SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the registrant [X]
Filed by a party other than the registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary proxy statement
[X] Definitive proxy statement
[ ] Definitive additional materials
[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)
Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transactions applies:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which
the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous
filing by registration statement number, or the form or
schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount previously paid:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, schedule or registration statement no.:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing party:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date filed:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION
1200 WALL STREET WEST, LYNDHURST, NEW JERSEY 07071
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To the Stockholders of
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION:
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
Curtiss-Wright Corporation, a Delaware corporation, will be held at the
Renaissance Meadowlands Hotel, 801 Rutherford Avenue, Rutherford, New Jersey on
Friday, May 4, 2001, at 2:00 p.m., for the following purposes:
(1) To elect eight directors, each to hold office until the next Annual
Meeting of Stockholders and until his or her successor shall have been
elected and shall qualify;
(2) To appoint independent accountants for the current year,
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP having been nominated as such by the Board of
Directors; and
(3) To consider and transact such other business as may properly come
before the meeting.
Only record holders of common stock at the close of business on March 5,
2001 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting (the
'meeting'). A list of such holders will be available for examination by any
stockholder at the meeting and at the offices of the Corporation, 1200 Wall
Street West, Lyndhurst, New Jersey 07071, during the ten days preceding the
meeting date.
All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person.
Stockholders who plan to attend the meeting in person are nevertheless requested
to sign and return their proxies to make certain that their stock will be
represented at the meeting should they be prevented unexpectedly from attending.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
BRIAN D. O'NEILL
Secretary
IMPORTANT: WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE FILL IN, SIGN
AND PROMPTLY RETURN YOUR PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE.
March 2001
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION
1200 WALL STREET WEST, LYNDHURST, NEW JERSEY 07071
PROXY STATEMENT
This proxy statement is being furnished by Curtiss-Wright Corporation
(hereinafter called the 'Corporation' or the 'Company') on or about March 23,
2001 in connection with the solicitation of proxies for use at the annual
meeting of stockholders to be held at the time and place and for the purposes
set forth in the foregoing notice of annual meeting of stockholders.
As of March 5, 2001, the record date for determining the holders of common
stock entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting, there were
10,050,468 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual
meeting. Each share of stock is entitled to one vote.
The proxy card provides space for a stockholder to withhold voting for any
or all nominees for the board of directors, and to abstain from voting for the
appointment of independent accountants. The election of directors requires a
plurality of the votes cast while the approval of the appointment of independent
accountants requires the affirmative vote of a majority in interest of the
stockholders present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote. Abstentions and
broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is
present at the meeting. An abstention will be treated as a negative vote with
respect to each matter other than the election of a director as to whom the
stockholder abstained. As to broker non-votes, if a broker indicates on the
proxy that it does not have discretionary authority to vote on a particular
matter, the shares represented by the non-votes will not be considered as
present and entitled to vote with respect to that matter.
Where a specific designation is given in the proxy with respect to the vote
on the election of directors or the appointment of independent accountants, the
proxy will be voted in accordance with such designation. If no such designation
is made, the proxy will be voted in favor of the directors named below and in
favor of the appointment of independent accountants. Any proxy given pursuant to
this solicitation may be revoked by the stockholder giving it at any time before
its use by delivering to the Secretary of the Corporation at the above address
of the Corporation, written notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy
bearing a later date, or by attending the meeting and voting in person.
PERSONS MAKING THE SOLICITATION
This solicitation of proxies is made on behalf of the board of directors of
the Corporation, and the cost thereof will be borne by the Corporation. The
Corporation will reimburse brokerage firms and nominees for their expenses in
forwarding proxy material to beneficial owners of the stock of the Corporation.
In addition, a number of employees, officers and directors of the Corporation
(none of whom will receive any compensation therefore in addition to his regular
compensation) may solicit proxies. The solicitation will be made by mail and in
addition, the telephone, telegrams, facsimile and other electronic communication
and personal interviews may be utilized.
DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Stockholders of the Corporation may submit proper proposals for inclusion in
the Corporation's proxy statement and for consideration at the next annual
meeting of its stockholders by submitting their proposals in writing to the
Secretary of the Corporation in a timely manner. In order to be included in the
Corporation's proxy materials for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held
in the year 2002, stockholder proposals must be received by the Secretary of the
Corporation no later than November 8, 2001, and must otherwise comply with the
requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the 'Exchange Act'). All notices of proposals by stockholders,
whether or not included in the Corporation's proxy materials, should be sent to
Curtiss-Wright Corporation, 1200 Wall Street West, Lyndhurst, New Jersey 07071,
Attention: Corporate Secretary. The attached proxy card grants the proxy holders
discretionary authority to vote on any matter raised at the Annual Meeting.
Pursuant to amended SEC Rule 14a-4(c)(1), the Corporation shall exercise
discretionary voting authority to the extent conferred by proxy with respect to
shareholder proposals received after January 22, 2002.
APPRAISAL RIGHTS
Holders of Curtiss-Wright common stock are not entitled to appraisal rights
under Section 262 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware in
connection with any of the matters discussed in this proxy statement.
RECAPITALIZATION
The Company and Unitrin, Inc. ('Unitrin'), the holder of approximately 44%
of the Company's outstanding capital stock, announced a series of transactions
that will permit Unitrin to distribute to its stockholders in a tax-free
distribution the approximately 4.4 million shares of the Company's common stock
currently held by Unitrin. In order to permit this distribution to be tax-free
for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Company proposed to make certain
changes to its capital structure.
The proposed transactions (the 'recapitalization') between the Company and
Unitrin will result in the creation of a new class of common stock of the
Company. The recapitalization is being proposed because current U.S. federal
income tax law requires that, in order for the distribution to be tax-free to
Unitrin and its stockholders, Unitrin must own, at the time of the distribution,
capital stock of the Company having the right to elect at least 80% of our board
of directors, and must distribute all of that stock to its stockholders in a
single transaction. The Company's common stock currently held by Unitrin will be
converted on a one for one basis into approximately 4.4 million shares of
Class B common stock of the Company. Unitrin will distribute all of the Class B
common stock issued to Unitrin in the recapitalization to its stockholders
immediately following the recapitalization. Each Curtiss-Wright stockholder
other than Unitrin will retain its shares of Curtiss-Wright common stock. Due to
continuing consideration of the recapitalization, the filing date of
February 16, 2001 for the proxy statement relating to the recapitalization, as
mentioned in the Company's 2000 Annual Report, has been postponed, but the
Company anticipates filing such proxy statement in the first half of 2001. The
distribution of the Class B common stock is also expected to be completed in the
first half of 2001, subject to, among other things, approval of the tax-free
status of the distribution by the Internal Revenue Service and approval by the
stockholders of the Company at a Special Meeting of Stockholder also anticipated
to be held in the first half of 2001.
If the Recapitalization and related corporate governance amendments are
approved by the stockholders of the Company, as detailed below, the holders of
shares of Class B common stock will be entitled to elect at least 80% of our
board of directors. The holders of shares of common stock will have the right to
elect the remaining members of our board of directors. In all other respects the
rights of the holders of the common stock and the Class B common stock will be
identical, including with respect to voting rights on fundamental transactions
affecting the Company. The minimum number of directors on our board will be set
at five so the holders of common stock will always be assured of representation.
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At this Annual Meeting eight directors are to be elected, each to hold
office until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his or her
successor shall have been duly elected and shall qualify. Each nominee has been
recommended for election by the committee on directors and governance of the
board of directors and by the board. In the event that any such nominee should
become unavailable for election, the persons named in the proxy may vote for
the election of a substitute nominee. However,
2
the board of directors has no reason to believe that any of the nominees
described below will be unavailable for election.
The eight nominees listed below to serve one-year terms of office are
currently directors of the Company and have indicated their willingness to
serve. However, if any nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at
the time of the annual meeting, proxies will be voted for the nominee designated
by the present board to fill the vacancy. The term of office of each person
elected as a director will continue until the 2002 annual meeting or until a
successor has been elected and qualified.
The Board of Directors recommends that the stockholders vote 'FOR' the
nominees listed below:
YEAR
BUSINESS EXPERIENCE AND PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION FOR LAST FIVE FIRST
YEARS; DIRECTORSHIPS IN PUBLIC CORPORATIONS AND ELECTED
NAME INVESTMENT COMPANIES; AGE DIRECTOR
---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --------
Martin R. Benante Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of 1999
Curtiss-Wright Corporation since April 2000; formerly President and
Chief Operating Officer from April 1999 to April 2000; formerly
Vice-President of the Corporation since April 1996; formerly
President of Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corporation from March 1995
to April 1999; Age 48.
James B. Busey IV Aviation safety and security consultant, April 1996-present; 1995
Director, Mitre Corporation since February 1995; Director, Texas
Instruments, Incorporated since July 1993; President and Chief
Executive Officer of Armed Forces Communications and Electronics
Association, September 1993-April 1996; Age 68.
David Lasky Director, Primex Technologies, Inc. from January 1997 to 1993
January 2001; formerly Chairman of the Board of Directors of
Curtiss-Wright Corporation from May 1995 to April 2000; formerly
Chief Executive Officer of Curtiss-Wright Corporation from April 1993
to April 2000; Age 68.
S. Marce Fuller Director, Mirant Corporation, since July 1999; President and Chief 2000
Executive Officer of Mirant Corporation, since July 1999; formerly
President and Chief Executive Officer of Mirant Americas Energy
Marketing, LP. February 1998-November 1999; formerly Chief Executive
Officer of Mirant Americas Energy Marketing, LP, September
1997-October 1998; formerly Executive Vice-President of Mirant
Corporation from October 1998 to July 1999; formerly Senior Vice
President of Mirant Corporation from May 1996 to September 1998;
formerly Vice President of Mirant Corporation 1994-1996; Age 40.
William B. Mitchell Director, Mitre Corporation since May 1997; Director, Primex 1996
Technologies, Inc. from January 1997 to January 2001; Vice Chairman,
1993-1996, Director, 1990-1996 and Executive Vice President, 1987-1993
of Texas Instruments Incorporated; Chairman, American Electronics
Association, September 1995-September 1996; Age 65.
John R. Myers Chairman, Tru-Circle Corporation since June 1999; Director, Iomega 1996
Corporation since 1994; limited partner of Carlisle Enterprises, a
venture capital group, since 1993; Consultant, UNC, Inc.,
August-December 1996; Chairman of the Board of Garrett Aviation
Services, 1994-1996; Age 63.
William W. Sihler Professor of Business Administration, Darden Graduate School of 1991
Business Administration, University of Virginia; Age 63.
J. McLain Stewart Director, McKinsey & Company, Management Consultants, until 1997; 1989
Age 84.
3
OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS
Directors of the Company are presently serving on the following boards of
directors of other publicly held companies:
NAME OF DIRECTOR COMPANY
---------------- -------
James B. Busey IV............................ Texas Instruments, Inc.
Mitre Corporation
S. Marce Fuller.............................. Mirant Corporation
BEWAG AG (Supervisory Board)
William B. Mitchell.......................... Mitre Corporation
John R. Myers................................ Iomega Corporation
CERTAIN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On January 14, 1999, Mobile Energy Services Company, LLC (MESC) and its
parent company Mobile Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (MESH) -- both indirect
subsidiaries of Southern Company -- filed voluntary petitions for Chapter 11
bankruptcy relief in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
Alabama. Ms. Fuller has served as a vice president of MESC since 1995 and she
served as president and chief executive officer of MESH from August 1997 to
January 1999.
MESC was and is the owner and operator of a facility that was intended to
generate electricity, produce steam, and process black liquor as part of a pulp
and paper complex in Mobile, Alabama owned by Kimberly-Clark Tissue Company
(KCTC), with which MESC had entered into long-term operating and energy services
agreements in late 1994. The bankruptcy filings were in direct response to
KCTC's announcement in May 1998 of plans to close its pulp mill, effective
September 1, 1999. On February 8, 2000 MESC, MESH and KCTC entered into a
comprehensive, conditional settlement agreement, approved by the Bankruptcy
Court, under which KCTC has agreed to pay $53 million and other sums in damages
to MESC and MESH, and to grant MESC and MESH certain use and purchase rights to
the closed pulp mill and its facilities. In return, MESC agreed to reduce the
energy charges to KCTC's tissue mill and to grant KCTC releases of a variety of
claims asserted by MESC against KCTC related to the closure of the pulp mill.
That settlement was subject to several conditions that had to be satisfied by
mid-February 2001 and that now appear unlikely to be satisfied. If that
settlement agreement expires due to the failure of those conditions, MESC is
expected to continue operating as a debtor in possession under existing
contractual arrangements with the mill owners while it explores other
restructuring options.
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
The following table sets forth information concerning the ownership of
common stock of the Corporation by each director and nominee, each of the
executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table below and all
directors and executive officers as a group, as of February 1, 2001. The shares
are owned directly and the owner has the sole voting and investment power in
respect thereof. As of February 1, 2001, none of these individuals owned any
common stock of Unitrin, Inc., or Argonaut Group, Inc.
4
% OF
NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER BENEFICIALLY OWNED COMMON STOCK
------------------------ ------------------ ------------
Martin R. Benante(1)........................................ 19,616 (2)
Robert A. Bosi(3)........................................... 24,496 (2)
James B. Busey IV(4)........................................ 2,276 (2)
David Lasky(5).............................................. 112,956 1%
S. Marce Fuller(6).......................................... 389 (2)
William B. Mitchell(7)...................................... 1,670 (2)
John R. Myers(7)............................................ 1,082 (2)
Gerald Nachman(8)........................................... 72,357 (2)
Brian D. O'Neill(9)......................................... 10,370 (2)
William W. Sihler(7)........................................ 1,015 (2)
J. McLain Stewart(10)....................................... 916 (2)
George J. Yohrling(11)...................................... 26,023 (2)
Directors and Executive Officers as a group
(15 persons)(12).......................................... 285,241 2.8%
- ---------
(1) Of the total number of shares, 18,682 represents the number of shares that
may be acquired within 60 days upon the exercise of options granted under
the Corporation's 1985 Stock Option Plan and 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(2) Less than one percent.
(3) Of the total number of shares, 20,962 represents the number of shares that
may be acquired within 60 days upon the exercise of options granted under
the Corporation's 1985 Stock Option Plan and 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(4) Includes 516 shares of restricted common stock issued pursuant to the
Corporation's 1996 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors and fractional
shares purchased pursuant to a broker dividend reinvestment plan.
(5) Of the total number of shares, 61,114 represents the number of shares that
may be acquired within 60 days upon the exercise of options granted under
the Corporation's 1985 Stock Option Plan and 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(6) Shares are restricted common stock issued pursuant to the Corporation's
1996 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors.
(7) Includes 516 shares of restricted common stock issued pursuant to the
Corporation's 1996 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors.
(8) Of the total number of shares, 38,371 represents the number of shares that
may be acquired within 60 days upon the exercise of options granted under
the Corporation's 1985 Stock Option Plan and 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(9) Of the total number of shares, 5,248 represents the number of shares that
may be acquired within 60 days upon the exercise of options granted under
the Corporation's 1985 Stock Option Plan and 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(10) This consists of 516 shares of restricted common stock issued pursuant to
the Corporation's 1996 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors and 400 shares
which are indirectly beneficially owned as custodian pursuant to the
Uniform Gift to Minors Act.
(11) Of the total number of shares, 19,304 represents the number of shares that
may be acquired within 60 days upon the exercise of options granted under
the Corporation's 1985 Stock Option Plan and 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(12) Of the total number of shares, 172,040 represents the number of shares that
may be acquired within 60 days upon the exercise of options granted under
the Corporation's 1985 Stock Option Plan and 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
5
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
During fiscal year 2000, there were no material proceedings to which any
director, nominee, or executive officer of the Corporation is a party adverse to
the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to
the Corporation. No director, nominee or executive officer has been indebted in
excess of $60,000 to the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries during the last
fiscal year.
During fiscal year 2000, the Corporation entered into a retirement and
consulting arrangement with David Lasky which provided for his retirement as of
April 10, 2000, from his position as chairman and chief executive officer of the
Company and each of its affiliates for all purposes. The agreement further
provides that Mr. Lasky shall serve as a consultant to the Company commencing on
his retirement date and ending on April 9, 2003. In connection with his
retirement and pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Lasky was paid a lump sum payment
of $600,000 (less applicable withholding taxes) 30 days following his
retirement.
During the 12-month period commencing on the first anniversary of Mr.
Lasky's retirement, the Company will pay Mr. Lasky, over 12 equal monthly
installments, a consulting fee at the annual rate of $300,000. During the
12-month period commencing on the second anniversary of Mr. Lasky's retirement,
the consulting fee will be at the annual rate of $200,000. The agreement also
provides for the continuation of medical, dental and prescription drug coverage
under the Company's program for him and his spouse until October 9, 2004 and the
payment of all premiums thereafter for medigap coverage for the remainder of
their lives. Mr. Lasky will also be provided financial counseling services until
December 31, 2002.
Mr. Lasky remains a member of the Company's board of directors subject to
subsequent election by the shareholders. During the consulting period, Mr. Lasky
is not entitled to compensation for serving as a member of the board. The
Company's obligations under the consulting arrangement are not dependent upon
Mr. Lasky's continued service as a member of the board of directors.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Based solely on its review of copies of filings under Section 16(a) of the
Exchange Act, as amended, received by it, or written representations from
certain reporting persons, the Corporation believes that during fiscal-year
2000, all Section 16(a) filing requirements were met.
OPERATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES
During 2000 the board of directors held eight meetings. All of the directors
attended at least 91% of the aggregate of all meetings in 2000 of the board of
directors and committees on which they served.
The audit committee, presently consisting of Messrs. William W. Sihler,
James B. Busey IV and Ms. S. Marce Fuller, met five times during 2000. The
committee's functions include the following: serving as an independent and
objective party to monitor the Company's financial reporting process and
internal control system; reviewing and appraising the audit efforts of the
Company's independent auditors; providing an open avenue of communication among
the independent auditors, the Company's financial and senior management and the
board of directors; and making recommendations to the board as to the nomination
of independent accountants for appointment by the stockholders. The audit
committee acts under a written charter first adopted and approved by the board
of directors in April 2000. Each of the members of the audit committee is
'independent' as defined by the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. A
copy of the audit committee charter is attached to this Proxy Statement as
Appendix I.
The executive compensation committee, presently consisting of Messrs. John
R. Myers, William B. Mitchell, and J. McLain Stewart, met three times during
2000. This committee reviews compensation of elected officers prior to
submission to the board; establishes specific awards to be made to individuals
under the Corporation's modified incentive compensation plan and the
Corporation's 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and reviews the establishment
and/or amendment of executive compensation plans.
The committee on directors and governance (formerly known as the nominating
committee), presently consisting of Messrs. J. McLain Stewart, James B.
Busey IV, David Lasky, and John R. Myers,
6
met three times in 2000. Consistent with the change of the committee's name, the
committee's responsibilities as expanded include the following:
(i) recommending to the board of directors nominees for election as directors;
(ii) establishing procedures for identifying candidates for the board and
periodically reviewing potential candidates; (iii) recommending to the board
criteria for board membership; (iv) developing recommendations to enhance the
board's effectiveness; and (v) reviewing and making recommendations relating to
the board's compensation. Any stockholder may recommend nominees to the
committee for consideration by writing to the Secretary of the Corporation. Such
submission should include the full name and address of each proposed nominee, a
statement of his or her business experience and qualifications and a written
statement from the proposed nominee consenting to his or her nomination and
agreeing to serve if elected.
REPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE(1)
In fulfilling the oversight responsibilities, the audit committee reviewed
the audited financial statements in the annual report on Form 10-K with
management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability,
of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and
the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2000.
The audit committee reviewed with the independent auditors, who are
responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited
financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, their
judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company's
accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed
with the audit committee under generally accepted auditing standards. In
addition, the audit committee discussed with the independent auditors the
auditors' independence from management and the Company including the matters in
the written disclosures required by the Independence Standards board and
considered the compatibility of nonaudit services with the auditors'
independence. The audit committee also discussed with the auditors the matters
set forth in the Statement of Auditing Standards No. 61.
The audit committee discussed with the Company's internal and independent
auditors the overall scopes and plans for their respective audits. The audit
committee met with the internal and independent auditors, with and without
management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their
evaluations of the Company's internal controls, and the overall quality of the
Company's financial reporting.
Based upon these reviews and discussions, the audit committee recommended to
the board of directors that the audited financial statements be included in the
annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WILLIAM W. SIHLER, Chairman
JAMES B. BUSEY IV
S. MARCE FULLER
- ---------
(1) The material in this report is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed
with the SEC and is not incorporated by reference in any filing of the
Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, whether made
before or after the date of this proxy statement and irrespective of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
7
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The executive compensation committee (the 'committee') of the board of
directors is responsible for the administration of the executive compensation
program of the Corporation. The committee is composed of three independent
non-employee directors who are not eligible to participate in the Corporation's
compensation plans for employees.
In 2000 the compensation of the executive officers of the Corporation
consisted of salary, cash bonus awards under the Modified Incentive Compensation
Plan (the 'Bonus Plan') of the Corporation and non-qualified stock options and
performance units pursuant to the Corporation's 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
The amount of compensation for each of these elements is arrived at through
consideration of a number of objective and subjective factors.
SALARY
Officer salaries are subject to annual review by the committee and are
adjusted on the basis of competitive salary ranges for the officers' positions,
individual performance and the officers' contributions to the Corporation. Also
considered in 2000 were survey data related to compensation of officers in the
Corporation's peer group of companies, the recommendations of the Corporation's
compensation consultant as to appropriate target salary levels for the
Corporation's officers, and each officer's years of service and total
compensation received in 1999 and 1998. A number of objective financial measures
of performance, corporate or business unit, as appropriate, were also
considered. The board acts upon the recommendations of the committee as to
salary adjustments. In determining Mr. Benante's salary, the committee took into
account the compensation paid by other corporations of similar size and nature
and Mr. Benante's years of service and other non-salary compensation. The
committee also considered specific measures of corporate performance, including
return on assets, return on capital employed, return on equity, and operating
cash flow, both for the full years 1999 and 1998, and on a year-to-date basis,
for 2000. In 2000, Mr. Benante's annual salary rate was increased by the
committee to bring Mr. Benante's annual salary rate more in line with the
salaries paid by other corporations of similar size and nature to their chief
executive officers of similar years of service.
BONUS
Since 1998 the Corporation's bonus plan has been structured to align the
awards granted under the bonus plan with the performance of the Corporation and
its business units as well as to place a value on individual achievements.
Payments under the bonus plan are made both to officers and to a broad group of
other key employees. The amount of the annual bonus paid to each participant,
including Mr. Benante, under the bonus plan is based on the attainment of
performance objectives agreed to by senior management, and the committee early
in the fiscal year. The 2000 round of bonus awards was made early in the year,
and was based on performance during 1999. Early in the year, each participant in
the bonus plan is notified of a pre-set bonus range, including a threshold level
below under which no bonus will be paid, a target at which the full
'contemplated' bonus would be paid and a maximum award level above the target
level. The threshold level is pre-set at approximately 50% of the target and the
maximum is set at 200% of the target. Sixty percent (60%) of each bonus award is
based on a pre-established quantitative objective ('business unit's operating
earnings' as defined in the Long Term Incentive Plan) and forty percent (40%) on
pre-established individual qualitative objectives. A target level of operating
earnings was proposed by senior management and approved by the committee. In
addition to the quantitative factor, the committee also considered the success
of participants in attaining their pre-agreed qualitative performance objectives
for the year. The qualitative objectives are non-financial in nature, but are
measurable and weighted as appropriate to their relative importance to the
success of the Corporation.
8
LONG TERM INCENTIVE AWARDS
In 2000 the awards made under the Long Term Incentive Plan consisted of
performance units and stock options. Made to a broad group of key employees in
addition to corporate officers, they are intended to attract and retain highly
qualified key employees and to provide those employees with an additional
incentive to work over a longer period toward increasing the value of the
Corporation and improving the results of the business units with which they are
associated.
In making the 2000 long term incentive target awards the committee
considered the effect that the efforts of the recipients could have on the
growth of the Corporation and their value to the business. In awarding
performance units to its key employees and executive officers, the committee
considered specific objectives relating to the gross average annual sales of the
individual business unit or the Corporation as a whole, as appropriate, over the
three year period ending December 31, 2003 and to the average annual return on
capital, as defined, during the same period for the respective organizations.
The committee also considered the amount of 1999 and 2000 base pay, the annual
bonus received by the awardees in each of those years and the 1999 stock options
and performance unit awards that each had received.
In awarding stock options to its key employees and executive officers, the
committee considered the effect such persons' efforts could have on the growth
of the corporation. Options were granted with an exercise price of 100% of the
market price on the date of grant. The options are exercisable to the extent of
one third of the total number of shares covered beginning on the first
anniversary of the grant, two thirds from the second anniversary and in full
after the third anniversary.
While to some degree grants were based on subjective factors relating to the
performance of individuals, in 2000 the committee continued the practice of
having Long Term Incentive Plan awards bear a relationship to base salary, based
on the target percentages previously suggested by the Corporation's compensation
consultant. Recommendations previously supplied by the Corporation's
compensation consultant also confirmed that awards of the size granted under the
1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan were fair and reasonable and consistent with
corresponding awards made by other corporations.
In making a target award of long-term incentive compensation to Mr. Benante,
the committee considered factors beyond those applicable to other officers. The
committee made this award to Mr. Benante to provide a further incentive for him
to continue his efforts to advance the interests of the Corporation. Mr.
Benante's dedication to the strategic planning process and the progress that
continues to be made in identifying and exploring growth opportunities were
considered, as was the impact Mr. Benante's efforts could have on future growth.
The committee also considered the compensation awarded other chief executive
officers, as reported by a compensation consultant advising the Corporation with
respect to its overall executive compensation program. A number of objective
financial measures of corporate performance were also considered.
JOHN R. MYERS, Chairman
WILLIAM B. MITCHELL
J. MCLAIN STEWART
9
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table contains information concerning the six most highly
compensated executive officers of the Corporation as of December 31, 2000.
LONG TERM COMPENSATION
-------------------------------
AWARDS PAY-OUTS
------------------ ----------
ANNUAL COMPENSATION (g)
(a) ------------------------------- SECURITIES (h) (i)
NAME AND PRINCIPAL (b) (c) (d) UNDERLYING LTIP ALL OTHER
POSITION YEAR SALARY(1) BONUS OPTIONS PAYOUTS(1) COMPENSATION(3)
-------- ---- --------- ----- ------- ---------- ---------------
(NUMBER OF SHARES)
------------------
Martin R. Benante, Chairman and 2000 $359,616 $170,000 11,646 $ 41,107 $ 3,897
Chief Executive Officer 1999 $232,577 $ 81,840 14,987 -- $ 3,505
of Curtiss-Wright Corp. 1998 $181,000 $ 66,000 4,150 -- $ 2,537
David Lasky, Chairman and Chief 2000 $724,685(5) $437,600 -- $161,700 $56,637(6)
Executive Officer 1999 $442,308 $275,000 7,759 -- $ 4,634
of Curtiss-Wright Corp.(4) 1998 $441,300 $275,000 15,941 -- $ 4,634
Gerald Nachman, Executive V.P. 2000 $337,308 $170,000 6,599 $ 70,110 $ 2,794
of Curtiss-Wright Corp.; 1999 $330,000 $243,950 8,603 -- $ 2,794
President, Metal Improvement 1998 $337,200 $170,000 7,844 -- $ 2,942
Company, Inc.
George J. Yohrling, V.P. of 2000 $249,058 $135,034 4,930 -- $ 1,325
Curtiss-Wright Corp.; 1999 $232,300 $ 59,299 5,735 -- $ 1,321
President, Curtiss-Wright 1998 $223,400 $ 68,000 5,061 -- $ 1,251
Flight Systems, Inc.
Robert A. Bosi, V.P.-Finance 2000 $183,308 $ 91,200 2,911 $ 46,305 $ 3,765
of Curtiss-Wright Corporation 1999 $172,892 $ 73,500 3,780 -- $ 3,541
1998 $170,000 $ 70,000 3,543 -- $ 3,424
Brian D. O'Neill, 2000 $156,635 $ 83,160 2,329 $ 16,923 $ 3,136
General Counsel and Secretary 1999 $146,215 $ 15,840 2,503 -- $ 2,699
of Curtiss-Wright Corporation 1998 $132,612 $ 16,000 1,619 -- $ 2,443
- ---------
(1) Includes salaries and amounts deferred under the Corporation's Savings and
Investment Plan and Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.
(2) Payments made to eligible employees based upon the maturity of performance
unit grants made in 1996 under the Company's 1995 Long Term Incentive Plan.
Year 2000 was the first year such payments were made under the 1995 LTI
Plan.
(3) Includes premium payments for executive life insurance paid by the
Corporation during the covered fiscal year for term life insurance.
(4) Mr. Lasky was the Company's Chairman and CEO until he retired on April 11,
2000.
(5) Mr. Lasky received a lump sum cash payment of $600,000 in lieu of an award
in November 1999 under the Company's long-term incentive plan.
(6) Includes a payment in the amount of $51,923 for accrued vacation time.
10
PERFORMANCE UNITS
Pursuant to the Corporation's 1995 Long Term Incentive Plan, the Executive
Compensation Committee of the board of directors awarded performance units in
November 2000 to its executive officers, senior managers and other key
employees.
Performance units are denominated in dollars and payable in cash three years
after their award date, contingent upon attaining an average annual return on
capital and an average annual growth rate based upon objectives established by
the Executive Compensation Committee of the board of directors. Awards to
employees of the Corporation's business units are based on the extent to which
these objectives are achieved by the business unit, or units, with which the
employees are affiliated. Awards to employees of the corporate office are based
on the extent to which the Corporation as a whole achieves these objectives.
The values shown below reflect the potential value at a target value of one
dollar per unit payable at the end of the three-year performance period if the
Corporation's average return on capital and average annual growth rate
objectives are attained. The chart also reflects the fact that each unit may
prove to be worth approximately two dollars if both performance targets are
substantially exceeded, or nothing at all, depending upon the extent to which
the performance targets are not met.
AWARD OF PERFORMANCE UNITS
NUMBER OF MINIMUM MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE
NAME UNITS VALUE TARGET VALUE VALUE(1) PERIOD
---- ----- ----- ------------ -------- ------
M. Benante......................... 2000 - 150,000 $0 $150,000 $304,500 2001-2003
1999 - 140,250 $0 $140,250 $284,708 2000-2002
1998 - 41,000 $0 $ 41,000 $ 83,230 1999-2001
D. Lasky(2)........................ 2000 - -0- $0 $ -0- $ -0- 2001-2003
1999 - 67,500 $0 $ 67,500 $137,025 2000-2002
1998 - 157,500 $0 $157,500 $319,725 1999-2001
G. Nachman......................... 2000 - 85,000 $0 $ 85,000 $172,550 2001-2003
1999 - 82,500 $0 $ 82,500 $167,475 2000-2002
1998 - 77,500 $0 $ 77,500 $157,325 1999-2001
G. Yohrling........................ 2000 - 63,500 $0 $ 63,500 $128,905 2001-2003
1999 - 55,000 $0 $ 55,000 $111,650 2000-2002
1998 - 50,000 $0 $ 50,000 $101,500 1999-2001
R. Bosi............................ 2000 - 37,500 $0 $ 37,500 $ 76,125 2001-2003
1999 - 36,250 $0 $ 36,250 $ 73,588 2000-2002
1998 - 35,000 $0 $ 35,000 $ 71,050 1999-2001
B. O'Neill......................... 2000 - 30,000 $0 $ 30,000 $ 60,900 2001-2003
1999 - 24,000 $0 $ 24,000 $ 48,720 2000-2002
1998 - 16,000 $0 $ 16,000 $ 32,480 1999-2001
- ---------
(1) The performance units are denominated in dollars and are contingent upon
satisfaction of performance objectives keyed to profitable growth over a
period of three fiscal years commencing with the fiscal year following such
awards. Based upon the satisfaction of the performance objectives, the value
of the units is determined by comparing the number of units to the number of
objectives satisfied and assigning a percentage from a pre-established
matrix. The maximum percentage available is 203%. If retirement occurs at
age sixty-five or thereafter, the performance units are still payable to the
employee over the three years following the date of retirement, prorated for
the period of employment prior to retirement.
(2) Mr. Lasky was paid a lump sum amount in lieu of the grant of performance
units as part of 2000 compensation.
11
OPTIONS GRANTED IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
PURSUANT TO THE CORPORATION'S 1995 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
% OF
SHARES TOTAL OPTIONS
COVERED BY GRANTED TO EXERCISE
OPTIONS EMPLOYEES IN PRICE GRANT DATE
NAME GRANTED(1) 2000 PER SHARE EXPIRATION DATE PRESENT VALUE(2)
---- ---------- ---- --------- --------------- ----------------
Martin R. Benante............. 11,646 9.3% $47.72 Nov. 20, 2010 $197,400
David Lasky................... -0- -0- -- -- $ 0
Gerald Nachman................ 6,599 5.3% $47.72 Nov. 20, 2010 $111,853
George J. Yohrling............ 4,930 4.0% $47.72 Nov. 20, 2010 $ 83,564
Robert A. Bosi................ 2,911 2.3% $47.72 Nov. 20, 2010 $ 49,341
Brian D. O'Neill.............. 2,329 1.9% $47.72 Nov. 20, 2010 $ 39,477
- ---------
(1) Options were granted with an exercise price of 100% of the market price on
the date of grant. The options are exercisable to the extent of one third of
the total number of shares covered beginning on the first anniversary of the
grant, two thirds from the second anniversary and in full after the third
anniversary. The options are not transferable other than upon the death of
the optionee, in which case they are transferable pursuant to a designation
of the optionee, or by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. If
the optionee terminates his or her employment the option expires upon such
event; however, if employment is terminated by early retirement under a
retirement plan of the Corporation, the option may be exercised within three
months following the date of retirement. If retirement occurs at age
sixty-five or thereafter, the option may be exercised within three years of
the date of retirement but no later than ten years following the option
grant date.
(2) These values were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The Black-Scholes model is a complicated mathematical formula, which is
widely used and accepted for valuing traded stock options. The model is
premised on immediate exercisability and transferability of the options.
This is not true for the Corporation's options granted to executive officers
and other employees. Therefore, the values shown are theoretical and are not
intended to reflect the actual values the recipients may eventually realize.
Any ultimate value will depend on the market value of the Corporation's
stock at a future date. In addition to the stock price at time of grant and
the exercise price, which are identical, the following assumptions were used
to calculate the values shown: expected dividend yield (1.09 percent, the
current yield of the Corporation's common shares on the grant date),
expected stock price volatility (23.96 percent, the most recent volatility
for the month-end stock prices of the Corporation's common shares for the
preceding 3 years), risk-free rate of return (5.87 percent equal to the
yield on a 7-year U.S. Treasury bond on the option grant date), and expected
exercise of options within seven years from the date of the grant.
12
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
(d)
NUMBER OF (e)
SECURITIES VALUE OF
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED
UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY
OPTIONS AT FISCAL OPTIONS AT FISCAL
(b) YEAR-END YEAR-END(1)
SHARES (c) -------- -----------
(a) ACQUIRED VALUE EXERCISABLE/ EXERCISABLE/
NAME ON EXERCISE REALIZED($) UNEXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
---- ----------- ----------- ------------- -------------
Martin R. Benante................ 0 $0 19,985/23,020 $ 336,678/$99,440
David Lasky...................... 0 $0 71,914/10,486 $1,411,648/$93,222
Gerald Nachman................... 0 $0 38,371/14,949 $ 755,491/$72,792
George J. Yohrling............... 0 $0 19,304/10,440 $ 355,951/$48,027
Robert A. Bosi................... 0 $0 20,962/6,612 $ 435,230/$32,268
Brian D. O'Neill................. 0 $0 6,948/4,537 $ 123,297/$19,221
- ---------
(1) Calculated by determining the difference between the fair market value of
the common stock underlying the options on December 29, 2000 ($46.50, the
closing price on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Transactions) and the
exercise price of the options on that date.
TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT
Pursuant to a policy designed to retain key employees established by the
Corporation's board of directors in 1977, the Corporation has at will agreements
with Messrs. Benante, Nachman, Yohrling, Bosi and O'Neill, as well as a number
of other key employees, which provide for the payment by the Corporation of
severance pay, in the case of involuntary termination of employment other than
for cause, in an amount equal to one year's base salary at the time of
termination, as well as the continued availability of certain employee benefits,
for a period of one year following termination. The agreements provide that such
severance pay and benefits also would be made available in the case of voluntary
retirement or termination of employment, which is the direct result of a change
in the terms or conditions of employment, including a reduction in compensation
or in job responsibilities. At the option of the employee, said amount of
severance pay may be paid over the two-year period following such termination,
in which case such employee benefits would continue in effect for the same
period. Under the agreements, the payment of severance pay, and the availability
of benefits, is contingent upon a number of conditions, including the employee's
performance of his agreements with respect to providing consulting services and
not entering into competition with the Corporation.
Consistent with the Corporation's policy designed to retain key employees,
the Corporation also has severance protection agreements with Messrs. Benante,
Nachman, Yohrling, Bosi, and O'Neill which provide for payment of severance pay
equal to two times the sum of the executive's base salary and average annual
bonus over a three-year period and the continued availability of certain
employee benefits for a period of two years following termination of employment,
in each case if employment is terminated within twenty-four months following a
change in control of the Corporation. The agreements further provide for the
vesting of all benefits accrued through the termination of employment in the
Corporation's Retirement and Retirement Benefits Restoration Plans; provided
however, that if vesting under any such Plan is not permitted by applicable law,
an actuarially determined lump sum shall be paid in an amount equaling the
non-vested benefit under the applicable Plan. The agreements further provide
that upon a change in control any previously awarded performance units under the
Corporation's 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan shall be paid on a pro-rata basis
for the period of employment and that previously awarded stock options shall
become fully vested and exercisable. The severance pay and benefits under the
severance protection agreements are in lieu of any that would have been provided
under the immediately preceding paragraph of this Proxy Statement.
13
RETIREMENT PLAN
The Corporation's Retirement Plan is a tax qualified, defined benefit,
trusteed plan. The Plan is non-contributory and covers most employees, including
the Corporation's executive officers. On September 1, 1994, the Corporation
amended this Plan. Benefits accrued as of August 31, 1994 were transferred into
the amended Plan. As of September 1, 1994 the following monthly pension benefits
had been accrued: Martin R. Benante, $137; Gerald Nachman, $11,885; George J.
Yohrling, $2,559; Robert A. Bosi, $972, and Brian D. O'Neill, $915. These
benefits are indexed to reflect increases in compensation, as defined, from that
date forward. The Plan as amended provides for an annual benefit at age 65 of
1.5% times the five year final average compensation in excess of social security
covered compensation plus 1% of the five year final average compensation up to
social security covered compensation, in each case multiplied by the
participant's years of service after September 1, 1994, not to exceed 35. In
addition, a participant earns a pay-based cash balance credit equal to 3% of his
or her compensation.
The chart below illustrates the estimated aggregate amount of annual
benefits on a straight life annuity basis attributable to service on or after
September 1, 1994 that would be payable on retirement at age 65 to an employee
in the compensation classification specified, under various assumptions as to
compensation and years of service. The current compensation covered by the
Retirement Plan is substantially equivalent to the cash compensation reported
under the headings entitled 'Salary' and 'Bonus' on page 16 of this Proxy
Statement for the executive officers listed there.
YEARS OF SERVICE
----------------------------------------------------
COMPENSATION 15 20 25 30 35
- ------------ -- -- -- -- --
$125,000 .................................. $ 25,332 $ 33,776 $ 42,221 $ 50,665 $ 59,109
150,000 .................................. 30,957 41,276 51,596 61,915 72,234
175,000 .................................. 36,582 48,776 60,971 73,165 85,359
200,000 .................................. 42,207 56,276 70,346 84,415 98,484
225,000 .................................. 47,832 63,776 79,721 95,665 111,609
250,000 .................................. 53,457 71,276 89,096 106,915 124,734
300,000 .................................. 64,707 86,276 107,846 129,415 150,984
400,000 .................................. 87,207 116,276 145,346 174,415 203,484
450,000 .................................. 98,457 131,276 164,096 196,915 229,734
500,000 .................................. 109,707 146,276 182,846 219,415 255,984
550,000 .................................. 120,957 161,276 201,596 241,915 282,234
Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ('ERISA'), many
employees elect a survivor option payable to the employee's spouse and, as a
consequence, the amount actually received on retirement by such employee would
be less than indicated above. The Internal Revenue Code provides that effective
January 1, 2001 the maximum allowable annual benefit under the Retirement Plan
is $140,000 (adjusted for each year of employment beyond age 65) and the maximum
allowable annual compensation that may be included in the calculation of a
benefit under the Retirement Plan is $170,000. These limits are substantially
lower than the maximum amounts shown above. Accordingly, the Corporation
maintains a Retirement Benefits Restoration Plan (the 'Restoration Plan')
whereby all participants in the Retirement Plan whose benefits or compensation
under the Retirement Plan would exceed the limitations imposed by the Internal
Revenue Code will receive a supplemental retirement benefit equal to the excess
of the benefit which would have been payable to them under the Retirement Plan
but for said limitations, over the amount payable under the generally applicable
formulas of the Retirement Plan, given said limitations. Such supplemental
benefit is not funded. The amounts set forth above include amounts payable
pursuant to the Restoration Plan. Benefit amounts are not subject to reduction
for any Social Security benefits to which Plan participants may be entitled.
Credited years of service under the Retirement Plan at December 31, 2000 are as
follows: Gerald Nachman, 26 years; George J. Yohrling, 24 years; Martin R.
Benante, 22 years; Robert A. Bosi, 11 years; and Brian D. O'Neill, 20 years. For
each of these persons as of said date, credited service for purposes of the pay-
14
based cash balance credit referred to above includes six years and four months
under the preceding chart.
In the event of a change in control, the Corporation has agreed to fund a
'Rabbi' trust agreement between the Corporation and PNC Bank, N.A. dated
January 30, 1998, which provides for the payment of the Corporation's obligation
under the Restoration Plan referred to in the preceding paragraph.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
Currently all directors, excluding Mr. Lasky, who are not also employees of
the Corporation receive an annual director's fee of $20,000. The meeting fees
for non-employee directors were $1,200 for every board and committee meeting
attended. Additionally, an annual retainer for the chairman of committees is
paid at the rate of $3,000 per annum. The board of directors also operates under
a fee structure, not to exceed $2,000 per day, for non-employee directors who
provide services to the Corporation beyond the normal duties of the director.
Any such services must be authorized in advance by the board of directors and
requested by the chairman of the board. Pursuant to the 1996 Stock Plan for
Non-Employee Directors (the 'Stock Plan for Directors') non-employee directors
may elect to receive their annual director fees and meeting fees in the form of
common stock of the Corporation or in cash or both. Elections have been made to
receive shares in lieu of cash fees and to defer receipt of said shares. In
2000, four non-employee directors received a portion of their 1997 and 1998
deferred compensation under the Stock Plan for Directors totaling an aggregate
of 1,546 shares of the Corporation's common stock. The aggregate balance of said
deferred shares remaining in the Stock Plan for Directors was 11,210 as of
December 31, 2000. The shares issued to the four non-employee directors are
included in the table on page 5. The aggregate balance of shares remaining in
the Stock Plan for Directors has not been included in the table on page 5, since
these shares have not yet been issued. In addition, in accordance with the terms
of the Stock Plan for Directors each non-employee director appointed to the
board in 1996 received 516 shares of common stock in 1996. S. Marce Fuller
received 389 restricted shares in April 2000 after her election to the board of
directors at last year's annual meeting of stockholders. All of these shares are
restricted for a period of five years from the date of grant and during that
period may not be sold or transferred and are subject to forfeiture if the
director resigns or declines to continue serving as such during that period.
These shares are included in the table on page 5. For each director who is not
an employee, the Corporation also provides group term life insurance coverage of
$50,000.
15
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
Set forth below is a graph comparing the cumulative total stockholder
returns (assuming the reinvestment of dividends) on common stock of the
Corporation with such returns of companies listed on the Russell 2000 Index and
the S & P Aerospace/Defense Index. The graph assumes $100 invested on
December 31, 1995 in stock of the Corporation and the companies on each of these
indices.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEARS CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
AMONG CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP., THE RUSSELL 2000 INDEX
AND THE S&P AEROSPACE/DEFENSE INDEX
[PERFORMANCE GRAPH]
12/95 12/96 12/97 12/98 12/99 12/00
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Curtiss-Wright................ $100.00 $ 95.54 $139.90 $148.92 $146.10 $186.54
Russell 2000.................. 100.00 116.49 142.55 138.92 168.45 147.25
S&P Aerospace Defense......... 100.00 133.76 137.61 105.49 102.77 162.02
* $100 invested on 12/31/95 in Stock or Index -- including Reinvestment of
Dividends. Fiscal Year ending December 31.
16
SECURITY OWNERSHIP AND TRANSACTIONS WITH CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The following information is given with respect to the persons who, to the
knowledge of the Corporation, own beneficially more than 5% of any class of the
voting securities of the Corporation outstanding as of February 14, 2001.
AMOUNT AND NATURE
NAME & ADDRESS OF OF BENEFICIAL PERCENT
TITLE OF CLASS BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNERSHIP OF CLASS
-------------- ---------------- --------- --------
Common Stock................... Unitrin, Inc.(1) 4,382,400 shares 44%
One East Wacker Drive Direct
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Common Stock................... Argonaut Group, Inc.(2) 822,200 shares 8.2%
1800 Avenue of the Stars Indirect
Los Angeles, Cal. 90067
Common Stock................... GAMCO Investors, Inc., 773,400 shares 7.7%
And Direct
Gabelli Funds, Inc., 370,300 shares 3.7%
And Direct
Gabelli & Company, Inc.(3) 100 shares Less than 1%
Corporate Center at Rye Direct
Rye, NY 10580
Common Stock................... Royce & Associates, Inc. 979,800 shares 9.8%
And Direct
Royce Management Co.(4) 3,000 shares Less than 1%
1414 Ave. of the Americas Direct
New York, NY 10019
- ---------
(1) This information is as of January 11, 2001 and is based upon a report on
Schedule 13D filed by Unitrin, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
(2) This information is as of October 9, 1986 and is based upon a report on
Schedule 13D filed by Argonaut Group, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
(3) This information is as of February 7, 2001 and is based upon a report on
Schedule 13D filed by Gabelli Asset Management Inc with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
(4) This information is as of February 5, 2001 and is based upon a report on
Schedule 13D filed by Royce & Associates, Inc. with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
PROPOSAL 2
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
The board of directors has nominated the firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
for appointment by the stockholders as independent accountants for the purpose
of auditing and reporting upon the financial statements of the Corporation for
its fiscal year ending December 31, 2001, subject to the approval of its
appointment by stockholders at the annual meeting. The firm of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was engaged in 1992 and has served in this capacity
for the Corporation through the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000. The
selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as independent accountants of
the Corporation was based upon a recommendation by the audit committee of the
board of directors and was approved by the full board. Representatives of
17
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be present at the annual meeting of
stockholders to make such statements and answer such questions as are
appropriate.
If the stockholders fail to so appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the board
of directors, pursuant to the by-laws of the Corporation, will appoint other
independent accountants to perform such duties for the current fiscal year. It
is not contemplated that such appointment of other independent accountants would
be submitted to the stockholders for ratification. The appointment of
independent accountants to serve with respect to the year 2002 would be acted
upon by the stockholders at their annual meeting early in that year.
BOARD RECOMMENDATION
The board of directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the
appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditors for the
calendar year ending December 31, 2001.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to Curtiss-Wright
Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 by the Company's
principal accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP:
Audit Fees and Expenses..................................... $375,000
Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation
Fees...................................................... $ 0
All Other Fees.............................................. $234,468(a)(b)
--------
$609,468
--------
--------
- ---------
(a) Includes fees for tax consulting, permitted internal audit outsourcing and
other non-audit services.
(b) The audit committee has considered whether the provision of these services
is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant's independence.
OTHER MATTERS WHICH MAY BE PRESENTED FOR ACTION AT THE MEETING
The board of directors does not intend to present for action at this annual
meeting any matter other than those specifically set forth in the Notice of
Annual Meeting. If any other matter is properly presented for action at the
Meeting, it is the intention of persons named in the proxy to vote thereon in
accordance with their judgment pursuant to the discretionary authority conferred
by the proxy.
By Order of the Board of Directors
BRIAN D. O'NEILL
Secretary
Dated: March 5, 2001
18
APPENDIX I
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
MEMBERSHIP
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors shall consist of at least
three independent Directors who shall be appointed by a majority of the whole
Board of Directors.
All of the members of the Audit Committee shall be financially literate and
at least one member shall have accounting or related financial management
expertise. Any question concerning the independence, financial literacy or
expertise of a Director shall be determined by the Board of Directors in its
business judgment, consistent with any requirements of the New York Stock
Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
One less than a majority of the members of the Audit Committee, but not less
than two members, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of the business
of the Committee and the act of a majority of those Directors present at a
meeting at which a quorum is present shall be the act of the Committee.
ACCOUNTABILITY OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The independent auditors of the Corporation are ultimately accountable to
the Board of Directors and the Committee. The Board shall have the ultimate
authority to evaluate and, where appropriate, to replace the independent
auditors. The Committee shall recommend the firm to be nominated by the Board of
Directors as the Corporation's independent auditors for election by the
stockholders of the Corporation and shall, where appropriate, recommend to the
Board the replacement of the independent auditors.
Annually, the Committee shall: (i) review a formal written statement from
the independent auditors delineating all relationships between the auditors and
the Corporation, (ii) discuss with the auditors any such disclosed relationships
and their impact on the auditors' independence and (iii) to the extent
appropriate, recommend that the Board of Directors take action in response to
the auditors' report to satisfy itself of the auditors' independence.
OTHER ACTIVITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
1. Consult with the independent auditors and the internal auditors with
regard to the audit plan for the current year, including:
(a) discussion in general terms of the proposed scope of the
examination;
(b) a review of the prior year's independent audit fee and an estimate
of the current year's fee; and
(c) an inquiry into (i) the adequacy and rotation of the independent
auditors' staff assigned to the audit and (ii) the adequacy and
capabilities of the internal audit staff of the Corporation.
2. Review, before publication, in consultation with management and the
independent auditors, the auditors' proposed report of audit and the
annual audited financial statements of the Corporation, including a
discussion with the independent auditors regarding the matters required
to be discussed by Statement of Auditing Standards No. 61.
3. Discuss with the independent auditors and management, prior to the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Corporation's
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report, the Corporation's interim financial
statements, including the matters required to be discussed by Statement
of Auditing Standards No. 61.
4. Submit any report of the Audit Committee required by the Securities and
Exchange Commission to be included in the annual proxy statement of the
Corporation.
A-1
5. Consider and review with the independent auditors and management any
management letter or other report prepared by the independent auditors
relating to the prior year's audit, as well as any responses by
management thereto.
6. Periodically, review the activities of the internal auditors.
7. Review with the independent auditors and management the effect of any
significant new or proposed pronouncements of the accounting profession
or regulatory bodies on the Corporation's accounting policies and
financial statements.
8. Consult with the independent auditors, the internal auditors and
management with regard to their views concerning the adequacy of the
internal accounting controls of the Corporation, any major weaknesses
discovered and the related corrective actions taken or in progress.
9. Report to the Board concerning the significant matters reviewed by the
Audit Committee at its meetings.
10. Perform such further functions as shall from time to time be assigned to
the Committee by the Board of Directors.
NOTE: The Corporation's management is responsible for preparing the
Corporation's financial statements. The Corporation's independent auditors are
responsible for auditing the financial statements. The activities of the
Committee are in no way designed to supersede or alter those traditional
responsibilities.
A-2
Appendix II
PROXY
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION
1200 Wall Street West, Lyndhurst, New Jersey 07071
This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors
The undersigned hereby appoints MARTIN R. BENATE, ROBERT A. BOSI and BRIAN
D. O'NEILL, and each of them as proxies with power of substitution to vote all
shares of the Corporation which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 4, 2001, at the Renaissance Meadowlands
Hotel, 801 Rutherford Avenue, Rutherford, New Jersey on Friday, May 4, 2001, at
2:00 p.m., local time, or any adjournment or postponement thereof, with all the
powers the undersigned would have if personally present, as specified,
respecting the following matters described in the accompanying Proxy Statement
and, in their discretion, on other matters which come before the meeting.
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STOCKHOLDER SPECIFICATIONS. THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" EACH OF
PROPOSAL ONE AND PROPOSAL TWO. UNLESS DIRECTED BY THIS PROXY TO VOTE OTHERWISE,
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ITEMS 1 AND 2. A majority (or if only one, then
that one) of the proxies or substitutes acting at the meeting may exercise the
powers conferred herein. Receipt of the accompanying Notice of Meeting and Proxy
Statement is hereby acknowledged.
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND MAIL IN ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
NO POSTAGE REQUIRED IN UNITED STATES.
(CONTINUED, AND TO BE SIGNED, ON REVERSE SIDE)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLD AND DETACH HERE
A VOTE FOR ITEMS 1 AND 2 IS RECOMMENDED.
Please mark
your votes as [X]
indicated in
this example
FOR all nominees (1) ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
listed to the right
(except as marked Nominees: M.R. Benante, J.B. Busey IV, S.M. Fuller
to the contrary), D. Lasky, W.B. Mitchell J.R. Myers, W.W. Sihler,
J.M. Stewart
[ ]
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
to vote for all nominees
listed to the right
[ ]
(INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, write
that nominee's name in the space provided below.)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP as
independent public accountants of the Corporation.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
SIGNATURE________________________ SIGNATURE_____________________DATE ______
(Please sign name as fully and exactly as it appears opposite. When signing in a
fiduciary or representative capacity, please give full title as such. Where more
than one owner, each owner should sign. Proxies executed by a corporation should
be signed in full corporate name by duly authorized officer.)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLD AND DETACH HERE