1
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1998
[ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Commission file number 333-17961
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 25-1534498
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
600 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219-2704
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's Telephone Number: (412) 433-2747
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
Registrant as of March 31, 1999: Not determinable.
Common Stock outstanding at March 31, 1999: 14,908 shares.
Documents Incorporated by Reference: None
1
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
----
PART I
Item 1. Business 3
Item 2. Properties 12
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 12
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 12
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters 13
Item 6. Selected Financial Data 13
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations 13
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 18
Item 8. Financial Statements 18
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants On
Accounting and Financial Disclosure 37
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 37
Item 11. Executive Compensation 41
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management 45
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 46
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports
on Form 8-K 46
SIGNATURES 48
2
3
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
THE COMPANY
Aristech Chemical Corporation ("Aristech") was incorporated under the laws of
the State of Delaware on October 14, 1986, and began doing business on December
4, 1986.
On October 1, 1997, Aristech formed a joint venture with Mitsubishi Rayon Co.,
Ltd. ("MRC") to manufacture and sell acrylic sheet and decorative surfacing
products. Aristech's former acrylic sheet division was reorganized as Aristech
Acrylics LLC ("AALLC"), a Kentucky limited liability company in which Aristech
holds a 90% ownership interest. Dianal America, Inc. ("DAI"), a wholly owned
U.S. subsidiary of MRC holds a 10% ownership interest in AALLC.
The "Company" refers to Aristech and Avonite, Inc. (a New Mexico corporation and
a 60% owned consolidated subsidiary, hereinafter "Avonite" for on and after July
1, 1996) and AALLC (for on and after October 1, 1997).
GENERAL
The Company is a producer and marketer of chemical and polymer products with
total annual rated production capacity in excess of three billion pounds. The
Company's operations are divided into two reportable operating segments:
Chemicals and Polymers. The Company's Chemicals reportable operating segment
consists of the aggregation of its Phenol and Plasticizer and related products.
The Polymers reportable operating segment consists of the aggregation of its
polypropylene and acrylic sheet products. These chemical and polymer products
provide the Company with a diversified revenue base. While many of the Company's
products are considered commodities, the Company's production of polypropylene
and acrylic sheet has been increasingly directed toward more specialized, higher
margin products. There is significant vertical integration among the Company's
products, providing the Company with supplies of certain of its raw materials.
The Company also has a diverse customer base, with no single customer comprising
more than 7% of gross revenues during 1998. End-use markets for the Company's
products include automotive components, home and office construction,
appliances, modular tubs/showers, whirlpools, spas, apparel, packaging, medical
supplies, signs and a wide range of consumer products. Each segment has its own
dedicated sales force responsible for domestic sales. Sales for export markets,
which accounted for approximately 20% of total sales in 1998, are either handled
directly, through distributors or with independent representatives. Financial
information concerning the Company's two reportable operating segments are
included herein under Item 8, Note J to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
4
PLANT PROFILE
The following table lists the products produced by the Company and the locations
of the plants where such products are produced. A narrative description of each
product follows the table.
(Million Pounds)
Annual Current Typical End Plant
Product Produced Rated Capacity Use of Product Locations
---------------- -------------- -------------- ---------
CHEMICALS
2-Ethylhexanol 280 Plasticizers, Acrylates, Resins, Surfactants Pasadena, TX
Defoamers and Lube Additives
Acetone 434 Solvent, Acrylic Plastic and Bisphenol-A Haverhill, OH
Alphamethylstyrene 52 ABS Plastic and Resins Haverhill, OH
Aniline 150 Rigid Polyurethane and Rubber Chemicals Haverhill, OH
Bisphenol-A 215 Engineering Plastics, Epoxy Resins and Haverhill, OH
Flame Retardants
Cumene Hydroperoxide 16 Polymerization Catalyst Haverhill, OH
Diphenylamine 25 Rubber Chemicals and Lube Additives Haverhill, OH
Phenol 700 Phenolic Resins and Bisphenol-A Haverhill, OH
Plasticizers 210 Flexible Vinyl Neville Island, PA
Phthalic Anhydride 265 Plasticizers, Unsaturated Polyester Resins, Pasadena, TX
Alkyd Paints and Molding Resins
POLYMERS
AALLC-Acrylic Sheet 75 Outdoor Signs, Lighting Fixtures, Modular Florence, KY
Tub and Shower Units, Spas, Whirlpool,
Vanity and Kitchen Countertops and
Exterior Wall Cladding
Avonite-Polyester Sheet 2.5 million Vanity and Kitchen Countertops and Other Belen, NM
Square Feet Decorative Architectural Applications
Polypropylene 828 Automotive Parts, Fibers, Battery Casings LaPorte, TX
Consumer and Medical Products, Packaging Neal, WV
Films, Strapping and Housewares
4
5
CHEMICALS
The following is a narrative of the chemicals produced and marketed by Aristech.
Aristech's chemical products are produced with processes using licensed
technology, except for cumene hydroperoxide ("CHP") and diphenylamine ("DPA")
technologies that were developed internally by Aristech.
2-ETHYLHEXANOL. 2-Ethylhexanol ("2-EH") is a commodity intermediate chemical
used in the manufacture of organic chemical products. Plasticizers are the major
market for 2-EH and account for approximately half of total domestic 2-EH
consumption and over three-quarters of global consumption. The main raw
materials used in 2-EH are propylene and natural gas. Aristech has entered into
supply contracts for natural gas and propylene, and both are also available on
the spot market. Aristech used approximately 32% of 2-EH production in 1998 as a
raw material for plasticizers. The remainder of the 2-EH produced by Aristech is
sold primarily in the merchant export market. Competition is based primarily on
price.
ACETONE. Acetone is used as a solvent for paints, varnishes, lacquers and vinyl
resins, and as a raw material for a wide range of chemicals such as methyl
methacrylate ("MMA"), bisphenol-A ("BPA"), methyl isobutyl ketone and others.
Approximately 22% of Aristech's acetone production was used as a raw material
for the production of MMA for AALLC and internally for BPA in 1998, with the
remainder being sold to the merchant market. Aristech's 1997 phenol unit
expansion resulted in increased acetone production capacity by 44 million pounds
annually. Aristech is in the process of expanding the Haverhill, Ohio plant. The
new unit, when completed, is expected to be capable of producing 150 million
pounds of acetone bringing the total acetone capacity to 584 million pounds in
late 1999.
ALPHAMETHYLSTYRENE. High-purity alphamethylstyrene ("AMS"), a low volume
product, is used to increase heat distortion temperature and provide strength in
ABS resins. Capital expansions increased AMS production capability by nearly 50%
in 1997. Aristech's production is sold in the merchant market or hydrogenated to
cumene.
ANILINE. Aniline is predominantly consumed in the production of MDI-based rigid
polyurethane foams and coating resins. Polymeric isocyanates have been growth
products used in construction, mainly as building insulation and in the
automotive industry. Aniline is also consumed in the production of rubber,
photographic developers, agricultural chemicals and dyes. Aniline is produced
from internally produced phenol and purchased ammonia that is available from
nearby sources. Aristech is one of two companies worldwide that produces aniline
from phenol.
BPA. BPA is an organic chemical intermediate that is produced from phenol and
acetone. BPA is consumed mainly in the production of polycarbonate and epoxy
resins, but increasing amounts are used to produce flame retardants, polysulfone
resins, phenoxy resins and polyester resins. The raw materials for BPA are
internally produced phenol and acetone. Approximately 57% of Aristech's BPA
trade sales were sold to export markets during 1998. Aristech also purchases and
resells BPA through agreements with Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation ("MCC") to
supplement its own production.
CHP. CHP is a low volume, intermediate compound extracted from Aristech's phenol
and acetone facilities that is purified using a process developed by Aristech's
research group. CHP is sold in the domestic market primarily for use as a
polymerization catalyst.
DPA. DPA is low volume product used to make rubber chemicals as well as
lubricant additives, dyes and to make a stabilizer for acrylates. Aristech
produces DPA by its own proprietary process from internally produced aniline.
Aristech is one of two domestic producers of DPA selling to the merchant market.
PHENOL. The largest single use of phenol is as a raw material for BPA. Other
important uses are phenolic resins for plywood, chipboard, foundry and
industrial applications. Phenol, when used as a chemical intermediate, becomes a
component of nylon, and surfactants. Aristech uses phenol as a raw material for
its production of BPA and aniline. Competition is based primarily on price.
The main raw material for phenol is cumene, which is first oxidized to form CHP
and then cleaved to produce phenol, acetone and AMS. Cumene is obtained by
Aristech from several sources under supply agreements, and is also available on
the spot market. An expansion in the phenol unit was completed in the fourth
quarter of 1997, increasing production capacity by 70 million pounds annually.
Aristech also obtains phenol through arms'-length purchases from MCC to
supplement its own production.
5
6
In 1998, Aristech sold approximately 55% of its total production of phenol into
the merchant market. Exports of phenol represented approximately 22% of
Aristech's total phenol trade sales in 1998. Aristech is in the process of
expanding the Haverhill, Ohio plant. The new unit, when completed, is expected
to be capable of producing 242 million pounds of phenol bringing the total
phenol capacity to 942 million pounds in late 1999.
PLASTICIZERS. Plasticizers are organic esters produced primarily in high volume
commodity grades. Plasticizers are used principally in the manufacture of
flexible polyvinyl chloride ("PVC") plastic products. PVC products are sold into
a wide variety of applications, including consumer (rainwear, toys and boots),
housing (flooring and wall coverings), automotive (seat and dashboard covers and
vinyl roofs) and industrial (wire and cable insulation).
Plasticizers are made from a variety of dibasic acids (primarily phthalic
anhydride) and alcohols, including 2-EH. Aristech produces its own supply of
phthalic anhydride and 2-EH that are used in large volumes in plasticizers.
Aristech produces a complete line of plasticizers, for both general and
specialized applications, all of which are sold into the merchant market.
Competition is based primarily on price. Aristech manufactures plasticizers
utilizing well-developed batch process technology at its facility located on the
Ohio River at Neville Island, Pennsylvania.
PHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE. Phthalic anhydride ("PA") is a commodity intermediate
chemical used in the manufacture of organic chemical products, such as
plasticizers, unsaturated polyester resins, alkyd paint and molding resins. PA
is manufactured from orthoxylene, a petrochemical commodity purchased from a
number of sources under supply agreements, and it is also available on the spot
market. Aristech consumed approximately 27% of PA production in 1998 as a raw
material for plasticizers, with the remainder sold to the merchant market.
Competition is based primarily on price.
POLYMERS
The following is a narrative of the polymers produced and marketed by Aristech.
The Company's polymers consist of AALLC's acrylic sheet products, Avonite's
polyester sheet products and Aristech's polypropylene products.
AALLC-ACRYLIC SHEET. AALLC produces acrylic sheet. Acrylic sheet is a polymeric
product produced in specialty and commodity grades. Applications include
bathtubs, modular tubs/showers, spas, whirlpool units, glazing, skylights, sign
facia, vanity and kitchen countertops and other decorative uses. All sales of
acrylic sheet are in the merchant market.
The primary feedstock for acrylic sheet is MMA, which is currently obtained
through third party toll conversion using acetone produced at Aristech's
Haverhill, Ohio plant.
AALLC produces acrylic sheet using the continuous cast method. This process
permits AALLC to produce cross-linked sheet products of significantly greater
widths and lengths than are obtainable from the more commonly used cell-cast or
extrusion methods. AALLC's acrylic sheet is produced at its Florence, Kentucky
plant that is equipped with three continuous casters. Design, operation and
maintenance of the continuous casters represent significant proprietary
technology of AALLC. AALLC is one of five domestic producers of cast acrylic
sheet products and one of two that use the continuous cast method. The Florence,
Kentucky plant is in the process of being expanded. The expansion, when
completed in late 1999, is expected to increase its annual production capacity
by 44.5 million pounds.
AVONITE-POLYESTER SHEET. Avonite produces premium solid surface polyester sheet
under the tradename Avonite(R). Avonite(R) is used for countertops, wall
cladding and other decorative architectural applications. Avonite's production
facility is in Belen, New Mexico. Avonite produces its sheet from unsaturated
polyester resins purchased in the highly competitive resin market. In addition,
Avonite purchases and resells certain of AALLC's Acrystone(R) acrylic solid
surface sheet products.
POLYPROPYLENE. Polypropylene is a thermoplastic resin produced by Aristech in
both commodity and specialty grades. The major markets for polypropylene are:
synthetic fibers used in carpet backing, carpet face yarns, upholstery fabrics,
geotextiles and disposable diapers; automotive applications, including battery
cases and interior trim parts; packaging films for food and non-food
applications; injection-molded caps and closures; medical applications (syringes
and vials); and a wide range of other consumer products.
6
7
Propylene is the principal raw material used in the production of polypropylene.
The LaPorte, Texas plant obtains its supply of chemical and polymer grade
propylene primarily via pipeline under agreements with Mobil Oil Corporation
("Mobil") and Equistar Chemicals LP, and the remainder on the spot market. The
Neal, West Virginia plant is supplied with refinery grade propylene via pipeline
from the nearby refinery of Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC and refinery and
chemical grade propylene by rail from other producers in the northern tier of
the United States and Canada. Both plants operate propylene splitters that
permit the upgrading of lower cost refinery and chemical grade propylene to
polymer grade raw materials.
Aristech sells substantially all of its output of polypropylene to the merchant
market. Exports, primarily to the Far East, represented approximately 6% of
polypropylene sales in 1998. Imports are not a significant factor in the
domestic market.
Aristech is one of 12 producers of polypropylene in the United States.
Competition among producers of commodity grade polypropylene is primarily on the
basis of price, as well as quality and service. In specialty grades, competition
is based primarily on product development, quality and service. To help direct
Aristech's product mix toward the more specialized, higher margin products, a
technical services group provides assistance to customers to develop specialty
formulations to meet their specific product requirements. A new polypropylene
technical center was opened in November 1997, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
further strengthening Aristech's commitment to customer service and focus on
specialty products. Control of raw materials supply and cost, utilization of the
latest production technology, and proximity to markets are also important
competitive factors.
The Neal, West Virginia plant utilizes Spheripol-technology developed by
Montedison S.p.A. and licensed from Technipol B.Y. The LaPorte, Texas plant
utilizes licensed high-yield catalyst technology. The LaPorte, Texas plant is in
the process of being expanded. The expansion, when completed in late 1999, is
expected to add 550 million pounds of annual capacity.
On February 12, 1998, Aristech and MCC entered into a nonbinding memorandum of
understanding that contemplated the formation of a joint venture in the
polypropylene business in the United States. The parties have discontinued
discussions regarding the formation of a joint venture in the polypropylene
business.
ORDER BACKLOG
Normally, significant customer orders are placed during the same month that
shipment is requested and orders placed for future delivery are subject to
revision or cancellation. For these reasons, the Company does not consider order
backlog to be a meaningful indication of future business activity for its
businesses.
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
The Company employs approximately 1,750 people. The operating personnel at Neal,
West Virginia, Neville Island, Pennsylvania and AALLC's Florence, Kentucky
facilities are represented by the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International
Union, the United Steelworkers of America, and the International Chemical
Workers, respectively. Historically, operations have generally not been
interrupted by strikes. The Company's other facilities are not represented by
unions.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Company's research and development activities are conducted at research
centers at Monroeville, Pennsylvania and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and augmented
by product development and technical service groups directly attached to the
polypropylene and plasticizers businesses and AALLC.
7
8
PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS
The Company possesses a substantial body of technical know-how and trade secrets
and owns approximately 105 United States patents applicable to all phases of its
business, including product formulations and production processes. The Company
considers its know-how, trade secrets and patents important to the conduct of
its business although no individual item is considered to be material to the
business. Certain plants use technology licensed from others. Royalty expense on
these licenses amounted to $4.5 million in 1998, $3.9 million in 1997, and $3.0
million in 1996. AALLC also has licensed its Acrysteel(R) technology to MRC.
Aristech is entitled to receive royalties under certain circumstances for two
stage cleavage technology used in the production of phenol and acetone, which is
licensed by a third party to MCC.
ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH AND SAFETY MATTERS
The Company (and the industry in which it competes) is subject to pervasive
environmental laws and regulations concerning the production of chemicals,
emissions to the air, discharges to waterways and the generation, handling,
storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of waste materials and is also
subject to other Federal and state laws and regulations regarding health and
safety matters. These laws and regulations are constantly evolving and it is
impossible to predict accurately the effect these laws and regulations will have
on the Company in the future.
Each of the Company's production facilities has permits and licenses regulating
air emissions and water discharges. Each of these production facilities that
requires permits for the treatment, storage or disposal of hazardous waste has
interim or final permits. Some permits and licenses, including all for hazardous
waste treatment, storage or disposal, require that the holder meet financial
responsibility criteria. The Company meets the financial responsibility criteria
required for holding hazardous waste permits and licenses by meeting the
requirements of a financial test mechanism under applicable state or federal
regulation.
It is the Company's policy to comply with all applicable environmental, health
and safety laws and regulations. Nonetheless, in the course of conducting its
business, regulatory compliance issues can arise with regard to the Company's
operations or its products. In addition, environmental laws and regulations
establish requirements for recordkeeping and other administrative efforts.
Resolving such issues and satisfying recordkeeping and other administrative
requirements can require the Company to incur ongoing operating costs and/or
make capital expenditures to achieve or maintain compliance with such laws and
regulations. The Company has expended substantial funds for such compliance in
the past, and expects to continue to do so. Future requirements arising from new
laws and regulations can also give rise to additional compliance costs. The
Company is unable to predict the magnitude of its aggregate future compliance
costs. Violations of environmental permits or licenses could result in
substantial sanctions, which could be civil, criminal, or both. Violations could
also result in the revocation of such permits or licenses. In addition, the
operation of any chemical manufacturing plant entails risk of adverse
environmental effect, including exposure to chemical products and by-products
from the Company's operations.
In some cases, compliance can only be achieved by capital expenditures. In 1998,
the Company spent approximately $11.1 million for environmentally related
capital expenditures. Based upon preliminary estimates of capital expenditures
for environmental projects at existing facilities and without any detailed
engineering or other technical planning, the Company broadly estimates that
expenditures for 1999 and 2000 will total $11.0 million in the aggregate.
The Company's facilities for many years have shipped waste materials to third
party sites for treatment and/or disposal. As a result of these practices, the
Company is currently involved in investigative or cleanup projects under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA")
or comparable state laws at 28 sites. Based on currently available information,
the Company has reserved $6.0 million in the aggregate for its share of costs
associated with certain of these sites. No amount has been reserved for a
majority of such sites, since amounts are included only when costs are
reasonably estimable. At seventeen of the sites, either the regulatory agency
has indicated that no further action will be required or the Company has settled
out as a de minimis party. It is possible that the Company may be involved in
future investigations and cleanups of other sites to which the Company sent
waste materials. The Company cannot predict such future liabilities with
accuracy.
8
9
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA") requires the Company to
estimate the closure and post-closure costs for its hazardous waste treatment,
storage and disposal facilities. The Company estimates total closure and
post-closure costs for its existing facilities, and any former facilities for
which the Company contractually retained liability, to be approximately $9.3
million. The Company revises these costs at least annually to reflect inflation,
and at other times to address changed conditions. The Company has closed
hazardous waste management facilities at its Linden, New Jersey and Florence,
Kentucky facilities. The Company is awaiting regulatory acceptance of these
closures and it is not known whether additional closure requirements will be
imposed.
The New Jersey Industrial Sites Recovery Act requires that Aristech investigate
site conditions at its former manufacturing facility in Linden, New Jersey
(currently operated as a warehouse and distribution facility) to assess the type
and extent of contamination that may be present. Aristech has submitted a
Remedial Investigation/Remedial Action Plan (the "Plan") to the New Jersey
Department of Environmental Protection (the "NJDEP") with respect to this
facility. Aristech has performed certain remedial actions pursuant to the Plan
with the approval of the NJDEP at a cost of approximately $0.2 million. The
remaining remedial actions proposed by the Plan, currently estimated to cost
$0.7 million, have not been approved by the NJDEP. Aristech cannot predict
whether the NJDEP will approve the remainder of the Plan as proposed, whether
additional cleanup conditions, if any, may be imposed, or the costs of any such
additional cleanup conditions.
Aristech has been investigating an area of its former Colton, California
facility at the request of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board
("Water Board"). Soil sampling has revealed residual contamination and
groundwater monitoring wells have been installed. In October 1997, the Water
Board requested that Aristech and the owner of a neighboring facility conduct an
off-site, downgradient investigation of the groundwater. Aristech and the owner
of the neighboring facility have agreed to this request. Aristech estimates its
share of the investigation requested by the Water Board will not be material. It
is not possible to estimate the costs of further investigation or cleanup at
this time.
RCRA can also impose corrective action requirements at facilities where
hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal occurs or has occurred.
Corrective action requirements include investigation, and remedial action for
impacted soils and groundwater. While preliminary investigations have occurred
at some of the Company's facilities, it is not possible to predict the timing or
extent of the remedial actions that ultimately might be required.
Some studies suggest that certain industrial chemicals, including phthalates and
BPA, mimic the effect of hormones in people and animals, and adversely influence
the reproductive process. Some phthalate esters have been implicated in
unverified screening tests. Aristech believes that this effect is not associated
with its phthalate ester product line, based on the results of independent and
industry sponsored testing. BPA has also been implicated by the same screening
tests. To address this allegation, Aristech and the other United States BPA
producers have established an extensive reproductive health testing program that
Aristech believes will demonstrate that BPA does not cause estrogenic effects in
animals or humans. Newly enacted legislation associated with the safety of
drinking water and the food supply contains requirements for performing
estrogenicity screens. While BPA and certain phthalate esters will most likely
be targeted by these requirements, Aristech believes that voluntary testing
completed or currently underway will mitigate or obviate the need for additional
estrogenicity testing. Certain plasticizers, particularly DEHP (di-ethylhexyl
phthalate, also known as dioctyl phthalate, or DOP) have been under public
attention and close scrutiny by health and environmental agencies during recent
years. While there are no government regulations in force or proposed that
restrict their marketing, sale or use, public perception may eventually affect a
segment of the market for DOP and other plasticizers.
The Company's domestic competitors are subject to the same environmental, health
and safety laws and regulations and the Company believes that its issues and
potential expenditures are comparable to those faced by its major domestic
competitors. As noted in the discussion of individual product lines, the markets
for most of the Company's products are very price competitive. Therefore, future
environmentally related capital expenditure requirements, liabilities and costs
could be a major factor in the Company's future sales and income, since it may
not always be possible to pass costs on to customers.
9
10
DISPOSITION OF CERTAIN BUSINESSES
COAL CHEMICALS BUSINESS
In March 1996, Aristech sold to Koppers Industries, Inc. ("Koppers")
substantially all of its assets related to the production and sale of coal
chemicals (the "Coal Chemicals Business"), and Koppers assumed certain of the
liabilities in connection with the Coal Chemicals Business. Aristech agreed to
indemnify Koppers against liabilities arising from (i) breaches of Aristech's
representations, warranties and covenants contained in the asset purchase
agreement and (ii) claims relating to the Coal Chemicals Business arising out of
events occurring prior to the sale. The representations and warranties expired
on September 30, 1997, and any claim by Koppers for indemnification for breach
of the expired representations and warranties had to be made by an October 15,
1997 deadline. No such claims were made. Under a reorganization agreement dated
October 14, 1986, under which the Coal Chemicals Business was transferred from
USX Corporation ("USX") to Aristech, USX generally retained responsibility for
pre-1986 environmental conditions on the properties. Koppers generally assumed
(with certain exceptions) all environmental compliance, toxic exposure,
environmental damage and environmental response cost liabilities arising after
1986 with respect to the Coal Chemicals Business. Aristech retained, and agreed
to indemnify Koppers for, liabilities arising from specific listed environmental
"incidents," although Aristech is not aware of any asserted or overtly
threatened claims likely to lead to material liabilities related to any of the
enumerated incidents.
Aristech also agreed to retain liabilities related to: (i) claims of personal
injury arising from exposure to regulated substances released between December
4, 1986 and the sale; (ii) claims of property value diminution arising from
releases to the air of regulated substances by Aristech occurring between
December 4, 1986 and the sale (but only if those claims are asserted within 24
months of the sale); (iii) claims related to the shipment, treatment or disposal
of regulated substances at off-site locations during the period of Aristech's
operations of the facilities; and (iv) enforcement actions and penalties
relating to violations of environmental laws resulting from operations of the
business or use of the property during the period of Aristech's ownership. As of
the date of this filing, Aristech is not aware of any actual or threatened claim
for indemnification arising under these provisions.
POLYESTER BUSINESS
In April 1995, Aristech sold to Ashland, Inc. ("Ashland") substantially all of
its assets related to the manufacture and sale of unsaturated polyester resins
("UPR") and maleic anhydride ("MA") and the distribution of UPR and other
polyester products (collectively, the "Polyester Business"). Ashland also
assumed certain of Aristech's liabilities in connection with the Polyester
Business. Aristech retained ownership of the land underlying the production
facility for the Polyester Business located at Neville Island, Pennsylvania.
Aristech continues to manufacture plasticizers at Neville Island. Ashland
generally purchased all physical assets at the Neville Island facility primarily
used in the production of UPR and MA, and Aristech retained those primarily used
to manufacture plasticizers. Aristech granted to Ashland an irrevocable easement
for the land beneath the structures transferred to Ashland and certain areas
around and between those structures, and each party granted the other rights to
permit access to and maintenance of the other party's assets, as necessary.
Ashland and Aristech also entered into a service agreement whereby each agreed
to supply the other with certain services related to the other party's
operations at the Neville Island facility. The prices charged for such services
are generally designed to approximate the supplier's cost of providing the
services. The services agreement contains a mutual release and indemnification
provision whereby each party, as a recipient of services, releases and
indemnifies the other, as a service provider, from and against claims arising
from the acts of the service provider's employees or claims asserted by such
employees in connection with the furnishing of services under the agreement.
Aristech agreed to indemnify Ashland against liabilities arising from (i)
breaches of Aristech's representations, warranties and agreements contained in
the asset purchase agreement and related documents and (ii) Aristech's operation
of the Polyester Business prior to the sale. Most of Aristech's representations
and warranties have expired. Aristech's indemnification obligations for breach
of any representation or warranty (whether or not expired) are capped at $30.0
million. The parties' respective obligations with respect to environmental
matters are not covered by the foregoing provisions.
10
11
With respect to environmental matters, Aristech: (1) retained liability for any
claims that might be asserted regarding previous shipments of regulated
substances from the business to off-site treatment and disposal facilities; (2)
agreed to indemnify Ashland from enforcement proceedings or penalties arising
from alleged violations of environmental laws resulting from business operations
that may have occurred prior to the closing; and (3) agreed to make certain
modifications of the incinerator at the Jacksonville, Arkansas site to assure
compliance with applicable air quality permit requirements and performance
criteria.
With respect to the Neville Island facility: (1) Aristech agreed (subject to a
number of limitations) to indemnify Ashland against claims arising from
pre-closing environmental contamination conditions, if any, and any
contamination caused by future releases from Aristech's operations; (2) Ashland
agreed to indemnify Aristech from environmental conditions arising from future
releases caused by Ashland; and (3) an allocation arrangement is established
under which responsibility for an environmental condition may be shared. Because
an environmental assessment has not been completed at the Neville Island
facility, the nature and extent of potential environmental contamination has not
been ascertained.
With respect to the other UPR and MA production facilities, Aristech agreed to
indemnify Ashland for any required investigation and remediation of: (1) certain
former waste management units at the Colton, California site; (2) phosphate
contamination in groundwater at the Bartow, Florida site, caused by nearby
mining operations; and (3) contamination in a former waste pond at Bartow.
Aristech also agreed to complete closure of certain listed former waste
management units at those production facilities, and to be responsible for
certain additional assessments or investigations of specifically identified
areas affected by various former solid waste management units and
previously-removed underground storage tanks. Aristech has reserved sufficient
amounts for the estimated costs of completing the presently required
investigations and closure work, although any estimate of the costs associated
with work required in the future cannot be made until further investigations
have been completed. As to remediation of environmental conditions arising from
previous solid waste units, Aristech and Ashland agreed to share such expenses
in excess of an annual deductible amount, under a sliding scale that reduces
Aristech's share from 100% to 0% over 25 years. With respect to other
environmental conditions (including presently unknown and unidentified
conditions), Aristech agreed to share with Ashland costs of additional
investigations and remedial actions, with Aristech's share of such costs based
on a sliding scale that decreases over a 21-year period. Those obligations to
indemnify Ashland are subject to a minimal annual deductible amount.
As to the distribution facilities (all of which were leased properties),
Aristech retained liability for pre-closing environmental conditions, if any,
only until the expiration of the then pending leases. The last of those leases
expired on October 30, 1998. Special provisions govern the allocation of
responsibilities at the leased Ankeny, Iowa distribution facility, as to
contamination resulting from the former operations of the Albaugh Chemical
Company, to the extent that such matters are not covered under an
indemnification provided by the lessor of that property.
All of Aristech's indemnification obligations relating to environmental
conditions at the former UPR and MA business facilities, including Neville
Island, are subject to a cap of $34.0 million, which value is escalated on a
quarterly basis based upon the producer price index.
Mitsubishi Corporation ("MC") entered into a letter agreement with Ashland to
provide certain assurances to Ashland with respect to Aristech's environmental
indemnification obligations to Ashland. The letter agreement prohibits MC, in
its capacity as a controlling stockholder of Aristech, from (i) dissolving
Aristech or (ii) causing Aristech to transfer assets such that the value of its
remaining tangible assets falls below $40.0 million, unless MC provides to
Ashland reasonable security or other financial assurance regarding such
obligations. The letter agreement expires the earliest of (i) April 28, 2020,
(ii) effectuation by Aristech of a public offering of its equity securities,
(iii) MC and its subsidiaries ceasing to own over 50% of Aristech's outstanding
equity securities and (iv) Aristech becoming the subject of a bankruptcy
proceeding. Also in connection with the sale, Ashland and Aristech entered into
supply contracts for the purchase and sale of MA (the "MA Supply Contract"), PA
(the "PA Supply Contract") and 2-EH (the "2-EH Supply Contract"). The MA Supply
Contract obligates Aristech to purchase from Ashland all of its annual North
American consumption requirement of MA for the facilities and businesses owned
by Aristech as of April 28,1995. The PA Supply Contract obligates Ashland to
purchase from Aristech all of Ashland's North American consumption requirement
of PA for the facilities and businesses owned by Ashland as of April 28, 1995.
The 2-EH Supply Contract requires Ashland to purchase from Aristech the 2-EH
used by Ashland to produce UPR. The MA and PA Supply Contracts terminate on
April 28, 2000, subject to the parties' obligation to negotiate in good faith
the terms and conditions of an additional 60 month supply agreement. The 2-EH
Supply Contract has a term expiring on December 31, 1999 and continuing from
year to year thereafter unless terminated by prior notice of either party.
11
12
OLEFINS BUSINESS
In January 1988, Aristech sold to Mobil certain assets of Aristech's Olefins
operations (the "Olefins Business") and Mobil assumed certain liabilities in
connection with the Olefins Business. Mobil assumed no pre-existing
environmental liabilities related to the Olefins Business. Aristech has agreed
to indemnify Mobil for environmental liabilities related to the Olefins Business
existing on or prior to the sale. As of December 31, 1998, there were no pending
or threatened claims for indemnification arising under these provisions. With
respect to environmental claims arising from actions of parties other than
Aristech and USX prior to the ownership of the Olefins Business by USX,
Aristech's indemnification obligations expired in November 1992, since Mobil
made no demand for such indemnification within five years of the closing. The
maximum aggregate liability of Aristech for indemnification of Mobil for
environmental claims is $5.0 million. Mobil agreed to indemnify Aristech for all
environmental liabilities related to actions taken or the failure to take
actions by Mobil relating to the Olefins Business on or after the sale.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The location and general character of the principal plants and other important
physical properties of the Company are described in Item 1. The plants are
located on properties that are held in fee simple. The executive offices,
research facility at Monroeville, Pennsylvania, polypropylene technical center,
sales offices and warehouses are leased from third parties. The plants and other
facilities have been constructed or acquired from time to time over a period of
years and vary in age and operating efficiency. The Company considers its
properties to be in suitable condition for their intended use and purpose.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company becomes involved from time to time in various claims and lawsuits
incidental to the ordinary course of its business. A discussion with regards to
these matters are included in Note K to the Consolidated Financial Statements at
Item 8, and "Environmental, Health and Safety Matters" at Item 1.
Aristech is involved, often along with other defendants, in product liability
lawsuits filed in federal and state courts in several jurisdictions; many of
these cases involve multiple plaintiffs. Although Aristech is sometimes a named
defendant, more typically Aristech has assumed the defense for USX Corporation
in these cases as a result of contractual obligations to do so for claims
arising out of the business of the former USS Chemicals Division of USX
Corporation. A majority of these cases have typical and similar factual
allegations, that during the course of the plaintiffs' employment with other
companies they were exposed to benzene or benzene-containing products
manufactured by the various defendants, including the former USS Chemicals
Division of USX Corporation or Aristech. Plaintiffs contend that the alleged
exposures caused physical injuries. Plaintiffs in these cases typically seek
relief in the form of monetary damages, often in unspecified amounts. The
claimed monetary damages in these cases, when taken in the aggregate may be
substantial; however, Aristech does not believe that the claimed monetary
damages are a realistic measure of either the cost to defend or resolve the
cases.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
12
13
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
There is not an established public trading market for Aristech's shares of
common stock. Aristech paid cash dividends of $4.0 million and $8.3 million
during the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively. At December 31,
1998, there were four holders of Aristech's common stock (See Item 12).
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Year Ended December 31:
(In millions except per share data)
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
Sales $ 830.8 $ 897.4 $ 906.6 $ 1,023.3 $ 945.5
Net Income From
Continuing Operations 14.4 8.0 33.3 60.2 0.1
BALANCE SHEET DATA
Total Assets $ 1,182.1 $ 1,097.5 $ 1,013.8 $ 1,090.0 $ 1,183.4
Long-term Obligations
Due After One Year 451.0 365.7 309.9 623.2 763.6
Cash Dividends Declared
Per Common Share $ 268 $ 558 $ 1,990 $ -- $ --
See Item 1. "Business - Disposition of Certain Businesses"
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.
This discussion should be read in connection with the information contained in
the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto.
FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION
In addition to the other information contained in this Report on Form 10-K, the
following factors should be considered carefully. Information contained in this
report contains "forward-looking statements" which can be identified by the use
of forward-looking terminology such as "believes," "expects," "may," "will,"
"should," "projected," "contemplates" or "anticipates" or the negative thereof
or other variations thereon or comparable terminology or by discussions of
strategy. See, e.g., "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations" and "Business." No assurance can be given
that the future results covered by the forward looking-statements will be
achieved. The following matters constitute cautionary statements identifying
important factors with respect to such forward-looking statements, including
certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary
materially from the future results covered in such forward-looking statements.
Other factors, such as the general state of the economy, could also cause actual
results to vary materially from the future results covered in such
forward-looking statements.
13
14
ABILITY TO PASS THROUGH FEEDSTOCK PRICE INCREASES AND PRICE VOLATILITY. Raw
materials account for approximately two-thirds of the Company's total production
cost. As a result, the Company's ability to pass on increases in feedstock costs
to customers has a significant impact on operating results. The ability to pass
on increases in feedstock costs is, to a large extent, related to market
conditions. While the Company generally has been able to pass increases in
feedstock costs on to customers, there can be no assurance that the Company will
be able to do so in the future. The Company's ability to pass on increases in
feedstock costs is particularly subject to uncertainty with respect to the
Company's commodity products. Substantial increases in capacity, both actual and
planned, in certain of the commodity and specialty chemical markets in which the
Company participates can be expected to affect such ability. In addition, prices
of feedstock can be subject to significant price fluctuations. Increases in
costs may not be accompanied by corresponding increases in selling prices for
the Company's products in all instances, regardless of market conditions.
DEPENDENCE ON SIGNIFICANT SUPPLIERS. A number of the Company's suppliers provide
a significant amount of raw materials, and if one significant supplier or a
number of significant suppliers were unable to meet their obligations under
present supply contracts, or if such contracts could not be renewed, or replaced
upon expiration, raw materials costs incurred by the Company could increase
substantially.
CYCLICALITY OF INDUSTRIES. A substantial portion of the Company's sales are to
customers that manufacture products having end-use applications in the
automotive, housing or construction industries, and such manufacturers are
significantly affected by cyclical fluctuations in those industries. It is
anticipated that reductions in the business levels of these industries would
impact negatively on the Company's sales and profits.
COMPETITIVE INDUSTRY. The Company faces competition from a substantial number of
global and regional competitors, some of which have greater financial, research
and development, production and other resources than the Company. Although
competitive factors vary among the Company's product lines, in general the
Company's competitive position is based primarily on selling prices, product
quality, manufacturing technology, access to raw materials, proximity to markets
and customer service and support. The Company's competitors can be expected in
the future to improve technologies, expand capacity, and, in certain product
lines, develop and introduce new products. While there can be no assurances of
its ability to do so, the Company believes that it will have sufficient
resources to maintain its current position.
POTENTIAL LIABILITIES RELATING TO ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH AND SAFETY REGULATIONS.
The chemical industry is subject to numerous federal, state and local laws
relating to the storage, handling, emission, transportation, manufacture and use
of chemicals, the discharge of materials into the environment and the
maintenance of safe conditions in the workplace. United States chemical
manufacturers, including the Company, have expended substantial funds for
compliance with such laws and regulations. Future legislation and regulations
could impose additional costs on the industry. Company production facilities
require permits and licenses that are subject to renewal or modification.
Violations of such permits or licenses could result in substantial sanctions,
which could be civil, criminal, or both. Violations could also result in the
revocation of such permits or licenses. In addition, the operation of any
chemical manufacturing plant entails risk of adverse environmental effect,
including exposure to chemical products or by-products from the Company's
operations. The Company is also involved in investigative or cleanup projects at
waste disposal sites owned by other parties. The Company has agreed to indemnify
certain third parties against certain claims or liabilities, including
liabilities under laws relating to the protection of the environment and the
workplace, relating to assets acquired or divested by the Company. The markets
for most of the Company's products are very price competitive. Therefore, future
environmentally related capital expenditure requirements, liabilities and costs
could be a major factor in the Company's future sales and income, since it may
not always be possible to pass costs on to customers. See Item 1,
"Environmental, Health and Safety Matters" and "Disposition of Certain
Businesses."
RELIANCE ON CONTINUED OPERATION AND SUFFICIENCY OF MANUFACTURING FACILITIES. The
Company's revenues are dependent on the continued operation of its various
manufacturing facilities. Although presently all operating plants are considered
to be in good condition, the operation of manufacturing plants involves many
risks, including the breakdown, failure or substandard performance of equipment,
power outages, the improper installation or operation of equipment, natural
disasters and the need to comply with directives of governmental agencies.
Except for polypropylene, each of the Company's product lines is manufactured at
only a single facility and production could not be transferred to another site.
The occurrence of material operational problems, including but not limited to
the above events, may adversely affect the profitability of the Company during
the period of such operational difficulties. See Item 1, "Plant Profile."
14
15
EFFECT OF PLANNED MAINTENANCE TURNAROUNDS. In addition to its routine repair and
maintenance activities, the Company has a program of planned maintenance
turnarounds under which certain facilities are temporarily taken out of
production for repairs and maintenance. To the degree that the cost of planned
maintenance turnarounds is not evenly spread over the program's normal cycle,
year-to-year and quarterly variations in the income can result. Subject to
regulatory inspections and maintaining the Company's safety standards, the
timing of maintenance turnarounds is largely at the discretion of management. In
determining the schedule of maintenance turnarounds, management considers, among
other things, the level of product demand, catalyst life and the operating
performance of the production facility.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 COMPARED WITH THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997.
During 1998, the Company's net sales decreased by 7% from $897.4 million in 1997
to $830.8 million in 1998. This decrease is primarily due to a 14% decline in
average net selling prices per pound shipped, despite a 7% increase in overall
shipment volumes from 1997 to 1998. Net sales for Chemicals decreased by $24.0
million or 5% from 1997, which was caused primarily by a 13% decline in the
average selling price per pound shipped, offset by an 8% increase in shipment
volumes. Average net selling prices for Polymers decreased by 14% offset by a 4%
increase in shipment volumes resulting in a 10% or $38.1 million decrease in net
Polymers sales.
Total operating costs decreased by $64.6 million or 8% from $845.7 million in
1997 to $781.1 million in 1998. Feedstock costs, which comprise approximately
two-thirds of the Company's total cost of sales, decreased by $76.7 million and
was primarily attributable to a 28% decrease in the Company's average cost per
pound for raw materials. The Chemicals operating segment's average raw materials
cost per pound, which includes primarily cumene, decreased by approximately 24%,
while the Polymers average raw materials cost per pound, which includes
primarily propylene, decreased by approximately 31%. The Company's conversion
costs, which represent the remaining one-third of costs of sales, remained
consistent with 1997. Partially offsetting the decrease in production costs was
the 1998 recognition of a $9.5 million adjustment to reduce its LIFO inventory
value to the lower of aggregate cost or market value and a $2.4 million LIFO
adjustment; increased selling, general and administrative expenses, that
reflected primarily increased sales and marketing efforts and costs associated
with the Company's year 2000 readiness plan; and increased depreciation expense
due to the Company's ongoing efforts to expand its business.
Operating income at the Company's consolidated level for 1998 remained
consistent with 1997; however, the Chemicals operating segment increased its
operating income by $14.8 million, while Polymers operating income decreased by
$16.8 million. The Chemicals increase came primarily as a result of the
increased shipment volumes in addition to higher margins for Phenol and BPA. For
Polymers, the 4% increase in shipment volumes from 1997 to 1998 was not
sufficient to offset the decline in the spread between net selling prices and
raw material costs.
Net loss on disposal of assets decreased by $7.9 million from 1997 to 1998
primarily due to the 1997 write-off of deferred engineering costs associated
with the Company's consideration of a cumene/phenol complex at Garyville,
Louisiana.
Interest expense increased by $3.1 million or 13% from 1997 to 1998 and reflects
the increased borrowings necessary to finance the Company's production capacity
expansions. The Company's weighted average cost of borrowing for both 1998 and
1997 was 6.4% and 6.5%, respectively.
The effective rates on the Company's provision for income taxes were 27% and 53%
for 1998 and 1997, respectively. The decrease in the effective rate from 1997 to
1998 was caused primarily by the recognition of income tax benefits resulting
from the anticipated utilization of tax credits originating from the Company's
ongoing production capacity expansions, income tax refunds related to prior
years' foreign sales and lower pretax income during 1997.
15
16
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 COMPARED WITH THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996.
Operating income for 1997 was $51.7 million on sales of $897.4 million compared
with operating income of $107.6 million in 1996 on sales of $906.6 million. The
reduction in operating income reflects reduced margins in most of the Company's
product lines compared to the prior year. Higher raw materials and conversion
costs more than offset slightly higher product selling prices. Raw materials and
conversion costs increased 8% in 1997 compared to 1996 while overall average net
selling prices increased just 1% in 1997 over 1996. Sales volumes declined 1% in
1997 compared with the prior year period.
Selling prices increased slightly in Chemicals and Polymers; however, raw
materials and conversion costs increased at a greater rate. Chemicals raw
materials and conversion costs increased 9% in 1997 while selling prices
increased less than one percent. Raw materials and conversion costs were also
higher in Polymers increasing 7% compared with the prior year period. Polymers
overall pricing increased less than one percent in 1997 compared to 1996. Sales
volumes increased 2% for Polymers but declined 2% in Chemicals.
In addition, the Company's operating income in 1997 declined compared to 1996
due to the sale of the Coal Chemicals Business in March 1996. That business
contributed $2.6 million in operating income in 1996.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $3.9 million or 8% in
1997 compared to the prior year due, in large part, to the consolidation of
expenses relating to Avonite. Selling, general and administrative expenses for
Avonite, were $5.7 million in 1997 as compared to $2.3 million in 1996. Avonite
became a consolidated subsidiary on July 1, 1996.
Loss on disposal of assets was $9.2 million in 1997, an increase of $1.3 million
compared to the prior year period. The loss on disposal of assets in 1997 was
primarily attributable to the write-off of deferred engineering costs associated
with the Company's consideration of a cumene/phenol complex at Garyville,
Louisiana.
Interest expense was $23.6 million in 1997 as compared to $37.9 million for the
prior year. The $14.3 million decrease in interest expense resulted primarily
from the conversion of $179.5 million in principal amount of the Company's
payment-in-kind debentures to common stock on September 30, 1996.
The provision for estimated tax expense for 1997 was $9.3 million compared with
a provision for estimated taxes of $27.6 million for the prior year. The
Company's effective tax rate has increased to 53% in 1997 from 45% in 1996 as a
result of the amortization of excess of cost over assets acquired and lower
pre-tax income.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
During 1998, the Company's working capital balance decreased by $69.0 million
from $74.6 million at December 31, 1997 to $5.6 million at December 31, 1998.
The decrease in working capital is due primarily to the $91.9 million reduction
in receivables from the second quarter 1998 sale of trade receivables used to
finance a portion of the Company's capacity expansion program, offset by a $24.9
million reduction in current liabilities. The decrease in current liabilities
was driven by a $28.6 million decrease in accounts payable caused primarily by
the overall reduction in the prices of its raw materials. Despite a $6.4 million
increase in the Company's net income for 1998 over 1997, net cash provided by
operating activities for the same period decreased by $18.4 million from $68.3
million in 1997 to $49.9 million in 1998. The 1998 decrease in operating cash
flows occurred primarily as a result of the change in the Company's working
capital requirements.
The Company generally funds its working capital requirements on a short-term
basis primarily through borrowings on a $50.0 million discretionary line of
credit with a commercial bank. Subsequent to December 31, 1998, the Company
acquired, from commercial banks, two additional unsecured lines of credit with
an aggregate maximum borrowing limit of $30.0 million in order to provide any
future working capital needs.
16
17
During the first quarter of 1999, the management of Aristech implemented
measures to reduce certain of its future operating and selling, general and
administrative expenses. As one of the measures, an incentive was offered to
employees covered under the Aristech Salaried Pension Plan to voluntarily elect
early retirement in exchange for certain increased pension benefits. The
additional costs to be incurred by the Company during 1999 that are in excess of
the funded pension benefits for the voluntary retirees are not anticipated to
have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of
operations or its cash flows. In addition to the voluntary retirement program,
the Company intends to embark upon an involuntary termination program during the
second quarter of 1999, the extent of which will be based, in part, upon the
results of the voluntary retirement program. The Company anticipates the
benefits of any of its cost reduction measures to primarily affect years
subsequent to 1999.
Under the voluntary retirement program, the Company's Senior Vice
President-Polymers, Treasurer, and Corporate Comptroller have elected voluntary
retirement effective April 1, 1999. The Company has not yet determined their
successors.
The Company anticipates that the remaining outstanding fixed capital commitments
connected to the capacity expansion program, and future working capital
requirements will be funded by cash flows from operations, additional borrowings
under the unsecured line of credit agreements and unused borrowings available
under the revolving loan from Mitsubishi International Corporation.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
The Company continued to invest in plant capacity expansion during 1998 as
evidenced by the increase in capital expenditures of $129.9 million over 1997.
The 1998 capital expenditures of $231.8 million have been funded by cash flows
from operations, net additional long-term borrowings of $98.0 million on its
revolving credit agreements and $82.1 million in proceeds from the sale of its
trade receivables. The 1997 capital expenditures of $101.9 million were funded
by 1997 cash flows from operations and net additional long-term borrowings of
$39.0 million. Both the 1998 and 1997 capital expenditures reflect production
capacity expansions within its phenol product line at Haverhill, Ohio, its
polypropylene product line at LaPorte, Texas, and its acrylic sheet product line
at Florence, Kentucky. At December 31, 1998, the Company has remaining
outstanding fixed commitments for capital expenditures totaling $147.0 million.
During the third quarter of 1998, the Company executed two operating lease
agreements each extending for a period of twenty years that will provide for a
total of 932 new railcars to be placed in service at various intervals through
December 1999. The new railcars will be used to replace existing cars and
support future increased requirements.
YEAR 2000 READINESS DISCLOSURE
The Company's Year 2000 ("Y2K") project team is working on making the Company's
systems, both information technology and non-information technology, ready for
the next millennium. The team has completed its assessment phase for Y2K impacts
and costs of upgrading or replacing systems that are not Y2K ready, and testing
and monitoring systems for Y2K readiness. Phases where current efforts are
focused include upgrading or replacing systems, systems testing, and contingency
planning. The Company believes the project will be completed by October 1999.
Costs incurred from inception through December 31, 1998 were approximately $6.0
million. Total Y2K project costs are expected to range from $8.0 million to
$10.0 million. The Company does not expect the Y2K project costs to have a
material effect on its financial position or results of operations. The costs of
the Y2K project and the time by which the Company expects to complete it are
based on management's best estimates, which were derived using numerous
assumptions of future events including the availability of certain resources,
third party modifications, and other factors. There is no guarantee that these
estimates will be achieved and actual results could differ from these plans.
The Company is contacting major customers and suppliers to seek assurance of
their intent to be Y2K ready, and is responding to customer requests for
information on the Company's Y2K project. The Company cannot control whether
third parties, including governments, upon which the Company relies will be
fully Y2K compliant by December 31, 1999.
17
18
The failure to correct a material Y2K problem could result in an interruption
in, or a failure of, certain normal business activities or operations. Such
failures could materially and adversely affect the Company's results of
operations, liquidity and financial condition. Due to the general uncertainty
inherent in the Y2K problem, resulting in part from the uncertainty of Y2K
readiness of third-party suppliers and customers, the Company is unable to
determine at this time whether the consequences of Y2K failures will have a
material impact on the Company's results of operations, liquidity or financial
condition. The Company's Y2K project is expected to significantly reduce its
level of uncertainty about the Y2K problem including the possibility of
significant interruptions of normal operations and, in particular, about the Y2K
compliance and readiness of its material external agents.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Approximately 87% of the Company's sales are sold domestically, with the
remaining 13% representing export sales. Sales in currencies other than the US
dollar are insignificant thereby minimizing any market risk exposure due to
changes in foreign exchange rates. However, the Company, in connection with its
ongoing capacity expansion, purchased certain machinery and equipment at amounts
denominated in foreign currencies that were hedged to optimize the US dollar
value. Any gain or loss resulting from the purchased machinery will not have a
significant effect on the Company's results of operations.
The Company does not currently engage in any significant investing activities as
available funds are used for business expansion, thereby eliminating any
investment-related market risk exposure.
The Company does, however, focus on its interest rate risk management primarily
to reduce the overall cost of funding provided to the Company. The Company has
strategically financed its business expansion with diverse and cost-effective
debt instruments at both fixed and variable interest rates. The majority of the
Company's variable rate long-term debt is currently based on the London
Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"). A hypothetical 1% increase in the interest
rate for the Company's variable rate long-term debt would increase annual
interest expense by approximately $2.9 million. Actual changes in interest rates
may differ from hypothetical changes. This analysis does not take into effect
other changes that might occur in the economic environment due to such changes
in short-term interest rates. The Company's debt instruments are monitored daily
to eliminate, to the extent possible, any significant interest rate risk
exposure. At December 31, 1998, the fair value of the Company's outstanding
long-term debt was $446.8 million compared to its respective carrying amount of
$451.7 million.
The Company does not enter into any material fixed purchase or fixed supply
contracts with its suppliers or customers, or engage in any material hedging
activities to mitigate any related commodity price risk.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements:
Page
----
Independent Auditors' Report 19
Consolidated Statements of Income For the Years Ended
December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 20
Consolidated Balance Sheets, December 31, 1998 and 1997 21
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Years Ended
December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 22
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity For the Years
Ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 23
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 24
18
19
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Aristech Chemical Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Aristech
Chemical Corporation and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and
the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998. Our
audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule listed in the
Exhibit at Item 14. These consolidated financial statements and consolidated
financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial
statements and consolidated financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Aristech Chemical Corporation and
its subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1998, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
February 5, 1999 (except for Note M,
as to which the date is March 31, 1999)
19
20
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Income
For the Years Ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996
(Dollars in Millions)
1998 1997 1996
---- ---- ----
Sales $ 830.8 $ 897.4 $ 906.6
Operating Costs:
Cost of sales 668.5 745.6 704.4
Selling, general and administrative expenses 59.9 50.8 46.9
Depreciation and amortization 52.7 49.3 47.7
-------- -------- --------
Total Operating Costs 781.1 845.7 799.0
-------- -------- --------
Operating Income 49.7 51.7 107.6
Loss on Disposal of Assets, Net (1.3) (9.2) (7.9)
Other Expense, Net (1.0) (1.7) (1.6)
Interest Income 2.3 0.5 0.7
Interest Expense (26.7) (23.6) (37.9)
-------- -------- --------
Income Before Income Taxes 23.0 17.7 60.9
Provision for Income Taxes 6.3 9.3 27.6
-------- -------- --------
Income Before Minority Interest 16.7 8.4 33.3
Minority Interest (2.3) (0.4) --
-------- -------- --------
Net Income $ 14.4 $ 8.0 $ 33.3
======== ======== ========
Related Party Transactions:
Sales $ 52.9 $ 70.9 $ 73.5
Purchases 26.4 24.2 24.0
Interest Expense 11.0 9.9 35.8
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
20
21
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 1998 and 1997
(Dollars in Millions)
1998 1997
---- ----
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and equivalents $ 1.1 $ 3.9
Receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $.2
and $.6 at December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively) 4.4 105.8
Receivables-related parties -- 8.4
Subordinated note receivable-related party 17.9 --
Inventories 124.3 123.5
Other current assets 1.1 1.1
---------- ----------
Total Current Assets 148.8 242.7
Property, plant and equipment, net 845.5 662.8
Long-term receivables 8.0 8.2
Excess cost over assets acquired 162.2 167.4
Deferred income taxes 1.4 1.4
Other assets 16.2 15.0
========== ==========
Total Assets $ 1,182.1 $ 1,097.5
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 54.6 $ 85.5
Accounts payable-related parties 3.9 1.6
Payroll and benefits payable 9.3 9.2
Accrued taxes 7.3 6.1
Deferred income taxes 0.5 3.9
Short-term borrowings 45.9 42.3
Long-term debt due within one year 0.7 0.6
Other current liabilities 21.0 18.9
---------- ----------
Total Current Liabilities 143.2 168.1
Long-term debt-related parties 135.0 187.0
Long-term debt-other 316.0 178.7
Deferred income taxes 160.3 162.9
Other liabilities 38.7 37.0
---------- ----------
Total Liabilities 793.2 733.7
---------- ----------
Minority Interest 7.4 3.0
---------- ----------
Common stock ($.01 par value, 20,000 shares authorized, 14,908
shares issued at December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively) -- --
Additional paid-in capital 382.5 386.3
Retained deficit (1.0) (25.5)
---------- ----------
Total Stockholders' Equity 381.5 360.8
---------- ----------
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $ 1,182.1 $ 1,097.5
========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
21
22
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996
(Dollars in Millions)
1998 1997 1996
---- ---- ----
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income $ 14.4 $ 8.0 $ 33.3
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation 47.5 44.1 42.5
Amortization of excess cost over assets acquired 5.2 5.2 5.2
Amortization of merger expenses 2.0 2.0 2.0
Deferred income taxes (6.0) 1.5 (5.1)
Discount on sale of receivables 5.2 -- --
Loss on disposal of assets 1.3 9.2 7.9
Income from equity investment (0.2) -- --
(Increase) decrease in receivables 4.6 (4.0) 11.0
Increase in inventories (0.8) (10.4) (9.0)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
and other current liabilities (26.5) 10.0 (1.9)
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiary 2.3 0.4 --
Other 0.9 2.3 (1.9)
------ ------ ------
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 49.9 68.3 84.0
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures (231.8) (101.9) (41.5)
Proceeds from maturity of short-term investment -- -- 17.0
Proceeds from disposal of assets -- -- 39.7
Long-term receivables -- (8.3) --
Other -- -- 0.7
------ ------ ------
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities (231.8) (110.2) 15.9
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in short-term borrowings 3.6 1.9 31.7
Repayment of long-term debt (259.6) (167.3) (220.1)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 357.0 207.4 148.9
Net proceeds from sale of receivables 82.1 -- --
Long-term debt issuance costs -- 0.2 (4.0)
Dividends paid (4.0) (8.3) (24.2)
Proceeds from equity contribution to AALLC -- 10.0 --
Redemption of preferred stock -- -- (6.2)
Redemption of payment-in-kind debentures -- -- (24.5)
------ ------ ------
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities 179.1 43.9 (98.4)
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND EQUIVALENTS (2.8) 2.0 1.5
Cash and Equivalents, Beginning of Year 3.9 1.9 0.4
======== ======== ========
Cash and Equivalents, End of Year $ 1.1 $ 3.9 $ 1.9
======== ======== ========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest (net of amount capitalized) $ 26.5 $ 23.2 $ 39.3
Income taxes 11.7 14.5 27.3
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
During 1998, Avonite converted the Note payable to an Avonite stockholder
of $12.4 million and Notes Payable to Aristech totalling $9.0 million to
shares of common stock of Avonite (see Note L).
During 1997, the Company acquired property, plant and equipment with a cost
of $16.2 million financed through a capital lease obligation.
During 1996, the Company converted debentures of $179.5 million and
Redeemable Series A Convertible payment-in-kind ("PIK") Preferred Stock of
$44.8 million for common stock totaling $224.3 million, and the Company
acquired an additional 10% ownership interest in Avonite in exchange for
the assignment of a $1.0 million promissory note from Avonite to the
Avonite minority stockholders.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
22
23
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Stockholder's Equity
For the Years Ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996
(Dollars in Millions)
Additional Total
Common Paid-in Retained Stockholders'
Stock Capital Deficit Equity
----- ------- ------- ------
Balance, January 1, 1996 $-- $ 154.5 $ (20.8) $ 133.7
Net income -- -- 33.3 33.3
Dividend - Series A Convertible Preferred Stock -- -- (4.2) (4.2)
Dividend - common stock -- -- (20.0) (20.0)
Conversion of PIK debentures to common stock -- 179.5 -- 179.5
Conversion of Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock to common stock -- 44.8 -- 44.8
Assumption of minority deficit in Avonite -- -- (14.1) (14.1)
Other -- -- 0.6 0.6
--- -------- ------- --------
Balance, December 31, 1996 -- 378.8 (25.2) 353.6
Net income -- -- 8.0 8.0
Dividend - common stock -- -- (8.3) (8.3)
Proceeds from equity contribution to AALLC -- 7.5 -- 7.5
--- ------ ------- --------
Balance, December 31, 1997 -- 386.3 (25.5) 360.8
Net income -- -- 14.4 14.4
Dividend - common stock -- -- (4.0) (4.0)
Conversion of Note Payable to Avonite
Stockholder to Avonite common stock -- 12.4 -- 12.4
Avonite capital restructuring -- (16.2) 14.1 (2.1)
=== ======== ======= ========
Balance, December 31, 1998 $-- $ 382.5 $ (1.0) $ 381.5
=== ======== ======= ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
23
24
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
ORGANIZATION
Aristech Chemical Corporation ("Aristech") was incorporated under the laws of
the State of Delaware on October 14, 1986 as a wholly owned subsidiary of USX
Corporation ("USX"). On December 4, 1986, USX transferred substantially all of
the assets and liabilities of its USS Chemicals Division to Aristech, and
Aristech's common stock was offered and sold to the public. The USS Chemicals
Division was formed by USX in 1966. On March 7, 1990, Mitsubishi Corporation
("MC"), certain other investors and certain members of Aristech's management
acquired Aristech in a going-private transaction. The interest of certain of the
investors, including the management investors, has subsequently been reacquired
and MC beneficially owns 82.3% of Aristech's outstanding common stock. The
"Company" refers to Aristech and its majority-owned consolidated subsidiaries
(see Note L).
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
The Company is a producer and marketer of chemical and polymer products that are
generally sold for further processing by manufacturers of automotive components,
construction materials and consumer products.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Aristech Chemical
Corporation include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned
consolidated subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries over
which the Company does not exercise control are accounted for under the equity
method.
Certain reclassifications were made to the prior years' consolidated financial
statements to conform to the classifications used in the 1998 consolidated
financial statements.
ACCOUNTING CHANGES
In June 1997, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 131
"Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" was
issued. SFAS No. 131 is effective for financial statements issued for periods
beginning after December 15, 1997. Accordingly, the Company has adopted the
disclosure provisions of this statement (See Note J).
In February 1998, SFAS No. 132 "Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits" was issued. SFAS 132 is effective for financial
statements issued for periods beginning after December 15, 1997. Accordingly,
the Company has adopted the disclosure provisions of this statement (See Note
I).
In June 1998, SFAS No. 133 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities" was issued. SFAS No. 133 is effective for fiscal quarters of fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 1999. The Company has not yet determined the
effect of this standard on its financial reporting.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
24
25
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three
months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Such investments
are carried at cost which approximates fair value.
INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of aggregate cost or market. Cost is
determined primarily by the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method. Inventory costs
include direct and indirect manufacturing costs associated with the production
of product.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost. Major replacements and
improvements that extend the life of the property are capitalized, while
maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. The Company capitalizes the
interest cost ($7.4 million in 1998 and $0.9 million in 1997) associated with
major property additions while in progress and amortizes the amount over the
useful lives of the related assets. Depreciation of plant and equipment is
computed on the straight-line method.
When a plant or major facility within a plant is sold or otherwise disposed of,
any gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statement of income. Proceeds
from the sale of other facilities depreciated on a group basis are credited to
the depreciation reserve.
EXCESS COST OVER ASSETS ACQUIRED
The acquisition of Aristech by MC was accounted for as a purchase transaction
with the purchase price being allocated to assets and liabilities based on their
fair values as of the date of acquisition. The excess cost over the fair value
of assets acquired is generally amortized on a straight-line basis over a period
of 40 years. Such amount associated with the 1990 acquisition has been allocated
to each of the Company's businesses based on historical operating results prior
to the acquisition. Accumulated amortization of the excess cost over assets
acquired was $59.6 million and $54.4 million at December 31, 1998 and 1997,
respectively.
INCOME TAXES
Income taxes are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for
Income Taxes". Under SFAS No. 109, deferred income taxes are recognized for the
estimated taxes ultimately payable or recoverable based on enacted tax law. The
deferred income taxes are computed annually for differences between book and tax
bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible
amounts in the future.
PENSIONS
The Company maintains defined benefit pension plans for substantially all of its
employees with benefits based on compensation and years of service. The
Company's funding practice is to contribute annually not less than the
actuarially determined minimum funding requirements of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 nor more than the maximum funding limitation under
the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are intended to provide for benefits
for service to date and for benefits expected to be earned in the future.
The Company also maintains defined contribution plans that cover certain
eligible salaried and hourly employees. The Company's cost is determined based
on a percentage of compensation as defined by the plans.
25
26
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
INCOME RECOGNITION
Sales and related costs of sales are included in income when goods are shipped
or services are rendered to the customer.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND REMEDIATION
Environmental compliance costs include maintenance, monitoring and similar
costs. Such costs are expensed as incurred. Costs for long-term operations and
maintenance obligations at sites subject to a regulatory agreement are accrued
in advance based upon management's estimate. Except to the extent costs can be
capitalized, environmental remediation costs are fully accrued when
environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable and the cost can
be reasonably estimated.
NOTE B - RECEIVABLES
On April 1, 1998, Aristech entered into an agreement with Morgan Guaranty Trust
Company of New York and Delaware Funding Corporation ("DFC") to finance its
trade receivables. Pursuant to the agreement, Aristech sells its trade
receivables, as generated through operations, to Aristech Receivables Company
LLC ("ARC"), a Delaware limited liability company. ARC is a 100% owned
unconsolidated subsidiary of Aristech. ARC, in turn, sells an undivided interest
in the trade receivables to DFC on a nonrecourse basis, that provides for a
revolving financing facility to ARC for a maximum of $100.0 million. Collections
received on the receivables reduce the amount owed under the facility. As new
trade receivables are generated through operations, those receivables are sold
to ARC and then an undivided interest in those receivables is sold to DFC. The
agreement expires on March 31, 1999, and may be extended for additional periods
not to exceed 364 days from the extension date.
Initial proceeds from the sale amounted to $91.5 million and were used primarily
to reduce the amount outstanding on the Revolving Loan - Mitsubishi
International Corporation ("MIC"). Ongoing costs of the financing will
approximate DFC's cost of issuing asset-backed commercial paper to fund the
purchase plus a program fee. Aristech accounted for the sale of receivables to
ARC as a sale under the provisions of SFAS No. 125 "Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities". At December
31, 1998, Aristech had $102.4 million of its outstanding trade receivables sold
to ARC for cash proceeds of $82.1 million and a subordinated note receivable due
from ARC of $17.9 million. The amount of the subordinated note receivable due to
Aristech from ARC is subordinated to ARC's ultimate repayment of the amount
outstanding ($82.1 million at December 31, 1998) to DFC under the revolving
financing facility.
NOTE C - INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following at December 31:
1998 1997
---- ----
(In millions)
Raw materials $ 34.9 $ 35.9
Finished products 79.4 68.0
Supplies and sundry items 19.5 19.6
Lower of cost or market reserve (9.5) --
======== ========
Total Inventory $ 124.3 $ 123.5
======== ========
The current cost of inventories at December 31, 1998 and 1997 was $112.2 million
and $116.1 million, respectively.
LIFO liquidations amounted to $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1998.
There were no significant LIFO liquidations in 1997 and 1996.
26
27
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE D - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following at December 31:
Estimated Useful
Lives (In Years) 1998 1997
---------------- ---- ----
(In millions)
Land -- $ 14.1 $ 14.1
Buildings 35 66.7 54.6
Machinery and equipment 4 to 22 860.3 806.6
Construction in process -- 224.4 70.0
--------- --------
1,165.5 945.3
Accumulated depreciation (320.0) (282.5)
========= ========
Property, plant and equipment, net $ 845.5 $ 662.8
========= ========
The Company had contract commitments for capital expenditures for property,
plant and equipment totaling $147.0 million at December 31, 1998.
Of the total property, plant and equipment at December 31, 1998 and 1997, the
Company has the following leased under capital lease agreements:
1998 1997
---- ----
(In millions)
Land $ 0.2 $ 0.2
Buildings 16.0 16.0
Machinery and equipment 2.1 1.7
------- -------
18.3 17.9
Accumulated depreciation (2.1) (1.7)
======= =======
$ 16.2 $ 16.2
======= =======
The Company leases certain property and equipment, primarily railway equipment
and buildings, under operating lease agreements generally with terms ranging
from five to twenty years including certain renewal options (see Note G).
Operating lease rental expense for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and
1996 was $12.1 million, $10.8 million and $12.0 million, respectively.
The Company had the following other operating costs at December 31:
(In millions) 1998 1997 1996
---- ---- ----
Maintenance and repairs of plant and equipment $ 26.4 $ 32.0 $ 36.0
Research and development costs 16.2 13.0 13.0
NOTE E - LONG-TERM RECEIVABLES
In May of 1996, the Company entered into an agreement with the Pittsburgh
Economic and Industrial Development Corporation ("PEIDC") which provided that
the Company would assist in financing the construction of its leased
polypropylene technical center. Under this agreement, the Company advanced a
total of $8.4 million to PEIDC during 1997. The advance is scheduled to be
repaid monthly including interest at a rate of 8.25% over the Company's 20 year
lease term for the facility, which commenced in November 1997. At December 31,
1998 and 1997, $8.0 million and $8.2 million was outstanding under this
agreement and included as long-term receivables with the remaining $0.2 million
and $0.1 million included in other current assets, respectively.
27
28
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE F - SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
In December of 1996, the Company arranged for a $50.0 million discretionary line
of credit with a commercial bank bearing interest at a variable rate. Short-term
borrowings drawn under this line amounted to $45.9 million and $42.3 million at
December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The effective annual interest rate
paid under this line was 5.7% for both 1998 and 1997.
NOTE G - LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following at December 31:
1998 1997
---- ----
(In millions)
Revolving Loan - MIC, $200.0 maximum commitment amount, due April 18, 2002
bearing interest at a variable rate (effectively 6.1%
and 5.9% for 1998 and 1997, respectively) $ 85.0 $ 137.0
Term Loan - MIC, due April 18, 2002, bearing interest at a variable
rate (effectively 6.1% and 5.9% for 1998 and 1997, respectively) 50.0 50.0
-------- --------
Total long-term debt - related parties 135.0 187.0
Revolving Loan - Gotham Funding Corporation ("GFC") and Broadway Capital
Corporation ("BCC"), unsecured, $150.0 million maximum commitment amount,
due March 31, 2001, bearing interest at a variable rate (effectively 6.0%
for 1998). The facility is unconditionally
and irrevocably guaranteed by MC 150.0 --
6-7/8% Notes, dated November 25, 1996, due November 15, 2006, with semiannual
interest payments due May 15 and November 15 of each year 149.1 148.9
Note payable to Avonite stockholder, due July 1, 2006, with interest calculated
and payable quarterly at the prime rate of interest plus 2.0%. The loan was
converted to shares of Avonite common stock
in November of 1998 (see Note L) -- 12.4
Capital lease obligations, maturing at various dates from 1999 to 2017,
with a weighted average interest rate of 5.9% at December 31, 1998 15.9 16.2
Other 1.7 1.8
-------- --------
451.7 366.3
Less amount due within one year (0.7) (0.6)
======== ========
Total Long-term debt $ 451.0 $ 365.7
======== ========
Based on the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for loans with
similar terms and average maturities, the fair value of the Company's debt was
$446.8 million at December 31, 1998. At December 31, 1997 the fair value of the
Company's debt approximated its respective carrying amount.
28
29
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE G - LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED)
Maturities of the Company's long-term debt and minimum annual rental commitments
for non-cancelable leases with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one
year as of December 31, 1998 are as follows:
Long-term Debt
----------------------
Capital All Operating
(In Millions) Leases Other Leases
------ ----- ------
1999 $ 1.6 $ 0.1 $ 17.8
2000 1.6 0.1 15.6
2001 1.5 150.1 11.7
2002 1.5 135.1 8.1
2003 1.5 0.1 6.9
Thereafter 18.9 150.3 78.5
Amount representing interest (10.7) -- --
------ ------ ------
Total $ 15.9 $435.8 $138.6
====== ====== ======
On August 3, 1998, the Company entered into a revolving credit agreement (or
"loan") with GFC as lender and the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Trust Company
("BTM") as agent to provide a revolving credit facility in the maximum amount of
$150.0 million. The agreement expires on March 31, 2001 and is unconditionally
and irrevocably guaranteed by MC. The entire amount of the loan was drawn with
the proceeds used to reduce the amount outstanding under the Company's revolving
loan with MIC. In conjunction with the BTM agreement, on November 23, 1998, the
Company also entered into an unsecured uncommitted credit facility with BCC.
Outstanding advances under the BCC agreement are unconditionally and irrevocably
guaranteed by MC and are limited to the unused available borrowings under the
Company's revolving credit agreement with GFC, not to exceed the GFC loan
maximum amount of $150.0 million. At December 31, 1998, there were $150.0
million in aggregate outstanding advances drawn under these agreements.
Outstanding advances drawn under the uncommitted facility with BCC are renewable
at the option of BCC. Should the advances not be renewed by BCC, any amounts
outstanding would be renewed under the committed facility from GFC.
The Company has agreed to pay MC a guarantee fee on the outstanding principal
balance of all financing obtained from MIC, GFC and BCC. The guarantee fee is
calculated on a daily basis based on the amount outstanding under the guaranteed
loans. The guarantee fee expense for 1998, 1997 and 1996 was $0.4 million, $0.3
million and $0.9 million, respectively.
On September 30, 1996, the Company called for the redemption of all its
outstanding payment-in-kind ("PIK") debentures. MC, MIC and Mitsubishi Chemical
Corporation ("MCC") elected to exercise their right to convert $179.5 million of
the PIK Debentures into 3,888 shares of the Company's common stock. The
remaining $24.5 million of PIK Debentures held by Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd.
("MRC") were redeemed for cash. Also, on September 30, 1996, MC, MIC and MCC
elected to convert $44.8 million of their Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
into 970 shares of the Company's common stock. The preferred shares held by MRC
were redeemed for $6.2 million in cash.
29
30
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE H - INCOME TAXES
Provision for income taxes consists of the following for the years ended
December 31:
1998 1997 1996
---- ---- ----
(In millions)
Current federal income taxes $ 11.2 $ 6.4 $ 28.6
Current state and local income taxes 1.2 1.4 3.4
Deferred income taxes (4.3) 1.0 (3.6)
------- ------ -------
Total provision before change in valuation allowance 8.1 8.8 28.4
Change in valuation allowance (1.8) 0.5 (0.8)
======= ====== =======
Total provision for income taxes $ 6.3 $ 9.3 $ 27.6
======= ====== =======
Following is a reconciliation of the differences between income taxes computed
at the federal statutory rate to the total provision for income taxes for the
years ended December 31:
1998 1997 1996
---- ---- ----
(In millions)
Statutory rate applied to income before income taxes $ 6.5 $ 6.1 $ 21.0
Foreign Sales Corporation benefits and other tax credits (0.1) (1.7) (0.5)
Amortization of excess cost over assets acquired 1.8 1.8 2.0
Losses from equity investee -- -- 4.3
State income taxes after federal income tax benefit (2.7) 2.8 2.0
Utilization of net operating losses 2.6 -- --
Other -- (0.2) (0.4)
------ ------ -------
Total provision before change in valuation allowance 8.1 8.8 28.4
Change in valuation allowance (1.8) 0.5 (0.8)
====== ====== =======
Total provision for income taxes $ 6.3 $ 9.3 $ 27.6
====== ====== =======
The tax effect of the significant temporary differences that comprise the
deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows for the years ended December
31:
1998 1997
---- ----
(In millions)
Deferred tax assets:
Accruals different than payments $ 17.8 $ 14.4
Net operating loss carryforwards 7.8 9.3
Other 2.6 0.6
-------- --------
Deferred tax assets before valuation allowance 28.2 24.3
Valuation allowance (7.4) (9.2)
-------- --------
Total deferred tax assets 20.8 15.1
-------- --------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Property and inventory 180.2 180.5
-------- --------
Net deferred tax liabilities $ 159.4 $ 165.4
======== ========
30
31
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE H - INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
Avonite, Inc. (see Note L) has net operating loss carryforwards of $22.2 million
of which $21.8 million expire in years 2003 through 2011 and $0.4 million
expires in 2017 due to recent tax law changes. Since Avonite is not consolidated
with the Company for income tax purposes, utilization of these carryforwards is
limited to the taxable income of Avonite.
During 1996, the Company settled the IRS examination related to audit years
through December 1990 that resulted in an increase in the excess cost over
assets acquired of $1.7 million in 1995. Management believes that the reserves
established for open years are adequate to cover any additional liabilities.
NOTE I - PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
Substantially all of the Company's employees are covered by various defined
benefit or defined contribution pension plans.
In addition to pension benefits, the Company provides eligible retired employees
with certain postretirement benefits consisting primarily of life insurance and
either medical coverage or a Defined Dollar Benefit Plan ("DDBP"). The DDBP
provides credits to be used by the retirees exclusively for medical expenses.
During 1998, the Company amended its DDBP to increase by 50%, the amount of
credits provided by the Company. The increase in credits provided will not
significantly increase the DDBP's annual service cost. Under the terms of these
unfunded benefit plans, the Company reserves the right to modify or discontinue
the plans.
The following relates to the Company's defined benefit and other postretirement
benefits as of and for the years ended December 31:
Pension Benefits Other Benefits
---------------- --------------
1998 1997 1998 1997
---- ---- ---- ----
(In millions)
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation, beginning of year $ 70.9 $ 60.0 $ 18.8 $ 16.1
Service cost 5.1 4.2 0.4 0.4
Interest cost 4.4 4.5 1.3 1.2
Actuarial (gain) loss (0.5) 7.3 0.6 1.6
Amendments 0.6 0.5 3.1 0.4
Benefits paid (3.6) (5.6) (0.9) (0.9)
------- ------- ------- -------
Benefit obligation, end of year 76.9 70.9 23.3 18.8
------- ------- ------- -------
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year 48.7 40.7 -- --
Actual return on plan assets 7.1 7.9 -- --
Employer contribution 4.4 5.7 0.9 0.9
Benefits paid (3.6) (5.6) (0.9) (0.9)
------- ------- ------- -------
Fair value of plan assets, end of year 56.6 48.7 -- --
------- ------- ------- -------
Funded status (20.3) (22.2) (23.3) (18.8)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss 8.2 11.3 1.4 0.8
Unrecognized transition obligation -- -- 3.2 3.5
Unrecognized prior service cost 4.3 4.6 3.6 0.5
------- ------- ------- -------
Prepaid (accrued) benefit cost $ (7.8) $ (6.3) $ (15.1) $ (14.0)
======= ======= ======= =======
31
32
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE I - PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
Pension Benefits Other Benefits
-------------------- ---------------------
1998 1997 1998 1997
---- ---- ---- ----
Amounts recognized in consolidated balance sheet:
Prepaid benefit cost included in other assets $ 0.6 $ 0.8 $ -- $ --
Accrued benefit liability included in
other liabilities (8.4) (7.1) (15.1) (14.0)
-------- -------- ------- --------
Prepaid (accrued) benefit cost $ (7.8) $ (6.3) $ (15.1) $ (14.0)
======== ======== ======= ========
Additional year end information for plans with
benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:
Benefit obligation $ 72.6 $ 70.9 $ 23.3 $ 18.8
Fair value of plan assets 52.2 48.7 -- --
Additional year end information for pension plans
with accumulated benefit obligations in excess
of plan assets:
Projected benefit obligation $ 5.0 $ 9.7 n/a n/a
Accumulated benefit obligation 4.4 8.5 n/a n/a
Fair value of plan assets -- 3.9 n/a n/a
Weighted-average assumptions:
Discount rate 6.75% 7.00% 6.75% 7.00%
Expected return on plan assets 9.50% 9.50% n/a n/a
Rate of compensation increase 4.25% 4.25% 4.25% 4.25%
Pension Benefits Other Benefits
--------------------------- ----------------------
1998 1997 1996 1998 1997 1996
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(In millions)
Components of net periodic
benefit cost:
Service cost $ 5.1 $ 4.2 $ 3.8 $ 0.4 $ 0.4 $ 0.4
Interest cost 4.4 4.5 3.8 1.3 1.2 1.2
Expected return on plan assets (4.3) (4.1) (3.2) -- -- --
Amortization of prior service cost 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 -- --
Amortization of transition obligation -- -- -- 0.2 0.2 0.2
Recognized actuarial (gain) loss 0.1 0.1 0.3 -- -- --
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total defined benefit cost 5.8 5.2 4.8 2.0 1.8 1.8
Defined contribution cost 1.7 0.8 0.9 -- -- --
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total benefit cost $ 7.5 $ 6.0 $ 5.7 $ 2.0 $ 1.8 $ 1.8
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Amounts recognized in the 1996 consolidated income statements due to the
settlement or curtailment of pension plans that resulted primarily from the
discontinuation of plans and sales of discontinued business units were not
significant.
32
33
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE I - PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
Pension Benefits Other Benefits
-------------------- ----------------------
1998 1997 1998 1997
---- ---- ---- ----
Assumed health care cost trend:
Initial trend rate n/a n/a 6.20% 6.67%
Ultimate trend rate n/a n/a 4.00% 4.00%
Year ultimate trend reached n/a n/a 2005 2002
A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would
have the following effects:
One Percentage- One Percentage-
Point Increase Point Decrease
-------------- --------------
(In millions)
Effect on total service and interest cost components for 1998 $ 0.1 $ (0.1)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation 1.0 (0.9)
NOTE J - SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company domestically produces a broad range of chemical products within two
reportable operating segments: Chemicals and Polymers. Management evaluates each
segment's overall operating performance based on its respective operating
incomes, and earnings before taxes and depreciation. The Company has a diverse
customer base with no single customer comprising more than 7% of gross revenues
during 1998. Intersegment sales are recorded at cost plus applicable profit and
are eliminated upon consolidation. The Company allocates corporate income and
expense to its operating segments as follows: selling, general and
administrative expenses based on each segment's pro rata share of corporate
headcount; interest income and expense based on each segment's pro rata share of
operating income; and provision for incomes taxes based on each segment's pro
rata share of income before income taxes.
The Chemicals reportable operating segment consists of the aggregation of the
Company's Phenol and Plasticizer and related products. Chemicals are used as key
ingredients for a wide variety of applications, including automotive parts,
consumer goods, construction materials, vinyl plastics, food wrap, flooring and
medical applications. The major chemical products include phenol, acetone,
bisphenol-A, aniline, phthalic anhydride, 2-ethylhexanol and plasticizer.
Chemical products are manufactured at the Company's facilities located in
Haverhill, Ohio; Pasadena, Texas; and Neville Island, Pennsylvania and shipped
primarily by railcar or truck.
The Polymers reportable operating segment consists of the aggregation of the
Company's polypropylene and acrylic sheet products. Polymers are major
thermoplastic materials that are used in a wide variety of applications,
including synthetic fibers for carpets, upholstery fabrics, disposable diapers,
automotive applications, including battery cases and interior trim, packaging
films for food and non-food applications, injection molded caps and closures;
syringes and vials for medical use, countertops, outdoor signs, wall cladding
and many other consumer products. Polymer products are manufactured at the
Company's facilities located in Neal, West Virginia, LaPorte, Texas, Florence,
Kentucky and Belen, New Mexico.
33
34
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE J - SEGMENT INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Financial information about the Company's industry segments is summarized as
follows for the years ended December 31:
1998 1997 1996
---- ---- ----
(In millions)
Sales:
Chemicals $ 487.7 $ 511.7 $ 520.9
Polymers 349.0 387.1 385.7
Intersegment sales (5.9) (1.4) --
---------- ---------- ----------
$ 830.8 $ 897.4 $ 906.6
========== ========== ==========
Depreciation and amortization:
Chemicals $ 34.1 $ 32.8 $ 32.0
Polymers 18.6 16.5 15.7
---------- ---------- ----------
$ 52.7 $ 49.3 $ 47.7
========== ========== ==========
Operating income:
Chemicals $ 41.6 $ 26.8 $ 62.6
Polymers 8.1 24.9 45.0
---------- ---------- ----------
$ 49.7 $ 51.7 $ 107.6
========== ========== ==========
Interest expense, net:
Chemicals $ 12.4 $ 11.6 $ 23.3
Polymers 12.0 11.5 13.9
---------- ---------- ----------
$ 24.4 $ 23.1 $ 37.2
========== ========== ==========
Provision for income taxes:
Chemicals $ 7.8 $ 2.5 $ 16.5
Polymers (1.5) 6.8 11.1
---------- ---------- ----------
$ 6.3 $ 9.3 $ 27.6
========== ========== ==========
Segment assets:
Chemicals $ 658.4 $ 667.1 $ 628.8
Polymers 523.7 430.4 385.0
---------- ---------- ----------
$ 1,182.1 $ 1,097.5 $ 1,013.8
========== ========== ==========
Segment capital expenditures:
Chemicals $ 100.2 $ 35.4 $ 17.0
Polymers 131.6 66.5 24.5
---------- ---------- ----------
$ 231.8 $ 101.9 $ 41.5
========== ========== ==========
The company's sales by geographic area are summarized as follows:
1998 1997 1996
---- ---- ----
United States $ 721.6 $ 760.7 $ 772.2
Canada 52.6 54.1 50.4
Other foreign countries 56.6 82.6 84.0
---------- ---------- ----------
$ 830.8 $ 897.4 $ 906.6
========== ========== ==========
34
35
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE K - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Aristech is obligated to indemnify USX against certain claims or liabilities
which USX may incur relating to USX's prior ownership and operation of the
business and facilities transferred to Aristech in 1986, including liabilities
under laws relating to the protection of the environment and the workplace. Such
known liabilities have been provided for in the consolidated financial
statements.
As of December 31, 1998 and 1997, the Company had outstanding irrevocable
standby letters of credit and surety bonds in the amount of $4.7 million and
$5.6 million, respectively, primarily in connection with environmental matters.
The Company is subject to pervasive environmental laws and regulations
concerning the production, handling, storage, transportation, emission and
disposal of waste materials and is also subject to other federal and state laws
and regulations regarding health and safety matters. These laws and regulations
are constantly evolving, and it is impossible to predict accurately the effect
these laws and regulations will have on the Company in the future.
The Company is also the subject of, or party to, a number of other pending or
threatened legal actions involving a variety of matters. In the opinion of
management, any ultimate liability arising from these contingencies, to the
extent not otherwise provided for, should not have a material adverse effect on
the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the
Company.
NOTE L - CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
ARISTECH ACRYLICS LLC
On October 1, 1997, Aristech formed a joint venture with Mitsubishi Rayon Co.,
Ltd. ("MRC") to manufacture and sell acrylic sheet and decorative surface
products. Aristech's former acrylic sheet product line was reorganized as
Aristech Acrylics LLC ("AALLC"), a Kentucky limited liability company in which
Aristech holds a 90% ownership interest. Dianal America, Inc. ("DAI"), a wholly
owned U.S. subsidiary of MRC, holds the remaining 10% ownership interest in
AALLC. DAI contributed $10.0 million for its 10% ownership interest that
exceeded the proportionate share of the book value purchased by $7.5 million
that has been recorded as additional paid-in capital.
AVONITE, INC.
On December 15, 1987, the Company acquired for $5.0 million a 50% ownership
interest in Avonite, Inc. ("Avonite") of Belen, New Mexico, a producer and
marketer of premium unsaturated polyester sheet. The investment was accounted
for under the equity method.
On July 1, 1996, the Company acquired an additional 10% of the outstanding
common stock of Avonite in exchange for the assignment to the Avonite minority
owners of a $1.0 million note owed by Avonite to the Company. As a result,
Avonite became a consolidated subsidiary of the Company. Excess cost over assets
acquired of $3.5 million was recorded and the Company absorbed the minority
deficit of $14.1 million in its entirety.
In 1998, an agreement was executed whereby Avonite exchanged Notes Payable to
Aristech totaling $9.0 million and the Note Payable to Avonite Stockholder of
$12.4 million (see Note G) for common stockholders' equity of Avonite.
Aristech's overall ownership interest in Avonite was not changed as a result of
this transaction. However, the exchange did result in positive stockholders'
equity at Avonite and Aristech reassigned, through retained earnings, the
previously assumed $14.1 million minority deficit in Avonite to minority
interest.
35
36
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE M - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On March 10, 1999, the Company's Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of
$242 per common share payable on March 31, 2000, to stockholders of record as of
March 10, 1999. The total amount of the dividend was $3.6 million.
On February 26, 1999, the Company arranged for a $25.0 million unsecured
discretionary line of credit sponsored by a commercial bank. The line bears
interest at a variable rate. The entire amount of the line was subsequently
drawn with the proceeds used to reduce other debt obligations.
On February 26, 1999, AALLC arranged for a short-term unsecured revolving line
of credit from a commercial bank with a maximum borrowing amount of $5.0
million. The line was subsequently fully drawn, bears interest at a variable
rate and expires on February 29, 2000.
On March 1, 1999, the Company reduced the maximum limit on the accounts
receivable financing facility from $100.0 million to $90.0 million (see Note B).
On March 31, 1999, the agreement was renewed for an additional 364 days to March
30, 2000.
During the first quarter of 1999, the management of Aristech implemented
measures to reduce certain of its future operating and selling, general and
administrative expenses. As one of those measures, an incentive was offered to
employees covered under the Aristech Salaried Pension Plan to voluntarily elect
early retirement in exchange for certain increased pension benefits. The
additional costs to be incurred by the Company during 1999 that are in excess of
the funded pension benefits for the voluntary retirees are not anticipated to
have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of
operations or its cash flows. In addition to the voluntary retirement program,
the Company intends to embark upon an involuntary termination program during the
second quarter of 1999, the extent of which will be based, in part, upon the
results of the voluntary retirement program. The Company anticipates the
benefits of any of its cost reduction measures to primarily affect years
subsequent to 1999.
36
37
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Aristech's by-laws provide that the Board of Directors ("Board") will consist of
13 members, which number may be increased or decreased by an amendment to the
by-laws, but in any event the number of directors may not be less than three.
There are currently nine members of Aristech's Board. The members of the Board
will serve until the year 2000 annual Board of Directors meeting or until their
successors are elected and qualified. Aristech's Board of Directors has
established an Executive Committee to act between meetings of the Board on all
matters that may be legally delegated to a committee of the Board. Aristech's
Board members, with the exception of the outside Board member who receives a
nominal fee, do not currently receive any fees or remuneration of their service
as a Board member or a member of any Board committee. Information with respect
to those persons who serve as directors is set forth below:
NAME, AGE AND OCCUPATION
Masatake Bando (56) Masatake Bando became Chairman and Chief
Chairman and Chief Executive Executive Officer March 18, 1998 and has
Officer; Member of Executive been a Director since August 1996. Mr. Bando
Committee was Chairman Elect from January 1, 1998 to
March 17, 1998; Vice Chairman from September
1997 to December 1997; Senior Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer-Chemicals of
MIC, from June 1996 to August 1997; General
Manager of Aromatics Petrochemicals
Department of MC from May 1994 to June 1996;
General Manager of Corporate Planning,
Eastern Petrochemical Co. from May 1992 to
April 1994.
H. Patrick Jack (47) H. Patrick Jack became President and Chief
President and Chief Operating Officer on September 28, 1998. Mr.
Operating Officer; Member Jack was Senior Vice President-Chemicals of
of Executive Committee Fina Oil & Chemical Company ("Fina") from
April 1995 to September 1998; and Vice
President-Chemicals of Fina from September
1988 to April 1995.
Hajime Koga (56) Hajime Koga became a Director in April 1990.
Director; Member of Executive Mr. Koga has been a Director and General
Committee Manager of Basic Chemicals Division B of MC
since June 1997. Mr. Koga was General
Manager of Basic Chemicals Division B of MC
since April 1997; General Manager of
Aristech Department and General Manager of
Basic Chemicals Division B of MC from June
1996 to March 1997; General Manager of
Aristech Department and Senior Assistant to
Managing Director-Chemicals of MC from June
1995 to June 1996; General Manager of
Aristech Department of MC from April 1995 to
May 1995; Senior Staff of Managing
Director-Chemicals of MC from August 1994 to
March 1995; Senior Vice President, Chief
Operating Officer-Chemicals of MIC from
April 1993 to June 1994.
37
38
Yasuo Sone (59) Yasuo Sone became a Director in August 1996.
Director Mr. Sone has been Managing
Director-Chemicals of MC since April 1996.
Mr. Sone was Director and Senior Assistant
to Managing Director-Chemicals of MC from
March 1995 to March 1996; Director of MC and
Executive Vice President of MIC from June
1994 to February 1995; Executive Vice
President of MIC from April 1993 to June
1994.
Muneo Suzuki (60) Muneo Suzuki became a Director in July 1996.
Director Mr. Suzuki has been Managing Director and
President of Industrial Chemicals Company of
MCC since June 1996. Mr Suzuki was Managing
Director and President of Fiber
Intermediates Company of MCC from June 1995
to June 1996; Director and President of
Fiber Intermediates Company of MCC from
October 1994 to June 1995; Board Director,
General Manager of Synthetic Chemicals
Division and Polyester Division of
Mitsubishi Kasei Corporation ("MKC") (a
predecessor of MCC) from January 1994 to
September 1994.
Tatsuo Suzuki (58) Tatsuo Suzuki became a Director in July
Director 1997. Mr. Suzuki has been President of MRC
Holdings America, Inc. since December 1998
and a Board Member and General Manager
Affiliated Companies Administration and
Planning of Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd.
("MRC") since June 1997. Mr. Suzuki was
General Manager Affiliated Companies
Administration and Planning of MRC from June
1996 to June 1997; Director Affiliated
Companies Administration and Planning from
June 1995 to June 1996; General Manager
Metablen and Film Division from April 1993
to June 1995.
Takayori Tsuboi (61) Takayori Tsuboi became a Director in July
Director 1996. Mr. Tsuboi has been President of
Mitsubishi Chemical America Inc. since June
1996 and Managing Director of MCC since June
1995. Mr. Tsuboi was Managing Director,
Petrochemical Planning Department and
Overseas Department of MCC from October 1994
to June 1995; Director, Corporate Planning
Department and Management Planning
Department of Mitsubishi Petrochemical Co.,
Ltd. ("MPC") (a predecessor of MCC) from
June 1993 to September 1994.
38
39
Takuji Nakamura (54) Takuji Nakamura became a Director in March
Director; Member of Executive 1998. Mr. Nakamura has been Senior Vice
Committee President and Chief Operating
Officer-Chemicals of MIC since September
1997. Mr. Nakamura was General Manager, Fine
Chemicals Department of MC from July 1996 to
August 1997; General Manager,
Pharmaceuticals and Agrochemical Department
of MC from April 1996 to June 1996; General
Manager, Fine Chemicals Business Development
Department of MC, March of 1996; General
Manager, Fine Chemicals Business Development
Department and Bio-Chemicals Department of
MC from October 1994 to February 1996;
General Manager, Fine Chemicals Business
Development Department of MC from April 1992
to September 1994.
Patrick E. Baggett (58) Patrick E. Baggett became a Director in
Director October 1998. Mr. Baggett was the President
and Chairman for Chemical Market Associates,
Inc. from January 1994 to December 1998.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Set forth below is certain information relating to the ages and business
experience of the non-director officers of the Company.
NAME, AGE AND OCCUPATION
Mark K. McNally (52) Mark K. McNally became Senior Vice
Senior Vice President, President, General Counsel and Corporate
General Counsel and Secretary in April 1995. Mr. McNally was
Corporate Secretary Vice President-Environmental Affairs,
Occupational Health and Safety from 1992 to
1995.
Michael J. Prendergast (50) Michael J. Prendergast became Senior Vice
Senior Vice President and President and Chief Financial Officer in
Chief Financial Officer October 1998. Mr. Prendergast was Acting
Chief Financial Officer from October 1997 to
October 1998; Vice President and Controller
from April 1997 to October 1997; Corporate
Comptroller from January 1994 to April 1997.
James, J. Driscoll Jr. (60) * James J. Driscoll Jr. became Senior Vice
Senior Vice President- President- Polymers in June 1994. Mr.
Polymers Driscoll was Senior Vice
President-Thermoplastic Polymers from March
1993 to June 1994.
Charles P. Costanza (57) Charles P. Costanza became Senior Vice
Senior Vice President- President-Manufacturing in September 1996.
Manufacturing Mr Costanza was Vice President-Chemicals
from June 1994 to August 1996; Vice
President-Intermediate Chemicals from March
1993 to June 1994.
39
40
William D. Walston (63) * William D. Walston became Treasurer in
Treasurer January 1994. Mr. Walston was Corporate
Comptroller from 1986 to January 1994.
Richard A. Becker (56) * Richard A. Becker became Corporate
Corporate Comptroller Comptroller in November 1997. Mr. Becker was
Director-General and Consolidation
Accounting from September 1995 to November
1997 and Controller-Intermediate Chemicals
from October 1993 to September 1995.
Dennis R. Henderson (49) Dennis R. Henderson became Vice President-
Vice President-Chemicals Chemicals in December 1997. Mr. Henderson
was Division Vice President-Chemicals from
May 1997 to December 1997; Division Vice
President- Intermediate Chemicals from April
1996 to May 1997; General
Manager-Intermediate Chemicals from June
1994 to April 1996 and General
Manager-Plasticizer and Distribution from
June 1990 to June 1994.
* Retiring as of April 1, 1999.
40
41
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table summarizes all compensation paid to and earned by the
Company's chief executive officer and each of the Company's four most highly
compensated executive officers other than the chief executive officer for
services rendered to the Company for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and
1996.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Long-term
Annual Compensation Compensation
------------------------------------------ ---------------------
Other Annual All Other
Compen- Compen-
Name and Salary Bonus sation (5) LTIP sation (1)
Principal Position Year ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
- ------------------------ ---- ------- ------- ----------- ------- -----------
Jiro Kamimura (2)(4) 1998 98,182 -- 28,049 -- 900
Chairman and Chief 1997 368,333 -- 80,833 -- 8,724
Executive Officer 1996 310,000 -- 81,085 -- 8,407
Masatake Bando (3)(4) 1998 326,061 -- 75,962 -- --
Chairman and Chief 1997 83,335 -- 25,531 -- 9,010
Executive Officer
Charles W. Hamilton (6) 1998 297,500 -- 14,071 200,328 3,000
President and Chief 1997 290,000 341,253 7,485 200,328 8,416
Operating Officer 1996 277,500 271,649 9,035 -- 9,568
James J. Driscoll 1998 240,500 -- 13,986 132,741 3,500
Senior Vice President- 1997 233,000 245,723 5,735 132,741 10,837
Polymers 1996 222,167 214,895 5,580 -- 10,323
Mark K. McNally 1998 196,000 -- 13,846 105,461 4,006
Senior Vice President, 1997 190,000 197,990 6,770 105,461 9,458
General Counsel and 1996 181,667 165,868 4,945 -- 7,651
Corporate Secretary
Charles P. Costanza 1998 192,500 -- 9,928 99,816 4,000
Senior Vice President- 1997 185,000 185,612 2,940 99,816 5,517
Manufacturing 1996 168,333 161,560 2,790 -- 7,557
(1) Includes matching contributions under Aristech's 401(k) savings and
deferred compensation plans.
(2) Mr. Kamimura did not participate in Aristech's bonus plans, or in any of
Aristech's executive benefit plans.
(3) Mr. Bando succeeded Mr. Kamimura as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
effective March 18, 1998. Mr. Bando is a participant in the LTIP, however,
he does not participate in any other executive benefit plans.
(4) Messrs. Kamimura and Bando are under agreement with MC to remit quarterly
to MC, the amount necessary to reconcile their total compensation to the MC
executive pay scale.
(5) For 1998, amounts include allowances under Aristech's welfare cafeteria
plan, imputed income related to Company provided life insurance and
long-term disability coverage, and other taxable fringe benefits. For
Messrs. Kamimura's and Bando's other annual compensation also includes
reimbursement for housing and automobile costs. For 1997 and 1996, the
allowances under the welfare cafeteria plan, imputed income related to
Company provided life insurance and long-term disability coverage were
included as all other long-term compensation.
(6) H. Patrick Jack succeeded Mr. Hamilton as President and Chief Operating
Officer effective September 28, 1998. Mr. Hamilton retired effective
December 31, 1998.
41
42
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
The Aristech Chemical Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Deferral
Plan") is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that is designed to permit
eligible highly compensated employees of Aristech to defer current compensation.
Members of the Corporate Management Committee and other key employees designated
by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors are eligible to participate
in the Deferral Plan. The Deferral Plan was adopted effective February 22, 1996.
A participant can defer up to 50% of his base salary and 90% of his or her
incentive bonus payments on an annual basis. In addition, a participant will
receive credit to his account from Aristech under the Deferral Plan of matching
contributions in an amount equal to the matching contributions Aristech would
have made on his or her behalf to Aristech's Savings Plan without regard to
Internal Revenue Code maximums had the participant's Deferral Plan contributions
been contributed to the Savings Plan. Deemed interest is credited on all
deferred amounts and matching credits at an annual effective rate equal to 120%
of the 60-month rolling average rate of 10-year U.S. Treasury Notes or such
other rate as Aristech determines. A participant is always entitled to receive
100% of the compensation he or she defers through the Deferral Plan if he or she
leaves Aristech for any reason. The participant becomes entitled to Aristech
credits accumulated in his or her account on the first day of the calendar year
following the year in which the matching credit was earned. Regardless of years
of service, a participant is entitled to the full value of his or her matching
credits if he or she retires, becomes disabled or dies or upon a change in
control (as defined in the Deferral Plan) or termination of the Deferral Plan.
Aristech has established a grantor trust with Wachovia Bank of North Carolina,
N. A., to accumulate assets in the form of corporate-owned life insurance for
the payments of the benefits established under the Deferral Plan. The assets of
the trust are subject to the claims of Aristech's creditors in bankruptcy.
LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
Aristech's Long Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP") provides designated members of
Aristech's management team with an opportunity to earn cash bonuses based on the
long-term performance of Aristech. In general, performance cycles under the LTIP
will be four years in length. A new four-year cycle will begin every two years
so two cycles are active at any given time. There was an initial two year
transition cycle for 1995-1996 as well as a four-year cycle for 1995-1998. A
target award, expressed as a percentage of base salary, will be established for
each participating executive at the beginning of each performance cycle.
The performance measures used under the LTIP are relative return on gross assets
(involving a comparison of Aristech's return on gross assets with the median
return on gross assets of a group of comparable chemical manufacturing
companies) and growth in gross assets. For purposes of determining the actual
awards, relative return on gross assets is weighted 75% and growth in gross
assets is weighted 25%. The total target award that is earned by a participant
depends upon the levels of relative return on gross assets and growth in gross
assets attained by Aristech for the performance period. The Board of Directors
is permitted to make discretionary adjustments in payments to be made to
participants upon completion of a performance cycle, but such adjustments,
whether positive or negative, may not exceed 10% of the total target award pool.
Awards earned under the LTIP will be paid 50% as soon as practicable after the
close of the performance cycle and 50% during January of the following year.
Participants are permitted to defer a portion of each of the awards under the
terms of the Deferral Plan.
If a participant dies, retires, becomes disabled or is involuntarily terminated
without cause during a performance cycle, the participant (or his or her
beneficiary) is entitled to a pro-rated award for such performance cycle. If a
participant voluntarily terminates or is involuntarily terminated for cause, the
participant will receive no award for the then-current performance period and
will forfeit all rights to payments not yet made with respect to any other
performance periods. If a change in control of Aristech (as defined in the LTIP)
or an initial public offering occurs during a performance period, the LTIP shall
terminate and each participant shall receive a pro-rated award payment in cash.
42
43
In addition to the provisions of the LTIP concerning awards to key executives of
Aristech, the LTIP authorizes the establishment of a supplemental award pool for
distribution to top line and staff executives who are not eligible for
individual target awards as described above. The selection of recipients and
amounts of individual awards under this supplemental pool shall be determined by
the Corporate Management Committee at the conclusion of a performance period
based on each participating individual's contribution to Aristech's performance.
The Board of Directors has the authority to establish the amount of this
supplemental award pool, and accordingly, established a supplemental award pool
of $1,000,000 for the current cycles.
EXECUTIVE LIFE INSURANCE PLAN
Aristech's Executive Life Insurance Plan (the "Life Insurance Plan") was
established to provide members of the Corporate Management Committee or other
designated key employees of Aristech with supplemental life insurance benefits.
Under the Life Insurance Plan, Aristech obtains life insurance policies on the
lives of participating employees. Such policies provide each participant with a
basic survivor benefit equal to three times the participant's annual base
salary, less $50,000, provided that after the participant's retirement, but
before the 15th anniversary date of the insurance policy, the participant's
basic survivor benefit will equal one times the participant's annual base salary
in effect prior to retirement. After the participant's retirement and after the
policy's 15th anniversary date, Aristech will withdraw from the policy's cash
value an amount equal to Aristech's share of cumulative premiums, and ownership
of the policy will then be transferred to the participant.
While employed by Aristech, a participant may elect to purchase optional
coverage in addition to the basic survivor benefit. During the participant's
active employment optional coverage may be in an amount equal to either one
times or two times the participant's annual base salary. After retirement, the
participant may elect to reimburse Aristech for its cumulative premiums and take
ownership of the policy. Aristech will pay all the necessary premiums for the
basic survivor benefit for all participants. Each participant must contribute to
Aristech the premium amount attributable to optional coverage.
LONG-TERM DISABILITY
Aristech's Executive Long Term Disability Plan was established to provide
members of the Corporate Management Committee or other designated key employees
of Aristech with disability insurance benefits covering the continuation of
income in the event the eligible employee is unable to work due to accident or
sickness. The disability benefit is based on 60% of the covered employee's
eligible compensation that includes base annual salary and any annual variable
bonus up to a maximum benefit of $15,000 per month.
PENSION BENEFITS
Aristech maintains the Aristech Salaried Pension Plan (the "Salaried Pension
Plan") for eligible salaried and hourly employees not otherwise covered by
hourly or pre-existing special purpose pension plans. The Salaried Pension Plan
is a non-contributory defined benefit plan for salaried and hourly employees who
were participants in the USX Employee Pension Plan on December 4, 1986, and new
salaried employees on the first of January following date of hire. Benefits
under the Salaried Pension Plan are payable in the form of a monthly annuity or
lump sum.
Aristech adopted the 1996 Supplemental Pension Plan (the "Supplemental Pension
Plan") effective February 22, 1996 to provide certain supplemental pension
benefits on a nonqualified basis to key employees designated as eligible by the
Board of Directors. A grantor trust established with Wachovia Bank of North
Carolina, N.A. allows for the accumulation of assets in the form of corporate
owned life insurance to pay benefits under the Supplemental Pension Plan. The
assets of this trust are subject to the claims of Aristech's creditors in
bankruptcy. Benefits under the Supplemental Pension Plan are payable in the form
of a monthly annuity or lump sum.
43
44
The following table shows the total annual non-contributory pension benefits for
retirement at age 65 (or earlier under certain circumstances) under the Salaried
Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan, before any deduction for Social
Security and certain other government-administered benefits, where applicable,
and reductions for benefits payable under the USX Employee Pension Plan or
certain other pre-existing pension plans or benefit plans, for various levels of
covered compensation which would be payable to employees retiring with
representative years of service.
YEARS OF SERVICE
Covered
Compensation 15 Years 20 Years 25 Years 30 Years 35 Years 40 Years
------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
$ 125,000 $ 56,250 $ 62,500 $ 68,750 $ 75,000 $ 81,250 $ 87,500
150,000 67,500 75,000 82,500 90,000 97,500 105,000
175,000 78,750 87,500 96,250 105,000 113,750 122,500
200,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 140,000
225,000 101,250 112,500 123,750 135,000 146,250 157,500
250,000 112,500 125,000 137,500 150,000 162,500 175,000
300,000 135,000 150,000 165,000 180,000 195,000 210,000
350,000 157,500 175,000 192,500 210,000 227,500 245,000
400,000 180,000 200,000 220,000 240,000 260,000 280,000
450,000 202,500 225,000 247,500 270,000 292,500 315,000
Covered compensation for purposes of the Salaried Pension Plan includes salary
and some other forms of compensation from Aristech, but excludes incentive
bonuses and other recognition-type payments. Benefits under the Salaried Pension
Plan are offset by benefits payable under the USX Employee Pension Plan, but are
not offset by Social Security benefits. Covered compensation under the
Supplemental Pension Plan includes base salary and incentive compensation.
Benefits under the Supplemental Pension Plan are offset by benefits payable
under the Salaried Pension Plan, the USX Employee Pension Plan and 50% of the
participant's Social Security old age insurance benefits. Messrs. Hamilton,
Driscoll, McNally, Costanza and Prendergast had 37, 27, 19, 30 and 22 years of
service, respectively, and $436,401, $340,066, $264,987, $251,291 and $172,652
in covered compensation, respectively, for purposes of the Supplemental Pension
Plan. H. Patrick Jack, who joined Aristech as President and Chief Operating
Officer in September of 1998, also participates in the plan and accordingly, his
covered compensation was $112,123 for 1998.
Mr. Bando, who joined Aristech on September 1, 1997 and became Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer on March 18, 1998, participates in the Salaried Pension
Plan but not the Supplemental Pension Plan. The following table shows the total
annual non-contributory pension benefits for retirement at age 65 (or earlier
under certain circumstances) under the Salaried Pension Plan, before any
deduction for Social Security and certain other government-administered
benefits, where applicable, and reductions for benefits payable under the USX
Employee Pension Plan or certain other pre-existing pension plans or benefit
plans, for various levels of covered compensation which would be payable to
employees retiring with representative years of service.
YEARS OF SERVICE
Covered
Compensation 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 25 Years 30 Years 30 Years
------------ ------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
$ 125,000 $9,375 $18,750 $28,125 $37,500 $46,875 $ 56,250 $65,625
150,000 11,250 22,500 33,750 45,000 56,250 67,500 78,750
160,000 12,000 24,000 36,000 48,000 60,000 72,000 84,000
Directors who have not been employees of Aristech will not receive any benefits
under the Salaried Pension Plan or the Supplemental Pension Plan.
44
45
CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENTS
Aristech has entered into change in control agreements with Messrs. Hamilton,
Driscoll, McNally, Costanza and Prendergast. Each such agreement has an initial
term of three years, subject to automatic annual renewals, but the agreements
will become operative only if and when a change in control (as defined in the
agreements) occurs during the term of the agreement or if the executive's
employment is terminated in connection with or in anticipation of a change in
control. From the date of any change in control until the third anniversary of
such date the executive shall be entitled to remain employed by Aristech and
receive compensation at least as favorable as that in effect prior to the change
in control.
Upon a discharge of the executive other than for cause (as defined in the
agreements) or a resignation by the executive for good reason (as defined in the
agreements) during this three-year employment period, the executive will be
entitled to receive (i) payment of certain obligations accrued at the effective
date of termination (e.g., salary, earned but unpaid bonus, vacation pay and
other cash entitlements), (ii) benefits payable under plans, practices, programs
and policies of Aristech and (iii) a lump sum cash payment consisting of: (a) a
proportionate bonus based upon the executive's average bonus for the three most
recent completed fiscal years and (b) the product of 2.99 times the sum of the
executive's base salary and the executive's average bonus for the three most
recent completed fiscal years. In addition, the executive is entitled to
continued employee welfare benefits for three years after the date of
termination. Payments under the agreements are capped so that no excise tax will
be payable under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the "Internal Revenue Code"), provided that this cap will only apply if it
results in the executive receiving greater benefits on an after-tax basis than
if the cap does not apply.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the beneficial
ownership of shares of the Company's common stock as of December 31, 1998 by
each person known to Aristech to be a beneficial owner of the Company's
outstanding common stock.
Number of Percent
Name of Stockholder Shares of Class
------------------- ------ --------
Mitsubishi Corporation
6-3, Marunouchi 2-Chome
Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo 100-8086 Japan 11,589 (1) 77.74%
Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation (2)
Mitsubishi Building
5-2, Marunouchi 2-Chome 2,200 14.76%
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0005 Japan
Mitsubishi International Corporation
520 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022 678 4.55%
Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd. (2)
6-41, Konan 1-Chome
Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8506 Japan 441 2.96%
------ ------
Total 14,908 100.00%
====== ======
(1) Excludes 678 shares held by MIC, a New York corporation and a wholly owned
subsidiary of MC. Including the shares owned by MIC, MC beneficially owns
82.3% of the Company's outstanding common stock.
(2) MC does not have a controlling interest in either MCC or MRC.
45
46
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
See Item 8 - Financial Statements for the Company's related party information
and transactions.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
A. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Financial statements filed as part of this report are listed on the index to the
consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 - Financial Statements.
B. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Consolidated Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (Schedule II)
All other schedules are omitted as they are not applicable or required
information is contained in the financial statements and notes thereto.
SCHEDULE II - CONSOLIDATED VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
(IN MILLIONS)
Additions
-------------------------
Balance at Charged to Charged to Balance
beginning costs and other at end of
Description of period expense accounts Deductions period
----------- --------- ------- -------- ---------- ------
Year ended 12/31/98
Reserve for bad debts $ 0.6 $ -- $ -- $ (0.4) $ 0.2
Year ended 12/31/97
Reserve for bad debts $ 0.6 $ 0.2 $ -- $ (0.2) $ 0.6
Year ended 12/31/96
Reserve for bad debts $ 0.6 $ 0.4 $ -- $ (0.4) $ 0.6
C. EXHIBIT INDEX
3.01 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Aristech Chemical Corporation,
as amended (See Exhibit 3.01 of the Company's Form S-4 filed December
16, 1996)
3.02 By-Laws of Aristech Chemical Corporation, as amended (See Exhibit 3.02
of the Company's Form S-4 filed December 16, 1996)
4.01 Indenture dated as of November 1, 1996 between Aristech Chemical
Corporation, as Issuer, and Merrill Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated, as Initial Purchasers (See Exhibit 4.01 of
the Company's Form S-4 filed December 16, 1996)
46
47
4.02 Registration Rights Agreement dated as of November 25, 1996 among
Aristech Chemical Corporation, as Issuer, and Merrill Lynch & Co.,
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, as Initial
Purchasers (See Exhibit 4.02 of the Company's Form S-4 filed December
16, 1996)
4.03 Form of Security for 6-7/8% Notes due 2006, originally issued by
Aristech Chemical Corporation on November 25, 1996 (See Exhibit 4.03 of
the Company's Form S-4 filed December 16, 1996)
4.04 Form of Security for 6-7/8% Notes due 2006, issued by Aristech Chemical
Corporation on March 12, 1997 and registered under the Securities Act
of 1933 (See Exhibit 4.04 of the Company's Form S-4 filed December 16,
1996)
10.01 Term Loan Agreement dated as August 1, 1994 between Aristech Chemical
Corporation and Mitsubishi Corporation, as amended through September
30, 1996 (See Exhibit 10.01 of the Company's Form S-4 filed December
16, 1996)
10.02 Term Loan and Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of August 1, 1994
between Aristech Chemical Corporation and Mitsubishi International
Corporation, as amended through October 1, 1997 (See Exhibit 10.02 of
the Company's Form S-4 filed December 16, 1996)
10.03 CP Conduit Facility Agreement (See Exhibit 10.03 of the Company's Form
S-4 filed December 16, 1996)
10.04 Agreement regarding Guarantees dated January 4, 1995 among Aristech
Chemical Corporation and Mitsubishi Corporation, as amended through
March 3, 1997 (See Exhibit 10.04 of the Company's Form S-4 filed
December 16, 1996)
10.05 Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of April 28, 1995 between Ashland
Inc. and Aristech Chemical Corporation (See Exhibit 10.05 of the
Company's Form S-4 filed December 16, 1996)
10.06 Form of Change in Control Agreement between Aristech Chemical
Corporation and each of Charles W. Hamilton, James J. Driscoll, Mark K.
McNally, Michael J. Prendergast and Charles P. Costanza (See Exhibit
10.06 of the Company's Form S-4 filed December 16, 1996)
10.07 Aristech Chemical Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (See Exhibit
10.07 of the Company's Form S-4 filed December 16, 1996)
10.08 Aristech Chemical Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan (See Exhibit
10.08 of the Company's Form S-4 filed December 16, 1996)
10.09 Aristech Chemical Corporation Executive Life Insurance Plan (See
Exhibit 10.09 of the Company's Form S-4 filed December 16, 1996)
10.10 Summary of Aristech Chemical Corporation Long Term Disability Plan (See
Exhibit 10.10 of the Company's Form S-4 filed December 16, 1996)
10.11 Aristech Chemical Corporation 1996 Supplemental Pension Plan (See
Exhibit 10.11 of the Company's Form S-4 filed December 16, 1996)
10.12 Aristech Chemical Corporation Variable Bonus Program (See Exhibit 10.12
of the Company's Form S-4 filed December 16, 1996)
12.01 Statement re: Computation of Ratio of Consolidated Earnings to Fixed
Charges
21.01 Significant Subsidiaries of Aristech Chemical Corporation
27.01 Financial Data Schedule
47
48
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Date: 3/31/99 By MICHAEL J. PRENDERGAST
--------------------------- -------------------------------
Michael J. Prendergast
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
/s/ MASATAKE BANDO Chairman of the Board, 3/31/99
- -------------------------------------- Chief Executive Officer and Director
Masatake Bando (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ H. PATRICK JACK President, Chief Operating Officer and 3/31/99
- -------------------------------------- Director
H. Patrick Jack
/s/ MICHAEL J. PRENDERGAST Senior Vice President and 3/31/99
- -------------------------------------- Chief Financial Officer
Michael J. Prendergast (Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ RICHARD A. BECKER Corporate Comptroller 3/31/99
- -------------------------------------- (Principal Accounting Officer)
Richard A. Becker
/s/ HAJIME KOGA Director 3/31/99
- --------------------------------------
Hajime Koga
/s/ YASUO SONE Director 3/31/99
- --------------------------------------
Yasuo Sone
/s/ MUNEO SUZUKI Director 3/31/99
- --------------------------------------
Muneo Suzuki
/s/ TATSUO SUZUKI Director 3/31/99
- --------------------------------------
Tatsuo Suzuki
/s/ TAKAYORI TSUBOI Director 3/31/99
- --------------------------------------
Takayori Tsuboi
/s/ TAKUJI NAKAMURA Director 3/31/99
- --------------------------------------
Takuji Nakamura
/s/ PATRICK E. BAGGETT Director 3/31/99
- --------------------------------------
Patrick E. Baggett
48
49
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED WITH REPORTS FILED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT BY REGISTRANTS
WHICH HAVE NOT REGISTERED SECURITIES PURSUANT TO
SECTION 12 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
The Registrant has not provided an annual report to its security holders
covering the Registrant's last fiscal year other than its Form 10-K, and has not
provided a proxy statement, form of proxy or other proxy soliciting material to
more than ten of the Registrant's security holders with respect to any annual or
other meeting of security holders.
49