[RIDDELL WILLIAMS P.S. LOGO]



August 8, 2006




VIA EDGAR AND FACSIMILE

Ms. Kristi Beshears, Staff Accountant
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:     Red Lion Hotels Corporation
        Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005
        Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006
        File No. 001-13957

Dear Ms. Beshears:

    We are providing on behalf of our client, Red Lion Hotels Corporation (the
"Company" or "RLH"), the response of the Company to the comments of the staff
(the "Staff") of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") in
its letter dated July 27, 2006 relating to the Company's Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2006.

    The Company has supplied the supplemental information set forth in this
letter for use herein, and has reviewed and approved all of the responses set
forth herein to the Staff's comments. For convenience, each of the Staff's
consecutively numbered comments is set forth in italics, followed by the
Company's response.

                 FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4.  PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, PAGE 63

   1.   COMMENT: Tell us your basis in GAAP for consolidating the Kalispell
        Center based upon your 50% ownership interest. It is not clear from your
        disclosure how you ascertained that you control the property, which
        resulted in its consolidation in your financial statements. Please cite
        the relevant accounting literature in your response.


Ms. Kristi Beshears, Staff Accountant
August 8, 2006
Page 2

        RESPONSE:

        The Kalispell Center Hotel and Retail Complex ("Kalispell" or "the
   property") is a combined-use property comprised of the Red Lion Hotel
   Kalispell (the "Hotel") and the Kalispell Center Mall (the "Mall"). RLH
   believes that it is appropriate to account for its investment in the property
   using the consolidation method prescribed by Accounting Research Bulletin No.
   51 "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Statement of Financial Accounting
   Standards ("SFAS") No. 94 "Consolidation of Majority Owned Subsidiaries"
   ("SFAS No. 94"). The basis for this decision was determined as follows:


            (1) RLH's 50% legal ownership position indicating shared control;
                and

            (2) RLH's indicated control of Kalispell given the following
                factors:

                o   RLH's involvement in ongoing activities of the property
                    through its lease of the Hotel and, up until April 30, 2006,
                    its status as a property manager for the Mall;

                o   RLH's resulting disproportionate risk in the performance of
                    the property as a whole; and

                o   RLH's veto authority over major decisions.

            RLH holds a 50% tenancy-in-common ("TIC") interest in the Kalispell
        land, building, and operations. The other 50% is owned by an unrelated,
        third-party real estate investor. Funding and financing, voting power,
        ownership rights, and decision making authority are shared. Both parties
        to the TIC have veto rights on major decisions.

            RLH leases and operates the Hotel. The lease of the Hotel is
        material to the combined operations of the property. In addition,
        through a wholly owned operating business referred to as G&B Real Estate
        Services, RLH served as a property manager for the Mall through April
        30, 2006. Effective that date, RLH divested ownership of G&B Real Estate
        Services, which resulted in the transfer of the property management
        function for the Mall. On an ongoing basis RLH has the right, together
        with the owner of the other 50% of the TIC, to name a successor property
        manager for the Mall.

            Based upon the relative ownership percentages, the importance of the
        Hotel to the property, RLH's ability to veto major decisions as outlined
        in the TIC agreement, and its disproportionate risk as compared to the
        other owner in the success or failure of the property, RLH concluded
        that control existed and generally accepted accounting principles
        required consolidation as compared to treatment as an equity method
        investment. At the time of the original TIC

Ms. Kristi Beshears, Staff Accountant
August 8, 2006
Page 3


        agreement, RLH's ability to impact daily operations of the Mall in its
        capacity as a property manager led further weight to this decision.
        While RLH no longer serves in that capacity, RLH still has significant
        influence in selecting which third party management company will manage
        the Mall, and therefore significant influence with respect to the
        operations of that portion of the property.

            Future disclosure of this ownership in the Company's annual Form
        10-K and interim filings will include the affirmative statement that "We
        consolidate the Kalispell Center retail and hotel complex as we believe
        the form of our ownership and the level of our influence over the
        operations of the assets indicate that consolidation is appropriate for
        the property."

NOTE 5.  OTHER INVESTMENTS, PAGE 65

   2.   COMMENT: Tell us your basis in GAAP for treating the trust in which you
        own a 3% interest as an equity method investment. We note from page 54
        that this trust is considered a VIE under FIN 46(R). Please also tell us
        whether or not you are the primary beneficiary of the trust and how you
        reached that conclusion. We may have further comment.

        RESPONSE:

        The Company has considered both SFAS No. 94 and FASB Interpretation No.
    46(R) "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46(R)") and
    believes that it is appropriate to account for the investment in the Red
    Lion Hotels Capital Trust ("the Trust") using the equity method of
    accounting prescribed by Accounting Principle Board Opinion No. 18 "The
    Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock". The basis for
    this decision follows from:

        (1)  RLH's legal ownership of 100% of the trust common securities issued
             by the Trust, which represents 3% of the total book basis
             capitalization of the Trust; the remaining capitalization consists
             of trust preferred securities, held publicly and traded on the New
             York Stock Exchange;

        (2)  RLH not being the primary beneficiary of the Trust and therefore
             consolidation under FIN 46(R) being deemed inappropriate; and

        (3)  RLH's significant influence over the Trust indicating that equity
             method accounting for the investment was appropriate.

        RLH holds a 3% interest in the Trust through its ownership of the trust
    common securities. The other 97% of the capitalization of the Trust is in
    the form of trust preferred securities held publicly (by outside, unrelated
    third-party

Ms. Kristi Beshears, Staff Accountant
August 8, 2006
Page 4



    investors) and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
    RLH-pa. The Trust was created solely to facilitate the offering of the trust
    preferred securities. While the Company believes the Trust meets the
    definition of a variable interest entity under FIN 46(R), it also believes
    the trust preferred security holders are the primary beneficiaries of the
    Trust. As such, the Company concluded that consolidation of the Trust into
    RLH was not appropriate.

        Given the 100% ownership of the trust common securities, service by
    officers of RLH as administrative trustees of the Trust, material
    transactions between the Trust and RLH including certain material
    debentures, and the overall dependency of the Trust on RLH, the Company
    believes that RLH has significant influence over the Trust and that equity
    method treatment for the investment is appropriate.

         Future disclosure of this ownership in the Company's annual Form 10-K
      and interim filings will include the affirmative statement that "...we are
      not considered the primary beneficiary of the Trust."

NOTE 16.  BUSINESS SEGMENTS, PAGE 76

      3.  COMMENT: We note that there are intra-segment revenues between the
          franchise and management segment and the hotels segment; however, the
          revenue presented for each of these segments is the same as the
          amounts presented on consolidated statements of operations. Please
          quantify and disclose the amount of intra-segment revenue in
          accordance with paragraph 27(b) of SFAS 131 and confirm to us that
          these amounts have been eliminated from your consolidated financial
          statements.

          RESPONSE:

          Certain owned hotels, making up a component of the Company's hotels
      segment, pay a management fee for services to the franchise and management
      segment that is reflected on a hotel property's individual stand alone
      financial statements. For the year ended December 31, 2005, that fee
      totaled approximately $3,073,000 for all of the hotels in question. That
      fee is appropriately eliminated upon consolidation. In Note 16 to its
      consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005,
      the Company presented the table for its segments on a "post-elimination"
      basis. In accordance with SFAS No. 131 "Disclosures about Segments of an
      Enterprise and Related Information", the Company presents the information
      included in the measure of segment profit and loss reviewed by the
      Company's chief operating decision maker. The Company's chief operating
      decision makers evaluate segment profit and loss based upon its impact to
      the

Ms. Kristi Beshears, Staff Accountant
August 8, 2006
Page 5


      consolidated statements, otherwise described as on a post elimination
      basis. The Company believes the footnote conforms to the requirements of
      SFAS No. 131. Future disclosure of segments in the Company's annual Form
      10-K and interim filings will include the affirmative statement that the
      table "... reflects balances after the elimination of intra-segment
      transactions".

                          ----------------------------

In responding to the Staff's comments, the Company acknowledges:

      o     The Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the
            disclosure in the Form 10-K and Form 10-Q;

      o     Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff
            comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with
            respect to the Form 10-K and Form 10-Q; and

      o     the Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any
            proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the
            federal securities law of the United States.

    Please contact the undersigned at (206) 389-1519 with any questions
concerning this letter. In addition, we request that you advise us when the
Staff has completed its review of the filings.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Frank C. Woodruff
- ---------------------
Frank C. Woodruff
        of
RIDDELL WILLIAMS P.S.


cc:     Daniel L. Gordon
        Securities and Exchange Commission

        Arthur Coffey
        President and Chief Executive Officer
        Red Lion Hotels Corporation