 3.0 million shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price
of $1.75 (a 12% premium over the Company's share price at the time the
transaction was negotiated with ABC). The warrants expire on April 30, 2008.
Such shares (and shares underlying the warrants) are restricted from sale by the
holders for a period of three years from the date of transaction, and give the
holders certain registration rights.
On September 1, 1999, the Company satisfied its remaining obligations to
Nalco by paying Nalco approximately $4.5 million, representing the $2.5 million
remaining balance on the note, plus accrued interest, and a buyout of the
balance of the contingent payment obligation for approximately $2.0 million. At
the time of the transaction, a maximum of approximately $5.4 million remained
outstanding under the contingent payment obligation. This transaction was
financed by a $4.5 million term loan from the Company's existing bank (see Note
8 to the consolidated financial statements). As a result of this transaction,
the Company recorded approximately $2.0 million of additional goodwill.
The following unaudited proforma financial information gives effect to the
NFT acquisition as if it had occurred as of January 1, 1997. The proforma
information is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily
indicative of the results of operations that actually would have been achieved
had the acquisition been consummated as of that date.
1998 1997
----------- -----------
Net revenues $25,864,000 $20,066,000
Net income (loss) 515,000 (3,337,000)
Basic earnings (loss) per common share $.03 $ (.27)
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share $.03 $ (.27)
Proforma income includes interest expense on the $3.0 million Nalco note
beginning January 1, 1997, but does not include certain operating benefits
resulting from the Nalco transaction.
21
3. TAXATION
At December 31, 1999, FTI had tax losses available for offset against
future years' earnings of approximately $47.4 million in the United States. For
financial statement purposes, a valuation allowance has been recorded to offset
the tax benefit of these carryforwards. Under the provisions of the U.S. Tax
Reform Act of 1986, utilization of the Company's U.S. federal income tax loss
carryforwards may be limited should ownership changes exceed 50% within a
three-year period. The U.S. federal tax loss carryforwards expire as follows (in
thousands):
2000 $ 1,387
2001 6,231
2002 7,520
2003 14,925
2004 4,639
2005 5,467
2006 1,987
2007 2,325
2008 1,480
2009 220
2010 309
2011 884
2012 40
-------
$47,414
=======
The components of income (loss) before taxes for the years ended December
31 are as follows (in thousands):
1999 1998 1997
---- ---- ----
Domestic $5,167 $3,190 $ (418)
Foreign (860) (1,288) (2,153)
------ ------ -------
Income (loss) before taxes $4,307 $1,902 $(2,571)
====== ====== =======
A reconciliation between the provision for income taxes calculated at the
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate and the consolidated provision in the
consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31 is as
follows (in thousands):
1999 1998 1997
------- ------- -------
Provision (benefit) at the U.S. federal
statutory rate $ 1,507 $ 666 $ (900)
Foreign losses without tax benefit 301 446 640
Valuation allowance adjustment (1,052) 220 198
State income taxes 576 -- --
Other (33) 31 62
------- ------- -------
Provision for income taxes $ 1,299 $ 1,363 $ --
======= ======= =======
The reduction in the valuation allowance in 1999 results primarily from the
utilization of tax loss carryforwards from where a valuation allowance had
previously been provided.
Temporary differences arising from treating income and expense items for
financial reporting purposes differently than for tax return purposes are not
material.
Effective March 31, 1985, FTI effected a quasi-reorganization and reduced
the value of certain of its assets. Tax benefits resulting from the utilization
of the U.S. federal tax loss carryforwards existing as of the date of the
quasi-reorganization have been excluded from the results of operations and
credited to additional paid-in capital when realized. Tax benefits of $722,000
and $1,363,000 were realized in 1999 and 1998, respectively. As such, a non-cash
charge was recorded as deferred income tax expense, and additional paid-in
capital was increased accordingly for the amounts noted above in both years.
There are no remaining tax loss carryforwards from years prior to the date of
the quasi-reorganization.
At December 31, 1999, the Company's international subsidiaries have tax
loss carryforwards of approximately $5,050,000 (primarily in Germany), which can
be carried forward indefinitely. A valuation allowance has been recorded to
offset the tax benefit of these loss carryforwards.
22
4. COMMON STOCK
At December 31, 1999, the Company had 18,328,673 common shares outstanding,
with an additional 477,023 shares reserved for issuance upon conversion of the
nil coupon non-redeemable convertible unsecured loan notes (see Note 5) and
1,874,500 shares reserved for issuance upon the exercise of stock options,
802,000 of which are currently exercisable (see Note 6).
5. NIL COUPON NON-REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE UNSECURED LOAN NOTES
At December 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company had $4,030,500 and $18,180,000
principal amount of nil coupon non-redeemable convertible unsecured perpetual
loan notes (the "Loan Notes") outstanding, respectively. The Loan Notes are
convertible at any time into shares of the Company's common stock generally at
rates that vary from $6.50 to $11.43 per share. The Loan Notes bear no interest
and have no maturity date. They are generally repayable only in the event of the
Company's dissolution and, accordingly, have been classified within
shareholders' equity in the accompanying balance sheet. In 1989 and 1993, the
Company incurred approximately $1.1 million and $100,000, respectively, in
expenses related to Loan Note issuances. The Loan Notes are shown net of the
residual portion of these expenses, which approximates $141,000 and $931,000 at
December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
During 1999 and 1998, approximately $11,012,500 and $12,500 principal
amount of Loan Notes were converted into 963,600 and 1,922 shares of the
Company's common stock, respectively. Also, during 1999, the Company purchased
and retired approximately $3,137,000 principal amount of Loan Notes.
6. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
The Company has granted stock options under the 1993 Incentive Plan ("1993
Plan"). Under the 1993 Plan, awards may be granted to participants in the form
of Non-Qualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation
Rights, Restricted Stock, Performance Awards, Bonuses or other forms of
share-based or non-share-based awards or combinations thereof. Participants in
the 1993 Plan may be such of the Company's directors, officers, employees,
consultants or advisors (except consultants or advisors in capital-raising
transactions) as the directors determine are key to the success of the Company's
business. The amount of shares that may be issued or reserved for awards to
participants under a 1998 amendment to the 1993 Plan is 12.5% of outstanding
shares. In 1999 and 1998, 513,500 and 767,500 options were granted,
respectively. In 1997, no options were granted.
If compensation expense for the Company's plans had been determined based
on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under its plans, consistent with
the method described in SFAS No. 123, the Company's net income (loss) and income
(loss) per share would have been adjusted as follows for the years ended
December 31:
1999 1998 1997
------------------------------
Net income (loss) (in thousands):
As reported $3,008 $539 $(2,571)
As adjusted 2,714 (39) (2,733)
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share:
Basic--
As reported $ .17 $.03 $ (.21)
As adjusted .15 .00 (.22)
Diluted--
As reported $ .16 $.03 $ (.21)
As adjusted .14 .00 (.22)
23
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the "As adjusted"
disclosures include only the effect of stock options granted after 1994. The
application of the "As adjusted" disclosures presented above are not
representative of the effects SFAS No. 123 may have on such operating results in
future years due to the timing of stock option grants and considering that
options vest over a period of immediately to five years.
The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating
the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are
fully transferable. In addition, option pricing models require the input of
highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility.
Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly
different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective
input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's
opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single
measure of the fair value of its stock options.
The fair value of each option grant, for "As adjusted" disclosure purposes,
was estimated on the date of grant using the modified Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
1999 1998 1997
-------------------------------------
Expected dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% N/A
Risk-free interest rate 6.68% 5.03% N/A
Expected volatility 108.4% 43.7% N/A
Expected life of option 4 years 4 years N/A
The following table presents a summary of the Company's stock option
activity and related information for the years ended December 31:
1999 1998 1997
Weighted- Weighted- Weighted-
Number of Average Number of Average Number of Average
Options Exercise Price Options Exercise Price Options Exercise Price
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding at beginning of year 1,728,493 $ 3.18 1,057,728 $ 6.81 1,114,228 $ 6.77
Granted 513,500 2.13 767,500 1.74 - -
Exercised (129,085) 1.63 - - - -
Expired or forfeited (238,408) 7.48 (96,735) 2.31 (56,500) 4.52
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding at end of year 1,874,500 $ 2.39 1,728,493 $ 3.18 1,057,728 $ 6.81
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exercisable at end of year 802,000 $ 3.05 989,160 $ 4.27 886,895 $ 7.47
Weighted-average fair value of
options granted during the year $ 1.59 $ 0.56 $ -
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding
at December 31, 1999:
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Weighted-Average Weighted- Weighted-
Range of Number of Remaining Average Number of Average
Exercise Prices Options Contractual Life Exercise Price Options Exercise Price
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1.375 - $3.38 1,712,000 6.61 years $ 1.92 639,500 $ 1.97
$4.75 - $12.06 162,500 2.15 years $ 7.27 162,500 $ 7.27
------------- -------------
$1.375 - $12.06 1,874,500 6.22 years $ 2.38 802,000 $ 3.05
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Company also has outstanding warrants to purchase 140,000 common shares
for $4.00 per share. The warrants are exercisable at any time, at the holder's
option, in whole or in part prior to the expiration date of March 1, 2001.
Lastly, as mentioned in Note 2, ABC has warrants to purchase an additional 3.0
million shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $1.75 (a
12% premium over the Company's share price at the time the transaction was
negotiated with ABC). The warrants expire April 30, 2008. Such shares (and
shares underlying the warrants) are restricted from sale by the holders for a
period of three years from the date of the transaction and give the holders
certain registration rights.
24
7. COMMITMENTS
Operating Leases
The Company leases office space, autos and certain equipment under
agreements expiring on various dates through 2009. Future minimum lease payments
at December 31, 1999, are as follows (in thousands):
2000 $324
2001 284
2002 284
2003 291
2004 205
Thereafter 676
For the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, rent expense
approximated $493,000, $455,000 and $70,000, respectively.
Performance Guarantees
The Company's long-term equipment construction and license contracts
typically contain performance guarantees. The Company has outstanding
performance guarantees of $634,000 for projects that have not completed their
final acceptance test or that are still operating under a warranty period.
Management of the Company believes that these projects will be successfully
completed and that there will not be a materially adverse impact on the
Company's operations from these guarantees.
8. DEBT FINANCING
In 1999, the Company entered into a $3.0 million revolving credit facility
expiring August 31, 2002, which is collateralized by all personal property owned
by the Company. The Company can use this facility for cash advances and standby
letters of credit. The interest rate to be borne on cash advances is the bank's
reference rate, or an optional rate that can be selected by the Company, and is
based on the bank's Interbank Offering Rate plus 2.25%.
At December 31, 1999, the bank had provided standby letters of credit to
customers totaling approximately $489,000. In connection with contracts in
process, the Company is committed to reimbursing the issuing bank for any
payments made by the bank under these letters of credit. At December 31, 1999,
there were no cash borrowings against this facility and a credit balance of
approximately $2.5 million was available.
On September 1, 1999, the Company entered into a term loan agreement with a
bank for a total principal balance of $4.5 million. The principal balance is to
be repaid in quarterly installments of $225,000 commencing on December 31, 1999,
with a final principal payment of $2,025,000 due on August 31, 2002. The Company
has entered into an interest rate swap transaction that fixes the rate of
interest at 8.91% on approximately 50% of the outstanding principal balance
during the term of the loan. The remaining principal balance bears interest at
the prevailing rates available in the marketplace, which is based on the bank's
Interbank Offering Rate plus 2.25%. The borrowings under this facility are
collateralized by all personal property owned by the Company.
The fair value of debt is the carrying value at December 31, 1999. The fair
value of the interest rate swap, based on quoted market prices, is ($1,000) at
December 31, 1999. The notional value of the swap is $2,250,000 at December 31,
1999.
9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has a 21.8% common stock ownership interest in Clean Diesel
Technologies, Inc. (CDT), at December 31, 1999. The Company is precluded from
selling its interest in CDT except pursuant to a registration statement or
within the limitations of Rule 144 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
On August 3, 1995, the Company signed a Management and Services Agreement
with CDT. According to the agreement, CDT is to reimburse the Company for
management, services and administrative expenses incurred by the Company on
behalf of CDT. Additionally, the Company charges CDT an additional 3%-10% of
such costs annually, depending upon the nature of the cost.
For the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, $106,000, $168,000
and $403,000, respectively, was charged to CDT as a management fee.
On July 1, 1995, CDT entered into a $745,000 demand note with the Company,
bearing interest at 8% per annum (the "Demand Note"). In 1997, $250,000 of such
amount was repaid. During 1997, the Company restructured the unpaid balance of
the Demand Note whereby the Demand Note was due in three annual installments of
$100,000 each on July 1 of each of the years 1998 through 2000 and a final
installment of $195,000 on July 7, 2001. Interest of 8% per annum was due on the
unpaid balance on each principal payment date.
25
In February 1998, the Company provided CDT a $500,000 bridge loan. On
November 11, 1998, the $495,000 demand note, the $500,000 bridge loan and
interest thereon of $20,000 was converted into 2,029 shares of Series A
Convertible preferred stock in CDT. Each preferred share is convertible into
333.33 shares of CDT common stock. The Company accounts for its investment in
CDT using the equity method, and recorded a loss of $500,000 in 1998 and
$495,000 in 1997 related to its share of CDT's operating results in those years.
The CDT common and preferred stock has no carrying value in the Company's
balance sheet as of December 31, 1999 and 1998.
Pursuant to an assignment agreement of certain technology to CDT, the
Company is due royalties from CDT of 2.5% of CDT's annual revenue from sales of
CDT's Platinum Fuel Catalyst, commencing in 1998. The royalty obligation expires
in 2008. CDT may terminate the royalty obligation to the Company by payment of
$12 million commencing in 1998 and declining annually to $1,090,910 in 2008. CDT
as assignee and owner will maintain the technology at its own expense. To date,
no royalties from CDT have been received by the Company. The report of
independent auditors pertaining to CDT's financial statements for the years
ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, contained a going concern qualification. The
Company intends to record royalties from CDT on a cash basis.
During 1997, the Company decided to close its offices in the United
Kingdom, and such offices were officially closed in January 1998. In connection
therewith, the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 1997, includes a provision of $281,000 to close such
facility. All amounts were paid in 1998.
On April 30, 1998, the Company entered into an agreement with American
Bailey Corporation for it to provide certain management and consulting services
to the Company. ABC currently owns 26% of the Company's common shares and also
owns warrants to purchase an additional 3.0 million shares, which expire on
April 30, 2008. No fees were to be payable under the agreement for the first 24
months. This agreement was amended in 1999 to extend its term to April 30, 2002,
and provide for the payment of a management fee of $10,417 per month commencing
September 1, 1999, through May 1, 2000, and $20,833 per month until the
termination of the agreement.
NFT paid fees to FTI as compensation for selected sales and other specified
services. In addition, NFT reimbursed FTI for payroll, rent and other
expenditures incurred on its behalf. Through April 30, 1998, and in 1997, these
billings were $1,001,000 and $2,013,000, respectively.
10. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN
The Company has a retirement savings plan available for all U.S. employees
who have met minimum length-of-service requirements. The Company's contributions
are determined based upon amounts contributed by the Company's employees with
additional contributions made at the discretion of the Company's Board of
Directors. Costs related to this plan were $276,000, $148,000 and $23,000 in
1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
26
11. BUSINESS SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC AREA DATA
The Company's business is organized into one operating segment providing
air pollution control chemicals and equipment.
Information concerning the Company's operations by geographic area is
provided below. Operating earnings represent sales less cost of products sold
and operating expenses. Foreign operating expenses include direct expenses
incurred outside of the United States of foreign corporations controlled by the
Company plus an allocation of domestic selling and general expenses directly
related to the foreign operations. Assets are those directly associated with
operations of the geographic area.
For the years ended December 31 1999 1998 1997
------------ ------------ ------------
Revenues:
Domestic $ 25,127,000 $ 20,638,000 $ 148,000
Foreign 8,198,000 5,226,000 --
------------ ------------ ------------
$ 33,325,000 $ 25,864,000 $ 148,000
============ ============ ============
Operating Earnings:
Domestic $ 4,017,000 $ 3,204,000 $ (1,575,000)
Foreign 812,000 (601,000) (341,000)
------------ ------------ ------------
$ 4,829,000 $ 2,603,000 $ (1,916,000)
============ ============ ============
December 31 1999 1998 1997
------------ ------------ ------------
Assets:
Domestic $ 22,020,000 $ 16,307,000 $ 5,272,000
Foreign 2,444,000 2,846,000 675,000
------------ ------------ ------------
$ 24,464,000 $ 19,153,000 $ 5,947,000
============ ============ ============
27
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
NONE
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information required by this Item will be set forth under the captions
"Election of Directors" and "Directors and Executive Officers of the Company" in
the Company's Proxy Statement related to the 2000 Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders (the `Proxy Statement") and is incorporated by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information required by this Item will be set forth under the caption
"Executive Compensation" in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference
excluding, however, the information under the captions "Report of the Board of
Directors on Executive Compensation" and "Performance Graph," which is not
incorporated by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Information required by this Item will be set forth under the caption
"Principal Shareholders and Stock Ownership of Management" in the Proxy
Statement and is incorporated by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Information required by this Item will be set forth under the captions
"Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" and "Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions" in the Proxy Statement and is
incorporated by reference.
28
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) (1) Financial Statements
The financial statements identified below and required by Part II, Item 8
of this Form 10-K are set forth above.
Report of Independent Auditors
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1999 and 1998
Consolidated Statements of Operations for Years Ended December 31,
1999, 1998 and 1997 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity
for the Years Ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
1999, 1998 and 1997
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Schedules have been omitted because of the absence of the conditions under
which they are required or because the required information where material is
shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits
+ 1.0 Articles of Association of Fuel-Tech N.V. (in Dutch and English) as
amended through April 27, 1998
* 2.1 Instrument Constituting US $19,200,000 Nil
Coupon Non-Redeemable Convertible Unsecured Loan Notes of Fuel-Tech
N.V., dated December 21, 1989
* 2.2 First Supplemental Instrument Constituting US $3,000,000 Nil Coupon
Non-Redeemable Convertible Unsecured Loan Notes of Fuel-Tech N.V.,
dated July 10, 1990
* 2.3 Instrument Constituting US $3,000,000 Nil Coupon Non-Redeemable
Convertible Unsecured Loan Notes of Fuel-Tech N.V., dated
May 9, 1991
* 2.4 Instrument Constituting US $6,000,000 Nil Coupon Non-Redeemable
Convertible Unsecured Loan Notes of Fuel-Tech N.V., dated
March 12, 1993
** 2.5 Form of Warrants issued April 30, 1998 evidencing right to purchase
3 million shares of Fuel-Tech N.V. common stock.
* 3.1 Form of Indemnity Agreement between Fuel-Tech N.V. and directors and
officers
* 3.2 Fuel Tech, Inc. 1984 Incentive Stock Option Plan
* 3.3 Fuel-Tech N.V. 1988 Stock Option Plan
* 3.4 Fuel Tech, Inc. Form of 1984 Stock Option Agreement
* 3.5 Fuel Tech, Inc. Form of 1987 Stock Option Agreement
* 3.6 Fuel Tech, Inc. Form of 1992 Substitute Stock Option Agreement
* 3.7 Fuel-Tech N.V. Form of 1992 Substitute Stock Option Agreement
* 3.8 Fuel-Tech N.V. Form of 1993 Stock Option Agreement
* 3.10 Master License Agreement dated December 30, 1987 between Fuel Tech,
Inc. and Fuel-Tech N.V.
* 3.10.1 Master License Agreement dated April 8, 1987 between Fuel Tech. Inc.
and Fuel Tech GmbH
* 3.10.2 Assignment dated December 30, 1987 from Fuel Tech, Inc. to Fuel-Tech
N.V. of Master License Agreement dated April 8, 1987 between Fuel
Tech, Inc. and Fuel Tech GmbH
* 3.10.4 Master License Agreement dated December 30, 1987 between Fuel-Tech
N.V. and Fuel Tech B.V.
* 3.12 License Implementation Agreement dated April 22, 1991 among NFT,
Fuel Tech International, B.V., and Flakt Canada Ltd.
* 3.13 License Implementation Agreement dated June 10, 1991 among NFT,
Nalco Fuel Tech, B.V., and Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation
* 3.14 License Implementation Agreement dated April 23, 1991 among NFT,
Nalco Fuel Tech, B.V., and R-C Environmental Services &
Technologies, a division of Research Cottrell, Inc.
* 3.15 License Implementation Agreement dated December 20, 1990 between NFT
and RJM Corporation
* 3.16 License Implementation Agreement dated December 20, 1990 between NFT
and Todd Combustion, Inc.
* 3.17 License Implementation Agreement dated May 22, 1991 among NFT, Nalco
Fuel Tech, B.V., and Wheelabrator Air Pollution Control, Inc.
* 3.18 Agreement dated July 3, 1990 between NFT and Arcadian Corporation
* 3.19 License Agreement dated September 12, 1991 between NFT and BP
Chemicals Inc.,
* 3.20 Agreement dated November 5, 1990 between NFT and Cargill,
Incorporated
* 3.21 Agreement dated August 30, 1990 between NFT and Nitrocbem, Inc.
* 3.22 License Agreement dated December 27, 1990 between NFT and Union Oil
Company of California dba Unocal
* 3.23 Agreement dated September 30, 1990 between NFT and W.H. Shurtleff
Company
* 3.24 Cooperative Agreement dated November 26, 1991 between Vitkovice City
Enterprise and Fuel Tech GmbH
** 3.25 Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 23, 1998, between
Fuel-Tech N.V., and the several Investors signatory thereto,
including exhibits
29
** 3.26 Purchase Agreement dated as of March 23, 1998, between Nalco FT,
Inc., Nalco Chemical Company and Fuel Tech, Inc., including exhibits.
o 3.27 The 1993 Incentive Plan of Fuel-Tech N.V. as amended through
August 3, 1999
#o 3.28 License Agreement dated November 18, 1998 between The Gas Research
Institute and Fuel Tech, Inc. relating to the FLGR Process
#o 3.29 License Agreement dated December 8, 1998 between The Gas research
Institute and Fuel Tech, Inc. relating to the AEFLGR Process
#o 3.30 Amendment No. 1, dated February 28, 2000, to License Agreement of
November 18, 1998 between The Gas Research Institute and Fuel Tech,
Inc.
oo 19.2 Those portions of the Proxy Statement to be distributed to
Shareholders of the Company for the 2000 Annual General Meeting
of Shareholders of Fuel-Tech N.V. specifically incorporated by
reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K
o 23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
- ------------
* Filed with Registration Statement on Form 20-F, No. 000-21724 of August
26, 1993, as amended
** Filed with Registrant's Report on Form 6-K for the month of March 1998
+ Filed with Registrant's Report on Form 20-F for the year 1997
o Filed herewith
oo To be filed with the Registrant's definitive proxy material for its 2000
Annual General Meeting
# Confidential information removed and filed separately
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K were filed by the Company during the fourth
quarter of 1999.
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, Fuel -Tech N.V. has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
FUEL-TECH N.V.
Dated: March 29, 2000 By: /Ralph E. Bailey
-------------------------------
Ralph E. Bailey
Chairman, Managing Director and
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been duly signed below by the following persons on behalf of
Fuel-Tech N.V. and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Ralph E. Bailey Chairman, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
-------------------------- (Principal Executive Officer)
Ralph E. Bailey
/s/ Scott M. Schecter Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Treasurer
-------------------------- (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Scott M. Schecter
/s/ Douglas G. Bailey Managing Director
--------------------------
Douglas G. Bailey
/s/ John A. de Havilland Managing Director
--------------------------
John A. de Havilland
/s/ Charles W. Grinnell Managing Director, Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
--------------------------
Charles W. Grinnell
/s/ Jeremy D. Peter-Hoblyn Managing Director
--------------------------
Jeremy D. Peter-Hoblyn
/s/ John R. Selby Managing Director
--------------------------
John R. Selby
Tarma Trust Management N.V. Managing Director
By: /s/ Robert W. Huyzen Managing Director
--------------------------
Robert W. Huyzen
/s/ James M. Valentine Managing Director
--------------------------
James M. Valentine
31