EXHIBIT 99.1
BOTTLING GROUP, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
in millions
FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 28, 2002, DECEMBER 29, 2001 AND DECEMBER 30, 2000
2002 2001 2000
---- ---- ----
NET REVENUES............................... $9,216 $8,443 $7,982
Cost of sales.............................. 5,001 4,580 4,405
----- ----- -----
GROSS PROFIT............................... 4,215 3,863 3,577
Selling, delivery and administrative
expenses................................. 3,318 3,185 2,986
----- ----- -----
OPERATING INCOME........................... 897 678 591
Interest expense........................... 131 132 136
Interest income............................ 33 54 47
Other non-operating expenses, net.......... 7 -- 1
Minority interest.......................... 9 14 8
----- ----- -----
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES................. 783 586 493
Income tax expense before rate change...... 49 24 22
Income tax rate change benefit............. -- (25) --
----- ----- -----
NET INCOME................................. $734 $587 $ 471
==== ==== =====
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
19
BOTTLING GROUP, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
in millions
FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 28, 2002, DECEMBER 29, 2001 AND DECEMBER 30, 2000
2002 2001 2000
------- ------- -------
CASH FLOWS -- OPERATIONS
Net income ................................................................ $ 734 $ 587 $ 471
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation ........................................................... 443 379 340
Amortization ........................................................... 8 135 131
Other non-cash charges and credits, net ................................ 140 146 145
Changes in operating working capital, excluding effects of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable ................................................. (19) (28) 8
Inventories ......................................................... 13 (50) 11
Prepaid expenses and other current assets ........................... 27 (29) (102)
Accounts payable and other current liabilities ...................... (36) 56 22
------- ------- -------
Net change in operating working capital ........................... (15) (51) (61)
------- ------- -------
Pension contributions .................................................. (151) (86) (26)
Other, net ............................................................. (52) (37) (26)
------- ------- -------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATIONS ........................................... 1,107 1,073 974
------- ------- -------
CASH FLOWS -- INVESTMENTS
Capital expenditures ...................................................... (623) (593) (515)
Acquisitions of bottlers .................................................. (921) (52) (26)
Sales of property, plant and equipment .................................... 6 6 9
Notes receivable from PBG.................................................. (117) (310) (268)
Investment in debt defeasance trust ....................................... (181) -- --
------- ------- -------
NET CASH USED FOR INVESTMENTS ............................................. (1,836) (949) (800)
------- ------- -------
CASH FLOWS -- FINANCING
Short-term borrowings, net -- three months or less ........................ (78) 50 12
Proceeds from issuances of long-term debt ................................. 1,031 -- --
Payments of long-term debt ................................................ (120) -- (9)
Distributions to owners ................................................... (156) (223) (45)
------- ------- -------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) FINANCING ................................. 677 (173) (42)
------- ------- -------
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS .............. (8) (7) (4)
------- ------- -------
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS ...................... (60) (56) 128
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS -- BEGINNING OF YEAR ............................ 262 318 190
------- ------- -------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS -- END OF YEAR .................................. $ 202 $ 262 $ 318
======= ======= =======
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
20
BOTTLING GROUP, LLC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
in millions
DECEMBER 28, 2002 AND DECEMBER 29, 2001
2002 2001
------- --------
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents ................................................................. $ 202 $ 262
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $67 in 2002 and $42 in 2001 ........................ 922 823
Inventories ............................................................................... 378 331
Prepaid expenses and other current assets ................................................. 161 115
-------- --------
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS ................................................................... 1,663 1,531
Property, plant and equipment, net ........................................................ 3,308 2,543
Intangible assets, net .................................................................... 4,687 3,684
Notes receivable from PBG.................................................................. 954 837
Investment in debt defeasance trust ....................................................... 170 --
Other assets .............................................................................. 125 82
-------- --------
TOTAL ASSETS ........................................................................... $ 10,907 $ 8,677
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND OWNERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and other current liabilities ............................................ $ 1,138 $ 977
Short-term borrowings ..................................................................... 67 77
-------- --------
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES .............................................................. 1,205 1,054
Long-term debt ............................................................................ 3,535 2,299
Other liabilities ......................................................................... 621 406
Deferred income taxes ..................................................................... 360 168
Minority interest ......................................................................... -- 154
-------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES ...................................................................... 5,721 4,081
OWNERS' EQUITY
Owners' net investment .................................................................... 5,782 5,012
Accumulated other comprehensive loss ...................................................... (596) (416)
-------- --------
TOTAL OWNERS' EQUITY ................................................................... 5,186 4,596
-------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND OWNERS' EQUITY ................................................ $ 10,907 $ 8,677
======== ========
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
21
BOTTLING GROUP, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN OWNERS' EQUITY
in millions
FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 28, 2002, DECEMBER 29, 2001 AND DECEMBER 30, 2000
ACCUMULATED
OWNERS' OTHER
NET COMPREHENSIVE COMPREHENSIVE
INVESTMENT LOSS TOTAL INCOME/(LOSS)
---------- ---- ----- -------------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 25, 1999 ............. $ 4,150 $ (222) $ 3,928
Comprehensive income:
Net income ......................... 471 -- 471 $ 471
Currency translation adjustment..... -- (31) (31) (31)
-------
Total comprehensive income ............ $ 440
=======
Cash distributions to owners .......... (45) -- (45)
Non-cash distribution to owner ........ (2) -- (2)
------ ----- ------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 30, 2000 ............. 4,574 (253) 4,321
Comprehensive income:
Net income ......................... 587 -- 587 $ 587
Currency translation adjustment .... -- (48) (48) (48)
Minimum pension liability adjustment -- (96) (96) (96)
Cash flow hedge adjustment ......... -- (19) (19) (19)
-------
Total comprehensive income ............ $ 424
=======
Cash distributions to owners .......... (223) -- (223)
Non-cash contribution from owner ...... 74 -- 74
------ ----- ------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 29, 2001 ............. 5,012 (416) 4,596
Comprehensive income:
Net income ......................... 734 -- 734 $ 734
Currency translation adjustment .... -- 25 25 25
Minimum pension liability adjustment -- (216) (216) (216)
Cash flow hedge adjustment ......... -- 11 11 11
-------
Total comprehensive income ............ $ 554
=======
Non-cash contribution from owner ...... 192 -- 192
Cash distributions to owners .......... (156) -- (156)
------ ----- ------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 28, 2002.............. $5,782 $(596) $5,186
====== ===== ======
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
22
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Tabular dollars in millions
NOTE 1 -- BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Bottling Group, LLC (collectively referred to as "Bottling LLC," "we,"
"our" and "us") is the principal operating subsidiary of The Pepsi Bottling
Group, Inc. ("PBG") and consists of substantially all of the operations and
assets of PBG. Bottling LLC, which is consolidated by PBG, consists of bottling
operations located in the United States, Canada, Spain, Greece, Russia, Turkey
and, as a result of our recent acquisition, Mexico.
In conjunction with PBG's initial public offering and other subsequent
transactions, PBG and PepsiCo contributed bottling businesses and assets used in
the bottling businesses to Bottling LLC. As a result of the contribution of
these assets, PBG owns 93.2% of Bottling LLC and PepsiCo owns the remaining 6.8%
as of December 28, 2002.
Certain reclassifications were made in our Consolidated Financial
Statements to 2001 and 2000 amounts to conform to the 2002 presentation.
NOTE 2 -- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
("U.S. GAAP") requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION - The accounts of all of our wholly and
majority-owned subsidiaries are included in the accompanying Consolidated
Financial Statements. We have eliminated intercompany accounts and transactions
in consolidation.
FISCAL YEAR - Our fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in December
and, as a result, a 53rd week is added every five or six years. Fiscal years
2002 and 2001 consisted of 52 weeks while fiscal year 2000 consisted of 53
weeks.
REVENUE RECOGNITION - We recognize revenue when our products are
delivered to customers. Sales terms do not allow a right of return unless
product freshness dating has expired.
SALES INCENTIVES - We offer certain sales incentives to our customers,
which are accounted for as a reduction in our net revenues when incurred. A
number of these arrangements are based upon annual and quarterly targets that
generally do not exceed one year. Based upon forecasted volume and other
performance criteria, net revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Operations
are reduced by the expected amounts to be paid out to our customers.
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING COSTS - We are involved in a variety of
programs to promote our products. We include advertising and marketing costs in
selling, delivery and administrative expenses and expense such costs in the
fiscal year incurred. Advertising and marketing costs were $441 million, $389
million and $350 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, before bottler
incentives received from PepsiCo and other brand owners.
BOTTLER INCENTIVES - PepsiCo and other brand owners, at their sole
discretion, provide us with various forms of bottler incentives. These
incentives cover a variety of initiatives, including direct marketplace support,
capital equipment funding and advertising support. Based on the objective of the
programs and initiatives, we record bottler incentives as an adjustment to net
revenues or as a reduction of selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
Direct marketplace support represents PepsiCo's and other brand owners' funding
to assist us in offering sales and promotional discounts to retailers and is
recorded as an adjustment to net revenues. Capital equipment funding is designed
to help offset the costs of purchasing and installing marketing equipment, such
as vending machines and glass door coolers at customer locations and is recorded
as a reduction of selling, delivery and administrative expenses. Advertising
support represents the cost of media time, promotional materials, and other
advertising and marketing costs that are funded by PepsiCo and other brand
owners and is recorded as a reduction to advertising and marketing expenses
within selling, delivery and administrative expenses. In addition, PepsiCo and
other brand owners may share certain media costs with us due to our joint
objective of promoting their brands. There are no conditions or other
requirements that could result in a repayment of the bottler incentives
received. Total bottler incentives received, including media costs shared by
PepsiCo and other brand owners were $604 million, $598 million and $566 million
in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Of these amounts, we recorded $293 million
in both
23
2002 and 2001 and $277 million in 2000, in net revenues, and the remainder as a
reduction of selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
SHIPPING AND HANDLING COSTS - We record the majority of our shipping
and handling costs within selling, delivery and administrative expenses. Such
costs totaled $1,116 million, $1,058 million and $977 million in 2002, 2001 and
2000, respectively.
FOREIGN CURRENCY GAINS AND LOSSES - We translate the balance sheets of
our foreign subsidiaries that do not operate in highly inflationary economies at
the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, while we translate the
statements of operations at the average rates of exchange during the year. The
resulting translation adjustments of our foreign subsidiaries are recorded
directly to accumulated other comprehensive loss. Foreign currency gains and
losses reflect translation gains and losses arising from the remeasurement into
U.S. dollars of the net monetary assets of businesses in highly inflationary
countries and transaction gains and losses. Turkey and Russia were considered
highly inflationary economies for accounting purposes in 2002.
Beginning in 2003, Russia will no longer be considered highly
inflationary, and will change its functional currency from the U.S. dollar to
the Russian ruble. We do not expect any material impact on our consolidated
financial statements as a result of Russia's change in functional currency in
2003. Turkey is expected to remain highly inflationary for fiscal year 2003.
PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS - We sponsor pension and other
postretirement plans in various forms covering substantially all employees who
meet eligibility requirements. We account for our defined benefit pension plans
and our postretirement benefit plans using actuarial models required by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 87, "Employers'
Accounting for Pensions," and SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions."
The assets, liabilities and assumptions used to measure expense for any
fiscal year are determined as of September 30 of the preceding year
("measurement date"). The discount rate assumption used in our pension and
postretirement benefit plans' accounting is based on current interest rates for
high-quality, long-term corporate debt as determined on each measurement date.
The expected return on plan assets is based on our long-term historical
experience, our plan asset allocation and our expectations for long-term
interest rates and market performance. In evaluating our rate of return on
assets for a given fiscal year, we consider a 15 to 20 year time horizon for our
pension investment portfolio. In addition, we look at the return on asset
assumptions used by other companies in our industry as well as other large
companies. Over the past three fiscal years the composition of our plan assets
was approximately 70%-75% equity investments and 25%-30% fixed income
securities, which primarily consist of U.S. government and corporate bonds.
Differences between actual and expected returns are generally recognized in the
net periodic pension calculation over five years. To the extent the amount of
all unrecognized gains and losses exceeds 10% of the larger of the benefit
obligation or plan assets, such amount is amortized over the average remaining
service life of active participants. The rate of future compensation increases
is based upon our historical experience and management's best estimate
regarding future expectations. We amortize prior service costs on a
straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of employees
expected to receive benefits.
For our postretirement plans that provide medical and life insurance
benefits, we review external data and our historical health care cost trends
with our actuarial advisors to determine the health care cost trend rates.
INCOME TAXES - We are a limited liability company, taxable as a
partnership for U.S. tax purposes and, as such, generally will pay no U.S.
federal or state income taxes. Our federal and state distributable share of
income, deductions and credits will be allocated to our owners based on their
percentage of ownership. However, certain domestic and foreign affiliates pay
taxes in their respective jurisdictions and record related deferred income tax
assets and liabilities. Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary
differences between assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting
purposes and such amounts recognized for income tax purposes. In accordance with
SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," these deferred taxes are measured
by applying currently enacted tax laws. With the exception of certain of our
subsidiaries for which we have recorded deferred taxes in our Consolidated
Financial Statements, deferred taxes associated with our U.S. operations are
recorded directly by our owners.
CASH EQUIVALENTS - Cash equivalents represent funds we have temporarily
invested with original maturities not exceeding three months.
24
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS - We determine our allowance for
doubtful accounts based on the evaluation of the aging of our trade receivable
portfolio and a customer-by-customer analysis of our high-risk customers. Our
reserves contemplate our historical loss rate on receivables, specific customer
situations, and the economic environments in which we operate.
INVENTORIES - We value our inventories at the lower of cost computed on
the first-in, first-out method or net realizable value for the majority of our
locations. For our recent acquisitions in Mexico and Turkey, we value
inventories at the lower of cost computed on the weighted-average cost method or
net realizable value.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT - We state property, plant and equipment
("PP&E") at cost, except for PP&E that has been impaired, for which we write
down the carrying amount to estimated fair market value, which then becomes the
new cost basis.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS - During 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,"
which requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives
no longer be amortized, but instead tested for impairment. Effective the first
day of fiscal year 2002, we no longer amortize goodwill and certain franchise
rights, but evaluate them for impairment annually.
Our identifiable intangible assets principally arise from the
allocation of the purchase price of businesses acquired, and consist primarily
of franchise rights. Our franchise rights are typically perpetual in duration,
subject to compliance with the underlying franchise agreement. The value and
life of our franchise rights are directly associated with the underlying
portfolio of brands that we are entitled to make, sell and distribute under
applicable franchise agreements. In considering whether franchise rights have an
indefinite useful life, we consider the nature and terms of the underlying
franchise agreements; our intent and ability to use the franchise rights; and
the age and market position of the products within the franchise as well as the
historical and projected growth of those products. We assign amounts to such
identifiable intangibles based on their estimated fair values at the date of
acquisition.
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 02-07,
"Unit of Accounting for Testing Impairment of Indefinite-Lived Intangible
Assets," we evaluate our franchise rights with indefinite useful lives for
impairment annually as asset groups on a country-by-country basis ("asset
groups"). We measure the fair value of these asset groups utilizing discounted
estimated future cash flows, including a terminal value, which assumes the
franchise rights will continue in perpetuity. Our long-term terminal growth
assumptions reflect our current long-term view of the marketplace. Our discount
rate is based upon our weighted-average cost of capital plus an additional risk
premium to reflect the risk and uncertainty inherent in separately acquiring a
franchise agreement between a willing buyer and a willing seller. Each year we
re-evaluate our assumptions in our discounted cash flow model to address
changes in our business and marketplace conditions. Based upon our annual
impairment analysis, the estimated fair values of our franchise rights with
indefinite lives exceeded their carrying amounts in 2002.
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, we evaluate goodwill on a
country-by-country basis ("reporting unit") for impairment. We evaluate each
reporting unit for impairment based upon a two-step approach. First, we compare
the fair value of our reporting unit with its carrying value. Second, if the
carrying value of our reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we compare the
implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill to its carrying amount to
measure the amount of impairment loss. In measuring the implied fair value of
goodwill, we would allocate the fair value of the reporting unit to each of its
assets and liabilities (including any unrecognized intangible assets). Any
excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its
assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill.
We measure the fair value of a reporting unit as the discounted
estimated future cash flows, including a terminal value, which assumes the
business continues in perpetuity, less its respective minority interest and net
debt (net of cash and cash equivalents). Our long-term terminal growth
assumptions reflect our current long-term view of the marketplace. Our discount
rate is based upon our weighted-average cost of capital. Each year we
re-evaluate our assumptions in our discounted cash flow model to address changes
in our business and marketplace conditions. Based upon our annual impairment
analysis in the fourth quarter of 2002, the estimated fair value of our
reporting units exceeded their carrying value and as result, we did not proceed
to the second step of the impairment test.
Other identifiable intangible assets that are subject to amortization
are amortized straight-line over the period in which we expect to receive
economic benefit and are reviewed for impairment when facts and circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable.
Determining the expected life of these intangible assets is based on an
evaluation of a number of factors, including the competitive environment,
market share and brand history. If the carrying value is not recoverable,
impairment is measured as the amount by which the carrying value
25
exceeds its estimated fair value. Fair value is generally estimated based on
either appraised value or other valuation techniques.
INVESTMENT IN DEBT DEFEASANCE TRUST - We have purchased $181 million in
U.S. government securities and placed those securities into an irrevocable
trust, for the sole purpose of funding payments of principal and interest on the
$160 million of 9 3/4% senior notes maturing in March 2004, in order to defease
their respective covenants. These marketable securities have maturities that
coincide with the scheduled interest payments of the senior notes and ultimate
payment of principal. We have categorized these marketable securities as
held-to-maturity as we have the positive intent and ability to hold these
securities to maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized
cost. The total amortized cost for these held-to-maturity securities at December
28, 2002, was $182 million. The current portion of these held-to-maturity
securities is recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the
amount of $12 million, and the remaining long-term portion of $170 million is
recorded in investment in debt defeasance trust in our Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
MINORITY INTEREST - Prior to 2002, PBG had a direct minority ownership
in one of our subsidiaries. PBG's share of combined income or loss and assets
and liabilities in the subsidiary is accounted for as minority interest. During
2002, PBG made a capital contribution to us of its ownership in our subsidiary.
As a result, PBG's minority interest was reduced to zero.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT - We use derivative
instruments to hedge against the risk associated with the price of commodities
purchased and used in our business, interest rates on outstanding debt and in
2002, certain currency exposures relating to our acquisition of Pepsi-Gemex,
S.A. de C.V. ("Gemex"), a company we acquired in November 2002. Our use of
derivative instruments is limited to interest rate swaps, forward contracts,
futures and options on futures contracts. Our corporate policy prohibits the use
of derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes, and we have
procedures in place to monitor and control their use.
All derivative instruments are recorded at fair value as either assets
or liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Derivative instruments are
generally designated and accounted for as either a hedge of a recognized asset
or liability ("fair value hedge") or a hedge of a forecasted transaction ("cash
flow hedge").
For a fair value hedge, both the effective and ineffective portions of
the change in fair value of the derivative instrument, along with an adjustment
to the carrying amount of the hedged item for fair value changes attributable to
the hedged risk, are recognized in earnings. For derivative instruments that
hedge interest rate risk, the fair value adjustments are recorded to interest
expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
For a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of changes in the fair
value of the derivative instrument that are highly effective are deferred in
accumulated other comprehensive loss until the underlying hedged item is
recognized in earnings. The applicable gain or loss is recognized in earnings
immediately and is recorded consistent with the expense classification of the
underlying hedged item.
The ineffective portion of fair value changes on qualifying cash flow
hedges is recognized in earnings immediately and is recorded consistent with the
expense classification of the underlying hedged item. If a fair value or cash
flow hedge were to cease to qualify for hedge accounting or be terminated, it
would continue to be carried on the balance sheet at fair value until settled,
but hedge accounting would be discontinued prospectively. If a forecasted
transaction were no longer probable of occurring, amounts previously deferred in
accumulated other comprehensive loss would be recognized immediately in
earnings.
On occasion, we enter into derivative instruments that do not qualify
for hedge accounting. These instruments are reflected in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings.
We also may enter into certain derivative instruments for which hedge
accounting is not required because it is entered into to offset changes in the
fair value of an underlying transaction recognized in earnings ("natural
hedge"). These instruments are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at
fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings.
STOCK-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION - We measure PBG stock-based
compensation expense using the intrinsic value method in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees," and its related interpretations. Accordingly, compensation expense
for PBG stock option grants to our employees is measured as the excess of the
quoted market price of PBG's common stock at the grant date over the amount the
employee must pay for the stock. Our policy is to grant PBG stock options at
fair value on
26
the date of grant. As allowed by SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure", we have elected to continue to apply
the intrinsic value-based method of accounting described above, and have adopted
the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation." If we had measured compensation cost for the stock options
granted to our employees under the fair value based method prescribed by SFAS
No. 123, net income would have been changed to the pro forma amounts set forth
below:
2002 2001 2000
---- ---- ----
Net Income
Reported........................................ $ 734 $ 587 $ 471
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based
method for all awards, net of taxes........... (70) (64) (46)
---- ---- ----
Pro forma....................................... $664 $523 $425
==== ==== ====
Pro forma compensation cost measured for stock options granted to
employees is amortized straight-line over the vesting period, which is typically
three years.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES - We are subject to various claims and
contingencies related to lawsuits, taxes, environmental and other matters
arising out of the normal course of business. Liabilities related to commitments
and contingencies are recognized when a loss is probable and reasonably
estimable.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS - During 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141,
"Business Combinations," which requires that the purchase method of accounting
be used for all business combinations initiated or completed after June 30,
2001, and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which requires
that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be
amortized, but instead tested for impairment. Effective the first day of fiscal
year 2002 we no longer amortize goodwill and certain franchise rights, but
evaluate them for impairment annually. We have completed our annual impairment
review and have determined that our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible
assets are not impaired. The following table provides pro forma disclosure of
the elimination of goodwill and certain franchise rights amortization in 2001
and 2000, as if SFAS No. 142 had been adopted in 2000:
2002 2001 2000
---- ---- ----
Reported net income........................... 734 $ 587 $ 471
Add back: Goodwill amortization............. -- 35 37
Add back: Franchise rights amortization..... -- 88 86
---- ----- -----
Adjusted net income........................... $734 $ 710 $ 594
==== ===== =====
During 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations." SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and
reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived
assets and the associated asset retirement costs. It requires that we recognize
the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period
in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. SFAS
No. 143 is effective for fiscal year 2003. We do not anticipate that the
adoption of SFAS No. 143 will have a material impact on our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
During 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." SFAS No. 144 establishes a single
accounting model for the impairment of long-lived assets and broadens the
presentation of discontinued operations to include more disposal transactions.
We adopted SFAS No. 144 at the beginning of fiscal year 2002. The adoption of
SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
During 2001, the EITF issued EITF Issue No. 01-09, "Accounting for
Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer or Reseller of the Vendor's
Products," which addresses the recognition of income statement and
classification of various sales incentives. We adopted EITF Issue No. 01-09 at
the beginning of fiscal 2002 and it did not have a material impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
During 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs
Associated with the Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS No. 146 is effective for
exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. We do not
anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 146 will have a material impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
27
During 2002 the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure," which amends SFAS No. 123, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation." SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of
transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for
stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this statement requires SFAS No.
123 disclosure requirements in both annual and interim financial statements. We
will continue to measure stock-based compensation expense in accordance with APB
Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and its related
interpretations, and therefore we do not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS
No. 148 will have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
During 2002, the EITF addressed various issues related to the income
statement classification of certain payments received by a customer from a
vendor. In November 2002, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 02-16,
"Accounting by a Reseller for Cash Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer
(Including a Reseller of the Vendor's Products)," addressing the recognition and
income statement classification of various consideration given by a vendor to a
customer. Among its requirements, the consensus requires that certain cash
consideration received by a customer from a vendor is presumed to be a reduction
of the price of the vendor's products, and therefore should be characterized as
a reduction of cost of sales when recognized in the customer's income statement,
unless certain criteria are met. EITF Issue No. 02-16 will be effective
beginning in our fiscal year 2003. We currently classify bottler incentives
received from PepsiCo and other brand owners as adjustments to net revenues and
selling, delivery and administrative expenses. In accordance with EITF Issue No.
02-16, we will classify certain bottler incentives as a reduction of cost of
sales beginning in 2003. We are currently assessing the transitional guidance
released by the EITF to determine the net impact to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
NOTE 3 -- INVENTORIES
2002 2001
-------- --------
Raw materials and supplies ................. $ 162 $ 117
Finished goods ............................. 216 214
-------- --------
$ 378 $ 331
======== ========
NOTE 4 -- PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
2002 2001
-------- --------
Land ....................................... $ 228 $ 145
Buildings and improvements ................. 1,126 925
Manufacturing and distribution equipment ... 2,768 2,308
Marketing equipment ........................ 2,008 1,846
Other ...................................... 154 121
-------- --------
6,284 5,345
Accumulated depreciation ................... (2,976) (2,802)
-------- --------
$ 3,308 $ 2,543
======== ========
28
We calculate depreciation on a straight-line basis over the estimated lives of
the assets as follows:
Buildings and improvements ........ 20-33 years
Manufacturing equipment ........... 15 years
Distribution equipment ............ 2-10 years
Marketing equipment ............... 3-7 years
NOTE 5 -- INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
<Table>
<Caption>
2002 2001
---------- ----------
Intangibles subject to amortization:
Gross carrying amount:
Franchise rights ....................... $ 20 $ 12
Other identifiable intangibles ......... 24 39
---------- ----------
44 51
---------- ----------
Accumulated amortization:
Franchise rights ....................... (6) (2)
Other identifiable intangibles ......... (9) (25)
---------- ----------
(15) (27)
---------- ----------
Intangibles subject to amortization (less
accumulated amortization)............... 29 24
---------- ----------
Intangibles not subject to amortization:
Carrying amount:
Franchise rights ....................... 3,424 2,577
Goodwill ............................... 1,192 1,046
Other identifiable intangibles ......... 42 37
---------- ----------
Intangibles not subject to amortization .. 4,658 3,660
---------- ----------
Total Intangible Assets (less accumulated
amortization) .......................... $ 4,687 $ 3,684
========== ==========
</Table>
For intangible assets subject to amortization, we calculate amortization on
a straight-line basis over the period we expect to receive economic benefit.
Total amortization expense was $8 million, $135 million and $131 million in
2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The weighted-average amortization period for
each class of intangible assets and their estimated aggregate amortization
expense expected to be recognized over the next five years are as follows:
Weighted-Average
Amortization Period Estimated Aggregate Amortization Expense to be Incurred
------------------- -------------------------------------------------------
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Franchise rights ................... 5 years $4 $4 $4 $2 $-
Other identifiable intangibles...... 7 years $4 $4 $3 $2 $1
Through our various current and prior year acquisitions we accumulated $146
million of goodwill during 2002.
NOTE 6 -- ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
2002 2001
---------- ----------
Accounts payable ................... $ 394 $ 362
Trade incentives ................... 210 205
Accrued compensation and benefits... 181 141
Other accrued taxes ................ 57 30
Other current liabilities .......... 296 239
---------- ----------
$ 1,138 $ 977
========== ==========
29
NOTE 7 -- SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS AND LONG-TERM DEBT
2002 2001
---------- ----------
Short-term borrowings
Current maturities of long-term debt ......................... $ 16 $ 3
Other short-term borrowings .................................. 51 74
---------- ----------
$ 67 $ 77
========== ==========
Long-term debt
5 5/8% senior notes due 2009 ................................. $ 1,300 $ 1,300
5 3/8% senior notes due 2004 ................................. 1,000 1,000
4 5/8% senior notes due 2012 ................................. 1,000 --
9 3/4% senior notes due 2004 ................................. 160 --
Other (average rate 3.5%) .................................... 68 11
---------- ----------
3,528 2,311
Add: SFAS No. 133 adjustment * .............................. 23 7
Fair value adjustment relating to purchase accounting .. 14 --
Less: Unamortized discount, net .............................. 14 16
Current maturities of long-term debt ................... 16 3
---------- ----------
$ 3,535 $ 2,299
========== ==========
* In accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 133, the portion of our
fixed-rate debt obligations that is hedged is reflected in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets as an amount equal to the sum of the debt's carrying value
plus a SFAS No. 133 fair value adjustment representing changes recorded in
the fair value of the hedged debt obligations attributable to movements in
market interest rates.
Maturities of long-term debt as of December 28, 2002, are 2003: $16
million, 2004: $1,164 million, 2005: $3 million, 2006: $2 million, 2007: $37
million and thereafter, $2,306 million.
The $1.3 billion of 5 5/8% senior notes (with an effective interest rate
of 5.6%) and the $1.0 billion of 5 3/8% senior notes (with an effective
interest rate of 4.5%) were issued on February 9, 1999, by Bottling LLC and
they are guaranteed by PepsiCo.
The $1.0 billion of 4 5/8% senior notes (with an effective interest rate
of 4.6%) was issued on November 15, 2002, by Bottling LLC and will be
guaranteed by PepsiCo, in accordance with the terms set forth in the related
indenture.
Each of the senior notes mentioned above has redemption features,
covenants and will, among other things, limit our ability and the ability of our
restricted subsidiaries to create or assume liens, enter into sale and
lease-back transactions, engage in mergers or consolidations and transfer or
lease all or substantially all of our assets.
The $160 million of 9 3/4% senior notes were issued by Gemex. These senior
notes have an effective interest rate of 3.7% after a fair value adjustment of
$14 million resulting from our acquisition of Gemex. In December 2002, we
purchased $181 million of U.S. government securities and placed those securities
into an irrevocable trust, for the sole purpose of funding payments of principal
and interest on the $160 million of 9 3/4% senior notes maturing in March 2004,
in order to defease its respective covenants. We estimate that the U.S.
government securities will be sufficient to satisfy all future principal and
interest requirements of the senior notes. See Note 2.
We have available short-term bank credit lines of approximately $167
million and $177 million at December 28, 2002, and December 29, 2001,
respectively. These lines were used to support the general operating needs of
our businesses outside the United States. The weighted-average interest rate for
these lines of credit outstanding at December 28, 2002, and December 29, 2001,
was 8.9% and 4.3%, respectively.
Amounts paid to third parties for interest were $126 million, $121 million
and $131 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
NOTE 8 -- COMMITMENTS
We have noncancellable commitments under both capital and long-term
operating leases, which consist principally of buildings, office equipment and
machinery. Capital and operating lease commitments expire at various dates
through 2021. Most leases require payment of related executory costs, which
include property taxes, maintenance and insurance.
30
Our future minimum commitments under noncancellable leases are set forth
below:
LEASES
--------------------------------------
CAPITAL OPERATING
---------- ----------
2003 ............... $ 1 $ 34
2004 ............... 1 25
2005 ............... -- 19
2006 ............... -- 15
2007 ............... -- 14
Later years ........ 3 70
---------- ----------
$ 5 $ 177
========== ==========
In addition, at December 28, 2002 we have outstanding letters of credit and
surety bonds valued at $29 million primarily to provide collateral for estimated
self insurance claims and other insurance requirements.
At December 28, 2002, the present value of minimum payments under capital
leases was $3 million, after deducting $2 million for imputed interest. Our
rental expense was $62 million, $40 million and $42 million for 2002, 2001 and
2000, respectively.
NOTE 9 -- FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT
These Consolidated Financial Statements reflect the implementation of SFAS
No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 138, on the first day of fiscal year 2001. In
June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities." This statement establishes accounting and reporting
standards for hedging activities and derivative instruments, including certain
derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, which are collectively
referred to as derivatives. It requires that an entity recognize all derivatives
as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and measure
those instruments at fair value. In June 2000, the FASB issued SFAS No. 138,
amending the accounting and reporting standards of SFAS No. 133. Prior to the
adoption of SFAS No. 133, there were no deferred gains or losses from our
hedging activities recorded in our Consolidated Financial Statements. The
adoption of these statements resulted in the recording of a deferred gain in our
Consolidated Balance Sheets, which was recorded as an increase to current assets
of $4 million and a reduction of accumulated other comprehensive loss of $4
million. Furthermore, the adoption had no impact on our Consolidated Statements
of Operations.
As of December 28, 2002, our use of derivative instruments is limited to
interest rate swaps, forward contracts, futures and options on futures
contracts. Our corporate policy prohibits the use of derivative instruments for
trading or speculative purposes, and we have procedures in place to monitor and
control their use.
CASH FLOW HEDGES - We are subject to market risk with respect to the cost
of commodities because our ability to recover increased costs through higher
pricing may be limited by the competitive environment in which we operate. We
use future and option contracts to hedge the risk of adverse movements in
commodity prices related to anticipated purchases of aluminum and fuel used in
our operations. These contracts, which generally range from one to 12 months in
duration, establish our commodity purchase prices within defined ranges in an
attempt to limit our purchase price risk resulting from adverse commodity price
movements and are designated as and qualify for cash flow hedge accounting
treatment.
The amount of deferred losses from our commodity hedging that we
recognized into cost of sales in our Consolidated Statements of Operations was
$22 million in 2002 and $4 million for 2001. As a result of our commodity
hedges, $16 million and $19 million of deferred losses remained in accumulated
other comprehensive loss in our Consolidated Balance Sheets based on the
commodity rates in effect on December 28, 2002, and December 29, 2001,
respectively. Assuming no change in the commodity prices as measured on
December 28, 2002, $13 million of the deferred loss will be recognized in our
cost of sales over the next 12 months. The ineffective portion of the change in
fair value of these contracts was not material to our results of operations in
2002 or 2001.
On November 15, 2002, we issued a $1 billion 10 year bond with an interest
rate of 4 5/8 %. In anticipation of the bond issuance, we entered into several
treasury rate future contracts to hedge against adverse interest rate changes.
We recognized $8 million as a deferred gain reported in accumulated other
comprehensive loss resulting
31
from these treasury rate contracts. These deferred gains are released to match
the underlying interest expense on the debt. Deferred gains of $0.7 million will
be recognized in interest expense over the next 12 months.
FAIR VALUE HEDGES - We finance a portion of our operations through
fixed-rate debt instruments. We converted our entire $1.0 billion 5 3/8% senior
notes and $300 million of our $1.3 billion 5 5/8% senior notes to floating rate
debt through the use of interest rate swaps with the objective of reducing our
overall borrowing costs. These interest rate swaps meet the criteria for fair
value hedge accounting and are 100% effective in eliminating the market rate
risk inherent in our long-term debt. Accordingly, any gain or loss associated
with these swaps are fully offset by the opposite market impact on the related
debt. The change in fair value of the interest rate swaps was a gain of $16
million in 2002 and a gain of $7 million in 2001. The fair value change was
recorded in interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and in
prepaid expenses and other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. An
offsetting adjustment was recorded in interest expense in our Consolidated
Statements of Operations and in long-term debt in our Consolidated Balance
Sheets representing the change in fair value of the related long-term debt.
UNFUNDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION LIABILITY - Participating employees in our
deferred compensation program can elect to defer all or a portion of their
compensation to be paid out on a future date or dates. As part of the deferral
process, employees select from phantom investment options that determine the
earnings on the deferred compensation liability and the amount that they will
ultimately receive. Employee investment elections include PBG stock and a
variety of other equity and fixed income investment options. Our unfunded
deferred compensation liability is subject to change in these investment
elections.
Since the plan is unfunded, employees' deferred compensation amounts are
not directly invested in these investment vehicles. Instead, we track the
performance of each employee's investment selections and adjust his or her
deferred compensation account accordingly. The adjustments to the employees'
accounts increases or decreases the deferred compensation liability reflected on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets with an offsetting increase or decrease to our
selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
We use prepaid forward contracts to hedge the portion of our deferred
compensation liability that is based on PBG's stock price. At December 28, 2002,
we had a prepaid forward contract for 638,000 shares at an exercise price of
$28.50, which was accounted for as a natural hedge. This contract requires cash
settlement and has a fair value at December 28, 2002, of $16 million recorded in
prepaid expenses and other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The fair value of this contract changes based on the change in PBG's stock price
compared with the contract exercise price. We recognized $1 million in gains in
2002 and $2 million in gains in 2001, resulting from the change in fair value of
these prepaid forward contracts. The earnings impact from these instruments are
classified as selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
OTHER DERIVATIVES - During 2002, we entered into option contracts to
mitigate certain foreign currency risks in anticipation of our acquisition of
Gemex. Although these instruments did not qualify for hedge accounting, they
were deemed derivatives since they contained a net settlement clause. These
options expired unexercised and the cost of these options of $7 million has been
recorded in other non-operating expenses, net in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - Financial assets with carrying
values approximating fair value include cash and cash equivalents and accounts
receivable. Financial liabilities with carrying values approximating fair value
include accounts payable and other accrued liabilities and short-term debt. The
carrying value of these financial assets and liabilities approximates fair value
due to the short maturities and since interest rates approximate current market
rates for short-term debt.
Long-term debt at December 28, 2002, had a carrying value and fair value of
$3.5 billion and $3.7 billion, respectively, and at December 29, 2001, had a
carrying value and fair value of $2.3 billion. The fair value is based on
interest rates that are currently available to us for issuance of debt with
similar terms and remaining maturities.
NOTE 10 -- PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
PENSION BENEFITS
Our U.S. employees participate in noncontributory defined benefit pension
plans, which cover substantially all full-time salaried employees, as well as
most hourly employees. Benefits generally are based on years of service and
compensation, or stated amounts for each year of service. All of our qualified
plans are funded and contributions are
32
made in amounts not less than minimum statutory funding requirements and not
more than the maximum amount that can be deducted for U.S. income tax purposes.
Our net pension expense for the defined benefit plans for our operations outside
the U.S. was not significant.
Our U.S. employees are also eligible to participate in our 401(k) savings
plans, which are voluntary defined contribution plans. We make matching
contributions to the 401(k) savings plans on behalf of participants eligible to
receive such contributions. If a participant has one or more but less than 10
years of eligible service, our match will equal $0.50 for each dollar the
participant elects to defer up to 4% of the participant's pay. If the
participant has 10 or more years of eligible service, our match will equal $1.00
for each dollar the participant elects to defer up to 4% of the participant's
pay.
PENSION
--------------------------------------
Components of pension expense: 2002 2001 2000
---- ---- ----
Service cost ................................................ $ 28 $ 25 $ 24
Interest cost ............................................... 56 50 49
Expected return on plan assets .............................. (66) (57) (53)
Amortization of prior service amendments .................... 6 4 5
Special termination benefits ................................ 1 -- --
---- ---- ----
Net pension expense for the defined benefit plans ........... $ 25 $ 22 $ 25
---- ---- ----
Cost of defined contribution plans .......................... $ 18 $ 17 $ 15
---- ---- ----
Total net pension expense recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations .................................... $ 43 $ 39 $ 40
==== ==== ====
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
Our postretirement plans provide medical and life insurance benefits
principally to U.S. retirees and their dependents. Employees are eligible for
benefits if they meet age and service requirements and qualify for retirement
benefits. The plans are not funded and since 1993 have included retiree cost
sharing.
POSTRETIREMENT
--------------------------------------
Components of postretirement benefits expense: ............. 2002 2001 2000
---- ---- ----
Service cost ............................................... $ 3 $ 3 $ 3
Interest cost .............................................. 17 16 14
Amortization of net loss ................................... 2 1 1
Amortization of prior service amendments ................... (6) (6) (6)
---- ---- ----
Net postretirement benefits expense recognized in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations ...................... $ 16 $ 14 $ 12
==== ==== ====
33
CHANGES IN THE BENEFIT OBLIGATION
PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
------------------------------- -------------------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
-------- -------- -------- --------
Obligation at beginning of year $ 760 $ 664 $ 228 $ 212
Service cost ......................... 28 25 3 3
Interest cost ........................ 56 50 17 16
Plan amendments ...................... 22 10 -- --
Actuarial loss ....................... 127 48 55 14
Benefit payments ..................... (41) (37) (17) (17)
Special termination benefits ......... 1 -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- --------
Obligation at end of year ............ $ 953 $ 760 $ 286 $ 228
======== ======== ======== ========
CHANGES IN THE FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS
PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
------------------------------ ------------------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
------- ------- ------- -------
Fair value at beginning of year $ 578 $ 665 $ -- $ --
Actual return on plan assets ......... (61) (120) -- --
Asset transfers ...................... 11 -- -- --
Employer contributions ............... 51 70 17 17
Benefit payments ..................... (41) (37) (17) (17)
------- ------- ------- -------
Fair value at end of year ............ $ 538 $ 578 $ -- $ --
======= ======= ======= =======
SELECTED INFORMATION FOR THE PLANS WITH ACCUMULATED BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS
IN EXCESS OF PLAN ASSETS
PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
------------------------ ------------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
------ ------ ------ ------
Projected benefit obligation .................. $ 953 $ 760 $ 286 $ 228
Accumulated benefit obligation ................ 843 690 286 228
Fair value of plan assets * ................... 663 604 -- --
*Includes fourth quarter employer contributions.
FUNDED STATUS RECOGNIZED ON THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
----------------------------- -----------------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
------- ------- ------- -------
Funded status at end of year ........ $ (415) $ (182) $ (286) $ (228)
Unrecognized prior service cost ..... 41 36 (9) (16)
Unrecognized loss ................... 407 153 110 57
Unrecognized transition asset ....... -- (1) -- --
Fourth quarter employer contributions 125 26 6 5
------- ------- ------- -------
Net amounts recognized .............. $ 158 $ 32 $ (179) $ (182)
======= ======= ======= =======
NET AMOUNTS RECOGNIZED IN THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
------------------------------- -------------------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
-------- -------- -------- --------
Other liabilities .................. $ (196) $ (101) $ (179) $ (182)
Intangible assets .................. 42 37 -- --
Accumulated other comprehensive loss 312 96 -- --
------- ------- ------- -------
Net amounts recognized ............. $ 158 $ 32 $ (179) $ (182)
======= ======= ======= =======
34
At December 28, 2002, and December 29, 2001, the accumulated benefit
obligation of certain PBG pension plans exceeded the fair market value of the
plan assets resulting in the recognition of the unfunded liability as a minimum
balance sheet liability. As a result of this additional liability, our
intangible asset increased by $5 million to $42 million in 2002, which equals
the amount of unrecognized prior service cost in our plans. The remainder of the
liability that exceeded the unrecognized prior service cost was recognized as an
increase to accumulated other comprehensive loss of $216 million and $96 million
in 2002 and 2001, respectively.
ASSUMPTIONS
The weighted-average assumptions used to compute the above information are set
forth below:
PENSION
-------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
--- --- ---
Discount rate for benefit obligation 6.8% 7.5% 7.8%
Expected return on plan assets (1) .............. 9.5% 9.5% 9.5%
Rate of compensation increase ................... 4.3% 4.3% 4.6%
(1) Expected return on plan assets is presented after administration
expenses.
POSTRETIREMENT
-------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
--- --- ---
Discount rate for benefit obligation..................... 6.8% 7.5% 7.8%
We evaluate these assumptions with our actuarial advisors on an annual
basis and we believe they are within accepted industry ranges, although an
increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside our control
could have a direct impact on reported net earnings.
FUNDING AND PLAN ASSETS
The pension plan assets are principally invested in stocks and bonds. None
of the assets are invested directly into PBG, PepsiCo or any bottling affiliates
of PepsiCo, although it is possible that insignificant indirect investments
exist through our broad market indices. Our contributions are made in
accordance with applicable tax regulations that provide for current tax
deductions for our contributions and for taxation to the employee of plan
benefits when the benefits are received. We do not fund our pension plan and
postretirement plans when our contributions would not be deductible and when
benefits would be taxable to the employee before receipt. Of the total pension
liabilities at year end 2002, $52 million relates to plans not funded due to
these unfavorable tax consequences.
HEALTH CARE COST TREND RATES
We have assumed an average increase of 12.0% in 2003 in the cost of
postretirement medical benefits for employees who retired before cost sharing
was introduced. This average increase is then projected to decline gradually to
5.0% in 2013 and thereafter.
Assumed health care cost trend rates have an impact on the amounts reported
for postretirement medical plans. A one-percentage point change in assumed
health care costs would have the following effects:
1% 1%
INCREASE DECREASE
-------- --------
Effect on total fiscal year 2002 service and interest cost components ............... $ -- $ --
Effect on the fiscal year 2002 accumulated postretirement benefit obligation......... $ 10 $ (8)
35
NOTE 11 -- EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLANS
Under PBG's long-term incentive plan, PBG stock options are issued to our
middle and senior management employees and vary according to salary and level.
Except as noted below, options granted in 2002, 2001 and 2000 had exercise
prices ranging from $23.25 per share to $29.25 per share, $18.88 per share to
$22.50 per share, and $9.38 per share to $15.88 per share, respectively, expire
in 10 years and generally become exercisable 25% after one year, an additional
25% after two years, and the remainder after three years.
In 2001, two additional option grants were made to certain senior
management employees. One grant had an exercise price of $19.50 per share,
expires in 10 years and became exercisable on the grant date. The other grant
had an exercise price of $22.50 per share, expires in 10 years and becomes
exercisable in 5 years.
The following table summarizes option activity during 2002:
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
EXERCISE
Options in millions OPTIONS PRICE
-------- --------
Outstanding at beginning of year ............................. 39.7 $ 13.20
Granted ................................................... 6.4 25.32
Exercised ................................................. (8.1) 11.63
Forfeited ................................................. (0.6) 16.89
-------- --------
Outstanding at end of year ................................... 37.4 $ 15.53
======== ========
Exercisable at end of year ................................... 19.9 $ 12.59
======== ========
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year $ 10.89
========
The following table summarizes option activity during 2001:
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
EXERCISE
Options in millions OPTIONS PRICE
-------- --------
Outstanding at beginning of year ............................. 33.2 $ 10.75
Granted ................................................... 10.2 20.47
Exercised ................................................. (1.8) 10.84
Forfeited ................................................. (1.9) 12.01
-------- --------
Outstanding at end of year ................................... 39.7 $ 13.20
======== ========
Exercisable at end of year ................................... 6.6 $ 13.38
======== ========
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year $ 8.55
========
The following table summarizes option activity during 2000:
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
EXERCISE
Options in millions OPTIONS PRICE
-------- --------
Outstanding at beginning of year ............................. 22.4 $ 11.49
Granted ................................................... 13.2 9.57
Exercised ................................................. (0.2) 10.53
Forfeited ................................................. (2.2) 11.20
-------- --------
Outstanding at end of year ................................... 33.2 $ 10.75
======== ========
Exercisable at end of year ................................... 1.8 $ 11.11
======== ========
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year $ 4.68
========
36
Stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 28, 2002:
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
------------------------------------------- -------------------------
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
REMAINING
Options in millions WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
CONTRACTUAL WEIGHTED-AVERAGE EXERCISE
RANGE OF EXERCISE PRICE OPTIONS LIFE IN YEARS EXERCISE PRICE OPTIONS PRICE
- ----------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
$9.38-$11.49 ............ 8.9 6.99 $ 9.39 7.0 $ 10.38
$11.50-$15.88 ........... 13.2 6.06 $ 11.63 9.6 $ 11.61
$15.89-$22.50 ........... 9.1 8.00 $ 20.49 3.2 $ 20.04
$22.51-$29.25 ........... 6.2 9.00 $ 25.34 0.1 $ 25.16
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
37.4 7.24 $ 15.53 19.9 $ 12.59
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
The fair value of PBG stock options used to compute pro forma net income
disclosures was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model based on the following weighted-average assumptions:
2002 2001 2000
------- ------- -------
Risk-free interest rate..... 4.5% 4.6% 6.7%
Expected life .............. 6 years 6 years 7 years
Expected volatility ........ 37% 35% 35%
Expected dividend yield..... 0.16% 0.20% 0.43%
</Table>
NOTE 12 -- INCOME TAXES
We are a limited liability company, taxable as a partnership for U.S. tax
purposes and, as such, generally pay no U.S. federal or state income taxes. Our
federal and state distributable share of income, deductions and credits are
allocated to our owners based on their percentage of ownership. However, certain
domestic and foreign affiliates pay income taxes in their respective
jurisdictions. We had income tax expense of $49 million in 2002, an income tax
benefit of $1 million in 2001 and income tax expense of $22 million in 2000.
These amounts were comprised of current income tax expense of $12 million, $8
million and $27 million, and deferred income tax expense of $37 million in 2002
and deferred income tax benefit of $9 million and $5 million in 2001 and 2000,
respectively.
Our 2001 deferred income tax benefit includes a nonrecurring benefit of $25
million due to enacted tax rate changes in Canada during the year.
Our reconciliation of income taxes calculated at the U.S. federal statutory
rate to our provision for income taxes is set forth below:
2002 2001 2000
-------- -------- --------
Income taxes computed at the U.S. federal
statutory rate ............................. 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
Transfer of income to owners ................. (26.4) (28.5) (27.5)
State income tax, net of federal tax benefit . 0.6 0.4 0.9
Impact of foreign results .................... (4.8) (8.5) (8.6)
Goodwill and other nondeductible expenses .... 0.8 2.7 3.7
Other, net ................................... 1.2 3.0 0.9
-------- -------- --------
6.4 4.1 4.4
Rate change benefit .......................... -- (4.3) --
-------- -------- --------
Total effective income tax rate .............. 6.4% (0.2)% 4.4%
======== ======== ========
</Table>
37
The details of our 2002 and 2001 deferred tax liabilities (assets) are set
forth below:
<Table>
<Caption>
2002 2001
-------- --------
Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment $ 370 $ 175
Other ............................................. 30 36
-------- --------
Gross deferred tax liabilities .................... 400 211
-------- --------
Net operating loss carryforwards .................. (142) (121)
Various liabilities and other ..................... (63) (49)
-------- --------
Gross deferred tax assets ......................... (205) (170)
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance ............ 147 122
-------- --------
Net deferred tax assets ........................... (58) (48)
-------- --------
Net deferred tax liability ........................ $ 342 $ 163
======== ========
Included in:
Prepaid expenses and other current assets ......... $ (18) $ (5)
Deferred income taxes ............................. 360 168
-------- --------
$ 342 $ 163
======== ========
</Table>
We have net operating loss carryforwards totaling $443 million at December
28, 2002, which are available to reduce future taxes in the U.S., Spain, Greece,
Russia, Turkey and Mexico. Of these carryforwards, $14 million expire in 2003
and $429 million expire at various times between 2004 and 2022. We have
established a full valuation allowance for the net operating loss carryforwards
attributable to Spain, Greece, Russia, Turkey and Mexico based upon our
projection that it is more likely than not that these losses will not be
realized. In addition, at December 28, 2002, we have a tax credit carryforwards
in the U.S. of $7 million with an indefinite carryforward period and in Mexico
of $13 million, which expire at various times between 2006 and 2012.
Our valuation allowances, which reduce deferred tax assets to an amount
that will more likely than not be realized, have increased by $25 million and
decreased by $26 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase in 2002
was mainly due to the purchase of bottling companies in Turkey and Mexico.
Deferred taxes are not recognized for temporary differences related to
investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration.
Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred taxes related to these
investments is not practicable.
Income taxes payable were $8 million at December 28, 2002 and income taxes
receivable were $10 million at December 29, 2001. Such amounts are recorded
within accounts payable and other current liabilities and prepaid expenses and
other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, respectively. Amounts
paid to taxing authorities for income taxes were $0, $11 million and $34 million
in 2002, 2001 and 2000 respectively.
38
NOTE 13 -- GEOGRAPHIC DATA
We operate in one industry, carbonated soft drinks and other ready-to-drink
beverages. We conduct business in 41 states and the District of Columbia in the
United States. Outside the U.S., we conduct business in Canada, Spain, Russia,
Greece, Turkey and Mexico.
<Table>
<Caption>
NET REVENUES
-----------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
------ ------ ------
U.S ............................. $7,572 $7,197 $6,830
Mexico .......................... 164 -- --
Other countries ................. 1,480 1,246 1,152
------ ------ ------
$9,216 $8,443 $7,982
====== ====== ======
</Table>
<Table>
<Caption>
LONG-LIVED ASSETS
-----------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
------ ------ ------
U.S ............................. $6,531 $6,232 $5,719
Mexico .......................... 1,586 -- --
Other countries ................. 1,127 914 960
------ ------ ------
$9,244 $7,146 $6,679
====== ====== ======
</Table>
NOTE 14 -- RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
PepsiCo, Inc. ("PepsiCo") is considered a related party due to the nature
of our franchisee relationship and its ownership interest in our company.
Approximately 90% of our 2002 volume was derived from the sale of Pepsi-Cola
beverages. In addition, at December 28, 2002, PepsiCo owned 6.8% of our equity.
We have entered into a number of agreements with PepsiCo since PBG's
initial public offering. Although we are not a direct party to these contracts,
as the principal operating subsidiary of PBG, we derive direct benefit from
them. Accordingly, set forth below are the most significant agreements that
govern our relationship with PepsiCo:
The most significant agreements that govern our relationship with PepsiCo
consist of:
(1) The master bottling agreement for cola beverages bearing the
"Pepsi-Cola" and "Pepsi" trademark in the United States; master
bottling agreements and distribution agreements for non-cola
products in the United States, including Mountain Dew; and a master
fountain syrup agreement in the United States;
(2) Agreements similar to the master bottling agreement and the non-cola
agreements for each country, including Canada, Spain, Russia,
Greece, Turkey and Mexico, as well as a fountain syrup agreement
similar to the master syrup agreement for Canada;
(3) A shared services agreement whereby PepsiCo provides us or we
provide PepsiCo with certain support, including information
technology maintenance, procurement of raw materials, shared space,
employee benefits, credit and collection, international tax and
accounting services. The amounts paid or received under this
contract are equal to the actual costs incurred by the company
providing the service. Through 2001, a PepsiCo affiliate provided
casualty insurance to us; and
(4) Transition agreements that provide certain indemnities to the
parties, and provide for the allocation of tax and other assets,
liabilities, and obligations arising from periods prior to the
initial public offering. Under our tax separation agreement, PepsiCo
maintains full control and absolute discretion for any combined or
consolidated tax filings for tax periods ended on or before the
initial public offering. PepsiCo has contractually agreed to act in
good faith with respect to all tax audit matters affecting us. In
addition, PepsiCo has agreed to use its best efforts to settle all
joint interests in any common audit issue on a basis consistent with
prior practice.
BOTTLER INCENTIVES AND OTHER ARRANGEMENTS - We share a business objective
with PepsiCo of increasing the availability and consumption of Pepsi-Cola
beverages. Accordingly, PepsiCo, at its discretion, provides us with various
forms of bottler incentives to promote its beverages. These incentives cover a
variety of initiatives, including direct marketplace support, capital equipment
funding and advertising support. Based on the objective of the programs and
initiatives, we record bottler incentives as an adjustment to net revenues or as
a reduction of selling, delivery and administrative expenses. Direct marketplace
support represents PepsiCo's funding to assist us in
39
offering sales and promotional discounts to retailers and is recorded as an
adjustment to net revenues. Capital equipment funding is designed to help offset
the costs of purchasing and installing marketing equipment, such as vending
machines and glass door coolers at customer locations and is recorded as a
reduction of selling, delivery and administrative expenses. Advertising support
represents the cost of media time, promotional materials, and other advertising
and marketing costs that are funded by PepsiCo and is recorded as a reduction to
advertising and marketing expenses within selling, delivery and administrative
expenses. In addition, PepsiCo may share certain media costs with us due to our
joint objective of promoting PepsiCo brands. There are no conditions or other
requirements that could result in a repayment of the bottler incentives
received. Bottler incentives received from PepsiCo, including media costs shared
by PepsiCo, were $560 million, $554 million and $524 million for 2002, 2001 and
2000, respectively. Of these amounts, we recorded $257 million, $262 million and
$244 million for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, in net revenues, and the
remainder as a reduction of selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
PURCHASES OF CONCENTRATE AND FINISHED PRODUCT - We purchase concentrate
from PepsiCo, which is the critical flavor ingredient used in the production of
carbonated soft drinks and other ready-to-drink beverages. PepsiCo determines
the price of concentrate annually at its discretion. We also pay a royalty fee
to PepsiCo for the Aquafina trademark. Amounts paid or payable to PepsiCo and
its affiliates for concentrate and royalty fees were $1,699 million, $1,584
million and $1,507 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
We also produce or distribute other products and purchase finished goods
and concentrate through various arrangements with PepsiCo or PepsiCo joint
ventures. During 2002, 2001 and 2000, total amounts paid or payable to PepsiCo
or PepsiCo joint ventures for these transactions were $464 million, $375 million
and $155 million, respectively.
We provide manufacturing services to PepsiCo and PepsiCo affiliates in
connection with the production of certain finished beverage products. During
2002, 2001 and 2000, total amounts paid or payable by PepsiCo for these
transactions were $10 million, $32 million and $36 million, respectively.
FOUNTAIN SERVICE FEE - We manufacture and distribute fountain products and
provide fountain equipment service to PepsiCo customers in some territories in
accordance with the Pepsi beverage agreements. Amounts received from PepsiCo for
these transactions are offset by the cost to provide these services and are
reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Operations in selling, delivery and
administrative expenses. Net amounts paid or payable by PepsiCo to us for these
services were approximately $200 million, $185 million and $189 million, in
2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
OTHER TRANSACTIONS - Prior to 2002, Hillbrook Insurance Company, Inc., a
subsidiary of PepsiCo, provided insurance and risk management services to us
pursuant to a contractual agreement. Total premiums paid to Hillbrook Insurance
Company, Inc. during 2001 and 2000 were $58 million and $62 million,
respectively.
We provide PepsiCo and PepsiCo affiliates or PepsiCo provides us various
services pursuant to a shared services agreement and other arrangements,
including information technology maintenance, procurement of raw materials,
shared space, employee benefits, credit and collection, international tax and
accounting services. Total net expenses incurred were approximately $57 million,
$133 million and $117 million during 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
We purchase snack food products from Frito-Lay, Inc., a subsidiary of
PepsiCo, for sale and distribution in all of Russia except Moscow. Amounts paid
or payable to PepsiCo and its affiliates for snack food products were $44
million, $27 million and $24 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
40
The Consolidated Statements of Operations include the following income
(expense) amounts as a result of transactions with PepsiCo and its affiliates:
2002 2001 2000
------- ------- -------
Net revenues:
Bottler incentives ................................... $ 257 $ 262 $ 244
======= ======= =======
Cost of sales:
Purchases of concentrate and finished products,
and Aquafina royalty fees ........................ $(2,163) $(1,959) $(1,662)
Manufacturing and distribution service reimbursements 10 32 36
------- ------- -------
$(2,153) $(1,927) $(1,626)
======= ======= =======
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses:
Bottler incentives ................................... $ 303 $ 292 $ 280
Fountain service fee ................................. 200 185 189
Frito-Lay purchases .................................. (44) (27) (24)
Insurance costs ...................................... -- (58) (62)
Shared services ...................................... (57) (133) (117)
------- ------- -------
$ 402 $ 259 $ 266
======= ======= =======
We are not required to pay any minimum fees to PepsiCo, nor are we
obligated to PepsiCo under any minimum purchase requirements.
As part of our acquisition in Turkey (see Note 16), we paid PepsiCo $8
million for its share of Fruko Mesrubat Sanayii A.S. and related entities. In
addition, we sold certain brands to PepsiCo from the net assets acquired for $16
million.
As part of our acquisition of Gemex in Mexico (see Note 16), PepsiCo
received $297 million for the tender of its shares for its 34.4% ownership in
the outstanding capital stock of Gemex. In addition, PepsiCo made a payment to
us for $17 million, to facilitate the purchase and ensure a smooth ownership
transition of Gemex.
We paid PepsiCo $10 million and $9 million during 2002 and 2001,
respectively, for distribution rights relating to the SoBe brand in certain
PBG-owned territories in the U.S. and Canada.
The $1.3 billion of 5 5/8% senior notes and the $1.0 billion of 5 3/8%
senior notes issued on February 9, 1999, by us are guaranteed by PepsiCo. In
addition, the $1.0 billion of 4 5/8% senior notes issued on November 15, 2002,
also by us, will be guaranteed by PepsiCo in accordance with the terms set forth
in the related indenture.
Amounts payable to PepsiCo and its affiliates were $26 million and $17
million at December 28, 2002, and December 29, 2001, respectively. Such amounts
are recorded within accounts payable and other current liabilities in our
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
PBG is considered a related party, as we are the principal
operating subsidiary of PBG and we make up substantially of all of the
operations and assets of PBG. At December 28, 2002, PBG owned approximately
93.2% of our equity.
Beginning in 2002, PBG provides insurance and risk management services to
us pursuant to a contractual agreement. Total premiums paid to PBG during 2002
was $86 million.
We have loaned PBG $117 million and $310 million during 2002 and 2001,
respectively, net of repayments. During 2002 these loans were made through a
series of 1-year notes, with interest rates ranging from 1.9% to 2.5%. Total
intercompany loans owed to us from PBG at December 28, 2002 and December 29,
2001, was $954 million and $837 million, respectively. The proceeds were used by
PBG to pay for interest, taxes, dividends, share repurchases
41
and acquisitions. Accrued interest receivable from PBG on these notes totaled
$22 million and $44 million at December 28, 2002 and December 29, 2001,
respectively, and is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in
our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Total interest income recognized in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations relating to outstanding loans with PBG was $24 million, $44 million
and $36 million, in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
On March 8, 1999, PBG issued $1 billion of 7% senior notes due 2029, which
are guaranteed by us.
PBG has a $500 million commercial paper program that is supported by
two $250 million credit facilities, which is guaranteed by us. One of the
credit facilities expires in May 2003 and the other credit facility expires in
April 2004. There were no borrowings outstanding under these credit facilities
at December 28, 2002, or December 29, 2001.
We also guarantee that to the extent there is available cash, we will
distribute pro rata to PBG and PepsiCo sufficient cash such that aggregate cash
distributed to PBG will enable PBG to pay its taxes and make interest payments
on the $1 billion 7% senior notes due 2029. During 2002 and 2001, we made cash
distributions to our owners totaling $156 million and $223 million,
respectively. Any amounts in excess of taxes and interest payments were used by
PBG to repay loans to us.
NOTE 15 -- CONTINGENCIES
We are involved in a lawsuit with current and former employees concerning
wage and hour issues in New Jersey. We believe that the ultimate resolution to
this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, financial condition or liquidity. Subsequent to year end we have
resolved this matter, see Note 18.
We are subject to various claims and contingencies related to lawsuits,
taxes, environmental and other matters arising out of the normal course of
business. We believe that the ultimate liability arising from such claims or
contingencies, if any, in excess of amounts already recognized is not likely to
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition
or liquidity.
NOTE 16 -- ACQUISITIONS
During 2002, we acquired the operations and exclusive right to manufacture,
sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola beverages from several PepsiCo franchise
bottlers. The following acquisitions occurred for an aggregate amount of $921
million in cash and $369 million of assumed debt:
- Fruko Mesrubat Sanayii A.S. and related entities of Turkey in March.
- Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Aroostook, Inc., of Presque Isle, Maine
in June.
- Seaman's Beverages Limited of the Canadian province of Prince Edward
Island in July.
- Pepsi-Gemex, S.A. de. C.V of Mexico in November.
- Kitchener Beverages Limited of Ontario, Canada in December.
Also in 2002, PBG acquired the Pepsi-Cola bottling operations along with
the exclusive right to manufacture, sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola beverages
from Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Macon, Inc. in Georgia ("Macon"). In
connection with the acquisition, PBG contributed the business and certain net
assets of Macon totaling $24 million to Bottling LLC.
The largest of our acquisitions was Gemex, where we acquired all of their
outstanding capital stock. Our total cost for the purchase of Gemex was a net
cash payment of $871 million and assumed debt of approximately $305 million.
Gemex produces, sells and distributes a variety of soft drink products under the
Pepsi-Cola, Pepsi Light, Pepsi Max, Pepsi Limon, Mirinda, 7 UP, Diet 7 UP, KAS,
Mountain Dew, Power Punch and Manzanita Sol trademarks under exclusive franchise
and bottling arrangements with PepsiCo and certain affiliates of PepsiCo. Gemex
owns, produces, sells and distributes purified and mineral water in Mexico under
the trademarks Electropura and Garci Crespo and has rights to produce, sell and
distribute soft drink products of other companies in Mexico.
Our U.S. and Canadian acquisitions were made to enable us to provide better
service to our large retail customers. We expect these acquisitions to reduce
costs through economies of scale. The Mexican and Turkish acquisitions were made
to allow us to increase our markets outside the United States.
42
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in connection with our acquisitions and the asset
contribution of Macon from PBG, net of cash acquired:
USEFUL
LIFE
ASSETS (YEARS) GEMEX OTHER TOTAL
------- -------- -------- --------
Current assets ..................................... $ 101 $ 33 $ 134
Fixed assets ....................................... 5-33 505 85 590
Intangible assets:
Non-compete agreements subject to amortization .... 3-5 -- 4 4
Franchise rights subject to amortization .......... 5 -- 8 8
Franchise rights not subject to amortization ...... 808 35 843
Goodwill (non-tax deductible) ..................... 126 20 146
Other assets ....................................... 15 2 17
-------- -------- --------
TOTAL ASSETS .............................. $ 1,555 $ 187 $ 1,742
-------- -------- --------
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and other current liabilities ..... 141 42 183
Short-term borrowings .............................. 5 50 55
Long-term debt ..................................... 300 14 314
Other liabilities .................................. 238 14 252
-------- -------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES ......................... $ 684 $ 120 $ 804
-------- -------- --------
NET ASSETS ACQUIRED .................................. $ 871 $ 67 $ 938
======== ======== ========
In addition to the net assets acquired above, we also incurred
non-capitalizable costs associated with the acquisition of Gemex. As discussed
in Note 9, we entered into option contracts to mitigate certain foreign currency
risks in anticipation of our acquisition. These options expired unexercised and
the cash flow of $7 million associated with these options included in
acquisitions of bottlers in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The allocation of the purchase price for Gemex is preliminary, pending
final valuations on certain assets. The final allocations of the purchase price
will be determined based on the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed as of the date of acquisition.
Non-compete agreements and franchise rights that are subject to
amortization acquired during 2002 have a weighted-average amortization period of
three and five years, respectively.
The following unaudited pro forma operating information summarizes our
consolidated results of operations as if the Gemex acquisition had occurred on
the first day of fiscal year 2001.
2002 2001
------- -------
Net revenues ................. $10,297 $ 9,617
Income before income taxes ... $ 813 $ 615
Net income ................... $ 755 $ 608
The operating results of each of our acquisitions are included in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements from its respective date of
purchase.
During 2001, PBG acquired the Pepsi-Cola bottling operations along with the
exclusive right to manufacture, sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola beverages from
Pepsi-Cola Bottling of Northern California. In connection with the acquisition,
PBG contributed certain net assets acquired totaling $74 million to Bottling
LLC. Also during 2001, we acquired the operations and exclusive right to
manufacture, sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola beverages from Pepsi-Cola Elmira
Bottling Co. Inc. for $46 million in cash and assumed debt. These acquisitions
were made to enable us to provide better service to our large retail customers
as well as reduce costs through economies of scale.
43
NOTE 17 - ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The balances related to each component of accumulated other comprehensive
loss were as follows:
2002 2001 2000
------- ------- -------
Currency translation adjustment ........ $ (276) $ (301) $ (253)
Cash flow hedge adjustment ............. (8) (19) --
Minimum pension liability adjustment ... (312) (96) --
------- ------- -------
Accumulated other comprehensive loss ... $ (596) $ (416) $ (253)
======= ======= =======
NOTE 18 -- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (UNAUDITED)
During the first quarter of 2003, we acquired a Pepsi-Cola bottler based in
Buffalo, New York, for a purchase price of approximately $75 million.
In the first quarter of 2003, we settled a lawsuit with the New Jersey
State Department of Labor and with current and former employees concerning
overtime wage issues. The amount of this settlement was approximately $28
million, which was fully provided for in our litigation reserves as of
December 28, 2002 in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
NOTE 19 -- SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
2002 QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER FULL YEAR
------- ------- ------- ------- ---------
Net revenues ...................... $1,772 $2,209 $2,455 $2,780 $9,216
Gross profit ...................... 830 1,024 1,118 1,243 4,215
Operating income .................. 135 272 338 152 897
Net income ........................ 107 240 287 100 734
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
2001 QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER FULL YEAR
------- ------- ------- ------- ---------
Net revenues .................... $1,647 $2,060 $2,274 $2,462 $8,443
Gross profit .................... 765 952 1,052 1,094 3,863
Operating income ................ 90 218 285 85 678
Net income (1) .................. 67 201 260 59 587
(1) During 2001, the Canadian Government passed laws reducing federal and
certain provincial corporate income tax rates. These rate changes resulted
in one-time gains of $16 million and $9 million in the second and third
quarters of 2001, respectively.
44
MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
To Our Owners:
We are responsible for the preparation, integrity and fair presentation of
the Consolidated Financial Statements, related notes and other information
included in this annual report. The Consolidated Financial Statements were
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America and include certain amounts based upon our estimates
and assumptions, as required. Other financial information presented in the
annual report is derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting, designed
to provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of the Consolidated
Financial Statements, as well as to safeguard assets from unauthorized use or
disposition. The system is supported by formal policies and procedures,
including an active Code of Conduct program intended to ensure employees adhere
to the highest standards of personal and professional integrity. Our internal
audit function monitors and reports on the adequacy of and compliance with the
internal control system, and appropriate actions are taken to address
significant control deficiencies and other opportunities for improving the
system as they are identified.
The Consolidated Financial Statements have been audited and reported on by
our independent auditors, KPMG LLP, who were given free access to all financial
records and related data, including minutes of the meetings of the Board of
Directors and Committees of the Board. We believe that management
representations made to the independent auditors were valid and appropriate.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed solely of
outside directors, provides oversight to our financial reporting process and our
controls to safeguard assets through periodic meetings with our independent
auditors, internal auditors and management. Both our independent auditors and
internal auditors have free access to the Audit Committee.
Although no cost-effective internal control system will preclude all errors
and irregularities, we believe our controls as of December 28, 2002 provide
reasonable assurance that our assets are safeguarded.
Alfred H. Drewes Andrea L. Forster
Principal Financial Officer Principal Accounting Officer
45
Independent Auditors' Report
The Owners of
Bottling Group, LLC:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bottling Group,
LLC as of December 28, 2002 and December 29, 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, cash flows and changes in owners' equity for each of
the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 28, 2002. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of management of
Bottling Group, LLC. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bottling Group, LLC
as of December 28, 2002 and December 29, 2001, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended
December 28, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
adopted FASB 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," as of December 30,
2001.
/s/ KPMG LLP
New York, New York
January 28, 2003
SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
in millions
FISCAL YEARS ENDED 2002 2001 2000(1) 1999 1998
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Net revenues ....................................... $ 9,216 $ 8,443 $ 7,982 $ 7,505 $ 7,041
Cost of sales ...................................... 5,001 4,580 4,405 4,296 4,181
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Gross profit ....................................... 4,215 3,863 3,577 3,209 2,860
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses ...... 3,318 3,185 2,986 2,813 2,583
Unusual impairment and other charges and credits (2) -- -- -- (16) 222
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Operating income ................................... 897 678 591 412 55
Interest expense, net .............................. 98 78 89 129 157
Other non-operating expenses, net .................. 7 -- 1 1 26
Minority interest .................................. 9 14 8 5 4
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before income taxes .................. 783 586 493 277 (132)
Income tax (benefit) expense (3) ................... 49 (1) 22 4 (1)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss) .................................. $ 734 $ 587 $ 471 $ 273 $ (131)
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT PERIOD END):
Total assets ....................................... $ 10,907 $ 8,677 $ 8,228 $ 7,799 $ 7,227
Long-term debt:
Allocation of PepsiCo long-term debt ............ -- -- -- -- 2,300
Due to third parties ............................ 3,535 2,299 2,286 2,284 61
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total long-term debt .......................... $ 3,535 $ 2,299 $ 2,286 $ 2,284 $ 2,361
Minority interest .................................. $ -- $ 154 $ 147 $ 141 $ 112
Accumulated other comprehensive loss ............... $ (596) $ (416) $ (253) $ (222) $ (238)
Owners' equity ..................................... $ 5,186 $ 4,596 $ 4,321 $ 3,928 $ 3,283
(1) Our fiscal year 2000 results were impacted by the inclusion of an extra
week in our fiscal year. The extra week increased net income by $12
million.
(2) Unusual impairment and other charges and credits comprises of the
following:
- - $45 million non-cash compensation charge in the second quarter of 1999.
- - $53 million vacation accrual reversal in the fourth quarter of 1999.
- - $8 million restructuring reserve reversal in the fourth quarter of 1999.
- - $222 million charge related to the restructuring of our Russian bottling
operations and the separation of Pepsi-Cola North America's concentrate and
bottling organizations in the fourth quarter of 1998.
(3) Fiscal Year 2001 includes Canada tax law change benefits of $25 million.
47