JOHN R. THOMAS
                                            DIRECT (503) 294-9448
                                            jrthomas@stoel.com



May 26, 2006


VIA EDGAR AND OVERNIGHT COURIER

Ms. Pamela A. Long
Assistant Director
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F Street, N.E.
Mail Stop 7010
Washington, D.C.  20549

RE:      VERASUN ENERGY CORPORATION
         RESPONSE TO CORRESPONDENCE DATED MAY 25, 2006
         AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO FORM S-1
         FILED MAY 23, 2006
         FILE NO. 333-132861

Dear Ms. Long:

This letter is the response of VeraSun Energy Corporation (the "Company") to the
Staff's comments to the above-referenced correspondence relating to Amendment
No. 2 to Form S-1. The Company has included each of the Staff's comments dated
May 25, 2006 and the Company's responses below.

        Principal and Selling Shareholders, page 78

                1.      WE NOTE YOUR PROPOSED RESPONSE TO COMMENT 2 OF OUR
                        LETTER DATED MAY 24, 2006. PLEASE INCLUDE THE
                        REPRESENTATIONS CONTAINED IN THE RESPONSE IN YOUR
                        PROSPECTUS.

                        The Company has made the requested revision. Please
                        refer to page 79 of Amendment No. 3 to the Company's
                        Registration Statement on Form S-1 ("Amendment No. 3").

        Financial Statements for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2006 Note 4 -
        Stock-Based Compensation, page F-36

                2.      WE HAVE REVIEWED YOUR RESPONSES TO COMMENTS THREE AND
                        FOUR. DESPITE THE SIGNIFICANT UNCERTAINTY REGARDING THE
                        EMERGENCE OF THE ETHANOL INDUSTRY AND THE




Pamela A. Long
May 26, 2006
Page 2



                        VOLATILITY OF ETHANOL PRICES DURING THE FIRST QUARTER OF
                        2006, WE WOULD EXPECT A REASONABLE VALUATION TO REFLECT
                        AN INCREASE IN THE VALUE OF YOUR COMMON STOCK OF GREATER
                        THAN THE $0.05 PER SHARE YOU HAVE RECORDED FOR THE FIRST
                        QUARTER OF 2006.

                        THE DUFF AND PHELPS VALUATION REPORT YOU REFER TO IN
                        YOUR RESPONSE ESTIMATED THE VALUE OF YOUR COMMON STOCK
                        AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2005. ON APRIL 28, 2006 YOU ESTIMATED
                        THE VALUE OF YOUR COMMON STOCK AS OF MARCH 31, 2006
                        USING THE SAME ASSUMPTIONS ORIGINALLY USED BY DUFF AND
                        PHELPS IN THEIR DECEMBER 31, 2005 ANALYSIS. HOWEVER, WE
                        NOTE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:

                        -       YOU MET WITH UNDERWRITERS REGARDING THE
                                POSSIBILITY OF AN IPO TWO MONTHS EARLIER, AND IN
                                THE INTERVENING PERIOD, BEFORE THE END OF THE
                                QUARTER, YOU FILED A FORM S-1.

                        -       YOUR APRIL 28 ANALYSIS ASSUMED THREE PLANTS,
                                DESPITE YOUR PLANS TO BUILD TWO ADDITIONAL
                                PLANTS, WHICH YOU DISCUSS IN THE PROSPECTUS
                                SUMMARY AND ELSEWHERE IN THE FORM S-1 YOU FILED
                                ON MARCH 30, 2006.

                        -       BASED ON THE INFORMATION YOU PROVIDED, IT
                                APPEARS THAT THE PER GALLON RACK PRICE OF
                                ETHANOL INCREASED 11%, FROM $2.15 TO $2.38,
                                BETWEEN THE NOVEMBER 30, 2005 OFFERING AND MARCH
                                31, 2006. THIS IS COMPARED TO THE SUBSEQUENT
                                INCREASE OF 12% FROM $2.38 AT MARCH 31 TO THE
                                AVERAGE RACK PRICE PER GALLON TO DATE FOR MAY OF
                                $2.66.

                        -       IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT CERTAIN COMPANIES
                                IN THE ETHANOL INDUSTRY HAVE EXPERIENCED
                                SIGNIFICANT STOCK PRICE INCREASES SUBSEQUENT TO
                                MARCH 31, 2006; HOWEVER, IT ALSO APPEARS THAT
                                SUCH INCREASES WERE PRECEDED BY SIMILAR
                                INCREASES DURING THE PERIOD FROM NOVEMBER 30,
                                2005 TO MARCH 31, 2006.

                        ALTHOUGH WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE DRAMATIC INCREASE IN THE
                        PRICE OF ETHANOL AND YOUR VALUATION DUE TO RECENT
                        DEVELOPMENTS IN THE MARKET, IT APPEARS THAT A
                        SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE INCREASE IN THE VALUE OF YOUR
                        COMMON STOCK OCCURRED PRIOR TO MARCH 31, 2006.

                        Based upon the Company's discussions with the Staff, and
                        after re-evaluating its valuation model and assumptions
                        as of March 31, 2006, the Company has calculated a
                        revised valuation of its common stock as of March 31,
                        2006 of $15.60 per share and, accordingly, has increased
                        the valuation of the put warrant issued to Teachers
                        Insurance and Annuity Association of America by $10.9
                        million. This results in a corresponding increase in the
                        interest charge for the first quarter of 2006 of $10.9





Pamela A. Long
May 26, 2006
Page 3



                        million. The Company has revised the relevant financial
                        information in Amendment No. 3 accordingly.

                3.      WE HAVE REVIEWED YOUR RESPONSE TO COMMENT SIX. IF TRUE,
                        PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE ORIGINAL TERMS OF EACH OF THE
                        OPTIONS THAT HAD A MEASUREMENT DATE PRIOR TO THE APRIL
                        1, 2006 PROVIDED FOR ACCELERATION UPON AN INITIAL PUBLIC
                        OFFERING. IN THIS REGARD, WE NOTE YOUR STATEMENT ON PAGE
                        F-38 THAT "CERTAIN" SERVICE AWARDS PROVIDE FOR
                        ACCELERATED VESTING UPON A CHANGE IN CONTROL.

                        The Company confirms that the original terms of the
                        options that will accelerate upon completion of the
                        Company's planned initial public offering have not been
                        changed. With respect to the second half of comment no.
                        3, the Company confirms that some of its options,
                        including those awarded to directors of the Company, do
                        not provide for accelerated vesting upon a change of
                        control.

        Exhibits

                4.      WE NOTE YOUR RESPONSE TO COMMENT 8 OF OUR LETTER DATED
                        MAY 24, 2006. PLEASE EXPAND UPON YOUR RESPONSE TO
                        DISCUSS YOUR VIEW THAT THE CONTRACT IS IMMATERIAL, GIVEN
                        YOUR PROSPECTUS DISCLOSURE REGARDING THE AGREEMENT AND
                        AMERICAN MILLING'S ANTICIPATED PARTICIPATION IN YOUR
                        DIRECTED SHARE PROGRAM. THIS RESPONSE SHOULD INCLUDE THE
                        SUBSTANTIVE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT, PARTICULARLY ITS
                        CONSIDERATION. IN ADDITION PLEASE CONFIRM THAT AMERICAN
                        MILLING IS NOT A RELATED PARTY OR, ALTERNATIVELY, REVISE
                        YOUR PROSPECTUS TO DISCLOSE THE NATURE OF THE
                        RELATIONSHIP.

                        The Company has filed the American Milling agreement as
                        Exhibit 2.1 to Amendment No 3. The Company is seeking
                        confidential treatment for the pricing terms in the
                        agreement because they may affect the Company's
                        acquisition of property in the future, even though the
                        Company may not purchase any development sites under the
                        agreement. The Company confirms that American Milling is
                        not a related party.

The Company is appreciative of the Staff's efforts on its behalf over the past
few weeks and management looks forward to speaking with you today regarding this
letter and Amendment No. 3. Please address any questions or comments you may
have about this letter or Amendment No. 3 to me at (503) 294-9448.




Pamela A. Long
May 26, 2006
Page 4


Very truly yours,

/s/ John R. Thomas

John R. Thomas

cc:      Mr. Chris Edwards, Special Counsel
         Mr. Matt Franker, Staff Attorney
         Mr. Ernest Greene, Staff Accountant
         Mr. Scott Watkinson, Senior Staff Accountant
         Mr. Donald L. Endres
         Mr. Danny C. Herron
         Mr. John M. Schweitzer
         Mr. John J. Sabl