1 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549 ------------------------------ FORM 10-K (Mark One) [X]ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 OR [ ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-10093 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) MARYLAND 13-6908486 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) Incorporation or Organization) 27600 NORTHWESTERN HIGHWAY 48034 SOUTHFIELD, MICHIGAN (zip code) (Address of Principal Executive Offices) REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: 248-350-9900 SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 (b) OF THE ACT: NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE TITLE OF EACH CLASS ON WHICH REGISTERED ------------------- --------------------- Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, New York Stock Exchange $0.01 Par Value Per Share SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 (g) OF THE ACT: None Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements to this Form 10-K. [ ] Aggregate market value of the voting shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March 15, 2000: approximately $98,170,000. Approximately 7,216,793 Common Shares of Beneficial Interest of the registrant were outstanding as of March 15, 2000. DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: Portions of the 2000 Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on June 7, 2000 are incorporated by reference into Part III. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTE:Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust is sometimes referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as "Registrant", or the "Company". ITEM PAGE ---- ---- PART I 1. Business.................................................... 2 2. Properties.................................................. 7 3. Legal Proceedings........................................... 12 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders......... 12 PART II 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters......................................... 13 6. Selected Financial Data..................................... 15 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations................................... 17 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................. 24 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.................................... 24 PART III 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.......... 25 11. Executive Compensation...................................... 25 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.................................................. 25 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.............. 25 PART IV 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K......................................................... 26 30 SIGNATURES..................................................................... 1 3 PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS. GENERAL Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust (the "Company") is a Maryland trust organized pursuant to Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Declaration of Trust dated October 2, 1997. The Company is the successor entity of Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust (the "Massachusetts Trust") a Massachusetts business trust. In December 1997, with the approval of its shareholders, the Company changed its state of organization from Massachusetts to Maryland through the termination of the Massachusetts Trust's Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust by amending such Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust to provide for the termination of the Trust, the merger (the "Change of Venue Merger") of the Massachusetts Trust into the Company and the conversion of each outstanding share of beneficial interest in the Massachusetts Trust into a common share of beneficial interest of the Company. The term the "Company" refers to Ramco- Gershenson Properties Trust and/or its predecessors. The principal office of the Company is located at 27600 Northwestern Highway, Suite 200, Southfield, Michigan 48034. RPS Realty Trust, a Massachusetts business trust, was formed on June 21, 1988 to be a diversified growth oriented real estate investment trust ("REIT"). From 1988 until April 30, 1996, RPS Realty Trust was primarily engaged in the business of owning and managing a participating mortgage loan portfolio, and, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, owning and operating eight real estate properties. The Company was organized for the purpose of qualifying as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") under Section 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). In May 1996, the Company (i) acquired substantially all of the shopping center and retail properties as well as the management organization and business operations, of Ramco-Gershenson, Inc. and certain of its affiliates (the "Ramco Acquisition"), (ii) changed the Company's name from RPS Realty Trust to Ramco- Gershenson Properties Trust, (iii) combined the outstanding shares of the Company by way of a one-for-four reverse split, and, (iv) spun-off eight mortgage loans and two real properties (the "RPS Mortgage Assets") to Atlantic Realty Trust , a newly formed real estate investment trust ("Atlantic"). The Company conducts substantially all of its business through Ramco-Gershenson Properties, L.P. (the "Operating Partnership'). The Company is the sole general partner of, and has exclusive power to manage and conduct the business of, the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all of the Company's interest in its properties, either directly or indirectly through subsidiaries (including subsidiary property partnerships). The Operating Partnership also owns 100% of the non-voting common stock and 5% of the voting common stock of Ramco-Gershenson, Inc. (Ramco); such stock ownership enables the Company to receive in excess of 95% of the dividend and liquidating distributions of Ramco. The Company's property management operations are conducted through Ramco to facilitate compliance with certain REIT requirements under the Code. The income attributable to the ownership of the Ramco stock is accounted for under the equity method. Operations of the Company. The Company is engaged in the business of owning, developing, acquiring, managing and leasing community shopping centers, regional malls and single tenant retail properties, nationally. At December 31, 1999, the Company had a portfolio of 54 shopping centers, with more than 10,700,000 square feet of gross leasable area, located in Michigan, Ohio, Florida, New Jersey, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Alabama, Wisconsin, Virginia and Georgia. The Company's properties consist of 2 regional enclosed malls, 43 community centers, 6 power centers, and 3 single tenant retail properties. Regional enclosed malls are larger retail properties (containing 400,000 to more than 1,000,000 square feet of GLA) with two or more department stores as anchors and a wide variety of stores along enclosed, climate controlled malls connecting the anchors. This layout is intended to maximize 2 4 customer traffic for the mall stores. At many regional enclosed malls, freestanding stores are located along the perimeter of the parking area. Community shopping centers generally range in size up to 400,000 square feet of GLA and are located in developed retail and commercial areas in which other similar centers may be nearby. In addition, with respect to some of these centers, there may be one or more regional enclosed malls nearby. Community shopping centers generally fall into two types: traditional community centers and power centers. Traditional community centers typically are convenient to their trade areas and focus primarily on value-oriented and convenience goods and services. They are designed to service a neighborhood area, and are usually anchored by a supermarket, drugstore or discount retailer providing basic necessities, although certain community centers are free standing single-user buildings. Power centers are different from traditional community centers because they are designed to service a larger trade area and they contain at least two anchors, which occupy a substantial portion of the GLA in the center. These anchors are often national retailers which are leaders in their market or "category killers" i.e., larger stores which offer a complete selection of a category of items (e.g., toys, office supplies, home improvement products, electronics, etc.) at low prices, and often in a warehouse format. The Company's business objective and operating strategy is to increase funds from operations and cash available for distribution per share. The Company expects to achieve internal growth and to enhance the value of the properties by increasing their rental income over time through (i) contractual rent increases, (ii) the leasing and re-leasing of available space at higher rental levels, and (iii) the selective renovation of the properties. The Company intends to achieve external growth through the selective expansion and redevelopment of existing properties and the acquisition of shopping center properties through the Company's joint venture entity. Ramco performs all property management functions for the properties. At December 31, 1999, Ramco had 133 full-time employees devoted exclusively to property management, including on-site personnel. Property management efforts are directed toward improving tenant sales and rents by continually repositioning the centers. Ramco strives to meet the needs of its tenants in the areas of promotion, marketing and ongoing management of its properties and seeks to bring together a sufficient critical mass of complementary tenants. As part of its property management efforts, Ramco monitors tenant mix, store size, sales results and store locations, and works closely with tenants to improve the overall performance of their stores. Ramco seeks to anticipate trends in the retailing industry and introduce new retail names and concepts into its shopping center properties in response to these trends. As part of its ongoing business strategy, the Company continues to expand and redevelop existing properties in its shopping center portfolio, depending on tenant demands and market conditions. The Company plans to take advantage of attractive purchase opportunities by acquiring additional shopping center properties in underserved, attractive and/or expanding markets. The Company also seeks to acquire strategically located, quality shopping centers that (i) have leases at rental rates below market rates, (ii) have potential for rental and/or occupancy increases or (iii) offer cash flow growth or capital appreciation potential where the Company's financial strength, relationships with retail companies or expansion or redevelopment capabilities can enhance value, and provide anticipated total returns that will increase the Company's cash available for distribution per share. In order to accomplish its acquisition strategy, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement during 1999, with an affiliate of Investcorp International, Inc., as an alternative source of investment capital to take advantage of favorable acquisition opportunities. The Company believes that its in-house redevelopment and expansion capabilities provide it with opportunities to acquire shopping center properties that may not necessarily be attractive to other owners. In addition, the Company will continue its strategy to sell non-core assets when properties are not viable redevelopment candidates. DEVELOPMENTS AND EXPANSIONS During 1999, the Company substantially completed construction of its White Lake MarketPlace development, a community shopping center located in White Lake Township, Michigan. This 339,000 square foot shopping center is anchored by Wal-Mart, Home Depot, Farmer Jack, and OfficeMax. 3 5 In June 1999, the Company began construction on its newest development, Auburn Mile, a 650,000 square foot shopping center located in Auburn Hills, Michigan. Anchor tenants include Meijer, Target and JoAnn etc. The center is scheduled for completion during the third quarter of 2000. During 1999, the Company completed redevelopment projects aggregating approximately 170,000 square feet at a total cost of approximately $8,368,000 at six of its shopping centers. The Company is currently expanding or redeveloping five shopping centers. COMPETITION Numerous shopping center properties compete with the Company's properties in attracting tenants to lease space. Some of these competing properties may be newer, better located, better capitalized or better tenanted than some of the Company's properties. Furthermore, the Company believes that it is likely that major national or regional commercial property developers will continue to seek development opportunities in markets where the Company's properties are located. These developers may have greater financial resources than the Company. The number of competitive commercial properties in a particular area could have a material effect on the Company's ability to lease space in its properties or at newly developed or acquired properties and on the rents charged. In addition, the Company may face competition from alternate forms of retailing, including home shopping networks, mail order catalogues and on-line based shopping services which may limit the number of retail tenants that desire to seek space in shopping center properties generally, all of which may affect the Company's ability to make expected distributions. The Company is subject to the risks that upon expiration of leases for space located in its properties, the leases may not be renewed, the space may not be relet or the terms of renewal or reletting (including the cost of required renovations) may be less favorable than current lease terms. Leases on a total of approximately 6.2% of the Company owned GLA will expire in 2000. If the Company were unable to promptly relet or renew the leases for all or a substantial portion of this space and, if the rental rates upon such renewal or reletting were significantly lower than expected rates, or if the Company were unable to maintain its current occupancy levels, then the Company's cash flow and ability to make distributions to shareholders could be adversely affected. The shopping center industry is seasonal in nature. Tenant sales and occupancy are higher in the fourth quarter due to the Christmas selling season. Back-to-school and Easter events also result in sales fluctuations. TAX MATTERS Qualification as a REIT. The Company first elected to qualify as a REIT for the year ended December 31, 1988. The Company's policy is to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. If the Company so qualifies, amounts paid by the Company as distributions to its shareholders will not be subject to corporate income taxes. For any year in which the Company does not meet the requirements for electing to be taxed as a REIT, it will be taxed as a corporation. The requirements for qualification as a REIT are contained in sections 856-860 of the Code and the regulations issued thereunder. The following discussion is a brief summary of some of those requirements. Such requirements include certain provisions relating to the nature of a REIT's assets, the sources of its income, the ownership of its stock, and the distribution of its income. Among other things, at the end of each fiscal quarter, at least 75% of the value of the total assets of the Company must consist of real estate assets (including interests in mortgage loans secured by real property and interests in other REIT's) as well as cash, cash items and government securities (the "75% Asset Test"). There are also certain limitations on the amount of other types of securities which can be held by a REIT. Additionally, at least 75% of the gross income of the Company for the taxable year must be derived from certain sources, which include "rents from real property," and interest secured by mortgages on real property. An additional 20% of the gross income of the Company must be derived from these same sources or from dividends, interest from any source, or gains from the sale or other disposition of stock or securities or any combination of the foregoing. There are also restrictions on the percentage of gross income derived from the sale or disposition of certain assets within 4 6 certain time periods. A REIT is also required to distribute annually at least 95% of its REIT Taxable Income (as defined in the Code) to its shareholders. During the third quarter of 1994, the Company held more than 25% of its value of its gross assets in overnight Treasury Bill reverse repurchase transactions which the United States Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") may view as non-qualifying assets for the purpose of satisfying an asset qualification test applicable to REITs based on a Revenue Ruling published in 1977 (the "Asset Issue"). The Company has requested that the IRS enter into a closing agreement with the Company that the Asset Issue will not impact the Company's status as a REIT. The IRS has deferred any action relating to the Asset Issue pending the further examination of the Company's 1991 -- 1995 tax returns (the "Tax Audit"). Based on developments in the law which have occurred since 1977, the Company's Tax Counsel, Battle Fowler LLP, has rendered an opinion that the Company's investment in Treasury Bill repurchase obligations would not adversely affect its REIT status. However, such opinion is not binding upon the IRS. In connection with the spin-off of Atlantic, Atlantic has assumed all liability arising out of the Tax Audit and the Asset Issue, including liabilities for interest and penalties and attorney fees relating thereto. In connection with the assumption of such potential liabilities, Atlantic and the Company have entered into a tax agreement which provides that the Company (under the direction of its Continuing Trustees), and not Atlantic, will control, conduct and effect the settlement of any tax claims against the Company relating to the Tax Audit and the Asset Issue. Accordingly, Atlantic will not have any control as to the timing of the resolution or disposition of any such claims. The Company and Atlantic also received an opinion from Special Tax Counsel, Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen LLP, that, to the extent there is a deficiency in the Company's taxable income arising out of the IRS examination and provided the Company timely makes a deficiency dividend (i.e., declares and pays a distribution which is permitted to relate back to the year for which each deficiency was determined to satisfy the requirement that the REIT distribute 95 percent of its taxable income), the classification of the Company as a REIT for the taxable years under examination would not be affected. Under the tax agreement referred to above, Atlantic has agreed to reimburse the Company for the amount of any deficiency dividend so made. If notwithstanding the above-described opinions of legal counsel, the IRS successfully challenged the status of the Company as a REIT, its status could be adversely affected. If the Company lost its status as a REIT, the Company believes that it will be able to re-elect REIT status for the taxable year beginning January 1, 1999. The IRS agent conducting the examination has issued his examination report with respect to the tax issues raised in the Tax Audit, including the Asset Issue (collectively, the "Tax Issues"). The report sets forth a number of positions which the examining agent has taken with respect to the Company's taxes for the years that are subject to the Tax Audit, which the Company believes are not consistent with applicable law and regulations of the IRS. Based on the report, the Company could be liable for up to $43.1 million in combined taxes, penalties and interest through March 31, 2000. The IRS examination report notes, however, that the Company is eligible to avoid termination of its REIT status for certain of the years under audit if the Company makes a deficiency distribution to its shareholders. A deficiency dividend would be deductible by the Company, thereby reducing its liability for federal income tax. The proposed adjustments to taxable income would require the Company to pay a deficiency dividend to its current shareholders resulting in combined taxes, penalties, interest and deficiency dividends of approximately $44.5 million as of March 31, 2000. As noted above, pursuant to a Tax Agreement between Atlantic and the Company, Atlantic assumed all liability arising out of the Tax Audit and Tax Issues, including the payment of the deficiency dividend. Based on the amount of Atlantic's net assets, as disclosed in its most recent quarterly report Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999, the Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of the Tax Issues will have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. The issuance of the revenue agent's report constitutes only the first step in the IRS administrative process for determining whether there is any deficiency in the Company's tax liability for the years at issue and any adverse determination by the examining agent is subject to administrative appeal within the IRS and, thereafter, to judicial review. As noted above, the agent's report sets forth a number of positions, which the Company and its legal counsel believe are not consistent with applicable law and regulations of the IRS. The 5 7 Company filed an administrative appeal challenging the findings contained in the IRS agent's examination report on April 30, 1999. ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS Under various Federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations relating to the protection of the environment ("Environmental Laws"), a current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances disposed, stored, released, generated, manufactured or discharged from, on, at, onto, under or in such property. Environmental Laws often impose such liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence or release of such hazardous or toxic substance. The presence of such substances, or the failure to properly remediate such substances when present, released or discharged, may adversely affect the owner's ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral. The cost of any required remediation and the liability of the owner or operator therefore as to any property is generally not limited under such Environmental Laws and could exceed the value of the property and/or the aggregate assets of the owner or operator. Persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances may also be liable for the cost of removal or remediation of such substances at a disposal or treatment facility, whether or not such facility is owned or operated by such persons. In addition to any action required by Federal, state or local authorities, the presence or release of hazardous or toxic substances on or from any property could result in private plaintiffs bringing claims for personal injury or other causes of action. In connection with the ownership (direct or indirect), operation, management and development of real properties, the Company may be potentially liable for remediation, releases or injury. In addition, Environmental Laws impose on owners or operators the requirement of on-going compliance with rules and regulations regarding business-related activities that may affect the environment. Such activities include, for example, the ownership or use of transformers or underground tanks, the treatment or discharge of waste waters or other materials, the removal or abatement of asbestos-containing materials ("ACMs") or lead-containing paint during renovations or otherwise, or notification to various parties concerning the potential presence of regulated matter, including ACMs. Failure to comply with such requirements could result in difficulty in the lease or sale of any affected property and/or the imposition of monetary penalties, fines or other sanctions in addition to the costs required to attain compliance. Various of the Company's properties have or may contain ACMs or underground storage tanks ("USTs"); however, except as set forth below, the Company is not aware of any potential environmental liability which could reasonably be expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. No assurance can be given that future laws, ordinances or regulations will not impose any material environmental requirement or liability, or that a material adverse environmental condition does not otherwise exist. There was a release of approximately 2,300 gallons of gasoline from a product line break in August 1986 and a release of approximately 1,200 gallons of gasoline from a delivery line break in October 1991 at a gasoline station located at Jackson Crossing. A release of gasoline was also discovered in 1987 at a time of removal of USTs from a gasoline station located adjacent to Lake Orion Plaza. Subsequent investigations indicated that levels of contamination exist in the ground water under such properties. Certain affiliates of the Company, jointly and severally, have agreed to indemnify the Company, the Operating Partnership and their respective subsidiaries and affiliates for any and all damages arising from or in connection with such environmental conditions at the Jackson Crossing and Lake Orion Plaza properties. 6 8 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES The Company's properties are located in twelve states primarily throughout the Midwest, East and the Southeast United States as follows: ANNUALIZED BASE NUMBER OF RENTAL AT COMPANY STATE PROPERTIES DECEMBER 31, 1999(1) OWNED GLA ----- ---------- -------------------- --------- Michigan............................... 21 $26,869,142 3,787,748 Florida................................ 9 7,143,798 1,298,234 Tennessee.............................. 6 4,357,421 806,590 Ohio................................... 3 3,620,040 375,858 North Carolina......................... 3 3,135,720 537,347 Georgia................................ 4 2,808,278 542,778 South Carolina......................... 2 2,765,258 471,688 New Jersey............................. 1 2,593,023 224,346 Wisconsin.............................. 1 2,339,182 329,454 Virginia............................... 1 2,233,715 240,042 Alabama................................ 2 1,506,569 348,790 Maryland............................... 1 1,538,241 250,016 -- ----------- --------- Total............................. 54 $60,910,387 9,212,891 == =========== ========= With the exception of Kentwood Towne Centre and Southfield Plaza Expansion in which the Company owns a 50% interest in the partnerships that own such properties and two properties owned by RPT/ INVEST, L.L.C., a 25% owned joint venture entity, all of the properties are 100% owned by the Operating Partnership or its subsidiaries. These four properties are included in the above tables. The Company's properties, by type of center, consist of the following: ANNUALIZED BASE NUMBER OF RENTAL AT COMPANY TYPE OF TENANT PROPERTIES DECEMBER 31, 1999(1) OWNED GLA -------------- ---------- -------------------- --------- Community centers...................... 43 $43,381,270 6,876,326 Power centers.......................... 6 9,060,348 1,107,992 Enclosed regional malls................ 2 7,723,506 1,059,769 Single tenant properties............... 3 745,263 168,804 -- ----------- --------- Total............................. 54 $60,910,387 9,212,891 == =========== ========= - ------------------------- (1) Annualized Base Rental Revenue is December 1999 base rental revenues multiplied by 12. Additional information regarding the Properties is included in the Property Schedule on the following pages. 7 9 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST PROPERTY SCHEDULE YEAR OPENED OR ACQUIRED/YEAR COMPANY COMPANY OF LATEST ANCHOR OWNED OWNED RENOVATION OR OWNED ANCHOR TENANT PROPERTY LOCATION TYPE OF PROPERTY EXPANSION[3] GLA GLA GLA -------- -------- ---------------- -------------- ------ ------- ------- ALABAMA Athens Town Center............ Athens, AL Community Center 1997/NA 128,747 80,815 Cox Creek Plaza............... Florence, AL Community Center 1997/NA 99,428 39,800 FLORIDA Crestview Corners............. Crestview, FL Community Center 1997/1993 79,603 32,015 Shoppes of Lakeland........... Lakeland, FL Power Center 1996/NA 200,792 48,000 Southbay Fashion Center....... Osprey, FL Community Center 1998/NA 31,700 64,990 Lantana Plaza................. Lantana, FL Community Center 1993/NA 40,275 76,022 Naples Towne Centre........... Naples, FL Community Center 1983/NA 104,577 21,000 23,152 Rivertowne Square(7).......... Deerfield Beach, FL Community Center 1998/NA 70,948 65,699 Sunshine Plaza................ Tamarac, FL Community Center 1991/NA 183,052 68,637 Pelican Plaza................. Sarasota, FL Community Center 1997/NA 35,768 70,105 Village Lakes Shopping Land O' Lakes, FL Community Center 1997/NA 125,141 61,335 Center....................... GEORGIA Conyers Crossing.............. Conyers, GA Community Center 1998/NA 138,882 31,040 Holcomb Center................ Alpharetta, GA Community Center 1996/NA 39,668 66,835 Indian Hills.................. Calhoun, GA Community Center 1997/NA 97,930 31,200 Mays Crossing................. Stockbridge, GA Community Center 1997/1986 100,183 37,040 MARYLAND Crofton Plaza................. Crofton, MD Community Center 1991/NA 181,039 68,977 MICHIGAN Clinton Valley Mall........... Sterling Heights, Community Center 1979/1993 73,861 79,337 MI Clinton Valley Strip.......... Sterling Heights, Community Center 1979/NA 50,000 0 44,360 MI Eastridge Commons............. Flint, MI Community Center 1990/1997 101,909 124,203 45,637 Edgewood Towne Center......... Lansing, MI Power Center 1990/1992 209,272 23,524 62,233 Ferndale Plaza................ Ferndale, MI Community Center 1984/NA 0 30,916 Fraser Shopping Center........ Fraser, MI Community Center 1983/NA 52,784 23,800 Jackson Crossing.............. Jackson, MI Regional Mall 1990/1996 254,243 139,857 244,875 Jackson West.................. Jackson, MI Community Center 1996/NA 194,484 15,837 % OF TOTAL COMPANY COMPANY % OF OWNED OWNED TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL GLA GLA SHOPPING COMPANY COMPANY LEASED LEASED CENTER OWNED OWNED AS OF AS OF PROPERTY GLA GLA GLA 12/31/99 12/31/99 ANCHORS -------- -------- ------- ------- -------- -------- ------- ALABAMA Athens Town Center............ 209,562 209,562 2.3% 189,881 90.6% Bruno's Food World Wal-Mart(4) Cox Creek Plaza............... 139,228 139,228 1.5% 118,178 84.9% Wal-Mart(4) FLORIDA Crestview Corners............. 111,618 111,618 1.2% 108,018 96.8% Fleming Foods Wal-Mart(4) Shoppes of Lakeland........... 248,792 248,792 2.8% 234,392 94.2% Kmart(8) Montgomery Ward Service Merchandise Southbay Fashion Center....... 96,690 96,690 1.1% 91,036 94.2% Jacobson's Ethan Allen Eckerd Drugs Lantana Plaza................. 116,297 116,297 1.3% 113,797 97.9% Publix Naples Towne Centre........... 148,729 44,152 0.5% 19,952 45.2% Florida Food & Drug(1) Kmart(1) Rivertowne Square(7).......... 136,647 136,647 1.5% 124,547 91.1% Office Depot Winn-Dixie Sunshine Plaza................ 251,689 251,689 2.8% 176,841 70.3% Old Time Pottery Publix Pelican Plaza................. 105,873 105,873 1.2% 102,073 96.4% Linens 'N Things Village Lakes Shopping 186,476 186,476 2.1% 186,476 100.0% Center....................... Kash 'N Karry Food Store Wal-Mart GEORGIA Conyers Crossing.............. 169,922 169,922 1.9% 167,122 98.4% Kmart Upton's(5) Holcomb Center................ 106,503 106,503 1.2% 88,629 83.2% A & P Indian Hills.................. 129,130 129,130 1.4% 121,880 94.4% Ingles Grocery Wal-Mart(4) Mays Crossing................. 137,223 137,223 1.5% 130,323 95.0% Ingles Grocery Wal-Mart(4) MARYLAND Crofton Plaza................. 250,016 250,016 2.8% 250,016 100.0% Basic's Supermarket Drug Emporium Kmart MICHIGAN Clinton Valley Mall........... 153,198 153,198 1.7% 66,968 43.7% Office Depot Clinton Valley Strip.......... 94,360 44,360 0.5% 44,360 100.0% Service Merchandise(1) Eastridge Commons............. 271,749 169,840 1.9% 169,840 100.0% Farmer Jack Staples Target(1) TJ Maxx Edgewood Towne Center......... 295,029 85,757 0.9% 85,757 100.0% OfficeMax Sam's Club(1) Target(1) Ferndale Plaza................ 30,916 30,916 0.3% 23,461 75.9% Old Navy Fraser Shopping Center........ 76,584 76,584 0.8% 71,624 93.5% Oakridge Market Rite-Aid Jackson Crossing.............. 638,975 384,732 4.2% 345,073 89.7% Kohl's Department Store Sears(1) Target(1) Toys 'R Us Jackson West.................. 210,321 210,321 2.1% 210,321 100.0% Circuit City Lowe's OfficeMax Michaels 8 10 YEAR OPENED OR ACQUIRED/YEAR COMPANY COMPANY OF LATEST ANCHOR OWNED OWNED RENOVATION OR OWNED ANCHOR TENANT PROPERTY LOCATION TYPE OF PROPERTY EXPANSION[3] GLA GLA GLA -------- -------- ---------------- -------------- ------ ------- ------- Kentwood Towne Center(2)...... Kentwood, MI Power Center 1989/NA 101,909 122,390 61,265 Lake Orion Plaza.............. Lake Orion, MI Community Center 1977/NA 114,574 14,878 Madison Center................ Madison Heights, MI Community Center 1997/1999 132,360 60,384 New Towne Plaza............... Canton, MI Community Center 1976/1993 91,122 80,668 Oakbrook Square............... Flint, MI Community Center 1989/NA 57,160 83,057 Roseville Plaza............... Roseville, MI Community Center 1983/1994 114,507 116,594 Southfield Plaza.............. Southfield, MI Community Center 1983/1983 128,358 37,658 Southfield Plaza Southfield, MI Community Center 1985/NA 0 19,400 Expansion(2)................. Taylor Plaza.................. Taylor, MI Single Tenant Retail 1996/NA 122,374 0 Tel-Twelve Mall............... Southfield, MI Regional Mall 1983/1997 449,921 225,116 West Oaks I................... Novi, MI Power Center 1981/1998 226,839 15,324 West Oaks II.................. Novi, MI Power Center 1987/NA 220,097 74,675 74,459 White Lake MarketPlace(6)..... White Lake, MI Community Center 1999 129,642 189,107 19,850 NEW JERSEY Chester Springs(7)............ Chester, NJ Community Center 1994/NA 81,760 142,586 NORTH CAROLINA Hickory Corners............... Hickory, NC Community Center 1997/1987 106,922 63,317 Holly Springs Plaza........... Franklin, NC Community Center 1997/1992 124,484 31,100 Ridgeview Crossing............ Elkin, NC Community Center 1997/1995 168,659 42,865 % OF TOTAL COMPANY COMPANY % OF OWNED OWNED TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL GLA GLA SHOPPING COMPANY COMPANY LEASED LEASED CENTER OWNED OWNED AS OF AS OF PROPERTY GLA GLA GLA 12/31/99 12/31/99 ANCHORS -------- -------- ------- ------- -------- -------- ------- Kentwood Towne Center(2)...... 285,564 183,655 2.0% 175,255 95.4% Kmart(8) OfficeMax Target(1) Lake Orion Plaza.............. 129,452 129,452 1.4% 129,452 100.0% Farmer Jack(A&P) Kmart Madison Center................ 192,744 192,744 2.1% 178,546 92.6% Dunham's Kmart New Towne Plaza............... 171,790 171,790 1.9% 171,790 100.0% Kohl's Department Store Oakbrook Square............... 140,217 140,217 1.6% 133,242 95.0% Kids 'R Us TJ Maxx Roseville Plaza............... 231,101 231,101 2.6% 148,823 64.4% Marshall's Service Merchandise Southfield Plaza.............. 166,016 166,016 1.8% 160,673 96.8% Burlington Coat Factory Marshall's F & M Drugs Southfield Plaza 19,400 19,400 0.2% 15,500 79.9% Expansion(2)................. None Taylor Plaza.................. 122,374 122,374 1.4% 122,374 100.0% Kmart Tel-Twelve Mall............... 675,037 675,037 7.4% 606,807 89.9% Chrysler (land lease) Circuit City Kmart Media Play Montgomery Ward Office Depot West Oaks I................... 242,163 242,163 2.7% 242,163 100.0% Circuit City Designer Shoe Warehouse Kmart (land lease)(1) OfficeMax Service Merchandise West Oaks II.................. 369,231 149,134 1.3% 146,882 98.5% Kmart(8) Kids 'R Us(1) Kohl's Department Store(1) Marshall's JoAnne etc. Toys 'R Us(1) White Lake MarketPlace(6)..... 338,599 208,957 100.0% 208,957 100.0% Home Depot Farmer Jack OfficeMax Wal-Mart(1) NEW JERSEY Chester Springs(7)............ 224,346 224,346 2.5% 219,054 97.6% Shop-Rite Supermarket Staples NORTH CAROLINA Hickory Corners............... 170,239 170,239 1.9% 163,939 96.3% Food Lion Grocery OfficeMax Wal-Mart(4) Holly Springs Plaza........... 155,584 155,584 1.7% 154,384 99.2% Ingles Grocery Wal-Mart Ridgeview Crossing............ 211,524 211,524 2.3% 208,249 98.5% Belk Department Store Ingles Grocery Wal-Mart 9 11 YEAR OPENED OR ACQUIRED/YEAR COMPANY COMPANY OF LATEST ANCHOR OWNED OWNED RENOVATION OR OWNED ANCHOR TENANT PROPERTY LOCATION TYPE OF PROPERTY EXPANSION[3] GLA GLA GLA -------- -------- ---------------- -------------- ------ ------- ------- OHIO OfficeMax Center.............. Toledo, OH Single Tenant Retail 1994/NA 22,930 0 Spring Meadows Place.......... Holland, OH Power Center 1987/1997 275,372 81,125 117,366 Troy Towne Center............. Troy, OH Community Center 1990/1996 90,921 85,000 69,437 SOUTH CAROLINA Edgewood Square............... North Augusta, SC Community Center 1997/1995 207,829 20,375 Taylors Square................ Greenville, SC Community Center 1997/1995 209,724 33,760 TENNESSEE Cumberland Gallery............ New Tazewell, TN Community Center 1997/NA 73,304 24,851 Highland Square............... Crossville, TN Community Center 1997/NA 131,126 40,420 Northwest Crossing............ Knoxville, TN Community Center 1997/1995 217,443 43,264 Northwest Crossing II......... Knoxville, TN Single Tenant 1999 23,500 0 Stonegate Plaza............... Kingsport, TN Community Center 1997/1993 127,042 11,448 Tellico Plaza................. Lenoir City, TN Community Center 1997/NA 94,805 19,387 VIRGINIA Aquia Towne Center............ Stafford, VA Community Center 1998/NA 77,438 162,604 WISCONSIN West Allis Town Centre........ West Allis, WI Community Center 1987/NA 216,474 112,980 --------- --------- --------- Total.................. 1,537,942 6,055,821 3,157,070 ========= ========= ========= % OF TOTAL COMPANY COMPANY % OF OWNED OWNED TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL GLA GLA SHOPPING COMPANY COMPANY LEASED LEASED CENTER OWNED OWNED AS OF AS OF PROPERTY GLA GLA GLA 12/31/99 12/31/99 ANCHORS -------- -------- ------- ------- -------- -------- ------- OHIO OfficeMax Center.............. 22,930 22,930 0.3% 22,930 100.0% OfficeMax Spring Meadows Place.......... 473,863 198,491 2.2% 190,417 95.9% Dick's Sporting Goods(1) Kroger(1) OfficeMax Service Merchandise(1) SuperPetz(5) Target(1) TJ Maxx Troy Towne Center............. 245,358 154,437 1.7% 147,584 95.6% County Market Sears Hardware Stage Department Store Wal-Mart(1) SOUTH CAROLINA Edgewood Square............... 228,204 228,204 2.5% 226,829 99.4% Bi-Lo Grocery Goody's Family Clothing Wal-Mart Taylors Square................ 243,484 243,484 2.7% 238,684 98.0% Goody's Family Clothing Wal-Mart Tags(5) TENNESSEE Cumberland Gallery............ 98,155 98,155 1.1% 93,955 95.7% Ingles Grocery Wal-Mart Highland Square............... 171,546 171,546 1.9% 145,626 84.9% Kroger Wal-Mart(4) Northwest Crossing............ 260,707 260,707 2.9% 260,707 100.0% Goody's Family Clothing Ingles Grocery Wal-Mart Northwest Crossing II......... 23,500 23,500 23,500 100.0% None Stonegate Plaza............... 138,490 138,490 1.5% 138,490 100.0% Food Lion Wal-Mart Tellico Plaza................. 114,192 114,192 1.3% 114,192 100.0% Bi-Lo Grocery Wal-Mart(4) VIRGINIA Aquia Towne Center............ 240,042 240,042 2.7% 209,147 87.1% Big Lots Shoppers Food Warehouse Regal Theatre(1) WISCONSIN West Allis Town Centre........ 329,454 329,454 3.6% 325,454 98.8% Kmart(8) Kohl's Supermarket (A&P) ---------- --------- ----- --------- ----- Total.................. 10,750,833 9,212,891 100.0% 8,564,170 93.0% ========== ========= ===== ========= ===== - ------------------------- (1) Anchor-owned store (2) 50% general partner interest (3) Represents year opened or acquired/year of latest renovation or expansion by either the Company or the former Ramco Group, as applicable. (4) Wal-Mart currently is not occupying its leased premises in this shopping center but remains obligated to pay under the terms of the respective lease agreement. (5) Tenant closed -- lease obligated (6) Final phase of development (7) 25% joint interest (8) Builder's Square leases which are guaranteed by Kmart 10 12 TENANT INFORMATION The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 1999, information regarding space leased to tenants which in each case, individually account for more than 2% of total annualized base rental revenue from the Company's properties. % OF % OF TOTAL TOTAL ANNUALIZED ANNUALIZED AGGREGATE COMPANY NUMBER OF BASE RENTAL BASE RENTAL GLA LEASED OWNED TENANT STORES REVENUE(1) REVENUE BY TENANT GLA ------ --------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Wal-Mart............................. 16 $6,239,653 10.24% 1,431,499 15.54% Kmart................................ 11 3,701,253 6.08% 1,017,543 11.04% A&P/Farmer Jack...................... 5 2,292,051 3.76% 246,141 2.67% OfficeMax............................ 9 2,277,717 3.74% 208,811 2.27% Circuit City......................... 3 1,418,639 2.33% 100,439 1.09% - ------------------------- (1) Annualized Base Rental Revenue is December 1999 base rental revenue multiplied by 12. Approximately 605,000 square feet of GLA at eight of the Southeast Portfolio shopping centers is leased to Wal-Mart, but not currently occupied by Wal-Mart, although Wal-Mart remains obligated under the respective lease agreements. Wal-Mart has entered into various subleases, with sub-tenants currently occupying approximately 428,000 square feet of GLA. In July 1997 Montgomery Wards ("Wards"), a tenant at three of the Company's properties, Tel-Twelve Mall, Clinton Valley Mall and Shoppes of Lakeland, filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Company was notified in March 1998 that Wards rejected the lease at the Company's Clinton Valley Mall. This location consists of a 101,200 square foot department store and a 7,480 square foot TBA store (Tires, Batteries and Automotive). On an annual basis, Wards paid approximately $1,000,000 in base rent and operating and real estate tax expense reimbursement for the Clinton Valley Mall. The Company is pursuing replacement tenants to lease the space and has currently leased 33,000 square feet of the former department store. The Company is expected to lease the balance of the space during 2000. The following table sets forth the total GLA leased to anchors, retail tenants, and available space, in the aggregate, of the Company's properties as of December 31, 1999: ANNUALIZED % OF ANNUALIZED AGGREGATE % OF TOTAL BASE RENTAL BASE RENTAL GLA LEASED COMPANY TYPE OF TENANT REVENUE(1) REVENUE BY TENANT OWNED GLA -------------- ----------- --------------- ---------- ---------- Anchor.................................... $32,229,593 52.9% 5,846,512 63.5% Retail (non-anchor)....................... 28,680,794 47.1% 2,717,658 29.5% Available................................. -- -- 648,721 7.0% ----------- ----- ---------- ----- Total........................... $60,910,387 100.0% 9,212,891 100.0% =========== ===== ========== ===== - ------------------------- (1) Annualized Base Rental Revenue is December 1999 base rental revenue multiplied by 12. 11 13 The following table sets forth as of December 31, 1999, the total GLA leased to national, regional and local tenants, in the aggregate, of the Company's properties. ANNUALIZED % OF ANNUALIZED AGGREGATE % OF TOTAL BASE RENTAL BASE RENTAL GLA LEASED COMPANY TYPE OF TENANT REVENUE(1) REVENUE BY TENANT OWNED GLA -------------- ----------- --------------- ---------- ---------- National.................................. $43,996,607 72.2% 6,830,841 79.8% Local..................................... 13,112,504 21.5% 1,224,746 14.3% Regional.................................. 3,801,276 6.3% 508,584 5.9% ----------- ----- ---------- ----- Total........................... $60,910,387 100.0% 8,564,170 100.0% =========== ===== ========== ===== - ------------------------- (1) Annualized Base Rental Revenue is December 1999 base rental revenue multiplied by 12. The following table sets forth lease expirations for the next five years at the Company's properties assuming that no renewal options are exercised. % OF ANNUALIZED % OF TOTAL AVERAGE BASE ANNUALIZED BASE RENTAL LEASED COMPANY RENTAL REVENUE BASE RENTAL REVENUE AS OF COMPANY OWNED GLA NO. OF PER SQ. FT. AS OF REVENUE AS OF 12/31/99 OWNED GLA REPRESENTED LEASE LEASES 12/31/99 UNDER 12/31/99 UNDER REPRESENTED BY EXPIRING BY EXPIRING EXPIRATION EXPIRING EXPIRING LEASES EXPIRING LEASES(1) EXPIRING LEASES (IN SQUARE FEET) LEASES - ---------- -------- ----------------- ------------------ --------------- ---------------- ----------- 2000................. 180 $9.06 $5,174,135 8.5% 571,278 6.2% 2001................. 129 $7.43 $4,053,299 6.7% 545,812 6.4% 2002................. 148 $9.55 $5,361,041 8.8% 561,603 6.6% 2003................. 129 $9.04 $5,405,936 8.9% 597,951 7.0% 2004................. 109 $7.00 $5,662,795 9.3% 808,633 9.4% - ------------------------- (1) Annualized Base Rental Revenue is December 1999 base rental revenue multiplied by 12. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS There are no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business against or involving the Company or its properties. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS During the fourth quarter of 1999, no matters were submitted for a vote of stockholders of the Company. 12 14 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS MARKET INFORMATION -- The Company's Common Shares have been listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "RPT" since May 13, 1996. The Common Shares were previously listed on the NYSE under the name of RPS Realty Trust, symbol "RPS", from December 28, 1988 until May 10, 1996. The following table shows high and low closing prices per share for each quarter in 1998 and 1999. SHARE PRICE ----------------- QUARTER ENDED HIGH LOW ------------- ---- --- March 31, 1998............................................. $21.250 $19.500 June 30, 1998.............................................. 21.625 19.000 September 30, 1998......................................... 19.000 16.125 December 31, 1998.......................................... 16.375 14.500 March 31, 1999............................................. 16.313 14.438 June 30, 1999.............................................. 16.875 15.312 September 30, 1999......................................... 16.625 14.500 December 31, 1999.......................................... 14.875 11.875 HOLDERS -- The number of holders of record of the Company's Common Shares was 2,370 as of March 15, 2000. DIVIDENDS -- Under the Code, a REIT must meet certain requirements, including a requirement that it distribute annually to its shareholders at least 95 percent of its taxable income. Dividend distributions per common share for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, are summarized as follows. The Company declared the following cash distributions per share to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 1998. DIVIDEND RECORD DATE DISTRIBUTION PAYMENT DATE ----------- ------------ ------------ March 31, 1998................................... $.42 April 21, 1998 June 30, 1998.................................... $.42 July 21, 1998 September 30, 1998............................... $.42 October 20, 1998 December 31, 1998................................ $.42 January 19, 1999 The Company declared the following cash distributions per share to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 1999: DIVIDEND RECORD DATE DISTRIBUTION PAYMENT DATE ----------- ------------ ------------ March 31, 1999................................... $.42 April 20, 1999 June 30, 1999.................................... $.42 July 20, 1999 September 30, 1999............................... $.42 October 19, 1999 December 31, 1999................................ $.42 January 18, 2000 Distributions paid by the Company are at the discretion of the Board of Trustees and will depend on a number of factors, including cash flow of the Company, its financial condition and capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements necessary to maintain its status as a REIT under the Code, and such other factors as the Board of Trustees deems relevant. The Company has a Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the "DRP Plan") which allows shareholders to acquire additional Common Shares by automatically reinvesting cash dividends. Shares are acquired pursuant to the DRP Plan at a price equal to the prevailing market price of such Shares, without payment of any 13 15 brokerage commission or service charge. Shareholders who do not participate in the Plan continue to receive cash distributions, as declared. The Company has issued an aggregate of 1,400,000 Series A Preferred Shares to certain clients advised by Morgan Stanley Asset Management, Inc. ("MSAM") and Kimco Realty Corporation ("Kimco"). The Preferred Units were sold pursuant to a Preferred Units and Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of September 30, 1997 among the Company, the Operating Partnership, certain clients advised by MSAM and Special Situations RG REIT, Inc. (the entity the investors used to effect their investment). The Preferred Units were sold for an aggregate consideration of $35,000,000 or $25.00 per Preferred Unit. The sale and issuance of the Preferred Units and Series A Preferred Shares was not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), in reliance upon Section 4 (2) of the Securities Act. The purchasers of the Preferred Units and the Series A Preferred Shares were limited to six institutional investors consisting of insurance companies, pension funds and other sophisticated institutional investors each of whom made representations to the Company and the Operating Partnership with respect to its intention to purchase the securities for investment only, and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution. Each investor also represented to the Company and the Operating Partnership that such investor was sophisticated and was able to bear the economic risk of its investment in the Operating Partnership and the Company. No underwriter was involved in the transaction and there were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid in connection therewith. Under certain circumstances, the Series A Preferred Shares are convertible into Common Shares. Each Series A Preferred Share may be converted into Common Shares at the Stated Value (equal to $25.00) plus any unpaid dividends, if any, for each Series A Preferred Share so converted, for Common Shares issued on conversion priced at $17.50 per Common Share, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances to prevent the dilution of the Series A Preferred Shares, including certain issues of Common Shares by the Company at prices less than $17.50. 14 16 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA AND NUMBER OF PROPERTIES) The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data for the Company and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 1996(1) 1995 ---- ---- ---- ------- ---- OPERATING DATA: Revenues: Rental revenues......................... $ 83,302 $ 75,997 $ 58,492 $ 37,598 $ 8,936 Gain on sales of real estate............ 974 -- -- -- -- Interest and other income............... 997 758 752 2,915 7,781 -------- -------- --------- -------- -------- Total Revenues..................... 85,273 76,755 59,244 40,513 16,717 -------- -------- --------- -------- -------- Expenses: Real estate taxes....................... 7,810 7,354 6,230 4,643 1,271 Recoverable operating expenses.......... 14,391 12,763 11,462 8,230 1,934 Depreciation and amortization........... 13,311 12,189 8,216 4,798 1,214 Other operating......................... 1,418 1,092 1,130 910 210 General and administrative.............. 5,964 5,548 4,597 4,564 4,100 Interest expense........................ 25,421 25,396 14,753 6,725 -- Spin-off and other expenses............. -- -- -- 7,976 -- Allowance for loan losses............... -- -- -- -- 4,450 -------- -------- --------- -------- -------- Total Expenses..................... 68,315 64,342 46,388 37,846 13,179 -------- -------- --------- -------- -------- Operating Income............................. 16,958 12,413 12,856 2,667 3,538 Loss From Unconsolidated Entities............ 204 304 314 216 -- -------- -------- --------- -------- -------- Income Before Minority Interest.............. 16,754 12,109 12,542 2,451 3,538 Minority Interest............................ 4,915 3,451 3,344 2,159 -- -------- -------- --------- -------- -------- Net Income......................... $ 11,839 $ 8,658 $ 9,198 $ 292 $ 3,538 ======== ======== ========= ======== ======== Net Income Available to Common Shareholders............................... $ 8,432 $ 7,044 $ 8,920 $ 292 $ 3,538 ======== ======== ========= ======== ======== Earnings Per Common Share: Basic...................................... $1.17 $0.99 $1.25 $0.04 $0.50 ======== ======== ========= ======== ======== Diluted.................................... $1.17 $0.98 $1.25 $0.04 $0.50 ======== ======== ========= ======== ======== Weighted Average Shares Outstanding Basic...................................... 7,218 7,133 7,123 7,123 7,123 ======== ======== ========= ======== ======== Diluted.................................... 7,218 7,165 7,148 7,123 7,123 ======== ======== ========= ======== ======== OTHER DATA: Funds from Operations -- Basic(2).......... $ 25,461 $ 22,716 $ 20,500 $ 15,225 $ -- Cash flow provided by (used in): Operating activities.................... 23,954 16,794 17,026 15,495 2,335 Investing activities.................... (10,703) (38,280) (153,183) 18,976 (56,335) Financing activities.................... (12,057) 21,003 137,649 (42,397) (9,117) Number of Properties at Year End........... 54 54 50 32 8 Company Owned GLA.......................... 9,213 9,029 8,372 5,297 1,189 Cash Distributions Declared Per Share...... $1.68 $1.68 $1.68 $1.44 $1.28 15 17 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 1996(1) 1995 ---- ---- ---- ------- ---- BALANCE SHEET DATA: Cash and cash equivalents.................. $ 5,744 $ 4,550 $ 5,033 $ 3,541 $ 11,467 REMIC Investments.......................... -- -- -- -- 58,099 Interest and accounts receivable........... 12,791 9,864 6,035 3,901 7,748 Mortgage loans receivable -- net........... -- -- -- -- 36,023 Investment in real estate (before accumulated depreciation)............... 542,955 535,980 473,213 314,854 58,046 Total Assets............................... 550,506 544,404 484,682 323,627 180,581 Mortgages and Notes Payable................ 337,552 328,248 295,618 143,410 -- Total Liabilities.......................... 358,662 348,727 314,436 159,056 3,561 Minority Interest.......................... 48,396 48,535 42,282 44,706 -- Shareholders' Equity....................... 143,448 147,142 127,964 119,865 177,020 - ------------------------- (1) Effective May 1, 1996, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the shopping center and retail properties, as well as the management organization and business operations of Ramco and its affiliates and the spin-off of its wholly owned subsidiary, Atlantic Realty Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust. In connection with the Ramco Acquisition, the Company's name was changed to Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust and a one-for-four reverse stock split was effectuated as of the close of business on May 1, 1996. (2) Management generally considers Funds From Operations ("FFO") to be one measure of financial performance of an equity REIT. The Company has adopted the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") definition of FFO, which was effective on January 1, 1996. Under the definition, FFO represents income (loss) before minority interest (computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP")), excluding gains (losses) from debt restructuring and sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of financing costs), and after adjustment for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Therefore, FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of the Company's performance or to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity or the ability to pay distributions. Furthermore, while net income and cash generated from operating, investing and financing activities, determined in accordance with GAAP, consider capital expenditures which have been and will be incurred in the future, the calculations of FFO does not. For periods beginning after December 31, 1999, NAREIT has clarified its definition that FFO should include both recurring and non-recurring operating results, except for those items defined as "extraordinary items" under generally accepted accounting principles. This clarification is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's FFO. 16 18 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust's (the "Company") Consolidated Financial Statements, the notes thereto, and the comparative summary of selected financial data appearing elsewhere in this report. Dollars are in thousands, except per Share and per Unit amounts. Certain information included in the following section of this report, other than historical information may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements are identified by terminology such as "may," "will," "believe," "expect," "estimate," "anticipate," "continue" or similar terms. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. OVERVIEW The results of operations depends primarily upon rental income. The Company's future success is dependent in part by its ability to maintain occupancy and increase rental rates. OCCUPANCY -- Occupancy remained stable for the Company's overall portfolio with a breakdown by asset category as follows: 1999 1998 ---- ---- Enclosed regional malls..................................... 89.8% 96.1% Power centers............................................... 97.0 98.8 Community centers........................................... 92.6 91.6 Single tenant retail properties............................. 100.0 100.0 Portfolio summary........................................... 93.0% 93.1% ===== ===== AVERAGE BASE RENTS -- Average base rents for the four portfolio categories at December 31: PERCENTAGE 1999 1998 INCREASE ---- ---- ---------- Enclosed regional malls............................. $8.11 $7.52 7.8% Power centers....................................... 8.43 8.24 2.3 Community centers................................... 6.81 6.64 2.6 Single tenant retail properties..................... 4.41 3.71 18.9 Portfolio summary................................... $7.11 $6.88 3.3% ===== ===== ==== LEASE RENEWALS -- The Company achieved the following in base rent for leases that were renewed during 1999: PER SQUARE PER SQUARE PERCENTAGE FOOT RENT FOOT RENT INCREASE PRIOR LEASE NEW LEASE (DECREASE) GLA ----------- ---------- ---------- --- Enclosed regional malls............... $12.03 $11.86 (1.4)% 10,130 Power centers......................... 14.83 17.36 17.1 3,225 Community centers..................... 8.71 9.43 8.3 166,191 17 19 NEW LEASES -- For new leases entered into during 1999, the Company achieved the following increases in base rent: PER PER SQUARE SQUARE FOOT RENT FOOT RENT PERCENTAGE PORTFOLIO AVERAGE NEW LEASE INCREASE GLA ----------------- --------- ---------- --- Anchor........................... $ 5.51 $ 6.02 9.3% 901,778 Non-anchor....................... 10.55 11.93 13.1 171,077 PER PER SQUARE SQUARE PERCENTAGE FOOT RENT FOOT RENT INCREASE PORTFOLIO AVERAGE NEW LEASE (DECREASE) GLA ----------------- --------- ---------- --- Enclosed regional malls.......... $8.11 $14.84 83.0% 22,052 Power centers.................... 8.43 5.36 (36.4) 411,592 Community centers................ 6.81 7.72 13.4 639,211 New leases for power centers includes 2 land leases that if excluded from the calculation, would have resulted in $12.46 per square foot rent for new leases entered into during 1999, or 47.8% increase. RESULT OF OPERATIONS (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 1999 to Year Ended December 31, 1998 Total revenue increased 11.1% or $8,518 to $85,273 for the year ended December 31, 1999, as compared to $76,755 for the year ended December 31, 1998. Of this increase, minimum rents increased by $4,920, or 9.0%, to $59,779 in 1999 from $54,859 in 1998. Recoveries from tenants increased $1,886 or 9.6% to $21,486 for the year ended December 31, 1999, compared to $19,600 for the year ended December 31, 1998. Approximately $2,975 of the increase in minimum rents resulted from a full year of operations in 1999 for the four properties acquired during 1998. The completion of White Lake MarketPlace development during 1999 contributed $743 to the increase in minimum rents. In addition, $522 of the increase in minimum rents is related to buildable sites delivered to two anchor tenants at the Auburn Mile development during 1999. The balance of the increase in minimum rents is primarily attributable to five redevelopment projects completed during 1999. The increase in recoveries from tenants is primarily due to a higher level of recoverable operating expenses and real estate taxes due to a full year of operations for the 1998 property acquisitions. The overall recovery ratio decreased to 96.8% in 1999 from 97.4% in 1998. The decrease is attributable to lower recovery ratios for the 1998 acquisition properties, of approximately 71%, when compared to the existing core portfolio (shopping center properties owned as of January 1, 1998). As the leases expire at these properties, the Company expects that new lease agreements will allow recovery ratios to increase. Gain on sales of real estate resulted from the sale of two properties, Trinity Corners and a single tenant retail Toys 'R' Us, in December 1999. Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 1999 increased 6.2%, or $3,973 to $68,315 as compared to $64,342 for the year ended December 31, 1998. The increase was due to a $2,084 increase in operating expenses, including recoverable operating expenses and real estate taxes, a $1,122 increase in depreciation and amortization, a $416 increase in general and administrative expenses, a $326 increase in other operating expenses and a $25 increase in interest expense. The increase in recoverable expenses, including recoverable operating expenses and real estate taxes, is primarily attributable to the four acquisitions made during 1998. Depreciation and amortization increased in 1999 by $1,122, or 9.2% to $13,311 from $12,189 in 1998. The increase resulted primarily from depreciation and amortization of the shopping centers acquired in 1998, the completion of White Lake MarketPlace and the redevelopment projects during 1999. 18 20 General and administrative expenses were $5,964 in 1999 as compared to $5,548 in 1998, an increase of $416, or 7.5%. The increase is attributable to the growth of the Company and the full year effect of increased full-time employees hired during the last half of 1998. General and administrative expenses were reduced by a $251 gain on sale of real estate recognized by one of the Company's unconsolidated entities in 1999, which reduced the Company's reimbursement obligation. Loss from unconsolidated entities decreased from $304 in 1998 to $204 in 1999 and is due in part to the impact of the RPT/Invest L.L.C. joint venture included for part of 1999. Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 1998 to Year Ended December 31, 1997 The Company increased its portfolio of shopping centers from 50 properties with 8,385 square feet of Company owned gross leaseable area ("GLA") at December 31, 1997 to 54 properties with 9,029 square feet at December 31, 1998 through the acquisition of four properties totaling 644 square feet of GLA. Total revenue increased 29.6% or $17,511, to $76,755 for the year ended December 31, 1998, as compared to $59,244 for the year ended December 31, 1997. Of this increase, minimum rents increased by $15,824, or 40.5%, to $54,859 in 1998 from $39,035 in 1997. Recoveries from tenants increased $1,610 or 9.0% to $19,600 for the year ended December 31, 1998, compared to $17,990 for the year ended December 31, 1997. Approximately $13,200 of the increase in minimum rents resulted from a full year of operations in 1998 for the 1997 property acquisitions. The four shopping centers acquired in 1998 contributed $1,533 to minimum rents. In addition, $548 of the increase in minimum rents is related to buildable sites delivered to two anchor tenants at the White Lake MarketPlace development during 1998. The balance of the increase in minimum rents is primarily attributable to initial anchor tenant openings at New Towne Plaza and the repositioning of West Oaks I, resulting in the opening of three new tenant stores. The increase in recoveries from tenants is primarily due to a higher level of recoverable operating expenses and real estate taxes due to a full year of operations for the 1997 property acquisitions. The overall recovery ratio decreased to 97.4% in 1998 from 101.7% in 1997. The decrease is attributable to lower recovery ratios for the Southeast Portfolio properties, approximately 84%, when compared to the existing core portfolio (shopping center properties owned as of January 1, 1997). As the Southeast Portfolio leases expire, the Company expects that new lease agreements will allow recovery ratios to increase to levels similar to the Company's normal recovery ratio of approximately 99%. Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 1998 increased 38.7%, or $17,954 as compared to $46,388 for the year ended December 31, 1997. The increase was due to a $2,425 increase in operating expenses, including recoverable operating expenses and real estate taxes, a $3,973 increase in depreciation and amortization, a $951 increase in general and administrative expenses, and a $10,643 increase in interest expense, offset in part, by a $38 decrease in other operating expenses. The increase in recoverable expenses, including recoverable operating expenses and real estate taxes, are primarily attributable to the acquisition of the Southeast Portfolio and the other acquisitions in 1997 and the four acquisitions made during 1998. Depreciation and amortization increased in 1998 by $3,973, or 48.4% to $12,189 from $8,216 in 1997. The increase resulted primarily from depreciation and amortization of the shopping centers acquired in 1997 and 1998. General and administrative expenses were $5,548 in 1998 as compared to $4,597 in 1997, an increase of $951, or 20.7%. The increase is attributable to the growth of the Company related to the 1997 and 1998 acquisitions and developments, and the full year effect of increased full-time employees hired during the fourth quarter of 1997. However, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue decreased from 7.8% in 1997 to 7.2% in 1998. Interest expense increased in 1998 by $10,643, or 72.1%, to $25,396 as compared to $14,753 in 1997. Approximately $6,900 of the increase in interest expense resulted from a full year of expense in 1998 for debt incurred for the Southeast Portfolio acquisition in 1997. In addition, $580 of the 1998 increase is attributable 19 21 to a mortgage loan that was closed on in December 1997. The increase in borrowings under the Company's $110,000 Credit Facility during 1998 resulted in additional interest expense of approximately $2,605. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES The Company generated $23,954 in cash flows from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 1999 and used $43,178 to fund two new development properties and the expansion and major redevelopment of existing projects at individual centers. During the year ended December 31, 1999, financing activities provided $21,771 from borrowings on two construction loans; used $3,179 to pay regularly scheduled principal repayments on mortgage obligations; reduced borrowings on the Credit Facility by $9,288 and paid $20,606 for cash distributions to common shareholders, holders of operating partnership units, and dividend payments to preferred shareholders. In August 1999, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with an affiliate of Investcorp International, Inc. to create RPT/Invest. At the formation of the joint venture, the Company sold two properties to RPT/Invest and received $27,851. The sale of the two properties resulted in a gain of approximately $722, which has been deferred and included in the equity investment of the unconsolidated entity. The proceeds from the sale were used to reduce the Credit Facility by $25,100 and for general corporate purposes. The Company's mortgages and notes payable amounted to $337,552 at December 31, 1999, with a weighted average interest rate of 8.03%. The debt consists of nine loans secured by various properties, plus two construction loans, one unsecured term loan and the Credit Facility, as defined below. Eight of the mortgage loans amounting to $169,192 have maturities ranging from 2000 to 2008, monthly payments which include regularly scheduled amortization, and have fixed interest rates ranging between 6.83% to 8.50%. One of the mortgage loans, evidenced by tax free bonds, amounting to $7,000 secured by Oak Brook Square Shopping Center is non-amortizing, matures in 2010, and carries a floating interest rate equal to 75% of the new issue long term Capital A rated utility bonds, plus interest to the lender sufficient to cause the lender's overall yield on its investment in the bonds to be equal to 200 basis points over their applicable LIBOR rate (6.96% at December 31, 1999). The Company has a $18.5 million construction loan to finance the Auburn Mile shopping center development located in Auburn Hills, Michigan. The loan carries an interest rate of 250 basis points over LIBOR, an effective rate of 8.67% at December 31, 1999, and matures December 2000. At the Company's option, the loan can then be converted to a 2-year term loan. Approximately $15.8 million has been borrowed at December 31, 1999. The Company has a $14 million construction loan to finance the White Lake MarketPlace shopping center development. The loan carries an interest rate of 185 basis points over LIBOR, an effective rate of 8.0% at December 31, 1999 and matures June 2000. At the Company's option, the loan can then be converted to a 2-year term loan. Approximately $11.9 million has been borrowed at December 31, 1999. It is the Company's intention to exercise its option to convert the above-mentioned construction loans to two year term loans. The Company has an unsecured term loan amounting to $45,000, maturing October 2000. This term loan bears interest between 250 and 275 basis points over LIBOR, depending on certain debt ratios (10.0% at December 31, 1999). The Company currently has a $110,000 Credit Facility, of which $88,700 was outstanding as of December 31, 1999. This credit facility bears interest between 137.5 and 162.5 basis points over LIBOR depending on certain debt ratios (effective rate of 7.60% interest rate at December 31, 1999) and matures October 2000. The credit facility is secured by mortgages on various properties and contains financial covenants relating to liabilities-to-asset ratio, minimum operating coverage ratios and a minimum equity value. As of December 31, 1999 the Company was in compliance with the covenant terms. 20 22 It is the Company's intention to extend the Credit Facility, at rates that are commercially reasonable. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to repay or refinance its indebtedness on commercially reasonable or any other terms. During August 1998, the Company executed an interest rate swap agreement to limit the Company's exposure to increases in interest rates on its floating rate debt. The notional amount of the agreement was $75,000. Based on rates currently in effect under the Company's Credit Facility, the agreement provides for a fixed rate of 7.425% through October 2000. The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other parties to the interest rate swap agreement, however, the Company does not anticipate non-performance by the counter party. After taking into account the impact of converting the variable rate debt into fixed rate debt by use of the rate protection agreement, the Company's variable rate debt accounted for $93,360 of outstanding debt with a weighted average interest rate of 9.1%. Variable rate debt accounted for approximately 27.7% of the Company's total debt and 19.0% of its total capitalization. Based on the debt and the market value of equity, the Company's debt to total market capitalization (debt plus market value equity) ratio was 68.7% at December 31, 1999. The properties in which the Operating Partnership owns an interest and are accounted for on the equity method of accounting are subject to non-recourse mortgage indebtedness. At December 31, 1999, the pro rata share of non-recourse mortgage debt on the unconsolidated properties (accounted for on the equity method) was $11,617 with a weighted average interest rate of 8.7%. The Company's current capital structure includes property specific mortgages, two construction loans, the unsecured term loan, the Credit Facility, Series A Preferred Shares, Common Shares and a minority interest in the Operating Partnership. Currently, the minority interest in the Operating Partnership represents the 29.0% ownership in the Operating Partnership which may, under certain conditions, be exchanged for 2,944,977 Common Shares. As of December 31, 1999, OP Units issued are exchangeable for Common Shares of the Company on a one-for-one basis. The Company, as sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, has the option to exchange OP Units for cash based on the current trading price of the Company's Common Shares. Assuming the exchange of all limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership and the exchange of Series A Preferred Shares for 2,000,000 shares of common stock, there would be outstanding 12,162,970 common shares with a market value of approximately $153,497 at December 31, 1999 (based on the closing price of $12.62 per share on December 31, 1999). The principal uses of the Company's liquidity and capital resources are for acquisitions, development, including expansion and renovation programs, debt repayment and repurchase of its common stock. To maintain its qualification as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), the Company is required to distribute to its shareholders at least 95% of its "Real Estate Investment Trust Taxable Income" as defined in the Code. The Company anticipates that the combination of the availability under the Credit Facility, construction loans, the sale of existing properties, and potential new debt and equity offerings will provide the necessary capital to achieve continued growth. The Company anticipates adequate liquidity for the foreseeable future to fund future acquisitions, developments, expansions, repositionings, and to continue its currently planned capital programs, to repurchase up to $10 million of the Company's common stock and to make distributions to its shareholders in accordance with the Code's requirements applicable to REITs'. Although the Company believes that the combination of factors discussed above will provide sufficient liquidity, no such assurance can be given. ECONOMIC CONDITIONS Substantially all of the leases at the Company's properties provide for tenants to pay their pro rata share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance and real estate taxes, thereby reducing the 21 23 Company's exposure to increases in operating expenses resulting from inflation. Many of the tenants' leases contain provisions designed to lessen the impact of inflation. Such provisions include the ability to receive percentage rentals based on a tenant's gross sales, which generally increase as prices rise, and or escalation clauses, which generally increase rental rates during the terms of the leases. In addition, many of the leases are for terms of less than ten years, which may enable the Operating Partnership to replace existing leases with new leases at a higher base and/or percentage rentals if rents of the existing leases are below the then existing market rate. The retail industry has experienced some financial difficulties during the past few years and certain local, regional and national retailers have filed for protection under bankruptcy laws. If this trend should continue, the Company's future earnings performance could be negatively impacted. SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS The Company has exposure to interest rate risk on its debt obligations. Based on the Company's interest in debt and interest rates in effect at December 31, 1999, a one percent increase in interest rates would decrease earnings and cash flows by approximately $781. A one percent decrease in interest rates would increase earnings and cash flows by approximately $1,086. YEAR 2000 Prior to December 31, 1999, the Company successfully completed its Year 2000 assessment of all critical and non-critical information systems. The Year 2000 issue did not adversely affect normal business operations and there was no material failure of the Company's business operations subsequent to December 31, 1999. The costs associated with Year 2000 testing and remediation have not had a material impact on the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 1999. FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS Management generally considers funds from operations ("FFO") to be one measure of financial performance of an equity REIT. It has been presented to assist investors in analyzing the performance of the Company and to provide a relevant basis for comparison to other REITs. The Company has adopted the most recent National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") definition of FFO, which was effective on January 1, 1996. Under the NAREIT definition, FFO represents income (loss) before minority interest (computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles), excluding gains (losses) from debt restructuring and sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of financing costs), and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Therefore, FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of the Company's performance or to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity or of the ability to pay distributions. Furthermore, while net income and cash generated from operating, investing and financing activities determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consider capital expenditures which have been and will be incurred in the future, the calculation of FFO does not. For periods beginning after December 31, 1999, NAREIT has clarified its definition that FFO should include both recurring and non-recurring operating results, except for those items defined as "extraordinary items" under generally accepted accounting principles. This clarification is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's FFO 22 24 The following table illustrates the calculation of FFO for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998: ACTUAL ----------------- 1999 1998 ---- ---- Net Income.................................................. $11,839 $ 8,658 Less: Gain on sale of property(1)......................... (1,225) -- Add: Depreciation and amortization........................ 13,339 12,221 Add: Minority interest in partnership..................... 4,915 3,451 ------- ------- Funds from operations -- diluted............................ 28,868 24,330 Less: Preferred share dividends........................... (3,407) (1,614) ------- ------- Funds from operations -- basic.............................. $25,461 $22,716 ======= ======= Weighted average equivalent shares outstanding(2)........... Basic..................................................... 10,170 9,991 ======= ======= Diluted................................................... 12,170 10,967 ======= ======= Supplemental disclosure: Straight-line rental income............................... $ 2,705 $ 2,159 ======= ======= Amortization of management contracts and covenants not to compete................................................ $ 422 $ 494 ======= ======= - ------------------------- (1) Includes $251 gain on sale of property of an unconsolidated entity. (2) For basic, represents the weighted average total shares outstanding, assuming the redemption of all Operating Partnership Units for Common Shares. For diluted, represents the weighted average total shares outstanding, assuming the redemption of all Operating Partnership Units for Common Shares, the Series A Preferred Shares converted to Common Shares and the Common Shares issuable under the treasury stock method upon exercise of stock options. CAPITAL EXPENDITURES During 1999, the Company spent approximately $15,678 on revenue generating capital expenditures including tenant allowances, leasing commissions paid to third-party brokers, legal costs relative to lease documents, and capitalized leasing and construction costs. These types of costs generate a return through rents from tenants over the term of their leases. Revenue enhancing capital expenditures, including expansions, renovations or repositionings were approximately $14,144. Revenue neutral capital expenditures, such as roof and parking lot repairs, which are anticipated to be recovered from tenants, amounted to approximately $7,453. IMPACT OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities. It requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. This Statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 133 as required for its first quarterly filing of fiscal year 2001. On December 3, 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, "Revenue Recognition", which among other topics, establishes standards for when the lessor can recognize contingent rental income that is based on future specified targets within the lessor's fiscal year. The SAB concluded that contingent revenue should be recorded in the period in which the specified target that results in contingent rental income is achieved. The Company's policy has been to recognize percentage rents throughout the year based on rent estimated to be due from the tenant. The Company will adopt this 23 25 change in the method of accounting as of January 1, 2000 and report the change of $1,193 of contingent rent receivables as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements with respect to the operation of certain of the Company's properties. Management of the Company believes the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements made in this document are based on reasonable assumptions. Certain factors could occur that might cause actual results to vary. These include general economic conditions, the strength of key industries in the cities in which the Company's properties are located, the performance of the Company's tenants at the Company's properties and elsewhere, and other factors discussed in the Company's report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. See pages F-1 to F-19, which are included herein. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. 24 26 PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT Incorporated herein by reference to Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K with respect to its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 7, 2000. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Incorporated herein by reference to Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K with respect to its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 7, 2000. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT Incorporated herein by reference to Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K with respect to its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 7, 2000. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS. Incorporated herein by reference to Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K with respect to its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 7, 2000. 25 27 PART IV ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES AND EXHIBITS (A)(1) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS See pages F-1 to F-19, which are included herein. (A)(3) EXHIBITS 3.1 Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of the Company, dated October 2, 1997, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997. 3.2 Articles Supplementary to Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated October 2, 1997, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997. 3.3 By-Laws of the Company adopted October 2, 1997, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997. 3.4 Rights Agreement dated as of December 6, 1989 between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A, File No. 1-10093, for the registration of Share Purchase Rights. 10.1 1996 Share Option Plan of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1996. 10.2 Employment Agreement, dated as of May 10, 1996, between the Company and Joel Gershenson, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1996. 10.3 Employment Agreement, dated as of May 10, 1996, between the Company and Dennis Gershenson, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1996. 10.4 Employment Agreement, dated as of May 10, 1996, between the Company and Michael A. Ward, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1996. 10.5 Employment Agreement, dated as of May 10, 1996, between the Company and Richard Gershenson, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1996. 10.6 Employment Agreement, dated as of May 10, 1996, between the Company and Bruce Gershenson, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1996. 10.7 Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of May 10, 1996, between Joel Gershenson and the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1996. 10.8 Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of May 10, 1996, between Dennis Gershenson and the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1996. 10.9 Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of May 10, 1996, between Michael A. Ward and the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1996. 26 28 10.10 Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of May 10, 1996, between Richard Gershenson and the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1996. 10.11 Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of May 10, 1996, between Bruce Gershenson and the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1996. 10.12 Letter Agreement, dated April 15, 1996, among the Company and Richard Smith concerning Mr. Smith's employment by the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1996. 10.13 Preferred Units and Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of September 30, 1997 by and among the Company, Special Situations RG REIT, Inc. and the Advancing Party named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997. 10.14 Agreement Regarding Exercise of Registration Rights dated as of September 30, 1997 among the Company, the Ramco Principals (as defined therein), the Other Holders (as defined therein), Special Situations RG REIT, Inc., and the Advancing Party, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997. 10.15 Registration Rights Agreement dated as of September 30, 1997 by and among the Company, Special Situation RG REIT, Inc., and the Advancing Party named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997. 10.16 Second Amended and Restated Master Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of October 30, 1997 among Ramco-Gershenson Properties, L.P., as Borrower, the Company, as Guarantor, and BankBoston, N.A., and the other Banks which may become parties to the loan agreement, and BankBoston, N.A., as Agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997. 10.17 Second Amended and Restated Note dated October 30, 1997 in the principal amount of $160,000,000 made by Ramco-Gershenson Properties, L.P. in favor of BankBoston, N.A., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997. 10.18 Amended and Restated Unconditional Guaranty of Payment and Performance dated as of October 30, 1997 by the Company in favor of BankBoston, N.A., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997. 10.19 Unsecured Term Loan Agreement dated as of October 30, 1997 among Ramco-Gershenson Properties, L.P., as Borrower, the Company, as Guarantor, BankBoston,N.A., the other Banks which may become parties to the agreement, and BankBoston, N.A., as Agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997. 10.20 Note dated as of October 30, 1997 in the principal amount of $45,000,000 made by Ramco-Gershenson Properties, L.P., in favor of BankBoston, N.A., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997. 10.21 Unconditional Guaranty of Payment and Performance dated as of October 30, 1997 by the Company in favor of BankBoston, N.A., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997. 10.22 Form of Contract of Sale dated July 7, 1997 relating to the acquisition of the Southeast Portfolio (Form #1), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997. 27 29 10.23 Form of Contract of Sale dated July 7, 1997 relating to the acquisition of the Southeast Portfolio (Form #2), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997. 10.24 Form of Contract of Sale dated July 7, 1997 relating to the acquisition of the Southeast Portfolio (Form #3), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997. 10.25 Agreement dated July 7, 1997 by and between Seller (as defined therein) and Ramco-Gershenson Properties, L.P., which agreement amends certain Contracts of Sale relating to the acquisition of the Southeast Portfolio, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997. 10.26 Loan Agreement dated as of November 26, 1997 between Ramco Properties Associates Limited Partnership and Secore Financial Corporation relating to a $50,000,000 loan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997. 10.27 Promissory Note dated November 26, 1997 in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000,000 made by Ramco Properties Associates Limited Partnership in favor of Secore Financial Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997. 10.28 Loan Agreement dated December 17, 1997 by and between Ramco-Gershenson Properties, L.P. and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company relating to a $8,500,000 loan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997. 10.29 Note dated December 17, 1997 in the aggregate principal amount of $8,500,000 made by Ramco-Gershenson Properties, L.P. in favor of Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997. 10.30 1997 Non-Employee Trustee Stock Option Plan of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997. 10.31 Change of Venue Merger Agreement dated as of October 2, 1997 between the Company (formerly known as RGPT Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust), and Ramco- Gershenson Properties Trust, a Massachusetts business trust, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997. 10.32 Promissory Note dated as of February 27, 1998 in the principal face amount of $15,225,000 made by A.T.C., L.L.C. in favor of GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1998. 10.33 Deed of Trust and Security Agreement dated as of February 27, 1998 by A.T.C., L.L.C to Lawyers Title Insurance Company for the benefit of GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation relating to a $15,225,000 loan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1998. 10.34 Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated as of October 8, 1998 among A.T.C., L.L.C., Ramco Virginia Properties, L.L.C., A.T. Center, Inc., Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust and LaSalle National Bank, as trustee for the registered holders of GMAC Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1998. 10.35 Exchange Rights Agreement dated as of September 4, 1998 between Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust, and A.T.C., L.L.C., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1998. 28 30 10.36 Loan Agreement dated December 22, 1998 between Ramco-Gershenson Properties, L.P. and NBD Bank relating to a $14,000,000 loan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. 10.37 Construction Note dated as of December 22, 1998 in the principal face amount of $14,000,000 made by Ramco-Gershenson Properties, L.P. in favor of NBD Bank, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999. 10.38 Loan Agreement dated June 1, 1999 between Ramco-Gershenson Properties, L.P. and Bank One, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period ended June 30, 1999. 10.39 Limited Liability Company Agreement of RPT/INVEST L.L.C. dated August 23, 1999, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period ended September 30, 1999. 21.1 Subsidiaries 23.1 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. 29 31 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust Dated: March 22, 2000 By: /s/ JOEL D. GERSHENSON ------------------------------------------------ Joel D. Gershenson, Chairman Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Dated: March 22, 2000 By: /s/ JOEL D. GERSHENSON ---------------------------------------------------- Joel D. Gershenson, Trustee and Chairman Dated: March 22, 2000 By: /s/ DENNIS E. GERSHENSON ------------------------------------------------ Dennis E. Gershenson, Trustee and President (Principal Executive Officer) Dated: By: ---------------------------------------------------- Stephen R. Blank, Trustee Dated: March 22, 2000 By: /s/ ARTHUR H. GOLDBERG ---------------------------------------------------- Arthur H. Goldberg, Trustee Dated: March 22, 2000 By: /s/ ROBERT A. MEISTER ---------------------------------------------------- Robert A. Meister, Trustee Dated: March 22, 2000 By: /s/ JOEL M. PASHCOW ---------------------------------------------------- Joel M. Pashcow, Trustee Dated: March 22, 2000 By: /s/ MARK K. ROSENFELD ---------------------------------------------------- Mark K. Rosenfeld, Trustee Dated: March 22, 2000 By: /s/ SELWYN ISAKOW ---------------------------------------------------- Selwyn Isakow, Trustee Dated: March 22, 2000 By: /s/ RICHARD J. SMITH ---------------------------------------------------- Richard J. Smith, Chief Financial Officer 30 32 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Board of Trustees of Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP Detroit, Michigan February 11, 2000 F-1 33 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND 1998 1999 1998 ---- ---- (IN THOUSANDS) ASSETS Investment in real estate -- net............................ $507,463 $509,844 Cash and cash equivalents................................... 5,744 4,550 Accounts receivable -- net.................................. 12,791 9,864 Equity investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities.................................................. 7,642 5,896 Other assets -- net......................................... 16,866 14,250 -------- -------- Total Assets........................................... $550,506 $544,404 ======== ======== LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Mortgages and notes payable................................. $337,552 $328,248 Distributions payable....................................... 5,127 5,244 Accounts payable and accrued expenses....................... 15,983 15,235 -------- -------- Total Liabilities...................................... 358,662 348,727 Minority Interest........................................... 48,396 48,535 Commitments and Contingencies............................... -- -- SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Preferred Shares, par value $.01, 10,000 shares authorized; 1,400 Series A convertible shares issued and outstanding, liquidation values of $35,000......... 33,829 33,829 Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, par value, $.01, 30,000 shares authorized; 7,218 issued and outstanding............................................ 72 72 Additional paid-in capital................................ 151,973 151,973 Cumulative distributions in excess of net income.......... (42,426) (38,732) -------- -------- Total Shareholders' Equity.................................. 143,448 147,142 -------- -------- Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity............. $550,506 $544,404 ======== ======== See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-2 34 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997 1999 1998 1997 ---- ---- ---- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) REVENUES Minimum rents............................................. $59,779 $54,859 $39,035 Percentage rents.......................................... 2,037 1,538 1,467 Recoveries from tenants................................... 21,486 19,600 17,990 Gain on sale of real estate............................... 974 -- -- Interest and other income................................. 997 758 752 ------- ------- ------- Total revenues.................................... 85,273 76,755 59,244 ------- ------- ------- EXPENSES Real estate taxes......................................... 7,810 7,354 6,230 Recoverable operating expenses............................ 14,391 12,763 11,462 Depreciation and amortization............................. 13,311 12,189 8,216 Other operating........................................... 1,418 1,092 1,130 General and administrative................................ 5,964 5,548 4,597 Interest expense.......................................... 25,421 25,396 14,753 ------- ------- ------- Total expenses.................................... 68,315 64,342 46,388 ------- ------- ------- Operating income............................................ 16,958 12,413 12,856 Loss from unconsolidated entities........................... 204 304 314 ------- ------- ------- Income before minority interest............................. 16,754 12,109 12,542 Minority interest........................................... 4,915 3,451 3,344 ------- ------- ------- Net income.................................................. 11,839 8,658 9,198 Preferred stock dividends................................... 3,407 1,614 278 ------- ------- ------- Net income available to common shareholders................. $ 8,432 $ 7,044 $ 8,920 ======= ======= ======= Basic earnings per share.................................... $1.17 $0.99 $1.25 ======= ======= ======= Diluted earnings per share.................................. $1.17 $0.98 $1.25 ======= ======= ======= Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic..................................................... 7,218 7,133 7,123 ======= ======= ======= Diluted................................................... 7,218 7,165 7,148 ======= ======= ======= See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-3 35 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997 COMMON ADDITIONAL CUMULATIVE TOTAL PREFERRED STOCK PAID-IN EARNINGS/ SHAREHOLDERS' STOCK PAR VALUE CAPITAL DISTRIBUTION EQUITY --------- --------- ---------- ------------ ------------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS) BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 1997................. $ 712 $149,872 $(30,719) $119,865 Cash distributions declared............ (11,968) (11,968) Conversion to $.01 par value Common Shares.............................. (641) 641 -- Series A Preferred Shares issuance (467 Shares)............................. $11,147 11,147 Preferred Shares dividends declared.... (278) (278) Net Income............................. 9,198 9,198 ------- ----- -------- -------- -------- BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1997............... 11,147 71 150,513 (33,767) 127,964 Cash distributions declared............ (12,009) (12,009) Conversion of Operating Partnership Units to Common Shares (95 shares)............................. 1 1,450 1,451 Stock options exercised................ 10 10 Series A Preferred Shares issuance (933 Shares)............................. 22,682 22,682 Preferred Shares dividends declared.... (1,614) (1,614) Net Income............................. 8,658 8,658 ------- ----- -------- -------- -------- BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1998............... 33,829 72 151,973 (38,732) 147,142 Cash distributions declared............ (12,126) (12,126) Preferred Shares dividends declared.... (3,407) (3,407) Net Income............................. 11,839 11,839 ------- ----- -------- -------- -------- BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1999............... $33,829 $ 72 $151,973 $(42,426) $143,448 ======= ===== ======== ======== ======== See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-4 36 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997 1999 1998 1997 ---- ---- ---- (IN THOUSANDS) CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net Income................................................ $ 11,839 $ 8,658 $ 9,198 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization.......................... 13,311 12,189 8,216 Amortization of deferred financing costs............... 635 1,102 335 Gain on sales of real estate........................... (974) -- -- Loss from unconsolidated entities...................... 204 304 314 Minority Interest...................................... 4,915 3,451 3,344 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Interest and accounts receivable..................... (2,927) (3,829) (2,134) Other assets......................................... (3,796) (7,171) (4,907) Accounts payable and accrued expenses................ 747 2,090 2,660 -------- -------- --------- Cash Flows Provided By Operating Activities................. 23,954 16,794 17,026 -------- -------- --------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Real estate acquired...................................... (43,178) (38,501) (152,492) Proceeds from real estate sales........................... 34,425 -- -- Distributions received from unconsolidated entities....... 287 106 -- Proceeds from (advances to) unconsolidated entities....... 92 115 (691) Investment in unconsolidated entities..................... (2,329) -- -- -------- -------- --------- Cash Flows Used In Investing Activities..................... (10,703) (38,280) (153,183) -------- -------- --------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Cash distributions to shareholders........................ (12,126) (11,970) (11,967) Cash distributions to operating partnership unit holders................................................ (5,227) (4,414) (4,389) Cash dividends paid on preferred shares................... (3,253) (1,186) -- Principal repayments on credit facility................... (34,388) (7,400) (58,594) Principal repayments on mortgage debt..................... (3,179) (4,829) (1,915) Net advances (proceeds) from affiliated entities.......... -- (1,325) 272 Payments of deferred financing costs...................... (658) (504) (2,335) Purchase of operating partnership units................... (97) -- (1,417) Borrowings on construction loans.......................... 21,771 -- -- Borrowings on debt........................................ 25,100 29,689 206,847 Net proceeds from preferred shares........................ -- 22,682 11,147 Refund of deferred financing costs........................ -- 250 -- Proceeds from exercise of stock options................... -- 10 -- -------- -------- --------- Cash Flows Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities....... (12,057) 21,003 137,649 -------- -------- --------- Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents........ 1,194 (483) 1,492 Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period.............. 4,550 5,033 3,541 -------- -------- --------- Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period.................... $ 5,744 $ 4,550 $ 5,033 ======== ======== ========= SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Cash Paid for Interest During the Period.................. $ 26,361 $ 24,469 $ 13,358 ======== ======== ========= SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES: Acquisitions of property: Debt assumed........................................... $ 15,170 $ 5,867 Value of OP units issued: Purchase of Aquia Towne Center....................... 5,273 Jackson earnout...................................... 3,823 Conversion of OP units into shares..................... 1,451 See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-5 37 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997 (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1. ORGANIZATION Effective May 1, 1996, RPS Realty Trust, completed the acquisition of substantially all of the shopping center and retail properties, as well as the management organization and business operations of Ramco-Gershenson, Inc. and its affiliates (the "Ramco Acquisition") and the spin-off of its wholly owned subsidiary, Atlantic Realty Trust ("Atlantic"), a Maryland real estate investment trust. In connection with the Ramco Acquisition, RPS Realty Trust's name was changed to Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust. Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust is referred to herein as the "Company". The Company is engaged in the business of owning, developing, acquiring, managing and leasing community shopping centers, regional malls and single tenant retail properties. At December 31, 1999, the Company had a portfolio of 54 shopping centers, with more than 10,750,000 square feet of gross leasable area, located in the Midwest, East and Southeast United States. The Company's centers are usually anchored by discount department stores or supermarkets and the tenant base consists primarily of national and regional retail chains and local retailers. The Company's credit risk, therefore, is concentrated in the retail industry. Revenues from the Company's largest tenant amounted to 10.2% and 10.8% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. No other single tenant accounted for more than 10.0% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 1997. 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION -- The consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 1999, and 1998 include the accounts of the Company and its majority owned subsidiary, the Operating Partnership (71.0% owned by the Company at December 31, 1999 and 70.9% at December 31, 1998) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Ramco Properties Associates Limited Partnership, a financing subsidiary. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. USE OF ESTIMATES -- The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. REVENUE RECOGNITION -- Shopping center space is generally leased to retail tenants under leases which are accounted for as operating leases. Minimum rents are recognized on the straight-line method over the terms of the leases. Certain of the leases also provide for additional revenue based upon the level of sales achieved by the tenant and are recorded on an accrual basis as percentage rent. The leases also typically provide for tenant recoveries of common area maintenance, real estate taxes and other operating expenses. These recoveries are recognized as revenue in the period the applicable costs are incurred. An allowance for doubtful accounts has been provided against the portion of tenant accounts receivable which is estimated to be uncollectible. Accounts receivable in the accompanying balance sheet is shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $1,490 and $1,298 as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS -- The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents. INCOME TAX STATUS -- The Company conducts its operations with the intent of meeting the requirements applicable to a real estate investment trust ("REIT") under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended (the "Code"). In order to maintain qualification as a real estate investment trust, F-6 38 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) the REIT is required to distribute at least 95% of its taxable income to shareholders and meet certain other asset and income tests as well as other requirements. As a real estate investment trust, the REIT will generally not be liable for federal corporate income taxes. Thus, no provision for federal income taxes has been included in the accompanying financial statements. REAL ESTATE -- Real estate assets are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Costs incurred for the acquisition, development, construction, and improvement of properties are capitalized, including direct costs incurred by Ramco. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives. Expenditures for improvements and construction allowances paid to tenants are capitalized and amortized over the remaining life of the initial terms of each lease. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when incurred. Real estate assets are reviewed periodically for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. To the extent an impairment has occurred, the excess of carrying value over its estimated net realizable value will be charged to income. OTHER ASSETS -- Consist primarily of prepaid expenses, proposed development and acquisition costs, and financing and leasing costs which are amortized using the straight-line method over the terms of the respective agreements. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS -- In managing interest rate exposure on certain floating rate debt, the Company at times enters into interest rate protection agreements. When interest rates change, the differential to be paid or received is accrued to interest expense and is recognized over the life of the agreements. The costs of these transactions are deferred and amortized over the contract period. The amortized costs of these transactions and interest income and interest expense on these interest rate protection agreements are included in interest expense. IMPACT OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS -- In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities. It requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. This Statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 133 as required for its first quarterly filing of fiscal year 2001. On December 3, 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, "Revenue Recognition", which among other topics, establishes standards for when the lessor can recognize contingent rental income that is based on future specified targets within the lessor's fiscal year. The SAB concluded that contingent revenue should be recorded in the period in which the specified target that results in contingent rental income is achieved. The Company's policy has been to recognize percentage rents throughout the year based on rent estimated to be due from the tenant. The Company will adopt this change in method of accounting as of January 1, 2000 and report the change of $1,193 of contingent rent receivables as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. RECLASSIFICATIONS -- Certain reclassifications have been made to the 1998 and 1997 financial statements to conform to the 1999 presentation. F-7 39 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 3. INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE Investment in real estate consists of the following: DECEMBER 31, -------------------- 1999 1998 ---- ---- Land..................................................... $ 73,797 $ 64,433 Buildings and improvements............................... 462,839 464,216 Construction in progress................................. 6,319 7,331 -------- -------- 542,955 535,980 Less: accumulated depreciation........................... (35,492) (26,136) -------- -------- Investment in real estate -- net......................... $507,463 $509,844 ======== ======== REAL ESTATE ACQUISITIONS The Company made the following property acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 1998 and the consolidated financial statements include the effects of these acquisitions commencing with the date of acquisition. These acquisitions have been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The purchase prices were allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair market value. ACQUISITION DATE PROPERTY NAME PROPERTY LOCATION PURCHASE PRICE - ---------------- ------------- ----------------- -------------- May 1998 Southbay Fashion Center Sarasota, Florida $ 6,000 September 1998 Conyers Crossing Conyers, Georgia 7,500 September 1998 Aquia Towne Center Stafford, Virginia 22,000 November 1998 Rivertowne Square Deerfield Beach, Florida 8,700 GAIN ON SALES OF REAL ESTATE -- In December 1999, the Company sold two shopping centers and recognized an aggregate gain of $974. In addition, a subsidiary of Ramco-Gershenson, Inc. (Ramco), an unconsolidated entity, sold a parcel of land and recognized a gain of $251. Accordingly, the cost reimbursement by the Operating Partnership to Ramco was reduced by the amount of the gain, thereby reducing the Company's general and administrative expenses in 1999. 4. INVESTMENTS IN AND ADVANCES TO UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES The Company's equity investments in unconsolidated entities at December 31, 1999 was comprised of 50% general partner interests in Kentwood Town Center ("Kentwood") and the Southfield Plaza Expansion ("Southfield Plaza"), the Company's 100% interest in the non-voting and 5% interest in the voting common stock of Ramco, and a 25% interest in RPT/INVEST, L.L.C. (RPT/Invest). These investments are not unilaterally controlled and are therefore accounted for on the equity method. On August 30, 1999 the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with an affiliate of Investcorp International, Inc. (Investcorp) to create RPT/Invest. The purpose of the joint venture is to acquire existing shopping centers with purchase prices totaling up to $125 million located in the Midwest, Mid-Atlantic and Northeast United States. The Company sold two existing properties to RPT/Invest for cash of approximately $27,800, net of $2,500 equity contribution (25% interest in the joint venture). The sale of the two properties resulted in a gain of approximately $722, which has been deferred and included in the equity investment of the unconsolidated entity. The Company used the proceeds from the sale to repay $25,000 of variable rate debt on its revolving F-8 40 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) Credit Facility. Investcorp contributed cash of approximately $7,600 in exchange for their 75% equity interest in the joint venture. The joint venture is managed by a five member Investment Committee, consisting of three members appointed by Investcorp and two members appointed by the Company. Under terms of the joint venture agreement, the Company will continue to manage the properties, including leasing and operating responsibilities, for which the Company will receive management fees, leasing commissions and asset management fees. In addition, the Company is responsible for identifying and acquiring properties and is expected to receive fees from the joint venture for such services. The joint venture agreement includes a provision whereby the Company has the right to purchase any property acquired by the joint venture during specific time periods from the date of acquisition of the property. F-9 41 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) Combined condensed financial information of the Company's unconsolidated entities is summarized as follows: 1999 1998 1997 ------------------------------------------------------ ------- ------- SOUTHFIELD RAMCO KENTWOOD PLAZA RPT/INVEST TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ----- -------- ---------- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ASSETS Investment in Real Estate -- Net.... $ 1,650 $ 534 $31,342 $33,526 $ 2,290 Other Assets........................ $ 3,403 599 113 1,226 5,341 4,400 ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- Total Assets................... $ 3,403 $ 2,249 $ 647 $32,568 $38,867 $ 6,690 ======= ======= ====== ======= ======= ======= LIABILITIES Mortgage Notes Payable.............. $10,716 $1,507 $22,000 $34,223 $12,390 Other Liabilities................... $ 522 416 37 631 1,606 1,352 ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- Total Liabilities.............. 522 11,132 1,544 22,631 35,829 13,742 ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- Owners' Equity (deficit)............ 2,881 (8,883) (897) 9,937 3,038 (7,052) ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- Total Liabilities and Owners' Equity............................ $ 3,403 $ 2,249 $ 647 $32,568 $38,867 $ 6,690 ======= ======= ====== ======= ======= ======= Company's Equity Investments in Unconsolidated Entities........... $ 3,093 $ 959 $ 576 $ 1,729 $ 6,357 $ 4,341 Advances to Unconsolidated Entities.......................... 1,285 1,285 1,555 ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- Total Equity Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Entities.......................... $ 4,378 $ 959 $ 576 $ 1,729 $ 7,642 $ 5,896 ======= ======= ====== ======= ======= ======= REVENUES Management Fees................... $ 1,252 $ 1,252 $ 913 $ 1,063 Leasing and Development Fees...... 523 523 110 392 Property Revenues................. $ 1,841 $ 267 $ 1,597 3,705 2,104 2,077 Gain on Sale of Real Estate....... 251 251 -- -- Other Revenues.................... 769 769 761 496 Leasing/Development Cost Reimbursements................. 2,323 2,323 2,080 1,321 ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- Total Revenues................. 5,118 1,841 267 1,597 8,823 5,968 5,349 ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- EXPENSES Employee Expenses................. 5,932 5,932 4,887 4,079 Office and Other Expenses......... 1,662 1,662 1,523 1,190 Property Expenses................. 1,509 189 1,389 3,087 1,668 1,662 Depreciation and Amortization..... 246 246 266 221 ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- Total Expenses................. 7,840 1,509 189 1,389 10,927 8,344 7,152 ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- Excess Revenues Over Expenses....... (2,722) 332 78 208 (2,104) (2,376) (1,803) Cost Reimbursement From Operating Partnership....................... 2,722 2,722 2,812 2,218 ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- Income.............................. $ -- $ 332 $ 78 $ 208 $ 618 $ 436 $ 415 ======= ======= ====== ======= ======= ======= ======= Company's Share of Income........... $ -- $ 166 $ 39 $ 52 $ 257 $ 218 $ 208 ======= ======= ====== ======= ======= ======= ======= The Company's share of the unconsolidated entities' income of $257, $218 and $208, for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997, was reduced by $461 in 1999, and $522 in both 1998 and 1997, which F-10 42 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) represents depreciation and amortization adjustments arising from the Company's net basis adjustments in the unconsolidated entities' assets. These adjustments result in a net loss of $204, $304 and $314 from unconsolidated entities' assets for the years ending December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 respectively. In addition, the Company's investment in RPT/Invest is approximately $722 lower than the net basis in the unconsolidated entity as a result of deferring the gain on the sale of the two properties sold to the joint venture. 5. OTHER ASSETS Other assets at December 31 are as follows: 1999 1998 ---- ---- Leasing costs.............................................. $ 8,924 $ 6,893 Prepaid expenses and other................................. 3,490 3,426 Deferred financing costs................................... 3,718 3,059 Proposed development and acquisition costs................. 5,500 3,911 ------- ------- 21,632 17,289 Less: accumulated amortization............................. (4,766) (3,039) ------- ------- Other assets -- net........................................ $16,866 $14,250 ======= ======= 6. MORTGAGES AND NOTES PAYABLE Mortgages and notes payable at December 31 consist of the following: 1999 1998 ---- ---- Fixed rate mortgages with interest rates ranging from 6.83% to 8.50% due at various dates through 2008................ $169,192 $172,371 Floating rate mortgages at 75% of the rate of long-term Capital A rated utility bonds, due January 1, 2010, plus supplemental interest to equal LIBOR plus 200 basis points. The effective rate at December 31, 1999 and 1998 was 6.96% and 7.49%, respectively......................... 7,000 7,000 Construction loan financing, with an interest rate at LIBOR plus 250 basis points due December 2002, including renewal option. The effective rate at December 31, 1999, was 8.67%. Maximum borrowings of $18,500...................... 15,801 -- Construction loan financing, with an interest rate at LIBOR plus 185 basis points due June 2002, including renewal option. The effective rate at December 31, 1999 and 1998, was 8.00% and 7.10%, respectively. Maximum borrowings of $14,000................................................... 11,859 5,889 Unsecured term loan, with an interest rate at LIBOR plus 275 basis points, due October 1, 2000. The effective rate at December 31, 1999 and 1998 was 10.00% and 9.06%, respectively.............................................. 45,000 45,000 Credit Facility, with an interest rate at LIBOR plus 162.5 basis points, due October 2000, maximum available borrowings of $110,000. The effective rate at December 31, 1999 and 1998, was 7.60% and 7.35%, respectively.......... 88,700 97,988 -------- -------- $337,552 $328,248 ======== ======== The mortgage notes and construction loans are secured by mortgages on properties that have an approximate net book value of $338,033 as of December 31, 1999. The Credit Facility is secured by mortgages on various properties that have an approximate net book value of $159,929 as of December 31, 1999. F-11 43 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) At December 31, 1999, $110,000 of the Credit Facility was available for borrowing, of which $88,700 was outstanding. The interest rate payable under the Credit Facility and the unsecured term loan is between 137.5 and 162.5 basis points over LIBOR, and between 250 and 275 basis points over LIBOR, respectively, depending on certain debt ratios set forth in the agreements. It is the Company's intention to extend the Credit Facility on a long-term basis, at rates that are commercially reasonable. The Company is currently negotiating the terms of a long-term debt agreement(s). However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to refinance its indebtedness on commercially reasonable or any other terms. At December 31, 1999, outstanding letters of credit issued under the Credit Facility, not reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, total approximately $912. The Credit Facility and the unsecured term loan contain financial covenants relating to loan to asset value, minimum operating coverage ratios, and a minimum equity value. As of December 31, 1999 the Company was in compliance with the covenant terms. During August 1998, the Company executed an interest rate swap agreement to limit the Company's exposure to increases in interest rates on its floating rate debt. The notional amount of the agreement was $75,000. Based on rates currently in effect under the Company's Credit Facility, the agreement provides for a fixed rate of 7.425% through October 2000. The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other parties to the interest rate swap agreement, however, the Company does not anticipate non-performance by the counter party. The following table presents scheduled principal payments on mortgages and notes payable as of December 31, 1999: Year end December 31, 2000...................................................... $142,295 2001...................................................... 3,988 2002...................................................... 30,813 2003...................................................... 4,013 2004...................................................... 4,230 Thereafter................................................ 152,213 -------- Total..................................................... $337,552 ======== 7. LEASES Approximate future minimum rentals under noncancelable operating leases in effect at December 31, 1999, assuming no new or renegotiated leases nor option extensions on lease agreements, are as follows: Year ended December 31, 2000...................................................... $ 53,831 2001...................................................... 50,543 2002...................................................... 46,458 2003...................................................... 41,306 2004...................................................... 58,090 Thereafter................................................ 280,110 -------- Total..................................................... $530,338 ======== F-12 44 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 8. EARNINGS PER SHARE The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) (in thousands, except share and per share data): 1999 1998 1997 ---- ---- ---- Numerator: Net Income................................................ $11,839 $ 8,658 $9,198 Preferred dividends....................................... (3,407) (1,614) (278) --------- --------- --------- Income available to common shareholders for basic and dilutive EPS......................................... $ 8,432 $ 7,044 $8,920 ========= ========= ========= Denominator: Weighted-average common shares for basic EPS.............. 7,217,993 7,132,517 7,123,105 Effect of dilutive securities: Options outstanding.................................... -- 32,097 25,257 --------- --------- --------- Weighted-average common shares for dilutive EPS........... 7,217,993 7,164,614 7,148,362 ========= ========= ========= Basic EPS................................................... $1.17 $0.99 $1.25 ========= ========= ========= Diluted EPS................................................. $1.17 $0.98 $1.25 ========= ========= ========= In 1999, 1998 and 1997, conversion of the Series A Preferred Shares and of the Operating Partnership Units would have been antidilutive and, therefore, were not considered in the computation of diluted earnings per share. 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES During the third quarter of 1994, the Company held more than 25% of the value of its gross assets in overnight Treasury Bill reverse repurchase transactions which the United States Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") may view as non-qualifying assets for the purposes of satisfying an asset qualification test applicable to REITs, based on a Revenue Ruling published in 1977 (the "Asset Issue"). The Company has requested that the IRS enter into a closing agreement with the Company that the Asset Issue will not impact the Company's status as a REIT. The IRS has deferred any action relating to the Asset Issue pending the further examination of the Company's 1991-1995 tax returns (the "Tax Audit"). Based on developments in the law which have occurred since 1977, the Company's Tax Counsel, Battle Fowler LLP, has rendered an opinion that the Company's investment in Treasury Bill repurchase obligations would not adversely affect its REIT status. However, such opinion is not binding upon the IRS. In connection with the spin-off of Atlantic, Atlantic has assumed all liability arising out of the Tax Audit and the Asset Issue, including liabilities for interest and penalties and attorney fees relating thereto. In connection with the assumption of such potential liabilities, Atlantic and the Company have entered into a tax agreement which provides that the Company (under the direction of its Continuing Trustees), and not Atlantic, will control, conduct and effect the settlement of any tax claims against the Company relating to the Tax Audit and the Asset Issue. Accordingly, Atlantic will not have any control as to the timing of the resolution or disposition of any such claims. The Company and Atlantic also received an opinion from Special Tax Counsel, Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen LLP, that, to the extent there is a deficiency in the Company's taxable income arising out of the IRS examination and provided the Company timely makes a deficiency dividend (i.e., declares and pays a distribution which is permitted to relate back to the year for which each deficiency was determined to satisfy the requirement that the REIT distribute 95 percent of its taxable income), the classification of the Company as a REIT for the taxable years under examination would not be affected. Under the tax agreement referred to above, Atlantic has agreed to reimburse the Company for F-13 45 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) the amount of any deficiency dividend so made. If notwithstanding the above-described opinions of legal counsel, the IRS successfully challenged the status of the Company as a REIT, its status could be adversely affected. If the Company lost its status as a REIT, the Company believes that it will be able to re-elect REIT status for the taxable year beginning January 1, 1999. The IRS agent conducting the examination has issued his examination report with respect to the tax issues raised in the Tax Audit, including the Asset Issue (collectively, the "Tax Issues"). The report sets forth a number of positions which the examining agent has taken with respect to the Company's taxes for the years that are subject to the Tax Audit, which the Company believes are not consistent with applicable law and regulations of the IRS. Based on the report, the Company could be liable for up to $43.1 million in combined taxes, penalties and interest through March 31, 2000. The IRS examination report notes, however, that the Company is eligible to avoid termination of its REIT status for certain of the years under audit if the Company makes a deficiency distribution to its shareholders. A deficiency dividend would be deductible by the Company, thereby reducing its liability for federal income tax. The proposed adjustments to taxable income would require the Company to pay a deficiency dividend to its current shareholders resulting in combined taxes, penalties, interest and deficiency dividends of approximately $44.5 million as of March 31, 2000. As noted above, pursuant to a Tax Agreement between Atlantic and the Company, Atlantic assumed all liability arising out of the Tax Audit and Tax Issues, including the payment of the deficiency dividend. Based on the amount of Atlantic's net assets, as disclosed in its most recent quarterly report Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999, the Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of the Tax Issues will have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. The issuance of the revenue agent's report constitutes only the first step in the IRS administrative process for determining whether there is any deficiency in the Company's tax liability for the years at issue and any adverse determination by the examining agent is subject to administrative appeal within the IRS and, thereafter, to judicial review. As noted above, the agent's report sets forth a number of positions, which the Company and its legal counsel believe are not consistent with applicable law and regulations of the IRS. The Company filed an administrative appeal challenging the findings contained in the IRS agent's examination report on April 30, 1999. In December 1999, the Board of Trustees approved the repurchase, at management's discretion, of up to $10 million of the Company's common stock. The program allows the Company to repurchase its common stock from time to time in the open market and/or in negotiated transactions. In connection with the development and expansion of various shopping centers as of December 31, 1999, the Company has entered into agreements for the construction of the shopping centers of approximately $3,100. 10. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Convertible Series A Preferred Shares -- In October, 1997 the Company entered into an agreement with certain clients advised by Morgan Stanley Asset Management, Inc. ("MSAM"), and Kimco Realty Corporation ("Kimco") pursuant to which such entities agreed to invest up to an aggregate of $35,000 in the Operating Partnership. The MSAM clients and Kimco initially purchased Preferred Operating Partnership Units which, after shareholder approval in December 1997, were converted into the Company's Series A Convertible Preferred Shares ("Series A Preferred Series") and, ultimately, may be converted into Common Shares. The initial investments of $11,667 were made in October 1997. During 1998, the Company issued 933,000 Series A Preferred Shares receiving net proceeds of approximately $22,682. After the closing of this transaction, the MSAM clients are required to purchase 19.4% of the first $50,000 in a follow-on public offering of the Company's Shares at the offering price less the underwriter's fees, F-14 46 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) commissions, and discounts per share. Upon consummation of such public offering, all outstanding Series A Preferred Shares will be exchanged into Common Shares of the Company, at a conversion price of $17.50 per share, which conversion price is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. The Series A Preferred Shares rank senior to the Common Shares with respect to dividends and upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company. The Series A Preferred Shares are entitled to receive cumulative dividends, payable quarterly in arrears, at an annual rate equal to the greater of (i) 9.60% of the stated value ($25.00 per share) and (ii) the dividend rate expressed as an annual rate which is implicit in the amount of dividends actually paid with respect to Common Shares, based on a $17.50 per share price for the Common Shares, determined as of each quarterly dividend payment date (the "Payable Component"). The Payable Component will be increased by an amount equal to an annual rate of 3% under certain circumstances. The holders of Series A Preferred Shares have the right to vote on all matters which holders of Common Shares are entitled to vote upon on an as converted basis, as though such holders own Common Shares. In addition, the Trust will not be permitted to engage in or effect certain types of transactions or actions without the approval of holders of at least 51% of the outstanding Series A Preferred Shares voting separately as a class. The conversion price for Common Shares of $17.50 contain anti-dilution rights and will be adjusted to reflect the effects of stock dividends, distributions, subdivisions or combination. The Series A Preferred Shares are subject to mandatory conversion on the date which is the earlier of a qualified underwritten offering or the maturity date which is on October 3, 2002. At the option of the holders, the Series A Preferred Shares will be convertible in whole or in part into Common Shares at the stated value plus unpaid dividends prior to the maturity date or qualified underwritten offering date. The maturity date will be accelerated and all Series A Preferred Shares will be redeemed in cash at the stated value plus unpaid dividends in the event that it is determined by the IRS that it will, for any period, deny to the Company the tax benefits associated with REIT qualification and either or both of the following circumstances arise: (i) the Company does not receive (within a period of 60 days of the date established by the IRS as the date of which the deficiency dividend or other additional taxes are required to be paid) the full indemnity payment for such loss of tax benefits that the Company is entitled to receive from Atlantic pursuant to the Tax Agreement with Atlantic, or (ii) counsel reasonably satisfactory to MSAM is unable to provide to the holders of the Series A Preferred Shares affirmative advice that, commencing not later than with the taxable year ending December 31, 1999, the Company will, notwithstanding such determination by the IRS, be able to elect to be qualified and taxed as a REIT under the Code, and its proposed method of operation will enable it so to qualify for following years. Dividend Reinvestment Plan -- The Company has a dividend reinvestment plan that allows for participating shareholders to have their dividend distributions automatically invested in additional shares of beneficial interest in the Company based on the average price of the shares acquired for the distribution. 11. STOCK OPTION PLANS 1996 Share Option Plan -- In May 1996, the Company adopted the 1996 Share Option Plan (the "Plan") to enable its employees to participate in the ownership of the Company. The Plan was amended in June 1999 to provide for the maximum number of common shares available for issuance under the Plan to equal 9 percent of the total number of issued and outstanding common shares (on a fully diluted basis assuming the exchange of all OP units and Series A Preferred Shares for common shares), which number would equal approximately 1,095 common shares at December 31, 1999. The Plan provides for the award of up to 1,095 stock options to purchase common shares of beneficial interest, at the fair market value at the date of grant, to executive officers and employees of the Company. The Plan is administered by the independent trustee members of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees, whose members are not eligible for grants under the Plan. Stock options granted under the Plan vest and become exercisable in installments on F-15 47 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant and expire ten years after the date of grant. No more than 50,000 share options may be granted to any one individual in any calendar year. 1997 Non-Employee Trustee Stock Option Plan -- On June 10, 1997, the Company adopted the 1997 Non-Employee Trustee Stock Option Plan (the "Trustees' Plan") which permits the Company to grant non-qualified options to purchase up to 100,000 common shares of beneficial interest in the Company at the fair market value at the date of grant. Each Non-Employee Trustee will be granted an option to purchase 2,000 shares annually on the Company's annual meeting date, beginning June 10, 1997. Stock options granted to participants vest and become exercisable in installments on each of the first two anniversaries of the date of grant and expire ten years after the date of grant. Information relating to the 1996 Share Option Plan and the 1997 Non-Employee Trustee Stock Option Plan (the "Plans") from December 31, 1996 through December 31, 1999 is as follows: NUMBER WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF SHARES EXERCISE PRICE --------- ---------------- Outstanding at December 31, 1996..................... 183,200 $16.04 Granted.............................................. 92,813 17.69 Exercised............................................ -- -- Cancelled or forfeited............................... (3,051) 16.56 ------- ------ Outstanding at December 31, 1997..................... 272,962 $16.60 Granted.............................................. 243,500 16.91 Exercised............................................ (533) 16.56 Cancelled or expired................................. (4,826) 17.08 ------- ------ Outstanding at December 31, 1998..................... 511,103 $16.74 Granted.............................................. 24,000 16.38 Cancelled or expired................................. (15,779) 17.23 ------- ------ Outstanding at December 31, 1999..................... 519,324 $16.71 ======= ====== Shares exercisable at December 31, 1997.............. 60,050 $16.03 ======= ====== Shares exercisable at December 31, 1998.............. 151,152 $16.39 ======= ====== Shares exercisable at December 31, 1999.............. 318,119 $16.58 ======= ====== At December 31, 1999, the range of exercise prices and weighted average remaining contractual life of outstanding options was $15.44 -- $21.63, and 7.7 years. The fair value of options granted during 1999, 1998 and 1997 was estimated to be negligible on the date of grant. All options granted were non-qualified share options. This was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used: 1999 1998 1997 ---- ---- ---- Risk-free interest rate.................................. 5.7% 4.8% 6.4% Dividend yield........................................... 11.2% 10.8% 9.2% Volatility............................................... 17.3% 17.3% 15.8% Weighted average expected life........................... 5.0 5.0 5.0 The Company accounts for the Plans in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 under which no compensation cost has been recognized for stock option awards. There would be no material difference if compensation cost had been calculated consistent with the provisions of Statement of Financial Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation." F-16 48 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 12. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107 requires disclosure about fair value of all financial instruments. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses are reasonable estimates of their fair values because of the short maturity of these financial instruments. As of December 31, 1999 and 1998 the mortgages and notes payable amounts are also a reasonable estimate of their fair value because their interest rates approximate the current borrowing rates available to the Company. The fair value of the Company's interest rate protection agreement represents the estimated amount the Company would receive or pay to terminate the agreement at December 31, 1999 and 1998. The fair value of this agreement was $292 at December 31, 1999 and ($1,087) at December 31, 1998 13. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) The following table sets forth the quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 (in thousands, except per share amounts): EARNINGS PER SHARE ------------------- REVENUES NET INCOME BASIC DILUTED -------- ---------- ----- --------- 1999 Quarter ended: March 31 $21,773 $2,809 $0.27 $0.27 June 30 20,760 2,525 0.23 0.23 September 30 21,094 2,678 0.25 0.25 December 31 21,646 3,827 0.41 0.41 1998 Quarter ended: March 31 $18,444 $2,003 $0.24 $0.24 June 30 18,261 2,079 0.25 0.25 September 30 18,963 1,995 0.23 0.23 December 31 21,087 2,581 0.26 0.26 F-17 49 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 14. REAL ESTATE ASSETS Net Investment in Real Estate Assets at December 31, 1999 INITIAL COST TO COMPANY ---------------------- YEAR YEAR YEAR BUILDING & PROPERTY LOCATION CONSTRUCTED(A) ACQUIRED RENOVATED LAND IMPROVEMENTS -------- -------- -------------- -------- --------- ------- ------------ ALABAMA Athens Town Center............. Athens, AL 1997 $ 854 $ 7,695 Cox Creek Plaza................ Florence, AL 1997 589 5,336 FLORIDA Crestview Corners.............. Crestview, FL 1997 400 3,602 Lantana Plaza.................. Lantana, FL 1993 2,590 2,600 Naples Towne Center............ Naples, FL 1983 1996 218 1,964 Pelican Plaza.................. Osprey, FL 1997 710 6,404 Shoppes of Lakeland............ Lakeland, FL 1996 1,279 11,543 Southbay Fashion Center........ Sarasota, FL 1998 597 5,355 Sunshine Plaza................. Tamarac, FL 1991 1998 1,748 7,452 Village Lakes.................. Land O' Lakes, FL 1997 862 7,768 GEORGIA Conyers Crossing............... Conyers, GA 1998 729 6,562 Holcomb Center................. Alpharetta, GA 1996 658 5,953 Indian Hills................... Calhoun, GA 1997 706 6,355 Mays Crossing.................. Stockbridge, GA 1997 725 6,532 MARYLAND Crofton Plaza.................. Crofton, MD 1991 3,201 6,499 MICHIGAN Auburn Mile.................... Auburn Hills, MI 1999 1999 17,015 0 Clinton Valley Mall............ Sterling Heights, MI 1979 1996 1999 1,101 9,910 Clinton Valley Strip Center.... Sterling Heights, MI 1979 1996 399 3,588 Eastridge Commons.............. Flint, MI 1990 1996 1997 1,086 9,775 Edgewood Towne Center.......... Lansing, MI 1990 1996 1992 665 5,981 Ferndale Plaza................. Ferndale, MI 1984 1996 265 2,388 Fraser Shopping Center......... Fraser, MI 1996 363 3,263 Jackson Crossing............... Jackson, MI 1996 1996 2,249 20,237 Jackson West................... Jackson, MI 1996 1996 1999 2,806 6,270 Lake Orion Plaza............... Lake Orion, MI 1977 1996 470 4,234 Madison Center................. Madison Heights, MI 1997 1999 817 7,366 New Towne Plaza................ Canton, MI 1976 1996 1998 817 7,354 Oak Brook Square............... Flint, MI 1996 955 8,591 Roseville Plaza................ Roseville, MI 1996 1994 1,466 13,195 Southfield Plaza............... Southfield, MI 1996 1999 1,121 10,090 Taylor Plaza................... Taylor, MI 1996 400 1,930 Tel-Twelve Mall................ Southfield, MI 1968 1996 1996 4,777 43,181 West Oaks I.................... Novi, MI 1981 1996 1997-98 0 6,304 West Oaks II................... Novi, MI 1987 1996 1999 1,391 12,519 Whitelake Marketplace.......... Whitelake Township, MI 1999 1998 2,965 0 NORTH CAROLINA Hickory Corners................ Hickory, NC 1997 1999 798 7,192 Holly Springs Plaza............ Franklin, NC 1997 829 7,470 Ridgeview Crossing............. Elkin, NC 1997 1,054 9,494 GROSS COST AT END OF PERIOD(B) SUBSEQUENT ---------------------- CAPITALIZED BUILDING & ACCUMULATED PROPERTY COSTS LAND IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL DEPRECIATION(C) ENCUMBRANCES -------- ----------- ------- ------------ -------- --------------- ------------ ALABAMA Athens Town Center............. $ 15 $ 854 $ 7,710 $ 8,564 $ 418 (d) Cox Creek Plaza................ 37 589 5,373 5,962 291 (d) FLORIDA Crestview Corners.............. 11 400 3,613 4,013 196 (d) Lantana Plaza.................. 712 2,590 3,312 5,902 550 (d) Naples Towne Center............ 19 218 1,983 2,201 185 (d) Pelican Plaza.................. 79 710 6,483 7,193 399 (d) Shoppes of Lakeland............ 122 1,279 11,665 12,944 945 (d) Southbay Fashion Center........ 84 597 5,439 6,036 222 (d) Sunshine Plaza................. 3,362 1,748 10,814 12,562 1,703 (d) Village Lakes.................. 43 862 7,811 8,673 392 (d) GEORGIA Conyers Crossing............... 259 729 6,821 7,550 219 Holcomb Center................. 73 658 6,026 6,684 472 (d) Indian Hills................... 43 706 6,398 7,104 346 (d) Mays Crossing.................. 40 725 6,572 7,297 357 (d) MARYLAND Crofton Plaza.................. 1,111 3,201 7,610 10,811 1,582 (d) MICHIGAN Auburn Mile.................... 7,092 17,015 7,092 24,107 0 15,801 Clinton Valley Mall............ 1,646 1,101 11,556 12,657 952 (e) Clinton Valley Strip Center.... 136 399 3,724 4,123 345 (d) Eastridge Commons.............. 2,053 1,086 11,828 12,914 1,198 (e) Edgewood Towne Center.......... 19 665 6,000 6,665 551 (d) Ferndale Plaza................. 13 265 2,401 2,666 226 (d) Fraser Shopping Center......... 134 363 3,397 3,760 341 (e) Jackson Crossing............... 4,933 2,249 25,170 27,419 2,172 (e) Jackson West................... 6,215 2,806 12,485 15,291 1,056 8,107 Lake Orion Plaza............... 79 470 4,313 4,783 401 (e) Madison Center................. 342 817 7,708 8,525 492 (d) New Towne Plaza................ 1,498 817 8,852 9,669 736 (e) Oak Brook Square............... 270 955 8,861 9,816 797 7,000 Roseville Plaza................ 726 1,466 13,921 15,387 1,309 (e) Southfield Plaza............... 1,274 1,121 11,364 12,485 963 (e) Taylor Plaza................... 15 400 1,945 2,345 168 (d) Tel-Twelve Mall................ 2,622 4,777 45,803 50,580 4,291 (e) West Oaks I.................... 2,733 0 9,037 9,037 719 4,155 West Oaks II................... 3,938 1,391 16,457 17,848 1,196 7,074 Whitelake Marketplace.......... 9,830 2,965 9,830 12,795 11 11,859 NORTH CAROLINA Hickory Corners................ 36 798 7,228 8,026 392 (d) Holly Springs Plaza............ 7 829 7,477 8,306 406 (d) Ridgeview Crossing............. 14 1,054 9,508 10,562 516 (e) F-18 50 RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) INITIAL COST TO COMPANY ---------------------- YEAR YEAR YEAR BUILDING & PROPERTY LOCATION CONSTRUCTED(A) ACQUIRED RENOVATED LAND IMPROVEMENTS -------- -------- -------------- -------- --------- ------- ------------ OHIO Office Max Center................... Toledo, OH 1994 1996 227 2,042 Spring Meadows Place................ Springfield Twp, OH 1987 1996 1997 1,662 14,959 Troy Towne Center................... Troy, OH 1990 1996 1996 930 8,372 SOUTH CAROLINA Edgewood Square..................... North Augusta, SC 1997 1,358 12,229 Taylors Square...................... Greenville, SC 1997 1,581 14,237 TENNESSEE Cumberland Gallery.................. New Tazewell, TN 1997 327 2,944 Highland Square..................... Crossville, TN 1997 913 8,189 Northwest Crossing.................. Knoxville, TN 1997 1,284 11,566 Northwest Crossing II............... Knoxville, TN 1999 1999 570 0 Stonegate Plaza..................... Kingsport, TN 1997 606 5,454 Tellico Plaza....................... Lenoir City, TN 1997 611 5,510 VIRGINIA Aquia Towne Center.................. Stafford County, VA 1998 2,187 19,776 WISCONSIN West Allis Towne Centre............. West Allis, WI 1987 1996 1,866 16,789 ------- -------- Totals $73,797 $414,019 ======= ======== GROSS COST AT END OF PERIOD(B) SUBSEQUENT ---------------------- CAPITALIZED BUILDING & ACCUMULATED PROPERTY COSTS LAND IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL DEPRECIATION(C) ENCUMBRANCES -------- ----------- ------- ------------ -------- --------------- ------------ OHIO Office Max Center................... 0 227 2,042 2,269 187 (d) Spring Meadows Place................ 743 1,662 15,702 17,364 1,478 6,171 Troy Towne Center................... 953 930 9,325 10,255 861 (e) SOUTH CAROLINA Edgewood Square..................... 12 1,358 12,241 13,599 664 (d) Taylors Square...................... 15 1,581 14,252 15,833 772 (e) TENNESSEE Cumberland Gallery.................. 9 327 2,953 3,280 160 (d) Highland Square..................... 5 913 8,194 9,107 444 5,284 Northwest Crossing.................. 24 1,284 11,590 12,874 629 (e) Northwest Crossing II............... 1,605 570 1,605 2,175 5 Stonegate Plaza..................... 3 606 5,457 6,063 296 (e) Tellico Plaza....................... 5 611 5,515 6,126 299 (d) VIRGINIA Aquia Towne Center.................. 111 2,187 19,887 22,074 641 14,975 WISCONSIN West Allis Towne Centre............. 19 1,866 16,808 18,674 1,541 (e) ------- ------- -------- -------- ------- $55,139 $73,797 $469,158 $542,955 $35,492 ======= ======= ======== ======== ======= - ------------------------- (a) If prior to May 1996, constructed by a predecessor of the Company (b) The aggregate cost of land and buildings and improvements for federal income tax purposes is approximately $408 million. (c) Depreciation for all properties is computed over the useful life which is generally forty years. (d) The property is pledged as collateral on the secured line of credit. (e) The property is pledged as collateral on secured mortgages. The changes in real estate assets and accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 1999, and 1998 are as follows: REAL ESTATE ASSETS 1999 1998 ------------------ ---- ---- Balance at beginning of period.............. $535,980 $473,213 Land Development/Acquisitions............... 18,135 $ 46,910 Capital Improvements........................ 25,041 15,857 Sale of Assets.............................. (36,201) 0 -------- -------- Balance at end of period.................... $542,955 $535,980 ======== ======== ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION 1999 1998 ------------------------ ---- ---- Balance at beginning of period................ $26,136 $14,919 Sales/Retirements............................. (2,752) -- Depreciation.................................. 12,108 11,217 ------- ------- Balance at end of period...................... $35,492 $26,136 ======= ======= F-19 51 EXHIBIT INDEX EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION - ------- ----------- 21.1 Subsidiaries 23.1 Independent Auditors Consent 27 Financial Data Schedule