<Page>
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)
For the transition period from to
METALLURG, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 13-1661467
(State of organization) (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
6 East 43rd Street
New York, New York 10017 (212) 835-0200
(Address of principal executive offices) (Registrant's telephone number,
including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [X]
There are no equity securities of Metallurg, Inc. held by non-affiliates.
Shares outstanding at June 30, 2002 and at March 27, 2003: 5,000,000
shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share.
Documents Incorporated By Reference
None.
<Page>
PART I
Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Metallurg's
Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes thereto included
elsewhere in this report.
Overview
Metallurg, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with its majority-owned
subsidiaries (collectively, "Metallurg") is a leading international producer and
seller of high-quality specialty metals, alloys and metallic chemicals which are
essential to the production of high-performance aluminum and titanium alloys,
superalloys, steel and certain non-metallic materials for various applications
in the aerospace, power supply, automotive, petrochemical processing and
telecommunications industries. Metallurg sells over 100 different products to
over 2,500 customers worldwide (primarily in North America and Europe).
The Metallurg group was founded in 1911 with the construction of a
vanadium alloy and chemical producing plant in Nuremberg, Germany. Metallurg
began mining chrome ore in 1916 and constructed a ferrochrome manufacturing
plant in Weisweiler, Germany in 1917. In subsequent years, Metallurg's customer
base grew throughout Europe and, in 1938, Metallurg added its first subsidiary
in the U.K. During the 1950's, Metallurg began operations in the U.S. and,
during the 1980's, added production operations in Brazil. Metallurg established
a worldwide sales network that sold products manufactured by Metallurg as well
as products manufactured by third parties. Metallurg, Inc. was incorporated as a
New York holding company in 1947 and reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in
1997.
In January 2002, Metallurg's Nuremberg, Germany manufacturing subsidiary,
GfE Gesellschaft fur Elektrometallurgie mbH ("GfE") sold its prosthetics company
based in Morsdorf, Germany. In December 2002, Metallurg sold all of its
ownership interests in GfE, as well as several sales offices in Europe, to
companies affiliated with Metallurg's controlling shareholder. As a result of
the December 2002 transactions, Metallurg has restated all financial information
included in this report in order to exclude the financial results of the
companies sold and to reflect the new reporting entity for all periods
presented. See "Note 2. Change in Reporting Entity" to Metallurg's Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Metallurg operates in one significant industry segment, the manufacture
and sale of performance-enhancing additives mainly for the metallurgical
industry. Metallurg is organized around its major production facilities in the
U.K., the U.S., Brazil and Germany. In addition to its own products, Metallurg
distributes products manufactured by third parties. The table below sets forth,
for the periods indicated, information concerning revenue from Metallurg's four
reportable segments, as described below:
Revenue by Segment
(In millions)
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
------- ------- -------
Segments (a)
LSM ........................ $ 161.0 $ 173.2 $ 180.6
SMC ........................ 92.1 104.1 118.9
CIF ........................ 32.9 39.4 29.0
EWW ........................ 31.7 35.9 36.6
Other ...................... 88.3 119.9 125.6
Intersegment eliminations .. (61.0) (78.4) (71.5)
------- ------- -------
Total revenue .......... $ 345.0 $ 394.1 $ 419.2
======= ======= =======
- ----------
(a) GfE, which was sold in December 2002, was previously a reportable segment.
Revenue of the European sales offices, also sold in December 2002, was
previously included in "Other". See "Note 2. Change in Reporting Entity"
to Metallurg's Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
<Page>
London & Scandinavian Metallurgical Co Limited and its subsidiaries
(collectively, "LSM") - This unit is comprised mainly of three production
facilities in the U.K. and another in Norway which manufacture and sell aluminum
alloy grain refiners and alloying tablets for the aluminum industry, chromium
metal and specialty ferroalloys for the steel and superalloy industries and
aluminum powder for various metal powder-consuming industries.
Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation ("SMC") - This unit is comprised of
two production facilities in the U.S. The Ohio plant manufactures and sells
ferrovanadium and vanadium-based chemicals used mostly in the steel and
petrochemical industries. The New Jersey plant currently manufactures and sells
alloying tablets for the aluminum industry and metal powders for the welding
industry. In the second quarter of 2001, Metallurg rationalized its aluminum
master alloy and grain refiner production. Production of these products ceased
at SMC's New Jersey plant and is now concentrated at LSM's and CIF's facilities
in the U.K., Norway and Brazil.
Companhia Industrial Fluminense ("CIF") - This unit is comprised mainly of
two production facilities in Brazil. The Sao Joao del Rei plant manufactures and
sells aluminum alloy grain refiners and alloying tablets for the aluminum
industry and metal oxides used in the telecommunications, superalloy and
specialty metal industries. The Nazareno mine extracts and concentrates ores
containing tantalum and niobium that are processed, along with other raw
materials, into metal oxides at the Sao Joao del Rei plant.
Elektrowerk Weisweiler GmbH ("EWW") - This production unit, located in
Germany, produces various grades of low carbon ferrochrome used in the
superalloy, welding and steel industries.
In addition to their manufacturing operations, LSM and SMC import and
distribute complementary products manufactured by affiliates and third parties.
Corporate-related items and results of subsidiaries not meeting the
quantitative thresholds prescribed by applicable accounting rules for
determining reportable segments are included in "Other". Metallurg does not
allocate general corporate overhead expenses to operating segments.
Products and Markets
For the year ended December 31, 2002, approximately 32% of Metallurg's
sales were made to the aluminum industry, 29% were made to the iron and steel
industry, 14% were made to the superalloy and titanium alloy industries and the
remaining 25% were made to other industries, none of which was individually
significant for reporting purposes. No single customer accounted for more than
10% of Metallurg's sales for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Based on customer location, for the year ended December 31, 2002,
approximately 37% of Metallurg's sales were made in Europe, 35% in North
America, 13% in Africa, 10% in Asia and 5% in South America.
2
<Page>
The following table sets forth the revenue of product groups most
significant to Metallurg's operations:
Significant Product Groups
(Dollars in millions)
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
--------------------- --------------------- --------------------
Revenue % Revenue % Revenue %
------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------
Name of Product Group
Aluminum ................. $132.1 38.3 $133.2 33.8 $127.8 30.5
Chromium ................. 67.6 19.6 78.1 19.8 69.9 16.7
Niobium .................. 21.1 6.1 29.8 7.6 30.8 7.3
Titanium ................. 17.0 4.9 16.8 4.3 13.7 3.3
Vanadium ................. 16.7 4.8 17.1 4.3 23.2 5.5
Powders .................. 16.4 4.8 13.2 3.4 11.8 2.8
Tantalum ................. 13.9 4.0 48.6 12.3 41.3 9.9
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
284.8 82.5 336.8 85.5 318.5 76.0
Other .................... 60.2 17.5 57.3 14.5 100.7 24.0
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total revenue ....... $345.0 100.0 $394.1 100.0 $419.2 100.0
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Aluminum Industry; Aluminum Master Alloys and Compacted Products -
Metallurg manufactures a series of aluminum-based alloys and compacted additives
supplied to the aluminum industry to enhance productivity in aluminum plants and
to introduce various specific properties into aluminum products for use in many
sectors, including automotive and transport, aerospace, power transmission,
construction and consumer durables. Metallurg sells to major aluminum producers
throughout the world, including Alcan Aluminium Limited, Alcoa Inc., Pechiney
S.A., Norsk Hydro ASA, Rio Tinto plc and Sumitomo Corporation. The aluminum
industry is cyclical. Consumption of aluminum products fluctuates with demand
from the industry sectors listed above, as well as competition between aluminum
and other metals and materials, such as plastics and glass.
Superalloy and Titanium Alloy Industries; Specialty Metals and Alloys -
Metallurg manufactures and sells a series of specialty metals and alloys which
are essential to achieving elevated temperature strength and oxidation
resistance in nickel-based superalloys and titanium alloys for aerospace, power
generation, and oil and petrochemical applications. Its principal products
include various chromium-based materials, niobium and vanadium alloys.
Metallurg's customers include Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Carpenter
Technology Corporation, Titanium Metals Corporation, RTI International Metals
and the Eramet Group. The superalloy and titanium alloy industries are cyclical.
Consumption of these products fluctuates with demand from the aerospace, power
generation, oil field and petrochemical sectors.
Iron and Steel Industry; Specialty Ferroalloys - Metallurg manufactures
and sells specialty ferroalloys for use in the iron and steel industry.
Metallurg's principal specialty ferroalloy products are ferrovanadium, standard
grades of low carbon ferrochrome and ferrotitanium. It also markets ferroboron,
ferrosilicon, ferromanganese, ferrochrome and ferroniobium produced by others.
These products are used by iron and steel producers to increase temperature and
corrosion resistance and improve mechanical properties and strength-to-weight
ratios. Ferroalloys are essential additives to many iron and steel products used
in a wide variety of industries, such as the aerospace, automotive, energy and
construction industries. Metallurg's iron and steel industry customers include
Affival, Inc., Ametek, Inc., Corus Group plc, Nucor Corporation, Steel Dynamics,
Inc., ThyssenKrupp Steel AG and United States Steel Corporation. The iron and
steel industry is cyclical, with iron and steel consumption depending greatly on
demand for durable goods, such as automobiles, construction materials,
machinery, appliances and miscellaneous manufactured products.
Other Industries and Products - In addition to the product lines described
above, Metallurg manufactures and distributes a number of products used outside
of the aluminum, superalloy, titanium alloy and steel industries. These products
include tantalum and coating materials which are sold to electronics,
telecommunications and tool manufacturers; vanadium chemicals for use in the
synthetic rubber and ceramics industries; polishing powders used by the glass
polishing industry; and metal powders used in the manufacture of rocket fuel,
automotive paints, and chemical and metallurgical products. These products
generally are higher-margin and technically sophisticated.
3
<Page>
Metallurg's financial performance fluctuates with the general economic
cycle, as well as cycles in the markets for Metallurg's products, which could
have a material adverse effect on Metallurg's business, financial condition and
results of operations. In addition, many of Metallurg's products are
internationally traded, with prices that are significantly affected by worldwide
supply and demand.
Foreign Operations and Currency Fluctuations - Metallurg has substantial
operations outside the U.S. At December 31, 2002, Metallurg's operations located
outside the U.S. represented approximately 63% (based on book values) of
Metallurg's assets. Approximately 85% of Metallurg's employees were outside the
U.S. Foreign operations are subject to certain risks that can materially affect
the sales, profits, cash flows and financial position of Metallurg, including
taxes on distributions or deemed distributions to Metallurg, Inc. or any U.S.
subsidiary, currency exchange rate fluctuations, limitations on repatriation of
funds, maintenance of minimum capital requirements, and import and export
controls. In general, Metallurg's cost of sales for products manufactured in
certain foreign locations can be impacted by changes in the rate of exchange of
the respective local currencies of those locations relative to the U.S. dollar
and other currencies in which it sells. While Metallurg engages in hedging
transactions to reduce certain of the risks of currency rate fluctuations, there
can be no assurances regarding the overall effectiveness or adequacy of
Metallurg's hedging activities.
Foreign Sales - Sales by Metallurg's domestic operations to foreign
customers totaled $8.9 million, $23.8 million and $16.2 million for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Manufacturing Processes
Metallurg's manufacturing processes involve melting, refining, casting,
crushing, sizing, blending and packaging operations, which vary from product to
product. For example, in the manufacture of low carbon ferrochrome, EWW consumes
raw materials including chrome ore, predominantly from Metallurg's Turkish
mines, and silicochrome. The raw materials are melted and reductants are added
to refine the chemistry of the production batch. The batch is poured into
casting molds to form ingots, which are cooled and then crushed, sized, blended
and packaged. The manufacture of ferrovanadium at SMC's Cambridge, Ohio plant
follows an analogous process of melting, casting and crushing, except that
vanadium-containing raw materials are used. In general, the manufacture of
aluminum master alloys also follows similar principles using aluminum and other
additives; however, these master alloys are generally cast as small ingots or
processed to a solid rod form for delivery to the customer. The manufacture of
briquettes and tablets involves the grinding and blending of raw materials, the
compression of these materials into a compacted form and packaging for delivery
to the customer. More sophisticated production routes are used for highly
specialized products, which can require chemical processing or the use of a
variety of other equipment.
4
<Page>
Facilities and Operations
Metallurg owns all of the facilities listed below.
Production Facilities - The following table sets forth, for each of
Metallurg's producing subsidiaries, the location of its facilities and the key
products manufactured by such subsidiary:
Manufacturing Subsidiary Location Key Products
- ------------------------ -------- ------------
LSM...................................... Rotherham, U.K. (Plant) Aluminum Alloying Tablets
Aluminum Master Alloys
Chromium Metal
Ferroboron
Ferrotitanium
Glass Polishing Powders
Metal Powders
Nickel Boron
Holyhead, U.K. (Plant) Atomized Aluminum Powder
Minworth, U.K. (Plant) Granulated Aluminum
Rjukan, Norway (Plant) Aluminum Master Alloys
SMC...................................... Cambridge, Ohio (Plant) Ferrovanadium
Vanadium Chemicals
Newfield, New Jersey (Plant) Aluminum Alloying Tablets and Briquettes
Metal Powders
CIF...................................... Sao Joao del Rei, Brazil (Plant) Aluminum Alloying Tablets
Aluminum Master Alloys
Niobium Oxide
Tantalum Oxide
Nazareno, Brazil (Mine) Tantalum and Niobium Ore
EWW...................................... Eschweiler-Weisweiler, Germany (Plant) Low Carbon Ferrochrome
Turk Maadin Sirketi A.S.................. Kavak, Tavas and Gocek, Turkey (Mines) Chrome Ore
Sales Offices - Metallurg has sales personnel at its production facilities
and at its separate representative offices in the following countries: Brazil,
Canada, Japan, Mexico, South Africa and the U.S.
Raw Materials
Metallurg produces a wide variety of products for sale to a number of
different metals industries and there is no single raw material that makes up
the basis of Metallurg's entire production.
Metallurg's Turkish subsidiary mines chrome ore, which is supplied to EWW
for the production of low carbon ferrochrome. Management believes the mines have
identifiable reserves of 1.1 million tons that are expected to last until 2012
and additional probable reserves of 320,000 tons. Metallurg has a program for
ongoing exploration activities to identify additional probable reserves.
For the production of chromium metal, LSM purchases chromium oxide from
the major global producers. This product also requires large quantities of
aluminum powder, substantially produced internally.
Metallurg's six aluminum processing plants in the U.S., the U.K., Brazil
and Norway buy approximately 35,000 tons of virgin aluminum from producers
worldwide, while important alloying chemicals are sourced from several different
suppliers around the world.
5
<Page>
Titanium scrap is sourced in significant quantities for the production of
ferrotitanium and other titanium-containing products from countries active in
the aerospace industry, such as the U.S., the Commonwealth of Independent States
("CIS") and the U.K.
Vanadium pentoxide in various forms is the raw material for Metallurg's
production of ferrovanadium and vanadium chemicals. For ferrovanadium
production, Metallurg purchases vanadium-containing spent catalysts and residues
from petrochemical refineries and ashes and residues from electric utilities
burning fuel oil. Metallurg currently obtains a majority of these raw materials
from only a few sources. See "Limited Sources for Raw Materials." Vanadium
chemicals are produced from commercially pure vanadium pentoxide, which is
purchased on the open market.
Metallurg also utilizes many other raw materials such as strontium,
nickel, boron chemicals, mischmetal, manganese and chrome silicide in the
manufacture of its broad product range which are purchased as required from
producers or traders. Coinciding with general sales terms, most purchases are
made on a spot basis at market prices to minimize the risk of exposure to market
fluctuations.
Limited Sources for Raw Materials - Certain of Metallurg, Inc.'s
subsidiaries are dependent on third parties for raw material supplies. SMC's
production unit in Cambridge, Ohio currently obtains a majority of its raw
materials requirements for the manufacture of ferrovanadium from only a few
sources. Although alternative sources of ferrovanadium raw materials exist,
there can be no assurance that Metallurg would be able to obtain adequate
supplies of such materials on acceptable terms, or at all, from other sources.
Titanium and boron chemicals for the manufacture of sophisticated aluminum
master alloys are sourced from long-time suppliers who, in certain instances,
also supply competitive producers with these raw materials. Although these and
other raw materials are generally priced with reference to related market
prices, any increase in demand could cause raw material costs to rise. To the
extent Metallurg is unable to recover its increased costs, operating results
would be adversely affected.
Competition
The metals industry is highly competitive on a worldwide basis.
Competition is primarily based on price, quality and timely delivery. In recent
years, price competition has been strong as a result of excess capacity in
certain products. In addition, export sales from the CIS and China of metals and
alloys produced in excess of local demand can severely hurt prices in Europe and
the U.S., which negatively impacts the price of some of Metallurg's products.
New entrants may also increase competition in the metals industry, which could
materially adversely affect Metallurg. An increase in the use of substitutes for
metal alloys also could have a material adverse effect on the financial
condition and operations of Metallurg. Although facing competition in each of
its markets, Metallurg does not believe that any single competitor competes in
all of its products or markets.
Aluminum Industry - Competition is international because of the relatively
small number of master alloy and alloying tablet manufacturers and the worldwide
operations of the aluminum industry. In most markets, Metallurg faces
competition to varying degrees from KBM Affilips B.V., KBAlloys, Inc. (and its
U.K. subsidiary, Anglo Blackwells, Ltd.), Aleastur (Asturiana de Aleaciones,
S.A.), the Eramet Group and Hoesch-Metallurgie GmbH.
Superalloy and Titanium Alloy Industries - Metallurg has limited
competition in special grades of low carbon ferrochrome from Japan, South Africa
and the CIS. Delachaux S.A., certain Chinese and CIS sources and, to a limited
extent, the Eramet Group compete with Metallurg in chromium metal. Strategic
Minerals Corporation and Reading Alloys, Inc. compete internationally with
Metallurg in vanadium aluminum. Reading Alloys, Inc. also competes in
sophisticated alloys for the superalloy industry, as do CBMM-Cia Brasileira de
Metalurgia e Mineracao, Cabot Corporation and H.C. Starck GmbH & Co. KG in
certain products.
Iron and Steel Industry - In North America, products manufactured by
Strategic Minerals Corporation, Treibacher Industrie AG, Highveld Steel and
Vanadium Corporation Limited, Xstrata AG and certain CIS and Chinese sources
compete with Metallurg's ferrovanadium products, while several U.S., U.K. and
Russian companies compete worldwide with Metallurg's ferrotitanium products. In
standard grades of low carbon ferrochrome, competition comes worldwide from
Samancor Limited (South Africa), Zimbabwe Alloys Ltd. and certain producers in
China and the CIS.
6
<Page>
Employees
As of December 31, 2002, Metallurg employed approximately 1,100 people
worldwide. Labor unions represent approximately 50% of Metallurg's employees.
Unions represent employees at seven locations in the U.S., the U.K., Germany,
Brazil and Norway. SMC's bargaining agreement with the United Steelworkers of
America (USW, Local 4836-02), which covers 69 employees at the Cambridge, Ohio,
plant, is scheduled to be renegotiated in May 2003. Many of the collective
bargaining agreements covering Metallurg's union employees at its foreign
subsidiaries are renewable on an annual basis. Metallurg's relationships with
its unions are managed at the local level and are considered by management to be
satisfactory.
Anti-Dumping Duties
In response to dumping by the former Soviet Union, Metallurg sought and
obtained anti-dumping orders against Russia for imports of ferrovanadium into
the U.S. Since July 1995, the Department of Commerce has imposed incremental
anti-dumping duties, which currently range from 10.1% to 108%, on imports of
Russian ferrovanadium and nitrided vanadium into the U.S. These duties are in
addition to the normal duty of 4.2% that applies to ferrovanadium imports. A
"sunset review" of the anti-dumping duty order was conducted by the
International Trade Commission and the Department of Commerce and was favorably
concluded in May 2001. As a result, the order will remain in effect until at
least April 2006 when the next "sunset review" is initiated.
On November 26, 2001, in response to a surge in imports of ferrovanadium
from South Africa and China, the Ferroalloys Association Vanadium Committee,
representing Metallurg and other U.S. producers, filed a petition seeking the
imposition of anti-dumping duty orders covering imports from those countries. In
response to the petition, the Commerce Department initiated investigations and
the International Trade Commission unanimously determined that there was a
reasonable indication that the U.S. industry was materially injured by reason of
imports from these two countries. The final antidumping investigations were
favorably concluded during the fourth quarter of 2002 and resulted in duties
ranging from 12.97% to 116%, in addition to the 4.2% normal tariff, being
imposed on imports from these two countries.
Anti-dumping duty rates are subject to annual review by the Department of
Commerce. Metallurg had revenues of approximately $12 million from sales of
ferrovanadium produced by it and sold in the U.S. for the year ended December
31, 2002. If the anti-dumping duties are not maintained at or near their current
levels, Metallurg may be materially adversely affected.
Environmental Matters
Metallurg's alloy manufacturing operations in Cambridge, Ohio and
Newfield, New Jersey are subject to various federal, state and local
environmental, safety and health laws and regulations, including those relating
to air and water quality, and solid and hazardous wastes. Metallurg's foreign
manufacturing operations are subject to analogous environmental laws and
regulations. Metallurg is faced with a number of environmental issues, which
have largely resulted from environmental cleanup requirements, particularly in
the areas of solid waste and hazardous waste removal. There can be no assurance
that the current environmental requirements will not result in future
liabilities and obligations, including future liability for disposal or
contamination at both domestic and foreign facilities. There is also the
possibility that changes to applicable environmental laws and regulations might
result in future liabilities and obligations for Metallurg, including those
related to contamination at Metallurg's facilities. These potential liabilities
might also be material to Metallurg's business operations, financial condition
or cash flow.
Metallurg maintains environmental and industrial safety and health
compliance programs at its plants and believes that its manufacturing operations
are in general compliance with all applicable safety, health and environmental
laws.
SMC is addressing certain environmental conditions at the Cambridge, Ohio
plant pursuant to a judicial consent order entered into with the State of Ohio
in 1997. SMC submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("NRC") in July 1999
a plan for decommissioning slag piles at the Cambridge facility. Such plan
contemplates capping the slag piles on-site, an alternative that the Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency ("OEPA") has approved. Before the NRC completed
its review of the plan, the NRC delegated its regulatory authority over the site
to the Ohio Department of Health ("ODH") in August 1999. The ODH is now the
governmental entity responsible for overseeing the decommissioning of the slag
piles. SMC has been engaged for some time in discussions with the ODH and the
OEPA with respect to such decommissioning plan and
7
<Page>
related alternatives, and with the OEPA on various matters that are regulated
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA"), including alleged
past violations of certain RCRA provisions. SMC has also been discussing the
matter of alleged past violations of RCRA with the United States Environmental
Protection Agency. In discussions with both agencies, the possibility of
penalties being assessed has arisen, and while there can be no assurance that
SMC will not make certain payments in connection therewith, management does not
expect that the outcome of these discussions will have a material adverse effect
on the operations, cash flow or financial position of Metallurg. At December 31,
2002, liabilities of $10.5 million remain outstanding from provisions made in
prior periods for the estimated future costs associated with the decommissioning
of NRC (now ODH) regulated materials and the remediation of sediments at the
Cambridge site. SMC submitted remediation plans with respect to these areas to
the OEPA and ODH at the end of 2001 and is currently negotiating the
finalization of this plan with remediation expected to begin in 2003. A plan for
the creation of wetlands is intended to be submitted during 2003. SMC expects to
expend the amount reserved for outstanding liabilities over the next 5 years.
In August 2002, SMC filed a decommissioning plan for its Newfield facility
with the NRC. At the same time, SMC requested an amendment to the authorized use
of the Newfield facility, as permitted by the NRC, to "storage only pending
decommissioning". While the Newfield facility will continue to operate, SMC does
not intend to resume any previously licensed activities and expects to commence
decommissioning activities upon approval of the plan by the NRC.
At December 31, 2002, liabilities of $21.3 million remain outstanding for
the estimated future costs associated with the decommissioning of NRC regulated
materials and the remediation of groundwater (as to which SMC is exploring
alternative treatment approaches), soil and sediments at the Newfield site. SMC
expects to expend such amount over the next 15 years.
There can be no assurance that SMC will not incur additional expenses
related to the environmental projects at the Cambridge and Newfield sites.
Liabilities for known environmental matters and Metallurg's related
accounting policies are summarized in "Note 13. Environmental Liabilities" and
"Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Environmental Remediation
Costs and Recoveries" to Metallurg's Consolidated Financial Statements. See also
"Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations - Liquidity and Financial Resources - Environmental Remediation
Costs."
While Metallurg's remediation obligations and other environmental costs
will, in the aggregate, reduce its liquidity, Metallurg believes its cash
balances, cash from operations and cash available under its credit facilities
are sufficient to fund its current and anticipated future requirements for
environmental expenditures.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Metallurg, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries are parties from time to
time to legal proceedings relating to their operations. The ultimate legal and
financial liability of Metallurg in respect of all legal proceedings in which it
is involved at any given time cannot be estimated with any certainty. However,
based upon examination of such matters and consultation with counsel, management
currently believes that the ultimate outcome of these contingencies, net of
liabilities already accrued in Metallurg's Consolidated Balance Sheet, will not
have a material adverse effect on Metallurg's consolidated financial position,
although the resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these matters
could have a significant impact on Metallurg's results of operations and/or cash
flows for that period. For discussion of specific environmental matters, see
"Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties - Environmental Matters."
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the
fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2002.
8
<Page>
PART II
Item 5. Market for Metallurg's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.
There is no public trading market for Metallurg, Inc.'s equity securities,
all of which are owned by its parent company, Metallurg Holdings, Inc.
("Metallurg Holdings"). Metallurg Holdings is owned by a group of investors led
by Safeguard International Fund, L.P. ("Safeguard International").
On November 20, 1998, the Board of Directors of Metallurg, Inc. (the
"Board") adopted the Metallurg, Inc. 1998 Equity Compensation Plan (the "ECP").
Under the ECP, 500,000 shares of common stock are authorized for stock awards
and stock options. Pursuant to the ECP, from 1998 through 2002, the Board has
awarded to eligible executives and non-employee Board members options to
purchase an aggregate of 400,000 shares of common stock, net of cancellations
and forfeitures, at an exercise price of $30.00 per share. Such options have a
term of ten years and vest in most cases 20% on the date of grant and 20% on
each of the first four anniversaries of the date of grant.
Metallurg, Inc. did not issue any securities during 2002.
Metallurg, Inc. does not presently intend to pay any dividends, although
it may choose to do so in the future. Metallurg, Inc. is restricted in the
amount of dividends payable to its shareholder as a result of the indenture for
its 11% Senior Notes due 2007 (the "Senior Notes"). Under the terms of the
indenture, Metallurg, Inc. is limited in its ability to make restricted
payments, as defined and including, among other things, minority investments in
subsidiaries and dividend payments, to a formula based on the cumulative net
income since November 1, 1997 and certain specified allowances. As a result of
this limitation, Metallurg, Inc. is permitted to make future restricted payments
in the amount of $7.5 million as of December 31, 2002. In addition, Metallurg,
Inc.'s revolving credit facility with Fleet National Bank prohibits the payment
of dividends through 2004. See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Financial
Resources" and "Note 8. Borrowings" to Metallurg's Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Currently, Metallurg Holdings, Metallurg, Inc.'s parent, does not have
sufficient cash on hand to make the interest payment due in January 2004 on its
12 3/4% Senior Discount Notes due 2008 (the "Senior Discount Notes"). While
Metallurg, Inc. may be able to distribute cash to Metallurg Holdings for the
purpose of making the January 2004 interest payment, Metallurg, Inc. could be
prohibited from making a cash distribution at such time under the restrictive
covenants of its revolving credit facility (see "Note 8. Borrowings" to
Metallurg's Consolidate Financial Statements). All of Metallurg, Inc.'s
outstanding common stock has been pledged as collateral for Metallurg Holdings'
obligations under the Senior Discount Notes. If Metallurg Holdings were unable
to make its interest payment when due, it could lead to a foreclosure on its
assets, principally the equity of Metallurg, Inc., and create a default in
accordance with the terms of Metallurg, Inc.'s 11% Senior Note indenture.
Metallurg, Inc. is a holding company with limited operations of its own.
Substantially all of Metallurg, Inc.'s operating income is generated by its
subsidiaries. As a result, Metallurg, Inc. will rely upon distributions or
advances from its subsidiaries to provide the funds necessary to meet its debt
service obligations. In some cases, however, Metallurg, Inc.'s subsidiaries are
restricted in their ability to pay dividends. Metallurg, Inc.'s Turkish
subsidiary is limited in its ability to pay dividends from retained earnings, as
a result of historical currency devaluation. In addition, working capital
facilities and other financing arrangements at EWW and LSM restrict such
subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends. For example, EWW must obtain the consent
of a German governmental authority, which guarantees a portion of EWW's
'E'3.2 million ($3.3 million) working capital facility, in order to pay
dividends. The stock of EWW has been pledged to collateralize obligations owed
by EWW to the German governmental authority. LSM is party to a working capital
facility that limits its ability to pay dividends to an amount up to 100% of
LSM's annual net income.
9
<Page>
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The following table presents selected historical financial data of
Metallurg for the years ended January 31, 1999 and 2000 and the years ended
December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002. All information in the table has been restated
to reflect the new reporting entity. See "Note 2. Change in Reporting Entity" to
Metallurg's Consolidated Financial Statements.
Information as of and for the fiscal years ended January 31, 1999 and 2000
is derived from the consolidated financial statements of Metallurg, as restated.
See "Note 2. Change in Reporting Entity" to Metallurg's Consolidated Financial
Statements. Information as of and for the period ended December 31, 2000 (the
"Transition Period") and the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002 is derived
from the consolidated financial statements of Metallurg, included elsewhere
herein.
The information in this table should be read in conjunction with "Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" and the consolidated financial statements of Metallurg, and related
notes thereto, included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data."
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(In thousands)
Year Ended
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
January 31, January 31, December 31, December 31, December 31,
1999 2000 2000 (b) 2001 2002
------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Statement of Operations Data:
Total revenue....................... $464,488 $371,314 $419,209 $394,078 $344,974
Gross profit........................ 59,556 34,914 56,659 54,009 29,217
Operating income (loss) (a)......... 12,074 1,734 20,836 19,573 (6,797)
Net (loss) income................... (919) (10,428) 9,588 2,154 (21,352)
January 31, January 31, December 31, December 31, December 31,
1999 2000 2000 (b) 2001 2002
------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets........................ $263,507 $259,102 $254,773 $241,519 $248,165
Total debt.......................... 104,936 104,281 119,863 123,521 127,291
(a) Includes:
o environmental expense recoveries of $5,501, $750, $631 and $3,000
for the years ended January 31, 2000, and December 31, 2000, 2001
and 2002, respectively (See "Note 13. Environmental Liabilities" to
Metallurg's Consolidated Financial Statements);
o restructuring charges, net, of $3,092 and $3,373 for the years ended
January 31, 2000 and December 31, 2002, respectively (See "Note 4.
Restructuring" to Metallurg's Consolidated Financial Statements);
and
o merger-related costs of $7,888 for the year ended January 31, 1999.
(b) The Transition Period (See "Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies - Basis of Presentation and Consolidation" to Metallurg's
Consolidated Financial Statements).
10
<Page>
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Metallurg's
consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included
elsewhere in this report.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain matters discussed under the captions "Business and Properties" and
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by the use of
words such as "plans", "expect", "believe", "should", "could", "anticipate",
"intend" and other expressions that indicate future events or trends. All
statements that address expectations or projections about the future, including
statements about Metallurg's strategy for growth, product development, market
position, expenditures and financial results are forward-looking statements and
as such may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
which may cause the actual results, performance and achievements of Metallurg to
be materially different from future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Factors which may cause Metallurg's results to be materially different include:
- - The cyclical nature of Metallurg's business.
- - Metallurg's dependence on foreign customers. Metallurg operates throughout
the world and derives a significant amount of its revenues from outside of
the U.S.
- - The impact of changes in foreign exchange rates and foreign trade
regulations on Metallurg's competitive standing. Revenues and earnings
from outside the U.S. could be materially affected by exchange rate
fluctuations.
- - The availability of raw materials, particularly vanadium-containing
materials. See "Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties - Limited Sources
for Raw Materials".
- - The impact of worldwide competition.
- - The economic strength of Metallurg's markets generally and particularly
the strength of the demand for aluminum, superalloys, titanium alloys,
iron and steel in those markets.
- - The accuracy of Metallurg's estimates of the costs of environmental
remediation.
- - The extension or expiration of existing anti-dumping duties. See "Items 1
and 2. Business and Properties - Anti-Dumping Duties".
- - The performance of world financial markets and the resulting effect on
pension expense of Metallurg's defined benefit plans.
- - The ability to meet debt service requirements.
- - The possible disruption of business or increases in the cost of doing
business resulting from terrorist activities or global conflicts.
- - Changes in tax laws, including changes related to taxation of foreign
earnings.
- - Changes in accounting standards.
11
<Page>
Overview
Metallurg is a leading international producer and seller of high-quality
specialty metals, alloys and metallic chemicals, which are essential to the
production of high-performance aluminum and titanium alloys, superalloys, steel
and certain non-metallic materials for various applications in the aerospace,
power supply, automotive, petrochemical processing and telecommunications
industries. The industries that Metallurg supplies are cyclical.
Western world* primary aluminum consumption fell by over 6% in 2001 and
the downward trend continued in the first quarter of 2002. The demand for
Metallurg's products for the aluminum industry reflected this trend. In the
second quarter of 2002, the trend reversed and the stronger demand for
Metallurg's products seen in the second quarter continued into the second half
of the year. However, excess production capacity in the primary aluminum
business as well as in the products supplied by Metallurg has led to intense
competition and lower prices. Over the past two years, Metallurg has improved
its competitive position by relocating its aluminum master alloy and grain
refiner production to its lowest cost melting, casting and finishing facilities
in the U.K., Norway and Brazil.
The aerospace sector saw its fortunes drop sharply after September 11,
2001, and since then it has been affected by the difficult financial situation
of much of the airline industry. This year has also seen the cancellation of
many land-based turbine power generation projects in the U.S. These market
developments led the producers of superalloys and titanium alloys to cut their
production rates very sharply, particularly in the U.S., and thus reduce
similarly their demand for Metallurg's chromium and niobium products and alloys
for the titanium industry. Metallurg has sustained sales volumes of its chromium
products by increasing sales of lower quality grades to non-superalloy users,
but at the expense of reduced prices and margins. Metallurg believes that the
supply chain to this sector has been reduced in line with the lower levels of
current consumption and thus Metallurg's volumes are expected to immediately
reflect any improvements in demand.
The U.S. steel industry operated at low production levels throughout most
of 2001 and into 2002 but, with the imposition of protective duties in March
2002, production rates increased significantly. In the second quarter, Metallurg
saw demand and pricing for its U.S. ferrovanadium production improve somewhat.
In the second half, prices continued to strengthen but volumes fell slightly due
to seasonal shutdowns; SMC's ferrovanadium plant operated for only two months
during the third quarter. The recently announced shutdown of primary vanadium
production by a major Australian producer has contributed to a more balanced
market outlook and prices have begun to improve from the historically low level
experienced during the past few years. Worldwide steel production also grew in
2002 thereby allowing further improvement in sales of ferrotitanium and normal
grade low carbon ferrochrome.
Although market price and demand for tantalum declined in 2001, Metallurg
had continued to benefit in the first quarter of 2002 from fixed price sales
contracts that had been negotiated in late 2000 when prices were at their peak.
Demand and consumption of tantalum was extremely weak in 2002, and this has
resulted in much lower volumes and prices for Metallurg's tantalum products.
Metallurg expects this trend to continue in 2003.
Metallurg has completed capital investments in the U.K., the U.S. and
Brazil aimed at reducing the cost of raw materials and expanding capacity for
the production of certain specialty grade products. Significant cost reduction
programs were initiated in the second quarter of 2002. These programs progressed
during the second half of the year and will continue. The investments and cost
saving measures have already begun to improve operating results though the
benefits are not expected to be fully realized until 2003.
* Defined as the world, excluding the CIS, Eastern Europe and China.
12
<Page>
Results of Operations
The following information has been restated to reflect the new reporting
entity. See "Note 2. Change in Reporting Entity" to Metallurg's Consolidated
Financial Statements.
As a result of Metallurg, Inc.'s change in its fiscal year from January 31
to a calendar year, effective as of December 31, 2000, the consolidated
operating results of Metallurg for the year ended December 31, 2000 include the
results of Metallurg, Inc., the parent holding company, for the 11 months ended
December 31, 2000 and, consistent with historical reporting practice, the
results of its operating subsidiaries for the 12 months ended December 31, 2000.
Intersegment
(In thousands) LSM SMC CIF EWW Other Eliminations Consolidated
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ------------ ------------
Year Ended December 31, 2002
Total revenue ................ $ 160,978 $ 92,053 $ 32,869 $ 31,707 $ 88,402 $ (61,035) $ 344,974
Gross profit ................. 12,606 1,078 2,960 492 10,577 1,504 29,217
SG&A ......................... 11,620 9,234 1,590 2,106 11,091 -- 35,641
Environmental expense
recoveries ................. -- (3,000) -- -- -- -- (3,000)
Restructuring charges, net ... 1,068 453 -- (137) 1,989 -- 3,373
Operating (loss) income ...... (82) (5,609) 1,370 (1,477) (2,503) 1,504 (6,797)
Interest (expense) income,
net ........................ (1,509) (368) (745) 101 (10,881) -- (13,402)
Income tax provision
(benefit) .................. 868 (2,026) 173 (506) 2,769 -- 1,278
Net (loss) income ............ (2,452) (3,951) 452 (870) (21,411) 6,880 (21,352)
Year Ended December 31, 2001
Total revenue ................ $ 173,161 $ 104,068 $ 39,383 $ 35,885 $ 119,928 $ (78,347) $ 394,078
Gross profit ................. 14,192 4,248 7,978 5,335 23,237 (981) 54,009
SG&A ......................... 10,311 9,810 1,831 1,758 11,357 -- 35,067
Environmental expense
recoveries ................. -- (631) -- -- -- -- (631)
Operating income (loss) ...... 3,881 (4,931) 6,147 3,577 11,880 (981) 19,573
Interest (expense) income,
net ........................ (1,651) (146) (982) 177 (9,510) -- (12,112)
Income tax provision
(benefit) .................. 630 (2,925) 1,678 1,531 4,644 -- 5,558
Net income (loss) ............ 1,795 (2,152) 3,487 2,223 20,011 (23,210) 2,154
Year Ended December 31, 2000
Total revenue ................ $ 180,579 $ 118,935 $ 29,010 $ 36,554 $ 125,644 $ (71,513) $ 419,209
Gross profit ................. 18,467 8,004 4,584 4,876 20,822 (94) 56,659
SG&A ......................... 10,788 10,159 1,595 1,999 12,032 -- 36,573
Environmental expense
recoveries ................. -- (750) -- -- -- -- (750)
Operating income (loss) ...... 7,679 (1,405) 2,989 2,877 8,790 (94) 20,836
Interest (expense) income,
net ........................ (1,177) 747 177 60 (8,579) -- (8,772)
Income tax provision
(benefit) .................. 2,167 (54) 416 2,206 3,239 -- 7,974
Net income (loss) ............ 4,584 (604) 2,750 731 21,404 (19,277) 9,588
13
<Page>
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2001
Total Revenue
Consolidated total revenue decreased by $49.1 million (12%) in the year
ended December 31, 2002.
LSM revenue was $12.2 million (7%) lower than the year ended December 31,
2001. Niobium product sales declined by $7.1 million after an agency agreement
for ferroniobium was terminated at the end of 2001. Sales of chrome products,
primarily chrome metal, fell by $3.4 million, as both demand and prices fell.
Sales of aluminum powder fell by $1.6 million as a drop in average selling price
more than offset a small increase in volume. Sales of nickel boron and other
nickel products fell by $1.2 million, primarily as a result of a fall in market
prices. Demand for compacted aluminum products fell, causing a $0.4 million
decrease in sales despite an increase in unit selling prices. Demand for
aluminum master alloys increased but total sales rose by only $0.4 million as a
result of a fall in selling prices. Sales of metal powders rose by $0.6 million,
despite a 25% increase in volume, as average unit selling prices declined. Sales
of titanium products, primarily ferrotitanium, were $1.0 million higher, mainly
due to a small increase in average unit selling prices.
SMC revenue was $12.0 million (12%) lower than the year ended December 31,
2001. Sales of chrome products, primarily sourced from EWW, fell by $9.8 million
due to a 38% decline in demand offset by a 12% improvement in unit prices.
Niobium products sales fell by $0.9 million primarily as a result of a drop in
unit selling prices. Sales of vanadium products, produced in SMC's Ohio plant,
fell by $0.4 million despite a small strengthening of prices as demand weakened
slightly. Sales of aluminum products increased by $1.4 million, primarily due to
an increase in volume of compacted products partly offset by a 20% drop in
average selling prices.
CIF revenue was $6.5 million (17%) lower than the year ended December 31,
2001. Tantalum sales fell by $10.2 million following a drop in world demand and
a return to more typical prices than those seen in 2000 and 2001. Despite a 6%
drop in prices, sales of aluminum products rose by $3.0 million due to increased
sales volume of aluminum master alloys following the transfer of melting
operations from SMC.
EWW revenue was $4.2 million (12%) lower than the year ended December 31,
2001. Total ferrochrome volumes were virtually unchanged but a change in product
mix resulted in a drop in average selling prices and a $1.7 million decrease in
sales. Demand for special grades of ferrochrome fell by 50%, resulting in a drop
in sales of $5.8 million but this was partially offset by an increase in demand
for normal grades and a resulting increase in sales of $3.2 million. EWW also
had $2.6 million of tantalum sales in 2001, which did not recur in 2002.
Revenue from operations included in "Other" declined by $31.5 million in
the year ended December 31, 2002, primarily due to the drop in tantalum demand
and prices, discussed above.
Gross Profit
Consolidated gross profit decreased to $29.2 million (8.5% of total
revenue) for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $54.0 million (13.7% of total
revenue) for the year ended December 31, 2001.
LSM gross profit was $1.6 million (11%) below the year ended December 31,
2001. Gross profits from compacted aluminum products fell $0.7 million as the
increase in unit production costs exceeded the increase in sales prices. Gross
profits on niobium products fell by $0.5 million to virtually zero following the
termination of the agency agreement (see above). Gross profit from chrome
products fell by $0.4 million as a result of the decrease in demand discussed
above. Gross profits from nickel boron and other nickel products fell by $0.4
million primarily as a result of a fall in market prices. Gross profit from
titanium products improved by $0.7 million as a result of increased selling
prices. Aluminum powder gross profits increased by $1.3 million mainly due to an
improved product mix which resulted in increased average margins.
SMC gross profit was $3.2 million (75%) below the year ended December 31,
2001. Unit costs of aluminum master alloys would have been lower than in 2001
except for inventory write-downs and other costs relating to the transfer of
aluminum melting operations to CIF. Combined with a drop in selling prices, this
resulted in a drop in gross profit of $1.7 million. Gross profit from chrome
products fell by $1.6 million as a result of the drop in volume discussed above.
Gross profit from vanadium products declined by $0.7 million as a result of an
increase in unit production costs. The increase in volumes of compacted products
resulted in a drop in average unit cost and an increase in gross profit of $1.2
million.
14
<Page>
CIF gross profit was $5.0 million (63%) below the year ended December 31,
2001. A 90%, $5.5 million, decline in gross profits from tantalum and niobium
products, following the price correction discussed above, was partially offset
by an increase of $0.5 million in profits from aluminum master alloys following
the transfer of melting operations from SMC and the resulting volume increase.
EWW gross profit was $4.8 million (91%) below the year ended December 31,
2001. Total ferrochrome gross profits decreased by $3.1 million, primarily as a
result of the change in product mix, discussed above. Also, average unit
production costs increased, mainly due to the halving of volumes of special
grades. There were no sales of tantalum in 2002 and, therefore, gross profits of
$1.2 million made in 2001 were not repeated.
Gross profit from operations included in "Other" was $12.7 million (54%)
below the year ended December 31, 2001 due primarily to decreased margins on
tantalum products resulting from the decline in selling prices (see above).
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses ("SG&A")
SG&A increased to $35.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 from
$35.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, an increase of $0.5 million
(2%). An increase in pension expense, primarily $1.5 million at LSM, was mostly
offset by reductions in compensation and other expenses resulting from the
restructuring program discussed below. For the year ended December 31, 2002,
SG&A represented 10.3% of total revenue compared to 8.9% for the year ended
December 31, 2001.
Restructuring Charges, Net
During 2002, Metallurg carried out a restructuring program intended to
reduce the cost structure at corporate headquarters, SMC and LSM. The
restructuring plan includes the discontinuation of certain production
activities, the termination of employees and the write-down of redundant plant
and equipment. As a result of the restructuring and other cost reduction
activities, Metallurg currently expects to generate cost savings of
approximately $8 million annually in future periods. A charge of $3.4 million
was incurred in the year ended December 31, 2002, primarily for severance costs
of terminated employees.
At corporate headquarters, Metallurg, Inc. recorded a restructuring charge
of $2.0 million for severance costs of four corporate executives and five
administrative employees, all of whom were terminated during the year. Under the
terms of their employment and severance agreements, the severance will be paid
over a period of up to 18 months. Of this amount, $0.5 million was paid as of
December 31, 2002.
LSM recorded a restructuring charge of 'L'0.7 million ($1.1 million)
for severance costs of 18 production employees and 11 administrative employees
who were terminated during the year. The entire amount was paid during the year.
SMC recorded a restructuring charge of $0.5 million of which $0.4 million
was for severance costs of one executive, 16 production employees and nine
administrative employees, all of whom were terminated during the year. Of this
amount, $0.2 million had been paid by December 31, 2002. The remaining $0.1
million was for the write-down of property and equipment no longer used in
operations.
The restructuring charge of $3.4 million is net of the reversal of a prior
year accrual balance of $0.1 million following the completion of a restructuring
program at EWW in 2002
See "Note 4. Restructuring" to Metallurg's Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Operating (Loss) Income
There was an operating loss of $6.8 million for the year ended December
31, 2002 compared to operating income of $19.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2001, due primarily to the decrease in gross profit and the
restructuring, discussed above. In addition, SMC recognized environmental
expense recoveries of $3.0 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December
31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
15
<Page>
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net, was as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
2002 2001
-------- --------
Interest income .................. $ 805 $ 1,774
Interest expense ................. (14,207) (13,886)
-------- --------
Interest expense, net ...... $(13,402) $(12,112)
======== ========
Interest income decreased as a result of lower cash balances, primarily in
the U.S. See "Note 8. Borrowings" to Metallurg's Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Income Tax Provision, Net
Income tax provision, net of tax benefits, was as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
2002 2001
-------- --------
Total current .................... $ 1,533 $ 4,281
Total deferred ................... (255) 1,277
-------- --------
Income tax provision, net .. $ 1,278 $ 5,558
======== ========
The difference between the statutory federal income tax rate and
Metallurg's effective rate for the year ended December 31, 2002, is principally
due to: (i) certain deductible temporary differences, principally domestic net
operating losses, which in other circumstances would have generated a deferred
tax benefit, have been fully provided for in a valuation allowance; (ii) taxes
paid on foreign dividends; and (iii) the excess of foreign tax rates over the
statutory federal income tax rate. See "Note 10. Income Taxes" to Metallurg's
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net (Loss) Income
Metallurg had a net loss of $21.4 million for the year ended December 31,
2002 compared to net income of $2.2 million for the year ended December 31,
2001.
Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2000
Total Revenue
Consolidated total revenue decreased by $25.1 million (6%) in the year
ended December 31, 2001.
LSM revenue was $7.4 million (4%) lower than the year ended December 31,
2000. An increase in sales of aluminum products, due to increased sales volume
of aluminum powder and master alloys and the acquisition of the Norwegian
facility on March 31, 2000, and higher sales volume of ferrotitanium and
chromium metal were offset by a discontinuation of sales of certain low-margin
products sourced from third parties. SMC revenue was $14.9 million (13%) lower
than the year ended December 31, 2000. Increased sales volume of chromium
products was more than offset by lower sales volume and selling prices of
vanadium and aluminum products. CIF revenue was $10.4 million (36%) higher than
the year ended December 31, 2000 due to increased selling prices of tantalum
products and increased sales volume of aluminum master alloys. EWW revenue was
$0.7 million (2%) lower than the year ended December 31, 2000 due primarily to
reduced sales volume of low carbon ferrochrome partially offset by sales of
tantalum products. Revenue from operations included in "Other" was $5.7 million
(5%) lower than for the year ended December 31, 2000, due to decreased sales of
tantalum products and various products sourced from third parties.
Gross Profit
Gross profit decreased to $54.0 million (13.7% of total revenue) for the
year ended December 31, 2001 from $56.7 million (13.5% of total revenue) for the
year ended December 31, 2000. LSM gross profit was $4.3 million (23%) below the
year ended December 31, 2000 due primarily to lower selling prices of aluminum
products and chromium metal and higher costs of ferrotitanium and chromium
metal. SMC gross profit was $3.8 million (47%) below the year ended December 31,
16
<Page>
2000 due primarily to lower volume and selling prices of vanadium and aluminum
products. CIF gross profit was $3.4 million (74%) above the year ended December
31, 2000 due primarily to increased selling prices of tantalum products and
increased volume of niobium oxide. EWW gross profit was $0.5 million (9%) above
the year ended December 31, 2000 due primarily to sales of tantalum products,
partially offset by reduced sales volume of low carbon ferrochrome. Gross profit
from operations included in "Other" was $2.4 million (12%) above the year ended
December 31, 2000 due primarily to increased margins on tantalum products.
SG&A
SG&A decreased to $35.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 from
$36.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, a decrease of $1.5 million
(4%). Increases in compensation and bad debt expense were more than offset by
reductions in occupancy expenses and professional fees. For the year ended
December 31, 2001, SG&A represented 8.9% of total revenue compared to 8.7% for
the year ended December 31, 2000. Due to the change in fiscal year-end, SG&A
expenses for 2000 were $0.5 million less than what they would have been if
twelve months of headquarter expenses were included.
Operating Income
Operating income decreased to $19.6 million for the year ended December
31, 2001 from $20.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, due primarily
to the decrease in gross profits discussed above. Results included environmental
expense recoveries of $0.6 million and $0.8 million for the years ended December
31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net, was as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
2001 2000
-------- --------
Interest income .................. $ 1,774 $ 3,387
Interest expense ................. (13,886) (12,159)
-------- --------
Interest expense, net ...... $(12,112) $ (8,772)
======== ========
Interest expense, net, increased due to lower cash balances and higher
external borrowings, primarily in the U.K., following recent acquisitions and
capital projects. Interest expense on Metallurg, Inc.'s Senior Notes was $0.9
million higher in 2001 due to the change in its fiscal year. See "Note 8.
Borrowings" to Metallurg's Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income Tax Provision, Net
Income tax provision, net of tax benefits, was as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
2001 2000
-------- --------
Total current .................... $ 4,281 $ 4,586
Total deferred ................... 1,277 3,388
-------- --------
Income tax provision, net .. $ 5,558 $ 7,974
======== ========
The difference between the statutory federal income tax rate and
Metallurg's effective rate for the year ended December 31, 2001, is principally
due to: (i) taxes paid on foreign dividends; (ii) the excess of foreign tax
rates over the statutory federal income tax rate; and (iii) certain deductible
temporary differences which, in other circumstances would have generated a
deferred tax benefit, have been fully provided for in a valuation allowance.
See "Note 10. Income Taxes" to Metallurg's Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net Income
Metallurg had net income of $2.2 million for the year ended December 31,
2001 compared to $9.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2000. The 2000
results included a pre-tax gain of $5.1 million relating to the sale of
Solikamsk Magnesium Works.
17
<Page>
Liquidity and Financial Resources
General
Metallurg's sources of liquidity include cash and cash equivalents, cash
from operations and amounts available under credit facilities. At December 31,
2002, Metallurg had $29.4 million in cash and cash equivalents and working
capital of $92.6 million as compared to $31.8 million and $115.0 million,
respectively, at December 31, 2001.
Metallurg believes that existing cash balances and the sources discussed
below are sufficient to fund the current and anticipated future requirements of
working capital, capital expenditures, pension benefits, potential acquisitions
and environmental expenditures through at least December 31, 2003. Metallurg's
long-term debt agreements contain numerous covenants and prohibitions that limit
the financial activities of Metallurg, including requirements that Metallurg
satisfy certain financial ratios and limitations on additional indebtedness. The
ability of Metallurg to meet its debt service requirements and to comply with
such covenants will be dependent upon future operating performance and financial
results of Metallurg, which will be subject to financial, economic, political,
competitive and other factors affecting Metallurg, many of which are beyond its
control.
Cash Flow Information
Cash Flows from Operating Activities - Cash provided by operating
activities was $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to
$6.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, after interest payments of
$11.0 million on the Senior Notes in each year. In 2002, a net loss, adjusted
for depreciation and other non-cash items, was more than offset by a decrease in
working capital. In 2001, net income, adjusted for non-cash items, was offset by
cash used to fund increases in working capital items. SMC realized environmental
expense recoveries upon receipt of $3.0 million and $0.6 million in 2002 and
2001, respectively, upon settlement with insurance companies relating to
coverage for certain environmental claims.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities - Net cash used in investing
activities decreased to $14.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, from
$15.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. While capital expenditures
were $4.3 million lower in 2002, there was a net increase of $3.0 million in
Metallurg's loan to GfE during the year.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities - Cash provided by financing
activities was $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to
$6.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. In 2002, in accordance with
prescribed accounting principles, cash proceeds of $3.5 million from the sales
of GfE and the European sales offices were classified as capital contributions,
as these sales were to members of a common controlled group. Similarly,
dividends received from these entities prior to their sales have been
reclassified as capital contributions. See "Note 2. Change in Reporting Entity"
to Metallurg's Consolidated Financial Statements. Cash flows in 2001 reflect
LSM's restructuring of its revolving credit facilities and term loans.
Credit Facilities and Other Financing Arrangements
On October 29, 1999, Metallurg, Inc., SMC and certain of Metallurg, Inc.'s
other subsidiaries (the "Borrowers") renewed their existing credit facility with
certain financial institutions led by Fleet National Bank as agent (the
"Revolving Credit Facility") for a term of five years. This facility, as amended
in December 2002, provides the Borrowers with up to $30.0 million for working
capital requirements and general corporate purposes. Interest is charged at a
rate per annum equal to (i) LIBOR, plus 2.0% - 2.5% or (ii) Prime, plus up to
1.0%, based on the performance of Metallurg, Inc. and certain of its
subsidiaries (the "North American Group"), as defined in the Revolving Credit
Facility. Interest rates on amounts borrowed are adjusted quarterly, based on
the North American Group's fixed charge coverage ratio. The Borrowers are
required to pay a fee of 0.375% per annum on the unused portion of the facility.
The total amount the Borrowers may borrow at any time is limited to a borrowing
base calculation that is based on eligible accounts receivable, inventory and
certain fixed assets. At December 31, 2002, there were no borrowings under this
facility; however, outstanding letters of credit totaled $21.4 million. The
Borrowers had unused borrowing capacity of $0.4 million under this facility. The
Revolving Credit Facility continues to prohibit Metallurg, Inc. from making
dividends prior to 2004 and requires the Borrowers and certain subsidiaries to
comply with various covenants, including the maintenance of minimum liquidity,
as defined in the agreement, at a $10.0 million level. Liquidity, as defined,
was $14.0 million at December 31, 2002.
18
<Page>
LSM has revolving credit facilities with Barclays Bank plc ("Barclays")
and HSBC Bank plc ("HSBC"). In 2002, the overdraft facility with Barclays was
reduced by 'L'1.0 million ($1.6 million). These facilities now provide LSM
with up to 'L'7.5 million ($12.1 million) of borrowings, 'L'43.3 million
($69.7 million) of foreign exchange contracts and options and 'L'4.0 million
($6.4 million) for other ancillary banking arrangements, including bank
guarantees. Borrowings under these facilities are unsecured and payable on
demand. Outstanding loans under this facility bear interest at a rate of 1.0%
over the lender's base rate. At December 31, 2002, there were no borrowings
under these facilities.
LSM also has four revolving term loan facilities with Barclays and HSBC
that provide for borrowings up to 'L'12.0 million ($19.3 million), all of
which were outstanding at December 31, 2002. Two of the facilities expire during
the second quarter of 2004 while the other two expire during the second quarter
of 2006. These term loan facilities are unsecured and require LSM to comply
annually with various covenants, including the maintenance of minimum net worth
and interest coverage. In 2002, following a decline in operating results, the
term loan agreements were amended and the annual interest rate was increased to
LIBOR plus 1.75%. Also due to the decline in operating results, LSM obtained, in
December 2002, waivers from HSBC regarding the annual minimum interest coverage
ratio covenant for the period ended December 31, 2002.
LSM's Norwegian facility has an unsecured overdraft facility of NOK 15.0
million ($2.2 million). Borrowings under this facility bear interest at a rate
of NIBOR plus 1.25%. At December 31, 2002, there was NOK 10.6 million ($1.5
million) outstanding under this facility. During 2000, the Norwegian facility
entered into an unsecured term loan in the amount of NOK 10.0 million ($1.4
million). Repayments began in November 2000 and continue for 10 years in equal
monthly installments plus interest at NIBOR plus 1.25%.
EWW has committed lines of credit with several banks in the aggregate
amount of 'E'3.2 million ($3.3 million). The credit agreements require EWW to
pledge certain assets, which include accounts receivable, inventory and fixed
assets. At December 31, 2002, there were no borrowings under these facilities.
In 1998, EWW borrowed DM 1.5 million ('E'0.8 million or $0.8 million).
Payments began in 2000 and continue at DM 0.2 million ('E'0.1 million or $0.1
million) per year until maturity in 2008. The loan bears interest at 4.25%.
Metallurg, Inc.'s other foreign subsidiaries maintain short-term secured
and unsecured borrowing arrangements, generally in local currencies, with
various banks totaling $10.2 million. Borrowings under these arrangements
aggregated $4.5 million at December 31, 2002 at a weighted-average interest rate
of 11.6%.
Contractual Cash Obligations
As described in Notes 8 and 15 to Metallurg's Consolidated Financial
Statements at December 31, 2002, Metallurg is obligated to make future payments
under various contracts, such as debt and lease agreements. Significant
contractual cash obligations of Metallurg are as follows (in millions):
Payments Due By Period
-----------------------------------------------------
Less than After
Total 1 year 2-3 years 4-5 years 5 years
------ ------ --------- --------- -------
Contractual Cash Obligations:
Short-term debt ........................ $ 6.0 $ 6.0
Long-term debt ......................... 121.3 0.3 $ 10.3 $110.2 $ 0.5
Interest on Senior Notes ............... 55.0 11.0 22.0 22.0 --
Non-cancelable operating leases ........ 6.4 1.1 1.8 1.3 2.2
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total contractual cash obligations .. $188.7 $ 18.4 $ 34.1 $133.5 $ 2.7
====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Capital Expenditures
Metallurg invested $11.2 million in capital projects during the year ended
December 31, 2002. Metallurg's capital expenditures include projects related to
improving Metallurg's operations, productivity improvements, replacement
projects and ongoing environmental requirements (which are in addition to
expenditures discussed in "Environmental Remediation Costs" below). Capital
expenditures are projected to decrease to approximately $5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003, including $3 million of capital investments which
Metallurg believes will result in decreased costs of production,
19
<Page>
improved efficiency and expanded production capacities. The remaining capital
expenditures planned are primarily for replacement and repairs of existing
facilities. Although Metallurg has projected these items for the year ended
December 31, 2003, Metallurg has not committed purchases to vendors for all of
these projects, as some projects remain contingent on final approvals and other
conditions and the actual timing of expenditures may extend into 2004. Metallurg
believes that these projects will be funded through existing and future
internally generated cash and credit lines.
Environmental Remediation Costs
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' Statement of Position
96-1, "Environmental Remediation Liabilities," states that losses associated
with environmental remediation obligations are accrued when such losses are
deemed probable and reasonably estimable. Such accruals generally are recognized
no later than the completion of the remedial feasibility study and are adjusted
as further information develops or circumstances change. Costs of future
expenditures for environmental remediation obligations are generally not
discounted to their present value. During the year ended December 31, 2002,
Metallurg expended $2.7 million for environmental remediation.
In 1997, SMC entered into settlement agreements with various environmental
regulatory authorities with regard to all of the significant environmental
remediation liabilities of which it is aware. Pursuant to these agreements, SMC
has agreed to perform environmental remediation, which, as of December 31, 2002,
had an estimated net cost of completion of $28.0 million, net of trust funds of
$3.8 million. Of this amount, $4.2 million is expected to be expended in 2003,
$1.9 million in 2004 and $1.7 million in 2005. In addition, Metallurg estimates
it will make expenditures of $0.7 million with respect to environmental
remediation at its foreign facilities over the next three years. These amounts
have been accrued for in prior years and are reflected in Metallurg's balance
sheet liabilities. See "Note 13. Environmental Liabilities" to Metallurg's
Consolidated Financial Statements.
While its remediation obligations and other environmental costs, in the
aggregate, will reduce its liquidity, Metallurg believes its cash balances, cash
from operations and cash available under its credit facilities are sufficient to
fund its current and anticipated future requirements for environmental
expenditures.
Market Risk
Metallurg is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates,
interest rates and certain commodity prices. Derivative instruments used to
manage these exposures involve little complexity and are not used for
speculative purposes. The counterparties of these instruments are diversified
financial institutions. Metallurg monitors the concentration risk to limit its
counterparty exposure.
Foreign Currency Exposures - Metallurg actively manages foreign currency
exposures that are associated with foreign currency purchases and sales and
other assets and liabilities created in the normal course of business at the
operating unit level. Metallurg uses forward contracts to mitigate exposures
that cannot be naturally offset within an operating unit. See "Note 9. Financial
Instruments" to Metallurg's Consolidated Financial Statements.
Interest Rate Exposures - Metallurg has exposure to interest rate risk
from its short-term and certain long-term debt. While the rates on Metallurg's
long-term debt are generally fixed, LSM has term loans of 'L'12.0 million
($19.3 million) at variable rates. In 2001, LSM entered into a zero premium
interest rate collar for a term of three years in order to hedge the interest on
this variable rate long-term debt. See "Note 8. Borrowings" to Metallurg's
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Commodity Price Exposures - Metallurg is exposed to volatility in the
prices of raw materials used in some of its products and uses forward contracts
to manage some of those exposures. Where Metallurg does not take physical
delivery of the raw material under the forward contract, gains and losses on
these derivatives are recognized currently in earnings.
Other
Commencing in January 2004, Metallurg Holdings must make semi-annual
interest payments of $2.6 million on the outstanding Senior Discount Notes.
Metallurg Holdings is a holding company, and its ability to meet its payment
obligations on these notes is dependent upon the receipt of dividends and other
distributions from its direct and indirect subsidiaries. Currently, Metallurg
Holdings, Metallurg, Inc.'s parent, does not have sufficient cash on hand to
make the interest payment due on its Senior Discount Notes in January 2004.
While Metallurg, Inc. may be able to distribute cash to Metallurg
20
<Page>
Holdings for the purpose of making the January 2004 interest payment, Metallurg,
Inc. could be prohibited from making a cash distribution at such time under the
restrictive covenants of its Revolving Credit Facility (see "Note 8. Borrowings"
to Metallurg's Consolidated Financial Statements). If Metallurg Holdings were
unable to make its interest payment when due, it could lead to a foreclosure on
its assets, principally the equity of Metallurg, Inc., and create a default in
accordance with the terms of Metallurg, Inc.'s 11% Senior Note indenture.
The funded status of Metallurg's pension plans continues to be impacted by
decreases in the plans' assets values due to continuing declines in equity
markets and interest rates in 2002. Management continues to monitor these
developments as further declines in the funded status of these plans may impact
future pension expense and funding requirements.
Related Party Transactions
In December 2002, Metallurg sold all of its ownership interests in GfE to
Safeguard International Fund PFW, L.L.C., a Delaware company owned by Safeguard
International, the majority owner of Metallurg Holdings, Metallurg's parent
company. Metallurg also sold a number of its European sales offices to Sudamin
Recycling GmbH & Co. KG, a German company controlled by Safeguard International.
See "Note 2. Change in Reporting Entity" to Metallurg's Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Accounts receivable and payable balances between Metallurg and the
companies sold in December 2002, previously recorded as intergroup balances and
eliminated on consolidation, are now shown as related party balances on
Metallurg's Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In 2002, Metallurg, Inc. charged its parent company, Metallurg Holdings,
$12,000 per quarter for administrative services performed. In addition, in
accordance with an advisory agreement dated July 1, 2000, Metallurg, Inc. paid
Safeguard International Management, L.L.C. ("Safeguard LLC") $150,000 in
connection with certain advisory and other services. Effective October 31, 2002,
this advisory agreement was terminated and two members of Safeguard LLC, Dr.
Heinz C. Schimmelbusch and Mr. Arthur R. Spector, were employed by Metallurg,
Inc. on November 11, 2002, as Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice
Chairman, respectively. See "Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of
Metallurg, Inc."
Dr. Schimmelbusch and Mr. Spector are managing directors of the general
partner of Safeguard International, the majority owner of Metallurg Holdings,
and in these positions receive compensation from this entity.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make judgments, estimates
and assumptions regarding uncertainties that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses. In applying Metallurg's significant
accounting policies, as more fully discussed in "Note 1. Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies", management uses its judgment to determine the appropriate
assumptions to be used in the determination of certain estimates. Those
estimates are based on historical experience, terms of existing contracts,
observances of trends in the industry, information provided by Metallurg's
customers and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate.
Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be
perceived with certainty and accordingly, these estimates may change as new
events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is
obtained and as Metallurg's operating environment changes. Metallurg deems the
following estimates and accounting policies to be critical:
Inventories
Metallurg's inventory is a significant component of current assets and is
stated at the lower of cost or market. Metallurg regularly estimates the net
realizable value of inventories on hand and adjusts the carrying amounts of
these inventories to market value, less a normal profit margin, as necessary.
Significant or unanticipated changes to market values of these items, either
adverse or positive, could impact the amount and timing of any such adjustments
that may be required. Such provisions were not significant in the periods
presented.
Taxes
Metallurg accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes",
which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using
enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and
tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 109 also requires that
deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely
than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be
realized.
21
<Page>
Metallurg evaluates quarterly the realizability of its deferred tax assets
by assessing its valuation allowance and by adjusting the amount of such
allowance, if necessary. The factors used to assess the likelihood of
realization are Metallurg's forecast of future taxable income and available tax
planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred tax
assets. Metallurg has used tax-planning strategies to realize or renew net
deferred tax assets in order to avoid the potential loss of future tax benefits.
Failure to achieve forecasted taxable income might affect the ultimate
realization of the net deferred tax assets. Factors that may affect Metallurg's
ability to achieve sufficient forecasted taxable income include, but are not
limited to, the following: a decline in sales or margins, increased competition
or loss of market share. In addition, Metallurg operates within multiple taxing
jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. These audits can
involve complex issues, which may require an extended period of time to resolve.
In management's opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes and valuation
allowances against deferred taxes have been made for all years.
Environmental Remediation Costs
Losses associated with environmental remediation obligations are accrued
when such losses are deemed probable and reasonably estimable. Such accruals
generally are recognized no later than the completion of the remedial
feasibility study and are adjusted as further information develops or
circumstances change. Significant judgment is required in developing assumptions
and estimating costs to be incurred for environmental remediation activities due
to, among other factors, the complexity of environmental regulations and
remediation technologies. Metallurg enters into agreements (e.g., administrative
orders, consent decrees) that generally cover many years. Management must assess
the type of technology to be used to accomplish the remediation as well as the
continually evolving regulatory environment in evaluating costs associated with
these sites. These factors are considered in management's estimates of the
timing and amount of any future costs that may be necessary for remedial
actions. Given the level of judgments and estimation as described above, it is
likely that materially different amounts could be recorded if different
assumptions were used or if underlying circumstances were to change (e.g., a
significant change in environmental standards).
Asset Impairment
Metallurg's recent history includes years with unprofitable results and
negative cash flows. This history of losses is an indication that the carrying
amounts of Metallurg's long-lived assets might not be recoverable from future
cash flows. As a result, Metallurg completed an impairment assessment under SFAS
No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" during
the fourth quarter of 2002. In order to complete this assessment, Metallurg
identified for testing three asset groups - SMC, LSM and EWW.
Metallurg evaluates its long-lived assets by comparing estimated future
undiscounted cash flows using the particular cash flow assumptions that are
considered most likely to occur. Significant judgment is required to estimate
future cash flows, including the impact of future prices, production and
shipment levels, cost reduction initiatives, prices of inputs like raw materials
and energy and future capital requirements. Management uses its best judgment to
assess these factors. The result of this assessment led Metallurg to conclude
that there was no impairment related to the long-lived assets in the three asset
groups tested, as the undiscounted cash flows exceeded the net carrying value of
the applicable net assets in each of the three asset groups. If, however, future
demand and market conditions are less favorable than those projected by
management, asset write-downs may be required.
Pensions
Metallurg maintains defined benefit plans for its employees in the U.S.,
the U.K., Norway and Germany. Several statistical and other factors that attempt
to anticipate future events are used in calculating the expense and liability
related to the plans. These factors include assumptions about the discount rate,
expected return on plan assets and rate of future compensation increases as
determined by Metallurg, within certain guidelines. In addition, Metallurg's
actuarial consultants also use subjective factors such as employee turnover and
mortality rates to estimate these factors.
The rate used to discount future estimated liabilities is determined
considering the rates available at year-end on long-term, high quality corporate
bonds that could be used to settle the obligations of the plan. An increase in
the discount rate of 1/4 of 1% would decrease the 2002 pension liability by
approximately $5.9 million and the net periodic pension expense in 2003 by
approximately $0.5 million. A decrease in the discount rate of 1/4 of 1% would
increase the 2002 pension liability by approximately $6.4 million and the net
periodic pension expense in 2003 by approximately $0.6 million.
22
<Page>
The long-term rate of return is estimated by considering historical
returns and expected returns on current and projected asset allocations. A
change in the assumption for the long-term rate of return on plan assets of 1/4
of 1% would impact net periodic pension expense in 2003 by approximately $0.2
million.
The combination of negative actual investment returns and declining
interest rates have increased Metallurg's underfunded plan status. At December
31, 2002, Metallurg recognized a liability on its balance sheet for each pension
plan where the fair value of the assets of that pension plan was less than the
accumulated benefit obligation. This liability is called a "minimum pension
liability" and is recorded by a charge to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
in Shareholder's (Deficit) Equity. In 2002, Metallurg recorded a charge of $18.9
million, net of deferred tax of $6.3 million. This charge has no current impact
on Metallurg's net income, liquidity or cash flows.
Based upon the current underfunded status of the plans and the actuarial
assumptions being used for 2003, Metallurg believes that it will be required to
make cash contributions in 2003 of approximately $0.4 million and $2.0 million
in the U.S. and the U.K., respectively.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Effective January 1, 2002, Metallurg adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets", which addresses the accounting and reporting of
acquired goodwill and other intangible assets. The adoption of SFAS No. 142 did
not have a material effect on Metallurg's financial statements. The financial
statements do not reflect the pushdown of purchase accounting adjustments,
including goodwill, recorded by Metallurg Holdings in 1998.
In June 2001, SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations"
was issued. This statement covers all legally enforceable obligations associated
with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and provides the accounting
and reporting requirements for such obligations. SFAS No. 143 is effective on
January 1, 2003. Metallurg does not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 143 will
have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2001, SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets" was issued. This statement supersedes SFAS No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" and related literature and establishes a single accounting
model, based on the framework established in SFAS No. 121, for long-lived assets
to be disposed of by sale, but it retains the fundamental provisions of SFAS No.
121 for the recognition of the impairment of long-lived assets to be held and
used. SFAS No. 144 was effective for Metallurg on January 1, 2002. The adoption
of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on Metallurg's consolidated
financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2003, Metallurg will adopt SFAS No. 146, "Accounting
for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities". This statement nullifies
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain
Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity", under which
a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of an entity's
commitment to an exit plan. SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost
associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized at fair value only
once the liability is incurred. The provisions of this statement will be applied
to any future exit or disposal activities.
In December 2002, SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure" was issued. This statement amends SFAS
No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", to provide alternative
methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair-value-based method of
accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this statement
amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent
disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of
accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method
used on reported results. Metallurg accounts for stock-based employee
compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions of Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and
complies with the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148.
In November 2002, Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No.
45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees,
Including Indirect Guarantees and Indebtedness of Others", was issued. This
interpretation requires the initial recognition and initial measurement, on a
prospective basis only, of guarantees issued or modified after December 31,
2002. Additionally, certain disclosure requirements are effective for financial
statements ending after December 15, 2002. There were no disclosures required in
Metallurg's Consolidated Financial Statements for the year
23
<Page>
ended December 31, 2002, and Metallurg does not believe the adoption of this
interpretation in 2003 will have a material impact on its financial statements.
Effects of Inflation
Inflation has not had a significant effect on Metallurg's operations.
However, there can be no assurance that inflation will not have a material
effect on Metallurg's operations in the future. Metallurg is subject to price
fluctuations in its raw materials and products. These fluctuations have affected
and will continue to affect Metallurg's results of operations. See "Results of
Operations."
24
<Page>
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The following audited consolidated financial statements of Metallurg, Inc.
and its consolidated subsidiaries are presented herein pursuant to the
requirements of Item 8 on the pages indicated below:
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Page
----
Report of Independent Accountants - PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP for the Years Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001,
and the Transition Period Ended December 31, 2000 ............... 26
Statements of Consolidated Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 ................................ 27
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2002 and 2001 .............. 28
Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 ................................ 29
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years
Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 .......................... 30-59
Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) for the
Years Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 .......................... 60
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE:
Report of Independent Accountants on Financial Statement
Schedule - PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the Years
Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 ............................ 61
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves ........... 62
25
<Page>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors of Metallurg, Inc.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related
consolidated statements of operations and of cash flows present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Metallurg, Inc. and its
subsidiaries ("Metallurg") at December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended December
31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, and the period ended December 31, 2000 (the
"Transition Period", see Note 1) in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements
are the responsibility of Metallurg's management; our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We
conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, on December 31,
2002, Metallurg sold a production facility and certain sales offices to entities
under the common control of Metallurg's shareholder. These dispositions have
been accounted for as a change in reporting entity, which requires that the
financial statements be restated to exclude the sold entities from all periods
for the Company's financial reporting purposes.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
March 17, 2003
26
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------
Notes 2002 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Sales ............................................. 1 $ 344,346 $ 393,445 $ 418,804
Commission income ................................. 1 628 633 405
--------- --------- ---------
Total revenue ............................... 344,974 394,078 419,209
Cost of sales ..................................... 315,757 340,069 362,550
--------- --------- ---------
Gross profit ................................ 29,217 54,009 56,659
Selling, general and administrative expenses ...... 35,641 35,067 36,573
Environmental expense recoveries .................. 1,13 (3,000) (631) (750)
Restructuring charges, net ........................ 4 3,373 -- --
--------- --------- ---------
Operating (loss) income ..................... (6,797) 19,573 20,836
Other:
Other income, net ........................... 12 228 279 5,491
Interest expense, net ....................... 8 (13,402) (12,112) (8,772)
--------- --------- ---------
(Loss) income before income tax provision and
minority interest ......................... (19,971) 7,740 17,555
Income tax provision .............................. 1,10 1,278 5,558 7,974
--------- --------- ---------
(Loss) income before minority interest ...... (21,249) 2,182 9,581
Minority interest ................................. 1 (103) (28) 7
--------- --------- ---------
Net (loss) income ........................... (21,352) 2,154 9,588
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment ..... 1, 11 7,899 (3,911) (8,084)
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net ... 1, 7, 11 (18,876) (13,802) --
Deferred loss on derivatives, net ........... 1, 9, 11 (219) (122) --
--------- --------- ---------
Comprehensive (loss) income ................. $ (32,548) $ (15,681) $ 1,504
========= ========= =========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
27
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
December 31,
---------------------------
Notes 2002 2001
--------- --------- ---------
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents .................................... 1 $ 29,438 $ 31,772
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful
accounts ($2,036 in 2002 and $1,697 in 2001) ............... 46,154 43,419
Accounts receivable - related parties ........................ 17 5,632 5,010
Inventories .................................................. 1,5 65,741 75,183
Prepaid expenses and other current assets .................... 9,656 14,570
--------- ---------
Total current assets .................................... 156,621 169,954
Investments in affiliates .......................................... 1 2,117 1,126
Property, plant and equipment, net ................................. 1,6 66,522 59,107
Other assets ....................................................... 22,905 11,332
--------- ---------
Total ................................................... $ 248,165 $ 241,519
========= =========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S (DEFICIT) EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Short-term debt .............................................. 8 $ 5,988 $ 4,368
Current portion of long-term debt ............................ 8 284 234
Accounts payable ............................................. 36,102 29,418
Accounts payable - related parties ........................... 17 1,027 834
Accrued expenses ............................................. 14,342 13,504
Current portion of environmental liabilities ................. 1,13 4,191 3,842
Taxes payable ................................................ 10 2,048 2,767
--------- ---------
Total current liabilities ............................... 63,982 54,967
--------- ---------
Long-term Liabilities:
Long-term debt ............................................... 8 121,019 118,919
Accrued pension liabilities .................................. 1,7 47,509 20,109
Environmental liabilities, net ............................... 1,13 26,285 29,049
Other liabilities ............................................ 1,394 1,234
--------- ---------
Total long-term liabilities ............................. 196,207 169,311
--------- ---------
Total liabilities ....................................... 260,189 224,278
--------- ---------
Commitments and Contingencies 14
Minority Interest .................................................. 1 462 340
Shareholder's (Deficit) Equity:
Common stock - par value $.01 per share, authorized 10,000,000
shares, issued and outstanding 5,000,000 shares ............ 11 50 50
Due from parent company ...................................... 11 (21,715) (19,714)
Additional paid-in capital ................................... 11 72,514 67,352
Accumulated other comprehensive loss ......................... 11 (38,621) (27,425)
Retained deficit ............................................. 11 (24,714) (3,362)
--------- ---------
Total shareholder's (deficit) equity .................... (12,486) 16,901
--------- ---------
Total ................................................... $ 248,165 $ 241,519
========= =========
See notes to consolidated financial statements
28
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
-------- -------- --------
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net (loss) income ................................................ $(21,352) $ 2,154 $ 9,588
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization .............................. 8,293 8,175 7,109
Gain on sale of assets ..................................... -- -- (5,128)
Deferred income taxes ...................................... (255) 1,277 3,388
Restructuring charges, net ................................. 3,373 -- --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable ................. 3,045 3,380 (3,777)
Decrease (increase) in inventories ......................... 14,770 (318) (12,141)
Decrease (increase) in other current assets ................ 4,362 (948) (2,609)
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued
expenses ................................................ (2,748) (2,762) 2,636
Restructuring payments ..................................... (1,805) (60) (1,311)
Environmental payments ..................................... (2,734) (1,842) (2,525)
Other assets and liabilities, net .......................... 406 (2,897) (2,671)
-------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities ... 5,355 6,159 (7,441)
-------- -------- --------
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment ....................... (11,240) (15,553) (13,918)
Proceeds from sale of assets ..................................... -- -- 8,311
Acquisitions, net of cash ........................................ -- -- (11,386)
Other, net ....................................................... (3,207) 185 235
-------- -------- --------
Net cash used in investing activities ................. (14,447) (15,368) (16,758)
-------- -------- --------
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt ..................................... 216 17,312 8,545
Repayment of long-term debt ...................................... (309) (9,324) (515)
Net borrowing (repayment) of short-term debt ..................... 883 (2,907) 8,083
Purchase of parent company debt .................................. -- -- (19,714)
Capital contributions ............................................ 4,401 1,257 90
-------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities ... 5,191 6,338 (3,511)
-------- -------- --------
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents .... 1,567 (1,148) (658)
-------- -------- --------
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents ........................ (2,334) (4,019) (28,368)
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period .................. 31,772 35,791 64,159
-------- -------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period ........................ $ 29,438 $ 31,772 $ 35,791
======== ======== ========
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid for income taxes ....................................... $ 1,877 $ 2,356 $ 3,279
======== ======== ========
Cash paid for interest ........................................... $ 13,681 $ 13,184 $ 12,272
======== ======== ========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
29
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Metallurg, Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiaries (collectively,
"Metallurg") manufacture and sell high-quality specialty metals, alloys and
metallic chemicals which are essential to the production of high-performance
aluminum and titanium alloys, superalloys, steel and certain non-metallic
materials for various applications in the aerospace, power supply, automotive,
petrochemical processing and telecommunications industries. Metallurg sells over
100 different products to over 2,500 customers worldwide (primarily in North
America and Europe).
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation - The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of Metallurg, Inc. and its majority-owned
subsidiaries. Investments in companies where Metallurg has greater than 50%
ownership interests are fully consolidated, with the equity owned by the
respective partners shown as minority interest on the balance sheet and their
portion of net income or loss shown separately in the statement of operations.
All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Effective December 31, 2002, Metallurg sold all of its ownership interests
in its Nuremberg, Germany manufacturing facility and its European trading
companies (See "Note 2. Change in Reporting Entity"). As the above transactions
are between members of a common controlled group, as defined for accounting
purposes, they are accounted for on an historical basis with no gain or loss
being recorded, and the results presented herein have been restated to exclude
the financial results of the companies sold and to reflect the new reporting
entity for all periods presented.
Metallurg is a wholly owned subsidiary of Metallurg Holdings, Inc.
("Metallurg Holdings") since the acquisition date of July 13, 1998. The
financial statements do not reflect the pushdown of purchase accounting
adjustments recorded by Metallurg Holdings.
Effective December 31, 2000, Metallurg, Inc. changed from a fiscal year
ending January 31 to a calendar year. As a result, the year ended December 31,
2000 (the "Transition Period") includes 11 months of results for Metallurg,
Inc., the parent holding company and, consistent with historical reporting
practice, the 12 months ended December 31, 2000 of results for its operating
subsidiaries.
Accounting Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Foreign Currency Translation - For foreign operations with functional
currencies other than the U.S. dollar, asset and liability accounts are
translated at current exchange rates; income and expenses are translated using
weighted-average exchange rates. Resulting translation adjustments are reported
in a separate component of shareholder's equity. Translation adjustments for
operations in highly inflationary economies and exchange gains and losses on
transactions are included in earnings, and amounted to (losses) gains of
$(1,092,000), $1,624,000, and $(73,000) for the years ended December 31, 2002,
2001 and 2000, respectively.
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Metallurg presents all highly liquid
instruments, maturing within 30 days or less when purchased, as cash
equivalents.
Inventories - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost
being determined using principally the average cost and specific identification
methods. Metallurg estimates the net realizable value of its inventories at
least quarterly and adjusts the carrying amount of these inventories to its
market value, less a normal profit margin, as necessary.
Investments in Affiliates - Investments in affiliates in which Metallurg
has a 20% to 50% ownership interest and exercises significant management
influence are accounted for in accordance with the equity method. Where
management does not exercise significant influence and where Metallurg has less
than a 20% interest, the investment is carried at cost.
30
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
Property and Depreciation - Depreciation is computed using principally the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Major
renewals and improvements are capitalized, while maintenance and repairs are
expensed when incurred. Upon sale or retirement, the costs and related
accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the respective accounts and any
resulting gain or loss is included in income.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets - Metallurg periodically evaluates the
carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used, including goodwill and
other intangible assets, when events and circumstances warrant such a review.
The carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the
anticipated undiscounted cash flow from such asset is separately identifiable
and is less than its carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based
on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value of the
long-lived asset. Fair market value is determined primarily using the
anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved.
Losses on long-lived assets to be disposed of are determined in a similar
manner, except that fair market values are reduced for the cost to dispose.
Revenue Recognition - Revenue is recognized when the earnings process is
complete and the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the
customer. In certain instances, Metallurg arranges sales for which the supplier
invoices the customer directly. In such cases, Metallurg receives commission
income, in its role as agent, which is recognized when the supplier passes title
to the customer. Metallurg assumes no significant credit or other risk with such
transactions.
Environmental Remediation Costs and Recoveries - Losses associated with
environmental remediation obligations are accrued when such losses are deemed
probable and reasonably estimable. Such accruals generally are recognized no
later than the completion of the remedial feasibility study and are adjusted as
further information develops or circumstances change. Cost of future
expenditures for environmental remediation obligations are not discounted to
their present value. Environmental expense recoveries are generally recognized
in income upon final settlement with Metallurg's insurance carriers.
Income Taxes - Metallurg uses the liability method whereby deferred income
taxes are provided for the temporary differences between the financial reporting
basis and the tax basis of Metallurg's assets and liabilities. Metallurg does
not provide for U.S. federal income taxes on the accumulated earnings considered
permanently reinvested in certain of its foreign subsidiaries, which
approximated $44,600,000 at December 31, 2002. These earnings have been invested
in facilities and other assets and have been subject to substantial foreign
income taxes, which may or could offset a major portion of any tax liability
resulting from their remittance and inclusion in U.S. taxable income.
Accordingly, Metallurg does not provide for U.S. income taxes on foreign
currency translation adjustments related to these foreign subsidiaries.
Retirement Plans - Metallurg maintains defined benefit plans for its
employees in the U.S., the U.K., Norway and Germany. Several statistical and
other factors, including assumptions about the discount rate, expected return on
plan assets, rate of future compensation increases, employee turnover and
mortality rates, are used in calculating the expense and liability related to
the plans. The rate to discount future estimated liabilities is determined
considering the rates available at year-end on long-term, high quality corporate
bonds that could be used to settle the obligations of the plans. The long-term
rate of return is estimated considering historical returns and expected returns
on current and projected asset allocations. A liability is recognized on the
balance sheet for each pension plan where the fair value of the assets of that
pension plan is less than the accumulated benefit obligation. This liability is
called a "minimum pension liability" and is recorded by a charge to Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss in Shareholder's (Deficit) Equity. Pension costs are
funded or accrued currently.
31
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
Stock-Based Compensation - Metallurg has a stock-based compensation plan,
which is described in "Note 11. Shareholder's (Deficit) Equity". Metallurg
accounts for this plan using the intrinsic value method in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees" and related interpretations. Accordingly, no compensation cost is
reflected in net income, as all options granted under this plan had an exercise
price at least equal to the estimated market value of the underlying common
stock on the date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net
income if Metallurg had applied the fair value measurement and recognition
methods prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No.
123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" to record expense for stock
option compensation (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
-------- -------- --------
Net (loss) income, as reported ..................... $(21,352) $ 2,154 $ 9,588
Less: compensation expense for option awards
determined by the fair value based method, net of
related tax effects ............................. 263 454 408
-------- -------- --------
Pro forma net (loss) income ................... $(21,615) $ 1,700 $ 9,180
======== ======== ========
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Metallurg uses derivative
instruments, primarily forward contracts, to manage certain foreign currency,
interest rate and commodity price exposures. Derivative instruments are viewed
as risk management tools by Metallurg and are not used for trading or
speculative purposes. Derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet
at fair value. Derivatives used to hedge foreign-currency-denominated balance
sheet items are reported directly in earnings along with offsetting gains and
losses on the items being hedged. Derivatives used to hedge forecasted cash
flows associated with foreign currency commitments or forecasted commodity
purchases are accounted for as cash flow hedges. Gains and losses on derivatives
designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income and
reclassified to earnings in a manner that matches the timing of the earnings
impact of the hedged transactions. The ineffective portion of all hedges, if
any, and gains and losses on foreign currency transactions not designated as
hedges are recognized currently in income.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - Effective January 1, 2002, Metallurg
adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", which addresses
the accounting and reporting of acquired goodwill and other intangible assets.
The adoption of SFAS No. 142 did not have a material effect on Metallurg's
financial statements. The financial statements do not reflect the pushdown of
purchase accounting adjustments, including goodwill, recorded by Metallurg
Holdings in 1998.
In June 2001, SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations"
was issued. This statement covers all legally enforceable obligations associated
with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and provides the accounting
and reporting requirements for such obligations. SFAS No. 143 is effective on
January 1, 2003. Metallurg does not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 143 will
have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2001, SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets" was issued. This statement supersedes SFAS No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" and related literature and establishes a single accounting
model, based on the framework established in SFAS No. 121, for long-lived assets
to be disposed of by sale, but it retains the fundamental provisions of SFAS No.
121 for the recognition of the impairment of long-lived assets to be held and
used. SFAS No. 144 was effective for Metallurg on January 1, 2002. The adoption
of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on Metallurg's consolidated
financial statements.
32
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
Effective January 1, 2003, Metallurg will adopt SFAS No. 146, "Accounting
for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities". This statement nullifies
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain
Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity", under which
a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of an entity's
commitment to an exit plan. SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost
associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized at fair value only
once the liability is incurred. The provisions of this statement will be applied
to any future exit or disposal activities.
In December 2002, SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure" was issued. This statement amends SFAS
No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," to provide alternative
methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair-value-based method of
accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this statement
amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent
disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of
accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method
used on reported results. Metallurg accounts for stock-based employee
compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions of Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and
complies with the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148.
In November 2002, Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No.
45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees,
Including Indirect Guarantees and Indebtedness of Others," was issued. This
interpretation requires the initial recognition and initial measurement, on a
prospective basis only, of guarantees issued or modified after December 31,
2002. Additionally, certain disclosure requirements are effective for financial
statements ending after December 15, 2002. There were no disclosures required in
Metallurg's Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31,
2002, and Metallurg does not believe the adoption of this interpretation in 2003
will have a material impact on its financial statements.
Earnings Per Share - Earnings per share is not presented since Metallurg,
Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Metallurg Holdings.
2. Change in Reporting Entity
Effective December 31, 2002, Metallurg completed the sale of certain
subsidiaries as described below. As these transactions are between members of a
common controlled group, as defined for accounting purposes, Metallurg has
restated its financial statements for all periods to reflect a new reporting
entity that excludes these subsidiaries. As a result, there is no gain or loss
recorded and any proceeds received have been recorded as capital contributions
from members of the common controlled group. Had Metallurg continued to report
results of the former reporting entity, net (loss) income would have been
$(17,483,000), $3,767,000 and $10,123,000 for the years ended December 31, 2002,
2001 and 2000, respectively.
Metallurg, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Metallurg Holdings
Corporation, sold all of its ownership interests in (a) GfE Gesellschaft fur
Elektrometallurgie mbH ("GfE"), which was comprised of production facilities and
a sales office in Germany; and (b) the following sales offices: Metallurg
International Resources GmbH ("MIR"), a German company, and its foreign
branches; Ferrolegeringar Aktiengesellschaft ("FAG"), a Swiss company, and its
subsidiaries; and Aktiebolaget Ferrolegeringar ("ABF"), a Swedish company.
33
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
2. Change in Reporting Entity - (Continued)
The shares of MIR, FAG, ABF and GfE Giesserei- und Stahlwerksbedarf GmbH,
GfE's sales office in Germany, were sold to Sudamin Recycling GmbH & Co. KG
("Sudamin"), a German company. Sudamin is controlled by Safeguard International,
the majority owner of Metallurg Holdings. The aggregate purchase price consisted
of $6,499,000 in cash plus $2,001,000 in fair value of Metallurg Holdings'
12.75% Senior Discount Notes due 2008 (the "Senior Discount Notes"). The
purchase price will be adjusted upon finalization of U.S. GAAP financial
statements as of December 31, 2002. The net book value of the entities sold was
$7,527,000 at December 31, 2002.
The shares of GfE (exclusive of its sales office) were sold to Safeguard
International Fund PFW, L.L.C. ("Safeguard PFW"). Safeguard PFW is a Delaware
company owned by Safeguard International Fund, L.P. ("Safeguard International").
Consideration consisted of (i) one Euro in cash and (ii) the right of Metallurg
to receive a further payment of 3% of the net proceeds received by GfE or
Safeguard PFW in the event of a sale of GfE's medical products subsidiary, GfE
Medizintechnik GmbH. The shares of GfE (exclusive of its sales office) had a
negative net book value of $9,093,000 at December 31, 2002. In conjunction with
the sale, an outstanding intercompany loan from Metallurg to GfE in the amount
of $7,000,000 was restructured. Metallurg is to receive $1,000,000 in 2003. The
remaining $6,000,000 principal balance is subordinated. The loan bears interest
at a rate of 10% per annum and repayments of principal and interest are due from
2006 through 2010. Under certain circumstances, the loan may be repaid prior to
its maturity.
Dr. Heinz C. Schimmelbusch and Mr. Arthur R. Spector, both of whom are
directors and officers of Metallurg Holdings, are also directors and officers of
Safeguard PFW and directors of Sudamin.
3. Segments and Related Information
Metallurg operates in one significant industry segment, the manufacture
and sale of performance-enhancing additives mainly for the metallurgical
industry. Metallurg is organized around its major production facilities in the
U.K., the U.S., Brazil and Germany, which are supported by an established
worldwide sales network. In addition to its own products, Metallurg distributes
complementary products manufactured by third parties.
Reportable Segments
London & Scandinavian Metallurgical Co Limited and its subsidiaries
(collectively, "LSM") - This unit is comprised mainly of three production
facilities in the U.K. and another in Norway which manufacture and sell aluminum
alloy grain refiners and alloying tablets for the aluminum industry, chromium
metal and specialty ferroalloys for the steel and superalloy industries and
aluminum powder for various metal powder-consuming industries.
Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation ("SMC") - This unit is comprised of
two production facilities in the U.S. The Ohio plant manufactures and sells
ferrovanadium and vanadium-based chemicals used mostly in the steel and
petrochemical industries. The New Jersey plant currently manufactures and sells
alloying tablets for the aluminum industry and metal powders for the welding
industry. In the second quarter of 2001, Metallurg rationalized its aluminum
master alloy and grain refiner production. Production of these products ceased
at SMC's New Jersey plant and is now concentrated at LSM's and CIF's facilities
in the U.K., Norway and Brazil.
Companhia Industrial Fluminense ("CIF") - This unit is comprised mainly of
two production facilities in Brazil. The Sao Joao del Rei plant manufactures and
sells aluminum alloy grain refiners and alloying tablets for the aluminum
industry and metal oxides used in the telecommunications, superalloy and
specialty metal industries. The Nazareno mine extracts and concentrates ores
containing tantalum and niobium that are processed, along with other raw
materials, into metal oxides at the Sao Joao del Rei plant.
34
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
3. Segments and Related Information - (Continued)
Elektrowerk Weisweiler GmbH ("EWW") - This production unit, located in
Germany, produces various grades of low carbon ferrochrome used in the
superalloy, welding and steel industries.
In addition to their manufacturing operations, LSM and SMC import and
distribute complementary products manufactured by affiliates and third parties.
Summarized financial information concerning Metallurg's reportable
segments is shown in the following table (in thousands). Each segment records
direct expenses related to its employees and operations. The "Other" column
includes corporate-related items and results of subsidiaries not meeting the
quantitative thresholds as prescribed by applicable accounting rules for
determining reportable segments. Metallurg does not allocate general corporate
overhead expenses to operating segments. The accounting policies of the segments
are the same as those described in "Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies". Transactions among segments are established based on negotiation
among the parties.
Intersegment Consolidated
LSM SMC CIF EWW Other Eliminations Totals
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ------------ ------------
Year Ended December 31, 2002
Revenue from external customers.... $ 132,766 $ 86,698 $ 17,878 $ 21,865 $ 85,767 $ 344,974
Intergroup revenue ................ 28,212 5,355 14,991 9,842 2,635 $ (61,035) --
Environmental expense recoveries... -- (3,000) -- -- -- -- (3,000)
Interest income ................... 200 981 37 151 3,988 (4,552) 805
Interest expense .................. 1,709 1,349 782 50 14,869 (4,552) 14,207
Depreciation and amortization ..... 4,368 1,598 1,053 425 849 -- 8,293
Income tax provision (benefit) .... 868 (2,026) 173 (506) 2,769 -- 1,278
Net (loss) income ................. (2,452) (3,951) 452 (870) (21,411) 6,880 (21,352)
Assets ............................ 102,588 79,058 22,388 26,709 252,947 (235,525) 248,165
Capital expenditures .............. 2,168 5,366 3,057 304 345 -- 11,240
Year Ended December 31, 2001
Revenue from external customers ... $ 145,475 $ 99,038 $ 16,265 $ 18,396 $ 114,904 $ 394,078
Intergroup revenue ................ 27,686 5,030 23,118 17,489 5,024 $ (78,347) --
Environmental expense recoveries .. -- (631) -- -- -- -- (631)
Interest income ................... 82 1,022 58 219 4,629 (4,236) 1,774
Interest expense .................. 1,733 1,168 1,040 42 14,139 (4,236) 13,886
Depreciation and amortization ..... 4,067 1,516 1,153 518 921 -- 8,175
Income tax provision (benefit) .... 630 (2,925) 1,678 1,531 4,644 -- 5,558
Net income (loss) ................. 1,795 (2,152) 3,487 2,223 20,011 (23,210) 2,154
Assets ............................ 84,105 81,453 20,421 26,981 302,729 (274,170) 241,519
Capital expenditures .............. 4,661 7,579 2,685 140 488 -- 15,553
35
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
3. Segments and Related Information - (Continued)
Intersegment Consolidated
LSM SMC CIF EWW Other Eliminations Totals
--------- --------- --------- --------- -------- ------------ ------------
Year Ended December 31, 2000
Revenue from external customers $ 147,475 $ 114,297 $ 14,948 $ 19,554 $ 122,935 $ 419,209
Intergroup revenue ............. 33,104 4,638 14,062 17,000 2,709 $ (71,513) --
Environmental expense recoveries -- (750) -- -- -- -- (750)
Interest income ................ 51 1,152 551 116 3,725 (2,208) 3,387
Interest expense ............... 1,228 405 374 56 12,304 (2,208) 12,159
Depreciation and amortization .. 3,398 1,409 988 641 673 -- 7,109
Income tax provision (benefit) . 2,167 (54) 416 2,206 3,239 -- 7,974
Net income (loss) .............. 4,584 (604) 2,750 731 21,404 (19,277) 9,588
Assets ......................... 96,371 74,556 16,086 29,591 193,727 (155,558) 254,773
Capital expenditures ........... 8,746 3,435 887 234 616 -- 13,918
Metallurg sells its products in over 50 countries. The following table
presents revenue by country based on the location of the user of the product (in
thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
-------- -------- --------
U.S ............................ $ 97,126 $135,025 $148,862
South Africa ................... 40,468 34,483 35,682
Germany ........................ 31,918 41,242 36,001
U.K ............................ 25,228 35,101 44,457
Canada ......................... 18,222 15,934 23,201
France ......................... 13,169 15,418 14,277
Italy .......................... 10,510 8,874 10,504
Sweden ......................... 8,461 8,937 10,555
Other .......................... 99,244 98,431 95,265
Commission income .............. 628 633 405
-------- -------- --------
Total revenue ............ $344,974 $394,078 $419,209
======== ======== ========
The following table presents property, plant and equipment by country
based on the location of the assets (in thousands):
December 31,
-------------------------
2002 2001
------- -------
U.K ............................... $25,600 $24,682
U.S ............................... 23,073 19,546
Brazil ............................ 9,015 7,014
Germany ........................... 2,341 2,108
Other ............................. 6,493 5,757
------- -------
Total ....................... $66,522 $59,107
======= =======
36
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
4. Restructuring
During 2002, Metallurg carried out a restructuring program intended to
reduce the cost structure at corporate headquarters, SMC and LSM. The
restructuring plan includes the discontinuation of certain production
activities, the termination of employees and the write-down of redundant plant
and equipment. As a result of the restructuring and other cost reduction
activities, Metallurg currently expects to generate cost savings of
approximately $8 million annually in future periods. Details of the
restructuring charge are as follows (in thousands):
Utilized Balance at
Original --------------------- December 31,
Charge Cash Non-cash 2002
-------- ------ -------- ------------
Severance and other employee costs ..... $3,407 $1,786 $1,621
Write-down of plant and equipment ...... 103 -- $ 103 --
------ ------ ------ ------
Total ........................... $3,510 $1,786 $ 103 $1,621
====== ====== ====== ======
At corporate headquarters, Metallurg, Inc. recorded a restructuring charge
of $1,989,000 for severance costs of four corporate executives and five
administrative employees, all of whom were terminated during the year. Under the
terms of their employment and severance agreements, the severance will be paid
over a period of up to 18 months. Of this amount, $499,000 was paid as of
December 31, 2002.
LSM recorded a restructuring charge of 'L'710,000 ($1,068,000) for
severance costs of 18 production employees and 11 administrative employees who
were terminated during the year. The entire amount was paid during the year.
SMC recorded a restructuring charge of $453,000, of which $350,000 was for
severance costs of one executive, 16 production employees and nine
administrative employees, all of whom were terminated during the year. Of this
amount, $219,000 had been paid by December 31, 2002. The remaining $103,000 was
for the write-down of property and equipment no longer used in operations.
During 2002, EWW paid $19,000 and reversed the remaining prior year
accrual balance of $137,000 following the completion of its restructuring
program, resulting in Metallurg recording a net restructuring charge of
$3,373,000 in 2002.
5. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
--------------------------
2002 2001
------- -------
Raw materials ................ $12,727 $18,318
Work in process .............. 998 701
Finished goods ............... 49,528 53,454
Other ........................ 2,488 2,710
------- -------
Total ................... $65,741 $75,183
======= =======
37
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
6. Property, Plant and Equipment
The major classes of property, plant and equipment are as follows (in
thousands):
December 31,
------------------------ Estimated
2002 2001 Lives
-------- -------- ---------
Land ........................................... $ 2,488 $ 1,998
Buildings and leasehold improvements ........... 20,798 18,656 5-50
Machinery ...................................... 75,412 53,361 3-12
Office furniture and equipment ................. 6,642 6,225 3-10
Transportation equipment ....................... 2,612 2,314 2-5
Construction in progress ....................... 798 8,388
-------- --------
Total ................................ 108,750 90,942
Less: accumulated depreciation ................. 42,228 31,835
-------- --------
Property, plant and equipment, net ... $ 66,522 $ 59,107
======== ========
Depreciation expense related to property, plant and equipment was
$7,679,000, $7,347,000, and $6,480,000 for the years ended December 31, 2002,
2001 and 2000, respectively.
7. Retirement Plans
Metallurg, Inc. and Domestic Subsidiaries
Metallurg, Inc. and its domestic subsidiaries have tax qualified,
noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all
salaried and certain hourly paid employees. The plans generally provide benefit
payments using a formula based on an employee's compensation and length of
service. These plans are funded in amounts equal to the minimum funding
requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Substantially all
plan assets are invested in cash and short-term investments or listed stocks and
bonds. Metallurg, Inc. also maintains tax qualified defined contribution plans
covering substantially all of the salaried employees of Metallurg, Inc. and its
domestic subsidiaries. All contributions, including a portion that represents a
company match, are made in cash into mutual fund accounts in accordance with the
participants' investment elections.
Foreign Subsidiaries
Two of Metallurg's major subsidiaries, LSM and EWW, maintain defined
benefit pension plans covering all eligible employees in the U.K. and Norway and
in Germany, respectively. Substantially all plan assets are invested in listed
stocks and bonds. Benefits under these plans are based on years of service and
the employee's compensation. Benefits are paid either from plan assets or, if
necessary, directly by Metallurg. The range of assumptions that are used for
these plans reflect the different economic environments within the various
countries. Several of Metallurg's other foreign subsidiaries have retirement
plans that cover certain eligible employees.
38
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
7. Retirement Plans - (Continued)
Net pension cost consisted of the following for the years ended December
31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively (in thousands):
U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans
Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------- -----------------------------
2002 2001 2000 2002 2001 2000
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost ...................................... $ 479 $ 498 $ 464 $ 2,309 $ 1,654 $ 1,685
Interest cost ..................................... 1,410 1,382 1,341 5,442 4,736 4,416
Expected return on plan assets .................... (1,480) (1,677) (1,836) (5,298) (5,228) (5,719)
Net amortization and deferral ..................... 12 8 (241) 1,077 22 (296)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
421 211 (272) 3,530 1,184 86
Cost of other defined benefit plans ............... -- -- -- 46 4 --
Cost of defined contribution plans (net of
forfeitures) .................................... 196 226 205 77 82 73
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total retirement plan expense (benefit) recognized
in the Statements of Consolidated Operations .... $ 617 $ 437 $ (67) $ 3,653 $ 1,270 $ 159
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
The following table summarizes the changes in benefit obligation and
changes in plan assets for Metallurg's principle defined benefit plans (in
thousands).
U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans
Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
----------------------- -----------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year ..................... $ 20,241 $ 19,029 $ 92,536 $ 85,019
Service cost ................................................ 479 498 2,309 1,654
Interest cost ............................................... 1,410 1,382 5,442 4,736
Actuarial loss .............................................. 947 603 5,513 5,432
Benefits paid ............................................... (1,375) (1,271) (4,814) (2,026)
Amendments .................................................. 40 -- -- --
Foreign currency translation adjustment ..................... -- -- 11,291 (2,279)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Benefit obligation at end of year ........................... 21,742 20,241 112,277 92,536
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year .............. 16,996 19,095 66,394 73,823
Actual return on plan assets ................................ (1,759) (1,103) (8,973) (5,825)
Employer and employee contributions ......................... 228 275 2,286 2,058
Benefits paid ............................................... (1,375) (1,271) (4,432) (1,743)
Foreign currency translation adjustment ..................... -- -- 6,483 (1,919)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Fair value of plan assets at end of year .................... 14,090 16,996 61,758 66,394
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Funded status ................................................... (7,652) (3,245) (50,519) (26,142)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss ................................. 6,107 1,927 49,900 27,433
Unrecognized prior service cost ................................. 111 78 40 39
--------- --------- --------- ---------
(Accrued) prepaid pension cost - principle benefit plans .... (1,434) (1,240) (579) 1,330
(Accrued) prepaid pension cost - other plans ................ -- -- (81) (35)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total (accrued) prepaid pension cost recognized in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets ..................... $ (1,434) $ (1,240) $ (660) $ 1,295
========= ========= ========= =========
39
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
7. Retirement Plans - (Continued)
U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans
Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
----------------------- -----------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
-------- -------- -------- --------
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
are as follows:
Other assets:
Prepaid pension asset ..................... $ 766 $ 766
Intangible asset .......................... $ 111 $ 78 -- --
Accrued pension liabilities .................. (6,549) (2,245) (40,960) (17,864)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss ......... 5,004 927 39,534 18,393
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net amount recognized ................... $ (1,434) $ (1,240) $ (660) $ 1,295
======== ======== ======== ========
The following table indicates the weighted-average assumptions made for
Metallurg's defined benefit plans:
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
----------- ----------- ----------
U.S. Plans:
Discount rate.............................................. 6.75% 7.25% 7.50%
Rate of compensation increase.............................. 4.00% 4.00% 4.00%
Expected return on plan assets............................. 9.00% 9.00% 9.00%
Non-U.S. Plans:
Discount rate.............................................. 5.57% 5.72% 6.07%
Rate of compensation increase.............................. 3.68% 3.93% 4.34%
Expected return on plan assets............................. 7.70% 7.69% 7.73%
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair
value of plan assets for pension benefit plans with accumulated benefit
obligations in excess of plan assets as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 were as
follows (in thousands):
U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans
December 31, December 31,
------------------------- --------------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
------- ------- -------- -------
Projected benefit obligation........................ $21,742 $20,241 $104,660 $85,730
Accumulated benefit obligation...................... 20,639 19,241 93,056 75,202
Fair value of plan assets........................... 14,090 16,996 53,781 59,861
40
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
8. Borrowings
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
----------------------
2002 2001
-------- --------
Metallurg, Inc.:
Senior Notes ................. $100,000 $100,000
-------- --------
Foreign subsidiaries:
LSM .......................... 20,447 18,459
EWW .......................... 545 549
Other ........................ 311 145
-------- --------
21,303 19,153
-------- --------
Subtotal ................ 121,303 119,153
Less: amounts due within one year .. 284 234
-------- --------
Total long-term debt .... $121,019 $118,919
======== ========
Metallurg, Inc. and Domestic Subsidiaries
In November 1997, Metallurg, Inc. sold its $100,000,000 11% Senior Notes
due 2007 (the "Senior Notes"). Interest is payable semi-annually. The Senior
Notes are redeemable at the option of Metallurg, Inc., in whole or in part, at
any time on or after December 2002. The Senior Notes are fully and
unconditionally guaranteed by the U.S. subsidiaries of Metallurg, Inc. on a
senior unsecured basis. The Senior Note indenture contains limitations on, among
other things, the ability of Metallurg to incur indebtedness and enter into
certain mergers, consolidations or asset sales. In addition, under the terms of
the indenture, Metallurg, Inc. is limited in its ability to make restricted
payments, as defined and including, among other things, minority investments in
subsidiaries and dividend payments, to a formula based on the cumulative net
income since November 1, 1997 and certain specified allowances. As a result of
this limitation, Metallurg, Inc. is permitted to make future restricted payments
in the amount of $7,494,000 as of December 31, 2002.
On October 29, 1999, Metallurg, Inc., SMC and certain of Metallurg, Inc.'s
other subsidiaries (the "Borrowers") renewed their existing credit facility with
certain financial institutions led by Fleet National Bank as agent (the
"Revolving Credit Facility") for a term of five years. This facility, as amended
in December 2002, provides the Borrowers with up to $30,000,000 for working
capital requirements and general corporate purposes. Interest is charged at a
rate per annum equal to (i) LIBOR, plus 2.0% - 2.5% or (ii) Prime, plus up to
1.0%, based on the performance of Metallurg, Inc. and certain of its
subsidiaries (the "North American Group"), as defined in the Revolving Credit
Facility. Interest rates on amounts borrowed are adjusted quarterly, based on
the North American Group's fixed charge coverage ratio. The Borrowers are
required to pay a fee of 0.375% per annum on the unused portion of the facility.
The total amount the Borrowers may borrow at any time is limited to a borrowing
base calculation that is based on eligible accounts receivable, inventory and
certain fixed assets. At December 31, 2002, there were no borrowings under this
facility; however, outstanding letters of credit totaled $21,379,000. The
Borrowers had unused borrowing capacity of $364,000 under this facility. The
Revolving Credit Facility continues to prohibit Metallurg, Inc. from making
dividends prior to 2004 and requires the Borrowers and certain subsidiaries to
comply with various covenants, including the maintenance of minimum liquidity,
as defined in the agreement, at a $10,000,000 level. Liquidity, as defined, was
$13,992,000 at December 31, 2002.
Currently, Metallurg Holdings, Metallurg, Inc.'s parent, does not have
sufficient cash on hand to make the interest payment due on its Senior Discount
Notes in January 2004. While Metallurg, Inc. may be able to distribute cash to
Metallurg Holdings for the purpose of making the January 2004 interest payment,
Metallurg, Inc. could be prohibited from making a cash distribution at such time
under the restrictive covenants of its Revolving Credit Facility. If Metallurg
Holdings were unable to make its interest payment when due, it could lead to a
foreclosure on its assets, principally the equity of Metallurg, Inc., and create
a default in accordance with the terms of Metallurg, Inc.'s Senior Note
indenture.
41
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
8. Borrowings - (Continued)
Foreign Subsidiaries
LSM has revolving credit facilities with Barclays Bank plc ("Barclays")
and HSBC Bank plc ("HSBC"). In 2002, an overdraft facility with Barclays was
reduced by 'L'1,000,000 ($1,610,000). These facilities now provide LSM with
up to 'L'7,500,000 ($12,073,000) of borrowings, 'L'43,300,000
($69,700,000) of foreign exchange contracts and options and 'L'4,000,000
($6,439,000) for other ancillary banking arrangements, including bank
guarantees. Borrowings under these facilities are unsecured and payable on
demand. Outstanding loans under this facility bear interest at a rate of 1.0%
over the lender's base rate. At December 31, 2002, there were no borrowings
under these facilities.
LSM also has four revolving term loan facilities with Barclays and HSBC
that provide for borrowings up to 'L'12,000,000 ($19,316,000), all of which
were outstanding at December 31, 2002. Two of the facilities expire during the
second quarter of 2004 while the other two expire during the second quarter of
2006. These term loan facilities are unsecured and require LSM to comply with
various covenants, including the maintenance of annual minimum net worth and
interest coverage. In 2002, following a decline in operating results, the term
loan agreements were amended and the annual interest rate was increased to LIBOR
plus 1.75%. Also due to the decline in operating results, LSM obtained, in
December 2002, waivers from HSBC regarding the annual minimum interest coverage
ratio covenant for the period ended December 31, 2002.
LSM's Norwegian facility has an unsecured overdraft facility of NOK
15,000,000 ($2,165,000). Borrowings under this facility bear interest at a rate
of NIBOR plus 1.25%. At December 31, 2002, there was NOK 10,562,000 ($1,524,000)
outstanding under this facility. During 2000, the Norwegian facility entered
into an unsecured term loan in the amount of NOK 10,000,000 ($1,443,000).
Repayments began in November 2000 and continue for 10 years in equal monthly
installments plus interest at NIBOR plus 1.25%.
EWW has committed lines of credit with several banks in the aggregate
amount of 'E'3,168,000 ($3,326,000). The credit agreements require EWW to
pledge certain assets, which include accounts receivable, inventory and fixed
assets. At December 31, 2002, there were no borrowings under these facilities.
In 1998, EWW borrowed DM 1,478,000 ('E'756,000 or $794,000). Payments began
in 2000 and continue at DM 185,000 ('E'95,000 or $100,000) per year until
maturity in 2008. The loan bears interest at 4.25%.
Metallurg, Inc.'s other foreign subsidiaries maintain short-term secured
and unsecured borrowing arrangements, generally in local currencies, with
various banks totaling $10,164,000. Borrowings under these arrangements
aggregated $4,464,000 at December 31, 2002 at a weighted-average interest rate
of 11.6%.
Interest expense totaled $14,207,000, $13,886,000, and $12,159,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
The scheduled maturities of long-term debt during the next five years are
as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
------------
2003............................................ $ 284
2004............................................ 9,961
2005............................................ 304
2006............................................ 9,957
2007............................................ 100,248
Thereafter...................................... 549
-----------
Total................................. $ 121,303
===========
42
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
9. Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments are as
follows (in thousands):
December 31, 2002 December 31, 2001
------------------------------ --------------------------------
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Amount Value Amount Value
----------- ---------- ------------ ----------
Financial assets and liabilities:
Cash and cash equivalents ....................... $ 29,438 $29,438 $ 31,772 $ 31,772
Investments in affiliates ....................... 2,117 2,117 1,126 1,126
Short-term debt ................................. 5,988 5,988 4,368 4,368
Senior Notes .................................... 100,000 63,000 100,000 88,000
Other long-term debt ............................ 21,303 21,303 19,153 19,153
Notional Market Notional Market
Amount Value Amount Value
----------- ---------- ------------ ----------
Derivative instruments:
Forward exchange contracts:
Sales ........................................ $23,906 $(134) $29,221 $242
Purchases .................................... 4,513 (347) 3,197 368
Interest rate collar ............................ 19,316 (361) 17,472 (120)
Commodity price contracts:
Sales ........................................ 130 (2) 2,771 28
Purchases .................................... 4,023 25 5,448 (94)
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents and short-term debt
approximates fair value due to their liquidity and short-term maturities. All
investments purchased with maturities of three months or less are considered
cash equivalents. Fair values of investments in affiliates are not readily
available. The fair value of Metallurg, Inc.'s Senior Notes is based on quoted
market prices. Metallurg's other long-term debt includes floating-rate debt, the
carrying amount of which approximates fair value.
Metallurg does not use financial instruments for trading or other
speculative purposes. Metallurg does not hedge the net investment in its
subsidiaries.
Metallurg enters into foreign exchange contracts in the regular course of
business to manage exposure against fluctuations on sales and raw material
purchase transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional
currencies of its businesses. The contracts mature at the anticipated cash
requirement date, generally within 12 months, and are predominantly denominated
in U.S. Dollars and Euros. The counterparties to these contractual arrangements
are a diverse group of major financial institutions with which Metallurg also
has other financial relationships. Metallurg is exposed to credit risk generally
limited to unrealized gains in such contracts in the event of non-performance by
counterparties of those financial instruments, but it does not expect any
counterparties to fail to meet their obligations given their high credit
ratings. The notional values provide an indication of the extent of Metallurg's
involvement in such instruments but do not represent its exposure to market
risk, which is essentially limited to risk related to currency rate movements.
The estimated fair value of foreign exchange contracts is based on estimated
amounts at which they could be settled based on market exchange rates and
include all foreign exchange contracts regardless of hedge designation.
43
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
9. Financial Instruments - (Continued)
In 2001, LSM entered into a zero premium interest rate collar on its
long-term debt of 'L'12,000,000 ($19,316,000) notional principal that limits
the variable spread on its LIBOR-based interest payments between a floor of
5.22% and a cap of 7.0%, plus a margin of 1.75%. Any amounts to be paid or
received on the collar are recognized as an adjustment to interest expense. The
agreement expires in June 2004. The fair value of the collar is based on the
amount at which it can be settled with the counterparty.
Metallurg is exposed to volatility in the prices of raw materials used in
some of its products and uses forward contracts to manage some of these
exposures. As the hedging documentation requirements are not currently being
met, gains and losses on these derivatives are recognized currently in earnings.
The estimated fair value of the forward contracts is based on estimated amounts
at which they could be settled based on market prices and include all forward
contracts regardless of hedge designation.
10. Income Taxes
For financial reporting purposes, (loss) income before income tax
provision and minority interest includes the following components (in
thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
-------- -------- --------
U.S ..................... $(19,721) $ (5,330) $ 1,441
Foreign ................. (250) 13,070 16,114
-------- -------- --------
Total ........ $(19,971) $ 7,740 $ 17,555
======== ======== ========
The reconciliation of income tax from continuing operations computed at
the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to Metallurg's effective tax rate is as
follows (dollars in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
-------------------- --------------------- ---------------------
Tax Tax Tax
(Benefit) Provision Provision
Provision % (Benefit) % (Benefit) %
--------- ------- --------- ------- --------- -------
Income tax (benefit) provision at
statutory rate ......................... $(6,990) 35.0 $ 2,709 35.0 $ 6,144 35.0
State and local income taxes, net
of federal income tax effect ........... 21 (0.1) 145 1.9 163 0.9
Effect of net change of foreign
valuation allowance and differences
between U.S. and foreign rates ......... 1,557 (7.8) 916 11.8 1,159 6.6
Foreign dividends ......................... 1,273 (6.4) 2,059 26.6 642 3.7
Changes in domestic valuation allowance ... 5,185 (26.0) (302) (3.9) (185) (1.1)
Permanent and other differences ........... 232 (1.1) 31 0.4 51 0.3
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total .......................... $ 1,278 (6.4) $ 5,558 71.8 $ 7,974 45.4
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
44
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
10. Income Taxes - (Continued)
The income tax provision represents the following (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
------- ------- -------
Current:
U.S. federal ....................... $ (231) $ (170) $ 85
U.S. state and local ............... 32 219 247
Foreign ............................ 1,732 4,232 4,254
------- ------- -------
Total current ................ 1,533 4,281 4,586
------- ------- -------
Deferred:
U.S. federal and state ............. 8 19 843
Foreign ............................ (263) 1,258 2,545
------- ------- -------
Total deferred ............... (255) 1,277 3,388
------- ------- -------
Total income tax provision ... $ 1,278 $ 5,558 $ 7,974
======= ======= =======
U.S. federal income tax refunds receivable of $208,000 and $1,133,000 at
December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, consist of carryback claims related to
environmental expenses. These receivables are reflected in prepaid expenses in
the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of
Metallurg's deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
-------------------------
2002 2001
-------- --------
Deferred Tax Assets:
NOL and other credit carryforwards .... $ 16,503 $ 11,869
Retirement benefits ................... 11,274 4,355
Environmental liabilities ............. 9,935 11,027
Other accruals and reserves ........... 1,086 871
Inventories ........................... 385 510
Fixed assets .......................... 207 64
Other ................................. 231 401
-------- --------
Total deferred tax assets ................... 39,621 29,097
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance ...... (22,748) (19,792)
-------- --------
16,873 9,305
-------- --------
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
Fixed assets .......................... (4,149) (2,834)
Other ................................. (3,102) (2,596)
-------- --------
Total deferred tax liabilities .............. (7,251) (5,430)
-------- --------
Net deferred tax asset ...................... $ 9,622 $ 3,875
======== ========
45
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
10. Income Taxes - (Continued)
At December 31, 2002, Metallurg has net operating loss carryforwards
relating to domestic operations of $37,171,000 (of which $3,300,000 is subject
to certain limitations relative to utilization), which expire through 2021, and
alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of $953,000, which can be carried
forward indefinitely. Metallurg, Inc.'s consolidated foreign subsidiaries have
income tax loss carryforwards aggregating $7,319,000, a substantial portion of
which relates to Brazilian operations, which do not expire under current
regulations. Due to significant uncertainties surrounding the realization of
certain loss carryforwards, the related deferred tax assets have been
substantially provided for in the valuation allowance at December 31, 2002.
A cumulative deferred tax credit related to a minimum pension liability
adjustment in the amount of $11,860,000 was recorded in shareholder's (deficit)
equity, of which $6,342,000 relates to the year ended December 31, 2002. See
"Note 11. Shareholder's (Deficit) Equity".
11. Shareholder's (Deficit) Equity
Accumulated Total
Common Stock Due from Additional Other Shareholder's
------------------ Parent Paid-In Comprehensive Retained Equity
Shares Amount Company Capital Loss Deficit (Deficit)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands, except share amounts)
Balance at January 31, 2000 ....... 5,000,000 $ 50 $ 62,857 $ (1,506) $ (15,104) $ 46,297
Net income ..................... -- -- -- -- 9,588 9,588
Change in translation
adjustment .................. -- -- -- (8,084) -- (8,084)
Purchase of parent company
debt ........................ -- -- $ (19,714) -- -- -- (19,714)
Capital contributions .......... -- -- -- 90 -- -- 90
Deferred tax effects of
fresh-start adjustments ..... -- -- -- 969 -- -- 969
--------- ----- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Balance at December 31, 2000 ...... 5,000,000 50 (19,714) 63,916 (9,590) (5,516) 29,146
Net income ..................... -- -- -- -- -- 2,154 2,154
Change in translation
adjustment .................. -- -- -- -- (3,911) -- (3,911)
Minimum pension liability
adjustment (net of deferred
tax of $5,518) .............. -- -- -- -- (13,802) -- (13,802)
Deferred loss on derivatives,
net ......................... -- -- -- -- (122) -- (122)
Capital contributions .......... -- -- -- 1,257 -- -- 1,257
Deferred tax effects of
fresh-start adjustments ..... -- -- -- 549 -- -- 549
Fresh-start adjustment for the
tax benefits of environmental
carryback claims ............ -- -- -- 1,630 -- -- 1,630
--------- ----- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Balance at December 31, 2001 ...... 5,000,000 50 (19,714) 67,352 (27,425) (3,362) 16,901
Net loss ....................... -- -- -- -- -- (21,352) (21,352)
Change in translation
adjustment .................. -- -- -- -- 7,899 -- 7,899
Minimum pension liability
adjustment (net of deferred
tax of $6,342) .............. -- -- -- -- (18,876) -- (18,876)
Deferred loss on derivatives,
net ......................... -- -- -- -- (219) -- (219)
Capital contributions .......... -- -- (2,001) 6,402 -- -- 4,401
Deferred tax effects of
fresh-start adjustments ..... -- -- -- 11 -- -- 11
Fresh-start adjustment for the
tax benefits of environmental
carryback claims ............ -- -- -- (1,251) -- -- (1,251)
--------- ----- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Balance at December 31, 2002 ...... 5,000,000 $ 50 $ (21,715) $ 72,514 $ (38,621) $ (24,714) $ (12,486)
========= ===== ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
46
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
11. Shareholder's (Deficit) Equity - (Continued)
The retained deficit as of January 31, 2000 reflects a credit of $766,000
that has been recorded to adjust the value of long-term prepaid pension costs
established in periods prior to that date.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows (in
thousands):
December 31,
-----------------------
2002 2001
-------- --------
Foreign currency translation adjustment ....... $ (5,602) $(13,501)
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net ..... (32,678) (13,802)
Deferred loss on derivatives .................. (341) (122)
-------- --------
$(38,621) $(27,425)
======== ========
Metallurg, Inc. has 5,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value,
outstanding, all of which are owned by Metallurg Holdings.
Under the terms of the Senior Note indenture, Metallurg, Inc. is limited
in its ability to make restricted payments, as defined and including, among
other things, minority investments in subsidiaries and dividend payments, to a
formula based on cumulative net income since November 1, 1997 and certain
specified allowances. As a result of this limitation, Metallurg, Inc. is
permitted to make future restricted payments in the amount of $7,494,000 as of
December 31, 2002. In addition, Metallurg, Inc.'s revolving credit facility with
Fleet National Bank prohibits the payment of dividends through 2004.
As of December 31, 2002, Metallurg completed the sale of several of its
subsidiaries to companies affiliated with Metallurg's controlling stockholder
(See "Note 2. Change in Reporting Entity"). In conjunction with this sale,
Metallurg acquired $2,001,000 in value of the Senior Discount Notes of Metallurg
Holdings, its parent company, and $3,499,000 in cash. These amounts, together
with dividends paid by these subsidiaries prior to their sale, have been
recorded as capital contributions.
On October 17, 2000, Metallurg, Inc. completed the purchase of $76,065,000
in face amount of the Senior Discount Notes for $19,714,000 in cash. These
Senior Discount Notes were not subsequently retired. The Senior Discount Notes
were purchased on the open market in several separately negotiated transactions.
Metallurg, Inc.'s investment in these Senior Discount Notes is recorded as a
reduction in equity, as the only significant asset of Metallurg Holdings, Inc.
is its investment in Metallurg, Inc. Semi-annual interest payments of $2,571,000
are payable on the outstanding Senior Discount Notes beginning in January 2004.
Stock Compensation Plan
On November 20, 1998, 500,000 shares of common stock were made available
for stock awards and stock options under the 1998 Equity Compensation Plan (the
"ECP"). Options issued have a term of ten years and vest, in most cases, 20% on
the date of grant and 20% on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of
grant. The weighted-average remaining life of options outstanding at December
31, 2002 was 4.8 years.
47
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
11. Shareholder's (Deficit) Equity - (Continued)
Stock option transactions under the ECP are summarized as follows:
Weighted-
average
Exercise Fair Value at
Number of Shares Price Grant Date
---------------- -------------- -------------
Balance at January 31, 2000 .................................. 434,500
Granted ................................................. 15,000 $30.00 $6.26
Canceled or forfeited ................................... (17,500)
---------------
Balance at December 31, 2000 ................................. 432,000
Granted ................................................. 65,000 $30.00 $3.88
Canceled or forfeited ................................... (24,500)
---------------
Balance at December 31, 2001 ................................. 472,500
Canceled or forfeited ................................... (72,500)
---------------
Balance at December 31, 2002 ................................. 400,000
===============
Shares reserved for future options ........................... 100,000
Stock options exercisable at:
December 31, 2000 ....................................... 248,625
December 31, 2001 ....................................... 317,500
December 31, 2002 ....................................... 355,750
Had the compensation cost for Metallurg, Inc.'s stock option plan been
determined based upon the fair value at the grant date, consistent with SFAS No.
123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", Metallurg, Inc.'s net income
would have been reduced by $263,000, $454,000, and $408,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Principal assumptions used in
applying the Black-Scholes model for options granted in the periods presented
are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Expected volatility ............................. (a) 0% 0%
Expected dividend yield ......................... (a) 0% 0%
Expected life ................................... (a) 4 years 4 years
Risk-free interest rate ......................... (a) 3.54% 6.02%
- ----------
(a) No options were granted in 2002
12. Other Income, Net
Other income, net, consists of the following (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
----------- ---------- ---------
Gain on sale of interest in Solikamsk
Magnesium Works ............................... $5,128
Other, net....................................... $228 $279 363
----------- ---------- ---------
Total..................................... $228 $279 $5,491
=========== ========== =========
In April 2000, Metallurg sold its entire interest in Solikamsk Magnesium
Works for $8,311,000, resulting in a gain of $5,128,000.
48
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
13. Environmental Liabilities
Metallurg's manufacturing operations in Cambridge, Ohio; Newfield, New
Jersey; Sao Joao del Rei, Brazil and Weisweiler, Germany are subject to
environmental laws and regulations for which Metallurg has incurred
environmental liabilities. These liabilities are primarily related to the
investigation and remediation of contamination resulting from historic
operations.
Total environmental liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
--------------------
2002 2001
------- -------
U.S.:
SMC - Ohio ....................... $10,454 $10,854
SMC - New Jersey ................. 21,316 23,534
------- -------
31,770 34,388
Foreign ................................ 2,494 2,164
------- -------
Total environmental liabilities .. 34,264 36,552
Less: trust funds ................ 3,788 3,661
------- -------
Net environmental liabilities .......... 30,476 32,891
Less: current portion ............ 4,191 3,842
------- -------
Environmental liabilities ... $26,285 $29,049
======= =======
SMC and Cyprus Foote Mineral Company ("Cyprus Foote"), the former owner of
the Cambridge site, entered into a consent order with the State of Ohio in
December 1996. SMC and Cyprus Foote agreed in the consent order to conduct
remediation and decommissioning activities at the Cambridge site. Additionally,
SMC and Cyprus Foote agreed to enhance, restore and preserve certain wetlands in
the vicinity of the Cambridge site. Pursuant to the consent order, SMC and
Cyprus Foote are jointly and severally liable to the State of Ohio in respect of
these obligations. However, SMC has agreed with Cyprus Foote that it shall
perform and be liable for the performance of these remedial obligations.
Therefore, SMC has accrued its best estimate of associated costs that it expects
to substantially disburse over the next 5 years.
With respect to the financial assurance obligations to the State of Ohio,
Cyprus Foote has agreed to provide a substantial portion of the financial
assurance required by the State of Ohio. SMC, in addition to agreeing to provide
the balance thereof, has purchased an annuity contract which will provide for
future payments into the trust fund to cover certain of the estimated operation
and maintenance costs over approximately the next 100 years.
Historic manufacturing processes at both Cambridge and Newfield have
resulted in on-site slag piles containing naturally occurring radioactivity. At
the Cambridge site, SMC plans to decommission and to cap the slag piles on-site.
In August 2002, SMC filed a decommissioning plan for its Newfield facility with
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the "NRC"). At the same time SMC
requested an amendment to the authorized use of the Newfield facility, as
permitted by the NRC, to "storage only pending decommissioning". Financial
assurance for implementation and ongoing maintenance of such decommissioning
plans is partially assured by cash funds held in trust, letters of credit and an
annuity contract.
SMC entered into administrative consent orders with the New Jersey
Department of Environmental Protection under which SMC must conduct remediation
activities at the Newfield facility. These obligations include the closure of
wastewater lagoons, the decontamination of groundwater, soil remediation,
surface water and sediment clean up, wetlands restoration and related operation
and maintenance activities. SMC accrued its best estimate of the associated
costs with respect to remedial activities at the site, which it expects to
disburse over the next 15 years. At December 31, 2002, outstanding letters of
credit issued as financial assurances in favor of various environmental agencies
totaled $19,069,000. These letters of credit were issued under the Revolving
Credit Facility. See "Note 8. Borrowings". The cost of providing financial
assurance over the term of the remediation activities has been contemplated in
the accrued amounts.
49
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
13. Environmental Liabilities - (Continued)
CIF has accrued environmental liabilities in the amounts of $147,000 and
$172,000 at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, to cover reclamation costs
of closed mine sites. EWW has accrued costs of $2,347,000 and $1,992,000 at
December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, to cover the costs of closing an
off-site dump.
In 2002, 2001 and 2000, SMC recognized environmental expense recoveries of
$3,000,000, $631,000 and $750,000, respectively, upon settlement with insurance
companies relating to coverage for certain environmental claims stemming from
the 1960's and forward. These claims relate mostly to the historical costs of
remedial activities at SMC's Newfield, New Jersey site.
14. Contingent Liabilities
In addition to environmental matters, which are discussed in Note 13,
Metallurg defends, from time to time, various claims and legal actions arising
in the normal course of business. Management believes, based on the advice of
counsel, that the outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse
effect on Metallurg's consolidated financial position, results of operations or
liquidity. There can be no assurance, however, that existing or future
litigation will not result in an adverse judgment against Metallurg that could
have a material adverse effect on Metallurg's future results of operations or
cash flows.
15. Leases
Metallurg leases office space, facilities and equipment. The leases
generally provide that Metallurg pays the tax, insurance and maintenance
expenses related to the leased assets. At December 31, 2002, future minimum
lease payments required under non-cancelable operating leases having remaining
lease terms in excess of one year are as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
------------
2003................................................... $1,071
2004................................................... 981
2005................................................... 829
2006................................................... 675
2007................................................... 654
Thereafter............................................. 2,211
-----------
Total........................................ $6,421
===========
Rent expense under operating leases was $1,202,000, $1,093,000 and
$716,000 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
50
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
16. Supplemental Guarantor Information
In November 1997, Metallurg, Inc. issued $100 million principal amount of
its 11% Senior Notes due 2007. Under the terms of the Senior Notes, SMC,
Metallurg Holdings Corporation, Metallurg Services, Inc., Metallurg
International Resources, LLC ("MIR, LLC") and MIR (China), Inc. (collectively,
the "Guarantors"), wholly owned subsidiaries of Metallurg, Inc., have fully and
unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis Metallurg, Inc.'s
obligations to pay principal, premium and interest relative to the Senior Notes.
During the second quarter of 1999, Metallurg, Inc. established Metallurg
International Resources, Inc. (now MIR, LLC) as a wholly owned subsidiary and a
guarantor of the Senior Notes. Certain commercial activities previously carried
out by Metallurg, Inc. are now being carried out by MIR, LLC. Management has
determined that separate, full financial statements of the Guarantors would not
be material to potential investors and, accordingly, such financial statements
are not provided. Supplemental financial information of the Guarantors is
presented below.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2002
(In thousands)
Combined Combined
Guarantor Non-Guarantor
Metallurg, Inc. Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
--------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total revenue ............................. $ 109,833 $ 282,101 $ (46,960) $ 344,974
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of sales .......................... 106,992 257,229 (48,464) 315,757
Selling, general and administrative
expenses .......................... $ 5,260 10,141 20,240 -- 35,641
Environmental expense recoveries ....... -- (3,000) -- -- (3,000)
Restructuring charges, net ............. 1,989 453 931 -- 3,373
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total operating costs and expenses .. 7,249 114,586 278,400 (48,464) 351,771
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating (loss) income ............. (7,249) (4,753) 3,701 1,504 (6,797)
Other:
Other (expense) income, net ............ -- (17) 245 -- 228
Interest (expense) income, net ......... (10,850) 1,644 (4,196) -- (13,402)
Equity in (losses) income of
subsidiaries ...................... (5,211) (486) 321 5,376 --
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(Loss) income before income tax
(benefit) provision ............ (23,310) (3,612) 71 6,880 (19,971)
Income tax (benefit) provision ............ (1,958) 1,864 1,372 -- 1,278
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Loss before minority interest ....... (21,352) (5,476) (1,301) 6,880 (21,249)
Minority interest ......................... -- -- (103) -- (103)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net loss ............................ (21,352) (5,476) (1,404) 6,880 (21,352)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment 7,899 7,813 14,345 (22,158) 7,899
Minimum pension liability adjustment,
net ............................... (18,876) (15,058) (29,598) 44,656 (18,876)
Deferred loss on derivatives, net ...... (219) (217) (402) 619 (219)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Comprehensive loss .................. $ (32,548) $ (12,938) $ (17,059) $ 29,997 $ (32,548)
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
51
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
16. Supplemental Guarantor Information - (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet at December 31, 2002
(In thousands)
Combined Combined
Guarantor Non-Guarantor
Metallurg, Inc. Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
--------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents ................ $ 13,302 $ 1,054 $ 15,082 $ 29,438
Accounts receivable, net ................. 26,167 17,039 52,967 $ (44,387) 51,786
Inventories .............................. -- 23,513 43,594 (1,366) 65,741
Other assets ............................. 1,953 7,130 9,398 (8,825) 9,656
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total current assets ................. 41,422 48,736 121,041 (54,578) 156,621
Investments - intergroup ................... 68,851 10,437 38,686 (117,974) --
Investments - other ........................ -- -- 2,117 -- 2,117
Property, plant and equipment, net ......... 585 22,488 43,449 -- 66,522
Other assets ............................... 11,037 59,216 12,922 (60,270) 22,905
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total ................................ $ 121,895 $ 140,877 $ 218,215 $(232,822) $ 248,165
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDER'S (DEFICIT) EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Short-term debt and current portion of
long-term debt ......................... $ 6,272 $ 6,272
Accounts payable ......................... $ 3,878 $ 39,285 38,353 $ (44,387) 37,129
Accrued expenses ......................... 3,331 7,984 7,218 -- 18,533
Other current liabilities ................ 3,224 3,601 4,048 (8,825) 2,048
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total current liabilities ............ 10,433 50,870 55,891 (53,212) 63,982
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Long-term Liabilities:
Long-term debt .......................... 100,000 -- 21,019 -- 121,019
Accrued pension liabilities ............. 6,072 477 40,960 -- 47,509
Environmental liabilities, net .......... -- 23,812 2,473 -- 26,285
Other liabilities ....................... 17,876 -- 43,788 (60,270) 1,394
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total long-term liabilities .......... 123,948 24,289 108,240 (60,270) 196,207
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total liabilities .................... 134,381 75,159 164,131 (113,482) 260,189
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Minority interest .......................... -- -- 462 -- 462
Shareholder's (Deficit) Equity:
Common stock ............................ 50 1,217 118,126 (119,343) 50
Due from parent company ................. (21,715) -- -- -- (21,715)
Additional paid-in capital .............. 72,514 128,351 7,076 (135,427) 72,514
Accumulated other comprehensive loss .... (38,621) (31,137) (58,750) 89,887 (38,621)
Retained deficit ........................ (24,714) (32,713) (12,830) 45,543 (24,714)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total shareholder's (deficit) equity . (12,486) 65,718 53,622 (119,340) (12,486)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total ................................ $ 121,895 $ 140,877 $ 218,215 $(232,822) $ 248,165
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
52
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
16. Supplemental Guarantor Information - (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2002
(In thousands)
Combined Combined
Guarantor Non-Guarantor
Metallurg, Inc. Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Consolidated
--------------- ------------ ------------ ------------
Cash Flows from Operating Activities ..... $(15,260) $ 10,039 $ 10,576 $ 5,355
-------- -------- -------- --------
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment (16) (5,369) (5,855) (11,240)
Other, net ............................... (6,937) 4,002 (272) (3,207)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net cash used in investing activities . (6,953) (1,367) (6,127) (14,447)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Intergroup borrowings (repayments) ....... 6,430 (5,891) (539) --
Proceeds from long-term debt ............. -- -- 216 216
Repayment of long-term debt .............. -- -- (309) (309)
Net short-term borrowings ................ -- -- 883 883
Capital contributions .................... -- 4,401 -- 4,401
Intergroup dividends received (paid) ..... 10,564 (7,401) (3,163) --
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities .............. 16,994 (8,891) (2,912) 5,191
-------- -------- -------- --------
Effects of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents ............. -- -- 1,567 1,567
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash
equivalents ........................... (5,219) (219) 3,104 (2,334)
Cash and cash equivalents -
beginning of period ................... 18,521 1,273 11,978 31,772
-------- -------- -------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents -
end of period ......................... $ 13,302 $ 1,054 $ 15,082 $ 29,438
======== ======== ======== ========
53
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
16. Supplemental Guarantor Information - (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2001
(In thousands)
Combined Combined
Guarantor Non-Guarantor
Metallurg, Inc. Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
--------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total revenue ............................... $ 158,912 $ 298,974 $ (63,808) $ 394,078
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of sales ............................ 139,324 263,572 (62,827) 340,069
Selling, general and administrative
expenses ............................... $ 4,898 10,893 19,276 -- 35,067
Environmental expense recoveries ......... -- (631) -- -- (631)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total operating costs and expenses .... 4,898 149,586 282,848 (62,827) 374,505
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating (loss) income ............... (4,898) 9,326 16,126 (981) 19,573
Other:
Other income, net ........................ -- -- 279 -- 279
Interest (expense) income, net ........... (9,783) 1,006 (3,335) -- (12,112)
Equity in income of subsidiaries ......... 15,676 4,449 2,104 (22,229) --
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before income tax (benefit)
provision............................ 995 14,781 15,174 (23,210) 7,740
Income tax (benefit) provision .............. (1,159) 1,304 5,413 -- 5,558
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before minority interest ....... 2,154 13,477 9,761 (23,210) 2,182
Minority interest ........................... -- -- (28) -- (28)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net income ............................ 2,154 13,477 9,733 (23,210) 2,154
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Foreign currency translation adjustment .. (3,911) (10,583) (4,379) 14,962 (3,911)
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net (13,802) (13,150) (25,750) 38,900 (13,802)
Deferred (loss) gain on derivatives, net . (122) 58 (242) 184 (122)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Comprehensive loss .................... $ (15,681) $ (10,198) $ (20,638) $ 30,836 $ (15,681)
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
54
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
16. Supplemental Guarantor Information - (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet at December 31, 2001
(In thousands)
Combined Combined
Guarantor Non-Guarantor
Metallurg, Inc. Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
--------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents ......... $ 18,521 $ 1,273 $ 11,978 $ 31,772
Accounts receivable, net .......... 31,213 18,014 46,764 $ (47,562) 48,429
Inventories ....................... -- 35,226 42,827 (2,870) 75,183
Other assets ...................... 745 8,288 8,174 (2,637) 14,570
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total current assets ........... 50,479 62,801 109,743 (53,069) 169,954
Investments - intergroup ............. 86,600 21,124 49,901 (157,625) --
Investments - other .................. -- -- 1,126 -- 1,126
Property, plant and equipment, net ... 728 18,818 39,561 -- 59,107
Other assets ......................... 6,814 59,271 6,035 (60,788) 11,332
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total .......................... $ 144,621 $ 162,014 $ 206,366 $(271,482) $ 241,519
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Short-term debt and current portion
of long-term debt ................ $ 4,602 $ 4,602
Accounts payable .................. $ 2,569 $ 43,355 31,890 $ (47,562) 30,252
Accrued expenses .................. 2,843 7,649 6,854 -- 17,346
Other current liabilities ......... 2,546 91 2,767 (2,637) 2,767
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total current liabilities ...... 7,958 51,095 46,113 (50,199) 54,967
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Long-term Liabilities:
Long-term debt .................... 100,000 -- 18,919 -- 118,919
Accrued pension liabilities ....... 1,886 359 17,864 -- 20,109
Environmental liabilities, net .... -- 26,906 2,143 -- 29,049
Other liabilities ................. 17,876 -- 44,146 (60,788) 1,234
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total long-term liabilities .... 119,762 27,265 83,072 (60,788) 169,311
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total liabilities .............. 127,720 78,360 129,185 (110,987) 224,278
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Minority interest .................... -- -- 340 -- 340
Shareholder's Equity:
Common stock ...................... 50 1,227 118,152 (119,379) 50
Due from parent company ........... (19,714) -- -- -- (19,714)
Additional paid-in capital ........ 67,352 121,964 7,076 (129,040) 67,352
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss ............................. (27,425) (23,675) (43,095) 66,770 (27,425)
Retained deficit .................. (3,362) (15,862) (5,292) 21,154 (3,362)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total shareholder's equity ..... 16,901 83,654 76,841 (160,495) 16,901
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total .......................... $ 144,621 $ 162,014 $ 206,366 $(271,482) $ 241,519
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
55
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
16. Supplemental Guarantor Information - (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2001
(In thousands)
Combined Combined
Guarantor Non-Guarantor
Metallurg, Inc. Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Consolidated
--------------- ------------ ------------ ------------
Cash Flows from Operating Activities ..... $ (3,589) $ (1,803) $ 11,551 $ 6,159
-------- -------- -------- --------
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment (35) (7,583) (7,935) (15,553)
Other, net ............................... 89 -- 96 185
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities ............. 54 (7,583) (7,839) (15,368)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Intergroup (repayments) borrowings ....... (16,329) 16,575 (246) --
Proceeds from long-term debt ............. -- -- 17,312 17,312
Repayment of long-term debt .............. -- -- (9,324) (9,324)
Net repayment of short-term debt ......... -- -- (2,907) (2,907)
Capital contributions .................... -- 1,257 -- 1,257
Intergroup dividends received (paid) ..... 13,209 (8,757) (4,452) --
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities ............. (3,120) 9,075 383 6,338
-------- -------- -------- --------
Effects of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents ............. -- -- (1,148) (1,148)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and
cash equivalents ...................... (6,655) (311) 2,947 (4,019)
Cash and cash equivalents -
beginning of period ................... 25,176 1,584 9,031 35,791
-------- -------- -------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents -
end of period ......................... $ 18,521 $ 1,273 $ 11,978 $ 31,772
======== ======== ======== ========
56
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
16. Supplemental Guarantor Information - (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2000
(In thousands)
Combined Combined
Guarantor Non-Guarantor
Metallurg, Inc. Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
--------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total revenue ............................. $ 175,198 $ 302,784 $ (58,773) $ 419,209
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of sales .......................... 154,690 266,610 (58,750) 362,550
Selling, general and administrative
expenses ........................... $ 5,888 11,347 19,338 -- 36,573
Environmental expense recoveries ....... -- (750) -- -- (750)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total operating costs and expenses .. 5,888 165,287 285,948 (58,750) 398,373
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating (loss) income ............. (5,888) 9,911 16,836 (23) 20,836
Other income (expense):
Other income, net ...................... -- 5,128 363 -- 5,491
Interest (expense) income, net ......... (8,338) 854 (1,217) (71) (8,772)
Equity in income of subsidiaries ....... 19,183 8,216 -- (27,399) --
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before income tax (benefit)
provision....................... 4,957 24,109 15,982 (27,493) 17,555
Income tax (benefit) provision ............ (4,631) 5,836 6,769 -- 7,974
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before minority interest ..... 9,588 18,273 9,213 (27,493) 9,581
Minority interest ......................... -- -- 7 -- 7
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net income .......................... 9,588 18,273 9,220 (27,493) 9,588
Other comprehensive loss:
Foreign currency translation adjustment (8,084) (5,113) (5,660) 10,773 (8,084)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Comprehensive income ................ $ 1,504 $ 13,160 $ 3,560 $ (16,720) $ 1,504
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
57
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
16. Supplemental Guarantor Information - (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2000
(In thousands)
Combined Combined
Guarantor Non-Guarantor
Metallurg, Inc. Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Consolidated
--------------- ------------ ------------ ------------
Cash Flows from Operating Activities ........ $ (9,762) $ 1,593 $ 728 $ (7,441)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment .. (92) (3,457) (10,369) (13,918)
Proceeds from sale of assets ................ -- 8,311 -- 8,311
Other, net .................................. 117 (34) (11,234) (11,151)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities ......................... 25 4,820 (21,603) (16,758)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Intergroup (repayments) borrowings .......... (383) 2,607 (2,224) --
Proceeds from long-term debt ................ -- -- 8,545 8,545
Repayment of long-term debt ................. -- -- (515) (515)
Net short-term borrowings ................... -- -- 8,083 8,083
Purchase of parent company debt ............. (19,714) -- -- (19,714)
Capital contributions ....................... 83 -- 7 90
Intergroup dividends received (paid) ........ 9,500 (8,000) (1,500) --
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net cash (used in) provided by financing
activities ......................... (10,514) (5,393) 12,396 (3,511)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and
cash equivalents ......................... -- -- (658) (658)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash
equivalents .............................. (20,251) 1,020 (9,137) (28,368)
Cash and cash equivalents -
beginning of period ...................... 45,427 564 18,168 64,159
-------- -------- -------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents -
end of period ............................ $ 25,176 $ 1,584 $ 9,031 $ 35,791
======== ======== ======== ========
58
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
17. Related Party Transactions
In December 2002, Metallurg sold all of its ownership interests in GfE to
Safeguard PFW, a Delaware company owned by Safeguard International, the majority
owner of Metallurg Holdings, Metallurg's parent company. Metallurg also sold a
number of its European sales offices to a German company controlled by Safeguard
International. See "Note 2. Change in Reporting Entity."
Accounts receivable and payable balances between Metallurg and the
companies sold in December 2002, previously recorded as intergroup balances and
eliminated on consolidation, are now shown as related party balances on
Metallurg's Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Metallurg, Inc. charges its parent company, Metallurg Holdings, $12,000
per quarter for administrative services performed. There was no outstanding
balance at December 31, 2002.
Pursuant to an Advisory Agreement entered into as of January 1, 1999
between Metallurg, Inc. and Safeguard International Management, L.L.C.
("Safeguard LLC"), Metallurg, Inc. paid $33,000 per month through June 2000 (for
a total of $198,000 during 2000) in connection with certain advisory and other
services. Effective July 1, 2000, a new Advisory Agreement between Safeguard LLC
and Metallurg, Inc. was entered into, which provides for the payment of $15,000
per month by Metallurg, Inc. in connection with the same types of services.
Under this Agreement, Metallurg paid $150,000, $90,000 and $180,000 in 2002,
2001 and 2000, respectively. Effective October 31, 2002, this advisory agreement
was terminated and two members of Safeguard LLC, Dr. Heinz C. Schimmelbusch and
Mr. Arthur R. Spector, were employed by Metallurg, Inc. on November 11, 2002 as
Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice Chairman, respectively. See "Item 10.
Directors and Executive Officers of Metallurg, Inc."
Dr. Schimmelbusch and Mr. Spector are managing directors of the general
partner of Safeguard International, the majority owner of Metallurg Holdings,
and in these positions receive compensation from this entity.
On October 17, 2000, Metallurg, Inc. completed the purchase of $76,065,000
in face amount of the Senior Discount Notes for $19,714,000 in cash. Metallurg,
Inc.'s investment in these Senior Discount Notes is recorded as a reduction in
equity. See "Note 11. Shareholder's (Deficit) Equity."
59
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Selected Quarterly Financial Data
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
First Second Third Fourth
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Year
--------------- ---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Year Ended December 31, 2002
Sales.......................... $77,505 $86,291 $90,392 $90,158 $344,346
Gross profit................... 6,842 6,711 9,063 6,601 29,217
Net loss (a)................... (3,144) (7,214) (4,130) (6,864) (21,352)
First Second Third Fourth
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Year
--------------- ---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Year Ended December 31, 2001
Sales.......................... $105,905 $103,140 $93,648 $90,752 $393,445
Gross profit................... 15,357 15,058 11,943 11,651 54,009
Net income (loss) (b).......... 1,805 1,317 297 (1,265) 2,154
- ----------
(a) Includes environmental expense recovery of $3,000 in the first quarter and
restructuring charges, net, of $1,361, $990 and $1,022 in the second,
third and fourth quarters, respectively.
(b) Includes environmental expense recoveries of $318, $282 and $31 in the
first, second and fourth quarters, respectively.
60
<Page>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
To the Board of Directors of Metallurg, Inc.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our
report dated March 17, 2003 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K also
included an audit of the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15 (a) (2)
of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in
conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
March 17, 2003
61
<Page>
METALLURG, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
(In thousands)
Deductions
-----------------------------
Balance at Charged to Uncollectable Balance at
Beginning Costs and Accounts End
of Period Expenses Written Off Other (a) of Period
--------- -------- ----------- --------- ---------
Year Ended December 31, 2000
Accounts receivable allowance
for doubtful accounts.......... $853 $623 $(146) $(4) $1,326
Year Ended December 31, 2001
Accounts receivable allowance
for doubtful accounts.......... $1,326 $889 $(343) $(175) $1,697
Year Ended December 31, 2002
Accounts receivable allowance
for doubtful accounts.......... $1,697 $679 $(515) $175 $2,036
- ----------
(a) Foreign currency translation adjustments.
62
<Page>
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of Metallurg, Inc.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the
individuals who are the directors and executive officers of Metallurg, Inc.:
Name Age Position
- ---- --- --------
Heinz C. Schimmelbusch......................... 58 Chairman of the Board, Director and Chief Executive Officer
Arthur R. Spector.............................. 62 Vice Chairman of the Board, Director and Executive Vice Chairman
Eric E. Jackson................................ 50 President and Chief Operating Officer
Barry C. Nuss.................................. 49 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
James Pearson ................................. 62 Managing Director of LSM
Michael J. Emmi................................ 61 Director
Nils A. Kindwall............................... 79 Director
Jack L. Messman................................ 63 Director
Samuel A. Plum................................. 58 Director
Michael D. Winfield............................ 64 Director
Each director of Metallurg, Inc. holds office until the next annual
meeting of the stockholder of Metallurg, Inc. or until his successor has been
elected and qualified. Officers of Metallurg, Inc. are selected by the Board of
Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Heinz C. Schimmelbusch - Dr. Heinz C. Schimmelbusch was appointed Chief
Executive Officer of Metallurg, Inc. in November 2002. He has been Chairman of
the Board and a Director of Metallurg, Inc., as well as President, Chief
Executive Officer and a Director of Metallurg Holdings, Inc. (Metallurg, Inc.'s
parent company), since July 1998. He is a Managing Director of the general
partner, and founder, of Safeguard International Fund, L.P., a private equity
fund investing in North America and Europe; and Chairman and CEO of Allied
Resource Corporation, a global technology and engineering group, both located in
Wayne, Pennsylvania. He serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
following companies: In the U.S. - Alanx Corporation in Newark, Delaware and
Puralube, Inc. in Wayne, Pennsylvania; In Germany - ALD Vacuum Technologies AG
in Hanau; Pfalz-Flugzengwerke AG in Speyer; and KWH Katalystorenwerke GmbH in
Marl; and in Belgium - Sudamin Holdings S.A. in Brussels. During his
professional career, Dr. Schimmelbusch held various industrial positions in
Germany: Chairman of the Managing Board of Metallgesellschaft AG in Frankfurt;
Chairman of the Supervisory Boards of Buderus AG in Wetzlar; Dynamit Nobel AG in
Troisdorf; Norddeutsche Affinerie AG in Hamburg; Grillowerke AG in Duisburg; and
of BUS Umweltservice AG in Frankfurt. In Canada, he was Chairman of the Board of
Directors of Metall Mining Corporation in Toronto and Methanex Corporation in
Vancouver. He served on the following Boards of Directors: Allianz Versicherungs
AG, Munich and Mobil Oil AG, Hamburg in Germany; Teck Corporation in Vancouver,
Canada and Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. in Wayne, Pennsylvania. He was a Member
of the Advisory Boards of Dresdner Bank AG in Frankfurt, Germany; Creditanstalt
AG in Vienna, Austria; the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development in
London, England; and of Hermes Kreditversicherungs-AG in Hamburg, Germany. Dr.
Schimmelbusch also served as a member of the Presidency of the Federation of
German Industries (BDI) in Cologne, Germany and Chairman of its Environmental
Committee; and member of the Presidency of the International Chamber of Commerce
(ICC) in Paris, France. Dr. Schimmelbusch received his graduate degree (with
distinction) and his doctorate (magna cum laude) from the University of
Tubingen, Germany. For chairing the International Advisory Committee of the
Austrian Chancellor, he was awarded the Golden Cross of Honor for services to
the Republic of Austria.
Arthur R. Spector - Mr. Spector was elected Vice Chairman of the Board and
as Executive Vice Chairman of Metallurg, Inc. in November 2002. He has been a
Director of Metallurg, Inc. and Metallurg Holdings, Inc. since July 1998 and has
been Executive Vice President of Metallurg Holdings, Inc. since July 1998 and
Treasurer since August 2000. He is a Managing Director of the general partner
and of the management company of Safeguard International Fund, L.P. From January
1997 to March 1998, Mr. Spector served as Managing Director of TL Ventures LLC,
a venture capital company. Mr. Spector has also served as Chairman of various
public companies, including Casino & Credit Services, Inc., Abraham Lincoln
Federal Savings Bank and State National Bank of Maryland. Mr. Spector serves as
a Director of Docucorp International, a document
63
<Page>
automation company. Mr. Spector holds a B.S. degree in economics from the
Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and a J.D. from the University
of Pennsylvania Law School.
Eric E. Jackson - Mr. Jackson was appointed President and Chief Operating
Officer of Metallurg, Inc. in November 2002 after having served as Senior Vice
President of Metallurg, Inc. since August 1998. He also serves as an officer and
director of certain subsidiaries of Metallurg, Inc. Mr. Jackson was Senior Vice
President and then President of Shieldalloy from September 1996 and retains the
position of President currently. From 1993 to 1995, he was Assistant Director at
Phibro, a division of Salomon, Inc., where he directed trading and distribution
operations. Prior thereto, he was a Vice President at Louis Dreyfus Corporation
from 1989 to 1993, where he managed trading and soft physical commodities
operations. From 1979 to 1989, Mr. Jackson served in various capacities at
Cargill Incorporated in Canada and the United States. Mr. Jackson received a
B.S. degree in economics and an M.B.A. from the University of Saskatchewan.
Barry C. Nuss - Mr. Nuss joined Metallurg, Inc. as Financial Controller in
1983, was appointed Vice President, Finance of Shieldalloy in 1988, then became
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Metallurg, Inc. in 1994,
and assumed his current position as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer in November 2002. He also serves as an officer and director of various
subsidiaries of Metallurg, Inc. He was previously employed as an auditor at
Deloitte Haskins & Sells (now known as Deloitte & Touche LLP) from 1976 to 1981
and as a Financial Analyst at Cabot Mineral Resources from 1981 to 1983. Mr.
Nuss is a Certified Public Accountant and has a B.S. degree in accounting from
Fairleigh Dickinson University.
James Pearson - Dr. Pearson was appointed Joint Managing Director of LSM
in 1983 and then became Managing Director of LSM in August 1998. Prior to this
appointment, he held several technical positions at LSM, which he joined in
1968. Prior to joining LSM, Dr. Pearson worked for Workington Iron & Steel Works
in Workington, England. Dr. Pearson has a B.Sc. and Ph.D. in metallurgy from the
University of Wales.
Michael J. Emmi - Mr. Emmi was elected a Director of Metallurg, Inc. in
February 2001. In April 2002, Mr. Emmi founded and became Chief Executive
Officer of IPR International, a provider of data backup and recovery services.
He retired as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Systems & Computer
Technology Corp. (SCT), a provider of industry-focused technology solutions, in
January 2002. Mr. Emmi joined SCT from General Electric in May 1985, after 25
years in the information services industry. He is a current board member of
CompuCom Systems, Inc. and CDI Corporation. Civic board positions include the
Philadelphia Orchestra Association, the Greater Philadelphia Technology Council,
Legatus International and the Business-Higher Education Forum. Mr. Emmi has a
B.S. degree in business management from the State University of New York,
Albany.
Nils A. Kindwall - Mr. Kindwall was elected a Director of Metallurg, Inc.
in August 1998. He is the retired Vice Chairman of Freeport McMoRan, Inc. At
Freeport, he was one of the founders of Freeport Indonesia, a producer of copper
and gold. He has been involved in the financing of varied projects within the
mining industry. He is also a former member of Chemical Bank's Advisory Board
and a former Director of Inmet Mining Corporation, Northfield Minerals and John
Wiley & Sons (publishers). He is currently a Director of Allied Resource
Corporation. Mr. Kindwall received his B.A. from Princeton University and an
M.B.A. from the Columbia University Graduate School of Business.
Jack L. Messman - Mr. Messman was elected a Director of Metallurg, Inc. in
November 1998. In July 2001, he became President and Chief Executive Officer of
Novell, Inc., a provider of Net services software, upon its acquisition of
Cambridge Technology Partners, Inc., an E-Business services provider (of which
he had been President and Chief Executive Officer from August 1999 to July
2001). He was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Union Pacific
Resources Group Inc. (UPRG) from 1996 to August 1999. Prior to becoming Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of UPRG, Mr. Messman was President of UPRG. Prior to
joining UPRG in 1991, Mr. Messman had been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of U.S. Pollution Control, Inc., Union Pacific's environmental services company,
since 1988. Prior thereto, he was managing director of Mason Best Company of
Houston, an investment banking firm, from 1986 to 1988, and simultaneously
served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Somerset House Corporation, a
publishing company owned by Mason Best. He was Executive Vice President-Chief
Financial Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of Warner Amex Cable
Communications, Inc. from 1983 to 1986. From 1981 to 1983, he was Executive Vice
President and a Director of Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. and also served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of Novell, Inc., a company controlled by
Safeguard Scientifics, Inc., from 1982 to 1983. He was President and Chief
Executive Officer of Norcross, Inc., a consumer products company, from 1973 to
1980. Prior thereto, he was a partner in a Philadelphia investment banking firm.
Mr. Messman is a graduate of the University of Delaware, with a B.S. degree in
chemical engineering, and received his M.B.A. from the Harvard Graduate School
of Business Administration. He was also a Director
64
<Page>
of Union Pacific Corporation (former parent of UPRG) and MTV Networks, Inc. Mr.
Messman currently serves on the Board of Directors of Safeguard Scientifics,
Inc., Novell, Inc., US Data, Inc., Cambridge Technology Partners, Inc. and
Radioshack Corporation.
Samuel A. Plum - Mr. Plum was elected to serve as a Director of Metallurg,
Inc. in November 1998 and as a Director of Metallurg Holdings in October 1998.
He has been a Managing General Partner of the general partner of SCP Private
Equity Partners, L.P. since its commencement in August 1996 and was an employee
of Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. from 1993 to 1996. From February 1989 to January
1993, Mr. Plum served as President of Charterhouse, Inc. and Charterhouse North
American Securities, Inc., the U.S. investment banking and broker-dealer
divisions of Charterhouse PLC, a merchant bank located in the U.K. From 1973 to
1989, he served in various capacities, including Managing Director and partner,
at the investment banking divisions of Paine Webber Inc. and Blyth Eastman
Dillon & Co., Inc., respectively. Mr. Plum is also a Director of PacWest
Telecomm, Inc., Index Stock Photography, Inc., Pentech Financial Service, Inc.,
WebVision, Inc. and the Philadelphia Zoological Society. Past directorships
include Tishman Holdings Corporation, Icon CMT Corp., Vortex Sound
Communications, Inc., Quaker Fabrics Corporation and the National Audubon
Society, the latter two as Chairman. Mr. Plum holds a B.A. degree in history
from Harvard University and an M.B.A. degree from the Harvard Graduate School of
Business Administration.
Michael D. Winfield - Michael D. Winfield was elected a Director of
Metallurg Inc. on November 9, 2001. He began his career with UOP LLC, a leading
international supplier of technology, products and services to the oil refining,
petrochemical and gas processing industries, in 1962. He retired as President
and Chief Executive Officer of UOP in 2001 and continues to serve on its Board
of Managers and as a Senior Advisor following his retirement. He is Chairman of
Landauer Corp., a radiation dosimetry measurement and services company, and a
Director of Chicago Bridge and Iron NV, a designer and fabricator of tankage. He
has professional affiliations with a number of industry and international trade
organizations. Mr. Winfield earned a B.S. in chemical engineering from Ohio
State University, where he is a Distinguished Alumnus and a member of the
College of Engineering's Advisory Committee, and an M.B.A. from the University
of Chicago.
The Board of Directors has a compensation committee and an audit
committee, on which Dr. Schimmelbusch, Mr. Winfield and Mr. Kindwall; and
Messrs. Spector, Kindwall and Plum; respectively, serve.
Effective November 21, 2002, Mr. Michael A. Standen resigned his positions
as Vice Chairman of the Board and as a Director of Metallurg, Inc.
65
<Page>
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The following table sets forth the compensation earned by Metallurg,
Inc.'s Chief Executive Officers and the four other most highly compensated
executive officers (collectively, the "Named Officers") during the calendar
years 2000, 2001 and 2002, for services rendered in all capacities to Metallurg,
Inc. during each of those periods. The compensation information is presented on
a calendar year basis.
Summary Compensation Table
Long-Term Compensation
------------------------------
Annual Compensation Securities
-------------------------- Underlying All Other
Salary Bonus Options Compensation
Name and Principal Position Year ($) ($) (c) (#) ($)
- --------------------------- ------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------------
Heinz C. Schimmelbusch ............................ 2002 74,038(a) -- -- --
Chairman of the Board, Director and Chief
Executive Officer
Alan D. Ewart...................................... 2002 530,000(b) -- -- 57,290(b,d)
President, Chief Executive Officer 2001 530,000 175,000 -- 6,078
and Director 2000 510,000 229,500 -- 5,898
Arthur R. Spector ................................. 2002 66,987(a) -- -- --
Vice Chairman of the Board, Director and
Executive Vice Chairman
Eric E. Jackson.................................... 2002 323,000 120,000 -- 6,040(d)
President and Chief Operating 2001 323,000 107,000 -- 5,790
Officer 2000 310,000 145,000 -- 5,790
Barry C. Nuss...................................... 2002 266,000 100,000 -- 6,040(d)
Senior Vice President and Chief 2001 266,000 88,000 -- 5,790
Financial Officer 2000 255,000 115,000 -- 5,790
James Pearson...................................... 2002 222,398 20,293 -- 15,000(e)
Managing Director of LSM 2001 193,094 26,298 -- 15,000
2000 197,223 56,891 -- 15,000
- ----------
(a) Dr. Schimmelbusch and Mr. Spector were elected to their positions as Chief
Executive Officer and Executive Vice Chairman, respectively, effective
November 8, 2002.
(b) Mr. Ewart's employment ended on November 8, 2002. In agreement with the
Board and in accordance with terms of his employment agreement, he was
paid $50,962 for accrued vacation in addition to his full annual salary in
2002.
(c) Bonuses are paid in the first quarter of the following year (e.g. bonuses
with respect to 2002 are reported above on that line, but are paid in
2003).
(d) These amounts consist of matching contributions by Metallurg under its
401(k) Plan ($5,500, paid in 2003), plus term life insurance premiums
($828, $540 and $540) with respect to Mr. Ewart, Mr. Jackson and Mr. Nuss,
respectively.
(e) Dr. Pearson received a consulting fee from Metallurg, Inc.
Option Grants In the Last Fiscal Year
There were no grants of options made during fiscal 2002 to the Named
Officers.
66
<Page>
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option
Values
The following table provides information on the number of stock options
held by the Named Officers at fiscal year-end. Values of unexercised outstanding
options are not provided since Metallurg, Inc.'s equity securities are not
traded. No options were exercised in 2002.
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options at
December 31, 2002
Named Officer Exercisable/Unexercisable
- ------------- --------------------------------
Heinz C. Schimmelbusch ................... 25,000 / --
Arthur R. Spector ........................ 15,000 / --
Alan D. Ewart (a)......................... 60,000 / --
Eric E. Jackson........................... 35,000 / --
Barry C. Nuss............................. 25,000 / --
James Pearson ............................ 17,500 / --
- ----------
(a) As Mr. Ewart's employment ended on November 8, 2002, all of his
outstanding options expired unexercised in February 2003.
Stock Compensation Plans
On November 20, 1998, the Board of Directors of Metallurg, Inc. (the
"Board") adopted the 1998 Equity Compensation Plan ("ECP") to provide
(i) designated employees of Metallurg, Inc. and its subsidiaries, (ii) certain
advisors who perform services for Metallurg, and (iii) non-employee members of
the Board with the opportunity to receive grants of incentive stock options,
non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and
performance units. Metallurg believes that the ECP will encourage the
participants to contribute materially to the growth of Metallurg and will align
the economic interests of the participants with those of its shareholder. As of
December 31, 2002, the number of authorized shares of common stock of Metallurg
("Company Stock") was 10,000,000 shares, of which 5,000,000 are outstanding.
Subject to certain adjustments specified in the ECP, the aggregate number of
shares of Company Stock that may be issued or transferred under the ECP is
500,000 shares.
Pursuant to the ECP, between 1998 and December 31, 2002, the Board has
awarded aggregate options (net of cancellations and forfeitures) to purchase up
to 400,000 shares of Company Stock at an exercise price of $30.00 per share.
Each member of the Board (other than Mr. Ewart) received options to purchase
15,000 shares, except that Dr. Schimmelbusch received options to purchase 25,000
shares. Messrs. Ewart, Jackson and Nuss and Dr. Pearson received stock options
in the amounts of 75,000, 35,000, 25,000 and 17,500, respectively. The options
have a term of 10 years and vest as follows: 20% on the date of the grant and
20% on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of grant. During 2002,
an aggregate of 72,500 options terminated without exercise and became available
again for grant under the ECP.
Pension Plan
The Pension Plan of Metallurg, Inc., effective as of January 1, 1989, as
amended (the "Pension Plan"), covers substantially all of Metallurg, Inc.'s and
Shieldalloy's U.S. salaried employees. The Pension Plan is maintained as a
tax-qualified defined benefit plan, which covers most officers and salaried
employees on a non-contributory basis. Such employees generally become eligible
to receive a vested retirement benefit under such plan after completion of five
years of service. Benefits under the Pension Plan are generally based upon the
number of years of service credit, up to 30 years, the final average
compensation (base salary only) of each individual employee, and a percentage of
such employee's eligible earnings. Final average compensation is calculated
using the highest 60 consecutive calendar months of compensation during the last
120 months prior to the date of retirement or termination of employment. Normal
retirement is age 65.
67
<Page>
The following table shows the estimated annual retirement benefits payable
at age 65 under the Pension Plan assuming current regulatory limitations on
covered compensation to participating employees, including the Named Officers
(other than Dr. Pearson), in the remuneration and years of service
classifications indicated. Metallurg, Inc. does not currently have a
supplemental executive retirement plan.
Years of Service
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remuneration 10 15 20 25 30
- ------------ -------------- ---------------- -------------- --------------- ---------------
$100,000.......................... 16,436 24,654 32,872 41,090 49,308
$125,000.......................... 21,186 31,779 42,372 52,965 63,558
$150,000.......................... 25,936 38,904 51,872 64,840 77,808
$175,000.......................... 30,686 46,029 61,372 76,715 92,058
$200,000.......................... 35,436 53,154 70,872 88,590 106,308
The respective years of service credited for pension purposes as of
December 31, 2002 and the estimated years of service at age 65 for each of the
Named Officers (other than Dr. Pearson) are as follows:
Completed Completed
Years of Service at Years of Service at
Named Officer December 31, 2002 Normal Retirement
- ------------- ------------------------ -------------------------
Heinz C. Schimmelbusch -- 7
Arthur R. Spector -- 3
Eric E. Jackson 6 20
Barry C. Nuss 19 30
Dr. Pearson has completed approximately 38 years of service at LSM at
December 31, 2002 and will have completed approximately 40 years of service at
normal retirement age. He is entitled to an annual estimated benefit of
approximately 'L'84,000 ($135,215) under LSM's pension plan at age 65.
Compensation of Directors
Non-executive directors of Metallurg, Inc. receive an annual retainer of
$10,000 and a fee of $1,000 for each Board meeting attended. The Board meets
each quarter and may act by unanimous written consent or call special meetings
between regularly scheduled meetings, as necessary. The Chairman of the
Compensation Committee and the Chairman of the Audit Committee each receives an
additional $1,000 for each committee meeting attended. Additional compensation
may be paid to directors in connection with special assignments, as determined
by the Compensation Committee. In November 1998, each non-executive director was
awarded 15,000 stock options, except for the Chairman of the Board, Dr.
Schimmelbusch, who was awarded 25,000 stock options. During 2001, Messrs. Emmi
and Winfield, upon being elected Directors, were each awarded 15,000 stock
options. The options have ten year terms, vest 20% on date of grant and 20% on
each of the first four anniversaries of the date of grant, and have an exercise
price of $30.00 per share.
Executive Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements
Metallurg, Inc. entered into employment agreements with the following
Named Officers (individually, an "Executive"): Heinz C. Schimmelbusch and Arthur
R. Spector, effective November 11, 2002; and Eric E. Jackson and Barry C. Nuss,
effective August 10, 1998. Each agreement is for an initial term of two years
and automatically renews for successive one-year periods unless the Executive
or Metallurg notifies the other in writing at least ninety days prior to the
next scheduled expiration date that the term will not be extended. Each
Executive has agreed not to compete against Metallurg during the employment term
and for a period of twelve to eighteen months thereafter, depending on certain
circumstances.
Each Executive receives an annual base salary equal to his annual base
salary in effect on the date of the agreement, which may be increased by the
Board of Directors. Each Executive is entitled to participate in the employee
benefit plans generally made available to Metallurg's senior-level executives.
Pursuant to the executive employment agreements, the base salaries set forth
therein (subject to annual increases) are $525,000 for Dr. Schimmelbusch,
$475,000 for Mr. Spector, $280,000 for Mr. Jackson and $240,000 for Mr. Nuss.
68
<Page>
The agreements contain customary provisions concerning termination of
employment by Metallurg with and without cause, by the Executive with and
without "good reason" (as defined therein), and as a result of death or
disability. Depending upon the basis for termination, severance may be paid for
a period up to 18 months after termination or not at all. Bonuses may be paid,
at the discretion of the Chief Executive Officer (or in consultation with the
Compensation Committee, in the case of Dr. Schimmelbusch and Mr. Spector), but
no formal bonus plan has been adopted.
Effective November 8, 2002, Mr. Ewart's employment with Metallurg, Inc.
ended. In agreement with the Board and under terms of his employment agreement,
Mr. Ewart is entitled to receive additional salary payments of $718,897, payable
through May 8, 2004, and payments in lieu of other employee benefits of
approximately $42,650, payable through January 2005.
Effective June 21, 2002, the employment of Ms. Ellen T. Harmon and Mr.
Dennis P. Kelly, formerly Vice President and General Counsel, and Vice
President, Group Strategic Planning of Metallurg, Inc., respectively, were
terminated. Under terms of her agreement, Ms. Harmon received her full annual
salary of $251,000 and payments in lieu of employee benefits of $4,501 in 2002.
She is entitled to receive additional salary payments of $244,564, payable
through December 21, 2003, and payments in lieu of employee benefits of
approximately $17,653, payable through January 2004. Under terms of his
agreement, Mr. Kelly received his full annual salary of $237,000 in 2002. He is
entitled to receive additional salary payments of $230,923, payable through
December 21, 2003, and payment in lieu of employee benefits of approximately
$16,514, payable through January 2004.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
All of the issued and outstanding voting securities of Metallurg, Inc. are
owned by Metallurg Holdings, Inc., located at Building 400, 435 Devon Park
Drive, Wayne, PA 19087, whose voting securities are owned (to the extent of 5%
or more) by Safeguard International Fund, L.P. and SCP Private Equity Partners,
L.P. An aggregate (net of cancellations and forfeitures) of 400,000 option
shares of Metallurg, Inc. stock has been issued to all officers and directors
and other employees of Metallurg (see "Aggregated Option Exercises in Last
Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values" and "Stock Compensation Plans"
for details), none of which has been exercised.
Number of Securities
to be Issued upon Weighted-Average Number of Securities
Exercise of Exercise Price of Remaining Available
Outstanding Options Outstanding Options for Future issuance
-------------------- ------------------- ---------------------
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders (a) .... 400,000 $30.00 100,000
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders ........ None None None
- ----------
(a) On November 20, 1998, the Board adopted the ECP. Options issuable under
the ECP have a term of ten years and vest in most cases 20% on the date of
grant and 20% on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of the
grant. The ECP is Metallurg's only equity compensation plan.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
See the discussion under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Related Party Transactions" for
details of certain related party transactions occurring in 2002.
Item 14. Controls and Procedures
Within the 90 days prior to the date of this report, Metallurg carried out
an evaluation, under the supervision of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its
disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based
upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that Metallurg's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in
timely alerting them to material information relating to Metallurg (including
its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in its Exchange Act
filings.
There have been no significant changes in Metallurg's internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date that Metallurg carried out its evaluation.
69
<Page>
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) Documents filed as part of this report:
(1) A list of the financial statements filed as part of this report
appears on page 25.
(2) The financial statement schedule, required to be filed as part of
this report, appears on page 62.
(3) The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
Exhibit
Number Description of Exhibit
- ------ ----------------------
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Metallurg, Inc. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit T3A.3 to the Form T-3 filed by Metallurg, Inc. with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 1997 (File No.
022-22265)).
3.2 Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Metallurg,
Inc., filed in the State of Delaware on November 30, 1998 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Metallurg, Inc.'s Annual Report on
Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30,
1999 (File No. 333-42141)).
3.3 By-laws of Metallurg, Inc., as amended February 16, 2001 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Metallurg, Inc.'s Annual Report on
Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28,
2001 (file No. 333-42141)).
4.1 Indenture, dated as of November 25, 1997, by and among Metallurg, Inc.,
the Guarantors and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit S44.1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement filed by Metallurg, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 30, 1997 (File No. 333-42141)).
4.2 Form of 11% Series A Senior Notes due 2007, dated as of November 25,
1997 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit S44.2 to the Form S-4
Registration Statement filed by Metallurg, Inc. with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 30, 1997 (File No. 333-42141)).
4.3 Form of 11% Series B Senior Notes due 2007, dated as of November 25,
1997 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit S44.3 to the Form S-4
Registration Statement filed by Metallurg, Inc. with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 30, 1997 (File No. 333-42141)).
4.4 Registration Agreement, dated as of November 20, 1997, by and among
Metallurg, Inc., the Guarantors and the Initial Purchasers (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit S44.4 to the form S-4 Registration
Statement filed by Metallurg, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 30, 1997 and Amendments No. 1 through 4 thereto,
filed through March 13, 1998 (File No. 333-42141)).
10.1 Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated October 29, 1999, by and
among Metallurg, Inc., Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation and
Metallurg International Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, Metallurg
Services, Inc., MIR (China), Inc. and Metallurg Holdings Corporation, as
Guarantors, and Fleet National Bank (formerly known as BankBoston, N.A.)
as Agent for the lending institutions listed therein (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Metallurg, Inc.'s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 10, 1999 (File No. 333-42141)).
10.2 First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement (dated as of
October 29, 1999), dated as of October 11, 2000, among Metallurg, Inc.,
Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation and Metallurg International
Resources, Inc. as Borrowers, Metallurg Services, Inc., Metallurg
Holdings Corporation and MIR (China), Inc. as Guarantors, and Fleet
National Bank (formerly known as BankBoston, N.A.) as Agent for itself
and the other financial institutions parties thereto, and the banks
named therein (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10 to
Metallurg, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 11, 2000 (File No.
333-42141)).
70
<Page>
Exhibit
Number Description of Exhibit
- ------ ----------------------
10.3 Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement (dated as of
October 29, 1999), dated as of November 3, 2000, by and among Metallurg,
Inc., Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation and Metallurg International
Resources, LLC, as Borrowers, Metallurg Services, Inc., MIR (China),
Inc. and Metallurg Holdings Corporation, as Guarantors, and Fleet
National Bank (formerly known as BankBoston, N.A.) as Agent for itself
and the other financial institutions parties thereto, and the banks
named therein (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Metallurg, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2001 (File No.
333-42141)).
10.4 Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement (dated as of
October 29, 1999), dated as of July 2, 2001, among Metallurg, Inc.,
Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation and Metallurg International
Resources, LLC, as Borrowers, Metallurg Services, Inc., Metallurg
Holdings Corporation and MIR (China), Inc. as Guarantors, and Fleet
National Bank (formerly known as BankBoston, N.A.) as Agent for itself
and the other financial institutions parties thereto, and the banks
named therein (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Metallurg, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2001 (File No.
333-42141)).
10.5 Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement (dated as of
October 29, 1999), dated as of December 13, 2001, by and among
Metallurg, Inc., Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation and Metallurg
International Resources, LLC, as Borrowers, Metallurg Services, Inc.,
MIR (China), Inc. and Metallurg Holdings Corporation, as Guarantors, and
Fleet National Bank (formerly known as BankBoston, N.A.) as Agent for
itself and the other financial institutions parties thereto, and the
banks named therein (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to
Metallurg, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2002 (File No. 333-42141)).
10.6 Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement (dated as of
October 29, 1999), dated as of December 20, 2002, by and among
Metallurg, Inc., Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation and Metallurg
International Resources, LLC, as Borrowers, Metallurg Services, Inc.,
MIR (China), Inc. and Metallurg Holdings Corporation, as Guarantors, and
Fleet National Bank (formerly known as BankBoston, N.A.) as Agent for
itself and the other financial institutions parties thereto, and the
banks named therein.
10.7 Sixth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement (dated as of
October 29, 1999), dated as of January 30, 2003, by and among Metallurg,
Inc., Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation and Metallurg International
Resources, LLC, as Borrowers, Metallurg Services, Inc., MIR (China),
Inc., Metallurg Holdings Corporation and Metallurg (Canada) Ltd., as
Guarantors, and Fleet National Bank (formerly known as BankBoston, N.A.)
as Agent for itself and the other financial institutions parties
thereto, and the banks named therein.
10.8 Settlement Agreement dated December 27, 1996 between Metallurg, Inc.,
Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation, the Environmental Protection
Agency, the Department of the Interior, the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit S410.5 to the Form S-4
Registration Statement filed by Metallurg, Inc. with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 30, 1997 (File No. 333-42141)).
71
<Page>
Exhibit
Number Description of Exhibit
- ------ ----------------------
10.9 Permanent Injunction Consent Order dated December 23, 1996 between the
State of Ohio, Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation and Cyprus Foote
Mineral Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit S410.6 to
the Form S-4 Registration Statement filed by Metallurg, Inc. with the
Securities Exchange Commission on December 30, 1997 (File No.
333-42141)).
10.10 Merger Agreement, dated June 15, 1998, among Metallurg, Inc., Metallurg
Holdings and Metallurg Acquisition Corp. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Metallurg,
Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 1998 (File
No. 333-42141)).
10.11 1998 Equity Compensation Plan of Metallurg, Inc. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Metallurg, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form
10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 1999
(File No. 333-42141)).
10.12 Employment Agreements dated November 19, 1998 and November 20, 1998 by
and between Metallurg, Inc. and each of Eric E. Jackson and Barry C.
Nuss, respectively (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to
Metallurg, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on April 30, 1999 (File No. 333-42141)).
10.13 Employment Agreements dated November 11, 2002, by and between Metallurg,
Inc. and each of Heinz C. Schimmelbusch and Arthur R. Spector.
10.14 Advisory Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2000, by and between Metallurg,
Inc. and Safeguard International Management LLC (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Metallurg, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13,
2000 (File No. 333-42141)).
10.15 Intercompany Tax Allocation Agreement, dated July 13, 1998, by and among
Metallurg Holdings, Inc., Metallurg, Inc. and various subsidiaries
thereof (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Metallurg,
Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 30, 1999 (File No. 333-42141)).
21.1 Subsidiaries of Metallurg, Inc.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
-------------------
Metallurg, Inc. filed a Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on January 15, 2003, reporting the sale of certain
subsidiaries to related parties.
72
<Page>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the undersigned registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized as of the
27th day of March 2003.
METALLURG, INC.
By: /s/ Barry C. Nuss
----------------------------
Barry C. Nuss
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Signature Title(s) Date
--------- -------- ----
/s/ HEINZ C. SCHIMMELBUSCH Chairman, Director and Chief Executive Officer March 27, 2003
- ----------------------------------
Heinz C. Schimmelbusch
/s/ ARTHUR R. SPECTOR Vice Chairman, Director and Executive Vice Chairman March 27, 2003
- ----------------------------------
Arthur R. Spector
/s/ ERIC E. JACKSON President and Chief Operating Officer March 27, 2003
- ----------------------------------
Eric E. Jackson
/s/ BARRY C. NUSS Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer March 27, 2003
- ----------------------------------
Barry C. Nuss
/s/ MICHAEL J. EMMI Director March 27, 2003
- ----------------------------------
Michael J. Emmi
/s/ NILS A. KINDWALL Director March 27, 2003
- ----------------------------------
Nils A. Kindwall
/s/ JACK L. MESSMAN Director March 27, 2003
- ----------------------------------
Jack L. Messman
/s/ SAMUEL A. PLUM Director March 27, 2003
- ----------------------------------
Samuel A. Plum
/s / MICHAEL D. WINFIELD Director March 27, 2003
- ----------------------------------
Michael D. Winfield
/s / JAMES PEARSON Managing Director of LSM March 27, 2003
- ----------------------------------
James Pearson
73
<Page>
OFFICERS' CERTIFICATIONS
I, Heinz C. Schimmelbusch, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Metallurg, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we
have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual
report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.
Date: March 27, 2003
/s/ Heinz C. Schimmelbusch
-------------------------------------
Heinz C. Schimmelbusch
Chief Executive Officer
74
<Page>
OFFICERS' CERTIFICATIONS (CONTINUED)
I, Barry C. Nuss, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Metallurg, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we
have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual
report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.
Date: March 27, 2003
/s/ Barry C. Nuss
------------------------------------
Barry C. Nuss
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
75
STATEMENT OF DIFFERENCES
------------------------
The British pound sterling sign shall be expressed as.................. 'L'
The Euro sign shall be expressed as.................................... 'E'
The section symbol shall be expressed as...............................'SS'