.
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                     Exhibit 5.6


                   [FRESHFIELDS BRUCKHAUS DERINGER LETTERHEAD]



                                                         
Burns Philp Deutschland GmbH
Wandsbeker Zollstra(beta)e 59
22041 Hamburg

Burns Philp Deutschland Grundbesitz GmbH
Wandsbeker Zollstra(beta)e 59
22041 Hamburg

Deutsche Hefewerke GmbH
Wandsbeker Zollstra(beta)e 59
22041 Hamburg

Burns Philp Deutschland Export
Nahrungsmittel-Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH

Wandsbeker Zollstra(beta)e 59
22041 Hamburg




5 March 2004

         RE:    - BURNS PHILP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, BURNS PHILP DEUTSCHLAND
                  GRUNDBESITZ GMBH, DEUTSCHE HEFEWERKE GMBH AND BURNS PHILP
                  DEUTSCHLAND EXPORT NAHRUNGSMITTEL-VERTRIEBSGESELLSCHAFT MBH AS
                  GUARANTORS OF BURNS PHILP CAPITAL PTY. LTD. US$ 210 MILLION
                  10-3/4% SENIOR SUBORDINATED NOTES DUE 2011

                - EXHIBIT TO THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT: FILE NO: 333-107085,
                  INITIAL FILING DATE: 16 JULY 2003

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have acted as special German counsel to Burns Philp & Co. Ltd., Sydney in
connection with the issuance by Burns Philp Capital Pty. Ltd., an Australian
corporation, and Burns Philp Capital (U.S.) Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"ISSUERS"), of US$ 210 million in the aggregate principal amount of 10 3/4%
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 (the "NOTES") and the guaranty of the Notes
(the "GUARANTY") by Burns Philp Deutschland GmbH, Hamburg ("BPD"), Burns Philp
Deutschland Grundbesitz GmbH, Hamburg ("BPDG"), Deutsche Hefewerke GmbH
(formerly: Deutsche Hefewerke Verwaltungs GmbH), Hamburg ("DHW") and Burns Philp
Deutschland Export Nahrungsmittel-Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH




                                                            2/6

("BPDE") (BPD, BPDG, DHW and BPDE collectively the "COMPANIES") pursuant to the
Indenture (together with the Guaranty included therein, the "INDENTURE") dated
20 February 2003 among the Issuers, the guarantors named therein (the
"GUARANTORS") and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee.

1.       DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

         In rendering this opinion, we have examined the following documents:

         a)       the Indenture;

         b)       a certified copy of an excerpt from the Commercial Register of
                  the Local Court (Amtsgericht) of Hamburg dated 4 March 2004
                  on BPD;

         c)       a certified copy of an excerpt from the Commercial Register of
                  the Local Court (Amtsgericht) of Hamburg dated 4 March 2004
                  on BPDG;

         d)       a certified copy of an excerpt from the Commercial Register of
                  the Local Court (Amtsgericht) of Hamburg dated 4 March 2004
                  on DHW;

         e)       a certified copy of an excerpt from the Commercial Register of
                  the Local Court (Amtsgericht) of Hamburg dated 4 March 2004
                  on BPDE;

         f)       a copy of a shareholders' resolution dated 14 January 2003, a
                  copy of a confirmatory shareholders' resolution dated 29
                  January 2003 and a copy of a supplemental resolution dated 17
                  February 2003 each of BPD;

         g)       a copy of a shareholders' resolution dated 13 January 2003, a
                  copy of a confirmatory shareholders' resolution dated 29
                  January 2003 and a copy of a supplemental resolution dated 17
                  February 2003 each of BPDG;

         h)       a copy of a shareholders' resolution dated 13 January 2003, a
                  copy of a confirmatory shareholders' resolution dated 29
                  January 2003 and a copy of a supplemental resolution dated 17
                  February 2003 each of DHW;




                                                            3/6

         i)       a copy of a shareholders' resolution dated 3 February 2003 and
                  a copy of a supplemental resolution dated 17 February 2003
                  each of BDPE;

         j)       a copy of the articles of association of BPD dated 22
                  September 1997;

         k)       a copy of the articles of association of BPDG dated 24
                  September 1997;

         l)       a copy of the articles of association of DHW dated 17 February
                  1998 as amended on 30 June 2003;

         m)       a copy of the articles of assocation of BPDE dated 26 August
                  1999;

         n)       a power of attorney of BPD, BPDG and DHW dated 30 January 2003
                  and a confirmation of these powers of attorney by BPD, BPDG
                  and DHW dated 17 February 2003;

         o)       a power of attorney of BPDE dated 3 February 2003 and a
                  confirmation of this power of attorney by BPDE dated 17
                  February 2003;

         p)       a statement of John McKenna dated 5 March 2004 confirming
                  that (i) the articles of association of BPD, BPDG, DHW and
                  BPDE referred to in lit. j) to m) have not been changed and
                  (ii) that the Shareholders' Resolutions referred to in lit. f)
                  to i), the powers of attorney and their confirmations referred
                  to in lit. n) and o) above and the Indenture above have not
                  been revoked, rescinded, repealed, terminated, amended or
                  supplemented by the Companies.

         The shareholders' resolutions listed under lit. f) to i) above are
         hereinafter collectively referred to as the "SHAREHOLDERS'
         RESOLUTIONS". The articles of association listed under lit. j) to m)
         above are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "ARTICLES OF
         ASSOCIATION".

         We confirm that we have examined all documents and public records and
         made the investigations that we consider appropriate for rendering this
         opinion.

2.       ASSUMPTIONS





                                                            4/6

         In considering the above documents and rendering this opinion we have
         with your consent and without further enquiry assumed:

         a)       the conformity to originals of documents supplied to us as
                  copies;

         b)       the genuineness of all signatures on, and the authenticity and
                  completeness of, all documents submitted to us whether as
                  originals or copies;

         c)       that the Statement of John McKenna referred to in no. 1 lit.
                  p) above is true, accurate and correct;

         d)       that the excerpts from the Commercial Register of the Local
                  Court (Amtsgericht) of Hamburg referred to under no. 1 lit. b)
                  to e) above are accurate and complete as of their respective
                  dates;

         e)       the full legal capacity of all individuals who have executed
                  and delivered the Indenture and the Shareholders' Resolutions
                  on behalf of the parties thereto.

3.       LAWS CONSIDERED

         The undersigned is admitted to the bar in Dusseldorf, Germany, and
         licensed as an attorney in Germany. This opinion is, therefore, limited
         to matters of German law as presently in effect. We have not
         investigated and do not express or imply an opinion with respect to the
         laws of any other jurisdiction.

4.       OPINION STATEMENTS

         Based on the foregoing and subject to the limitations and
         qualifications stated herein and to any factual matters or documents
         not disclosed to us, we are of the opinion that:

         a)       BPD, BPDG, DHW and BPDE are limited liability companies
                  (Gesellschaften mit beschrankter Haftung) duly incorporated
                  and registered under German law.





                                                            5/6

         b)       The Indenture has been duly executed on behalf of the
                  Companies and has been duly authorized by all necessary
                  corporate action on behalf of the Companies. Subject to para.
                  4 c) below, BPD, BPDG, DHW and BPDE have full power and all
                  necessary consents and approvals to execute, deliver and
                  perform their obligations under the Indenture.

                  It should, however, be noted that, under German conflict of
                  laws rules, the validity and interpretation of a power of
                  attorney authorizing a contract is normally governed by the
                  law of the country where the contract is to be executed. Any
                  choice of law included in the power of attorney may thus be
                  disregarded by German courts. Hence a German court may
                  disregard the choice of German law included in the power of
                  attorney and take the opinion that validity and interpretation
                  of the power of attorney be governed by Australian law as the
                  law of the country where the Indenture was executed.

         c)       The execution, delivery and performance of the Indenture does
                  not conflict with the charter and by-laws of the Companies or
                  German law, provided that the application of New York law as
                  the law governing the Indenture does not lead to a result
                  which is incompatible with German public policy (ordre
                  publique).

5.       QUALIFICATIONS

         The opinion expressed herein is subject to the following limitations
         and qualifications:

         a)       The opinion expressed herein may be affected or limited by the
                  provisions of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency,
                  reorganisation, moratorium, fraudulant conveyance laws, and
                  other or similar laws of general application affecting the
                  enforcement or protection of creditor's rights. In particular,
                  a German insolvency administrator for any of the Companies may
                  challenge the validity of the Guaranty given by the respective
                  Company in the Indenture if it has been granted during the
                  last three months preceding the insolvency application, or at
                  any time thereafter.



                                                            6/6

         b)       This opinion shall be governed by, and construed in accordance
                  with, the laws of the Federeal Republic of Germany.

         c)       Nothing herein should be taken as expressing an opinion with
                  respect to the representations and warranties, or other
                  factual statements, contained in any of the documents referred
                  to above.

         d)       This opinion speaks as of its date and relates only to the
                  laws of the Federal Republic of Germany in force and as
                  applied as at the date hereof. It is rendered in connection
                  with the transaction contemplated in the Indenture and is
                  limited to the matters addressed herein and is not to be read
                  as an opinion in respect of any other matter. In particular,
                  this opinion is not to be read as an opinion in respect of the
                  validity and/or enforceability of the Indenture or any of its
                  terms or provisions.

Dewey Ballantine LLP may also rely on our opinion with respect to matters of
German law for purposes of its opinion filed as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement, as if our opinion had been addressed to it.

We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an Exhibit to the
Registration Statement No. 333-107085 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission by the Issuers and the Guarantors and to the reference to our name
under the caption "Legal Matters" in the prospectus included therein. In giving
this consent, we do not thereby admit that we are included within the category
of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of
the United States, or the rules and the regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission promulgated thereunder.

Very truly yours,

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer

By /s/ Dr. Ulrich von Schonfeld
   ----------------------------
    Dr. Ulrich von Schonfeld