Exhibit 99.10

Fairness Opinion of FMV Opinions, Inc Issued September 12, 2002

Our board of directors retained FMV to advise them in connection with
the merger. FMV is a nationally recognized firm engaged in the valuation of
businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions and
other purposes. After interviewing three valuation firms, the board selected FMV
to give its opinion in connection with the merger based on FMV's qualifications,
expertise, reputation, cost and the upon the recommendations of the our
financial and legal advisors. FMV had not previously rendered any other services
to us.

On September 12, 2002, at a meeting of our board of directors at which
the board considered the merger and approved the Agreement and the merger, FMV
orally delivered its opinion to our board (which was subsequently confirmed in
writing) that, as of that date, and based upon and subject to certain stated
assumptions, qualifications and limitations, the consideration to be paid by us
in the merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to us.

The full text of FMV's written opinion dated September 12,
2002, is attached as Annex B to this document and is incorporated
herein by reference. You are urged to read the fairness opinion
carefully in its entirety to understand the procedures followed,
assumptions made, matters considered and limitations on the review
undertaken by FMV in providing its opinion. The opinion is directed to
our board and addresses only the fairness of the merger consideration
to be paid by Entrada from a financial point of view. It does not
address any other aspect of the merger or the merits of the underlying
decision by our board or management to engage in the merger. The
opinion of FMV does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder
as to how any stockholder should vote on any matters addressed in this
document, or any other matter.

The following summary of the opinion of FMV is qualified in its
entirety by reference to, and should be read together with, the full
text of the fairness opinion. The opinion of FMV is based on the
economic, monetary, market and other conditions as they were in effect
on, and the information made available to FMV as of, the date of the
opinion.

In preparing its opinion, FMV, among other things:

11. reviewed our 8-K filing of January 15, 2002 announcing its
issuance of 10% Senior Convertible Debentures to HOV;

12. reviewed our 8-K filing of August 16, 2002, which includes the
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated August 15, 2002, by and
among Entrada, DBW, and HOV, including Exhibit A, Certificate
of Designation of Series B Preferred Stock of Entrada
Networks, Inc., and Exhibit B, Investor Rights Agreement;

13. reviewed our 10-K filing for the fiscal year ended January 31,
2002 and respective 10-Q filings for the fiscal quarters ended
April 30, 2002 and July 31, 2002;

14. reviewed Savant's audited financial statements for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 1999 through 2001, and internally
prepared, unaudited financial statements for the interim
periods ended June 30, 2001 and 2002;

15. reviewed certain financial and operating information with the
managements of Entrada, Savant, and HOV, including the
operations, business strategy, recent financial performance
and expectations regarding the future operating and financial
performance of Savant and Entrada, as well as the terms and
rationale of the merger and strategic alternatives;

16. reviewed the recent trading activity of our common stock;

17. compared certain aspects of the financial performance of
Entrada and Savant with publicly traded and recently acquired
companies engaged in similar lines of business;

18. considered public equity market rates of return;

19. visited the facilities of Entrada (in Irvine, California),
Savant (in Edison, New Jersey), DBW, and HOV (both in Santa
Monica, California); and

The Board of Directors
Entrada Networks, Inc.
September 12, 2002
Page 2

20. conducted such other investigations and analyses as FMV deemed
necessary to render its opinion.

FMV's investigations consisted of gathering and reviewing information
directly available from the managements of HOV, Entrada, and Savant, and from
public sources. In preparing its opinion, FMV assumed and relied on the accuracy
and completeness of all information supplied or otherwise made available to it,
and did not assume any responsibility for independently verifying such
information. FMV assumed that statements by the managements of Savant and
Entrada of their expectations for future financial performance reflected the
best currently available estimates and judgment of the managements of the
respective companies. FMV's opinion was necessarily based upon market,
economic, and other conditions as they existed on the date of its opinion.

For the purpose of rendering its opinion, FMV assumed, in all respects
material to its analyses, that the merger will be consummated as described in
the Agreement, that all the representations and warranties of each party
contained in the Agreement are true and correct, that each party to the
Agreement will perform all of the obligations and agreements required to be
performed by it there under without any consents or waivers of the other parties
thereto, and that all conditions to the consummation of the merger will be
satisfied without waiver thereof.

FMV noted in its opinion that it is not a legal, tax or accounting
expert and that it relied upon, without assuming any responsibility for
independent verification or liability therefore, the assessment of our legal,
tax and accounting advisors with respect to the legal, tax and accounting
matters related to the merger. FMV assumed that all governmental, regulatory or
other consents and approvals (contractual or otherwise) necessary for or in
connection with the consummation of the merger will be obtained without any
adverse effect on Entrada, DBW, or Savant, in any respect material to its
analyses.

Our board of directors did not place any limitation on the
investigations or analyses conducted by FMV. The following is a summary
explanation of the various sources of information and valuation methodologies
employed by FMV in conjunction with rendering its opinion.

In rendering its opinion, FMV considered, among other things, (1) the
valuation of Entrada; (2) the valuation of the consideration to be paid by us;
(3) the valuation of Savant, and (4) the relative contribution of Entrada and
Savant to the post-merger company.

Entrada Valuation Analysis.

As part of its analysis, FMV considered the trading history of our
common stock and the valuation multiples at which our common stock has traded in
comparison with the valuation multiples of other publicly traded companies and
acquired companies engaged in similar lines of business, or in lines of business
which FMV believed to be exposed to similar overall economic and business
trends. However, FMV found no meaningful comparison between us and these
companies because of differences in size and the nature of their businesses.
Accordingly, FMV used a modified discounted cash flow analysis to analyze our
market value. In performing this analysis, FMV looked at current earnings (most
recent six months ended June 30, 2002, annualized) and did not adjust the tax
rate on the understanding that we will continue to be able to shelter all of the
income on its current business with its net loss carry forwards. Based on these
assumptions and discount rates of 16 to 24 percent, FMV estimated that our
market capitalization was equivalent to the present value of approximately 3 to
4 years of our current net income.

Merger Consideration Valuation Analysis.

As part of its analysis, FMV considered the value of the consideration
to be paid in connection with the merger, taking into account, among other
things, the contingent nature of some of the payments, the expected life of the
convertible preferred portion of the payment, the time value of money, the
restricted nature of the securities, and the appropriate associated discounts
for lack of marketability which reduce the fair market value of the restricted
securities, and the impact of control and marketability on the valuation of the
consideration.

In determining the value of the consideration, FMV used a discount rate
of 7.2 percent, based on higher quality corporate bond rates, for the
non-contingent, fixed value, short-term payments to be made as part of the
merger consideration and used a range of discount rates from 16 to 24 percent
for the contingent, long-term payments. Based on this analysis, FMV determined
the

The Board of Directors
Entrada Networks, Inc.
September 12, 2002
Page 3

range of value for the merger consideration to be $5.7 million to $7.6 million.
The lower end of this range reflected the assumption that none of the contingent
payments will be paid, and the higher end reflected the assumption that all of
the contingent payments will be paid.

Savant Valuation Analysis.

In developing indications of the value of Savant, FMV employed analyses
based on: (1) guideline public companies, (2) guideline acquired companies, and
(3) discounted cash flow.

Savant Guideline Publicly Traded Companies Analysis.

As part of its analyses, FMV compared certain financial information of
the Savant with that of a group of 17 publicly traded corporations involved in
information technology (IT) staffing augmentation, in a broader range of IT
services, or in the general staffing business. FMV also reviewed and analyzed
certain public market trading multiples for these 17 publicly traded
corporations. These corporations were:

1. Computer Task Group, Inc.
2. Hall, Kinion & Associates, Inc.
3. TSR, Inc.
4. Computer Horizons Corp.
5. Cotelligent, Inc.
6. MPS Group, Inc.
7. SCB Computer Technology, Inc.
8. CDI Corp.
9. ComforceCorp.
10. Edgewater Technology Inc.
11. First Consulting Group, Inc.
12. Kforce, Inc.
13. Manpower, Inc.
14. Personnel Group of America, Inc.
15. RCM Technologies, Inc.
16. Robert Half International, Inc.
17. Spherion Corporation

FMV examined earnings multiples for the publicly traded corporations
and for Savant for the most recent twelve months and for the most recent fiscal
year, as well as three-year and five-year averages, with primary emphasis on the
figures for the most recent twelve months. The calculations incorporated
adjustments to the financial statements necessary to make Savant's data more
directly comparable to the publicly traded corporations, and included the
assumption of a 40 percent tax rate. The ratios examined included market value
of invested capital ("MVIC," the market value of all equity and debt) to
revenues; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization
("EBITDA"); and earnings before interest and taxes ("EBIT"); as well as of
market value of equity ("MVE") to net income ("NI") and cash flow ("CF," net
income plus depreciation and amortization). In its analysis, FMV excluded
earnings multiples that were greater than 100 or less than 0 as not meaningful.

In the analysis of the guideline publicly traded corporations, FMV did
not incorporate a control premium. FMV noted, however, that the incorporation of
a control premium would have a favorable impact on the determination of the
fairness of the merger to Entrada. A summary of the public market trading
earnings multiples, using the most recent twelve-month figures available to FMV,
and the reference ranges of the multiples, was as follows:

The Board of Directors
Entrada Networks, Inc.
September 12, 2002
Page 4

Overall Range Inter-quartile Reference Range
of Multiples Range Median of Multiples
------------ ----- ------ ------------

MVIC/Revenues 0.20 - 2.39 0.31 - 0.47 0.37 0.3 - 0.6
MVIC/EBITDA 2.2 - 29.6 5.0 - 13.3 10.6 10 - 16
MVIC/EBIT 4.7 - 44.3 8.9 - 33.5 17.2 13 - 22
MVE/CF 5.9 - 91.1 9.5 - 29.7 15.6 11 - 22
MVE/NI 8.3 - 72.1 11.4 - 61.2 28.3 13 - 28

FMV used the reference ranges of multiples to calculate implied value
ranges for Savant by applying the multiples to Savant's earnings for the most
recent twelve months ended June 30, 2002. Net income and cash flow were
calculated using a 40 percent income tax rate. Based on this analysis, the
implied value ranges utilizing the earnings for the most recent twelve months
ended June 30, 2002 were as follows:

Implied Value
Range ($millions)
-----------------

MVIC/Revenues 4.4 - 10.2
MVIC/EBITDA 4.7 - 8.3
MVIC/EBIT 5.9 - 10.9
MVE/NI 4.0 - 8.7
MVE/CF 4.0 - 7.9

FMV noted that all of these indications of value were based on a level
of profitability that was at a lower margin than that required achieve the
contingent portion of the merger consideration. Accordingly, FMV also considered
that using a normalized net income of $812,000 (based on a seven percent pretax
margin and a 40 percent tax rate) resulted in an implied value range of $10.6
million to $22.7 million.

None of the guideline publicly traded corporations examined by FMV in
its analysis is identical to Savant. Therefore, an analysis of the results
considered by FMV Opinions necessarily involved complex considerations and
judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of
Savant and the guideline publicly traded corporations. In evaluating the
guideline publicly traded corporations' ratios, FMV made judgments and
assumptions with regard to industry performance, general business, economic,
market, and financial conditions and other matters. Mathematical analysis (such
as determining the mean or median) is not, in itself, a meaningful method of
using the data on the guideline publicly traded corporations.

Savant Guideline Acquired Company Transactions Analysis.

As part of its analyses, FMV considered data on transactions involving
the acquisition of companies in lines of business similar to Savant's. For each
transaction for which data was available, FMV examined financial ratios and
multiples for the acquired companies based on financial results for the most
recently reported four quarters prior to the acquisition. The multiples examined
included: (1) Market value of invested capital /Revenues, (2) Market value of
invested capital /Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization
(which we will refer to as "EBITDA"), and (3) Market value of invested
capital/Earnings before interest and taxes (which we will refer to as "EBIT").
The transactions that FMV Opinions reviewed included the acquisitions of:

1. Technisource, Inc. by Intellimark, Inc.; and

2. Healthcare Resource Management Corporation by AMN Healthcare
Services, Inc.

The calculations for the transactions yielded market value of invested
capital /revenues multiples of 0.35 for Technisource and 0.76 for Healthcare
Resource Management, market value of invested capital /EBITDA multiples of 14.8
for Technisource and 7.0 for Healthcare Resource Management, and market value of
invested capital/EBIT multiples of 31.2 for Technisource and 7.2 for Healthcare
Resource Management.

The Board of Directors
Entrada Networks, Inc.
September 12, 2002
Page 5

FMV used the ranges of these multiples to calculate implied value
ranges for Savant by applying the multiples to Savant's earnings for the twelve
months ended June 30, 2002. Based on this analysis, the implied value ranges
utilizing the earnings for the most recent twelve months ended June 30, 2002
were as follows:

Implied Value
Range ($millions)
-----------------

MVIC/Revenues 5.4 - 13.3
MVIC/EBITDA 2.8 - 7.6
MVIC/EBIT 2.6 - 16.1

FMV also considered that the above transactions incorporated control
premiums. The Technisource transaction involved a 56 percent control premium
while the Healthcare Resource Management transaction involved an implicit
control premium that could not be measured because Healthcare Resource
Management was privately held prior to the transaction.

None of the guideline acquired companies examined by FMV in its
analysis is identical to Savant. Therefore, an analysis of the results
considered by FMV necessarily involved complex considerations and judgments
concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of Savant and
the guideline acquired companies. In evaluating the guideline acquired
companies' ratios, FMV made judgments and assumptions with regard to industry
performance, general business, economic, market, and financial conditions and
other matters. Mathematical analysis (such as determining the mean or median) is
not, in itself, a meaningful method of using the data on guideline acquired
companies.

Savant Discounted Cash Flow Analysis.

As part of its analyses, FMV calculated, using a discounted cash flow
methodology, a range of values for the Company based on multiple scenarios of
revenue growth and profit margins through the end of the December 31, 2006,
based on discussions with our management and those of HOV, and Savant. Free cash
flow to equity was calculated using net income (based on income taxes at 40
percent) plus depreciation and amortization expense, minus capital expenditures,
minus net increases in working capital accounts, minus debt pay down. The
terminal value was estimated using a capitalization rate of 13 to 19 percent
(based on the discount rate of 16 to 24 percent minus a perpetuity growth rate
of 3 to 5 percent) times projected terminal free cash flow. FMV noted that this
methodology for determining the terminal value is more conservative than
applying a multiple to terminal cash flow, due to the greater difficulty of
forecasting future multiples. The free cash flows and the terminal value were
discounted at rates between 16 and 24 percent. Based upon this analysis, FMV
determined the range of value under the Discounted Cash Flow Analysis for Savant
to be $3.0 million to $17.4 million.

Contribution Analysis.

As part of its analyses, FMV looked at the relative revenue and pretax
earnings contribution to the combined post-merger company by Savant and Entrada,
respectively. FMV's analysis was based on multiple scenarios of revenue growth
and pretax profit margins for Savant, that in turn were based on discussions
with our management and those of HOV and Savant. FMV also analyzed multiple
scenarios for the number of shares to be issued in connection with the merger,
the number of contingent shares to be earned, and the number of outstanding
options and warrants to be exercised to determine a range of ownership of the
post-merger company. Based upon this analysis, FMV estimated that, subsequent to
the merger, HOV would hold between 63 and 76 percent of the post-merger company.
FMV also estimated that in the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004, Savant
would contribute between 68 and 73 percent of revenues and between 53 and 78
percent of pretax earnings of the post-merger company, with an expectation of
Savant's contribution percentage continuing to grow thereafter.